WEBVTT - ELECTION NIGHT COVERAGE (HOUR 2)

0:00:00.540 --> 0:00:02.550
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to KFI AM 640 On Demand.

0:00:07.810 --> 0:00:09.350
<v Speaker 2>Live from Los Angeles.

0:00:09.530 --> 0:00:11.910
<v Speaker 3>I think you have a lot of people that are disgruntled.

0:00:11.950 --> 0:00:16.820
<v Speaker 4>There are powerful forces aligned to darken our life. This state,

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:18.419
<v Speaker 4>how desperately is it changing?

0:00:18.660 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Votes and tallies, propositions, candidates, unique positions.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.180
<v Speaker 1>Which precincts are now reporting?

0:00:26.260 --> 0:00:28.820
<v Speaker 5>Election night is never boring.

0:00:28.980 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 6>On the air.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:31.140
<v Speaker 3>AM 640.

0:00:31.140 --> 0:00:32.450
<v Speaker 7>On the air.

0:00:32.510 --> 0:00:35.330
<v Speaker 8>Make us a preset on the free iHeartRadio.

0:00:35.350 --> 0:00:36.170
<v Speaker 3>Preset pad.

0:00:36.250 --> 0:00:37.410
<v Speaker 9>No dirty back.

0:00:39.610 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>This is KFR Election Night.

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.860
<v Speaker 3>And now your hosts, Gary Hoffman and Shannon Farrell.

0:00:49.570 --> 0:00:51.690
<v Speaker 10>Could be getting a preview of the next two years

0:00:51.750 --> 0:00:55.690
<v Speaker 10>already in Pennsylvania. It's KFI election night here, Gary and Shannon.

0:00:55.770 --> 0:00:59.130
<v Speaker 10>Josh Shapiro has just given his victory speech. And as

0:00:59.170 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 10>we've talked about all week long, really, the campaign for

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.700
<v Speaker 10>president 2028 begins tonight officially. And he took to the

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 10>stage tonight. And you got a precursor of what you're

0:01:09.900 --> 0:01:12.100
<v Speaker 10>going to hear from Josh Shapiro in the next two years.

0:01:12.540 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 10>He appeared on stage. Tom Petty's I won't back down.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.500
<v Speaker 10>His opening remarks were, it's been 250 years since Americans

0:01:19.540 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 10>declared their independence from a king, and so on and

0:01:23.380 --> 0:01:24.970
<v Speaker 10>so forth.

0:01:25.050 --> 0:01:29.190
<v Speaker 8>Polls just closed a short time ago. Montana, Nevada, Utah.

0:01:29.230 --> 0:01:32.630
<v Speaker 8>Some polls actually closed in the eastern portions of Idaho

0:01:32.650 --> 0:01:35.810
<v Speaker 8>and Oregon, but that's getting specific. The things to watch

0:01:35.990 --> 0:01:37.910
<v Speaker 8>this hour that we'll keep our eyes on when we

0:01:37.950 --> 0:01:40.139
<v Speaker 8>start to see some of these rolling totals coming in.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.589
<v Speaker 8>The House races in Montana, Nevada, and Utah. Congressional and

0:01:44.650 --> 0:01:49.020
<v Speaker 8>governor's races in Arizona. The polls actually closed at six

0:01:49.060 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 8>in Arizona, but they hold their results until this hour.

0:01:52.190 --> 0:01:53.780
<v Speaker 5>So we'll start to see some of those come out.

0:01:53.890 --> 0:01:57.150
<v Speaker 10>So, yeah, in the Senate, where Republicans do right now

0:01:57.210 --> 0:02:00.290
<v Speaker 10>have a majority, as we mentioned, Democrats need a net

0:02:00.330 --> 0:02:02.790
<v Speaker 10>gain of four seats to take control. Now, the seven

0:02:02.850 --> 0:02:06.650
<v Speaker 10>competitive races that could decide the balance are almost all

0:02:06.730 --> 0:02:09.910
<v Speaker 10>in states that Donald Trump won in 2024. And that

0:02:09.990 --> 0:02:12.310
<v Speaker 10>is why he had such a packed travel schedule yesterday.

0:02:12.530 --> 0:02:16.940
<v Speaker 10>heading into tonight to try and sew up victories in

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 10>those places. Sacramento we want to go to now where

0:02:21.580 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 10>it seems like a victory is all but sewn up

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:25.740
<v Speaker 10>there for Javier Becerra.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.700
<v Speaker 8>Delaney Joyce is joining us now with the latest on

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 8>Javier Becerra's watch party for this evening.

0:02:31.620 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Delaney, how's it going?

0:02:34.230 --> 0:02:36.790
<v Speaker 11>It's going great over here. I'm currently at the Sarah's

0:02:36.870 --> 0:02:39.950
<v Speaker 11>election night event here in Sacramento. The man of the

0:02:39.990 --> 0:02:42.550
<v Speaker 11>hour has not arrived yet, but speakers are set to

0:02:42.590 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 11>begin in a little less than 30 minutes.

0:02:44.380 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 6>I'm told.

0:02:45.740 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 10>Are there any other big name Democrats that are going

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.739
<v Speaker 10>to show up there that you're anticipating being there, being

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.910
<v Speaker 10>it in Sacramento? Any big names?

0:02:56.590 --> 0:02:58.510
<v Speaker 11>We've heard some rumors, but I know that there's a

0:02:58.530 --> 0:03:01.090
<v Speaker 11>few different watch parties happening tonight. Some people are saying

0:03:01.110 --> 0:03:03.850
<v Speaker 11>there's a potential Newsom could show up, but we haven't

0:03:03.870 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 11>really gotten any major confirmations. It's been pretty quiet.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.260
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I was wondering because of that very thing on Saturday,

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.150
<v Speaker 10>we saw them kind of make their final case for

0:03:15.190 --> 0:03:19.340
<v Speaker 10>Javier Becerra being Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris. all appearing

0:03:19.380 --> 0:03:22.190
<v Speaker 10>together at the Hollywood Palladium, was wondering if there might

0:03:22.270 --> 0:03:25.570
<v Speaker 10>be another three-pronged event type of a thing at the

0:03:25.610 --> 0:03:28.190
<v Speaker 10>victory party tonight, but I guess we'll just have to

0:03:28.230 --> 0:03:30.770
<v Speaker 10>wait and see. I'm assuming that you'll be able to

0:03:31.350 --> 0:03:35.500
<v Speaker 10>notice the high-profile nature of the security sweep should that

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.220
<v Speaker 10>thing get kind of closer to reality.

0:03:38.910 --> 0:03:42.110
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, the police have been out in full force. As press,

0:03:42.150 --> 0:03:43.910
<v Speaker 11>we had to go through full security. We had a

0:03:43.930 --> 0:03:46.850
<v Speaker 11>dog sniff all of our stuff. So they're definitely making

0:03:46.870 --> 0:03:49.550
<v Speaker 11>sure that things are locked down over here. But music

0:03:49.610 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 11>is playing. Fire pits are going. People are laughing, having fun,

0:03:53.500 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 11>getting ready for the speakers to come out soon. So

0:03:56.980 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 11>it's a good vibe over here.

0:03:58.020 --> 0:04:01.580
<v Speaker 8>Delaney Joyce there at the Javier Becerra campaign headquarters or

0:04:01.740 --> 0:04:03.180
<v Speaker 8>campaign watch party for tonight.

0:04:03.220 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Delaney. The issues of polling... that we've talked about.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 8>Many times in terms of watching the polls, which polls

0:04:11.060 --> 0:04:13.460
<v Speaker 8>are right. How do you determine, how do you define

0:04:13.700 --> 0:04:16.180
<v Speaker 8>when a poll is right or not right? This is

0:04:16.260 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 8>one of those where it doesn't matter. This is one

0:04:18.990 --> 0:04:22.029
<v Speaker 8>of those races. At this point, most of the polls

0:04:22.270 --> 0:04:27.670
<v Speaker 8>have Javier Becerra in double digits by 20 points. 27

0:04:27.670 --> 0:04:30.990
<v Speaker 8>points was the latest LA Times Berkeley Institute of Government

0:04:31.029 --> 0:04:33.750
<v Speaker 8>Studies poll that came through. And the real clear politics

0:04:33.850 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 8>average has him at about 24 points. And As we

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.700
<v Speaker 8>heard previous, he heard in the news, Steve Hilton told

0:04:40.860 --> 0:04:43.810
<v Speaker 8>Heather Brooker basically that he knows the polls aren't great,

0:04:44.230 --> 0:04:46.430
<v Speaker 8>but he likes the attitude. That's what he's got to say.

0:04:46.930 --> 0:04:50.030
<v Speaker 8>And I don't know what his future is politically, if

0:04:50.050 --> 0:04:52.510
<v Speaker 8>there is one for him, if he goes back to

0:04:52.770 --> 0:04:55.500
<v Speaker 8>hosting a television show, if he becomes sort of an activist,

0:04:55.820 --> 0:04:58.740
<v Speaker 8>I don't know. But this is one of those, this

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 8>is one of those races that is also, don't forget,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.300
<v Speaker 8>It was not that long ago that Javier Becerra couldn't

0:05:07.420 --> 0:05:11.620
<v Speaker 8>pull a hand sandwich. And I mean, even with mustard

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.450
<v Speaker 8>and mayonnaise, he was getting zero support. He bumped himself

0:05:15.529 --> 0:05:18.110
<v Speaker 8>up to somewhere between three and four percent. And it

0:05:18.190 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 8>wasn't until Eric Swalwell dropped out of the Democratic primary

0:05:21.150 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 8>for governor that that anybody paid Javier Becerra any attention.

0:05:24.820 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 10>And then the entire party coalesced around him. Now, we

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.780
<v Speaker 10>do know there is precedent in the Trump era for

0:05:29.860 --> 0:05:34.780
<v Speaker 10>polls to overestimate Democrats. It is reasonable to wonder whether

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.900
<v Speaker 10>the polls may be overestimating Democratic strength yet again. It's

0:05:38.940 --> 0:05:42.460
<v Speaker 10>a real possibility. We do know that Trump supporters are

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:47.789
<v Speaker 10>relatively unlikely to respond to polls, which introduces the risk

0:05:47.870 --> 0:05:52.590
<v Speaker 10>of a misfire. So there are prediction markets you can

0:05:52.710 --> 0:05:55.730
<v Speaker 10>keep an eye on. But in some of these battleground states,

0:05:55.750 --> 0:05:57.990
<v Speaker 10>you really can't put too much credence in what the

0:05:58.029 --> 0:05:58.650
<v Speaker 10>polls tell you.

0:05:58.750 --> 0:06:02.700
<v Speaker 8>It's also important to remember, they cost money. Polls cost money.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 8>That's why massive media companies like the LA Times, the

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.420
<v Speaker 8>New York Times, ABC News, that's why they fund these

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 8>polling companies when they want to go through and try

0:06:12.860 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 8>to come up with what should be an accurate poll.

0:06:15.140 --> 0:06:17.370
<v Speaker 5>And if you're running into specific.

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:23.250
<v Speaker 8>Areas, specific demographics and ethnographics, however you want to term it,

0:06:23.510 --> 0:06:27.270
<v Speaker 8>that do not respond to polls regularly, you have to

0:06:27.310 --> 0:06:30.390
<v Speaker 8>spend more money to make sure that you try to

0:06:30.430 --> 0:06:32.969
<v Speaker 8>get them to respond to polls and then wait your

0:06:33.010 --> 0:06:33.350
<v Speaker 8>poll longer.

0:06:34.290 --> 0:06:37.550
<v Speaker 10>But the midterms often a referendum on the sitting president

0:06:37.650 --> 0:06:41.770
<v Speaker 10>and a significant number of Republican leading voters do disapprove

0:06:42.029 --> 0:06:45.330
<v Speaker 10>of his job performance, much less popular than he was

0:06:45.390 --> 0:06:49.099
<v Speaker 10>ahead of previous Trump era elections, including the ones where

0:06:49.140 --> 0:06:50.140
<v Speaker 10>Republicans lost.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 8>Just want to throw in Fox has projected that Annie

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.460
<v Speaker 8>Andrews has defeated Darlene Graham for that Senate seat in

0:06:58.540 --> 0:07:02.900
<v Speaker 8>South Carolina, which would be another flip. Four Democrats, another

0:07:02.980 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 8>gain for them, a Democrat taking over a long-held Republican

0:07:07.460 --> 0:07:10.220
<v Speaker 8>seat there. Lindsey Graham, of course, the longtime senator from

0:07:10.260 --> 0:07:13.900
<v Speaker 8>South Carolina who passed away. His sister Darlene took over

0:07:13.940 --> 0:07:16.470
<v Speaker 8>the seat. She was running for the full term. But

0:07:16.510 --> 0:07:19.230
<v Speaker 8>she has been defeated again, about 87 percent of the

0:07:19.290 --> 0:07:22.850
<v Speaker 8>vote in. But Annie Andrews has 51 percent so far.

0:07:23.230 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 10>Again, it seems like a foregone conclusion that Democrats will

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.220
<v Speaker 10>control the House. The Senate still still up for grabs

0:07:30.380 --> 0:07:34.260
<v Speaker 10>at this time. Let us now check in with California,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 10>the California election desk.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Multiple media outlets are reporting long lines tonight at in-person

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.660
<v Speaker 4>voting centers in Los Angeles. In Koreatown, some voters are

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.830
<v Speaker 4>waiting up to two hours to cast their ballots. The

0:07:45.850 --> 0:07:48.530
<v Speaker 4>California Secretary of State says on their website voters can

0:07:48.550 --> 0:07:50.790
<v Speaker 4>still drop off their mail-in ballots in person at voting

0:07:50.810 --> 0:07:53.780
<v Speaker 4>centers until 8 p.m. Along with the governor's race between

0:07:53.820 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Democrat Javier Becerra and Republican Steve Hilton, there are 14

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 4>propositions on the ballot tonight, including Proposition 39, which if

0:08:00.500 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>passed would require a government-issued ID in order to vote.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.100
<v Speaker 4>and Proposition 40, which would impose a one-time tax on billionaires.

0:08:06.460 --> 0:08:09.420
<v Speaker 4>There are several other closely watched races happening in California,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.460
<v Speaker 4>including a Central Valley race in District 22 between Republican

0:08:12.500 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 4>David Valadao and Democrat Randy Villegas, and the District 40

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.610
<v Speaker 4>race where Republican Young Kim and Republican Ken Calvert are

0:08:19.650 --> 0:08:23.010
<v Speaker 4>competing for one Republican spot after redistricting. The Department of

0:08:23.070 --> 0:08:26.270
<v Speaker 4>Justice has sent poll monitors to several California counties, including

0:08:26.310 --> 0:08:29.050
<v Speaker 4>Los Angeles, Alameda, and Sacramento, according to a map published

0:08:29.090 --> 0:08:31.570
<v Speaker 4>by the DOJ. Governor Gavin Newsom has said he'll be

0:08:31.590 --> 0:08:35.250
<v Speaker 4>deploying 1,000 state observers to monitor the federal monitors. That's

0:08:35.309 --> 0:08:36.970
<v Speaker 4>the latest from the California Election Desk.

0:08:37.150 --> 0:08:37.890
<v Speaker 5>I'm Rich Cassone.

0:08:38.630 --> 0:08:40.630
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to KFI AM640 On Demand.

0:08:43.780 --> 0:08:47.219
<v Speaker 10>The very latest Democrats projected to win the U S house.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.150
<v Speaker 10>This has been predicted all along, but they have surged

0:08:50.210 --> 0:08:54.490
<v Speaker 10>past the 218 seats needed to control the chamber. NBC

0:08:54.530 --> 0:08:57.970
<v Speaker 10>news projects that they could take a total or will

0:08:58.010 --> 0:09:03.820
<v Speaker 10>take a total of 244 seats. Um, CNN has called

0:09:03.940 --> 0:09:08.350
<v Speaker 10>it for the Democrats controlling the house as well. Um,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.979
<v Speaker 10>So the party now leaning towards flipping four Republican controlled

0:09:13.100 --> 0:09:17.100
<v Speaker 10>Senate seats in Kansas, Ohio, Texas and South Carolina.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.380
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:09:20.260 --> 0:09:24.130
<v Speaker 8>As of right now, they have called about 170 races,

0:09:24.470 --> 0:09:27.990
<v Speaker 8>House races out of the 435 total. So far, three

0:09:28.030 --> 0:09:29.929
<v Speaker 8>of them have flipped. But as you mentioned, they are

0:09:30.030 --> 0:09:32.550
<v Speaker 8>projecting that they're going to get a whole lot more

0:09:32.590 --> 0:09:36.069
<v Speaker 8>than that. Democrats have also flipped at least two seats

0:09:36.230 --> 0:09:38.950
<v Speaker 8>in the Senate so far. They need 51 for the majority,

0:09:38.970 --> 0:09:41.930
<v Speaker 8>and they're currently at 46. So it's time to get

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 8>a look at some of the other important midterm elections

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:44.500
<v Speaker 8>around the country.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.300
<v Speaker 5>Team coverage from iHeart reporters around the nation.

0:09:47.820 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 12>There's a big upset to tell you about in a

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.260
<v Speaker 12>New Jersey House race. Democrat Rebecca Bennett is projected to

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.460
<v Speaker 12>win over incumbent Republican Tom Cain Jr. Cain was criticized

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 12>for taking a lengthy leave from Congress only later to

0:09:59.900 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 12>say that he was being treated for depression. But some

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 12>raised concerns about his reported stock trading during the absence

0:10:05.980 --> 0:10:08.850
<v Speaker 12>in the governor's racist New York's Kathy Hochul and Connecticut's

0:10:08.900 --> 0:10:12.370
<v Speaker 12>Ned Lamont, both projected to win reelection overall. It's been

0:10:12.390 --> 0:10:14.719
<v Speaker 12>a good night for Democratic incumbents. Only a handful of

0:10:14.770 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 12>Republicans overall have been projected to win. I'm Daria Albinger

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 12>in the Northeast. Now let's see what's happening in the

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 12>Southeast with Liz Kennedy.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 6>NBC News projects Republican Byron Donalds will win the governor's

0:10:26.380 --> 0:10:29.860
<v Speaker 6>race in Florida. He defeated Democrat David Jolly. Donalds was

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.770
<v Speaker 6>endorsed by President Trump and is the state's first Black governor.

0:10:33.790 --> 0:10:37.510
<v Speaker 6>NBC News is also calling the race for governor in Georgia.

0:10:37.610 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 6>Democratic candidate Keisha Lance Bottoms beats Republican billionaire Rick Jackson.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.850
<v Speaker 6>Bottoms is the former Atlanta mayor and Biden advisor. This

0:10:47.300 --> 0:10:52.270
<v Speaker 6>race replaces GOP Governor Brian Kemp after serving two terms.

0:10:52.690 --> 0:10:55.150
<v Speaker 6>I'm Liz Kennedy in the South. Now let's check in

0:10:55.190 --> 0:10:57.030
<v Speaker 6>with Brian Combs in the Midwest.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.900
<v Speaker 13>Democrats holding on to what was considered one of the

0:10:59.940 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 13>races Republicans thought that they could flip in Ohio. First

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.719
<v Speaker 13>District Congressman Greg Lansman from Cincinnati holds the seat he's

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 13>held for the last four years. Democrats picking up a

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.819
<v Speaker 13>House seat in Indiana and Nebraska as well.

0:11:12.300 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Illinois has reelected J.B.

0:11:13.820 --> 0:11:16.540
<v Speaker 13>Pritzker to a third term as governor, and he's predicting

0:11:16.580 --> 0:11:19.620
<v Speaker 13>a big night for the Democratic Party, looking to Michigan, Kansas,

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.730
<v Speaker 13>and Iowa for what he says are going to be

0:11:21.790 --> 0:11:22.790
<v Speaker 13>big victories as well.

0:11:23.210 --> 0:11:24.930
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Combs in the Midwest. Let's go to Matt

0:11:24.950 --> 0:11:28.630
<v Speaker 3>Mattinson in the Rockies. Polls are now closed in Utah, Nevada,

0:11:28.770 --> 0:11:32.090
<v Speaker 3>and Idaho. Some races have been called. In Colorado, NBC

0:11:32.130 --> 0:11:35.350
<v Speaker 3>News projecting Democrat Phil Weiser will be the state's next governor,

0:11:35.590 --> 0:11:39.589
<v Speaker 3>and Democratic U.S. Senator John Hinklelooper will win re-election. In

0:11:39.630 --> 0:11:42.870
<v Speaker 3>New Mexico, NBC News projects Democrat Ben Ray Lujan will

0:11:42.910 --> 0:11:45.590
<v Speaker 3>retain his U.S. Senate seat, and the battle for Texas'

0:11:45.610 --> 0:11:49.170
<v Speaker 3>Senate seat between Republican Ken Paxton and Democrat James Tallarico

0:11:49.350 --> 0:11:50.890
<v Speaker 3>is one of the most closely watched.

0:11:51.230 --> 0:11:53.510
<v Speaker 5>I'm Matt Mattinson in the Rockies. Let's check with Jason

0:11:53.530 --> 0:11:54.859
<v Speaker 5>Cambadonia in the Pacific.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 9>Voters will be choosing a governor in both California and Oregon.

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.660
<v Speaker 9>Both blue states are expected to have a Democrat win

0:12:01.700 --> 0:12:05.490
<v Speaker 9>the race, despite some fierce fights from Republicans. Newly drawn

0:12:05.550 --> 0:12:08.910
<v Speaker 9>congressional races are up for grabs across California. The effort

0:12:08.950 --> 0:12:13.150
<v Speaker 9>from current governor and possible presidential candidate Gavin Newsom was

0:12:13.190 --> 0:12:16.410
<v Speaker 9>intended to help Democrats take back the House following Republican

0:12:16.429 --> 0:12:20.260
<v Speaker 9>redistricting efforts from across the country. And Los Angeles may

0:12:20.300 --> 0:12:23.500
<v Speaker 9>have a Democratic Socialist of America member leading the city

0:12:23.580 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 9>as mayor. But most polls say that Nithya Raman and

0:12:26.890 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 9>current L.A. Mayor Karen Bass are just neck and neck.

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.239
<v Speaker 9>That's a look at the Pacific region. I'm Jason Campadonia.

0:12:33.260 --> 0:12:35.380
<v Speaker 9>Now back to you, Gary and Shannon. Thanks, Jay.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.739
<v Speaker 8>The whole thing about redistricting is also an issue that

0:12:38.980 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 8>is going to come up in the autopsy of what's

0:12:42.970 --> 0:12:46.870
<v Speaker 8>going on today. And one of our reporters there mentioned

0:12:46.890 --> 0:12:51.410
<v Speaker 8>what's going on in Florida. Republicans actually fell short in

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.410
<v Speaker 8>their efforts to pick up four of the House seats

0:12:54.570 --> 0:13:00.099
<v Speaker 8>in Florida through redistricting. Democrat Kathy Castor, Congresswoman, won re-election

0:13:00.179 --> 0:13:03.250
<v Speaker 8>in a district there in Tampa. And Jared Moskowitz won

0:13:03.290 --> 0:13:06.270
<v Speaker 8>reelection to a third term despite shifting to a nearby

0:13:06.790 --> 0:13:10.500
<v Speaker 8>district that was Republican-leaning. So they said that these were

0:13:11.059 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 8>one of the most expensive or two of the most

0:13:12.860 --> 0:13:15.580
<v Speaker 8>expensive House races in this election cycle.

0:13:15.980 --> 0:13:18.460
<v Speaker 5>Both of those two new.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 8>Districts were supposed to go to Republicans. That's why the

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 8>Republican state legislature in Florida redrew them that way. Of course,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 8>all of that started with Texas. When President Trump encouraged

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:35.330
<v Speaker 8>Republican-controlled states to redraw their congressional maps, other states came

0:13:35.380 --> 0:13:39.370
<v Speaker 8>along and did the same as sort of a retaliation.

0:13:39.450 --> 0:13:40.150
<v Speaker 10>California.

0:13:40.190 --> 0:13:42.890
<v Speaker 8>California, one of them. So at this point, we do

0:13:42.950 --> 0:13:46.740
<v Speaker 8>not know how that, in all of them, because there's,

0:13:46.790 --> 0:13:49.459
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there's multiple states with North Carolina and Ohio

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.980
<v Speaker 8>and Tennessee and Louisiana and Alabama and Missouri, and I

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.370
<v Speaker 8>mentioned Florida. And then, of course, the Democrat response to

0:13:56.429 --> 0:13:59.630
<v Speaker 8>those redistricting plans and how it's all going to play out.

0:13:59.770 --> 0:14:03.110
<v Speaker 10>Just wanted to drill down for a moment on North Carolina,

0:14:03.170 --> 0:14:07.469
<v Speaker 10>where every county so far has shifted toward Democratic Senate

0:14:07.510 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 10>candidate Roy Cooper by huge margins. In counties with a

0:14:12.580 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 10>median income of under $ 60, 000, Trump was huge. He won

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 10>by 26 points in this demographic in 2024. Cooper has

0:14:21.540 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 10>swung voters in those counties, those voters, by 21 points

0:14:25.780 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 10>to the left.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.610
<v Speaker 8>That's what we're seeing in a lot of these races

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.290
<v Speaker 8>so far, places where Donald Trump would win, either a

0:14:32.350 --> 0:14:35.010
<v Speaker 8>state or in these individual districts, he would win by

0:14:35.070 --> 0:14:39.170
<v Speaker 8>double digits, and they've gone Democrat just two years later.

0:14:40.190 --> 0:14:43.270
<v Speaker 8>So I mentioned earlier the question of what do Democrats

0:14:43.330 --> 0:14:47.250
<v Speaker 8>do with these wins? Do they take it as... A

0:14:47.370 --> 0:14:51.510
<v Speaker 8>message that the electorate wants to see more progressive policies

0:14:51.990 --> 0:14:54.550
<v Speaker 8>or is it nothing more than it? It's nothing more

0:14:54.610 --> 0:14:58.830
<v Speaker 8>than a pushback against the Republican Congress and Republican White

0:14:58.870 --> 0:15:01.620
<v Speaker 8>House that they don't want the pendulum to swing too far.

0:15:01.940 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 8>But they're going to get more than that. They're going

0:15:05.780 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 8>to get double digit seats in the House is what

0:15:07.860 --> 0:15:08.300
<v Speaker 8>it looks like.

0:15:08.630 --> 0:15:08.830
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:15:08.870 --> 0:15:11.230
<v Speaker 10>Coming up next, we'll be talking to the chair of

0:15:11.270 --> 0:15:15.610
<v Speaker 10>the California Democratic Party about will this be a mandate,

0:15:15.810 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 10>depending on how Democrats do across the country and here

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.740
<v Speaker 10>in California in terms of which direction the party will go.

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.820
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to KFI AM 640 on demand.

0:15:28.670 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 10>I do want to share this with you because prediction

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 10>markets are a new phenomenon. People putting big money on elections.

0:15:36.620 --> 0:15:39.859
<v Speaker 10>It's almost like the Super Bowl. The Washington Post had

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.420
<v Speaker 10>this story to share in the bathroom just outside the

0:15:43.460 --> 0:15:47.070
<v Speaker 10>hotel ballroom where Vivek Ramaswamy is holding a watch party.

0:15:47.090 --> 0:15:52.270
<v Speaker 10>29-year-old Sean Manin is stressing for two reasons. Manin told

0:15:52.330 --> 0:15:54.670
<v Speaker 10>an older man washing his hands in the sink next

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.900
<v Speaker 10>to him, I might need to call my girlfriend. I

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 10>put a lot of money on this race. He's a

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:04.470
<v Speaker 10>committed Republican. He bet $ 5, 000 on an online gambling site

0:16:04.510 --> 0:16:08.410
<v Speaker 10>that Ramaswamy would win. He is from Dublin, Ohio. He

0:16:08.450 --> 0:16:12.300
<v Speaker 10>told the Washington Post reporter, I'm not feeling great. He

0:16:12.340 --> 0:16:15.740
<v Speaker 10>says he's very surprised at how well Amy Acton is doing.

0:16:15.780 --> 0:16:19.180
<v Speaker 10>He still hopes Ramaswamy will pull off the win. But

0:16:19.260 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 10>if he loses, he says he's going to have to

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.090
<v Speaker 10>tell his girlfriend they're going to cut back on their

0:16:23.130 --> 0:16:25.810
<v Speaker 10>expenses for quite a while. They've got to move to

0:16:25.850 --> 0:16:29.690
<v Speaker 10>San Francisco on deck and they need that cushion. If

0:16:29.730 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 10>you're wondering how that race is going, Amy Acton leads

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 10>80 percent of the precincts reporting there. The AP has

0:16:36.540 --> 0:16:39.300
<v Speaker 10>not called that one just 80 percent reporting. But Amy

0:16:39.420 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 10>Acton does lead Vivek Ramaswamy. That race got a lot

0:16:42.740 --> 0:16:47.310
<v Speaker 10>of national attention because of the ad Vivek Ramaswamy and

0:16:47.330 --> 0:16:50.990
<v Speaker 10>the campaign chose to air, which was Amy Acton's mother reporting.

0:16:51.090 --> 0:16:54.250
<v Speaker 10>who Amy Acton hasn't spoken to in 50 years because

0:16:54.690 --> 0:16:56.690
<v Speaker 10>Amy was removed from the home with her brother. It's

0:16:56.730 --> 0:17:00.350
<v Speaker 10>a family mess that was used for politics in this cycle.

0:17:00.870 --> 0:17:05.090
<v Speaker 10>And it may just backfire with Vivek Ramaswamy here tonight.

0:17:05.490 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 5>Vivek polling right. I'm sorry.

0:17:07.470 --> 0:17:10.669
<v Speaker 8>The results in so far, he's at 46 percent and

0:17:10.710 --> 0:17:14.780
<v Speaker 8>Amy Acton at just about 51, just shy of 51 percent.

0:17:14.820 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 8>And like you said, 80 percent. And the girlfriend's like,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.100
<v Speaker 8>why couldn't you just bet on the Cleveland Browns?

0:17:19.650 --> 0:17:20.110
<v Speaker 10>Exactly.

0:17:20.130 --> 0:17:21.669
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah. There's also that.

0:17:22.690 --> 0:17:27.350
<v Speaker 10>Rusty Hicks is the chairman of the California Democratic Party. And, Rusty,

0:17:27.430 --> 0:17:31.850
<v Speaker 10>I'm anticipating quite the celebratory mood for Democrats, not just

0:17:31.910 --> 0:17:35.370
<v Speaker 10>in California, but across the country here tonight with many

0:17:35.430 --> 0:17:38.750
<v Speaker 10>news outlets calling the House going to the Democrats, something

0:17:38.770 --> 0:17:40.869
<v Speaker 10>that we saw coming. But here we are.

0:17:40.890 --> 0:17:46.290
<v Speaker 2>Well, certainly it's an exciting night to be a Democrat,

0:17:46.310 --> 0:17:49.060
<v Speaker 2>whether you're in California or in another part of the country.

0:17:49.910 --> 0:17:53.410
<v Speaker 2>Certainly what we see on the East Coast, I think

0:17:53.470 --> 0:17:56.300
<v Speaker 2>in many ways, started here in the West Coast with

0:17:56.340 --> 0:18:00.780
<v Speaker 2>Proposition 50 passed in 2025. And so tonight we've got

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to fulfill the promise of Proposition 50 and

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.810
<v Speaker 2>put a Democratic majority over the top in the House.

0:18:08.910 --> 0:18:11.030
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we hope to do shortly after 8

0:18:11.030 --> 0:18:11.629
<v Speaker 2>o'clock tonight.

0:18:12.910 --> 0:18:15.870
<v Speaker 8>How did we get to the point where Javier Becerra is...

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 8>Just absolutely mopping the floor with Steve Hilton. And I'll

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 8>phrase it this way. Back in April, I would have

0:18:23.530 --> 0:18:26.190
<v Speaker 8>said that Javier Becerra was probably a few days away

0:18:26.230 --> 0:18:30.710
<v Speaker 8>from dropping out until Eric Swalwell dropped out. How did

0:18:30.790 --> 0:18:34.540
<v Speaker 8>he get, how did Javier Becerra get the entire Democratic

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.239
<v Speaker 8>machine to line up behind him?

0:18:37.780 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 11>It all worked.

0:18:38.850 --> 0:18:42.250
<v Speaker 2>Well, Secretary Becerra has been a fighter for California for

0:18:42.450 --> 0:18:47.189
<v Speaker 2>many decades, whether it was in Los Angeles or in

0:18:47.230 --> 0:18:51.230
<v Speaker 2>Sacramento or in Washington, D.C. And so he has continued

0:18:51.270 --> 0:18:54.970
<v Speaker 2>to be the experienced, steady hand at so many roles

0:18:55.050 --> 0:18:58.910
<v Speaker 2>that he's had. And he began to surge at exactly

0:18:59.350 --> 0:19:03.629
<v Speaker 2>the right time. And so You know, we're excited to see. Obviously,

0:19:03.650 --> 0:19:05.810
<v Speaker 2>we've got to wait for some results to come in,

0:19:05.850 --> 0:19:08.580
<v Speaker 2>but certainly expect him to be the next governor of California.

0:19:09.060 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think he's going to continue Governor Newsom's leadership,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>California leadership, both at home and abroad. So I'm actually

0:19:17.290 --> 0:19:21.090
<v Speaker 2>here at his election night party preparing to see some

0:19:21.109 --> 0:19:23.770
<v Speaker 2>results and show there's good spirits all around us.

0:19:24.140 --> 0:19:27.449
<v Speaker 10>Rusty, there's been a lot of talk about this blue tsunami,

0:19:27.530 --> 0:19:30.530
<v Speaker 10>as it's been called, sweeping the nation tonight in the midterms,

0:19:31.010 --> 0:19:34.109
<v Speaker 10>and how the Democratic Party may see this as a

0:19:34.570 --> 0:19:37.689
<v Speaker 10>mandate that people like the way the party is moving

0:19:37.730 --> 0:19:42.830
<v Speaker 10>in terms of closer to the Democratic socialist agenda. What

0:19:42.930 --> 0:19:46.169
<v Speaker 10>do you hear up there in Sacramento in terms of

0:19:46.250 --> 0:19:47.810
<v Speaker 10>the future of the Democratic Party?

0:19:47.830 --> 0:19:53.740
<v Speaker 2>Well, my focus is on the California Democratic Party. I

0:19:53.780 --> 0:19:56.260
<v Speaker 2>can't speak to what's happening all across the country, but

0:19:56.300 --> 0:19:59.780
<v Speaker 2>what's happening here is a reflection of really the diversity

0:20:00.380 --> 0:20:02.580
<v Speaker 2>of our party, which is in many ways the strength

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.020
<v Speaker 2>of our party. And so certainly there are Uh, candidates, uh,

0:20:07.060 --> 0:20:10.570
<v Speaker 2>that are more moderate that are candidates that are more progressive,

0:20:10.590 --> 0:20:12.429
<v Speaker 2>but at the end of the day, uh, they are

0:20:12.470 --> 0:20:16.510
<v Speaker 2>all pushing in the same direction of improving the lives

0:20:16.550 --> 0:20:19.629
<v Speaker 2>of all Californians. Uh, and so I think that's the

0:20:19.670 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>work that we're going to continue to do, uh, governor, uh,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.629
<v Speaker 2>to be a governor elect, uh, the Sarah. our state

0:20:27.670 --> 0:20:31.869
<v Speaker 2>legislative bodies and big city mayors and local leaders up

0:20:31.910 --> 0:20:32.590
<v Speaker 2>and down the state.

0:20:33.330 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 10>Tonight is the unofficial start of the presidential race for 2028.

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 10>Javier Becerra was with Gavin Newsom over the weekend and

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:45.060
<v Speaker 10>with Kamala Harris at the Hollywood Palladium on Saturday. Do

0:20:45.100 --> 0:20:48.869
<v Speaker 10>we anticipate Governor Newsom making an appearance at that party

0:20:48.910 --> 0:20:52.330
<v Speaker 10>there tonight in Sacramento? And do we anticipate him speaking

0:20:52.470 --> 0:20:55.369
<v Speaker 10>in what could become his first speech as he runs

0:20:55.430 --> 0:20:57.530
<v Speaker 10>for 2028?

0:20:58.270 --> 0:21:00.650
<v Speaker 2>And I'll be honest, I'm not sure of what his

0:21:00.830 --> 0:21:04.690
<v Speaker 2>what his plans are tonight or in the future. I

0:21:04.730 --> 0:21:07.650
<v Speaker 2>do know that he's been a remarkable leader for for

0:21:07.670 --> 0:21:10.450
<v Speaker 2>California and is going to continue to be a leader

0:21:10.510 --> 0:21:15.619
<v Speaker 2>for our party, whatever he might do next.

0:21:15.730 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Quick final question.

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.859
<v Speaker 8>Is it good for one state to have control of

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.460
<v Speaker 8>the governor's mansion, the state assembly and the state Senate?

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:29.619
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day, that's the decision for

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the voters. And time and time again, certainly over the

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:38.830
<v Speaker 2>last decade plus, voters in California have continued to want

0:21:39.750 --> 0:21:44.649
<v Speaker 2>Democrats to serve in important leadership roles in government. We

0:21:44.670 --> 0:21:48.270
<v Speaker 2>don't own these seats. We rent these seats every two years,

0:21:48.369 --> 0:21:51.389
<v Speaker 2>and we have to work hard every single cycle to

0:21:51.510 --> 0:21:55.910
<v Speaker 2>earn the support of voters. Democrats continue to do that

0:21:55.950 --> 0:22:00.910
<v Speaker 2>here in California, especially while California Republicans continue to come

0:22:00.970 --> 0:22:04.170
<v Speaker 2>up short. So we're going to continue to fight hard

0:22:04.210 --> 0:22:06.220
<v Speaker 2>for all Californians. And at the end of the day,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I think voters are going to make that important decision.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.740
<v Speaker 10>All right, Rusty Hicks, chairman of the California Democratic Party.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.139
<v Speaker 10>You live where I want to live up there in northern,

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.060
<v Speaker 10>northern California with all those beautiful redwoods. You enjoy that.

0:22:19.619 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 5>I will do my best to take care. Thank you.

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.570
<v Speaker 8>One of the things I think that is The unspoken

0:22:25.609 --> 0:22:29.109
<v Speaker 8>thing that Rusty missed there was he said for the

0:22:29.150 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 8>last 10 years, California voters have decided that Democrats are

0:22:34.260 --> 0:22:38.020
<v Speaker 8>the ones they want to control both houses of the legislature,

0:22:38.500 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 8>basically every elected statewide elected office and obviously the governor's mansion.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 8>We can't forget that for the last 10 years, Donald

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 8>Trump has been on every ballot. Regardless of whether his

0:22:50.260 --> 0:22:53.460
<v Speaker 8>name is on the ballot, and this tonight is definitely

0:22:53.500 --> 0:22:56.100
<v Speaker 8>one of those times, his name is not on the ballot.

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.369
<v Speaker 8>But so many decisions are being made about either supporting

0:23:00.410 --> 0:23:04.730
<v Speaker 8>his plans or going against his plans. So a lot

0:23:04.750 --> 0:23:07.250
<v Speaker 8>of this may be a protest vote as opposed to

0:23:07.330 --> 0:23:10.990
<v Speaker 8>being fully supportive of policies in Sacramento.

0:23:11.630 --> 0:23:11.910
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:23:11.950 --> 0:23:14.990
<v Speaker 10>We will now turn to our team coverage from iHeart

0:23:15.030 --> 0:23:19.470
<v Speaker 10>reporters from across the country with our national election update.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.020
<v Speaker 14>NBC News is reporting that the Democrats will flip control

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.580
<v Speaker 14>of the House and do it in a very impressive fashion.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.859
<v Speaker 14>Democrats are projected to take a total of 244 seats.

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 14>That translates into a sizable voting margin over Republicans projected

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 14>to take 191 seats. This means Hakeem Jeffries will most

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.820
<v Speaker 14>likely become the first black speaker of the House. As

0:23:40.859 --> 0:23:43.619
<v Speaker 14>for the Senate, the Democrats are also doing very well there.

0:23:43.940 --> 0:23:46.810
<v Speaker 14>They have so far picked up two seats, including Annie Andrews.

0:23:47.230 --> 0:23:50.610
<v Speaker 14>As NBC News projects, she will win South Carolina's Senate race,

0:23:50.630 --> 0:23:54.310
<v Speaker 14>defeating Republican Senator Darlene Graham. Graham is the sister of

0:23:54.350 --> 0:23:57.570
<v Speaker 14>the late Senator Lindsey Graham and was endorsed by President Trump.

0:23:57.810 --> 0:24:00.710
<v Speaker 14>South Carolina has not sent a Democrat to the Senate

0:24:01.050 --> 0:24:04.710
<v Speaker 14>in nearly 30 years. NBC News is projecting Republican Sarah

0:24:04.730 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 14>Huckabee Sanders is has won another term as Arkansas governor.

0:24:08.140 --> 0:24:12.379
<v Speaker 14>She defeated Democrat Fred Love. Huckabee Sanders has served since

0:24:12.380 --> 0:24:15.850
<v Speaker 14>2023 and was heavily favored to win a second term. Meantime,

0:24:15.910 --> 0:24:19.209
<v Speaker 14>polls are closing this hour in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, and Utah.

0:24:19.670 --> 0:24:21.430
<v Speaker 14>At the Decision Desk, I'm Chris Coraggio.

0:24:22.510 --> 0:24:24.550
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to KFI AM 640 On Demand.

0:24:30.420 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 10>Looks like another upset victory in South Carolina's Senate race.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 10>Democrats with a victory. Annie Andrews toppling Republican Senator Darlene Graham,

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.219
<v Speaker 10>appointed last year, of course, to take over for her

0:24:49.260 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 10>late brother, longtime Senator Lindsey Graham. That was a bit

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 10>of a struggle for Darlene Graham the entire campaign cycle.

0:24:57.980 --> 0:25:01.310
<v Speaker 10>She is a novice, and unfortunately it definitely showed. I

0:25:01.330 --> 0:25:03.169
<v Speaker 10>don't know if she knew what she was getting into

0:25:03.250 --> 0:25:05.229
<v Speaker 10>or if she was pushed into.

0:25:05.090 --> 0:25:06.909
<v Speaker 5>That one, I think.

0:25:07.330 --> 0:25:09.030
<v Speaker 8>One of those instances where it could have been a

0:25:09.070 --> 0:25:13.070
<v Speaker 8>single soundbite that just doomed her candidacy, which was that

0:25:13.130 --> 0:25:16.950
<v Speaker 8>she said she didn't know anything about foreign policy. Taking

0:25:17.010 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 8>over for her brother who was an incredible mind when

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:20.940
<v Speaker 8>it came to foreign policy.

0:25:21.030 --> 0:25:21.740
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:25:21.900 --> 0:25:26.429
<v Speaker 8>Governor of Ohio, CNN has declared that Dr. Amy Acton

0:25:26.510 --> 0:25:29.570
<v Speaker 8>will win the Ohio governor's race over Vivek Ramaswamy. We

0:25:29.590 --> 0:25:33.470
<v Speaker 8>just mentioned that story. And then NBC is now projecting

0:25:33.950 --> 0:25:39.540
<v Speaker 8>Democrats will win at least, at least 248 seats in

0:25:39.580 --> 0:25:43.580
<v Speaker 8>the House of Representatives. They need 218 for the majority

0:25:43.740 --> 0:25:45.380
<v Speaker 8>and that they will win at least 248 seats.

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.170
<v Speaker 5>Again, not all of those are called seats. But that's

0:25:49.210 --> 0:25:50.510
<v Speaker 5>the projection from NBC News.

0:25:50.650 --> 0:25:53.929
<v Speaker 10>The president has weighed in on truth social as the

0:25:53.970 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 10>Democrats were winning these key victories in South Carolina, Georgia,

0:25:57.220 --> 0:26:00.100
<v Speaker 10>North Carolina. Trump wrote on truth social that he wasn't

0:26:00.180 --> 0:26:02.980
<v Speaker 10>on the ballot. He wrote, I wasn't on the ballot.

0:26:03.050 --> 0:26:05.690
<v Speaker 10>And if I was, we would have won in a landslide.

0:26:05.730 --> 0:26:10.609
<v Speaker 10>Thank you for your attention to this matter. Michael Monks is.

0:26:10.650 --> 0:26:12.190
<v Speaker 5>Don't introduce me after that.

0:26:12.590 --> 0:26:13.109
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man.

0:26:13.390 --> 0:26:15.210
<v Speaker 5>Well, I don't want you to pay attention to this.

0:26:15.270 --> 0:26:15.790
<v Speaker 14>Period.

0:26:15.930 --> 0:26:16.790
<v Speaker 5>New paragraph.

0:26:17.250 --> 0:26:22.950
<v Speaker 10>Michael Monks is covering the massive slate of California propositions

0:26:23.010 --> 0:26:28.690
<v Speaker 10>for us and joins us now. This was a chore

0:26:28.770 --> 0:26:30.730
<v Speaker 10>for all of us going to the ballots today.

0:26:30.930 --> 0:26:33.179
<v Speaker 7>It was a lot of work to be prepared to

0:26:33.220 --> 0:26:35.140
<v Speaker 7>know which way you wanted to vote on these things.

0:26:35.180 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 7>If you crack that ballot open today for the first

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 7>time without doing any work.

0:26:39.130 --> 0:26:41.889
<v Speaker 5>You had your hands full. You were inundated. Yeah, completely.

0:26:41.910 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 7>There's 14 statewide ballots. And then depending on where you

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.770
<v Speaker 7>live in Southern California, all the counties have their own

0:26:47.790 --> 0:26:50.830
<v Speaker 7>things going on. Maybe the municipality you live in, L.A.,

0:26:50.910 --> 0:26:53.629
<v Speaker 7>various other cities have their own things going on.

0:26:54.150 --> 0:26:54.469
<v Speaker 5>It's a lot.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:59.780
<v Speaker 8>Board of Equalization, Water Board, School Board, City Councils, County Supervisors.

0:27:00.020 --> 0:27:04.540
<v Speaker 7>Superior Court judges are always very difficult. College trustees.

0:27:04.940 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 5>It's a lot.

0:27:05.660 --> 0:27:07.500
<v Speaker 8>I wanted to ask about Prop 39. This would be

0:27:07.540 --> 0:27:12.580
<v Speaker 8>the voter ID proposition. And this is something that is

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.780
<v Speaker 8>citizen-driven to get this on the ballot. And, you know,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 8>Meryl and I have talked about this, trying to look

0:27:18.460 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 8>at it from both sides, because there's this idea that

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.140
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot of fraud that takes place across the country.

0:27:24.490 --> 0:27:26.709
<v Speaker 7>And here in California when it comes to elections. And

0:27:27.210 --> 0:27:29.750
<v Speaker 7>not a lot of evidence that that is necessarily true.

0:27:29.770 --> 0:27:31.790
<v Speaker 7>We know fraud happens, but does it happen on such

0:27:31.810 --> 0:27:35.369
<v Speaker 7>a large scale that we've got to change the way

0:27:35.390 --> 0:27:37.169
<v Speaker 7>that we vote, as you hear, you know, maybe the

0:27:37.210 --> 0:27:40.210
<v Speaker 7>president and supporters might say. But on the other hand,

0:27:40.650 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 7>Democrats who are resistant to some of these ID requirements

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 7>really talk about voters in such a way that, I

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 7>don't know, I think it's kind of offensive.

0:27:49.740 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Like, Well, people can't get IDs.

0:27:51.540 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:27:51.740 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, you expect a black person to go down and

0:27:53.619 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 5>get an ID.

0:27:54.420 --> 0:27:54.620
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:27:54.859 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 5>What kind of world? Why are you insulting your voters?

0:27:57.900 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 5>Just in general, it's a condescending tone. It totally is.

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:02.510
<v Speaker 5>Just get your ID.

0:28:02.650 --> 0:28:05.530
<v Speaker 7>And really, I think that this helps folks on the

0:28:05.570 --> 0:28:08.689
<v Speaker 7>left to just kind of settle that argument. What's the

0:28:08.730 --> 0:28:11.830
<v Speaker 7>problem with pulling out an ID and confirming in person

0:28:11.850 --> 0:28:13.570
<v Speaker 7>that you are who you say you are? It shouldn't

0:28:13.609 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 7>be that big of a deal. But that is Prop 39,

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 7>one of the higher profile propositions that we are considering today.

0:28:19.700 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 7>We'll be curious to see how that goes, because in

0:28:22.740 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 7>order to pass that, you don't need me to tell

0:28:25.180 --> 0:28:27.350
<v Speaker 7>you that the Democrats make up the majority of the

0:28:27.380 --> 0:28:31.010
<v Speaker 7>electorate in California. You're going to need serious Democratic support

0:28:31.030 --> 0:28:33.950
<v Speaker 7>to push that over the line. And if that comes across,

0:28:33.970 --> 0:28:34.750
<v Speaker 7>then that's what you've got.

0:28:35.330 --> 0:28:39.230
<v Speaker 8>And the polling, we've talked before, we will talk tomorrow

0:28:39.390 --> 0:28:42.150
<v Speaker 8>and the rest of the week probably for how polls

0:28:42.870 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 8>turn out in terms of how accurate they were judging

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.060
<v Speaker 8>the trends before we get to election night. That's one

0:28:49.100 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 8>of those that I've not seen a lot of polling on.

0:28:51.740 --> 0:28:52.100
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:52.540 --> 0:28:57.180
<v Speaker 7>There was, I think, one poll that showed voters in

0:28:57.300 --> 0:29:01.700
<v Speaker 7>favor of voter ID and against the billionaire's tax, which

0:29:01.740 --> 0:29:03.810
<v Speaker 7>you look at those results and you think, well, how

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.260
<v Speaker 7>is Javier Becerra up by 30 points in the polls.

0:29:08.460 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 8>In a place that looks like they're voting for relatively

0:29:10.940 --> 0:29:11.900
<v Speaker 8>conservative ideas.

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 5>Exactly.

0:29:12.700 --> 0:29:15.380
<v Speaker 7>This is not a D versus R issue, apparently.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:16.500
<v Speaker 5>Now, look, these are polls.

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:18.890
<v Speaker 10>Well, they ask you all of those questions that are

0:29:18.930 --> 0:29:21.210
<v Speaker 10>right there on your ID when you go to your

0:29:21.370 --> 0:29:26.489
<v Speaker 10>voting polling place. First name, last name, street address. It'd

0:29:26.550 --> 0:29:29.110
<v Speaker 10>be a lot easier just to hand over that ID.

0:29:29.150 --> 0:29:31.130
<v Speaker 10>I grew up in a place before moving out here

0:29:31.150 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 10>where you had to show your ID. And it was never... controversial. No,

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.270
<v Speaker 10>I still put it in my pocket. I did it

0:29:37.310 --> 0:29:39.490
<v Speaker 10>this morning when I walked into my polling place because.

0:29:39.370 --> 0:29:41.260
<v Speaker 5>It's just automatic. It's not a big deal.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.340
<v Speaker 8>Let's talk about ranked choice voting. It's actually on the

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 8>ballot in a couple of States, Maine and Alaska tonight,

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 8>but also Irvine.

0:29:49.980 --> 0:29:50.340
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:29:50.460 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Irvine is, is looking at this.

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 7>It's one of the municipal ballot measures that cities in

0:29:56.340 --> 0:29:59.490
<v Speaker 7>orange County are looking at Irvine's measure D and, It

0:29:59.530 --> 0:30:05.450
<v Speaker 7>would implement single-winner ranked-choice voting. It proposes establishing the single-winner

0:30:05.650 --> 0:30:10.730
<v Speaker 7>instant runoff ranked-choice voting for Irvine's mayor and city council elections.

0:30:10.770 --> 0:30:13.890
<v Speaker 7>And the folks who want to see this happen, they

0:30:13.990 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 7>say that it allows voters to rank their preferred candidates

0:30:19.490 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 7>without splitting votes or supporting someone who might be in

0:30:23.620 --> 0:30:27.170
<v Speaker 7>the race as some sort of spoiler. So it's Their

0:30:27.250 --> 0:30:29.890
<v Speaker 7>idea behind ranked choice voting is that the person who

0:30:29.930 --> 0:30:33.670
<v Speaker 7>wins this race has broad support, may not always be

0:30:33.690 --> 0:30:37.370
<v Speaker 7>the first choice, but is supported well enough to have

0:30:37.830 --> 0:30:41.390
<v Speaker 7>come through this ranked choice process, which I think is

0:30:41.410 --> 0:30:45.170
<v Speaker 7>a little bit complicated. Opponents say ranked choice voting is confusing.

0:30:45.230 --> 0:30:50.430
<v Speaker 7>It complicates ballot counting. And if you asked me on

0:30:50.470 --> 0:30:52.090
<v Speaker 7>the fly, there was a pop quiz a couple of

0:30:52.110 --> 0:30:54.860
<v Speaker 7>days ago. What is ranked choice voting? I would have failed.

0:30:55.610 --> 0:30:56.270
<v Speaker 7>I would have failed.

0:30:56.350 --> 0:30:59.090
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's an issue specifically in Alaska because of the

0:30:59.130 --> 0:31:01.470
<v Speaker 8>double Dan Sullivan issue that they're talking about, where the

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.980
<v Speaker 8>Democrats hired a guy. Well, convinced a guy to get

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.180
<v Speaker 8>on the ballot because he had the same name as

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 8>the incumbent Republican senator. Now, ranked choice voting, actually, I've

0:31:11.380 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 8>heard this argument would completely change. Wipe out any issue

0:31:17.340 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 8>with that, because if you didn't know which Dan Sullivan

0:31:19.580 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 8>to vote for, you vote for both Dan Sullivans. And

0:31:23.180 --> 0:31:26.810
<v Speaker 8>that guarantees that the Republican incumbent, based on the polls

0:31:26.850 --> 0:31:30.130
<v Speaker 8>right now, that the Republican incumbent would get all of

0:31:30.530 --> 0:31:33.270
<v Speaker 8>the Dan Sullivan votes, no matter who they were for.

0:31:33.690 --> 0:31:36.790
<v Speaker 8>I mean, but that's that's also it's confusing to say

0:31:36.810 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 8>it that way. It's a confusing issue. I just don't

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 8>think people are smart enough. Is that a way to

0:31:43.180 --> 0:31:43.460
<v Speaker 8>say it?

0:31:44.340 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 10>I don't.

0:31:45.900 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 7>Ranked choice voting is very trendy. You've got people that

0:31:48.940 --> 0:31:51.910
<v Speaker 7>want to see this more broadly, not just in places

0:31:51.930 --> 0:31:54.830
<v Speaker 7>like Alaska, which seems like a weird place to have this.

0:31:54.870 --> 0:31:57.490
<v Speaker 7>But not a bad place to experiment with it because

0:31:58.130 --> 0:32:00.050
<v Speaker 7>there's not a huge population.

0:32:00.110 --> 0:32:01.850
<v Speaker 5>Population of Glendale. Exactly.

0:32:01.970 --> 0:32:03.270
<v Speaker 7>If we're going to try it somewhere, let's try it

0:32:03.310 --> 0:32:05.090
<v Speaker 7>in Alaska and then we'll see how it goes. It's

0:32:05.110 --> 0:32:08.090
<v Speaker 7>a bit of an experiment. But basically, you know, if

0:32:08.170 --> 0:32:10.070
<v Speaker 7>it's the race for mayor, let's say there's six candidates.

0:32:10.950 --> 0:32:12.290
<v Speaker 5>You rank them.

0:32:12.430 --> 0:32:12.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:32:13.090 --> 0:32:17.020
<v Speaker 7>And if somebody doesn't get 50%, After the first round,

0:32:17.260 --> 0:32:21.010
<v Speaker 7>the bottom drops out, and they recalculate how everybody ranked

0:32:21.090 --> 0:32:21.990
<v Speaker 7>those folks.

0:32:22.170 --> 0:32:24.750
<v Speaker 8>If your number one was dropped out, it goes to

0:32:24.790 --> 0:32:25.410
<v Speaker 8>your number two.

0:32:25.450 --> 0:32:25.890
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:32:26.420 --> 0:32:28.340
<v Speaker 10>All right, coming up next, we will check in with

0:32:28.380 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 10>the rest of the country. What is going on in Ohio?

0:32:31.500 --> 0:32:34.570
<v Speaker 10>You've got a Democrat, Dr. Amy Acton, that has been

0:32:34.620 --> 0:32:39.150
<v Speaker 10>elected governor. It looks like the Republican-controlled Senate seat in

0:32:39.250 --> 0:32:42.250
<v Speaker 10>Ohio is going blue as well. Looks like the same

0:32:42.310 --> 0:32:46.210
<v Speaker 10>in Kansas, Texas. South Carolina will have you having all

0:32:46.230 --> 0:32:48.950
<v Speaker 10>of the latest results as they pour in. When we

0:32:49.030 --> 0:32:51.450
<v Speaker 10>return right here to Election Night on KFI.

0:32:52.430 --> 0:32:53.470
<v Speaker 1>KFI AM 640 On Demand.