WEBVTT - 2-10-26 Scott Sloan Show

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Just answered this nationwide keyword on our website bank. That's

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bank answer it now. My Scott's Loan Show on seven

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred WLW is Instagram engineered like a like a casino

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>in order to hook your kids. The jury's going to

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>answer that question as tech CEOs get called to the

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>witness stand in a very fascinating case where social media, TikTok, insta, Facebook,

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>all of that is on trial. Jason Philibaum is a

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>defense attorney here in Cincinnati and joins the show to

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>discuss Jason, welcome, how you have.

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, doing well? Thank you.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>So I've read this and it's fascinating because we're all

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>engaged in social in some way, shape or form, but

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>especially on more impressionable younger people. And that's the crux

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of the argument. To me, it strikes me as a

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially a product liability case in that the

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>defense is going to have to walk this type rope

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of going, well, yeah, the platforms are engaging by this,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>but they're not harmful. And that's the intent of this thing,

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is that the folk from here.

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I think this is going to probably near

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the either the gun cases or the cigarette cases where

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you have, for example, the gun lobby shut that down.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>But the cigarette cases, they started out in the sixties

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>and the seventies, and you have a couple of big verds.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 3>The next thing you know, you have a multi state settlement.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think what you're seeing here is the beginning

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 3>of either the end or the expansion of social media, having.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Tech companies or other companies that past successfully defended that

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>accusation of their products.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Somehow it was addictive, yes, And that's what's interesting.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 3>And again I see such parallels between the social media

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>trial that's starting now in the cigarette cases, because when

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>the cigarette cases first started, they defended it and they

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>shot it down and they won I think the first

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit within the fifties, and they lost big time, and

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I think they even got attorning keys. And then you know,

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>they started in the sixties and the seventies, and then

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>finally it was in I think nineteen eighty eight or

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 3>something like.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>That you finally had a big verdict.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 3>And then a few years later the state stepped in

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>because now you have a flood of lawsuits. So I

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>think what you're going to see here is you've got

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>this lawsuit against a social media or all of them

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 3>essentially claiming they're addictive, claiming they're subjecting the children to

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>sexual abuse or other type of anxiety from the images

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 3>they see. And what you're going to have is if

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 3>they get a verdict here, you can see now a

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 3>flood of lawsuits that follow, sort of mirroring the same evidence,

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>making the same argument. Yea.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Although here's the problem I have, and this is the

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>argument I would tend to make here, Jason, if I

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>were the big media companies, tech companies, is that, Okay,

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do this like we did the like

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the cigarette lawsuit.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 2>What's the deal.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, we know cigarettes called cancer and the cigarette mantuffacts No, no,

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>no no, And now we found memos that said, yeah,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we recognize there's a direct correlation between smoking and lung cancer.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That's irrefutable. And there's probably not much else you're doing

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in your life that would cause lung cancer save not

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>smoking cigarettes. Okay, so there's that direct scientific connection. Whereas

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>in this case you're making the same argument going, Okay,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for social media, kids would be happy,

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they'd be engaged, they wouldn't be depressed. That might be

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>an ally, that may be a factor but there's also

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>other causes for this. The causation nightmare is what about

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>family trauma? What about academic pressure, what about bullying, what

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>about genetics? What about COVID? It just keeps going and

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>going and going, And so there's other factors I could

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I could point to in a child's life as to

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>why they might be addicted to social media and why

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>their temperament is bad. And you know, there are some

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>kids killing themselves, there's no question about it, and maybe

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>social pushes them over the edge. But there's a whole

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>host of other factors you have with social media that

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have with cigarette smoking.

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's exactly what the social media companies

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>are going to be seeing. So we talked, you know,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>just now it's almost like cigarettes. But one would argue,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think your argument was, this is more like

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the gun cases, the firearm cases, where you know, yes

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 3>guns can cause damage and yes guns can cause death,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 3>but there's an intervening cause and that's a bad guy

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 3>doing it. You know, guns just don't pop up and

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 3>start killing people. It's some bad guy picks up a

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 3>gun and does something bad.

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 4>And so that's what they're going to argue.

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Here in social media, which is, look, you know, we

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 3>we have a platform, and if a bunch of you know,

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>perverts get on and start, you know, sending messages your kids,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 3>that's a bad actor using otherwise okay platform. And so

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's the biggest hurdle that the plaintiffs

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 3>are going to have to get over, which is, you

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 3>know this this is designed to be you know, addictive. Maybe,

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 3>but at the end of the day, it's only causing

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 3>trouble because the bad guys on the other side doing things,

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and that's you know, one could argue with mirrors the

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 3>gun lobby cases which end up going away.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, the gun lobby cases were interesting in that the

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>argument we all to say product defect issue. This is

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a product liability issue and a gun company so well

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not really. You put around in the chamber, you load it,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>you rack it, and you pull the trigger and a

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>bullet flies out. No, that works like it should. It

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>depends on who's using it and what the intent is.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, That's what they basically said, like, look, these social

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 3>media platforms, there's other reasons for mental health. You know,

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>we have a society that's built.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>On bad news or you know, We've got people on

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the other side that are them.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 3>And all this does is is create more of a

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>public form that you're going on yourself.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 2>The parents are allowing it to happen.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 3>And so the argument from the social media company is, look,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 3>we provide a platform where people can share pictures and

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 3>talk about their life, and just because someone comes in

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and does something bad or because another friend starts to

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>bully you, that's not on us. I mean, we can't

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 3>have a free, open platform but then regulate everybody. That's

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 3>a whole different issue that Connors is looking at. And

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 3>so I think that's what they're going to claim, is

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 3>that bad actors are what causing your child's mental health,

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 3>not the actual Instagram or Facebook or TikTok.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, the idea is you're getting fed a steady diet

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of everything that you want to hear. But okay, that's

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>social media and there's an algorithm for that. How is

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that different in any way, shape or form than something

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I may watch on streaming, for example, or TV, whether

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't know, it could be food TV. Maybe

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a food today. I can watch food NonStop

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all the time to make a look good. They don't

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>see the after effects of it, or something that we

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>could recognize as cable news. You know, if you are

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you write leaning, you watch Fox News.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>But there's even more extreme networks out there one America.

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>There's Newsmax, right, and that's a steady the same algorithms

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and play here. Why would they be exempted social media?

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Not?

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean that's anything right now, that's just

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>targeting on advertising. I mean you'll look up something for

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 3>a puppy and next thing you know, you're flooded with

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>everything that goes along with the puppy, from leashes, the food,

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the puppy pads, you name it. And I think in

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>this case that's what they're going to argue is, look, yes,

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 3>we set it up so if you show interest in baseball,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 3>we're going to show you a bunch of baseball stuff.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 3>If you show interest in workout, we're going to show

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 3>you workout stuff. And then likewise, you know, people can

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>come on and talk to you, and if they're bad

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>about it, that's on them. Now, what I'd be most

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 3>interested is snap Chat and TikTok settled before this started,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'd be curious. We'll never know what that amount

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 3>is for but you know, something about snap Chat and

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>TikTok had them worried enough to leases to a settlement,

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and I'm guessing that settlement is what then is fueling

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the litigation on the other because there's experts involved, there

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 3>was an undercover study done.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is going to be very interesting to

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>watch over the next month.

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's another factor you don't have and all these

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>other suits. Jason Philibaum, attorney at law, we're talking about

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the interesting case. I think it's going to kind of

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>grip us here too, because we're all involved in social

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>media in some way, shape or form. The young you

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>are probably more likely. But products like Instagram and TikTok

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook and x are they engineered to hook your kids?

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And the juries can answer that question as CEOs like

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg get called to the witness stand shortly to say, yeah,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>well we wanted the product to be engaging, but no,

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not addictive. It's not causing all these societal problems

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>facing young people specifically. There's also something in there that's

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not applied to any other the types of suits we've

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about. When comes a pride to product liability, Jason.

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>That's something called Section two thirty, which basically protects platforms

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>from liability for user generated content. So I may get

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on social and create something that's not on meta or YouTube,

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that's on the user, and so it does exactly so

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>do section two thirty provide a shield here from these

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>suits even more?

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 2>That's what they're going to argue.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think what you have is, you know, we

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 3>had the whole argument what five years ago, when before

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 3>X was taken over by month, you know, we're we're

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>certain people being blocked out or being excluded, and is

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>this a public form? And of course Congress acts and

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 3>basically says, look, you can you can say and do

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 3>what you want on these platforms because who it is

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 3>for me to say that's misinformation? And then so now

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I think you're going to see the social media companies

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 3>argue the same thing, which is, look, we do make

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 3>this engaging, we do make this interesting. If you like something,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 3>we're going to send you more things that way. But

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, we can't control what

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 3>people do, whether they harass you, whether they put false

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 3>information out there or anything else. We can't control that.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 3>And there's actually a statue that says we shouldn't and

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 3>we're not liable for that.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day, this will.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Then come down to are they knowingly putting children at risk?

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's a hard burden to overcome for

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the plaintiffs. How does the First Amendment factor into that, Well,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 3>I think that protects the speech that comes across. But again,

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 3>if you're it's like it's like a cigarette. You know,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 3>it's you, it's your right to to smoke, and you

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 3>choose to do that. But we put a product out

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 3>that we knew was going to be damaging, that we

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 3>knew was going to cause cancer, and the only difference

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 3>and then we advertise towards you. Now that I think

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the same thing could be said about social media. We

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 3>created this product that we knew would take up eight

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 3>hours of your day of scrolling.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>We knew that it would, you.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Know, cause vision trouble or or mental health trouble because

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>you're not sleeping. And then we also made it more

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 3>addictive so we can send more stuff at you. And

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 3>we knew a lot of that stuff was that if

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 3>that's what they can prove, then yeah, there could be

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>a verdict in this case. But that social media comes

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 3>back and says, wait a second. All we did was

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 3>again create a platform that's fun, and the more fun

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 3>it is, the more you're gonna want to do it.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>But that's life. That's not creating a bad sort of product.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 3>That's the people that engage that you're with. It's like

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 3>going to a park. We created a beautiful park, but

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 3>if there's bad people and they're yelling at you and

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 3>doing stupid stuff, that's that's not on us, that's on

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the bad people.

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Jason. A couple of studies have come out in the

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years from different institutions, and I was

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about it earlier in the show, and that factors

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in here, and that is, you know, certainly young people

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular who spend a lot of time and girls

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>especially spend a lot of time on social media, they

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to be more depressed, to have higher levels of anxiety,

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>less performance, things along those lines. However, versus kids who

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>are completely banned from social media, the kids who have

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of social media in their lives tend

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to fare better. And so it sounds to me like

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the research says there's a happy medium. You know, if

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you spend all your time looking at your phone. That's

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>really really bad. If you don't have a phone, or

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>don't use or don't engage, it's it's not as bad

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as that, but it's also not good. There's a sweet spot,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and it's always in the middle in that regard. Then

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we have things like teen accounts and parental controls and

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>screen time warnings and all that stuff. If those tools

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are out there, and the same people who bring the

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>suit fail to engage in that and fail to monitor

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>their kids because you know, they're kids, they don't have agency,

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't that an affirmative defense for the tech companies and saying, hey, listen,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a parent. You have a responsibility to parent. You know,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got to know what your kid's doing

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and monitor. You gave them a phone. They didn't buy

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the phone themselves under the money, especially the young ones.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Is that on the parent?

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, And that's what the meta attorney actually said

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>in open which basically they have repeatedly warn parents and teams,

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 3>but more importantly the parents that harmful conduct does or

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>content does get past our firewalls. They do get past

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>the safeguards, and this can be an issue, and you

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 3>need the monitor child. It's like taking the child to

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 3>a play area and just letting them go and they

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 3>fall off the top. At some point, you've got to

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 3>monitor your children as well. And I think that's what

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, Meta at least was arguing, which is the

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>parents have responsibility too, And you know, just because you

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 3>open up an area and let your kid go unexplored,

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 3>that's not on us. We've warned you. And this goes

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 3>back to the whole product liability issue. You and I

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 3>have joked about this. Before you want a drinking party

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>at home, go read your warning labels on all your products,

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 3>because that means someone did that to get that warning

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 3>label there. And I think that's what they're saying, is

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>we put the warning here that said it could be

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 3>a problem, and you ignored it and let your kid

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 3>just have a free phone for eight ten hours a day.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe I saw Mark Zuckerberg is going to testify,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and that is going to be a moment for sure.

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>What are the legal risks for Meta putting him on

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the stand.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, he probably doesn't know a lot about the You know,

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, you become so big

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 3>in your company that you don't necessarily know the little

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 3>but I think that'll be very interesting. I mean, he's

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 3>testified in Congress, so you know, he's testified before hearings.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 3>I would think that he's going to do pretty well.

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Set up to testify. I think the things that going

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 3>to be interesting is that they hit him with something

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 3>that maybe he didn't know about, you know, something someone

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>lower or whatever they said. But in this case, this

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>has been going on for a while. They've got Discovery.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I would hope he's prep and I think Instagram CEO

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>is also going to testify, and that'll again be interesting

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>because they've all testified in Congress, again, pretty hostile crowds

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 3>where the rules of evidence don't apply. I would think

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 3>they're probably going to end up doing fine, and it's

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the people underneath them that's that's going to be the

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>real interesting is how this operates, how this works, how

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 3>they actually target the kids.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>That's that's I think going to be end up cruct

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>of the case.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because the I mean, it's really this, this whole

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>thing we're talking about, this culture. It's all his fault

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because he was a nerd at Harvard and wanted to

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>be chicks. That's that's basically what this whole thing came about.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It was like, it's like a senior prank called wildly,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>wildly out of control.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 3>And ruck, I mean downfall society, social media and next

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 3>thing is terminator.

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 2>With all the ais.

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 3>But hey, at the end of the day, we're welking

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 3>him it with open arms. And that's the defense of

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 3>the social media is, look, you guys use it, so

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 3>all we'd do is putting the products out there. And

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 3>just because other people use it poorly, that's not on.

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Us, right.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So we saw Snapchat and TikTok settle. Do they

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>wind up just settling in this case? Is that and

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the foregone conclusion here? Jason philbum No, I.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Think they're going to go through with it.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they have decided that they're going to be

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>a target if they settle, I mean if and I

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 3>think I don't know why TikTok and Snapchat did. I

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know if there's maybe some internal memos that could

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 3>have got them in trouble, but at the end of

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the day they settled. But I think think you've got

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Instagram and Facebook and meta and all that they're going

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 3>to fight this to the end because otherwise you're going

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to open up a flood of litigation like they do,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>like they did in the cigarette cases, and so I

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 3>think we're going to end up seeing this at a verdict.

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Interesting all right, he's Jason Philibum defense attorney. Maybe a

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>little outside his scope here, but the guy knows more

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about law than most people do for sure, especially Lawa's

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Jason all the best, buddy, appreciate you.

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it. Thank you, and their.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Official attorney of the Scott Sloan Show here on seven

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred WLW, we'll get a time out of news. I

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about this more after the news here

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>at nine point thirty. And this is a huge, huge

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>issue and if you think about it, there are all

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>sorts of core questions here because as I mentioned, there's

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a precedent if they wind up winning, the plaintiffs win

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this case, meaning that social media is addictive by design

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're at fault. Does that open up I mean Netflix,

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, go after Netflix because of AutoPlay or you know,

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>news sites, infinite scroll, or mobile games, online shopping. I'll

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>go the thems pretty much everything, and I mentioned no

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>cable news would be a great example of that. Are

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we just opening Pandora's box where if you just get

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on the information super high Highway, getting the digital fast lane. Now,

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, there's legal risk involved for the

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>company put the content out there. What uh yeah, that's

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty scary, right. I'll also make this case. I don't

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think social media should be on trial at all. I

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's what should be on trial. There's something else,

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get into that right after news in your

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>calls just ahead, Scott's Loan show. This is seven hundred WW.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Scott Floatan continues here seven hundred WLW. Welcome to the

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>show on this Tuesday morning, the sunshine's in.

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>We're at h What I got here?

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have my ammometer here. Let me look at

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the old watch. I got thirty eight degrees. Watch this

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight. Let's go at thirty eight.

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I have to hopefully north of fifty today. Hopefully your

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>some pump is working, gonna be a lot by Buddy

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Miles and Basement Doctor's gonna get a lot of

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>calls in three to one. That's just how it is.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I kind of got a little theme running for the

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>first half of the show. Tod I just had Jason

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Phillbaum and talk about the social media addiction trial. I

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's fascinating. Christine Miles as a psychologist. She's on

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>later to talk about then update on you know, the

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>schools have banned cell phones largely because the dangers of that.

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the real problem here and I you know,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, was like, Okay, social media, it's so

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>bad for kids, so bad, so bad, And then you

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>have studies come out and going, yeah, but kids who

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>aren't engaged in social media tend to also have problems

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>socializing and mental stress and things like that, largely because

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that's her kids meet. You know, if you simply deny

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the kid going hey, you cal it's really bad you

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>can't have a cell phone, that's our whole social sphere.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>That's like saying, well, you're not allowed to go to

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the mall. You're not allowed to go to the movies.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not allowed to go you know, when we were younger,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>that's how kids socialize in person. They do it digitally.

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Now it's just the way things are, and so's that's

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not good for the kid either. So there's a happy

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>medium where you actually, I hate to say it, you know,

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>we got a parent. That's the hardest thing in the

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>world is parenting. You know, you just can't simply let

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>your kid go feral. And then when they spend twenty

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>hours a day on the phone and there you know

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they they don't develop properly or they have mental health issues.

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>You turn around and you sue the company. It's like,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>well you got on the phone. Is you do have

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a some liability in this yourself actually the bulk of it.

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And a kid has to be an educated consumer, sadly

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>at a younger age than we were. But that's them's

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the rules, right. And I point this out because you know,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, the problem here going after

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>social media, that social in my opinion, should not be

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the thing on trial here. It should be smartphones. I

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>mean a smartphone, it's a handheld slot machine. If you

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>go into the casino, downtown anywhere for that matter, everything

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in there is set up for them to take your money.

0:19:58.000 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>And we know this going in. We know the how

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>hose always wins. You go to Vegas, Why do they

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>comp your drinks, why do they comp your rooms? Why

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>do you get the comp this that? Because you spend

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money playing the games and at the

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the day when you get a free family

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>members that go and they gamble it, and they gamble

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>uf with like they never pay for a cruise. I

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's awesome. It's like you go now, it's one

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, basically, go on this cruise. Why is it

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>because we gamble a lot and you can write those

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>now for your taxes. The whole thing. I don't know

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>if it's a wash or not, but again, it's your money.

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You worked a lifetime, you earned it. Do what you

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>want with your money. I don't need the government or

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>anyone else tell me what to do what I want

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to do with my money. If I want to give

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it to charity, give it to the church, or gamble

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it away. It's my damn money. Leave me alone. Leave

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>me alone. And so you go to a casino and

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all set to take that money from you, right.

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>All of the bells on a slot machine, the chimes

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are done in a certain way, in a certain fashion

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to make that the most appealing sound in the world

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to you. Done researching the whole thing about pumping oxygen,

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and they really don't. But it's a good wives tele

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all and get you to spend more money to game

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>up more. Okay, so if that's true with the casino,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>we don't band casinos, we regulate them. I look at

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>social media, go. I don't look at social media. I

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>think it's the phone, because it is that handheld slot machine.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>It is literally an amusement park in the palm of

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>your hand. You can certainly look at social media. You

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>can engage in that. You can scroll videos, you can

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>listen to audio and podcast, you can play games, you

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>can watch porn, you can bet, you can gamble. You

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>can do all of these things you want to do

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>within the palm of your hand. And so I don't

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>know if it's social that should be on trial. It

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>should be the phone. But that's a whole separate set,

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole different indictment. It's easier to blame social

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>media is the evil thing because yeah, in a way,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we're on but no, I'm just on Facebook. I don't

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>look at it that much. Okay, good, but you know

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not the platform young people are on. But you

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>can be. I'm addicted to that phone as well. I

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>also point out this that if the whole crux of

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the argument, like smoking or guns or whatever it might be,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>as the fact that this is a product liability issue

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>and nothing else and they win this thing. Here's what

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>should scare you about this is that, all right, snapchack,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the snapchat TikTok. They settled and now it's meta and

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube right now. But okay, this social media's addictive. Well,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, then they will come after your phones next.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>This certainly makes a mobile phone even more so, I think,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>than social media, something that could be banned or litigated against,

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that the nature of the phone itself

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is addictive. I mean when the first iPod came out.

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>You may not have been around then when the iPod

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>came Remember the first iPod came out, and these things

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>were you know, they weren't part of your phone, and

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>it was you know, we weren't streaming music over the

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>over your over data. It was a cost prohibit. You

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>had download the song onto the physical iPad. You have

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a phone and you have an iPod with you, and

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the iPod is about the size of while the cell

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>phone now about the palm of your hand. And when

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they designed that, they designed it for something that had

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a tactile feel to it, like the back of the

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the the original and the iPods. They were chrome, they're heavy,

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and the edges were round it. It was shining and you

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>wanted to touch it. And the buttons were intuitive and

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you felt it and weren't you know, just touch screens,

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the actual physical buds and the whole product. The field

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was designed for you not to want to put it down.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>It felt good in your hand, and that was the

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>first step towards developing a product, as all products are.

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not only visually and audio opena, but sensory from

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>a sensory perspective of the peeling. It drew you in.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It made you want to use it more. It made

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it so you never wanted to set it down. That's

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a hell of a design. But okay, does that

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:02.719
<v Speaker 1>now mean that the whole idea of music YouTube, for example,

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>against social media more than anything. I think it's just videos,

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's a social media channel that those algorithms

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>are set up for you to get more of the

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>videos you want to see. So, by nature, the way

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>we design things are that you use it more. You

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>can say the same thing about food, about potato chips.

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, I get you go get a bag of

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>grippos the barbecue, especially, why do you want to eat

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole bag? Because they've got a great balance between salt,

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>between fat, and between sugar. And we talk about that

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to obesity. Look at all the hidden

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>sugar and product wires. There sugar in there. Shouldn't be

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>sugar in this. Yeah, it's there's sugar in it to

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>make it more appealing. So it rewires your taste buds,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not in a conspiratorial sense, but rather they want you

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to eat more because you'll buy more chips. You also

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have to have the ability to go I'm good, I'm satiated,

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine. So what else are we going to go

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>after if they win this lawsuit? Is it going to

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>be food? It's gonna be phones, It's gonna be music.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Netflix comes to mind. They've got auto play. The algorithm

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>sees what you're watching, goes hey, we think you'll like this.

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's not just Netflix. That's every streaming platform from

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Netflix to YouTube, TV to Amazon Prime, ESPN, whatever it

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>might be. News sites have something called infinite scroll. You

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>read a story and it sends you more of what

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>you want. I would argue also that if you're sitting

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>there going, well, you know this is we got the

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.239
<v Speaker 1>social it's the problem the fu I don't know. If

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you're still hooked up to cable you're watching cable news,

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>all right. If you like Fox, and you've watched Fox

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>because you're conservative, you might really like like One America,

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>or you might like Newsmax. We are the commercials for Newsmax.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>And the whole thing with Newsmax is basically is like

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump likes Newsmax, so you should watch it too. Tell

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the president you watch TV.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 2>Wait what?

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And if that's part of your identity and who you are,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>then isn't that a steady diet of more of the

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>things that you're addicted to? Now it doesn't give you

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a great sense of what's going on the rest of

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the world or opposing viewpoints, or you know, the ability

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to think for yourself, which I try to do. I

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't want people lying to me. I don't care

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Democrat or Republican. I want to know

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what the agenda is and let me figure out the

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>game myself. That's just how I'm more and I get

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a unicord in that regard. Although I suspect the

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>way things are going maybe more people are going to go, yeah,

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you know what, maybe we got a back off, like

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>social media, we need a back off a little bit.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, could you go after one of these

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>conservative or you know, if you I don't know, maybe

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>watch CNN. But now you're going, hey, you know, msnbs

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are the view for God's sakes. With that First Amendment lawsuit,

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It's like, if you want a steady diet

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of progressive left or conservative right, you can find something

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that for you. Because it's not an algorithm,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's alread it is. And so at the end

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day, are we opening up Pandora's box. We're

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>engaging in anything becomes legally risky, whether I meaning it

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a potato chip or watching I don't know, cable news.

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty slippery slope, I think. And now everything

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that is because the idea of making a product is

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to get more people to buy it, regardless of what

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>it is to consume it. And no one goes, hey,

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to design a product, but I don't really

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>want that many people using I don't. I just there's

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>lit the old theory about it's really not that true.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>But the idea you know, back in the old days,

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I get a refrigerator, and the refrigerator the last seventy year,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I still got an old, you know, calvinator. In the garage,

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I got a nord Er a Crossley that's still running.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, if you look in that thing, it's you know,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it's got a limited amount of parts. It was designed

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to be replaced as or repair as supposed to replace.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But we live in a disposal age right now. It's

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lowered the cost of those goods substantially compared to what

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a long time ago. TV's are a great

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>example of that. You go back and look at I

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know, the cost of a TV for a twenty

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one inch you know, black and white TV let alone

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>color was like four hundred dollars back in the seventies

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and sixties, and today, you know, you can get a

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, an eighty inch TV for less than a

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. For several hundred dollars. It's because well, it's

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not meant to be repaired, it's meant to be disposed.

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And they last a fairly long time for that matter.

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 1>But that's the idea here, is that, like, you know,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we keep changing things and it gets gets a little

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>better in a disposable society, for sure, But when it

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to the issue of, you know, the consumer culture.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>We try to make things as appealing as possible from

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a cost standpoint, for sure with the TV analogy, but

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>also from something that we want to use over and

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. Yeah, we want product and brand loyalty.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Isn't this essentially tied in a digital fashion? I mean,

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>can you go after Tide really cleans closed very very well?

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It's all I want to use is Tide. Well, they

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do a great job. Okay, P and G. So now

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is there going to be a LOSSU against P and

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>gcs tied? So damn good? But you're not addicted to

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's got that yeah, but I'm addicted to that smell

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and the clean.

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And again, this is the way the legal system works.

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It pushes boundaries for sure, and pushes a lot of buttons.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know, it's like we're battling over social

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>media as the bad guy here, and maybe it is

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone. It's also probably a lot about us. It's

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the damnedest thing that started with the tobacco settlements, and

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit different too in a sense. I

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>know that in this case, you know, there are documents

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out from Facebook and those companies that said, yeah,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 1>we've got an addictive product here, and we're keeping kids engaged,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but it also it's causing mental problems. It's a smoking

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>gun that executives knew their platforms harmed kids, but we

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>prioritize engagement in revenue. Anyway, I'm not sure if that's

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>legally damaging simply because like, Okay, we got a product

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that's really really good and people, in this case kids

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>want to use it. Should that really be legally damaging?

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can become addicted better to I guess

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>food or potato chips, and certainly smoking, then you could

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>social media or gun. I mean the argument fall apart

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>with weapons in that. Yeah, well, it's not a product

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>liability if it works as we sold it. Well, what

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>do you mean, Well, you're saying it's the product's dangerous.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the liability. It's not dangerous in a sense of

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a defect. It's not defective at all. But you know,

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it's saying, like a lighter, I burned my house down

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because the lighter worked. Yeah, well, you know you took

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the little bit lighter out and you pulled that little

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>wheel and it made a spark, and then your thumb

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>hit the button and made the buttane come out, and

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>now you've got a flame the cause your fired that

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>caused the house to burn down. No, no, it's not

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the lighter's fault. At some point, you know, we do

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>have to take accountability here, and I know it's easier

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>said than done, because you know, raising my kids was hard,

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if I did, how good a

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>job I did, We don't know. I guess the standard

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>right now is you know, nobody is in prison. I mean,

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if you st the par really low, neither my kids

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>are in prison. I think it's good enough, but tend

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to be good, good people. Now, you may measure it differently,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and everyone does. As a parable, we don't know what

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the yardstick is. What is it supposed to be, how

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 1>much money you make, how much education you have, what

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you look like. I'm not quite sure, but everyone's different

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. The one constant is it's damn near

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in posset. It's really really hard to do. And to

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>simply let your kids be ferial and go, okay, well

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you go here here's a phone, go have fun. Just

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>don't bother me. I know it's today's version of you know,

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>my mom and dad would go, hey, here's a TV.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's some ma Ree runs, or watch TV. Leave me

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>alone for a minute. You know, TV was the babysitter.

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Now it's something digital. How you going to a restaurant,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>how many kids or adults for that matter, are engaged

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>on the screen. You know, you've got the you've got

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the tablet that you bring in with the cartoon on

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it or game or whatever it is. And you know,

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>kids as young as three four five are sitting there

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the meal to come out, and they're they're

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>engaged with a digital thing. You know, in spite of

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>engaging with the family, you give them a tablet and

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they shut the hell up. It's a digital pacify. Yeah,

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 1>we've all done that in some regard help. You know,

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>back in the day when the mini and are still there,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but the you know minivans, Hey I got a TV.

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I can put a video on for my kid in

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the back seat, so they quit bugging the hell out

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of me. We've all done that in some way, shape

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or form. Some people more extreme than the others but

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is it the fault of the You know, kids want

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to watch NonStop. My kid love Toy Story when he

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was growing up. Mean, we watch it once a day

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for real. I have the movie on and then you

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>got to say, hey, listen, we need to turn it off.

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Despite the tantrum they held, you're still at the day.

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You have to be the gatekeeper here, not expecting a

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>big company like Meta or YouTube or Facebook or TikTok

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that for us, because watch out for the consequence.

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>If we want that to happen as a society, then

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>watch out for the negative side, which is going to

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>be them going after Oh hey, wait a minute, Now

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that's different. I was watching that. Yeah, well good, now

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna shut down cable news or whatever it might

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be that you're consuming, because essentially it's an algorithm. Let

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>me get a news update and we'll continue this thread

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. A little bit different here, you know,

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a high windy can. We have banned cell phones in

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>schools largely, which I think and for an educational perspective

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and during instructional time. I think it's obviously that's a

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. However, the idea, what are social media or

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>phones for?

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>That matter.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Schools have banned cell phones, as you know, and I

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder now, as we're starting to get more data out

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about this, that maybe the phone wasn't the problem, because

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent still of teachers say I have a

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult time trying to kid keep the young people engaged. Well,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we thought it was cell phones, but it turns out

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not. What else does it play here? I got

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>an idea. We'll share that just ahead here with my

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>guest Christine Miles after news on the Home of the

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Red seven hundred ww Cincinnati. By the way, iHeartMedia and

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Big One. Salute Cincinnati's own Procter and Gamble. If

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got someone there you'd like for us to recognize

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on the air, text their name to five one eight

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>eight one and be listening. Flown me here on seven

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred WWS. Schools across America locking up, snatching up kids

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>cell phones like their hot conquer band. So you got

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 1>bell to bell bands, you got the big mad night

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of pousage, you got confiscation. Policies. Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana all

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>require school districts to implement policies banning those phones during

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>instructional class time. And each state's so a little bit

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>different than that. Every but largely most states have this

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>conon policy.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:14.959
<v Speaker 2>But here's the question.

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You're ready for the question, here's the question no one's

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>asking us. So new studies come out, and not just new,

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but preceding studies have come out. The shows teachers spend

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between twenty five and thirty something percent of their day,

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so between a quarter and a third of their instructional

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>day trying to get kids to listen despite strict cell

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>phone bans. That hasn't changed. So our phones the core problem?

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Or is it just a scapegoat?

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 4>On that?

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Christine Miles, she's a psychologist and works with school systems

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Founder of the Listening Past. Christine, Welcome

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are you? I'm great.

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm so glad we're talking about this, so thanks for

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 5>having me on.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I was thinking about this before a conversation,

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know I was not. I don't know about you,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but I was not part of the cell phone generation.

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I had my mobile down and had it for

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years. But I look back and go, wow,

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have this problem when I was a kid.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>As most parents and grandparents certainly say things are different.

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Of course they're supposed to be different. That's how the

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>world this is, That's how America's designed. I guess this

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>would be like what if I in school, if I

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>were allowed to bring my TV with a cable on

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it and I could watch MTV, What that would do

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for my ability to learn?

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 2>It's the same thing, right it really.

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 5>That's beautifully said, That's exactly what it is. We don't

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 5>need We just don't need the cord. Yeah, so so,

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 5>But I so appreciate the question because it is a

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 5>big It is a big, big problem, and I'm so

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 5>glad the schools are finally.

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Taking this step.

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we know better, we do better. I mean

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 5>I remember I grew up when smoking was allowed in

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 5>most places, but then we realized it was harmful for

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 5>your health, so we took it outside and we made

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 5>smoking areas and things like that. So setting some limits

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 5>is similar to that, Because I think this is like

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 5>that the ships sailed before we knew what the repercussions were.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think it's the root cause it's just

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 5>that in gasoline to the already raging fire. In terms

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 5>of the problem of kids, struggling to listen. There's also

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 5>some rebound effects here. So you take the phones out

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 5>of the schools, and attention spans are still harder to

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 5>come by because when if they're on their phones and

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 5>on devices, which the numbers are kind of staggering. You know,

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 5>these are spending nine hours plus a day outside of

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 5>school work. That's a lot of time. So it's not

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 5>like your brain's going to recover just because you don't

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 5>have it in school. But again we're still it's still

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 5>not the root cause. In my opinion, the root cause

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 5>is that we're told, not taught, and this is a

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 5>problem since been documented since the nineteen fifties.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was making that case, and this kind of

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>a theme show today on this I had earlier. We're

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about the social media live trial. It's about to

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>happen that social media and TikTok and snapchat and instant,

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>all those platforms are addictive by design and will ruin

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>your kid's life. Yeah, if they go uncheck, if they're

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>completely fear aal online with no roadblocks up, But that's

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on the parent. I don't think that's on the company

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>also made the case that the social is not the problem.

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The phone itself is the problem. It is like literal,

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's like bringing it's a handheld damn

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>casino is what it is. Right, It's like I've got

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>everything out that it's not social. It's I can message,

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I can look at videos, i can watch porn, I

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>can check sports, I can bet online, I can I

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>can do all of these things in the problem in

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>my hand. That's really it's not social. It's the phone.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's it's all the things that are coming. It's

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 5>the world coming at kids, not the world, you know,

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 5>not kids exploring the world and what's finding them.

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 5>Again, there's could be a lot of debate about algorithms

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 5>and how we're targeting just espe. We could have debates

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 5>about cigarette companies targeting the brain and making things addictive.

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 5>So there's there's it's a very complex issue, and I think, yes,

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 5>parental control is important schools. Taking these steps is important

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 5>when again, when we know better, we do better, and

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 5>we still be One of the things taking this time

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 5>away in schools is that it forces us to do

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 5>something else. So, you know, I've talked with parents, as

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, a family therapist and one time a parent

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 5>said to me, what if my child won't eat anything,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 5>drink anything but soda? And I said, well, if you

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 5>take soda away in the house, they'll get thirsty eventually.

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 5>So you know they'll eventually drink water if water is

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 5>all there is. So what will happen is kids will

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 5>start to reacclimate towards socializing with each other more than

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 5>they will to the phones when the phones aren't in

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 5>front of them. But it's two at tempting, So we

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.879
<v Speaker 5>need to remove those barriers. But then we also got

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 5>to give them the skills. I mean, we've been telling

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 5>we've been telling people to listen kids, starting with kids

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 5>from like I said, this is a problem documented back

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 5>to the nineteen fifties where we don't have formal listening

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 5>education and classrooms. So we tell them expecting the ears

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 5>to do the work instead of building this as a skill,

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 5>which is what it is.

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean I saw we should be addressing

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.399
<v Speaker 1>in school. She's a schools that's Christine Mouse, psychologist. Let's

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>back up a little bit what goes on in the

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>adolescent brain from a developmental psychology perspective, what's actually happening

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 1>when their kids are always on their phone? And you

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>metch you know, nine, ten, twelve or more hours a day.

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, so I will say that I can talk about

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 5>this from the This is not my core expertise. I'm

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 5>a systems family therapist. But what I do know and

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 5>what the research is, it's just a it's a dopamine hit.

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 5>It's a constant dopamine hit. It is it is asking

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 5>like a drug. Now we can talk about that from

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 5>an adult perspective, and we know how difficult that is.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 5>You talked about family, you talked about porn. These are

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 5>things for adults that they struggle with in terms of

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 5>the time on the phone. When you're bringing to the

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 5>developing we're in a whole different realm here. So we

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 5>were not forming the pathways that need to be formed

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 5>in early childhood and in adolescence, which is really why

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 5>it's so dangerous, because we're changing those neuropathways we're getting

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 5>they're having a hard time self soothing, They're having a

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 5>hard time you know. This is why we know the

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 5>mental health issues are spiking, not just the attention issues.

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 5>This is very well documented now in the in the literature.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but there's also a separation factor here. I guess

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for lack of a better word, we're seeing some students

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are you know, they're experiencing genuine anxiety and panic attacks

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>when they're separated from their phones during these bands. Is

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that a clinical concern we should take seriously or is

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that a warning for everyone else?

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it's a withdrawal issue. I think this

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 5>is exactly you know what, let's go back to something simple.

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, we get to the pacifier because it helps

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 5>them sue themselves and when it's time, when the parents go, okay,

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 5>it's time to now wean off of that. There's some

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 5>peers that when we have to say goodbye to something

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 5>that was helping us south just because it helps us

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 5>suit doesn't mean it's good for us. This is not

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 5>how we want we want kids to regulate is through

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 5>a device and through having to have constant you know,

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 5>attention coming at us, so that our constant stimulus. So

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 5>we're we're not thinking, feeling, or even operating in the

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 5>present and that's the danger zone. So this is where

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 5>but we've got to fill that gap so that they're

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 5>not as anxious again, this is where the socialization is

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 5>the answer. It's not just take it away, it's the

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.439
<v Speaker 5>only way to stop the behavior to start a new one.

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 5>So you take the phones away, now you have to

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 5>replace it with more socialization, more skill building around listening.

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Which is why again teachers have been telling kids to

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 5>listen in the classrooms for you know, decades, and this

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 5>is a constant battle because it's hard to pay attention

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 5>for eight hours a day, especially if you don't have

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 5>the skill. If I said, you go run a marathon

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 5>that you know how to run, but get into the

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 5>get to the end of the race. Got you gotta train,

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 5>you gotta build the muscle. And so this is our

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 5>opportunity is to finally solve this problemhich is what I'm

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.879
<v Speaker 5>committed to doing, is to is to provide education from

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 5>elementary classrooms to corporations. Because it doesn't matter what age

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 5>you are, you only you know, a very small percentage,

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 5>less than two percent have any formal listening training.

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she is Christine Miles. She's a psychologist of what

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's cost to you not to listen to the founder

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of the listening path or talking about school cell phone

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And then we have that in Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana to

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a large degree. But the question nobody's asking that I'm

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing in this morning is their studies are coming out

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're showing that teachers still spend a quarter or

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 1>more of their workday, of their instruction day, just trying

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to get kids to listen. Then that was before and

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>now after cell phone band, so our cell phone is

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>really the problem. They really wreck kids lives. I've also

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>seen studies that pointed out early it said that that,

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the extreme is if you spend all your

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>time on the phone, it's really really bad for you.

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's horrible for your development, all these things

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. That's absolutely true. But kids who do

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't on social or don't have phones, who don't use

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>them aren't allowed to tend to also suffer some of

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>those same symptoms. May not the extreme we're talking about

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with overusage, but under usage. There's a sweet spot right

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. And when I hear that, I go, Okay.

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Kids if they're exposed a little social media and able

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to congregate online with friends, because that's how kids socialize today.

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid where we'd socialized at the mall

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>or the arcade, and kids today do it digitally. So

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to lean into that. Is this just a

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>lesson that we are woefully behind how we educate kids

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in America still today, because we're teaching them like we

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>did a couple hundred years ago. There's a you know,

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's instead of a blackboard, it's a whiteboard or

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a smartboard, but you're still it's rote memorization. It's all

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>these things we've taught kids largely the same way. If

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>phones and social media, Christine, are changing kids' brains, shouldn't

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.959
<v Speaker 1>we be adopting the school curricula to meet the way

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>kids learn now as opposed to how they did a

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 1>couple hundred years ago.

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're this is such a good point. I mean,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 5>we we know that just what we know about the

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 5>neurodivergency and the way kids learn that. Look, we're you know,

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 5>you and I could go back and say, well, you know,

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 5>if somebody was dyslexic or had genuinely had a d

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 5>D or things like that, this wasn't necessarily talked about

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 5>or diagnosed to the same degree. We once could argue that,

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, not everybody has a d D that, but

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 5>it is real. It is a real thing. So we

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 5>just know that teachers have a lot of divergent learning

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 5>needs and so it's really about meeting kids where they are,

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 5>which is part of why the listening is hard too,

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 5>because kids needs are different, which is why this is

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.479
<v Speaker 5>a this you're The point you're making is I think

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 5>and I which is where my heart and soul is

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 5>is this is a systemic problem. We're not going to

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 5>fix this with one thing. Again, we know that that

0:44:55.880 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 5>phone that what we're trying to prevent is is keeping

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 5>them off of engaging with each other, engaging with the future,

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 5>and engaging with the with the core curriculum. Like you said,

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.760
<v Speaker 5>take the TV out of the classroom, that's just common sense.

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 5>Right then we have the issue of what we do

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 5>at home and how we limit time. We know that

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 5>past the screen time, the scrolling, the doom scrolling, that's

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 5>not super productive and that can get that's very addictive. Well,

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, then there's some socialization. How can you mitigate

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 5>that with socialization? And then you get to the but

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 5>you take all that and you cure all that, you

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 5>still have this learning problem and you still have this

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 5>listening problem. To systemic communication problem. We focus on speaking, telling, knowing,

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 5>and test scores versus how we're learning, and that's what AI,

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 5>in my opinion, is going to come in and change

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 5>is that. You know, we had the calculator. Now we

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 5>have something that can do the formulators but have formulas.

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 5>But how can you explain it, How can you make

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.440
<v Speaker 5>sense out of it? How can you show up as

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 5>a person that knows how to collaborate? And these are

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 5>all the skills that are at the core of what's

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 5>going to make somebody successful in the future. Starting we

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 5>got to start teaching that at a very early age,

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 5>as early as first grade, so that they're ready. And

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 5>this is where we have to fit this systemically, so

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 5>that we're teaching the skills so everybody is a common

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 5>language is how so they can understand.

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's another factor here in my mind that this

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>whole thing and I get it. There's a lot of

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about phones descrying attention spans, and the argument is

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 1>whether the phone is the cause or just the most

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 1>convenient delivery system for a culture that's already dopamine driven

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and overstimulate. I mean, you know, parents are were upset

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 1>with the cell phone bands because they want to be

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>able to get a hold of their kid instantly at

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>any time during an emergency. But as an excuse to go.

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I can text you during class because parents are also

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>anxious all the time as well, and it trickles down

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that we're all anxious and all the time. But I

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:54.479
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting, is that. So the way to beat

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing is to simply use AI and use

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the algorithms for good as opposed to evil, if you

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>want to call social media evil, and that is educators

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and the system should be creating platforms much like TikTok

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and snapchat in insta that feed that feeds a student

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a steady diet of what they're interested in to learn,

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that continues to push stuff towards them and challenge them

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and learn what their likes and dislikes are and try

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 1>and strengthen those dislikes and make everything better. Use use

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the technology for good instead of social media. But the

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>problem with that is now you're going to replace all

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of these teachers and all these administrators in schools with

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.760
<v Speaker 1>something that's digital. That means now that threatens the teachers' unions,

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>That threatens the administrators and the whole construct of schools

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in general. Because guess what if I can do this

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with my phone much like we've seen, you know, broadcast, TV,

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>go away radio, everything else, newspapers for example, because of

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the digital age that now threatens the livelihood of the

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>education class and we can't have that in America. And

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so what winds up happening is it's disconnect between the

0:47:58.040 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 1>kids in the classroom.

0:47:58.880 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Am I wrong?

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 5>Well, here's what I think. I so, you know, I

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 5>yes again the world. It's just like we could be

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:08.720
<v Speaker 5>saying the same thing about corporate America.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 2>The road.

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 5>The road things can be replaced, well, can't be replaced

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:16.280
<v Speaker 5>by the human skills. And that's one of the things

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 5>that I think teachers are getting away from, and not

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 5>by the doing because there's so much pressure to teach

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 5>to these core ideas and curriculum and the standards, is

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:32.359
<v Speaker 5>that they're getting away from the human part of the job,

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 5>which is really how we develop kids, how we nurture kids.

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 5>And so this is going to be the heart of

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 5>what happens in the school and what teachers love to

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 5>do and why most teachers get into the work. So

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 5>I think it's not that they'll be replaced as to

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 5>what the emphasis.

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that needs to change.

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 5>And that's the same thing that I see on the

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 5>corporate side, that if you want to. You have to

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 5>drive that value as a what in your job because

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:01.760
<v Speaker 5>some of the redundancies can be and so the answer

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.880
<v Speaker 5>isn't more time on screens. The answer is more connection

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 5>in terms of how we raise the kids and how

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 5>we teach them, and how we help them connect through

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 5>language and through interaction, so that everything they learn in

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:19.839
<v Speaker 5>this kind of this fast paced digital world and what's

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 5>coming at them, then they can manage their emotions. They

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 5>can manage the emotions of others, they can develop empathy.

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 5>They have the things that the AI and the machines

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 5>don't have. And that's the risk is that we're tipping

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 5>over into too much of the screen time.

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>She is Christine Miles, psychologist. Her book is What Is

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Costing You Not to Listen? Founder of the Listening Path.

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Christine Miles thanks at the time.

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it, appreciate the conversation.

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 5>It's really really helpful.

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I just made a case here teachers can

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>be replaced. This is believe me, this is like, this

0:49:54.320 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous territory. If you could come up with an algorithm,

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's easy to do because we've seen this replicated

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:05.720
<v Speaker 1>time and time again, that would teach kids on their level,

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:08.360
<v Speaker 1>meaning it feeds them a steady diet. The algorithm feeds

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 1>them a steady die of things they're interested in and

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>expands their knowledge base in learning and kind of sort

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of tricks them into learning where it becomes fun and

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>engaging on a personal level, just like social media is.

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>And now they're hooked on this, and you put that

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in the classroom and ban the phone and give them

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a device that is the alternate to social media and

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff coming at you. And that's how kids

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>learn today. They learn on social media, they learn through

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>digital interaction. If you do that in the classroom, kids

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>now become smarter, more engaged, more learned. But what happens

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to the educational system the computer replaces the teacher. We

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>can't have that in America, can we? Because of what's

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>at stake? There's also the is she mentioned important too?

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:57.839
<v Speaker 1>The social interaction thing? But is this like the it's

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like clickbait right? This is what the educational system doesn't

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>want you to know. This one weird old trick for

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>saving us a lot of money and getting a better student.

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts after news here Scotsland continues on seven hundred WLW

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Good cute. Get the party start, let's go, let's go

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sloany here seven hundred WLW on this Tuesday morning, and

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful one at that with the sunshining right now,

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>temperature's going up there. We've cost the forty degree threshold.

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Come home, baby, Let's get some melton, Go on? What

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>do you say? What do you say? Just spent like

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a first half of the show. We talked about social

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 1>media addiction, Christine Miles, school psychologists and cell phone bands

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and the like, and yeah, I'll tell you what you know.

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of sobering.

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 1>We could make great progress when it comes to educating

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>kids if we just did it on their level. And

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in the digital age, they learn digitally now as opposed

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 1>to face to face, and so if that's the if

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that's how you get kids and that's where they are,

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>then you have to meet them on their level, and

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that would involve more AI, more digital algorithms to teach

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 1>them what they don't know and kind of make it

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:11.919
<v Speaker 1>appealing to them in a way, because the old ways

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of teaching just don't simply how it makes the work.

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's face it, there's better ways to do it.

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>But as a threat to that precious ecosystem and all

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that fat cache that goes to our school systems from

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 1>our property taxes, And that's what's in danger here. You know,

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a disruptor, but how disruptive do

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to get? You know, the fear is a

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of jobs are being replaced by AI. As I speak.

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The City of Cincinnati is coming up with a policy

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that would regulate data centers in Hamlin County, specifically in Cincinnati. Obviously,

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>also that's an issue for the commissioners too. Do we

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>want data centers in Cincinnati? Look what's happening in Kentucky

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Butler County up near Columbus and around the area, And

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 1>that's a concern. Big, huge, multi acre plants that suck

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of resources, natural resources, water and of

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 1>course electricity and the grid can't handle anymore. Do we

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:10.280
<v Speaker 1>want that in the city of Cincinnati itself? They're debating

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it as we speak, what that policy would look like.

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And so we are all guilty in some way, shape

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>or formed this whole thing. If your job and my

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>job is endangering to be replaced by AI. Would teachers?

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Would education? Which educators be any less in danger? Should

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>they be protected like I don't know, you know here

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:33.799
<v Speaker 1>at seven hundred w W and iHeart we have the

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed human. I'm sure you've heard the we're guaranteed human,

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>yeah for now. When you hear they're like, okay, well

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 1>we're guaranteed human today tomorrow they're it's gonna be hard

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 1>to compete with AI. Let's face it, for spoken order,

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>music or video. Hollywood's in danger being upended by AI.

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's job is in question right now. Nless, of course

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in the trades, and you know, as long as

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I can do plumbing and electrical and carpentry and stuff

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, I got a gig for now for now.

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So should we protect the status quo in schools? And

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we talk about homeschooling, which is

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think somewhat.

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Of a threat.

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the education, but of course privateized schools, private

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 1>schools is a threat. I think the next big threat's

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be AI, because we're going to teach kids on

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 1>their level, and I think you're gonna have smarter kids. Granted,

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:29.799
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a lot to be desired when

0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to interpersonal communication and talking with a living,

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:35.280
<v Speaker 1>breathing human being. You're still going to need that skill,

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to be maybe the big

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 1>challenges whole thing.

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:39.800
<v Speaker 2>But man, I don't know.

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking over my shoulder going, why don't we just

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>have a platform like you would with social media, be

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a TikTok or Instagram and using the same type of

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>algorithms teach kids on their level. And he said, hey,

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and look at that. You don't even have to go

0:54:55.239 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>into class, right, you could be at home doing this stuff.

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Frightening. We want change, but that much change.

0:55:00.960 --> 0:55:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, We've got that going on today, on this on

0:55:03.880 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful Tuesday morning, Big Dave points out to me,

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>my producer, that Ohio is ranked twenty first in the

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 1>nation for alien abductions. You know, whether it's like business

0:55:17.760 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 1>or education, cost of living, we always middle of the pack.

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>We are mid ass Ohio, that's what we are, always

0:55:25.680 --> 0:55:27.840
<v Speaker 1>right right near twenty five, well right in the mid

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes as high as twenty, sometimes as low as forty.

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But generally speaking with some outliers, we're right. How are you?

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:40.280
<v Speaker 1>We're very mid mid Ohio was legit, we're mid twenty

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:44.279
<v Speaker 1>first of the nation for alien abductions. What you have

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>a ready for the percentages. Now, according to this is

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a British website, so I'm sorry, British gaming site, So

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the credibility is here, but if

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>believe in the markets, Ohios have a one point one

0:55:56.719 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 1>three percent chance of being abducted by aliens. So you're

0:56:00.760 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 1>saying there's a chance we have and this has surprising me.

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Over four thousand abductions since twenty nineteen. Reports of abduction

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:13.680
<v Speaker 1>since twenty nineteen. Don't know how many of those reports

0:56:13.719 --> 0:56:16.920
<v Speaker 1>dealt with hallucinogens or alcohol, drugs, whatever it might be,

0:56:17.000 --> 0:56:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but four thousand and if you're wondering if you want

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to increase your chances of being abducted by an alien,

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for something to do, Maine in Idaho

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are your top two states for abductions, which is surprising

0:56:33.080 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 1>because you think it would be Nevada, you know, Area

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and all this stuff, maybe Arizona, but nope,

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Maine in Idaho and Maine and Ahiho. There's nothing

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 1>better to do than to get abducted by aliens. Maybe

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you're so busy in Ohio, Kentucky, Anyon elsewhere, we just

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, abducted we don't pay attention to it, but

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:54.640
<v Speaker 1>there's still a little going on in Idaho and Maine

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that I mean, some people probably look forward to. It's

0:56:57.520 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like hitting the lottery. It's like getting a number in Kino.

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the percentage is only two percent,

0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:05.359
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we are kind of splitting hairs here.

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So good to no, there you go middle of the pack.

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Even aliens are like, Ohio, that's all right, Midway, Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we're fine. We need a body book there. But largely

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Maine in Idaho look looking for trouble out there. This

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is the United States of drama. I was looking forward

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to talking about that. I didn't think, honestly, if you

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 1>asked me, hey, what are you gonna be talking about

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, I didn't think we would still be talking

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about this about America, the Snowflake. It is incredible to

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 1>watch how we could be this upset over a ten

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>minute free concert. Literally tens of millions of people fighting

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>over a halftime show, and the biggest winners NBC and

0:57:47.720 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, because you know, the super Bowl itself kind

0:57:51.040 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of boring. I mean, there was some action, but it

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was a defensive battle. No touchdowns, to the second half.

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The ads were a couple ads. I like the Dunkin

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Donuts one because it's nostalgic and I'm old and that's

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what we like. Anytime you can get George Costanza and

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Ted Danson in there.

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Good.

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought the William Shatner won will shat Fantastic made

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 1>me laugh out loud, a little snort going on there.

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Like Sarah Le's the heart is certainly Budweiser. They always

0:58:19.640 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hit out of the part with a bird that became

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 1>an eagle, and a couple other ones as well, but

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>buying Large's like, yeah, it's kind of kind of the

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Ohio super Bowl NBC NFL they win because I think

0:58:32.080 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of all the controversies surrounding the halftime show. So here

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we are in day two and one of the stories

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 1>still trending is bad Bunny. We got about twenty percent

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of the country outraged about an all Spanish show by

0:58:44.840 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a Puerto Rican man against ice raids, and then another

0:58:47.480 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent thinks this show was somehow transformative and historic

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and progressive awakening, and it's bringing tears in my eyes

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and just thinking how far he's come, And like, I

0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think both sides. I think it's a gross exaggeration. And

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this is back to phones and social media. But we

0:59:05.280 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 1>all have to have a hot take, and we got

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to be pissed off about everything at all times, and

0:59:08.400 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>everything is a microaggression, and we take our accues from leadership.

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump is great at being aggravated by seemingly the pettiest things,

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and we have to look for validation of our beliefs

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything. So you're supposed to act now today that

0:59:21.880 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>everything is upsetting and polarizing, and it just it's perfectly

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>normal to go, eh, not for me.

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 4>It's not for me.

0:59:33.200 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not a validation, nor is it an indictment. It's

0:59:37.200 --> 0:59:40.720
<v Speaker 1>just targeting a different audience. You can say what you

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 1>want to be. The NFL and the spectacular crack to

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is going to regret this whole thing as

0:59:45.200 --> 0:59:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we all have sleepless executives and finger pointing and speed

0:59:48.080 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like the it's like when they you know, when they

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>went woke with bud light. No, it's not like anything

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. Simply in this case is because the NFL

0:59:55.720 --> 0:59:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is almost too big to lose at this point. And

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the numbers from the halftimes, they

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>got what they wanted free publicity, well maybe not free,

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:06.919
<v Speaker 1>but publicity and eyeballs to the tune of a hunder

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty five million people. And so yeah, mission accomplished. And

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>if they're looking to expand the market to Latin America

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>as they did Europe, then this is how you do that.

1:00:18.160 --> 1:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a math game to them and nothing else. It's

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>not about patriotism and taking signs. They love that stuff

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>because it means more people are going to watch over

1:00:25.760 --> 1:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the controversy or the support, as the case may be

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for those on the left. But you know, and here's

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing, I try to be consistent. So I'm trying

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to figure out the inconsistencies here and it's pretty easy.

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So initially the backlash of bad Bunny was and I

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>get it. You know, he's anti Ice, and you know,

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to those people that think that I should be completely

1:00:44.880 --> 1:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>shut down, it's like, well, yeah, that's great until the

1:00:47.320 --> 1:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>person that they take into costody as someone who's accused of,

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, abducting Savannah Guthrie, not saying that that's

1:00:54.040 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>someone who.

1:00:54.440 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Shouldn't be here.

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, but you know what I'm saying, it's like,

1:00:57.240 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you're just assuming that those people are innocent and they're not.

1:01:00.160 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>They may be here legally, which in itself technically is

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a crime, but not to the level of what we're

1:01:05.120 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>witnessing in streets. But if you're trying to get people

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>out there who are here illegally and also committing serious crimes,

1:01:10.760 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you want that you're standing up and fighting for a criminal.

1:01:13.840 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make a lot of sense. In my book,

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it'd be nice to know which one you know. Is

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this a guy we're just picking up because he's out

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there and is here illegally, or is he here illegally and

1:01:22.640 --> 1:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>also committing some serious felonies, because that to me and

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's a distinction there. But the consistency here is

1:01:31.480 --> 1:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what makes me laugh. We're angered that No,

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not angered. I got it. It was in Spanish. I

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>used to know a little more Spanish than you today.

1:01:41.280 --> 1:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't use it that often. I'm really good when

1:01:43.320 --> 1:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm drunk by it. Give me some tequila and I'm

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>spitting Spanish like I'm Pablo Escobar.

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable.

1:01:51.040 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>That the lyrics are in Spanish, and therefore some I like,

1:01:54.640 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but I'm not just this

1:01:57.880 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of my not super powers. For share can

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>understand lyrics of a lot of songs, especially newer songs,

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and that and that's an English because there's a lot

1:02:06.400 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of slang. And as you get older, it's like, I'm

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>not sure what the vernacular is and what this is

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>supposed to mean. And I don't you know thet the

1:02:12.800 --> 1:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>battles between Kendrick and Drake. I'm like, I'm not quite

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sure this whole thing. And you know, we've been also

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>been whether it's an English or not, we've been getting wrong.

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We've been screwing up lyrics or generations. I think about it,

1:02:23.720 --> 1:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>how many songs we sang out loud in our car

1:02:27.120 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or in the shower or whatever, Like you hear what

1:02:28.880 --> 1:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the lyrics are, They're like, wait, that's what he's saying.

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>You mean it's revved up like a deuce, not revved

1:02:35.280 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>up like a douche. When my wife is young, and

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that song was fairly popular verse Springsteen, Manford, man et cetera.

1:02:43.720 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day. That song time, and she sung

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>along with it. Her mom forbid her from listening to

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that song because mom was convinced it was rebbed up

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like a douche, which makes no sense. It's a deuce,

1:02:54.560 --> 1:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's about a car. It's nonetheless, that's where things do.

1:02:57.680 --> 1:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We always screw up lyrics, so I don't know way

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to speak, and I don't also point out too, like

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the most successful genres of music right now

1:03:04.200 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in America is K pop. Korean pop very popular Spanish.

1:03:08.160 --> 1:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>If you look at, for example, in my business and radio,

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the top formats across the country is Spanish.

1:03:15.880 --> 1:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not outraged about that. It's you know, you're

1:03:17.880 --> 1:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to sell materials and good services and a like

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>too to those folks. Yeah, because guess what. Edy doesn't

1:03:25.080 --> 1:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just affect old white people like me and you listening

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to this radio station. I'm sure there's plenty of Spanish

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>speakers out there who need those ed supplements. Nonetheless, I

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>will also say the outrage machine then turned to the

1:03:36.360 --> 1:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive lyrics somehow and pearl clutching over impressionable kids who

1:03:39.480 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>don't speak Spanish.

1:03:40.360 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>So no one understands this.

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But then at the same time, once you get the

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lyrics decoded, once you get the lyrics decoded, then we

1:03:48.000 --> 1:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have to be offended. Well, if you don't speak Spanish,

1:03:50.480 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to really worry about that, do you,

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And now you look predictable. Ah, my side says, okay,

1:03:57.920 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll play that game for a second. I think this

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is just the offensive lyrics over bad Bunny. All right,

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>there's some offensive lyrics and they're sure. Meanwhile, the alternative,

1:04:07.920 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the wholesome American alternative. This was kid Rock. Now I

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>always heard to see kid before he really blew up,

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and I thought he was, man, this guy's gonna go play.

1:04:15.360 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>He's awesome. And I've seen him I don't know four

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or five six times, and you're going, oh, it's it's

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>really the lyrics are you know, kids are impressiable and

1:04:23.760 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>they're young, and they're seeing and they're seeing these women

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:28.439
<v Speaker 1>shake their asses like, hey, guess what you can see

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>far worse in a store on your phone or in

1:04:32.200 --> 1:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>person then you know some Latina, big bone latina women

1:04:37.200 --> 1:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>shaking i ass on TV is like it really wasn't that.

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But the funny part about the whole alternative thing on

1:04:44.400 --> 1:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>attorning point was kid Rock is performing who boy like

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Kid Rock has a giant middle finger on the tall

1:04:50.840 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of its private jet and when kid Rock broke and

1:04:55.040 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this would have been late nineties. I remember the outrage

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>from the same conservatives about the you know, the great

1:05:00.480 --> 1:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>society's falling apart because of hip hop music and the like.

1:05:03.080 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And here's this guy out there, and he's in and

1:05:07.360 --> 1:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he opens, He opens with a song and and bob

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>with the ba is. I want to read the lyrics

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>for you that he sang. And the same people are

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>offended by bad Bunny. We're not offended by the midnight

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>glances and the topless dancers, the gender freaks, the g's

1:05:23.400 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and the forties and the chicks with beepers, and there

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are the lights of Southern comfort. It don't it don't

1:05:27.280 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>even matter that their veins are punctured. And he talks

1:05:30.240 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>about topless dancers and say it, talks about his heroes

1:05:34.760 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and the methadone clinic and the crackheads and the critics

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and the cynics and the crooked cops and the cluttered desks,

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>all you bastards at the I R s and the

1:05:42.040 --> 1:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>half pints of love and the fifthest dress for the hooker.

1:05:44.440 --> 1:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to sing the song, but you know

1:05:47.040 --> 1:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>he's celebrating his homies in the county at cell Block six,

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't know. I will look at that,

1:05:54.760 --> 1:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>go okay, if a kid here's that and has to

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you, you know what meth is or what a

1:05:59.840 --> 1:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>chick with beepers to show you how old a song is,

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know. It's like I can't equate, Like

1:06:05.240 --> 1:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>why bad Bunnies more offensive than that? I don't think

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>either one is offensive. It just it's music. It's always

1:06:09.880 --> 1:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>been that way, and it's the snowflaking of America and

1:06:14.920 --> 1:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this time conservative of snowflakes that are worked up about this. Meanwhile,

1:06:17.880 --> 1:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a long ago for progressives that are having

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that smug look on their face. I'd say, weren't y'all upset?

1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Like a couple of years ago when when Baby It's

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Cold Outside was outrageous, you know, the old classic standard,

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>baby It's cold Outside, where the guys try to talk

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>her into staying because it's cold outside, and basically he

1:06:34.680 --> 1:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>went wants sex and she's like, oh, I don't know.

1:06:39.560 --> 1:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like what did you put in this drink? And

1:06:41.560 --> 1:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>now it's the me too movement came involved and it

1:06:43.880 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was like we are all rolling our eyes, going are

1:06:45.560 --> 1:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you kidding me?

1:06:46.200 --> 1:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

1:06:47.520 --> 1:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Because at the same time, that everyone and any way

1:06:50.360 --> 1:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on the left was upset about baby It's Cold Outside,

1:06:53.240 --> 1:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>which is stupid the number one and the number one

1:06:56.160 --> 1:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>song in the United States when that song was always

1:06:58.040 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it was Cardi B's wap what letter a P word?

1:07:09.760 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Female body?

1:07:10.600 --> 1:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Well go look at that, Like, why are we upset

1:07:14.120 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about the number one song in the country is far

1:07:15.880 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>more offensive than baby It's Cold Out? Saying that's different. Okay, Now,

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the selective outrage, it's just exhausting, right, Like now we're

1:07:22.320 --> 1:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>down to the super Bowl where the super Bowl halftime

1:07:24.840 --> 1:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>show is what everybody's pissed off about. It's it's part

1:07:29.920 --> 1:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of the outrage culture and certainly has to do with

1:07:32.360 --> 1:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've been talking about in the morning. That social media.

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:07:37.680 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got to go, hey, you know what it used

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to be like that's not for me. Look when people

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>would complain about my show, I hate your far How

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:47.479
<v Speaker 1>are you Why are you still? Like, well enough people listen.

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>If enough people don't listen, I get fired. That's how

1:07:49.320 --> 1:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>our same w any show that's streaming, I hate that show?

1:07:53.440 --> 1:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Why is that show a thing? Why are you exist?

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Why are you telling people what they should and shouldn't like,

1:07:58.600 --> 1:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>why are you so insecure that you're looking at that

1:08:02.040 --> 1:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>going well, somebody must like it. Fine, great, good for you.

1:08:05.560 --> 1:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not my thing.

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm good.

1:08:07.560 --> 1:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But instead of just being passive about being so aggressive

1:08:10.880 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and going, it needs to be canceled because I don't

1:08:13.000 --> 1:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with it. I just I don't understand that it's

1:08:16.360 --> 1:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>all about the money. At the end of the day,

1:08:17.800 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>if you understand it's about green and nothing else, that's

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:22.479
<v Speaker 1>what it is. Anyway, I got a news update in here.

1:08:22.560 --> 1:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Enough of this more to follow. It's we'll talk to

1:08:25.439 --> 1:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Andy Shaffer eleven thirty five. Keep it money related for

1:08:27.840 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the next hour. Has that because it's a good day

1:08:29.560 --> 1:08:31.519
<v Speaker 1>to think about money. Because if you got a little

1:08:31.520 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>bit on the market, it's just a little bit. You're

1:08:33.080 --> 1:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>making more. It's a good day. Seven hundred W you

1:08:38.680 --> 1:08:41.479
<v Speaker 1>got futted back on seven hundred WLW welcome to it.

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>We'll jump right in with stuff because there's stuff, you know,

1:08:45.600 --> 1:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we got stuff. Trumpet administration has decided to ease the

1:08:50.200 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fuel economy standards know it as a cafe standards for vehicles,

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so roll back. Under Biden, they required a two percent

1:08:56.240 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>annual efficiency and improvement, so two percent annually. They have

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to make better better fiel accountanies, I guess the new

1:09:03.920 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>proposal cuts us back to a half a percent, and

1:09:06.400 --> 1:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they're also rolling back the taelpipe emission standards. So the

1:09:09.320 --> 1:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>question is what does this mean overall for the car

1:09:12.040 --> 1:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>industry Because cars we've hit American consumers said we're not

1:09:16.160 --> 1:09:18.639
<v Speaker 1>paying more for cars. We have had a breaking point

1:09:18.760 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in the costing new automobiles.

1:09:20.120 --> 1:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>What does that do for us?

1:09:20.920 --> 1:09:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Brian Moody is the executive Adam Kelly Bluebook and Auto Trader.

1:09:25.600 --> 1:09:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Welcome Brian hy Ben.

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks. You're right, that does change things a little bit,

1:09:30.840 --> 1:09:33.360
<v Speaker 4>but I think it could be for the good, even

1:09:33.439 --> 1:09:35.840
<v Speaker 4>though temporarily the headlines are going to be bad.

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think in the long term it seems good.

1:09:39.439 --> 1:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have this quest to try and lower

1:09:42.280 --> 1:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>efficiency start, you know, increase efficiency and how many more

1:09:45.920 --> 1:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>miles you would drive per gallon tank, and we know

1:09:49.040 --> 1:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>there's environmental impact there, and that's all well and good,

1:09:51.600 --> 1:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>but it feels like the screws have really been put

1:09:54.760 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to the auto industry itself and saying, okay, there's a

1:09:57.240 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>reasonable bound here, but we'ren't in the point of absurdity.

1:10:01.280 --> 1:10:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Right I agree. It turns out the government is a

1:10:03.960 --> 1:10:09.000
<v Speaker 4>terrible automaker, and not just ours, but across the world.

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:12.080
<v Speaker 4>If you look in Europe, for example, it was government

1:10:12.080 --> 1:10:15.640
<v Speaker 4>that incentivized diesel to the point where that became the

1:10:15.680 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 4>dominant fuel type across Europle. It turns out that's not

1:10:18.479 --> 1:10:21.559
<v Speaker 4>good for you. So when government is in the position

1:10:21.640 --> 1:10:24.519
<v Speaker 4>of building consumer products, that's not great. And when it

1:10:24.560 --> 1:10:28.400
<v Speaker 4>comes to regulation, I don't think people understand that. They

1:10:28.479 --> 1:10:32.000
<v Speaker 4>understand that good Bettershoel economy is good on one sense,

1:10:32.040 --> 1:10:34.880
<v Speaker 4>so I think we all understand that. But what people

1:10:34.960 --> 1:10:40.680
<v Speaker 4>don't understand is that regulation which leads to needs compliance,

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:45.280
<v Speaker 4>which costs money, which adds complexity, which adds weight, takes

1:10:45.320 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 4>away certain things from consumers such as reliability, low cost,

1:10:50.640 --> 1:10:55.160
<v Speaker 4>and you know, the lightweight of the car, which could

1:10:55.200 --> 1:10:58.680
<v Speaker 4>be a safety feature. I guess, for lack of.

1:10:58.680 --> 1:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>A better word, yeah, understand those masks. But the fact

1:11:01.840 --> 1:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of the matter is we, as American consumers, have an

1:11:04.760 --> 1:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>insatiable demand for trucks and SUVs that's at odds with

1:11:09.080 --> 1:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>these outdated standards or two aggressive standards I guess under

1:11:12.760 --> 1:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the by administration.

1:11:14.920 --> 1:11:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, And here's the thing about trucks, and SUVs. You

1:11:18.960 --> 1:11:21.920
<v Speaker 4>could argue, well, are people buying those because they need

1:11:21.960 --> 1:11:24.000
<v Speaker 4>it or because it's what they want? I don't really know.

1:11:24.760 --> 1:11:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Consumer choice always benefits the consumer. But here's a great

1:11:29.000 --> 1:11:33.679
<v Speaker 4>example of how trucks can become more efficient while also

1:11:33.840 --> 1:11:37.719
<v Speaker 4>serving the consumer's need. For example, there's a Ford pickup

1:11:37.800 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 4>right now called the Ford Maverick. It's a small pickup truck.

1:11:41.040 --> 1:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Well that hasn't been around for very long, of course,

1:11:43.040 --> 1:11:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the name goes way back down to the seventies, but

1:11:46.000 --> 1:11:49.080
<v Speaker 4>the actual vehicle that we have now, the Ford Maverick

1:11:49.200 --> 1:11:52.080
<v Speaker 4>small pickup, has only been around for a few years.

1:11:52.240 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 4>When they first introduced that, they couldn't make enough of

1:11:55.360 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 4>those to keep up with demand. So that shows that

1:11:58.280 --> 1:12:02.240
<v Speaker 4>consumers want something that makes sense. It's up to automakers

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:05.200
<v Speaker 4>to meet them where they are and give them the range,

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:08.080
<v Speaker 4>the price, the value and reliability they expect.

1:12:08.240 --> 1:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought I had rare or heard that the Maverick,

1:12:10.320 --> 1:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the Ford Maverick is just basically what it's replacing, the

1:12:13.640 --> 1:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Ford Escape.

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, the Ford Escape is a small suv

1:12:19.000 --> 1:12:21.320
<v Speaker 4>and we may end up seeing hybrid or plug in

1:12:21.400 --> 1:12:24.400
<v Speaker 4>hybrid versions of that in the near future. The thing

1:12:24.439 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 4>with the Maverick that was so I guess telling is

1:12:28.120 --> 1:12:31.360
<v Speaker 4>that it doesn't have a big VA, it isn't oversized,

1:12:31.439 --> 1:12:34.120
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't cost sixty thousand dollars, it doesn't even cost

1:12:34.120 --> 1:12:38.920
<v Speaker 4>fifty thousand dollars. It's low price. It has some nice features,

1:12:39.200 --> 1:12:43.720
<v Speaker 4>but it arguably has much less capability than say a

1:12:43.960 --> 1:12:47.679
<v Speaker 4>Ford F two fifty, which is probably a special thing

1:12:48.160 --> 1:12:50.920
<v Speaker 4>that some people do need. But the Maverick is a

1:12:50.920 --> 1:12:53.080
<v Speaker 4>great example, and I bet you you'll see others when

1:12:53.120 --> 1:12:56.479
<v Speaker 4>it comes to hybrids and electric counts more right, size

1:12:56.520 --> 1:12:58.880
<v Speaker 4>solutions for what Americans want today.

1:12:59.000 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, you've seen the small pig and I

1:13:01.240 --> 1:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>guess I don't know what you categorize, but the small

1:13:03.040 --> 1:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>pickup truck Jeep has a model. It's like every manufacturer's

1:13:06.200 --> 1:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>rolling out a small pickup truck because they pickup truck.

1:13:09.760 --> 1:13:14.479
<v Speaker 4>Aesthetic, right, Like there's a Hyundai Santa Cruz. You know

1:13:14.520 --> 1:13:17.600
<v Speaker 4>what these cars all remind me of. It's almost like

1:13:17.720 --> 1:13:20.760
<v Speaker 4>everything that's everything that's new, or everything that's old is

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:24.360
<v Speaker 4>new again. These small pickups like the Hyundai Santa Cruz

1:13:24.400 --> 1:13:25.960
<v Speaker 4>and the Fort Maverick and some of the ones that

1:13:26.040 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, what they kind of remind me of as

1:13:28.160 --> 1:13:32.840
<v Speaker 4>a Chevy El Camino. It's small car base, right, not

1:13:32.960 --> 1:13:35.320
<v Speaker 4>the Jeep, but the other ones are car based, better

1:13:35.360 --> 1:13:39.160
<v Speaker 4>fuel economy, and it occasionally helps you do some utility

1:13:39.240 --> 1:13:42.160
<v Speaker 4>tasks that you might need or might not need. But

1:13:42.240 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 4>meanwhile you can drive it around every day comfortably.

1:13:45.080 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It can't belong before bring the station wagon back. You

1:13:50.320 --> 1:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna happen.

1:13:52.200 --> 1:13:54.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm hoping because here's what I've noticed, and I'm this

1:13:54.800 --> 1:13:59.479
<v Speaker 4>is only anecdotal. My own kids, who recently became driving age,

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:03.240
<v Speaker 4>have said nobody wants those big SUVs because it's too

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:05.759
<v Speaker 4>hard to judge where you are and when you're learning

1:14:05.760 --> 1:14:09.240
<v Speaker 4>how to drive. They both kids said they prefer a

1:14:09.360 --> 1:14:15.639
<v Speaker 4>small sedan or a hatchback. Well, SUVs replaced all those cars.

1:14:15.640 --> 1:14:18.519
<v Speaker 4>So what's going to happen when these younger people move

1:14:18.600 --> 1:14:21.360
<v Speaker 4>into the place where they're like, I don't want SUVs.

1:14:21.400 --> 1:14:24.479
<v Speaker 4>They don't want SUV's because why we didn't want station wagons.

1:14:24.600 --> 1:14:25.559
<v Speaker 4>That's my mom drives.

1:14:25.720 --> 1:14:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, And eventually we'll come back like trucker

1:14:29.640 --> 1:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>hats and fanny packs. He's Brian Moody. He's the executive

1:14:33.840 --> 1:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>editor of Auto Trader and Kelly Bluebook talking about Trump's

1:14:38.320 --> 1:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Trump administrations cut on cafe standards, which environmentals

1:14:41.680 --> 1:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are gnashing their teeth over. But I think it's a

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>good business simply because it's so hard for Detroit or

1:14:46.240 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>all automatic American automakers, for manner doesn't have to be

1:14:49.040 --> 1:14:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Detroit to try and keep up with that kind of stuff,

1:14:51.960 --> 1:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And it totally does not mesh with what consumers demand,

1:14:55.040 --> 1:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>which are more trucks and SUVs and even smaller pickup

1:14:58.360 --> 1:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>trucks and SUVs for that matter. Do we also have

1:15:00.760 --> 1:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk about evs. I was blown away when I

1:15:03.640 --> 1:15:07.919
<v Speaker 1>traveled this summer to Australia the number of Chinese evs

1:15:07.920 --> 1:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that are on the market as ubers there, and I

1:15:10.760 --> 1:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>thought the fit and finish looked pretty good in most cases,

1:15:13.920 --> 1:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes maybe not so much. But how much a threat

1:15:17.000 --> 1:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is that to our market here?

1:15:19.280 --> 1:15:23.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a big threat. That's how economic weapons work. I mean,

1:15:24.040 --> 1:15:27.360
<v Speaker 4>they use their advantage to drive the price down, and

1:15:27.600 --> 1:15:30.600
<v Speaker 4>they have working conditions and things in other parts of

1:15:30.600 --> 1:15:34.000
<v Speaker 4>the world we wouldn't have here. But in other parts

1:15:34.000 --> 1:15:36.479
<v Speaker 4>of the world they don't go by those same rules.

1:15:37.160 --> 1:15:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Undercut the price of what's there and introduce it to

1:15:39.680 --> 1:15:42.200
<v Speaker 4>a market and then you can drive the other people

1:15:42.240 --> 1:15:46.479
<v Speaker 4>out of business. That's called an economic weapon. The idea

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:50.320
<v Speaker 4>that people would want these cars is not surprising because

1:15:50.360 --> 1:15:52.840
<v Speaker 4>they're good, but there has to be some kind of

1:15:52.920 --> 1:15:56.160
<v Speaker 4>protection all over the world, not just in the US,

1:15:56.200 --> 1:15:58.720
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that it's living up to the standards

1:15:58.720 --> 1:16:02.280
<v Speaker 4>that we all hold amongst ourselves in terms of where

1:16:02.280 --> 1:16:04.599
<v Speaker 4>are the materials come from, how is it built, and

1:16:05.040 --> 1:16:06.120
<v Speaker 4>who's building.

1:16:05.800 --> 1:16:10.599
<v Speaker 1>It well as we relax cafe standards for internal combusting engines.

1:16:10.880 --> 1:16:12.759
<v Speaker 1>It looks like to me, and again it's a brief sample.

1:16:12.760 --> 1:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>You tell me, Brian, the global market continues to prioritize electrification.

1:16:16.680 --> 1:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of put us at a disadvantage in

1:16:18.400 --> 1:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the next I don't know, within the next ten years maybe.

1:16:22.320 --> 1:16:26.439
<v Speaker 4>But here's the thing, more realistic goals would be helpful.

1:16:27.080 --> 1:16:29.840
<v Speaker 4>No one's going No one's arguing that, you know, oh,

1:16:29.880 --> 1:16:32.120
<v Speaker 4>electric cars are going to go away. That's not true.

1:16:32.560 --> 1:16:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I think if most people, the average American, if they

1:16:36.080 --> 1:16:38.680
<v Speaker 4>were to drive an electric car, they would like it. Yep.

1:16:39.120 --> 1:16:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Now that means there's other things that have to be

1:16:42.000 --> 1:16:44.360
<v Speaker 4>solved though. What about the price, what about the durability,

1:16:44.400 --> 1:16:47.360
<v Speaker 4>what about the resale value. What about where I charge

1:16:47.360 --> 1:16:49.880
<v Speaker 4>it up? It's perfect for people to have their own home,

1:16:49.960 --> 1:16:52.479
<v Speaker 4>because that's about eighty percent of people that have electric

1:16:52.520 --> 1:16:55.519
<v Speaker 4>cars charge them up at home. What about everybody else? Right,

1:16:55.720 --> 1:16:58.640
<v Speaker 4>it's not the car that's necessarily the issue. It's a

1:16:58.640 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 4>lot of other things that go into it.

1:17:00.560 --> 1:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if I live in a metro city like Cincinnati

1:17:03.479 --> 1:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have a garage, I don't have access

1:17:06.240 --> 1:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to that. How do I charge my electric vehicle? I

1:17:08.720 --> 1:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>need a traditional internal combustion engine at least, so we

1:17:11.680 --> 1:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>solve that. But again, the market will decide that.

1:17:15.000 --> 1:17:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Right, the market should always decide these things. One thing

1:17:18.439 --> 1:17:21.559
<v Speaker 4>that's a misnomer that I've heard often with electric cars

1:17:21.680 --> 1:17:26.719
<v Speaker 4>is there's an argument that presumes that people who live

1:17:26.800 --> 1:17:32.200
<v Speaker 4>in apartments or in mixed use housing. Let's say they

1:17:32.200 --> 1:17:34.720
<v Speaker 4>don't want electric cars because they're too expensive, and the

1:17:34.760 --> 1:17:36.880
<v Speaker 4>reason they're living in an apartment is because that's what

1:17:36.920 --> 1:17:41.080
<v Speaker 4>they can afford. That's not true. There's many, many people

1:17:41.280 --> 1:17:44.800
<v Speaker 4>in many cities across the country that choose to live

1:17:44.960 --> 1:17:49.200
<v Speaker 4>in apartments, townhouses, or condos because that's what suits their

1:17:49.240 --> 1:17:52.719
<v Speaker 4>lifestyle best. Not everyone wants to mow yard on a Saturday.

1:17:53.080 --> 1:17:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Not everybody wants that. They just want come home. I

1:17:56.200 --> 1:17:58.120
<v Speaker 4>have a place to go. It's all taken care of.

1:17:58.600 --> 1:18:00.719
<v Speaker 4>And that's the thing that we need to solve next

1:18:00.760 --> 1:18:03.320
<v Speaker 4>for how do you charge those things up? Also, there's

1:18:03.439 --> 1:18:06.360
<v Speaker 4>just a mechanism of how long it takes to charge.

1:18:06.520 --> 1:18:09.479
<v Speaker 4>If you need ten gas pumps, you probably need thirty

1:18:09.560 --> 1:18:13.599
<v Speaker 4>charging stations based on the duration of time it takes

1:18:13.960 --> 1:18:16.519
<v Speaker 4>to quote fill up your tank with an electric car.

1:18:16.479 --> 1:18:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it makes sense.

1:18:17.120 --> 1:18:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you drive several hundred miles, for example,

1:18:19.880 --> 1:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you road trip it, you're going to have to plan

1:18:21.520 --> 1:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>out how long and where you stop. It's going to

1:18:23.400 --> 1:18:25.519
<v Speaker 1>take more time to get from point A to point

1:18:25.520 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>B driving a electric you can do much more on

1:18:28.920 --> 1:18:31.599
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid, which seems to also have fallen out of favors.

1:18:31.640 --> 1:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And I mean my son has a hybrid, he's had

1:18:33.880 --> 1:18:35.599
<v Speaker 1>one for years. He loves it. He's getting like ninety

1:18:35.640 --> 1:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>nine miles of the gallon and when it's not charged,

1:18:37.880 --> 1:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the internal combustion engine kicks in. It seems like a

1:18:40.880 --> 1:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>fair trade. Why did that fallow the favor.

1:18:43.760 --> 1:18:46.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, because I think a lot of it is marketing.

1:18:47.360 --> 1:18:49.400
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of it is headline grabbing. But

1:18:49.479 --> 1:18:51.439
<v Speaker 4>I think twenty twenty six will be the year of

1:18:51.479 --> 1:18:54.280
<v Speaker 4>the hybrid. I really do think that people have kind

1:18:54.280 --> 1:18:58.280
<v Speaker 4>of come to terms with the taxpayer funded incentive for

1:18:58.439 --> 1:19:04.080
<v Speaker 4>EV's is gone. The cars at current state are relatively expensive,

1:19:04.080 --> 1:19:07.559
<v Speaker 4>about fifty eight thousand dollars on average. Hybrids are much

1:19:07.600 --> 1:19:10.400
<v Speaker 4>more affordable, and you have brands like Towyta that are

1:19:10.400 --> 1:19:14.400
<v Speaker 4>moving to almost all hybrids. All of their cars either

1:19:14.720 --> 1:19:17.880
<v Speaker 4>can be had as hybrids or in some cases like

1:19:17.920 --> 1:19:22.400
<v Speaker 4>the Sienna and the Camera and the Crown, that's the

1:19:22.400 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 4>only way it comes. So we're moving to a point

1:19:25.080 --> 1:19:27.080
<v Speaker 4>when you look at Twitter like as a leader in

1:19:27.160 --> 1:19:29.760
<v Speaker 4>this area, right, they're moving to a point where it's

1:19:29.800 --> 1:19:32.040
<v Speaker 4>not a choice about getting a hybrid, it's just going

1:19:32.120 --> 1:19:36.439
<v Speaker 4>to come that way, and the way they operate is normal.

1:19:36.479 --> 1:19:39.000
<v Speaker 4>For the most part. They've changed. Listen, anybody out there

1:19:39.000 --> 1:19:40.559
<v Speaker 4>who's thought, oh, I was going to get a hybrid

1:19:40.600 --> 1:19:43.160
<v Speaker 4>fifteen years ago, but they're terrible to drive. You've got

1:19:43.160 --> 1:19:45.000
<v Speaker 4>to drive one today, they're much much better.

1:19:45.400 --> 1:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, technology improves, I mean in EVS. I drove a

1:19:48.479 --> 1:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Tesla a few years ago and it was an incredible experience.

1:19:52.040 --> 1:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're driving a computer, self driving computer for

1:19:54.439 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 1>that matter. That technology is only going to get better.

1:19:56.520 --> 1:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But I still think we I think hybrid bridge is

1:19:59.200 --> 1:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a gap for a long time. I'm to Thomas Brian

1:20:01.040 --> 1:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Moody over Kelly Bluebook and Auto Trader talking about Trump

1:20:05.120 --> 1:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>relaxing the cafe standards, which is great for manufacturers. It's

1:20:09.040 --> 1:20:11.559
<v Speaker 1>also great for consumers as well. We going to see

1:20:11.560 --> 1:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>prices level off, if not drop because of this.

1:20:15.240 --> 1:20:15.679
<v Speaker 6>We may.

1:20:15.960 --> 1:20:19.120
<v Speaker 4>But here's the thing about any kind of those predictions.

1:20:19.479 --> 1:20:24.160
<v Speaker 4>The cycle where automakers planned and developed and research vehicles

1:20:24.760 --> 1:20:27.120
<v Speaker 4>is much longer than a year or two. It's more

1:20:27.320 --> 1:20:32.000
<v Speaker 4>like six to eight years. So the few economy standards

1:20:32.000 --> 1:20:34.439
<v Speaker 4>that we have now, yeah, there's a few things they

1:20:34.479 --> 1:20:37.719
<v Speaker 4>can do in the short term, but planning, long term planning,

1:20:38.040 --> 1:20:41.880
<v Speaker 4>And this is probably a point where what President Trump

1:20:41.880 --> 1:20:45.080
<v Speaker 4>has done might be a disadvantage because the back and

1:20:45.160 --> 1:20:48.320
<v Speaker 4>forth can be hard on the automaker being able to

1:20:48.360 --> 1:20:52.200
<v Speaker 4>plan out their product portfolio long term. So it would

1:20:52.200 --> 1:20:54.800
<v Speaker 4>be better to have a middle ground and just say, hey,

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:57.439
<v Speaker 4>we all agree, let's just keep it this way for

1:20:57.479 --> 1:20:59.680
<v Speaker 4>the next twelve years. That would be better than up

1:20:59.760 --> 1:21:01.360
<v Speaker 4>and down out in the short term.

1:21:01.400 --> 1:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess get more granular here, Brian, what's the actual

1:21:04.040 --> 1:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>production cost difference between meeting the old two percent standard

1:21:07.240 --> 1:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>versus the half a percent standard per vehicle? How much

1:21:09.960 --> 1:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>does that shave off a car any idea.

1:21:12.880 --> 1:21:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how much it shaves off a car

1:21:14.760 --> 1:21:17.120
<v Speaker 4>in terms of production, but I know that it does

1:21:17.240 --> 1:21:20.360
<v Speaker 4>reduce the cost of building cars in terms of compliance.

1:21:20.800 --> 1:21:23.599
<v Speaker 4>For example, I spoke to this. This is some time ago.

1:21:23.680 --> 1:21:27.320
<v Speaker 4>I spoke to an executive at the company Renault, which

1:21:27.360 --> 1:21:30.760
<v Speaker 4>is a French company, and one of the reasons they

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:34.080
<v Speaker 4>stopped making one of their cars with a certain power

1:21:34.120 --> 1:21:38.240
<v Speaker 4>train I think it was a diesel powered subcompact. They said,

1:21:38.240 --> 1:21:41.240
<v Speaker 4>we can't make money on this car because thirty percent

1:21:41.400 --> 1:21:45.000
<v Speaker 4>of the cost is compliant. So any kind you hear

1:21:45.400 --> 1:21:50.040
<v Speaker 4>an additional piece of equipment being added or standards being changed,

1:21:50.280 --> 1:21:53.479
<v Speaker 4>there's a cost for compliance. There's a cost for testing

1:21:53.720 --> 1:21:57.880
<v Speaker 4>in addition to the actual production of the car. Let alone,

1:21:58.000 --> 1:22:01.760
<v Speaker 4>whether or not you decreased drivability or reliability.

1:22:02.200 --> 1:22:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's what we'll set that aside. That's an interesting

1:22:04.840 --> 1:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>perspective from them too. But the other element here too is, Okay,

1:22:08.120 --> 1:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the ev incentives anymore, so, you know,

1:22:10.960 --> 1:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>no more bellouts for EV and relaxed standards. What happens

1:22:14.120 --> 1:22:16.599
<v Speaker 1>with market share relative to EV's and it's not hybrids

1:22:16.680 --> 1:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but just electric vehicles over the next let's say, five

1:22:18.880 --> 1:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to eight years, I.

1:22:20.760 --> 1:22:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Think they're going to level off at a certain there's

1:22:22.920 --> 1:22:24.519
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be a point where it's going to

1:22:24.600 --> 1:22:27.799
<v Speaker 4>feel comfortable as part of the market, maybe ten percent,

1:22:27.880 --> 1:22:32.320
<v Speaker 4>let's say. However, I think that the elimination of the rebates,

1:22:32.400 --> 1:22:36.240
<v Speaker 4>the taxpayer funded incentives for electric cars, I think that's

1:22:36.280 --> 1:22:38.840
<v Speaker 4>going to be good for electric cars in the long run.

1:22:39.760 --> 1:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>What about the sun costs that all automakers have gotten

1:22:42.720 --> 1:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>into with evs, and now that we're backing off of that,

1:22:44.760 --> 1:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens with that?

1:22:47.080 --> 1:22:49.560
<v Speaker 4>That's hard. They're going to have to make some adjustments,

1:22:49.640 --> 1:22:54.280
<v Speaker 4>and we already see companies like Volvo, for example, maybe

1:22:54.320 --> 1:22:56.800
<v Speaker 4>walking it back a little bit. And rather than saying, hey,

1:22:56.800 --> 1:23:00.200
<v Speaker 4>we're going to force an ideological solution onto the consumer,

1:23:00.720 --> 1:23:04.200
<v Speaker 4>they have recently said we're going to let consumer demand

1:23:04.400 --> 1:23:07.840
<v Speaker 4>dictate what we do. So full electric by a certain

1:23:07.880 --> 1:23:11.360
<v Speaker 4>time okay, maybe, but they're not going to artificially set

1:23:11.400 --> 1:23:13.880
<v Speaker 4>those times. They're going to let like you had said before,

1:23:14.360 --> 1:23:17.240
<v Speaker 4>let the market decide. That's always going to work out

1:23:17.280 --> 1:23:20.479
<v Speaker 4>best for the company and for the consumer, because what

1:23:20.600 --> 1:23:22.439
<v Speaker 4>do we pick. We all picked the thing that we

1:23:22.600 --> 1:23:24.439
<v Speaker 4>like best that we can afford.

1:23:24.760 --> 1:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, But then, logically speaking, three years from now, let's

1:23:28.400 --> 1:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>say a Democrat gets elected. Does this all get wiped

1:23:30.840 --> 1:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>out and we start over again? And how do you

1:23:32.400 --> 1:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>plan that far ahead, if at all, If you're an

1:23:35.000 --> 1:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>auto manufacturer or tell a car.

1:23:37.120 --> 1:23:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Dealer, that's a risk. I mean, that's definitely a risk.

1:23:41.760 --> 1:23:44.240
<v Speaker 4>And some could argue that's a weak point in the system,

1:23:44.280 --> 1:23:49.720
<v Speaker 4>that it's too prone to partisan back and forth. It

1:23:49.760 --> 1:23:53.679
<v Speaker 4>would be better to have a middle ground that just said, hey,

1:23:53.840 --> 1:23:56.880
<v Speaker 4>here's a good number for a fuel economy. Let's all agree.

1:23:57.000 --> 1:24:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's have like a cross party committee that can just

1:24:01.080 --> 1:24:03.519
<v Speaker 4>agree that this is a number and not politicize it.

1:24:03.600 --> 1:24:07.559
<v Speaker 4>Because most cars today, like the average car, you can

1:24:07.600 --> 1:24:10.559
<v Speaker 4>get a car that's gackling only not a hybrid that

1:24:10.640 --> 1:24:13.080
<v Speaker 4>can get forty miles per gallon on the highway. That

1:24:13.200 --> 1:24:16.559
<v Speaker 4>was unheard of twenty years ago, right.

1:24:16.560 --> 1:24:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Because of well, how much of that is innovation and

1:24:20.240 --> 1:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>how much of that is government? In that Hey, as

1:24:22.439 --> 1:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>soon as gas prices go up, people start selling their

1:24:24.840 --> 1:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>evs and cars and get more fuel efficient things. We

1:24:27.240 --> 1:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have another oil prices. Everyone wants an EV or something

1:24:30.200 --> 1:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to get more miles to the gown. The

1:24:31.600 --> 1:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>minute it starts to go back down, we go back,

1:24:34.120 --> 1:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>whipsaw back to the other things. And that's well, again,

1:24:37.400 --> 1:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a consumer demand in the thickleness that we have there.

1:24:39.880 --> 1:24:40.920
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's.

1:24:40.840 --> 1:24:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Valid, right, But consumers don't want a twelve mile per

1:24:44.880 --> 1:24:48.639
<v Speaker 4>gallon car and the generation to go or less. That

1:24:48.920 --> 1:24:53.599
<v Speaker 4>was not an unusual thing. Today, people expect their car

1:24:53.720 --> 1:24:57.000
<v Speaker 4>to get reasonable fuel economy, add hybrid to it, and

1:24:57.080 --> 1:25:00.400
<v Speaker 4>like you said, I personally drove a plug in ibridge

1:25:00.439 --> 1:25:02.639
<v Speaker 4>for three months. This won't happen to be a Volvo.

1:25:02.760 --> 1:25:05.839
<v Speaker 4>I've got seventy five to eighty miles per gallon plugging

1:25:05.840 --> 1:25:09.240
<v Speaker 4>it in every day, so I know that's possible. And

1:25:09.400 --> 1:25:14.200
<v Speaker 4>I think what happens is the fuel economy ads convenience.

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:18.000
<v Speaker 4>You now have cars, especially hybrids, with a driving range

1:25:18.000 --> 1:25:21.839
<v Speaker 4>of five or six hundred miles. That is a lifestyle changer.

1:25:22.280 --> 1:25:24.920
<v Speaker 4>When I hear people with electric cars or who are

1:25:25.000 --> 1:25:27.400
<v Speaker 4>electric car proponents say well, on a long trip, it

1:25:27.400 --> 1:25:29.760
<v Speaker 4>only takes an extra forty five minutes to charge up.

1:25:30.240 --> 1:25:32.360
<v Speaker 4>That's true, it does only take an extra forty five

1:25:32.360 --> 1:25:34.800
<v Speaker 4>minutes to charge up. But that sounds like someone who

1:25:34.840 --> 1:25:37.080
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have toddlers.

1:25:37.760 --> 1:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, exactly, and we'll leave it at that again.

1:25:41.240 --> 1:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Moody Kelly Bluebook in the Auto Trader, he's the

1:25:43.640 --> 1:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>executive editor there. So I think this is a great thing.

1:25:48.000 --> 1:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Quite honestly, is getting a little bit more common sense

1:25:50.280 --> 1:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>back in manufacturers will thus they'll be incentive for them

1:25:53.360 --> 1:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to reduce an increased fuel efficiency in the future. It's

1:25:57.120 --> 1:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not like simply it's going to go well twelve miles

1:25:58.960 --> 1:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a gall and we won't stand for that anymore. It's

1:26:01.040 --> 1:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>all about consumer demand, not what the government wants. And

1:26:03.400 --> 1:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this one makes sense to me. Brian, all the best,

1:26:04.960 --> 1:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks for jumping on this morning.

1:26:07.040 --> 1:26:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you beautiful day.

1:26:08.240 --> 1:26:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Edd.

1:26:08.320 --> 1:26:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Speak of weatherwise, we're gonna push maybe mid fifties today.

1:26:11.640 --> 1:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>By this time next week we could see sixty the

1:26:13.640 --> 1:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>big six to oz incredible full forecast in the Way

1:26:16.240 --> 1:26:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Traffic News and when a return, we'll keep it money

1:26:19.160 --> 1:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with Andy Schaeffer from all Worth Financial on that and more.

1:26:22.040 --> 1:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Just ahead seven hundred WLW time to talk.

1:26:25.800 --> 1:26:28.639
<v Speaker 4>About money, how to make it, how to keep it,

1:26:28.880 --> 1:26:34.880
<v Speaker 4>and how to keep others off your stash.

1:26:35.160 --> 1:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>This is all Worth Advice with Andy Shaeffer. Yeah's time

1:26:38.840 --> 1:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk a well cash money. He is the cash

1:26:40.920 --> 1:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>money player. The Minister of Money is Andy Shaeffer. Joining

1:26:43.920 --> 1:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>us from all Worth Financial this morning on seven hundred

1:26:46.040 --> 1:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>WW Scott's Loan Show, Little Tuesday Morning check at a

1:26:49.520 --> 1:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>case and last week ended pretty damn well with the

1:26:51.640 --> 1:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Dow Jones closing about fifty thousand dollars for the first

1:26:54.960 --> 1:26:58.799
<v Speaker 1>time ever. Although I'm told that is the old person's index,

1:26:58.880 --> 1:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a younger people, younger investors don't give a damn about

1:27:02.000 --> 1:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the Dow.

1:27:02.760 --> 1:27:06.160
<v Speaker 6>Andy Schaeffer, Well, I'm not exactly a young person, so

1:27:06.280 --> 1:27:09.760
<v Speaker 6>I kind of care about it. And I mean it

1:27:09.800 --> 1:27:12.840
<v Speaker 6>did it hit fifty thousand on Friday, which was great.

1:27:12.920 --> 1:27:15.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, I celebrated Friday night because I remember when

1:27:15.880 --> 1:27:18.880
<v Speaker 6>I started in this business out in Denver, Colorado, back

1:27:18.880 --> 1:27:21.960
<v Speaker 6>in nineteen ninety nine, it was around nine or ten thousand.

1:27:22.160 --> 1:27:25.360
<v Speaker 6>So you know, that tells you immediately that if you

1:27:25.479 --> 1:27:28.880
<v Speaker 6>just stay the course and have some strategies in place

1:27:28.920 --> 1:27:32.280
<v Speaker 6>to navigate volatility, you know you're gonna come out on

1:27:32.320 --> 1:27:34.719
<v Speaker 6>the other side looking pretty good. And so yeah, fifty

1:27:34.760 --> 1:27:37.120
<v Speaker 6>thousand was a big deal to me. You know, usually

1:27:37.120 --> 1:27:39.840
<v Speaker 6>when you talk about the markets and how the markets

1:27:39.840 --> 1:27:41.759
<v Speaker 6>are performing, I think the S and P five hundreds

1:27:41.920 --> 1:27:43.799
<v Speaker 6>is a little bit better gauge. You have five hundred

1:27:43.800 --> 1:27:46.719
<v Speaker 6>of the largest US companies compared to the Dallas thirty.

1:27:46.760 --> 1:27:50.080
<v Speaker 6>But it was still an exciting day and I certainly

1:27:50.080 --> 1:27:52.719
<v Speaker 6>celebrated Friday night because I think that's a big deal.

1:27:52.600 --> 1:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>With well, like a ten thousand dollars bottle of wine.

1:27:55.520 --> 1:27:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, you know, we had a good time.

1:27:58.920 --> 1:28:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I saw Street. I know what happens in

1:28:01.520 --> 1:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>those limos.

1:28:03.320 --> 1:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Amount of money.

1:28:04.479 --> 1:28:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, and I think you know, a lot of people

1:28:06.120 --> 1:28:08.040
<v Speaker 6>have made a lot of money over the last three years.

1:28:08.080 --> 1:28:12.040
<v Speaker 6>If you've been invested and didn't panic during the terrorists

1:28:12.120 --> 1:28:15.439
<v Speaker 6>last April, made some adjustments to your portfolio, there's a

1:28:15.479 --> 1:28:16.960
<v Speaker 6>lot of people that have made a lot of money

1:28:17.080 --> 1:28:19.600
<v Speaker 6>over the last three years. And you know, hopefully everybody's

1:28:19.640 --> 1:28:22.640
<v Speaker 6>continuing to participate. You know, our data right now is

1:28:22.680 --> 1:28:25.519
<v Speaker 6>fairly stable, So hang in there. I think there are

1:28:25.560 --> 1:28:26.599
<v Speaker 6>still brighter days to come.

1:28:26.720 --> 1:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as Cube said, it was a good day. That's

1:28:28.960 --> 1:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>right at the same time we got fifty thousand the Dow.

1:28:32.160 --> 1:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We also saw a little bit how AI can disrupt markets.

1:28:35.920 --> 1:28:39.160
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, so AI was interesting last week. You know

1:28:39.200 --> 1:28:41.519
<v Speaker 6>that at one point there was a venture capitalist that

1:28:41.800 --> 1:28:44.559
<v Speaker 6>said that software is eating the work, eating the world.

1:28:44.560 --> 1:28:47.240
<v Speaker 6>And he said that back in twenty and eleven, and

1:28:47.240 --> 1:28:49.600
<v Speaker 6>and what he meant by that was that, you know,

1:28:49.600 --> 1:28:52.040
<v Speaker 6>when we have this new technology, it can make other

1:28:52.120 --> 1:28:55.160
<v Speaker 6>technology a little bit obsolete. And one of the things

1:28:55.200 --> 1:28:58.080
<v Speaker 6>that he said was, you know, the emerging cloud computing

1:28:58.120 --> 1:29:02.439
<v Speaker 6>capabilities and the ability to scale infrastructure with low upfront costs,

1:29:02.840 --> 1:29:06.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, can have a big impact on our general

1:29:06.160 --> 1:29:08.200
<v Speaker 6>production and the way that we do business. And so

1:29:08.880 --> 1:29:10.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, if you fast forward to today, there's some

1:29:10.800 --> 1:29:13.599
<v Speaker 6>fear that AI is kind of doing the same to software.

1:29:14.320 --> 1:29:16.160
<v Speaker 6>And some of that was evident last week when you

1:29:16.200 --> 1:29:20.040
<v Speaker 6>saw Anthropodict showcase some of the new features in It's

1:29:20.120 --> 1:29:23.000
<v Speaker 6>in its cloud agent that basically can handle a lot

1:29:23.080 --> 1:29:25.720
<v Speaker 6>of the complex workflows that you would have with your

1:29:25.760 --> 1:29:29.400
<v Speaker 6>basic CRMs. You know, we use Salesforce here at all

1:29:29.400 --> 1:29:32.160
<v Speaker 6>Worth Financial, and I do love that CRM. But what

1:29:32.200 --> 1:29:33.920
<v Speaker 6>you're starting to see is is that some of these

1:29:34.000 --> 1:29:37.479
<v Speaker 6>AI capabilities you know, can solve a lot of these

1:29:37.479 --> 1:29:40.360
<v Speaker 6>workflows a lot more efficiently than what we see with

1:29:40.479 --> 1:29:42.920
<v Speaker 6>General CRM. So there's some concern there.

1:29:42.960 --> 1:29:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1:29:43.120 --> 1:29:45.439
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that this is going to you know,

1:29:45.560 --> 1:29:48.040
<v Speaker 6>change the way that we do business overnight or make

1:29:48.200 --> 1:29:51.040
<v Speaker 6>the software obsolete, but there has to be a transition

1:29:51.280 --> 1:29:53.439
<v Speaker 6>on the end user companies to attempt to kind of

1:29:53.479 --> 1:29:56.960
<v Speaker 6>recreate some of those types of AI approaches, and so

1:29:57.120 --> 1:30:00.960
<v Speaker 6>that's something that has a lot of investors concern generally speaking,

1:30:00.960 --> 1:30:03.679
<v Speaker 6>and I think there could be over time some pressure

1:30:03.720 --> 1:30:05.519
<v Speaker 6>on that industry. But you know, it's you have to be.

1:30:05.479 --> 1:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Seen, okay, Yeah, and it's it's all changing, its intermingling

1:30:09.120 --> 1:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and those things across I guess it. So at some point,

1:30:11.240 --> 1:30:13.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe AI companies become traded on the Dow and then

1:30:13.600 --> 1:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the young people who hate the Dow will and lean

1:30:16.040 --> 1:30:17.679
<v Speaker 1>into it because they're older and that's where the money

1:30:17.720 --> 1:30:20.439
<v Speaker 1>is it's more stable. So that's right. It just trickles up.

1:30:20.479 --> 1:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>It's just I mean, you look at it throughout history.

1:30:23.320 --> 1:30:24.800
<v Speaker 6>You know, when we were in the nineteen twenties and

1:30:24.840 --> 1:30:27.599
<v Speaker 6>nineteen thirties, you know, we had mostly an industrial type

1:30:27.640 --> 1:30:30.120
<v Speaker 6>of economy, you know, general Electric used to be on

1:30:30.160 --> 1:30:31.680
<v Speaker 6>the Dow. They're not on the Dow anymore. And so

1:30:31.880 --> 1:30:33.519
<v Speaker 6>you know, when you when you look at the way

1:30:33.520 --> 1:30:36.400
<v Speaker 6>that we transition from a society where it used to

1:30:36.479 --> 1:30:40.400
<v Speaker 6>be manufacturing was the driver to how you know, our

1:30:40.560 --> 1:30:43.240
<v Speaker 6>total output as far as GDP was more important than

1:30:43.280 --> 1:30:45.479
<v Speaker 6>the services industry. Well, that is flipped on its head.

1:30:45.520 --> 1:30:48.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, now the services industry is way more important

1:30:48.280 --> 1:30:50.519
<v Speaker 6>than our manufacturing industry, and you just have to be

1:30:50.880 --> 1:30:51.719
<v Speaker 6>willing to adapt.

1:30:51.960 --> 1:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very good, that's the volatility. Where at the Dow,

1:30:54.960 --> 1:30:57.599
<v Speaker 1>things are looking good. Everything's holding steady. Right now, Let's

1:30:57.640 --> 1:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about that job market. The January jobs report laid

1:31:00.360 --> 1:31:03.519
<v Speaker 1>because of the mini meltdown that Congress had last week,

1:31:04.360 --> 1:31:06.959
<v Speaker 1>but there's plenty of labor market data to decipher.

1:31:07.000 --> 1:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Here.

1:31:07.160 --> 1:31:07.559
<v Speaker 1>What do we have?

1:31:08.080 --> 1:31:10.679
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so the January jobs report was delayed last week.

1:31:10.720 --> 1:31:13.040
<v Speaker 6>We're actually going to get those numbers tomorrow, so that

1:31:13.080 --> 1:31:16.839
<v Speaker 6>will be interesting. Yeah, we're looking at kind of lukewarm report,

1:31:16.960 --> 1:31:20.679
<v Speaker 6>maybe seventy thousand new jobs added. I think unemployment might

1:31:20.920 --> 1:31:23.840
<v Speaker 6>hold study at about four point four percent. But we

1:31:23.840 --> 1:31:26.679
<v Speaker 6>did get some some data last week, the Jolts Report,

1:31:26.720 --> 1:31:28.640
<v Speaker 6>which we like to call to take this job and

1:31:28.680 --> 1:31:32.320
<v Speaker 6>Shove it report where if you have a job and

1:31:32.360 --> 1:31:35.160
<v Speaker 6>you're actively seeking another job, and so you know, that

1:31:35.200 --> 1:31:38.880
<v Speaker 6>gives us an indication of how much availability in jobs

1:31:38.880 --> 1:31:40.760
<v Speaker 6>that are out there. And we saw that they fell

1:31:40.840 --> 1:31:43.160
<v Speaker 6>sharply and December at about six point five million, and

1:31:43.200 --> 1:31:46.439
<v Speaker 6>that was its lowest level. So it's twenty twenty. The

1:31:46.560 --> 1:31:50.120
<v Speaker 6>ratio of job openings to unemployed workers further fell below one,

1:31:50.240 --> 1:31:53.160
<v Speaker 6>So that kind of signaled a hiring demand and wage

1:31:53.160 --> 1:31:55.880
<v Speaker 6>pressure are easing a little bit. And so you know,

1:31:55.920 --> 1:31:57.840
<v Speaker 6>when we flip that towards the FED, you know, the

1:31:57.880 --> 1:31:59.719
<v Speaker 6>FED is thinking at this point, well, if we continue

1:31:59.760 --> 1:32:02.639
<v Speaker 6>to see you know, more stress in the labor market

1:32:02.720 --> 1:32:05.120
<v Speaker 6>than things starting to cool down, that might allow them

1:32:05.160 --> 1:32:07.360
<v Speaker 6>to cut rates even further. So we'll see how that goes.

1:32:07.400 --> 1:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, we saw jobless numbers go up, though.

1:32:09.920 --> 1:32:12.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, jobs claims rose from two hundred and nine thousand

1:32:12.760 --> 1:32:14.920
<v Speaker 6>to two hundred and thirty one. Some of that might

1:32:15.000 --> 1:32:19.320
<v Speaker 6>be seasonal around the MLK holiday than a sudden deterioration,

1:32:19.479 --> 1:32:21.240
<v Speaker 6>but I do think, you know, we did have this

1:32:21.360 --> 1:32:23.799
<v Speaker 6>data that came out which is the Challenger Jobs cuts,

1:32:23.920 --> 1:32:26.599
<v Speaker 6>and what that means is that a lot of these

1:32:26.680 --> 1:32:30.439
<v Speaker 6>large companies have to announce cuts before they make them.

1:32:30.439 --> 1:32:32.880
<v Speaker 6>If you have certain meat, certain criteria as far as

1:32:32.920 --> 1:32:35.800
<v Speaker 6>the size of your company and the revenue that you have,

1:32:35.920 --> 1:32:38.920
<v Speaker 6>you actually have to give a heads up, you know,

1:32:39.000 --> 1:32:42.360
<v Speaker 6>from a public standpoint, about what you're planning to do.

1:32:42.640 --> 1:32:46.200
<v Speaker 6>And so we saw those ers to over one hundred

1:32:46.200 --> 1:32:48.280
<v Speaker 6>and eight thousand in January, so that was about a

1:32:48.400 --> 1:32:51.920
<v Speaker 6>over one hundred percent increase year over year. Now a

1:32:51.960 --> 1:32:54.360
<v Speaker 6>lot of that has to do with three of the

1:32:54.400 --> 1:32:57.439
<v Speaker 6>major companies on the S and P five hundred, Ups

1:32:57.479 --> 1:33:00.559
<v Speaker 6>which is about thirty thousand, Amazon about six, and now

1:33:00.640 --> 1:33:03.360
<v Speaker 6>Chemical which is about four point five. So I think

1:33:03.400 --> 1:33:06.000
<v Speaker 6>this is a little bit more concentrated as opposed to

1:33:06.479 --> 1:33:08.920
<v Speaker 6>a more wide ranging issue when we move forward.

1:33:09.120 --> 1:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting too, Okay, So yeah, job as a go to,

1:33:13.040 --> 1:33:14.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess the thing is, I'm looking at the Dow

1:33:14.520 --> 1:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>when people always connected wrongly. So, but what's going on

1:33:17.360 --> 1:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street and mainstream at the jobs? Okay, so it's

1:33:19.120 --> 1:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to find Why is it so hard to find

1:33:20.720 --> 1:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a job?

1:33:21.960 --> 1:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you know?

1:33:22.439 --> 1:33:23.760
<v Speaker 4>What I do know?

1:33:23.960 --> 1:33:26.599
<v Speaker 6>And so what we're looking at now is there's still

1:33:26.680 --> 1:33:30.280
<v Speaker 6>uncertainty out there manufacturing, even though we got a positive

1:33:30.320 --> 1:33:33.640
<v Speaker 6>report from the Ism Services for the first time in

1:33:33.680 --> 1:33:36.200
<v Speaker 6>a year. It's still wavering a little bit. And so

1:33:37.200 --> 1:33:38.880
<v Speaker 6>a lot of times what you're looking at is from

1:33:38.880 --> 1:33:40.719
<v Speaker 6>a corporate standpoint, when you go to the c suite

1:33:40.760 --> 1:33:42.639
<v Speaker 6>and they're trying to make decisions as far as payroll

1:33:42.760 --> 1:33:45.920
<v Speaker 6>is concerned, is that they're happy with the employers that

1:33:45.960 --> 1:33:49.120
<v Speaker 6>they have. They're basically holding steady. We still don't have

1:33:49.200 --> 1:33:51.920
<v Speaker 6>full clarity on the impact of tariffs. We still don't

1:33:51.960 --> 1:33:55.920
<v Speaker 6>have deals done with China, Canada and Mexico, and so

1:33:56.479 --> 1:33:59.680
<v Speaker 6>instead of hiring more to begin to ramp up for

1:33:59.720 --> 1:34:02.599
<v Speaker 6>more production, a lot of companies are holding steady. Now

1:34:02.800 --> 1:34:06.520
<v Speaker 6>that doesn't necessarily mean that they're making cuts. But if

1:34:06.560 --> 1:34:08.400
<v Speaker 6>you have a job right now, it's like that you'll

1:34:08.920 --> 1:34:10.680
<v Speaker 6>keep a job. But if you don't, it's going to

1:34:10.720 --> 1:34:13.160
<v Speaker 6>be harder. And I did see a report from economists

1:34:13.200 --> 1:34:16.519
<v Speaker 6>not too long ago, particularly college graduates are having a

1:34:16.520 --> 1:34:19.000
<v Speaker 6>difficult time to find a job. And so you know,

1:34:19.000 --> 1:34:21.920
<v Speaker 6>when I'm explaining what's going on from a corporate standpoint,

1:34:21.960 --> 1:34:24.360
<v Speaker 6>this is more about white collar jobs and it is

1:34:24.360 --> 1:34:27.240
<v Speaker 6>about blue collar jobs. They're hard to find. What companies

1:34:27.280 --> 1:34:29.679
<v Speaker 6>are looking for, if they do hire, is usually somebody

1:34:29.680 --> 1:34:34.200
<v Speaker 6>with experience that has specific, specific talents that are able

1:34:34.240 --> 1:34:36.800
<v Speaker 6>to help them get you know, pass of certain goals

1:34:36.840 --> 1:34:39.519
<v Speaker 6>that they have as opposed to training new people out

1:34:39.520 --> 1:34:42.000
<v Speaker 6>of school. So it's really hard right now for college

1:34:42.000 --> 1:34:44.840
<v Speaker 6>graduates that are coming out now. Blue collar jobs are available,

1:34:45.280 --> 1:34:47.360
<v Speaker 6>so they're to be had, and I'm a big support

1:34:47.400 --> 1:34:50.280
<v Speaker 6>of the trades. You know, it's particularly for young people.

1:34:50.400 --> 1:34:54.080
<v Speaker 6>It's an easy and fast way to begin a career

1:34:54.080 --> 1:34:56.400
<v Speaker 6>that can be very successful in rewarding, and you can

1:34:56.400 --> 1:34:58.479
<v Speaker 6>make good money doing it. So it really just kind

1:34:58.479 --> 1:35:00.599
<v Speaker 6>of depends on the industry that you're looking at. When

1:35:00.640 --> 1:35:02.400
<v Speaker 6>people say it's hard to find a job, it just

1:35:02.439 --> 1:35:03.760
<v Speaker 6>kind of depends on the demographic.

1:35:03.880 --> 1:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I think schools are leading into it. Earlier the week

1:35:06.080 --> 1:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I had on the present, Miami University talking about that

1:35:09.120 --> 1:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>new thirty one million dollar tech center that they have

1:35:11.960 --> 1:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>up there right advanced Manufacturing. They partner you know, they

1:35:15.640 --> 1:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>partner with Butler Tech. They partner with companies to basically

1:35:19.400 --> 1:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>create a workforce. And I think University of looking at

1:35:21.920 --> 1:35:23.519
<v Speaker 1>this and going, hey, you know what, the old model,

1:35:23.520 --> 1:35:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the way we taught for your degree, that's not working

1:35:26.320 --> 1:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of areas. We got to lean into this

1:35:28.640 --> 1:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the workforce development thing, and we got to get people

1:35:31.120 --> 1:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>interested in manufacturing.

1:35:32.520 --> 1:35:32.760
<v Speaker 6>Again.

1:35:32.800 --> 1:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>It's all high tech. It's not like the factories of old.

1:35:35.040 --> 1:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>For sure, the money are really good, but it's good

1:35:37.400 --> 1:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to see the educational system, in particular Miami lean into

1:35:41.040 --> 1:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this thing.

1:35:41.720 --> 1:35:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:35:41.960 --> 1:35:45.120
<v Speaker 6>I actually heard that that was a great interview too.

1:35:45.160 --> 1:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you, I appreciate it.

1:35:46.680 --> 1:35:49.680
<v Speaker 6>You're pretty good at your job. But yeah, that was

1:35:49.760 --> 1:35:51.360
<v Speaker 6>that was awesome. And one of the things that I

1:35:51.400 --> 1:35:54.679
<v Speaker 6>took away from that was he was talking about, you know,

1:35:55.040 --> 1:35:57.280
<v Speaker 6>you can start a career there, and you can get

1:35:57.320 --> 1:36:00.439
<v Speaker 6>high school students to get involved there as well and

1:36:00.560 --> 1:36:02.200
<v Speaker 6>merge with a lot of the college students. They can

1:36:02.240 --> 1:36:05.680
<v Speaker 6>earn credits, and furthermore, it's not you know, you're there

1:36:05.720 --> 1:36:07.400
<v Speaker 6>for two years or you're there for four years, and

1:36:07.400 --> 1:36:08.880
<v Speaker 6>then you move on to your career and they never

1:36:08.880 --> 1:36:10.880
<v Speaker 6>see again. One of the things I found fascinating about

1:36:10.880 --> 1:36:13.000
<v Speaker 6>your interview was that he's like, he said that, hey,

1:36:13.000 --> 1:36:15.840
<v Speaker 6>you can keep coming back and continue to add credentials

1:36:15.840 --> 1:36:18.479
<v Speaker 6>and continue to add skills and those type of things,

1:36:18.479 --> 1:36:21.040
<v Speaker 6>and I thought that was neat. The other thing that

1:36:21.040 --> 1:36:24.120
<v Speaker 6>stood out to me was when he was explaining about

1:36:24.160 --> 1:36:27.320
<v Speaker 6>what work looks like in factories these days. And I

1:36:27.360 --> 1:36:30.400
<v Speaker 6>have a client that was an executive at Schneider Electric

1:36:30.520 --> 1:36:32.840
<v Speaker 6>down at Lexington, and I went down to visit his

1:36:32.960 --> 1:36:35.080
<v Speaker 6>factory and had a meeting with them. When you go

1:36:35.120 --> 1:36:38.120
<v Speaker 6>in some of these factories these days, they are spotless.

1:36:38.320 --> 1:36:42.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean they're run very well. They take the very

1:36:42.280 --> 1:36:46.680
<v Speaker 6>specific precautions about cleanliness and efficiency. I mean you have

1:36:46.760 --> 1:36:49.600
<v Speaker 6>to you know, mask up and put boots on, you know,

1:36:49.640 --> 1:36:53.000
<v Speaker 6>like slippers and clean Oh my gosh, it's amazing. And

1:36:53.040 --> 1:36:56.120
<v Speaker 6>the efficiency and the technology that's involved with it. It's

1:36:56.120 --> 1:36:58.080
<v Speaker 6>not like it was back in the thirties or forties,

1:36:58.080 --> 1:37:01.240
<v Speaker 6>where you have Greece and the place and you know,

1:37:01.280 --> 1:37:02.920
<v Speaker 6>and you're hammering and all that kind of we still

1:37:02.920 --> 1:37:06.240
<v Speaker 6>battle that. Yeah, it's it's completely different. So, yeah, that

1:37:06.280 --> 1:37:07.920
<v Speaker 6>interview was great. And then you know, it just goes

1:37:07.960 --> 1:37:10.679
<v Speaker 6>to show you that people are not forgetting about the trades,

1:37:10.720 --> 1:37:13.439
<v Speaker 6>particularly Miami University, and they put money into it, and

1:37:13.439 --> 1:37:16.840
<v Speaker 6>that facility up there in Butler County is amazing. So

1:37:16.960 --> 1:37:18.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm really looking forward to seeing how that all plays

1:37:18.880 --> 1:37:20.439
<v Speaker 6>out up there, because I think that's pretty exciting.

1:37:20.600 --> 1:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, taking a little paper million you made a

1:37:22.000 --> 1:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>huge investment there, and I think it's gonna it's gonna

1:37:24.040 --> 1:37:26.439
<v Speaker 1>pay dividends for the future of the workforce. So you know,

1:37:26.479 --> 1:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there are jobs out there we just got to get.

1:37:28.160 --> 1:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It's also the mind changes that we talked about too,

1:37:30.320 --> 1:37:32.599
<v Speaker 1>is you know that the people, and largely it's influenced

1:37:32.600 --> 1:37:34.639
<v Speaker 1>by mom and Dad and Graham and Grandpa, that it's

1:37:34.439 --> 1:37:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a greasy, grimy job and you know you're gonna get

1:37:37.360 --> 1:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>hurt and your disability and it's like yeah, and then

1:37:39.640 --> 1:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you walk into a place to go, wow, this is manufacturing. Yeah,

1:37:42.320 --> 1:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a lab where they would make microchips.

1:37:45.040 --> 1:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right, you know, and it's it's as safe as

1:37:47.920 --> 1:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as possibly can be. You know, the robots and the

1:37:50.720 --> 1:37:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like are doing the that that kind of dangerous work,

1:37:52.800 --> 1:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of supervise. But I'm not saying it's

1:37:55.000 --> 1:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, just watching machines run all day, not

1:37:57.040 --> 1:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>at all. It certainly involves a skill level, for sure,

1:38:00.760 --> 1:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but you know to think that somehow it's it's degrading

1:38:03.360 --> 1:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>work and you walk into go wow, so are you

1:38:05.320 --> 1:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like an engineer? It feels like it right, it's advanced podcast.

1:38:09.120 --> 1:38:11.400
<v Speaker 6>Well that's really the titles of a lot of those workers.

1:38:11.439 --> 1:38:13.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, I was I was walking around freely, and

1:38:13.880 --> 1:38:16.840
<v Speaker 6>they have some very specific skills to be able to

1:38:16.920 --> 1:38:20.519
<v Speaker 6>run these machines. And these machines are you know, hundreds

1:38:20.520 --> 1:38:23.639
<v Speaker 6>of tons, and it's just amazing to watch these workers

1:38:23.760 --> 1:38:27.040
<v Speaker 6>and the delicate balance that they play of operating these

1:38:27.080 --> 1:38:29.599
<v Speaker 6>machines and the efficiency and it's kind of a it's

1:38:29.600 --> 1:38:31.479
<v Speaker 6>a calmer environment. You know, a lot of these workers

1:38:31.520 --> 1:38:33.800
<v Speaker 6>that have their headphones on, they're interacting with each other.

1:38:34.560 --> 1:38:37.080
<v Speaker 6>You can make a good wage at these places. So

1:38:37.720 --> 1:38:40.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, I would encourage young people to consider, you know,

1:38:41.240 --> 1:38:43.639
<v Speaker 6>you work in the trades and you know, in blue

1:38:43.640 --> 1:38:47.080
<v Speaker 6>collar industries because it's not like it was fifty years ago.

1:38:47.160 --> 1:38:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

1:38:47.920 --> 1:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So anyway that's going to make and Hamilton, I'm sure

1:38:50.080 --> 1:38:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be replicated anywhere. Yeah, it's going to

1:38:52.320 --> 1:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>be really really good. So there are jobs there, it's

1:38:55.040 --> 1:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just again look finding the ones that that most people

1:38:59.040 --> 1:39:00.760
<v Speaker 1>turn their nose up at it. Why he would because

1:39:00.760 --> 1:39:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a really really good, playing to paying job. So

1:39:02.920 --> 1:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll say today snapshot, we talked about the market and

1:39:05.080 --> 1:39:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the now hitting fifty thousand AI being a disruptor. Jobs

1:39:08.280 --> 1:39:10.240
<v Speaker 1>where to find him and what's going on in the

1:39:10.360 --> 1:39:12.639
<v Speaker 1>week between now when we next talk on Tuesday.

1:39:13.120 --> 1:39:15.639
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we have some data that I have my on obviously,

1:39:15.680 --> 1:39:18.599
<v Speaker 6>the jobs report tomorrow, you know, that's that's a big one.

1:39:18.640 --> 1:39:18.800
<v Speaker 4>You know.

1:39:18.840 --> 1:39:21.559
<v Speaker 6>We're also going to get the CPI index, which is

1:39:21.880 --> 1:39:24.519
<v Speaker 6>the Consumer Price index that is a measure of inflation.

1:39:24.600 --> 1:39:27.120
<v Speaker 6>That's going to be on Friday. Thursday. We're going to

1:39:27.160 --> 1:39:29.760
<v Speaker 6>get existing home sales. I think that, you know, I

1:39:29.760 --> 1:39:34.280
<v Speaker 6>can continue to watch home sales, building permits, things like that,

1:39:34.360 --> 1:39:36.040
<v Speaker 6>and I know you're interested in that too, Scott. And

1:39:36.439 --> 1:39:39.160
<v Speaker 6>I think that as rates continue to come down, you know,

1:39:39.240 --> 1:39:41.519
<v Speaker 6>this might loosen up the housing market quite a bit.

1:39:42.240 --> 1:39:44.439
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's likely that we're going to see at

1:39:44.520 --> 1:39:47.400
<v Speaker 6>least one cut this year, probably in June maybe two.

1:39:47.479 --> 1:39:51.240
<v Speaker 6>But I think if we start to get mortgage rates

1:39:51.280 --> 1:39:54.639
<v Speaker 6>into the fives, I think that will really shake things loose,

1:39:54.720 --> 1:39:57.200
<v Speaker 6>to encourage people to start moving around a little bit.

1:39:57.320 --> 1:40:00.040
<v Speaker 6>So as the year progresses, you know, I think that

1:40:00.080 --> 1:40:02.280
<v Speaker 6>will happen. And we're going to get those numbers on Thursday,

1:40:02.320 --> 1:40:05.320
<v Speaker 6>So I'm interested in that as well. Quick question, Yeah,

1:40:05.360 --> 1:40:11.240
<v Speaker 6>where's gold today? Gold this morning is somewhere around six thousand.

1:40:11.439 --> 1:40:14.960
<v Speaker 6>Let's see, it's at five seventy seven, so it's down

1:40:15.080 --> 1:40:17.000
<v Speaker 6>quite a bit from its ties. You know when we

1:40:17.080 --> 1:40:19.680
<v Speaker 6>talked about three weeks ago and you gave me the

1:40:19.720 --> 1:40:21.720
<v Speaker 6>business because I wasn't a big fan of it, and

1:40:21.720 --> 1:40:23.680
<v Speaker 6>then all of a sudden it went down about a

1:40:23.720 --> 1:40:26.559
<v Speaker 6>thousand points. And I think gold is still high. I mean,

1:40:26.560 --> 1:40:28.680
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot of value there. And the reason that

1:40:28.720 --> 1:40:31.560
<v Speaker 6>it started to come back to reality was is, you know,

1:40:31.600 --> 1:40:34.320
<v Speaker 6>there's some you know, more technical issues that are involved

1:40:34.360 --> 1:40:36.920
<v Speaker 6>with it, with futures contracts and margin calls and things

1:40:36.960 --> 1:40:40.439
<v Speaker 6>like that. But it's a steady hedge against inflation, and

1:40:40.880 --> 1:40:44.120
<v Speaker 6>when you continue to see inflation come down, it becomes

1:40:43.720 --> 1:40:47.280
<v Speaker 6>a less attractive area to put your money. You know,

1:40:47.320 --> 1:40:49.680
<v Speaker 6>gold is fine. I don't have anything against it, but

1:40:49.720 --> 1:40:51.680
<v Speaker 6>as a long term investment, I don't think that's your

1:40:51.680 --> 1:40:52.200
<v Speaker 6>best option.

1:40:52.520 --> 1:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what about these gold medals. I'm an Olympian.

1:40:55.960 --> 1:40:57.479
<v Speaker 1>I want to unload one of these gold medals? How

1:40:57.520 --> 1:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>much checking get?

1:40:58.840 --> 1:41:00.880
<v Speaker 6>Well? I think, you know, and what I can tell

1:41:01.040 --> 1:41:04.280
<v Speaker 6>I think the golden medals are about you know, six

1:41:04.400 --> 1:41:07.400
<v Speaker 6>grams or something like that, and so you know, if

1:41:07.439 --> 1:41:07.960
<v Speaker 6>you get.

1:41:07.960 --> 1:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>What's that an American.

1:41:09.920 --> 1:41:13.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, somebody mentioned kilogram the other day. I

1:41:13.800 --> 1:41:16.320
<v Speaker 6>don't know if that's eight pounds or one hundred at

1:41:16.320 --> 1:41:19.280
<v Speaker 6>one point, but I think you know, with a you know,

1:41:19.360 --> 1:41:21.479
<v Speaker 6>six gram of gold, a mouse about a thousand bucks.

1:41:21.520 --> 1:41:24.000
<v Speaker 6>And so if you if you win a silver medal,

1:41:24.040 --> 1:41:26.720
<v Speaker 6>you're probably looking at you know, for the price of

1:41:26.760 --> 1:41:29.599
<v Speaker 6>the medal, you're probably looking at somewhere around eighty dollars.

1:41:30.240 --> 1:41:32.960
<v Speaker 6>Bronze medal, you're probably looking at something about six dollars.

1:41:32.960 --> 1:41:35.000
<v Speaker 6>But that's not why these athletes are out there. It's

1:41:35.120 --> 1:41:38.240
<v Speaker 6>they're not out there for you know, winning a medal

1:41:38.280 --> 1:41:40.679
<v Speaker 6>and turning it in at a pawn shop. They're there

1:41:40.720 --> 1:41:43.240
<v Speaker 6>for you know, the glory of their country and doing

1:41:43.240 --> 1:41:46.960
<v Speaker 6>it for their families, and you know, for competition and achievement.

1:41:47.080 --> 1:41:48.960
<v Speaker 6>And I'm a big fan of the Olympics, and I've

1:41:49.000 --> 1:41:51.160
<v Speaker 6>been keeping up with it and I can expect I'll

1:41:51.160 --> 1:41:52.320
<v Speaker 6>continue to watch throughout the weekend.

1:41:52.360 --> 1:41:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, Okay, all the semantics and

1:41:54.439 --> 1:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's a thousand bucks. A thousand bucks. It's like

1:41:56.680 --> 1:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a carping. Yeah, because I'm thinking of unloading my old

1:42:00.200 --> 1:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>medals and maybe I'll just hold on them.

1:42:01.800 --> 1:42:03.599
<v Speaker 6>I don't know. You know, I think if we gave

1:42:03.640 --> 1:42:05.519
<v Speaker 6>you six months, you might be able to make the

1:42:05.560 --> 1:42:06.160
<v Speaker 6>curling team.

1:42:07.479 --> 1:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I might multiple you know, if farting were an

1:42:10.640 --> 1:42:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Olympic sports schaeffer, I would be. I'd be the Michael Phelps. Anyway,

1:42:16.960 --> 1:42:20.439
<v Speaker 1>He's Andy Schaeffer at all Worth Financial every Tuesday morning

1:42:20.439 --> 1:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>week chopping up with your money. And it was a

1:42:22.720 --> 1:42:24.439
<v Speaker 1>good week. Let's let's make it two in a row.

1:42:24.520 --> 1:42:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Andy, all the best.

1:42:25.560 --> 1:42:27.680
<v Speaker 6>That sounds good, Scott.

1:42:26.920 --> 1:42:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Hay care man, appreciate you so much. Let me get

1:42:28.640 --> 1:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a news update in Willie is standing by afterwards here

1:42:31.120 --> 1:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Big One. As we start to cross the

1:42:34.000 --> 1:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty degree threshold today, where so we're close to it,

1:42:37.840 --> 1:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>some people are saying, like, hey, maybe forty eight forty

1:42:40.479 --> 1:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>nine catch marks is like fifty five. Hope she's right.

1:42:45.120 --> 1:42:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Meant a little of the snow out. I just hope.

1:42:47.800 --> 1:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I just hope your basement stays dry. That's all Sloany.

1:42:51.240 --> 1:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Home of the Reds Pitchers and catchers reporting yesterday there

1:42:55.200 --> 1:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>at Goodyear seven hundred WWT, Cincinnati,