WEBVTT - 1-10-26 Ken Broo

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Now your host Ken Brew on news Radio seven hundred

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>w welw come on in.

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>We don't play well we did years ago, but we

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 2>beat the rap. Welcome on in to another Saturday Afternoon extravaganza.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 3>It has been a week. It has been a week,

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 3>and so.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Much has transpired, both on the national and international stage,

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>that it's often difficult to keep up from things that

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 2>are occurring globally with the President to things that are

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>occurring right here in our country.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 3>The shootings in.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Portland and Minneapolis involving ICE agents, and all of the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>rhetoric nonsense, most of it from politicians that abound.

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 3>It's hard for me to believe that any.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Of these people that are speaking out against ICE really

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>care about the woman that was killed, whether she was

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>in the right or the wrong. They desperately want to

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>change the narrative from what is a growing scandal in Minnesota,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 2>in Minneapolis in particular, involving fraud and Somalians and a

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 2>fraud that may even extend here to the state of

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Ohio and other points in between. They want to change

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the narrative, and unfortunately, there was a shooting that helped them,

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>particularly with.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 3>The mainstream media.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, Internationally, you have Venezuela and Iran and Greenland. Back home,

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>you got Scotis Supreme Court of these United States on

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tariffs and a number of other things in between.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be.

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>A tough thing to get done in the next fifteen

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>or twenty minutes, but I'm going to try because I

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 2>have a man standing by who may be the finest

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>political mind of our time, someone who understands the inner

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>workings of all of this. You can find him on

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Real Clear Politics as a number of other places. I

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>believe we'll get into that. He's a good guest of

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>this program. And his name, obviously is kenn Spivak and Kennan,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>how aren't you on this Glory Is Saturday.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 4>I am fantastic, but I would prefer sitting the expectations

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 4>low so I might exceed them.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right, under promise and overdelivered. I got that. Welcome

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 2>to radio. I'm going to be really I guess hopscotch

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.559
<v Speaker 2>with my questions here because there's so many. I'll start Internationally. Venezuela.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>We heard again this week the President say that he's

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>not into nation building in Venezuela. But they got Maduro out.

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to reset the structure in there. They have

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 2>nobody in charge. The vice president seems to be at

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 2>least mildly corrupt because she was part of the Maduro regime.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 2>How do we go into Venezuela, do what we do

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and say we're going to be there probably for three

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>or four years, and have it not be nation building?

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Help me throw that one? Can you?

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 5>All right? Well?

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>This is something really very very different. I want to

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 4>give credit to a calling you find it real clear

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 4>David de Rosis, who wrote a terrific article about the

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 4>difference between going in on normal nation like what we

0:02:59.400 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 4>did in A.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 6>And this from afar.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Coercing the existing, as they say, management, the existing government

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 4>of the country to do what we want. Now, we

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 4>don't know if this is going to work. We know

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 4>that this is avoiding boots on the ground. We know

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 4>that it is so far, in a very short period

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 4>of time, seeming to work. But there is no way

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 4>to accomplish what we want. First, it'll stop the second

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 4>we have a change in administration, unless maybe it's to

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 4>another Republican and even then it might stop. The commitment

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 4>might not be the same. Second for this to work,

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 4>will require continuing effort by the US, contrary to world

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 4>opinion of what America should be doing. Because look, let's

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 4>face facts, getting Maduro out was in many ways a

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 4>law enforcement operation. We've done it many times before. But

0:03:55.520 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 4>what we're doing now does involve elements of imperialists. It

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 4>involves economic imperialism regarding their oil, it involves elements of

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 4>healthcare imperialism regarding the drugs. This is not.

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 6>A simple one off operation.

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 4>This is maybe a very clever, less risky building.

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So it sounds like that everybody is starting to

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>feel their way through this thing, and we'll see exactly

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>if there are outside players with all of this. I

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 2>refer to, of course, the country of China. Let's hop

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 2>scotch to around. Apparently there's great unrest there. The economy

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>is in free fall, if it hasn't already crashed, and

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Homine is saying that, okay, these protests better stop, or

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>we're going to start banging heads. Trump says, you start

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 2>banging heads, you might feel the wrath of the United States.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Aron's week.

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 2>We know that internally externally, how big of a situation

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 2>is that and how much of a commitment do you

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 2>think the United States is willing to make if that

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 2>regime falls.

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 6>Obama and before him Trump.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry Bush lost the chance to use U power

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 4>to support uprisings in around. Trump is not going to

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 4>lose that opportunity. And I do think we're going to

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 4>see some use of force special forces, perhaps Israel, in

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>support of this uprising. I think that Trump has a

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 4>commitment to see this uprising result in regime change. I

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 4>don't think you're going to see the US to see

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 4>the US, at least through special forces operations effectuating the

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 4>change in control and around.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, they may just implode on their own

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll see what happens in there. To pick

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>up the pieces. There's a lot going on internationally. I

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>want to get to Greenland. I look at Greenland. Trump

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>wants Greenland, Greenland. He said there are military reasons why.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>There's also the element of minerals that Greenland has that

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>we want in the United States. I see three options

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 2>for Trump. Let me know if you think there's a fourth.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 2>He can invade it militarily. If he does, I think

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>that could be the end of NATO. He could buy it.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like he may be trying to buy off some

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 2>people inside Greenland as we speak, or he could work

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 2>with the Danes for more military presence and these minerals.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I would suggest door number three. But I go back

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to the original question. I think we talked about maybe

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the last time you were on much of it. How

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 2>much of an immediate interest is this for Trump with

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 2>all of this other stuff going on internationally?

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 6>This is crazy.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 4>This talk of in Greenland has got to stop. And

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 4>I've said that on the show before. Talking about it

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 4>is almost as bad as doing it. It is contrary

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 4>to all core American values. I think it's important to Trump.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 4>It was important to Trump in the first administration. Now

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 4>that he had this terrific success in Venezuela, he and

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 4>are back on this. What most people don't realize is

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 4>we already have a treaty that gives the US troops

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 4>and US forces in Greenland in as many bases as

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 4>we want.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 5>We want.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 4>We already can do a lot of what it is

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 4>that we need to do in Greenland, which is to

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 4>use Greenland to.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 5>Protect the US.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 4>From China and Russian adventurousness. But we don't need to

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 4>do it by invading a country which is part of NATO.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Which is part of the European Union, which is an ally,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 4>and we need to go through door three, use a

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 4>combination of economic incentives enforcing the existing treaty. And we

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 4>need to stop this talk of attacking a NITO ally.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I understand the strategic situation that goes on there,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>but you're right, that benefits nobody. It just makes a

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>situation that could have a positive effect even more difficult

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>to achieve.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's come home.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it was seventeen Republicans joined Democrats this week

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the pass in essence the subsidies for Obamacare extend them

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>for three more years.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the vote was two thirty. I think they

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>got two hundred and thirty positive votes on that. Riya's

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>on that.

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Does that survive a filibuster in the Senate? In other words,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 2>was this a show vote inside the House and when

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>it gets to the Senate, it's not going to survive

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>a filibuster, And then in essence put us on a

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>road perhaps for another governm and shutdown.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 4>It's not going to survive a celibuster. It was a mistake.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Those Republicans should not have done what they did. A

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 4>six month extension fine, a one year extension even I

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 4>could understand that, but a three year extension for subsidies

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.479
<v Speaker 4>that were never intended to be part of the program,

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 4>that are subsidizing millionaires and billionaires, that are undermining ability

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 4>to control health care, and that go against the policy

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 4>of an administration that they're trying. It was a terrible mistake,

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 4>but it will, in hindsight, have been show votes.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what does that do for a potential shutdown?

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 7>Though?

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, because this was the big folk rum right

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 3>back in the fall.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, was so if I'm not mistaken, and place correct

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>me if I'm wrong that we run out of money

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>allegedly at the end of this month, don't we?

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 5>Right right.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 4>On, I learned that it was better to give predictions

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 4>that no one will know if they're true or false

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 4>for at.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Least a few years.

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 4>This one's last twenty seven days away.

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't think there.

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Will be another shutdown, but this vote made one more

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 4>likely because it gives cover to the Democrats that there

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 4>is by partisan support for.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 5>What they want to do. So I had the vote not.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Gone this way, I would have ruled out a shutdown

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 4>with this vote. I think it's unlikely, but it's not impossible.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 4>I do hope that there's another shutdown that Trump this

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 4>time more fully effectuates what he threatened last time, which

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 4>is to use the shutdown to downsize of.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it goes back to what I believe that

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>every Democrat in Washington is a Democrat, but not every

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Republican is a Republican in Washington. D see, and obviously

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 2>these seventeen are scared to death about re election in

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>November as opposed to what may or may not be best

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 2>for the country. That's a discussion for another day. I'm

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 2>wondering we had that shooting in Minneapolis this week, we

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>had the shooting in Portland this week, and we saw

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 2>what ensued. Where those go legally, particularly the one in Minneapolis,

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 2>is not something that we know.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 3>You and I know at this point whether the.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Officer involved, the ice officer involved, was in self defense,

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>whether it was something else. But we did see what

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 2>happened afterwards, and that were these instant, almost call to

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>arms demonstrations that take over a city. Now I think

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a there's some sort of zone that's been set

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 2>up again in Portland where I guess the mob can

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 2>rule and destroy businesses. Why doesn't the president just enforce

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the Insurrection Insurrection Act that other presidents before him did.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, JFK did it, LBJ did it, albeit a

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 2>long time ago in different circumstances in Alabama and other

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>places in the South. But my question is is he

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 2>could end a lot of the stuff that we've seen

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>in the wake of these shootings if he just said,

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 2>look enough, this is what we're doing and we're in

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>full compliance with the law. You're staging an insurrection and

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you will be arrested if you continue. Seems to me

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>he has that power and he doesn't want to do it.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Can you understand why he wouldn't want to do it?

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, first, I'm not so sure.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 4>Well, let me back up.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 6>I think that all.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Of these demonstrations and many of these elected Democrat officials

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 4>are in advocating insurrection. I believe that Ice has the

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 4>right and the duty to enforce US law. The fact

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 4>that Biden chose to let in ten or twelve or

0:12:54.360 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 4>fifteen million illegal aliens doesn't void the Trump administration's right

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 4>and duty to deport those illegal aliens, and particularly those

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 4>involved in criminal activity. And I strongly support the right

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 4>of the federal government to enforce federal law. And I

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 4>strongly disapprove of Democrats who are using this shooting or

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 4>other activities to really do nothing more than say we

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 4>want the illegal aliens to come into the US and stay,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 4>and we oppose the right of the federal government to

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 4>enforce federal law. But not all demonstrations and not all

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 4>talk are insurrection. Not everything we've seen is insurrection. Seen

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 4>demonstrators walk up to ICE during law enforcement activities and

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 4>interfere in those law enforcement activities, that is at least

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>an element of insurrection. And that may be insurrection. When

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 4>we see demonstrators not interfering in operations but merely demonstrating,

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 4>or elected officials saying stupid things, that's not insurrection. Coming

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 4>back to Trump, we're already seeing, as a practical matter,

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 4>the impact of federal troops or federal law enforcement in

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 4>localities that don't want them there. We're already seeing the

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 4>violence that's resulting from that. And I put the entire

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 4>blame for that on the demonstrators and the Democrat elected officials,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 4>and none on the Trump administration. Even if it turns

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 4>out that this ICE officer was in the gray zone

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 4>for whether he should have used lethal force, or even

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 4>if it turns out that he made a mistake, and

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it looks like he didn't make a mistake,

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 4>and I think it looks like he acted lawfully. But

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you, we need to see some more

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 4>of the process play out on that. But I do

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 4>think Trump's going to continue to be cautious about this.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 4>He's also bought decisions go against the federalization of the

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 4>National Guard, even when being deployed to protect federal facilities.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 4>On the other hand, the Ninth Circuit did allow him

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 4>to deploy the National Guard for that purpose, and he

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 4>was allowed to do it in Washington, d C. So

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 4>not all the decisions have gone against him. To end

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 4>this fairly long answer, I'm not so sure that what

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing is an insurrection from a legal point of view.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 4>But what we're seeing is certainly a political insurrection from

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 4>people who think it's okay to use violence if they

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 4>don't like federal law.

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know how these guys with ice do

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>their job. Then, particularly in Minneapolis and Portland, Chicago, some

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 2>of these other places, there's little if any cooperation with

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the local authorities there, so they're basically sitting ducks and

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 2>anybody that that what happened in Minneapolis was not going

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>to happen at some point simply was not paying attention.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know what the answer to that is,

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 2>because Trump's not going to back down. We do have

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 2>ten I think the number is greater than ten to

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>twelve million, but who knows, let's go with that number.

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>They're here for a reason, they're here for a political

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>reason more than anything else. They're votes. That's the way

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Democrats they'll eventually be votes. And so because of that,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 2>these guys with ice are just sitting out there and

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 2>they're on an island. So I don't know what the

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>answer is. Maybe you do as to what happens in

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the cities where there's no cooperation.

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, Chicago, Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle have all given orders to

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 4>police forces not to protect ice. That means ice, which

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 4>is not trained in riot situations, has to protect itself,

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 4>and that's when what happens in Minneapolis happens. That's we

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 4>saw another shoe also happened with border patrol. It's going

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 4>to happen more and more if the police don't step in.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 4>It's going to happen more and more. If Democrat officials

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 4>don't get their act together and understand that saying that

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 4>ICE is ripping apart families and that you get the

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 4>f out, none of that is helpful. ICE is enforcing

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 4>federal law, and federal law was violated when Joe Biden

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 4>let in whatever number of millions of illegal, unvetted, illegal

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 4>aliens he allowed in. He allowed in Chinese military troops,

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 4>he allowed in drug dealers, he allowed in rapists, he

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 4>allowed in people from all around the world without any vetting.

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 4>And this notion about aligning with our values. People who

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 4>come here whose goals and values are antithetical to American

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 4>values don't need to be coming here.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 5>There are probably are.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 4>A lot of immigrants who are good people who if

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 4>it come in legally, I would be delighted to have

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 4>them here. But they didn't come in legally, and we

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 4>don't know that because there was no process.

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Or vetting exactly exactly.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 4>And I do think we're going to see more of this,

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 4>and it's not good.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 3>No, it's not.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think a lot of these politicians really

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>give a rats rear end about that woman that was killed.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I really don't. I don't mean to be callous about it.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Anytime life is lost, it's a tragedy, particularly someone young

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 2>as she was. I think Tim Walls jumped on this

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and the mayor of Minneapolis jumped on this because they

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 2>desperately wanted to change the narrative which has been in

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 2>there about the fraud that goes on in that state,

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>and they use I think this woman as a pawn

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 2>just to get the conversation away from all of that.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Tim Walls certainly fray the mayor, maybe not phrase the

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 4>radical left mayor, who I think believes what he's saying.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 4>I think he is overently opposed to limits on immigration.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 4>To Trump and to Ice. Tim Maall's is a different

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 4>story in Tim Wall's clearly was using this to try

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 4>to move the narrative along. Well. One point that's important

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 4>is we don't need to wait for all these illegal

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 4>aliens to become voters for them to move the election

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 4>toward Democrats because they're counted in the census. Now Trump

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 4>positioned in executive order not to count them. That's also

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 4>moving itself through the courts. But over the last thirty

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 4>forty years, illegal aliens have counted in the census. The

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 4>census is used to allocate Congress people, and so depending

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 4>upon where these people live, they can increase the number

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 4>of Democrat representatives in the House even before they can vote.

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I know people that have been commissioned by

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the Census Bureau and they're fighting the same thing people

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that have been a guest on my show. But Kenn Spivack,

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 2>it's always great to how can you bring great perspective

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to things that seem out of control? You're at RealClearPolitics

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 2>dot com and of course on Newsmack you're a star

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>of your star of untold proportions. At this point, I'd

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>like to think maybe appearing on my show has helped

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>out along, but that would be egotistical on my part,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not about to walk down that road other

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 2>than to say, I hope you have a great weekend

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 2>and you'll answer the phone when we call again.

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 6>We will, and your show is always the high point.

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 4>I love being on it.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you all right, to stay well, Kennon Spivac, RealClearPolitics

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>dot com. It's coming up on twelve twenty seven. It's

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 2>Saturday afternoon. It's you and me seven hundred wl W

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 2>twelve forty one on this Saturday twelve forty one. Welcome

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Back seven hundred a WLW Kenbrew right till Xavier basketball

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>later on this afternoon. I'll be a three thirty Airtime

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>four o'clock tip Byron and Joe with old play as

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>someone either Xavier or you see looks for traction. In

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 2>this particular season, Miami is playing exceptionally well. Northern Kentucky

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>is doing okay, but two major universities inside the greater

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati area not so good.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll see if that particular fortune changes here later this afternoon.

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I mentioned that it was twelve forty one,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>but as you and I both know, it's five o'clock somewhere.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 2>It's one for you, it's one for me. Oh, that's

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 2>one for the ages. This is moonshine, isn't it. Well,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying it's like illego. Just hold me.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 8>I've just got time for one.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 2>More ABV seven hundred. Oh, that could be a problem.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 2>What happens in Aja.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll be gone and you can let some other pools

0:21:58.320 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 3>sit down.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we're going to get into what happens if the

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court knocks down Trump's tariffs this coming week. Apparently

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the fourteenth is the date where the Supreme Court will.

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Rule on that.

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, what happens economically, The market is just exploded, and

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>so if you're invested, it's great.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 3>If you're on Main Street and you're not, or.

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 2>If you're looking for your first house, or particularly for

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 2>the gen Z crowd, the economy isn't all that great

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and the job market over the course of the last

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 2>year has not been good. Now, a lot of that

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 2>is what you inherit and a lot of it is

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 2>what you try to do. And Trump has gone down

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 2>this tariff road and it's created a lot of uneasiness,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 2>shall we say, with the economy, we'll get into one

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 2>o'clock what happens if the tariffs get shot down? And

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 2>then why is Main Street and Wall Street so disconnected?

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Two o'clock the Vake Ramaswami has made his selection his

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 2>running mate, and it sounds like it was a bone

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 2>to the current governor of Ohio, Mike the Wine, And

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's good or bad, but we'll

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>find out. Rebecca Downs from the Daily Signal is going

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 2>to join us. She covers Ohio politics and does it

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 2>as she does better than anybody know. But We're going

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to get her opinion on all of that, and also

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 2>what Amy Actin, the presumptive Democrat nominee, what she did

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>with David Pepper this week and did that really help

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>her ticket? Amy Actin, maybe other than Mike de Wine,

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe the most divisive politician that's out there right now,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 2>largely due to the way she did what she did

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>with shutdowns and whatnot during COVID. But the dem seem

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to think that they got a chance to take that

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 2>governor's seat and that's who they're running with. So does

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Pepper help her or not? So on the show today,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a blockbusters show every single time it comes into

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 2>our city. I'm talking about the Elvis Tribute Spectacular. Oh

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>it's tonight at the Aeronov Center. Elvis tribute artists including

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Sean Clush, will be on stage. Also on stage is

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 2>a guy who has been joined at the hip with Elvis.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>You'vehamistically speaking since Elvis left the building in nineteen seventy seven.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 2>But his backup singers were the Stamps Quartet, led by J. D. Sumner,

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>who had one of the lowest, the.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Lowest, the lowest, the lowest voices in recorded history.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 5>JD.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Is no longer with us.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>He's left the earth, but the guy that's now in

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 2>charge of the Stamps core Tet Elvis's backup singers will

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 2>join us later on the program.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Ed Enoch in.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Town for the show tonight as well. Did you watch

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the game last night? Did you watch Indiana systematically pick

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 2>apart Oregon right from jump to the National Championship game

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 2>with a fifty six twenty two win over the Oregon Ducks.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>This game was even more lopsided than the final score

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:24.959
<v Speaker 2>would indicate. For Ernando Mendoza Heisman Trophy winners, seventeen of

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty one hundred and seventy seven yards five count them

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>one two, three, four, five, five touchdowns spread out over

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>one two three four different receivers, and Fernando Mendoza, with

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>his performance last night, was absolutely astounded. Now, after the game,

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 2>the head coach was corralled on the field by whoever

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>was part of that broadcast crew and was doing the

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 2>on field interviews, and she asked Kurt Signetti, the guy

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that never seems to smile. She asked him whether he was,

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, looking ahead already to that championship matchup against

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 2>the University of Miami here's coach Signetti. Listen to the question.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 6>I know you're thinking about the next game, but when

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 6>will you stop and appreciate how special and how historic

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 6>all of this has been.

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm really not thinking about the next game.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 9>I'm thinking about cracking open a beer.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 3>There you go.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 2>That's about as humorous as it gets for Indiana. But

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>they don't need humor. They've got a great football team.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 2>And if I had a make book right now, I

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 2>would ride on Indiana. All due respect to the you,

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 2>and they're playing very well. I would ride on Indiana.

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Mendoza especially, this is a guy that, let's face it,

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 2>he has gotten better as the season has progressed, so

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 2>much so that he has won the current Heisman Trophy.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Here's Mendoza after the game and just his journey this year.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I would say I have came a long way

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 10>from you know, being here in January, being Game one

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 10>came on through your pass. I was trying to be superman,

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 10>and then the coaching staff settled me down. He's like, hey,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 10>you don't got to be superman. We have a great

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 10>defense and a great superstars, you know, playmakers and alvisly

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 10>on offense, so just do your job. So my job

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 10>is to be effective with making you know, really accurate

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 10>balls and really great decisions. And that's why i pride

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 10>myself on every single play and so I'm glad those

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 10>results of game.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 3>However, none of that matters. All that matters right now

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 3>is National.

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Championship the National Championship Game, and the National Championship Game

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>is coming up on the nineteenth between the University of

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Miami and Indiana. Like I said, if I had to

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>make book on it right now, I would ride it

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>on IU. But you know, you can't get caught up

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 2>in the moment. Miami played very well the other night

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 2>against Ole, miss not as well as Indiana played last night.

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 2>So uh Duke Tobin, the de facto general manager of

0:27:55.560 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 2>your Cincinnati Bengals, held a news conference yesterday. It's fun

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to watch Twitter leading up to it. Breathless were some

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of the tweets, both from people that report on the

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Bengals and people that are just fans, like this was

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be akin to what Winston Churchill was going

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 2>to say to the Supreme Allied Command before D Day.

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>And anybody that's been around and watched how the Bengals

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 2>operate knows that This was not going to be anything

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 2>that would reveal any way that would provide a window

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 2>into the way the Bengals operate. Anybody that thought Duke

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 2>tobd was going to come out yesterday and say, you

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 2>know what, I've screwed up this thing six ways till Sunday.

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to resign, it wasn't going to happen.

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Anybody that thought Duke Tobin was going to come out

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 2>yesterday and say, the problem is Zach Taylor doesn't know

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 2>what to do it crunch time. He just doesn't know

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>what plays to call, and he's under the gun and

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>he better go five out of the shoot and qualify

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>for the playoffs in twenty twenty six wasn't going to happen.

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 2>If anybody thought he was going to say, you know

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>what the problem is here. We have enough scouts, we

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>have enough people looking at talent, and that's why sometimes

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>we make draft picks that confound even elementary school children.

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't gonna happen. Duke Tobin did say yesterday that, yes,

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the season, this past one was a disappointment.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 11>It was frustrating, it was challenging, it was disappointing for

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 11>all of us. But More importantly, it was all those

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 11>things for our fans. We feel that that weighs on us.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 11>It hurts us because we know that they have high

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 11>expectations for us. We embrace those high expectations. Believe me,

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 11>we have high expectations for this football team as well.

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you could have rolled him out there at any

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 2>point and he would have said the same thing. They're

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>going to roll him out of the combine, He's going

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to say the same thing. I think the whole thing

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>yesterday was theater and it was basically to appease the

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>fan base that it is a complete disconnect between what

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals do and what they're fans that actually support

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 2>that team monetarily and otherwise what they expect. So they

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 2>rolled the guy out. It's not like he's been around

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>for six minutes. He's basically at his hands on the

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>construction of this team since the turn of the millennium.

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I.

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Understand where he thought. It was a disappointment, and I

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>understand why the fans thought it was disappointing to hear

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 2>him say this about his scouting department and how, let's

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 2>just say, how thin it might be.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 11>Our scouting staff in my opinion is it is the

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 11>size that it is because I think the collaboration.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Is better at that size.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 11>We have never lacked for information on a player. There's

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 11>never been a player selected that we didn't know anything about.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 11>There's never been a player selected that we didn't have

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 11>multiple reports and large background on. It's not about the

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 11>volume of information we have. If we make a mistake,

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 11>it's because at the decision point we made the wrong decision.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 11>But it wasn't because we didn't have information on the player.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.719
<v Speaker 11>We have information, and we have plenty of opinion.

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 2>On the and they also have a lot of clunkers.

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just go back to twenty twenty. You take

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Berwin Higgins one two, I mean, anybody could have made

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 2>those picks. Logan Wilson in round three, a Keen Davis.

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Gathery's still in the leg, serviceable but hardly a star.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>And then of course it completely fell apart with Khalid

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Kareem and Hakeem Dientity. I mean they'd played a dentergy

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a while a tackle. He's there was nothing special about him.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Twenty oh one, twenty twenty one, Chase, anybody could have

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 2>made that pick. Jackson Carmen in round two clunker. After

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 2>you get past Joseph Asai and Cam Sample. Pretty good guys,

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty good players. Carmen Osai's going to make a boatload

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 2>of money this offseason. Tyler Shelvin Huh, Dante Smith. What

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>they did get McPherson. They also got Wyatt Huber and

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Chris Evans. I mean, I could go on and on

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 2>in these lists. You're you're you're going to look at

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the body of a draft and what you got out

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of it and then see if you exceeded what the

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 2>norm is for the NFL. There's only about thirty to

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>forty percent of NFL draft picks ever make an active

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 2>roster forty percent of your picks, you get that you're

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 2>about at league average, But how many actually become a

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>major contributor. There was a study that was out that

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 2>found about thirty two percent of drafted players become major contributors.

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Now that would be like three and a half seasons,

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a certain number of snaps. I'm not defending Duke Tobin.

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Duke Tobin is what he is, and this team is

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>what it was or has been over the course of

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 2>his tenure. Here some good years, some bad years, But

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think if you have a robust scouting department

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that does due diligence, that you wind up taking players

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 2>like Jermaine Burton, like Jackson Carmen. Remember Carmen was an

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>early Day two pick in twenty twenty one. That guy

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>couldn't block a doorway. I think if you do due diligence,

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 2>you don't draft Cedric o'bahe and think, Okay, we're fine

0:33:55.160 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 2>replacing perhaps the guy that maybe the best second best

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 2>tackle in the history of your franchise.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I question about that. I know everybody likes to be

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 3>lean and mean.

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Best question of the day was asked by Jason Williams

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of The Inquire and he asked a very simple question.

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Understanding that you think everything is fine, that the coaches

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 2>did a good job at the scouting department, is the

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 2>right size, and everybody has to play harder, why are

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 2>you still here?

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 11>If your question is do I have confidence in myself?

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 5>I do?

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 11>But most importantly I've got confidence in the people here.

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I really do. And I've got.

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 11>Confidence in the processes that we have here, and I've

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 11>got confidence in our ownership. I've got confidence in the

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 11>players we have. We have very good players. It's not

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 11>up to me to determine whether I'm here or not.

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I've been doing this my whole life. It is my life.

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 11>NFL football has been a part of my life since

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 11>I opened my eyes. That is what I do. So

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 11>I believe I know this game. I believe I know players,

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 11>and I know for a fact that nobody works at

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 11>it more than me.

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the coaches, the scouting department, the players, everything's fine.

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 2>There Again, why are you here? And how much of

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 2>a heat factor is there for you and for tailor

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 2>for next year? You'll never know because Mike Brown will

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 2>never say. And at the end of all of it,

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 2>it's still Mike Brown's team, a man of immense patients,

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 2>immense loyalty. So anybody that thought yesterday was going to

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 2>be some sort of revelation day.

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 3>It was never going to happen. It's twelve fifty six

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 3>straight ahead.

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 2>What happens if the Supreme Court tells Trump your tariffs

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>and oh good, they're done.

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 3>What happens to you, me and everybody else?

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Because it sounds like the economy, which is burping right along,

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 2>may go straight into the abyss. We'll talk about that

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 2>next seven hundred WLW.

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Now your post, Ken Brew on news radio seven hundred WLW, Welcome.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 2>Back on this Saturday. Yes, yes, yes, Saturday in Cincinnati.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Who would like that?

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like a perfect day for me. Even if outside

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>it's not all that swift, doesn't matter. That's how we'd

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>like it in January. We like it as long as

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not snowing in January as.

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 5>What we like.

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Nevertheless, for whatever reason, the Supreme Court decided not to

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 2>rule on Trump's tariffs that was expected to come down

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 2>last Thursday or Friday. It now is supposedly going to

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 2>come down sometime this week. And what it does, and

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court is more than likely going to rule

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 2>against Trump and his tariffs, it will throw for the

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, for the moment, certainly, at least the near future,

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the economic development and the economic strategy of this administration

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 2>into a bit of the unknown. And that's to be expected,

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I think, because Trump's tariffs have been controversial from the start.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 2>But what happens if they do decide the court I'm

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 2>speaking of now, what if it does decide to do

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 2>away with the tariffs? What then becomes of the economic

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 2>growth in this country that everybody I think wants to see.

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty five was an awful year for jobs. According

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 2>to stats just released, about five hundred and eighty four

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand jobs were created in twenty and twenty five. Two

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 2>million jobs were added in twenty twenty four and twenty

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty three under the previous administration, four million in twenty

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. Now, a lot of that was because of

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the economy coming back from COVID, but the jobs that

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>were added in twenty twenty five five hundred and eighty

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 2>four thousand seems extraordinarily low. So what's going on here?

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 2>And why is Wall Street so out of sync with

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 2>what's going on? With Main Street? Standing by to join us?

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Is Dan Varoni, highly regarded economic strategist, two time author,

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and the number one best selling book on Amazon dot

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 2>com Rethinking Economic Growth? And Dan Varoni, how are you

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 2>on this glorious Saturday?

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm terrific, Kenada.

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 9>Although it's raining outside, its sunny inside.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 2>God bless you for that. It should be sunny for

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 2>everybody that's still walking around and breathing and sounds like

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 2>both you and me are okay? What happens if the

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.959
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court, I think as anticipated comes back this week

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and says, you know, mister President, these tariffs they're simply illegal,

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 2>and you've exceeded your authority with them. What happens to

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 2>this country at that point economically.

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 9>So, based on what I'm reading and what I'm hearing,

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 9>it sounds like the administrator has a Plan B of

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 9>Plant C and a Plan D, and that Plan B,

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 9>Plan C, Plan D will really be delivered on the

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 9>basis of what the Supreme Court says. The Supreme Court.

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Could say the following.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 9>They could say, mister President, you've exceeded your authority in

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 9>the executive branch and from now on you need to

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 9>get the legislative branch to sign off on these. Or

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 9>they could say, mister President, not only have you exceeded

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 9>your authority, but you got to give the money back.

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 9>There could be any number of things.

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 5>They say.

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 9>My sense is the reason for the delay can and

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 9>I've been thinking this through a lot. They may be

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 9>looking for a way. Back in my days, ass city councilmen.

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 5>Back in the day, we.

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 9>Used to have a strategy called we got to find

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 9>a way to cut the baby in half right away

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 9>that makes this thing work. It might be that they

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 9>come up with a definition for what tariffs are, what

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 9>they should be, and who has the authority to develop

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 9>and implement them, And at the same time say, mister President,

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 9>you have in fact exceeded your authority. The tariffs that

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 9>were in effect can stay there, or something.

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Along those lines.

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 9>But I think they are looking to write an opinion

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 9>that gets them to a middle ground that causes the

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 9>least possible disruption.

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, it sounds like from what you just said that

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court would then be writing policy, which is,

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned earlier, a job for the US Congress,

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 2>for the House and for the Senate. That to me

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 2>would seem a little dangerous.

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 9>Is that what you're suggesting, Well, not suggesting, the suggesting

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 9>that that's what they're probably thinking through right now. You know,

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 9>what should that role be? What is it we should say?

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 9>The third option could be that they just push it

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 9>back to the administration and say you've got to go

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 9>to Congress and figure this out. I think they're looking

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 9>at any number of scenarios, and I think that's why

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 9>there is a delay.

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, if they have to get if they rule that

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 2>he has to or we have to give the money back,

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 2>that's disastrous. I don't care how many ways to slice

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 2>it In an economy that has been at very kind

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 2>sluggish since the president, the current administration took over, if

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 2>he's forced to give the money back, that really would

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>shake Main Street to its core, would it not?

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 3>There had to be a residual effect for something like that.

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's interesting because you know, ninety seven percent

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 9>of small businesses export products outside the United States. But

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 9>at the same time, you know, depending on the sector

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 9>and small business you talk to, it's been brutal for some,

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 9>favorable for others, and it's been a dynamic debate. Yes,

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 9>it has caused uncertainty. I can tell you that for

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 9>a fact. I learned that in my book Interviews. But

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 9>what I will tell you Ken is that this is

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 9>we are in uncharted territory, and because we're in chartered territory,

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 9>no one really knows what the Supreme Court is going

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 9>to say or what it's going to do. But on

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 9>the basis of the Supreme Court majority, my sense is

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 9>that they are strict constructionists, meaning that they will stick

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 9>to the letter of the law in the Constitution as

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 9>best as possible and will find a way to make

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 9>this work work. Meaning cause the least amount of disruption.

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll see, as a couple of lawyers that I

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 2>raised once told me the only thing that is more

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 2>difficult to handicap than a jury is handicap what a

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 2>judge will do. So yeah, I think that there's I

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.399
<v Speaker 2>think that there's great anticipation on this from a number

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 2>of different levels. Let's take it down to the guy

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 2>walking around the street here in Cincinnati. Five hundred and

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 2>eighty five thousand jobs created in twenty five In twenty

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty five seems like an inordinately low number. Now we

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 2>know that a lot of that not certainly not approaching

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 2>two million, but a lot of those jobs were eliminated

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 2>by DOGE, and a lot of those were eliminated by

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 2>other cutbacks inside the federal government. I think unless you

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 2>work for the federal government, there are not a lot

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 2>of people weeping for those jobs going away. But there

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 2>were those jobs that were created in the latter stages

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Biden administration, and when he put five hundred

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 2>and eighty five thousand up against that, it looks a

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 2>little weak. Was it all because Biden was rebuilding or

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 2>enjoying the effects of a rebuilding economy After COVID or

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 2>is there something else at work here?

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 9>So here's what I think it comes down to a

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 9>couple of things. One is, Biden had a highly regulated

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 9>economy and we had regulations that were imposed that cost

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 9>one point four trillion dollars. Those are job killers. They

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 9>do not incentivize businesses to hire workers. So small businesses,

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 9>who are the big hiring part of the US economy,

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 9>they hire two of three new private sector jobs. Hiring

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:34.439
<v Speaker 9>becomes a disincentive because your cost to comply with.

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:35.800
<v Speaker 5>New regulations are expensive.

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 9>Inflation grew to nine point one percent, and again for

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 9>small businesses, it was very difficult to make a profit.

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 9>So I think the last administration had policy put policy

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 9>in place that served as job killers that were just

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 9>as simple as that. And the third thing I'll say

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:00.959
<v Speaker 9>is that the cost of money, the cost capital, grew

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 9>to be too expensive. So small businesses who aren't sitting

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 9>around with big piles of cash going out to try

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 9>and get loans. It was expensive to get loans. So

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 9>when you put those three things together, that's really what

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 9>you're seeing. At the same time, you had major corporate

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:20.439
<v Speaker 9>layoffs to the tune last year, I think of over

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 9>a million and those corporate layoffs. You know what did

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 9>they come from, Well, they came from high cost of

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 9>doing business, uncertainty around the consumer, what was going to

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:34.760
<v Speaker 9>happen with the consumer? And then uncertainty what would happen

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 9>in the new administration. But I will, But what I

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 9>want you to know is that when you look at

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 9>those things, productivity in our economy has searched almost five percent.

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 5>That's the highest it's been in almost six years. The

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 5>cost of.

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 9>Employing people is lower.

0:45:54.280 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 12>We're looking at at growth. GDP growth was four point

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 12>three percent the third quarter, could be over five percent

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 12>in the fourth quarter from last year. But the issue is,

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 12>the big issue is is this going to be a

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 12>jobless recovery? And your timing for this conversation is impeccable

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 12>because I spent the entire morning during research.

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm writing an up that article asking.

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 9>The Federal Reserve to come to their senses and reduce

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 9>interest rates by another seventy five basis points.

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 5>And here's why.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 9>So they cut them three times total of three to

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 9>twenty five basis point last year in the third and

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 9>fourth quarter. But here's the bottom line. Bottom line wasn't enough.

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 9>The cost of capital is still too high. If you

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 9>want the economy to grow, you've got to bring your

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 9>tart target federal fund rates down another seventy five basis points.

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 9>And they're worried about inflation. But here's what we know

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 9>about inflame. Inflation fell. We heard in November. In December,

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 9>from what happened in November two point from three point

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 9>zero to two point seven. The core inflation rate fell

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 9>to two point six percent. Those numbers will be updated

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:21.240
<v Speaker 9>next week, I think Tuesday or Wednesday, and my senses

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 9>those numbers will be low again. The issue is the

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 9>Federal Reserve must aggressively pursue its dual mandate. They're better

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 9>on inflation now it's about employment, and in order to

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 9>get the employment machine going in small business, they must

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:43.240
<v Speaker 9>reduce interest rates by a notice seventy five basis points.

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I was just going to say, I think

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 2>they will because you're going to get Jerome Palell out

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of the.

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Way here in the next several months. And you know

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 3>his economic philosophies I think or are not this is

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a good word progressive in this sense.

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not progressive. Just thinks he's using tactics that might

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 2>have been in vogue in the seventies and the eighties,

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and this country and this economy is nowhere close to

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 2>where it was back then. I think you got to

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 2>get this guy out of the way before we get

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 2>to what you want, which is seventy five basis points,

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 2>which is a significant cut, as you well know, Yeah it's.

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 9>A significant cut, but I will tell you it will

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 9>bring the rates down to like the target rate will

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 9>go from like two and a half to three percent.

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Right now it's about three and a half to three

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 5>point seventy five.

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 9>And we want small businesses to fully leverage the Big

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 9>Beautiful Law and the first year one hundred percent expensing

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 9>for plants and equipment. If they do, more buildings will

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 9>get built, They will hire people, more equipment will be purchased.

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 9>As they're purchasing equipment, the people building that equipment will

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 9>have to hire more people. This has a tremendous magnifier effect.

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 9>And honestly, I feel like the Federal Reserve is constraining

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 9>employment that this time with the rates where they are,

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 9>and as I've been thinking about it since the jobs

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.439
<v Speaker 9>numbers came out yesterday, I feel like you're looking at.

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 5>The wrong data.

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 9>The right data is small business jobs. They were down

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 9>last year. They had a rebound in December of last year,

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 9>and the way to get the biggest possible bounce in

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 9>jobs is to cut those rates. Small business will lead

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 9>hiring as it has historically.

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:30.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the majority of businesses anyway in this

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 2>country are small businesses. It's the business that you pass

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 2>on main Street on your way to the big box centers. Absolutely,

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 2>but there is Dan Varney is our Gas Economic Strategists

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 2>now founder and CEO of Potomac Core Potomac Core Strategy

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Planning firm. Here's the one thing, and I don't want

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to harp on these numbers too much, but in December,

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 2>most of the gains were in food service, healthcare, social assistance,

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and the losses were in not only detail trade, but manufacturing.

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 2>And we got to get back in this country to

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 2>making things we had. That's that is the gut of

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 2>our economy, and it just seems like that's been a problem,

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 2>not just with this current administration but the last couple

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of people that have been in the White House.

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 3>We got to make things again in this country.

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 5>So you're absolutely right.

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 9>Manufacturing jobs serve as a like whenever they create a job,

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 9>they create two or three jobs, and the manufacturing job

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 9>two or three new jobs are created in the service sector.

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 9>What I like about the Big Beautiful Law, Ken is

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 9>that it has the intention and the pieces to a

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 9>puzzle that reindustrialize the US economy.

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 5>And that's what that expensing in plants and equipment is

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 5>all about.

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 9>I did a look back on the Reagan tax cuts,

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 9>and I compare them to the Big Beautiful Law, and

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 9>I'm telling you that they are far more geared to

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 9>getting the manufacturing economy going a lot faster than even

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 9>the Reagan tax cuts did. And the Reagan tax cuts

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 9>were amazing, but they were for manufacturing. They came in

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:21.880
<v Speaker 9>over and they were phased in over three years. These

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 9>come in as a first year investment. So now I'm

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 9>going to tell you why I'm excited about this. So

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 9>I worked for Nut Gingrich a couple of years back

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 9>in twenty nine and ten. And when I first went

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 9>to work for him, came into my office and I

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 9>had a big whiteboard in front of me, and he said, so,

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 9>we're going to write a tax plan for small business today.

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 5>And I said, and he and I argued the.

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 9>Reagan accelerated appreciation versus the one hundred percent expensing, And

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 9>he said to me, Dan, if you really want to

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 9>get jobs growing again at a substantial level, it's the

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:58.840
<v Speaker 9>one hundred percent expensing first year right off. People will invest,

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 9>they will buy, and it will create jobs throughout the economy.

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 9>So when this was included by by the President and

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 9>by Treasury Secretary Bessant, I was overjoyed because I learned

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 9>over a decade ago this is a way to really

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 9>grow jobs.

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I share your optimism about twenty twenty six, and

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I hope it reaches down to all levels of the

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 2>various age groups that we have, particularly the younger group

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 2>gen Z, because I think there it's vital that they

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 2>have a chance to get out of the gate in

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 2>a strong manner. And I think it's vital if you're

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration that that happens if you indeed want

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 2>to keep what he has got going now is going

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 2>past when his term is up. But Dan Varney, our

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 2>time is up. Tom mccore dot com is where you

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:49.439
<v Speaker 2>can find him. And as always, Dan, we we thank

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:51.439
<v Speaker 2>you for your time. Stay well and you know we'll

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 2>be calling again.

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Thank you. Look forward to it.

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Dan Varney, coming up on one twenty four on this

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Saturday afternoon Radio seven hundred WLW one thirty seven News

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Radio seven hundred WLW. Welcome back, I am ken Brew

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:13.760
<v Speaker 2>as we cruise to use Xavier basketball at three thirty

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 2>this afternoon, Joe and Byron all the play by play

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 2>and then the tip at four between Xavier and Prominence.

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Xavier and Prominence at the Cinta Center right here on

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred WYLW. Down the road, Rebecca Downs the Daily Signal. Okay,

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Vivek has made his choice for his running mate. Was

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 2>it a bone to Governor Dwine? And what about David

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Pepper running with Amy Acton? Does that really help the ticket?

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into that with miss Downs from the Daily

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Signal at.

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Two six today.

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty five, it was just a horrible year for

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 2>the restaurant Cracker Barrel. We all know what happened with

0:53:56.800 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Cracker Barrel in twenty twenty five. They brought in some

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 2>woman who thought she was going to turn that restaurant

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 2>chain on its head, and instead she.

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Took the thing off a cliff.

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 2>It crashed and burned, and all of a sudden, the

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 2>changes that Cracker Barrel made, well some of them were

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 2>completely undone. I don't know if that woman still works

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 2>for Cracker Barrel or not. Her name is Julie Fel's Messino.

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:26.279
<v Speaker 2>She and the consulting firm profit were the ones that

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:28.359
<v Speaker 2>thought they had all the answers, and it turns out

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 2>they didn't even know what the questions were.

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Nevertheless, Cracker Barrel did not get all of the things

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 3>undone until this past week. This past week, I said,

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 3>you went to Cracker Barrel this past week. You know

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 3>this already.

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 2>But if he did not, two of their great comfort

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 2>food menu items were back on the menu. Hamburger steak

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and eggs in the basket, both comfort food staples of

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Cracker Barrel, and the dining public loved them.

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 3>But the the.

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Brains of Cracker Barrel decided, well, you know, that is

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:07.920
<v Speaker 2>so old fashioned. I mean, hamburger steak had been on

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:10.839
<v Speaker 2>the menu since Cracker Barrel opened back in I think

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 2>it was nineteen sixty eight sixty nine. And eggs in

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 2>a basket is basically an egg inside a piece of bread.

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how difficult can that be to make? And

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 2>why was it gone? Along with Grandpa whatever he was?

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 2>On the logo and the redesign of all these restaurants

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:28.879
<v Speaker 2>makes you wonder, makes my next guest wonder just how

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.319
<v Speaker 2>long it's going to take for this chain to get

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:34.359
<v Speaker 2>back on its feet. I mean, the stock traded at

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 2>sixty dollars a share before all those changes last week

0:55:38.760 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 2>had closed it under twenty eight dollars a share. That's

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 2>not exactly driving business. And kJ Blattenbauer knows it, you're saying, Ken,

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 2>who is kJ Blattenbauer. Well, kJ is a public relations expert.

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 2>She has three decades of experience helping customers and companies

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 2>interact their stories. And she's got a new book that's

0:56:00.760 --> 0:56:03.239
<v Speaker 2>about to come out. We'll talk all about that next,

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 2>but for the moment, kJ Blattenberg, how are you on

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 2>this glorious Saturday.

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 8>I'm fantastic. Thank you for having me.

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:10.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you're here.

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Look, the worst thing about a mistake is if you

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:18.240
<v Speaker 2>don't correct it. And Cracker Barrel has gone. I think

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a long way in correcting the mistakes that were made

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 2>by CEO Julie fels Messino. She was working with a

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 2>PR company, I think the name of it was Profit,

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 2>and between the two of them, they came up with

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:33.359
<v Speaker 2>this logo makeover and restaurant makeover and menu you make over,

0:56:34.000 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and in doing so, they completely alienated their base and

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it turned into a pr nightmare. Looking back, obviously that

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 2>was a bad move on Cracker Barrel's part to partner

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 2>with these people. But I think you got to give

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Cracker Barrel credit because of the things they've done in

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the wake of that disaster.

0:56:51.360 --> 0:56:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I give them credit. Would you.

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Would?

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 8>I would give I would definitely give them credit. You know,

0:56:56.800 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 8>they didn't fail because they changed. They failed because they

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 8>changed about clearly protecting the emotional contract that they have

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 8>with their customers. People didn't go to Cracker Barrel for

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 8>the novelty of it. They went for familiarity, and when

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 8>you disrupt that without explanation, you don't get innovation points.

0:57:12.680 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 8>You get backlash. But after receiving backlash, they have at

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 8>least been smart enough to finally course correct. It might

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 8>have taken them longer than customers wanted then the stock

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 8>prices wanted, but they're getting there. They're making the right adjustment.

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 2>The problem that I have with that particular episode in

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Cracker Barrel's existence is the warning signs are all over,

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:35.320
<v Speaker 2>aren't they. I mean, we had new Coke Old Coke

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 2>back in the eighties. We had the bud Light disaster

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:40.640
<v Speaker 2>with Dylan mulvaney a couple of years ago, and I

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 2>think when you alienate your base to try and grab

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:45.240
<v Speaker 2>something that is out there that may or may not

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>gravitate towards you, invariably, it's going to lead to, I think,

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 2>just devastation, because if the base isn't with you, it

0:57:53.400 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter who you bring in that's new. You've lost

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:59.000
<v Speaker 2>what made you so special. Why don't companies understand that?

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 8>I think companies kind of lose sight. With the new

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 8>Coke comparison, You're right on target. Right, Coke tried to

0:58:05.880 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 8>replace an icon. Cracker Barrel temporarily tried to obscure its identity,

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:14.800
<v Speaker 8>and you know, without leadership willing to admit it, you

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 8>can't replace your identity. Cracker Barrel briefly forgot what business

0:58:18.960 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 8>it was really in. People want to be with brands

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 8>they like, they know, they're familiar with, they trust, and

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 8>when you disrupt that emotional contract without clearly protecting it,

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 8>customers are going to drift anywhere else where they feel

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:32.439
<v Speaker 8>their values are being met.

0:58:32.600 --> 0:58:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, I don't know how this works you know far

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:37.440
<v Speaker 2>better than I. But I would bet that the CEO

0:58:37.640 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that was behind the change in Cracker Barrel a year ago,

0:58:41.240 --> 0:58:44.959
<v Speaker 2>this Julie Fells Messino character. I would bet she got

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the ear of certain people on the board, but not

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 2>everybody on the board, and so she thought she probably

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:54.360
<v Speaker 2>had enough of a goal to do what she did

0:58:54.480 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 2>or her team did.

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think.

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Dealing with these large corporations, you're dealing with a lot

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of different people on the board, a lot of personalities,

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 2>and in a sense, you're dealing with their families, their

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 2>spouses and whatnot. How tricky a road is that to

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 2>navigate when you know you don't have everybody, but you

0:59:13.080 --> 0:59:15.360
<v Speaker 2>just have a few people that are saying, okay, we

0:59:15.440 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 2>control the purse springs, go ahead.

0:59:18.600 --> 0:59:20.160
<v Speaker 8>Oh, It's incredibly tricky.

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:59:20.760 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 8>First of all, markets hate uncertainty, especially when a legacy

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:26.360
<v Speaker 8>brand is sending mixed signals, and that's all Cracker Barrel

0:59:26.400 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 8>has been doing for months. I think the bigger issue

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 8>for them is that leadership as a whole altogether. Everyone

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 8>in the room needs to understand brand trust is a

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:37.800
<v Speaker 8>long term asset and it's not something that you can

0:59:37.840 --> 0:59:40.760
<v Speaker 8>experiment with lately, which is what they have tried to do.

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 8>The takeaway for companies big and small everywhere, I think

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 8>is simple, as a result of watching Cracker Barrel, innovation

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:51.400
<v Speaker 8>doesn't mean abandoning what made you beloved. The smartest brands

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 8>are going to evolve around their core identity, not away

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 8>from it. When you protect what you're known for, when

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 8>you protect what people trust in you, customers are going

0:59:59.360 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 8>to follow you for no matter where you go.

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, have you ever been to a cracker barrel? Have

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 3>you ever eaten a one.

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 8>All the time? All the time.

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean the food is not great. I think you

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>go for the atmosphere and the comfort, and you go

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>there because you can. If you if you have kids,

1:00:15.520 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 2>or if you got mom or dad or whatever, you

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>can you can go there and get a decent meal

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>for a really affordable price. And things like Hamburger steak

1:00:24.040 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>which came back on the menu this week, and eggs

1:00:26.720 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>in the basket came back on the menu. None of

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that stuff is what I would call food that's going

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>to make it happy. But it's comfort food, and I

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>think I think they just completely upended the comfort of

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>their clients. So yeah, I could see where this would

1:00:40.720 --> 1:00:43.439
<v Speaker 2>would be a major problem, and they lost a hell

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of money in doing it. I mean,

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:47.880
<v Speaker 2>my gosh, can you imagine working for a company and

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>you go to somebody on the board and say, hey,

1:00:50.200 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you know that my idea didn't didn't go so well,

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know we're out seven billion dollars. I mean,

1:00:57.280 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>what reaction would you expect if you had to go

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>tell somebody.

1:00:59.920 --> 1:01:03.160
<v Speaker 8>Like that, Well, they wouldn't let me in the building.

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:05.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that. I don't think i'd be employed.

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 8>I don't think i'd be employed there any longer.

1:01:07.640 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's say you do contract. This is hypothetical. Let's

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>say your company is Heresay PR Right, I love that name.

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Here's a PR I loved it. So let's say that

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Cracker Barrel came to you a year and a half,

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>two years ago, and I said, look, we feel that

1:01:24.960 --> 1:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>we've gotten kind of stale. Our growth isn't where it

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>should be. We're afraid we may lose complete traction inside

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>the food industry if we don't do a few things

1:01:33.920 --> 1:01:37.800
<v Speaker 2>to you know, freshen up our approach. You've eaten there,

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 2>so your customer, you know what those restaurants are like.

1:01:40.280 --> 1:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>What would you have said to somebody that came to

1:01:42.680 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you from that company, if indeed they came to you

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:46.320
<v Speaker 2>and contracted.

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:48.479
<v Speaker 8>With you, well, I think the first thing is looking

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 8>at who the customers are. I would encourage them to

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 8>have gotten with customers from the beginning, done some focus groups,

1:01:54.120 --> 1:01:57.960
<v Speaker 8>done more research, because strong brands don't ignore feedback when

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:01.440
<v Speaker 8>it's loud, consistent, and values based, and Cracker Barrel has

1:02:01.600 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 8>that customer base. Their voices are angry and we're hearing

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:07.920
<v Speaker 8>about it because the customers are mad, they're moving away

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:10.760
<v Speaker 8>from why they trusted Cracker Barrel, and so I think

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 8>the brand protection they should have started with from the

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 8>beginning is Okay, we need to evolve. Here's the ways

1:02:15.280 --> 1:02:17.720
<v Speaker 8>we need to evolve in these areas. Let's talk to

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 8>our customers about the changes we can make or we

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:24.000
<v Speaker 8>shouldn't be making in order to move ourselves forward and

1:02:24.080 --> 1:02:26.479
<v Speaker 8>the best way possible for our brand, but also for

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 8>the people who make our brand possible. Pay our bills

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 8>and keep the lights on.

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's empowerment, right, You're empowering the people that use

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 2>your restaurant. I think a lot of times these places think, well,

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>it's our menu, it's my money. I've invested into this business,

1:02:40.280 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and by god, you're going to get what I serve you.

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:44.960
<v Speaker 2>But all it takes is just a little time on

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>task and a little bit of that research. They would

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>have been better if they had their store manager just

1:02:50.480 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>go I don't how many stores they have, but the

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>store manager in each one of their stores just work

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the room and then report back to whomever he reports

1:02:58.200 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 2>back to. And I'm sure that person re spports back corporate.

1:03:01.160 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>But just work the room a little bit in these

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>places and maybe you will get a better idea of

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>where you should take your business. I think a lot

1:03:08.040 --> 1:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of it is just time on task. Basically, what about you?

1:03:11.520 --> 1:03:14.280
<v Speaker 8>I have to agree with you. I think it also

1:03:14.320 --> 1:03:17.600
<v Speaker 8>has created a discussion around rebranding for a company, and

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 8>I think it's important to note that rebrands aren't risky

1:03:19.920 --> 1:03:24.840
<v Speaker 8>by default. Rebrands that ignore emotional loyalty like Cracker Barrel did. Now,

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:27.800
<v Speaker 8>that is the problem. The rebrand for Cracker Barrel didn't

1:03:27.800 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 8>fail because people hate change. It failed because the brand

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:34.200
<v Speaker 8>forgot who the change is for the people. And so

1:03:34.560 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 8>you've built your you built your business for a certain

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:40.440
<v Speaker 8>customer base, or you've attracted a certain customer base and

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:43.439
<v Speaker 8>any change you make moving forward, you have to take

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:46.080
<v Speaker 8>those people and their emotional stake in your brand in

1:03:46.120 --> 1:03:48.760
<v Speaker 8>your company when you adapt moving forward.

1:03:48.880 --> 1:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>But like Coke, and like Dylan Molvaney and l like

1:03:51.600 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Cracker Barrel, you know there's going to be somebody at

1:03:54.280 --> 1:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>a corporate office that does something stupid that affects.

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Their restaurant or whatever. I mean, it's just it's almost

1:04:02.400 --> 1:04:04.919
<v Speaker 2>built into our economy. Right, somebody's going to do something

1:04:04.960 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>stupid in a year or two. Right, maybe then they'll

1:04:06.880 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>call here, say.

1:04:07.520 --> 1:04:11.880
<v Speaker 8>Pr here's helping, and then they can avoid any problem.

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there you go. What's your book all about, Pitchworthy,

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about that.

1:04:15.840 --> 1:04:19.240
<v Speaker 8>My book is for small business owners and solopreneurs who

1:04:19.280 --> 1:04:21.760
<v Speaker 8>are looking to use public relations to help move their

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 8>business forward. It gives them the basic steps and tips

1:04:25.040 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 8>that they can do to put themselves out there and

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:29.800
<v Speaker 8>get their brand known without paying a high cost for

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.480
<v Speaker 8>a public a publicist or a public relations agency.

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you believe in advertising? I mean, I know a

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of people right now, or they'll open a place

1:04:37.400 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>I could name you five here in the greater Cincinnati area.

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:41.760
<v Speaker 2>In the last year they open, they think, well, I'm

1:04:41.800 --> 1:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook, and I've got a website and all this,

1:04:44.600 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'm thinking to myself, well, maybe you need to,

1:04:47.600 --> 1:04:49.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, just go into a bigger tent than all

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>of that.

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>But so do you. Are you someone who believes in

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the power of advertising?

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:56.080
<v Speaker 8>I believe in the power of advertising, and I love

1:04:56.120 --> 1:04:59.440
<v Speaker 8>the power of public relations because it's free advertising. I

1:04:59.760 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 8>think when you create a business, you open a business. Yes,

1:05:02.080 --> 1:05:04.440
<v Speaker 8>you build the website, but just because you build it,

1:05:04.440 --> 1:05:07.920
<v Speaker 8>it doesn't mean they'll come. I think advertising, marketing, public relations,

1:05:07.920 --> 1:05:09.600
<v Speaker 8>it has to be front of funnel. No one can

1:05:09.640 --> 1:05:12.600
<v Speaker 8>fund you, hire you, or visit your establishment if they

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:13.800
<v Speaker 8>don't know you exist, right.

1:05:13.760 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, particularly if you're in the service industry, and it

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:20.480
<v Speaker 2>may be something else for different businesses. Business to business

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly is different. But I often wondered about that because

1:05:23.400 --> 1:05:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of businesses fail. And I know

1:05:26.280 --> 1:05:27.960
<v Speaker 2>we're off on a tangent here, just a little bit

1:05:27.960 --> 1:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>from cracker barrel, but I think a lot of businesses

1:05:29.760 --> 1:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>fail simply because they don't want to spend the money

1:05:33.120 --> 1:05:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to get the word out. The person that owns the

1:05:36.040 --> 1:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>company or the business will throw everything into the business

1:05:39.160 --> 1:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and then wonder why nobody shows up, and I guess

1:05:42.200 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 2>this is in your book. There's so many easy ways

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to just get your product your service in front of people.

1:05:48.080 --> 1:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Got to be creative, but I think eventually you got

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:52.640
<v Speaker 2>to tell more people about it than just the people

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>that are already in the tent. But that's maybe that's

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:58.920
<v Speaker 2>why while I never considered PR, maybe I should have

1:05:58.960 --> 1:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>done that. It might have been a more stable business.

1:06:01.040 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Who knows, who knows? All right, how do people find

1:06:05.680 --> 1:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>your business? HERESAYPR? I'm guessing it's heresapr dot com. And

1:06:09.560 --> 1:06:11.720
<v Speaker 2>when they go there, what do they find? Besides I'm

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 2>sure a real nice picture of view and.

1:06:13.200 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 8>Testimonials, they're going to find EASYPR tip. They're going to

1:06:17.760 --> 1:06:19.840
<v Speaker 8>find a way to grab my book. But they're also

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:22.480
<v Speaker 8>going to learn simple and free steps that they can

1:06:22.600 --> 1:06:24.800
<v Speaker 8>use to promote their business, product or service.

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Simple and free. I like that. Yeah, I like that

1:06:28.240 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>all right.

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:30.600
<v Speaker 2>So what's your outlook for Cracker Barrel in the next

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:32.480
<v Speaker 2>six to nine months. Are they back completely on their

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>feed or do you think it's still going to be

1:06:33.960 --> 1:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a struggle.

1:06:35.920 --> 1:06:37.120
<v Speaker 8>I think it's going to be a little bit of

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:38.959
<v Speaker 8>a struggle for them, But I think they're moving things

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 8>forward in the right way. They're finally starting to listen

1:06:41.800 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 8>to people, and I think they're finally starting to see

1:06:44.400 --> 1:06:47.960
<v Speaker 8>a few customers come back around when they start moving forward,

1:06:48.040 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 8>bringing back what people are familiar with and they trust,

1:06:50.880 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 8>and customers see that rolling out their course correcting is

1:06:54.240 --> 1:06:56.280
<v Speaker 8>going to be They're going to be perfectly fine.

1:06:56.360 --> 1:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's good because come Monday, I'm going to go

1:06:58.760 --> 1:07:01.360
<v Speaker 2>to Cracker Bureau for that meal over two for nineteen

1:07:01.440 --> 1:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine.

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:03.480
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like a deal.

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>kJ Blatinbauer PR Expert Pitchworthy is her book. It will

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>be released soon. You can find her at hearsaypr dot com. Okay, kJ,

1:07:13.000 --> 1:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>thanks for your time, stay well and hopefully we can

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 2>do this again.

1:07:16.520 --> 1:07:16.920
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Seven hundred million dollars is what the company Cracker Barrel

1:07:24.000 --> 1:07:27.440
<v Speaker 2>spent on the rebrand that lasted all to two weeks.

1:07:27.680 --> 1:07:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Seven hundred million dollars. But do a deeper dive. We

1:07:33.320 --> 1:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much money it actually cost Cracker Barrel

1:07:36.440 --> 1:07:43.240
<v Speaker 2>to emerge from that terrible business decision, but there are

1:07:43.320 --> 1:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>reports that say they suffered significant losses two hundred and

1:07:48.920 --> 1:07:53.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty million dollars in stock value it's two hundred and

1:07:53.360 --> 1:07:56.240
<v Speaker 2>fifty million dollars on top of the seven hundred million

1:07:56.280 --> 1:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>it's spent. So this this pr whiz that came in

1:08:01.280 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the CEO and this group that she hired profit for

1:08:05.840 --> 1:08:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the rebrand Julie Fells Messino cost her company nine hundred

1:08:12.680 --> 1:08:20.439
<v Speaker 2>and fifty almost one billion dollars. We'll see if you're that,

1:08:20.880 --> 1:08:23.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if that particular Jim has passed on to

1:08:23.160 --> 1:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>you the consumer. My guess is eventually it will be.

1:08:28.880 --> 1:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>We're at one fifty three on this Saturday afternoon, still

1:08:31.400 --> 1:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>to come. The Ohio Governor's race is beginning to heat up,

1:08:34.920 --> 1:08:37.639
<v Speaker 2>even though we're still many months away from it. How

1:08:37.760 --> 1:08:42.599
<v Speaker 2>much does David Pepper help Amy acton? And was the

1:08:42.640 --> 1:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>only reason that Mike de Wine supports now Viveke Ramaswami

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is because of whom Vivek has chosen for his running mate.

1:08:52.360 --> 1:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Rebecca Downs from the Daily Signal will join us for

1:08:54.880 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>that and then down the road. One man that has

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:03.679
<v Speaker 2>been with Elvis Presley, well, nobody's nobody's with Elvis right now.

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Unless you're in the ground. But one man who was

1:09:06.560 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>with Elvis Presley for a long long time is in

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:15.760
<v Speaker 3>town tonight at the Elvis Tribute Spectaculars. We'll talk to

1:09:15.840 --> 1:09:18.439
<v Speaker 3>him and much more as we count down to Xavier

1:09:18.479 --> 1:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>basketball on seven hundred w l W.

1:09:28.200 --> 1:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Now your host Ken Brew on News Radio seven hundred

1:09:32.560 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>WLW and out Amon We go right.

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Till Xavior basketball today at three thirty Savior against Providence

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>at the Sintas Center. All the play by play with

1:09:42.640 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Byron and Joe right here on seven hundred WLWD. Well,

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 2>this week, the Republican nominee for the governorship of Ohio,

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:55.519
<v Speaker 2>Vivek Ramaswami, made his choice for his running mate, and

1:09:55.680 --> 1:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>he selected Senate President Rob McCauley as his for a

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:05.800
<v Speaker 2>lieutenant governor. I never heard of him either, and that's

1:10:05.920 --> 1:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>probably more on me than anyone else. But as I

1:10:09.360 --> 1:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>travel around Ohio, I'm sure you have to, it's amazing

1:10:13.280 --> 1:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>to me how people who are not from Southwest Ohio

1:10:16.960 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 2>pay attention to state politics, and we here in the

1:10:20.479 --> 1:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>great state of Cincinnati, both you and me and also

1:10:24.160 --> 1:10:28.519
<v Speaker 2>the media here, pay anything but close attention to what

1:10:28.640 --> 1:10:31.439
<v Speaker 2>goes on in the state capitol. It's almost like you

1:10:31.600 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 2>really have to search for state politic news in the

1:10:36.240 --> 1:10:39.519
<v Speaker 2>Inquirer or the local television stations, And I think it's

1:10:39.600 --> 1:10:42.200
<v Speaker 2>largely reflected on the fact that we look at Columbus,

1:10:42.240 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 2>whether we're on one side of the political argument or

1:10:45.560 --> 1:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the other, with a little bit of a jaundiced eye,

1:10:48.040 --> 1:10:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and so we don't pay attention to it unless some

1:10:50.160 --> 1:10:53.680
<v Speaker 2>scandal breaks out or there's a controversial bill, and then

1:10:53.720 --> 1:10:55.840
<v Speaker 2>we want to know who voted for it. And even

1:10:55.880 --> 1:10:58.480
<v Speaker 2>if we do that, we're surprised as to who represents

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:02.719
<v Speaker 2>us and who voted for it. But anyway, it's Senate

1:11:02.760 --> 1:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>President Rob McCauley, who's been around Ohio politics for a

1:11:06.880 --> 1:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>long time. He seems to be a well liked guy

1:11:12.880 --> 1:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>inside the GOP. I view this as a.

1:11:16.840 --> 1:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Guy that's with the I guess the old line GOP,

1:11:21.920 --> 1:11:25.880
<v Speaker 3>a guy that would be viewed as, you know, one

1:11:25.880 --> 1:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>of the boys in Columbus.

1:11:28.120 --> 1:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>And I view it as a bone that was thrown

1:11:30.160 --> 1:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to Mike DeWine. Mike DeWine after this endorsed Vake Ramaswami.

1:11:36.160 --> 1:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Mike Dwine has always said I'm going to support the

1:11:38.920 --> 1:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>GOP candidate, except he wasn't all that closed is supporting

1:11:44.400 --> 1:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the vike Ramaswami until this. So this obviously was a

1:11:49.360 --> 1:11:54.360
<v Speaker 2>bone to the wine, and the Republicans want unity in

1:11:54.479 --> 1:11:57.719
<v Speaker 2>this state. The Republicans want unity everywhere, but they don't

1:11:58.200 --> 1:12:01.840
<v Speaker 2>walk in lockstep like the Dems do. But this is

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>one of those deals where it looks like, Okay, I'll

1:12:05.080 --> 1:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>throw the bone to the governor. We'll get the governor

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>on board, and then everybody can sing Kumbaya right up

1:12:10.200 --> 1:12:11.719
<v Speaker 2>till election night this November.

1:12:12.400 --> 1:12:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, Amy Acton, the COVID queen.

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>You remember her from twenty twenty and her role in

1:12:19.680 --> 1:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>shutting things down, and it really and truly got to

1:12:23.400 --> 1:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>a point where she had to leave because nobody could

1:12:25.920 --> 1:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>stand her. Now she's the dominee of the Democrat Party,

1:12:29.479 --> 1:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>or appears to be the nominee of the Democrat Party,

1:12:33.000 --> 1:12:37.519
<v Speaker 2>and she selected David Pepper to run with her this year.

1:12:37.640 --> 1:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>David Pepper a name of great note here in the

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:43.960
<v Speaker 2>greater Cincinnati area. He seems to get swatted down a

1:12:44.040 --> 1:12:48.880
<v Speaker 2>lot in statewide elections. He was successful locally here with

1:12:49.120 --> 1:12:53.679
<v Speaker 2>local politics, son of the former CEO of Procter and Gamble.

1:12:53.760 --> 1:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>But the fact of the matter is he's on the

1:12:55.439 --> 1:12:59.040
<v Speaker 2>ticket now with Amy Acton. So how much does how

1:12:59.120 --> 1:13:02.240
<v Speaker 2>much does any this matter? This far out an endorsement

1:13:02.360 --> 1:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>by the sitting governor who's not very popular and on

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>his way out, and the son of someone who was

1:13:08.120 --> 1:13:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a big time, big city, big deal with Procter and

1:13:11.640 --> 1:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Gamble helping the top of the ticket standing by the

1:13:15.479 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>way in as someone who's wondering as well. Rebecca Downs

1:13:19.040 --> 1:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>writes and writes very well about Ohio politics for The

1:13:22.240 --> 1:13:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Daily Signal, and I wanted to her take on this

1:13:25.080 --> 1:13:27.759
<v Speaker 2>as we're still a number of months out, but still

1:13:28.360 --> 1:13:31.080
<v Speaker 2>things are beginning to come into focus for who is

1:13:31.160 --> 1:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>going to succeed the Wine as governor here in the

1:13:34.360 --> 1:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>state of Ohio. So, Rebecca Downs, how are you on

1:13:37.280 --> 1:13:38.400
<v Speaker 2>this glorious Saturday.

1:13:39.800 --> 1:13:41.920
<v Speaker 8>I'm doing all right, Thanks so much for having me.

1:13:42.040 --> 1:13:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm glad you're back here because it's been swirling

1:13:44.520 --> 1:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>politically here in the great state of Ohio. And so

1:13:47.840 --> 1:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>let's start at the top. But Viake Ramaswamy makes his

1:13:51.000 --> 1:13:55.080
<v Speaker 2>choice for his lieutenant governor. It's Senate President Rob McCauley.

1:13:55.520 --> 1:13:58.599
<v Speaker 2>So that's the ticket, Ramaswami and McCauley. It almost has

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>a little alliteration going there. What do you ask, what

1:14:01.920 --> 1:14:04.519
<v Speaker 2>do we know about Rob McCauley, Because quite Frankly, the

1:14:04.560 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 2>media down here doesn't cover Ohio's state politics all that well.

1:14:09.520 --> 1:14:13.280
<v Speaker 13>So I actually made the prediction that Ramasami was going

1:14:13.360 --> 1:14:18.640
<v Speaker 13>to pick Rob McCauley, especially because in part because I was,

1:14:18.800 --> 1:14:21.080
<v Speaker 13>I think he was the race the way there were

1:14:21.120 --> 1:14:22.120
<v Speaker 13>going to be other races.

1:14:22.320 --> 1:14:27.240
<v Speaker 8>Other potential picks are running for other slots. But he

1:14:27.439 --> 1:14:29.720
<v Speaker 8>seems to be really well liked.

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:35.760
<v Speaker 13>He's a trusted conservatives but also an agreeable person in this.

1:14:35.880 --> 1:14:38.400
<v Speaker 13>Instead of people like him, they seem to get along

1:14:38.439 --> 1:14:42.960
<v Speaker 13>with him. He's young, but he's experienced. He also brings

1:14:43.920 --> 1:14:49.680
<v Speaker 13>the Ramasami campaign, and there's supporters making the case experience

1:14:50.320 --> 1:14:52.759
<v Speaker 13>in the in the sense that Ramaswami doesn't.

1:14:52.920 --> 1:14:55.800
<v Speaker 8>You know, Ramaswammi is open that he is not a politician.

1:14:56.840 --> 1:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, that was the selling point for him

1:14:58.880 --> 1:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>all along, even in the pres as an enter race

1:15:00.800 --> 1:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot. It seems to me, though, you know, Mike

1:15:03.800 --> 1:15:05.880
<v Speaker 2>de Wine had been sitting on the sidelines on this.

1:15:06.080 --> 1:15:09.799
<v Speaker 2>He said he would eventually you know, support the GOP nominee,

1:15:10.040 --> 1:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>but he was kind of lukewarm in my opinion to Ramaswami.

1:15:13.800 --> 1:15:16.680
<v Speaker 2>So is this, I guess, a deference a little bit

1:15:16.720 --> 1:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>of difference to Dwine from Ramaswami when he selects Rob McCauley.

1:15:20.640 --> 1:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>McCauley is, you know, a very politically active and has

1:15:24.200 --> 1:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>been in this state for a while, would seem to

1:15:26.400 --> 1:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>be an ally of the wine. So did Ramaswami do

1:15:29.520 --> 1:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>this to get the wine's blessing?

1:15:32.280 --> 1:15:35.600
<v Speaker 8>I think you could absolutely make that argument. But of

1:15:35.720 --> 1:15:38.200
<v Speaker 8>course I also think you could say, you know, two

1:15:38.240 --> 1:15:38.680
<v Speaker 8>things can.

1:15:38.680 --> 1:15:41.720
<v Speaker 13>Mature at once, that he does that he gets an

1:15:41.880 --> 1:15:46.599
<v Speaker 13>endorsement more willingly, more convincingly from Mike de Wine while

1:15:46.960 --> 1:15:50.840
<v Speaker 13>not sacrificing what he wants in a running name. What

1:15:51.120 --> 1:15:54.720
<v Speaker 13>you know, Republican voters, well, we'll see if stuff what

1:15:54.880 --> 1:15:56.599
<v Speaker 13>they want, you know, when they go to the polls,

1:15:56.680 --> 1:16:00.559
<v Speaker 13>and I may Republicans actually vote for Ramaswami and whatnot.

1:16:01.120 --> 1:16:04.080
<v Speaker 13>So I think you could absolutely make that case, including

1:16:04.400 --> 1:16:07.040
<v Speaker 13>you know, I think that based on my own understanding

1:16:07.040 --> 1:16:10.680
<v Speaker 13>of Ohio politics, but also you know, people people talk

1:16:10.720 --> 1:16:11.400
<v Speaker 13>about these things.

1:16:11.560 --> 1:16:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I mean a lot of the old guard GOP

1:16:13.920 --> 1:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>in the state still like Mike Dwine. I think some

1:16:16.760 --> 1:16:21.519
<v Speaker 3>of the Neuvo Republicans, you know, the Maga crowd, I

1:16:21.600 --> 1:16:23.799
<v Speaker 3>don't think they care for Dwine all that much.

1:16:23.800 --> 1:16:26.439
<v Speaker 8>And quite frankly, that not a polite way of putting it.

1:16:26.720 --> 1:16:29.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I just I just don't since he

1:16:29.600 --> 1:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>has the political clout inside the GOP that he once had,

1:16:33.560 --> 1:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering what the endorsement of the wine really means

1:16:36.360 --> 1:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>in this race.

1:16:36.920 --> 1:16:37.719
<v Speaker 3>Does it mean anything?

1:16:39.400 --> 1:16:42.240
<v Speaker 8>I think it means I think it would almost mean

1:16:42.400 --> 1:16:43.599
<v Speaker 8>more if.

1:16:43.479 --> 1:16:48.200
<v Speaker 13>He completely quiet on it, or you know, he went

1:16:48.280 --> 1:16:53.439
<v Speaker 13>and endorsed any action. I think the left and their allies,

1:16:53.520 --> 1:16:55.920
<v Speaker 13>including in the mainstream media, would.

1:16:55.840 --> 1:16:57.720
<v Speaker 8>Make a ton out of it. And how could they not,

1:16:58.000 --> 1:16:58.879
<v Speaker 8>you know, that would.

1:16:58.720 --> 1:17:02.040
<v Speaker 13>Be pretty awkward. You know, Oh, the Republican governor is

1:17:02.160 --> 1:17:05.320
<v Speaker 13>not endorsing his heir apparents. I think that would I

1:17:05.439 --> 1:17:07.760
<v Speaker 13>think so. I think it shows even yet, even if

1:17:07.800 --> 1:17:11.160
<v Speaker 13>it means nothing, even if you know, like, oh, the

1:17:11.240 --> 1:17:13.240
<v Speaker 13>Republican endorsed the Republican.

1:17:12.800 --> 1:17:13.360
<v Speaker 8>Well there you go.

1:17:13.560 --> 1:17:17.880
<v Speaker 13>At least it keeps that narrative out that oh dyke,

1:17:18.040 --> 1:17:22.719
<v Speaker 13>you know, Republicans are at united, especially because speaking of unity,

1:17:23.439 --> 1:17:26.200
<v Speaker 13>that is the main scene that I've been hearing from

1:17:26.360 --> 1:17:30.720
<v Speaker 13>Ohio Republican Party Chairman Alex Chantefalo I went to an

1:17:30.760 --> 1:17:34.800
<v Speaker 13>event in September in Columbus where the bag. Gramaswammi and

1:17:35.400 --> 1:17:39.080
<v Speaker 13>Senator John Houston were endorsing each other, and the chairman

1:17:39.120 --> 1:17:41.760
<v Speaker 13>spoke before and he focused on unity and how much

1:17:41.880 --> 1:17:45.800
<v Speaker 13>the Ohio Republican Party is behind Ramaswami.

1:17:45.960 --> 1:17:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought it was wise for DeWine. Look, there's

1:17:49.760 --> 1:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>one thing that every politician has, and that's an ego.

1:17:52.600 --> 1:17:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Every politician has.

1:17:53.760 --> 1:17:56.400
<v Speaker 3>One, and maybe in the back of the politics, Yeah,

1:17:56.520 --> 1:17:59.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe the back of DeWine's mind that there's a place

1:17:59.120 --> 1:18:01.799
<v Speaker 3>for him in party politics, maybe even in a grander

1:18:01.880 --> 1:18:03.160
<v Speaker 3>stage than in Ohio.

1:18:03.680 --> 1:18:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I doubt it, but maybe that's that's part of it.

1:18:06.600 --> 1:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>He's playing this much better than John Kasch.

1:18:09.640 --> 1:18:12.120
<v Speaker 8>I think that guy's completely I was thinking of.

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's completely alienated himself from the GOP and kind

1:18:16.040 --> 1:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>of kind of looks foolish with some of the stuff

1:18:18.160 --> 1:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>he's been doing. So I think I think that this

1:18:21.400 --> 1:18:24.400
<v Speaker 2>was probably a wise political move on de Wine's part.

1:18:24.560 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 2>If he had endorsed Amy Acton, he'd have been dead

1:18:27.360 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 2>in the water because he would never be embraced by Democrats.

1:18:30.439 --> 1:18:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he'd be embraced, as you said, by the media

1:18:33.200 --> 1:18:36.360
<v Speaker 2>for a hard minute, but by Democrats, he would never

1:18:36.479 --> 1:18:38.719
<v Speaker 2>be embraced and he'd be ostracized from the GOP.

1:18:39.120 --> 1:18:42.240
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, and that's exactly what John Keitha did. I'm sure

1:18:42.320 --> 1:18:45.280
<v Speaker 13>you and your listeners recall he was invited. I think

1:18:45.320 --> 1:18:49.320
<v Speaker 13>he did speak at the twenty twenty DNC. But then

1:18:49.560 --> 1:18:52.639
<v Speaker 13>Democrat voters were like, well, you don't like John Keisick.

1:18:52.760 --> 1:18:55.320
<v Speaker 8>He's a Republican. Why are you inviting this guy? So

1:18:56.120 --> 1:18:57.120
<v Speaker 8>a good example.

1:18:57.600 --> 1:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean these urinating contests that that the old

1:19:01.120 --> 1:19:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Reagan Republicans think that they've got with MAGA. It's like,

1:19:04.720 --> 1:19:08.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, Ronald Reagan, he was a great president. He

1:19:08.600 --> 1:19:10.400
<v Speaker 2>might have been the greatest president of my time. I

1:19:10.439 --> 1:19:12.439
<v Speaker 2>don't know for everything that he achieved, but he's not

1:19:12.520 --> 1:19:14.840
<v Speaker 2>coming back and I don't think that's coming back to

1:19:14.920 --> 1:19:16.439
<v Speaker 2>that party anytime soon, do you.

1:19:18.160 --> 1:19:18.559
<v Speaker 8>I don't.

1:19:19.080 --> 1:19:21.519
<v Speaker 13>I'm I'm tickled to hear how you think he's the

1:19:21.680 --> 1:19:24.360
<v Speaker 13>greatest president because I only wish I lived under Reagan.

1:19:24.680 --> 1:19:27.120
<v Speaker 8>But yes, you're in a different era. You're in a

1:19:27.240 --> 1:19:30.400
<v Speaker 8>completely different era. We you know, for better or worse, it's.

1:19:30.320 --> 1:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>The drump era now, right, And to cling onto the

1:19:33.960 --> 1:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>past when no chance of it coming back is just

1:19:36.400 --> 1:19:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to me, it's just it's unrealistic.

1:19:38.240 --> 1:19:42.439
<v Speaker 3>It's like, it's right, it's like saying the Beatles are

1:19:42.479 --> 1:19:43.960
<v Speaker 3>going to start touring next year.

1:19:44.000 --> 1:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>It's they're not. They're not coming back. Let's talk about

1:19:48.320 --> 1:19:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the other side of this ticket. Amy Acton and David Pepper.

1:19:51.920 --> 1:19:54.080
<v Speaker 2>David Pepper is a well known Cincinnati and he's been

1:19:54.120 --> 1:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>on city council. His dad was the CEO of P

1:19:57.240 --> 1:19:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and G. I mean, it's a it's a large name

1:20:00.120 --> 1:20:04.719
<v Speaker 2>in Democrat politics. How much does David Pepper, in your opinion,

1:20:04.880 --> 1:20:05.879
<v Speaker 2>help Amy act.

1:20:07.200 --> 1:20:10.840
<v Speaker 13>Oh I don't know if he will will help Amy

1:20:10.880 --> 1:20:16.000
<v Speaker 13>action that much given his electoral history in other races.

1:20:16.080 --> 1:20:19.240
<v Speaker 13>Although a local Democrat, I'm friends, but there are a

1:20:19.280 --> 1:20:20.799
<v Speaker 13>few of them in my family.

1:20:21.680 --> 1:20:24.080
<v Speaker 8>Pointed out that he yep, oh, yeah.

1:20:24.600 --> 1:20:28.519
<v Speaker 13>He pointed out that he was a former DNC chair

1:20:28.640 --> 1:20:31.160
<v Speaker 13>And even if you're like, well, that record isn't that

1:20:31.360 --> 1:20:35.760
<v Speaker 13>great when for Ohio, he does have the connection as

1:20:35.800 --> 1:20:37.599
<v Speaker 13>a former party chairman.

1:20:38.040 --> 1:20:41.519
<v Speaker 8>So my thinking is that well helped. But at the

1:20:41.600 --> 1:20:46.040
<v Speaker 8>same time, I was looking at his electoral history in

1:20:46.120 --> 1:20:46.799
<v Speaker 8>the same way.

1:20:46.680 --> 1:20:49.200
<v Speaker 13>I was actually looking at Jim wall Who's electoral history

1:20:49.640 --> 1:20:51.920
<v Speaker 13>and how he got less and less vote each time

1:20:52.000 --> 1:20:52.960
<v Speaker 13>he ran for governor.

1:20:53.439 --> 1:20:54.840
<v Speaker 8>But I don't.

1:20:55.520 --> 1:20:57.920
<v Speaker 13>I don't know if she could have picked a stronger

1:20:58.000 --> 1:21:01.880
<v Speaker 13>picking up barbeade from me to giv iiodemocrats advice. I

1:21:02.120 --> 1:21:04.439
<v Speaker 13>just that really surprised me that that would be the

1:21:04.520 --> 1:21:08.639
<v Speaker 13>pick she went with. And I have seen Republicans Ohio

1:21:08.760 --> 1:21:12.439
<v Speaker 13>Republicans just mocking him from you know here to High

1:21:12.479 --> 1:21:16.719
<v Speaker 13>Heaven David Pepper and Amy action for picking David Pepper.

1:21:17.040 --> 1:21:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, well, he got his clock cleaned by DeWine.

1:21:20.360 --> 1:21:23.479
<v Speaker 2>I think it was in twenty fourteen for the uh

1:21:23.720 --> 1:21:27.439
<v Speaker 2>any attorney general, and then the host handled him fairly

1:21:27.520 --> 1:21:30.559
<v Speaker 2>well for that open seat when he ran for an auditor.

1:21:31.160 --> 1:21:33.679
<v Speaker 2>But he was he was very active and successful around

1:21:33.720 --> 1:21:37.720
<v Speaker 2>here in local politics. Ran for mayor, did not get

1:21:38.160 --> 1:21:40.759
<v Speaker 2>did not get elected mayor. Mark Mallory won that election

1:21:40.920 --> 1:21:43.840
<v Speaker 2>back in five. I'm just wondering about the strength of

1:21:43.920 --> 1:21:47.679
<v Speaker 2>that ticket. She her political accuting, Yeah, their political accume

1:21:47.840 --> 1:21:52.320
<v Speaker 2>basically began with when DeWine all but abdicated all of

1:21:52.360 --> 1:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the responsibility to her during COVID, and I think she

1:21:57.000 --> 1:22:00.160
<v Speaker 2>alienated most of the state. Now she's back as the

1:22:00.240 --> 1:22:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Democrat Darling. I just I can't what would her base

1:22:04.280 --> 1:22:07.799
<v Speaker 2>be other than nobody wants the Vake Ramaswami as governor.

1:22:07.840 --> 1:22:09.360
<v Speaker 2>What what would her base be?

1:22:10.880 --> 1:22:14.599
<v Speaker 13>That's a good question, you know, certainly if you don't want, well,

1:22:14.680 --> 1:22:16.320
<v Speaker 13>I don't want the Dake Grandma Swamy.

1:22:16.400 --> 1:22:19.240
<v Speaker 8>That crowd my other choice to ding the acting.

1:22:20.160 --> 1:22:23.479
<v Speaker 13>She seems like a nice lady in all honesty. Maybe

1:22:23.520 --> 1:22:27.200
<v Speaker 13>somebody's like, I really don't like Republicans. I don't know

1:22:27.479 --> 1:22:29.960
<v Speaker 13>much about any action, but she's not the Dake Grandma

1:22:30.040 --> 1:22:33.559
<v Speaker 13>Swamy or you know, I trust her as a doctor.

1:22:34.000 --> 1:22:36.920
<v Speaker 13>I don't want to say that it would be uninformed

1:22:37.000 --> 1:22:39.479
<v Speaker 13>people voting for her, but but you know what I mean,

1:22:39.520 --> 1:22:43.679
<v Speaker 13>people who might not be so in the news about Okay,

1:22:43.840 --> 1:22:46.759
<v Speaker 13>she had her emergency power stripped away, which is actually

1:22:46.800 --> 1:22:49.920
<v Speaker 13>what Rob McCauley talked about on Wednesday night when he

1:22:50.120 --> 1:22:51.480
<v Speaker 13>just estaped for that announcement.

1:22:51.960 --> 1:22:55.680
<v Speaker 8>He basically made his entire the premise of what he.

1:22:55.840 --> 1:23:01.680
<v Speaker 13>Was saying about how she was a quitter is not so,

1:23:02.000 --> 1:23:03.960
<v Speaker 13>you know, I thought that was a very interesting take

1:23:04.040 --> 1:23:04.559
<v Speaker 13>on his part.

1:23:04.720 --> 1:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, could be a theme throughout the campaign. We're chatting

1:23:07.320 --> 1:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>with Rebecca Downs the Daily Signal. We're talking about Ohio politics.

1:23:11.720 --> 1:23:17.040
<v Speaker 2>You and I briefly touched on the Senate race John Houstead,

1:23:17.160 --> 1:23:20.360
<v Speaker 2>who I'm sure is well known inside the GOP in Ohio.

1:23:20.880 --> 1:23:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Nobody seems to know who the hell he is outside that.

1:23:23.120 --> 1:23:25.439
<v Speaker 2>I think the survey that we talked about forty percent

1:23:25.479 --> 1:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>of this the state does you know who he is?

1:23:29.080 --> 1:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>And so here he is in Washington, d C. Filling

1:23:31.880 --> 1:23:35.200
<v Speaker 2>out the term of JD Vance and back in not

1:23:35.320 --> 1:23:38.360
<v Speaker 2>a shame to cry, is shared Brown, and he's running

1:23:38.400 --> 1:23:43.360
<v Speaker 2>against Houston. Let's just an update on that race. Brown

1:23:43.560 --> 1:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>was you know, he's been around as long as it

1:23:46.120 --> 1:23:51.599
<v Speaker 2>seems like the capital has existed, and it was roundly

1:23:51.760 --> 1:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>defeated the last time out. What does he have in

1:23:55.520 --> 1:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>his favor going up against John Houston?

1:24:00.479 --> 1:24:00.799
<v Speaker 8>Shared?

1:24:00.880 --> 1:24:03.720
<v Speaker 13>Brown is a well known name in Ohio politics also

1:24:03.800 --> 1:24:06.240
<v Speaker 13>outside of Ohio, So you know that could help with

1:24:06.680 --> 1:24:09.240
<v Speaker 13>out of state donations, which I always have a take

1:24:09.320 --> 1:24:11.680
<v Speaker 13>on is like, Okay, these people can give money, but

1:24:11.800 --> 1:24:14.320
<v Speaker 13>they can't actually vote here in Ohio. So let's see

1:24:14.360 --> 1:24:19.120
<v Speaker 13>how that translates. He John Hoaston would say to that

1:24:19.320 --> 1:24:21.840
<v Speaker 13>in response to, oh, he's well known, is John Houston

1:24:21.880 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 13>said out a pre press conference I was at last month, Well,

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:27.360
<v Speaker 13>you know along the lines of well, he doesn't really

1:24:27.479 --> 1:24:31.000
<v Speaker 13>he John Houston doesn't really want to be associated with

1:24:31.280 --> 1:24:33.280
<v Speaker 13>oh He's well known in the sunset.

1:24:33.360 --> 1:24:38.759
<v Speaker 8>People really don't like Washington, DC politics. And John Houston

1:24:38.840 --> 1:24:40.680
<v Speaker 8>is an Ohio guy. He told me right, He's calls

1:24:40.720 --> 1:24:42.599
<v Speaker 8>all those statewide roles.

1:24:43.200 --> 1:24:47.799
<v Speaker 13>So he has the support of I mean, Chuck Schumer

1:24:48.600 --> 1:24:49.479
<v Speaker 13>really recruited him.

1:24:49.479 --> 1:24:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Chuck.

1:24:50.080 --> 1:24:52.240
<v Speaker 13>Schumer has his own problems, but he's not even up

1:24:52.320 --> 1:24:56.200
<v Speaker 13>for re elections this cycle. But the Democrats seem to

1:24:56.360 --> 1:24:58.840
<v Speaker 13>like and he also has done well in the past

1:24:58.920 --> 1:25:02.600
<v Speaker 13>with independence so called moderates because he's considered a so

1:25:02.800 --> 1:25:06.280
<v Speaker 13>called moderate. I think it's I think John eastid has

1:25:06.320 --> 1:25:09.360
<v Speaker 13>a good chance. But I think it's really going to

1:25:09.400 --> 1:25:12.320
<v Speaker 13>be a race to watch. And if John east is losing,

1:25:13.320 --> 1:25:14.960
<v Speaker 13>I think that's going to be a bell lother.

1:25:14.880 --> 1:25:16.760
<v Speaker 8>For how the rest of it night is going to go. Yeah,

1:25:16.800 --> 1:25:19.680
<v Speaker 8>you know Republicans overall nationwide.

1:25:19.920 --> 1:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's incumbent. If Trump really wants to

1:25:24.040 --> 1:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>get involved in this election here in Ohio, and well,

1:25:26.840 --> 1:25:29.599
<v Speaker 2>I guess is why wouldn't he be, But he's got

1:25:29.680 --> 1:25:32.479
<v Speaker 2>to get together with Thune Trump does and figure out

1:25:32.520 --> 1:25:38.559
<v Speaker 2>a way to boost John Houston's reckon just his status

1:25:38.720 --> 1:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>in the state and forty. I saw this pole a

1:25:40.880 --> 1:25:44.760
<v Speaker 2>month ago. People don't know who he is. That's good,

1:25:44.880 --> 1:25:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess, whatever picture you want to yourself. But it's

1:25:47.800 --> 1:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>also pretty darn bad for a guy that's been in

1:25:50.120 --> 1:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>a while politics forever. So I think he has to

1:25:53.160 --> 1:25:55.600
<v Speaker 2>boost his visibility in Washington, don't you.

1:25:57.120 --> 1:25:59.599
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely Trump did offer an endorsement.

1:25:59.640 --> 1:26:01.160
<v Speaker 8>I believe Jady Vance did as well.

1:26:01.240 --> 1:26:03.880
<v Speaker 13>If you said, campaign is certainly speaking to that and

1:26:04.080 --> 1:26:08.120
<v Speaker 13>promoting that, but he's just, you know, there's not You

1:26:08.240 --> 1:26:11.960
<v Speaker 13>have some quieter senators and some more in your faith senators,

1:26:12.240 --> 1:26:14.040
<v Speaker 13>and it's okay to be a quiet senator in a

1:26:14.080 --> 1:26:14.719
<v Speaker 13>lot of ways.

1:26:14.600 --> 1:26:15.280
<v Speaker 8>Get a lot done.

1:26:15.600 --> 1:26:18.720
<v Speaker 13>But it will it does present again, the campaign would

1:26:18.760 --> 1:26:23.040
<v Speaker 13>call it an opportunity. That's definitely an opportunity. We'll see

1:26:23.040 --> 1:26:24.519
<v Speaker 13>if they're going to see that. We're now in the

1:26:24.600 --> 1:26:28.040
<v Speaker 13>new year, so let's see. Let's see how that will

1:26:28.080 --> 1:26:31.160
<v Speaker 13>turn out, especially if they're going to maybe have campaign

1:26:31.200 --> 1:26:35.680
<v Speaker 13>events together. He said of Gramaswami, my understanding and conversations

1:26:35.760 --> 1:26:40.400
<v Speaker 13>I've had that's been at least implied that the ticket

1:26:40.520 --> 1:26:42.479
<v Speaker 13>is going to kind of help each other out, and

1:26:42.800 --> 1:26:43.920
<v Speaker 13>we'll see where that goes.

1:26:44.680 --> 1:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>All under the purview of another Cincinnati guy, Alex Treantapila,

1:26:48.000 --> 1:26:51.160
<v Speaker 2>who is the Ohio Republican Party chairman. It's amazing, Rebecca,

1:26:51.280 --> 1:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>how all things filter back to Cincinnati. Doesn't know what

1:26:54.040 --> 1:26:58.719
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about. Whether it's politics, sports, medicine, international affairs,

1:26:58.760 --> 1:27:02.160
<v Speaker 2>everything seems to filter back to Cincinnati. Rebecca down, Yeah,

1:27:02.640 --> 1:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the daily Yes, yes, you for your time today. Keep

1:27:06.920 --> 1:27:08.320
<v Speaker 2>up the good work and we'll be in touch.

1:27:08.520 --> 1:27:11.960
<v Speaker 8>Thanks, thank you. Have a great weekend, you too, you.

1:27:12.080 --> 1:27:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Too, We'll see. I don't know.

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:17.320
<v Speaker 2>We got a long way to go before election, before

1:27:17.360 --> 1:27:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the gubernatorial election in November. I don't know how much

1:27:20.520 --> 1:27:23.759
<v Speaker 2>McCaulay helps with the general electorate. I certainly did inside

1:27:23.800 --> 1:27:26.360
<v Speaker 2>his own party. And I have no idea about David Pepper.

1:27:26.400 --> 1:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I just I just think the top of that ticket

1:27:29.240 --> 1:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>when you when you just peel it away is I

1:27:31.760 --> 1:27:35.040
<v Speaker 2>just think she's she's very unpopular, and whether or not

1:27:35.439 --> 1:27:37.880
<v Speaker 2>she actually winds up with a nomination, it would appear

1:27:38.000 --> 1:27:38.360
<v Speaker 2>she would.

1:27:39.520 --> 1:27:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what kind of I don't know what kind.

1:27:42.800 --> 1:27:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Of traction she's got from an electric stamp, an electoric standpoint.

1:27:47.560 --> 1:27:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Find out, that's why they play the games, right, coming

1:27:50.400 --> 1:27:53.880
<v Speaker 2>up on two twenty seven, News Radio seven hundred WLW.

1:28:01.320 --> 1:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Now your host Ken Brew on news Radio seven hundred WLW.

1:28:06.720 --> 1:28:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Hey, we've got a little bonus coverage today, normally done three,

1:28:10.120 --> 1:28:13.160
<v Speaker 3>taking it right up to three thirty. In Xavier basketball

1:28:13.280 --> 1:28:17.200
<v Speaker 3>against Providence, Xavier struggling. They've lost three in a row.

1:28:17.240 --> 1:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>They've only won twice since defeating the University of Cincinnati

1:28:21.040 --> 1:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and the Crosstown shootout. Of course, they had that long

1:28:23.000 --> 1:28:27.360
<v Speaker 2>break in December. But nevertheless, on whard they pressed today

1:28:27.400 --> 1:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>against Providence. There was a poll that was out latter

1:28:31.920 --> 1:28:35.160
<v Speaker 2>part of twenty twenty five, and it caught my eye

1:28:35.240 --> 1:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>because I think it speaks to what a lot of

1:28:37.040 --> 1:28:39.479
<v Speaker 2>what we speak about here on this show and certainly

1:28:39.520 --> 1:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>other shows on seven hundred a WLW was conducted by

1:28:43.320 --> 1:28:44.960
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times in Ceno.

1:28:45.120 --> 1:28:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Sienna is a university. Liberal university.

1:28:49.439 --> 1:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust polling that's conducted in any way, shape

1:28:52.280 --> 1:28:55.960
<v Speaker 2>or form by any university that's not to run down

1:28:56.120 --> 1:28:59.479
<v Speaker 2>universities per se. I just don't think that polling in

1:28:59.600 --> 1:29:03.479
<v Speaker 2>general has a very good track record, and then when

1:29:03.520 --> 1:29:06.479
<v Speaker 2>you combine it with universities, it seems to get worse.

1:29:06.520 --> 1:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, I did find this interesting. Many of us,

1:29:10.920 --> 1:29:14.679
<v Speaker 2>you and me, believe that America is too politically divided. Duh,

1:29:15.120 --> 1:29:18.519
<v Speaker 2>of course it is, though some of the polling that

1:29:18.760 --> 1:29:21.639
<v Speaker 2>was done in there leads one to believe that maybe

1:29:21.800 --> 1:29:26.280
<v Speaker 2>we're not salvageable as a society when it comes to politics.

1:29:26.920 --> 1:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Sixty four percent of registered voters think the country's sharp

1:29:31.360 --> 1:29:34.920
<v Speaker 2>divisions cannot solve political problems, and one third of us

1:29:34.960 --> 1:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>say the political system still has merit and we can

1:29:39.160 --> 1:29:41.880
<v Speaker 2>get to the bottom of what's wrong. Now that's a

1:29:41.960 --> 1:29:44.080
<v Speaker 2>huge jump from the last time this poll was done

1:29:44.080 --> 1:29:46.559
<v Speaker 2>about five years ago. Forty two percent of the country

1:29:46.600 --> 1:29:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Back then thought the nation was too divided to solve

1:29:49.439 --> 1:29:52.000
<v Speaker 2>its problems. Fifty one percent said the country could still

1:29:52.040 --> 1:29:55.519
<v Speaker 2>do it. Now it's at sixty four registered voters who

1:29:55.600 --> 1:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>think the country is divided to a point where it's

1:29:59.240 --> 1:30:03.920
<v Speaker 2>unsolvable unsalvagable, and thirty three percent say the system can

1:30:04.840 --> 1:30:07.960
<v Speaker 2>address the problems. It just seems like this is getting

1:30:08.120 --> 1:30:12.200
<v Speaker 2>worse and worse. So from time to time I am

1:30:12.240 --> 1:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>on a guy that I think is really interesting. I

1:30:14.120 --> 1:30:16.880
<v Speaker 2>hope you find it this way too. His name is

1:30:16.920 --> 1:30:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Peter Lemage. He is someone who came to this country,

1:30:20.320 --> 1:30:26.559
<v Speaker 2>emigrated to this country legally. He was from Albania, which,

1:30:26.640 --> 1:30:30.040
<v Speaker 2>as you know, is not a country that's very open minded,

1:30:31.160 --> 1:30:33.799
<v Speaker 2>and he settled in Connecticut. He's run for political office

1:30:33.880 --> 1:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>up there in Connecticut and unsuccessfully on a number of times.

1:30:37.160 --> 1:30:41.080
<v Speaker 2>He's running in twenty twenty six for the job of

1:30:41.240 --> 1:30:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of State in the great state of Connecticut. But

1:30:45.560 --> 1:30:47.719
<v Speaker 2>like I say, I value his opinion and I wanted

1:30:47.760 --> 1:30:50.720
<v Speaker 2>to get his thoughts on this poll and whether or

1:30:50.800 --> 1:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>not our society as a whole when it comes to politics,

1:30:56.240 --> 1:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>is saveable, if not salvageable.

1:31:00.120 --> 1:31:02.360
<v Speaker 3>So let's welcome in, Peter Lamage. Good to have you

1:31:02.439 --> 1:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>with us. How are I in this fine Saturday.

1:31:05.280 --> 1:31:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing well.

1:31:06.000 --> 1:31:06.800
<v Speaker 8>Thank you for having me.

1:31:06.880 --> 1:31:08.639
<v Speaker 3>How you doing I'm doing well too.

1:31:08.720 --> 1:31:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad that you're here, because, as you well know,

1:31:11.360 --> 1:31:13.920
<v Speaker 2>we are a country that is at each other's throats.

1:31:13.920 --> 1:31:16.880
<v Speaker 2>And it's all because it seems like politics here. Now,

1:31:16.920 --> 1:31:20.080
<v Speaker 2>a New New York Times siena pol that shows sixty

1:31:20.200 --> 1:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>four percent of us of voters now believe America is

1:31:24.720 --> 1:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>too divided to solve its problems. And this is a

1:31:28.479 --> 1:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>stunning drop and optimism compared to just a couple of

1:31:31.479 --> 1:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>years ago.

1:31:32.600 --> 1:31:33.679
<v Speaker 3>Sixty four percent.

1:31:33.880 --> 1:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Doctor, that's two and every three of us think this

1:31:36.439 --> 1:31:38.200
<v Speaker 2>thing is hopeless here in this country.

1:31:38.560 --> 1:31:41.519
<v Speaker 3>Please give us some hope and tell us why. Yet again,

1:31:41.600 --> 1:31:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times may be wrong.

1:31:44.560 --> 1:31:46.560
<v Speaker 7>Look, I was reading the poll, but the pool. But

1:31:46.840 --> 1:31:48.800
<v Speaker 7>you have to understand one thing. New York Times has

1:31:48.960 --> 1:31:53.000
<v Speaker 7>not been doing justice to conducting these polls. And I

1:31:53.040 --> 1:31:55.720
<v Speaker 7>would take that with a grain of salt when it

1:31:55.800 --> 1:31:58.920
<v Speaker 7>comes to the American population. But for the fact with

1:31:59.000 --> 1:32:01.439
<v Speaker 7>the American people, but for the fact that the media

1:32:01.560 --> 1:32:06.120
<v Speaker 7>keeps on driving this divide between them, the academia, the politicians. Otherwise,

1:32:06.160 --> 1:32:09.000
<v Speaker 7>American people ordinary posts like you and I. We wake

1:32:09.080 --> 1:32:11.439
<v Speaker 7>up in the morning, we go to work, support our families.

1:32:11.680 --> 1:32:15.160
<v Speaker 7>We don't think about disliking each other. Somehow, New York

1:32:15.200 --> 1:32:18.040
<v Speaker 7>Times finding that people to come up with a fall

1:32:18.120 --> 1:32:20.599
<v Speaker 7>that sixty four percent or sixty three to sixty four

1:32:20.680 --> 1:32:25.880
<v Speaker 7>percent of the American people believe that America cannot resolve.

1:32:25.479 --> 1:32:26.640
<v Speaker 8>Its own challenges.

1:32:26.960 --> 1:32:29.439
<v Speaker 7>They forget the fact that we have faced greater challenges

1:32:29.479 --> 1:32:32.200
<v Speaker 7>in the past. You can go back to eighteen sixty one,

1:32:32.240 --> 1:32:34.240
<v Speaker 7>eighteen sixty five, will report a civil war.

1:32:34.560 --> 1:32:35.960
<v Speaker 8>We have the civil rights.

1:32:35.840 --> 1:32:39.599
<v Speaker 7>Movements, we have the ninety eleven attack. Somehow Americans find

1:32:39.640 --> 1:32:43.200
<v Speaker 7>a way of uniting when it comes to Americanism. But

1:32:43.520 --> 1:32:46.559
<v Speaker 7>New York Times, for whatever reason, you know, it's able

1:32:46.720 --> 1:32:50.559
<v Speaker 7>to come up with these numbers. We still see people

1:32:50.640 --> 1:32:53.360
<v Speaker 7>from all over the world wanting to come to the

1:32:53.479 --> 1:32:57.600
<v Speaker 7>United States, both legally and illegally, because they see America

1:32:57.880 --> 1:33:02.200
<v Speaker 7>as the exceptional nation that we are where people have

1:33:02.320 --> 1:33:05.120
<v Speaker 7>the opportunity to live the American dream, to pursue the

1:33:05.200 --> 1:33:08.519
<v Speaker 7>American dream. And every time that you have American born

1:33:08.640 --> 1:33:13.640
<v Speaker 7>citizens trying to promote something that is not quite American.

1:33:14.160 --> 1:33:17.240
<v Speaker 7>People like me who give the United States thirty six

1:33:17.360 --> 1:33:20.680
<v Speaker 7>years ago so refugee, we really are battled by it

1:33:20.880 --> 1:33:24.479
<v Speaker 7>that they think that we are just another country in

1:33:24.560 --> 1:33:28.240
<v Speaker 7>the world. America is that exceptional country that was founded

1:33:28.280 --> 1:33:32.080
<v Speaker 7>by the founding fathers of this country, and it remains

1:33:32.160 --> 1:33:35.000
<v Speaker 7>the strongest and the most prosperous and the greatest nation

1:33:35.120 --> 1:33:37.120
<v Speaker 7>in the world. And I don't say that for you

1:33:37.320 --> 1:33:39.320
<v Speaker 7>just because I live in the United States. It is

1:33:39.800 --> 1:33:41.879
<v Speaker 7>the fact that when I compare it with the countries

1:33:41.920 --> 1:33:43.920
<v Speaker 7>that I've visited, that I've seen, that I've lived in,

1:33:44.800 --> 1:33:49.120
<v Speaker 7>it is just completely different from the rest of the world,

1:33:49.320 --> 1:33:52.040
<v Speaker 7>and I think that we're maintaining that position. We're maintaining

1:33:52.080 --> 1:33:54.400
<v Speaker 7>that of those standards, regardless of what The New York

1:33:54.439 --> 1:33:55.920
<v Speaker 7>Times is reporting on that board.

1:33:56.040 --> 1:33:59.599
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Peter is not just the Times. In April,

1:33:59.680 --> 1:34:03.520
<v Speaker 2>there was a group called the Network Contagion Research Institute

1:34:03.760 --> 1:34:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and Rutgers University sponsored this that had found that fifty

1:34:07.120 --> 1:34:11.400
<v Speaker 2>five percent, fifty five percent of self identified left of

1:34:11.479 --> 1:34:15.320
<v Speaker 2>center respondents said that it was at least somewhat justified

1:34:15.800 --> 1:34:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to murder President Trump. In twenty seventeen, u goov, you know,

1:34:19.840 --> 1:34:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the YouGov group, they were asked people, was it justified

1:34:24.360 --> 1:34:28.880
<v Speaker 2>to advance political goals with violence? Eight percent said just

1:34:28.960 --> 1:34:31.400
<v Speaker 2>a little bit justified. Well, they come back and they

1:34:31.479 --> 1:34:34.760
<v Speaker 2>do that same poll again after Charlie Kirk was assassinated,

1:34:35.120 --> 1:34:39.280
<v Speaker 2>eleven percent said violence can sometimes be justified to achieve

1:34:39.360 --> 1:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>political goals. Let's let's be honest here. The left of

1:34:44.720 --> 1:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>center group is a dangerous group right now. And I

1:34:48.000 --> 1:34:51.519
<v Speaker 2>think if you're getting something like what Rutger's got, and

1:34:51.600 --> 1:34:54.400
<v Speaker 2>it could quite possibly be an outlier. And I don't

1:34:54.439 --> 1:34:57.000
<v Speaker 2>trust any kind of a polling. I think it is

1:34:57.040 --> 1:35:00.880
<v Speaker 2>an outdated metric. But Nevertheless, I don't see how you

1:35:01.000 --> 1:35:04.520
<v Speaker 2>come back from something like that. That's that's that's radicalism

1:35:04.640 --> 1:35:06.080
<v Speaker 2>right there, your thoughts.

1:35:07.280 --> 1:35:09.200
<v Speaker 7>No one can deny the fact that we have been,

1:35:09.600 --> 1:35:12.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, the United States has been radicalized in a

1:35:12.160 --> 1:35:15.040
<v Speaker 7>certain group of or a certain part of the population

1:35:15.280 --> 1:35:15.880
<v Speaker 7>United States.

1:35:16.200 --> 1:35:17.800
<v Speaker 8>One of the greatest mistakes.

1:35:17.400 --> 1:35:19.599
<v Speaker 7>That we have been making in the last I would

1:35:19.600 --> 1:35:22.320
<v Speaker 7>say forty fifty years is that we have been importing

1:35:22.439 --> 1:35:24.680
<v Speaker 7>certain cultures in the United States that they are not

1:35:24.840 --> 1:35:27.519
<v Speaker 7>compatible with our values and what we stand for.

1:35:28.160 --> 1:35:29.160
<v Speaker 8>Violence should never.

1:35:29.120 --> 1:35:33.040
<v Speaker 7>Be justified to settle political differences, you know, in the

1:35:33.120 --> 1:35:34.519
<v Speaker 7>United States or anyone else.

1:35:34.439 --> 1:35:35.479
<v Speaker 8>In the world for that matter.

1:35:35.960 --> 1:35:37.840
<v Speaker 7>But when you look at that goal, you see that

1:35:37.960 --> 1:35:41.519
<v Speaker 7>the majority that the largest majority of the Republicans disagree

1:35:41.560 --> 1:35:43.880
<v Speaker 7>with that. I think it was ninety percent department mistake,

1:35:43.960 --> 1:35:47.400
<v Speaker 7>or even greater. It was the fringers in the United

1:35:47.439 --> 1:35:50.200
<v Speaker 7>States that they believe that if you disagree with someone

1:35:50.240 --> 1:35:55.280
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to certain political principles or values, violence

1:35:55.320 --> 1:35:58.519
<v Speaker 7>may be justified, and that is something that we should

1:35:58.640 --> 1:36:02.000
<v Speaker 7>never tolerate in United State. But that number sometimes surprises me.

1:36:02.160 --> 1:36:04.800
<v Speaker 7>That is not even higher when you see that we

1:36:04.960 --> 1:36:09.320
<v Speaker 7>have professors in our institution that are promoted anti Americanism,

1:36:09.360 --> 1:36:12.400
<v Speaker 7>and that they think that Republicans are evil, that President

1:36:13.200 --> 1:36:15.360
<v Speaker 7>Trump is evil, that he's a notpted, that he's this

1:36:15.479 --> 1:36:18.520
<v Speaker 7>fassions that I mean, the way they describe the Republicans

1:36:18.600 --> 1:36:20.960
<v Speaker 7>sometimes is like, I'm surprised that the number is not

1:36:21.040 --> 1:36:25.320
<v Speaker 7>even higher. You barely hear Republicans or Conservatives or common

1:36:25.400 --> 1:36:30.560
<v Speaker 7>sensical Democrats, including the senator from Pennsylvania, which surprises me

1:36:30.720 --> 1:36:35.000
<v Speaker 7>sometimes the left that way. The interview that he gave

1:36:35.080 --> 1:36:37.280
<v Speaker 7>last night on Parks or he was speaking somewhere and

1:36:37.320 --> 1:36:39.880
<v Speaker 7>I was following that, he said, I cannot dislike or

1:36:39.960 --> 1:36:43.080
<v Speaker 7>hate Republicans. I'm the only Democrat in my family. He said,

1:36:43.160 --> 1:36:46.000
<v Speaker 7>these people are not anti Americans, they are not passions.

1:36:46.080 --> 1:36:48.400
<v Speaker 7>They are not these crazy people that you think that

1:36:48.479 --> 1:36:51.520
<v Speaker 7>they are. But then on the other hand, the Democrats

1:36:51.560 --> 1:36:55.560
<v Speaker 7>they stand there. But ninety percent of the media in

1:36:55.600 --> 1:36:59.320
<v Speaker 7>the United States, they keep them speaking or promoting negative things.

1:36:59.479 --> 1:37:03.720
<v Speaker 7>But Republicans and so do so do the educational institutions.

1:37:03.760 --> 1:37:07.679
<v Speaker 7>Although the newspapers sometimes and these numbers come from the left,

1:37:07.760 --> 1:37:10.360
<v Speaker 7>and it's unfortunate, but you know that that number is

1:37:10.479 --> 1:37:14.360
<v Speaker 7>quite you know, correct when it comes especially center left

1:37:14.600 --> 1:37:19.280
<v Speaker 7>with Americans that they would believe in, you know, using

1:37:19.439 --> 1:37:22.760
<v Speaker 7>violence to settle political differences. I thought that I would

1:37:22.800 --> 1:37:25.680
<v Speaker 7>never see this in the United States, but unfortunately we've

1:37:25.680 --> 1:37:28.320
<v Speaker 7>seen that. And we saw that with President Trump that

1:37:28.400 --> 1:37:30.560
<v Speaker 7>twice there were you know, attamns on his life. We

1:37:30.640 --> 1:37:33.400
<v Speaker 7>sw that with the assassination of Choraley Kurk. And when

1:37:33.439 --> 1:37:35.960
<v Speaker 7>you look at all these assassinations in the United States

1:37:36.240 --> 1:37:39.360
<v Speaker 7>or attempted assassinations in the United States, the.

1:37:39.439 --> 1:37:42.000
<v Speaker 8>Targets have always, with the exception.

1:37:41.800 --> 1:37:46.080
<v Speaker 7>Of JFK, been Conservatives or Republicans, and the assassins or

1:37:46.120 --> 1:37:49.439
<v Speaker 7>potential assassins, they have always been on the left. And

1:37:49.560 --> 1:37:52.240
<v Speaker 7>this is some this is something that the Democrat Party

1:37:52.600 --> 1:37:54.240
<v Speaker 7>is going to have to come to its terms to

1:37:54.360 --> 1:37:59.320
<v Speaker 7>understand that their membership has to be somehow, uh, the

1:37:59.400 --> 1:38:03.360
<v Speaker 7>more understand and of the differences that the Republicans or

1:38:03.400 --> 1:38:07.120
<v Speaker 7>the political differences that the Republicans are you know, presenting

1:38:07.200 --> 1:38:11.240
<v Speaker 7>to them. And unfortunately I don't see that happening soon enough. Actually,

1:38:11.280 --> 1:38:14.559
<v Speaker 7>we need that as soon as possible, that that boy,

1:38:14.560 --> 1:38:15.720
<v Speaker 7>he's going to have to understand that.

1:38:16.040 --> 1:38:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Peter image our guest. He is a conservative strategist.

1:38:19.520 --> 1:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>He is also a candidate for elective office in Connecticut.

1:38:23.439 --> 1:38:26.519
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think about things about where all of

1:38:26.600 --> 1:38:30.160
<v Speaker 2>this went off the rails. I remember the debates between

1:38:30.240 --> 1:38:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Nixon and Kennedy, between Carter and Ford, between Reagan and Carter,

1:38:35.240 --> 1:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>and so on, and they were all very respectful debates.

1:38:39.600 --> 1:38:42.880
<v Speaker 2>We all knew that the media, even back the mainstream media,

1:38:43.000 --> 1:38:47.360
<v Speaker 2>even back in the sixties, was a leaning left operation.

1:38:48.080 --> 1:38:51.719
<v Speaker 2>It is hard leaning left right now, ABC, CBS, NBC.

1:38:52.360 --> 1:38:55.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just the way they are. They're populated by reporters

1:38:55.760 --> 1:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and strategists and editors that have come out of liberal institutions,

1:39:00.240 --> 1:39:03.519
<v Speaker 2>and so it translates into what we see and here

1:39:03.600 --> 1:39:04.599
<v Speaker 2>on a daily basis.

1:39:05.040 --> 1:39:07.200
<v Speaker 3>But I think this all went off the rails more

1:39:07.240 --> 1:39:07.920
<v Speaker 3>I think about it.

1:39:08.439 --> 1:39:12.840
<v Speaker 2>In the twenty sixteen election, the Democrats fully believed that

1:39:13.080 --> 1:39:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Clinton not only was going to be elected president,

1:39:16.520 --> 1:39:19.320
<v Speaker 2>but deserved to be elected president and should have been

1:39:19.360 --> 1:39:22.599
<v Speaker 2>elected president. And when it didn't happen, I think that's

1:39:22.680 --> 1:39:26.799
<v Speaker 2>when all of this stuff, this Nazis and this Hitler

1:39:26.880 --> 1:39:29.719
<v Speaker 2>and all that, all that diatribe that had been thrown

1:39:29.800 --> 1:39:32.280
<v Speaker 2>against the right. I think it all began in the

1:39:32.360 --> 1:39:35.640
<v Speaker 2>wake of that. I don't think Democrats could handle the

1:39:35.720 --> 1:39:40.360
<v Speaker 2>fact that Donald Trump, whom they loved, doctor they loved before.

1:39:40.160 --> 1:39:41.120
<v Speaker 3>He ran for president.

1:39:41.200 --> 1:39:43.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they could handle the fact that Donald

1:39:43.800 --> 1:39:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump was now president of the United States and the

1:39:46.800 --> 1:39:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Golden Girl Hillary was not.

1:39:49.040 --> 1:39:49.639
<v Speaker 3>Am I wrong?

1:39:51.280 --> 1:39:52.040
<v Speaker 8>No, you're not wrong.

1:39:52.160 --> 1:39:55.560
<v Speaker 7>Actually, the keyword that you used to her here is

1:39:55.640 --> 1:39:58.920
<v Speaker 7>that they believed that she deserved it to be the

1:39:59.000 --> 1:40:01.160
<v Speaker 7>president of the Uni States. And I think that is

1:40:01.479 --> 1:40:05.280
<v Speaker 7>what we should underline, that nobody deserves anything. You walk

1:40:05.320 --> 1:40:07.560
<v Speaker 7>out there, you earn it, you work for it, you

1:40:07.680 --> 1:40:09.960
<v Speaker 7>fight for it, and you get you convince people to

1:40:10.040 --> 1:40:13.320
<v Speaker 7>vote for you. And I think that Clinton miserably failed

1:40:13.400 --> 1:40:16.320
<v Speaker 7>to do that, so did Harris. And Donald Trump was

1:40:16.360 --> 1:40:20.519
<v Speaker 7>able to convince the larger part of the American population

1:40:20.680 --> 1:40:22.599
<v Speaker 7>to vote for him, and they get to the American

1:40:22.640 --> 1:40:25.360
<v Speaker 7>people continue to love him. I mean, still the bas

1:40:25.479 --> 1:40:28.479
<v Speaker 7>is about ninety percent supportive of what Trump stands for

1:40:28.680 --> 1:40:31.080
<v Speaker 7>and what he's doing to put America first. But when

1:40:31.120 --> 1:40:35.040
<v Speaker 7>you look at the Socialist Democrats of America of America,

1:40:35.120 --> 1:40:38.160
<v Speaker 7>for example, you look at the leadership that that movement had,

1:40:38.439 --> 1:40:40.519
<v Speaker 7>and you look at the names over there, whether it's

1:40:40.760 --> 1:40:44.360
<v Speaker 7>Receive at the leap or whether it's Omar or Bernie Sanders,

1:40:44.600 --> 1:40:47.559
<v Speaker 7>Zorah Mandani. Now, I mean, you look at these people

1:40:48.040 --> 1:40:51.760
<v Speaker 7>and it makes you wonder that most of them, or

1:40:51.800 --> 1:40:54.680
<v Speaker 7>all of them, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, they

1:40:54.680 --> 1:40:57.280
<v Speaker 7>were not even born in the United States. They've come

1:40:57.360 --> 1:41:00.560
<v Speaker 7>from countries that they were supposed to escape, or that

1:41:00.560 --> 1:41:05.000
<v Speaker 7>at least we believe they were escaping these liberal, socialistic policies,

1:41:05.280 --> 1:41:07.080
<v Speaker 7>and yet they come to the United States and the

1:41:07.200 --> 1:41:10.880
<v Speaker 7>moment they become American citizens, they promote the exact same

1:41:10.960 --> 1:41:13.800
<v Speaker 7>policies that they left behind in their countries which drove

1:41:13.920 --> 1:41:16.560
<v Speaker 7>them out of their countries. And this is something that

1:41:16.760 --> 1:41:20.519
<v Speaker 7>is that the Democrat Party has allowed this left wing

1:41:21.000 --> 1:41:24.360
<v Speaker 7>part of the party to take control of the party,

1:41:24.479 --> 1:41:28.240
<v Speaker 7>and now the more common sensical people, including the Senator

1:41:28.320 --> 1:41:31.600
<v Speaker 7>from New York, they are afraid of these people, including ocagiquarters,

1:41:31.640 --> 1:41:33.880
<v Speaker 7>that they are going to primary them and remove them

1:41:33.920 --> 1:41:37.519
<v Speaker 7>from power because they have garnished so much support, whether

1:41:37.520 --> 1:41:40.040
<v Speaker 7>it's the youth, whether it's the minorities in these cities,

1:41:40.680 --> 1:41:43.800
<v Speaker 7>whereas the ones that they can consider to be disenfranchised.

1:41:43.960 --> 1:41:45.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean, they have garnished so much support in these

1:41:45.920 --> 1:41:49.120
<v Speaker 7>cities that the common sensical Democrats are scared of them.

1:41:49.960 --> 1:41:52.040
<v Speaker 8>They're going to have to stand up to these you.

1:41:52.080 --> 1:41:58.320
<v Speaker 7>Know, so forth leaders of the socialist Americans and then

1:41:58.520 --> 1:42:01.679
<v Speaker 7>just dismantled their policies. They have to have to bag

1:42:01.760 --> 1:42:03.840
<v Speaker 7>bone the character in the forty two to stand up

1:42:03.880 --> 1:42:06.440
<v Speaker 7>with these people and tell them this is not American

1:42:06.560 --> 1:42:08.680
<v Speaker 7>at all and we're not going to tolerate this.

1:42:08.800 --> 1:42:10.439
<v Speaker 8>And I hope they do that in this election.

1:42:11.120 --> 1:42:14.519
<v Speaker 2>It's been about five or six years ago, but doctor

1:42:14.560 --> 1:42:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Peter Lumage wrote a terrific book. It's called My Father's Prayers,

1:42:18.080 --> 1:42:22.320
<v Speaker 2>and it details coming to America, escaping socialism, and his

1:42:22.439 --> 1:42:24.960
<v Speaker 2>hope for America. If you can find it, it's a

1:42:25.040 --> 1:42:26.960
<v Speaker 2>tough fine, but if it's out there, it is a

1:42:27.120 --> 1:42:30.360
<v Speaker 2>great read. And doctor Lemage, it's always great having you on.

1:42:30.560 --> 1:42:32.560
<v Speaker 3>You stay well. We need to hear your voice and

1:42:32.720 --> 1:42:34.120
<v Speaker 3>thank you for your time here.

1:42:35.160 --> 1:42:36.880
<v Speaker 8>Thank you very much, God bless you guys. I have

1:42:36.920 --> 1:42:37.519
<v Speaker 8>a great weekend.

1:42:37.680 --> 1:42:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

1:42:38.520 --> 1:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Sixty four percent say it's out of our control now,

1:42:43.880 --> 1:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a beast running amok. Yeah, but you know what,

1:42:47.800 --> 1:42:51.240
<v Speaker 2>it all seems to come back to center eventually, the

1:42:51.320 --> 1:42:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Democrats that have you believe that's when Donald Trump leaves

1:42:54.320 --> 1:42:56.760
<v Speaker 2>office and rides into the sunset to never be heard

1:42:56.800 --> 1:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>from again. And the Democrats the Republicans would tell you,

1:43:01.360 --> 1:43:04.519
<v Speaker 2>as soon as the squad shuts up, as soon as

1:43:04.680 --> 1:43:07.840
<v Speaker 2>socialists are stopped being elected to public office, it'll all

1:43:07.920 --> 1:43:10.400
<v Speaker 2>get better. The fact of the matter is, none of

1:43:10.439 --> 1:43:13.519
<v Speaker 2>that's true. It's up to you and me to make

1:43:13.600 --> 1:43:17.960
<v Speaker 2>it better. That's where it all starts. And maybe next

1:43:18.000 --> 1:43:20.400
<v Speaker 2>time they take that survey. Maybe next time, if there

1:43:20.479 --> 1:43:22.000
<v Speaker 2>is a next time for the New York Times and

1:43:22.080 --> 1:43:24.280
<v Speaker 2>seeing a college, maybe that number isn't sixty four.

1:43:25.160 --> 1:43:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's a little bit lower, maybe it's a lot lower.

1:43:28.439 --> 1:43:31.280
<v Speaker 3>That's what you've got to keep alive. That's hope.

1:43:32.720 --> 1:43:36.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if hope becomes reality now three twenty three

1:43:36.200 --> 1:43:40.000
<v Speaker 2>on this Saturday afternoon news Radio seven hundred ALW