WEBVTT - Did She Do It After All?

0:00:00.210 --> 0:00:07.250
<v Speaker 1>Okay, 720-ish Wednesday, you know what that means. Truth or Troll.

0:00:07.430 --> 0:00:16.700
<v Speaker 1>Take it away, Mike. And now, America's favorite game show.

0:00:17.220 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Where you get to decide on the Kuna Report.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.450
<v Speaker 1>This is Truth or Troll.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Today's entry of Truth or Troll comes from President Barack

0:00:29.300 --> 0:00:33.220
<v Speaker 2>Obama speaking at Salem State University the other day, where

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.820
<v Speaker 2>he talks about how he used to fantasize and still

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:40.250
<v Speaker 2>does fantasize about having women run all of the world's governments.

0:00:41.990 --> 0:00:49.590
<v Speaker 3>Even when I was president, I sometimes fantasized about if

0:00:49.630 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you put women in charge of every government for like

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>two years. And then just kind of saw, all right,

0:01:01.260 --> 0:01:07.140
<v Speaker 3>how are things going? I have a strong belief that

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:09.700
<v Speaker 3>things would, they wouldn't be perfect.

0:01:10.750 --> 0:01:17.610
<v Speaker 1>But they'd be better. I'm confident about that. I really do.

0:01:18.690 --> 0:01:21.990
<v Speaker 1>He's such a BS-er. So there it is. So what

0:01:22.010 --> 0:01:22.709
<v Speaker 1>do you think, Jeff?

0:01:23.310 --> 0:01:26.610
<v Speaker 2>Is he being for real here, or is he just

0:01:26.650 --> 0:01:32.020
<v Speaker 2>patronizing vote grab to troll woman voters?

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.580
<v Speaker 1>You nailed it. Look, it's what the British call clap trap.

0:01:36.620 --> 0:01:39.540
<v Speaker 1>A trap for a clap. That's where the term comes from,

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a clap trap. It's a British expression. So you will

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.410
<v Speaker 1>say something. It's a room basically full of feminists. So

0:01:45.450 --> 0:01:48.570
<v Speaker 1>it's full of women, you know, female TikTok feminists, actually.

0:01:49.090 --> 0:01:52.990
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, if only all of you ran the world.

0:01:54.990 --> 0:01:59.790
<v Speaker 1>You know, oh, everything, it wouldn't be perfect, but oh,

0:01:59.810 --> 0:02:02.270
<v Speaker 1>it'd be a hell of a lot better. You know,

0:02:02.570 --> 0:02:04.930
<v Speaker 1>so if that's the case, why did you run against

0:02:04.970 --> 0:02:08.620
<v Speaker 1>a woman in 2008 and beat her? For the Democratic primary,

0:02:08.660 --> 0:02:12.940
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton. You phony, you fraud, you. That's point number one.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Point number two. Well, we saw Kamala. Was she good?

0:02:17.340 --> 0:02:19.019
<v Speaker 1>Was she good for the country? Was she good for

0:02:19.060 --> 0:02:23.940
<v Speaker 1>the world? Here, we have a female governor of Massachusetts,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Maura Healey. Is she good? Is she making your life better? Okay,

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Kathy Hochul up in New York. People in New York,

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.780
<v Speaker 1>she's making your life any better up there? In other words,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.460
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying there aren't brilliant female leaders. Of course

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.139
<v Speaker 1>they are. One of my great, you know, I admire,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.100
<v Speaker 1>for example, Margaret Thatcher immensely. Golda Meir. I mean, I

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>could run down the whole list. Here in the United States,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:56.570
<v Speaker 1>there are some superb female governors and senators. Marsha Blackburn

0:02:56.610 --> 0:03:00.070
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee, to me, I think is outstanding. But no,

0:03:00.770 --> 0:03:05.630
<v Speaker 1>he's pandering, he's playing to the gallery, and he's BSing.

0:03:06.490 --> 0:03:09.850
<v Speaker 1>In other words, he's trolling. But that's me. I want

0:03:09.870 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. When Obama says that women should

0:03:14.419 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>run the world, is he A, telling the truth, i.e.

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:25.769
<v Speaker 1>he really means what he's saying, or B, is he trolling?

0:03:26.570 --> 0:03:29.150
<v Speaker 1>Is he, you know, playing to the gallery, as they say?

0:03:29.669 --> 0:03:33.150
<v Speaker 1>You know where I stand. This is pure BS, and

0:03:33.230 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>even he knows it. But that's me. I want to

0:03:36.140 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. You can vote on our webpage, wrko.com

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:46.470
<v Speaker 1>slash Kuhner. W-R-K-O dot com slash Kuhner, K-U-H-N as in

0:03:46.530 --> 0:03:51.110
<v Speaker 1>national E-R. And as always, you can also vote on

0:03:51.510 --> 0:03:55.750
<v Speaker 1>via X, my handle there, all one word, at the

0:03:55.910 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Kuhner Report, at the Kuhner Report. Andy in New Hampshire.

0:04:02.500 --> 0:04:04.700
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for holding, Andy, and welcome.

0:04:07.580 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Hello, Jeff.

0:04:08.500 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Andy.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:11.860
<v Speaker 4>Where's Judge Judy when you need her?

0:04:14.100 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, she would have run a very different trial. I

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, Andy.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.420
<v Speaker 4>Country needs more bulldog judges. This is making a mockery

0:04:24.460 --> 0:04:30.650
<v Speaker 4>of the judicial system big time. And it's just she's

0:04:30.690 --> 0:04:32.290
<v Speaker 4>not going to get away with this one way or

0:04:32.330 --> 0:04:34.810
<v Speaker 4>the other the way I see it, because her life

0:04:35.070 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 4>would be misery in jail forever. or left free to go, whatever,

0:04:40.220 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>or in an institution. So she's, you know, let nature

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:50.169
<v Speaker 4>take its course, but she doesn't have a life anymore.

0:04:50.230 --> 0:04:56.589
<v Speaker 4>But this whole court system, it's not right. Things are

0:04:56.750 --> 0:04:58.090
<v Speaker 4>not looking good with that.

0:04:58.850 --> 0:05:01.250
<v Speaker 1>Well, Andy, let me ask you this. Look, I know

0:05:01.270 --> 0:05:04.250
<v Speaker 1>the judges come under a lot of criticism, and I'm

0:05:04.330 --> 0:05:06.810
<v Speaker 1>part of it, I think he deserves all of the

0:05:06.850 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>criticism he's been getting. But he basically oversaw a circus.

0:05:12.460 --> 0:05:16.219
<v Speaker 1>And he let the defense run wild. And, you know,

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Reddington was intimidating that loan holdout juror. He was targeting

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that loan holdout juror. He was making all kinds of

0:05:25.300 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>outlandish statements outside the courtroom, even during the trial. And

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>where was the gag order? I mean, the judge should

0:05:32.820 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>have said, shut your mouth. You're not going to turn

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this into a freak show. You know, this is not

0:05:39.300 --> 0:05:41.990
<v Speaker 1>going to be a P.T. Barnum act. This is not

0:05:42.020 --> 0:05:45.510
<v Speaker 1>about you getting your face on the camera. And instead,

0:05:46.110 --> 0:05:48.590
<v Speaker 1>he just let this guy, you know, run his mouth

0:05:49.170 --> 0:05:51.730
<v Speaker 1>and go in front of every TV camera and make

0:05:51.850 --> 0:05:55.469
<v Speaker 1>every outlandish charge you could possibly make. And so I

0:05:55.490 --> 0:05:58.990
<v Speaker 1>got to ask you, Andy, did the judge lose control

0:05:59.170 --> 0:06:00.430
<v Speaker 1>over this entire case?

0:06:02.290 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely. He never stepped in when he should have. And

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.020
<v Speaker 4>even after yesterday, he should have stepped in and said,

0:06:09.060 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 4>this isn't going to be allowed. Forget it. Just the

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 4>evidence that's there and everything, it just shouldn't have been allowed.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 4>The judge, they just sit there. They don't step in.

0:06:17.900 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 4>The days of the old bulldog judges seem to have

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 4>gone away, but they need them back.

0:06:22.460 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Amen.

0:06:23.610 --> 0:06:23.870
<v Speaker 4>Amen.

0:06:24.510 --> 0:06:28.070
<v Speaker 1>Andy, thank you very much for that call. Look, I

0:06:28.089 --> 0:06:30.060
<v Speaker 1>would have put him on, you know, right on the spot. No,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.580
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to declare her. I'm not going to,

0:06:32.620 --> 0:06:35.460
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not going to acquit her. OK, just

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>super quick. Let me just play one cut, which pretty

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>much sums up his motion yesterday. This is the defense attorney,

0:06:42.660 --> 0:06:47.660
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Reddington. He's now changed the defense for Lindsay Clancy.

0:06:48.270 --> 0:06:50.950
<v Speaker 1>in a new motion. He doesn't want this to go

0:06:50.990 --> 0:06:54.630
<v Speaker 1>to a retrial or a second trial after the jury

0:06:54.690 --> 0:06:58.890
<v Speaker 1>was deadlocked after the first trial. He now says, forget

0:06:58.930 --> 0:07:01.290
<v Speaker 1>the fact that she admitted to doing it and I

0:07:01.390 --> 0:07:05.010
<v Speaker 1>said she did it, but she's not responsible because she

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>had a psychosis. She was apparently insane. We're saying now

0:07:09.580 --> 0:07:14.850
<v Speaker 1>something very different. There is no evidence that that Lindsay

0:07:14.910 --> 0:07:20.450
<v Speaker 1>Clancy murdered her three children. She did not do it.

0:07:21.570 --> 0:07:23.930
<v Speaker 1>Roll cut 22, Mike.

0:07:28.810 --> 0:07:30.990
<v Speaker 5>So I ask the court to harken back to the

0:07:31.070 --> 0:07:34.850
<v Speaker 5>evidence that was presented and ask yourself, where's the evidence

0:07:34.870 --> 0:07:35.470
<v Speaker 5>that she did this?

0:07:36.270 --> 0:07:41.450
<v Speaker 1>Where is the evidence that she did this? My question

0:07:41.490 --> 0:07:48.270
<v Speaker 1>to you, Is Lindsay Clancy innocent or guilty? And do

0:07:48.330 --> 0:07:54.070
<v Speaker 1>you believe that Kevin Reddington is right? Is there no evidence?

0:07:54.550 --> 0:07:58.830
<v Speaker 1>Is this an innocent woman who has been framed? And

0:07:58.870 --> 0:08:02.510
<v Speaker 1>there is another person out there who is the real killer.

0:08:02.540 --> 0:08:06.330
<v Speaker 6>617- 266-6868.

0:08:06.970 --> 0:08:10.530
<v Speaker 1>You know where I stand. I think she's guilty of sin.

0:08:11.030 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>She did it. She planned it. It was premeditated. She's

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.100
<v Speaker 1>guilty of first-degree murder. But now the defense is making

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:25.030
<v Speaker 1>a completely different argument. Do you buy it? Linda in Medford.

0:08:25.170 --> 0:08:27.450
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for holding, Linda, and welcome.

0:08:32.090 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 7>I believe she's guilty. I do think she was postpartum.

0:08:36.860 --> 0:08:39.420
<v Speaker 7>And I think the whole thing speaks to a bigger

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:45.540
<v Speaker 7>issue that's going on. Many people that sexually abuse children,

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 7>they were sexually abused. So does that mean we excuse them?

0:08:50.340 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:59.770
<v Speaker 7>I mean, when does this thinking train stop? It's unfortunate.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:05.380
<v Speaker 7>And they're blaming everybody else, including the health care system,

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 7>which I believe has gone downhill since COVID. However, I

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.590
<v Speaker 7>will say that with the type of drugs that she

0:09:13.660 --> 0:09:19.550
<v Speaker 7>was being given, people frequently do change them because of

0:09:20.290 --> 0:09:24.709
<v Speaker 7>side effects. So that wouldn't be unusual to two or

0:09:24.750 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 7>three times have the medications changed.

0:09:30.950 --> 0:09:34.890
<v Speaker 1>Well, Linda, I promise I'll let you finish. This is

0:09:34.950 --> 0:09:42.969
<v Speaker 1>another thing. She was prescribed, apparently, in total, 13 powerful prescriptions. And,

0:09:43.070 --> 0:09:46.550
<v Speaker 1>you know, remember, she called a suicide hotline twice. She

0:09:46.610 --> 0:09:49.650
<v Speaker 1>apparently admitted to her husband and to her parents and

0:09:49.690 --> 0:09:53.010
<v Speaker 1>the in-laws that she was thinking of hurting herself and

0:09:53.110 --> 0:09:57.830
<v Speaker 1>even hurting the children. They admitted on the stand, the in-laws,

0:09:57.910 --> 0:10:01.290
<v Speaker 1>the parents and the father, that she was Patrick Clancy,

0:10:02.260 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>then the husband, that they were even thinking of removing

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the children from the house because they feared that she

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a danger, not just to herself,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>but to them. But then they would look at her

0:10:13.740 --> 0:10:17.180
<v Speaker 1>and she'd be feeding the kids or reading to the

0:10:17.220 --> 0:10:20.859
<v Speaker 1>kids or whatever, attending to the children. And they said,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.330
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem to be that bad. In other words,

0:10:25.380 --> 0:10:29.449
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to go to, you know, DEFCON 1.

0:10:29.450 --> 0:10:31.570
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't have to take this and remove

0:10:31.590 --> 0:10:36.030
<v Speaker 1>the children. But they, you know, they were concerned to

0:10:36.050 --> 0:10:38.690
<v Speaker 1>the point that they were thinking about removing the children.

0:10:39.330 --> 0:10:45.130
<v Speaker 1>They know that she called a suicide hotline. she institutionalized herself.

0:10:46.070 --> 0:10:48.490
<v Speaker 1>She went to a mental institution and said, please, I

0:10:48.530 --> 0:10:52.070
<v Speaker 1>need help. And she had herself admitted into an institution

0:10:52.110 --> 0:10:57.570
<v Speaker 1>for nearly five days. Now, the one thing that the defense,

0:10:57.690 --> 0:11:00.410
<v Speaker 1>I think, is clearly lying about, they're lying about several things,

0:11:00.490 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>but this one to me is without question. She wasn't

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:09.349
<v Speaker 1>taking all 13 prescriptions at once. In fact, one of

0:11:09.370 --> 0:11:12.890
<v Speaker 1>the complaints from the healthcare professionals and the psychiatrists who

0:11:12.929 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>treated her was, we're giving you medication, you say you need,

0:11:17.580 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you're saying you have these symptoms, but you're not taking it.

0:11:21.980 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Or you only take it, let's say, once or twice. Well,

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.660
<v Speaker 1>you know, for meds to work, you've got to take

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.829
<v Speaker 1>them for whatever, a week, 10 days, you know, whatever

0:11:29.850 --> 0:11:31.850
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's got to be for a longer period

0:11:31.870 --> 0:11:35.750
<v Speaker 1>of time. So she wasn't taking all 13 at once, right?

0:11:37.190 --> 0:11:40.670
<v Speaker 1>She didn't take some of the medication that was prescribed

0:11:41.290 --> 0:11:43.630
<v Speaker 1>that the healthcare professional said would have helped her with

0:11:43.690 --> 0:11:51.790
<v Speaker 1>her condition. And the toxicology report, which Reddington dismissed during

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.980
<v Speaker 1>the trial, but the lone holdout juror said, no, why?

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.900
<v Speaker 1>He's not an expert. The toxicology report and the expert

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:05.220
<v Speaker 1>said there was nothing in her system that in terms

0:12:05.260 --> 0:12:09.059
<v Speaker 1>of the prescription medications that she was taking, that would

0:12:09.100 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have altered her mind or that would have caused hallucinations

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.780
<v Speaker 1>or that would have had like sort of violent or

0:12:18.850 --> 0:12:25.250
<v Speaker 1>aggressive impulses. So, and that's why, you know, the loan

0:12:25.270 --> 0:12:29.230
<v Speaker 1>holdout juror, Michael Disronville, said that was one of the

0:12:29.270 --> 0:12:31.530
<v Speaker 1>reasons why he said, no, I'm telling you, she's guilty.

0:12:32.830 --> 0:12:37.190
<v Speaker 1>Don't try to blame the meds. The toxicology reports are clear.

0:12:37.250 --> 0:12:40.820
<v Speaker 1>The meds did not cause her to do this. So,

0:12:40.940 --> 0:12:44.660
<v Speaker 1>you see, the thing about Reddington and Clancy is that

0:12:44.700 --> 0:12:51.100
<v Speaker 1>they blame everyone but themselves. Everyone but Lindsay. To the

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:58.030
<v Speaker 1>point now that they're making the argument she didn't kill him. Okay,

0:12:58.070 --> 0:13:01.150
<v Speaker 1>so who did? Well, they don't want to say that,

0:13:01.230 --> 0:13:04.130
<v Speaker 1>but she didn't kill him. So you've got three dead kids,

0:13:04.850 --> 0:13:09.309
<v Speaker 1>a mother who allegedly attempted suicide, threw herself through the

0:13:09.350 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>window on the ground. Why would she do that if

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.620
<v Speaker 1>she didn't kill her kids? So I guess someone then

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:22.730
<v Speaker 1>threw her out the window to frame her. Okay, who, how? No,

0:13:23.450 --> 0:13:27.620
<v Speaker 1>now they think or they're hoping that, They can play

0:13:28.140 --> 0:13:30.660
<v Speaker 1>off of the sympathy for Lindsay from all of these

0:13:30.730 --> 0:13:36.849
<v Speaker 1>TikTok feminists and all of this liberal mob and this

0:13:37.010 --> 0:13:41.370
<v Speaker 1>media mob to pressure the judge into saying, I'm just

0:13:41.390 --> 0:13:43.510
<v Speaker 1>going to give you an acquittal and this thing is over.

0:13:44.450 --> 0:13:45.490
<v Speaker 1>Final word to you, Linda.

0:13:47.290 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 7>I think she's guilty. I think she should be institutionalized. Somebody...

0:13:55.610 --> 0:14:01.209
<v Speaker 7>has responsibility for those three children. And she had a

0:14:01.350 --> 0:14:07.309
<v Speaker 7>lot of help. Her in-laws, her mother, her husband.

0:14:07.390 --> 0:14:07.910
<v Speaker 8>A nanny.

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 7>A nanny.

0:14:09.020 --> 0:14:14.300
<v Speaker 1>A husband who went working home full-time from his work said, please,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.420
<v Speaker 1>I can't stay at the office. I have to work full-time.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:21.070
<v Speaker 1>So he was home full-time. She saw multiple psychiatrists. She

0:14:21.110 --> 0:14:25.810
<v Speaker 1>saw multiple health professionals. Look, I don't begrudge him, but,

0:14:25.990 --> 0:14:29.030
<v Speaker 1>you know, Patrick was making a very good income. She

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.620
<v Speaker 1>was also a labor delivery nurse. She was a very

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:39.090
<v Speaker 1>highly skilled nurse. So she knew all about, you know, postpartum,

0:14:39.150 --> 0:14:45.070
<v Speaker 1>postpartum depression, postpartum psychosis. So look, they lived well. I'm

0:14:45.090 --> 0:14:48.290
<v Speaker 1>not begrudging them. I'm just saying she had a lot

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>more help and means than most people. And yet somehow

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>what I find incredible, Linda, is she's the victim. This

0:14:57.940 --> 0:15:00.740
<v Speaker 1>is what I find incredible about Reddington and his entire defense.

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.260
<v Speaker 1>It's like these three children don't exist. And let me

0:15:06.340 --> 0:15:10.590
<v Speaker 1>tell you why the holdout juror held the line. A,

0:15:10.610 --> 0:15:13.850
<v Speaker 1>he followed the evidence. He followed the law. But there

0:15:13.890 --> 0:15:16.729
<v Speaker 1>was something else. And I'll play the video later because

0:15:16.750 --> 0:15:21.950
<v Speaker 1>he released about a one-minute video. He is a devout

0:15:22.310 --> 0:15:27.900
<v Speaker 1>Christian black man. He is a devout Roman Catholic in particular.

0:15:28.820 --> 0:15:32.100
<v Speaker 1>So he says, for him, truth and being accountable to

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>God for your actions are everything. But he's also a

0:15:36.340 --> 0:15:40.500
<v Speaker 1>young father. There are pictures of him holding his young

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>daughter in his arms. And so you can see on

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:50.100
<v Speaker 1>the jury, he was immensely sympathetic to those three kids

0:15:51.460 --> 0:15:55.739
<v Speaker 1>because he has his own little baby. And he's like,

0:15:56.100 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing the kids through my daughter. If someone murdered

0:16:01.020 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>my daughter, I would want justice for my young daughter.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted the same justice for those three kids. And

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.860
<v Speaker 1>the part where he drove the other 11 jurors absolutely

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:17.050
<v Speaker 1>apoplectic was when he took out cans and he put

0:16:17.070 --> 0:16:22.530
<v Speaker 1>the exercise bands around the cans to show everyone, do

0:16:22.570 --> 0:16:26.090
<v Speaker 1>you know what it takes to strangle your child? And

0:16:26.110 --> 0:16:29.140
<v Speaker 1>he starts squeezing the cans and squeezing the cans. And

0:16:29.180 --> 0:16:33.460
<v Speaker 1>then he held it for a minute afterwards and as

0:16:33.500 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the child is kicking and the eyes are flushed with

0:16:38.460 --> 0:16:41.140
<v Speaker 1>blood and the eyeballs are going to pop out and

0:16:41.860 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>your body's jerking and jerking and jerking. And he said,

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what she did once, twice, three times. If that's

0:16:54.460 --> 0:16:59.540
<v Speaker 1>not premeditated murder, if that's not first degree murder, I

0:16:59.570 --> 0:17:04.820
<v Speaker 1>don't know what is. And that's exactly what Michael Disronville said.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>And he said, I told him, here I stand, I

0:17:09.660 --> 0:17:15.490
<v Speaker 1>can do no other. That man is a hero. Linda,

0:17:15.869 --> 0:17:19.750
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for that call. Okay, this is

0:17:19.810 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a great point on Messenger from Larry. Jeff, I just

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.939
<v Speaker 1>thought of something. All of these women making videos of

0:17:29.980 --> 0:17:36.970
<v Speaker 1>themselves having breakdowns, breaking things in solidarity because of their

0:17:37.070 --> 0:17:43.630
<v Speaker 1>mental stress as the excuse to kill kids. Now they've

0:17:43.710 --> 0:17:48.210
<v Speaker 1>lost the argument based on the change by the defense

0:17:49.010 --> 0:17:53.980
<v Speaker 1>that Lindsay Clancy didn't do it. That is a very

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:58.409
<v Speaker 1>good point. It now undercuts All of these idiotic, you know,

0:17:58.510 --> 0:18:03.010
<v Speaker 1>feminists on TikTok who, and it's true, it's video after video.

0:18:03.210 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>It's really, it's very disturbing where they're yelling, shouting, screaming,

0:18:09.180 --> 0:18:14.459
<v Speaker 1>like having mental breakdowns, smashing glasses and plates and, you know,

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm under so much stress.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:17.260
<v Speaker 7>Sorry.

0:18:20.350 --> 0:18:23.330
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what raising children does to them or

0:18:23.390 --> 0:18:27.780
<v Speaker 1>having postpartum or the stresses of being a mother or whatever.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:33.970
<v Speaker 1>And that somehow in solidarity with Lindsay, any woman could

0:18:34.070 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>snap at any time and just say to hell with it,

0:18:37.730 --> 0:18:41.910
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to kill my children. And, you know, this

0:18:41.950 --> 0:18:45.470
<v Speaker 1>was the argument they kept making. She's not the, you know,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>her emotions forced her to do it. Her psychosis forced

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>her to do it. Her mental breakdown made her do it. Well,

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.630
<v Speaker 1>now they've undercut. Reddington is now completely undercut all of that.

0:18:58.910 --> 0:19:02.310
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the reason for her cause celebre, the

0:19:02.350 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>reason why she's become a celebrity is because she came

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like a folk hero for many women who were saying,

0:19:08.859 --> 0:19:14.149
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're just, we're at the breaking point. Well, now, no,

0:19:14.310 --> 0:19:18.270
<v Speaker 1>it had nothing to do with her being postpartum or

0:19:18.330 --> 0:19:23.990
<v Speaker 1>postpartum psychosis or her hormones or whatever. She didn't do it.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.899
<v Speaker 1>She just didn't do it. Someone else did it.

0:19:29.220 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Who?

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.940
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. But according to the lawyer now, she

0:19:31.980 --> 0:19:35.629
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it. There's no evidence she did it, according

0:19:35.690 --> 0:19:39.179
<v Speaker 1>to him. She never admitted now, apparently, that she did it.

0:19:40.050 --> 0:19:42.190
<v Speaker 1>She just woke up in bed, and they all said, yeah,

0:19:42.230 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you did it. She said, okay. Tony in Gloucester, thanks for... holding, Tony,

0:19:51.540 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and welcome.

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.939
<v Speaker 6>Jeff, Reddington just announced his defense. It was space aliens.

0:19:59.900 --> 0:20:05.010
<v Speaker 6>They were fighting the UFOs. They wiped her memory. The

0:20:05.030 --> 0:20:07.470
<v Speaker 6>space aliens. That's why she doesn't have any memory of

0:20:07.510 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 6>the whole thing. I want people to go online and

0:20:11.900 --> 0:20:15.959
<v Speaker 6>look at Reddington's record. He's tried to make himself famous

0:20:16.020 --> 0:20:21.820
<v Speaker 6>by doing this insanity thing. Case in point, Whitey Bulger's girlfriend,

0:20:21.859 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 6>remember her?

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:22.940
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:20:23.420 --> 0:20:26.220
<v Speaker 6>Who was her defense lawyer? The whole time she was

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:30.820
<v Speaker 6>in Whitey, she was insane. Didn't work. She ended up

0:20:30.859 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 6>going to jail. He had a few high-profile cases, which

0:20:35.030 --> 0:20:38.180
<v Speaker 6>he never won over this defense. But everyone thinks he's

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 6>the guy for that defense.

0:20:41.220 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tony, I want to ask you, now, of course,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he's done a complete U-turn, okay? And I don't know

0:20:48.619 --> 0:20:51.020
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen now, but we'll see. But I

0:20:51.060 --> 0:20:54.939
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you this. If you truly believe, now,

0:20:54.980 --> 0:20:56.850
<v Speaker 1>I think he's lying, you know that, but let's just

0:20:56.890 --> 0:20:58.409
<v Speaker 1>play it out because I'm going to take him at

0:20:58.450 --> 0:21:03.570
<v Speaker 1>his word. If you truly believe your client is innocent,

0:21:03.890 --> 0:21:07.090
<v Speaker 1>in other words, your client didn't do it, Someone else

0:21:07.230 --> 0:21:10.970
<v Speaker 1>murdered those three kids. And I would assume by extension

0:21:11.030 --> 0:21:14.429
<v Speaker 1>tried to murder her and threw her out the window

0:21:14.990 --> 0:21:16.889
<v Speaker 1>to make it seem like she murdered the kids and

0:21:16.910 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>then like a murder-suicide. And they succeeded with the kids.

0:21:20.820 --> 0:21:23.900
<v Speaker 1>They didn't succeed with her. How the hell do you

0:21:23.980 --> 0:21:28.020
<v Speaker 1>go through a six-week trial and repeatedly say, I could

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.100
<v Speaker 1>play the clips again. I don't want to bore everybody,

0:21:30.140 --> 0:21:33.070
<v Speaker 1>where he says repeatedly, no, no, she did it. No,

0:21:33.690 --> 0:21:36.609
<v Speaker 1>I'm not disputing that. She did it. She just, you know,

0:21:36.670 --> 0:21:38.730
<v Speaker 1>she was psychotic. She was not in the right state

0:21:38.750 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of mind. How do you do that? In other words, because,

0:21:43.180 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, even if they found her not guilty,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:52.139
<v Speaker 1>the jurors were going to send her to a mental institution. Whatever,

0:21:52.220 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>two years, three years, five years, or 10 years, whatever

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.770
<v Speaker 1>it is, you know, a psychiatric ward. So you're going

0:21:59.790 --> 0:22:03.570
<v Speaker 1>to have this woman who, be put behind, you know, whatever,

0:22:03.630 --> 0:22:08.100
<v Speaker 1>locked up or, you know, institutionalized for years and years

0:22:08.170 --> 0:22:11.380
<v Speaker 1>and years, but now you're telling me she's been innocent

0:22:11.420 --> 0:22:14.740
<v Speaker 1>the entire time, she never did it? Like, I'm sorry,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what kind of a scumbag does that? Tony, am I wrong?

0:22:18.340 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 6>Ryan, but this is what's become of the law. You know,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:29.210
<v Speaker 6>here in liberal Massachusetts, I've had some experience in the

0:22:29.250 --> 0:22:31.130
<v Speaker 6>courts over the years. Most of them have been good.

0:22:31.690 --> 0:22:33.409
<v Speaker 6>I've got to tell you right now, I might get

0:22:33.450 --> 0:22:36.050
<v Speaker 6>some flack about it, but a lot of these women judges,

0:22:36.510 --> 0:22:40.300
<v Speaker 6>they're nuts. And the male judges are afraid to go

0:22:40.340 --> 0:22:44.219
<v Speaker 6>up against them because, you know, they're just– all these

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 6>liberal judges, they're blatant feminists. And, boy, the male judges

0:22:50.300 --> 0:22:54.090
<v Speaker 6>are afraid to overturn anything they did And this is

0:22:54.130 --> 0:22:57.170
<v Speaker 6>what we're faced with now. This is what we're faced with.

0:22:57.550 --> 0:22:59.570
<v Speaker 6>And a lot of these attorneys, there's too many attorneys,

0:23:00.150 --> 0:23:04.210
<v Speaker 6>too many attorneys. And they're just, there's some real shysters

0:23:04.270 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 6>out there. And Reddington has made a career of it.

0:23:06.590 --> 0:23:07.430
<v Speaker 6>That's all I can say.

0:23:07.510 --> 0:23:10.390
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you nailed it. He's made a career of it. Oh,

0:23:10.410 --> 0:23:14.570
<v Speaker 1>you're right. You're right. That's why, you know, people, you know,

0:23:14.590 --> 0:23:16.709
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are saying, ah, Jeff, he's my lawyer.

0:23:16.790 --> 0:23:19.869
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't get him as my lawyer. This guy, if

0:23:19.910 --> 0:23:22.410
<v Speaker 1>he's willing, because look, I'm telling you, he was willing

0:23:22.450 --> 0:23:25.010
<v Speaker 1>to sell his client out. You're saying, well, what do

0:23:25.030 --> 0:23:27.870
<v Speaker 1>you mean, Jeff? No, no, no, no. If the jury

0:23:27.950 --> 0:23:30.830
<v Speaker 1>came back, it would have been not guilty by reason

0:23:30.869 --> 0:23:34.670
<v Speaker 1>of insanity. Well, that means that she would have been

0:23:34.690 --> 0:23:38.969
<v Speaker 1>in an asylum. She would have been institutionalized probably for years.

0:23:40.770 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But now you're telling me that she's innocent? You sold

0:23:44.619 --> 0:23:48.810
<v Speaker 1>your client out. If your client is innocent, then your

0:23:48.850 --> 0:23:52.590
<v Speaker 1>client shouldn't spend a single moment anywhere behind bars or

0:23:52.650 --> 0:23:56.260
<v Speaker 1>in an institution. Now, she may have to get psychological

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:01.260
<v Speaker 1>or psychiatric help for depression, bipolar, whatever, but not in

0:24:01.340 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>some asylum. So, no, he sold his client out. That's

0:24:07.180 --> 0:24:09.900
<v Speaker 1>why I'm like, he thinks he's being cute. I'm looking

0:24:09.940 --> 0:24:11.780
<v Speaker 1>at this and I'm saying, this guy's a bottom feeder.

0:24:13.980 --> 0:24:18.350
<v Speaker 1>If I have a client... And my client is innocent

0:24:18.470 --> 0:24:21.510
<v Speaker 1>of the charges against him. And I'm talking first degree murder.

0:24:23.090 --> 0:24:25.909
<v Speaker 1>And I promise in about half an hour, I'm going

0:24:25.930 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to lay out exactly what he says. He's going on

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about there's no evidence. I mean, you should see everything

0:24:31.260 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to claim. Well, if you really believe that,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:38.260
<v Speaker 1>that's the defense you should have presented. If the case

0:24:38.300 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>was that weak, that pathetic, that non-existent. that manufactured, then

0:24:44.500 --> 0:24:47.260
<v Speaker 1>you should have destroyed him in the first trial by saying, no,

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.699
<v Speaker 1>my client, an innocent woman is being framed. I don't

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.450
<v Speaker 1>know by who, but she's being framed. She did not

0:24:54.670 --> 0:25:00.869
<v Speaker 1>murder her three children. That's your defense. Not guilty, period.

0:25:02.130 --> 0:25:08.889
<v Speaker 1>Not by reason of insanity. Not guilty, period. So again,

0:25:09.109 --> 0:25:14.010
<v Speaker 1>how is this guy not freaking disbarred? Tony, thank you

0:25:14.050 --> 0:25:16.540
<v Speaker 1>very much for that call. I wouldn't want him defending me,

0:25:16.580 --> 0:25:22.179
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this. Diana in New Bedford. Thanks for holding, Diana,

0:25:22.540 --> 0:25:23.020
<v Speaker 1>and welcome.

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:24.379
<v Speaker 2>Hello.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:25.820
<v Speaker 1>Hi.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:30.730
<v Speaker 8>I side with the lone juror. He's right that she

0:25:30.790 --> 0:25:35.430
<v Speaker 8>was the murderer. And I think the prosecution has to

0:25:35.630 --> 0:25:39.070
<v Speaker 8>get smart and get tough because there's another way to

0:25:39.300 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 8>say she did it and she didn't do it. by

0:25:43.020 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 8>saying she has a split personality and that the other

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.940
<v Speaker 8>part did it and tried to kill her and throw

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.619
<v Speaker 8>her out the window and she had no idea. I

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.899
<v Speaker 8>think the prosecution is too weak. They got to dismiss

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:06.020
<v Speaker 8>every single possibility and prove that she wasn't a split personality, whatever,

0:26:06.660 --> 0:26:08.580
<v Speaker 8>and try to get her because she is just a

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:13.609
<v Speaker 8>pure murderer. She just got tired of of being overwhelmed

0:26:13.810 --> 0:26:14.790
<v Speaker 8>by three children.

0:26:17.050 --> 0:26:20.390
<v Speaker 1>Diana, I think you so hit the nail on the head.

0:26:20.790 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not even funny. Miranda Devine from the New York Post,

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>who personally I think is one of the best columnists

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.740
<v Speaker 1>in the country, she's one of the few people I read,

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, religiously. A lot of people I read, I

0:26:34.140 --> 0:26:36.129
<v Speaker 1>read Victor Davis Hanson. I mean, I don't want to

0:26:36.150 --> 0:26:38.730
<v Speaker 1>tell you what I read, but I don't read everything

0:26:38.790 --> 0:26:42.229
<v Speaker 1>they write. Usually it's got to be the topic. But

0:26:43.030 --> 0:26:45.830
<v Speaker 1>I respect them and I admire them and I want

0:26:45.850 --> 0:26:47.230
<v Speaker 1>to know what they have to say. So I read

0:26:47.270 --> 0:26:49.580
<v Speaker 1>them quite often. But Miranda Devine is one of the

0:26:49.619 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>few columnists that I don't miss a column because I

0:26:52.740 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think she's that good. And that was her argument that

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>she said, look, as a woman, as a mother, she goes,

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, I've seen this over and over again.

0:27:04.460 --> 0:27:07.619
<v Speaker 1>She was overwhelmed. That's what this is all about. She

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:13.370
<v Speaker 1>was clearly overwhelmed as a mother. And rather than own

0:27:13.450 --> 0:27:17.570
<v Speaker 1>up to that, she decided to take the easy way out.

0:27:18.530 --> 0:27:22.230
<v Speaker 1>And the easy way out was to murder her three children. Period.

0:27:22.290 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Full stop. And then she concocted, or her defense team concocted,

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:34.180
<v Speaker 1>this ridiculous postpartum psychosis defense. Not that postpartum depression doesn't exist,

0:27:34.380 --> 0:27:38.139
<v Speaker 1>of course. And in some extreme cases, yes, there is

0:27:38.210 --> 0:27:41.790
<v Speaker 1>postpartum psychosis. There's no question about it. but she was

0:27:41.830 --> 0:27:45.730
<v Speaker 1>never diagnosed with it. No one even thought about that

0:27:46.670 --> 0:27:49.590
<v Speaker 1>until the defense came up with this, you know, cockamamie

0:27:49.630 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>theory that she suffered from postpartum psychosis. And so she said, no,

0:27:55.220 --> 0:27:59.060
<v Speaker 1>this was cold blooded murder. And this is a woman

0:27:59.540 --> 0:28:03.620
<v Speaker 1>who just couldn't handle it, had three children for whatever reason,

0:28:04.030 --> 0:28:06.910
<v Speaker 1>was starting to break down. And because she was so

0:28:07.030 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmed and the easy way out, kill all three of them.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>And then I thought she made a brilliant argument when

0:28:13.700 --> 0:28:17.570
<v Speaker 1>she said, look at the cuts on her wrist. Look

0:28:17.590 --> 0:28:22.470
<v Speaker 1>at the cuts on her neck. They're very superficial. They

0:28:22.510 --> 0:28:25.949
<v Speaker 1>don't go anywhere near a main artery or a jugular,

0:28:25.970 --> 0:28:29.619
<v Speaker 1>a vein. Look at the way she throws herself out

0:28:29.650 --> 0:28:32.980
<v Speaker 1>of a second floor window, allegedly. No one is going

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.859
<v Speaker 1>to die from being thrown out or jumping out of

0:28:35.900 --> 0:28:39.860
<v Speaker 1>a second floor window. Now, she miscalculated the way her

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>body contorted when she fell, and that caused paralysis. But

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.100
<v Speaker 1>she said she wanted to make it look like she

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was mentally ill, and then made this suicide attempt to

0:28:55.180 --> 0:28:59.620
<v Speaker 1>cover her tracks, and it ended up paralyzing her. But

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:04.060
<v Speaker 1>she said, no, this woman was rational. This woman knew

0:29:04.140 --> 0:29:07.190
<v Speaker 1>right from wrong. We know she knew right from wrong.

0:29:07.430 --> 0:29:11.070
<v Speaker 1>Even Desronville, the lone holdout juror, as you said, was

0:29:11.090 --> 0:29:13.390
<v Speaker 1>the hero in this. He said, well, of course she

0:29:13.430 --> 0:29:15.890
<v Speaker 1>knew right from wrong. He goes, why do you think

0:29:15.930 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>she sends Patrick Clancy out on an errand? If you

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know right from wrong, you just start killing the child,

0:29:22.380 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like right in front of everybody. You just, you know,

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's right. I don't know what's wrong. No, no, no, no.

0:29:28.500 --> 0:29:32.270
<v Speaker 1>She wanted him out. She wanted him out because she

0:29:32.330 --> 0:29:34.910
<v Speaker 1>knew he would stop her if she was killing the children.

0:29:35.770 --> 0:29:39.190
<v Speaker 1>So she knew what she was doing was wrong. That's

0:29:39.230 --> 0:29:41.230
<v Speaker 1>why get him out. out and get him out for

0:29:41.270 --> 0:29:47.300
<v Speaker 1>an hour, which gives her all the time in the world. So, no,

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.060
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. And, you know, we'll see what's

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:56.370
<v Speaker 1>going to happen now. Look, this judge should immediately order

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.970
<v Speaker 1>a second trial. I don't think it should be held

0:30:00.030 --> 0:30:02.730
<v Speaker 1>in Plymouth County. I think they have tainted the jury pool.

0:30:03.510 --> 0:30:08.350
<v Speaker 1>I think what Reddington has done is to me poison

0:30:08.390 --> 0:30:13.510
<v Speaker 1>the jury pool, which is blatantly unethical. And you should

0:30:13.570 --> 0:30:18.330
<v Speaker 1>get this case out of Plymouth. And what he's also doing,

0:30:18.870 --> 0:30:21.230
<v Speaker 1>and this is to me very dangerous because it strikes

0:30:21.370 --> 0:30:24.230
<v Speaker 1>at the very heart of the Sixth Amendment, the Constitution,

0:30:24.930 --> 0:30:28.510
<v Speaker 1>which is the right to a trial by jury. When

0:30:28.610 --> 0:30:32.910
<v Speaker 1>you start targeting jurors because you don't like the way

0:30:32.990 --> 0:30:37.460
<v Speaker 1>they voted, what you're doing now is sending a message,

0:30:37.540 --> 0:30:41.180
<v Speaker 1>and that's what he's doing, to the next jury, the

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.750
<v Speaker 1>next 12 members for the next trial, you better not

0:30:44.870 --> 0:30:49.590
<v Speaker 1>vote guilty. Because if you vote guilty, we are going

0:30:49.610 --> 0:30:52.430
<v Speaker 1>to destroy you. We're going to drag your name through

0:30:52.450 --> 0:30:55.980
<v Speaker 1>the mud. We're going to dox you. We're going to

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.820
<v Speaker 1>release your name. Your career is going to be ruined.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Your name is going to be ruined. You're going to

0:31:03.620 --> 0:31:08.570
<v Speaker 1>go down in infamy. And so he's blatantly bullying and

0:31:08.610 --> 0:31:13.170
<v Speaker 1>intimidating the jury even before they're selected. And let me

0:31:13.210 --> 0:31:14.810
<v Speaker 1>say one last thing, Diane, I want to give you

0:31:14.830 --> 0:31:19.740
<v Speaker 1>the final word. What he's also done is so turned

0:31:19.790 --> 0:31:23.770
<v Speaker 1>this into a celebrity case, you're going to see feminist

0:31:23.910 --> 0:31:29.430
<v Speaker 1>activists who just want to see Lindsay Clancy go free.

0:31:30.890 --> 0:31:33.750
<v Speaker 1>They're going to sneak their way into the jury. They're

0:31:33.770 --> 0:31:37.750
<v Speaker 1>going to infiltrate the jury. They're going to lie. You know,

0:31:37.790 --> 0:31:40.060
<v Speaker 1>do you have an opinion on this case?

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:40.140
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.140
<v Speaker 1>Have you followed this case?

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:43.220
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.620
<v Speaker 1>So you form no opinion on this case? No, none whatsoever.

0:31:48.690 --> 0:31:53.020
<v Speaker 1>And of course, they're going in to find her not guilty,

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the evidence, regardless of the truth, regardless of

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the law. In fact, you know, he's going on about

0:32:00.940 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that poor lone juror being investigated for doing the right thing.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:11.930
<v Speaker 1>You've got four jurors now who voted not guilty, who admitted,

0:32:12.610 --> 0:32:17.590
<v Speaker 1>admitted that that they were activists and that they went

0:32:17.810 --> 0:32:22.210
<v Speaker 1>on the jury to free Lindsay Clancy. That no matter

0:32:22.310 --> 0:32:25.670
<v Speaker 1>what the prosecution said, no matter what they presented, they

0:32:25.710 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would have been not guilty. They were not guilty from

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the trial. And yet no one's investigating them.

0:32:33.060 --> 0:32:39.590
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that destroys our whole jury system. If we're

0:32:39.620 --> 0:32:41.930
<v Speaker 1>just going to load it up with activists, then what's

0:32:41.970 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the point of even having a trial? The key to

0:32:45.900 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a jury system is you are judged by 12 of

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:54.140
<v Speaker 1>your peers who are supposed to be objective or as

0:32:54.440 --> 0:33:00.670
<v Speaker 1>objective as they can, nonpartisan, who then just simply look

0:33:00.790 --> 0:33:05.310
<v Speaker 1>at the evidence and the law and then together applying

0:33:05.390 --> 0:33:11.790
<v Speaker 1>their independent common sense and judgment come to a unanimous decision.

0:33:14.370 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's worked, it's an ingenious system because essentially, think

0:33:21.140 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>about it, if 12 members of your peers, all of

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>them independently come to the same conclusion after looking at

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.460
<v Speaker 1>the evidence and the law, whether it be guilty or

0:33:33.510 --> 0:33:39.390
<v Speaker 1>not guilty, you've protected the rights of the defendant, you've

0:33:39.430 --> 0:33:45.390
<v Speaker 1>protected the rights of the victim, And whatever the conclusion is,

0:33:45.830 --> 0:33:51.770
<v Speaker 1>you can bet 99.9999% of the time is accurate. That's

0:33:51.830 --> 0:33:56.790
<v Speaker 1>why trial by jury works. It's a little messy. It's

0:33:56.810 --> 0:34:00.250
<v Speaker 1>a little complicated. Trials tend to go on a bit long.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:05.580
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, it's the fairest system we've ever developed.

0:34:06.740 --> 0:34:10.700
<v Speaker 1>Now they're destroying it. And you mark my words, if

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this thing is held in Plymouth County, You're not going

0:34:13.660 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to have an honest jury. These TikTok feminists are going

0:34:17.980 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to be running to get into that jury. And this

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:26.570
<v Speaker 1>time they're going to guarantee you 12-0, not guilty. Diana,

0:34:26.670 --> 0:34:27.210
<v Speaker 1>am I wrong?

0:34:29.050 --> 0:34:31.850
<v Speaker 8>I think what's happening is it's given me so much

0:34:31.989 --> 0:34:35.750
<v Speaker 8>doubt about the legal system that I doubt that she

0:34:35.870 --> 0:34:40.100
<v Speaker 8>fully needs that wheelchair. I have my doubts.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:41.460
<v Speaker 7>Interesting.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:45.430
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. Interesting. Well, I got to say this. To me,

0:34:45.570 --> 0:34:48.730
<v Speaker 1>what was very disconcerting, first of all, she's got a

0:34:48.770 --> 0:34:53.109
<v Speaker 1>real evil smile. And to me, she's got evil eyes.

0:34:54.070 --> 0:34:56.050
<v Speaker 1>I look at those eyes, those are the eyes of

0:34:56.110 --> 0:35:02.860
<v Speaker 1>a stone-cold killer. But it's that smile. It's a creepy smile.

0:35:04.180 --> 0:35:09.590
<v Speaker 1>It's a malevolent smile. And she's smiling and laughing and

0:35:10.770 --> 0:35:13.890
<v Speaker 1>And she and her lawyers, they're having a good time.

0:35:15.030 --> 0:35:18.270
<v Speaker 1>There were three dead children, for God's sake. These were

0:35:18.290 --> 0:35:22.790
<v Speaker 1>your children. What the hell is funny? What are you

0:35:22.830 --> 0:35:27.690
<v Speaker 1>laughing about? Diana, thank you so much for that call.

0:35:28.650 --> 0:35:32.510
<v Speaker 1>Moe on the Cape. Thanks for holding, Moe, and welcome.

0:35:33.590 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Hey. Hi, Moe. I am.

0:35:38.300 --> 0:35:40.379
<v Speaker 5>all the things you pretty much touched. So I'd like

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 5>to make a confession right now. And that's what I

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 5>was with Reddington. And we threw her out the window.

0:35:55.110 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>There was you and Kevin, huh? Well, Mo, I think that's,

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the next thing that comes out

0:36:04.820 --> 0:36:09.100
<v Speaker 1>of this clown's mouth. Mo, do you think the judge

0:36:09.140 --> 0:36:12.580
<v Speaker 1>is going to buy it? And do you think the

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>public is going to buy it? I'm just curious.

0:36:16.219 --> 0:36:19.339
<v Speaker 5>I think they'll buy it wholesale. This is Massachusetts, you know,

0:36:20.580 --> 0:36:26.180
<v Speaker 5>and getting a fair trial in Massachusetts, it's all tainted now.

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:28.660
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, it'd be good if they could

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.819
<v Speaker 5>take it down to either Texas or Florida where they

0:36:30.860 --> 0:36:31.610
<v Speaker 5>got real people.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, they would find her guilty in a heartbeat. Oh,

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.969
<v Speaker 1>she wouldn't. They would have pled. I'm telling you, if

0:36:38.989 --> 0:36:43.330
<v Speaker 1>this was Florida or, I don't care, Texas, Utah, any

0:36:43.790 --> 0:36:46.690
<v Speaker 1>red state, hell, any purple state, just take it up

0:36:46.710 --> 0:36:49.890
<v Speaker 1>to New Hampshire, it's already different. They would have gone

0:36:49.910 --> 0:36:52.330
<v Speaker 1>for a plea deal right away. They wouldn't even bother

0:36:52.350 --> 0:36:56.170
<v Speaker 1>with a trial. You know, and I think the prosecution

0:36:56.210 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>probably would have, you know, Oh, that's right. The first degree,

0:36:59.860 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't plea. Yeah, you're right. You're right. You're right. Well, whatever. They,

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.259
<v Speaker 1>you know, the defense would have said, please don't go

0:37:06.340 --> 0:37:08.700
<v Speaker 1>first degree or change the charges. We're going to make

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.670
<v Speaker 1>a plea. You know, I think they would have said,

0:37:11.690 --> 0:37:18.390
<v Speaker 1>let's not even go through a trial. You know, so anyway, Mo,

0:37:18.469 --> 0:37:20.770
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for that call. But I do agree.

0:37:20.830 --> 0:37:22.779
<v Speaker 1>If this was in a red state or a purple

0:37:22.820 --> 0:37:27.980
<v Speaker 1>state with normal people, she's toast. She, Lindsay Clancy, is toast,

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and everybody knows it. Okay, Pat in New Hampshire. Thanks

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:34.700
<v Speaker 1>for holding, Pat, and welcome.

0:37:37.030 --> 0:37:37.220
<v Speaker 7>Hi.

0:37:37.260 --> 0:37:37.660
<v Speaker 6>Hi, Pat.

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:42.350
<v Speaker 9>A couple things crossed my mind about this woman. She

0:37:42.370 --> 0:37:47.310
<v Speaker 9>works in a hospital. She's out on leave. So hospitals

0:37:47.430 --> 0:37:53.210
<v Speaker 9>fail their patients, and they also fail their employees because

0:37:53.230 --> 0:37:57.140
<v Speaker 9>they Anybody from the hospital checking on her, they know

0:37:57.180 --> 0:38:00.219
<v Speaker 9>she's out for mental reasons. They know that she has

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:04.500
<v Speaker 9>three kids. I think she's guilty as hell. If it

0:38:04.540 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 9>was held in New Hampshire, she would be. I was

0:38:09.700 --> 0:38:11.650
<v Speaker 9>on that jury. And believe me, I try to get

0:38:11.710 --> 0:38:15.010
<v Speaker 9>on juries. But I think it's fixed, the jury system,

0:38:15.469 --> 0:38:19.450
<v Speaker 9>because you don't get a lot of conservatives. So the

0:38:19.489 --> 0:38:22.500
<v Speaker 9>way they're questioning them, Pat, can.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.049
<v Speaker 1>You please hang on? I'm up against a break. If

0:38:25.090 --> 0:38:26.739
<v Speaker 1>you don't mind, I want to flush this out.