WEBVTT - Lance with Scott Springer 10/2/26

0:00:04.269 --> 0:00:08.890
<v Speaker 1>620-700-WLW, the show R &amp; L Carrier Sports Talk presented

0:00:08.910 --> 0:00:10.550
<v Speaker 1>by Kelsey Chevrolet.

0:00:11.250 --> 0:00:14.190
<v Speaker 2>It is hosted by me, Lance McAllister. It's produced by

0:00:14.250 --> 0:00:14.830
<v Speaker 2>Russ Jackson.

0:00:15.390 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And Russ there to remind me that I originally wanted

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:19.820
<v Speaker 1>to bump in with what we call a sound.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Broken up by Cincinnati as the clock hits zero. Cincinnati

0:00:26.980 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 3>improves to 4-0 by winning its Big 12 opener 31-26.

0:00:32.990 --> 0:00:37.190
<v Speaker 3>The magic of Nip at Night continues.

0:00:39.300 --> 0:00:41.810
<v Speaker 2>4-0 Bearcats in Tucson.

0:00:41.850 --> 0:00:43.890
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a late kick in the desert tomorrow night

0:00:44.150 --> 0:00:47.300
<v Speaker 1>at 11 o'clock Cincinnati time versus the Arizona Wildcats on

0:00:47.340 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the scene early. To adjust his body clock, from the Enquirer, Cincinnati.com,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.690
<v Speaker 1>Scott Springer. Are you currently hanging out with cactus? Is

0:00:55.700 --> 0:00:56.970
<v Speaker 1>there a cactus nearby?

0:00:58.020 --> 0:01:01.510
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah. I went to the Saguaro National Park because

0:01:01.590 --> 0:01:05.230
<v Speaker 4>old guys like me, you can get this lifetime park pass,

0:01:05.750 --> 0:01:07.179
<v Speaker 4>and then it's like $ 75.

0:01:06.860 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>$ 80.

0:01:07.170 --> 0:01:09.530
<v Speaker 4>You might as well use it. I've had it for

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 4>a handful of years. And so when I go to Colorado,

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.540
<v Speaker 4>I hit the Rocky Mountain Park, and then my wife

0:01:16.580 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 4>and I have hit some here and there, so it's...

0:01:19.250 --> 0:01:22.130
<v Speaker 4>You know, one of the luxuries of being elderly, which

0:01:22.270 --> 0:01:23.050
<v Speaker 4>you're finding out.

0:01:23.190 --> 0:01:26.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am. And we may have to talk about

0:01:26.090 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that pass. I may have to get that. So you're

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>out early. The team got out early. And explain Scott's

0:01:32.380 --> 0:01:35.500
<v Speaker 1>plan and the idea for dealing with the time change

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:36.780
<v Speaker 1>and the late kick with his players.

0:01:38.170 --> 0:01:41.030
<v Speaker 4>Well, I've not owned a UC team to do this before,

0:01:41.150 --> 0:01:44.050
<v Speaker 4>but I guess the idea was they practiced Thursday, got

0:01:44.069 --> 0:01:46.490
<v Speaker 4>them out here, tried to keep them up and get

0:01:46.510 --> 0:01:48.860
<v Speaker 4>them more used to the late night and all. Although

0:01:48.890 --> 0:01:51.210
<v Speaker 4>in my book, most of these kids are up to 1,

0:01:51.210 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 4>2 a.m.

0:01:51.740 --> 0:01:52.059
<v Speaker 1>Anyway.

0:01:54.010 --> 0:01:55.070
<v Speaker 4>I think they'll be fine.

0:01:55.570 --> 0:01:56.170
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:01:56.230 --> 0:01:59.550
<v Speaker 4>They've played games. It's just they haven't had good records

0:01:59.610 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 4>come in playing games in mountain time. You go back

0:02:02.590 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 4>to 23 in BYU, that was kind of a tight

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.260
<v Speaker 4>win where you had some turnovers. Obviously, last year against Utah,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 4>that didn't work out so well. The year before in

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:16.470
<v Speaker 4>Colorado was 24. You had the Heisman winner and Shador Sanders.

0:02:16.530 --> 0:02:19.950
<v Speaker 4>That didn't work out very well. So they've not had

0:02:20.930 --> 0:02:23.290
<v Speaker 4>a time zone type win. You've got to go back

0:02:23.330 --> 0:02:26.770
<v Speaker 4>to Luke Fickle's second season, 2018, and that was West

0:02:26.810 --> 0:02:31.030
<v Speaker 4>Coast at UCLA, and that was when everyone discovered Desmond

0:02:31.050 --> 0:02:31.709
<v Speaker 4>Ritter that day.

0:02:32.990 --> 0:02:37.150
<v Speaker 1>This run game, offensive line, running backs, wide receivers blocking downfield,

0:02:37.270 --> 0:02:39.290
<v Speaker 1>it is a monster rushing attack.

0:02:39.380 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it?

0:02:40.810 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah. Well, you get 271 yards against Kansas State,

0:02:44.380 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 4>and they're only allowing 96 coming into that game. Now,

0:02:48.220 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 4>this rush defense here, Arizona is ranked pretty good as well.

0:02:51.620 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I think number 13 in the country out of like

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.830
<v Speaker 4>138 teams, UC has the number seven rushing offense. So

0:02:58.130 --> 0:03:01.350
<v Speaker 4>something's got to give. Satterfield's going to try to run

0:03:01.370 --> 0:03:03.470
<v Speaker 4>the ball, obviously. I think they're going to have to

0:03:03.490 --> 0:03:04.610
<v Speaker 4>throw some downfield.

0:03:04.630 --> 0:03:05.010
<v Speaker 3>J.C.

0:03:05.030 --> 0:03:07.790
<v Speaker 4>French only threw the ball recently. 13 times last week

0:03:07.850 --> 0:03:10.650
<v Speaker 4>against the Miami Redhawks. He threw it well over 40.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.740
<v Speaker 4>But I don't think it could be one-dimensional. But, you know,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 4>if you're one-dimensional and it works, then it's effective. If

0:03:17.500 --> 0:03:19.460
<v Speaker 4>you can get those guys to block, if you get

0:03:19.460 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 4>270 yards, I like your chances.

0:03:22.740 --> 0:03:25.830
<v Speaker 1>You hit on the perfect follow-up because J.C. French has

0:03:25.850 --> 0:03:30.149
<v Speaker 1>been good. 75% completion percentage, six TDs, no interceptions, was

0:03:30.150 --> 0:03:35.460
<v Speaker 1>8 of 13 Saturday night. Are they okay if he's

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.780
<v Speaker 1>forced to sling it more on Saturday night?

0:03:38.980 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you look at what he did at Georgia Southern,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.970
<v Speaker 4>he did throw for more yards than Brendan Sursby, albeit

0:03:44.450 --> 0:03:46.910
<v Speaker 4>in the Sun Belt. He looked decent throwing the ball

0:03:46.950 --> 0:03:49.070
<v Speaker 4>against Miami. He looked decent throwing the ball in the

0:03:49.110 --> 0:03:53.170
<v Speaker 4>second game. He didn't have to throw it as much

0:03:53.350 --> 0:03:56.290
<v Speaker 4>against Kansas State, and he's fine with that. And I

0:03:56.330 --> 0:04:00.630
<v Speaker 4>think Scott Satterfield likes him taking the shorter, more conservative

0:04:00.650 --> 0:04:04.390
<v Speaker 4>shots route sometimes rather than Sorsby every now and then

0:04:04.430 --> 0:04:06.350
<v Speaker 4>would try to fit one end that maybe wasn't going

0:04:06.370 --> 0:04:09.650
<v Speaker 4>to fit or try to hit somebody long that wasn't open.

0:04:10.050 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, it helped to have Cyrus Allen, an NFL

0:04:12.310 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 4>receiver there, but these guys aren't bad. I mean, JV Gibson,

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 4>actually the last game was the first game he didn't

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>score a touchdown. Malachi Henry has done a great job

0:04:22.020 --> 0:04:25.250
<v Speaker 4>and he's the son of a coach and, you know,

0:04:25.290 --> 0:04:27.390
<v Speaker 4>he had a great punt return. He's blocked well and

0:04:27.410 --> 0:04:30.180
<v Speaker 4>then he had the great reception and So eight out

0:04:30.220 --> 0:04:32.220
<v Speaker 4>of 13 and you win, I think they'll take it.

0:04:32.610 --> 0:04:35.010
<v Speaker 1>I would have never thought they'd take away the legs

0:04:35.050 --> 0:04:37.910
<v Speaker 1>of Avery Johnson, the K-State quarterback, last week and have

0:04:37.930 --> 0:04:40.990
<v Speaker 1>him throw 50 times. But, man, this Nate Woody defense,

0:04:41.010 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they're forcing turnovers. They're doing what Bearcat fans have been craving.

0:04:46.380 --> 0:04:48.460
<v Speaker 4>Well, they've been better in the second half. You know,

0:04:48.540 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 4>obviously against Miami, that was not very fun in the

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.350
<v Speaker 4>first half. That kind of allows it. So whatever you

0:04:54.380 --> 0:04:56.490
<v Speaker 4>had there, just flush that down the toilet and go

0:04:56.529 --> 0:04:59.910
<v Speaker 4>to plan B. But plan B, you outscored him 28-3

0:04:59.930 --> 0:05:02.410
<v Speaker 4>in the second half. You played a better second half

0:05:02.430 --> 0:05:05.710
<v Speaker 4>against Kansas State coming back. And actually in the other games,

0:05:05.790 --> 0:05:08.130
<v Speaker 4>if you look at them, second half defense has been good.

0:05:08.210 --> 0:05:12.029
<v Speaker 4>So the adjustments have been right there. This guy's tough.

0:05:12.089 --> 0:05:14.990
<v Speaker 4>Noah Fafita tore him up last year. That was going

0:05:15.010 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 4>against the old 3-3-5 where you're allowing this pocket passer

0:05:19.060 --> 0:05:21.700
<v Speaker 4>to just pick you apart. And they sacked him four times,

0:05:21.779 --> 0:05:22.500
<v Speaker 4>and he still won.

0:05:23.500 --> 0:05:24.540
<v Speaker 2>He's tough.

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 4>He's a little dude. I interviewed him at Big 12

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.700
<v Speaker 4>Media Days. They list him 5'10. He's probably about 5'8.

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.809
<v Speaker 4>But it doesn't matter if he's finding receivers. It doesn't

0:05:33.850 --> 0:05:36.710
<v Speaker 4>matter how tall he is. But I think they're going

0:05:36.730 --> 0:05:39.750
<v Speaker 4>to need some turnovers to have any chance. in this game.

0:05:39.930 --> 0:05:41.690
<v Speaker 1>Well, they've certainly got the right guy to do it.

0:05:41.690 --> 0:05:44.030
<v Speaker 1>I love the comment by Scott on his coaching show

0:05:44.050 --> 0:05:45.930
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week. I think he said, we feel

0:05:45.990 --> 0:05:48.849
<v Speaker 1>if Antoine Peake Jr. gets anywhere near the ball, there's

0:05:48.890 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance it's coming out. For those who don't understand

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the impact, he's got three in the last four games

0:05:55.380 --> 0:05:56.820
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is, nine for his career.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 2>We know what his dad did.

0:05:57.900 --> 0:06:01.340
<v Speaker 1>It's a family of noses for the football.

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible.

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.859
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and at the Miami game, there was a Brown

0:06:05.900 --> 0:06:08.339
<v Speaker 4>scout there, and he told me he was there looking

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 4>at Teague, and I told him, I said, watch him.

0:06:10.460 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 4>He's got a knack for finding the ball and making

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.430
<v Speaker 4>the hit that disrupts the ball, and they get it,

0:06:16.460 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 4>and sure enough, he did. So I don't know if

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.540
<v Speaker 4>that's going to help him later on. Actually, I had

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 4>to fly through Dallas this morning. His mother was on

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 4>my flight to Dallas. She had an earlier flight out

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 4>here to Tucson, but when you see somebody with a

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.370
<v Speaker 4>Pete Jr. shirt, number three, in Dallas, it's pretty easy

0:06:34.410 --> 0:06:35.589
<v Speaker 4>to narrow down who it is.

0:06:35.830 --> 0:06:36.210
<v Speaker 2>No doubt.

0:06:36.230 --> 0:06:36.929
<v Speaker 4>She's awfully proud.

0:06:37.630 --> 0:06:39.770
<v Speaker 2>No doubt about that. All right, you are out there.

0:06:39.810 --> 0:06:41.130
<v Speaker 2>You're going to be all over this.

0:06:41.510 --> 0:06:43.910
<v Speaker 1>Tell listeners how they can follow as the game unfolds

0:06:43.930 --> 0:06:45.730
<v Speaker 1>and then all the post-game reactions.

0:06:47.060 --> 0:06:49.060
<v Speaker 4>All right. If you want to go on X, it's

0:06:49.300 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 4>S Springer Sports Cincinnati dot com. We do a live

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.430
<v Speaker 4>blog and update the game. So either way, you can

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.570
<v Speaker 4>catch updates there. If you're up, have some coffee and

0:06:59.589 --> 0:07:02.670
<v Speaker 4>donuts at 2 a.m. We'll have some form of a

0:07:02.690 --> 0:07:05.090
<v Speaker 4>story up there for you. Don't know how it's.

0:07:05.010 --> 0:07:05.430
<v Speaker 2>Going to be.

0:07:05.450 --> 0:07:09.010
<v Speaker 4>I this is one way you got to be honest.

0:07:09.410 --> 0:07:11.610
<v Speaker 4>I think this is a tough one. And I picked

0:07:11.670 --> 0:07:14.230
<v Speaker 4>Arizona to win, but you never know. If you can

0:07:14.270 --> 0:07:16.350
<v Speaker 4>get through this one, that kind of changes a lot

0:07:16.390 --> 0:07:19.510
<v Speaker 4>of folks' opinions. But I thought it was important for

0:07:19.540 --> 0:07:21.820
<v Speaker 4>them to start 4-0 because you look at the next

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 4>state and you've got four top 25 teams. And that's

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 4>not counting Arizona or West Virginia.

0:07:26.860 --> 0:07:30.100
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, difficult path ahead. I appreciate the time, as always.

0:07:30.140 --> 0:07:30.660
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, sir.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.220
<v Speaker 4>All right, I'm hitting the pool.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, sounds like a plan. There you go, Scott Springer,

0:07:35.980 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 2>checking in from.

0:07:36.500 --> 0:07:37.500
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't do that to anybody.

0:07:38.700 --> 0:07:41.790
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, sir. Scott Springer checking in from Tucson.

0:07:41.810 --> 0:07:46.230
<v Speaker 1>Bearcats and Wildcats, 11 o'clock kick, 10 o'clock pregame here

0:07:46.290 --> 0:07:51.130
<v Speaker 1>on 700 WLW. Bearcats 4-0 for the first time since 2021.

0:07:51.130 --> 0:07:53.890
<v Speaker 1>They've gotten themselves into a bit of a bind the

0:07:53.940 --> 0:07:57.220
<v Speaker 1>last two games. They've figured their way out. They've overcome

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>double-digit deficits in back-to-back games. First time that's happened since 2011.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.820
<v Speaker 1>But to Scott's point about how the second half has

0:08:05.860 --> 0:08:11.510
<v Speaker 1>been better, they're outscoring opponents 107-1. 227 in the second

0:08:11.550 --> 0:08:14.270
<v Speaker 1>half this year and still i i and it is

0:08:14.330 --> 0:08:17.150
<v Speaker 1>not a misprint uc's running back and they went for

0:08:17.190 --> 0:08:22.650
<v Speaker 1>what 271 last week colt tabb leads the country rushing

0:08:22.770 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for 11.1 yards per carry he's rushing for a first

0:08:27.690 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>down plus every time he carries the football scott mentioned

0:08:31.700 --> 0:08:34.380
<v Speaker 1>noah fafita my goodness the arizona quarterback seems like he's

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.140
<v Speaker 1>been around forever He's put up 84 touchdowns at over

0:08:38.140 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>10,000 yards passing in his career. Among active college quarterbacks,

0:08:42.500 --> 0:08:46.380
<v Speaker 1>he's number one in touchdowns, and he's number two in

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.740
<v Speaker 1>passing yards. And that Arizona offense, they are really, really,

0:08:49.980 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>really good at converting on third down. I think I

0:08:52.580 --> 0:08:54.300
<v Speaker 1>saw on the notes they are number six in the

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:59.700
<v Speaker 1>country at over 56%. I mentioned Ohio State has Iowa

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.420
<v Speaker 1>on the road against Iowa for a 330 kick tomorrow.

0:09:03.590 --> 0:09:04.260
<v Speaker 2>That's the 70th time.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 1>The Ohio State Buckeyes have been part of the ESPN

0:09:08.780 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>College Game Day matchup. That is the most of any

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.300
<v Speaker 1>team in the country. And I was talking about this

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.020
<v Speaker 1>with Rock last night on the Roundtable show. Jeremiah Smith

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, and it's like video game numbers, is on

0:09:22.300 --> 0:09:30.830
<v Speaker 1>pace for 121 catches, 2,385 yards, and 26 touchdowns. See

0:09:30.850 --> 0:09:33.829
<v Speaker 1>what the Buckeyes do against pretty dang good Iowa defense.

0:09:34.150 --> 0:09:37.050
<v Speaker 1>They are allowing just eight points a game, leading the

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>nation in scoring. If you missed the headlines, a real

0:09:39.620 --> 0:09:42.260
<v Speaker 1>bummer for the Miami Redhawks. They have lost their starting quarterback.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.060
<v Speaker 1>Second starting quarterback of the year lost, David McComb, who

0:09:46.179 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>had seven touchdowns, one interception this year, and was averaging

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.969
<v Speaker 1>17.3 yards per completion. They get an 0-4 Eddie George-led

0:09:55.010 --> 0:09:58.250
<v Speaker 1>Bowling Green Falcons team on Saturday.

0:09:58.270 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, still ahead. We'll take a to the hoop.

0:10:01.150 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>A little basketball, a little NKU Norse activity.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.110
<v Speaker 2>They've got a Scoops for Hoops. I was pausing.

0:10:13.130 --> 0:10:15.270
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't remember if they call it Scoops for Hoops

0:10:15.330 --> 0:10:18.010
<v Speaker 1>or Hoops for Scoops. I guess Scoops for Hoops makes

0:10:18.030 --> 0:10:20.429
<v Speaker 1>the most sense, so we'll go with that. Darren Horn

0:10:20.450 --> 0:10:23.700
<v Speaker 1>shakes it after news. It's R &amp; L Carrier Sports Talk.

0:10:23.750 --> 0:10:26.900
<v Speaker 1>I'll be all right, I think. Presented by Kelsey Chevrolet,

0:10:26.900 --> 0:10:27.100
<v Speaker 1>700 WLW.