1 00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:04,880 Speaker 1: ESPN fifteen thirty, Cincinnati's sports station. 2 00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:08,960 Speaker 2: I don't know that a day or at least a 3 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:15,520 Speaker 2: week goes by without sports and the law intersecting. The 4 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:19,640 Speaker 2: Stefan Diggs story, which is not good, would be an 5 00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 2: example of that. We'll maybe spend some time on that 6 00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:24,600 Speaker 2: next week. And so I've wanted for a while. I've 7 00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: wanted somebody on our show who could talk about sports 8 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:30,560 Speaker 2: and the law and not necessarily an athlete getting in trouble. 9 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:34,360 Speaker 2: But like with what's happening in college sports right now, 10 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 2: the courts are often involved, and when they're not, they 11 00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:40,120 Speaker 2: probably will be. And so we have can I say 12 00:00:40,159 --> 00:00:43,559 Speaker 2: we've we've gotten on retainer to use the proper term. 13 00:00:43,880 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 2: Stuart Penrose from the Manilo Law Group, it's you're my 14 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 2: new legal guy. 15 00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:49,640 Speaker 3: I'm glad, glad to be Thanks for having me on 16 00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:50,640 Speaker 3: the show, MO, I appreciate it. 17 00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:52,840 Speaker 2: You're gonna end up answering a lot of really dumb 18 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:53,600 Speaker 2: questions from me. 19 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:58,240 Speaker 3: I answer dumb questions every day, both personally and professionally. 20 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:01,080 Speaker 3: I've answered dumb question on the radio with Kid Chris 21 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:02,200 Speaker 3: for years. That's not new to me. 22 00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:05,880 Speaker 2: Uh, he's better at asking dumb questions yes, he is. 23 00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:08,840 Speaker 2: All right, So so there's this is awesome and uh, 24 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:11,120 Speaker 2: and we're gonna have you every week. There's there's always 25 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:14,040 Speaker 2: stuff floating around as it relates to sports and the law. 26 00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 2: And sometimes it's like a real serious legal issue. Sometimes 27 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:20,320 Speaker 2: it's you know, something in the courts that's kind of 28 00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:24,840 Speaker 2: complex and beyond the realm of uh my understanding. Uh, 29 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:27,160 Speaker 2: and sometimes we'll have some fun stuff. So it's gonna 30 00:01:27,160 --> 00:01:28,720 Speaker 2: be a mixed bag. But I'm excited to do this. 31 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,160 Speaker 3: It's awesome to have you as am. I very excited. 32 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:35,560 Speaker 2: Uh let's start with this. So college sports are very 33 00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:39,800 Speaker 2: much in a weird place right. We have unprecedented challenges 34 00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:43,840 Speaker 2: in college sports as it relates to athlete compensation, the 35 00:01:43,959 --> 00:01:48,520 Speaker 2: transfer portal, and now we have players getting eligibility even 36 00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:52,320 Speaker 2: though they've already been drafted by an NBA team. And 37 00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 2: at the heart of all this, it feels like the 38 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 2: NCAA is basically saying, well, we're gonna let this guy 39 00:01:57,760 --> 00:02:00,320 Speaker 2: be eligible because if we end up getting taken the court, 40 00:02:00,360 --> 00:02:02,560 Speaker 2: we're gonna lose. The n cuaa's track record in court 41 00:02:02,680 --> 00:02:03,160 Speaker 2: is not good. 42 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 4: That's exactly what it is. 43 00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:07,080 Speaker 3: The crux of it is they've been losing anti trust 44 00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:10,560 Speaker 3: lawsuits started with the the ed O Bannon case. He's 45 00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 3: put in a video game with his likeness and says, hey, 46 00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:16,799 Speaker 3: this isn't right, ensues over it, and he wins, and 47 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:20,400 Speaker 3: you know that starts a string of lawsuits that challenge 48 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,600 Speaker 3: the n C double a on antitrust laws. You had, 49 00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:25,760 Speaker 3: you know, another case just a few years ago, the 50 00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 3: ash In case that basically opened nil completely supreme you know, 51 00:02:30,680 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 3: unanimous Supreme Court decision says that you can't stop these 52 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:36,840 Speaker 3: players from earning money from their name, image and likeness, 53 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:40,160 Speaker 3: that it violates anti trust laws to to do that 54 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:43,120 Speaker 3: and stop them from having open, uh, you know, markets 55 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:43,960 Speaker 3: for their compensation. 56 00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 2: So we hear the term anti trust, which is not 57 00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 2: a sports term. It's a sure a legal term, but 58 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:51,520 Speaker 2: it's used all the time as it relates to sports. 59 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 2: This is a stupid question. What what are anti trust 60 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:55,640 Speaker 2: laws about markets? 61 00:02:55,639 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 3: About having free markets, the ability to uh to earn 62 00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:03,399 Speaker 3: a living, the ability to have free markets determine prices 63 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:05,280 Speaker 3: of goods of services. 64 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:07,080 Speaker 4: It's about free markets. 65 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 2: Baseball's gotten anti trust exemptions, Professional sports leagues have gotten 66 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:15,359 Speaker 2: anti trust exemptions. Good college athletics get anti trust exemptions. 67 00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:16,919 Speaker 4: There are some limits to it. 68 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:22,080 Speaker 3: You're not going to see unlimited eligibility for instance. There 69 00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:23,919 Speaker 3: there are certain limits to where it can go with it. 70 00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 3: But the n C double A, they had an old 71 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:31,320 Speaker 3: model of have heart, you know, very strict rules, focus 72 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:35,520 Speaker 3: on preserving amateurism and then enforcing their rules, and by 73 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 3: losing all these anti trust cases, they've had to completely 74 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 3: switch to a new model, which is, don't stop losing 75 00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 3: precedent setting lawsuits. Be more adaptable, and that's what you're seeing. 76 00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 3: You're seeing the NC double A be a lot more 77 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:51,760 Speaker 3: adaptable on eligibility, certainly on NIL, which you know, we're 78 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 3: in the wild West, and I mean that's a completely 79 00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:58,360 Speaker 3: another topic for you for a different day. You know, 80 00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 3: pros and cons with that. There's some sort of very 81 00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:04,800 Speaker 3: unhealthy things with NIL. But they've had to adapt to 82 00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:06,880 Speaker 3: it to a new model to reserve to preserve some 83 00:04:07,440 --> 00:04:10,119 Speaker 3: relevancy and ensures that their schools don't leave. 84 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, so we have another case that's going to go 85 00:04:13,240 --> 00:04:15,440 Speaker 2: through the courts. A guess we're Diego Pavia, the Vanderbilt 86 00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 2: quarterback Heisman finalist, right, is suing because he wants to 87 00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:21,840 Speaker 2: keep playing college football. Right, and there's a lot of 88 00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:25,680 Speaker 2: athletes watching how this may unfold. Who then would go, Okay, well, 89 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:28,760 Speaker 2: I want to come back and play college football, college basketball, 90 00:04:29,160 --> 00:04:33,279 Speaker 2: whatever it is. Given the NCAA's track record, it would 91 00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:36,120 Speaker 2: feel like he is. His legal maneuvering is going to 92 00:04:36,160 --> 00:04:37,560 Speaker 2: be successful, you would. 93 00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:40,120 Speaker 3: Think, I mean, essentially, what he's challenging is he didn't 94 00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:43,120 Speaker 3: want his junior college years, which aren't n C double A, 95 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 3: to count towards. 96 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:45,640 Speaker 4: His NCUBAA eligibility. 97 00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 3: But he didn't play this year because the NCUBA allowed 98 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:50,520 Speaker 3: him to play, or that he got a waiver. He 99 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:53,560 Speaker 3: played because of judge granted an injunction preventing the nc 100 00:04:53,680 --> 00:04:56,600 Speaker 3: Double A from enforcing their denial of his eligibility for 101 00:04:56,640 --> 00:04:59,360 Speaker 3: this year. N C DOUBLEA didn't, you know, fight hard 102 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:01,480 Speaker 3: back on it. They see the writing on the wall 103 00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:03,840 Speaker 3: and they don't want to set bad precedent to you know, 104 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:06,720 Speaker 3: further degrade their brand and you know, lose more teeth 105 00:05:06,720 --> 00:05:09,360 Speaker 3: than they've already lost. But yes, I mean, he's my 106 00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:12,120 Speaker 3: understands that he's going to the NFL. But yes, all 107 00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:14,120 Speaker 3: the other athletes are gonna watch what happens in this 108 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,760 Speaker 3: lawsuit that he's not dropping and there have to believe 109 00:05:17,760 --> 00:05:20,200 Speaker 3: twelve other athletes in this lawsuit as well too. But 110 00:05:20,279 --> 00:05:21,800 Speaker 3: that's going to set a lot of precedent that will 111 00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:24,279 Speaker 3: affect a lot of JUCO players going forward. 112 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:27,160 Speaker 2: I hear people say, well, the NCAA is so bad 113 00:05:27,240 --> 00:05:30,800 Speaker 2: at this because their basic business model is illegal. What 114 00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:32,720 Speaker 2: would a lawyer say about that. 115 00:05:34,040 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 4: It's it's not completely black and white. 116 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,080 Speaker 3: They are trying how they do it is legal, but 117 00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:45,040 Speaker 3: they are trying to adapt to stay that way, and 118 00:05:45,120 --> 00:05:48,159 Speaker 3: they are getting challenged left and right. So it is legal, 119 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:52,279 Speaker 3: but certain aspects of it are being challenged, particularly with eligibility, 120 00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:56,040 Speaker 3: with different types of anti trust, with compensation models. 121 00:05:56,839 --> 00:05:58,839 Speaker 4: It is legal, but it's being parts of it are 122 00:05:58,880 --> 00:05:59,520 Speaker 4: being challenged. 123 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:02,320 Speaker 2: We basically in college sports, we you know, we have 124 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,000 Speaker 2: no rules, right, and so the Wild West now it 125 00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:07,559 Speaker 2: is the NFL has rules, right. The NFL has rules 126 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:09,760 Speaker 2: that are collectively bargained and agreed upon. 127 00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:10,000 Speaker 1: Right. 128 00:06:10,040 --> 00:06:14,440 Speaker 2: Where the players Association says, uh, well, here's what we want. 129 00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:16,800 Speaker 2: The NFL says, here what the owners want, and then 130 00:06:16,839 --> 00:06:20,440 Speaker 2: they agree to a collective bargaining agreement. It lasts, however, 131 00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:22,720 Speaker 2: many years. It's how it works in the NBA. It's 132 00:06:22,800 --> 00:06:25,640 Speaker 2: it works in Major League Baseball. We don't have that 133 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:30,719 Speaker 2: in college sports. In the absence of collective of collective bargaining, 134 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 2: can the nc double A legally start to create and 135 00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:39,280 Speaker 2: in force its own set of rules to rain everything in? 136 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:39,880 Speaker 4: Good luck? 137 00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:40,480 Speaker 2: Right? 138 00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:41,839 Speaker 4: Good luck? It's not gonna happen. 139 00:06:41,839 --> 00:06:42,279 Speaker 2: Can't happen. 140 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:45,719 Speaker 3: Everything's getting challenged. And let's be honest, there are powers 141 00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:46,240 Speaker 3: bigger than them. 142 00:06:46,320 --> 00:06:46,599 Speaker 4: Right now. 143 00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 3: The conferences are more powerful double A. The TV TV 144 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 3: is more powerful, you know, Fox, ABC and CBS. They 145 00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:58,680 Speaker 3: control the money of college football, along with the Big 146 00:06:58,760 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 3: ten SEC and to some extent, the Big twelve and 147 00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:04,120 Speaker 3: the others. The money dictates the power, and the n 148 00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:06,400 Speaker 3: C Double A has lost a grasp of that completely. 149 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:09,080 Speaker 2: I mean it is you know, people talk about it 150 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:12,280 Speaker 2: like it's some governing body. The NCAA is the collection 151 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 2: of schools. 152 00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:14,480 Speaker 4: It's technically a nonprofit r. 153 00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:16,920 Speaker 2: So if the collection of schools got together and said, look, 154 00:07:16,960 --> 00:07:20,320 Speaker 2: he're the rules. You have four years to you have 155 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:22,080 Speaker 2: five years to play for, which is what it used 156 00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:24,600 Speaker 2: to be five years to play for. You could transfer 157 00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:27,040 Speaker 2: once with that penalty. We're gonna put a hard cap 158 00:07:27,120 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 2: and what everybody can make in terms of revenue sharing, 159 00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:33,920 Speaker 2: and these are the rules. They would be completely unenforceable, 160 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:34,640 Speaker 2: is what you're telling me. 161 00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 4: In a lot of ways. Yes, I mean there are 162 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 4: some things that can be enforced. 163 00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 3: You can't, you know, for instance, beyond your third degree, 164 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 3: be on your doctrine and being your ninth year. There's 165 00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:49,600 Speaker 3: gonna be limits to it. There are still some limits 166 00:07:49,640 --> 00:07:51,480 Speaker 3: to it. You're not gonna have a thirty six year 167 00:07:51,520 --> 00:07:54,880 Speaker 3: old quarterback in college football. There are still some things 168 00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:58,400 Speaker 3: that just defy logic and reasoning that that would violate 169 00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:00,600 Speaker 3: anti trust. On the other end, given that this is 170 00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:03,880 Speaker 3: still some level of amateurism, you know, quote unquote whatever's 171 00:08:03,920 --> 00:08:08,520 Speaker 3: left of that, there's still technically students and in a 172 00:08:08,560 --> 00:08:11,600 Speaker 3: lot of ways, that's how they get around being employees 173 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:16,440 Speaker 3: and having contracts and being subject to employment law, insurance 174 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 3: and all of that. 175 00:08:17,160 --> 00:08:19,640 Speaker 2: How do you collectively bargain with a group of people 176 00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:20,440 Speaker 2: that's not a union. 177 00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:22,480 Speaker 3: Well, some of those some of the schools are trying 178 00:08:22,480 --> 00:08:24,200 Speaker 3: to union I some of the players are trying to 179 00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:27,120 Speaker 3: union ize. So that's there's just a lot of precedents 180 00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 3: that hasn't been set with some of this. But it's 181 00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:32,360 Speaker 3: I don't see how you could possibly do it when 182 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,440 Speaker 3: there's not a set organization like the NFL, like any 183 00:08:35,520 --> 00:08:38,720 Speaker 3: pro league. It's too fragmented in college football, in college 184 00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:39,360 Speaker 3: sports in general. 185 00:08:39,480 --> 00:08:43,280 Speaker 2: Rather, let me ask you about the Ohio University the 186 00:08:43,440 --> 00:08:47,319 Speaker 2: ex head coach at Ohio University, Brian Smith. So, in 187 00:08:47,440 --> 00:08:49,480 Speaker 2: the wake of the Sharon Moore thing, and I know 188 00:08:49,559 --> 00:08:52,400 Speaker 2: you're a Michigan guy, don't get me started, right, this 189 00:08:52,640 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 2: was sort of like Sharon Moore light right, Yes, where 190 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:58,960 Speaker 2: you had the coach Bryan Smith was terminated for a cause. 191 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 2: And thankfully we're not talking about somebody who went on 192 00:09:02,320 --> 00:09:06,480 Speaker 2: to do something that he's now you know, under you know, 193 00:09:06,559 --> 00:09:09,319 Speaker 2: felony indictment for. But he loses his job for a 194 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:12,240 Speaker 2: cause and the school says, well, you were having an 195 00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:18,599 Speaker 2: extra marital affair with a student at Ohio University student. So, 196 00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:20,079 Speaker 2: first of all, because I think there's a lot of 197 00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:23,440 Speaker 2: folks that know what explain make the distinction between firing 198 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:25,160 Speaker 2: with cause and without. 199 00:09:25,280 --> 00:09:27,200 Speaker 3: Well, if you fire him with cause, he's not going 200 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:30,400 Speaker 3: to get any of his buyout. Furthermore, you kind of 201 00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:32,560 Speaker 3: become unhireable, at least for a period of time. If 202 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:35,199 Speaker 3: if you've got a with cause firing, that is a 203 00:09:35,280 --> 00:09:36,440 Speaker 3: big stain on your record. 204 00:09:36,559 --> 00:09:39,360 Speaker 2: With cause basically means you did something that compelled them 205 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:39,960 Speaker 2: to fire. 206 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 3: In breach of your contract and compelled you to fire 207 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,400 Speaker 3: you and you know, brought some disrepute to the university. 208 00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:47,720 Speaker 4: Without cause, you get your buyout. 209 00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 3: If you're just fired for performance, the team's not performing 210 00:09:50,160 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 3: well enough, you get your buyout. Now he has counsel here, 211 00:09:53,679 --> 00:09:56,559 Speaker 3: he's disputing the allegations and the context of it. You 212 00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:58,599 Speaker 3: know my understanding for you know, he says that he 213 00:09:58,679 --> 00:10:00,319 Speaker 3: was in the middle of a divorce and then there 214 00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:03,079 Speaker 3: was no affair. And I'm not sure the age of 215 00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:05,040 Speaker 3: the student. I read somewhere that she was in her forties. 216 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:08,160 Speaker 3: I don't know if that's true or not. But and 217 00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:09,800 Speaker 3: you said there weren't going to be thirty six year 218 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:14,559 Speaker 3: old quarterbacks, right right. But he disputes, you know, the 219 00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:20,120 Speaker 3: nuances of what he's being alleged by the university. These 220 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 3: cases are almost certain in a settlement of some sort. Yeah, 221 00:10:23,240 --> 00:10:25,040 Speaker 3: he'll get some sort of settlement. 222 00:10:24,760 --> 00:10:25,320 Speaker 4: Of his buyout. 223 00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:27,319 Speaker 3: He's going to want to push for it to be 224 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 3: without cause. Firing that's going to be the big win 225 00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:30,559 Speaker 3: for him. 226 00:10:31,160 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 2: So the school says, well, you were having an affair 227 00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 2: with the student, and he says, well, you don't have 228 00:10:36,840 --> 00:10:38,480 Speaker 2: a rule against having an affair with the student. 229 00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:40,280 Speaker 4: First of all, I think there wasn't a rule against it. 230 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:43,800 Speaker 2: Is there no rule against having a sexual relationship with 231 00:10:43,840 --> 00:10:44,199 Speaker 2: the student? 232 00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:46,760 Speaker 3: Sure, I'm sure that there is some morality clause in 233 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:49,400 Speaker 3: his contract, and some clause that if he brings some 234 00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:53,800 Speaker 3: disrepute or you know, bad press to the university, and 235 00:10:53,920 --> 00:10:55,719 Speaker 3: I can see how it can be construed with that. 236 00:10:56,280 --> 00:10:58,199 Speaker 3: My understanding is that he was living at the university 237 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:00,439 Speaker 3: hotel at the time until he could find, you know, 238 00:11:00,520 --> 00:11:03,640 Speaker 3: a permanent home out there, and he was seen with 239 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 3: her with some of the players families. There is what 240 00:11:06,880 --> 00:11:09,520 Speaker 3: I read, So I can see how it can be 241 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:12,439 Speaker 3: argued a certain way. But there's enough gray area here 242 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 3: that the minds are going to meet in the middle somewhere. 243 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:18,679 Speaker 3: Neither side wants this drug got into litigation where you know, 244 00:11:18,840 --> 00:11:22,360 Speaker 3: bad facts on both sides are coming out. People want 245 00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:24,679 Speaker 3: to move on and there'll be some sort of settlement. 246 00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:26,960 Speaker 2: I would think if this guy wants to continue coaching 247 00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:29,520 Speaker 2: at any level, that it would make sense for him 248 00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:32,599 Speaker 2: to not have some of the senior details of his 249 00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:34,240 Speaker 2: life be spilled out into the public. 250 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:37,240 Speaker 3: Absolutely in same thing for Ohio University. You don't want 251 00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:39,440 Speaker 3: that either, you know, saying that this happened under our watch. 252 00:11:39,600 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. They also said he had booze in his office. 253 00:11:42,280 --> 00:11:44,600 Speaker 2: And if every coach that I know who's had booze 254 00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:46,800 Speaker 2: in their office, God fired, for there would be no coaches. 255 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:49,319 Speaker 2: We wouldn't have coaches to complain about college athletics. 256 00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:50,839 Speaker 4: How about lawyers with booze in their office? 257 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:51,600 Speaker 2: Does that happen? 258 00:11:52,120 --> 00:11:52,160 Speaker 1: No? 259 00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:57,400 Speaker 4: No, yes, radio executives not my office. Off not my office. 260 00:11:57,679 --> 00:11:59,880 Speaker 2: Well we can change that, all right. You're gonna join 261 00:11:59,920 --> 00:12:02,199 Speaker 2: me every Tuesday, every Tuesday, looking forward to it. It's 262 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:05,040 Speaker 2: gonna be awesome. Were my questions? These were dumb questions, 263 00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:05,679 Speaker 2: I will admit this. 264 00:12:05,880 --> 00:12:08,360 Speaker 4: No, they were great questions. They were fantastic questions. 265 00:12:08,559 --> 00:12:09,360 Speaker 2: Okay, very good. 266 00:12:09,440 --> 00:12:11,640 Speaker 4: Hopefully I had decent answers. Very all right. 267 00:12:11,720 --> 00:12:13,640 Speaker 2: I learned a lot. Well, thank you very much, Minila 268 00:12:13,679 --> 00:12:15,920 Speaker 2: Law Group, Stuart Penrose. We'll see you next Tuesday. Man, 269 00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:16,400 Speaker 2: thanks so much. 270 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 4: Thank you. 271 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 2: Mo. It is hutswelve away from five o'clock. We'd Oakley 272 00:12:19,280 --> 00:12:22,120 Speaker 2: Greens on ESPN fifteen thirty Cincinnati Sports. 273 00:12:21,800 --> 00:12:27,319 Speaker 3: Station Cincinnati's ESPN fifteen thirty traffic. 274 00:12:27,480 --> 00:12:30,800 Speaker 1: From the uc Health Traffic Center from non invasive to 275 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:35,120 Speaker 1: surgical treatments. The uc Health Backneck and Spine Center offers 276 00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:39,080 Speaker 1: every option to improve quality of life with convenient locations 277 00:12:39,160 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 1: across Greater Cincinnati and northern Kentucky. Learn more at ucehealth 278 00:12:43,600 --> 00:12:47,719 Speaker 1: dot com. Northbound seventy one left lane is blocked from 279 00:12:47,720 --> 00:12:52,040 Speaker 1: an accident after fields irdle. Another crash on southbound seventy 280 00:12:52,120 --> 00:12:55,840 Speaker 1: one seventy five between Donaldson and Turfway Road. I'm at 281 00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:58,439 Speaker 1: Ezelac with traffic this report