WEBVTT - One Aussie Team Remains

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Holly team and welcome into your finals edition of Between

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>two Posts. It was a good weekend if you're a

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Brumbies fan, you know what, it was a good weekend.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're an Aussie rugby fan. Be course, we've got

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>one team still tracking in their hope for a title,

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>their first since twenty twenty twenty twenty four, two thousand

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and four. Morgantinually James Hall, has it really been that long?

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Twenty years? Longer twenty one years into Brumbies one?

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I think so?

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Look yeah, look, I mean they've been in a number

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>of finals since then, but they did everything they could

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 3>on Saturday night to get the job done, be alive

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 3>for another week. So yeah, really good performance from the bus.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 4>Tough to win. Kevy aren't there? You know? Like are

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 4>there and there and thereabouts?

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Every year the Brumbies, every year we think are hick

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 5>on the Reds or the TARSI going to move up?

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 5>They're still the standard bear in Australian rugby.

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I did the odds with Morgs before the match closed

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>out between the Blues and Chiefs the other night, So

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we just use bookis odds to try and calculate the

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of having the Brumbies host the Blues in the

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the final, right, so we needed the obviously need the

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Blues to win. The other night you need the Brumbies

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to win, and then this week we obviously need Brumbies

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and Blues to both win as well. Ninety to one.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It was, so the first two legs are ticked off,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>two to go this weekend. Fellas before we preview, what's

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the come, Let's sink our teeth into that cold Oh

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>my god, that cold canbra night where it was three

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>degrees that kickoff felt like about minus two down.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 4>They see what was out?

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 5>The gloves were out Panel Atkinson, Ferguson Shepherd two of

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 5>the three war gloves.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 4>Who do you think you had the gloves on?

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Atkinson Shepherd?

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeap are soft ass?

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 5>No wonder that was so bad at Phinishy this year.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 5>No resilience those two.

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got to give the game some context. So the

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>way it was shaping up was it was going to

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>be rubber between the Brumbies and the Hurricanes. What all

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of us desperadoes wanted was to have something on the

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>line in the game. We wanted some feelings and vibe.

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So that meant that the Blues need to beat the Chiefs.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So closing stages of that game sideline, the Hurricanes are

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>lined up around Morgues and the rest of the crew.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgs here it is as you're watching the final try

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>getting out with Pete among A Jensen and is this

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>when so two to two was held up? What's this?

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 5>This when like so this is like management from Hurricanes

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 5>going what's happening?

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 4>What's what is that? Is that? Is that crawling? Is

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 4>that they happened on the advantage. It's still on.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 5>They're going to come back and Peter among A Jensen there,

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 5>you saw it as soon as that tries scored and

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 5>given he's better go warm up, this game means a

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 5>little bit more.

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>We lose them, they're on our way to mad Monday. Okay, fellas,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So I mean this match was such a good game

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of finals, given they were low scoring the two games

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that preceded it, and they've just come out throwing haymakers

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>at each other. Rub And loves the first man to

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>go in, and you're watching you think this Canes back

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>line is immaculate and Kevy they were so good with

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>his first dry.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, their ability to move the ball and they're off

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>floating through the tackle is just impressive. And I think

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 3>they have, you know, the last back half of this

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Super Rugby season, I think they've been probably the form

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 3>team and you know, you didn't want to play them

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 3>become finals, but the Brumbies the whole type five. I

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 3>think for the Brumbies this game really stood up, particularly

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 3>on I think in that first half it was sort

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>of a bit of ying and yang, whereas the Hurricanes

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 3>were using the balls, spreading it wide and the Brumbies

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 3>just went back to their you know, their core game,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 3>the mall, the scrum, tight forwards, carrying the ball hard

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and it was all square after sort of twenty two

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty three minutes.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 5>But if you're the Hurricanes today Monday and you're reviewing it, well,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, if you're the coaching staff, if you're want status,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, but you have to that's your job, right.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.839
<v Speaker 5>Clark's in there, is in the game because if you're

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 5>a head coach in superb you are a statist. He

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 5>can't be disappointed with the way his team played.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Do they played well?

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 5>They played the best version of themselves tactically smart got

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 5>to the edges on the Brumbies when the Brummies were

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 5>trying to come up and close. You know they'll be

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 5>disappointed they couldn't hold maybe one moll out. They win

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 5>the game like a couple of tiny things. But it's

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 5>one of the best losing performances in an elimination final

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 5>life scene.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>They were excellent, so so good the Canes. So too

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was Alan Abletowa, who scored his eighth try the season,

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and we had to bring up the stats stack again

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>after he went over man because when you reveal it,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>you will see that his previous ten years of Super Robi,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he had only scored four tries total. This year he

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>has gone through the roof Cavy wild stuff.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Meters gain for those tries a question total he's been.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 3>He's in good for I think you know he's critical

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>for the Wallaby success this year. He's been that good

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and that important for this run beside, but looking forward,

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 3>we need him on the park and hurt when he

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 3>wasn't there.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, we always try and look for the why

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 5>and that how why is that?

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 4>Why had he never scored more? But why now is

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>he s called double?

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 5>A decade worth of tries like we've seen, how good

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 5>he is close to the line.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 4>But it's not like he just learned it.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 3>No, do we think that there's more a big man

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 3>let's goal kicking from penalties, so there's more opportunities that

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>you're in the twenty two.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe so teams, but he's finish.

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but no one has.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Spending more time. So you's seeing more forwards scoring tries

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 3>because teams are spending more time in the opposition.

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 4>So the only real change is the dropout law.

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so he's there, like you know before, if you

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>got held up, you just came back.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 5>He had a five moved to strom. Now it's a

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 5>massive turnover. Maybe there's much more emphasis on how low

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 5>that body. He seems to be pretty much the best

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 5>in the comp almost getting lower than defense.

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Like and like the defensive onne where you've got to

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 3>stay behind that last minute like that makes it really

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>hard to.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 4>Pretty much impossible to legally defense.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it is.

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean you've got to bend it and if you

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 3>miss it by millisecond, Gonza, it's impossible to stop.

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So he gets about to fourteen fourteen, and then right

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on halftime the Brummy's get a chance to take three

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and take the lead at the break, they choose not

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to and it was so amusing to see the reaction

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of coach Stephen Larkins. A little flick over the top

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>from Lonigan just missed the chasing Tommy Wright. So Steve

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Larkins in the box, we can't really shot to him

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and the arms across and he looks real pensive and

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Good says, no, he's on board with this? I said,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is he? Is? He good? He doesn't look like he's key.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>But then they construct again fellas this rolling moll. What

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are they doing well with this rolling more to give

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>themselves a halftime lead.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the core game for the Brumbies, for

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 3>almost as long as I can remember, has been with

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Largan as a coach, has been around belt, around

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>the mall. So I think the ability to get the

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 3>player up and down and get the front of your

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 3>mare set is the key to morning. If you get

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 3>that front guard set, the depth and get the ball

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 3>along which you see here Billy Poll, it makes it

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 3>really hard to defend. And then you see the backs

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 3>coming in and adding the X ray. But it all

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>starts with the guys up front, where Billy Poyd does

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>well to finish it there on the left hand side

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>that should go to the guys. I think's Nick Frisce

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Slipper all to that front core piece of you more.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 3>If you can get that right with no dis option

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 3>where it makes it very hard to defend legally, and

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>that's what they did, and they get the ball long,

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>then you can't have the swimmers through on the ball.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 3>It becomes that edging edging, edging, and then the Canes

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>got to put players in. Billy Pollard picks the gap,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 3>picks on the nine.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Good footing gives him a twenty one to fourteen lead.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And then Morg's early into the second half, early ish

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, after turning away the Hurricanes and

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>dodging one with duple c Kerith his hands tragically for

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Canes going missing on him.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen these.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Such a crazy is a good play. We'll talking about

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>him in the post game soon as well. But then

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of magic from the Brumbys sets up

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a handy lead.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 5>It's the world's easiest Mackram. It is the Champagne Rugby

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 5>Union moment of the week. It's a two phase play

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 5>and as much as Stephen Larkham tries to facetiously deny it.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 5>It's one hundred percent plan. It's even the switch here.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's thinking Valentine needs to carry and that's the change up,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 5>changes the point of contact and Robbie's he's in his

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 5>slot to Alima gainst their late as his role.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Noel runs the one at the back and then just

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 4>through the middle.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 5>It's absolutely perfectly replicated what they would have done a

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Norton cross as Kevy on the training Paddy.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, and I think you can see. I think

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 3>there was one earlier in the Crusaders.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Twice one week one a few weeks.

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Against against the Hurricanes, and it's probably just it's the

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>slight of hand of that inside runner taking the attention

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 3>of who is it the number five there, I think

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>for the Canes, and just the late run where right

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>comes in late, you know in division. Late is just

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 3>such a great piece of work. And the ball from

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Valentini is nice, just a little one.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Handed inside, just the way they use Valentine.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 5>So if you're opposite Valentini, your third defender, So it's

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 5>a three man forward shape that we see Valentini square.

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 5>He's got the tip option on the outside, he's got

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 5>inside support if he needs it usually just to clean

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 5>out and obviously the poll parts out the back to

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 5>Noel a laser which we see fifty times a game.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 5>Rob Valentini carries every single time. The genius is in

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 5>the change. You show the same picture and you just

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 5>show a slightly different variation. Crusades have done it, Island's

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>done it. We've seen teams do it. But but the

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 5>fact that it's Valentini is such great deception because if

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm opposite him and third, all I'm thinking about is

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 5>blinkers on. I've got to tackle this guy. If I'm

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 5>the tip guy, I've got to tackle Pollard as a

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 5>tip I'm just vision square. We've got a good defensive line.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 5>We've all done our job, and suddenly the picture changes

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 5>and it is an untouched try.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>It used to be something you do always on the outside.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 3>It's the old I think where the insights and slider

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>the third end comes on the inside.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just doing that on it.

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Doing it on the inside is just a nice touch

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 3>from the Bruns, and as Mark said, a couple of

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 3>teams have been starting.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>To do it.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's do you know what I felt for? In

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that passage? You play Flanders He's landed the shot of

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the last five years on Bob Ballatin. He become the

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>first man a stop in front of has hammered him

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and then pops up and goes got him and goes, ah, shit,

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened? I did my job? Where were you?

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Bloats?

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So that makes it twenty eight to fourteen, and that's

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a handy lead, obviously, as you both know, in a

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>qualifying final. But then Sullivan hits back this the outside

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in line here was just so pretty to watch. Is

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there anything better outside in at pace?

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 5>I just just because it's such a blind spot to

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 5>come from, it's so effective. And then even to square

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 5>up through the line and get outside of Rhyma who's despairing.

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 5>So what happens often is you come back hard against

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the grange TV. You'll know because anytime there was space,

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Kevy didn't want it right. He just wanted to run

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 5>into the teether box. So he come back hard against

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 5>the line and off and you go into the next defender.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 5>But he comes through and almost wants a reverse j

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 5>line back out.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 4>It was brilliant.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 3>It's difficult because as you're so close to the line,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 3>you're watching the ball, you want to get off the line.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>The little bobble there at nine, he comes up. They

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 3>were all looking to try and stop him, and he

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 3>just you get outside iron outside I and you just

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 3>miss him.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It was good foot which brought it back to a

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>seven point marchin. The Brummies then get another opportunity to

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>take points with twenty two to go to make it

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>a ten point leads say, ah, we're kicking the line,

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. I mean, this was a throwdown

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>three the way that Nah was hitting him the other night.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to catch up with that man on between

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>two posts extra tomorrow. So they go to them all

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and then it's your old mate, Kevy, it's your good

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>friend James Slipper off the tap play. Eventually.

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Look, I mean I think at the time of the

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 3>game you're thinking, you know, if I'm put your head

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 3>on as a captain, I'm probably taking the three there

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>just to get two scores ahead. But I guess it

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 3>showed the confidence, the ability. I think Steve they just

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 3>wanted to build pressure down in that zone, which they

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 3>felt they didn't last time they played the Crew the

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Hurricanes and slips doesn't score many and not many from

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 3>far out but I think again he's he's been so

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 3>good for the Brahms and he's going around again.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 5>It's got one, Alan got one and Pollo got too. Yes,

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 5>so there's a lot of captain's question for you. So

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 5>I got a feeling that the Brumbies early on worked

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 5>out that this was going to be a straight out

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 5>shootout and the multiples of three probably aren't enough, and

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 5>that proved right a couple of times there As a captain,

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 5>do you sometimes go look to me like that was

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 5>almost a compliment of the Hurricanes, like three points is

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 5>not enough.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 4>We've got to keep going. Do you feel that in games?

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to, but you're always got to

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 3>look a where the key is, Like those were right

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 3>in front. They're gimmes, right like you definitely three points?

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 3>You know you used to always look and sit there

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.599
<v Speaker 3>and go, well, you know what of the odds of

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 3>kicking it, you work out where your kicks and go, well, look,

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 3>i'd rather kick it to touch because there's a chance

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 3>he's going to miss this.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 2>They're gimmes.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So I think building points and momentums are big thing

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 3>in games now, and the ability to hold and build

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 3>in the twenty two is key for teams being successful

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 3>in this competition so far. So I think that certainly

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to your point, marks plays into it. But you know,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I think when we'll talk about the Chiefs game, I

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 3>think they probably kicked too much for gold. They probably

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 3>should have gone for touch more and Bilk scored. They

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of went into themselves and just tried to chip

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 3>it over.

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 5>They go for penalty goal those two times they lose

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 5>the bun.

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, it's not that simple, but you know.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And as you say, the Carrians were playing such good

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for the toss. He scored again late, but it wasn't

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>enough to get the result men, So the Brummies go ahead.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>The Canes bounce out. I wanted to touch on the

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>postmatch interview, he's the closing stages. Now it goes and

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>whips it in a touch, so they bank their spot

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the closing stages of the game. So post game rather

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>where good justin Harrison interviews doeople see careefy, how good

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that little exchange was, How great that little bit of

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>insight was that they both shared. It's a shame that

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Canes got to bounce out. It's a shame that

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>had to be losing the other night.

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think Look, I mean Griffy himself is what

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>a player, what a guy that But look, I think

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 3>it shows you what it means to play in this

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 3>sort of finals appearance. And as you said, like both

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 3>teams mores touch on it. Canes can certainly hold their

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 3>heads high for that performance. It was sort of tough

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 3>to have to be a loser that night, and probably

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 3>up until about two minutes before they were about to

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>go warm art, we're probably thinking.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>We're going through anyway.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 3>We're going through anyway, so it doesn't matter about the performance.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 3>We get another crack next week.

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 5>They could have won the comp probably maybe scrum deep

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 5>in but back line, back road, the line out pressure.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 5>I put the Brumbies under the brand of rugby. They

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 5>played the ability to kick as well when they needed to.

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Later on the next couple of weeks they kept going

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 5>talk about not wanting to play someone.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>We wonder how much those injuries early on in the

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 3>year hurt them. That they made a late run in

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the comp that got them to where they were. I mean,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 3>they dropped some games early on that they probably when

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 3>you look at they probably should not have if they

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 3>picked them up. They're sitting you know, third, second home

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 3>game and game in Wellington, second crack at it probably

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 3>if they lost top.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Two is important?

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, when are we going to? When do you want

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk? Should we talk about it now? In this segment?

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Is this where it sits best? So we want to

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>get to it after Chiefs Blues. Let's go now, shall we?

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You're cool? Okay? There's been some constant The right term

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is consternation around the final setup. Now. I think it's

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous all of us up about it now because the

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>rules of beating place since the ball was kicked the

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>start the season, which dictated that there would only be

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the shuffling of the seeds at the back end, which

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>meant that if you finish first, you drop into the

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>second seed, but if the second seed, when you go

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>up in the first seat, which is kind of a

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>little confusing. But anyway, despite that, we knew that, and

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we also knew that if you finish first and you

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>lose your first week, if you lose your first week,

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you cop andel you still get to host the semi

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>final the next week. Why did I'm just trying to

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>work out why no and push back on it, or

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>why this wasn't highlight early because it doesn't for me

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>as a fan watching scene quite right. So I think

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if you lose back of the queue, you go where

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>do you see it? Are you okay with it?

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Keevy? I'm okay.

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 3>The in the consens of where we are now, I

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 3>think this I reckon. My view is that we could

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>do the final system a little bit different, where one

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 3>and two get a week off. Okay, three plays six

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 3>and five plays four yep, straight knockout.

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They then go to it and then one would play

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the one would play with lowest.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Rank gotcha, and then basically always at home and they win.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 3>That you've got one less game to got to one

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>less game to make it.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 2>To the final.

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think, yes, okay, that's your compromise. Where do

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you sit on this whole finals conundrum?

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think I think one the big point you

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 5>make is everyone knew the rule exactly start. Everyone has

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 5>first ever been beaten before since the days of top

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 5>four and maybe went to top eight when the crusade

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 5>from fourth.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 2>They might have gone to South Africa and one over.

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 4>There they beat the lines over there, first place lines.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Lines might have been first anyway.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, So one it's it's like, it's not something you

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 5>think is going to happen, and then the defending champions sneak.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 4>In the sixth.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 5>But I reckon it will put it this way, it

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 5>won't be there next year. I couldn't imagine it'll be changed.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Why did none of the clubs push back on it initially?

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So you actually think it's a fair run.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think many analyze them much.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Won't think about it though for exams, we not know.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 3>You're right if you're saying the weight it was. So

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 3>if the Canes won against the Brumbies away, yes, they

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 3>finished fourth. So how many points behind the Chiefs were they?

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I think two three games in the season they lost,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe less, A long way behind. They then would have

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 3>hosted a final. No, they wouldn't have, No, because no

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs still host. No, they would have they would have.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 3>If you're saying that in the way we want it

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 3>to be the way we want to be. The Canes who

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 3>finished fourth, who lost three to four games behind.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>You can't lose week You can't lose Week one and

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>host you want to.

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 5>You can't have double like an extra chance and keep

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 5>having you want.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>To keep you want to keep pushing for the team

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 3>to finish top two, because otherwise later in the season

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 3>you can pull the brakes off. Doesn't matter as long

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 3>as we finished top four West sweet man.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 4>If you finish top two, you get a second chance.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 4>You can lose.

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Hurricanes lost, They're out.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 4>That's the difference.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>You should never get the host if you lose. I

0:17:58.320 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>don't reckon, I don't reckon.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 2>But neutral venues?

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Where what's that?

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Lord?

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 2>How island? Is that?

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>What? He goes? That? In between here and over there?

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Where else? Is here? Between here?

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 5>And call the mythical TASMANI and afl Stane that won't.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Be built the.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Love that Luke Burgess, Yeah, cheering, it's a good watchers

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>going to see a bit of virgo on standsport in

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for months. It's absolutely not a wingd I just I couldn't.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even like our colleagues were going, hang on

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>but wait no, but then but.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 4>Really, but it's something that no one really looked at.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 2>No, but really just a couple of high.

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 5>Level execs camera who only worked it out when the

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Blues one.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 4>They were really really.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anyways, it is what it is. It'll be tough

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>for the Brumbies over there in Chiefs Town, who'll be

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>smarting after dropping that game. We're going to get to

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that game in a second. Firstly, we need to touch

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in on the Crusaders and the Reds. My my wife,

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>she has a term for games like I went bore

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>out with Yas the other day on Stan loved it,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>naughty naughty. Anyways, she says, this is a gong show.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>This was a gong show and when a teams it's

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a blowout. It's twenty seven il at one.

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Stage we want to be gonghim red kind of like that.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a Canadian term, gongim gong show. I mean, where

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>do you where do you pick? Apart this game from

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the other night, it looked as though the Crusaders just

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>played smarter, wet weather knockout footy.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, the Reds didn't fire a shot until in

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 3>the second half. I think ultimately they were beaten to

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 3>the punch. The Crusaders were just too good. They pressured

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 3>the ball out the back, particularly defensively for the red

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 3>so they couldn't get their sort of phase played going.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 3>They were defensively disrupted at the breakout breakdown and just

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 3>I think didn't really start playing the brand of rugby

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to play until probably sort of fifty fifty

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>five minutes and by then chasing a game in christ

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 3>It is just.

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 2>Too hard, you know.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 3>And look what thirty straight at home finals games at

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 3>home the Crusade the one I meant you wouldn't want

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 3>to have me going there for a final thirty.

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that record. And second, can I ask

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you both conditions like that, why by they playing any

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>rope in your half? Why try and run it from

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty out in the same way they did which led

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to the first try. The second try they just got

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>put under the pump after some refereeing decisions that could

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have gone easily could have gone either way. So why

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>try and run it from sixty out in weather like that?

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 5>I think the first salient point is no scrum, no win. Okay,

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 5>that's big. And then from there, if you're the Reds,

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 5>if you want to play that style of football against

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 5>the Crusaders, you're going to lose. That's if you shine

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 5>and play that brand against that brand Crusaders versus Reds,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 5>Reds lose, So you have to do something different. You've

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 5>got to win collisions which I didn't. You've got to

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 5>get fast recycled. That's your point of difference. You're not

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 5>going to be able to OutKick. Take's not box kicks

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 5>not his thing right, and then tactical kicking across the

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 5>board compared to what the Crusader's aid out there.

0:20:58.640 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 4>You don't win that.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Okay, find a battleground that you can win. They didn't

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 5>completely outclass never in the game. The Crusaders, they're thinking

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 5>about next week. By the fifty to fifth minute, this

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 5>is a French they'd say that they've sort of passed

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 5>a quarte like, so they've sort of missed their season here.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 5>The Reds, this is a season that they will rude.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 5>They look back and go, well, we dropped that one there,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 5>could have won that one tight. Then we finish outside

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 5>the top two, three, we're in trouble and then you

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 5>know you're outgunned. It's a disappointing season in them for

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 5>the Reds.

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>That Fiji game will be still crushing. They might imagine

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that miss line out late that cost them that win there.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>But we talk about the Crusaders thirty to zero at home,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>so they've never lost a finals game at home. Can

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>either of you. Kevy, you love your sport internationally, so

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to you, Mogs. Can you think of a team worldwide

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who has a playoff record like that, who have never

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>ever lost a match? Do they exist at home? Do

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they exist some of.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Your neutral venues? Now, there's not many that have that record.

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean green Bay maybe.

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're talking about it all conquering. You needed

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>team that had won four or five years straight, wouldn't you?

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Sidney UNI through the two thousands here in Sydney.

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Lots of those are neutral venues, correct, You're right, I

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know vantage. Yeah, it's like, is the most impressive

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>playoff team any sport anywhere in the world the Crusaders

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty zero?

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Because I'm just trying to think of a better sporting

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 4>team anyway. Yeah, who's better over over five year period accompassed?

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 4>It's not many.

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 3>You've had sort of dynasties in different sports that have

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 3>been three to four years, but it's been to drop away.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the AFLs and the NRLs, the and the big

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 5>finals in big sports in Europe they go to neutral

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 5>venues at home.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 4>And all the venues.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So you both make good points.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 4>It probably talks a lot about the advantage of home

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 4>ground ugby.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>They've had a lot of it. We talk about the

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>season not hitting the heights at eighty two for the Reds,

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>but can we talk about some of the players who

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>are either emerged or who have some minted their spots

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at the top level across twenty twenty five.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 3>I think Harry Wilson's been good and I think you

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 3>see when he wasn't there the impact he makes for

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the team. So I think he was good. I thought

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 3>he was pretty good again on the weekend. I mean

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 3>we can touch on that little deaf kick that he

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 3>puts in for frasement, right, I mean, that's just a

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 3>for a number eight to do that in the seventy

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 3>fifth minute tied legs. It's pretty good. Like I mean,

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>it's just pretty good good stuff. So look, I think

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 3>he's been good. I think they've missed Josh Fluke. I

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 3>think the last two weeks he's been back. I think

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 3>he's been again that sort of glue in the back

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 3>line that helps him. Whether he gets to a Wallaby's

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 3>level will be interesting to see. But him missing since

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 3>round three I think hurt the Reds in the back line.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think those two have been very good.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Fluke when we see him in the

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Wallaby squad's surely long term?

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, it's probably not yet twenty three at the moment.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 5>He's starting from behind as well. You mentioned yes, it

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 5>was like John Campbell, a bit like that, Harry will

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 5>something even like he needs.

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 4>A block of training. Now he's going to be firing.

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 5>He came back quick. You watched the last twenty minutes

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 5>of both of his games recently. He blew out and

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 5>still went on ticker. He's going to be wonder watch

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 5>when he gets a little block of training. Campbell and

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 5>flew The other ones just behind, you know, have to

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 5>play some army. What are they going to do with him?

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 5>Those sorts of guys Anderson, I thought's the one that's

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 5>probably improved his stocks. The rest of them at the

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Reds this year. We love take, we love phrase, we

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 5>love Harriett. They're all the ones.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 4>The usual suspects.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Had a better season, but it was tough on the weekend.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 5>But he had a better season when they needed him to.

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 5>They still haven't replaced two part scrum time. It's always

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 5>been their achilles heel had a lot of injuries in

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 5>that position which I had.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 3>For Australian rugby. You got two parts. Tell us you

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 3>know you're going to have to Whether you slip her there,

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure, but.

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 4>Even slips is trying to retire.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 3>He can't kept in front row is a challenge for

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 3>austral rugby across the board.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I was start to see Flute resign. I think long

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>term he's going to be a phenomenal their name for

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Wallabies. As for me and Brill, yeah, brows be

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>next time. He's he's a genuine presence. Now he's a

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>backgrower and as a super rugby player, he's got he's

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>got some go about him. And again, long term, I

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>can't wait, and is going to have to be in

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that squad. Surely if we got on form from this year.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You don't reckon, I reckon. I picked Fessler.

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 5>You'll be back just after the Reds game. Okay, maybe

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 5>that Australian New Zealand game. You've got to play in

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 5>one of those two? Okay, straight in mate, you think

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 5>so gosh?

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.239
<v Speaker 1>He started to start the fairs and then pull out

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, gets to line out throwing working. Okay, hooker,

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is what's your core role set peace, then let's get

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 1>the footballer after Okay, gotcha noted? I'll tell you what

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>what a game?

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 3>You know? I think you just got to make sure

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 3>he's got the mileage. He's come back from a bad

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 3>hamstring strange.

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>So you just haven't even can I haven't even considered

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't seen him.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 4>He's just got a window around window like.

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Whether he plays for the Reds, I don't. I think

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that might be a bit early for him. But game, yeah,

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 3>you live. He's got to have to play the CG

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 3>or the AUNZ game.

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they'll have to have some coverage in the squad.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 3>But I think if he's fit and they're comfortable with

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the work he's put in, I think he's starting.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Taking a square to sixty if you want. I got

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 5>every Australian player in camp if you want.

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Also in a scrumline at obviously brings Davy Precky the Porkster,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>right back into proceedings Blues Bee Chiefs, so we touched

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on how exciting this was to watch from the field,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>to play in Canberra. From the combox in Canberra, it

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was a doozy. The Chiefs put themselves out to a

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>thirteen point leading is go job down by how many

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in the animill this be? And then the Blues picked

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>open a little scene, pick picked at it, turned it

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>into a gaping hole, and then away they went. They

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>charged through it to score too converted Trice to win

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that game, to the delight of the Blues fans who

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>made the trip down. The Battle of the Bombays. We

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>worked it out so it's the Hills, correct, that separates

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the two, so they now the Bombay champions for the moment,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the Blues fell as, where do you want to start

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with this game? I mean, I don't ever know. I

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>don't ever know how to commence.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, the early part I would have thought was exactly

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 5>as you would have thought. The script was a bit

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 5>of ill discipline from the Blues. Chiefs physical like this.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 5>They just bashed each other. We saw that Hurricanes, but

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 5>we saw their crusaders step up physically, or probably five

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 5>or the six on the weekend stepped up. Breads were

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 5>maybe just below. But this was physical in the middle,

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 5>and it was the Chiefs that were more accurate, and

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 5>that's why they could accrue the three points. Both teams

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 5>played it like a final should be played in that

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 5>regard and the turning points will come later. But in

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 5>terms of the way the Chiefs managed the first period

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 5>of the game, they could have blown it away earlier.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I think it was interesting that it wasn't

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>a tri scord to like fifty fifth minute, like it

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 3>was sort of that close. And you know, as you said,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 3>the discipline, but I mean some of the some of

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 3>the tries or the bomb tries. I mean I think

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at one here. I mean, if this how

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Ratama lets this go, he's good. I mean how it

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>was so good he's looking on twice as well.

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not even like.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Could have been the greatest try assist of all time.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean the outside banana kick.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Like off the left, but also the read the ball

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 5>off the kick. It wasn't off your players run sixty

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 5>and then well cross one end of the.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Box and then Bowden Barrett just says I can do

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 2>it myself and then.

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Well the barrel.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 5>One's interesting is so tactically when he's going out of

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 5>burden Barrett, you can see he's thinking, I've just got

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 5>to get possession and the conditions.

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Will slide me over.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 5>It's hard to talk technique with one of the greats

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 5>of all time. But just elbows together, body elbows together,

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 5>just elbows together, and just get lucky.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Two cheese boys probably could have hit on suspicion there

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 3>when he when he goes to tell it through.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 5>I tell you, I'm sorry foremost and we just saw

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 5>it there vern Cotter's cap. Have you seen the way

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 5>you treats his cap? It comes off, brubs his head

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 5>with it. I reckon, I get slammed. Yeah, I think

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 5>justice for Verncotter's cap because it's been through the ring

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 5>of this year. It's got at least another week to

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 5>get well.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of bomb tries, Clark, I mean, I cannot believe

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the best try scorers in world rugby has

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not ice that one. It doesn't end up costing them,

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but they're down by third d they get the penalty

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>vantage and they run advantage anyway. You just don't. I

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>mean ninety I reckon, I've got Radamor at ninety eight

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>times out of one hundred, he ice is at body

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine. Clark's ninety nine point nine nine. That's to infinity.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>How has that happened?

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 4>We just got a good piece of it, did he

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 4>was a defender.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Again, I think it was fin now.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, just got a really good piece tackle for tackle, yes,

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 5>forget anything else.

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So then there's the tri scored by Eklund, and I,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't care who wins that game, obviously,

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but if I was a cheese fan, I'd be happening

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to close the look and no one because it kind

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of looked like he sort of has two or three

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>goals to get across the line in the same way

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that dou did later and was denied. So that try

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>stands Fellas, and then it comes down to the beer men.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 5>But even leading into that seventy five minutes, Chief's eternality

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 5>goal to win the whole thing.

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 4>So I got that one right.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because he's got goes out on the left eilbow

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>does anymore?

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Is that it happened from there?

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 5>It's that knee thrust and the double double. Yeah, so

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 5>he actually, yeah, he didn't need to do that the

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 5>ones he did.

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, eighty two minutes. Fellas traveled about eighty I just

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>can't see that. Eighty fifty four, Okay, So eighty fifty

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>four Gussy Gardner, who had a terrific night, I got

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to say, was so good creating the drama and explaining

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>all this on the way through. So then they've got

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the pell advantage and then they're just like we were.

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we would have a crack at it. And did

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you think I mean there was a sense of inevitability

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>around it wasn't there?

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, you look, you sort of crowded around that screen.

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 5>Everyone knew it was coming, especially a couple of times

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 5>it was penny vantage too, and then you know that's

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 5>a brilliant carry reach out finish it, and then.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:18.959
<v Speaker 4>Crucially where you score it.

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 5>It was you didn't want to go out into the

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 5>fifteenth if you want to score out there much as Barrett,

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 5>you're back.

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Him to kick it.

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Incredible scenes that cold would have been their shirts eye cold,

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and then body had to click over the conversion to

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>win it. And obviously Blake this has been such a

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>strong point of their game in twenty twenty five. They've

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>meant without the bells, without the whistls, without shifting it

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>why they're the narrow seeing the competition statistically. So yeah,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>as you both said, you knew that if they got closed,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to take a ton of stopping.

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 5>Which is why they're dangerous, which is why people were

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 5>riding off. They were always going to sneak in, and

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 5>we kept saying if they make it, no one wants

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 5>to play them. And they proved it and now they've

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 5>got a bit of confidence. They've also sort of they

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 5>got a chip on their shop now after being written off,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 5>and I think that's driven.

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's got the biggest ship Arico you want.

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He's chip boy, He's Smiths Chips, He's kettle chips, He's

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>all the chips. He's got them all over the joint.

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>He's got a point to prove, point and two prove

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in his last roue of the Blues. Before we move

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on to a quick look at some of the other

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>bits and pieces around around the grounds, I want to

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>give a shout to Cameron sewer Foire who watched that

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>game on from his hospital bed the other night. He's

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>already overcome Cancas once to make it back on the

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>field as a Blue and has been stricken again, so

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he watched on in his hospital room with his partner,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Blues social media team were good enough to

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>share some of it. Get well soon, mate, We're all

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>cheering for you from this side of the Tasman. I

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>thought there's that too, you know you've got that in

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the background. They're playing for the big Fella fellas. So

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>who knows what happens this weekend against the Crusaders. Who

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>knows how it all plays out? That's the first semi.

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That's Friday afternoon, Saturday night, Saturday afternoon. What do the

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>calling from here? Brumby's the chiefs just quickly record on

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a Monday, give us some hope. How does it play out?

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Can they get it done? At the moment Morgans, they're

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>four to one outsiders. They're not expected. The ag rhythm

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>says no.

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 4>That's probably short as a price. It's tough.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 5>Look, if anyone's got the game, they've got the game

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 5>to do it right. But we keep talking about there's

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 5>a reason there's home ground and bantage that counts so

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 5>much in Super Robia. Look throughout the history, recent and

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 5>long term. They have a game that you can take

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 5>on the road. They need to get their defense right,

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.959
<v Speaker 5>their first up tackle percentage right. They like to get up,

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 5>get an eyeline, make teams step back inside because they

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 5>got such a hard working forward pack. But they've got

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 5>to get their edge defense or it can get away

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 5>from them. Which it did last time, and then they're

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 5>just leaking a few if it's a tight And like

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 5>I say, look at Gardner right as a ref. He

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 5>did a great job because both teams didn't really need

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 5>speed in the game Chiefs versus Blues. They just wanted

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 5>to belt each other and Gardener was perfect. Chiefs might

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 5>want to get speed in the game against the Brumbies,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.959
<v Speaker 5>so the style of game it is, I reckon Kevy

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 5>might be important too.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I think the Brumbies are going to want

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 3>to focus on that type play. They don't want to

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 3>get the width because they would have seen the Chiefs

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 3>looking and see the success the Canes had out wide,

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 3>particularly early on, and they'll be to your point, be

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 3>targeting those shooting, isolate the shooting defender and pick and choose,

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 3>whereas the Brumbies are going to want to core game.

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 3>They're all a lot, they'll shifted a lot through the

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 3>front row type fire is going to be critical for

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 3>them and line out and more.

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.479
<v Speaker 5>I think it's that's the malls that so the Chiefs

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 5>are going to spend all week on the mall defensively.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 5>So guarantee Larkham's going to pick up a little one

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 5>out the back and the scene maybe one down the train.

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 4>And these sort of things rip and run. So the

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 4>tactical battle too is important.

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Sets up beautifully Saturday afternoon for that match, just mopping

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up some stuff in a nationally very quickly bathbeat Bristol

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Bristol rather in the semi in the prem and I

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned less of el because my check out Stan Sports

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Checker has coached the lesser Tigers through to another

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>shot at some sealwear for checks, so well don to

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>check and more some twenties news as well, quickly just

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 1>landing on our news thest today.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah on checks obviously, David Kidwell, Peter Hewitt's there. If

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 5>he perish, he's got a great try. So a bit

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 5>of an Australian theme there, check he wins where he goes.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 4>There's a bit of a lesson there.

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I was the twenty squad that will go to

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 5>Italy off the back of a hugely encouraging TRC in

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 5>South Africa under coach Chris Whittaker. He named his thirty

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 5>man squad the big one is drey Pakia. Now that

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 5>the Reds are out, logically goes back to national hons

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 5>under twenties. He'll be a huge in And what I

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 5>liked was two players got picked from outside of the

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 5>talent id pathway academies Gilfil and Venipolu, so we haven't

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.240
<v Speaker 5>seen them, so it's good to see that the selectors

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 5>were looking at club form and kids that have maybe

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 5>late bloomers. So it's an encouraging thing that is I

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 5>reckon for people that aren't exactly on the pathway.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Sid Harvey with Ossie experience now as well with the sevens,

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>should go well man Tomorrow we are going hard with

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the Brahmis. We've got no a lot of seat lined

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>up for Between two Posts. Extra is knockout semi finals week,

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so we will see you all again for your next

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 1>hit of Between two Posts. I'm talking Extra on Tuesday