1 00:00:02,240 --> 00:00:03,520 Speaker 1: Nine podcasts. 2 00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:08,000 Speaker 2: The ground prosecutor finishes her closing arguments, telling the jury 3 00:00:08,039 --> 00:00:12,560 Speaker 2: the accused killer engaged in multiple calculated deceptions, alleging she 4 00:00:12,680 --> 00:00:15,760 Speaker 2: persisted with telling lies even when the lunch guests were 5 00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:19,520 Speaker 2: gravely ill, and accusing her of trying to play the jury. 6 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:24,720 Speaker 3: Victoria's mushroom mystery, the mushroom lunch that claimed three lives 7 00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:27,880 Speaker 3: an Australian family's meal is now the center of a 8 00:00:27,880 --> 00:00:29,080 Speaker 3: homicide investigation. 9 00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:32,000 Speaker 1: The bizarre tragedy now grabbing global headlines. 10 00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:35,840 Speaker 3: Aaron Patterson's alleged victims died after eating a family lunch 11 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:37,480 Speaker 3: she'd serve them at her home. 12 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:41,239 Speaker 1: I cannot think of another investigation that has generated this 13 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:44,120 Speaker 1: level of media and public interest. 14 00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:46,640 Speaker 2: Four of the guests of that lunch were much loved 15 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:47,920 Speaker 2: members of this church. 16 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 4: Only one will ever return. 17 00:00:50,120 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 1: People are feeling very heavy with having lost such wonderful people. 18 00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:58,960 Speaker 2: Today, Aaron Pattison remained here inside her home. 19 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 4: She's continued to plead her innocence in a court room 20 00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 4: in Country Victoria. 21 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:08,880 Speaker 2: Aaron Patterson is on trial accused of using death cat 22 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:12,319 Speaker 2: mushrooms to kill She's pleaded not guilty to murdering three 23 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:14,560 Speaker 2: of her former in laws and attempting to kill a 24 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:18,280 Speaker 2: fourth the town's church pastor. It's up to the jurors 25 00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:21,600 Speaker 2: to decide what happened when Patterson's loved ones sat down 26 00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:27,000 Speaker 2: to eat. The prosecution has now finished the closing arguments 27 00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:30,120 Speaker 2: to the jury in this case, and initially Nnette Rogers 28 00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:33,319 Speaker 2: told the jurors there were four calculated deceptions that she'd 29 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:36,920 Speaker 2: take them through. There was then a little surprise, an 30 00:01:36,959 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 2: extra bit that came, which you'll hear a little bit 31 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 2: later in this episode. But let's start off with what 32 00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:45,240 Speaker 2: happened when Nannette Rogers got to her feet to make 33 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:46,399 Speaker 2: these final submissions. 34 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 3: Yeah, she got to court pretty early, rearing and ready 35 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:54,040 Speaker 3: to go. As she took to her feet, she moved 36 00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:56,560 Speaker 3: the lef turn in front of her to face directly 37 00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 3: to the jury, So she therefore had her back to 38 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:01,720 Speaker 3: Aaron Patterson, who is now in the dock and was 39 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 3: facing directly to the jury. Penny, And at this point 40 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 3: I noticed that she opened a red bind of folder 41 00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:10,240 Speaker 3: and in it were pages and pages of printed notes 42 00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:13,240 Speaker 3: in paragraphs, which is how we've seen her bring her 43 00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 3: notes to court throughout the whole trial. And she really 44 00:02:15,960 --> 00:02:19,120 Speaker 3: started off with a bang straight away telling the jury, 45 00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:21,519 Speaker 3: these are the four things that I'm going to take 46 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:23,960 Speaker 3: you through in particular. But it was in that fifth 47 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:28,400 Speaker 3: surprise element, Petty, that really had I guess everybody in 48 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:30,799 Speaker 3: the court room, the jurors, members of the public, and 49 00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 3: the media thinking, well, what's this. We thought that we're 50 00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 3: only going to have four, but essentially there was a fifth. 51 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,320 Speaker 2: Now, this closing has gone over multiple days, and we're 52 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:41,720 Speaker 2: going to take you through in chronological order and the 53 00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 2: topics that Nanette. 54 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:44,519 Speaker 4: Rodgers took the jury through. 55 00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:47,600 Speaker 2: So to start off with, let's hear what she said 56 00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:50,600 Speaker 2: about these initial four calculated deceptions. 57 00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 4: These are her words. It's voiced by an actor. 58 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,680 Speaker 1: Members of the jury. The twenty ninth of July twenty 59 00:02:55,760 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 1: twenty three lunch was arranged by the accused. Each of 60 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:05,440 Speaker 1: the guests were thereby her invitation. She alone chose what 61 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:10,200 Speaker 1: to cook, obtained the ingredients, and prepared the meal. Despite 62 00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:13,040 Speaker 1: the recipe being for a single dish intended to be 63 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:18,680 Speaker 1: cut into smaller serves, the accused made individual portions. That 64 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:24,079 Speaker 1: choice to make individual portions allowed her complete control over 65 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,600 Speaker 1: the ingredients in each individual parcel. It is a control 66 00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 1: the prosecution says that she exercised with devastating effect. It 67 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:37,720 Speaker 1: allowed her to give the appearance of sharing in the 68 00:03:37,760 --> 00:03:41,880 Speaker 1: same meal whilst ensuring that she did not consume a 69 00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:46,920 Speaker 1: beef Wellington parcel that she had laced with death cap mushrooms. 70 00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:52,360 Speaker 1: Each of the deliberately poisoned parcels was served and consumed 71 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:57,200 Speaker 1: by only Header and Ian Wilkinson and Don and Gail Patterson. 72 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:02,320 Speaker 1: What are the reasonable possibility he can explain why all 73 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:06,040 Speaker 1: of the lunch guests became so gravely ill with death 74 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:11,160 Speaker 1: cat mushroom poisoning, but that the accused did not. At 75 00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:15,480 Speaker 1: the heart of this case r four calculated deceptions made 76 00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:16,640 Speaker 1: by the accused. 77 00:04:17,200 --> 00:04:21,159 Speaker 2: Now, the first of these alleged four deceptions that make 78 00:04:21,279 --> 00:04:24,159 Speaker 2: up this case that Nanette Rogers sc took the jury 79 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:27,839 Speaker 2: to is what the prosecution alleged is this cancer lie. 80 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:31,120 Speaker 2: And they say the reason why Aaron Patterson held this 81 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:33,440 Speaker 2: lunch in the first place and why she invited her 82 00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:34,919 Speaker 2: loved ones over to her home. 83 00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:38,839 Speaker 3: Yes, she said that the that Pattison's fake cancer diagnosis 84 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:42,600 Speaker 3: really gave her lunch guests a reason to attend what 85 00:04:42,680 --> 00:04:47,039 Speaker 3: Annette Rogers says was otherwise a really unusual lunch and 86 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:51,120 Speaker 3: she started explaining in her words that the accused painted 87 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:54,440 Speaker 3: a picture of a gathering that wasn't just social. This 88 00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:56,800 Speaker 3: wasn't just a social catch up. It was a catch 89 00:04:56,839 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 3: up where the kids would be absent. And the prosecutor 90 00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:03,560 Speaker 3: said that that alone emphasized the serious nature of the 91 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,680 Speaker 3: matter that the accused allegedly wanted to discuss. 92 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 4: And we'll hear. 93 00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:10,080 Speaker 2: Throughout the evidence as well as what we're talking about 94 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:12,760 Speaker 2: a lot of references to different witnesses and their evidence. 95 00:05:12,800 --> 00:05:15,919 Speaker 2: That's how the prosecution is laying out their arguments. So 96 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:19,400 Speaker 2: as part of this element and this sort of subtopic 97 00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:21,360 Speaker 2: that she was talking about with the jury, and Neette 98 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:24,919 Speaker 2: Rodgers noted that the daughter of Aaron Patterson, who's given 99 00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:28,599 Speaker 2: evidence via the recorded video interview with police, had mentioned 100 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:31,680 Speaker 2: that her mum wanted to discuss adult things, yes, just 101 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:33,200 Speaker 2: with the adults at this lunch, and. 102 00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 4: She said that the jury should really consider. 103 00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:38,000 Speaker 2: That and take on board that and some evidence from 104 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:42,760 Speaker 2: other witnesses, including Simon Patterson and Ian Wilkinson, that this 105 00:05:43,040 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 2: was the purpose of the lunch, was to discuss something 106 00:05:45,440 --> 00:05:48,680 Speaker 2: just for adults and something quite serious, and in her 107 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:52,360 Speaker 2: leaning towards this being something of a serious medical nature, 108 00:05:52,440 --> 00:05:55,520 Speaker 2: and she touched on Ian Wilkinson's evidence of this being 109 00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:58,839 Speaker 2: a life threatening diagnosis and a life threatening situation that 110 00:05:58,880 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 2: she'd found herself in. 111 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:03,920 Speaker 3: Yeah. Rogers also reminded the jury that when Simon Patterson 112 00:06:03,960 --> 00:06:09,560 Speaker 3: declined to attend Penny, the accused expressed irritation at this 113 00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:12,080 Speaker 3: and telling him quote, I may not be able to 114 00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:15,000 Speaker 3: host a lunch like this again for some time. The 115 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:17,680 Speaker 3: prosecution alleged that was sent in an attempt to change 116 00:06:17,720 --> 00:06:20,000 Speaker 3: Simon Patterson's mind and get him to attend. 117 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:23,120 Speaker 2: Nannette Rodgers also spoke about in this part of her 118 00:06:23,160 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 2: closing address that it was the planting of a seed, 119 00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 2: that there was a research that Aaron Patterson had conducted. 120 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:32,920 Speaker 2: She said this was pre planned, but that in the texts, 121 00:06:32,920 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 2: particularly that the jury have been shown between Gail Patterson 122 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:41,080 Speaker 2: and Aaron Patterson, that there was evidence, she says, of 123 00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:44,320 Speaker 2: this seed being planted of I'm getting a biopsy, yes, 124 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 2: algo biopsy, and then I'm going to get an MRI, 125 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:49,760 Speaker 2: and that Gail had then written in her diary. As 126 00:06:49,760 --> 00:06:52,040 Speaker 2: the jury has been taken through on this particular date, 127 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:56,480 Speaker 2: around a month before Aaron Saint Vincent's and the evidence 128 00:06:56,520 --> 00:06:59,240 Speaker 2: that they've been shown through medical appointments and things that 129 00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:02,480 Speaker 2: were conveyed to family to plant this seed that something 130 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:04,279 Speaker 2: was really seriously wrong with her health. 131 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, and then another part to that as well was 132 00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:11,720 Speaker 3: this making sure that the children weren't their penny. The 133 00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:14,280 Speaker 3: way that Ninette Rogers explained it to the jury today 134 00:07:14,600 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 3: was their case is that this was done to ensure 135 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:19,240 Speaker 3: that they wouldn't be harmed, to ensure that there was 136 00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 3: no way that they could eat this poisoned lunch. And 137 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:25,560 Speaker 3: we heard a little bit more about the kids and 138 00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:29,720 Speaker 3: they what they said in their statements throughout the prosecution closings, 139 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 3: but essentially it was wrapped up and summarized this particular 140 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 3: chapter almost of the closings as being an elaborate lie. 141 00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:42,160 Speaker 1: You heard the evidence of Professor Andrew Burston, the intensive 142 00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 1: care specialist who examined her medical records and found no 143 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 1: evidence that she had received a cancer diagnosis. And of 144 00:07:51,400 --> 00:07:54,840 Speaker 1: course here in court the accused agreed she had never 145 00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:59,560 Speaker 1: been diagnosed with cancer. You might be wondering why on 146 00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:03,600 Speaker 1: earth would she tell such a lie. Well, the prosecution 147 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:06,840 Speaker 1: says that the accused never thought she would have to 148 00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: account for this lie. She did not think her lunch 149 00:08:10,560 --> 00:08:14,520 Speaker 1: guests would live to reveal it. Her lie would die 150 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:15,400 Speaker 1: with them. 151 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:18,880 Speaker 2: Now, the next topic that the Crown prosecutor took the 152 00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:22,520 Speaker 2: jury to was the fact that the prosecution alleged Aaron 153 00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:26,320 Speaker 2: Patterson deliberately sawce deathcap mushrooms and that she then placed 154 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:31,240 Speaker 2: them into this pre planned, organized special meal that she 155 00:08:31,360 --> 00:08:34,280 Speaker 2: wanted to have her family members come and eat with her. 156 00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:37,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's been referred to throughout the trial as the lunch, 157 00:08:37,240 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 3: but this was one of the ways that Nannette Rogers 158 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:43,640 Speaker 3: described this particular alleged deception as well as being the 159 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:47,600 Speaker 3: lunch and being the second deception. She was explaining to 160 00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:50,640 Speaker 3: the jury that it's the lethal doses of poison that 161 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:54,360 Speaker 3: the prosecution say Patterson sought out and then disguise in 162 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:57,400 Speaker 3: this beef Wellington that really made up this particular category. 163 00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 3: And she started off by explaining to the jury that 164 00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:04,760 Speaker 3: it was Aaron Patterson who chose the meal, who chose 165 00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:09,480 Speaker 3: to serve this particular style of the meal that deviated 166 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:12,480 Speaker 3: from the recipe book, and that she was solely in 167 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 3: charge of sourcing the ingredients as well. We have heard 168 00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:20,600 Speaker 3: earlier from the parts of the trial that Aaron Patterson 169 00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:23,400 Speaker 3: had said that she wanted to cook something special, something fancy. 170 00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:28,200 Speaker 3: But Rogers maintains that despite this, and despite getting on 171 00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 3: the standard and saying this to the jury, that at 172 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:33,680 Speaker 3: no point did Aaron Patterson tell her guest that wild 173 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:37,520 Speaker 3: mushrooms would be in the meal, and that she really 174 00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:40,840 Speaker 3: didn't follow that recipe book the way that it was 175 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 3: explained to her. 176 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:46,240 Speaker 2: In touching on that, the Crown prosecutor mentioned that Aaron Patterson, 177 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:51,000 Speaker 2: she alleges, sought specifically out the individual stakes to make 178 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:55,080 Speaker 2: individual portions of beef Wellington rather than the Logs style 179 00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 2: larger piece of meat than the recipe tin eats recipe 180 00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:02,240 Speaker 2: actually called for, and she noted in her closing that 181 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:05,720 Speaker 2: Aaron Patterson, she says, not only sought out that meat, 182 00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:08,920 Speaker 2: but so that she could create these individual parcels and 183 00:10:08,960 --> 00:10:10,960 Speaker 2: so that she could be certain that there would be 184 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:14,360 Speaker 2: a parcel for her to eat, that the prosecution alleges, 185 00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 2: wasn't poisoned and that's that so. 186 00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:18,000 Speaker 3: She got avoid poisoning herself. 187 00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:21,160 Speaker 2: To go a step further, they say the reason Aaron 188 00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:24,240 Speaker 2: Patterson was or the way they say Aaron Patterson was 189 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:27,199 Speaker 2: ensuring she wouldn't eat that was with a different colored plate, 190 00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:29,520 Speaker 2: and to explain that, they went back to the evidence 191 00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:31,599 Speaker 2: of Ian Wilkinson. These are some of the words of 192 00:10:31,640 --> 00:10:32,319 Speaker 2: Nnette Rogers. 193 00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:36,400 Speaker 1: Sc Ian Wilkinson told you that the accused plated the 194 00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:41,520 Speaker 1: food by herself. He gave clear evidence of four matching 195 00:10:41,640 --> 00:10:44,840 Speaker 1: large gray dinner plates, not dark or light gray, but 196 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:48,480 Speaker 1: a sort of middle gray color was his evidence. And 197 00:10:48,520 --> 00:10:54,480 Speaker 1: then a fifth smaller orangey tan colored plate. Under cross examination, 198 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:58,600 Speaker 1: he conveyed no doubt about what he had seen. There 199 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 1: were four plates that the same, they were gray, and 200 00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:06,920 Speaker 1: there was one smaller, different colored plate. Ian Wilkinson was 201 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:10,679 Speaker 1: a compelling witness who was able to recall a substantial 202 00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:14,120 Speaker 1: amount of detail about the lunch. You might recall him 203 00:11:14,120 --> 00:11:16,960 Speaker 1: describing the discussions at the house about a sick looking 204 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 1: tree and the accused pantry. He had a clear memory 205 00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:23,319 Speaker 1: of where everyone sat at the dining table during the lunch, 206 00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:26,640 Speaker 1: and you will remember the photo where he marked where 207 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:29,840 Speaker 1: people were sitting at the dining table. He had a 208 00:11:29,960 --> 00:11:33,040 Speaker 1: clear memory of exactly what was served at the lunch. 209 00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:38,760 Speaker 1: The individual wholly encased pasty type beef wellington, mashed potato 210 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:43,320 Speaker 1: and green beans. You will have no trouble in being 211 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:48,000 Speaker 1: satisfied that he is a reliable witness, and you can 212 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 1: confidently accept what he told you about the details of 213 00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:55,440 Speaker 1: the lunch, including the four gray plates and the fifth 214 00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:58,640 Speaker 1: odd plate. Of course, as you have heard, Ian was 215 00:11:58,679 --> 00:12:01,120 Speaker 1: not the only person to know not the different plate. 216 00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:05,520 Speaker 1: Heather Wilkinson said to Simon Patterson on the Sunday morning 217 00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 1: that she noticed Aaron served herself her food on a 218 00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:12,640 Speaker 1: colored plate which was different to the rest. This was 219 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:15,320 Speaker 1: clearly something that's stuck in Heather's mind. 220 00:12:15,920 --> 00:12:20,120 Speaker 2: It was noteworthy the prosecutor put to the jury that 221 00:12:20,679 --> 00:12:23,200 Speaker 2: this website I Naturalist, then they've heard a lot about 222 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:26,840 Speaker 2: She alleges that Aaron Patterson had the knowledge to use 223 00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:30,080 Speaker 2: that website, that she'd visited that website back in May 224 00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:32,760 Speaker 2: twenty twenty two, bit over a year before the lunch 225 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:35,480 Speaker 2: was put to the jury. This evidence that they've seen 226 00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:39,400 Speaker 2: a number of times of the particular search for I 227 00:12:39,559 --> 00:12:41,760 Speaker 2: Naturalist and then the narrowing in on a map of 228 00:12:41,840 --> 00:12:43,880 Speaker 2: Victoria for deathcap mushroom sightings. 229 00:12:43,960 --> 00:12:46,480 Speaker 4: At the same time that there was a. 230 00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:49,360 Speaker 2: Search for the curran Borough Middle Pub and that purchase 231 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 2: that was made with Aaron Patterson's details for a family 232 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:53,120 Speaker 2: dinner at that time. 233 00:12:53,559 --> 00:12:55,800 Speaker 4: The prosecutor really put to the jury. 234 00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 2: That they should take on board this evidence as being 235 00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:01,560 Speaker 2: an example of Aaron Patterson, they say, being able to 236 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 2: use that website, using that website to look for death 237 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:07,600 Speaker 2: cat mushrooms at that particular occasion, and they said that 238 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:11,920 Speaker 2: she also had the knowledge to blitz these mushrooms up, 239 00:13:12,440 --> 00:13:16,800 Speaker 2: as heard through the evidence of her estranged husband, Simon Patterson, 240 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:19,480 Speaker 2: in a conversation they had at the hospital with their 241 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:23,239 Speaker 2: children of how she had hidden mushrooms before in muffins 242 00:13:23,559 --> 00:13:27,439 Speaker 2: for their daughter to taste test. Nanette Rogers sc referred 243 00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:30,520 Speaker 2: to that as being a knowledge base for Aaron Patterson 244 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:33,000 Speaker 2: and an example of her blitzing up mushrooms before, and 245 00:13:33,040 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 2: that this was something she knew how to do well 246 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:36,360 Speaker 2: at this time. 247 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:39,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, and then she explained a little bit further about 248 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:42,400 Speaker 3: the fact that any suggestion that wild mushrooms were added 249 00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:46,840 Speaker 3: accidentally should should be rejected, not only for the reasons 250 00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:48,640 Speaker 3: that you just said, Penny, but also that we heard 251 00:13:48,640 --> 00:13:51,680 Speaker 3: from this expert witness, Tom May and he'd said that 252 00:13:51,760 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 3: he'd dried death cat mushrooms in the past as part 253 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,720 Speaker 3: of his job, and he recalled them smelling very, very unpleasant, 254 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:03,120 Speaker 3: and that was unlikely then that somebody would put something 255 00:14:03,160 --> 00:14:06,560 Speaker 3: that smelt really, really unpleasant deliberately into a meal that 256 00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:10,000 Speaker 3: was supposed to be special In connecting these dots here 257 00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:12,600 Speaker 3: as she was doing today, that's when she spoke a 258 00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:15,280 Speaker 3: little bit more about the fact that because they would 259 00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:18,559 Speaker 3: have smelt very unpleasant, it's a prosecution's case that it's 260 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:21,600 Speaker 3: unlikely that deathcat mushrooms would have then just been chopped up. 261 00:14:21,840 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 3: They would have had to have been blitzed into a 262 00:14:23,920 --> 00:14:27,040 Speaker 3: powder to be then hidden into the food. And this 263 00:14:27,080 --> 00:14:29,600 Speaker 3: is something the accused had told her online friends as 264 00:14:29,640 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 3: well that she'd done before, as she mentioned with the 265 00:14:32,400 --> 00:14:36,760 Speaker 3: muffins as well, that experimentation and it was another type 266 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:40,880 Speaker 3: of experimentation as well that Nanette Rogers put to the 267 00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:44,200 Speaker 3: jury was part of this particular deception, and that was 268 00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:48,160 Speaker 3: within days of purchasing a food dehydrator we know happened 269 00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:53,080 Speaker 3: in April twenty twenty three. The prosecution say that Patterson 270 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:55,760 Speaker 3: undertook a test run with button mushrooms and then took 271 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:58,320 Speaker 3: photographs with the device and then sent them to her 272 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:01,920 Speaker 3: online friends. Test run it was another part of that 273 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:06,600 Speaker 3: experimentation that the prosecution allege happened before deathcap mushrooms were 274 00:15:06,640 --> 00:15:10,200 Speaker 3: actually picked forage and then put into the dehydrator before 275 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:10,960 Speaker 3: going into the meal. 276 00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:13,960 Speaker 2: Now, the third point that the prosecution took the jury 277 00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 2: through as part of these closing arguments sort of subheadings, 278 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 2: was that they say Aaron Patterson was attempting to make 279 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:24,640 Speaker 2: herself look sick so that medical professionals and other people 280 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 2: would think she had ingested the deathcap mushrooms, because they 281 00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:30,480 Speaker 2: allege if she wasn't seen to be sick like her 282 00:15:30,520 --> 00:15:32,440 Speaker 2: lunch guests, that would be suspicious. 283 00:15:32,800 --> 00:15:36,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, the prosecution maintained that Aaron Patterson wasn't sick, and 284 00:15:36,640 --> 00:15:40,000 Speaker 3: so these attempts to make it look so were to 285 00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:41,800 Speaker 3: try and cover her tracks a little bit or to 286 00:15:41,880 --> 00:15:46,440 Speaker 3: disguise her crimes. Is the way that the prosecution explained it. 287 00:15:46,520 --> 00:15:49,760 Speaker 3: And as part of this third deception, the prosecution said 288 00:15:49,760 --> 00:15:52,160 Speaker 3: the accused of different accounts of when she became sick 289 00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:55,920 Speaker 3: to different people. There was lots of different ways the 290 00:15:55,960 --> 00:16:00,120 Speaker 3: prosecution alleged the evidence contradicted itself, and there was a 291 00:16:00,200 --> 00:16:02,720 Speaker 3: lot of back and forth about these different things. But yeah, 292 00:16:02,760 --> 00:16:06,160 Speaker 3: one of those elements of this being unwow was when 293 00:16:06,360 --> 00:16:09,880 Speaker 3: was she sick? How sick was she before she even 294 00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 3: made it to the hospital. 295 00:16:11,480 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 2: And one of those points that the prosecution went back 296 00:16:13,920 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 2: to a number of times, as you said, was that 297 00:16:15,800 --> 00:16:21,120 Speaker 2: Aaron Patterson, their prosecution alleged, through Simon Patterson's evidence, initially 298 00:16:21,200 --> 00:16:24,480 Speaker 2: told him that she'd become ill about this four four 299 00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:26,840 Speaker 2: thirty time on the Saturday afternoon. Now that's about an 300 00:16:26,880 --> 00:16:28,720 Speaker 2: hour and an hour and a half since the gun 301 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:32,000 Speaker 2: lunch guests left her home. The other lunch guests all 302 00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:35,360 Speaker 2: became ill sort of after eleven thirty around midnight one 303 00:16:35,400 --> 00:16:38,360 Speaker 2: am following that lunch, and the jury was told some 304 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 2: evidence that had come through one of the doctors at 305 00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:43,640 Speaker 2: one of the hospitals that this was an initial flag 306 00:16:43,880 --> 00:16:46,160 Speaker 2: for some of these medical professionals, that this may have 307 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:49,480 Speaker 2: been a mushroom poisoning incident rather than regular food poisoning, 308 00:16:49,480 --> 00:16:52,600 Speaker 2: because the prosecution says in the evidence that the jury 309 00:16:52,720 --> 00:16:56,440 Speaker 2: has heard from these witnesses, usually food poisoning sets in 310 00:16:56,480 --> 00:16:59,720 Speaker 2: within a couple of hours, which it appeared with what 311 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:02,440 Speaker 2: Patterson was talking about with her symptoms, that they were 312 00:17:02,520 --> 00:17:05,560 Speaker 2: relatively soon to having eaten the meal, but that it 313 00:17:05,680 --> 00:17:08,520 Speaker 2: was these lunch guests who became gravely ill and three 314 00:17:08,560 --> 00:17:12,919 Speaker 2: of whom lost their lives. Actually, they had become sicker 315 00:17:13,119 --> 00:17:16,760 Speaker 2: much later in terms of the onset of their particular symptoms. 316 00:17:17,040 --> 00:17:19,199 Speaker 3: Two to three hours for the onset of sort of 317 00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:22,640 Speaker 3: gas stro or food poisoning related symptoms, but twelve hours 318 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:26,439 Speaker 3: typically round about four deathcat mushroom poisoning. And it was 319 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:30,159 Speaker 3: the on call toxicologist at the dating On hospital. The 320 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:32,880 Speaker 3: jury were reminded today that was the one that put 321 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:36,639 Speaker 3: those pieces together, along with the doctor who was working 322 00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 3: at lean at the hospital. The two of them had 323 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 3: a foreign conversation and that's when deathcat mushroom poisoning was 324 00:17:42,080 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 3: really put on their radar for the first time. But 325 00:17:46,119 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 3: we also then heard a little bit about what happened 326 00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:53,120 Speaker 3: the day after the lunch Penny and the prosecution was saying, 327 00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:56,080 Speaker 3: this is another example of why Aaron Pattison couldn't have 328 00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:58,879 Speaker 3: been as ill as she was telling health officials and 329 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:02,080 Speaker 3: friends and family she really was, and that was a 330 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:05,679 Speaker 3: long two hour round trip. We heard that she was 331 00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:08,280 Speaker 3: taking her son to a flying lessons in tai Ab, 332 00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:11,359 Speaker 3: but it was at this time she also had told 333 00:18:11,520 --> 00:18:14,520 Speaker 3: later on a health Department official that she had explosive diary. 334 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:18,000 Speaker 3: During this time, Sonette Rodgers was explaining to the jury 335 00:18:18,040 --> 00:18:21,160 Speaker 3: that there was these different versions of events happening. Could 336 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:25,919 Speaker 3: somebody with explosive diary driver to our around trip and 337 00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:29,040 Speaker 3: not have an accident, and that these were the different 338 00:18:29,040 --> 00:18:31,960 Speaker 3: pieces of evidence that we'd heard over the last month 339 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:34,920 Speaker 3: or so that Nenette Rogers was really putting together and 340 00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:37,960 Speaker 3: trying to convince the jury why they should side with 341 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:39,240 Speaker 3: the prosecution in this case. 342 00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:41,880 Speaker 2: And as some of this, what the prosecution was also 343 00:18:41,920 --> 00:18:44,040 Speaker 2: touching on was the Saturday night trip in taking the 344 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:47,240 Speaker 2: friend's son home after the lunch that Aaron Patterson had 345 00:18:47,240 --> 00:18:50,159 Speaker 2: told Simon Patterson and other people that she had taken 346 00:18:50,520 --> 00:18:53,880 Speaker 2: this boy home at around seven seven thirty, that she'd 347 00:18:53,920 --> 00:18:56,760 Speaker 2: then taken her son to subway, And the prosecution was 348 00:18:56,800 --> 00:18:58,919 Speaker 2: putting to the jury why would she have made that 349 00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:02,119 Speaker 2: stop when she'd also told other witnesses that at that 350 00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:05,520 Speaker 2: point she was really worried that she wasn't really well 351 00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:08,640 Speaker 2: enough and she wouldn't really make it through other sort 352 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:10,840 Speaker 2: of trips without an accident. Why is that she was 353 00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:13,720 Speaker 2: then stopping to get a takeaway meal? But the jury 354 00:19:13,800 --> 00:19:16,720 Speaker 2: was then taken to another day after the lunch, being 355 00:19:16,720 --> 00:19:19,440 Speaker 2: the Monday, the thirty first, the day Aaron Patterson first 356 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:22,160 Speaker 2: presented at the Lee and Gatha Hospital, and they were 357 00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:26,760 Speaker 2: told that when she first presented that she seemed, on 358 00:19:26,800 --> 00:19:31,520 Speaker 2: the prosecution's allegation, reluctant to have treatment, but reluctant even 359 00:19:31,560 --> 00:19:32,080 Speaker 2: to come. 360 00:19:31,960 --> 00:19:32,879 Speaker 4: Into the hospital. 361 00:19:32,880 --> 00:19:35,000 Speaker 2: That the prosecution put to the jury that it was 362 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:37,560 Speaker 2: this point when she arrived that it was put to 363 00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:39,920 Speaker 2: her that there might be mushroom poisoning. That that was 364 00:19:39,960 --> 00:19:44,000 Speaker 2: the first time she, they alleged, realized that there was 365 00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:46,480 Speaker 2: a concern about deathcat mushroom poisoning and that there was 366 00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:49,119 Speaker 2: a concern that perhaps she may have something to do 367 00:19:49,200 --> 00:19:51,320 Speaker 2: with that, and that's why the prosecution alleged that she 368 00:19:51,400 --> 00:19:52,280 Speaker 2: left the hospital at. 369 00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:53,639 Speaker 3: That time and for almost two hours. 370 00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:55,720 Speaker 2: Penny, Yeah, they say that that one hour and thirty 371 00:19:55,720 --> 00:19:57,760 Speaker 2: eight minutes that she left for that she had done 372 00:19:57,840 --> 00:20:01,160 Speaker 2: that because she realized what the doctors and nurses were 373 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:03,240 Speaker 2: thinking and therefore didn't want to be in that place. 374 00:20:03,280 --> 00:20:06,560 Speaker 2: So the prosecutor touched on some evidence from some of 375 00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:09,240 Speaker 2: the nurses, one who said that she couldn't get Aaron 376 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:12,520 Speaker 2: Patterson to come in and initially get her observations taken properly. 377 00:20:12,640 --> 00:20:16,120 Speaker 2: She'd said that it was to prepare things for her children. 378 00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:18,280 Speaker 2: She'd said it was to prepare things for her animals. 379 00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:20,520 Speaker 2: She'd also said that it was to pack her daughter's 380 00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:23,200 Speaker 2: ballet bag. But it was touched on quite a bit 381 00:20:23,240 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 2: by the prosecutor that she'd also said to her estranged husband, 382 00:20:26,560 --> 00:20:29,480 Speaker 2: Simon Patterson, on his evidence that when she went to 383 00:20:29,560 --> 00:20:32,600 Speaker 2: her home at land Gatha, that she'd laid down on 384 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:35,199 Speaker 2: the floor for around forty five minutes and fallen asleep, 385 00:20:35,240 --> 00:20:37,360 Speaker 2: and the prosecutor put to the jury that even if 386 00:20:37,359 --> 00:20:40,600 Speaker 2: that was the case, the prosecutor says that she feels 387 00:20:40,640 --> 00:20:42,679 Speaker 2: that's an unlikely thing for someone to do in this 388 00:20:42,760 --> 00:20:45,280 Speaker 2: situation when they knew other people were sick in hospital 389 00:20:45,320 --> 00:20:48,679 Speaker 2: and they themselves had these symptoms, but that even if 390 00:20:48,720 --> 00:20:51,320 Speaker 2: she did lay down for forty five minutes, that doesn't 391 00:20:51,359 --> 00:20:54,800 Speaker 2: account for the entire space of time. And that's when 392 00:20:55,080 --> 00:20:57,680 Speaker 2: the prosecutor also said to the jury that they had 393 00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:02,760 Speaker 2: seen CCTV some security footage of Aaron Patterson leaving that hospital, 394 00:21:02,760 --> 00:21:05,000 Speaker 2: and she put to the jury that there was nothing 395 00:21:05,040 --> 00:21:07,600 Speaker 2: to indicate that she was weak or unable to walk 396 00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:09,919 Speaker 2: in that particular footage that she'd driven away from the 397 00:21:09,920 --> 00:21:12,840 Speaker 2: hospital and eventually after that hour and thirty eight minutes 398 00:21:12,840 --> 00:21:13,800 Speaker 2: she drove herself back. 399 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:16,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, and Nnette Rogers took quite a bit of time 400 00:21:16,680 --> 00:21:19,560 Speaker 3: comparing who said what at one point as well explaining 401 00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:21,200 Speaker 3: to the jury that it was this witness that said 402 00:21:21,240 --> 00:21:24,000 Speaker 3: this in contradiction to what the accused were saying, and 403 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:26,360 Speaker 3: that at this point this other witness had said this 404 00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:31,199 Speaker 3: really painting a picture of the prosecution case in fine detail. 405 00:21:31,880 --> 00:21:33,040 Speaker 4: And she also spoke. 406 00:21:32,840 --> 00:21:35,280 Speaker 2: About as part of that what Aaron Patterson was doing 407 00:21:35,359 --> 00:21:38,399 Speaker 2: at different times compared to her lunch guests who were growing, 408 00:21:38,440 --> 00:21:40,879 Speaker 2: as the prosecution says, sicker and sicker. 409 00:21:40,960 --> 00:21:42,879 Speaker 4: Here's some more of the words as the jury heard it. 410 00:21:43,160 --> 00:21:46,399 Speaker 1: Nurse Miriam Sespond did one on one nursing care for 411 00:21:46,440 --> 00:21:50,400 Speaker 1: Heather Wilkinson, while another nurse did the same one on 412 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:53,639 Speaker 1: one care for Ian. This is the same morning that 413 00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:56,520 Speaker 1: the accused drove her to children to the bus stop 414 00:21:56,600 --> 00:22:00,400 Speaker 1: and then drove herself to hospital on that say, day 415 00:22:00,440 --> 00:22:03,919 Speaker 1: thirty one July. By the time Ian and Heather Wilkinson 416 00:22:04,119 --> 00:22:08,240 Speaker 1: were also transferred to Dandenong Hospital. Ian was reported to 417 00:22:08,280 --> 00:22:13,120 Speaker 1: be extremely nauseated and constantly vomiting. That was the evidence 418 00:22:13,240 --> 00:22:17,679 Speaker 1: of doctor Mark Douglas. This is around the time that 419 00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:21,879 Speaker 1: the accused had discharged herself from lean Gatha Hospital and 420 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:25,639 Speaker 1: drove home. She said to pack her daughter's ballet bag. 421 00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:29,399 Speaker 1: You saw for yourselves how she appeared on the CCTV 422 00:22:29,560 --> 00:22:33,879 Speaker 1: shortly after eight five am as she was discharging herself 423 00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:38,960 Speaker 1: from Leanngatha Hospital. Don and Gale Patterson were both transferred 424 00:22:39,000 --> 00:22:43,000 Speaker 1: to the Austin Hospital on thirty one July. At two 425 00:22:43,160 --> 00:22:47,240 Speaker 1: thirty pm that day, Don Patterson was critically ill and 426 00:22:47,359 --> 00:22:51,840 Speaker 1: in multiple organ failure. He was on life support ventilation 427 00:22:52,080 --> 00:22:56,600 Speaker 1: with a tube down his windpipe. At this time, the 428 00:22:56,680 --> 00:23:00,760 Speaker 1: accused was being transported by ambulance to Modash Medical Center 429 00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:05,600 Speaker 1: and was calm and chatty. By August first, twenty twenty three, 430 00:23:05,800 --> 00:23:08,320 Speaker 1: all four of the lunch guests had been conveyed to 431 00:23:08,359 --> 00:23:12,480 Speaker 1: the Austin Hospital ICEE you on life support and in 432 00:23:12,520 --> 00:23:16,879 Speaker 1: an advanced state of multiple organ failure with their organs 433 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:21,320 Speaker 1: essentially shutting down. Gail Patterson was in an advanced state 434 00:23:21,400 --> 00:23:25,760 Speaker 1: of shock. That was the evidence of Professor Warrillo. This 435 00:23:25,920 --> 00:23:29,080 Speaker 1: is the day the accused was discharged home from the 436 00:23:29,119 --> 00:23:33,879 Speaker 1: Modash Medical Center with no clinical or biochemical evidence of 437 00:23:33,920 --> 00:23:39,119 Speaker 1: Amanita mushroom poisoning or any other toxic substance, and no 438 00:23:39,520 --> 00:23:40,520 Speaker 1: liver damage. 439 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:43,200 Speaker 4: Here's more of what the prosecutor went on to say. 440 00:23:43,600 --> 00:23:48,520 Speaker 1: It is inexplicable about why four of five people who 441 00:23:48,640 --> 00:23:53,399 Speaker 1: ostensibly ate the same meal fell fatally ill and only 442 00:23:53,440 --> 00:23:57,040 Speaker 1: one person, the person who prepared the meal, did not. 443 00:23:57,480 --> 00:23:59,879 Speaker 2: We'll be back after this with more of the prosecution 444 00:24:00,119 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 2: closing arguments. The fourth deception topic allegation Penny that the 445 00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:09,639 Speaker 2: jury were taken through was the sustained cover up, a 446 00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:13,200 Speaker 2: sustained cover up to conceal what the prosecution alleged really 447 00:24:13,440 --> 00:24:16,359 Speaker 2: was the truth at that time, and this included lying 448 00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:19,639 Speaker 2: about feeding her children leftovers, lying about the source of 449 00:24:19,680 --> 00:24:23,680 Speaker 2: the mushrooms, disposing of the food dehydrator, and then allegedly 450 00:24:23,720 --> 00:24:27,400 Speaker 2: deliberately concealing her usual mobile phone from police. These were 451 00:24:27,119 --> 00:24:32,040 Speaker 2: the elements that the prosecutions say make up this last deception, 452 00:24:32,160 --> 00:24:35,000 Speaker 2: this sustained cover up. Yes, so sort of dot points 453 00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:39,600 Speaker 2: or subheadings within subheadings that and Nannette Rodgers she really 454 00:24:39,640 --> 00:24:42,320 Speaker 2: signposted these for the jury, and then she went through 455 00:24:42,359 --> 00:24:44,280 Speaker 2: them in detail, and we'll try and do that for 456 00:24:44,320 --> 00:24:47,080 Speaker 2: you now as well. So beginning with feeding her the 457 00:24:47,160 --> 00:24:50,880 Speaker 2: leftovers to the children. Now, the prosecution alleged Aaron Patterson 458 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:54,120 Speaker 2: never fed leftovers from the lunch to the children, that 459 00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:57,440 Speaker 2: what she fed to the children was something else entirely 460 00:24:57,560 --> 00:25:00,760 Speaker 2: that night, despite the fact that they've given evidence that 461 00:25:00,800 --> 00:25:03,439 Speaker 2: it was the leftovers from the lunch. And what the 462 00:25:03,480 --> 00:25:06,800 Speaker 2: Crown prosecutor pointed to as part of this was some 463 00:25:06,880 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 2: of the different things that Aaron Patterson had said or 464 00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:12,400 Speaker 2: had said to her by different witnesses at different times, 465 00:25:12,600 --> 00:25:14,800 Speaker 2: and what they say was her reluctance to have her 466 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:17,320 Speaker 2: children initially medically assessed. 467 00:25:17,760 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, this was one of the first lies that the 468 00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:24,879 Speaker 3: prosecution say Aaron Patterson told as part of this whole case, 469 00:25:24,960 --> 00:25:28,199 Speaker 3: and that was that her children had been fed some 470 00:25:28,240 --> 00:25:31,840 Speaker 3: of the leftovers. Now, the prosecution agree that the children 471 00:25:31,880 --> 00:25:33,680 Speaker 3: did eat steak and that they would have eaten mashed 472 00:25:33,680 --> 00:25:35,840 Speaker 3: potato and beans, which is the evidence that we've heard 473 00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:38,600 Speaker 3: during this trial. But they maintained it certainly wasn't the 474 00:25:38,640 --> 00:25:41,560 Speaker 3: steak that had been cooked in the mushroom paste and 475 00:25:41,600 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 3: with the pastry over it the day before, and there 476 00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:47,280 Speaker 3: was a number of different reasons. She said that was 477 00:25:47,320 --> 00:25:49,480 Speaker 3: the case and why they should be able to satisfy 478 00:25:49,560 --> 00:25:54,080 Speaker 3: the jury beyond reasonable doubt. That this particular part was satisfied, 479 00:25:54,119 --> 00:25:56,720 Speaker 3: and that was because when remnants of the lunch ended 480 00:25:56,800 --> 00:25:59,879 Speaker 3: up with scientists, she was explaining that even they were 481 00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:03,480 Speaker 3: struggling to separate the mushroom paste from the meat in 482 00:26:03,520 --> 00:26:06,879 Speaker 3: their testing. The prosecution's cases, it would make absolutely no 483 00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:10,600 Speaker 3: sense for a mother to feed her child something that 484 00:26:10,640 --> 00:26:13,040 Speaker 3: she could have believed could have made the lunch guest sick. 485 00:26:13,080 --> 00:26:15,760 Speaker 3: And when she fed her children this meal on the 486 00:26:15,800 --> 00:26:20,200 Speaker 3: Sunday night, Penny, we know at that point Aaron Patterson 487 00:26:20,240 --> 00:26:22,360 Speaker 3: already knew that a number of the lunch. 488 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:23,240 Speaker 4: Guests had got sick. 489 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:25,720 Speaker 3: And it's the prosecution case that there is no way 490 00:26:25,840 --> 00:26:29,800 Speaker 3: that a mother would feed their beloved children anything that 491 00:26:29,800 --> 00:26:31,280 Speaker 3: could potentially make them sick. 492 00:26:31,520 --> 00:26:34,000 Speaker 2: Let's hear a little bit of that scientific evidence, as 493 00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:36,360 Speaker 2: Annette Rodgers sc put it to the jury. 494 00:26:36,440 --> 00:26:37,680 Speaker 4: This is voiced by an actor. 495 00:26:38,280 --> 00:26:41,199 Speaker 1: The accused attempted to explain why the children would not 496 00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:45,240 Speaker 1: be sick despite eating the leftovers by repeatedly stating that 497 00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:48,720 Speaker 1: she'd scraped the mushrooms off their serves because they didn't 498 00:26:48,800 --> 00:26:54,200 Speaker 1: like mushrooms. However, the scientific evidence in this case strongly 499 00:26:54,240 --> 00:26:58,120 Speaker 1: suggests that simply scraping the mushroom paste away would not 500 00:26:58,240 --> 00:27:02,560 Speaker 1: have been enough to prevent the children from ingesting amatoxins 501 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:06,280 Speaker 1: had they also eaten the leftover beef Wellington. You might 502 00:27:06,320 --> 00:27:10,240 Speaker 1: remember mister Mandy Cross examining doctor Jeris de Mulus about 503 00:27:10,320 --> 00:27:14,280 Speaker 1: the leftover meat sample and how tiny pieces of mushroom 504 00:27:14,520 --> 00:27:17,280 Speaker 1: or mushroom paste were still stuck to it inside the 505 00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:21,480 Speaker 1: small glass vials. Mister Mandy may argue that the toxins 506 00:27:21,480 --> 00:27:24,840 Speaker 1: did not really penetrate the meat. The meat sample was 507 00:27:24,880 --> 00:27:28,880 Speaker 1: simply unable to be separated from the poisonous mushroom paste, 508 00:27:29,080 --> 00:27:33,160 Speaker 1: and that is why the specimen tested positive for beta amaneton. 509 00:27:33,920 --> 00:27:37,160 Speaker 1: Maybe that is so, Maybe the toxin penetrated the meat, 510 00:27:37,320 --> 00:27:40,760 Speaker 1: or maybe the mushroom paste just could not be separated 511 00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:45,239 Speaker 1: so that the sample tested positive for beta amaneitan. But 512 00:27:45,280 --> 00:27:48,639 Speaker 1: it doesn't really matter. The result is the same. The 513 00:27:48,680 --> 00:27:52,720 Speaker 1: meat from that dish carried beta amaneitan in it. Even 514 00:27:52,920 --> 00:27:56,639 Speaker 1: when a forensic toxicologist tried to extract the meat portion 515 00:27:56,760 --> 00:28:00,720 Speaker 1: for analysis, it could not be entirely separated from the 516 00:28:00,840 --> 00:28:05,480 Speaker 1: mushroom paste. It is impossible, we suggest to you, that 517 00:28:05,560 --> 00:28:08,440 Speaker 1: the accused could have served up a piece of leftover 518 00:28:08,520 --> 00:28:12,440 Speaker 1: steak with all of the poisonous mushrooms or mushroom paste removed. 519 00:28:12,840 --> 00:28:15,879 Speaker 1: Not even a forensic toxicologist managed to do that in 520 00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:16,760 Speaker 1: an laboratory. 521 00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:19,800 Speaker 2: So as you touched on before, then erin as well 522 00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:23,320 Speaker 2: as we've just heard in that evidence that prosecutions say 523 00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:27,200 Speaker 2: that physically Aaron Patterson could never have removed the toxins 524 00:28:27,240 --> 00:28:28,840 Speaker 2: from the meat if she was to feed it to 525 00:28:28,880 --> 00:28:31,919 Speaker 2: those children. There was a lot of what they were 526 00:28:31,920 --> 00:28:35,040 Speaker 2: putting to the jury, these words of the beloved children, 527 00:28:35,080 --> 00:28:37,400 Speaker 2: the doting mother, that they've heard a lot of evidence 528 00:28:37,440 --> 00:28:40,400 Speaker 2: that Aaron Patterson really was those things and that she 529 00:28:40,480 --> 00:28:43,160 Speaker 2: really did protect her children. And that's why they say 530 00:28:43,160 --> 00:28:45,840 Speaker 2: that they really wouldn't have been put in a situation 531 00:28:45,960 --> 00:28:48,720 Speaker 2: where they ate this meal, nor where they could have 532 00:28:48,840 --> 00:28:51,960 Speaker 2: possibly been at the particular lunch. But what they also 533 00:28:52,160 --> 00:28:55,120 Speaker 2: say the prosecution as part of this is that while 534 00:28:55,120 --> 00:28:58,720 Speaker 2: the leftover showed there was the toxin, they say that 535 00:28:58,760 --> 00:29:01,480 Speaker 2: this was from the sixth beatf Wellington, this beef Wellington 536 00:29:01,520 --> 00:29:04,080 Speaker 2: that ended up in the outside bin at Aaron Patterson's home, 537 00:29:04,120 --> 00:29:06,200 Speaker 2: and the Crown Prosecutor has put to the jury in 538 00:29:06,240 --> 00:29:10,200 Speaker 2: the closings that this sixth beef Wellington was on their case, 539 00:29:10,280 --> 00:29:13,240 Speaker 2: intended for Simon Patterson. That while he had texted to 540 00:29:13,280 --> 00:29:15,760 Speaker 2: say he wouldn't be attending to the meal, the last 541 00:29:15,800 --> 00:29:18,600 Speaker 2: words that he and Aaron Patterson had exchanged on text 542 00:29:18,680 --> 00:29:21,560 Speaker 2: before the lunch itself was her saying I hope to 543 00:29:21,600 --> 00:29:26,000 Speaker 2: see you there. And that the prosecution say these shows 544 00:29:26,080 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 2: that she had this meal prepared ready to go for 545 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:31,360 Speaker 2: Simon Patterson, but that she'd got rid of that, put 546 00:29:31,360 --> 00:29:33,120 Speaker 2: it in the bin, and that's the leftovers that were 547 00:29:33,120 --> 00:29:36,720 Speaker 2: eventually tested. It's not the leftovers that the children were 548 00:29:36,760 --> 00:29:37,480 Speaker 2: actually eating. 549 00:29:37,960 --> 00:29:41,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, And the prosecution also said that it would, in 550 00:29:41,920 --> 00:29:45,760 Speaker 3: their mind more readily help people believe that this whole 551 00:29:45,920 --> 00:29:49,800 Speaker 3: ordeal was just a big shocking accident. If Aaron Patterson 552 00:29:49,840 --> 00:29:53,920 Speaker 3: had in fact fed this beef Wellington leftover to her children, 553 00:29:54,600 --> 00:29:57,480 Speaker 3: a lie helped cover her tracks. Is a quote I 554 00:29:57,520 --> 00:30:00,800 Speaker 3: remember from today. I looked at the jury as they 555 00:30:00,840 --> 00:30:05,120 Speaker 3: were being taken through this particular deception chapter and it 556 00:30:05,160 --> 00:30:07,680 Speaker 3: was quite lengthy and it was quite complicated, but they 557 00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:10,560 Speaker 3: seem to be following every single word. There wasn't a 558 00:30:10,600 --> 00:30:12,760 Speaker 3: lot of eyes darting around the room other than to 559 00:30:12,760 --> 00:30:15,680 Speaker 3: look at Aaron Patterson herself in the dock. It was 560 00:30:15,720 --> 00:30:19,360 Speaker 3: a jury who were all really fixed on Whatnette Rogers 561 00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:19,920 Speaker 3: was saying to. 562 00:30:19,880 --> 00:30:22,440 Speaker 2: Them, and Aaron Patterson, as we've mentioned, is back in 563 00:30:22,480 --> 00:30:24,200 Speaker 2: the dock. She's no longer in the witness box where 564 00:30:24,240 --> 00:30:26,080 Speaker 2: she was for quite a few days giving her evidence, 565 00:30:26,080 --> 00:30:29,640 Speaker 2: but she was sitting behind us erin and looking back 566 00:30:29,680 --> 00:30:32,120 Speaker 2: at her a couple of times. She was very much 567 00:30:32,160 --> 00:30:35,440 Speaker 2: watching Nenette Rogers sc as you mentioned, She's sort of 568 00:30:35,440 --> 00:30:38,280 Speaker 2: moved her positioning slightly so that she's very much presenting 569 00:30:38,360 --> 00:30:41,720 Speaker 2: to the jury and her back is entirely to the public, 570 00:30:41,840 --> 00:30:42,720 Speaker 2: to the media. 571 00:30:42,520 --> 00:30:44,720 Speaker 4: And to Aaron Patterson. And Aaron Patterson. 572 00:30:44,800 --> 00:30:48,640 Speaker 2: She was certainly watching with a lot of interest and 573 00:30:49,360 --> 00:30:51,880 Speaker 2: very much fixed on what the prosecutor was saying, with 574 00:30:51,920 --> 00:30:55,719 Speaker 2: her glasses sort of right down her nose and keeping 575 00:30:55,760 --> 00:30:59,360 Speaker 2: her direction of her gaze fixed right in that area 576 00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:01,240 Speaker 2: of the prout and the jury box. 577 00:31:01,280 --> 00:31:03,720 Speaker 3: She was also taking a lot of notes today, Penny. 578 00:31:03,720 --> 00:31:06,680 Speaker 3: I saw a blue pen in her right hand as 579 00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:09,840 Speaker 3: she was looking down her nose through her glasses. She 580 00:31:09,960 --> 00:31:14,000 Speaker 3: was frantically taking notes at some stage, other times pausing 581 00:31:14,840 --> 00:31:17,640 Speaker 3: to reflect on what the evidence was or reflecting on 582 00:31:17,680 --> 00:31:20,760 Speaker 3: what the prosecution had to say. And once again we 583 00:31:20,840 --> 00:31:23,600 Speaker 3: had a number of family members in court. There was 584 00:31:23,640 --> 00:31:28,040 Speaker 3: about ten members I counted from the Wilkinson and Patterson families. 585 00:31:28,040 --> 00:31:30,560 Speaker 3: Ian Wilkinson again was there seated in the back row, 586 00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:33,520 Speaker 3: seated today between one of his daughters and his son 587 00:31:33,560 --> 00:31:37,960 Speaker 3: in law. This was at a time, Penny where the 588 00:31:38,640 --> 00:31:41,560 Speaker 3: jury were really being reminded of what happened in those 589 00:31:41,600 --> 00:31:46,560 Speaker 3: final days as well, including to Ian Wilkinson himself, and 590 00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:49,040 Speaker 3: how their illnesses really got worse and worse over a 591 00:31:49,080 --> 00:31:53,080 Speaker 3: number of days. While Aaron Patterson was experiencing one thing, 592 00:31:53,360 --> 00:31:56,760 Speaker 3: these four lunch guests were going into organ failure and 593 00:31:56,800 --> 00:31:58,920 Speaker 3: there wasn't a lot of reaction from those in the 594 00:31:58,960 --> 00:32:02,080 Speaker 3: court room. I think every was really focused on what 595 00:32:02,160 --> 00:32:03,280 Speaker 3: Neette Rodgers had to say. 596 00:32:03,880 --> 00:32:06,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, and as part of what Nanette Rodgers was talking 597 00:32:06,880 --> 00:32:10,680 Speaker 2: about with this organ failure and the progressive decline of 598 00:32:10,760 --> 00:32:13,840 Speaker 2: the lunch guests, she spoke to the jury about that. 599 00:32:13,920 --> 00:32:17,200 Speaker 2: At the same time Aaron Patterson was being asked about 600 00:32:17,240 --> 00:32:20,440 Speaker 2: where these mushrooms had come from, and the prosecution allege 601 00:32:20,920 --> 00:32:23,840 Speaker 2: at this point she came up with, they say, another 602 00:32:23,880 --> 00:32:27,719 Speaker 2: elaborate lie regarding the source of the mushrooms and started 603 00:32:27,760 --> 00:32:30,000 Speaker 2: to tell people they'd come from an Asian grocer. But 604 00:32:30,120 --> 00:32:33,000 Speaker 2: the prosecution put to the jury that this story about 605 00:32:33,040 --> 00:32:35,800 Speaker 2: the Asian grosser and the details became broader over time 606 00:32:35,880 --> 00:32:36,800 Speaker 2: and more complex. 607 00:32:37,440 --> 00:32:40,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, she said that on their case, Aaron Patterson sat 608 00:32:40,680 --> 00:32:43,960 Speaker 3: on her hands as her loved ones were growing more 609 00:32:44,000 --> 00:32:47,000 Speaker 3: and more unwell, and she really sent the Department of 610 00:32:47,040 --> 00:32:50,080 Speaker 3: Health and also the City of Monash on a wild 611 00:32:50,160 --> 00:32:53,080 Speaker 3: goose chase to find what they say was a fictional 612 00:32:53,120 --> 00:32:55,800 Speaker 3: Asian grocer store. With something we've heard a lot about 613 00:32:55,840 --> 00:32:58,680 Speaker 3: in this trial and was again mentioned today at length, 614 00:32:59,000 --> 00:33:02,120 Speaker 3: was whether or Aaron Patterson somebody who used to work 615 00:33:02,160 --> 00:33:04,600 Speaker 3: and used to live in this particular part of Melbourne 616 00:33:04,600 --> 00:33:08,040 Speaker 3: many many many years earlier, would have known the areas 617 00:33:08,080 --> 00:33:09,960 Speaker 3: and would have known the suburbs. And as you said, 618 00:33:10,760 --> 00:33:14,120 Speaker 3: this lie, the prosecution say, grew bigger and bigger as 619 00:33:14,160 --> 00:33:17,560 Speaker 3: time went on, and more suburbs they say, were added in. 620 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:23,080 Speaker 3: More broad descriptions of things then followed, and they say 621 00:33:23,120 --> 00:33:25,600 Speaker 3: this was all not as somebody who was panicking, but 622 00:33:25,720 --> 00:33:28,440 Speaker 3: somebody who was caught in their own lives. Yeah. 623 00:33:28,480 --> 00:33:30,680 Speaker 2: And the one of the words that Nnette Rodgers used 624 00:33:30,720 --> 00:33:32,720 Speaker 2: that really stuck out for me was she called it 625 00:33:32,800 --> 00:33:34,880 Speaker 2: a frolic. She said that they had been sent on 626 00:33:34,920 --> 00:33:38,040 Speaker 2: a frolic the Health Department. And then she also went 627 00:33:38,120 --> 00:33:41,280 Speaker 2: through how the Monash Health investigators were also involved in 628 00:33:41,360 --> 00:33:44,160 Speaker 2: this foot on the ground search going through all of 629 00:33:44,200 --> 00:33:47,880 Speaker 2: these different local businesses looking for any source of mushrooms. 630 00:33:48,040 --> 00:33:50,680 Speaker 2: The three hundred and forty photos that were taken by 631 00:33:50,760 --> 00:33:53,760 Speaker 2: that environmental officer and sent to the Department of Health 632 00:33:53,800 --> 00:33:56,440 Speaker 2: because there was this major concern that as well as 633 00:33:56,440 --> 00:33:59,240 Speaker 2: this one family was really unwell in hospital, that there 634 00:33:59,280 --> 00:34:01,240 Speaker 2: could be a big part public health emergency. At the 635 00:34:01,280 --> 00:34:04,840 Speaker 2: same time, Nannette Rodgers, as part of the closings and 636 00:34:04,880 --> 00:34:07,680 Speaker 2: this part of her address, she took the jury through 637 00:34:07,720 --> 00:34:12,040 Speaker 2: eleven times. The prosecution allege between when Aaron Patterson first 638 00:34:12,080 --> 00:34:15,320 Speaker 2: spoke with doctor Chris Webster on the thirty first of July, 639 00:34:15,480 --> 00:34:18,879 Speaker 2: that Monday that she first presented at Leanngatha Hospital, through 640 00:34:19,040 --> 00:34:22,000 Speaker 2: to a couple of days after the lunch on the 641 00:34:22,040 --> 00:34:25,000 Speaker 2: second of August, when she was visited by a Child 642 00:34:25,000 --> 00:34:28,279 Speaker 2: Protection worker and she had a speakerphone conversation with a 643 00:34:28,280 --> 00:34:29,480 Speaker 2: public health official. 644 00:34:29,840 --> 00:34:31,080 Speaker 4: The prosecution says. 645 00:34:30,840 --> 00:34:33,880 Speaker 2: There's eleven times there and they signposted them there to 646 00:34:33,920 --> 00:34:36,799 Speaker 2: the jury of the things Aaron Patterson said and they 647 00:34:36,840 --> 00:34:40,879 Speaker 2: say didn't say regarding where these particular mushrooms came from, 648 00:34:40,920 --> 00:34:44,080 Speaker 2: beginning with that first doctor saying that the mushrooms, they 649 00:34:44,160 --> 00:34:46,440 Speaker 2: say on the evidence of him, and with what the 650 00:34:46,480 --> 00:34:50,120 Speaker 2: prosecution alleged that she just replied Woolli's and that despite 651 00:34:50,280 --> 00:34:53,280 Speaker 2: the defense saying that she had said, he had asked 652 00:34:53,360 --> 00:34:56,480 Speaker 2: where the ingredients came from, the prosecution said that the 653 00:34:56,560 --> 00:34:59,400 Speaker 2: jury should consider that he asked where the mushrooms had 654 00:34:59,440 --> 00:35:02,040 Speaker 2: come from, and that that doctor, doctor Chris Webster, was 655 00:35:02,120 --> 00:35:04,680 Speaker 2: very much focused on mushrooms at the time, not on 656 00:35:04,719 --> 00:35:05,880 Speaker 2: the ingredients. 657 00:35:05,480 --> 00:35:06,080 Speaker 4: As a whole. 658 00:35:06,520 --> 00:35:09,480 Speaker 2: All the way through to these different suburbs and the 659 00:35:09,560 --> 00:35:13,560 Speaker 2: different descriptions that they say Aaron Patterson gave these particular 660 00:35:13,719 --> 00:35:17,000 Speaker 2: public health officials and investigators. But what they also touched 661 00:35:17,080 --> 00:35:21,280 Speaker 2: on was the prosecution say that it was Aaron Patterson 662 00:35:21,719 --> 00:35:26,360 Speaker 2: not always responding or not always being forthcoming with information 663 00:35:26,640 --> 00:35:28,920 Speaker 2: that the jury should also look at here that towards 664 00:35:28,920 --> 00:35:31,800 Speaker 2: the end of Sally Ann Atkinson needing to get information 665 00:35:31,840 --> 00:35:34,560 Speaker 2: from her. In those later days, Aaron Patterson wasn't always 666 00:35:34,800 --> 00:35:37,200 Speaker 2: returning her calls or her voicemail messages. 667 00:35:37,320 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 3: At other times text messages were responded to, but they 668 00:35:41,160 --> 00:35:43,680 Speaker 3: didn't answer the questions of Sally Ane Atkinson from the 669 00:35:43,680 --> 00:35:46,640 Speaker 3: Department of Health was asking, now we do know this 670 00:35:46,760 --> 00:35:49,920 Speaker 3: time Aaron Patterson gave evidence and the jury were reminded 671 00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:52,200 Speaker 3: of this today that in one of the messages she 672 00:35:52,280 --> 00:35:54,400 Speaker 3: did right back, well, I'm a bit busy, I'm dealing 673 00:35:54,400 --> 00:35:56,359 Speaker 3: with my children. I've got a bit of my plate 674 00:35:56,400 --> 00:35:59,279 Speaker 3: at the moment, essentially, but that it was some of 675 00:35:59,280 --> 00:36:02,520 Speaker 3: those other phone calls that followed that she was so 676 00:36:02,880 --> 00:36:05,440 Speaker 3: difficult to get hold of. And this is something as well. 677 00:36:05,680 --> 00:36:09,239 Speaker 3: The jury reminded that was the complete opposite to what 678 00:36:09,280 --> 00:36:12,040 Speaker 3: Aaron Patterson said in her police interview. She told police 679 00:36:12,080 --> 00:36:14,520 Speaker 3: that she was very, very helpful with the Department of Health, 680 00:36:14,800 --> 00:36:17,960 Speaker 3: where Asnette Rodgers said that really wasn't the case. 681 00:36:18,280 --> 00:36:20,760 Speaker 2: Here's a little bit of what Nenette Rogers told the jury. 682 00:36:20,800 --> 00:36:21,840 Speaker 2: It's voiced by an actor. 683 00:36:22,239 --> 00:36:24,560 Speaker 1: Even if you could accept it is something you might 684 00:36:24,600 --> 00:36:27,279 Speaker 1: not remember. You would think that if you were in 685 00:36:27,320 --> 00:36:30,720 Speaker 1: a situation like this, for the sake of your very 686 00:36:30,840 --> 00:36:34,640 Speaker 1: ill family members, and for anyone else who might be exposed, 687 00:36:35,040 --> 00:36:38,360 Speaker 1: you would do everything you could to try and remember 688 00:36:38,400 --> 00:36:42,600 Speaker 1: the store. But the accused sat on her hands while Don, 689 00:36:42,840 --> 00:36:47,160 Speaker 1: gail Ian and Heather were all in comas. She was 690 00:36:47,200 --> 00:36:50,680 Speaker 1: slow to respond to the Department of Health, even totally 691 00:36:50,800 --> 00:36:54,800 Speaker 1: non responsive at times, and as time passed, her description 692 00:36:54,960 --> 00:36:59,560 Speaker 1: of the Chinese food store shifted and grew broader. You 693 00:37:00,120 --> 00:37:02,920 Speaker 1: noticed that when the accused was giving the evidence that 694 00:37:02,960 --> 00:37:07,760 Speaker 1: she appeared to have a remarkable memory. She could recall dates, evidence, 695 00:37:07,840 --> 00:37:11,040 Speaker 1: and details easily, as she was being asked questions over 696 00:37:11,120 --> 00:37:15,600 Speaker 1: many days. Even now in June twenty twenty five, she 697 00:37:15,680 --> 00:37:19,360 Speaker 1: could recall that April twenty eighth, twenty twenty three was 698 00:37:19,400 --> 00:37:22,520 Speaker 1: a Friday and not a Monday, as I had suggested 699 00:37:22,520 --> 00:37:27,080 Speaker 1: to her in cross examination. Yet in August twenty twenty three, 700 00:37:27,360 --> 00:37:29,680 Speaker 1: she could not recall the shop or even the suburb 701 00:37:29,920 --> 00:37:33,640 Speaker 1: where she purchased the mushrooms from an Asian grosser in 702 00:37:33,680 --> 00:37:37,960 Speaker 1: the same April of twenty twenty three. It's simply beggar's belief. 703 00:37:39,120 --> 00:37:42,600 Speaker 1: How were the mushrooms packaged? Not only did the locations 704 00:37:42,640 --> 00:37:47,200 Speaker 1: of the supposed Asian grosser spread across more and more suburbs. 705 00:37:47,600 --> 00:37:50,960 Speaker 1: The story about the mushrooms from the Asian Grosser also 706 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:56,040 Speaker 1: became more complex when professionals asked the accused about the packaging, 707 00:37:56,360 --> 00:37:58,920 Speaker 1: She said she didn't have it, then came up with 708 00:37:59,000 --> 00:38:02,320 Speaker 1: an elaborate ex explanation for why that would be the case, 709 00:38:02,719 --> 00:38:05,160 Speaker 1: given that she had only prepared the meal a few 710 00:38:05,200 --> 00:38:05,960 Speaker 1: days earlier. 711 00:38:06,719 --> 00:38:09,880 Speaker 2: Now, another point that Nanette Rodgers sc has taken the 712 00:38:09,960 --> 00:38:13,320 Speaker 2: jury too in part of her closings were the claims 713 00:38:13,360 --> 00:38:17,600 Speaker 2: around that Aaron Patterson says she read hydrated the Asian 714 00:38:17,680 --> 00:38:21,879 Speaker 2: grosser mushrooms and added them into this particular meal. Now, 715 00:38:22,200 --> 00:38:25,040 Speaker 2: she went back to some of Aaron Patterson's evidence that 716 00:38:25,120 --> 00:38:27,600 Speaker 2: she said while she was on the stand that she'd 717 00:38:27,680 --> 00:38:30,320 Speaker 2: noticed how crisp things were when they came out of 718 00:38:30,360 --> 00:38:33,879 Speaker 2: her dehydrator, and she felt these particular Asian mushrooms, which 719 00:38:33,960 --> 00:38:37,040 Speaker 2: previously the jury had heard evidence from other witnesses that 720 00:38:37,120 --> 00:38:39,920 Speaker 2: she'd told them, smelt a bit funny or a little 721 00:38:39,920 --> 00:38:42,200 Speaker 2: bit strange, and that's why she hadn't included them in 722 00:38:42,280 --> 00:38:44,839 Speaker 2: other foods at the time. That she felt that those 723 00:38:44,920 --> 00:38:47,200 Speaker 2: mushrooms were a bit rubbery in the tupper where she'd 724 00:38:47,200 --> 00:38:49,600 Speaker 2: put them in, so at some point she couldn't remember 725 00:38:49,600 --> 00:38:51,799 Speaker 2: exactly when, but she'd taken them out, she'd popped them 726 00:38:51,840 --> 00:38:54,840 Speaker 2: into the dehydrator and that was to crisp them up. 727 00:38:54,920 --> 00:38:57,960 Speaker 2: And what Nanette Rogers told the jury was that in 728 00:38:58,040 --> 00:39:02,920 Speaker 2: telling the taught this in her evidence that she was 729 00:39:02,960 --> 00:39:06,279 Speaker 2: telling a ridiculous lie. That was Nnette Roger's words, that 730 00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:09,480 Speaker 2: she was trying to show that there could still be 731 00:39:09,719 --> 00:39:13,280 Speaker 2: some contamination with the Asian grosser mushrooms. But that really 732 00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:16,880 Speaker 2: all along, Aaron Patterson knew. The prosecution alleges that she 733 00:39:17,080 --> 00:39:20,879 Speaker 2: had dehydrated deathcat mushrooms in her own sun Beam dehydrator, 734 00:39:20,960 --> 00:39:23,480 Speaker 2: and they suggest that she bought that dehydrator for the 735 00:39:23,560 --> 00:39:25,800 Speaker 2: exact purpose of dehydrating those mushrooms. 736 00:39:25,960 --> 00:39:28,719 Speaker 3: Yeah, Rogers said that it wouldn't make sense to purchase 737 00:39:29,000 --> 00:39:32,640 Speaker 3: dried mushrooms to then rehydrate them, to put them in 738 00:39:32,680 --> 00:39:37,320 Speaker 3: this meal, to then chop them up to then redry 739 00:39:37,400 --> 00:39:41,000 Speaker 3: them again. And that was at a point where there 740 00:39:41,040 --> 00:39:42,600 Speaker 3: was a few of us are a little bit confused 741 00:39:43,320 --> 00:39:45,600 Speaker 3: trying to make sense of this. But the way she 742 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:48,480 Speaker 3: broke it down was, yes, Aaron Patterson's evidence was, when 743 00:39:48,520 --> 00:39:52,319 Speaker 3: I took these mushrooms out of the pantry, I rehydrated 744 00:39:52,320 --> 00:39:54,239 Speaker 3: them with a little bit of water, I chopped them up, 745 00:39:54,360 --> 00:39:56,759 Speaker 3: and then I added them to the meal. But why 746 00:39:56,840 --> 00:39:59,760 Speaker 3: and then and how has remnants of death cat mushrooms 747 00:39:59,800 --> 00:40:03,239 Speaker 3: then made their way onto the dehydrator. So and Nette 748 00:40:03,280 --> 00:40:06,560 Speaker 3: Rogers was saying essentially that that is another lie, it 749 00:40:06,600 --> 00:40:10,000 Speaker 3: doesn't make sense, and that Aaron Patterson did in fact 750 00:40:10,239 --> 00:40:14,640 Speaker 3: source dry and add mushrooms deathcat mushrooms to the meal. 751 00:40:14,960 --> 00:40:18,040 Speaker 2: It's a little bit more from what Nannette Rogers told 752 00:40:18,040 --> 00:40:20,799 Speaker 2: the jury regarding the dumping of the dehydrator. 753 00:40:20,960 --> 00:40:23,480 Speaker 1: The defense may argue that this was part of a 754 00:40:23,719 --> 00:40:27,480 Speaker 1: wild panic, that the accused did this because she was 755 00:40:27,520 --> 00:40:31,319 Speaker 1: worried she would be falsely accused of deliberately poisoning her 756 00:40:31,400 --> 00:40:36,800 Speaker 1: lunch guests. You should completely reject that position. Her story 757 00:40:36,880 --> 00:40:40,000 Speaker 1: about Simon accusing her in the hospital of using the 758 00:40:40,040 --> 00:40:43,960 Speaker 1: dehydrator and this sending her into a panic is nonsense. 759 00:40:44,600 --> 00:40:48,520 Speaker 1: Simon Patterson categorically denied to you ever saying such a 760 00:40:48,600 --> 00:40:51,920 Speaker 1: thing to the accused. You will use your common sense 761 00:40:51,960 --> 00:40:55,279 Speaker 1: when you're considering the evidence in this case, including this 762 00:40:55,400 --> 00:40:59,640 Speaker 1: piece of evidence. If there was nothing incriminating about the 763 00:40:59,680 --> 00:41:03,680 Speaker 1: deh hydrator, why hide it? And there is only one 764 00:41:03,880 --> 00:41:09,040 Speaker 1: reasonable explanation. She knew it would incriminate her. She knew 765 00:41:09,120 --> 00:41:13,600 Speaker 1: that she had dehydrated death cap mushrooms in that appliance 766 00:41:13,840 --> 00:41:17,720 Speaker 1: and that she had deliberately done so, and she knew 767 00:41:17,800 --> 00:41:21,080 Speaker 1: that keeping it was going to be far too risky. 768 00:41:21,520 --> 00:41:24,279 Speaker 3: Yeah, this dumping of the dehydrator, Rogers said, was one 769 00:41:24,280 --> 00:41:28,399 Speaker 3: of the first things that Aaron Patterson did as soon 770 00:41:28,400 --> 00:41:31,400 Speaker 3: as she was released from that Monash hospital. And she 771 00:41:31,480 --> 00:41:33,920 Speaker 3: then took the jury through a number of other things 772 00:41:33,920 --> 00:41:37,280 Speaker 3: that they say she did that prove she was covering 773 00:41:37,320 --> 00:41:40,319 Speaker 3: her tracks after she attempted to kill some of her 774 00:41:40,400 --> 00:41:43,239 Speaker 3: lunch guests. And this next thing that they say she 775 00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:46,320 Speaker 3: did was the dumping of what Nanette called the dummy phone. 776 00:41:46,400 --> 00:41:48,239 Speaker 3: We've heard during some of this evidence that there was 777 00:41:48,280 --> 00:41:51,200 Speaker 3: fhone A in phone B, but she really used different 778 00:41:51,280 --> 00:41:55,120 Speaker 3: terminology during her closings and explained that Aaron Patterson had 779 00:41:55,160 --> 00:41:57,319 Speaker 3: a usual phone and she had a dummy phone. And 780 00:41:57,400 --> 00:42:01,359 Speaker 3: their case is that Aaron Patterson handed police the dummy phone, 781 00:42:01,360 --> 00:42:03,120 Speaker 3: a phone that she knew that had been wiped and 782 00:42:03,120 --> 00:42:05,319 Speaker 3: then was later wiped again while it was in the 783 00:42:05,360 --> 00:42:08,800 Speaker 3: locker of the police informat and that she didn't actually 784 00:42:08,800 --> 00:42:12,480 Speaker 3: hand over her usual phone. Now, Neett Rodgers reminded the 785 00:42:12,560 --> 00:42:15,520 Speaker 3: jury that the defense case was this other phone, this 786 00:42:15,719 --> 00:42:18,040 Speaker 3: usual phone was just left on the window sill in 787 00:42:18,120 --> 00:42:21,120 Speaker 3: there in Patterson's house and police had missed it. And 788 00:42:21,600 --> 00:42:25,080 Speaker 3: Rogers really encouraged the jury to reject that suggestion and 789 00:42:25,120 --> 00:42:27,040 Speaker 3: said that the police had been there for four hours. 790 00:42:27,520 --> 00:42:30,920 Speaker 3: They're searching for all of the devices that they could find, 791 00:42:31,000 --> 00:42:32,960 Speaker 3: and it wouldn't make any sense for them to have 792 00:42:33,880 --> 00:42:37,160 Speaker 3: missed or looked over a phone that was now sitting 793 00:42:37,200 --> 00:42:39,040 Speaker 3: on a window sill in air in Patterson's house. 794 00:42:39,400 --> 00:42:41,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, and for the listeners that have been listening along 795 00:42:42,080 --> 00:42:45,200 Speaker 2: we have referred to in previous episodes, like the prosecution 796 00:42:45,800 --> 00:42:49,160 Speaker 2: and the defense have that what the prosecution now alleged 797 00:42:49,280 --> 00:42:52,239 Speaker 2: is a dummy phone, that is Phone B and the 798 00:42:52,560 --> 00:42:56,200 Speaker 2: phone A, that phone that police never recovered is what 799 00:42:56,360 --> 00:42:59,160 Speaker 2: Nenette Rodgers is referring to there as well. 800 00:42:59,520 --> 00:43:00,880 Speaker 4: Toward the end of. 801 00:43:00,920 --> 00:43:04,759 Speaker 2: Her final submission her closing arguments, Nanette Rodgers spoke a 802 00:43:04,760 --> 00:43:08,239 Speaker 2: lot about the relationships within the family and why she 803 00:43:08,480 --> 00:43:11,400 Speaker 2: says there may have been while there doesn't need to 804 00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:13,560 Speaker 2: be a motive in this particular case, but there may 805 00:43:13,600 --> 00:43:17,160 Speaker 2: have been some animosity in this particular family. And she 806 00:43:17,360 --> 00:43:20,960 Speaker 2: touched on what she says is evidence that these particular 807 00:43:21,000 --> 00:43:23,759 Speaker 2: relationships had changed over time and changed around the time 808 00:43:23,800 --> 00:43:24,320 Speaker 2: of the lunch. 809 00:43:24,480 --> 00:43:26,799 Speaker 3: She reminded the jury when she was speaking about this 810 00:43:26,920 --> 00:43:30,200 Speaker 3: that the prosecution doesn't need to prove a motive to 811 00:43:30,360 --> 00:43:32,880 Speaker 3: prove murder. It's not one of the full elements of 812 00:43:32,960 --> 00:43:36,080 Speaker 3: murder that a jury needs to be satisfied beyond reasonable 813 00:43:36,120 --> 00:43:40,040 Speaker 3: doubt that they have reached to find somebody guilty of murder. 814 00:43:40,400 --> 00:43:42,840 Speaker 3: But the way it was explained was that sometimes the 815 00:43:42,880 --> 00:43:45,600 Speaker 3: reasons are obvious as to why somebody might kill somebody, 816 00:43:45,600 --> 00:43:48,399 Speaker 3: in other times they're not. And so that was part 817 00:43:48,440 --> 00:43:51,279 Speaker 3: of the explanation about what was going on then with 818 00:43:51,320 --> 00:43:53,960 Speaker 3: the family at the time. And she noted that on 819 00:43:54,000 --> 00:43:56,759 Speaker 3: the surface, it may have seemed like the accused was 820 00:43:56,760 --> 00:44:00,839 Speaker 3: in this really loving family, this loving relationship, yes, but 821 00:44:00,880 --> 00:44:03,920 Speaker 3: perhaps the truth was that what was really going on 822 00:44:03,960 --> 00:44:06,719 Speaker 3: with Don and Gail Patterson and Aaron Patterson at that 823 00:44:06,840 --> 00:44:09,879 Speaker 3: time was that things weren't always really harmonious. 824 00:44:10,239 --> 00:44:12,640 Speaker 2: Hiss a little bit of what the jury was told 825 00:44:13,000 --> 00:44:16,520 Speaker 2: about the situation within the family at the time of 826 00:44:16,520 --> 00:44:17,000 Speaker 2: the lunch. 827 00:44:17,640 --> 00:44:20,759 Speaker 1: The accused professed her love for Don and Gail in 828 00:44:20,800 --> 00:44:24,160 Speaker 1: her police interview. Even Simon told you that they got 829 00:44:24,200 --> 00:44:27,640 Speaker 1: on well, that is, the accused and his parents, and 830 00:44:27,719 --> 00:44:31,320 Speaker 1: that the accused seemed to love his parents. On the surface, 831 00:44:31,600 --> 00:44:35,879 Speaker 1: perhaps it seemed that way even to the family members themselves, 832 00:44:36,800 --> 00:44:39,759 Speaker 1: but you have heard evidence which shows that the relationship 833 00:44:39,800 --> 00:44:43,480 Speaker 1: between the accused and Don and Gail was not always 834 00:44:43,600 --> 00:44:47,160 Speaker 1: a harmonious one, particularly in the nine months or so 835 00:44:47,280 --> 00:44:50,800 Speaker 1: leading up to the lunch. Don and Gail were dragged 836 00:44:50,920 --> 00:44:55,120 Speaker 1: unwillingly into the conflict between the accused and Simon over 837 00:44:55,239 --> 00:44:56,000 Speaker 1: child support. 838 00:44:56,239 --> 00:44:58,680 Speaker 3: And this is what Annette Rogers told the jury about motive. 839 00:44:59,120 --> 00:45:02,600 Speaker 1: Motive is not an element of the crime of murder 840 00:45:02,880 --> 00:45:06,120 Speaker 1: or the crime of attempted murder, and it is only 841 00:45:06,200 --> 00:45:09,800 Speaker 1: the elements of the offense that you must find proven 842 00:45:09,880 --> 00:45:14,560 Speaker 1: beyond reasonable doubt that makes sense. People do different things 843 00:45:14,600 --> 00:45:18,760 Speaker 1: for different reasons. Sometimes the reason is obvious enough to others. 844 00:45:19,480 --> 00:45:23,960 Speaker 1: At other times, the internal motivations are only known by 845 00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:27,560 Speaker 1: the person themselves. You don't have to know why a 846 00:45:27,600 --> 00:45:31,480 Speaker 1: person does something in order to know they did it. 847 00:45:32,320 --> 00:45:34,440 Speaker 2: Now, this is the part that we have alluded to 848 00:45:34,600 --> 00:45:37,920 Speaker 2: earlier in the episode that there was a surprise for 849 00:45:38,080 --> 00:45:40,640 Speaker 2: the jury, for us sitting in the courtroom as well 850 00:45:40,880 --> 00:45:43,160 Speaker 2: and the members of the public when it came to 851 00:45:43,239 --> 00:45:46,839 Speaker 2: the number of calculated deceptions that the prosecution alleged Aaron 852 00:45:46,840 --> 00:45:48,520 Speaker 2: Patterson took part in. 853 00:45:48,520 --> 00:45:50,640 Speaker 4: Initially, Annette Rodgers. 854 00:45:50,280 --> 00:45:53,200 Speaker 2: As you heard outlined in what she told the jury 855 00:45:53,239 --> 00:45:56,480 Speaker 2: earlier in this episode, said there were four calculated deceptions. 856 00:45:56,520 --> 00:45:59,360 Speaker 4: Then she said there was a fifth calculated deception. 857 00:46:00,080 --> 00:46:03,920 Speaker 2: She says, this deception is Aaron Patterson herself saying that, 858 00:46:04,120 --> 00:46:07,840 Speaker 2: in Nnette Roger's words, that Aaron Patterson tried to play 859 00:46:07,880 --> 00:46:08,360 Speaker 2: the jury. 860 00:46:08,560 --> 00:46:11,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, Nenette Rogers was facing the jury at this time, 861 00:46:12,200 --> 00:46:15,440 Speaker 3: and the jury, as they really had behaved throughout all 862 00:46:15,480 --> 00:46:19,160 Speaker 3: of her closing submissions, they couldn't be seen taking any notes, 863 00:46:19,160 --> 00:46:21,480 Speaker 3: they weren't looking at their iPads. Their eyes were really 864 00:46:21,560 --> 00:46:24,680 Speaker 3: fixed on Nett Rogers as she was speaking. And this 865 00:46:24,840 --> 00:46:27,960 Speaker 3: was a moment where there was surprise across the faces 866 00:46:28,000 --> 00:46:30,600 Speaker 3: of some of the jury members, and one of the 867 00:46:30,640 --> 00:46:33,720 Speaker 3: male jurors as well, almost smirt He had a smile 868 00:46:33,760 --> 00:46:35,919 Speaker 3: on his face. When they were told that there would 869 00:46:35,920 --> 00:46:39,080 Speaker 3: be this fifth element, and then all of a sudden 870 00:46:39,080 --> 00:46:41,560 Speaker 3: we heard net Rodgers say, this is the lies that 871 00:46:41,600 --> 00:46:44,319 Speaker 3: we say. Aaron Patterson told you the juror as while 872 00:46:44,360 --> 00:46:46,879 Speaker 3: she was here in the courtroom. Now, I was sitting 873 00:46:46,920 --> 00:46:48,719 Speaker 3: in the courtroom like I have been every day of 874 00:46:48,760 --> 00:46:52,000 Speaker 3: this trial, Penny, and I looked around to see Aaron Patterson. 875 00:46:52,040 --> 00:46:55,040 Speaker 3: She seated in the dock behind where the media is sitting, 876 00:46:55,040 --> 00:46:58,319 Speaker 3: and she had been taking notes throughout both days, and 877 00:46:58,320 --> 00:47:00,880 Speaker 3: that was happening again today. Glasses on the end of 878 00:47:00,920 --> 00:47:03,000 Speaker 3: her nose, and she was continuing to take notes, and 879 00:47:03,320 --> 00:47:05,440 Speaker 3: there wasn't a lot of reaction to what was happening 880 00:47:05,440 --> 00:47:06,120 Speaker 3: at that point. 881 00:47:06,440 --> 00:47:09,160 Speaker 2: So what Nanette Rodgers told the jury is that Aaron 882 00:47:09,200 --> 00:47:11,680 Speaker 2: Patterson didn't have to give evidence, that she made the 883 00:47:11,760 --> 00:47:14,520 Speaker 2: choice to give evidence off her own bat, and that 884 00:47:14,560 --> 00:47:17,520 Speaker 2: therefore she opened herself up to cross examination just like 885 00:47:17,640 --> 00:47:20,560 Speaker 2: any other witness. And there were a number of those 886 00:47:20,640 --> 00:47:23,680 Speaker 2: points that you mentioned that Nanette Rogers put to the 887 00:47:23,800 --> 00:47:26,879 Speaker 2: jurors saying, we put to you that she lied about this, 888 00:47:27,160 --> 00:47:29,200 Speaker 2: that she lied about this, that she lied about this, 889 00:47:29,280 --> 00:47:32,839 Speaker 2: And she started off with the cancer diagnosis, quoting from 890 00:47:32,840 --> 00:47:35,640 Speaker 2: what she'd told police what she'd told different witnesses, and 891 00:47:35,640 --> 00:47:37,480 Speaker 2: then what she'd said on the stand, and she said 892 00:47:37,480 --> 00:47:40,839 Speaker 2: every time we asked her questions about that that her 893 00:47:40,880 --> 00:47:42,600 Speaker 2: story seemed to be changing. 894 00:47:42,840 --> 00:47:45,200 Speaker 3: She mentioned that Aaron Patterson seemed to have a really 895 00:47:45,200 --> 00:47:48,560 Speaker 3: good memory for some things, particularly dates and the day 896 00:47:48,560 --> 00:47:51,440 Speaker 3: of the week. She explained that in other parts Aaron 897 00:47:51,480 --> 00:47:55,760 Speaker 3: Patterson was unable to explain certain elements, but also didn't 898 00:47:55,800 --> 00:47:58,960 Speaker 3: answer or give full some answers to other questions. And 899 00:47:59,320 --> 00:48:01,239 Speaker 3: that was the reason or part of the reason why 900 00:48:01,239 --> 00:48:04,000 Speaker 3: Anette Rogers said the jury should not put a lot 901 00:48:04,040 --> 00:48:07,480 Speaker 3: of faith into what Aaron Patterson was saying, and to 902 00:48:07,560 --> 00:48:10,200 Speaker 3: really put that aside and focus on what evidence it 903 00:48:10,280 --> 00:48:11,920 Speaker 3: is that the prosecution brought to the table. 904 00:48:12,040 --> 00:48:15,760 Speaker 2: Now, the prosecution has anticipated in some of what they've 905 00:48:15,800 --> 00:48:18,440 Speaker 2: told the jury, they expect the defense will say in 906 00:48:18,480 --> 00:48:21,960 Speaker 2: their closings. You'll hear a little bit in these words 907 00:48:21,960 --> 00:48:25,279 Speaker 2: of Nannette Rogers that were about to play you. This 908 00:48:25,400 --> 00:48:28,360 Speaker 2: begins with her talking about the fact that the defense 909 00:48:28,400 --> 00:48:31,200 Speaker 2: may try to suggest that a lot of these things 910 00:48:31,239 --> 00:48:33,280 Speaker 2: happened because of an innocent panic. 911 00:48:33,600 --> 00:48:34,800 Speaker 4: This is voiced by an actor. 912 00:48:35,160 --> 00:48:37,520 Speaker 1: It might be suggested to you that some of the 913 00:48:37,560 --> 00:48:41,040 Speaker 1: accused behavior after the lunch was the result of panic, 914 00:48:41,239 --> 00:48:45,200 Speaker 1: innocent panic about the prospect of being blamed, and that 915 00:48:45,320 --> 00:48:49,280 Speaker 1: this is why she disposed of the dehydrator and why 916 00:48:49,400 --> 00:48:52,279 Speaker 1: she told some of the lies I have already referred to. 917 00:48:53,040 --> 00:48:58,200 Speaker 1: We suggest you can reject those suggestions why, because panic 918 00:48:58,320 --> 00:49:02,160 Speaker 1: does not explain the extent and prolonged efforts that the 919 00:49:02,239 --> 00:49:06,280 Speaker 1: accused went to in order to cover up what she'd done. 920 00:49:06,800 --> 00:49:10,400 Speaker 1: It does not explain why the accused chose to persist 921 00:49:10,440 --> 00:49:14,160 Speaker 1: with lies even when the lives of the lunch guests 922 00:49:14,200 --> 00:49:17,480 Speaker 1: were at stake. And you might also remember that the 923 00:49:17,560 --> 00:49:21,400 Speaker 1: accused volunteered some of those lies to someone who she 924 00:49:21,520 --> 00:49:24,520 Speaker 1: had absolutely no reason to lie to. 925 00:49:25,040 --> 00:49:27,800 Speaker 2: From then innet, Rogers took the jury through a few 926 00:49:27,840 --> 00:49:31,080 Speaker 2: more bits of evidence of different witnesses. What she says 927 00:49:31,200 --> 00:49:35,360 Speaker 2: that Aaron Patterson told Jenny Hay, one of her online friends, 928 00:49:35,440 --> 00:49:38,200 Speaker 2: regarding elements that had happened after the lunch with the 929 00:49:38,280 --> 00:49:41,319 Speaker 2: leftovers and where she says she got the mushrooms. And 930 00:49:41,800 --> 00:49:45,040 Speaker 2: after these two days of closings that the jury has 931 00:49:45,120 --> 00:49:47,799 Speaker 2: heard from Nannette Rogers, it was time for her to 932 00:49:48,040 --> 00:49:50,840 Speaker 2: sit back down and say she had finished these closing submissions. 933 00:49:51,120 --> 00:49:54,080 Speaker 3: She actually thanked the jury. She said thank you for 934 00:49:54,160 --> 00:49:56,880 Speaker 3: your time and sat back down. And we know what 935 00:49:57,000 --> 00:50:00,600 Speaker 3: happened next, Penny. Is that Colin Mandy. It was his 936 00:50:00,680 --> 00:50:03,239 Speaker 3: turn at the lectern. He did the same. He came 937 00:50:03,280 --> 00:50:05,840 Speaker 3: in and moved it so it was facing the jury 938 00:50:05,880 --> 00:50:07,960 Speaker 3: and we'll bring you some more about what he has 939 00:50:08,000 --> 00:50:09,879 Speaker 3: to say in our next episode. 940 00:50:10,640 --> 00:50:13,040 Speaker 4: Thank you for listening to this episode of Say Grace. 941 00:50:13,200 --> 00:50:15,120 Speaker 2: Please press the follow button in your app to get 942 00:50:15,160 --> 00:50:17,480 Speaker 2: our next episodes as soon as we publish. 943 00:50:17,680 --> 00:50:19,880 Speaker 3: For more reporting on the case, check out the Age 944 00:50:19,880 --> 00:50:21,880 Speaker 3: of nine News in your browser or app store. 945 00:50:22,000 --> 00:50:24,279 Speaker 2: We'd like to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land 946 00:50:24,360 --> 00:50:27,200 Speaker 2: that this podcast was recorded on and wherever you're listening 947 00:50:27,239 --> 00:50:27,800 Speaker 2: to it now. 948 00:50:28,120 --> 00:50:31,080 Speaker 4: Say Grace is created and hosted by me Penelope Leash 949 00:50:31,239 --> 00:50:35,120 Speaker 4: and me Aaron Pearson. This podcast is produced by Genevieve Rule.