WEBVTT - ‘The Great Wall of China’: A law firm’s cautionary tale

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The Australian Financial Review. When Australian law firm Mallison Stephen

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Shak merged with China's king and Wood in twenty twelve,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it broke new ground.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So Kate WM is the first international firm headquartered in Asia.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 2>So the future for US is aligned with very much

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the emergence of Asia, including China.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Shi Jimping was just coming to power, and while the

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>two countries' political and legal systems were vastly different, most lawyers,

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>politicians and business people believe China would continue to open up.

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>To the world.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>One person who was there right from the start was

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese lawyer Rupert Lee. He was integral to the merging

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>negotiations and would go on to become the firm's chief

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>operating officer its third most senior executive. But late last year,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Lee was out. His sudden departure led Financial Review

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>journalist Max Shanahan to start digging around, and what he

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>discovered among court files in Beijing, allegedly corrupt wind farm

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>deals in Montenegro and a controversial legal conference in Russia,

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>has raised serious questions about how Kingenwood Mallison's manages risk

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and conflicts across its jurisdictions.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Kingwood Mallisons has no independent directors who might pull them

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 3>up and say, you know, hold on what deals we

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>being exposed to? Why is Rupert who's on our global

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>board worrying eight million Hong Kong dollars from the firm?

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 3>When's he going to pay it? Buck?

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Finn. I'm Lisa Murray. This week Max

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan on kwm's China experiment and whether it can last.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>It's Thursday, June nineteenth. Hi, Max, thanks for coming on

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, Lisa, thanks for having me. KM has been

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>operating as a global law firm since twenty twelve. What

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>made you decide to start looking into the merged firm

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and how it works now?

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, well, I've always been interested in how the mergers worked.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 3>It's a merge between an Australian and a Chinese law firm.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 3>They're such radically different legal systems it must be really

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 3>difficult to bridge those systems. How are they pulling it off?

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>If they are pulling it off? And so the way

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 3>this sort of all came about was I'd written a

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 3>story about the global chief executive retiring Soe Kench and

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>then I started to hear about this guy Rupert Lee,

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>who was the global chief operating officer, heard that he

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 3>was leaving as well, and I'd planned to write a

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 3>story about it. But then last October one of the

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>international legal trade publications reported that not only was he

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 3>leaving the firm, Kingwood Mallison's was suing him for eight

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 3>million Hong Kong dollars, and so that sort of set

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>off all sorts of red flags.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So he started looking into Rupert Lee.

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it turned out that he got himself into

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit of legal and financial trouble. So obviously

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>there was some sort of falling out, and katiewm had

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 3>sued Rupert Lee for taking an eight million Hong Kong

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 3>doll alone from the Hong Kong partnership. So it got

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>to the points where we had to try and track

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>him down. By this time he'd left the firm, he

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>was sort of difficult to get in touch with. So

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 3>we sent someone around to his place in Hong Kong,

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 3>in quite a nice neighborhood on Hong Kong Islands, and

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>we dropped a list of questions under his door. A

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>few days went by and I managed to track down

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>a phone number and I gave him a call and

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 3>he said he'd received our questions and he was going

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to send me a response.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So before we delve into Rupert Lee's financial and legal

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>problems and how he responded to your questions, let's go

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>right back to the start. Why did Mallisons and King

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and Would decide to merge in the first place.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So Mallison's has always been one of the top firms

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 3>in Australia. It was founded almost two hundred years ago.

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Two of the current High Court bench did time at Mallison's.

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 3>There's sort of high profile business people and war directors

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 3>like Nicola Wakefield Evans for example. They're sort of smattering

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>of kind of conservative politicians that have come out of there.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 3>And so it's a place that if you go through

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>law school and you get a clerk shup at Mallison's,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 3>you're sort of set up for a good career if

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 3>you stay in the firm all through the connections you

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 3>get you can go on to arrange different careers in

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>the bar or in business. And so the context of

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the merger is about fifteen years ago a lot of

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Mallison's rivals in Australia were doing deals to tie up

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 3>with UK firms to add some sort of global element

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 3>to their business. So Free Hills, an Australian law firm,

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 3>did a tie up with Herbert Smith Allen's, one of

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 3>their big rivals with Link Leaders, a UK firm and

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Mallison's had tried the other few times but nothing really

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>came to pass, so they started to talk to China.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmm.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Chinese President Hu Jintao arrived at the White House to

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 5>an elaborate welcome ceremony. The two leaders spent most of

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 5>their time talking about the economy, both repeatedly uttering the word.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 6>Of the day cooperation, cooperation.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>And at this time China's economy was really booming and

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>it was the next big thing. Trade between Australia and

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>China was really expanding at a rapid base.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 6>Well it was because of the continuing demand from China,

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 6>largely that Australia's economy managed to fare better than most

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 6>developed countries during last year's global financial crisis.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 3>It was opening up its economy and everyone thought this

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>growth and liberalization would just continue as it was.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 7>The pilot Free Trade Zone allows foreign competitors' access to

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 7>China's highly protected services sector. The government is promising to

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 7>cut through the red tape for businesses opening here and

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 7>give investors tax benefits.

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 3>The merger was eventually done into the last few months

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 3>of the Hugean Taoer era, and there was a new leader, Xijimping,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 3>who was meant to continue on this liberalization.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 4>However, it is widely hoped that his new government will

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 4>take some drastically needed reforms in order to get the

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 4>country's economy back on track and to fight the ever

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 4>growing problem of corruption.

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I was actually in China at the time in twenty twelve,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and I remember that period. I remember the merger and

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone being so excited about it, and I also remember

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>writing stories about China at the time opening up not

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just economically but politically. Everyone expected political reforms from Sheeting Ping,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>So there was a lot of optimism at the time.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 3>And both firms saw a huge opportunity in this to

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 3>capitalize on that sentiment, and so the dually ended up

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 3>doing was with King and Wood, which is one of

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 3>the top Chinese firms that was set up in the

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 3>early nineties just as private law firms were first allowed

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>in China, and from the start it wanted to really

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>focus on doing international work and appealing to Western clients,

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>so its name is a great example. There was no

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 3>King no Wood. They were just emulating this ideal of

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>what an imagined kind of authoritative and well connected Western

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 3>law firm looks like. At the time they merged, there

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 3>were sort of roughly the same size between one hundred

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>and fifty two hundred partners, and now the Chinese partnership

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 3>is double the size of the Australian partnership. And there's

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 3>this great scene in a book that was written about

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the history of Kingwood Mallson's where these three senior Australian

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 3>partners get on a plane to Beijing and then they

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 3>turn up in their shirt sleeves and it's freezing cold,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>and they make their way to the Kingwood offices in

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>this big tall building in Beijing, and they greeted in

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 3>this huge boardroom. There's only three of them, and on

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the other side there's eleven Chinese partners and this guy

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 3>who was managing partner, as time Strooke Fuller, he leans

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 3>across to his colleagues and he says, you know, I

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 3>think we've undercooked this.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But despite the Mallison's delegation being completely out numbered, the

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>talks went well, the two firms did end up eventually merging.

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the deal, how did it actually work.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So the firm's structured as a Swiss Varian, which is

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 3>this sort of structure that's not uncommon in these big

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>international law firms, and it means that each member partnership

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 3>in each country is financially separate, so things go badly

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 3>in one part of the world, it doesn't bring the

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 3>rest of the firm down with it. So what's different

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 3>about Kingwood Mallison's is there's only three main partnerships as Australia,

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 3>China and Hong Kong, so that's a bit unique. But

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 3>despite that, it's intended to present to the world as

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 3>a single firm. It's pitched to clients as I think

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the line that uses where the top tier international firm

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 3>for Asia from Asia. So the merger presented heaps of

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>opportunities for the firm, but the different Australian and Chinese

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 3>attitudes in some cases to governance and risk also through

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 3>up lots of challenges.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 8>What are some of the challenges you've confronted in putting together.

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Such established firms from such different settings.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 8>Yes, we don't have long enough for all of the challenges.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 8>It's a classic question.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>In an interview about a decade ago then global managing

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>partners to it full set as much.

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 8>Right from the start of Kingwood and Mallisons, this concept

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 8>of merger of equals not a takeover of Australia of

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 8>China or China of Australia. Everybody has an equal voice.

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>But he stressed that the two firms still shared these

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>common values and the relationship was developing with speed and

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 3>everything was going to plan.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 8>I think every month and every year that goes by,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 8>people see the benefit of merging the firms.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 3>And so while this varian structure isolates risk, it also

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>has the effect of clouding visibility over each of the

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 3>partner firms, particularly in the Mallison's case, when you have

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>clients with big data protection of concerns, they want to

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 3>know that their data isn't going to be shared with

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese part of the firm, So you have to

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 3>erect these walls within the firm, which sort of compounds

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the existing walls between the partnerships. So that makes things

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 3>difficult to manage in some cases. So what it really

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>means is that while each partnership leverages the brand the

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 3>reputation and the international connections of KWM, in practice, little

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>knowledge or transparency over what each part of the firm

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 3>is working on. So I spoke to a bunch of

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>former partners and staff at KWM, some of whom were

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 3>really closely involved in the merger, some of whom were

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 3>there until quite recently, and they all said that there

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 3>was always an awareness that there were transparency issues in

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 3>the partnership. One former partner said they caught it within

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 3>the firm the Great Wall of China, which he took

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 3>to me, and the gap between what you understand is

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.479
<v Speaker 3>happening and what is actually happening in the Chinese partnership.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Another gave me an example. They were working with a

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.119
<v Speaker 3>major bank kill as a client and they had operations

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 3>in Australia, Hong Kong and China, but they just couldn't

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>find out which partner in the Chinese firm the client

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 3>was using, so in the end they had to go

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and ask the client directly. So I was clearly problems

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 3>with communication between the international elements and yeah, because of

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 3>all these cybersecurity concerns that clients had, there were big

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 3>internal boundaries erected between the partnerships. They were on completely

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 3>different document sharing systems. Even simple inform was difficult to

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 3>obtain and it really was an environment that was conducive

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 3>to any sort of corporation or collaboration and rupe.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>At least job as chief operating officer was to oversee

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that cooperation between the Australian and Chinese lawyers. But it

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like there was much going on. Max. When

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>did Lee's problems become a problem for KWM.

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it turns out that while he was global

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Chief operating Officer of the firm, which is quite a

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 3>big job, he was also had this whole range of

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 3>private business interests on the side, probably the most colorful

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 3>of which is this payments company, which got caught up

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>in China's gambling crackdown in twenty twenty one. One of

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 3>its employees was convicted for facilitating payments for an illegal

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>aligning casino run by Sun City Group, which is quite

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 3>well known in Australia for its junkets operation, which came

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 3>up in inquiries into Crown and Star casinos. He was

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 3>alleged to have been part of a group that helped

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 3>channel funds to the chair of relisted company the chair

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 3>was also his business partner in a separate business. In

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three, he gets this huge three hundred and

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 3>seventy million Hong Kong dollar money lenders claim from this mysterious,

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 3>small little lender in Kowloon. He says, nothing to worry

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 3>about there. Even if that is the case, it's sort

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 3>of a unusual thing for a global law firm executive

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to be caught up in. And then in February last year,

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>he gets this bankruptcy petitioned from a financial firm in

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong, and Rupert says Katoem actually helped him out

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 3>here and they even opened a file for him, helped him.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>He says, security settlement in this bankruptcy claim. Kingwood Mouson's

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Australia completely denies that, which is a bit unusual. And

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 3>the other unusual thing is that there's this just lack

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 3>of agreement between Rupert and KWM about how he actually

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 3>came to leave the firm. So KWM Australia says that

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 3>KWM China asked him to resign halfway through last year

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 3>because of I presume all these financial business issues which

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 3>are really piling up on top of each other Ruperts

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>said that he actually left of his own cord and

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that he was retained as a business consultant at the

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>firm until the end of last year, so there's a

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 3>bit of discordance between those two explanations. Naturally, all of

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 3>this made me want to look further into what he

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 3>was doing while I was still working for KIM, and

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 3>I discovered that in twenty seventeen he became the director

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 3>of this big state owned electricity company that was also

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 3>quite a major client to Kingwood Mouson's and about a

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>year before Lee joined the board of that firm, it

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>had brought into a wind farm project in Montenegro that

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 3>is now the subject of corruption investigations in three separate countries.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Max, we're talking about King and Wood Mallison's, the first

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ever Sino Australian law firm, which has been operating for

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>over a decade now. Your investigation has uncovered some real

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>governance challenges for the firm and these were highlighted in

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a wind farm deal which its lawyers advised on in Montenegro.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>As you said, the deal is now the subject of

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>corruption investigations in three separate countries. Tell us about the

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>deal and how KWM was involved.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So Kingwood Mallisons provided legal advice over the course

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.239
<v Speaker 3>of about three years for this wind farm project in Montenegro.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>It was a product of China's Belton Road initiative, which

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 3>was the signature foreign policy of jijimping. It provided huge

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 3>opportunities for legal work. So one of these projects took

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 3>KWM to Malta, which is a small island in the Mediterranean.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a European Union member country and it sort of

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>tried to leverage that to make its way in the world,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>tried to attract a lot of foreign investments through becoming

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>a haven for offshore companies. Now rupidly had become a

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 3>non executive director of this state owned company called shang

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Hi Electric Power in May twenty seventeen. It was a

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 3>longtime client of Kingwood Mallison's and his appointment came in

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the same month that he was appointed as its global

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 3>chief operating Officer. So Shanghi Electric was involved in a

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 3>range of deals in Southern Europe, including buying a third

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>of Malta's state owned energy company and a Malta which

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 3>was in a heap of debt at this point, and

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>so in twenty sixteen, which is about a year before

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Lee joins the board. Shanghai Electric brought the rights to

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 3>build this wind farm in Montenegro, which was done as

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a partnership with an A Malta. The law firm was

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 3>responsible for completing due diligence on the project. But the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 3>real problem with the deal was the price that Shanghai

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Electric paid for the wind farm. It forked out more

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 3>than three times of value that the wind farm had

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 3>garnered just a couple of months previously. And Kingwood Mallinson's

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>was the law firm responsible for drafting the contracts which

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 3>enabled that deal to go through. And there's never any

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>explanation about why that markup is paid. So Rupert Lee

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 3>is not alleged to have broken any rules, ought to

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 3>have been aware that the propriety of the deal had

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>been caught into question. He only became a director after

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 3>the price markup was paid, and he told me he

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 3>was unaware that cato IM had even acted on the deal.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So max, are the investigations chiefly about that markup in price?

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So there's three governments investigating the deal to try

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 3>and find out why the Montenegro and the Maltese and

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the Spanish governments are all in on it, and Europoles

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>involved as well. The allegations are that the price was

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 3>inflated and some of the money eventually found its way

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 3>to offshore accounts held by senior Maltese politicians, and it

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 3>was also controversial because of the involvement of this Maltese

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 3>casino entrepreneur and property developer named Jorgen Fenick. Jorgen Fennick

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 3>has been accused of all austrating the car bombing murder

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of an investigative journalist who was looking into the Missouri

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>wind farm deal.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Carojuana Galitzia was the country's best known investigative journalist. She

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>was killed on Monday in this car minutes after she

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 2>left her home in Malta.

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 3>And another equally suspected deal involving the same characters.

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 9>Galizia ran a popular blog in which she highlighted the

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 9>cases of suspected corruption in Malta. Once described as a

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 9>one woman WikiLeaks, she famously led the Panama Paper's investigation

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 9>into corruption in Malta.

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 3>And almost five million euros from the markup made its

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 3>way to companies controlled by Fenik, so Jorgan Fenik was

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>arrested on these charges related to the car bombing. In

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 3>late twenty nineteen.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Police have now arrested one of the country's most prominent

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 4>businessmen in connection to the case.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 8>Organ Fenek, was detained by armed officers after his yachts

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 8>was intercepted. As Walter's handling of the case has drawn

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 8>international criticism.

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>He was released on bail in January this year and

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 3>there's still no trial dates. Kingwood Mausons isn't alleged to

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 3>have broken any rules or to have been aware of

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the potential corruption, and a lot of it happens downstream

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 3>from its involvement, but I think it is something you'd

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 3>probably ask questions about you. Why are we writing in

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 3>this massive markup to this company no one's ever heard of?

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>But Kingwood Mallsons extends its relationship with Shanghai Electric and

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 3>the Montenegro Deal, continuing to act as its legal advisor,

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and in twenty eighteen it secures the financing for the

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 3>project to enable it to actually be constructed and go ahead.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>You also came across another example that exposed the different

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>approaches of the Australian and Chinese partnerships. How did a

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>KWM lawyer end up as a speaker at a contentious

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>legal conference in Saint Petersburg the year after Russia invaded Ukraine.

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 3>So the senior kater and partner Tian Wenjing, who also

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>worked on the Montenegro wind farm deal. In May twenty

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, she turns up at this big Saint Petersburg

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 3>legal conference, which is organized by the Russian Ministry of Justice.

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 3>So this wasn't just your run of the mill legal conference.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of boring panels about legal professional things,

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 3>but the sort of keynote speakers at this event were

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and the Russian former

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 3>president dmitriy Medvedev. There were political panels, including one which

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 3>is called the Russophobia twenty first century Nazism. Most gollingly,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>probably there was a panel which promoted the forced relocation

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 3>of Ukrainian orphans into Russia. This is the subject of

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 3>an international Criminal Court arrest warrant. That panel was headed

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>by two Russian cabinet ministers. Tian Wenjing she appeared on

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 3>two panels.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 2>It is my honor to talk about Chinese approach from

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a perspective of chalish.

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Lawyer alongside representatives of these major Russian state owners enterprises.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 6>I never could expect to witness such changes that were

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 6>observing currently.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 3>One of which was the United Shipbuilding Corporation, whose representative

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 3>was actually leading the panel.

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm very optimistic about the current situation Russia in now

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 6>is it undergoing the period of changes.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 3>This is the company which builds the majority of Russia's

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 3>naval fleet and it's sanctioned by the Australian government. Spoke

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>about opportunities arising from other global law firms exits from

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Russia and the growing market for Russian companies to arbitrate

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 3>disputes in Hong Kong and China. The program for one

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 3>of her panels referred to unfriendly countries such as Australia,

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>which were continuing to strengthen their sanctions policies against Russia

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 3>and Belarus. And a result of all the Western sanctions

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 3>on Russia, which has isolated from the global financial system

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 3>and then forced big Western companies to pull out of

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 3>the country. That's opened up a lot of opportunities for

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Chinese companies, and it's natural that Chinese lawyers would follow

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>that business. It's quite a lucrative source of business. But

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 3>this kind of shows the intensions at the heart of

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 3>this Kingwood Malson's relationship. On its Australian website, the firm

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 3>is advising clients on how to comply with Western sanctions

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 3>on Russia, including on its energy sector. On its Chinese website,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Tian co author and article with this chief executive of

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 3>a Russian energy plant company on how to actually invest

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 3>in the Russian energy sector, and this guy has eventually

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months later a sanctioned.

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>The very different approaches.

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, kind of acting at cross purposes and pulling in

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 3>very different directions.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So then a final question Max, can KWM continue as

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a Sino Australian firm or do these different approaches to

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>governance and risk management start to affect its brand and

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>reputation so much that it could force a rethink on

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the merger.

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 3>So this whole merger was based on on a bit

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 3>of a punt, which is a rare thing for law firms,

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 3>that China's growth was going to continue as it was,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 3>It's economy and politics was going to continue to liberalize,

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 3>but none of that came to pass. So the original

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of thesis for the merger isn't there anymore. But

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 3>even if the Australian Partnership wanted to leave the firm,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 3>there are a few things holding it back. So the

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong Partnership, which was the only actual combination between

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Australian and Chinese lawyers, has become a really profitable part

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 3>of the firm. And probably the most inconvenient thing is

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 3>that there's a sort of penalty clause in the merger agreement.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So if the Australian Partnership were to pull out, then

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 3>it would have to give up the Hong Kong Partnership,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 3>which is probably something it doesn't want to do. So

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 3>all of this, I think kind of shines a light

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 3>on law firm governance, which probably isn't the most exciting topic,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 3>but when you consider it in light of what's happened

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 3>to the big accounting and consulting firms who have the

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 3>same private partnership structure, law firms have really got out

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>of this whole post PEC tax leaks upheaval unscathed. Kingod

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Mallison's has no independent directors who might pull them up

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>and say, you know, hold on what deals were being

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 3>exposed to. Why is Rupert who's on our global board

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 3>borrowing eight million Hong Kong dollars from the firm, when's

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>he going to pay it back? And also they don't

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 3>publish accounts. There's no sort of transparency. Despite being a

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 3>global organization, as they say, having almost two hundred partners

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 3>in Australia, they'd be bringing in hundreds of millions of

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 3>dollars in revenue. But the end of the day, it's

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of a branding issue, all right. They advertise themselves

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 3>as this single global law firm will connect you with Asia,

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 3>where the law firm for Asia for the Asian century.

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 3>But also we have no idea what's going on in

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 3>our Chinese partnership, and the firm can't even speak as

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>one entity. I mean, when the going is good, it's

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Kingwood Mallisons, the global law firm. But when you start

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 3>to ask questions, it's where Kingwood Mallison's Australia, Kingwood Mallisons

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong and Kingwood Mallison's China. So I think that's

0:23:58.880 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 3>something that it has to deal with.

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Max, Thanks Lissen, Thank you for listening to The finn.

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa Murray with Financial Review reporter Maxim Shanahan joining

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast today. The Finn is produced by Alex Gau

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>with assistance from Mandy Coolan. Fiona Buffini is head of

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Premium Content. Our theme is by Alex Goo. If you

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>like the show and want to hear more, follow us

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, and consider rating and reviewing

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>us as it helps others find us. For more stories

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about markets, business and power, Subscribe to The Financial Review

0:24:53.480 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>at AFI dot com slash subscribe next week. The Australian

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Financial Review