WEBVTT - An AI bust is coming. But when? And who will be hit hardest?

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.080
<v S1>There's a battle brewing over which country will come out

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.680
<v S1>as the leader in AI, and the United States is

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.560
<v S1>betting the House economically that it will come out on top.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.280
<v S1>I'm Samantha Selinger Morse, and you're listening to The Morning

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:24.439
<v S1>Edition from The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald. Today,

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.760
<v S1>international and political editor Peter Hartcher on what previous infrastructure

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.320
<v S1>booms like the craze for building railways in the 1840s,

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.720
<v S1>or the.com boom of the 1990s, tells us where this

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.640
<v S1>will lead economically and which countries might be hit hardest

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:49.240
<v S1>in an AI bust. It's August the 6th. Peter, welcome

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:49.960
<v S1>back to the podcast.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:50.760
<v S2>Pleasure, Samantha.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.920
<v S1>Okay. I'm so looking forward to this because many of us,

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.240
<v S1>we think of AI, we think of maybe our mate

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.720
<v S1>who's using it to craft a wedding speech, or perhaps

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:01.960
<v S1>some of our friends who use it to, you know,

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.000
<v S1>cheat at uni on on essays. But you've pointed out

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:07.800
<v S1>in your most recent column, it's actually sort of the

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.880
<v S1>cornerstone or it will be of any country's given power.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.200
<v S1>So just remind us, how is that?

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.400
<v S2>Well, the threshold question really is, do you want to

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.760
<v S2>be a country in control of its own fate or

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.840
<v S2>a country that is at the whim of other countries

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.400
<v S2>that have greater technological advantage than you do? You could

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.560
<v S2>use a parallel going back to the times of imperialism

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.880
<v S2>and colonialism, the countries that had the technological edge of

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.039
<v S2>being part of the early part of the industrial revolution

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.440
<v S2>were the countries that took over all the other countries.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:45.759
<v S2>So AI is a new level of capability now, which

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.680
<v S2>will be not not all, but one of the distinguishing

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.960
<v S2>factors between countries that can control their own destiny and

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:56.600
<v S2>sovereignty and the countries that can't. That's the core proposition.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.960
<v S1>Okay. No small, no small thing. But there's also the potential,

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.720
<v S1>and you've written about this to unleash major chaos, right?

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.920
<v S1>Which as part of, I guess, your ability or a

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.760
<v S1>country's ability to take over possibly another country. So I

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.239
<v S1>guess tell us about that, whether in the context or not,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.200
<v S1>of maybe recent AI launches or just what the capacity

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.760
<v S1>is at the moment or what it will be.

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:24.520
<v S2>Yeah. Well, to create chaos, I mean, absolutely, countries can

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:29.000
<v S2>already do that using warfare, kinetic warfare. This is a

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.799
<v S2>new type of chaos. And we've had a we've had

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.200
<v S2>a fair flavor of it through. One example is cyber

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:43.200
<v S2>attacks and, you know, great outages, failures online. This AI

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:48.079
<v S2>takes this stuff to a new level. In fact, a

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.600
<v S2>couple of weeks ago, I quoted the former head of

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.760
<v S2>the Australian Signals Directorate, the. The ASD is a highly

0:02:54.760 --> 0:03:02.930
<v S2>sophisticated secret signals interception and Surveillance agency. It's, I suppose,

0:03:02.930 --> 0:03:07.610
<v S2>the equivalent of America's NSA, National Security Agency. Rachel Noble

0:03:07.610 --> 0:03:11.010
<v S2>Rachel said to me that, um, she said, this is

0:03:11.010 --> 0:03:16.290
<v S2>already totally, uh, operating in our systems. We're already completely

0:03:16.290 --> 0:03:22.130
<v S2>dependent on it. Everything from space, GPS, cyber security, she said,

0:03:22.169 --> 0:03:25.170
<v S2>for example, we're going to need it to defend against

0:03:25.210 --> 0:03:28.649
<v S2>other countries, she said. Already, we know ASD has put

0:03:28.650 --> 0:03:35.210
<v S2>out advisories that they have detected Chinese malware implanted throughout

0:03:35.530 --> 0:03:39.570
<v S2>critical infrastructure systems and sites in Australia. Very hard to

0:03:39.570 --> 0:03:44.210
<v S2>detect inactive. We need to be able better to to

0:03:44.250 --> 0:03:47.090
<v S2>track it. This is what she told me. And she

0:03:47.090 --> 0:03:50.730
<v S2>was a top signal spy for the country. And AI

0:03:50.770 --> 0:03:55.570
<v S2>gives China greater capacity to do more, uh, to potentially

0:03:55.570 --> 0:03:58.890
<v S2>disrupt other countries. And as Rachel Noble said, this malware

0:03:58.890 --> 0:04:02.970
<v S2>sits on your system until, the hostile state decides it's

0:04:02.970 --> 0:04:05.050
<v S2>the moment they want to activate it. Push the button

0:04:05.050 --> 0:04:07.330
<v S2>and knock out all your systems. She said. We need

0:04:07.330 --> 0:04:10.730
<v S2>a better capacity to detect it, and our enemies will

0:04:11.050 --> 0:04:14.890
<v S2>want a better capacity to inflict it. So it's really

0:04:14.890 --> 0:04:20.050
<v S2>basic nation state, uh, state on state warfare in a

0:04:20.050 --> 0:04:24.570
<v S2>new dimension. It's geopolitics by other means.

0:04:25.210 --> 0:04:27.890
<v S1>And we're already seeing it, I believe. There's been reports

0:04:27.890 --> 0:04:32.570
<v S1>that the United States military reportedly used Claude, I think

0:04:32.610 --> 0:04:35.250
<v S1>AI built by anthropic in the bombing of Iran and

0:04:35.250 --> 0:04:39.730
<v S1>before that, the Venezuela raid in January. So and further

0:04:39.730 --> 0:04:42.130
<v S1>to that, you've written that the US is betting its

0:04:42.130 --> 0:04:45.050
<v S1>economic house on AI. So what do you mean by that?

0:04:45.089 --> 0:04:50.250
<v S2>Yeah. Well, part one of your question, uh, a famous

0:04:50.250 --> 0:04:54.850
<v S2>professor of international relations, Hal Brands, has has written that

0:04:54.850 --> 0:04:59.650
<v S2>all wars are AI wars from now on. And already

0:04:59.690 --> 0:05:01.970
<v S2>we see examples, as you say. It doesn't mean that

0:05:01.970 --> 0:05:04.810
<v S2>because you have AI, you'll win the war. Like with

0:05:04.810 --> 0:05:07.290
<v S2>any type of power, you have to deploy it intelligently

0:05:07.290 --> 0:05:10.529
<v S2>in pursuit of a sound strategy. If you I mean,

0:05:10.570 --> 0:05:13.490
<v S2>take the case of the US, we've talked about this extensively,

0:05:13.490 --> 0:05:16.130
<v S2>but the US against Iran doesn't matter how much raw

0:05:16.130 --> 0:05:18.650
<v S2>power it has in pursuit of a stupid strategy, it

0:05:18.650 --> 0:05:21.290
<v S2>will fail. So you still need to have good strategy.

0:05:21.290 --> 0:05:26.050
<v S2>But if you have two countries with equal strategy and capability,

0:05:26.410 --> 0:05:29.050
<v S2>AI is a potential source of advantage in all countries,

0:05:29.050 --> 0:05:33.370
<v S2>of course, will want that advantage. As for the Americans

0:05:33.410 --> 0:05:36.650
<v S2>getting their economic house on AI, there's a few ways

0:05:36.650 --> 0:05:41.050
<v S2>you can slice this particular salami. One way is that

0:05:41.050 --> 0:05:45.330
<v S2>the huge surge of investment to set up the infrastructure

0:05:45.330 --> 0:05:49.370
<v S2>for this industry is responsible for, depending on the month, um,

0:05:49.529 --> 0:05:52.849
<v S2>most economic growth in the US or down to about

0:05:52.850 --> 0:05:55.610
<v S2>a third of economic growth in the US. So this

0:05:55.610 --> 0:05:58.010
<v S2>is just one industry. Just think of the size of

0:05:58.050 --> 0:06:01.210
<v S2>that economy and all the industries across the whole thing.

0:06:02.010 --> 0:06:05.610
<v S2>And this one sector is accounting for between a third

0:06:05.610 --> 0:06:09.890
<v S2>and and two thirds or more of US growth in

0:06:09.890 --> 0:06:13.609
<v S2>any given month or quarter. That's that's one dimension. Another

0:06:13.610 --> 0:06:17.170
<v S2>dimension is look at the stock market. And this is

0:06:17.170 --> 0:06:19.810
<v S2>where it gets out of control. So the the actual

0:06:19.850 --> 0:06:23.850
<v S2>hard investment in systems and data centers and chips and

0:06:23.850 --> 0:06:27.290
<v S2>all of that stuff. Four of the big American tech companies,

0:06:27.290 --> 0:06:31.810
<v S2>the so-called hyperscalers until this year, are estimated to have

0:06:31.810 --> 0:06:37.770
<v S2>spent or have disclosed investment of 1.1 trillion USD in

0:06:37.770 --> 0:06:44.089
<v S2>setting up their AI structures. Right. So that's Amazon, Google, meta, Microsoft,

0:06:44.529 --> 0:06:47.370
<v S2>and they're estimated to spend this year on top of

0:06:47.410 --> 0:06:51.770
<v S2>that 1.1 trillion. Another 745 billion USD. So that's just

0:06:51.970 --> 0:06:55.330
<v S2>just four of the companies just in in, you know,

0:06:55.330 --> 0:06:59.210
<v S2>up till today essentially to the end of this year. Uh,

0:06:59.450 --> 0:07:03.610
<v S2>but then looking beyond that, there are credible estimates that

0:07:03.610 --> 0:07:08.210
<v S2>the whole sector will spend $9 trillion in physical investment

0:07:08.210 --> 0:07:11.010
<v S2>in this sector over the next four years to 2030.

0:07:12.850 --> 0:07:16.290
<v S2>So to put that in perspective, total US annual GDP

0:07:16.290 --> 0:07:21.090
<v S2>is $30,000,000,000,009 trillion in investment in one sector. You can

0:07:21.090 --> 0:07:27.810
<v S2>see this is a huge new source of investment and activity.

0:07:28.010 --> 0:07:30.290
<v S2>But then so that's the physical investment. Then you get

0:07:30.290 --> 0:07:33.010
<v S2>to the stock market where all the speculation is going on.

0:07:33.010 --> 0:07:35.330
<v S2>And that's where it really gets out of control. The

0:07:35.330 --> 0:07:41.410
<v S2>market capitalization today, uh, it fluctuates, but, uh, today approximately

0:07:41.610 --> 0:07:45.010
<v S2>won't change that much in the next 24 hours of

0:07:45.010 --> 0:07:48.970
<v S2>all AI related companies on the US markets is 27

0:07:48.970 --> 0:07:54.210
<v S2>trillion USD, again compared to 30 trillion annual GDP. So

0:07:54.770 --> 0:07:58.489
<v S2>just the size of the market value of those companies

0:07:58.490 --> 0:08:01.260
<v S2>is roughly the size of the entire output of the

0:08:01.300 --> 0:08:05.780
<v S2>US economy in a given year. Now you could say, well,

0:08:05.820 --> 0:08:10.340
<v S2>isn't that good? That's impressive. Yeah, it's a huge transformative technology.

0:08:10.380 --> 0:08:13.900
<v S2>Why not put a lot of money into this? Well,

0:08:14.740 --> 0:08:18.500
<v S2>the problem, Samantha, is that this is a classic investment frenzy,

0:08:18.540 --> 0:08:19.100
<v S2>a boom.

0:08:19.980 --> 0:08:21.300
<v S1>And we know it follows a boom.

0:08:21.540 --> 0:08:24.700
<v S2>Yes, we do know what comes after a boom. Um,

0:08:25.100 --> 0:08:26.580
<v S2>also starts with the letter B.

0:08:26.620 --> 0:08:27.100
<v S1>Yeah.

0:08:27.220 --> 0:08:29.540
<v S2>Um, two ways of coming at this one. I'll read

0:08:29.700 --> 0:08:33.220
<v S2>from a paragraph from the Bank of International Settlements annual

0:08:33.220 --> 0:08:36.819
<v S2>report in June. The Bank of International Settlements is often

0:08:36.820 --> 0:08:39.939
<v S2>called the central Bank of Central Banks. It coordinates all

0:08:39.980 --> 0:08:42.420
<v S2>the central banks around the world. And they put out

0:08:42.420 --> 0:08:45.260
<v S2>an annual report on risks to the economy and as

0:08:45.260 --> 0:08:50.300
<v S2>well as prospects. Um, they talked about instructive parallels being

0:08:50.340 --> 0:08:53.700
<v S2>the canal mania of the 1830s, the British railway mania

0:08:53.700 --> 0:08:58.780
<v S2>in the 1840s, the electrification exuberance of the late 1920s,

0:08:59.140 --> 0:09:02.300
<v S2>and the.com boom of the late 1990s, they all shared

0:09:02.300 --> 0:09:08.059
<v S2>one common tray a genuine technological breakthrough that attracted capital

0:09:08.059 --> 0:09:12.060
<v S2>in excess of what commercial returns could ultimately justify. These

0:09:12.059 --> 0:09:16.140
<v S2>episodes ended with an eventual reversal in investment inducing, economy

0:09:16.179 --> 0:09:21.780
<v S2>wide recessions bust and the current Wall Street frenzy the

0:09:21.780 --> 0:09:26.740
<v S2>bank described as bearing resemblance to these precedents. So that's

0:09:26.740 --> 0:09:29.459
<v S2>that's one we have. This is a standard pattern. There

0:09:29.500 --> 0:09:33.540
<v S2>is a real technological breakthrough. But investors in the excitement

0:09:33.700 --> 0:09:36.100
<v S2>and shall we say, greed of wanting to get in

0:09:36.100 --> 0:09:39.380
<v S2>on the boom. Yeah. Go over the top. Invest way

0:09:39.380 --> 0:09:43.900
<v S2>more than the the actual underlying companies and technologies can

0:09:43.900 --> 0:09:47.580
<v S2>ultimately return. Yeah. And they go market collapses. And there's

0:09:47.580 --> 0:09:50.940
<v S2>so much wealth tied up as there is today in

0:09:50.940 --> 0:09:54.140
<v S2>those shares that when they crunch, it drags the whole

0:09:54.140 --> 0:09:57.700
<v S2>economy down. And as they've said, the most recent was

0:09:57.700 --> 0:10:01.820
<v S2>the.com boom from 1999 20, which we well remember. The

0:10:01.820 --> 0:10:03.580
<v S2>other way of looking at this is just to get

0:10:04.340 --> 0:10:11.220
<v S2>a gauge, I guess, a numerical indicator. The best I think,

0:10:11.260 --> 0:10:13.820
<v S2>and I wrote a book about the US, I. In fact,

0:10:13.820 --> 0:10:17.540
<v S2>I predicted the global financial crisis in a book I

0:10:17.540 --> 0:10:21.060
<v S2>wrote called Bubble Man about Alan Greenspan. My great crime, though,

0:10:21.059 --> 0:10:25.060
<v S2>Samantha was. I was two years early. Um, uh, but,

0:10:25.100 --> 0:10:28.700
<v S2>you know, um, that's worse to be.

0:10:28.740 --> 0:10:31.300
<v S1>Now, you know, keep all your good ideas. Just bank them. Yeah,

0:10:31.300 --> 0:10:32.940
<v S1>just thank them for a couple of years, and you'll.

0:10:32.940 --> 0:10:34.740
<v S2>Only push the button when you see it starting to crumble.

0:10:34.780 --> 0:10:35.500
<v S1>Yeah, exactly.

0:10:35.540 --> 0:10:40.660
<v S2>But, uh, this measure is market capitalization. So the total

0:10:40.660 --> 0:10:44.020
<v S2>value of shares on the market in this industry compared

0:10:44.020 --> 0:10:47.380
<v S2>to or the overall market, total stock market compared to

0:10:47.380 --> 0:10:54.460
<v S2>a country's GDP. Uh, historically, when you get significantly over 100%,

0:10:54.460 --> 0:10:58.300
<v S2>when the market capitalization is more than the total value

0:10:58.300 --> 0:11:02.660
<v S2>of the underlying economy in a given year. That's a

0:11:02.660 --> 0:11:05.340
<v S2>red zone territory where you can expect there's going to

0:11:05.340 --> 0:11:07.380
<v S2>be a bust. On the other side of it, in

0:11:07.380 --> 0:11:10.059
<v S2>the case of the.com boom, it got up to about

0:11:10.100 --> 0:11:15.540
<v S2>140 150% of GDP. Wow. Um, at the moment, with

0:11:15.540 --> 0:11:19.939
<v S2>the AI frenzy in Wall Street, it's up above 200%

0:11:19.940 --> 0:11:22.860
<v S2>of GDP. So this is really out of whack.

0:11:23.300 --> 0:11:25.700
<v S1>Uh, it's currently at two. Wow.

0:11:25.740 --> 0:11:30.540
<v S2>Yeah. Okay. So there's 27. Is the AI related stocks

0:11:30.540 --> 0:11:34.820
<v S2>alone $27 trillion worth. But if you take the whole market, uh,

0:11:34.860 --> 0:11:38.140
<v S2>covering all US industries, and that's, that's the comparative measure

0:11:38.140 --> 0:11:42.580
<v S2>that I'm using, it's well over 200% of GDP. So

0:11:42.580 --> 0:11:47.100
<v S2>by historical standards, in recent centuries, this is a whopper. Uh,

0:11:47.100 --> 0:11:50.020
<v S2>and as you say, with a boom, the bigger the boom,

0:11:50.020 --> 0:11:53.420
<v S2>the bigger the bust. Timing is the tricky part, but

0:11:53.420 --> 0:11:57.020
<v S2>it will bust. So, uh, there are a couple of

0:11:57.020 --> 0:12:00.949
<v S2>the ways in which you can not only see the

0:12:01.270 --> 0:12:05.590
<v S2>the patterns, but you can see the dimensions and hence

0:12:05.910 --> 0:12:08.910
<v S2>the original phrase you use. The US is betting the house.

0:12:08.950 --> 0:12:09.350
<v S1>Right.

0:12:09.390 --> 0:12:10.069
<v S2>On AI.

0:12:11.790 --> 0:12:12.750
<v S1>After the break.

0:12:13.150 --> 0:12:16.150
<v S2>If you're in a competitive market, you can't afford to

0:12:16.470 --> 0:12:19.630
<v S2>be charging way more than your competitor. I mean, look

0:12:19.670 --> 0:12:22.870
<v S2>at what the Chinese system has done with electric vehicles,

0:12:22.870 --> 0:12:24.950
<v S2>where they now command 60% of the world market and

0:12:24.950 --> 0:12:26.150
<v S2>the Americans are being crushed.

0:12:34.429 --> 0:12:36.590
<v S1>Okay. So you know how I love to ask you

0:12:36.590 --> 0:12:39.150
<v S1>to pull out your crystal ball. So does any of this.

0:12:39.150 --> 0:12:41.870
<v S1>And the precedence, does any of this suggest when this

0:12:41.870 --> 0:12:44.590
<v S1>AI bust might be coming for all of us?

0:12:45.750 --> 0:12:49.270
<v S2>Well, uh, I'll just dust off the crystal.

0:12:49.309 --> 0:12:49.790
<v S3>Yeah, exactly.

0:12:49.830 --> 0:12:50.350
<v S2>It's gone very.

0:12:50.350 --> 0:12:51.270
<v S3>Foggy. Yeah, yeah.

0:12:51.510 --> 0:12:54.069
<v S2>Well, there's a famous quote from John Maynard Keynes, the

0:12:54.070 --> 0:13:01.470
<v S2>noted British economist, who said that markets can remain irrational

0:13:01.470 --> 0:13:05.110
<v S2>longer than you can stay solvent. In other words.

0:13:06.190 --> 0:13:07.189
<v S1>Just trying to tease that out.

0:13:07.190 --> 0:13:07.390
<v S3>Yeah.

0:13:07.429 --> 0:13:10.470
<v S2>In other words, bull markets run longer than anybody expects.

0:13:10.510 --> 0:13:10.950
<v S1>Okay.

0:13:11.070 --> 0:13:15.030
<v S2>So who knows. But this is a well advanced bull market.

0:13:15.030 --> 0:13:17.710
<v S2>We saw it take a hit. It was a big scare.

0:13:17.710 --> 0:13:21.110
<v S2>Big shudder. A couple of weeks ago. Hit the Korean market,

0:13:21.110 --> 0:13:25.390
<v S2>hit the US market and had reverberations around the world.

0:13:25.830 --> 0:13:29.350
<v S2>It could happen at any time. You need a displacement event.

0:13:29.390 --> 0:13:32.790
<v S2>A displacement event can be any shock that changes. The

0:13:32.790 --> 0:13:36.350
<v S2>outlook can be a change in official interest rates. Monetary

0:13:36.350 --> 0:13:39.469
<v S2>policy right. It can be an investment shock or it

0:13:39.470 --> 0:13:42.030
<v S2>can be a shock from a competitor, let's say China.

0:13:42.030 --> 0:13:44.309
<v S1>Well, this is what I wanted to ask you about

0:13:44.309 --> 0:13:47.910
<v S1>because if the US is betting its house economically speaking

0:13:48.110 --> 0:13:50.990
<v S1>on AI, I guess tell us what's happening with China

0:13:51.030 --> 0:13:54.390
<v S1>because there's really a battle now, right? It's really China

0:13:54.390 --> 0:13:56.190
<v S1>versus the USA in terms of who's going to come

0:13:56.230 --> 0:13:58.790
<v S1>out on top in terms of AI capability and infrastructure

0:13:58.790 --> 0:14:01.710
<v S1>and so forth. So tell us how China is doing then.

0:14:01.750 --> 0:14:03.030
<v S1>Are they also betting the House?

0:14:03.150 --> 0:14:07.750
<v S2>Well, the orthodoxy until early last year was that the

0:14:07.750 --> 0:14:11.110
<v S2>US was years ahead of everybody, including Chinese friends.

0:14:11.150 --> 0:14:11.630
<v S3>Yes.

0:14:12.110 --> 0:14:15.030
<v S2>And then early last year, there was the so-called deep

0:14:15.070 --> 0:14:18.750
<v S2>seek shock, deep seek being the Chinese company that produced

0:14:18.790 --> 0:14:23.550
<v S2>a new AI model, which was, uh, at the same

0:14:23.550 --> 0:14:27.510
<v S2>or similar level to frontier models in the US, just

0:14:27.510 --> 0:14:32.990
<v S2>as capable. Yeah. But had two advantages. One much cheaper.

0:14:33.310 --> 0:14:36.350
<v S2>It had been developed at a cost of about 8%

0:14:36.430 --> 0:14:40.550
<v S2>of the ChatGPT equivalent that it was compared with, and

0:14:40.590 --> 0:14:44.990
<v S2>used far fewer chips. And like all the Chinese models

0:14:44.990 --> 0:14:49.150
<v S2>coming onto the market, its so-called open weight versus the

0:14:49.150 --> 0:14:52.230
<v S2>US ones, which are all closed systems, open weight simply

0:14:52.230 --> 0:14:55.630
<v S2>means you can anyone can download these models and you

0:14:55.630 --> 0:14:57.710
<v S2>can tinker with them. You can customize them according to

0:14:57.710 --> 0:15:01.190
<v S2>your own company's needs or institutions needs or whatever it is.

0:15:01.510 --> 0:15:05.950
<v S2>The American proprietary systems are all tightly locked and closely guarded,

0:15:06.630 --> 0:15:10.990
<v S2>and that rattled everybody. But pretty soon the juggernaut on

0:15:10.990 --> 0:15:16.950
<v S2>Wall Street resumed. Just overlooked that. But it's happened repeatedly now,

0:15:16.950 --> 0:15:19.910
<v S2>and the latest one was just two weeks ago, when

0:15:19.910 --> 0:15:24.030
<v S2>a company called moonshot produced its new model, Kimmy three,

0:15:24.430 --> 0:15:27.470
<v S2>which again, was right up there in the top, uh,

0:15:27.510 --> 0:15:31.110
<v S2>comparable with the top 2 or 3 most advanced and

0:15:31.110 --> 0:15:35.510
<v S2>most expensive US models. But the advantage of the Chinese

0:15:36.390 --> 0:15:39.830
<v S2>offering of Kimmy three is that you could operate it

0:15:39.830 --> 0:15:43.670
<v S2>at one third the cost, and it's open weight, so

0:15:43.670 --> 0:15:46.550
<v S2>you can model it to suit yourself. So this gave

0:15:46.550 --> 0:15:49.390
<v S2>the market a big shock. Uh, Wall Street took a

0:15:49.430 --> 0:15:52.190
<v S2>hit again, but it only took a couple of days.

0:15:52.190 --> 0:15:54.550
<v S2>There was some strong earnings results from the big American

0:15:54.550 --> 0:15:57.790
<v S2>tech companies. And the market said, oh, let's just get

0:15:57.830 --> 0:15:59.710
<v S2>on with this. We're in the middle of the Bulls

0:15:59.790 --> 0:16:02.150
<v S2>are running. Let's just keep running. And they did. And

0:16:02.150 --> 0:16:04.430
<v S2>so the market recovered and will and will continue for

0:16:04.430 --> 0:16:10.590
<v S2>a while. But this is a really important moment because

0:16:10.590 --> 0:16:14.390
<v S2>it shows that the the Chinese system, first of all,

0:16:14.390 --> 0:16:17.950
<v S2>is capable of producing not just 1 or 2. There

0:16:17.950 --> 0:16:21.550
<v S2>have been multiple of these companies now, AI startups that

0:16:21.550 --> 0:16:26.550
<v S2>are capable of producing top notch competitive AI models that

0:16:26.550 --> 0:16:29.950
<v S2>cost a fraction, a small fraction of what the US

0:16:30.390 --> 0:16:33.990
<v S2>companies are producing. Now. If you're in a competitive market,

0:16:33.990 --> 0:16:38.790
<v S2>you can't afford to be charging way more than your competitor.

0:16:38.830 --> 0:16:41.270
<v S2>I mean, look at what the Chinese system has done

0:16:41.270 --> 0:16:44.310
<v S2>with electric vehicles, where they now command 60% of the

0:16:44.310 --> 0:16:47.390
<v S2>world market and the Americans are being crushed. Look at

0:16:47.390 --> 0:16:52.910
<v S2>the next one, which is humanoid robotics, where Musk. Elon

0:16:52.910 --> 0:16:55.790
<v S2>Musk has been bragging about how he's going to produce

0:16:55.790 --> 0:16:58.550
<v S2>this great robot. They're still struggling to get it into production.

0:16:58.550 --> 0:17:02.840
<v S2>The Chinese, in the meantime, I've got 180 manufacturers already

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.280
<v S2>selling humanoid robots. Fully functional on the global market. More

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:10.399
<v S2>than 300 models and last year accounted for 90% of

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:16.480
<v S2>the global market. Because quality is good, price is cheaper. EVs.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.600
<v S2>Humanoid robots are. Now we're going to see this play

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.080
<v S2>out in AI.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.840
<v S1>So essentially what you're saying is the American AI market

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:25.760
<v S1>is is it inevitable then. Are we at that point

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.199
<v S1>where it's inevitable that the AI market in America and

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.560
<v S1>elsewhere is just going to be crushed by the Chinese

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:31.080
<v S1>AI market?

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.439
<v S2>It's not inevitable. And Lord knows this is this is

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.359
<v S2>frontier stuff on the technological frontier. So anything can happen.

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:38.920
<v S3>Right.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.120
<v S2>But if you if you were a betting person, you

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.719
<v S2>would look at, for example, the technological tracker maintained by Aspi,

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:51.359
<v S2>the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, which is an internationally recognised benchmark,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.720
<v S2>where they say of the I think it's 64 technologies.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.120
<v S2>They rate as critical advanced technologies in the world today. Yeah.

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.600
<v S2>China is leading the US in 59 of those, nearly

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:07.240
<v S2>all of them. And the Chinese technological momentum is surging

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.119
<v S2>and carrying the Chinese systems to the fore in almost

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:17.359
<v S2>every sector. So the the pattern and the momentum is

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:22.960
<v S2>distinctly with China to catch up to or surpass the

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:27.800
<v S2>US in various multiple almost all technological fields. This is

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.240
<v S2>why it's on the cusp with AI now on the

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.680
<v S2>cusp of seeing which way this goes. So we've talked

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.000
<v S2>about the massive investments in the trillions of dollars that

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:42.960
<v S2>the US companies are making. Last year, according to Stanford University,

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.800
<v S2>they have a lab that monitors all things AI. According

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:51.560
<v S2>to them, Chinese private sector investment in AI last year

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.560
<v S2>was just 12 billion USD 12 billion. At the same time,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:19:00.280
<v S2>each of the major US companies is spending many multiples

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.000
<v S2>of that, each one of them spending in collectively trillions

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.560
<v S2>against 12 billion. No wonder the Chinese can charge lower

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.440
<v S2>prices because they have lower capital outlays. So this contrast

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.480
<v S2>is striking. And it's increasing. And we'll see where it goes.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.520
<v S1>Okay. So if everyone though is partaking in this AI

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.800
<v S1>boom and therefore a bust is headed presumably at some point,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.040
<v S1>possibly even a recession, does that mean that China would

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.920
<v S1>be slightly insulated from that? Like if it's spending way

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.320
<v S1>less than, say, everybody else is, or in particular the

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.199
<v S1>US is? Might it be less vulnerable to a bust

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.959
<v S1>or a recession than, say, America or even us?

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.119
<v S2>Exactly right. It's it's a really important point, because if

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.040
<v S2>you're only spending that much. So while the Wall Street

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.600
<v S2>companies have got AI companies and related to AI companies

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.600
<v S2>have got capitalization of 27 trillion outstanding in the marketplace,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.879
<v S2>the Chinese equivalent is about 4 trillion. So, you know,

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.119
<v S2>the US crash has got that much to fall. The

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.160
<v S2>Chinese crash has only got that much to fall. We

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v S2>head into this phase with the US having bet the

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.359
<v S2>House on AI, whereas China has just bet maybe a

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.119
<v S2>couple of the bedrooms, right?

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.439
<v S1>Okay, well, I wanted to I guess just to wrap up, Peter,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:15.040
<v S1>I wanted to talk about, I guess, what's happening more immediately, perhaps, uh,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.520
<v S1>in things that threat, perhaps the American market and beyond.

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.280
<v S1>Because of course, Donald Trump still has two and a

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.520
<v S1>half years left of his presidency. So his economic stewardship

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.080
<v S1>will be around for a while.

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:26.480
<v S3>But I'm sure.

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:27.320
<v S2>It'll pass in a.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:27.639
<v S3>Breeze.

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.639
<v S1>Oh that's right. Yeah, I'm sure it'll be effortless for

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.560
<v S1>everybody involved. But he is struggling right now, isn't he,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.240
<v S1>to rein in the economic chaos that he has arguably

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.760
<v S1>unleashed with this war with Iran? The chaos sort of

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.639
<v S1>comes and goes. The market reacts, goes up and down,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.040
<v S1>depending on what's happening with the Strait of Hormuz. So

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.159
<v S1>I guess just tell us the latest. Is Trump any

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.200
<v S1>way to inking a deal with Iran that will convince

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.760
<v S1>the Iranians to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and not

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.200
<v S1>impose shipping fees for entrance, because that's sort of been

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:58.679
<v S1>the long running. I mean, it's been going for a

0:20:58.720 --> 0:20:59.200
<v S1>while now.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:20:59.560
<v S3>Yes.

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.320
<v S1>And it's the markets don't like it.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:01.560
<v S3>Yes.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:02.920
<v S2>We've seen this two step dance.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:03.240
<v S3>Yes.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:04.320
<v S2>Well, nobody really likes it.

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:05.000
<v S3>No one likes it.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:10.119
<v S2>Everybody would like to have a predictable supply of oil, fertilizer, hydrogen,

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.679
<v S2>all the other things that flow through the Strait of Hormuz.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.280
<v S2>But we've seen this two step dance from Trump many times.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.119
<v S2>And one day it's going to be he's going to

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.040
<v S2>end their civilization the next day. They're great friends and

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:22.000
<v S2>and smart people.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:22.680
<v S3>That's right.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.560
<v S2>Um, so yesterday it was going to be the biggest

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.800
<v S2>attack since World War Two. He was about to launch

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.399
<v S2>on Iran. Right. And then today, not only does he

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.760
<v S2>say they're negotiating, but Scott Bessent, his Treasury secretary in

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.320
<v S2>the last few hours, has said that a deal is imminent.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.640
<v S2>At the same time, however, the Iranians are saying there

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.040
<v S2>is no negotiation whatsoever.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.600
<v S3>That's right. So take your pick.

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.280
<v S1>And then on Monday, I think Trump was saying all

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:50.959
<v S1>they do is make me angry. They just make me

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.320
<v S1>more angry. I think he was saying that the Iranians

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.560
<v S1>were unbelievably duplicitous. But apparently Scott thinks things are going great. So.

0:21:59.290 --> 0:22:00.929
<v S2>Well, Scott thinks it's going well. And of course, the

0:22:00.930 --> 0:22:03.250
<v S2>Iranians have a different view because they say that twice

0:22:03.250 --> 0:22:06.210
<v S2>now where the US has commenced attacks on Iran last

0:22:06.210 --> 0:22:08.530
<v S2>year and then again this year, they were in the

0:22:08.530 --> 0:22:11.050
<v S2>middle of negotiations with the US across the table at

0:22:11.050 --> 0:22:15.010
<v S2>the time the Americans launched hostilities. So they would see

0:22:15.010 --> 0:22:18.530
<v S2>the duplicity coming from the other side. Yes, but look, both.

0:22:18.570 --> 0:22:22.250
<v S2>They've both got themselves in this Gordian knot of antagonism

0:22:22.250 --> 0:22:28.330
<v S2>and distrust. And it's it's impossible to know how and

0:22:28.330 --> 0:22:32.290
<v S2>when that will ultimately resolve. So we'll come back next

0:22:32.290 --> 0:22:33.850
<v S2>week and we'll have another look.

0:22:34.010 --> 0:22:36.970
<v S1>That's right. Well, thanks, Peter, as always for your time.

0:22:37.290 --> 0:22:38.609
<v S2>Pleasure to chat with you, Samantha.

0:22:43.730 --> 0:22:47.450
<v S1>In other news today, experts say concerns about recent buyers

0:22:47.450 --> 0:22:51.010
<v S1>going into negative equity in the current downturn are overblown.

0:22:51.210 --> 0:22:54.330
<v S1>With less than 1% of home owners in negative equity

0:22:54.330 --> 0:22:59.010
<v S1>across Australia, AI could deliver the national economy a desperately

0:22:59.090 --> 0:23:04.169
<v S1>needed productivity boost worth almost $120 billion, and support the

0:23:04.170 --> 0:23:07.810
<v S1>creation of tens of thousands of jobs, according to nation

0:23:07.810 --> 0:23:12.409
<v S1>leading analysis of the burgeoning boom. And former international English

0:23:12.410 --> 0:23:16.450
<v S1>cricketer Ben Stokes believes that cricket's relationship with alcohol has

0:23:16.450 --> 0:23:19.290
<v S1>not moved on as the game has become more professional,

0:23:19.290 --> 0:23:22.129
<v S1>but denied that the England team he captained for around

0:23:22.130 --> 0:23:27.850
<v S1>four years had a drinking problem. You can read more@theage.com.au

0:23:28.010 --> 0:23:36.570
<v S1>or smh.com.au. Today's episode was produced by Kai Wong. Our

0:23:36.570 --> 0:23:40.210
<v S1>executive producer is Tammy Mills, and our podcasts are overseen

0:23:40.210 --> 0:23:44.210
<v S1>by Lisa Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. If you like our show,

0:23:44.210 --> 0:23:46.810
<v S1>follow The Morning Edition and leave a review for us

0:23:46.850 --> 0:23:49.889
<v S1>on Apple or Spotify. Thanks for listening.