WEBVTT - The Sydney Swans sexual assault allegations

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.200
<v S1>Another scandal involving an alleged sexual assault has erupted in

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.639
<v S1>the AFL. This time, a number of players from the

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.039
<v S1>Sydney Swans football team have been spoken to by police

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.360
<v S1>after an alleged incident occurred in the early hours of

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.120
<v S1>Monday morning. I'm Samantha Selinger Morris and you're listening to

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.599
<v S1>The Morning Edition from The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald. Today,

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.920
<v S1>The Age's chief AFL writer Jake Niall on what we

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.800
<v S1>know now. And just a note, this masthead is not

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.519
<v S1>suggesting the players are under investigation by police, just that

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:41.519
<v S1>they are assisting with their inquiries. Welcome, Jake, to the podcast.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.000
<v S2>Oh thanks, Samantha.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.519
<v S1>Now, Jake, we're recording this on Tuesday afternoon, so can

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.040
<v S1>you just tell us what you know so far about

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.159
<v S1>how this incident has unfolded?

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:57.280
<v S2>Well, the Sydney Swans played against Essendon on Sunday. Late

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.600
<v S2>late game. By the time I get back to you know,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.680
<v S2>you leave the bus from the ground. You're looking at,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:07.270
<v S2>you know, after 8:00. Some of the players have gone out,

0:01:07.750 --> 0:01:11.709
<v S2>and there's a group of five players that have stayed

0:01:11.709 --> 0:01:15.230
<v S2>behind as a result of an incident that, uh, police

0:01:15.230 --> 0:01:17.150
<v S2>are investigating at the hotel room.

0:01:17.190 --> 0:01:20.709
<v S3>Good afternoon. The Sydney Swans are today in turmoil, the

0:01:20.709 --> 0:01:24.789
<v S3>club confirming several players are embroiled in an alleged incident

0:01:24.790 --> 0:01:28.510
<v S3>as Victoria Police investigates reports of a sexual assault at

0:01:28.510 --> 0:01:29.390
<v S3>a Melbourne hotel.

0:01:29.430 --> 0:01:34.910
<v S2>Police swarmed the hotel room on Monday morning and they

0:01:35.069 --> 0:01:39.150
<v S2>took CCTV and people in. The people in the hotel

0:01:39.190 --> 0:01:40.390
<v S2>obviously have been spoken to.

0:01:40.430 --> 0:01:42.630
<v S4>In the early hours of this morning. Police will allege

0:01:42.630 --> 0:01:45.990
<v S4>this sexual assault case has occurred at the Pullman Hotel

0:01:45.990 --> 0:01:49.350
<v S4>in Melbourne, which is where the Swans were staying. We

0:01:49.350 --> 0:01:51.390
<v S4>had uniformed and plainclothes.

0:01:51.390 --> 0:01:54.310
<v S5>Police go in and out of the Pullman Hotel yesterday.

0:01:54.750 --> 0:01:58.870
<v S6>We're extremely shocked and disappointed that this has taken place

0:01:58.870 --> 0:02:02.390
<v S6>and that the players have found themselves in this situation.

0:02:02.430 --> 0:02:04.550
<v S6>Given it's a police matter right now, that is all

0:02:04.590 --> 0:02:05.550
<v S6>that we can say.

0:02:05.990 --> 0:02:11.370
<v S7>Yeah, obviously extremely disappointed with what's happened and understand the questions.

0:02:11.370 --> 0:02:15.250
<v S7>And we'll update as we as we gather more information.

0:02:15.810 --> 0:02:18.489
<v S2>We've named four of the players and two of them

0:02:18.490 --> 0:02:24.170
<v S2>are star players in Isaac Heeney and, uh, Chad Warner. Uh,

0:02:24.330 --> 0:02:28.970
<v S2>and there's also James Jordan and Riley Vice. The players

0:02:28.970 --> 0:02:33.090
<v S2>have not been formally interviewed by the police. But of course,

0:02:33.090 --> 0:02:37.530
<v S2>in an investigation of this type, Sam, the police have

0:02:37.530 --> 0:02:40.169
<v S2>to look at have to get the information first from

0:02:40.210 --> 0:02:43.730
<v S2>those making the allegations before they do formal interviews of

0:02:43.730 --> 0:02:47.130
<v S2>record with players, either whether that's as there's an allegation

0:02:47.130 --> 0:02:50.330
<v S2>against one of one or more of them or as witnesses.

0:02:50.330 --> 0:02:53.770
<v S2>And as it stands now, um, the players, it's all

0:02:53.770 --> 0:02:56.210
<v S2>but certain that they won't be playing on the weekend.

0:02:56.850 --> 0:03:00.210
<v S2>Um and that there'll be some sort of um punitive

0:03:00.210 --> 0:03:04.690
<v S2>action taken not because of what they've allegedly done or

0:03:04.690 --> 0:03:06.530
<v S2>not done, but I haven't got to that stage yet

0:03:06.530 --> 0:03:10.880
<v S2>in the process. The AFL doesn't step in to criminal investigations.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.040
<v S2>It lets that take its course. But they can be

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.640
<v S2>suspended for getting themselves into that position by the club

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:19.440
<v S2>and the league.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:23.120
<v S1>Okay. And you mentioned that police have spoken to five

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.040
<v S1>players of the Sydney Swans. We've named four of those players.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.000
<v S1>Why at this point hasn't the fifth player been named?

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.040
<v S2>Well, the fifth player there's pushback from a representative of

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.360
<v S2>the of the fifth player to say that he wasn't

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:41.920
<v S2>involved now. Um I can't at this point answer that

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.280
<v S2>you know accurately what to say accurately with full, you know,

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.480
<v S2>with with the full facts of that. There's a lot

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.240
<v S2>of there's a lot of question marks over what is

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:56.680
<v S2>actually occurred. And there's obviously the interest in this as

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.680
<v S2>a story is it's one of the biggest stories you'd

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.720
<v S2>find in the AFL. Um, and it will have huge

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.960
<v S2>bearing on, you know, the final series on all sorts

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.760
<v S2>of things, the reputation of the Swans, the individual's careers.

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.760
<v S2>It's got a lot of potential fallouts. Then again, we

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.339
<v S2>we don't know enough about the incident, right. Except that

0:04:16.339 --> 0:04:20.180
<v S2>the there's a there's a sexual assault allegation.

0:04:21.180 --> 0:04:24.339
<v S1>And so who has actually been talking about the allegations

0:04:24.339 --> 0:04:27.180
<v S1>since the reporting emerged on Monday? I mean, have we

0:04:27.180 --> 0:04:30.580
<v S1>heard from the alleged victim? And what about the AFL

0:04:30.580 --> 0:04:31.820
<v S1>and the club's leadership?

0:04:31.860 --> 0:04:36.539
<v S2>Well, Matthew Pavelich, the club CEO, he he fronted a

0:04:36.700 --> 0:04:39.380
<v S2>media conference yesterday, but he really just read a statement

0:04:39.380 --> 0:04:42.779
<v S2>and didn't answer any questions. Uh, and then the coach,

0:04:42.820 --> 0:04:46.540
<v S2>Dean Cox, and they both expressed disappointment was the one

0:04:46.540 --> 0:04:48.620
<v S2>of the one of the words used that was Matthew Pavelich,

0:04:48.620 --> 0:04:51.820
<v S2>the CEO is a former champion player at Fremantle. Um,

0:04:51.860 --> 0:04:53.659
<v S2>and a, you know, a figure of renown in the

0:04:53.660 --> 0:04:56.420
<v S2>game of, you know, an absolute great of the game. Uh,

0:04:56.540 --> 0:05:00.620
<v S2>and Dean Cox, the coach, um, he, he, he would

0:05:00.620 --> 0:05:03.180
<v S2>feel this very personally. My understanding from what I've been

0:05:03.180 --> 0:05:05.779
<v S2>told is the swans are the words that were used were,

0:05:05.779 --> 0:05:10.380
<v S2>are filthy with, with the players getting themselves into this position. They,

0:05:10.420 --> 0:05:14.500
<v S2>of course, will be caught between defending their own values,

0:05:14.500 --> 0:05:18.969
<v S2>their own reputations, their own brand, and at the same time, um,

0:05:19.010 --> 0:05:24.170
<v S2>making sure the players are held accountable. But the players

0:05:24.170 --> 0:05:27.290
<v S2>are valuable assets for the club. It's always a very

0:05:27.290 --> 0:05:30.810
<v S2>tricky situation. And this is why the AFL will step

0:05:30.810 --> 0:05:33.250
<v S2>in and the AFL's got to be involved. They're not

0:05:33.250 --> 0:05:36.650
<v S2>talking directly to the players but they are dealing with

0:05:36.650 --> 0:05:39.930
<v S2>the Swans officials. Tom Harley, who's a senior figure at

0:05:39.970 --> 0:05:42.050
<v S2>uh at the AFL, he's basically the two I see.

0:05:42.490 --> 0:05:46.729
<v S2>He was the club CEO for only what, a year ago? So, uh,

0:05:46.770 --> 0:05:49.010
<v S2>you know, so he'll be he'll be doing he'll be

0:05:49.050 --> 0:05:52.010
<v S2>he's involved in that. Um, and of course the club,

0:05:52.050 --> 0:05:55.090
<v S2>the AFL CEO Andrew Dillon. I mean, the buck stops

0:05:55.089 --> 0:05:57.290
<v S2>with him when it's something this serious. He was the

0:05:57.290 --> 0:06:00.810
<v S2>former legal counsel of the AFL. He's a lawyer. He's

0:06:00.810 --> 0:06:02.450
<v S2>right on top of it. And there's a number of

0:06:02.450 --> 0:06:04.810
<v S2>other people. The integrity unit, the AFL have their own

0:06:04.810 --> 0:06:08.130
<v S2>integrity unit to deal with matters, but they can't. The

0:06:08.170 --> 0:06:12.170
<v S2>AFL can't get interfere with police processes. So this will

0:06:12.170 --> 0:06:15.610
<v S2>play out through the police before the AFL, uh, deals

0:06:15.610 --> 0:06:18.030
<v S2>fully with it. It would be would be my understanding

0:06:18.029 --> 0:06:20.150
<v S2>of how it works. And that's over a lot of

0:06:20.150 --> 0:06:23.150
<v S2>these cases that I've seen, regrettably. Samantha. Too many.

0:06:23.589 --> 0:06:26.270
<v S1>And so what's happened to the players in this particular instance? Like,

0:06:26.310 --> 0:06:29.950
<v S1>have they been stood down officially or suspended from the

0:06:29.950 --> 0:06:32.150
<v S1>game while this investigation takes place?

0:06:32.270 --> 0:06:34.830
<v S2>Well, they some of them didn't attend training, I gather,

0:06:34.830 --> 0:06:37.349
<v S2>but um, I would be staggered. I think they won't

0:06:37.350 --> 0:06:40.510
<v S2>play this weekend. They're just I just don't see that happening.

0:06:40.790 --> 0:06:44.190
<v S2>And very likely they'll be uh, they'll be suspended by

0:06:44.190 --> 0:06:46.310
<v S2>the club slash AFL. I think the AFL and the

0:06:46.310 --> 0:06:48.590
<v S2>club will come to some sort of almost an agreement.

0:06:48.950 --> 0:06:51.390
<v S2>Um they can be of course suspended under the rules.

0:06:51.430 --> 0:06:53.990
<v S2>There's a, there's a range of AFL rules I won't

0:06:54.029 --> 0:06:56.670
<v S2>bore the listeners with, but you know, bringing the game

0:06:56.670 --> 0:06:59.710
<v S2>into disrepute, conduct unbecoming. There's all sorts of things. It's

0:06:59.710 --> 0:07:04.190
<v S2>important though that whatever they get suspended with, it's not

0:07:04.190 --> 0:07:08.390
<v S2>prejudicing a police matter. So those two processes are kept

0:07:08.390 --> 0:07:09.190
<v S2>very separate.

0:07:09.750 --> 0:07:11.950
<v S1>Well, I really wanted to ask you about this so-called,

0:07:11.990 --> 0:07:14.710
<v S1>you know, bringing the game into disrepute because it's been

0:07:14.710 --> 0:07:17.750
<v S1>reported that, you know, these five Sydney Swans players, that's

0:07:17.750 --> 0:07:19.870
<v S1>what they're going to be charged with. You know, they'll

0:07:19.870 --> 0:07:23.100
<v S1>miss several matches because they brought the game into disrepute.

0:07:23.500 --> 0:07:26.580
<v S1>And are we to understand that that disrepute charge is

0:07:26.580 --> 0:07:30.300
<v S1>about them being out drinking when normally that's not permitted?

0:07:30.300 --> 0:07:33.500
<v S1>Or is it or is it about this allegation of

0:07:33.500 --> 0:07:34.420
<v S1>sexual assault?

0:07:35.060 --> 0:07:39.060
<v S2>Well, it can't be about the allegation of the sexual assault,

0:07:40.100 --> 0:07:43.340
<v S2>because that has to be dealt with by the police.

0:07:44.100 --> 0:07:47.460
<v S2>And you can't interfere with the laws of the land.

0:07:47.460 --> 0:07:49.460
<v S2>The laws of the land come first. It's one of

0:07:49.460 --> 0:07:53.100
<v S2>those situations where they have to take action, but at

0:07:53.100 --> 0:07:55.900
<v S2>the same time, they can't prejudice, right? What's what's going

0:07:55.900 --> 0:08:00.020
<v S2>to happen in the future and that the timelines just

0:08:00.020 --> 0:08:02.739
<v S2>probably don't match up at all. I mean, typically I'm

0:08:02.780 --> 0:08:05.860
<v S2>not a legal or police expert, but these things take

0:08:05.860 --> 0:08:08.540
<v S2>a lot longer than the what the season would be,

0:08:08.580 --> 0:08:11.340
<v S2>you would say. I mean, they don't get necessarily resolved

0:08:11.340 --> 0:08:15.700
<v S2>in in months, let alone weeks. So I think you'll

0:08:15.700 --> 0:08:19.140
<v S2>see a punishment. Uh, they'll get a, you know, let's

0:08:19.140 --> 0:08:22.540
<v S2>say two weeks and then it'll probably have to be uniform.

0:08:22.540 --> 0:08:24.720
<v S2>This is my view of it. It'll probably have to

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.960
<v S2>be a uniform punishment because if it's not uniform, Sam,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.160
<v S2>then it's it's starting to err on the side of

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.240
<v S2>which player is culpable. And that's getting into where the

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.920
<v S2>criminal matter lies. Does that make sense?

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.240
<v S1>It does make sense. And I do want to now

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.559
<v S1>ask you a question more broadly about, I guess, the

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.319
<v S1>AFL versus the NRL when it comes to handling allegations

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.680
<v S1>like this, because your colleague, age sports reporter Peter Ryan,

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.880
<v S1>has argued that there's a big question that the AFL

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.559
<v S1>needs to address now. And that is, of course, whether

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.280
<v S1>it needs a no fault stand down policy for the

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.439
<v S1>code for its players. Obviously, this is something the NRL

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.240
<v S1>introduced after a string of allegations were made against its players.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.400
<v S1>So can you just talk us through this issue? What

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.760
<v S1>does the AFL have in place for instances when players

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.880
<v S1>are accused of a crime? And of course, we have

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.960
<v S1>to reiterate these five players that we've spoken about. They

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.640
<v S1>haven't been accused of a crime yet, but what does

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.160
<v S1>the AFL have in place?

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.680
<v S2>Well, the AFL, the AFL doesn't have what the NRL has.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.230
<v S2>The the NRL has a stand down policy Which is

0:09:26.230 --> 0:09:33.030
<v S2>only triggered above for, uh, above a certain thresholds for crime.

0:09:33.190 --> 0:09:35.990
<v S2>The AFL does not have that policy. They have a

0:09:35.990 --> 0:09:38.790
<v S2>case by case basis. Uh, there was a case last

0:09:38.790 --> 0:09:43.630
<v S2>year where a Geelong player, Geelong Football Club, uh, Tanner Bruin, um,

0:09:43.630 --> 0:09:46.150
<v S2>he was unnamed. He was on this leave of absence.

0:09:46.150 --> 0:09:48.630
<v S2>He was subject to a suppression order. People could see

0:09:48.630 --> 0:09:51.830
<v S2>he wasn't playing. It was never mentioned why he wasn't playing.

0:09:52.230 --> 0:09:57.069
<v S2>He was, um, essentially stood down by or um, by

0:09:57.070 --> 0:10:00.350
<v S2>the game. And he was not playing in that period

0:10:00.350 --> 0:10:02.310
<v S2>until he was cleared. He was actually cleared of the

0:10:02.309 --> 0:10:06.589
<v S2>charge eventually. And um, but everyone of course discovered that

0:10:06.590 --> 0:10:09.030
<v S2>it was people could work out what was going on.

0:10:09.030 --> 0:10:12.270
<v S8>And in more breaking news, rape charges against Geelong player

0:10:12.270 --> 0:10:16.550
<v S8>Tanner Bruin have been sensationally dropped. The AFL midfielder and

0:10:16.550 --> 0:10:19.870
<v S8>his friend Patrick Synnott, were charged with rape after being

0:10:19.910 --> 0:10:21.870
<v S8>accused of sexually assaulting a woman.

0:10:21.910 --> 0:10:24.870
<v S2>I guess the bottom line is the AFL follows what the.

0:10:25.030 --> 0:10:28.070
<v S2>It doesn't jump in on on it to the degree

0:10:28.070 --> 0:10:30.690
<v S2>that the NRL does, and it's quite a bit of

0:10:30.690 --> 0:10:34.970
<v S2>criticism for not having a stand down policy. Um, it's

0:10:34.970 --> 0:10:38.690
<v S2>an interesting debate because what happens if the player, uh,

0:10:38.730 --> 0:10:45.090
<v S2>is cleared and it takes three years that conceivably can happen.

0:10:45.290 --> 0:10:49.090
<v S2>So it's an interesting discussion. But the AFL has chosen

0:10:49.290 --> 0:10:53.530
<v S2>as an organisation Sam. They're an outfit that likes to

0:10:53.809 --> 0:10:57.850
<v S2>maintain flexibility. I've always felt I've always wanted to be

0:10:57.890 --> 0:11:00.890
<v S2>able to dispense their own forms of justice. I'm not

0:11:00.890 --> 0:11:03.210
<v S2>going to call them arbitrary, but and say they make

0:11:03.210 --> 0:11:05.090
<v S2>it up as they go along. But they have a

0:11:05.130 --> 0:11:07.689
<v S2>they have a tendency to be very pragmatic about outcomes

0:11:07.690 --> 0:11:08.730
<v S2>rather than pure.

0:11:09.090 --> 0:11:11.050
<v S1>And just to wrap up, Jake, I wanted to ask

0:11:11.050 --> 0:11:13.730
<v S1>you about one broad question because there's already some frustration

0:11:13.770 --> 0:11:17.570
<v S1>out there, including from AFL player Kate McCarthy, that some

0:11:17.570 --> 0:11:21.610
<v S1>other reporting has focused on the impact on Sydney's finals

0:11:21.650 --> 0:11:24.650
<v S1>chances and not on the alleged victim or the sexual

0:11:24.650 --> 0:11:26.610
<v S1>assault allegations. So what do you make of that?

0:11:26.770 --> 0:11:29.290
<v S2>Yeah, I think Kate makes a valid point. I made

0:11:29.290 --> 0:11:33.440
<v S2>that point on channel nine this morning that the ramifications

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:40.440
<v S2>for the Swans finals is really a secondary point. You've

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.680
<v S2>got to consider the alleged victim and you've got to consider, um,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.480
<v S2>the the the what this is as an incident for

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.480
<v S2>people as opposed to a football club. And I think

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.440
<v S2>sometimes that can be lost. But of course, the reason

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.400
<v S2>everyone's getting publicity here and everyone's interested in it is

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.600
<v S2>because they're football stars. And that's um, that's a part

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.520
<v S2>of the celebrity culture that sport, uh, embraces for better

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:07.040
<v S2>or worse.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.240
<v S1>Well, thank you so much, Jake, for your time.

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:11.040
<v S2>Thanks, Sam.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.600
<v S1>Today's episode was produced by Tammy Mills, and our podcasts

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.320
<v S1>are overseen by Lisa Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. If you

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.160
<v S1>like our show, follow the Morning Edition and leave a

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.920
<v S1>review for us on Apple or Spotify. Thanks for listening.