Speaker 1: Paid board. Good morning to you. Good morning, am I
Speaker 1: the only person who thinks a five year ban on
Speaker 1: Warick Kappa going to any AFL events or games, or
Speaker 1: even entering the MCG, even for cricket or a concert,
Speaker 1: is just a little bit heavy handed. No, I don't
Speaker 1: believe so. I think there are some people around here
Speaker 1: who think it's a bit too much. Wow. Interesting, well,
Speaker 1: I mean so for those who haven't got up the
Speaker 1: AFL Grand Final last year he made a comment which
Speaker 1: he says was in a private box. He made the
Speaker 1: comment to his friends about a waitress who was serving them.
Speaker 1: I certainly think the comment was unnecessary, it was probably inappropriate.
Speaker 1: But a point that Warrick has made is that he believes,
Speaker 1: because he owns a brothel now that getting a job
Speaker 1: in a brothel is a perfectly legitimate career path for somebody. Now,
Speaker 1: if he owned a restaurant and he said I'd like
Speaker 1: to have a job in one of my restaurants, you know,
Speaker 1: would we be upset by that? Are we kind of
Speaker 1: being moralistic by getting outraged by that comment to the waitress?
Speaker 1: But five years it's certainly it's you know, they haven't
Speaker 1: led him off easily. Interestingly, Wayne Carey has come out
Speaker 1: and applauded the AFL for doing this. He was talking
Speaker 1: on Sam Nieman's podcast. You cannot be serious, and he
Speaker 1: doesn't sound like he's a great fan or friend of Warwick.
Speaker 1: You know Warick is. You know, his whole act is
Speaker 1: being a sort of oath or a naughty schoolboy, which
Speaker 1: is fine. You might get away with that in your twenties,
Speaker 1: but when you're sixty two, it's very hard to play
Speaker 1: the naughty school boy and think things that were funny
Speaker 1: way back then are still acceptable or funny now. He's
Speaker 1: a little of what Wayne Carey said.
Speaker 2: I have told Warick this to his face, and he's
Speaker 2: to me, like I said, he's too attention seeking when
Speaker 2: he's in the public arena, and that's why I call
Speaker 2: him vegimind. A little bit goes a long way.
Speaker 1: So yeah, no love there at all. But look, it's
Speaker 1: I think it's capper is. You know, he's never going
Speaker 1: to change. It's that strange toxic mix of ego and
Speaker 1: delusion and desperation. But certainly he'll pay a price for
Speaker 1: the next five years.