WEBVTT - Who really won the Kendrick-Drake feud? Plus, The Fall Guy debate

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.090
<v S1>Hey, I'm Osman Faruqi and this is the drop a

0:00:11.090 --> 0:00:13.340
<v S1>culture show from the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age,

0:00:13.340 --> 0:00:15.530
<v S1>where we dive into the latest in the world of

0:00:15.530 --> 0:00:19.310
<v S1>pop culture and entertainment. I'm here with Thomas Mitchell and

0:00:19.310 --> 0:00:22.610
<v S1>Mel Schembri. Tough week for you guys, Thomas. Your boy

0:00:22.610 --> 0:00:26.660
<v S1>Drake took a pretty big L. Mel, your girl Dua

0:00:26.690 --> 0:00:30.320
<v S1>Lipa released a deeply mid album. You guys holding up

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:31.340
<v S1>all right?

0:00:31.370 --> 0:00:34.490
<v S2>Yeah. Holding up okay. I mean, I think Dua's probably

0:00:34.490 --> 0:00:36.740
<v S2>come off a little better than Drake, but I'm sure

0:00:36.740 --> 0:00:38.600
<v S2>we'll get into that in a bit.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.750
<v S3>Yeah, I've always been excited to go on the record

0:00:41.750 --> 0:00:45.740
<v S3>defending possible predators. So yeah, it's just another week in

0:00:45.740 --> 0:00:46.490
<v S3>my life.

0:00:47.540 --> 0:00:51.169
<v S1>Uh, we'll be talking a lot more, perhaps unsurprisingly, about

0:00:51.170 --> 0:00:54.860
<v S1>the feud between Kendrick Lamar and Drake, its origins, how

0:00:54.860 --> 0:00:57.860
<v S1>it's played out and what kinds of consequences it could

0:00:57.860 --> 0:01:00.529
<v S1>have for the pair, the wider rap scene and the

0:01:00.530 --> 0:01:03.050
<v S1>music industry more broadly. We're also going to be talking

0:01:03.050 --> 0:01:06.410
<v S1>about the Dua album and some other big pop releases

0:01:06.410 --> 0:01:09.350
<v S1>that we're into at the moment, and finally, we'll be

0:01:09.350 --> 0:01:13.640
<v S1>discussing The Fall Guy, the Australian shot action comedy starring

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.060
<v S1>Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt. But first, this week it

0:01:17.060 --> 0:01:20.780
<v S1>was the first Tuesday in May, which means the Met

0:01:20.780 --> 0:01:21.620
<v S1>Gala was on.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.780
<v S4>It's fashion's biggest night.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.480
<v S5>Sydney the Met Gala is the party of the year.

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.200
<v S4>The Met Gala, the annual celeb studded fundraiser held to

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.050
<v S4>benefit New York City's Metropolitan Museum of Art.

0:01:38.050 --> 0:01:39.069
<v S6>Finally I'm here.

0:01:39.069 --> 0:01:41.410
<v S1>I was moving house on Tuesday, so I did not

0:01:41.410 --> 0:01:44.320
<v S1>pay very close attention to this one. Though I did

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.230
<v S1>get the sense from social media that it seems to

0:01:47.230 --> 0:01:50.110
<v S1>be taking up more and more attention every year. It's

0:01:50.110 --> 0:01:53.560
<v S1>kind of gone from a fashion focused fundraiser thing to

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.680
<v S1>just being like a key part of the pop cultural

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.490
<v S1>calendar every year. Does that ring true to you guys?

0:02:00.490 --> 0:02:02.740
<v S1>What kind of stood out from this year's Met Gala?

0:02:03.070 --> 0:02:05.020
<v S2>Yeah, I reckon that's totally true. And I think it

0:02:05.020 --> 0:02:07.690
<v S2>makes sense because the Met Gala feels so right for

0:02:07.690 --> 0:02:11.440
<v S2>our online generation. It's all spectacle and no substance. It's

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.830
<v S2>all about conscious illusion and artifice. And it's also unlike

0:02:14.860 --> 0:02:17.950
<v S2>other big events, red carpet events. It's just purely based

0:02:17.950 --> 0:02:20.739
<v S2>on celebrity. You have to get the invite from Anna Wintour.

0:02:20.770 --> 0:02:23.230
<v S2>You can be anyone. You don't necessarily have to be

0:02:23.230 --> 0:02:25.450
<v S2>there because you know, you've been nominated for a film.

0:02:25.450 --> 0:02:28.000
<v S2>So you also get quite a broad and interesting sweep

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.370
<v S2>of people, which sets it up for real kind of

0:02:30.370 --> 0:02:32.860
<v S2>viral moments that are perfect for the internet. What stood

0:02:32.860 --> 0:02:34.840
<v S2>out from this one? I actually think maybe it was

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.630
<v S2>the kind of lack of those big moments, those big

0:02:37.630 --> 0:02:40.060
<v S2>talking points, like when I think back to some of

0:02:40.060 --> 0:02:43.389
<v S2>the outfits in the past, Jared Leto in that cat,

0:02:43.389 --> 0:02:46.120
<v S2>Doja Cat as a cat, Lil NAS X room when

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.790
<v S2>he wore that all silver outfit, Kim K had that

0:02:48.790 --> 0:02:51.640
<v S2>big stocking thing. There's been some really big moments, and

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.649
<v S2>I don't really think there were any huge talking points

0:02:53.650 --> 0:02:55.690
<v S2>from this Met Gala. In a way, people seem to

0:02:55.690 --> 0:02:57.700
<v S2>play it really safe. And I also think the other

0:02:57.700 --> 0:03:00.310
<v S2>thing that stood out was the theme. Clearly confused a

0:03:00.310 --> 0:03:02.650
<v S2>lot of people. There was not like a lot of

0:03:02.650 --> 0:03:05.200
<v S2>cohesion in what people were wearing. And I think Anna

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.140
<v S2>Wintour has actually apologized. She kind of potentially saw this

0:03:08.139 --> 0:03:10.930
<v S2>coming because she apologized in advance that maybe the theme

0:03:10.930 --> 0:03:12.970
<v S2>had been a bit confusing. Well, the thing was like.

0:03:12.970 --> 0:03:15.640
<v S1>Garden of something, but people just took the garden bit

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:16.690
<v S1>more literally.

0:03:16.690 --> 0:03:18.250
<v S7>Yeah, well, the theme was Sleeping.

0:03:18.250 --> 0:03:21.820
<v S2>Beauty's Reawakening fashion, but then the dress code was the

0:03:21.820 --> 0:03:24.310
<v S2>Garden of Time. Um, which are.

0:03:24.310 --> 0:03:25.299
<v S1>The Garden of Time?

0:03:25.419 --> 0:03:30.430
<v S2>Yeah, yeah, yeah. Which, um, Anna Wintour obviously now realizes

0:03:30.430 --> 0:03:33.130
<v S2>was too complex for people. Um, so I think it

0:03:33.130 --> 0:03:35.230
<v S2>did come through on the carpet a lot, like it

0:03:35.230 --> 0:03:37.810
<v S2>was not really clear what people were dressing up. And

0:03:37.810 --> 0:03:39.610
<v S2>everyone had quite a different take on the theme.

0:03:39.610 --> 0:03:42.100
<v S3>Yeah, I just saw lots of photos of like, it

0:03:42.100 --> 0:03:44.290
<v S3>was like Hugh Jackman in a tux, Chris Hemsworth in

0:03:44.290 --> 0:03:46.990
<v S3>a tux. Like the Australian guys just doing what Australian

0:03:46.990 --> 0:03:50.260
<v S3>guys do and disappointing everybody. But like, I guess Zendaya

0:03:50.260 --> 0:03:52.240
<v S3>was the big one that everyone was talking about. I

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.360
<v S3>guess generally though, it felt like this was set up

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.480
<v S3>to be a big kind of flashpoint because, I mean,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.360
<v S3>it's hard to avoid the optics of something like that, uh,

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.090
<v S3>difficult right now with everything that's going on in the world.

0:04:04.090 --> 0:04:06.880
<v S3>People love to kind of have that conversation around big

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.420
<v S3>celebrity events when there are these huge, you know, global

0:04:10.420 --> 0:04:13.090
<v S3>events also happening at the same time, and especially with

0:04:13.090 --> 0:04:14.830
<v S3>something like the Met Gala that isn't, you know, like

0:04:14.830 --> 0:04:16.929
<v S3>an award ceremony or at least something broader. People are

0:04:16.930 --> 0:04:18.490
<v S3>always going to be like, well, do we need to

0:04:18.490 --> 0:04:20.229
<v S3>be doing this right now while you know everything that's

0:04:20.230 --> 0:04:21.400
<v S3>going on in the Middle East?

0:04:21.820 --> 0:04:23.560
<v S1>Yeah, when we talk, we talk about the Met Gala,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.290
<v S1>but really the way that we consume it publicly is

0:04:26.290 --> 0:04:30.160
<v S1>the celebrities outside the Met Gala being photographed as they enter.

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.010
<v S1>We don't really get a lot from what goes on inside.

0:04:33.010 --> 0:04:35.109
<v S1>I saw someone on social media being like, so what?

0:04:35.110 --> 0:04:38.680
<v S1>What happens in the Met Gala? And it's just what.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:39.460
<v S3>Does happen in the it's.

0:04:39.460 --> 0:04:41.260
<v S1>Like a fundraising dinner. I think there were some speeches

0:04:41.260 --> 0:04:44.320
<v S1>and people sort of eat food and wander around. They

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.710
<v S1>take selfies. There's occasionally like videos that emerge of Jennifer

0:04:47.710 --> 0:04:50.589
<v S1>Lopez running into other celebrities in the bathroom. There's an

0:04:50.589 --> 0:04:53.500
<v S1>episode of Dave, the Show that you still refuse to watch, Thomas,

0:04:53.500 --> 0:04:55.990
<v S1>which is set inside the Met Gala in an episode.

0:04:55.990 --> 0:04:58.330
<v S1>That's the closest I've come to understanding what the Met

0:04:58.330 --> 0:04:59.890
<v S1>Gala is like inside.

0:04:59.890 --> 0:05:02.680
<v S2>Yeah, an ocean's. There's an ocean set in in the

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.710
<v S2>Met Gala as well. That's entirely what I'm basing it on. Oh, yeah,

0:05:05.710 --> 0:05:06.340
<v S2>that's right.

0:05:06.339 --> 0:05:09.310
<v S1>Oh, the Ocean's eight. Um, yeah. They're not very good.

0:05:09.310 --> 0:05:12.520
<v S1>Ocean's not because of, you know, the fact that they're

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.380
<v S1>gender flipped. It just wasn't that good. Of course not

0:05:14.380 --> 0:05:16.930
<v S1>as a movie. Yeah. To your point, Thomas, about the

0:05:16.930 --> 0:05:20.049
<v S1>incongruous nature of it this year, Marina Hyde, who I

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.020
<v S1>normally really enjoy reading, she's a Guardian UK columnist, had

0:05:23.020 --> 0:05:26.200
<v S1>a piece this week arguing that during times when the

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.930
<v S1>news is very heavy and grim, an event like the

0:05:28.930 --> 0:05:32.380
<v S1>Met Gala serves as a distraction to it. Just something

0:05:32.380 --> 0:05:34.690
<v S1>we can sort of zone out and watch these people

0:05:34.690 --> 0:05:37.120
<v S1>wear their their outfits. But I mean, I think there's

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.029
<v S1>an argument that in some instances, like the opposite can

0:05:40.029 --> 0:05:43.810
<v S1>also be true. It felt, particularly this year, I think,

0:05:43.810 --> 0:05:46.210
<v S1>to do with the timing of it. Just very odd

0:05:46.210 --> 0:05:50.140
<v S1>where every second post was a celebrity being photographed, and

0:05:50.140 --> 0:05:52.570
<v S1>then the posts after that were like clips or news

0:05:52.570 --> 0:05:56.469
<v S1>stories of Israel's invasion of Gaza. The Met Gala is

0:05:56.470 --> 0:06:00.460
<v S1>deeply a political and like always has been, and it's

0:06:00.460 --> 0:06:02.650
<v S1>another contrast to events like the Oscars. It's not just

0:06:02.650 --> 0:06:05.920
<v S1>about it not being an awards ceremony, but you do see,

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:10.150
<v S1>even if most celebrities aren't embracing a political message we

0:06:10.150 --> 0:06:12.700
<v S1>have seen in this awards in the last kind of

0:06:12.700 --> 0:06:15.550
<v S1>12 months of awards season, at least, people wearing pins

0:06:15.550 --> 0:06:18.520
<v S1>making speeches. None of that happens at the Met Gala.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.480
<v S1>Anna Wintour keeps a pretty tight leash on that. There

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.870
<v S1>was this. Quote from Suzanne Collins that I saw doing

0:06:25.870 --> 0:06:28.330
<v S1>the rounds yesterday. She's the author of The Hunger Games,

0:06:28.330 --> 0:06:31.900
<v S1>and she said that she was inspired to write that

0:06:31.900 --> 0:06:35.530
<v S1>series because in the early 2000, she was watching TV

0:06:35.529 --> 0:06:39.219
<v S1>and it was reality TV being interspersed with clips of

0:06:39.220 --> 0:06:42.280
<v S1>the invasion of Iraq and sort of that, that I think, quote,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.070
<v S1>has been finding a lot of resonance this week because

0:06:45.070 --> 0:06:47.620
<v S1>people are saying, well, the Met Gala and the invasion

0:06:47.620 --> 0:06:49.840
<v S1>of Rafah happening at the exact same time. It's sort

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.560
<v S1>of hard to to disconnect those two things. It's a

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.679
<v S1>big question, but I mean, is this is this escapism

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.470
<v S1>that we all need? Is it a distraction? How do

0:06:59.470 --> 0:07:01.900
<v S1>you think people should be feeling about this?

0:07:01.930 --> 0:07:03.940
<v S3>Yeah. Like I think I can kind of see both

0:07:03.940 --> 0:07:06.490
<v S3>sides because, I mean, it's easy to say something like

0:07:06.490 --> 0:07:09.250
<v S3>the Met Gala is completely unnecessary and like in bad

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.710
<v S3>taste right now. But then it becomes, for me a

0:07:11.710 --> 0:07:13.690
<v S3>question of like, well, where do you draw the line?

0:07:13.690 --> 0:07:16.929
<v S3>Like we're about to spend however long discussing Drake and

0:07:16.930 --> 0:07:19.840
<v S3>Kendrick arguing over the internet, and you could so easily

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:21.880
<v S3>make the same argument that, like, that's so ridiculous that

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.650
<v S3>you would even give that air time right now with

0:07:23.650 --> 0:07:26.500
<v S3>everything that's going on. And like, I think it does

0:07:26.500 --> 0:07:29.260
<v S3>become this thing where at some point I guess you

0:07:29.260 --> 0:07:31.540
<v S3>have to decide that you can. I don't know that

0:07:31.540 --> 0:07:34.420
<v S3>these two things can coexist and and it's okay to

0:07:34.420 --> 0:07:36.820
<v S3>talk about both or have both, like it's really tricky

0:07:36.820 --> 0:07:39.820
<v S3>because you don't want to be seen to be like, oh, well,

0:07:39.820 --> 0:07:42.220
<v S3>I'm just putting that out of sight and, you know, whatever. Like,

0:07:42.220 --> 0:07:44.770
<v S3>unfortunately it's not impacting me. So I can just enjoy

0:07:44.770 --> 0:07:47.410
<v S3>the Met Gala. But I do think sometimes there is this,

0:07:47.410 --> 0:07:51.430
<v S3>like inclination to just then call everything shallow and all

0:07:51.430 --> 0:07:53.350
<v S3>we can all be talking about and focusing on 24

0:07:53.350 --> 0:07:55.240
<v S3>over seven is like, what's going on in the Middle East?

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.850
<v S3>And yeah, I think it creates this like lose lose

0:07:57.850 --> 0:07:59.110
<v S3>situation a little bit.

0:07:59.110 --> 0:08:01.660
<v S2>Yeah. I think it's funny that the, the dress code,

0:08:01.660 --> 0:08:03.610
<v S2>The Garden of Time is based on the name of

0:08:03.610 --> 0:08:06.670
<v S2>a short story by J.G. Ballard, who wrote the story

0:08:06.670 --> 0:08:08.980
<v S2>in 1962. Okay, this is a bit fun fact from

0:08:08.980 --> 0:08:11.650
<v S2>your resident reader, but it is kind of funny. The

0:08:11.650 --> 0:08:14.620
<v S2>short story is about this kind of rich couple who

0:08:14.620 --> 0:08:17.440
<v S2>live in an estate where the air is bright and

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.840
<v S2>the the weather is warm. They live in this beautiful

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.120
<v S2>kind of fantasy land. And then one day they look

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.670
<v S2>out onto the dry and barren plains and they see,

0:08:24.670 --> 0:08:28.540
<v S2>like people labored with heavy loads kind of around their neck,

0:08:28.540 --> 0:08:31.180
<v S2>and the kind of rabble sets up on the horizon,

0:08:31.180 --> 0:08:35.050
<v S2>encroaching on their fantasy land. And I mean, that's where

0:08:35.050 --> 0:08:38.020
<v S2>the rabble of the met is. The met is this

0:08:38.020 --> 0:08:41.439
<v S2>garden of illusion and artifice that can't last. But like

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.080
<v S2>this couple that have to kind of keep picking flowers,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.390
<v S2>you know, it's not going to last. And I mean,

0:08:46.390 --> 0:08:49.300
<v S2>I don't think the met is trying to be self-referential,

0:08:49.300 --> 0:08:51.940
<v S2>but that kind of is it. We're on the horizon,

0:08:51.940 --> 0:08:55.090
<v S2>kind of enjoying the beauty of this estate even as

0:08:55.090 --> 0:08:56.140
<v S2>we know it's fake.

0:08:56.140 --> 0:08:59.650
<v S1>Yeah, it's a kind of perfect accidental metaphor. Yeah. Look,

0:08:59.650 --> 0:09:03.370
<v S1>I don't expect anything dramatic or political from the Mecca.

0:09:03.370 --> 0:09:05.590
<v S1>I think it does what it does, and that's what

0:09:05.590 --> 0:09:07.240
<v S1>it's always done. And that's what it always will do.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.719
<v S1>I think there's probably just certain times in which the

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.199
<v S1>ability for some of the wealthiest people on the planet

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.860
<v S1>to insulate themselves and pretend nothing else is going on

0:09:17.860 --> 0:09:21.010
<v S1>can sometimes feel like a little bit too absurd. I

0:09:21.010 --> 0:09:23.260
<v S1>think it's a fair point about the rap stuff. Thomas.

0:09:23.260 --> 0:09:26.080
<v S1>I think we'll mention a bit about some of the

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.200
<v S1>criticisms of Drake and Kendrick just talking about themselves when

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.660
<v S1>there's a lot else going on. One of the things

0:09:31.660 --> 0:09:35.050
<v S1>that I just found bewildering, like the the appearance of

0:09:35.050 --> 0:09:39.099
<v S1>Anthony Pratt, the Australian cardboard billionaire dressed in sort of

0:09:39.100 --> 0:09:41.230
<v S1>a pink Willy Wonka suit. And I know that this

0:09:41.230 --> 0:09:43.090
<v S1>is a fundraiser, and I know that all sorts of

0:09:43.090 --> 0:09:45.580
<v S1>just like rich people go to it, but maybe it's

0:09:45.580 --> 0:09:48.820
<v S1>because he's Australian. It's like cultural cringe or something. But

0:09:48.820 --> 0:09:52.480
<v S1>I'm like, this feels like less exciting than it's felt

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.010
<v S1>before seeing him there.

0:09:54.010 --> 0:09:56.320
<v S2>Yeah. And you know how like, color analysis is like

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.660
<v S2>having a real moment at the moment and everyone's getting

0:09:58.660 --> 0:10:00.310
<v S2>it done and getting AI to do it. When I

0:10:00.309 --> 0:10:02.319
<v S2>saw him in that pink suit and his face just

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.479
<v S2>looked so pink, I was like, that is a case

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.569
<v S2>for why color analysis matters. But I also the other Aussie,

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.020
<v S2>you mentioned it earlier, Chris Hemsworth, very bland. Wasn't it?

0:10:11.020 --> 0:10:14.559
<v S2>Just like a classic three piece suit? Like just beige?

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.540
<v S2>So yeah, I don't know if the Australians had a

0:10:16.540 --> 0:10:18.280
<v S2>great showing at the met this year.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.510
<v S3>Except for Kylie. Obviously.

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:21.760
<v S1>I didn't see Kylie's outfit. She looked pretty.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.939
<v S2>Good. Troye Sivan as well. Our our pop princesses did great.

0:10:25.570 --> 0:10:28.630
<v S1>Okay, so from pop princesses to two people who had

0:10:28.630 --> 0:10:31.090
<v S1>nothing to do with the Met Gala at all, it's

0:10:31.090 --> 0:10:33.820
<v S1>time to talk about the biggest cultural moment of the week,

0:10:33.820 --> 0:10:38.440
<v S1>and arguably even the last few years. The incredibly personal,

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:43.209
<v S1>vicious and deeply fascinating feud between two of the biggest

0:10:43.210 --> 0:10:47.500
<v S1>rappers the past decade, Drake and Kendrick Lamar. I guess

0:10:47.500 --> 0:10:49.750
<v S1>the freshest development in this saga is the news that

0:10:49.750 --> 0:10:53.020
<v S1>one of Drake's security guards was shot inside his house

0:10:53.020 --> 0:10:57.010
<v S1>in Toronto on Wednesday morning. The assailant escaped. We have

0:10:57.010 --> 0:10:59.890
<v S1>no further details about the shooting or the background or

0:10:59.890 --> 0:11:02.380
<v S1>motivations of the shooter, but I mean, it is pretty

0:11:02.380 --> 0:11:07.690
<v S1>wild timing considering everything going on before that incident. It's

0:11:07.690 --> 0:11:10.390
<v S1>worth laying out, I guess. Basically where we were at

0:11:10.390 --> 0:11:13.960
<v S1>after spending a couple of weeks releasing tracks that were

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:18.340
<v S1>getting increasingly more personal, aimed at each other, allegations of

0:11:18.340 --> 0:11:23.470
<v S1>domestic abuse, sex trafficking, and underage grooming. Kendrick. Was widely

0:11:23.470 --> 0:11:28.720
<v S1>considered to have pretty thoroughly demolished Drake's reputation and outranked him.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.840
<v S1>Kind of culminated in the most recent track that's been released,

0:11:31.900 --> 0:11:34.690
<v S1>a track from Drake five minutes long, where he basically

0:11:34.690 --> 0:11:38.470
<v S1>spent most of it denying being a pedophile. It's kind

0:11:38.470 --> 0:11:42.729
<v S1>of been interpreted as a quiet, strategic retreat from this

0:11:42.730 --> 0:11:48.280
<v S1>whole episode. This was melanomas, particularly over the weekend when

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.510
<v S1>we had multiple tracks being dropped every day. I think,

0:11:52.510 --> 0:11:54.670
<v S1>safe to say, one of the biggest moments in in

0:11:54.670 --> 0:11:57.250
<v S1>pop culture in recent times, it felt like everyone had

0:11:57.250 --> 0:11:59.679
<v S1>sort of stopped to plug in and see what was

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.130
<v S1>going on. Sure, you were getting text messages either from

0:12:03.130 --> 0:12:05.230
<v S1>people being like, have you seen it? Or friends asking

0:12:05.230 --> 0:12:08.350
<v S1>you to explain what was going on felt particularly interesting.

0:12:08.350 --> 0:12:11.260
<v S1>In the era of media fragmentation, where we don't tend

0:12:11.260 --> 0:12:14.410
<v S1>to all like, gather on to one big thing. It

0:12:14.410 --> 0:12:17.229
<v S1>definitely felt like the biggest rap beef in years, potentially

0:12:17.230 --> 0:12:19.989
<v S1>bigger than the infamous feud between Jay-Z NAS in the

0:12:19.990 --> 0:12:22.780
<v S1>early 2000. There's going to be ramifications for both of

0:12:22.780 --> 0:12:25.630
<v S1>these guys and the direction of hip hop. There's plenty

0:12:25.630 --> 0:12:28.330
<v S1>to discuss, but maybe we'll start with with kind of

0:12:28.330 --> 0:12:32.170
<v S1>where this starts. And maybe before we do that, it

0:12:32.170 --> 0:12:35.050
<v S1>could be interesting to discuss the respective positions of each

0:12:35.050 --> 0:12:38.320
<v S1>of these rappers before they got into this feud. Thomas,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:39.520
<v S1>I'm wondering if you can give us a kind of

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.370
<v S1>TLDR on kind of Drake as a rapper. Where does

0:12:42.370 --> 0:12:45.040
<v S1>he sit and how does that compare to to Kendrick's

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.500
<v S1>profile and position in the hip hop world?

0:12:47.500 --> 0:12:51.130
<v S3>Yeah for sure Mel. So TLDR is too long. Don't worry.

0:12:51.250 --> 0:12:53.350
<v S2>I know nothing's ever too long for me to read.

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.190
<v S3>Um, so basically I guess like the scene is that

0:12:57.190 --> 0:13:00.969
<v S3>you've got Drake, arguably the biggest kind of name in

0:13:00.970 --> 0:13:04.479
<v S3>rap pop. He he's a hip hop guy, but really

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.840
<v S3>he's seen as the pop star of rap. Um, obviously,

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:12.370
<v S3>you know, enormously successful. Signed a $400 million complete global

0:13:12.370 --> 0:13:14.380
<v S3>publishing deal with universal a few years ago, one of

0:13:14.380 --> 0:13:17.199
<v S3>the biggest deals of all time called the LeBron deal

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.920
<v S3>of music. Um, you know, obviously we all know Drake songs.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.190
<v S3>He feels clubs, he tops the Billboard 100 all the time.

0:13:24.190 --> 0:13:26.860
<v S3>He wins lots of Grammys. He is kind of like

0:13:26.860 --> 0:13:30.460
<v S3>the palatable hip hop star, but really, he's a pop star.

0:13:30.460 --> 0:13:34.059
<v S3>Then you have Kendrick Lamar seen as many as, I guess,

0:13:34.059 --> 0:13:37.810
<v S3>like the icon of pure hip hop, he is kind

0:13:37.809 --> 0:13:40.719
<v S3>of the incumbent to Tupac Shakur. He's seen by purists

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.150
<v S3>as the true face of hip hop. Um, he's from

0:13:43.150 --> 0:13:46.360
<v S3>Compton in Los Angeles, often seen as the spiritual heartland

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.689
<v S3>of hip hop. And, you know, he releases albums that are,

0:13:49.690 --> 0:13:51.579
<v S3>you know, really kind of viewed in a more critical

0:13:51.580 --> 0:13:54.880
<v S3>lens than anything Drake ever does. He's won a Pulitzer Prize, Mel,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.730
<v S3>which is like a really important prize, basically. And yeah,

0:13:57.730 --> 0:14:00.250
<v S3>so that kind of sets the scene in, in what

0:14:00.250 --> 0:14:04.059
<v S3>I mean, does even though the feud has gone beyond ridiculous,

0:14:04.059 --> 0:14:06.430
<v S3>it set the scene for a really perfect match up

0:14:06.429 --> 0:14:09.910
<v S3>because it was like kind of like this good versus evil.

0:14:09.910 --> 0:14:13.000
<v S3>You know, the good guy being Kendrick, who represents the

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.550
<v S3>pure art of hip hop, and then Drake being the

0:14:15.550 --> 0:14:18.010
<v S3>sellout who represents, I guess, the problems of modern hip

0:14:18.010 --> 0:14:19.930
<v S3>hop according to a lot of fans. So, yeah, that

0:14:19.930 --> 0:14:22.600
<v S3>was kind of the state of things. But yeah, very

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.970
<v S3>much it was these two guys who represented two different

0:14:24.970 --> 0:14:27.640
<v S3>schools of thought of where hip hop is at right now.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.470
<v S1>And I think fair to say, Thomas, like you and

0:14:29.470 --> 0:14:32.140
<v S1>I have listened to probably every record that either Drake

0:14:32.140 --> 0:14:34.930
<v S1>or Kendrick have made and have a lot of time

0:14:34.930 --> 0:14:37.360
<v S1>and respect for what they do.

0:14:38.060 --> 0:14:40.430
<v S3>Yeah for sure. Like, I love both guys. I get

0:14:40.430 --> 0:14:42.560
<v S3>a lot of enjoyment out of both of their work, um,

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.930
<v S3>for different, very different reasons. And, and that's why I

0:14:44.930 --> 0:14:47.540
<v S3>think it was such a curious thing at the start

0:14:47.540 --> 0:14:49.910
<v S3>to see these two guys go at it, who, you know,

0:14:49.910 --> 0:14:52.730
<v S3>because in the early 20 tens, they were, you know,

0:14:52.730 --> 0:14:55.010
<v S3>very friendly and they appeared on each other's tracks. Um,

0:14:55.010 --> 0:14:57.770
<v S3>Poetic Justice, the Kendrick song and Kendrick also appeared on

0:14:57.770 --> 0:15:00.410
<v S3>Drake's Take Care album. They toured together, so they were

0:15:00.410 --> 0:15:02.720
<v S3>very much like friendly. But then as they both kind

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.700
<v S3>of went on their own trajectory and became very big

0:15:04.700 --> 0:15:08.600
<v S3>in different kind of crowds, they've drifted further apart. And

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.190
<v S3>then now here we are now.

0:15:10.220 --> 0:15:12.050
<v S1>Before we really dive into it all. I mean, where

0:15:12.050 --> 0:15:14.030
<v S1>do you sit with each of these guys? Do you

0:15:14.030 --> 0:15:18.530
<v S1>have a preference for the sounds of either Drake or Kendrick?

0:15:18.650 --> 0:15:20.750
<v S2>No, I think I've always kind of taken the El

0:15:20.750 --> 0:15:24.800
<v S2>Paso approach to it. I think both have both have

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.810
<v S2>like both can exist and we can be happy with

0:15:26.810 --> 0:15:29.330
<v S2>both and grateful to have both. I've never really nailed

0:15:29.330 --> 0:15:32.450
<v S2>my colours to any of their masks, and to be honest,

0:15:32.450 --> 0:15:35.330
<v S2>I'm very glad I didn't and I haven't because I

0:15:35.330 --> 0:15:38.870
<v S2>think this whole episode has been shameful and they are

0:15:38.870 --> 0:15:43.729
<v S2>both shameful. And I mean, I am disappointed I oh,

0:15:43.910 --> 0:15:46.430
<v S2>all right, there's the first one. Yeah, that's the wisest.

0:15:46.430 --> 0:15:47.990
<v S1>Thing I've heard. Um, yeah.

0:15:47.990 --> 0:15:52.400
<v S2>I mean, I know I'm, I'm trying hard not to

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.590
<v S2>think of this as a battle for relevancy. And I'm

0:15:54.590 --> 0:15:56.720
<v S2>listening to you, Oz, and I'm hearing that you're telling

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.400
<v S2>me this is about the future of hip hop. But

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.290
<v S2>part of me is like, is this about the end

0:16:00.290 --> 0:16:01.190
<v S2>of hip hop?

0:16:01.190 --> 0:16:03.620
<v S1>Well, I mean, look, that is not a terrible question

0:16:03.620 --> 0:16:06.410
<v S1>to to raise, because certainly that is one that a

0:16:06.410 --> 0:16:07.940
<v S1>lot of critics, a lot of hip hop critics have

0:16:07.940 --> 0:16:10.940
<v S1>been discussing, like this is maybe in some ways, you know,

0:16:10.940 --> 0:16:13.790
<v S1>these two, two titans that reflect an era that doesn't

0:16:13.790 --> 0:16:17.570
<v S1>really exist anymore, having one final throwdown, and we probably

0:16:17.570 --> 0:16:19.820
<v S1>will never see anything like this again. I think I

0:16:19.820 --> 0:16:22.280
<v S1>think there's a question there that that is worth discussing,

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.130
<v S1>but let's, um, let's sort of delve into how we

0:16:25.130 --> 0:16:27.650
<v S1>got here for a minute. So as some have said,

0:16:27.650 --> 0:16:30.500
<v S1>these guys, they were friends, they collaborated a few times.

0:16:30.500 --> 0:16:33.710
<v S1>They sort of went into different lanes for the past

0:16:33.710 --> 0:16:37.940
<v S1>nearly decade now, I'd say. But in October they came

0:16:37.940 --> 0:16:41.840
<v S1>back into each other's orbits. Drake released a song called

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:46.220
<v S1>First Person Shooter, which included a verse from another big rapper, J. Cole.

0:16:46.370 --> 0:16:49.580
<v S1>Uh J Cole referred to himself, Drake and Kendrick as

0:16:49.580 --> 0:16:51.260
<v S1>the big three of rap.

0:16:51.980 --> 0:16:54.290
<v UU>Me we the big three. Like we started the league.

0:16:54.290 --> 0:16:56.210
<v UU>But right now I feel like Muhammad Ali.

0:16:57.380 --> 0:17:01.040
<v S1>Didn't kind of feel that controversial at the time. It was,

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.830
<v S1>I guess, intended to be respectful and say, hey, we're

0:17:03.830 --> 0:17:06.080
<v S1>all pretty cool. I like hanging out with you guys.

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.960
<v S1>Hip hop is great. Look at us here at the top. Uh,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.840
<v S1>in March though, this year things got a bit more hectic,

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.550
<v S1>and we discussed this briefly a few weeks ago on

0:17:13.550 --> 0:17:17.180
<v S1>the show when Atlanta rapper future dropped an album with

0:17:17.180 --> 0:17:20.060
<v S1>producer Metro Boomin. Uh, I thought that album was like, fine.

0:17:20.060 --> 0:17:21.050
<v S1>There was like a bit of a blow up at

0:17:21.050 --> 0:17:23.960
<v S1>the time, but it didn't feel as dramatic as as

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:25.909
<v S1>it has since gotten. There was a track on that

0:17:25.910 --> 0:17:29.959
<v S1>album called Like That featured Kendrick, where he took aim

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.710
<v S1>at Drake and J. Cole, explicitly referencing that line about

0:17:33.710 --> 0:17:34.970
<v S1>them being the big three.

0:17:35.540 --> 0:17:39.380
<v S8>Motherfuck the big three. It's just big me, nigga. Boom.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.949
<v S1>Well, that was like definitely a dig at Drake and Cole.

0:17:42.950 --> 0:17:45.650
<v S1>It didn't feel like crazy. This is like a big

0:17:45.650 --> 0:17:47.689
<v S1>part of hip hop where people are just saying they're

0:17:47.690 --> 0:17:50.119
<v S1>better than the others. It's part of the braggadocio culture

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.840
<v S1>of hip hop. Didn't really expect things to take the

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.170
<v S1>turn that they did, but, um, yeah, we'll get there.

0:17:57.170 --> 0:17:58.910
<v S1>Probably the funniest twist, I think, in all of this

0:17:58.910 --> 0:18:02.750
<v S1>is J. Cole took that very personally and released a

0:18:02.750 --> 0:18:06.140
<v S1>seven minute long track criticizing Kendrick and then very, very

0:18:06.140 --> 0:18:08.300
<v S1>quickly deleted it and said, I'm sorry, I want nothing

0:18:08.300 --> 0:18:10.040
<v S1>to do with this. I don't know if he, like

0:18:10.310 --> 0:18:13.520
<v S1>someone from the future, went back in time and told him, dude,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:14.960
<v S1>you're just going to want to tap out of this

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.060
<v S1>one and just go stay at home and have a

0:18:17.060 --> 0:18:19.370
<v S1>nice time. Watch um Shogun on Disney+.

0:18:19.369 --> 0:18:20.659
<v S3>If anything, though, that has given us one of the

0:18:20.660 --> 0:18:22.550
<v S3>best parts of this beef in that like the internet

0:18:22.550 --> 0:18:24.680
<v S3>has had a field day with like, well, things have

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.619
<v S3>gotten increasingly vicious between Drake and Kendrick. There's all these

0:18:27.619 --> 0:18:29.780
<v S3>memes of like, J. Cole right now, and it's someone

0:18:29.780 --> 0:18:31.970
<v S3>like walking through a field of grass, like having the

0:18:31.970 --> 0:18:34.190
<v S3>time of their lives. So yeah, I do wonder if J.

0:18:34.190 --> 0:18:36.649
<v S3>Cole is a bit like, well, I'm so glad I

0:18:36.650 --> 0:18:39.650
<v S3>tapped out and deleted my song. Or I personally, um,

0:18:39.650 --> 0:18:42.350
<v S3>kind of think it's a little bit embarrassing for him.

0:18:42.350 --> 0:18:43.520
<v S2>Oh, you think he should have stepped up?

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.950
<v S3>Well, I mean, like, he he he basically like he

0:18:45.950 --> 0:18:48.650
<v S3>went in, he involved himself first and then like, he

0:18:48.650 --> 0:18:52.040
<v S3>really like whatever you think of Drake, I think at

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.920
<v S3>least he like he committed. He committed, he committed. Whereas J.

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.350
<v S3>Cole like you know, sure he hasn't then had like

0:18:57.350 --> 0:18:59.840
<v S3>all this dirty laundry of his aired. But I feel

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.639
<v S3>like that will stick with him forever in hip hop,

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.310
<v S3>which is famously like a reputation game. You know, he

0:19:04.310 --> 0:19:05.780
<v S3>may have made a smart decision, but it's still a

0:19:05.780 --> 0:19:07.639
<v S3>decision that paints him as someone who was not prepared

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:08.180
<v S3>to throw it out.

0:19:08.180 --> 0:19:09.679
<v S2>It's so good. I love that he, like, lit the

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.050
<v S2>fire and then kind of spider monkey it out of there.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.160
<v S1>Um, so Drake, uh, Drake decided to involve himself in this.

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.800
<v S1>In the middle of April, he released his first diss

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.770
<v S1>track aimed at Kendrick, push ups and tailor made freestyle.

0:19:21.770 --> 0:19:24.229
<v S1>At this stage, I think, like fair to say that

0:19:24.230 --> 0:19:28.399
<v S1>the disses were relatively tame. They mainly focused on. On

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.670
<v S1>Drake criticizing Kendrick's music. Drake listed a bunch of rappers.

0:19:31.670 --> 0:19:35.030
<v S1>He thought that, uh, were better than Kendrick. He had

0:19:35.030 --> 0:19:39.160
<v S1>a go at Kendrick for collaborating with. Taylorswift and other

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.290
<v S1>pop acts, which felt a bit dumb, like out of

0:19:41.290 --> 0:19:42.940
<v S1>all the people in the hip hop world who can

0:19:42.940 --> 0:19:47.890
<v S1>say you've gone too mainstream? Drake saying that to Kendrick. Uh,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.649
<v S1>I don't think really, really stacked up, but it's what

0:19:50.650 --> 0:19:54.639
<v S1>he did. And from there, things got way more personal.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.050
<v S1>Kendrick releases a track called euphoria and 616 in LA,

0:19:59.050 --> 0:20:04.180
<v S1>which accused Drake of having plastic surgery and most significantly,

0:20:04.180 --> 0:20:08.440
<v S1>at this stage, uh, Kendrick called Drake a bad father.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.240
<v S1>And we'll get back to why that's such a big deal.

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.780
<v S1>But that was probably the first real escalation in terms

0:20:13.780 --> 0:20:17.800
<v S1>of this taking a vicious personal turn. The same day, uh,

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.010
<v S1>Drake drops a track called Family Matters where he's like, okay,

0:20:21.010 --> 0:20:23.439
<v S1>you brought my son into this shit is going to

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.260
<v S1>get real now, uh, he says that one of Kendrick's

0:20:26.260 --> 0:20:30.460
<v S1>children was actually fathered by his friend and colleague, Dave Frye,

0:20:30.580 --> 0:20:36.400
<v S1>and he accused Lamar of being physically abusive towards his wife, Whitney.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:40.510
<v S1>20 minutes after that track came out, Kendrick releases Meet

0:20:40.510 --> 0:20:44.200
<v S1>the Grimes. Probably like the darkest track in this whole beef.

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.750
<v S1>And I say that because even though it really set

0:20:46.750 --> 0:20:48.370
<v S1>things to another level, no one really wants to talk

0:20:48.369 --> 0:20:50.920
<v S1>about this one too much because of just how brutal

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:55.750
<v S1>it got. Kendrick directly addresses Drake's son, Adonis. He accuses

0:20:55.750 --> 0:20:59.020
<v S1>Drake of hiding a second child, this time a daughter.

0:20:59.140 --> 0:21:03.369
<v S1>He suggests that Drake is attracted to underage children and

0:21:03.369 --> 0:21:06.909
<v S1>accuses him of running a sex trafficking ring out of

0:21:06.910 --> 0:21:10.870
<v S1>his Toronto mansion. Yeah, as you can tell, quite, quite

0:21:10.869 --> 0:21:14.140
<v S1>a severe escalation in all of this. Um, from where

0:21:14.140 --> 0:21:15.910
<v S1>it started, from the big three.

0:21:15.910 --> 0:21:18.340
<v S3>To very different to I'm better than you. Like it's

0:21:18.340 --> 0:21:20.050
<v S3>a big jump to then. Like, also you're running a

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:21.610
<v S3>sex trafficking ring.

0:21:21.820 --> 0:21:25.120
<v S1>The the next day, Kendrick follows up with another track,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.090
<v S1>Not Like Us. And this is maybe the best song

0:21:28.090 --> 0:21:29.830
<v S1>in the whole thing in terms of Just Like as

0:21:29.830 --> 0:21:31.090
<v S1>a standalone track.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.869
<v UU>Oh, I must have heard the beat. Ho de bo.

0:21:35.869 --> 0:21:38.450
<v UU>Any rap nigga. He a free throw, man. Damn. Call

0:21:38.450 --> 0:21:38.840
<v UU>the amber.

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.210
<v S8>Lamps. Tell em pre-pro nella nigga to the cross. He

0:21:41.210 --> 0:21:43.580
<v S8>walk around like teaser. What's up with these jabroni ass

0:21:43.580 --> 0:21:46.190
<v S8>niggas tryna see Compton. The industry can hate me. Fuck

0:21:46.190 --> 0:21:48.230
<v S8>em all they momma. How many apps you really got?

0:21:48.260 --> 0:21:50.570
<v S8>How many is too many options I'm finna pass on

0:21:50.570 --> 0:21:52.100
<v S8>this body I'm John Stockton.

0:21:52.340 --> 0:21:54.500
<v S1>There's sort of early numbers out on streaming that this

0:21:54.500 --> 0:21:57.230
<v S1>could actually replace Taylor Swift as the number one track

0:21:57.230 --> 0:22:00.230
<v S1>on Billboard this week has a really catchy beat by

0:22:00.230 --> 0:22:03.500
<v S1>DJ mustard, and on it, Kendrick doubles down on calling

0:22:03.500 --> 0:22:05.510
<v S1>Drake a pedophile who he literally this time says the

0:22:05.510 --> 0:22:10.430
<v S1>word pedophile. He parodies Drake's music style, and it's kind

0:22:10.430 --> 0:22:13.700
<v S1>of considered at this stage that this is the point

0:22:13.700 --> 0:22:17.659
<v S1>where Kendrick has successfully shredded Drake's reputation. He's kind of

0:22:17.660 --> 0:22:21.080
<v S1>releasing two tracks for every one track Drake is dropping,

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.650
<v S1>and he's also demonstrated his storytelling and his lyrical prowess,

0:22:24.650 --> 0:22:26.899
<v S1>which is the kind of level that he's on compared

0:22:26.900 --> 0:22:31.160
<v S1>to a more pop commercial pop star like Drake. The

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.110
<v S1>kind of brief code and all of this is a

0:22:33.109 --> 0:22:35.780
<v S1>track called The Heart Part six, which is the final

0:22:35.780 --> 0:22:39.710
<v S1>track so far from Drake. He denies the pedophile allegations,

0:22:39.710 --> 0:22:43.160
<v S1>but doesn't really land any new blows on Kendrick. So

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:44.660
<v S1>kind of takes us to where we are now, which

0:22:44.660 --> 0:22:48.740
<v S1>is a lot of personal, vicious rumors aimed at each other,

0:22:48.740 --> 0:22:51.680
<v S1>a lot of collateral damage for the people around them

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:57.230
<v S1>in their lives, and a feeling that Kendrick has essentially won,

0:22:57.230 --> 0:23:01.429
<v S1>quote unquote, whatever that means. This feud. There's a lot

0:23:01.430 --> 0:23:04.250
<v S1>of stuff going on, a lot of stuff to talk about.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.070
<v S1>I think maybe where we can start is like, why

0:23:07.070 --> 0:23:10.370
<v S1>this drew so much attention? I think aside from how

0:23:10.369 --> 0:23:13.940
<v S1>big and successful and popular both of these guys are,

0:23:14.330 --> 0:23:16.730
<v S1>the rapid fire way these songs are being released, like

0:23:16.730 --> 0:23:19.040
<v S1>having 4 or 5 tracks released over the course of

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.470
<v S1>a weekend. Like Thomas, you and I were messaging at

0:23:21.470 --> 0:23:24.170
<v S1>certain points about a track and then you're like, another

0:23:24.170 --> 0:23:27.830
<v S1>track has just been released. And then also how dark

0:23:27.859 --> 0:23:30.650
<v S1>a turn these allegations took. It feels like those two

0:23:30.650 --> 0:23:33.169
<v S1>things just sort of brought so many more people in

0:23:33.170 --> 0:23:36.020
<v S1>the periphery of hip hop into this feud over the

0:23:36.020 --> 0:23:40.520
<v S1>past week. Just talk me through why this became so big. Thomas.

0:23:41.030 --> 0:23:43.340
<v S3>Well, yeah, I think it really was the frequency. You know,

0:23:43.340 --> 0:23:46.369
<v S3>like in previous hip hop feuds, you would wait, like,

0:23:46.369 --> 0:23:49.399
<v S3>you know, whether it's NAS and Jay-Z or Tupac and

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.050
<v S3>Biggie and like the 90s, you'd have to wait like

0:23:51.050 --> 0:23:52.940
<v S3>ages for them to go off and like, film a video.

0:23:52.940 --> 0:23:55.760
<v S3>And it'd be like months between, you know, like hit

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.369
<v S3>him up versus who shot you. Whereas this was basically

0:23:58.369 --> 0:24:01.160
<v S3>contained to like a 48 hour period across the weekend.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.380
<v S3>And so I do think for a little while, you know,

0:24:03.380 --> 0:24:05.719
<v S3>this feud was kind of existing on the fringes, like

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.909
<v S3>people who were really into hip hop were following it.

0:24:07.910 --> 0:24:10.790
<v S3>But when it kind of like seized the momentum across

0:24:10.790 --> 0:24:12.890
<v S3>the weekend and it was just like track after track

0:24:12.890 --> 0:24:15.350
<v S3>after track, I think it did kind of bleed into

0:24:15.350 --> 0:24:17.000
<v S3>the mainstream and suddenly people were like, well, hold on,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.129
<v S3>why are these two guys like, what is going on here?

0:24:19.130 --> 0:24:21.650
<v S3>And then and then like that, coinciding with the fact

0:24:21.650 --> 0:24:25.160
<v S3>it became so personal and these like really intense, you know,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.800
<v S3>allegations were being traded back and forth. And you know,

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.780
<v S3>there's been so much chat and I think this really

0:24:29.780 --> 0:24:32.359
<v S3>plays into it, you know, of all these people saying like, oh,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.310
<v S3>this is why hip hop fans finally get why the

0:24:34.310 --> 0:24:37.490
<v S3>Swifties are so excited. Because like, this Easter egg culture

0:24:37.490 --> 0:24:39.950
<v S3>that we're in now, where all of these songs featured

0:24:39.950 --> 0:24:42.560
<v S3>like allegations or kind of like winks and nods about

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.600
<v S3>things going on. And so you kind of like, tapped

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.090
<v S3>into people's desire to go on the internet and be like, what?

0:24:47.090 --> 0:24:48.680
<v S3>What are they talking about? What is going on here?

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.680
<v S3>So suddenly you had this, like volume of content being like,

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.290
<v S3>flooded into the internet. At the same time, people are

0:24:54.290 --> 0:24:57.200
<v S3>like investigating to try and figure out what is going

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.199
<v S3>on and who's really like, you know, got the right

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.359
<v S3>Intel and everything. So it just kind of like this

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:06.020
<v S3>confluence of factors, I think, seize people's imagination. I don't know,

0:25:06.020 --> 0:25:08.359
<v S3>that was my experience. I don't know, Mel, as someone

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.570
<v S3>who may not be as typically tapped in to, you know,

0:25:11.570 --> 0:25:15.169
<v S3>this space, were you across it across the weekend?

0:25:15.170 --> 0:25:18.560
<v S2>I was across it. Um, I mean, I think people

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.739
<v S2>also like a train wreck, like, I don't know, I

0:25:21.740 --> 0:25:24.410
<v S2>think what we're seeing here is just both of these

0:25:24.410 --> 0:25:27.169
<v S2>people going off the rails, particularly, as you mentioned, the

0:25:27.170 --> 0:25:30.680
<v S2>claims got more and more intense. And I don't know,

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.260
<v S2>like I was interested in it. And obviously, if you

0:25:33.260 --> 0:25:35.630
<v S2>recognize all the Easter eggs, you get something different out

0:25:35.630 --> 0:25:38.659
<v S2>of this because you're understanding a lot more of the references.

0:25:38.660 --> 0:25:41.300
<v S2>But I don't know, I just think it became really gross.

0:25:41.300 --> 0:25:43.669
<v S2>And I do think, at least in some parts of

0:25:43.670 --> 0:25:46.070
<v S2>the internet, maybe among people who aren't as rusted on

0:25:46.070 --> 0:25:48.650
<v S2>hip hop fans, there's like a feeling that this is

0:25:48.650 --> 0:25:52.520
<v S2>kind of gross and disgusting to watch. Um, I don't know.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.140
<v S2>Do you guys feel that at all? Like, I know

0:25:54.140 --> 0:25:57.440
<v S2>you're excited by the the songs and the music and, like,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.690
<v S2>I get the lyrics, the kind of funny and interesting

0:25:59.690 --> 0:26:02.090
<v S2>and clever at times. And the songs are legit songs

0:26:02.090 --> 0:26:03.980
<v S2>on their own. But do you think there's a level

0:26:03.980 --> 0:26:06.020
<v S2>of grossness to this? And yeah.

0:26:06.020 --> 0:26:07.340
<v S1>Look, I want to I do want to get into that.

0:26:07.340 --> 0:26:09.080
<v S1>I think if it's okay, we'll put a pin in

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:10.850
<v S1>that element of it for a second, because I do

0:26:10.850 --> 0:26:14.630
<v S1>think there's a bit around the context to this before

0:26:14.630 --> 0:26:17.239
<v S1>we sort of unpack when things may be spun out

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.060
<v S1>of control a little bit, I think. I think, Thomas,

0:26:20.060 --> 0:26:22.970
<v S1>your point about Taylor Swift is, is really interesting because

0:26:22.970 --> 0:26:25.730
<v S1>in some ways, this is the first feud in a

0:26:25.730 --> 0:26:30.200
<v S1>kind of post Taylor Swift social media Reddit true crime

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.859
<v S1>era where like, you know, rap genius now just called genius.

0:26:33.859 --> 0:26:35.720
<v S1>The website's been around for a long time where you can, like,

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.120
<v S1>look up hip hop songs and people can provide annotations

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.639
<v S1>and things, but the level of analysis people were doing

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.790
<v S1>seemed out of control. Like the tracks 616 in LA,

0:26:43.820 --> 0:26:47.240
<v S1>people are like oh 616. That's a reference to Father's

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.820
<v S1>Day in Canada. That's a reference to the date. The

0:26:49.820 --> 0:26:52.760
<v S1>first season of euphoria, the TV show about high schoolers

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.760
<v S1>having sex that Drake executive produced, came out. That's also

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:57.800
<v S1>a reference to a biblical verse. It's also a reference

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.570
<v S1>to like. It could be a reference to one of

0:26:59.570 --> 0:27:02.000
<v S1>these things. It could be a reference to three of

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.129
<v S1>them or none of them. I think there's an element

0:27:04.130 --> 0:27:06.889
<v S1>of just people creating their own lore around this stuff

0:27:06.890 --> 0:27:09.830
<v S1>that just grows and grows and grows and snowballs, and

0:27:09.830 --> 0:27:12.080
<v S1>I think it's a really smart comparison to sort of

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.800
<v S1>put that in the frame. And as ludicrous as it sounds,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.409
<v S1>the way that Swift has sort of trained music fans

0:27:18.410 --> 0:27:21.980
<v S1>and others to think about music and lyrics. But one

0:27:21.980 --> 0:27:23.720
<v S1>of the things I want to ask you, Thomas, is

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:28.580
<v S1>whether you think this was ever a real or fair

0:27:28.580 --> 0:27:34.340
<v S1>rap battle feud. These are two very different kinds of rappers.

0:27:34.340 --> 0:27:36.260
<v S1>You laid it out very well at the start. Drake

0:27:36.260 --> 0:27:38.689
<v S1>is much more poppy, much more commercial. Kendrick is more

0:27:38.690 --> 0:27:42.530
<v S1>known for his incredibly complex rhymes, his storytelling. That's the

0:27:42.530 --> 0:27:45.650
<v S1>kind of thing that generally wins you a rap beef.

0:27:45.650 --> 0:27:47.389
<v S1>Do you think he was always going to come out

0:27:47.390 --> 0:27:49.220
<v S1>on top? Were there moments in which you thought Drake

0:27:49.220 --> 0:27:50.420
<v S1>had the upper hand here?

0:27:51.530 --> 0:27:55.700
<v S3>Uh, I mean, it's hard because there's so many quantifiers.

0:27:56.030 --> 0:28:01.399
<v S3>I love Drake, as you know, obviously pre potentially. Sex offender. Drake, I.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.889
<v S2>Believe you said to me that you're the Drake of journalism.

0:28:03.890 --> 0:28:05.600
<v S3>I know you said that to about me.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.060
<v S1>You were raised. You were raised in the clubs of

0:28:08.060 --> 0:28:11.330
<v S1>Sydney in the late 20 tens. It makes sense. It

0:28:11.330 --> 0:28:12.080
<v S1>makes sense. Exactly.

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.970
<v S3>Take care is a special album. No. But like, I

0:28:13.970 --> 0:28:19.360
<v S3>think I did think that generally there was a. Consensus

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:23.020
<v S3>that Kendrick was winning from the start and he was

0:28:23.020 --> 0:28:26.109
<v S3>always going to win. But when Drake dropped Family Matters

0:28:26.109 --> 0:28:30.850
<v S3>on Saturday morning, I think people saw a slight momentum

0:28:30.850 --> 0:28:32.590
<v S3>shift and I say slight because it lasted all of

0:28:32.590 --> 0:28:35.800
<v S3>20 minutes because it was it was a I think

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.270
<v S3>it was a pretty like hard hitting song. And he

0:28:37.270 --> 0:28:40.420
<v S3>also recorded a video with it like, you know, really impressive,

0:28:40.420 --> 0:28:43.420
<v S3>like production values. He kind of went all out, probably

0:28:43.420 --> 0:28:46.300
<v S3>not anticipating that Kendrick would like, cut his legs out

0:28:46.300 --> 0:28:46.810
<v S3>for two more.

0:28:46.810 --> 0:28:48.970
<v S1>In the chamber, ready to go straight away.

0:28:48.970 --> 0:28:52.000
<v S3>But I mean, my personal take is that obviously before

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.280
<v S3>things did get really problematic and weird and I was

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.920
<v S3>kind of like enjoying the drama of this beef for

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.250
<v S3>what it was like. There is this mentality in the

0:29:00.250 --> 0:29:03.250
<v S3>hip hop world that, you know, the critical bar for

0:29:03.250 --> 0:29:05.500
<v S3>someone like Drake is so much higher than what people

0:29:05.500 --> 0:29:08.620
<v S3>expect for Kendrick. Like, you know, Drake literally raps in

0:29:08.620 --> 0:29:11.110
<v S3>Family Matters. Like Kendrick just opened his mouth. Somebody hand

0:29:11.110 --> 0:29:13.270
<v S3>him a Grammy right now. And that is like, there's

0:29:13.270 --> 0:29:15.160
<v S3>a lot of truth in that joke. I think Kendrick

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.130
<v S3>can kind of like, do something or say anything that

0:29:18.130 --> 0:29:20.440
<v S3>and people will just fall over themselves to say how

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.770
<v S3>amazing and smart he is. And so I again, before

0:29:23.770 --> 0:29:26.110
<v S3>things got really weird, I was kind of impressed that

0:29:26.110 --> 0:29:28.660
<v S3>Drake did decide to take this on, and I thought

0:29:28.660 --> 0:29:30.130
<v S3>he was doing pretty well. And I thought when Family

0:29:30.130 --> 0:29:32.050
<v S3>Matters came out, he kind of took the lead. You know,

0:29:32.050 --> 0:29:35.230
<v S3>you've got Kendrick as this really earnest rapper who is

0:29:35.230 --> 0:29:38.770
<v S3>so serious, and Drake is the absolute embodiment of internet culture.

0:29:38.770 --> 0:29:40.900
<v S3>He responded to most of the tracks with just like

0:29:40.900 --> 0:29:43.840
<v S3>funny memes on the internet that people thought were really good,

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.940
<v S3>and he was like, needling Kendrick. And and I said

0:29:45.940 --> 0:29:48.370
<v S3>to you over the weekend, I was like, stepping out

0:29:48.370 --> 0:29:50.170
<v S3>of this. It really is a funny thing to watch

0:29:50.170 --> 0:29:52.960
<v S3>because Drake is the perfect foil for someone like Kendrick.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.650
<v S3>He he's mean, he's gossipy, he's funny. He's just like,

0:29:56.650 --> 0:29:59.560
<v S3>you know, snide remarks. Whereas Kendrick is like really, you know,

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.530
<v S3>self-serving and really serious. And so it made for a

0:30:02.530 --> 0:30:05.050
<v S3>great feud. And I personally thought when Family Matters came out,

0:30:05.050 --> 0:30:06.790
<v S3>I was like, oh, Drake actually is holding his own

0:30:06.790 --> 0:30:08.680
<v S3>here against someone who people are going to be really

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.950
<v S3>quick to give the win anyway. Obviously. Kendrick then released

0:30:11.950 --> 0:30:14.290
<v S3>two more tracks, especially Not Like Us. I think really

0:30:14.290 --> 0:30:16.540
<v S3>like killed the feud off, and also took it into

0:30:16.540 --> 0:30:19.360
<v S3>an area where even the kind of casual observers or

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.340
<v S3>the people really invested, like you and I, who were

0:30:21.340 --> 0:30:23.410
<v S3>enjoying it for what it kind of was, it started

0:30:23.410 --> 0:30:26.080
<v S3>to become harder to get hyped about it because it

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:26.710
<v S3>felt just like.

0:30:26.710 --> 0:30:29.140
<v S1>It's like The Simpsons meme like, stop, he's already dead,

0:30:29.140 --> 0:30:29.380
<v S1>you know?

0:30:29.380 --> 0:30:32.110
<v S3>Yeah, exactly. But yeah, I generally think it was an

0:30:32.110 --> 0:30:35.080
<v S3>interesting reflection for a while, at least that, you know,

0:30:35.170 --> 0:30:38.140
<v S3>Drake was up against it from the get go. He

0:30:38.140 --> 0:30:40.210
<v S3>was behind the eight ball. He is seen as this

0:30:40.210 --> 0:30:43.120
<v S3>dumb pop rapper. And I was like, ah, I think

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.340
<v S3>he gets points for like going into this and holding

0:30:45.340 --> 0:30:46.120
<v S3>his own. Yeah.

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.250
<v S1>I think that's why Mel and like, I promise you,

0:30:48.250 --> 0:30:49.990
<v S1>we will talk about when things got weird, but I

0:30:49.990 --> 0:30:52.720
<v S1>think I just wanted to set a little bit on

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.970
<v S1>the bits of the feud that sort of, you know,

0:30:54.970 --> 0:30:57.790
<v S1>felt more reminiscent of, of rap feuds of old because

0:30:57.790 --> 0:30:59.950
<v S1>this has been a part of hip hop for so long,

0:30:59.950 --> 0:31:02.470
<v S1>and maybe for people really outside of the culture, watching

0:31:02.500 --> 0:31:06.400
<v S1>two men in their like, late 30s trade barbs seems weird,

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.160
<v S1>but this has been in hip hop's DNA from day one,

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.470
<v S1>whether it is the East Coast, West Coast stuff, whether

0:31:11.470 --> 0:31:14.290
<v S1>it was the gangsta rap versus conscious rap stuff in

0:31:14.290 --> 0:31:17.590
<v S1>the 2000, the postcode wars in the drill scene in

0:31:17.590 --> 0:31:20.620
<v S1>UK and Australia, a large part of rap has been

0:31:20.620 --> 0:31:22.510
<v S1>people sort of like taking shots at one another, and

0:31:22.510 --> 0:31:26.440
<v S1>it's always strayed a bit into like weird territory. Like

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.960
<v S1>in the 90s and 2000, there was a lot of homophobia,

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:30.970
<v S1>there was a lot of accusations of people sleeping with

0:31:30.970 --> 0:31:34.150
<v S1>one another's wives. That's always been part of it. A

0:31:34.150 --> 0:31:35.530
<v S1>lot of it, you know, that I think is the

0:31:35.530 --> 0:31:37.930
<v S1>most interesting for for people like Thomas Knight probably is

0:31:37.930 --> 0:31:40.120
<v S1>when they make fun of each other or take shots

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:41.560
<v S1>at each other for the music that they make. Like

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.230
<v S1>the other Drake line I thought was interesting was, you know,

0:31:44.230 --> 0:31:46.510
<v S1>Drake said, Kendrick's always rapping like he's about to get

0:31:46.510 --> 0:31:49.120
<v S1>the slaves freed. Kendrick hit back hard on that, but

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:53.200
<v S1>it's like, that's funny, memorable sort of lines that reflect

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:54.729
<v S1>where each other are. And it's sort of, if you

0:31:54.730 --> 0:32:00.130
<v S1>take it in, uh, spirit of competition, it doesn't feel crazy. Like,

0:32:00.130 --> 0:32:03.220
<v S1>you know, we had Scribble Jam, like hip hop tournaments.

0:32:03.220 --> 0:32:06.670
<v S1>Rap battles were a place where rappers emerged and established

0:32:06.670 --> 0:32:09.580
<v S1>their credentials. So evaluating it on that level for a bit,

0:32:09.580 --> 0:32:12.310
<v S1>I think is is interesting. And then, yes, I think

0:32:12.310 --> 0:32:14.380
<v S1>we do need to talk about whether it went a

0:32:14.380 --> 0:32:19.100
<v S1>little bit kind of unhinged. But there's there's it feels

0:32:19.100 --> 0:32:21.080
<v S1>like Thomas says more going on here as well. Like

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.800
<v S1>there is this long term animosity that a lot of

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.220
<v S1>rappers seem to have towards Drake, and a lot of

0:32:28.220 --> 0:32:31.790
<v S1>that really came to the fore with some pretty explicit stuff,

0:32:31.790 --> 0:32:34.400
<v S1>Kendrick was saying. No need to get into like all

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.110
<v S1>the details. There are some people who say that this

0:32:36.110 --> 0:32:39.680
<v S1>goes back to 2002, when a rapper called Birdman didn't

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.470
<v S1>pay Pharrell for a beat. Believe it or not, there

0:32:42.470 --> 0:32:44.570
<v S1>is like a family tree that shows how you go

0:32:44.570 --> 0:32:48.050
<v S1>from Birdman on one hand to Drake and Pharrell to

0:32:48.050 --> 0:32:49.520
<v S1>push a T and all this sort of stuff. So

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.360
<v S1>there's like lots of history here as well. But Drake

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.840
<v S1>has been the subject of big disses from big rappers

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.660
<v S1>for a while, like Meek Mill. Uh, Philly rapper had

0:32:59.660 --> 0:33:02.180
<v S1>a go at him for using ghostwriters. Probably the biggest

0:33:02.180 --> 0:33:06.290
<v S1>thing that happened before this feud was Pusha T revealing

0:33:06.290 --> 0:33:08.510
<v S1>on his diss track Story of Adidon that Drake had

0:33:08.510 --> 0:33:11.120
<v S1>a kid like that is how the world found out

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.090
<v S1>that Drake had a secret son. And for a rapper

0:33:14.090 --> 0:33:18.020
<v S1>that really projected this sort of soft boy image, and

0:33:18.170 --> 0:33:20.479
<v S1>always at the clubs waiting for a text back that

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.830
<v S1>seemed to really shift the narrative around him. I think

0:33:24.830 --> 0:33:26.959
<v S1>the other part of this, and Kendrick addresses this head on,

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.300
<v S1>and I think probably not, none of us are the

0:33:29.300 --> 0:33:31.520
<v S1>right people to talk about this in detail, but it

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.060
<v S1>is worth mentioning that Drake, unlike Kendrick, has a mixed

0:33:35.060 --> 0:33:39.290
<v S1>race background. He has faced accusations of being like a

0:33:39.290 --> 0:33:42.920
<v S1>culture vulture of leaning into blackness when it suits him

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:46.850
<v S1>without paying proper respect. Kendrick mentions that a number of

0:33:46.850 --> 0:33:49.310
<v S1>times in these disses, he talks about the way Drake

0:33:49.310 --> 0:33:50.780
<v S1>says the N word. He doesn't like the way he

0:33:50.780 --> 0:33:52.610
<v S1>says the N word. He talks about when Drake goes

0:33:52.610 --> 0:33:56.930
<v S1>to Atlanta, kind of like a modern capital of current

0:33:56.930 --> 0:34:01.220
<v S1>southern hip hop, and goes there to get credibility and

0:34:01.220 --> 0:34:04.610
<v S1>cultural clout by working with artists like Migos. There is

0:34:04.610 --> 0:34:07.760
<v S1>a pretty intense racial dynamic to this as well. And

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.100
<v S1>people point out, well, J. Cole is also mixed race,

0:34:10.100 --> 0:34:12.589
<v S1>but the response there is, well, J Cole doesn't seem

0:34:12.590 --> 0:34:14.540
<v S1>to pick and choose as much like Drake has done

0:34:14.540 --> 0:34:16.520
<v S1>this for a long time. When he went to London

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.340
<v S1>and started borrowing that sort of south London sound, and

0:34:19.340 --> 0:34:21.470
<v S1>it's one of the first times someone's just laid it

0:34:21.469 --> 0:34:24.890
<v S1>out super, super explicitly. So it does feel like there's

0:34:24.890 --> 0:34:27.560
<v S1>this pent up anger from a lot of the hip

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.810
<v S1>hop scene to someone like Drake, who has become so

0:34:29.810 --> 0:34:32.930
<v S1>commercial by being able to pick and choose what his

0:34:32.930 --> 0:34:35.810
<v S1>kind of racial context is at different times. Is that

0:34:35.810 --> 0:34:36.560
<v S1>fair to say?

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.780
<v S3>Yeah, I think so, because it's always been this thing,

0:34:38.780 --> 0:34:40.940
<v S3>especially in the last like probably 20 years of these

0:34:40.940 --> 0:34:43.040
<v S3>like fans who feel like they need to like, safeguard

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.859
<v S3>the true honor of hip hop and what it really

0:34:45.860 --> 0:34:48.230
<v S3>means and what it's really supposed to be. But at

0:34:48.230 --> 0:34:51.320
<v S3>the same time, that mentality has had to deal with

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.750
<v S3>the fact that hip hop and I guess, like the

0:34:53.750 --> 0:34:56.149
<v S3>wider black culture, has become one of the most popular

0:34:56.150 --> 0:34:58.910
<v S3>like genres of music in the whole world. And, you know,

0:34:58.910 --> 0:35:01.700
<v S3>we've had so many conversations on this podcast about like,

0:35:01.700 --> 0:35:03.919
<v S3>for instance, the rise of country music and how you

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.799
<v S3>know what, who gets to own, you know, a genre.

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:08.990
<v S3>And I think a lot of like, purist hip hop

0:35:08.989 --> 0:35:11.450
<v S3>fans have struggled with the likes of Drake, who are

0:35:11.450 --> 0:35:14.330
<v S3>kind of like bonafide pop stars, but also like rappers

0:35:14.330 --> 0:35:17.750
<v S3>and hip hop. And and there has always been this, like, simmering,

0:35:17.750 --> 0:35:20.330
<v S3>you know, tension around Drake. I feel like he spent

0:35:20.330 --> 0:35:22.520
<v S3>a really long time at the start of his career

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.950
<v S3>battling it, and kind of like trying to prove to

0:35:24.950 --> 0:35:27.020
<v S3>people that he wasn't just like this punchline rapper who

0:35:27.020 --> 0:35:29.000
<v S3>could be made fun of. And for a long time

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.430
<v S3>he was like that sensitive, soft boy. And I feel

0:35:31.430 --> 0:35:34.040
<v S3>like despite, you know, the constant accusations around that, he

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.620
<v S3>kind of just because of the sheer volume of his hits,

0:35:36.620 --> 0:35:38.779
<v S3>he kind of, I guess, like managed to hold on

0:35:38.780 --> 0:35:41.360
<v S3>to some kind of cred. But there was always that

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:43.969
<v S3>feeling around him that he wasn't legit. Um, you know,

0:35:43.969 --> 0:35:46.009
<v S3>in the, in the true hip hop sense. And I

0:35:46.010 --> 0:35:48.980
<v S3>still don't really know how I feel about like that

0:35:48.980 --> 0:35:51.469
<v S3>mentality for the genre. Is it a good thing that

0:35:51.469 --> 0:35:54.200
<v S3>we still, you know, in this day and age, believe

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.780
<v S3>that you should try and hold on to like, what

0:35:56.780 --> 0:35:59.330
<v S3>the genre used to be 20, 30 years ago. Like

0:35:59.330 --> 0:36:02.030
<v S3>things change, things develop. And, you know, we just have

0:36:02.030 --> 0:36:04.250
<v S3>to accept that. But I do think this whole thing

0:36:04.250 --> 0:36:06.830
<v S3>has been a flashpoint then for Kendrick to kind of like,

0:36:06.830 --> 0:36:09.080
<v S3>speak into the echo chamber of all these people who

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:10.850
<v S3>already thought all this about Drake and be like, you know,

0:36:10.850 --> 0:36:13.460
<v S3>you're mixed race. You say the N word when you shouldn't.

0:36:13.460 --> 0:36:16.489
<v S3>You're basically a pop star who likes to rap occasionally,

0:36:16.489 --> 0:36:19.310
<v S3>you know? And also you take a pic. Hahaha. But

0:36:19.310 --> 0:36:22.070
<v S3>but yeah, like, it just kind of like lit a

0:36:22.070 --> 0:36:23.960
<v S3>fuse that was already waiting to blow.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:25.670
<v S2>I mean, I think as, as mentioned, those questions of

0:36:25.670 --> 0:36:28.640
<v S2>authenticity have always been built into hip hop, and I

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.730
<v S2>think those questions always come to the fore when you

0:36:31.730 --> 0:36:35.180
<v S2>see art that starts as quote unquote outsider art outside

0:36:35.180 --> 0:36:38.000
<v S2>of the mainstream become part of the mainstream. So when

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:41.629
<v S2>you have kids who grew up, you know, on the streets,

0:36:41.630 --> 0:36:46.190
<v S2>suddenly become billionaires, those questions of authenticity kind of are

0:36:46.190 --> 0:36:49.399
<v S2>inherently going to arise, because what made the art form,

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.560
<v S2>what it is, is no longer there. So I think

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.190
<v S2>like the change is inevitable in many ways, but those

0:36:55.190 --> 0:36:58.070
<v S2>questions have still kind of lingered. I don't know if

0:36:58.070 --> 0:37:00.620
<v S2>there is, like you said, you don't know what you

0:37:00.620 --> 0:37:03.590
<v S2>think is right or wrong, but maybe everyone's authentic is

0:37:03.590 --> 0:37:05.510
<v S2>very different. You know what I mean?

0:37:05.510 --> 0:37:07.219
<v S1>Yeah, I feel like I feel like the issue here

0:37:07.219 --> 0:37:10.040
<v S1>is like, obviously there's space in this world for a

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.260
<v S1>Drake and a Kendrick to exist. And I kind of

0:37:12.260 --> 0:37:14.930
<v S1>think Drake, I think it was a weird move for

0:37:14.930 --> 0:37:18.370
<v S1>Drake to involve himself in a rap feud, like. Because.

0:37:19.210 --> 0:37:22.240
<v S1>When you go like hip hop has evolved, it's changed.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.430
<v S1>There's all these different forms of it now as well.

0:37:24.430 --> 0:37:27.969
<v S1>But the format of a rap beef is like stripping

0:37:27.969 --> 0:37:29.770
<v S1>all of that away and you're just going toe to

0:37:29.770 --> 0:37:32.830
<v S1>toe bar for bar. Two people trying to prove how

0:37:32.830 --> 0:37:35.470
<v S1>real and authentic and brutal they can be to one another.

0:37:35.469 --> 0:37:37.840
<v S1>And in that context, a guy who grew up in

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.020
<v S1>the suburbs of Toronto became famous for being a child

0:37:41.020 --> 0:37:45.010
<v S1>star on Degrassi Junior High, was never going to beat

0:37:45.010 --> 0:37:47.950
<v S1>someone who grew up in Compton, who raps about seeing

0:37:47.950 --> 0:37:50.230
<v S1>his first execution on the street when he was nine

0:37:50.230 --> 0:37:53.260
<v S1>years old. Like that just there's no format of a

0:37:53.260 --> 0:37:55.989
<v S1>rap feud where Drake would have won from that, and

0:37:55.989 --> 0:37:58.089
<v S1>maybe it's like good on him for at least trying.

0:37:58.090 --> 0:38:01.480
<v S1>But it's like you're in a different world. Be happy

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.690
<v S1>in that world like no one asks you to. To

0:38:04.690 --> 0:38:09.279
<v S1>respond to the pretty soft initial Drake diss saying that

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.620
<v S1>he was, you know, it was big me, not big three.

0:38:11.620 --> 0:38:14.739
<v S1>I find that to be a strange decision for Drake.

0:38:14.739 --> 0:38:16.899
<v S1>Maybe he thought the payoff is I'll get a bunch

0:38:16.900 --> 0:38:20.320
<v S1>of streams, but then the risk is, well, actually, you're

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:22.810
<v S1>in a weaker position than you were before you entered it.

0:38:22.810 --> 0:38:27.580
<v S1>Because now everyone thinks you're an alleged sex criminal. It

0:38:27.580 --> 0:38:28.990
<v S1>just doesn't seem to have worked out.

0:38:28.989 --> 0:38:31.630
<v S3>Yeah, but, like, how hard is it to, you know,

0:38:31.630 --> 0:38:33.100
<v S3>it's easy for us to sit here and say that.

0:38:33.100 --> 0:38:35.470
<v S3>But this is a guy who, you know, is like,

0:38:35.469 --> 0:38:37.300
<v S3>basically on top of the music world. As I said before,

0:38:37.300 --> 0:38:39.640
<v S3>signed the largest publishing deal in history like a few

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.640
<v S3>years ago with universal. Everything and everyone around him is

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.489
<v S3>telling him he's probably the greatest rapper to have ever lived. Like,

0:38:45.489 --> 0:38:48.670
<v S3>do you think he's got any perspective left to not

0:38:48.790 --> 0:38:51.100
<v S3>have the ego to involve himself in this? Like, of

0:38:51.100 --> 0:38:54.129
<v S3>course he doesn't like, you know, and again, I think,

0:38:54.130 --> 0:38:56.170
<v S3>you know, probably he saw this as an opportunity to

0:38:56.170 --> 0:38:59.049
<v S3>be like, wow, all the things I haven't conquered. Maybe

0:38:59.050 --> 0:39:02.080
<v S3>I could take on the one guy that people really

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.840
<v S3>see as like above me right now in terms of

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.259
<v S3>credibility or, you know, just like bankability like Kendrick has

0:39:08.260 --> 0:39:10.360
<v S3>always had that kind of mystique. And, you know, like

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.930
<v S3>I said, that almost like the Tupac Shakur thing around

0:39:13.930 --> 0:39:16.330
<v S3>him where like, everyone just universally is like, well, Kendrick

0:39:16.330 --> 0:39:19.149
<v S3>is the man. And, you know, yeah, I definitely see

0:39:19.150 --> 0:39:22.000
<v S3>a reality where Drake is so high on his own

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.759
<v S3>success that, you know, there was never a world where

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:26.560
<v S3>he could have, like, not touched this.

0:39:36.630 --> 0:39:38.730
<v S1>Let's talk about where things got really dark. And I

0:39:38.730 --> 0:39:41.700
<v S1>think this is probably where a lot of people either

0:39:41.700 --> 0:39:45.480
<v S1>switched off or really switched in, just because of how crazy,

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:50.070
<v S1>outlandish things were getting. Lots of women as collateral damage.

0:39:50.070 --> 0:39:52.440
<v S1>Like that's that seems to be one of the clear,

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.890
<v S1>like big criticisms of this feud, even from hip hop

0:39:55.890 --> 0:40:01.920
<v S1>writers in the States. Drake accusing Kendrick of abusing his wife.

0:40:02.070 --> 0:40:05.400
<v S1>Kendrick saying that Drake has a daughter. Kendrick saying that

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.660
<v S1>he sleeps with underage children. Bizarrely, he didn't mention anyone

0:40:09.660 --> 0:40:11.550
<v S1>by name, and then Drake went out of his way

0:40:11.550 --> 0:40:15.180
<v S1>to mention Millie Bobby Brown, who is a she's obviously

0:40:15.180 --> 0:40:17.040
<v S1>the actress from Stranger Things, and there's been all sorts

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.680
<v S1>of weird rumors around that after she, I think she

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.500
<v S1>was 15, said that she was texting Drake and he

0:40:22.500 --> 0:40:25.290
<v S1>was giving her advice on dating. That was all very odd.

0:40:25.290 --> 0:40:27.719
<v S1>That wasn't mentioned by name by Kendrick, but then Drake

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.210
<v S1>sort of brought her into it like this, did, then

0:40:30.210 --> 0:40:33.480
<v S1>bring in a lot of people who clearly weren't choosing

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.390
<v S1>to be a part of it. I'll admit that, like

0:40:36.390 --> 0:40:38.580
<v S1>while it was going on, I wasn't saying this is

0:40:38.580 --> 0:40:40.200
<v S1>out of control. This is crazy. I just thought it

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.020
<v S1>was astonishing to see two of the biggest stars on

0:40:43.020 --> 0:40:46.980
<v S1>the planet just say stuff and be willing to say

0:40:46.980 --> 0:40:50.040
<v S1>it and double down and go after one another. And

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.920
<v S1>in some ways, I thought it was if you accept

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:55.169
<v S1>that a lot of rap and a lot of rap

0:40:55.170 --> 0:40:57.930
<v S1>beefs are kind of fictionalized, they're heightened and you just

0:40:57.930 --> 0:41:01.020
<v S1>sort of say exaggerated things to get attention. Didn't think

0:41:01.020 --> 0:41:03.150
<v S1>in the moment it was that out of control. But

0:41:03.150 --> 0:41:04.830
<v S1>when you look at it in the cold light of

0:41:04.860 --> 0:41:06.779
<v S1>day and you're like, oh, the body count is piled

0:41:06.780 --> 0:41:09.390
<v S1>up here, there's a lot of innocent parties to this

0:41:09.390 --> 0:41:13.920
<v S1>who just, like, would feel really shit about being used

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:18.399
<v S1>in this particular way. I guess that's how you feel, Mel.

0:41:18.430 --> 0:41:20.980
<v S1>Judging by what you were saying before, I really.

0:41:20.980 --> 0:41:23.890
<v S2>I was invested and enjoyed this when the attacks were

0:41:23.890 --> 0:41:28.000
<v S2>about each other's art, creativity, authenticity. But then all of

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:31.000
<v S2>a sudden, when these kind of wild claims got brought

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:34.210
<v S2>into it, it took a very dark turn. And on

0:41:34.210 --> 0:41:36.969
<v S2>one part, on one hand, I'm like, it's good that

0:41:36.969 --> 0:41:40.060
<v S2>being a kind of beating up your wife or having

0:41:40.060 --> 0:41:43.420
<v S2>sex with underage girls is considered bad, and that they're

0:41:43.420 --> 0:41:45.940
<v S2>saying it's a diss, like that's that's good on one level.

0:41:45.940 --> 0:41:50.620
<v S2>But there is something that feels quite wrong in weaponizing these,

0:41:50.620 --> 0:41:55.480
<v S2>these very serious kind of issues in, in a battle

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.570
<v S2>of this format. Like it's not really paying attention to

0:41:58.570 --> 0:42:01.150
<v S2>the victims in any way, and it's just using these

0:42:01.150 --> 0:42:03.130
<v S2>claims to kind of one up each other. I think

0:42:03.130 --> 0:42:06.670
<v S2>that's what is uncomfortable about it reducing these kind of

0:42:06.670 --> 0:42:09.250
<v S2>quite serious things to a disk, quote unquote.

0:42:09.250 --> 0:42:10.780
<v S1>And a lot of people have pointed out, you know,

0:42:10.780 --> 0:42:15.190
<v S1>for all of Drake's allegations about Kendrick being abusive, he

0:42:15.190 --> 0:42:18.040
<v S1>is a very public supporter of Tory Lanez, who was

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:20.589
<v S1>convicted of shooting Megan Thee Stallion. Like, it's not like

0:42:20.590 --> 0:42:23.500
<v S1>Drake has moral high ground here necessarily. I wonder whether

0:42:23.500 --> 0:42:26.170
<v S1>part of it is also, you know, in an era

0:42:26.170 --> 0:42:28.450
<v S1>without the internet where people just sort of say vague

0:42:28.450 --> 0:42:31.360
<v S1>things about like, you're an abuser, you're this, you're that.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:33.550
<v S1>It's sort of like it floats away and you don't

0:42:33.550 --> 0:42:35.830
<v S1>really know who they're talking about. If it's a specific thing,

0:42:35.830 --> 0:42:38.680
<v S1>is it a current thing? But as Thomas was saying earlier,

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.830
<v S1>now it's like this land of Easter eggs where you like, okay,

0:42:41.830 --> 0:42:45.130
<v S1>this is a reference to this particular individual. I've resurfaced

0:42:45.130 --> 0:42:47.170
<v S1>the TikTok video from 12 years ago. That's what this

0:42:47.170 --> 0:42:51.310
<v S1>is about. So you can actually name specific people who

0:42:51.310 --> 0:42:54.760
<v S1>rappers are maybe just intending to be metaphors or punchlines

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:55.990
<v S1>for a bigger point.

0:42:56.730 --> 0:43:00.030
<v S2>Yeah. I mean I am interested to about I guess

0:43:00.030 --> 0:43:01.710
<v S2>none of them are going to to the courts to

0:43:01.710 --> 0:43:04.080
<v S2>sue for libel, but it is kind of incredible the

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.660
<v S2>things you can, um, you can put inverse.

0:43:06.660 --> 0:43:09.089
<v S3>Yeah. I mean, it's it's gotten to a weird place.

0:43:09.090 --> 0:43:10.680
<v S3>And I think, you know, one of the big criticisms

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:13.709
<v S3>has been like, you know, if if Kendrick has long

0:43:13.710 --> 0:43:16.140
<v S3>suspected it or has information that Drake is running a

0:43:16.140 --> 0:43:18.540
<v S3>sex trafficking ring in his Toronto mansion, like, why hasn't

0:43:18.540 --> 0:43:20.460
<v S3>he brought this up earlier with the authorities and not

0:43:20.460 --> 0:43:23.040
<v S3>saved it for a rap beef? And like, similar with Drake,

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.169
<v S3>you know, like if he has proof that Kendrick like

0:43:25.170 --> 0:43:27.390
<v S3>it's obviously these things would never happen. But it's just

0:43:27.390 --> 0:43:31.049
<v S3>like when you think about the seriousness of these allegations

0:43:31.050 --> 0:43:32.370
<v S3>and they're only ever being brought up for the.

0:43:32.370 --> 0:43:33.780
<v S2>Snitches get stitches. Tom.

0:43:33.780 --> 0:43:35.610
<v S1>Yeah, it's interesting. I mean, like I think that's part

0:43:35.610 --> 0:43:37.650
<v S1>of it. Also, it's like they wouldn't go to the police,

0:43:37.650 --> 0:43:39.239
<v S1>but they want to sort of prove that they know

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:41.940
<v S1>these things and that they're better than the other person.

0:43:41.940 --> 0:43:44.190
<v S1>But yeah, okay. Maybe for like a sex trafficking ring,

0:43:44.190 --> 0:43:47.670
<v S1>if Kendrick really thinks there's like 114 year olds in

0:43:47.670 --> 0:43:52.080
<v S1>Drake's mansion, maybe don't sit on that until 2024. You know, until.

0:43:52.170 --> 0:43:53.819
<v S3>You happen to find yourself in a rap beef where

0:43:53.820 --> 0:43:55.980
<v S3>it would make for a really convenient punchline. So I

0:43:55.980 --> 0:43:58.260
<v S3>think that can, combined with the fact that it all

0:43:58.260 --> 0:44:02.700
<v S3>just got so dark, like, I'm not like us, you know? Yeah,

0:44:02.700 --> 0:44:05.160
<v S3>as I said, I think we've both been very, you know,

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.310
<v S3>keen observers and enjoying this for what it was. But

0:44:08.310 --> 0:44:11.010
<v S3>everyone I know that was really into it found themselves

0:44:11.010 --> 0:44:12.719
<v S3>increasingly like, it's like, how do you how are you

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.149
<v S3>supposed to respond to this? Like, I was genuinely really

0:44:15.150 --> 0:44:17.819
<v S3>interested to hear each new track, but as they got

0:44:17.820 --> 0:44:19.830
<v S3>more and more like, you know, there was more and

0:44:19.830 --> 0:44:22.260
<v S3>more collateral damage piling up, I was like, oh, I

0:44:22.260 --> 0:44:24.989
<v S3>don't know quite how to feel. At the end of

0:44:24.989 --> 0:44:28.049
<v S3>the day, when you look at the reality of this feud, like,

0:44:28.050 --> 0:44:32.040
<v S3>as I've said earlier, Drake belongs to Universal Music, and

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:35.790
<v S3>Kendrick in 2020 signed a publishing deal with Universal Music,

0:44:35.790 --> 0:44:38.160
<v S3>so his music is distributed by them. So at the

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.410
<v S3>end of the day, both of these guys are making

0:44:40.410 --> 0:44:42.660
<v S3>money for the same company, which renders the whole thing

0:44:42.660 --> 0:44:45.720
<v S3>a little bit crazy. Like if you check the stream count,

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.150
<v S3>these songs are like rocketing up. These guys are making

0:44:48.150 --> 0:44:50.850
<v S3>bank off this, even as all these people who didn't

0:44:50.850 --> 0:44:53.730
<v S3>ask to be involved are now dragged into it. But really,

0:44:53.730 --> 0:44:57.660
<v S3>it's universal music, this enormous conglomeration that's like the only

0:44:57.660 --> 0:44:58.620
<v S3>one winning well.

0:44:58.620 --> 0:45:00.360
<v S2>And both of them, and like we've talked about it

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.060
<v S2>quite a bit on the pod about hip hop's kind

0:45:03.060 --> 0:45:05.250
<v S2>of how you often speak about how there's not much

0:45:05.250 --> 0:45:07.020
<v S2>going on in hip hop that you find exciting, and

0:45:07.020 --> 0:45:08.549
<v S2>all of a sudden, look at us, we're talking about

0:45:08.550 --> 0:45:10.410
<v S2>hip hop. It's exciting. So yeah, I'm sorry.

0:45:10.410 --> 0:45:12.060
<v S1>To all my country friends, I'm out.

0:45:12.060 --> 0:45:15.870
<v S3>I'm out until Morgan Wallen, like, smashes Luke Combs in

0:45:15.870 --> 0:45:16.739
<v S3>the head with a guitar.

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.470
<v S1>Well, the other the other rapper that's weighed in on

0:45:19.469 --> 0:45:21.990
<v S1>this one who's also signed to universal is Vince Staples,

0:45:21.989 --> 0:45:24.779
<v S1>who is sort of like the conscience of of our

0:45:24.780 --> 0:45:27.390
<v S1>times right now. He he sort of made the point. Look,

0:45:27.390 --> 0:45:29.549
<v S1>universal is making coin of all of this. Universal has

0:45:29.550 --> 0:45:31.800
<v S1>collapsed all these labels that brought up that really cared

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:35.190
<v S1>about black music, black communities, they don't care about that anymore.

0:45:35.190 --> 0:45:37.469
<v S1>Hip hop is struggling like this is a real thing.

0:45:37.469 --> 0:45:39.660
<v S1>I think the other part of this, I think you're right, Mel, that,

0:45:39.660 --> 0:45:41.940
<v S1>you know, hip hop is in a not very strong

0:45:41.940 --> 0:45:44.969
<v S1>position in, in the US, at least right now. And

0:45:44.969 --> 0:45:46.860
<v S1>a large part of that or a significant part of

0:45:46.860 --> 0:45:49.140
<v S1>that has to do with the way that music labels

0:45:49.140 --> 0:45:52.469
<v S1>are just not nurturing or supporting or encouraging talent in

0:45:52.469 --> 0:45:54.210
<v S1>the way that they used to, partly because there aren't

0:45:54.210 --> 0:45:57.690
<v S1>that many specific hip hop labels left. And Vince is saying,

0:45:57.690 --> 0:46:00.000
<v S1>you know, hey, Taylor Swift's got clout. You know what

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:02.730
<v S1>she talks about? She talks about the plight of artists

0:46:02.730 --> 0:46:05.250
<v S1>and how to get more money for artists. These guys

0:46:05.250 --> 0:46:09.510
<v S1>have enormous power and money and profile, and they are

0:46:09.510 --> 0:46:12.180
<v S1>not talking about any of these issues that impact the

0:46:12.180 --> 0:46:14.460
<v S1>wider hip hop scene, which I thought was a really

0:46:14.460 --> 0:46:17.310
<v S1>interesting and really sharp observation from a guy also signed

0:46:17.310 --> 0:46:19.620
<v S1>to universal who sort of willing to call it out.

0:46:19.620 --> 0:46:21.870
<v S2>Yeah, I mean, Vince, one of me, and maybe that

0:46:21.870 --> 0:46:24.810
<v S2>will be the rapper I nail my colours to. Um,

0:46:24.810 --> 0:46:27.390
<v S2>can I ask if you had someone from out like

0:46:27.390 --> 0:46:30.150
<v S2>someone left field was to join this feud? It can

0:46:30.150 --> 0:46:32.279
<v S2>be anyone. Who would you like to see kind of

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:33.509
<v S2>weigh in now at this stage?

0:46:33.510 --> 0:46:36.000
<v S1>Well, one of the other funniest bits, as well as J.

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.609
<v S1>Cole sort of tapping out, was like the 48 hours

0:46:38.610 --> 0:46:41.640
<v S1>that Kanye West was involved, where he released a remix

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.200
<v S1>of Like That and it opened with like, you know,

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.750
<v S1>k-dot I Got You. And it just was terrible. And

0:46:45.750 --> 0:46:47.700
<v S1>I think it got deleted because he didn't. It wasn't

0:46:47.700 --> 0:46:50.549
<v S1>a proper remix and future, and everyone was like, get

0:46:50.550 --> 0:46:52.770
<v S1>out of this, dude, we don't need you involved in

0:46:52.770 --> 0:46:53.790
<v S1>this right now.

0:46:53.820 --> 0:46:56.670
<v S3>I already know my answer. And he actually did involve

0:46:56.670 --> 0:46:59.310
<v S3>himself last night. Does anyone here remember your boy bangs?

0:46:59.310 --> 0:46:59.790
<v S1>Yeah.

0:46:59.790 --> 0:47:02.640
<v S3>Of course. Yeah. I then take you to the movie. Yeah, yeah.

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:06.540
<v S3>He released a diss track to Drake last night. Uh, so,

0:47:06.540 --> 0:47:09.120
<v S3>I mean, if you remember bangs and his very odd

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:12.180
<v S3>viral hit take you to the movies, Shorty, uh, then

0:47:12.180 --> 0:47:14.370
<v S3>the the diss track to Drake is in much the

0:47:14.370 --> 0:47:18.060
<v S3>same nature. It's, uh, very hard to read and follow, but, yeah,

0:47:18.060 --> 0:47:20.700
<v S3>I mean, it's it's bringing in everyone from all corners

0:47:20.700 --> 0:47:24.060
<v S3>of hip hop. But perhaps most surprisingly, this artist actually

0:47:24.060 --> 0:47:26.520
<v S3>did involve himself. Someone I never would have thought been

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:28.500
<v S3>mentioned in the same breath. But Macklemore.

0:47:28.500 --> 0:47:32.100
<v S1>Yeah, this was so interesting because Macklemore has already sort

0:47:32.100 --> 0:47:34.950
<v S1>of been weirdly involved in Drake Kendrick's life. He won

0:47:34.950 --> 0:47:37.950
<v S1>the Grammy like ten years ago. He beat good kid

0:47:37.950 --> 0:47:40.020
<v S1>Mad City, he beat a Drake record as well, and

0:47:40.020 --> 0:47:41.850
<v S1>he famously shared a screenshot of a text he sent

0:47:41.850 --> 0:47:44.910
<v S1>to Kendrick saying, I'm sorry, you deserve to win. And

0:47:44.910 --> 0:47:50.880
<v S1>he released this really intense song, uh, this week about the, uh,

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:54.600
<v S1>not just Israel's invasion of Gaza and the amount of,

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:59.319
<v S1>you know, death and destruction. In Gaza, but also really

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:01.540
<v S1>blew up at the US government, told everyone he wasn't

0:48:01.540 --> 0:48:04.540
<v S1>going to vote for Biden, defended the student protests, discussed

0:48:04.540 --> 0:48:07.509
<v S1>Israel being an apartheid state. He went really, really hard

0:48:07.510 --> 0:48:11.380
<v S1>on this issue and also kind of took a pretty,

0:48:11.380 --> 0:48:13.060
<v S1>you know, it was a quick shot, but it was

0:48:13.060 --> 0:48:15.100
<v S1>a shot at both Drake and Kendrick, essentially. Like, you

0:48:15.100 --> 0:48:19.390
<v S1>guys are wasting time arguing with each other over nothing real. Meanwhile,

0:48:19.390 --> 0:48:23.170
<v S1>there's people dying and there's student protests happening in America

0:48:23.170 --> 0:48:25.690
<v S1>right now where police are, you know, cracking down on

0:48:25.690 --> 0:48:26.410
<v S1>freedom of speech.

0:48:26.590 --> 0:48:28.990
<v S9>What happens to the artists, what you gotta say, if

0:48:28.989 --> 0:48:31.270
<v S9>I was on a label, you could drop me today.

0:48:31.270 --> 0:48:33.820
<v S9>I'd be fine with it. Cause the heart fed my page.

0:48:33.820 --> 0:48:36.520
<v S9>I want a cease fire. A response from Drake.

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:39.670
<v S1>What you're willing to risk felt like a pretty hard

0:48:39.670 --> 0:48:43.540
<v S1>pivot from Macklemore. Not necessarily what I expected, but people

0:48:43.540 --> 0:48:46.090
<v S1>have pointed out that he's done this for a while.

0:48:46.090 --> 0:48:48.910
<v S1>This is kind of what modern Macklemore does. He talks

0:48:48.910 --> 0:48:51.460
<v S1>about white privilege and politics. I was sort of out

0:48:51.460 --> 0:48:54.489
<v S1>of the loop on his pivot, but he really injected

0:48:54.489 --> 0:48:55.810
<v S1>himself into this one.

0:48:55.810 --> 0:48:57.940
<v S3>Yeah, I mean, the Macklemore thing was a really weird

0:48:57.940 --> 0:49:00.759
<v S3>addition to an increasingly strange story. But yeah, I think

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.250
<v S3>what's most curious now is that basically, I guess this

0:49:03.250 --> 0:49:06.580
<v S3>is the longest amount of breath we've had since the weekend.

0:49:06.580 --> 0:49:09.250
<v S3>Like Drake released The Heart Part six on Monday morning,

0:49:09.250 --> 0:49:11.890
<v S3>and I think pretty much everyone saw it as a,

0:49:11.890 --> 0:49:14.470
<v S3>you know, quiet retreat. Um, he kind of tried to

0:49:14.469 --> 0:49:16.600
<v S3>be like, okay, whatever, man, I'm not doing this with

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:18.819
<v S3>you anymore. And then since then, we haven't heard anything

0:49:18.820 --> 0:49:21.850
<v S3>from either artist outside of, you know, this alleged shooting

0:49:21.850 --> 0:49:24.400
<v S3>at Drake's house on Wednesday morning. So I guess most

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:27.460
<v S3>people are, I think, accepting and kind of secretly hoping

0:49:27.460 --> 0:49:30.160
<v S3>that the feud is over. I don't know if it

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:32.830
<v S3>needs any more chapters. And I think, you know, knowing

0:49:32.830 --> 0:49:35.710
<v S3>Kendrick as I do, that I can't imagine him needing

0:49:35.710 --> 0:49:38.530
<v S3>to weigh back in now. Like it seems pretty obvious

0:49:38.530 --> 0:49:42.940
<v S3>that he, you know, like, rapped and exposed Drake into submission.

0:49:42.940 --> 0:49:45.430
<v S3>And I think it's for the best for everyone involved,

0:49:45.430 --> 0:49:48.850
<v S3>including the audience. And everyone mentioned that this feud is

0:49:48.850 --> 0:49:52.090
<v S3>over now. It was definitely a bizarre and interesting and

0:49:52.090 --> 0:49:55.480
<v S3>revealing moment in hip hop history, and no doubt we'll

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:57.820
<v S3>continue to kind of like dissect it. But yeah, I

0:49:57.820 --> 0:50:00.580
<v S3>personally would be so shocked if, you know, like in

0:50:00.580 --> 0:50:02.200
<v S3>two days time you text me and you're like, oh

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:03.759
<v S3>my God. Kendrick just dropped again.

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.640
<v S1>I agree, and I actually think that maybe Macklemore has helped.

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:08.440
<v S1>Just like put the nail in the coffin on this

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:10.030
<v S1>one as well. I think, you know, he sort of

0:50:10.030 --> 0:50:13.120
<v S1>just said, look, guys, this thing's going on. He's sort of,

0:50:13.390 --> 0:50:16.090
<v S1>you know, I think mainstream commercial hip hop in America

0:50:16.090 --> 0:50:19.270
<v S1>has been missing that political edge for a while. I mean,

0:50:19.270 --> 0:50:22.900
<v S1>Tupac was so good at being able to throw shots

0:50:22.900 --> 0:50:25.299
<v S1>at East Coast rappers and then also talk about what

0:50:25.300 --> 0:50:27.820
<v S1>was going on in the world and, and American imperialism

0:50:27.820 --> 0:50:31.210
<v S1>and whatever. And, and Macklemore of all people saying, all right, guys,

0:50:31.210 --> 0:50:34.390
<v S1>let's talk about real shit again. Could be the coda

0:50:34.390 --> 0:50:36.880
<v S1>on this one and kind of just usher in a

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:42.279
<v S1>new conversation about many different and perhaps less personal, uh,

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:45.580
<v S1>topics that these guys were trading shots on. It's a

0:50:45.580 --> 0:50:48.550
<v S1>bit of a heel turn. This next topic. Not really

0:50:48.550 --> 0:50:52.569
<v S1>an easy way to segue from Kendrick, Drake and Macklemore

0:50:52.570 --> 0:50:54.819
<v S1>to Dua Lipa. I guess it's music related, but on

0:50:54.820 --> 0:50:56.440
<v S1>the other end of the spectrum was one of the

0:50:56.440 --> 0:51:01.660
<v S1>most highly anticipated releases this year. Dua Lipa's Radical Optimism,

0:51:01.660 --> 0:51:04.330
<v S1>the follow up to her very fun and critically acclaimed

0:51:04.330 --> 0:51:08.080
<v S1>2020 album Future Nostalgia. The first single on Radical Optimism

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:08.920
<v S1>was Houdini.

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:15.820
<v UU>Tell me all the ways you need me. I'm not

0:51:15.820 --> 0:51:19.640
<v UU>here for long. Catch me or I go, Whodini, I

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:22.950
<v UU>come and I go. Prove you've got the right to

0:51:22.950 --> 0:51:27.590
<v UU>please me. Everybody knows. Catch me or I go Whodini

0:51:27.950 --> 0:51:30.170
<v UU>time is passing like a solid.

0:51:30.170 --> 0:51:34.370
<v S1>Produced by Australia's own Kevin Parker, Tame Impala. I didn't

0:51:34.370 --> 0:51:37.430
<v S1>love this track, but then when the album came out

0:51:37.430 --> 0:51:39.740
<v S1>last week and I listened to it a few times,

0:51:39.739 --> 0:51:42.469
<v S1>it's maybe the best song on it, which I think

0:51:42.469 --> 0:51:46.160
<v S1>sums up how I feel about this album. Very flat

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.950
<v S1>record to me. I think, especially following the kind of

0:51:48.950 --> 0:51:52.009
<v S1>disco club vibes of Future Nostalgia had so many bangers

0:51:52.010 --> 0:51:55.070
<v S1>levitating physical, I don't even know if this one like

0:51:55.070 --> 0:51:58.040
<v S1>is a full, proper pop album. There's a couple of

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.920
<v S1>pop songs, but do you guys remember adult contemporary where

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:03.890
<v S1>you're just like, this is a person making noise, and

0:52:03.890 --> 0:52:05.480
<v S1>it's sort of nice to have in the background, but

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.600
<v S1>it's not doing or saying much. Well, I know that

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:10.040
<v S1>you were hyped for this one, but how do you

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:10.940
<v S1>feel about it?

0:52:10.940 --> 0:52:13.100
<v S2>I was so hyped for this, and there was a

0:52:13.100 --> 0:52:15.440
<v S2>lot of kind of chat around it because from, um,

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:18.500
<v S2>Dance the Night Dua's song for Barbie, there was the

0:52:18.500 --> 0:52:21.739
<v S2>very symbolic shattering of the disco ball at the end

0:52:21.739 --> 0:52:24.350
<v S2>of that, which was meant to represent the end of

0:52:24.350 --> 0:52:27.049
<v S2>Dua's disco era. And in the lead up to the

0:52:27.050 --> 0:52:29.060
<v S2>release of this album, she'd kind of been making all

0:52:29.060 --> 0:52:33.620
<v S2>these claims about what had inspired the album Primal Scream,

0:52:33.620 --> 0:52:36.770
<v S2>Brit pop. Um, it was kind of low slung British

0:52:36.770 --> 0:52:40.160
<v S2>source material. So it kind of she was flagging that

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:42.950
<v S2>this was going to be a reinvention. And then when

0:52:42.950 --> 0:52:45.739
<v S2>I listened to to this album, I just don't think

0:52:45.739 --> 0:52:47.510
<v S2>it's a reinvention at all. There is a lot of

0:52:47.510 --> 0:52:50.239
<v S2>classic Dua on there, but without the kind of sparkle

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:53.870
<v S2>of future nostalgia. But it's not a complete pivot. I

0:52:53.870 --> 0:52:55.850
<v S2>don't think for her and I agree with you. I

0:52:55.850 --> 0:52:58.670
<v S2>was like, actually, really like the first three songs of

0:52:58.670 --> 0:53:01.220
<v S2>this album, end of an era, Whodini, you mentioned, and

0:53:01.219 --> 0:53:04.430
<v S2>Training Season, and then it kind of goes into this

0:53:04.610 --> 0:53:08.299
<v S2>pivot to a more muffled sound, a very kind of

0:53:08.300 --> 0:53:12.049
<v S2>Tame Impala. Kevin Parker, who produced this record, sound in

0:53:12.050 --> 0:53:15.590
<v S2>songs like Kind of French Exit and These Walls. They're

0:53:15.590 --> 0:53:17.510
<v S2>shades of Dua again in all of them, but they're

0:53:17.510 --> 0:53:19.760
<v S2>a lot more kind of drawn back. And then at

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:21.440
<v S2>the end of this album, there are these real like

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:26.180
<v S2>Eurovision bangers, these like kind of really big ballady sounds,

0:53:26.180 --> 0:53:28.880
<v S2>which some people love. But I much prefer Dua when

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:30.740
<v S2>she's like kind of when it's all in the vocals

0:53:30.739 --> 0:53:34.129
<v S2>and it's all in that, that really vibrant dance beat.

0:53:34.130 --> 0:53:35.720
<v S2>So yeah, I thought there were highs and lows on

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:37.759
<v S2>this album, but kind of agree with you that it

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:41.420
<v S2>wasn't the it wasn't the amazing sparkly record that I

0:53:41.420 --> 0:53:43.100
<v S2>kind of thought might be coming our way.

0:53:43.810 --> 0:53:46.540
<v S3>Yeah, I didn't really vibe at all. Um, our colleague

0:53:46.540 --> 0:53:48.730
<v S3>Rob Moran was so excited for this one, and he

0:53:48.730 --> 0:53:52.239
<v S3>just looked so crestfallen after having listened to it, because,

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:54.100
<v S3>I mean, this is this was the big year for like,

0:53:54.100 --> 0:53:56.800
<v S3>all these, like, massive pop albums that were previewed it.

0:53:56.800 --> 0:53:57.670
<v S1>I think at the start of the.

0:53:57.670 --> 0:53:59.770
<v S3>Year, I know, and this just feels like such a

0:53:59.770 --> 0:54:03.430
<v S3>limp like addition to that, you know, list. Yeah, like

0:54:03.430 --> 0:54:05.080
<v S3>I feel like Dua Lipa has been kind of untouchable

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:07.090
<v S3>for a while, and then it just makes you wonder,

0:54:07.090 --> 0:54:10.090
<v S3>like when you when you like in the studio, all

0:54:10.090 --> 0:54:11.860
<v S3>these different people and you listen through this album, how

0:54:11.860 --> 0:54:13.960
<v S3>is no one sitting there being like, I don't know,

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:15.700
<v S3>maybe they must think it's all really good, I don't know.

0:54:15.820 --> 0:54:18.100
<v S1>Yeah, there's some chat that, like her dad who's taken

0:54:18.100 --> 0:54:21.310
<v S1>over her management, maybe isn't sort of playing the the

0:54:21.310 --> 0:54:23.770
<v S1>best role he should be. I agree 100% on this.

0:54:23.770 --> 0:54:26.560
<v S1>Like there should be some label ainars in here being like, okay,

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:27.850
<v S1>you want to do some of this? That's cool. But like,

0:54:27.850 --> 0:54:29.620
<v S1>where are the hits? Like the point of a pop

0:54:29.620 --> 0:54:32.110
<v S1>record is you need some hits and this just doesn't have.

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:34.550
<v S3>Yeah. And that's why you need to bring in Tedros.

0:54:34.580 --> 0:54:38.120
<v S2>Tedros and that hit factory.

0:54:38.420 --> 0:54:40.580
<v S1>Um, talking about hits though, there is like a hit

0:54:40.580 --> 0:54:43.730
<v S1>I'm really enjoying right now. Uh, Sabrina Carpenter, who we

0:54:43.730 --> 0:54:47.359
<v S1>all saw when she opened for Taylor Swift, her song espresso.

0:54:48.170 --> 0:54:51.980
<v UU>Now, here's the thing about me every night. Oh, is

0:54:51.980 --> 0:54:55.220
<v UU>it that sweet? Like a song. So you can't sleep,

0:54:55.219 --> 0:55:03.580
<v UU>baby I know that's that means so. Nintendo. So you

0:55:03.580 --> 0:55:04.120
<v UU>can see.

0:55:06.360 --> 0:55:09.330
<v S1>This feels like the song of northern Hemisphere summer. People

0:55:09.330 --> 0:55:13.710
<v S1>are loving this song. I'm loving this song. Uh, it's

0:55:13.710 --> 0:55:15.569
<v S1>very fun. It feels like it should be on on

0:55:15.570 --> 0:55:18.569
<v S1>a duo record. You guys, you guys that that me

0:55:18.570 --> 0:55:19.950
<v S1>espresso your vibe in it.

0:55:19.950 --> 0:55:22.200
<v S2>Man, I love it. I've listened to that song though,

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.260
<v S2>so many times. And still I can only be like, no, no, no.

0:55:25.260 --> 0:55:28.140
<v S2>Espresso like that is the only line. I can still

0:55:28.380 --> 0:55:29.009
<v S2>switch it up like.

0:55:29.010 --> 0:55:29.790
<v S1>Nintendo.

0:55:29.940 --> 0:55:31.710
<v S2>You know, I mean, Nintendo Switch.

0:55:31.980 --> 0:55:35.370
<v S1>Yeah. There's also like, I was staying out late because

0:55:35.370 --> 0:55:37.740
<v S1>I'm a singer or something like that. It's very funny.

0:55:37.739 --> 0:55:40.650
<v S1>It's like very self-aware, funny lyrics and very catchy at

0:55:40.650 --> 0:55:41.040
<v S1>the same time.

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:43.560
<v S2>You know, like, don't give a fuck era. I really,

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.110
<v S2>I love Sabrina Carpenter. I liked nonsense too. I know

0:55:46.110 --> 0:55:47.940
<v S2>a lot of people don't didn't really get her vibe,

0:55:47.940 --> 0:55:50.760
<v S2>but I think she's very funny and interesting and is

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:53.070
<v S2>kind of more edgy and risky in her lyrics and

0:55:53.070 --> 0:55:56.100
<v S2>her performance. Um, than probably Taylor is.

0:55:56.100 --> 0:55:57.840
<v S1>Yeah, I think she could. She could be on the

0:55:57.840 --> 0:55:59.880
<v S1>cusp of blowing up. She does this really fun thing

0:55:59.880 --> 0:56:02.489
<v S1>on her tour where she sort of adds an extra

0:56:02.489 --> 0:56:04.620
<v S1>verse at the end of her set to reference where

0:56:04.620 --> 0:56:07.410
<v S1>she's at, and sometimes it's pretty saucy. It's cool. I

0:56:07.410 --> 0:56:10.440
<v S1>think she's fun and interesting and the song is really catchy.

0:56:10.620 --> 0:56:13.290
<v S1>Are you are you bumping this one time itch?

0:56:13.290 --> 0:56:15.299
<v S3>Yeah, I really like it. I like Sabrina too. I

0:56:15.300 --> 0:56:17.670
<v S3>feel like she's like having a bit of a moment. Um,

0:56:17.670 --> 0:56:19.589
<v S3>so she was also at the Met Gala yesterday along

0:56:19.590 --> 0:56:21.570
<v S3>with Barry? Um, yeah. Barry.

0:56:21.930 --> 0:56:22.739
<v S1>Partner, if.

0:56:22.739 --> 0:56:25.470
<v S3>People don't know. Yes. Correct. Um, yeah, I think she's

0:56:25.469 --> 0:56:28.379
<v S3>she's good. You can just see like, the trajectory she's on.

0:56:28.469 --> 0:56:31.560
<v S3>Obviously she toured here with Taylor Swift recently. Um, sadly,

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:33.390
<v S3>I did not get to see her because her set

0:56:33.390 --> 0:56:34.350
<v S3>was rained out.

0:56:34.590 --> 0:56:35.850
<v S1>Oh, true.

0:56:35.850 --> 0:56:38.580
<v S3>Electrical storm. But everyone, everyone that I had spoken to,

0:56:38.580 --> 0:56:40.080
<v S3>all the Swifties who had gone, you know, like, every

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:43.380
<v S3>single night were like, you know, raving about Sabrina Carpenter, um,

0:56:43.380 --> 0:56:44.910
<v S3>as much as they were Taylor. So I feel like

0:56:44.910 --> 0:56:47.280
<v S3>she's she's really on one. She's about to or just

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:49.350
<v S3>is the musical act on SNL.

0:56:49.350 --> 0:56:51.510
<v S2>And her Coachella set went kind of off as well.

0:56:51.510 --> 0:56:54.180
<v S2>People raved about it. Barry was there watching. Yeah, she's.

0:56:54.180 --> 0:56:56.339
<v S3>Collecting like all the pop culture rings you need when

0:56:56.340 --> 0:56:58.710
<v S3>you're on the way to being like, the next big thing. Um,

0:56:58.710 --> 0:57:01.200
<v S3>and then obviously she will enter into a feud with

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:03.870
<v S3>Olivia Rodrigo that we will then talk about. Um, I

0:57:03.870 --> 0:57:06.420
<v S3>think she has, hasn't she? Yeah. But like a proper

0:57:06.420 --> 0:57:08.819
<v S3>public one where Olivia Rodrigo is like, I don't know,

0:57:08.820 --> 0:57:11.160
<v S3>revealed to be. Oh, I see you were alien or Drake.

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:13.319
<v S1>Kendrick thing, and I stepped on it. I'm sorry, I'm sorry,

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:15.900
<v S1>but I think they sort of threw, um, barbs at

0:57:15.900 --> 0:57:19.290
<v S1>each other over driver's license. Is that is that what happened?

0:57:19.290 --> 0:57:21.360
<v S3>Yeah. They did. Um, because I think there was also

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:23.970
<v S3>an accusation of a shared boyfriend, uh, or something.

0:57:23.970 --> 0:57:26.880
<v S1>That's pretty hectic. That is. We're talking Drake. Kendrick level. Mel,

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:28.650
<v S1>where were you when that was going on? Not complaining

0:57:28.650 --> 0:57:29.430
<v S1>about collateral damage.

0:57:29.550 --> 0:57:30.570
<v S2>Exactly. You guys.

0:57:31.050 --> 0:57:33.360
<v S3>It really is the winter of discontent.

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:36.120
<v S2>Oh, nice. Thank you. I'm glad you've stooped to my request.

0:57:36.750 --> 0:57:38.730
<v S1>All right, movie time. Guys. There's been a lot of

0:57:38.730 --> 0:57:42.330
<v S1>discourse in entertainment news around the release of the new

0:57:42.330 --> 0:57:45.420
<v S1>Ryan Gosling Emily Blunt action comedy, The Fall Guy, which

0:57:45.420 --> 0:57:48.060
<v S1>was filmed in Sydney, Australia.

0:57:49.650 --> 0:57:53.850
<v S10>That's me. Colt Seavers. And this is my hero's journey.

0:57:58.690 --> 0:58:00.190
<v S11>Can we just start from the top?

0:58:02.890 --> 0:58:04.959
<v S10>What do you want it? Okay. I'm not the hero

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:10.450
<v S10>of this story. I'm just a stunt guy trying to

0:58:10.450 --> 0:58:12.700
<v S10>look cool in front of the director of this movie.

0:58:12.970 --> 0:58:13.810
<v S10>That's her.

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:15.430
<v S1>It's been a slow start to the year in terms

0:58:15.430 --> 0:58:19.000
<v S1>of box office numbers. And I think after the massive

0:58:19.000 --> 0:58:23.080
<v S1>Bodenheimer induced high of 2023, studios and cinema chains are

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:26.470
<v S1>kind of really desperately craving some big releases to get

0:58:26.470 --> 0:58:29.920
<v S1>people back into the movies. This was an expensive film.

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:33.430
<v S1>It cost 150 million USD to make. It's got big stars,

0:58:33.430 --> 0:58:36.220
<v S1>big action set pieces in it, so there's a bit

0:58:36.220 --> 0:58:39.640
<v S1>riding on it. We'll talk about its performance and what

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:41.560
<v S1>that might mean for Hollywood in a minute, but let's

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:43.420
<v S1>talk about the film and kind of interested to get

0:58:43.420 --> 0:58:46.630
<v S1>your takes on it as well. It's a loose adaptation

0:58:46.630 --> 0:58:49.210
<v S1>of the 1980s TV series of the same name starring

0:58:49.210 --> 0:58:51.280
<v S1>Lee majors. I never watched it. I just know Lee

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:53.290
<v S1>majors because he was in a Simpsons episode. I think

0:58:53.290 --> 0:58:55.960
<v S1>Marge had a big crush on him. Um, the movie's

0:58:55.960 --> 0:58:59.350
<v S1>directed by David Leitch. He's a former stuntman himself. He

0:58:59.350 --> 0:59:02.620
<v S1>co-directed the first John Wick film, directed Deadpool two, the

0:59:02.620 --> 0:59:05.140
<v S1>Fast and Furious spin off Hobbs and Shaw, and most recently,

0:59:05.140 --> 0:59:08.290
<v S1>the Brad Pitt starring Bullet Train. This film really is

0:59:08.290 --> 0:59:11.590
<v S1>a love letter to stunt performers. It stars Ryan Gosling

0:59:11.590 --> 0:59:14.650
<v S1>as a stuntman who, after quitting his job after getting

0:59:14.650 --> 0:59:17.800
<v S1>into an accident on set, is convinced to get back

0:59:17.800 --> 0:59:21.760
<v S1>in the game, working on his ex-girlfriend's directorial debut action

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:26.020
<v S1>film that's played by Emily Blunt. The movie's filming in Australia.

0:59:26.020 --> 0:59:28.720
<v S1>When he gets there, he finds himself involved in a

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:34.150
<v S1>conspiracy surrounding the disappearance of the film's lead actor, Aaron Taylor-Johnson.

0:59:34.150 --> 0:59:38.260
<v S1>The film also stars Hannah Waddingham from Ted Lasso, Teresa Palmer,

0:59:38.260 --> 0:59:41.350
<v S1>Stephanie Sue and Winston Duke. The movie is basically a

0:59:41.350 --> 0:59:44.170
<v S1>love story between Gosling and Blunt, with a lot of action,

0:59:44.170 --> 0:59:46.870
<v S1>a lot of stunts, a lot of fun references to

0:59:46.870 --> 0:59:49.330
<v S1>cinema and pop culture in there. I would describe it

0:59:49.330 --> 0:59:53.050
<v S1>as like, thoroughly entertaining, pretty fun, but not like a

0:59:53.050 --> 0:59:56.800
<v S1>transcendent movie. I thought Gosling in particular was really great,

0:59:56.800 --> 0:59:59.890
<v S1>and Emily Blunt was good, but her character does not

0:59:59.890 --> 1:00:04.090
<v S1>have a lot to do or much depth in this film.

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:06.190
<v S1>I had a good time in the cinema, but I

1:00:06.190 --> 1:00:08.410
<v S1>don't know if I describe it as a must watch. Uh,

1:00:08.410 --> 1:00:10.420
<v S1>what did you guys make of The Fall Guy?

1:00:10.870 --> 1:00:13.180
<v S2>I did not have a good time in the cinema. Oh, really?

1:00:13.210 --> 1:00:15.130
<v S2>I didn't I really wanted to like it. In fact,

1:00:15.130 --> 1:00:17.440
<v S2>I sat down next to Thomas and I said to him,

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:19.810
<v S2>I'm really happy. Like I was in the right headspace

1:00:19.810 --> 1:00:22.000
<v S2>to watch it. And I kept thinking about this. This

1:00:22.000 --> 1:00:23.440
<v S2>one time I was going to my friend's house and

1:00:23.440 --> 1:00:25.480
<v S2>we all had to bring a dessert, and I decided

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:28.060
<v S2>I would make an Eton mess, which is just like

1:00:28.060 --> 1:00:30.580
<v S2>a strategically, it looks like a mess, but it isn't

1:00:30.580 --> 1:00:32.800
<v S2>a mess and it tastes delicious. And when I ended

1:00:32.800 --> 1:00:34.780
<v S2>up making it, it turned out just a mess. Like,

1:00:34.780 --> 1:00:37.540
<v S2>look like something that someone had eaten and then regurgitated.

1:00:37.540 --> 1:00:40.660
<v S2>And I kind of felt like watching this. I was like,

1:00:40.660 --> 1:00:43.090
<v S2>someone thought this would be a good idea, but it

1:00:43.090 --> 1:00:45.970
<v S2>just turned out to be a bit of a mess. I,

1:00:45.970 --> 1:00:48.910
<v S2>I didn't enjoy it. There was too much action. Like,

1:00:48.910 --> 1:00:52.060
<v S2>I understand it's a love letter to to to stunts,

1:00:52.060 --> 1:00:56.320
<v S2>but there was so much spectacle and no story. Gosling's

1:00:56.320 --> 1:01:00.760
<v S2>character was confusing and seemed undercooked. Um, to be honest,

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:03.730
<v S2>I was probably most alert during the credits when they

1:01:03.730 --> 1:01:06.310
<v S2>were showing the real footage of the stunts being made,

1:01:06.310 --> 1:01:08.530
<v S2>and I and I actually thought, wow, I think I

1:01:08.530 --> 1:01:11.350
<v S2>would actually prefer to watch a documentary about making this

1:01:11.350 --> 1:01:14.590
<v S2>film than this film. I just did not enjoy it.

1:01:14.590 --> 1:01:17.590
<v S3>I kind of feel the same. I actually think, like,

1:01:17.590 --> 1:01:19.750
<v S3>I'm really surprised you said you thought Gosling was good.

1:01:19.750 --> 1:01:22.750
<v S3>I thought he was bad, like, I love I mean,

1:01:22.750 --> 1:01:24.520
<v S3>we all love the Gosling, and he's kind of like

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:26.290
<v S3>on a bit of a heater off the back of

1:01:26.290 --> 1:01:29.020
<v S3>Barbie and this kind of comedy era. And I just

1:01:29.020 --> 1:01:31.780
<v S3>thought he was like the first 15 minutes especially. I

1:01:31.780 --> 1:01:34.510
<v S3>was like, wow. He is like not making me laugh.

1:01:34.510 --> 1:01:36.370
<v S3>And this is someone who I think normally can take

1:01:36.370 --> 1:01:39.010
<v S3>a really poor script. And just with his like Gosling

1:01:39.010 --> 1:01:41.740
<v S3>delivery can make it funny. And so I don't know

1:01:41.740 --> 1:01:43.330
<v S3>if it's an indictment on the script, but I thought

1:01:43.330 --> 1:01:45.640
<v S3>both he my biggest issue with the film was that

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:48.580
<v S3>the chemistry between the two leads, Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt, was, like,

1:01:48.580 --> 1:01:51.340
<v S3>near non-existent for me. I thought he was in the

1:01:51.340 --> 1:01:53.890
<v S3>scene doing his Gosling schtick, and she was doing her

1:01:53.890 --> 1:01:56.920
<v S3>Emily Blunt schtick of like, talking really fast and seeming distracted.

1:01:56.920 --> 1:01:59.680
<v S3>But they weren't like, that's like two people acting in

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:02.890
<v S3>a scene, like of their own, not together. And I

1:02:02.890 --> 1:02:05.470
<v S3>just thought they didn't gel. And then on top of that,

1:02:05.470 --> 1:02:08.380
<v S3>I thought that the story was like a little bit flimsy.

1:02:08.380 --> 1:02:10.660
<v S3>It was hard to kind of like, get involved. I

1:02:10.660 --> 1:02:12.520
<v S3>really went into this being like, this will be a fun,

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:14.710
<v S3>kind of like Netflix movie, and it'll be like funny

1:02:14.710 --> 1:02:17.920
<v S3>and a good time. And instead I just, like, found

1:02:17.920 --> 1:02:20.020
<v S3>myself really drifting. Um, and the.

1:02:20.020 --> 1:02:22.150
<v S2>Jokes just didn't land in our cinema. Right. Which is

1:02:22.150 --> 1:02:24.340
<v S2>kind of like, I thought, because David Leitch did Bullet Train,

1:02:24.340 --> 1:02:26.680
<v S2>which I thought was very funny, but the jokes in

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:29.320
<v S2>our cinema didn't land like it was just really quite

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:32.140
<v S2>awkward watching one. How busy was another?

1:02:32.590 --> 1:02:34.390
<v S3>Not very busy. There's only a few people.

1:02:34.390 --> 1:02:35.350
<v S2>None of us laughed.

1:02:35.380 --> 1:02:37.000
<v S3>Yeah, I would say though, and like, you know, I

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:39.070
<v S3>do have to caveat all this with like a friend

1:02:39.070 --> 1:02:40.450
<v S3>of mine is in the film and I actually thought

1:02:40.450 --> 1:02:42.820
<v S3>he was great. Uh, his name is Adam Dunn, Australian actor,

1:02:42.820 --> 1:02:45.670
<v S3>played Nigel, uh, who was singing, you know, Genie in

1:02:45.670 --> 1:02:46.720
<v S3>a bottle during the karaoke.

1:02:46.840 --> 1:02:48.070
<v S1>He's great in the movie.

1:02:48.070 --> 1:02:50.500
<v S3>Yeah, he was really good. And, you know, like I'm

1:02:50.500 --> 1:02:52.150
<v S3>saying all this, I know he listens to the podcast.

1:02:52.150 --> 1:02:54.400
<v S3>We had a, you know, very honest chat on text.

1:02:54.570 --> 1:02:56.280
<v S3>After the movie where he asked me what I thought.

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:58.110
<v S3>He asked me to send a thumbs up or thumbs down,

1:02:58.110 --> 1:03:00.630
<v S3>which is a reference from the film. And I said

1:03:00.630 --> 1:03:01.980
<v S3>all of this to him, and, you know, he had

1:03:01.980 --> 1:03:04.290
<v S3>his own thoughts and we had a really interesting chat.

1:03:04.290 --> 1:03:05.850
<v S3>And I said to him that I didn't believe the

1:03:05.850 --> 1:03:08.370
<v S3>chemistry between the two leads, and he was really surprised

1:03:08.370 --> 1:03:10.530
<v S3>by that because he saw how hard they were working

1:03:10.530 --> 1:03:13.500
<v S3>on the film. So, you know, it's an interesting, I guess,

1:03:13.500 --> 1:03:16.950
<v S3>perspective to have. But yeah, I went in so prepared

1:03:16.950 --> 1:03:18.510
<v S3>to love this film because it had so many elements

1:03:18.510 --> 1:03:20.910
<v S3>that I was excited for, including the fact it was

1:03:20.910 --> 1:03:23.430
<v S3>shot here in beautiful Sydney. And yeah, I just for

1:03:23.430 --> 1:03:26.040
<v S3>some reason, like it didn't work for me. Like, I

1:03:26.040 --> 1:03:28.320
<v S3>loved The Gray Man. Like I'm so here for these

1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:31.020
<v S3>kind of like dumb Netflix films. And this one just felt,

1:03:31.020 --> 1:03:32.760
<v S3>aside from the fact it was 45 minutes too long,

1:03:32.760 --> 1:03:35.520
<v S3>it just didn't seem to work. It was having discussed

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:37.620
<v S3>so much about the mid era, this was like mid

1:03:37.620 --> 1:03:38.640
<v S3>to a tee for me.

1:03:38.640 --> 1:03:40.410
<v S1>I reckon you guys are in the wrong cinema with

1:03:40.410 --> 1:03:42.720
<v S1>the wrong people like I thought. I thought that the

1:03:42.720 --> 1:03:45.090
<v S1>jokes were funny. I thought Ryan Gosling was funny. I

1:03:45.090 --> 1:03:48.510
<v S1>thought the chemistry was great. I thought that when Ryan

1:03:48.510 --> 1:03:51.750
<v S1>Gosling is crying to Taylor Swift's All Too Well, uh,

1:03:51.750 --> 1:03:54.240
<v S1>that that was great. It was very moving.

1:03:54.240 --> 1:03:56.610
<v S3>But even that for me felt like such a, like,

1:03:56.610 --> 1:03:59.160
<v S3>heavy handed, like, oh, there's been so many funny, like,

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:01.440
<v S3>let's have a, you know, like guy listening to Taylor

1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:03.600
<v S3>Swift and being emotional, seeing let's just like wedge it

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:05.640
<v S3>in there. It felt so forced to me. Yeah.

1:04:05.640 --> 1:04:07.800
<v S2>I thought that was ironic. I thought they were making

1:04:07.800 --> 1:04:09.479
<v S2>fun of scenes of men.

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:11.100
<v S7>I reckon you were in the Taylor Swift movie.

1:04:11.100 --> 1:04:12.360
<v S1>You're in the wrong gear for this movie.

1:04:12.360 --> 1:04:15.510
<v S7>We were in the wrong. We're gonna be. We were happy.

1:04:16.470 --> 1:04:18.660
<v S3>No. Had a, uh, like a what did you have, like,

1:04:18.660 --> 1:04:19.530
<v S3>some kind of rap?

1:04:19.590 --> 1:04:20.520
<v S7>Yeah, I had.

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:22.410
<v S2>Like, I had food for once in the cinema, we.

1:04:22.410 --> 1:04:25.290
<v S2>I cannot tell you how ready we were to love

1:04:25.290 --> 1:04:26.070
<v S2>this film.

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:28.260
<v S1>All right, let's agree to disagree on this one. And

1:04:28.260 --> 1:04:30.600
<v S1>maybe you have more in common with the regular folk

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:33.510
<v S1>who don't seem to be rushing to see this, which

1:04:33.510 --> 1:04:37.260
<v S1>is freaking, uh, some distributors and studios and movie chains out.

1:04:37.260 --> 1:04:39.720
<v S1>I think they were expecting this movie, which generally has

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:42.120
<v S1>gotten pretty good reviews, like, it's sort of like three

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:44.100
<v S1>and a half to four stars around the place. It's

1:04:44.100 --> 1:04:46.170
<v S1>doing pretty well on Rotten Tomatoes. People think it's the

1:04:46.170 --> 1:04:49.080
<v S1>kind of movie that should be bringing people to cinemas,

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:52.050
<v S1>and it's not. And I wonder whether that's because, like

1:04:52.050 --> 1:04:53.880
<v S1>I said at the start, I had a fun time,

1:04:53.880 --> 1:04:55.560
<v S1>but I'm not racing out of the cinema and saying,

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:57.360
<v S1>you've all got to go see the fall guy. I

1:04:57.360 --> 1:05:01.680
<v S1>think sometimes it's the problem with Rotten Tomatoes, where it's 90% positive,

1:05:01.680 --> 1:05:05.190
<v S1>but if every positive review is like three stars, that

1:05:05.190 --> 1:05:09.150
<v S1>doesn't get you excited enough to actually be an enthused

1:05:09.150 --> 1:05:12.840
<v S1>ambassador for this film. I also wonder, and Thomas, you

1:05:12.840 --> 1:05:16.110
<v S1>mentioned the Gray Man. My friend Amy messaged me and

1:05:16.110 --> 1:05:17.790
<v S1>was like, oh, you saw the fall guy? I didn't,

1:05:17.790 --> 1:05:19.380
<v S1>I see that isn't that free guy? I've seen that

1:05:19.380 --> 1:05:22.290
<v S1>one before, which is a different movie with Ryan Reynolds.

1:05:22.290 --> 1:05:25.260
<v S1>And there's also The Nice Guys. There's a lot of

1:05:25.260 --> 1:05:31.500
<v S1>Guy films around featuring Ryan's, and I wonder whether that

1:05:31.500 --> 1:05:34.410
<v S1>is just confusing people. As dumb as that sounds, or

1:05:34.410 --> 1:05:36.690
<v S1>whether people are like, cool, I'll wait for this movie

1:05:36.690 --> 1:05:38.850
<v S1>to come out on streaming. It looks like mid tier entertainment.

1:05:38.850 --> 1:05:39.990
<v S1>If I don't have to go out to the movies

1:05:39.990 --> 1:05:42.660
<v S1>and pay $25 for it, I'll have a good time.

1:05:42.990 --> 1:05:44.400
<v S3>Well, Mel, you did say to me, I wonder if

1:05:44.400 --> 1:05:46.080
<v S3>I would have liked this film better if I watched

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:47.970
<v S3>it on a Saturday night when it popped up on

1:05:47.970 --> 1:05:49.800
<v S3>Netflix and I'd had, like, a couple of glasses of

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:52.890
<v S3>wine and like, I just popped it on and this, like,

1:05:52.890 --> 1:05:54.420
<v S3>it was just a Saturday night, like.

1:05:54.420 --> 1:05:56.900
<v S2>Yeah, if I could talk all the way through it. Yeah, yeah.

1:05:57.560 --> 1:05:58.700
<v S2>Like potentially I think.

1:05:58.700 --> 1:06:00.170
<v S1>I think potentially, I think maybe it will have a

1:06:00.170 --> 1:06:03.110
<v S1>big streaming run as well. But yeah, I wonder what

1:06:03.110 --> 1:06:05.390
<v S1>it means if it doesn't make its box office money back.

1:06:05.390 --> 1:06:08.420
<v S1>That's that's not a great result for this film or

1:06:08.420 --> 1:06:10.910
<v S1>for Hollywood making big movies. Uh, can I ask you

1:06:10.910 --> 1:06:13.970
<v S1>guys about, um, Sidney on film?

1:06:13.970 --> 1:06:14.689
<v S3>Sweeney.

1:06:15.950 --> 1:06:18.860
<v S1>Kind of. So we had anyone but you, which was

1:06:18.860 --> 1:06:21.020
<v S1>obviously filmed and set in Sydney and a lot of

1:06:21.020 --> 1:06:24.320
<v S1>gratuitous shots of Sydney Harbour Bridge and the opera House

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:27.050
<v S1>and Sydney Harbour. And then this movie was filmed basically

1:06:27.050 --> 1:06:30.200
<v S1>the same place. Like, I was wondering if when Ryan

1:06:30.470 --> 1:06:32.630
<v S1>Gosling is on a boat in Sydney Harbour, he was

1:06:32.630 --> 1:06:34.880
<v S1>going to run into Glen Powell and Sydney Sweeney on

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:37.520
<v S1>their boat. Maybe it's just because the proximity of these

1:06:37.520 --> 1:06:40.190
<v S1>two movies are really close together and they've both, you know,

1:06:40.190 --> 1:06:43.070
<v S1>gotten a lot of media attention. I love Sydney, I

1:06:43.070 --> 1:06:46.160
<v S1>love seeing Sydney on film. I feel like they could

1:06:46.160 --> 1:06:48.590
<v S1>do a bit more than just show us the opera

1:06:48.590 --> 1:06:51.110
<v S1>House and the Harbour Bridge and 2 or 3 blocks

1:06:51.110 --> 1:06:56.660
<v S1>in the city around Martin Place. So this is a big, beautiful, interesting, diverse,

1:06:56.660 --> 1:07:00.260
<v S1>fun city when you're in New York, not everything needs

1:07:00.260 --> 1:07:03.050
<v S1>to be in Manhattan. The Empire State Building can go

1:07:03.050 --> 1:07:05.330
<v S1>to Brooklyn. Not everything in London needs to be around

1:07:05.330 --> 1:07:07.610
<v S1>the Big Ben, you know? Like, is there a bit

1:07:07.610 --> 1:07:11.300
<v S1>of cringe here with the way that Sydney is just

1:07:11.300 --> 1:07:12.740
<v S1>the city and the harbour?

1:07:13.100 --> 1:07:15.200
<v S3>Yeah, I think so. It was like, I know everyone

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:17.510
<v S3>was excited to see the, you know, the Harbour Bridge

1:07:17.510 --> 1:07:19.250
<v S3>stunt with Ryan Gosling. And we'd all had a bit

1:07:19.250 --> 1:07:21.470
<v S3>of context because like, you know, all the news cameras

1:07:21.470 --> 1:07:23.840
<v S3>were hovering above the Harbour Bridge while he filmed it.

1:07:23.840 --> 1:07:26.120
<v S3>And but I do find it a bit boring. And

1:07:26.120 --> 1:07:28.010
<v S3>like Sydney, it may as well have been any other

1:07:28.010 --> 1:07:30.140
<v S3>city aside from the set piece on the Harbour Bridge,

1:07:30.140 --> 1:07:32.510
<v S3>and seeing the opera house like it just felt like,

1:07:32.510 --> 1:07:34.970
<v S3>you know, it could have been Toronto or New York

1:07:34.970 --> 1:07:38.630
<v S3>or Chicago or wherever, like, I don't know. Yeah, I agree,

1:07:38.630 --> 1:07:40.910
<v S3>I'm like, it'd be so nice to see them like

1:07:40.910 --> 1:07:43.760
<v S3>in like a national park or like in the western

1:07:43.760 --> 1:07:47.270
<v S3>suburbs or somewhere that was like still Sydney and recognizable

1:07:47.270 --> 1:07:49.220
<v S3>as Sydney, but just not, you know, the two biggest

1:07:49.220 --> 1:07:50.750
<v S3>icons that we're known for. Like, I'm surprised they didn't

1:07:50.750 --> 1:07:51.860
<v S3>go down to Bondi Beach.

1:07:51.860 --> 1:07:53.630
<v S2>Yeah. I mean, I'd be yeah. I mean, that's a

1:07:53.630 --> 1:07:56.070
<v S2>good point. I'd. Be curious to see when the New

1:07:56.070 --> 1:07:58.140
<v S2>South Wales Government and Federal government cough up the funding

1:07:58.170 --> 1:08:00.960
<v S2>to help bring these international films here. What the terms

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:01.440
<v S2>and conditions?

1:08:01.500 --> 1:08:02.040
<v S7>I'm sure I'm.

1:08:02.040 --> 1:08:04.350
<v S1>100% sure that the only reason there are so many

1:08:04.350 --> 1:08:06.180
<v S1>shots of the opera house is because the state government,

1:08:06.180 --> 1:08:07.980
<v S1>which gives a lot of money for these movies, have

1:08:07.980 --> 1:08:10.290
<v S1>said that's what we want. And I kind of think

1:08:10.290 --> 1:08:12.180
<v S1>maybe it's not the director's fault as much as it's

1:08:12.180 --> 1:08:14.940
<v S1>like the government being like, let's just turn every movie

1:08:14.940 --> 1:08:19.559
<v S1>into an ad for Sydney. But we're so, I guess,

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:22.140
<v S1>scared of telling people that Sydney is more than the

1:08:22.140 --> 1:08:25.229
<v S1>bridge or the opera House. We don't want them to

1:08:25.229 --> 1:08:27.540
<v S1>go west or south or wherever.

1:08:28.290 --> 1:08:30.930
<v S3>That's why, again, thanks to Taylor Swift for bringing us

1:08:30.930 --> 1:08:33.960
<v S3>to the attention of Sydney Zoo in the western suburbs.

1:08:35.340 --> 1:08:37.679
<v S3>I mean, Taylor, like, the more we talk about it,

1:08:37.680 --> 1:08:40.050
<v S3>the more I'm impressed. She's a she's a trailblazer.

1:08:40.439 --> 1:08:42.269
<v S1>Oh, they could go to that. What's that sandwich shop.

1:08:42.270 --> 1:08:43.890
<v S1>You like Thomas in your part of town?

1:08:43.920 --> 1:08:47.160
<v S3>Costas? Yeah. They could have gone to Costas. They not have.

1:08:47.160 --> 1:08:48.389
<v S1>Had a sandwich at Costas.

1:08:48.390 --> 1:08:51.300
<v S3>That's iconic. I mean, even like the like, there's, like,

1:08:51.300 --> 1:08:54.299
<v S3>Chifley Tower was in it, but yeah, otherwise it was like, it's,

1:08:54.300 --> 1:08:58.620
<v S3>you know, hardly even worth, like, getting excited about Sydney

1:08:58.620 --> 1:09:01.350
<v S3>being in the film. Yeah, I don't know. Uh, I

1:09:01.350 --> 1:09:03.390
<v S3>think there are lots of other better Sydney films, if

1:09:03.390 --> 1:09:04.380
<v S3>that's what you're after.

1:09:05.430 --> 1:09:08.220
<v S1>All right, let's wrap up with Impress Your Friends. When

1:09:08.220 --> 1:09:10.979
<v S1>we share something we watched, read, listened to, or just

1:09:10.979 --> 1:09:13.440
<v S1>enjoyed consuming in the past week, do you want to

1:09:13.439 --> 1:09:14.250
<v S1>go first summer's.

1:09:14.460 --> 1:09:16.830
<v S3>Uh, my one is TV series just to mix things up. Uh,

1:09:16.830 --> 1:09:20.519
<v S3>it's out today on Netflix. Uh, it's called Bodkin. Um,

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:22.680
<v S3>actually a weird kind of fall guy tie in in

1:09:22.710 --> 1:09:25.380
<v S3>that the series is produced and directed by Nash Edgerton,

1:09:25.380 --> 1:09:27.930
<v S3>who is a stuntman, uh, as well as being Joel

1:09:27.930 --> 1:09:30.990
<v S3>Edgerton's brother, who also makes a cameo in The Fall Guy. Uh,

1:09:30.990 --> 1:09:33.330
<v S3>but he's also a director. He directs this series. Uh,

1:09:33.330 --> 1:09:36.210
<v S3>it's very funny. It's a dark comedy, um, in the

1:09:36.210 --> 1:09:37.950
<v S3>kind of that vein of Irish TV that we all

1:09:37.950 --> 1:09:40.260
<v S3>know and love. And, uh, you guys will enjoy this.

1:09:40.260 --> 1:09:41.970
<v S3>It's about a group of three podcasters.

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:43.260
<v S1>Is it really?

1:09:43.260 --> 1:09:45.960
<v S3>It really is, uh, who come together. They work at

1:09:45.960 --> 1:09:50.820
<v S3>the Guardian. Bu but, um, they, they come together and, uh,

1:09:50.820 --> 1:09:53.370
<v S3>basically one of the, the, you know, lead journalists, uh,

1:09:53.370 --> 1:09:55.830
<v S3>she's been, you know, working on a big story in

1:09:55.830 --> 1:09:58.830
<v S3>London and she gets exiled to her hometown in Ireland, um,

1:09:58.830 --> 1:10:02.700
<v S3>to work on this series with two other podcasters. Um, about, like,

1:10:02.700 --> 1:10:04.290
<v S3>you know, a group of people that went missing 20

1:10:04.290 --> 1:10:06.689
<v S3>years ago. They slowly find themselves kind of, like, wrapped

1:10:06.689 --> 1:10:09.840
<v S3>up in, you know, the intricacies and feuds of the

1:10:09.840 --> 1:10:12.570
<v S3>small town. So it's that type of setup, but very funny.

1:10:12.570 --> 1:10:14.849
<v S3>And I think, you know, lots of people buy into

1:10:14.850 --> 1:10:17.400
<v S3>the podcast culture. And this has lots of like, uh,

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:19.650
<v S3>moments they will enjoy about how serious, you know, true

1:10:19.650 --> 1:10:21.990
<v S3>crime podcasters take themselves. So yeah, I thought it was

1:10:21.990 --> 1:10:24.660
<v S3>really funny. Um, each episode is 45 minutes. It's a

1:10:24.660 --> 1:10:27.090
<v S3>Netflix drop, so everything's there available for you to watch.

1:10:27.090 --> 1:10:29.070
<v S3>That one's out today. And yeah, worth your time.

1:10:29.070 --> 1:10:31.830
<v S1>The amount of movies and TV shows that are like

1:10:31.830 --> 1:10:35.760
<v S1>featuring podcasters as characters in the new Godzilla movie. Again,

1:10:35.760 --> 1:10:39.240
<v S1>Brian Tyree Henry is a podcaster. It's very strange. I

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:40.800
<v S1>really wonder why that.

1:10:41.130 --> 1:10:42.960
<v S7>I mean, it's a sexy medium, right? Well, podcast.

1:10:42.960 --> 1:10:45.840
<v S3>Is the new like hard nosed journalists of like 90s films.

1:10:45.870 --> 1:10:48.240
<v S1>Agreed. Um, Mel, what have you got?

1:10:48.330 --> 1:10:52.050
<v S2>Well, after everyone has listened to Kendrick and Drake and

1:10:52.050 --> 1:10:54.599
<v S2>you've kind of been through their whole kind of feud,

1:10:54.600 --> 1:10:57.360
<v S2>this is a nice one to put in your earphones.

1:10:57.360 --> 1:11:00.270
<v S2>I've been really vibing Jessica Pratt's here in the Pitch,

1:11:00.270 --> 1:11:04.320
<v S2>which is her new album. It's only nine songs, 27 minutes.

1:11:04.320 --> 1:11:07.410
<v S2>There's something light and sunny to them and almost airless,

1:11:07.410 --> 1:11:10.800
<v S2>as well as this kind of sense of sadness on them.

1:11:10.800 --> 1:11:12.870
<v S2>I mean, it does kind of feel like maybe stepping

1:11:12.870 --> 1:11:16.140
<v S2>into the garden, there's this kind of fantasy sound. I

1:11:16.140 --> 1:11:17.490
<v S2>don't know, it's just one of those albums that I

1:11:17.490 --> 1:11:20.490
<v S2>keep finding myself listening to. Some albums. I'm kind of like,

1:11:20.490 --> 1:11:22.559
<v S2>you've got to be in the right mood, and you've

1:11:22.560 --> 1:11:23.820
<v S2>got to kind of be in the right state of mind.

1:11:23.820 --> 1:11:25.530
<v S2>I've found that a lot with the Beyonce album, like

1:11:25.530 --> 1:11:28.650
<v S2>I'm not necessarily gravitating towards putting it on, but this

1:11:28.650 --> 1:11:30.510
<v S2>one just seems to be one that I keep returning to.

1:11:30.510 --> 1:11:33.450
<v S2>So it's, um, a really nice kind of folk, retro

1:11:33.450 --> 1:11:37.559
<v S2>pop classic sound that I would, um, highly recommend if

1:11:37.560 --> 1:11:38.940
<v S2>you need to come down from all the kind of

1:11:38.939 --> 1:11:40.469
<v S2>highs of the rap battle.

1:11:40.590 --> 1:11:43.050
<v S1>You put me onto this one. Uh, yesterday, Mel and

1:11:43.050 --> 1:11:44.939
<v S1>I have been listening to it. I really like it.

1:11:44.939 --> 1:11:47.550
<v S1>It's a great recommendation. Very, very good album.

1:11:47.729 --> 1:11:49.950
<v S2>Oh, good. I can imagine you in your new home

1:11:49.950 --> 1:11:50.879
<v S2>putting it on.

1:11:51.870 --> 1:11:54.809
<v S1>Um, I got one that I'm surprised neither of you mentioned.

1:11:54.810 --> 1:11:56.610
<v S1>Hack season three is back.

1:11:56.820 --> 1:11:57.600
<v S7>Yes, Jane.

1:11:57.600 --> 1:12:00.750
<v S1>Smart is back. It's on Stan, owned by nine. The

1:12:00.750 --> 1:12:03.480
<v S1>people who pay us to make this podcast, the Sydney

1:12:03.479 --> 1:12:05.309
<v S1>Morning Herald and The Age is probably more convoluted than

1:12:05.310 --> 1:12:07.500
<v S1>it needed to be. Um. It's great. There's not much

1:12:07.500 --> 1:12:08.880
<v S1>more I need to say about this show. I really,

1:12:08.880 --> 1:12:11.340
<v S1>really love hacks. I've been waiting for the new season

1:12:11.340 --> 1:12:13.559
<v S1>for a while. Go watch it. Very fun.

1:12:14.450 --> 1:12:16.430
<v S3>It is very funny, very excited. But I did text

1:12:16.430 --> 1:12:18.530
<v S3>you last night. That should not be a weekly drop.

1:12:18.530 --> 1:12:21.019
<v S3>That show like the first two episodes were. They dropped

1:12:21.020 --> 1:12:23.300
<v S3>two at the start and now it's weekly from like

1:12:23.479 --> 1:12:26.180
<v S3>moving forward. Annoying. Doesn't need to be weekly. Drop the

1:12:26.180 --> 1:12:28.790
<v S3>episodes like 30 minutes. It's a comedy that could be

1:12:28.790 --> 1:12:30.380
<v S3>like bang! Just like, give us it, all of it.

1:12:30.380 --> 1:12:31.730
<v S3>And you can watch it at your own leisure like

1:12:31.729 --> 1:12:34.010
<v S3>no one is. Is anyone really, like, hyped on a

1:12:34.010 --> 1:12:35.660
<v S3>Tuesday night to get the new hacks and then watch

1:12:35.660 --> 1:12:37.200
<v S3>it for 30 minutes that you want to watch 3

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:37.640
<v S3>or 4?

1:12:37.640 --> 1:12:40.130
<v S1>It does feel like the binge is reverse things that

1:12:40.130 --> 1:12:42.320
<v S1>should not be. Binges are. And the other way around,

1:12:42.320 --> 1:12:43.820
<v S1>someone's got to sort this out. They should put us

1:12:43.820 --> 1:12:46.130
<v S1>in charge of just every TV show we come in

1:12:46.130 --> 1:12:48.110
<v S1>and we're like, doesn't matter what platform it's on. We'll

1:12:48.110 --> 1:12:50.030
<v S1>tell you the release format for this one.

1:12:50.030 --> 1:12:53.240
<v S3>Yeah. Once we finished solving crimes in a tiny Irish town.

1:12:53.810 --> 1:12:57.019
<v S1>Guys. Great chat. Take care. See you next week. Bye.

1:12:59.670 --> 1:13:02.820
<v S1>This episode of The Drop was produced by Kai Wong.

1:13:02.850 --> 1:13:05.130
<v S1>If you enjoyed listening to today's episode of The Drop,

1:13:05.130 --> 1:13:07.710
<v S1>make sure to follow us in your favorite podcast app.

1:13:07.710 --> 1:13:10.020
<v S1>Leave us a review or better yet, share it with

1:13:10.020 --> 1:13:12.870
<v S1>a friend! I'm Usman Farooqi, see you next week.