1 00:00:07,410 --> 00:00:10,289 S1: Hey, I'm Osman Farooqi and this is the drop a 2 00:00:10,289 --> 00:00:13,020 S1: culture show from the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, 3 00:00:13,020 --> 00:00:15,120 S1: where we dive into the latest in the world of 4 00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:18,900 S1: pop culture and entertainment. I'm here with Thomas Mitchell and 5 00:00:18,900 --> 00:00:21,419 S1: Mel Kambouris. What's up team? How are you doing? 6 00:00:21,570 --> 00:00:24,690 S2: Pretty good. Yeah. Good week. Big week coming up. Lots 7 00:00:24,690 --> 00:00:27,060 S2: on the horizon in the pop culture world. Yeah. 8 00:00:27,090 --> 00:00:29,010 S3: Big, uh, one of our favorite weeks of the year, 9 00:00:29,010 --> 00:00:29,670 S3: I think. 10 00:00:29,670 --> 00:00:32,040 S1: Yeah, it's it's a big, big, big week. We're going 11 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:35,520 S1: to be talking primarily on today's show about the Oscars, 12 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:38,849 S1: which are on next Monday. But as you alluded to, Thomas, 13 00:00:38,850 --> 00:00:41,430 S1: it's been it's been a big one for cultural consumption 14 00:00:41,430 --> 00:00:44,790 S1: and and conversation. There's a lot happening and a lot 15 00:00:44,790 --> 00:00:47,130 S1: to talk about. So there's a few things I wanted 16 00:00:47,130 --> 00:00:48,900 S1: to run through with you guys before we get stuck 17 00:00:48,900 --> 00:00:52,620 S1: into our Oscars deep dive. Last month, it was Taylor 18 00:00:52,620 --> 00:00:56,730 S1: Swift causing a gigantic collective freakout in Australia. This time 19 00:00:56,730 --> 00:01:01,620 S1: it's the UK house musician Fred again. Dot dot dot uh. 20 00:01:01,620 --> 00:01:04,890 S1: He announced a pop up show at the Sydney Opera 21 00:01:04,890 --> 00:01:08,550 S1: House that sold, I think, thousands of tickets in like 22 00:01:08,550 --> 00:01:12,090 S1: 15 minutes. There was 200,000 people on the waiting list 23 00:01:12,090 --> 00:01:14,459 S1: at peak time. He went on to announce a run 24 00:01:14,459 --> 00:01:17,700 S1: of arena shows in Melbourne and Sydney. I hear from 25 00:01:17,700 --> 00:01:21,120 S1: insiders that nearly a million people tried to buy tickets 26 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:24,330 S1: to his arena shows, so not quite the Taylor Swift 27 00:01:24,330 --> 00:01:27,600 S1: level of hype, but still an enormous amount of interest 28 00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:29,069 S1: in Fred. Again, I don't know if you've seen clips 29 00:01:29,069 --> 00:01:32,040 S1: from his shows at Rod Laver Arena the last couple 30 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:32,580 S1: of nights. 31 00:01:32,580 --> 00:01:49,760 UU: Everyone is very into this young guy. Don't make some 32 00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:56,120 UU: fucking noise. Okay. 33 00:01:56,480 --> 00:01:58,490 S1: How do you guys feel about Fred again? Dot dot dot. 34 00:01:59,550 --> 00:02:02,850 S3: Look, I don't really get it. I don't really get 35 00:02:02,850 --> 00:02:05,070 S3: the interest, and I. 36 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:07,590 S2: I have you been a big Fred head. I think 37 00:02:07,590 --> 00:02:09,990 S2: something could have been wrong with the cosmic universe. 38 00:02:10,710 --> 00:02:12,480 S3: Like, I know you guys think you're all kind of 39 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:14,430 S3: cool and in on things, but I don't think he's 40 00:02:14,430 --> 00:02:17,940 S3: that cool. And I'm gonna quote Rob Moran here, who 41 00:02:17,940 --> 00:02:19,740 S3: has been on this pod and is one of the 42 00:02:19,740 --> 00:02:22,050 S3: best music writers in the country, who says he's just 43 00:02:22,050 --> 00:02:25,169 S3: the Ed Sheeran of dance music. And I think that's perfect. 44 00:02:25,169 --> 00:02:27,780 S3: I think that's a very apt description of what he is. 45 00:02:27,780 --> 00:02:30,060 S3: And there's a whole lot of excitement, which I think 46 00:02:30,060 --> 00:02:33,270 S3: is probably tied to kind of people feeling like they're 47 00:02:33,270 --> 00:02:36,030 S3: part of something to this musician that I don't really 48 00:02:36,030 --> 00:02:41,070 S3: think is warranted. Um, yeah. Thomas, I mean, you think 49 00:02:41,070 --> 00:02:42,959 S3: you're all indie. Is that why you like Fred again? 50 00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:43,530 S3: Thank you. Cool. 51 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:45,630 S2: When you talk about being cool, it's like talking to 52 00:02:45,630 --> 00:02:47,910 S2: my mom. Honestly. No, I know you think you're a 53 00:02:47,910 --> 00:02:51,360 S2: pretty cool dude. Um, no, I think you're actually kind 54 00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:53,130 S2: of right. Like, I think his music is good, but 55 00:02:53,130 --> 00:02:55,530 S2: I think the hype around Fred again has become like 56 00:02:55,530 --> 00:02:59,160 S2: its own really funny beast to watch. Um, and especially, 57 00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:02,010 S2: you know, I think in what's really important these days 58 00:03:02,010 --> 00:03:04,019 S2: as well, is that he's a bit of a marketing genius, 59 00:03:04,020 --> 00:03:06,900 S2: like doing the surprise show at the Sydney Opera House 60 00:03:06,900 --> 00:03:09,480 S2: to like, you know, whip everyone up into a frenzy 61 00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:11,460 S2: was a really smart idea because then everyone who missed 62 00:03:11,460 --> 00:03:13,620 S2: out was like, well, I'm 100% buying tickets to the 63 00:03:13,620 --> 00:03:16,290 S2: six arena shows. I think he's just become he's slot 64 00:03:16,290 --> 00:03:19,830 S2: into this weird, like kind of trend, you know, like 65 00:03:19,919 --> 00:03:22,320 S2: almost like post triple J, but love dance music, but 66 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:25,679 S2: still a bit accessible. And he's really captured a big 67 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:28,560 S2: kind of aging millennial audience, um, that have just, like, 68 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:31,470 S2: eaten his shit up big time. But I do think 69 00:03:31,470 --> 00:03:33,360 S2: his music is fun. He makes fun dance music. He's 70 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:36,060 S2: a good producer. And, you know, I thought particularly and 71 00:03:36,060 --> 00:03:39,690 S2: I think you'll appreciate this, seeing some vision of him 72 00:03:39,690 --> 00:03:44,040 S2: at Revolver in Melbourne at like 9 a.m., like simultaneously 73 00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:47,430 S2: made me envious. And I had like, PTSD. Uh, so yeah, 74 00:03:47,430 --> 00:03:50,550 S2: it he's definitely made a mark in his short time here. 75 00:03:50,970 --> 00:03:53,130 S1: I'm glad you brought up the marketing element of it, 76 00:03:53,130 --> 00:03:56,070 S1: because to me, this is where the Taylor Swift comparison 77 00:03:56,070 --> 00:03:59,070 S1: is really interesting. Not just because they both are very 78 00:03:59,070 --> 00:04:01,680 S1: popular and selling a lot of tickets in Australia. I 79 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:05,040 S1: think they both have found a very smart way to 80 00:04:05,040 --> 00:04:08,460 S1: create a, I guess, a mystique or an aura around 81 00:04:08,460 --> 00:04:11,850 S1: them that feels very relatable and very honest and very 82 00:04:11,850 --> 00:04:16,140 S1: earnest and very real when it is kind of anything but. 83 00:04:16,140 --> 00:04:18,300 S1: And by that I mean that both Taylor Swift and 84 00:04:18,300 --> 00:04:21,900 S1: Fred again have got, I would assume, giant marketing team 85 00:04:21,900 --> 00:04:24,690 S1: not even assume I know this giant marketing teams that 86 00:04:24,690 --> 00:04:28,589 S1: are working overtime to both do interesting things, like surprise 87 00:04:28,589 --> 00:04:32,550 S1: shows at revolver, keep a stadium show under wraps, post 88 00:04:32,550 --> 00:04:35,670 S1: in WhatsApp groups and discord chats like he's just a 89 00:04:35,670 --> 00:04:38,099 S1: regular person keeping you in the loop with his life. 90 00:04:38,100 --> 00:04:41,010 S1: It's a really interesting way to use a huge amount 91 00:04:41,010 --> 00:04:43,229 S1: of resources and a huge amount of buzz to feel 92 00:04:43,230 --> 00:04:46,229 S1: like just a regular person, and that certainly so much 93 00:04:46,230 --> 00:04:49,470 S1: of his aura. You mentioned elder millennials, Thomas. I think 94 00:04:49,470 --> 00:04:50,760 S1: there's a bit of that because I think maybe it 95 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,400 S1: reminds people of a kind of electronic music that is 96 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:54,839 S1: a little bit out of vogue or has been for 97 00:04:54,839 --> 00:04:57,990 S1: a while, but particularly younger people like Gen Z's in 98 00:04:57,990 --> 00:05:01,950 S1: the pandemic. Fred went ballistic on TikTok, making a kind 99 00:05:01,950 --> 00:05:04,589 S1: of music that I think that generation probably never really 100 00:05:04,589 --> 00:05:07,739 S1: heard commercially. And then when he came out of the 101 00:05:07,740 --> 00:05:11,190 S1: pandemic and started doing live shows for a lot of 102 00:05:11,190 --> 00:05:13,530 S1: people aged, I guess like 18 to 21, it was 103 00:05:13,529 --> 00:05:17,099 S1: probably the first live music they'd seen. And electronic music, 104 00:05:17,100 --> 00:05:21,360 S1: house music is so good for that collective, joyous experience 105 00:05:21,360 --> 00:05:24,359 S1: of dancing and partying. So they're like reasons why it 106 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:27,120 S1: makes sense to me. But I think what I find 107 00:05:27,120 --> 00:05:29,219 S1: interesting about Fred again, and I think this is why 108 00:05:29,220 --> 00:05:32,219 S1: it's in conversation with Taylor, is being a good musician 109 00:05:32,220 --> 00:05:35,280 S1: is only, like I would say, not even 50%, maybe 110 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:37,650 S1: like 20% of what it takes to succeed. The rest 111 00:05:37,650 --> 00:05:39,390 S1: of it is how do you market yourself? How do 112 00:05:39,390 --> 00:05:42,240 S1: you brand yourself, and how do you become part of 113 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:44,580 S1: a cultural conversation? And I think he's done that in 114 00:05:44,580 --> 00:05:47,580 S1: a very interesting way, in a way that I think 115 00:05:47,670 --> 00:05:50,729 S1: overstates how good the music is. Like, I don't totally 116 00:05:50,730 --> 00:05:52,890 S1: love the music, I don't really hate it, but for 117 00:05:52,890 --> 00:05:56,190 S1: me it is more about how he's created a wave 118 00:05:56,190 --> 00:06:00,030 S1: around him. Then he's this like incredible musician that's never 119 00:06:00,029 --> 00:06:02,250 S1: done anything like this before, because ultimately, Mel, I got 120 00:06:02,250 --> 00:06:05,190 S1: to say, Rob's comp is spot on, like Ed Sheeran, 121 00:06:05,190 --> 00:06:08,100 S1: Tash Sultana like when Fred does these shows, he's in 122 00:06:08,100 --> 00:06:11,250 S1: the round, he's in the middle. He's like recreating the stuff, 123 00:06:11,250 --> 00:06:14,910 S1: using his MPC and loops. It's very like busking in 124 00:06:14,940 --> 00:06:17,760 S1: that Ed Sheeran way. Australians seem obsessed with that kind 125 00:06:17,760 --> 00:06:21,300 S1: of music in particular. It's a really funny little moment, 126 00:06:21,300 --> 00:06:21,930 S1: I think. 127 00:06:21,930 --> 00:06:24,090 S3: Yeah, and I agree, like there are good kind of 128 00:06:24,089 --> 00:06:27,000 S3: catchy songs that Billie song I quite like. What are 129 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:30,359 S3: some of your other things? Well, Melanie, Melanie's doing the 130 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:31,980 S3: part in brackets. There you go. 131 00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:34,620 S1: Um, Rumble is also a really good song. Like there's 132 00:06:34,620 --> 00:06:35,670 S1: a couple of great tracks. 133 00:06:35,670 --> 00:06:39,120 S3: Yeah, I think you're completely right that it's just. And 134 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:42,240 S3: you say 20% talent, the rest marketing I think like 135 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:47,220 S3: it's 5% talent, really. And the rest is marketing. And 136 00:06:47,220 --> 00:06:49,229 S3: I do think that he's managed to hit that sweet 137 00:06:49,230 --> 00:06:52,289 S3: spot where, you know, it's supply versus demand of who 138 00:06:52,290 --> 00:06:54,089 S3: can get to see the show, but then it becomes 139 00:06:54,089 --> 00:06:56,700 S3: just a tool of social currency. You know, I went 140 00:06:56,700 --> 00:06:58,620 S3: to the show and I'm going to the show and 141 00:06:58,620 --> 00:07:01,729 S3: I like. Again, like I'm in the know without realizing. Like, 142 00:07:01,730 --> 00:07:04,310 S3: I guess the bigger picture is that, you know, you're 143 00:07:04,310 --> 00:07:06,469 S3: just being played in a way. So I do think 144 00:07:06,470 --> 00:07:08,810 S3: it's just become like a tool of social currency to 145 00:07:08,810 --> 00:07:11,090 S3: be like, I'm attending this gig. In the same way 146 00:07:11,090 --> 00:07:14,570 S3: any exclusivity, you know, becomes a marker of your taste 147 00:07:14,570 --> 00:07:17,330 S3: and class and who you are, like a performance of 148 00:07:17,330 --> 00:07:19,700 S3: your own identity. So I yeah, I think you're spot 149 00:07:19,700 --> 00:07:20,210 S3: on us. 150 00:07:20,210 --> 00:07:22,070 S2: That being said, if the team is listening to this pod, 151 00:07:22,070 --> 00:07:25,070 S2: we would love six tickets to some of the shows. 152 00:07:25,670 --> 00:07:27,650 S1: I would happily miss, so I'm not that fussed, but 153 00:07:27,650 --> 00:07:29,870 S1: I hope you guys managed to get tickets to the show. 154 00:07:29,870 --> 00:07:32,480 S1: I think the other the other reason why I wanted 155 00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:34,700 S1: to talk to you guys about it, because to me, 156 00:07:34,700 --> 00:07:38,000 S1: it raises this other question of, okay, well, he makes 157 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:40,070 S1: decent music and he's very smart at marketing where the 158 00:07:40,070 --> 00:07:42,500 S1: people around him are. Should that be a knock on him? 159 00:07:42,500 --> 00:07:45,200 S1: And I think the answer is obviously like, no, not necessarily. 160 00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:48,680 S1: But to me what it raises is who gets to 161 00:07:48,680 --> 00:07:51,260 S1: be Fred again and who gets to be Taylor Swift. 162 00:07:51,260 --> 00:07:53,240 S1: And I think we've talked about this over the last 163 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:56,750 S1: couple of weeks, thinking about the Australian music industry, the 164 00:07:56,750 --> 00:08:00,830 S1: live music space in particular, crumbling around us. So many acts, 165 00:08:00,830 --> 00:08:03,770 S1: so many artists that I know was talking, uh, to 166 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:06,080 S1: to a friend last night who I won't name the band, 167 00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:08,720 S1: but they're in like a very prominent Australian band that 168 00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:11,690 S1: that perform all over the country, all over the world. 169 00:08:11,690 --> 00:08:14,510 S1: And you would think that they would be like multi-millionaires 170 00:08:14,510 --> 00:08:16,520 S1: who own dozens of houses all over the country. And 171 00:08:16,520 --> 00:08:19,130 S1: probably in another era they would have been. But they're 172 00:08:19,130 --> 00:08:21,679 S1: like struggling financially because of the way the economics of 173 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:23,690 S1: music works right now. And then, on the other hand, 174 00:08:23,690 --> 00:08:25,970 S1: you've got someone like Fred again who just comes in, 175 00:08:26,060 --> 00:08:28,190 S1: who've is up all this demand and is in is 176 00:08:28,190 --> 00:08:32,180 S1: going ballistic. And there is this conversation around Fred again. 177 00:08:32,179 --> 00:08:35,090 S1: You guys aware of his family background at all? 178 00:08:35,090 --> 00:08:37,400 S2: Yeah. Isn't he like a rich private school kid? I am. 179 00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:40,220 S3: I have to say, the opening paragraph on like Wikipedia. 180 00:08:40,220 --> 00:08:43,070 S3: When you look, look him up like we've got words 181 00:08:43,070 --> 00:08:48,350 S3: like aristocrat jukes, viscounts. Like, I've never seen someone with 182 00:08:48,350 --> 00:08:51,110 S3: such a background with so many kind of high class 183 00:08:51,110 --> 00:08:53,120 S3: words involved in its description. 184 00:08:53,210 --> 00:08:54,860 S1: I don't even know what half these words mean. It's 185 00:08:54,860 --> 00:08:58,189 S1: on his Wikipedia. It says, descended from the Huntingdonshire gentry 186 00:08:58,190 --> 00:09:01,490 S1: on his father's side through his mother's side. Fred's ancestry 187 00:09:01,490 --> 00:09:07,190 S1: comprises earls Marcus Jukes as well as many other peerage 188 00:09:07,190 --> 00:09:11,420 S1: and baronet families. That's like Thomas. He sort of understated 189 00:09:11,420 --> 00:09:13,610 S1: it by saying, private school rich kid, these guys like 190 00:09:13,610 --> 00:09:14,960 S1: a baron. That's crazy. 191 00:09:15,260 --> 00:09:16,310 S2: Play that shit, Fred. 192 00:09:17,780 --> 00:09:21,559 S1: And I think his godfather is by Brian Eno, the, the, 193 00:09:21,559 --> 00:09:24,890 S1: the very well known producer and and this is what 194 00:09:24,890 --> 00:09:26,900 S1: I think is so interesting and I think it's deliberate 195 00:09:26,900 --> 00:09:30,740 S1: part of why he's constructed this persona around himself. Because 196 00:09:31,010 --> 00:09:33,800 S1: you can't really lean into that too much. Like it's 197 00:09:33,800 --> 00:09:35,810 S1: okay to be a bit rich, but it's hard to 198 00:09:35,809 --> 00:09:38,930 S1: be the literal baron who was raised and taught everything 199 00:09:38,929 --> 00:09:41,780 S1: he knew by Brian Eno. And I think it seems 200 00:09:41,780 --> 00:09:44,870 S1: like he's working overtime to be. I'm just a normal person. 201 00:09:44,870 --> 00:09:47,599 S1: This guy got his start writing songs like shotgun with 202 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:50,720 S1: George Ezra, solo by Clean Bandit, writing for Rita Ora, 203 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:54,140 S1: writing for producing for Ed Sheeran. Like he's born into 204 00:09:54,140 --> 00:09:57,080 S1: music royalty, but it is interesting to see how he 205 00:09:57,080 --> 00:09:59,599 S1: counteracts that because he does these shows at Rev's. He's 206 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:03,110 S1: been so supportive of Australian artists on this tour. He, 207 00:10:03,110 --> 00:10:05,690 S1: you know, he's done pop up shows with club Angel. 208 00:10:05,690 --> 00:10:08,900 S1: On Tuesday night at Rod Laver Arena, he brought out 209 00:10:08,900 --> 00:10:12,800 S1: Angie McMahon, a you know, young Australian artist who's got 210 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:14,929 S1: an album and doing a tour right now and brought 211 00:10:14,929 --> 00:10:16,730 S1: her on stage to perform, made. 212 00:10:16,730 --> 00:10:18,380 S4: Some noise for Angie McMahon. 213 00:10:34,370 --> 00:10:36,740 S1: And that's one of the things we knocked Taylor Swift for, 214 00:10:36,770 --> 00:10:39,140 S1: was not engaging with the local music scene and not 215 00:10:39,140 --> 00:10:41,600 S1: boosting that. So on that front, like, kudos to him. 216 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:43,490 S1: I think it's smart, but I also kind of think 217 00:10:43,490 --> 00:10:45,230 S1: you kind of have to do that stuff because it's 218 00:10:45,230 --> 00:10:47,300 S1: so easy to make fun of this guy as just 219 00:10:47,300 --> 00:10:50,059 S1: being like a nepo baby making electronic music. And I 220 00:10:50,059 --> 00:10:52,520 S1: guess that's that big a point of good on him 221 00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:55,189 S1: for giving back a bit. I'd still remain worried that 222 00:10:55,190 --> 00:10:58,729 S1: it's literally just Taylor Swift and a Baron that can 223 00:10:58,730 --> 00:11:01,849 S1: make and perform live music in this, in this current 224 00:11:01,850 --> 00:11:02,780 S1: era of pop. 225 00:11:02,809 --> 00:11:04,580 S2: Yeah, I mean, it's definitely an issue. I wish my 226 00:11:04,580 --> 00:11:06,559 S2: biggest issue in life, though, was like trying to seem 227 00:11:06,559 --> 00:11:08,449 S2: more regular because I was so rich. Like, if that 228 00:11:08,450 --> 00:11:10,670 S2: was my only problem in life, I think I'd be 229 00:11:10,670 --> 00:11:13,370 S2: doing okay. But I mean, we talked about before, you know, 230 00:11:13,370 --> 00:11:16,520 S2: that the marketing is maybe like 80% of it and then, 231 00:11:16,520 --> 00:11:18,740 S2: you know, the talent or the good bit, it's only 20%. 232 00:11:18,740 --> 00:11:20,330 S2: But I mean, like, I know you're wanting to speak 233 00:11:20,330 --> 00:11:22,070 S2: about this, that just kind of reminds me of the 234 00:11:22,070 --> 00:11:26,750 S2: maths on June. Like the marketing tells you, it's so good. 235 00:11:26,750 --> 00:11:28,640 S2: And then you sit there for seven hours and you're 236 00:11:28,640 --> 00:11:30,410 S2: just like, this is a letdown. 237 00:11:30,530 --> 00:11:32,420 S1: All right. Well, I'm glad you brought up. Let's pivot 238 00:11:32,420 --> 00:11:35,240 S1: to that. Let's pivot to that. I, I watched this 239 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:37,580 S1: movie again after we spoke about it last year. 240 00:11:37,910 --> 00:11:38,630 S3: Of course. 241 00:11:39,170 --> 00:11:41,870 S1: I had some time to reflect on on what I 242 00:11:41,870 --> 00:11:44,330 S1: said and what you guys said. And I've got to say, 243 00:11:44,330 --> 00:11:47,240 S1: you I mean, like Thomas in particular, you're so wrong 244 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:49,489 S1: on this movie, man. Like, like, I feel like I 245 00:11:49,490 --> 00:11:51,500 S1: was made out to be some sort of, like, sci 246 00:11:51,500 --> 00:11:53,930 S1: fi freak who was like, this weird movie that no 247 00:11:53,929 --> 00:11:56,060 S1: one will like is pretty cool. And then Tommy still 248 00:11:56,059 --> 00:11:58,730 S1: sending me text messages from your friends who are like, 249 00:11:58,730 --> 00:12:00,680 S1: you know, I was just making this movie sound so dumb. 250 00:12:00,679 --> 00:12:02,870 S1: You're right, Thomas, you're a man of the people. This 251 00:12:02,870 --> 00:12:06,830 S1: movie is not only objectively very good, it has been 252 00:12:06,830 --> 00:12:10,730 S1: critically acclaimed. It has been watched by millions of people. 253 00:12:10,730 --> 00:12:14,750 S1: It's breaking box office records. It's genuinely very good. Interesting. 254 00:12:14,750 --> 00:12:16,849 S1: I just wanted to ask you guys whether you had 255 00:12:16,850 --> 00:12:19,970 S1: had time to reflect on your thoughts, and if you 256 00:12:19,970 --> 00:12:22,040 S1: had any other things you wanted to say about the 257 00:12:22,040 --> 00:12:24,050 S1: state of the discourse around June part two? 258 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:26,600 S3: Yeah, I'll, I'll start off given the only one, I 259 00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:28,160 S3: am probably the only one out of the two of 260 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:33,350 S3: us that does reflect on their thoughts. Um, yeah. I was, 261 00:12:33,350 --> 00:12:35,959 S3: you know, I took a more middle ground approach, I 262 00:12:35,960 --> 00:12:37,760 S3: would probably say, but I was blown away by the 263 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:40,400 S3: box office results over the weekend. And I really did 264 00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:43,940 S3: see that this film is incredibly popular, and the box 265 00:12:43,940 --> 00:12:47,210 S3: office results for part two have been well and truly outdone. 266 00:12:47,210 --> 00:12:49,580 S3: Part one as well. So not only has it kind 267 00:12:49,580 --> 00:12:51,740 S3: of got a lot of fans, it's got heaps of 268 00:12:51,740 --> 00:12:54,710 S3: new fans as well since the first one. So, um, yeah, 269 00:12:54,710 --> 00:12:58,190 S3: I'm sorry, Oz, that we made you seem like an obscure. 270 00:12:58,220 --> 00:12:59,240 S1: I have to apologize. 271 00:12:59,720 --> 00:13:01,010 S2: I don't apologize on my behalf. 272 00:13:01,910 --> 00:13:04,520 S3: But you are the man of the people. 273 00:13:05,660 --> 00:13:05,959 S5: The man. 274 00:13:06,800 --> 00:13:07,699 S1: Of cinema. You could. 275 00:13:07,700 --> 00:13:08,480 S5: Say the man of the people. 276 00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:11,840 S2: Who's never flown economy. I did reflect on it, and 277 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:14,030 S2: I reflected on it with friends. Allow me to share 278 00:13:14,030 --> 00:13:16,370 S2: some of my reflections. So this is a friend of 279 00:13:16,370 --> 00:13:18,980 S2: mine who texted me every moment Oseman talks about June 280 00:13:18,980 --> 00:13:20,900 S2: confirms more and more that I absolutely do not want 281 00:13:20,900 --> 00:13:24,390 S2: to see it. And this is a separate friend. June 282 00:13:24,390 --> 00:13:27,319 S2: 2nd sounds boring as fuck lol. What are you doing? 283 00:13:28,010 --> 00:13:29,030 S5: I mean these maybe. 284 00:13:29,030 --> 00:13:30,410 S3: Reflect more on you and your friendship. 285 00:13:30,410 --> 00:13:32,030 S5: I agree you have completely. 286 00:13:32,030 --> 00:13:34,250 S1: Moronic friends who are not interested. I do have. 287 00:13:34,250 --> 00:13:36,830 S2: Some some really moronic friends. Uh, one of them is 288 00:13:36,830 --> 00:13:38,929 S2: included in that group, but I just think, look, it's 289 00:13:38,929 --> 00:13:42,290 S2: important that we show both sides of the debate. And, 290 00:13:42,290 --> 00:13:44,990 S2: you know, as we've discussed at length this week, I mean, 291 00:13:44,990 --> 00:13:47,390 S2: some people see June as this masterpiece, and other people 292 00:13:47,390 --> 00:13:50,840 S2: see it as a 2.5 hour movie about worms. So 293 00:13:50,840 --> 00:13:52,370 S2: that's the world that we live in. 294 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:55,309 S1: It is it is interesting, I think even and like Thomas, 295 00:13:55,309 --> 00:13:56,810 S1: even though you didn't love the movie, like you and 296 00:13:56,809 --> 00:13:59,809 S1: I were exchanging kind of Dune memes over the weekend 297 00:13:59,809 --> 00:14:02,900 S1: and stuff, it certainly you can acknowledge, has become like 298 00:14:02,900 --> 00:14:06,620 S1: a significant cultural moment. Probably not to the scale of Barbie, 299 00:14:06,620 --> 00:14:09,469 S1: but probably the next biggest in the last 12 months. 300 00:14:09,830 --> 00:14:13,250 S2: Yeah, 100%. And like it is funny because like we're 301 00:14:13,250 --> 00:14:16,010 S2: just saying it more and more now, like both before 302 00:14:16,010 --> 00:14:18,410 S2: and after a movie comes out. Just like the like 303 00:14:18,410 --> 00:14:21,140 S2: ecosystem of the internet around films is so crazy now. 304 00:14:21,140 --> 00:14:23,000 S2: Like we have joked about, you know, the June popcorn 305 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:26,120 S2: bucket or whatever, but like, yeah, like I've had people 306 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:28,310 S2: exchanging memes to me about June who I know haven't 307 00:14:28,310 --> 00:14:30,590 S2: actually even seen the movie yet. So yeah, it's really 308 00:14:30,590 --> 00:14:32,630 S2: weird that we live in this world now. That's a thing. 309 00:14:33,290 --> 00:14:36,080 S1: While we're talking about marketing, there is actually one bit 310 00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:39,470 S1: of the Dune Part two phenomenon that has left me 311 00:14:39,470 --> 00:14:42,109 S1: feeling like a little bit weird. I almost spent too 312 00:14:42,110 --> 00:14:43,790 S1: much time on this because I want to get to 313 00:14:43,790 --> 00:14:45,980 S1: the big stuff. The Oscars we're going to talk about today. 314 00:14:45,980 --> 00:14:51,140 S1: But the way that movie studios, distributors, marketing firms are 315 00:14:51,140 --> 00:14:55,010 S1: controlling the conversation about a movie in this day and 316 00:14:55,010 --> 00:14:58,040 S1: age is really fascinating to me and frankly, a little 317 00:14:58,040 --> 00:15:00,710 S1: bit depressing. So in the olden days, you know, the 318 00:15:00,710 --> 00:15:03,739 S1: first you generally hear about a movie and whether it 319 00:15:03,740 --> 00:15:05,330 S1: was good or bad, it was critics would go to 320 00:15:05,330 --> 00:15:07,910 S1: screenings early and they would write their reviews in the newspaper, 321 00:15:07,910 --> 00:15:10,640 S1: and great reviews would get you hyped. And you'd be like, 322 00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:12,200 S1: I guess that's the picture I want to go see 323 00:15:12,200 --> 00:15:14,330 S1: this weekend, and a bad review would like a movie 324 00:15:14,330 --> 00:15:16,790 S1: would be dead on arrival, right? So it's not surprising 325 00:15:16,790 --> 00:15:20,420 S1: that studios want to take some control back and set 326 00:15:20,420 --> 00:15:23,690 S1: the set the narrative on their terms. And so what 327 00:15:23,690 --> 00:15:28,520 S1: you've seen increasingly, is early screenings filled with influences more 328 00:15:28,520 --> 00:15:32,090 S1: than critics, even interview panels, which generally used to be 329 00:15:32,090 --> 00:15:36,580 S1: reserved for. Film journalists have now become about getting an influencer, 330 00:15:36,580 --> 00:15:39,729 S1: a TikToker, to ask someone involved in the movie what 331 00:15:39,730 --> 00:15:42,160 S1: their favorite like food is right to send that clip viral, 332 00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:45,130 S1: rather than an interesting conversation about what the movie is 333 00:15:45,130 --> 00:15:48,070 S1: about and what their process was. The new thing that 334 00:15:48,070 --> 00:15:49,840 S1: I've seen, and I think June Part two was, was 335 00:15:49,840 --> 00:15:53,140 S1: a really interesting example of this. You fill your early 336 00:15:53,140 --> 00:15:58,060 S1: release cinemas with fans of this franchise so that social media, 337 00:15:58,060 --> 00:16:03,310 S1: IMDb Letterboxd reviews are overwhelmingly positive because it's crazy spicy 338 00:16:03,310 --> 00:16:05,500 S1: to say it's great. That creates a narrative that this 339 00:16:05,500 --> 00:16:08,890 S1: movie is amazing, it's perfect, it's great, and no one 340 00:16:08,890 --> 00:16:10,840 S1: really wants to be the first person to say it 341 00:16:10,840 --> 00:16:13,870 S1: isn't quite that good. So everyone jumps on the hype train. 342 00:16:13,870 --> 00:16:16,270 S1: They watch it. The box office numbers are big. You 343 00:16:16,270 --> 00:16:18,160 S1: have that effect that you're talking about with Fred again 344 00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:19,450 S1: when no one wants to miss that. So they go 345 00:16:19,450 --> 00:16:22,140 S1: and see it. I think that's really interesting. It's really 346 00:16:22,140 --> 00:16:25,230 S1: smart marketing. The only bit of that that really annoys 347 00:16:25,230 --> 00:16:29,010 S1: me is those opportunities and that space that used to 348 00:16:29,010 --> 00:16:33,720 S1: be about writing about movies or asking interesting questions about 349 00:16:33,720 --> 00:16:38,670 S1: the choices directors and actors and editors make, going to 350 00:16:38,670 --> 00:16:41,790 S1: the kinds of people who and like. Obviously there are smart, 351 00:16:41,790 --> 00:16:44,910 S1: interesting film TikTokers and YouTubers. I'm not knocking those, but 352 00:16:44,910 --> 00:16:46,500 S1: a lot of it now is just how do we 353 00:16:46,500 --> 00:16:48,660 S1: get the most engagements to get this in people's feeds, 354 00:16:48,660 --> 00:16:50,460 S1: to get people to watch the movie? And I think 355 00:16:50,460 --> 00:16:52,560 S1: that's a little bit sad if that's the way it goes. 356 00:16:52,590 --> 00:16:54,330 S1: Do you guys have any any thoughts about this? Am 357 00:16:54,330 --> 00:16:55,530 S1: I just being curmudgeonly? 358 00:16:55,830 --> 00:16:58,800 S3: You are being a bit curmudgeonly because I do think 359 00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:01,710 S3: that there is. I think what they're doing is trying 360 00:17:01,710 --> 00:17:06,600 S3: to appeal to a demographic that traditional critics aren't appealing 361 00:17:06,630 --> 00:17:10,320 S3: to or aren't reaching, and that's exactly what they're trying 362 00:17:10,320 --> 00:17:12,240 S3: to do. And I think there is room for both. 363 00:17:12,240 --> 00:17:14,700 S3: I mean, I don't think at the June premiere, our 364 00:17:14,700 --> 00:17:19,800 S3: movie reviewers weren't invited because someone from an influencer was 365 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:21,660 S3: invited to take photos in front of, like, a wall 366 00:17:21,660 --> 00:17:24,210 S3: of sand. Like, I think they both can exist. And 367 00:17:24,210 --> 00:17:28,590 S3: I think a more positive frame on it is to say, look, 368 00:17:28,590 --> 00:17:31,260 S3: if this is how we're getting a new generation into 369 00:17:31,260 --> 00:17:34,770 S3: cinema and into films like that's a really good thing. 370 00:17:34,770 --> 00:17:37,139 S3: Like if this is a lot of people's first introduction 371 00:17:37,140 --> 00:17:40,859 S3: to cinematic culture, like, that's wonderful, why wouldn't we celebrate 372 00:17:40,859 --> 00:17:43,379 S3: the fact that we're reaching a younger audience? And I 373 00:17:43,380 --> 00:17:45,900 S3: do understand what you're saying, like, obviously we don't want 374 00:17:45,900 --> 00:17:48,960 S3: a dumbing down of the critical industry that we have, 375 00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:51,209 S3: but I just I really do think it's a way 376 00:17:51,210 --> 00:17:54,119 S3: of getting people into cinema more than kind of trying 377 00:17:54,119 --> 00:17:57,240 S3: to remove the critical culture around it. And they can 378 00:17:57,240 --> 00:17:59,520 S3: both exist because there will always be. And we had 379 00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:01,770 S3: serious reviews of Dune at the same time as there 380 00:18:01,770 --> 00:18:05,790 S3: is this kind of separate world going on for younger people. 381 00:18:05,790 --> 00:18:07,620 S3: And I will say it's not every film like it's 382 00:18:07,619 --> 00:18:10,740 S3: not like an Oppenheimer, although obviously that because of its 383 00:18:10,740 --> 00:18:12,600 S3: release with Barbie, we did see kind of a lot 384 00:18:12,600 --> 00:18:15,179 S3: of social stuff around it. But not every film is 385 00:18:15,180 --> 00:18:18,540 S3: treated the way Dune has been. Like Oppenheimer wasn't killers, 386 00:18:18,540 --> 00:18:20,970 S3: wasn't a lot of anatomy of a fall. These are 387 00:18:20,970 --> 00:18:25,080 S3: really big, critically glorious films, but they're not being treated 388 00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:27,420 S3: this way. So it is these kind of blockbuster films 389 00:18:27,420 --> 00:18:30,180 S3: that are getting this treatment particularly. Yeah. 390 00:18:30,180 --> 00:18:32,430 S2: And I think there will always be, um, a few 391 00:18:32,430 --> 00:18:34,889 S2: of us brave people who go on the pods and say, 392 00:18:34,890 --> 00:18:38,250 S2: June 2nd, June 2nd sucks. No, I think I think 393 00:18:38,250 --> 00:18:40,560 S2: it's a very valid argument. I think you guys, um, 394 00:18:40,560 --> 00:18:42,660 S2: kind of covered both sides. I do think, yeah, it 395 00:18:42,660 --> 00:18:44,580 S2: ultimately should be about the balance. Like, you know, I 396 00:18:44,580 --> 00:18:47,159 S2: remember when I went to the Saltburn screening and I 397 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:48,840 S2: was like, oh, this is really weird. Like, this is 398 00:18:48,840 --> 00:18:51,570 S2: it was such a like, almost like party like atmosphere 399 00:18:51,570 --> 00:18:53,100 S2: in the cinema. And this was like two weeks before 400 00:18:53,100 --> 00:18:56,580 S2: it came out. And then like when it was lights up, um, 401 00:18:56,580 --> 00:19:00,540 S2: I saw like several I would say like 60% of 402 00:19:00,540 --> 00:19:03,840 S2: the crowd was like influences who I knew and not recognized. 403 00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:05,940 S2: And then, like, would, you know, a day later saw 404 00:19:05,940 --> 00:19:08,970 S2: their content on online. And I guess it'll be about 405 00:19:08,970 --> 00:19:10,680 S2: the balance that you don't want to kind of like 406 00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:13,050 S2: flood it with that, you know, very I know it's 407 00:19:13,050 --> 00:19:15,300 S2: like so tempting for these movie companies to get the 408 00:19:15,300 --> 00:19:17,129 S2: influencers in to be like, oh, they'll, you know, you 409 00:19:17,130 --> 00:19:19,320 S2: do three posts to your 200,000 followers about how great 410 00:19:19,320 --> 00:19:21,510 S2: Saltburn is and blah, blah, blah. But, um, I don't 411 00:19:21,510 --> 00:19:23,400 S2: ever think we'll see, you know, the full watering down 412 00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:25,830 S2: of the critical, you know, uh, culture. 413 00:19:25,830 --> 00:19:27,540 S1: Yeah, I hope, I hope so. And you guys are right. 414 00:19:27,540 --> 00:19:29,250 S1: I mean, we are very lucky to get great access 415 00:19:29,250 --> 00:19:31,200 S1: to these movies. We get to watch them earlier, as 416 00:19:31,200 --> 00:19:33,780 S1: do critics. And we often get great access to stars 417 00:19:33,780 --> 00:19:36,240 S1: and talent. So I'm not saying that this is the 418 00:19:36,240 --> 00:19:38,790 S1: end of good film criticism, but something about the way 419 00:19:38,790 --> 00:19:41,910 S1: that the Dune stuff operated, on one hand super smart 420 00:19:41,910 --> 00:19:44,250 S1: from the studio and is clearly paid off. But I 421 00:19:44,250 --> 00:19:47,580 S1: just can see like like Paul Atreides with his with his, 422 00:19:47,580 --> 00:19:50,790 S1: you know, spice vision, a darker path ahead if we 423 00:19:50,790 --> 00:19:52,830 S1: follow this one too far down the track, but one 424 00:19:52,830 --> 00:19:53,820 S1: to watch, I reckon. 425 00:19:53,820 --> 00:19:55,169 S3: I mean, I don't know what that metaphor means. 426 00:19:55,170 --> 00:19:58,649 S5: So something about talking about a worm, I think. Yeah. 427 00:19:59,100 --> 00:19:59,760 S3: Blue liquid. 428 00:20:00,150 --> 00:20:03,510 S1: Um, look, one other thing we wanted to, to touch on, um, 429 00:20:03,510 --> 00:20:06,390 S1: was a show that I mentioned in the Impress Your 430 00:20:06,390 --> 00:20:10,020 S1: Friends segment last week, uh, called Shogun. It's had a 431 00:20:10,020 --> 00:20:14,130 S1: pretty big response internationally, making a lot of comparisons to 432 00:20:14,130 --> 00:20:17,729 S1: Game of Thrones and even succession. The ringer called it 433 00:20:17,730 --> 00:20:21,060 S1: high stakes event TV at its finest. The Washington Post 434 00:20:21,060 --> 00:20:24,300 S1: says that Shogun is what thrillers or wish they were. 435 00:20:24,300 --> 00:20:26,400 S1: It's a show made by FX in the in the US. 436 00:20:26,400 --> 00:20:29,160 S1: It's the home of shows like Atlanta Legion, It's Always Sunny, 437 00:20:29,160 --> 00:20:32,010 S1: but this feels like that leveling up. It's one of 438 00:20:32,010 --> 00:20:36,270 S1: their most epic, intense shows yet, airing on Disney+ in Australia. 439 00:20:36,270 --> 00:20:38,160 S1: And if you didn't catch me talking about it last week, 440 00:20:38,160 --> 00:20:41,490 S1: very quick summary. It's set in Japan in the 1600s. 441 00:20:41,490 --> 00:20:44,490 S1: It follows an Englishman who ends up shipwrecked in the 442 00:20:44,490 --> 00:20:48,060 S1: country and quickly becomes ensnared in political intrigue as this 443 00:20:48,060 --> 00:20:51,119 S1: group of five Japanese regents who rule over the country 444 00:20:51,119 --> 00:20:55,230 S1: trying to politically outdo and backstab each other. Thomas, you've 445 00:20:55,230 --> 00:20:57,840 S1: since watched Shogun. What did you think? 446 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:01,050 S2: Yeah, I am really into it. Um, it feels, I guess, 447 00:21:01,050 --> 00:21:04,860 S2: like the closest thing we have to prestige TV right now. Um, 448 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:06,449 S2: it just it just does such a good job of 449 00:21:06,450 --> 00:21:09,330 S2: setting up this world. It's not really like an easily 450 00:21:09,330 --> 00:21:12,930 S2: accessible world at, like, on paper, but you so quickly get, like, 451 00:21:12,930 --> 00:21:15,210 S2: drawn into the power struggles of these five different kind 452 00:21:15,210 --> 00:21:18,000 S2: of like families or regions. And, you know, it is 453 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:21,270 S2: those themes that we love consistently. From the shows that 454 00:21:21,270 --> 00:21:23,070 S2: we love. And, you know, we talked about comparisons to 455 00:21:23,070 --> 00:21:25,320 S2: succession and, you know, whether or not that's accurate, I 456 00:21:25,320 --> 00:21:28,080 S2: don't know. But like this power vacuum that is suddenly, 457 00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:31,770 S2: you know, has this ripple effect is so intoxicating, I think. 458 00:21:31,770 --> 00:21:33,060 S2: And on top of that, I also think like the 459 00:21:33,060 --> 00:21:35,670 S2: way they do the era is really great. And yeah, 460 00:21:35,670 --> 00:21:39,150 S2: I the first two episodes are actually pretty dense as well. 461 00:21:39,150 --> 00:21:41,310 S2: Like in terms of trying to figure out exactly what's 462 00:21:41,310 --> 00:21:43,770 S2: going on. And there is so many different characters. But yeah, I, 463 00:21:43,770 --> 00:21:46,500 S2: I'm very into this. I'm on the Shogun train now. 464 00:21:46,530 --> 00:21:48,390 S3: Oh my gosh, it is so graphic too. 465 00:21:48,390 --> 00:21:51,930 S5: This is like video game level violence. 466 00:21:51,930 --> 00:21:54,180 S3: And it did remind me of our Murray Scorsese episode. 467 00:21:54,180 --> 00:21:57,210 S3: We talked about his film silence, which is also set 468 00:21:57,210 --> 00:22:00,180 S3: in a similar period. And if you liked that film, 469 00:22:00,270 --> 00:22:02,520 S3: you will love Shogun, because it actually picks up on 470 00:22:02,520 --> 00:22:05,129 S3: a lot of those themes and the exact same kind 471 00:22:05,130 --> 00:22:08,100 S3: of rough and ready landscape, the kind of collapse and 472 00:22:08,100 --> 00:22:12,300 S3: building of civilizations. It's, uh, it's pretty gripping viewing. 473 00:22:12,480 --> 00:22:14,610 S1: Yeah, I get I get the Game of Thrones comparisons, 474 00:22:14,609 --> 00:22:17,760 S1: particularly the violence, the unexpected violence, this sort of sex 475 00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:20,850 S1: and stuff. But the creators have said, look, we want 476 00:22:20,850 --> 00:22:24,030 S1: this to be considered along shows like succession and House 477 00:22:24,030 --> 00:22:26,220 S1: of cards as well. And I get that too, because 478 00:22:26,220 --> 00:22:28,859 S1: while there is, you know, there like some really great 479 00:22:28,859 --> 00:22:31,770 S1: action sequences, so much of it is like conversations and 480 00:22:31,770 --> 00:22:35,130 S1: rooms and this, this web that continues to grow of 481 00:22:35,130 --> 00:22:39,090 S1: double dealing and like Catholic missionaries playing both sides. There's 482 00:22:39,090 --> 00:22:42,810 S1: so much complexity and denseness to this story, but I 483 00:22:42,810 --> 00:22:45,390 S1: think it's done in a way that's more, uh, I guess, 484 00:22:45,390 --> 00:22:48,240 S1: welcoming to outsiders and something like June, like they really 485 00:22:48,240 --> 00:22:50,670 S1: explained things to you, which really helps, particularly the first 486 00:22:50,670 --> 00:22:53,280 S1: couple of episodes. I feel like I get this world 487 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:56,670 S1: and the stakes and I'm really in, uh, I, I 488 00:22:56,670 --> 00:22:58,830 S1: also think the way it's shot is really interesting that 489 00:22:58,830 --> 00:23:01,860 S1: you said it's, you know, one of the few prestige 490 00:23:01,859 --> 00:23:04,260 S1: shows out right now. Thomas, I kind of agree, even 491 00:23:04,260 --> 00:23:06,630 S1: though there are like other hyped shows, you know, there's 492 00:23:06,630 --> 00:23:09,630 S1: the regime with Kate Winslet that's out on, um, out 493 00:23:09,630 --> 00:23:11,670 S1: on binge, the HBO show. But the way that this 494 00:23:11,670 --> 00:23:15,929 S1: show is filmed, the lighting, the directing, the sequences, the performances, 495 00:23:15,930 --> 00:23:20,040 S1: it feels like this last kind of we're making a 496 00:23:20,040 --> 00:23:23,189 S1: movie into a TV show over eight parts and come 497 00:23:23,190 --> 00:23:24,270 S1: along for the ride. 498 00:23:24,270 --> 00:23:26,760 S3: Yeah, you're like totally in that environment with them, with 499 00:23:26,760 --> 00:23:29,189 S3: the rough waters and the jungle and the kind of 500 00:23:29,190 --> 00:23:32,310 S3: you're they do such a good job at making you 501 00:23:32,310 --> 00:23:33,750 S3: feel like you're in that moment. 502 00:23:33,750 --> 00:23:36,000 S2: Yeah, it feels expensive. And also I, I've had like 503 00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:39,090 S2: a lot of people, um, like texting me about it, 504 00:23:39,090 --> 00:23:41,100 S2: like I can the word of mouth on this show is, like, 505 00:23:41,100 --> 00:23:42,780 S2: really kicking off over the last couple of weeks. Like 506 00:23:42,780 --> 00:23:46,010 S2: it it feels like it could be in 5 or 507 00:23:46,010 --> 00:23:48,090 S2: 6 episodes. People are like, oh, fuck. Shogun. This is 508 00:23:48,090 --> 00:23:49,050 S2: like the show for the year. 509 00:23:49,050 --> 00:23:51,330 S3: So the esteemed friends you quoted before who didn't like. 510 00:23:51,330 --> 00:23:53,100 S5: June, are they into Shogun? 511 00:23:53,100 --> 00:23:55,050 S2: Correct? Yeah. They've given Shogun the tick of approval. 512 00:23:55,109 --> 00:23:55,919 S3: Interesting. 513 00:23:55,920 --> 00:23:57,390 S1: Well, let's keep an eye on it, because I do 514 00:23:57,390 --> 00:23:59,310 S1: think you're right. I think more people will jump on, 515 00:23:59,310 --> 00:24:01,320 S1: and it may be worth doing, like a deeper dive 516 00:24:01,320 --> 00:24:04,859 S1: and some character analyses and and that sort of fun thing. 517 00:24:04,859 --> 00:24:07,050 S1: So yeah, we're all going to send the Shogun train, 518 00:24:07,050 --> 00:24:18,990 S1: it sounds like. All right, folks, the 96th Academy Awards 519 00:24:18,990 --> 00:24:22,440 S1: are nearly here. They are airing during the day on Monday, 520 00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:25,770 S1: the 11th Australian time. All three of us are fans 521 00:24:25,770 --> 00:24:28,800 S1: of the Oscars. We love cinema. We love award shows. 522 00:24:28,800 --> 00:24:31,740 S1: We love the celebration of film culture and everything to 523 00:24:31,740 --> 00:24:35,280 S1: do with the moving image with some sound attached to it. 524 00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:37,860 S1: We love it when the Oscars get it right. We 525 00:24:37,859 --> 00:24:39,149 S1: love it when they get it wrong. We love it 526 00:24:39,150 --> 00:24:40,770 S1: when they do both on the same night, which they 527 00:24:40,770 --> 00:24:44,310 S1: basically always do. Today we're going to do a deep 528 00:24:44,310 --> 00:24:47,129 S1: dive on this year's awards. We're going to take a 529 00:24:47,130 --> 00:24:49,619 S1: look at the state of the race, how the campaigns 530 00:24:49,619 --> 00:24:53,700 S1: for each film playing out, and we'll unpack exactly how 531 00:24:53,700 --> 00:24:57,450 S1: the awards work. And we'll also make some predictions that 532 00:24:57,450 --> 00:24:59,700 S1: you can hold us to next week when we do 533 00:24:59,700 --> 00:25:03,119 S1: a special Oscars reaction podcast, dropping in your feeds on 534 00:25:03,119 --> 00:25:06,990 S1: Monday evening. I actually thought, before we start talking about 535 00:25:06,990 --> 00:25:09,510 S1: this year's awards, it'd be fun to read out this 536 00:25:09,510 --> 00:25:13,679 S1: passage from a book. Mel Michael Shulman's Oscar was the 537 00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:14,909 S1: one that you and I both enjoy. 538 00:25:14,910 --> 00:25:15,870 S5: Favorite book? 539 00:25:15,869 --> 00:25:18,330 S1: It's about the history of the Oscars, and early on 540 00:25:18,330 --> 00:25:20,760 S1: in the book he asks, like, what are the Academy 541 00:25:20,760 --> 00:25:25,320 S1: Awards anyway? And he says that the closest thing America 542 00:25:25,320 --> 00:25:28,620 S1: has to royalty, they're the only thing forcing Hollywood to 543 00:25:28,619 --> 00:25:32,040 S1: factor art into commerce. They're a marketing ploy, propping up 544 00:25:32,040 --> 00:25:35,760 S1: a multi-billion dollar business there, a method, however dubious, of 545 00:25:35,760 --> 00:25:39,119 S1: organizing movies into canon. They're a game. They're a relic. 546 00:25:39,150 --> 00:25:42,000 S1: They're a fashion show. They're a horse race. They're an 547 00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:45,480 S1: orgy of self-congratulation by rich and famous people who think 548 00:25:45,480 --> 00:25:48,690 S1: too highly of themselves. They're the gay Super Bowl. I 549 00:25:48,690 --> 00:25:51,390 S1: thought that is like, awesome, because all of those statements 550 00:25:51,390 --> 00:25:54,690 S1: are right. And I think they explain why these awards 551 00:25:54,690 --> 00:25:57,090 S1: are so fascinating to watch and to talk about, both 552 00:25:57,090 --> 00:26:00,630 S1: as a spectacle, but both as a statement on this 553 00:26:00,630 --> 00:26:02,910 S1: big question that we talk about every show, how culture 554 00:26:02,910 --> 00:26:05,070 S1: is made and received in the world right now. 555 00:26:06,230 --> 00:26:08,030 S3: Yeah, just hearing that made me excited. 556 00:26:08,030 --> 00:26:08,330 S5: Yeah. 557 00:26:09,050 --> 00:26:10,939 S1: So. So now we've got that kind of summary out 558 00:26:10,940 --> 00:26:12,800 S1: of the way. I thought it'd be fun if the 559 00:26:12,800 --> 00:26:15,920 S1: three of us started with sharing some of our favorite 560 00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:18,320 S1: Oscar moments from recent years. What are the bits that 561 00:26:18,320 --> 00:26:20,690 S1: stand out that you still think about that make you think, 562 00:26:20,690 --> 00:26:23,359 S1: God damn, I love this insane group of people and 563 00:26:23,359 --> 00:26:25,310 S1: what they get up to? Mel. Jonah, do you want 564 00:26:25,310 --> 00:26:26,030 S1: to go first? 565 00:26:26,060 --> 00:26:28,040 S3: Well, I have to say one of them that I 566 00:26:28,040 --> 00:26:31,580 S3: think still the influence still continues to loom large on 567 00:26:31,580 --> 00:26:36,859 S3: our culture was Ellen's selfie, which turns ten this year? 568 00:26:37,160 --> 00:26:39,380 S1: Um, this week, I believe. Two days ago. Yeah. 569 00:26:39,410 --> 00:26:41,090 S3: Of course. Yeah. So, um. 570 00:26:41,240 --> 00:26:41,780 S5: Remind us. 571 00:26:41,780 --> 00:26:42,470 S1: Of the selfie. 572 00:26:42,470 --> 00:26:45,050 S3: No, I mean, it's a bit. Ellen. Probably. Now, we 573 00:26:45,050 --> 00:26:47,750 S3: know she probably bullied everyone into doing it and smiled 574 00:26:47,750 --> 00:26:50,780 S3: the whole way. So it's kind of a bit tinged now, but, um, 575 00:26:50,960 --> 00:26:55,100 S3: Ellen just happened to take that, you know, seemingly random selfie. 576 00:26:55,100 --> 00:26:58,220 S3: Probably ten years ago. We were all just discovering selfies, right? 577 00:26:58,490 --> 00:27:00,590 S3: And it had the who's who of Hollywood in it. 578 00:27:00,590 --> 00:27:03,860 S3: Everyone from Meryl Streep to Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence was 579 00:27:03,859 --> 00:27:06,500 S3: in it, Brad Pitt all like in a kind of 580 00:27:06,500 --> 00:27:10,340 S3: Renaissance style, scattered composition. And it was just kind of 581 00:27:10,340 --> 00:27:14,120 S3: captured a moment in time in Hollywood so perfectly. And 582 00:27:14,119 --> 00:27:17,600 S3: since then it's obviously been ripped off multiple times. Everyone's 583 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:19,580 S3: kind of done their own version of the Ellen self, 584 00:27:19,580 --> 00:27:22,040 S3: and it became a trend at other events as well. 585 00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:24,020 S1: It's so funny that selfie, because you're right, it had 586 00:27:24,020 --> 00:27:26,389 S1: this chokehold on the on the world. But now you 587 00:27:26,390 --> 00:27:29,240 S1: look back, you're like that is so cringe. Like who cares? 588 00:27:29,240 --> 00:27:33,920 S1: The photo looks like depressing Kevin Spacey. There's a few 589 00:27:33,920 --> 00:27:36,139 S1: people there that have not aged well, but now it's 590 00:27:36,140 --> 00:27:38,720 S1: like you just couldn't see that going ballistic the way 591 00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:39,619 S1: that that did. 592 00:27:39,619 --> 00:27:41,660 S3: No, I feel like if you saw it, you'd probably 593 00:27:41,660 --> 00:27:44,840 S3: mock them and criticize them for the ostentatious ness of 594 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:47,630 S3: it all. Um, of course, at the moment that I 595 00:27:47,630 --> 00:27:50,960 S3: think we'll never get past from the Oscars is the slap. Um, 596 00:27:50,960 --> 00:27:53,480 S3: not the Crystal talkers book, though we can talk about 597 00:27:53,480 --> 00:27:58,850 S3: that later. The 2022, um, Will Smith, Chris Rock, I'm 598 00:27:58,850 --> 00:27:59,450 S3: out here. 599 00:27:59,600 --> 00:28:07,699 UU: Oh, Richard. Oh, wow. Wow. 600 00:28:09,619 --> 00:28:11,600 S6: Will Smith just smack the shit out of me. 601 00:28:14,900 --> 00:28:17,210 UU: Name out your mouth. 602 00:28:18,080 --> 00:28:22,460 S6: Wow, dude. Yes, it was a G.I. Joe. 603 00:28:22,970 --> 00:28:26,090 S3: My wife's name. I remember we were all in the office, 604 00:28:26,090 --> 00:28:29,060 S3: I think, when it happened. And it was. The response was. 605 00:28:29,060 --> 00:28:31,310 S3: So no one really understood what was going on. 606 00:28:31,310 --> 00:28:33,439 S1: I was famously not in the office. I'd been helping 607 00:28:33,440 --> 00:28:35,210 S1: live blog at all day and went to get a 608 00:28:35,210 --> 00:28:36,470 S1: sandwich and was like. 609 00:28:37,220 --> 00:28:37,520 S5: What could. 610 00:28:37,520 --> 00:28:39,410 S1: Happen here? And I got my phone starts blowing up. 611 00:28:39,410 --> 00:28:41,690 S1: It's like, you know, Will Smith just slap Chris Rock. 612 00:28:41,690 --> 00:28:43,610 S1: I'm like, ah, I was like George Clooney at the 613 00:28:43,610 --> 00:28:45,800 S1: opening of Ocean's 12. And Julia Roberts calls and he 614 00:28:45,800 --> 00:28:48,979 S1: throws the flowers away and just gets back, runs back in. 615 00:28:48,980 --> 00:28:52,130 S2: It was like a BLT. Yeah, yeah, just enjoying himself. 616 00:28:52,400 --> 00:28:54,590 S1: It was so funny. You mentioned Crystal Soakers because I 617 00:28:54,590 --> 00:28:56,270 S1: can remember who it was. Someone in our team had 618 00:28:56,270 --> 00:28:59,870 S1: an idea to message Crystal and see if he would 619 00:28:59,870 --> 00:29:03,620 S1: comment on the slap, and and I did. He decided 620 00:29:03,620 --> 00:29:04,820 S1: to not buy it. Actually. 621 00:29:05,480 --> 00:29:07,550 S3: That is such a good idea and I think we 622 00:29:07,550 --> 00:29:08,870 S3: should ask him again. 623 00:29:08,870 --> 00:29:11,150 S1: I actually, I actually just found the message. He said, 624 00:29:11,150 --> 00:29:13,460 S1: Hi Osman, I think the wisest thing for me to 625 00:29:13,460 --> 00:29:16,160 S1: do is let the memes take care of themselves. Hope 626 00:29:16,160 --> 00:29:19,850 S1: that's okay. Don't hesitate to ask me anything. My best Christmas. 627 00:29:20,900 --> 00:29:21,710 S5: That's a great message. 628 00:29:22,070 --> 00:29:24,110 S3: Speaking of the time, I asked Helen Garner to write 629 00:29:24,110 --> 00:29:25,700 S3: about the Kardashians and. 630 00:29:26,840 --> 00:29:27,500 S5: Which I still. 631 00:29:27,500 --> 00:29:29,060 S3: Believe would have been a remarkable. 632 00:29:29,060 --> 00:29:30,590 S5: Can you bring this up often? 633 00:29:30,590 --> 00:29:35,210 S3: She just replied one line. No, not for me. Um, yeah, 634 00:29:35,210 --> 00:29:36,710 S3: but do you remember? We were all very confused about 635 00:29:36,710 --> 00:29:38,990 S3: whether it was a joke at first or like whether 636 00:29:38,990 --> 00:29:41,330 S3: it was staged. There was at least a kind of 637 00:29:41,330 --> 00:29:43,940 S3: a few minutes where everyone was kind of confused about 638 00:29:43,940 --> 00:29:46,010 S3: whether it was set up, one of those kind of interactive. 639 00:29:46,010 --> 00:29:47,510 S5: Yeah. It just seemed so outrageous that. 640 00:29:47,720 --> 00:29:48,590 S1: It actually happened. 641 00:29:48,590 --> 00:29:50,900 S2: I remember shortly after that Osbourne was like, you have 642 00:29:50,900 --> 00:29:53,060 S2: to write this anatomy of the slap piece, where I 643 00:29:53,060 --> 00:29:54,920 S2: broke it down into like, it was like, you know, 644 00:29:54,920 --> 00:29:56,990 S2: it was like a replay of a of a football 645 00:29:56,990 --> 00:29:59,030 S2: game or something and like, broke it down piece by piece. 646 00:29:59,030 --> 00:30:00,890 S2: And we got like vision made up. And that was 647 00:30:00,890 --> 00:30:02,930 S2: another one of those times where I'm like, I used 648 00:30:02,930 --> 00:30:04,850 S2: to be somebody. And now here's one of those. 649 00:30:04,850 --> 00:30:06,590 S1: Times where you said, oh, do I have to? And 650 00:30:06,590 --> 00:30:09,170 S1: then it became one of the most beautiful and best read. 651 00:30:09,500 --> 00:30:11,450 S5: It actually did absolutely pop up. What would have been like, 652 00:30:11,450 --> 00:30:11,720 S5: is this. 653 00:30:11,720 --> 00:30:12,620 S3: Even a story? 654 00:30:13,640 --> 00:30:14,090 S5: Um, funnily. 655 00:30:14,090 --> 00:30:16,880 S2: Enough, my Oscars moment comes from the same year I 656 00:30:16,880 --> 00:30:19,880 S2: present to you two words. Ladies and gentlemen, Adele. 657 00:30:19,880 --> 00:30:25,640 S7: Naseem, please welcome the wickedly talented one and only a dozen. 658 00:30:26,450 --> 00:30:28,880 S2: Aside from the fact I love Travolta, I also love 659 00:30:28,880 --> 00:30:32,210 S2: late era Travolta because he's just, like, fucking careening out 660 00:30:32,210 --> 00:30:34,459 S2: of control. He's a pilot whose face doesn't move. Um, 661 00:30:34,460 --> 00:30:37,730 S2: everything he does is hilarious. But the fact that, you know, 662 00:30:37,730 --> 00:30:40,430 S2: we can still have something like the Oscars, which is 663 00:30:40,430 --> 00:30:44,390 S2: the most heavily coordinated, one of the most watched black 664 00:30:44,570 --> 00:30:47,150 S2: cultural events in the world, and you can still have 665 00:30:47,150 --> 00:30:49,580 S2: these hilarious slip ups. It's very funny. Obviously, it was 666 00:30:49,580 --> 00:30:53,270 S2: when John Travolta went up on stage to introduce, um, 667 00:30:53,270 --> 00:30:55,910 S2: actor and songstress Idina menzel. Um, who was going to, 668 00:30:55,940 --> 00:30:58,760 S2: you know, perform Let It Go from frozen. And he 669 00:30:58,760 --> 00:31:02,810 S2: obviously he's I guess his logic is that he misread 670 00:31:02,810 --> 00:31:04,910 S2: the phonetic spelling of her name on the teleprompter, and 671 00:31:04,910 --> 00:31:09,950 S2: he said, Adele, dizzy. And I was just like, what 672 00:31:09,950 --> 00:31:13,250 S2: the fuck, Travolta? Um, and, you know, funnily enough, it was. Yeah, 673 00:31:13,460 --> 00:31:16,190 S2: it was ten years ago. Two days ago, I think. Um, 674 00:31:16,190 --> 00:31:18,950 S2: so Idina menzel went on Instagram to wish Adele regime 675 00:31:18,950 --> 00:31:19,400 S2: a happy. 676 00:31:19,700 --> 00:31:21,740 S5: Happy 10th birthday, which was very funny. 677 00:31:21,830 --> 00:31:24,020 S2: Um, so yeah, that's my one that stands out. 678 00:31:24,020 --> 00:31:25,880 S1: It's funny that all of ours are kind of fuckups, 679 00:31:25,880 --> 00:31:28,700 S1: like no moments, just like, wow, the first so-and-so to 680 00:31:28,700 --> 00:31:31,220 S1: win an Oscar because mine is my favorite moment of 681 00:31:31,220 --> 00:31:36,080 S1: all time. The 2017 Moonlight La La Land clusterfuck, which which, 682 00:31:36,080 --> 00:31:39,050 S1: if you don't remember, Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty were 683 00:31:39,050 --> 00:31:41,900 S1: announcing the winner of Best Picture. Everyone knew it was 684 00:31:41,900 --> 00:31:44,810 S1: down to La La Land and Moonlight. That was like 685 00:31:44,810 --> 00:31:48,530 S1: shades of the 2009 VMAs. It's kind of like clash 686 00:31:48,530 --> 00:31:51,980 S1: of of race and culture and films and what stories matters, 687 00:31:51,980 --> 00:31:57,260 S1: this beautiful, queer black story that just looked stunning compared 688 00:31:57,260 --> 00:32:00,080 S1: to this movie about Hollywood. You know, I'm not a 689 00:32:00,080 --> 00:32:02,780 S1: big La La Land guy, you guys know that. And 690 00:32:02,780 --> 00:32:05,989 S1: then they announced that it's La La Land. All the 691 00:32:05,990 --> 00:32:10,580 S1: producers jump up, everyone's celebrating. It's pretty exciting. Then Jordan Horowitz, 692 00:32:10,580 --> 00:32:13,310 S1: the producer, looks at the envelope and says, there's been 693 00:32:13,310 --> 00:32:16,190 S1: a mistake. Moonlight, you guys won Best Picture. 694 00:32:16,640 --> 00:32:18,050 S8: We lost, by the way. But, you know. 695 00:32:18,740 --> 00:32:22,460 S9: I'm sorry. No, there's a mistake. There's a mistake. Moonlight. 696 00:32:22,460 --> 00:32:24,950 S9: You guys won best picture. Moonlight won. 697 00:32:26,420 --> 00:32:28,700 S10: This is not a joke. This is not a joke. 698 00:32:28,700 --> 00:32:31,040 S10: I'm afraid they read the wrong thing. This is. 699 00:32:31,970 --> 00:32:34,730 S9: This is not a joke. Moonlight has won Best picture. 700 00:32:37,120 --> 00:32:39,160 S9: Moonlight Best Picture. 701 00:32:45,740 --> 00:32:48,350 S1: I watched that clip multiple times a week. It gives 702 00:32:48,350 --> 00:32:51,140 S1: me chills. No one knows what's going on. It is insane. 703 00:32:51,140 --> 00:32:53,900 S1: How do they get it wrong? I was liveblogging those 704 00:32:53,900 --> 00:32:55,880 S1: awards for a different company I was working for at 705 00:32:55,880 --> 00:32:58,940 S1: the time. I did the same thing I made you do, Thomas. 706 00:32:58,940 --> 00:33:01,910 S1: I did like an anatomy of it screenshots, time frames, 707 00:33:01,910 --> 00:33:04,700 S1: where it all went wrong. It was just so good 708 00:33:04,700 --> 00:33:07,610 S1: and I love that it lives on in Oscars history. 709 00:33:07,610 --> 00:33:09,980 S2: And again, it's just like, how does this happen? Not 710 00:33:09,980 --> 00:33:12,380 S2: since the winner of Australia's Next Top model has. 711 00:33:12,380 --> 00:33:15,170 S5: Such a disaster, but like, yeah. 712 00:33:15,590 --> 00:33:18,980 S2: I mean, it just was like that heart in the 713 00:33:18,980 --> 00:33:22,370 S2: mouth moment. Similar, I guess, to to the Will Smith thing. 714 00:33:22,370 --> 00:33:26,450 S2: Like everything in our world really is often so like 715 00:33:26,450 --> 00:33:28,940 S2: scripted and expected and there's not much room for chaos. 716 00:33:28,940 --> 00:33:31,520 S2: And so when stuff like that happens, especially at these 717 00:33:31,520 --> 00:33:33,980 S2: moments where, you know, like much of the world is watching, 718 00:33:34,280 --> 00:33:35,870 S2: it's just it's kind of beautiful. 719 00:33:35,870 --> 00:33:36,350 S5: Yeah. 720 00:33:36,350 --> 00:33:38,660 S3: I like the, you know, there's no chaos until there 721 00:33:38,660 --> 00:33:41,000 S3: is chaos and then it's absolute chaos. 722 00:33:41,420 --> 00:33:44,090 S1: And because this involves like people who make the best 723 00:33:44,090 --> 00:33:47,630 S1: films in the world, you think they can get a broadcast, right? 724 00:33:47,630 --> 00:33:50,090 S1: They can produce a ceremony. So I think you're spot on. 725 00:33:50,090 --> 00:33:52,430 S1: I think that element of chaos is why we love 726 00:33:52,430 --> 00:33:55,670 S1: the alive award ceremony as much as, like, who actually 727 00:33:55,670 --> 00:33:56,690 S1: wins and loses. 728 00:33:56,840 --> 00:33:58,400 S3: Yeah. Gosh, it would be good to have a like 729 00:33:58,400 --> 00:34:00,770 S3: a kind of documentary of what went on behind the 730 00:34:00,770 --> 00:34:02,540 S3: scenes after that kind of is. 731 00:34:02,540 --> 00:34:03,290 S5: It Warren Beatty is that. 732 00:34:03,290 --> 00:34:04,040 S2: Really old and can't. 733 00:34:04,040 --> 00:34:05,930 S5: Fucking say anything anymore? Yeah, yeah it is. 734 00:34:05,930 --> 00:34:07,970 S1: He did, I think I think from memory, like he 735 00:34:07,970 --> 00:34:11,930 S1: took the wrong envelope. He took it Emma Stone's envelope 736 00:34:11,930 --> 00:34:16,279 S1: for Best Actress, and he was confused and it had 737 00:34:16,280 --> 00:34:17,810 S1: La La Land on it. And he's like, well, I 738 00:34:17,810 --> 00:34:20,720 S1: guess that's the best picture. And so that's what happened. 739 00:34:20,810 --> 00:34:21,260 S5: If I. 740 00:34:21,260 --> 00:34:22,280 S3: Say it with confidence. 741 00:34:22,280 --> 00:34:23,480 S5: They'll believe me. 742 00:34:24,260 --> 00:34:26,719 S1: Now. Warren Beatty rules like good on him. And it 743 00:34:26,719 --> 00:34:29,540 S1: led to a very funny moment. So very happy for 744 00:34:29,540 --> 00:34:32,900 S1: everyone involved. Except, anyway, moonlight got the award. That's what matters. 745 00:34:33,230 --> 00:34:33,440 S5: Um. 746 00:34:34,190 --> 00:34:37,880 S1: Speaking of awards, I thought it'd be interesting to do 747 00:34:37,880 --> 00:34:42,080 S1: a bit of a reflection on last year's awards. Uh, 748 00:34:42,080 --> 00:34:45,320 S1: I think they're actually an interesting case study into how 749 00:34:45,320 --> 00:34:49,819 S1: the Oscars work and why some movies and actors and 750 00:34:49,820 --> 00:34:54,140 S1: directors win, when it might not necessarily seem super obvious. 751 00:34:54,140 --> 00:34:56,660 S1: It's a good way to kind of ground ourselves before 752 00:34:56,660 --> 00:35:00,230 S1: we talk about what could happen this year on Monday. 753 00:35:00,230 --> 00:35:05,779 S1: So last year, 2023 was basically a sweep for everything everywhere, 754 00:35:05,780 --> 00:35:08,960 S1: all at once. It won Best Picture, Best Director for 755 00:35:08,960 --> 00:35:12,950 S1: the two, Daniels, Best Original Screenplay for the Daniels Best Editing, 756 00:35:12,950 --> 00:35:16,610 S1: Best Actress for Michelle Yeoh, Best Supporting Actor for Kwan, 757 00:35:16,610 --> 00:35:20,300 S1: and Best Supporting Actress for Jamie Lee Curtis. It was 758 00:35:20,300 --> 00:35:23,300 S1: ultimately just one shy of what we call in the 759 00:35:23,300 --> 00:35:26,390 S1: business the Big five. When a film wins Best Picture, 760 00:35:26,390 --> 00:35:30,290 S1: best director, best screenplay, actor and actress, that's only happened 761 00:35:30,290 --> 00:35:33,230 S1: three times in history. Uh, it happened One Night, One 762 00:35:33,230 --> 00:35:35,870 S1: Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, and The Silence of the lambs. 763 00:35:35,870 --> 00:35:39,379 S1: Last one was 1991. So I watched this movie again, 764 00:35:39,380 --> 00:35:42,560 S1: like late last year after all the awards. And honestly, 765 00:35:42,560 --> 00:35:44,480 S1: I found it like a bit harder to sit through 766 00:35:44,480 --> 00:35:46,640 S1: than the first time I remember thinking the first one. 767 00:35:46,640 --> 00:35:49,520 S1: This is pretty wacky and fun. It's kind of interesting, 768 00:35:49,520 --> 00:35:52,730 S1: but do you guys think a year on that? It 769 00:35:52,730 --> 00:35:55,490 S1: kind of stacks up that this movie won so many 770 00:35:55,489 --> 00:35:56,509 S1: Academy Awards? 771 00:35:56,690 --> 00:35:59,330 S3: I haven't gone back and watched it, and I have 772 00:35:59,330 --> 00:36:00,859 S3: to say I enjoyed it at the time and same 773 00:36:00,860 --> 00:36:02,840 S3: as you. I found it kooky and different, and it 774 00:36:02,840 --> 00:36:04,820 S3: wasn't like anything else that was out at that time 775 00:36:04,820 --> 00:36:07,280 S3: of the year, and it had an interesting cast. Um, 776 00:36:07,430 --> 00:36:10,700 S3: but it really did seem that that year it was 777 00:36:10,700 --> 00:36:12,920 S3: kind of just on point. And I think we do 778 00:36:12,920 --> 00:36:15,740 S3: see this with the Oscars often. One film kind of 779 00:36:15,739 --> 00:36:17,930 S3: steals a lot of the oxygen, and it gets all 780 00:36:17,930 --> 00:36:20,450 S3: the hype in the build up to the Oscars campaign 781 00:36:20,450 --> 00:36:23,060 S3: and the kind of vibe is on its side, and 782 00:36:23,060 --> 00:36:25,910 S3: then it sweeps a lot of them. And then, you know, 783 00:36:25,910 --> 00:36:28,760 S3: it doesn't particularly always age well. I still think this 784 00:36:28,760 --> 00:36:30,740 S3: film is really good. Do I think it would have 785 00:36:30,739 --> 00:36:33,799 S3: won all those Oscars this year? Probably not, because I 786 00:36:33,800 --> 00:36:36,200 S3: think the mood is different that we're in right now, 787 00:36:36,200 --> 00:36:38,930 S3: and I think its success was a direct reflection of 788 00:36:38,930 --> 00:36:41,900 S3: kind of the world that was voting for it and 789 00:36:41,900 --> 00:36:44,030 S3: created it at the time. So no, I think it 790 00:36:44,030 --> 00:36:46,490 S3: was like pretty limited to that year. And that moment 791 00:36:46,489 --> 00:36:49,910 S3: and wouldn't necessarily have the same success at another time. 792 00:36:49,910 --> 00:36:50,750 S3: What do you think, Thomas? 793 00:36:50,750 --> 00:36:52,730 S2: I think Top Gun Maverick was robbed, which I think 794 00:36:52,730 --> 00:36:56,510 S2: was like obvious. No, like I yeah, I don't really 795 00:36:56,510 --> 00:36:58,850 S2: love everything everywhere all at once. Like, not as much 796 00:36:58,850 --> 00:37:02,029 S2: as everyone else seems to. I do like in my 797 00:37:02,030 --> 00:37:04,129 S2: most cynical part, I think, oh God, was the Oscars. 798 00:37:04,130 --> 00:37:06,200 S2: Just like, did they see a big opportunity to, like, 799 00:37:06,200 --> 00:37:09,260 S2: write some maybe historical wrongs and just kind of like 800 00:37:09,260 --> 00:37:12,500 S2: hand out, you know, in this one year, like, make 801 00:37:12,500 --> 00:37:15,469 S2: themselves feel better about their checkered history. I do think 802 00:37:15,469 --> 00:37:17,780 S2: there were better films. Um, and I especially think Jamie 803 00:37:17,780 --> 00:37:19,250 S2: Lee Curtis, which I know will get on to. But 804 00:37:19,250 --> 00:37:20,989 S2: that was like a fucking stitch up of a win. 805 00:37:20,989 --> 00:37:24,410 S2: I think that was them playing catch up. Uh, and 806 00:37:24,410 --> 00:37:27,470 S2: also I think similarly, Cate Blanchett sadly, was the best 807 00:37:27,469 --> 00:37:30,080 S2: actress that year and she was robbed. So that's my 808 00:37:30,080 --> 00:37:32,000 S2: thoughts on it. But this is this is a problem 809 00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:34,910 S2: that the Oscars faces. It's a vicious cycle they're stuck in. 810 00:37:34,910 --> 00:37:39,590 S2: And and yeah, I mean time will tell if Oppenheimer 811 00:37:39,590 --> 00:37:41,630 S2: basically does the same thing this year, I think it 812 00:37:41,630 --> 00:37:45,589 S2: will go even further. Um. Yeah, it's a funny thing. 813 00:37:45,590 --> 00:37:47,750 S2: And I think what you said is right, Mel, sometimes 814 00:37:47,750 --> 00:37:50,330 S2: we go into this season and the way, you know, 815 00:37:50,330 --> 00:37:52,700 S2: the major kind of critic awards go and the Globes 816 00:37:52,700 --> 00:37:54,589 S2: and stuff, and by the time we get to Oscars, 817 00:37:54,590 --> 00:37:57,319 S2: it's like, well, this is the way that everyone like, 818 00:37:57,320 --> 00:37:58,670 S2: this is the way the wind is blowing. So it's 819 00:37:58,670 --> 00:37:59,660 S2: like an inevitable. 820 00:37:59,690 --> 00:38:02,150 S1: Yeah. I'm glad you brought up those kind of make 821 00:38:02,150 --> 00:38:04,670 S1: good Oscars, as I call them, where someone gets rewarded 822 00:38:04,670 --> 00:38:08,450 S1: because the Oscars want to rectify a historical either injustice 823 00:38:08,450 --> 00:38:11,060 S1: or someone's turn. Right. They've been this big part of 824 00:38:11,060 --> 00:38:12,830 S1: Hollywood for so long, they haven't gotten an Oscar, and 825 00:38:12,830 --> 00:38:14,390 S1: so they give it to them. But what that really 826 00:38:14,390 --> 00:38:16,970 S1: does is it then creates another example of someone who 827 00:38:16,969 --> 00:38:19,310 S1: probably deserved it, didn't get it, that they have to, like, 828 00:38:19,310 --> 00:38:21,529 S1: make good down the track. And I think there were 829 00:38:21,530 --> 00:38:24,320 S1: a few of those examples with with everything everywhere. I 830 00:38:24,320 --> 00:38:27,650 S1: thought like the acting categories is so interesting because they 831 00:38:27,650 --> 00:38:30,680 S1: give you a bit of a snapshot of how different 832 00:38:30,680 --> 00:38:33,560 S1: narratives can can lead to a performance that you might 833 00:38:33,560 --> 00:38:36,080 S1: not think as being the best performance. Winning Michelle Yeoh 834 00:38:36,080 --> 00:38:40,490 S1: is an interesting example. Was she better than Cate Blanchett 835 00:38:40,489 --> 00:38:43,100 S1: in Tar like? I don't think so. I think Tarr 836 00:38:43,100 --> 00:38:45,800 S1: was an astonishing movie, and I thought Cate Blanchett did 837 00:38:45,800 --> 00:38:49,460 S1: an extraordinary job. But the Oscars aren't just like a 838 00:38:49,460 --> 00:38:51,710 S1: liberal who was the best in a movie. There's all 839 00:38:51,710 --> 00:38:56,989 S1: these questions and and conversations and in historical threads, like Blanchett, 840 00:38:56,989 --> 00:39:00,470 S1: for example, has an Oscar, Michelle Yeoh hasn't won an Oscar, 841 00:39:00,469 --> 00:39:02,660 S1: and if she was to win, which she did, she 842 00:39:02,660 --> 00:39:05,660 S1: would have become and did become the first East Asian 843 00:39:05,660 --> 00:39:08,299 S1: woman to do so. Right. So that's like a big 844 00:39:08,600 --> 00:39:11,060 S1: a big factor in that. And I think everything everywhere 845 00:39:11,060 --> 00:39:13,940 S1: was was really wrapped up with the identity politics of 846 00:39:13,940 --> 00:39:16,940 S1: that movie and the story it told. Then. Kwan, who 847 00:39:16,940 --> 00:39:19,580 S1: won Best Supporting Actor, it was sort of similar, like 848 00:39:19,580 --> 00:39:22,820 S1: you could argue, and I probably would, that both Barry 849 00:39:22,820 --> 00:39:26,689 S1: Kuhn and Brendan Gleeson gave more compelling performances in Banshees 850 00:39:26,690 --> 00:39:29,990 S1: of Inisherin like Kwan was fine, but he had this 851 00:39:29,989 --> 00:39:32,570 S1: amazing comeback narrative, right? He was basically written out of 852 00:39:32,570 --> 00:39:36,440 S1: Hollywood because of racism for decades and decades. He gave 853 00:39:36,440 --> 00:39:39,530 S1: powerful speeches when he won at other awards, and it 854 00:39:39,530 --> 00:39:42,470 S1: just became a story of like, we've got to rectify 855 00:39:42,469 --> 00:39:46,160 S1: the injustice we did to win. Sorry, Barry and Brendan, 856 00:39:46,160 --> 00:39:48,680 S1: and you mentioned Jamie Lee Curtis Thomas like that feels 857 00:39:48,680 --> 00:39:51,770 S1: like a total just like Jamie Lee Curtis. Thank you 858 00:39:51,770 --> 00:39:54,200 S1: for everything you've done for Hollywood. Take this award because 859 00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:57,350 S1: she's like, that role is fine. I don't think she 860 00:39:57,350 --> 00:39:59,090 S1: thought when she was doing it she was going to 861 00:39:59,090 --> 00:40:00,200 S1: be up for an Oscar, right? 862 00:40:00,890 --> 00:40:01,730 S2: Definitely not. 863 00:40:01,730 --> 00:40:03,560 S3: Yeah. But I do think we have to be careful 864 00:40:03,560 --> 00:40:06,260 S3: in a way, because you're speaking about like the Oscars 865 00:40:06,260 --> 00:40:09,739 S3: decided and it is like a member voted award. You know. 866 00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:10,850 S1: We'll get into all of that. 867 00:40:11,060 --> 00:40:12,590 S5: Yeah. All right. Yeah. 868 00:40:12,860 --> 00:40:16,490 S3: Because I think that that yeah. It's not like the 869 00:40:16,489 --> 00:40:20,359 S3: an institution is necessarily being like, you deserve this. It's 870 00:40:20,360 --> 00:40:23,570 S3: like people voting. Not that there can't be campaigns and 871 00:40:23,570 --> 00:40:26,600 S3: there's not like kind of groupthink in that, but maybe we'll, uh, 872 00:40:26,600 --> 00:40:28,310 S3: I can maybe we'll pin that. I feel like there's 873 00:40:28,310 --> 00:40:29,180 S3: more to be said. 874 00:40:29,360 --> 00:40:31,490 S2: I just for the second time, this podcast wanted to 875 00:40:31,489 --> 00:40:33,890 S2: quote the ever wise Rob Moran because he wrote about 876 00:40:33,890 --> 00:40:37,100 S2: this recently about award ceremonies playing catch up. And he said, 877 00:40:37,100 --> 00:40:39,859 S2: call it the who are effect the West. Sorry, Mr. Pacino, 878 00:40:39,860 --> 00:40:42,110 S2: we didn't watch Dog Day afternoon in the 70s because 879 00:40:42,110 --> 00:40:44,660 S2: of cocaine. Here, take this for scent of a woman. 880 00:40:44,900 --> 00:40:47,870 S5: And it's very true. And yeah, and, you. 881 00:40:47,870 --> 00:40:51,259 S2: Know, it's funny, I was watching DiCaprio's acceptance speech for 882 00:40:51,260 --> 00:40:53,569 S2: winning for The Revenant, which is not his best film. 883 00:40:53,570 --> 00:40:55,610 S2: He was a six time nominee. He probably should have 884 00:40:55,610 --> 00:40:58,400 S2: won for The Departed. And, you know, he got the 885 00:40:58,400 --> 00:41:01,100 S2: the Oscar for The Revenant. Same thing with Scorsese winning 886 00:41:01,100 --> 00:41:05,750 S2: for The Departed instead of Goodfellas. Like, the list is endless. Uh, and, 887 00:41:05,750 --> 00:41:08,480 S2: you know, again, I'll quote Rob here, who actually recalled 888 00:41:08,480 --> 00:41:11,089 S2: the very recent and very wise words of Jay-Z, who 889 00:41:11,090 --> 00:41:14,600 S2: said these organizations at least have to get it close to. Right. 890 00:41:15,200 --> 00:41:17,660 S1: Yeah, yeah. And I think it's good to have that history. 891 00:41:17,660 --> 00:41:19,730 S1: And I think that's why Michael Shulman's book is so interesting, 892 00:41:19,730 --> 00:41:22,310 S1: because for people who have just like, jumped on the 893 00:41:22,310 --> 00:41:24,710 S1: Oscars train and are really excited about what it says, 894 00:41:24,710 --> 00:41:27,770 S1: they always do weird things like, do not look to 895 00:41:27,770 --> 00:41:31,790 S1: them to be an objective, you know, decider of what 896 00:41:31,790 --> 00:41:34,250 S1: the best film or the best performance are, that they're 897 00:41:34,250 --> 00:41:36,920 S1: a political organization in the sense that. And you're right, Mel, 898 00:41:36,920 --> 00:41:39,020 S1: we're about to get into how they're deciding things. But 899 00:41:39,020 --> 00:41:41,839 S1: everyone in the academy, the near 10,000 members, have their 900 00:41:41,840 --> 00:41:44,570 S1: own personal views and biases. A lot of them don't 901 00:41:44,570 --> 00:41:47,090 S1: watch every movie. And yes, there are campaigns and narratives 902 00:41:47,090 --> 00:41:50,029 S1: that push people in certain directions, but they're very fallible. 903 00:41:50,030 --> 00:41:53,060 S1: They'll be the first to admit that they've made outrageous. 904 00:41:53,060 --> 00:41:56,630 S1: Troy Green Book won an Oscar, Driving Miss Daisy beat 905 00:41:56,630 --> 00:41:58,940 S1: Do the Right Thing, and it's almost because they get 906 00:41:58,940 --> 00:42:00,980 S1: things wrong a lot that I think it's so interesting 907 00:42:01,010 --> 00:42:03,020 S1: to talk about, because it'd be kind of boring if 908 00:42:03,020 --> 00:42:04,250 S1: they just nailed it all the time. 909 00:42:04,250 --> 00:42:07,250 S3: I do think, too, that, like, really good stuff is 910 00:42:07,250 --> 00:42:10,040 S3: often not appreciated in its time, which speaks to some 911 00:42:10,040 --> 00:42:13,190 S3: of what we're saying about people being recognized well after 912 00:42:13,190 --> 00:42:16,610 S3: the moment of their art. Like great art, doesn't necessarily 913 00:42:16,610 --> 00:42:19,940 S3: shine in the moment. What's the kind of the marry 914 00:42:19,940 --> 00:42:22,370 S3: the age widow in the next, which I always talk about, like, 915 00:42:22,370 --> 00:42:26,600 S3: you know, if you're so on point as an artist, 916 00:42:26,600 --> 00:42:29,810 S3: I don't know, sometimes you don't necessarily last the test 917 00:42:29,810 --> 00:42:32,720 S3: of time. And I guess some of these historical revisions 918 00:42:32,719 --> 00:42:35,960 S3: are people being recognized later on for the influence and 919 00:42:35,960 --> 00:42:38,870 S3: significance they had then, but it wasn't appreciated. 920 00:42:39,580 --> 00:42:41,230 S1: Yeah, I think that's a really good point. All right, 921 00:42:41,230 --> 00:42:44,770 S1: let's let's, um, let's break down how these awards are 922 00:42:44,770 --> 00:42:47,740 S1: actually decided. What do you guys know about how the 923 00:42:47,739 --> 00:42:51,910 S1: Academy decides who is nominated and who wins? 924 00:42:52,690 --> 00:42:54,340 S2: They don't just ask Warren Beatty. 925 00:42:56,110 --> 00:43:01,060 S3: And I know the very respectable PricewaterhouseCoopers is doing the auditing. 926 00:43:01,060 --> 00:43:02,950 S5: So that's are not always to be found. 927 00:43:03,100 --> 00:43:05,170 S2: I don't have I don't know if I know I 928 00:43:05,170 --> 00:43:07,570 S2: don't like I'm sure when you inevitably tell me in 929 00:43:07,570 --> 00:43:09,220 S2: about two minutes I'll be like, oh yeah, I did 930 00:43:09,219 --> 00:43:10,990 S2: know that, but I don't think I know exactly how 931 00:43:10,989 --> 00:43:11,290 S2: it works. 932 00:43:11,770 --> 00:43:14,140 S3: I do know, but it's very complicated. So I'm going 933 00:43:14,140 --> 00:43:16,600 S3: to hand over to Osmond. He's read this book called 934 00:43:16,600 --> 00:43:17,380 S3: Oscar Wars. 935 00:43:17,500 --> 00:43:17,980 S5: I might. 936 00:43:17,980 --> 00:43:19,360 S3: Be able to, uh, he might be able to. 937 00:43:19,360 --> 00:43:20,230 S5: Shine. Let me tell you. 938 00:43:20,230 --> 00:43:21,970 S1: I've gone super deep. And even if you go in 939 00:43:21,969 --> 00:43:24,879 S1: the Academy's website when they explain voting and stuff, it's 940 00:43:24,880 --> 00:43:29,050 S1: very superficial. And me being like a kind of, I guess, 941 00:43:29,050 --> 00:43:32,290 S1: election numbers nerd as well, was really fascinated in the 942 00:43:32,290 --> 00:43:34,359 S1: specific mechanics of all of this. So. So I've gone 943 00:43:34,360 --> 00:43:37,660 S1: pretty deep and it turns out it is super fascinating. Uh, 944 00:43:37,660 --> 00:43:39,550 S1: believe it or not. But I think the first thing 945 00:43:39,550 --> 00:43:41,049 S1: we should say and this this is to your point, 946 00:43:41,110 --> 00:43:43,960 S1: all these awards are like are not judged. They are 947 00:43:43,960 --> 00:43:46,030 S1: voted on. And by that I mean no one gets 948 00:43:46,030 --> 00:43:48,279 S1: together and says, okay, so we've all watched these movies. 949 00:43:48,280 --> 00:43:49,600 S1: Now let's sit down in a room for a couple 950 00:43:49,600 --> 00:43:52,810 S1: of hours and debate what deserves a nomination. And and 951 00:43:52,810 --> 00:43:55,540 S1: a win like this is an anonymous ballot. Obviously, people 952 00:43:55,540 --> 00:43:57,670 S1: talk to each other about what they think is good, 953 00:43:57,670 --> 00:44:00,730 S1: and we'll get into campaigning later on. But the nominations 954 00:44:00,730 --> 00:44:03,160 S1: and the winners are the result of like thousands of 955 00:44:03,160 --> 00:44:05,950 S1: discreet votes. It's more like an election than like a 956 00:44:05,950 --> 00:44:09,520 S1: literary awards judging panel where you just debate and decide 957 00:44:09,520 --> 00:44:12,609 S1: these things. And so who, who, who votes? The Academy 958 00:44:12,610 --> 00:44:16,060 S1: is made up of just under 10,000 people from all 959 00:44:16,060 --> 00:44:19,210 S1: around the world. It's actually a 60% increase from around 960 00:44:19,210 --> 00:44:22,180 S1: a decade ago. And that big increase happened because the 961 00:44:22,180 --> 00:44:25,270 S1: academy was trying to diversify its membership in terms of gender, 962 00:44:25,270 --> 00:44:29,200 S1: race and nationality. Each of those members is divided into 963 00:44:29,200 --> 00:44:32,739 S1: different branches. It's like actors and the acting branch directors 964 00:44:32,739 --> 00:44:36,070 S1: are in the directing branch, etc. and when you get 965 00:44:36,070 --> 00:44:39,250 S1: to voting, this is where it gets really interesting. There 966 00:44:39,250 --> 00:44:41,770 S1: are two rounds of voting. First is deciding who the 967 00:44:41,770 --> 00:44:45,880 S1: nominees are. Each branch gets to vote on the eligible 968 00:44:45,880 --> 00:44:48,969 S1: movies to decide who's nominated, and every category has got 969 00:44:48,969 --> 00:44:51,850 S1: five nominees except for Best Picture, which is ten, and 970 00:44:51,850 --> 00:44:54,130 S1: everyone gets to vote on that. So basically, if you're 971 00:44:54,130 --> 00:44:56,710 S1: a director, you get to decide who the nominees for 972 00:44:56,710 --> 00:45:00,460 S1: Best Director are. If you're a writer, you decide on 973 00:45:00,460 --> 00:45:05,260 S1: Best screenplay. The method used this is where, like Nerdy 974 00:45:05,260 --> 00:45:09,730 S1: Brain is. And if you're an Australian political science fan, 975 00:45:09,730 --> 00:45:11,440 S1: you're definitely going to want to turn the volume up 976 00:45:11,440 --> 00:45:14,620 S1: on this one. The method used to vote and decide 977 00:45:14,620 --> 00:45:19,660 S1: on the nominees is a system called proportional preferential voting. 978 00:45:19,750 --> 00:45:21,850 S1: Where have you heard that before, Thomas? 979 00:45:22,690 --> 00:45:27,880 S2: Succession? No. Like when we vote in the federal election. 980 00:45:28,060 --> 00:45:31,330 S1: Yes. That is the system used to elect the Senate 981 00:45:31,330 --> 00:45:32,290 S1: in Australia. 982 00:45:32,320 --> 00:45:34,840 S3: You're going to Canberra. You always wanted to go. You're going. 983 00:45:34,840 --> 00:45:36,100 S2: It was always my next posting. 984 00:45:36,100 --> 00:45:39,160 S1: Every federal election, we elect six senators from every state 985 00:45:39,160 --> 00:45:43,150 S1: using proportional preferential voting. And that is the same system 986 00:45:43,150 --> 00:45:46,600 S1: the Academy uses to decide the nominees. How cool is that? 987 00:45:47,310 --> 00:45:48,420 S2: Pretty cool. 988 00:45:49,110 --> 00:45:50,910 S5: I think it's really cool. I think it's really cool 989 00:45:50,940 --> 00:45:52,620 S5: because Australia is it's. 990 00:45:52,620 --> 00:45:55,650 S1: Really Senate electoral system is like kind of. It's pretty 991 00:45:55,650 --> 00:45:59,549 S1: rare in the Anglosphere and America doesn't use it famously 992 00:45:59,550 --> 00:46:01,740 S1: for its federal elections. And I think it's kind of 993 00:46:01,739 --> 00:46:04,200 S1: wacky that the Oscars are like, cool, let's use the 994 00:46:04,200 --> 00:46:06,960 S1: insane Senate system to decide our nominees. So that's a 995 00:46:06,960 --> 00:46:07,530 S1: fun one. 996 00:46:07,530 --> 00:46:08,250 S2: That is a fun one. 997 00:46:09,540 --> 00:46:12,509 S1: Thank you for encouraging me on this. Um, okay. So 998 00:46:12,510 --> 00:46:14,730 S1: then when you have your nominees, it's time for the 999 00:46:14,730 --> 00:46:16,799 S1: second round of voting. And I think a lot of 1000 00:46:16,800 --> 00:46:18,930 S1: people don't know that the second round where you decide 1001 00:46:18,930 --> 00:46:21,540 S1: who actually wins takes place in late February, and it 1002 00:46:21,540 --> 00:46:24,000 S1: only goes for like about a week. People lodged their 1003 00:46:24,000 --> 00:46:27,239 S1: ballots online. And this time everyone is allowed to vote 1004 00:46:27,239 --> 00:46:29,520 S1: in every category. So doesn't matter if you're an actor, 1005 00:46:29,520 --> 00:46:31,830 S1: director and editor or writer, you can vote on every 1006 00:46:31,830 --> 00:46:35,520 S1: single award. The voting system this time is much more straightforward. 1007 00:46:35,520 --> 00:46:38,370 S1: It's just first past the post, which is the system 1008 00:46:38,370 --> 00:46:40,950 S1: they use in the US presidential election. Whoever gets the 1009 00:46:40,950 --> 00:46:44,370 S1: most votes wins, even if they don't get over 50%. 1010 00:46:44,489 --> 00:46:48,420 S1: You're following me on that one? Yep, yep. The exception, however, 1011 00:46:48,420 --> 00:46:51,870 S1: is Best Picture, where they use preferential voting so you 1012 00:46:51,870 --> 00:46:54,509 S1: can number your ballots from 1 to 10, which is 1013 00:46:54,510 --> 00:46:58,529 S1: just like the system we use for the House of Representatives. 1014 00:46:58,530 --> 00:47:02,840 S1: So basically the Oscar system. Is pretty akin to the 1015 00:47:02,840 --> 00:47:04,969 S1: system we use to elect Australian Parliament. 1016 00:47:04,969 --> 00:47:08,420 S3: And what do you take? What is. 1017 00:47:08,960 --> 00:47:10,399 S5: So meaningful. 1018 00:47:10,400 --> 00:47:11,150 S3: To you? 1019 00:47:11,660 --> 00:47:13,760 S1: What isn't it cool like? I mean, maybe it's not cool. 1020 00:47:13,760 --> 00:47:15,920 S1: Maybe I'm the only person the Venn diagram of the 1021 00:47:15,920 --> 00:47:19,040 S1: Oscars and the Australian political system. But I just found 1022 00:47:19,040 --> 00:47:21,110 S1: that out, like in the last few weeks, that specifics 1023 00:47:21,110 --> 00:47:23,180 S1: of how the voting works and the fact that it 1024 00:47:23,180 --> 00:47:25,730 S1: mirrors something that we are so familiar with, but most 1025 00:47:25,730 --> 00:47:28,730 S1: Americans have no idea about is really interesting. And when 1026 00:47:28,730 --> 00:47:32,150 S1: you when you hear Academy like employees talk about this, 1027 00:47:32,150 --> 00:47:34,430 S1: they're like, most voters have no idea how any of 1028 00:47:34,430 --> 00:47:37,069 S1: this works that's so unfamiliar, even though they can put 1029 00:47:37,070 --> 00:47:40,310 S1: preferences down. They don't, because I just don't understand how 1030 00:47:40,310 --> 00:47:43,250 S1: preferences work. But why? Why, I guess it's relevant is 1031 00:47:43,430 --> 00:47:45,680 S1: up until a few years ago, the Academy only had 1032 00:47:45,680 --> 00:47:49,280 S1: five Best Picture nominees, and when they expanded it to ten, 1033 00:47:49,310 --> 00:47:52,700 S1: they realized they had to include preferences because you could 1034 00:47:52,700 --> 00:47:55,400 S1: end up with a situation where one film gets 12% 1035 00:47:55,400 --> 00:47:58,820 S1: of the vote and becomes Best picture, even though 88% 1036 00:47:58,820 --> 00:48:00,860 S1: of people didn't think it was the best one. So 1037 00:48:00,860 --> 00:48:03,800 S1: they had to change the mechanism to make sure that 1038 00:48:03,800 --> 00:48:09,560 S1: the actual best picture is reflective of what most people 1039 00:48:09,560 --> 00:48:11,150 S1: think is the best picture, if that makes sense. 1040 00:48:11,150 --> 00:48:11,989 S3: Yeah. That does. 1041 00:48:11,989 --> 00:48:13,820 S2: That actually is surprisingly interesting. 1042 00:48:14,270 --> 00:48:16,040 S1: I'm so glad you said so. I was worried I 1043 00:48:16,040 --> 00:48:19,190 S1: was losing you guys, but I think understanding these things 1044 00:48:19,190 --> 00:48:22,550 S1: helps you understand why sometimes you get divergences right between 1045 00:48:22,550 --> 00:48:25,250 S1: best picture and actors and actresses, and also makes me 1046 00:48:25,250 --> 00:48:28,190 S1: really fascinated to look at what I would love them 1047 00:48:28,190 --> 00:48:30,799 S1: if they somehow someday decided to release the raw votes 1048 00:48:30,800 --> 00:48:33,140 S1: for these movies. Like how many votes did a certain 1049 00:48:33,140 --> 00:48:36,650 S1: movie a certain actress get to get the award? It's 1050 00:48:36,650 --> 00:48:37,700 S1: super interesting. 1051 00:48:37,969 --> 00:48:41,149 S2: The podcast is just increasingly becoming like Osborne's fringe interest 1052 00:48:41,150 --> 00:48:41,719 S2: each week. 1053 00:48:44,270 --> 00:48:45,980 S5: I feel like we, both you and the awards. 1054 00:48:45,980 --> 00:48:47,240 S1: Are not a fringe interest, my. 1055 00:48:47,239 --> 00:48:48,560 S2: Friend. No, no no no. 1056 00:48:48,560 --> 00:48:50,690 S1: But frankly, that's what it's always been. So yeah. 1057 00:48:51,110 --> 00:48:51,529 S5: Yeah, yeah. 1058 00:48:51,530 --> 00:48:53,810 S3: Because you didn't do history and I'm at uni. Right. 1059 00:48:53,810 --> 00:48:54,770 S3: So now we're kind. 1060 00:48:54,770 --> 00:48:55,280 S5: Of yeah. 1061 00:48:55,700 --> 00:48:56,570 S3: We're up to date. 1062 00:48:56,780 --> 00:48:58,640 S1: Okay. So that's like the system. That's how it works. 1063 00:48:58,640 --> 00:49:02,930 S1: But in reality the actual process or I guess the campaigning, 1064 00:49:02,930 --> 00:49:05,330 S1: the way that this plays out behind the scenes and 1065 00:49:05,330 --> 00:49:07,580 S1: in front of the screens is way more interesting than 1066 00:49:07,580 --> 00:49:11,150 S1: just like how votes are tabulated by PricewaterhouseCoopers. I want 1067 00:49:11,150 --> 00:49:15,080 S1: to ask you guys about campaigning. Like we see this happen. 1068 00:49:15,080 --> 00:49:17,480 S1: We are kind of sometimes part of it, right? Where 1069 00:49:17,480 --> 00:49:20,300 S1: you get a PR person saying, hey, can you do 1070 00:49:20,300 --> 00:49:23,930 S1: an interview with this actor or actress or director? They 1071 00:49:23,930 --> 00:49:26,299 S1: want that person part of the narrative. They want that 1072 00:49:26,300 --> 00:49:29,450 S1: person talking about all the specific things they did to 1073 00:49:29,450 --> 00:49:33,110 S1: make this movie so good. Because Oscar voters and there 1074 00:49:33,110 --> 00:49:36,140 S1: are lots of Australian Oscar voters in the Academy might 1075 00:49:36,140 --> 00:49:38,960 S1: be swayed by that and might vote for that person. 1076 00:49:38,960 --> 00:49:43,069 S1: How do you guys feel about campaigning more generally? And also, 1077 00:49:43,070 --> 00:49:46,670 S1: any interesting highlights from the campaign for this year's Oscars 1078 00:49:46,670 --> 00:49:47,750 S1: that are stood out to you? 1079 00:49:47,960 --> 00:49:50,690 S3: Yeah, I do think it's a little less for the 1080 00:49:50,690 --> 00:49:53,029 S3: Oscars than it has been previously for the Golden Globes, 1081 00:49:53,030 --> 00:49:54,410 S3: because for the Golden Globes, you have to be a 1082 00:49:54,410 --> 00:49:57,770 S3: member of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. And then they 1083 00:49:57,770 --> 00:50:02,660 S3: really do sometimes only give access to actors, to people 1084 00:50:02,660 --> 00:50:05,989 S3: who are part of that association, um, knowing that they 1085 00:50:05,989 --> 00:50:08,509 S3: will be voting. So the Oscars is slightly different just 1086 00:50:08,510 --> 00:50:11,180 S3: because of the sheer number of people who can vote. 1087 00:50:11,180 --> 00:50:13,819 S3: But I mean, yeah, you do see the momentum and 1088 00:50:13,820 --> 00:50:18,170 S3: the push that develops behind these films, and none of 1089 00:50:18,170 --> 00:50:20,960 S3: it just kind of rarely does it grow authentically, as 1090 00:50:20,960 --> 00:50:23,870 S3: we were obviously talking about earlier in the pod. So 1091 00:50:23,870 --> 00:50:26,900 S3: like I would say, like in some ways Saltburn isn't 1092 00:50:26,900 --> 00:50:29,720 S3: on the list for, um, nominated for best films, but 1093 00:50:29,719 --> 00:50:32,210 S3: I reckon that was kind of quite a momentous push 1094 00:50:32,210 --> 00:50:33,980 S3: to try to get that to be part of the 1095 00:50:33,980 --> 00:50:37,160 S3: Oscar conversation, the way that that films kind of suddenly 1096 00:50:37,160 --> 00:50:39,620 S3: took off at the box office speaks to like, a 1097 00:50:39,620 --> 00:50:42,410 S3: marketing campaign that was rolled out and kind of capitalised 1098 00:50:42,410 --> 00:50:44,000 S3: on what was going on in the conversation to push 1099 00:50:44,000 --> 00:50:46,880 S3: it back to the forefront. So I do feel I 1100 00:50:46,880 --> 00:50:48,739 S3: do think you see some of those smaller films and 1101 00:50:48,739 --> 00:50:52,340 S3: then in the bigger films like, you know, with Scorsese, 1102 00:50:52,370 --> 00:50:56,750 S3: Christopher Nolan, Yorgos Lanthimos, you know, the huge stars are 1103 00:50:56,750 --> 00:50:59,930 S3: everywhere in the lead up to the releases of these films. Um, 1104 00:50:59,930 --> 00:51:02,089 S3: the releases are kind of tied to the start of 1105 00:51:02,090 --> 00:51:04,460 S3: the Oscar voting. Often, though, in Australia we get them 1106 00:51:04,460 --> 00:51:06,920 S3: at a different time. Um, so yeah, I mean, I 1107 00:51:06,920 --> 00:51:09,650 S3: think you can see that the campaigns do push certain 1108 00:51:09,650 --> 00:51:11,930 S3: films to the forefront of public discussion, and then they're 1109 00:51:11,930 --> 00:51:14,600 S3: often the films that are then reflected in the Oscars. 1110 00:51:14,840 --> 00:51:17,450 S2: Yeah, I think it's funny. Like I remember last year, um, 1111 00:51:17,450 --> 00:51:20,030 S2: our colleague Meg, who is currently on maternity leave, but 1112 00:51:20,030 --> 00:51:22,069 S2: like just a week before the Oscars, they just, like, 1113 00:51:22,070 --> 00:51:24,110 S2: made Austin Butler available to her. Do you remember that 1114 00:51:24,110 --> 00:51:25,759 S2: she did a really long sit down with Austin Butler 1115 00:51:25,760 --> 00:51:27,560 S2: like he was? He was in the middle of a 1116 00:51:27,560 --> 00:51:31,009 S2: very intense campaign, uh, to win Best actor for Elvis. 1117 00:51:31,010 --> 00:51:33,230 S2: He was probably the best shot that film had at 1118 00:51:33,230 --> 00:51:36,290 S2: a big award. And yeah, like I remember even saying 1119 00:51:36,290 --> 00:51:38,450 S2: to yours, like, it's so weird that Austin Butler is just, like, 1120 00:51:38,450 --> 00:51:40,640 S2: got like 45 minutes the week before the Oscars because 1121 00:51:40,760 --> 00:51:43,520 S2: they were just, like, really putting him out there to like, 1122 00:51:43,520 --> 00:51:46,190 S2: push hard. And, you know, he kind of was it 1123 00:51:46,190 --> 00:51:47,299 S2: was a great interview. You should go back and check 1124 00:51:47,300 --> 00:51:50,270 S2: it out. But yeah, it is interesting that, you know, 1125 00:51:50,270 --> 00:51:52,010 S2: even though we kind of look at these awards and 1126 00:51:52,010 --> 00:51:54,380 S2: think everything's maybe like preordained or it all feels so 1127 00:51:54,380 --> 00:51:56,930 S2: far away, like it is still such a big campaigning 1128 00:51:56,930 --> 00:52:00,380 S2: thing and you've ever spent time in especially like in the. 1129 00:52:00,830 --> 00:52:03,469 S2: Around any kind of, like, awards season. Like, we don't 1130 00:52:03,469 --> 00:52:05,150 S2: get it as much over here because we're not like, 1131 00:52:05,150 --> 00:52:09,380 S2: obviously in the ecosystem, but like over there, it's like 1132 00:52:09,380 --> 00:52:11,660 S2: the full billboards, like for your consideration. And, you know, 1133 00:52:11,660 --> 00:52:14,420 S2: on TV the ads are like relentless, like it's the, 1134 00:52:14,420 --> 00:52:17,359 S2: the constant pushing down your throat of the message of 1135 00:52:17,360 --> 00:52:20,810 S2: like vote and like it's just like pushing the awareness. 1136 00:52:20,810 --> 00:52:22,250 S2: And we don't really get it here as much. It's 1137 00:52:22,250 --> 00:52:23,690 S2: a very strange thing to say. 1138 00:52:24,110 --> 00:52:27,200 S1: Yeah. And, and all these studios have got big budgets 1139 00:52:27,200 --> 00:52:30,110 S1: for not just marketing movies, but for the Oscars specifically. 1140 00:52:30,110 --> 00:52:32,899 S1: Like for those ads, they also more often in the 1141 00:52:32,900 --> 00:52:35,330 S1: States than elsewhere, but also elsewhere, particularly as the Academy 1142 00:52:35,330 --> 00:52:38,060 S1: has become more internationalized. We'll host events and they'll get 1143 00:52:38,060 --> 00:52:41,000 S1: the actors and the directors there, and they'll it's like 1144 00:52:41,000 --> 00:52:43,940 S1: a political campaign. There are rules around campaign finance, like 1145 00:52:43,940 --> 00:52:46,070 S1: what you can and can't spend money on, and people 1146 00:52:46,070 --> 00:52:49,430 S1: will shake hands. There was, uh, someone telling a story 1147 00:52:49,430 --> 00:52:50,989 S1: on a podcast I was listening to where they're like, 1148 00:52:50,989 --> 00:52:53,930 S1: I'm voting for. I think it was Robert De Niro. No, 1149 00:52:53,930 --> 00:52:56,210 S1: it was Robert Downey Jr, because he just came up 1150 00:52:56,210 --> 00:52:57,980 S1: to me and said, hey, I'm Robert Downey Jr. How's 1151 00:52:57,980 --> 00:53:00,080 S1: your day going? He's like, great, I'm voting for him. 1152 00:53:00,080 --> 00:53:02,720 S1: So I think this goes to the point of like, 1153 00:53:02,719 --> 00:53:06,020 S1: it is just like 10,000 weird film nerds or people 1154 00:53:06,020 --> 00:53:08,540 S1: that used to make films, in some cases, voting on 1155 00:53:08,540 --> 00:53:10,730 S1: these things based on sometimes what they think is good, 1156 00:53:10,730 --> 00:53:13,940 S1: sometimes like an interview that they read that really compelled them, 1157 00:53:13,940 --> 00:53:16,759 S1: and sometimes who was nice to them, like a la, 1158 00:53:16,790 --> 00:53:20,150 S1: you know, luncheon event. That is a really interesting campaign 1159 00:53:20,150 --> 00:53:23,690 S1: move by, I think, neon, who distributed anatomy of a fall. 1160 00:53:23,690 --> 00:53:25,310 S1: And I don't want to give too much away, but 1161 00:53:25,310 --> 00:53:29,060 S1: the dog in that movie plays a few crucial roles. Uh, 1162 00:53:29,060 --> 00:53:31,910 S1: the dog's real name is messy. They brought that dog 1163 00:53:31,910 --> 00:53:34,760 S1: to the Oscars luncheon, and so every actor wanted to 1164 00:53:34,760 --> 00:53:37,100 S1: take a selfie with it. All the media, like, took 1165 00:53:37,100 --> 00:53:39,200 S1: photos of it. And so all of a sudden, for 1166 00:53:39,200 --> 00:53:41,930 S1: a week in the key voting period, everyone is talking 1167 00:53:41,930 --> 00:53:44,420 S1: about anatomy of a fall, like those kinds of tricks 1168 00:53:44,420 --> 00:53:46,969 S1: are used just to get your film in front of people. 1169 00:53:46,969 --> 00:53:49,069 S3: And it would be interesting to see actually, how many 1170 00:53:49,070 --> 00:53:53,450 S3: voting Australians we have in in the Oscars, because it 1171 00:53:53,450 --> 00:53:56,990 S3: could speak to how much access we get to these people, 1172 00:53:56,989 --> 00:53:59,779 S3: and also to the release dates of films here. Because 1173 00:53:59,780 --> 00:54:02,450 S3: if they're looking at Australia as a smaller or larger 1174 00:54:02,450 --> 00:54:05,390 S3: voting bloc, I think it would kind of determine how 1175 00:54:05,390 --> 00:54:07,400 S3: films are rolled out here. I don't I don't think 1176 00:54:07,400 --> 00:54:09,350 S3: we do have those numbers, but it would be fascinating. 1177 00:54:09,350 --> 00:54:11,300 S1: I would love to have the more data on this stuff, 1178 00:54:11,300 --> 00:54:13,340 S1: the better. And I, you know, maybe I will start 1179 00:54:13,340 --> 00:54:16,580 S1: a consultancy on the slide just helping rally votes for 1180 00:54:16,580 --> 00:54:19,969 S1: different movies. Um, the other part to this, I guess 1181 00:54:19,969 --> 00:54:23,509 S1: story is, is what we call the precursor awards. And Thomas, 1182 00:54:23,510 --> 00:54:25,430 S1: you were you were talking about these before. Like you 1183 00:54:25,430 --> 00:54:28,730 S1: can sort of basically start to predict what happens at 1184 00:54:28,730 --> 00:54:31,339 S1: the Oscars by looking at things like the Golden Globes, 1185 00:54:31,340 --> 00:54:33,800 S1: the Critics Choice, the Directors Guild, the SAG Awards. You 1186 00:54:33,800 --> 00:54:34,850 S1: want to talk a bit about that? 1187 00:54:35,480 --> 00:54:38,450 S2: Yeah. Like the there's. It's funny, certain awards seem to 1188 00:54:38,450 --> 00:54:41,330 S2: carry more weight. Um, but like awards season generally you 1189 00:54:41,330 --> 00:54:43,700 S2: start to get an idea of like which films are 1190 00:54:43,700 --> 00:54:45,410 S2: the ones that seem to be leading the way and 1191 00:54:45,500 --> 00:54:48,049 S2: specifically in like, you know, like best actor and actress 1192 00:54:48,050 --> 00:54:50,630 S2: and supporting actor and actress. You really get a sense 1193 00:54:50,630 --> 00:54:53,299 S2: of like, who the voters are going with. Or if 1194 00:54:53,300 --> 00:54:55,819 S2: it's a two horse race, we can start to see like, okay. 1195 00:54:55,820 --> 00:54:59,090 S2: But like critically, you know, the Critics Choice are going with, uh, 1196 00:54:59,090 --> 00:55:02,210 S2: you know, let's say Cillian Murphy and Oppenheimer, whereas SAG 1197 00:55:02,210 --> 00:55:04,790 S2: has gone with Paul Giamatti and The Holdovers. And and 1198 00:55:04,790 --> 00:55:07,009 S2: it's really funny because we talked about it last week 1199 00:55:07,010 --> 00:55:09,980 S2: in a story SAG especially, which is one of the 1200 00:55:09,980 --> 00:55:12,950 S2: last awards of the season. Very like the overlap with 1201 00:55:12,950 --> 00:55:15,620 S2: the Oscars winners is like almost like for like, um, 1202 00:55:15,620 --> 00:55:17,720 S2: so that's often a big one. But yeah, we have 1203 00:55:17,719 --> 00:55:20,810 S2: this full awards season now that by the end of it, um, 1204 00:55:20,810 --> 00:55:22,609 S2: you know, the Oscars is kind of the cherry on top, 1205 00:55:22,610 --> 00:55:25,460 S2: but it almost robs us of, of, of the mystery 1206 00:55:25,460 --> 00:55:27,860 S2: because it's like, well, really it's going to come down 1207 00:55:27,860 --> 00:55:31,100 S2: to like, you know, 1 or 2 films and there's 1208 00:55:31,100 --> 00:55:33,049 S2: going to be 1 or 2 categories where we maybe 1209 00:55:33,050 --> 00:55:36,110 S2: don't know, but we're pretty sure, like, you know, it's 1210 00:55:36,110 --> 00:55:39,530 S2: created this system whereby the mystery is gone a little bit. But, uh, yeah, 1211 00:55:39,650 --> 00:55:43,460 S2: basically come March, um, the whole industry has an idea 1212 00:55:43,460 --> 00:55:44,690 S2: of like, you know, if you're just turning up as 1213 00:55:44,690 --> 00:55:46,279 S2: a nominee and you know, you're not like, there's not 1214 00:55:46,280 --> 00:55:47,210 S2: a chance you're winning. 1215 00:55:47,510 --> 00:55:49,280 S3: Yeah. And if you look at like the kind of 1216 00:55:49,280 --> 00:55:52,220 S3: the what the, the odds that the betting companies are 1217 00:55:52,219 --> 00:55:55,940 S3: putting on it like everyone. Well, the, the gamblers are 1218 00:55:55,940 --> 00:55:58,670 S3: pretty sure that they know who is winning every single 1219 00:55:58,670 --> 00:56:01,070 S3: category at this point when it comes to the Oscars. 1220 00:56:01,070 --> 00:56:04,760 S2: Yeah, the bookies odds for this year's like pretty depressing. 1221 00:56:04,760 --> 00:56:05,779 S2: If you go and look at it like it doesn't 1222 00:56:05,780 --> 00:56:07,880 S2: it doesn't doesn't like make you want to watch the 1223 00:56:07,880 --> 00:56:09,500 S2: Oscars a bunch because it's like, well, they know who's 1224 00:56:09,500 --> 00:56:10,040 S2: going to win. 1225 00:56:10,280 --> 00:56:13,040 S1: Well, I think that very neatly brings us to this 1226 00:56:13,040 --> 00:56:18,350 S1: year's awards. Let's start by listing the ten nominees for 1227 00:56:18,350 --> 00:56:22,520 S1: Best Picture. Uh, they are, in no particular order, American fiction. 1228 00:56:22,520 --> 00:56:24,320 S1: And actually, I lied. They are in alphabetical order. I 1229 00:56:24,320 --> 00:56:24,589 S1: was about. 1230 00:56:24,590 --> 00:56:26,180 S5: To say that's quite clearly alphabetical. 1231 00:56:29,030 --> 00:56:33,260 S1: Uh, American fiction. Anatomy of a fall. Barbie. The holdovers. 1232 00:56:33,260 --> 00:56:37,790 S1: Killers of the Flower Moon. Maestro. Up and Huma, Past Lives, 1233 00:56:37,790 --> 00:56:41,210 S1: Poor Things, and The Zone of Interest. And how do 1234 00:56:41,210 --> 00:56:42,770 S1: we feel about that list? It's so interesting, because I 1235 00:56:42,770 --> 00:56:44,750 S1: feel like there are a couple of movies where at 1236 00:56:44,750 --> 00:56:46,879 S1: certain moments, I was like, that's probably going to win. 1237 00:56:46,880 --> 00:56:48,500 S1: Like when killers of the Flower Moon came out, it 1238 00:56:48,500 --> 00:56:51,170 S1: felt like cool, this big epic Scorsese thing that he 1239 00:56:51,170 --> 00:56:55,460 S1: really pulled off. But then Oppenheimer drops, you know, the 1240 00:56:55,460 --> 00:56:58,160 S1: zone of interest drops. Things start to shift a little bit. 1241 00:56:58,160 --> 00:57:00,440 S1: What are your thoughts on on the list of nominees, 1242 00:57:00,440 --> 00:57:02,660 S1: and do you think anything's missing from it? 1243 00:57:02,780 --> 00:57:05,149 S3: I'm pretty happy with that list. I think that does 1244 00:57:05,150 --> 00:57:07,100 S3: hit the big ones. There are two that, and I 1245 00:57:07,100 --> 00:57:09,770 S3: don't necessarily believe that they should be on that list, 1246 00:57:09,770 --> 00:57:12,739 S3: but it is interesting that they haven't got a look 1247 00:57:12,739 --> 00:57:13,550 S3: in and one. 1248 00:57:13,550 --> 00:57:16,340 S5: Bit you think, yeah. 1249 00:57:16,820 --> 00:57:19,670 S3: Best actress for sure. Um, Napoleon. 1250 00:57:19,970 --> 00:57:24,710 S5: Huge. You're obsessed. Are you talking in. Oh, that's so rogue. 1251 00:57:24,710 --> 00:57:24,920 S1: Mel. 1252 00:57:24,920 --> 00:57:25,520 S5: That's not great. 1253 00:57:25,520 --> 00:57:27,110 S3: No it's not. No, no, I don't think it's a 1254 00:57:27,110 --> 00:57:29,660 S3: great film. But I do think like, it's complete lack 1255 00:57:29,660 --> 00:57:32,930 S3: of kind of relevance. You know, there was a huge 1256 00:57:32,930 --> 00:57:35,240 S3: buildup to that film and it's such a big name, 1257 00:57:35,240 --> 00:57:36,530 S3: a big filmmaker. Are you going to like. 1258 00:57:36,530 --> 00:57:37,310 S5: Producing it. 1259 00:57:37,310 --> 00:57:38,150 S2: On Napoleon and. 1260 00:57:38,270 --> 00:57:39,770 S5: Like, getting money in the back end? Yeah, yeah. 1261 00:57:39,770 --> 00:57:42,890 S3: I train the horse. Um, and the other one that 1262 00:57:42,890 --> 00:57:46,220 S3: maybe I could see being on best Film. Priscilla I 1263 00:57:46,220 --> 00:57:50,510 S3: liked that film. Um, Sofia Coppola's Priscilla. Um, I could 1264 00:57:50,510 --> 00:57:52,820 S3: see it sitting on there, like, as comfortably as some 1265 00:57:52,820 --> 00:57:54,620 S3: of the others on that list. So I thought they 1266 00:57:54,620 --> 00:57:57,740 S3: were too kind of notable absences. Um, not that I 1267 00:57:57,740 --> 00:58:00,560 S3: think they deserve to win. Um, but yeah, I could 1268 00:58:00,560 --> 00:58:01,940 S3: have seen them on that list. 1269 00:58:02,240 --> 00:58:03,230 S1: What about you, Thomas? 1270 00:58:03,470 --> 00:58:05,210 S2: Uh, yeah. I've been banging this drum for a while. 1271 00:58:05,210 --> 00:58:06,500 S2: You guys are going to both laugh at me. I 1272 00:58:06,500 --> 00:58:08,570 S2: reckon fair play. Should have got a nomination for Best Picture. 1273 00:58:08,600 --> 00:58:09,500 S5: I'm obsessed with that film. 1274 00:58:09,500 --> 00:58:10,670 S3: You're always talking about it. 1275 00:58:10,670 --> 00:58:13,190 S2: Well, I actually am, but it was. It was a 1276 00:58:13,190 --> 00:58:17,210 S2: good film, and it suffered from, like, being a Netflix release. Um, 1277 00:58:17,450 --> 00:58:20,750 S2: and I think it could have easily slotted in there. Um, 1278 00:58:20,750 --> 00:58:24,020 S2: Chloe directed and I thought the two leads were great, 1279 00:58:24,020 --> 00:58:26,180 S2: and I just thought it was a really interesting, like, 1280 00:58:26,180 --> 00:58:29,240 S2: film for our time. And it kind of just like, 1281 00:58:29,240 --> 00:58:31,970 S2: didn't get the credit it deserves. Uh, but yeah, that 1282 00:58:31,970 --> 00:58:33,050 S2: would have been my audition. 1283 00:58:33,470 --> 00:58:37,640 S1: Yeah. Mine one is the Iron Claw. The, um, Zac Efron, uh, 1284 00:58:37,820 --> 00:58:41,630 S1: Jeremy Allen White wrestling movie. Um, I thought that movie 1285 00:58:41,630 --> 00:58:44,840 S1: was astonishing. I think the reason for it not getting 1286 00:58:44,840 --> 00:58:47,300 S1: nominated or not really having much of a campaign, it's 1287 00:58:47,300 --> 00:58:50,690 S1: an A24 movie like Past Lives and A24 put all 1288 00:58:50,690 --> 00:58:52,520 S1: their chips on past life. This, this. You see this 1289 00:58:52,520 --> 00:58:55,790 S1: happen with small but also big studios like Netflix and, 1290 00:58:55,790 --> 00:58:57,620 S1: you know, and Apple and whatever they'll be like, this 1291 00:58:57,620 --> 00:59:00,080 S1: is the movie we're going for, and past Lives is great, 1292 00:59:00,080 --> 00:59:02,930 S1: and I'm glad it's nominated and I'm glad it's getting love. 1293 00:59:02,930 --> 00:59:07,100 S1: But the ankle just felt like a really obvious absence 1294 00:59:07,100 --> 00:59:10,190 S1: in the Oscars conversation to me. Yeah. 1295 00:59:10,580 --> 00:59:12,230 S2: Yeah. And I feel like lots of people are saying 1296 00:59:12,230 --> 00:59:14,990 S2: that post Iron Claw being released. I still haven't seen it. Um, 1297 00:59:14,990 --> 00:59:17,960 S2: but yeah, like one of the biggest things I've heard 1298 00:59:17,960 --> 00:59:19,669 S2: people say is that I'm like really shocked it didn't 1299 00:59:19,670 --> 00:59:22,520 S2: get nominated for Best Picture. So yeah, it's curious that 1300 00:59:22,520 --> 00:59:23,690 S2: that's been overlooked. 1301 00:59:24,140 --> 00:59:27,950 S1: I think it's probably time to talk about the, the, uh, 1302 00:59:27,950 --> 00:59:31,700 S1: atomic bomb sized elephant in in the room. And this 1303 00:59:31,700 --> 00:59:34,130 S1: is what you're alluding to, Thomas, with the betting odds 1304 00:59:34,130 --> 00:59:39,420 S1: looking pretty. Pretty grim. Oppenheimer is just like expected, both 1305 00:59:39,420 --> 00:59:42,900 S1: through what the bookies are saying and the precursor awards 1306 00:59:42,900 --> 00:59:46,710 S1: that you were talking about, to sweep basically everything. How 1307 00:59:46,710 --> 00:59:47,670 S1: do we feel about that? 1308 00:59:49,030 --> 00:59:52,480 S2: Ah, I feel like I've got Oppenheimer fatigue a little bit, 1309 00:59:52,480 --> 00:59:56,350 S2: to be honest. It's the the cultural juggernaut that was 1310 00:59:56,350 --> 00:59:59,200 S2: Barb and Heimer, um, was amazing to be a part of, 1311 00:59:59,200 --> 01:00:01,900 S2: and we all really enjoyed it. I mean, Osmond openly 1312 01:00:01,900 --> 01:00:05,590 S2: wept at the end of, um. Osmond wept openly at 1313 01:00:05,590 --> 01:00:07,240 S2: the end of Oppenheimer and then saw it again the 1314 01:00:07,240 --> 01:00:07,840 S2: next day. 1315 01:00:07,840 --> 01:00:08,980 S5: It was it was. 1316 01:00:08,980 --> 01:00:10,390 S3: June, the original June. 1317 01:00:10,570 --> 01:00:11,140 S5: Yeah, it's been. 1318 01:00:11,140 --> 01:00:13,450 S1: A big I ended up seeing Oppenheimer at Imax three times, 1319 01:00:13,450 --> 01:00:14,290 S1: I believe in a week. 1320 01:00:14,440 --> 01:00:14,800 S5: Yeah. 1321 01:00:15,070 --> 01:00:17,320 S2: But yeah, like it was it was a really cool 1322 01:00:17,320 --> 01:00:19,000 S2: thing to be a part of. And, you know, maybe 1323 01:00:19,000 --> 01:00:21,340 S2: just it's just the passing of time. Unfortunately, it's been 1324 01:00:21,340 --> 01:00:24,070 S2: a while and it feels like Oppenheimer hasn't gone away. 1325 01:00:24,070 --> 01:00:27,310 S2: And it's a great movie, but I think I find 1326 01:00:27,310 --> 01:00:30,850 S2: it very like depressing to go into Oscar season and 1327 01:00:30,850 --> 01:00:32,590 S2: knowing that this film is just going to sweep. And 1328 01:00:32,590 --> 01:00:34,720 S2: I do have some major issues with some of the 1329 01:00:34,720 --> 01:00:36,790 S2: categories that it is predicted to sweep in. 1330 01:00:37,120 --> 01:00:40,300 S3: I think Oppenheimer is a stunning film, and I've watched 1331 01:00:40,300 --> 01:00:43,180 S3: it multiple times since, and I think it's incredible work 1332 01:00:43,180 --> 01:00:46,840 S3: by all the actors, um, and, and the filmmaker. And, 1333 01:00:47,230 --> 01:00:49,450 S3: but I do think it is maybe one of the 1334 01:00:49,450 --> 01:00:54,250 S3: safer films on that list. And often safer films do 1335 01:00:54,250 --> 01:00:57,040 S3: win awards because the more polarizing films. 1336 01:00:57,040 --> 01:00:58,810 S1: What do you mean, what do you mean by safe? 1337 01:00:59,080 --> 01:01:01,360 S3: I think it's a more traditional film. I think the 1338 01:01:01,360 --> 01:01:05,440 S3: way Christopher Nolan tells stories. I mean, it's a biopic 1339 01:01:05,440 --> 01:01:09,670 S3: of an American figure who is his genius kind of 1340 01:01:09,670 --> 01:01:13,390 S3: is hard to control, who has to reckon with guilt 1341 01:01:13,390 --> 01:01:15,220 S3: and right and wrong like it is kind of. You're 1342 01:01:15,220 --> 01:01:16,000 S3: talking about, maestro. 1343 01:01:16,000 --> 01:01:16,360 S2: Yeah. 1344 01:01:17,050 --> 01:01:19,450 S3: I mean, I yeah, that's kind of a similar genre 1345 01:01:19,450 --> 01:01:22,720 S3: of film, right? Obviously Christopher Nolan's film is way better. Um, 1346 01:01:22,720 --> 01:01:25,090 S3: and Cillian Murphy is way better in it. But I 1347 01:01:25,090 --> 01:01:29,620 S3: do think it's a film we recognize, particularly Hollywood recognizes 1348 01:01:29,620 --> 01:01:32,140 S3: it's tried and true and tested. And I'm not saying 1349 01:01:32,140 --> 01:01:34,630 S3: that to take away from how powerful it is, but 1350 01:01:34,630 --> 01:01:38,530 S3: I think the format is kind of one that universally 1351 01:01:38,530 --> 01:01:41,530 S3: people agree on. And when people universally agree on something 1352 01:01:41,530 --> 01:01:43,780 S3: that's kind of going to win, where is more like, 1353 01:01:43,780 --> 01:01:46,450 S3: you know, something like poor things is way more divisive, 1354 01:01:46,450 --> 01:01:48,820 S3: which is probably why we won't see it win. Best film. 1355 01:01:48,820 --> 01:01:49,450 S3: But this is where. 1356 01:01:49,450 --> 01:01:51,850 S2: Again, that catch up cycle comes into play because they're like, oh, 1357 01:01:51,940 --> 01:01:53,740 S2: we did the weird one last year. Like, we gave 1358 01:01:53,740 --> 01:01:55,540 S2: you everything everywhere all at once. Like that was you 1359 01:01:55,540 --> 01:01:57,670 S2: got the crazy A24 one. So this year we'll go 1360 01:01:57,670 --> 01:02:00,070 S2: back to more something more traditional. I agree with you. 1361 01:02:00,070 --> 01:02:03,220 S2: I think that, um, it, you know, Oscar bait is 1362 01:02:03,220 --> 01:02:04,930 S2: a term that gets thrown around a lot lately. But 1363 01:02:04,930 --> 01:02:07,540 S2: fuck me, Oppenheimer is Oscar bait to a T. 1364 01:02:07,540 --> 01:02:10,060 S1: Yeah, I, I see what you're saying. And I think 1365 01:02:10,060 --> 01:02:13,000 S1: in terms of the great man and and all that 1366 01:02:13,000 --> 01:02:15,040 S1: sort of stuff, it is traditional. But I also think 1367 01:02:15,040 --> 01:02:18,070 S1: Nolan and Killian and they did they did so many 1368 01:02:18,070 --> 01:02:20,470 S1: interesting things in that movie that made it a little 1369 01:02:20,470 --> 01:02:23,890 S1: bit more interesting than like other previous biopics out of one. 1370 01:02:23,890 --> 01:02:25,690 S1: But I think you're right. I mean, like, I think 1371 01:02:25,690 --> 01:02:28,270 S1: something like killers of the Flower Moon was told in 1372 01:02:28,270 --> 01:02:31,240 S1: such an interesting way, in such an interesting story that 1373 01:02:31,480 --> 01:02:33,640 S1: I would have loved to say that have more of 1374 01:02:33,640 --> 01:02:37,000 S1: a chance against something like Oppenheimer if Oppenheimer wasn't in 1375 01:02:37,000 --> 01:02:39,910 S1: this race. Do you guys think there's another obvious film 1376 01:02:39,910 --> 01:02:42,490 S1: that would be sweeping the way Oppenheimer is, or do 1377 01:02:42,490 --> 01:02:45,130 S1: you think things would be a little bit more disjointed, 1378 01:02:45,130 --> 01:02:47,230 S1: like Best Picture could go that way. Best Actor could 1379 01:02:47,230 --> 01:02:48,670 S1: go in a different way. 1380 01:02:49,320 --> 01:02:51,360 S2: I think things would be way more fractured if Oppenheimer 1381 01:02:51,360 --> 01:02:53,340 S2: wasn't in. I don't reckon there would be another obvious 1382 01:02:53,340 --> 01:02:56,220 S2: like sweep film, I think. You then say like the 1383 01:02:56,220 --> 01:02:59,190 S2: big five awards go to, like possibly five different films 1384 01:02:59,190 --> 01:03:01,290 S2: or these, you know, fractured. 1385 01:03:01,320 --> 01:03:04,950 S3: Yeah, I think I think maybe killers might have had 1386 01:03:04,950 --> 01:03:07,440 S3: more of a shoo in for Best Picture. I do 1387 01:03:07,440 --> 01:03:11,790 S3: think on Oppenheimer two, it's the narrative. Like if Hollywood 1388 01:03:11,790 --> 01:03:15,600 S3: is largely voting for this, an American institution, the story 1389 01:03:15,600 --> 01:03:18,660 S3: of the atomic bomb is something that really speaks deeply 1390 01:03:18,660 --> 01:03:21,690 S3: to the US, say, psyche and kind of their reckoning 1391 01:03:21,690 --> 01:03:25,980 S3: of their history and role in the global kind of community, 1392 01:03:25,980 --> 01:03:27,660 S3: I think. I don't know, I do think it speaks 1393 01:03:27,660 --> 01:03:31,380 S3: to that audience very differently as well to the Australian audience, 1394 01:03:31,380 --> 01:03:33,840 S3: which might be why we're seeing it kind of dominates 1395 01:03:33,840 --> 01:03:34,830 S3: so strongly. 1396 01:03:35,220 --> 01:03:39,090 S1: And also the Academy, the Academy loves movies that are like, oh, wow, 1397 01:03:39,090 --> 01:03:41,580 S1: like we persecuted communists in the 50s. And that was 1398 01:03:41,580 --> 01:03:44,550 S1: pretty bad. And war's pretty bad. Like, the Academy does 1399 01:03:44,550 --> 01:03:50,010 S1: have that small liberal sensitivity that makes Oppenheimer pretty appealing. Film. Mhm. Totally. 1400 01:03:50,130 --> 01:03:52,230 S1: I thought as a way, it's a little bit more 1401 01:03:52,230 --> 01:03:54,480 S1: fun to talk about the other categories, rather than just 1402 01:03:54,480 --> 01:03:57,000 S1: listing who's nominated and debating it. We could play a 1403 01:03:57,000 --> 01:04:01,290 S1: little game. So for Best Picture, Best Director, Best actress, 1404 01:04:01,290 --> 01:04:05,370 S1: Best Actor and the two screenplay categories adapted and original, 1405 01:04:05,370 --> 01:04:09,350 S1: we could share who we think. We want to win 1406 01:04:09,350 --> 01:04:11,690 S1: and who we think will win. I have a bit 1407 01:04:11,690 --> 01:04:13,460 S1: of a chat about those, and then when we do 1408 01:04:13,460 --> 01:04:17,300 S1: our Oscars kind of review show on Monday, we can. 1409 01:04:18,070 --> 01:04:20,440 S1: To hold ourselves accountable and see who actually won. How 1410 01:04:20,440 --> 01:04:21,580 S1: do you guys feel about that? 1411 01:04:21,640 --> 01:04:22,990 S3: I'm keen. Love a game. 1412 01:04:23,410 --> 01:04:26,500 S1: Well, let's start with Best Picture. I'll go first because 1413 01:04:26,500 --> 01:04:28,750 S1: I'm probably the most boring on this one. I do 1414 01:04:28,750 --> 01:04:30,880 S1: like I think I said I like killers of the 1415 01:04:30,880 --> 01:04:33,520 S1: Flower Moon a lot, but I think Oppenheimer is a 1416 01:04:33,520 --> 01:04:36,130 S1: great movie. I think it's like, you know, probably my 1417 01:04:36,130 --> 01:04:38,770 S1: favorite movie of the last year, and I think it 1418 01:04:38,770 --> 01:04:42,130 S1: deserves to win. I also think it will win. Uh, 1419 01:04:42,130 --> 01:04:45,760 S1: so happy to just get my boring best picture take 1420 01:04:45,760 --> 01:04:46,480 S1: out of the way. 1421 01:04:46,600 --> 01:04:48,250 S3: Yeah, you need to be in the academy. 1422 01:04:48,580 --> 01:04:48,910 S5: Um. 1423 01:04:49,600 --> 01:04:52,540 S3: For my what? I want to win. I'm just going 1424 01:04:52,540 --> 01:04:54,610 S3: purely subjective for all of them. Okay? Like, I'm not 1425 01:04:54,610 --> 01:04:56,320 S3: even going based on, like, what I think is a 1426 01:04:56,320 --> 01:04:58,540 S3: good film. It's the film that I liked the best. 1427 01:04:58,540 --> 01:05:00,400 S5: Completely uncritically. Yeah. 1428 01:05:00,400 --> 01:05:01,150 S1: That's why you're here. 1429 01:05:01,840 --> 01:05:05,500 S3: What I think was the actual best film was anatomy 1430 01:05:05,500 --> 01:05:09,940 S3: of a fall. I think that film was incredible, unlike 1431 01:05:09,940 --> 01:05:14,620 S3: anything I've probably seen in a while. Interesting concept, interestingly shot, um, 1432 01:05:14,620 --> 01:05:17,290 S3: very moving and will stick with me for a while. 1433 01:05:17,290 --> 01:05:18,370 S3: What I think will win. 1434 01:05:18,370 --> 01:05:20,140 S1: A bit a bit anti man though, right. 1435 01:05:20,140 --> 01:05:25,660 S5: Well yeah yeah yeah this is Oppenheimer. Very all about 1436 01:05:25,810 --> 01:05:26,380 S5: the man. 1437 01:05:26,620 --> 01:05:29,380 S3: So yes I think because we are also as a 1438 01:05:29,380 --> 01:05:32,440 S3: society all about a man. Oppenheimer will win as we've 1439 01:05:32,440 --> 01:05:33,880 S3: just full flagged. 1440 01:05:34,420 --> 01:05:38,470 S2: Yes. Uh well look I, I think sadly Oppenheimer will win. 1441 01:05:38,470 --> 01:05:40,180 S2: It is a great film. And I loved Oppenheimer, but 1442 01:05:40,180 --> 01:05:42,130 S2: I don't think it's the best film. Um, this won't 1443 01:05:42,130 --> 01:05:44,920 S2: shock you, because I am obviously famous for my emotional intelligence. 1444 01:05:44,920 --> 01:05:47,980 S2: The film that deserves it most is Past Lives. Uh, 1445 01:05:47,980 --> 01:05:51,010 S2: that film, you know, you guys were very, very early 1446 01:05:51,010 --> 01:05:52,570 S2: on it, and you saw it both before me, and 1447 01:05:52,570 --> 01:05:54,430 S2: you both spoke about how great it was, and I 1448 01:05:54,430 --> 01:05:56,440 S2: watched it, and it really it really broke me. I 1449 01:05:56,440 --> 01:05:59,740 S2: thought it was a beautiful movie, um, in every aspect 1450 01:05:59,740 --> 01:06:03,280 S2: of filmmaking. And I just think, unfortunately, coming after a 1451 01:06:03,280 --> 01:06:05,560 S2: year where A24 did so well, I think it suffered 1452 01:06:05,560 --> 01:06:08,200 S2: from that. Um, but that's who should win. But obviously 1453 01:06:08,200 --> 01:06:09,100 S2: Oppenheimer will win. 1454 01:06:09,340 --> 01:06:11,410 S1: Yeah, I think that's a really good chat. It is 1455 01:06:11,410 --> 01:06:12,820 S1: a great movie. I think the other thing is the 1456 01:06:12,820 --> 01:06:16,930 S1: Oscars just generally don't reward debut filmmakers. It's like, good 1457 01:06:16,930 --> 01:06:20,080 S1: on you. You got your nomination now. Like do your time. 1458 01:06:20,080 --> 01:06:22,900 S1: One of the exceptions that was Emerald Fennell, who, as 1459 01:06:22,900 --> 01:06:26,229 S1: we've spoken about before, just bizarrely won Best screenplay for 1460 01:06:26,230 --> 01:06:29,380 S1: Promising Young Woman, uh, her debut feature. Um. All right, 1461 01:06:29,380 --> 01:06:32,740 S1: onto Best Director. Yeah. This is the one I thought 1462 01:06:32,740 --> 01:06:37,750 S1: long and hard about. I, I do think Scorsese deserves 1463 01:06:37,750 --> 01:06:41,620 S1: it for killers because of the way he both adapted 1464 01:06:41,620 --> 01:06:45,430 S1: that movie from the source text, the way he filmed it, 1465 01:06:45,430 --> 01:06:48,130 S1: the way he opened it and closed it. He just, like, 1466 01:06:48,130 --> 01:06:51,130 S1: did so many interesting things and pulled off a movie 1467 01:06:51,130 --> 01:06:55,630 S1: that was both entertaining and gripping. And as far as 1468 01:06:55,630 --> 01:06:58,930 S1: movies about American history go, we we kind of maybe 1469 01:06:58,930 --> 01:07:00,790 S1: didn't know all the details about Oppenheimer. We knew the 1470 01:07:00,790 --> 01:07:03,430 S1: big picture stuff. I think most people accept that they 1471 01:07:03,430 --> 01:07:06,970 S1: had no knowledge of what was going on in Oklahoma, uh, 1472 01:07:06,970 --> 01:07:10,390 S1: in that period of time. So I, I would put 1473 01:07:10,390 --> 01:07:13,360 S1: in a vote for Scorsese. But I do think Nolan 1474 01:07:13,360 --> 01:07:16,870 S1: will win just with the Oppenheimer train, uh, trundling on 1475 01:07:16,870 --> 01:07:17,950 S1: the way that it is. 1476 01:07:17,950 --> 01:07:20,710 S3: Oh, you have totally talked me into Scorsese. Like, I 1477 01:07:20,710 --> 01:07:23,560 S3: remember remembering now the feelings of killers. And I think 1478 01:07:23,560 --> 01:07:24,820 S3: I would also like to see him when I head 1479 01:07:24,820 --> 01:07:28,420 S3: down Yorgos Lanthimos, though, for Poor Things. Only because I 1480 01:07:28,420 --> 01:07:30,190 S3: think when you talk about director, when you look at 1481 01:07:30,190 --> 01:07:32,290 S3: who took the most risks, who was working with the 1482 01:07:32,290 --> 01:07:37,240 S3: most kind of interesting source material, who pushed actors and actresses, 1483 01:07:37,240 --> 01:07:40,450 S3: that furthers the kind of whole aesthetic of that film. 1484 01:07:40,450 --> 01:07:44,260 S3: I think in terms of interesting filmmaking, Yorgos Lanthimos takes 1485 01:07:44,260 --> 01:07:46,990 S3: the takes the prize, but I tend to agree that 1486 01:07:46,990 --> 01:07:50,290 S3: Christopher Nolan also will probably get the nod from the Academy. 1487 01:07:50,290 --> 01:07:53,080 S2: Yeah, I agree, I'm in line with Mel on this one. 1488 01:07:53,080 --> 01:07:56,530 S2: I think Nolan will win. Um, but I also think, uh, 1489 01:07:56,530 --> 01:08:00,340 S2: Yorgos deserves it. And not only because the movie is great, 1490 01:08:00,340 --> 01:08:03,370 S2: but because he is Greek. And let me tell you, 1491 01:08:03,370 --> 01:08:06,520 S2: the last director to win an Academy Award who is, 1492 01:08:06,520 --> 01:08:09,310 S2: you know, even like second generation Greek was Elia Kazan 1493 01:08:09,310 --> 01:08:11,470 S2: in 1954 for On the Waterfront. It's one of the 1494 01:08:11,470 --> 01:08:14,680 S2: great injustices in cinema. Uh, and, you know. 1495 01:08:14,680 --> 01:08:17,920 S1: Obviously, Eli Cezanne was also a rat who betrayed former 1496 01:08:17,920 --> 01:08:20,560 S1: members of the Communist Party to the House. Uh, Committee 1497 01:08:20,560 --> 01:08:22,960 S1: on UN activity. Yeah. American activities. What do you. 1498 01:08:22,960 --> 01:08:23,770 S3: Have to say about that? 1499 01:08:23,770 --> 01:08:25,059 S2: I just say we take the wins where we can 1500 01:08:25,060 --> 01:08:25,450 S2: get them. 1501 01:08:25,450 --> 01:08:26,890 S1: And obviously. 1502 01:08:26,890 --> 01:08:29,590 S2: Yorgos was nominated in 2018, our very own George Miller 1503 01:08:29,590 --> 01:08:32,439 S2: nominated in 2015. But because of systemic racism, we've been 1504 01:08:32,439 --> 01:08:34,419 S2: overlooked since the 50s. And so. 1505 01:08:37,900 --> 01:08:41,229 S1: Uh, both of us outdoing each other on our insane takes. 1506 01:08:42,550 --> 01:08:45,160 S1: That's great. Okay. Best actor. This is interesting because I 1507 01:08:45,160 --> 01:08:47,980 S1: don't think this category is that stacked really. Like, I 1508 01:08:47,979 --> 01:08:50,140 S1: think when I think about some of the best performances 1509 01:08:50,140 --> 01:08:53,710 S1: of the year outside of Oppenheimer, I'm thinking about anatomy 1510 01:08:53,710 --> 01:08:56,019 S1: of a fall. I'm thinking about past lives. I'm thinking about, 1511 01:08:56,020 --> 01:08:59,410 S1: like a lot more performances from actresses. I thought, yeah, Killian, 1512 01:08:59,410 --> 01:09:02,110 S1: I think just really went for it in, in this. 1513 01:09:02,110 --> 01:09:04,540 S1: I think he should win and I think he will win. 1514 01:09:04,540 --> 01:09:06,880 S1: But interesting. You guys have a different take. 1515 01:09:06,880 --> 01:09:09,700 S3: Yeah, I completely, completely agree. Looking at the list, um, 1516 01:09:09,700 --> 01:09:13,600 S3: who's up for that? Bradley Cooper, Colman Domingo, Paul Giamatti, 1517 01:09:13,600 --> 01:09:16,780 S3: Jeffrey Wright and Cillian Murphy. Like, I feel like he is. 1518 01:09:17,060 --> 01:09:18,799 S3: Serving of that for sure. 1519 01:09:18,920 --> 01:09:20,990 S2: Do you think Kilian deserves that? This is probably like 1520 01:09:20,990 --> 01:09:23,510 S2: a should and will, although I will say, and we've 1521 01:09:23,510 --> 01:09:24,680 S2: had a bit of a chat about this in the office. 1522 01:09:24,680 --> 01:09:28,040 S2: And I know you fucking hate Maestro and Bradley Cooper. 1523 01:09:28,310 --> 01:09:29,780 S2: I feel bad for him. 1524 01:09:29,780 --> 01:09:32,030 S1: He is. I really do not like that movie and 1525 01:09:32,030 --> 01:09:33,410 S1: he is annoying me a lot. 1526 01:09:33,410 --> 01:09:37,850 S2: Okay, like I quite liked maestro, but also he like, 1527 01:09:37,850 --> 01:09:40,550 S2: he wants this. He is like, obsessed with winning an 1528 01:09:40,550 --> 01:09:43,820 S2: Oscar and, you know, like, let him have one. 1529 01:09:44,030 --> 01:09:44,750 S5: Yeah, but sometimes. 1530 01:09:44,750 --> 01:09:46,100 S3: You want things and you just don't. 1531 01:09:46,100 --> 01:09:48,740 S5: Get that. How the world works. Good on you. Do 1532 01:09:48,740 --> 01:09:49,880 S5: we feel a bit bad. 1533 01:09:49,880 --> 01:09:52,490 S2: For Bradley Cooper now? Like he is just he like, 1534 01:09:52,790 --> 01:09:55,700 S2: no one's working harder for that Oscar than Bradley Cooper. 1535 01:09:55,700 --> 01:09:58,490 S3: I think he's been overrated his entire career. And it's 1536 01:09:58,490 --> 01:10:00,950 S3: time for him to understand his place. 1537 01:10:01,910 --> 01:10:03,350 S5: He'll he'll get one now. He will. 1538 01:10:03,500 --> 01:10:05,120 S2: He'll do like the hangover 4 in 5 years. And 1539 01:10:05,120 --> 01:10:05,810 S2: they'll give it to him for that. 1540 01:10:05,810 --> 01:10:07,640 S3: I also don't think, like, I didn't mind that film 1541 01:10:07,640 --> 01:10:09,860 S3: as much as other people seem to, but, um, I 1542 01:10:09,860 --> 01:10:13,040 S3: don't think his role in it was that impressive, particularly 1543 01:10:13,040 --> 01:10:15,800 S3: not compared to Killian Murphy's. And I think the best 1544 01:10:15,800 --> 01:10:18,320 S3: parts of that movie were Carey Mulligan and him in 1545 01:10:18,320 --> 01:10:21,260 S3: dialogue and conflict with her, like, alone. He did not 1546 01:10:21,260 --> 01:10:22,280 S3: carry that film. 1547 01:10:22,280 --> 01:10:24,530 S2: Yeah, true. But anyway, it's all a moot point because 1548 01:10:24,530 --> 01:10:25,309 S2: Killian will win. 1549 01:10:26,360 --> 01:10:27,860 S1: Well, let's go to Best Actress. And this is one 1550 01:10:27,860 --> 01:10:31,160 S1: that I changed my mind on, like recently. Um, for 1551 01:10:31,160 --> 01:10:34,370 S1: a really interesting reason. Sandra Bullock, who is the lead 1552 01:10:34,370 --> 01:10:38,600 S1: in anatomy of a fall, but is also a really 1553 01:10:38,600 --> 01:10:41,270 S1: big part of the Zone of Interest, another movie nominated 1554 01:10:41,270 --> 01:10:44,450 S1: for Best Picture. And I know that people are nominated 1555 01:10:44,450 --> 01:10:47,600 S1: for like, individual movies, but the fact that she was like, 1556 01:10:47,600 --> 01:10:51,620 S1: astonishing and too pretty fascinating and interesting and very well 1557 01:10:51,620 --> 01:10:54,410 S1: made movies, uh, like hats Off to her in the 1558 01:10:54,410 --> 01:10:57,620 S1: same year. And I thought she really killed it in both. 1559 01:10:57,620 --> 01:11:01,009 S1: So I would love to see her win. Uh, I 1560 01:11:01,010 --> 01:11:03,110 S1: do think, and I'm not upset about this at all. 1561 01:11:03,110 --> 01:11:05,450 S1: I do think Lily Gladstone will win for killers of 1562 01:11:05,450 --> 01:11:07,400 S1: the Flower Moon. I know there's like a a lily 1563 01:11:07,400 --> 01:11:09,410 S1: versus Emma Stone thing going on. I think it's probably 1564 01:11:09,410 --> 01:11:12,320 S1: the most interesting category where we're not totally sure what's 1565 01:11:12,320 --> 01:11:14,240 S1: going to happen. Yeah, and I think Lily will win. 1566 01:11:14,240 --> 01:11:16,880 S1: She's won those awards. Thomas, that you mentioned tend to 1567 01:11:16,880 --> 01:11:19,400 S1: overlap the most with the Oscars. It seems like the 1568 01:11:19,400 --> 01:11:20,570 S1: most likely result. 1569 01:11:21,080 --> 01:11:24,680 S3: Yeah, I would really like to see Lily win. I 1570 01:11:24,680 --> 01:11:27,080 S3: think that what she did with that role, the kind 1571 01:11:27,080 --> 01:11:30,979 S3: of quiet power of the character she played is, was 1572 01:11:30,979 --> 01:11:34,040 S3: remarkable and very moving. And I think Emma Stone was 1573 01:11:34,040 --> 01:11:36,050 S3: fantastic in poor things and like really had to put 1574 01:11:36,050 --> 01:11:38,600 S3: herself out there as an actress. But it is in 1575 01:11:38,600 --> 01:11:43,130 S3: many ways a larger than life role versus what Lily 1576 01:11:43,130 --> 01:11:45,860 S3: Gladstone had to do with holding back, but still managing 1577 01:11:45,860 --> 01:11:49,280 S3: to convey so much. And I think in terms of acting, 1578 01:11:49,280 --> 01:11:52,189 S3: I was more impressed by Lily than than Emma. Um, 1579 01:11:52,189 --> 01:11:54,320 S3: so yeah, I think she should win. And I reckon 1580 01:11:54,320 --> 01:11:55,280 S3: she probably will too. 1581 01:11:55,970 --> 01:11:59,210 S2: Uh, yeah. I'm pretty sure that Legatum is going to 1582 01:11:59,210 --> 01:12:01,250 S2: win this category. I know that Emma Stone has kind 1583 01:12:01,250 --> 01:12:04,340 S2: of been tipped to win it, although just recently the 1584 01:12:04,340 --> 01:12:08,390 S2: bookies have like seen Lily move in front. That's interesting. Um, 1585 01:12:08,390 --> 01:12:10,490 S2: but I also think like it's one of those things where, 1586 01:12:10,850 --> 01:12:14,210 S2: you know, and like, I think lots of viewers often 1587 01:12:14,210 --> 01:12:16,820 S2: assume this like the Academy looks at what's happening and 1588 01:12:16,820 --> 01:12:18,470 S2: then it's like, well, just give out one here to 1589 01:12:18,470 --> 01:12:20,780 S2: make sure that, like, that film gets its big award 1590 01:12:20,780 --> 01:12:23,570 S2: and not that, you know, Lily's performance doesn't warrant the 1591 01:12:23,570 --> 01:12:26,090 S2: award anyway, but this feels like the category where if 1592 01:12:26,090 --> 01:12:29,000 S2: killers will, like, get it's just desserts. And and she 1593 01:12:29,000 --> 01:12:31,310 S2: was amazing in that movie. Emma Stone's already got an Oscar. 1594 01:12:31,310 --> 01:12:33,230 S2: Like it all just seems to add up that like, 1595 01:12:33,229 --> 01:12:35,450 S2: I think Lily Gladstone should and will win this category. 1596 01:12:36,140 --> 01:12:38,570 S1: So yeah, out of all of those, we basically all 1597 01:12:38,570 --> 01:12:41,090 S1: agree on who we think will win. Which is interesting 1598 01:12:41,090 --> 01:12:43,880 S1: because it means that we can't say we're better than 1599 01:12:43,880 --> 01:12:45,950 S1: the other on Monday. That is annoying. But also, I 1600 01:12:45,950 --> 01:12:48,830 S1: think speaks to how locked up the race is. A 1601 01:12:48,830 --> 01:12:50,900 S1: couple more categories to to whip through, which I thought 1602 01:12:50,900 --> 01:12:53,540 S1: would just add a little bit more uncertainty to the equation. 1603 01:12:53,540 --> 01:12:56,660 S1: Original and adapted screenplay. So original screenplay is where I 1604 01:12:56,660 --> 01:12:58,940 S1: think past lives could get a nod. It deserves to 1605 01:12:58,939 --> 01:13:01,969 S1: get a nod. It's a great screenplay, like it's we've 1606 01:13:01,970 --> 01:13:03,620 S1: talked about the movie before, don't need to go into 1607 01:13:03,620 --> 01:13:08,570 S1: it again. Just beautiful. Simple. Moving like just affected almost 1608 01:13:08,570 --> 01:13:12,320 S1: everyone I know who saw it. I think the holdovers 1609 01:13:12,320 --> 01:13:16,370 S1: will probably win just because GMT is like is is 1610 01:13:16,370 --> 01:13:18,170 S1: is part of this narrative. You know, after he won 1611 01:13:18,170 --> 01:13:22,009 S1: the Globes, he's being considered as a pretty close second 1612 01:13:22,010 --> 01:13:24,889 S1: to Killian in Best Actor category. So this could be 1613 01:13:24,890 --> 01:13:28,580 S1: where The Holdovers manages to to just get to get something. 1614 01:13:28,580 --> 01:13:30,769 S1: What do you guys thoughts on Original Screenplay? 1615 01:13:30,770 --> 01:13:33,469 S3: I would like to see anatomy of a Fall Win. 1616 01:13:33,470 --> 01:13:36,469 S3: I think that film is told in a really interesting wow. 1617 01:13:36,470 --> 01:13:37,220 S5: You really, really had a. 1618 01:13:37,220 --> 01:13:37,970 S1: Big impact on you. 1619 01:13:37,970 --> 01:13:40,099 S3: I thought it was pretty incredible. Like, did. 1620 01:13:40,100 --> 01:13:40,850 S2: You meet the dog? 1621 01:13:41,030 --> 01:13:42,290 S5: Yeah, I would. 1622 01:13:42,290 --> 01:13:43,160 S3: Love to. I would yeah. 1623 01:13:43,160 --> 01:13:44,450 S5: The dog is great though, isn't how good. 1624 01:13:44,540 --> 01:13:46,130 S3: Yeah, what a role I was the whole time. I 1625 01:13:46,130 --> 01:13:48,830 S3: was like, how did they get it to do that? Yeah. Um, 1626 01:13:49,189 --> 01:13:52,760 S3: I just think that how that story unfolded, like the 1627 01:13:52,760 --> 01:13:55,580 S3: kind of slow release of information at the same time 1628 01:13:55,580 --> 01:13:58,880 S3: as you're slowly starting to doubt people more and more like, 1629 01:13:58,880 --> 01:14:00,470 S3: I just think, I always think when you watch a 1630 01:14:00,470 --> 01:14:02,299 S3: film and you can't really see the joints of it 1631 01:14:02,300 --> 01:14:05,300 S3: like that is when I'm like wondering, how did they 1632 01:14:05,300 --> 01:14:07,580 S3: do that? How is it working? Like, that's a really 1633 01:14:07,580 --> 01:14:10,550 S3: good film. Um, so I think I would like to 1634 01:14:10,550 --> 01:14:14,299 S3: see that win. I actually think past lives will win. Interesting. Yeah. 1635 01:14:14,300 --> 01:14:17,150 S3: I think it's a way to acknowledge that. Movie which 1636 01:14:17,150 --> 01:14:20,780 S3: deserves to be acknowledged, um, to commend and encourage a 1637 01:14:20,780 --> 01:14:23,420 S3: first time filmmaker. Um, and that could be where it 1638 01:14:23,420 --> 01:14:25,670 S3: gets its nod, and it is well deserved to. 1639 01:14:25,820 --> 01:14:28,460 S1: If there was an award for best use of a 1640 01:14:28,460 --> 01:14:33,260 S1: steel band cover of $0.50 per amp, I think anatomy 1641 01:14:33,260 --> 01:14:35,720 S1: of a full should and would win that category. 1642 01:14:35,750 --> 01:14:36,740 S3: Yeah, it was in my head. 1643 01:14:36,860 --> 01:14:38,269 S5: So like for so. 1644 01:14:38,270 --> 01:14:38,780 S3: Long after the. 1645 01:14:38,780 --> 01:14:39,710 S5: Film, we could. 1646 01:14:39,710 --> 01:14:42,470 S2: Also do some like quite a fun, you know, best 1647 01:14:42,470 --> 01:14:44,360 S2: dog in a movie. 1648 01:14:45,150 --> 01:14:45,839 S5: Yeah. 1649 01:14:46,080 --> 01:14:46,920 S3: Do you have one at the. 1650 01:14:46,920 --> 01:14:47,970 S5: Top of your head? We'll do it next year. 1651 01:14:48,210 --> 01:14:51,479 S2: Anyway, I think Anatomy Before will win Best original Screenplay. 1652 01:14:52,380 --> 01:14:52,950 S1: Do you think it should? 1653 01:14:53,100 --> 01:14:54,870 S2: I think it should. Yeah. I think it should. Um, 1654 01:14:54,870 --> 01:14:57,840 S2: but I definitely think it's it's more curious to talk 1655 01:14:57,840 --> 01:15:00,030 S2: about best adapted. Um, which obviously we'll move on to 1656 01:15:00,030 --> 01:15:02,670 S2: now because of, you know, I mean, we've discussed this previously. 1657 01:15:02,670 --> 01:15:03,870 S2: The Barbie element. 1658 01:15:04,260 --> 01:15:06,900 S1: Yeah. Well, talk us through that. So Bobby ended up 1659 01:15:06,900 --> 01:15:10,500 S1: being put into that category because I guess the argument 1660 01:15:10,500 --> 01:15:13,830 S1: is that Barbie the doll is a source material that 1661 01:15:13,830 --> 01:15:14,969 S1: is being adapted. 1662 01:15:15,120 --> 01:15:17,160 S2: Yeah. So I think I believe it was originally submitted 1663 01:15:17,160 --> 01:15:20,040 S2: for Best Original because obviously, you know, the world and 1664 01:15:20,040 --> 01:15:23,310 S2: the story was completely created by, um, you know, Greta 1665 01:15:23,310 --> 01:15:26,280 S2: Gerwig and Margot Robbie and the entire team and Noah Baumbach, 1666 01:15:26,790 --> 01:15:29,280 S2: Gerwig's husband, who also co-wrote the movie. But then it 1667 01:15:29,280 --> 01:15:31,410 S2: was pushed into Best Adapted because they made the argument 1668 01:15:31,410 --> 01:15:35,220 S2: that there was original source material for Barbie. But, I mean, 1669 01:15:35,220 --> 01:15:38,340 S2: I don't know, it's now up against American fiction, Oppenheimer, 1670 01:15:38,340 --> 01:15:41,550 S2: Poor Things, and The Zone of Interest. Uh, pretty stacked field, 1671 01:15:41,640 --> 01:15:44,970 S2: but luckily, uh, both my should and will line up. Uh, 1672 01:15:44,970 --> 01:15:46,769 S2: it's a film that we all enjoy, the film that 1673 01:15:46,770 --> 01:15:49,680 S2: we discussed at length recently, and that is American fiction. 1674 01:15:50,310 --> 01:15:52,800 S3: Yeah. I would like to see American fiction when and 1675 01:15:52,800 --> 01:15:55,410 S3: particularly when you know that the book, Percival Everett's book 1676 01:15:55,410 --> 01:15:58,530 S3: is kind of written in a book within a book. 1677 01:15:58,530 --> 01:16:02,100 S3: I think the job of translating that to screen is 1678 01:16:02,100 --> 01:16:05,280 S3: pretty impressive. And the balancing of the satire with the 1679 01:16:05,280 --> 01:16:08,340 S3: familial relations, um, was really well done. So I'd like 1680 01:16:08,340 --> 01:16:10,860 S3: to see that when I reckon Barbie might win this, 1681 01:16:10,860 --> 01:16:13,680 S3: it will be controversial. Maybe it'll be the controversial moment 1682 01:16:13,680 --> 01:16:16,349 S3: of the Oscars, but I do think they might want 1683 01:16:16,350 --> 01:16:18,360 S3: to give Barbie a bit of a nod, and people 1684 01:16:18,360 --> 01:16:20,910 S3: might see this category as a way to celebrate that 1685 01:16:20,910 --> 01:16:23,940 S3: film and Greta Gerwig in her role in it. 1686 01:16:24,689 --> 01:16:27,150 S1: If, um, if killers was nominated, I would put in 1687 01:16:27,150 --> 01:16:29,280 S1: a plug for that. It's bizarrely not, even though I 1688 01:16:29,280 --> 01:16:32,910 S1: think it's maybe the best adapted screenplay this year, I, 1689 01:16:32,910 --> 01:16:34,620 S1: I think without that, I agree with you guys on 1690 01:16:34,620 --> 01:16:37,740 S1: American fiction. Don't be shocked if the zone of interest 1691 01:16:37,740 --> 01:16:40,620 S1: picks up here. Like, that movie is having a bit 1692 01:16:40,620 --> 01:16:43,110 S1: of a run at the moment. You know, picked up 1693 01:16:43,110 --> 01:16:45,810 S1: a bunch of awards at the BAFTAs. It's really landing 1694 01:16:45,810 --> 01:16:48,689 S1: with a lot of people, movies that that sort of 1695 01:16:48,689 --> 01:16:52,589 S1: discuss with or engage with the Holocaust have, have generally 1696 01:16:52,590 --> 01:16:56,490 S1: been pretty, you know, well received. Seems like a weird 1697 01:16:56,490 --> 01:16:59,250 S1: term to use. But the Oscars has acknowledged those movies 1698 01:16:59,250 --> 01:17:01,830 S1: generally in the past. Spielberg came out and said a 1699 01:17:01,830 --> 01:17:04,200 S1: very weird thing, that this is like the best Holocaust 1700 01:17:04,200 --> 01:17:06,960 S1: movie since Schindler's List, which sounds great until you remember 1701 01:17:06,960 --> 01:17:09,330 S1: that he made Schindler's List and was like, this is 1702 01:17:09,330 --> 01:17:11,040 S1: the best movie about this topic since the one that 1703 01:17:11,040 --> 01:17:13,590 S1: I did, so I think that could be an interesting 1704 01:17:13,590 --> 01:17:16,410 S1: one to watch as well. Are there any other categories 1705 01:17:16,410 --> 01:17:18,809 S1: you guys wanted to to mention any, any races or 1706 01:17:18,810 --> 01:17:21,300 S1: any particular films that we haven't touched on that, uh, 1707 01:17:21,300 --> 01:17:23,580 S1: deserve a little bit of conversation? 1708 01:17:23,580 --> 01:17:27,510 S2: Yes, I, I mean, it's no conversation about the Oscars 1709 01:17:27,510 --> 01:17:30,660 S2: is complete without getting a little bit parochial and talking 1710 01:17:30,660 --> 01:17:34,650 S2: about the Australians nominated, uh, obviously Margot was, uh, famously 1711 01:17:34,650 --> 01:17:36,510 S2: and controversially shut out, even though I think we all 1712 01:17:36,510 --> 01:17:39,360 S2: agreed that she probably didn't deserve a nomination. Uh, but yes, 1713 01:17:39,360 --> 01:17:42,179 S2: there are two Australians nominated in one category, which is 1714 01:17:42,180 --> 01:17:46,019 S2: live action short. So Niki Bentham, a producer of the after, 1715 01:17:46,020 --> 01:17:49,530 S2: which is on Netflix, and Sara MacFarlane, uh, red, white 1716 01:17:49,530 --> 01:17:52,320 S2: and blue. So they're both, uh, two Australian producers up 1717 01:17:52,320 --> 01:17:55,020 S2: against each other in best live action short. Uh, and 1718 01:17:55,020 --> 01:17:57,390 S2: actually I haven't seen either of those, but the after 1719 01:17:57,390 --> 01:17:59,010 S2: is kind of a hot favourite now, and we always 1720 01:17:59,010 --> 01:18:01,320 S2: love to see Australians do well. So that's Nicki Bentham 1721 01:18:01,410 --> 01:18:04,020 S2: up against Sara macfarlane in live action short. 1722 01:18:04,880 --> 01:18:05,630 S1: Great shout. 1723 01:18:05,810 --> 01:18:07,730 S3: We do. And we often the Australians we do really 1724 01:18:07,729 --> 01:18:11,180 S3: well in cinematography, historically has been where we often shine 1725 01:18:11,180 --> 01:18:15,439 S3: at the Oscars. Look I for music original song I 1726 01:18:15,439 --> 01:18:19,400 S3: wouldn't mind seeing. I'm just can get a nod. But 1727 01:18:19,400 --> 01:18:21,800 S3: particularly I'd like to get a nod over the Billie 1728 01:18:21,800 --> 01:18:22,880 S3: Eilish song. 1729 01:18:23,060 --> 01:18:24,589 S5: Was seriously enough. 1730 01:18:24,590 --> 01:18:25,790 S1: With the Billie Eilish thing. 1731 01:18:25,790 --> 01:18:27,470 S3: If one is going to get it from Bobby, I 1732 01:18:27,470 --> 01:18:28,670 S3: want it to be I'm just can. 1733 01:18:28,670 --> 01:18:31,310 S2: Yeah, I find the Billie Eilish song so like drab 1734 01:18:31,310 --> 01:18:34,220 S2: and yeah, I'm just getting way more fun. 1735 01:18:34,220 --> 01:18:36,200 S3: And I know the only other category I'm kind of 1736 01:18:36,200 --> 01:18:38,120 S3: interested in, only because I think a lot of the 1737 01:18:38,120 --> 01:18:41,420 S3: films we're talking about are so visually stunning is costume design, 1738 01:18:41,420 --> 01:18:44,630 S3: which we as Australians have also won in the past 1739 01:18:44,630 --> 01:18:47,090 S3: with Catherine Martin. Like when you look at the list 1740 01:18:47,090 --> 01:18:53,330 S3: for that Barbie, Poor Things, Killers and Napoleon and then Oppenheimer, 1741 01:18:53,330 --> 01:18:55,309 S3: which I would say probably isn't quite the same, though 1742 01:18:55,310 --> 01:18:57,860 S3: it does have stunning outfits like, yeah, who would you 1743 01:18:57,860 --> 01:19:01,130 S3: pick for that? They're all such remarkable acts of world 1744 01:19:01,130 --> 01:19:02,720 S3: building in their costuming. 1745 01:19:03,050 --> 01:19:05,780 S1: Totally, totally pull things. Or Barbie winning that would be 1746 01:19:05,780 --> 01:19:06,950 S1: would be pretty great. All right. 1747 01:19:06,950 --> 01:19:07,340 S5: Yeah. 1748 01:19:07,640 --> 01:19:09,320 S2: So it's so sad though, when we have a year where, 1749 01:19:09,320 --> 01:19:12,200 S2: like Mandy Walker or Catherine Martin aren't involved in a film, 1750 01:19:12,200 --> 01:19:13,460 S2: we're just like, not going to win any Oscars. 1751 01:19:15,560 --> 01:19:18,860 S1: Well, Greg Frazier will probably be nominated for cinematography for 1752 01:19:18,860 --> 01:19:20,179 S1: June part two next year. 1753 01:19:20,180 --> 01:19:21,200 S2: Oh my God. 1754 01:19:22,160 --> 01:19:22,760 S5: People get to. 1755 01:19:22,760 --> 01:19:24,050 S3: Relive it all over again. 1756 01:19:24,650 --> 01:19:26,300 S2: I was like, I saw it for the 800th time 1757 01:19:26,300 --> 01:19:26,810 S2: last week. 1758 01:19:26,810 --> 01:19:29,330 S1: And the only other thing that I wanted to mention, 1759 01:19:29,330 --> 01:19:31,730 S1: I won't go in deep on this one, is Best 1760 01:19:31,729 --> 01:19:35,780 S1: International Feature Film. I. I love this category, not just because, 1761 01:19:35,780 --> 01:19:38,990 S1: you know, it's also a category where Australians can sometimes compete, 1762 01:19:38,990 --> 01:19:41,780 S1: but the politics of it are the most fascinating. So 1763 01:19:41,780 --> 01:19:44,270 S1: the way this works, unlike the other categories that I 1764 01:19:44,270 --> 01:19:48,290 S1: ran through before, each country actually has a system whereby 1765 01:19:48,290 --> 01:19:53,090 S1: they nominate what the one movie from that country should 1766 01:19:53,090 --> 01:19:56,300 S1: be in terms of contention for Best International Feature Film. 1767 01:19:56,300 --> 01:19:59,570 S1: And in Australia, like it's Screen Australia, the government funded 1768 01:19:59,570 --> 01:20:02,750 S1: screen body that decides other countries have like the ministries 1769 01:20:02,750 --> 01:20:05,479 S1: of culture. So like the government picks the movie or 1770 01:20:05,479 --> 01:20:08,480 S1: they have like industry bodies and panels, it's a pretty 1771 01:20:08,479 --> 01:20:11,330 S1: interesting screen. Australia not a great track record. I think 1772 01:20:11,330 --> 01:20:15,020 S1: we've had one movie nominated since this category was introduced 1773 01:20:15,020 --> 01:20:17,660 S1: in the 90s, but there's actually a bit of drama 1774 01:20:17,660 --> 01:20:21,080 S1: around the French nominee, which this year was the taste 1775 01:20:21,080 --> 01:20:23,480 S1: of things, and a lot of people were upset that 1776 01:20:23,479 --> 01:20:26,450 S1: it wasn't anatomy of a fall because they thought it's 1777 01:20:26,450 --> 01:20:29,960 S1: nominated for Best Picture, it's nominated for Best Director. Why 1778 01:20:29,960 --> 01:20:33,590 S1: is Justine Tree's pretty good movie not in Best International Feature? 1779 01:20:33,590 --> 01:20:36,290 S1: And essentially there was like a lot of political bullshit 1780 01:20:36,290 --> 01:20:38,660 S1: that went down at the French body. There was a vote. 1781 01:20:38,660 --> 01:20:41,600 S1: It was 4 to 3 in favor of the taste 1782 01:20:41,600 --> 01:20:43,849 S1: of things instead of anatomy of a fall. One of 1783 01:20:43,850 --> 01:20:46,430 S1: the voters said, can I change my vote? I didn't 1784 01:20:46,430 --> 01:20:48,500 S1: realize I was going to be the swing vote. And 1785 01:20:48,500 --> 01:20:51,380 S1: they're like, no, you fucked up. I'm sorry. And seemingly 1786 01:20:51,380 --> 01:20:53,030 S1: the reason for it is, like the French film body 1787 01:20:53,030 --> 01:20:56,180 S1: has more conservative elements within it. And Justine Trier, when 1788 01:20:56,180 --> 01:20:58,880 S1: she won the Palme d'Or at Cannes since then gave 1789 01:20:58,880 --> 01:21:02,240 S1: a lot of speeches decrying the French government, accused them 1790 01:21:02,240 --> 01:21:05,900 S1: of being neo liberal stooges like basically has taken a 1791 01:21:05,900 --> 01:21:08,450 S1: very strong stance on a number of key issues which 1792 01:21:08,450 --> 01:21:11,990 S1: potentially alienated her from the French film body and probably 1793 01:21:11,990 --> 01:21:14,990 S1: cost France the best international feature Oscar. Because I think 1794 01:21:14,990 --> 01:21:18,200 S1: if anatomy was in, it would 100% have won this award. 1795 01:21:18,590 --> 01:21:19,790 S2: Yeah. That's crazy. 1796 01:21:19,970 --> 01:21:20,390 S5: Yeah. 1797 01:21:20,660 --> 01:21:24,710 S1: Geopolitics, man. This award rules the Oscars are the best. 1798 01:21:24,710 --> 01:21:26,900 S2: Oh, now I'm just like in 2000. Why did Screen 1799 01:21:26,900 --> 01:21:28,849 S2: Australia not put Wog Boys forward. 1800 01:21:29,120 --> 01:21:30,020 S5: That's like it. 1801 01:21:30,620 --> 01:21:32,450 S2: But seriously that was like the one time Nick Jonas 1802 01:21:32,450 --> 01:21:35,780 S2: got funding from Screen Australia is a good movie anyway. 1803 01:21:36,020 --> 01:21:38,420 S1: And on that note, we could have wrap up our 1804 01:21:38,450 --> 01:21:42,290 S1: 2024 Oscars deep dive. So we'll be back on Monday 1805 01:21:42,290 --> 01:21:44,990 S1: evening with a review and a wrap of the show 1806 01:21:44,990 --> 01:21:48,290 S1: and discussions of what worked, what went right and what 1807 01:21:48,290 --> 01:21:51,679 S1: went wrong, and hopefully some upsets to to chew on. 1808 01:21:51,680 --> 01:21:55,370 S1: But before we sign off, we're we've got our regular 1809 01:21:55,370 --> 01:21:59,180 S1: Impress Your Friends segment, something we watched read, listened to 1810 01:21:59,180 --> 01:22:01,939 S1: from the past week that we want to shout out, Thomas, 1811 01:22:01,939 --> 01:22:03,229 S1: why don't you go first this time? 1812 01:22:03,740 --> 01:22:06,530 S2: Yes, this is a Netflix show that's out today. It 1813 01:22:06,530 --> 01:22:08,840 S2: is the gentleman. This one's been coming for a little while. 1814 01:22:08,840 --> 01:22:11,270 S2: It's a spin off of the Guy Ritchie film. Um, 1815 01:22:11,270 --> 01:22:13,070 S2: and firstly, it's got a few things that I think 1816 01:22:13,070 --> 01:22:15,320 S2: make it really fun. Uh, it's firstly, it's got just 1817 01:22:15,320 --> 01:22:18,050 S2: a guy Ritchie's DNA all over it. Um, it's like 1818 01:22:18,050 --> 01:22:22,849 S2: proper gangsters, uh, you know, in London. The soundtrack is amazing. Uh, 1819 01:22:22,850 --> 01:22:24,980 S2: and the lead actor is Theo James, who, of course, 1820 01:22:24,979 --> 01:22:27,080 S2: we all know and love from The White Lotus. He's 1821 01:22:27,080 --> 01:22:29,450 S2: being very charming. He plays a guy named Eddie who 1822 01:22:29,450 --> 01:22:32,840 S2: basically his father dies. He he inherits, um, you know, 1823 01:22:32,840 --> 01:22:36,260 S2: a very impressive farm and house and also a, you know, 1824 01:22:36,260 --> 01:22:38,840 S2: becomes a duke. Uh, and then, as it turns out, 1825 01:22:38,840 --> 01:22:41,870 S2: the father had been basically leasing his land out to 1826 01:22:41,870 --> 01:22:44,090 S2: a nearby drug lord, and things kind of start to 1827 01:22:44,090 --> 01:22:46,010 S2: unravel from there. But, yeah, like I said, it's if 1828 01:22:46,010 --> 01:22:48,800 S2: you even have a passing interest in Guy Ritchie, you know, 1829 01:22:48,800 --> 01:22:51,530 S2: style and aesthetic and tone, this will be right up 1830 01:22:51,530 --> 01:22:54,349 S2: your alley. But aside from that, it's also just quite fun. 1831 01:22:54,350 --> 01:22:56,330 S2: Guy Ritchie can be a lot, but this is like 1832 01:22:56,330 --> 01:22:58,939 S2: him kind of honed and distilled at his very best. Uh, 1833 01:22:58,939 --> 01:23:00,379 S2: and that's on Netflix today. 1834 01:23:00,890 --> 01:23:03,920 S3: I am going this week with Abbey Morgan's. This is 1835 01:23:03,920 --> 01:23:07,060 S3: not a. Pity memoir, which is what it says. It 1836 01:23:07,060 --> 01:23:09,010 S3: is not. It is not a pity memoir. It's a 1837 01:23:09,010 --> 01:23:11,830 S3: great memoir. Abby Morgan, you might know she's a screamer. 1838 01:23:11,860 --> 01:23:12,519 S5: Is this a book? 1839 01:23:12,939 --> 01:23:13,780 S3: It is a. 1840 01:23:13,780 --> 01:23:16,660 S5: Book, don't you? Don't even say it anymore. No, no. 1841 01:23:16,660 --> 01:23:18,550 S1: No, I'm not, I'm not. I'm just checking. You didn't 1842 01:23:18,550 --> 01:23:21,160 S1: tell me what medium this this item came in. True. 1843 01:23:21,280 --> 01:23:22,000 S1: It's not a kitty. 1844 01:23:22,030 --> 01:23:22,480 S5: When I said. 1845 01:23:22,720 --> 01:23:27,640 S3: Memoir twice, maybe. But that also I've stitched up because 1846 01:23:27,640 --> 01:23:30,310 S3: Thomas doesn't read. It's like I'm doing TV. It's like, well, 1847 01:23:30,310 --> 01:23:33,700 S3: what's left? Um, you might know her. She's a screenwriter. 1848 01:23:33,700 --> 01:23:37,300 S3: She did like the Iron Lady suffragette. Shame. The hour, 1849 01:23:37,300 --> 01:23:40,900 S3: that TV show. Um, so it's a pretty remarkable tale. 1850 01:23:40,900 --> 01:23:44,740 S3: It's very funny the way it's told. Her husband has M.S., 1851 01:23:44,740 --> 01:23:49,150 S3: and he goes on an experiment tree, um, drug trial 1852 01:23:49,150 --> 01:23:51,339 S3: that puts him into a coma. And when he wakes up, 1853 01:23:51,340 --> 01:23:54,070 S3: he does not realize who she is. He does not 1854 01:23:54,070 --> 01:23:58,479 S3: remember her. He is convinced that she is an imposter 1855 01:23:58,479 --> 01:24:02,020 S3: in the body of his partner. And it's just a 1856 01:24:02,020 --> 01:24:06,370 S3: fascinating story, but really. Well told and like, kind of heartbreaking, 1857 01:24:06,370 --> 01:24:09,850 S3: but humorous as well. Um, it's been a very buzzy book. Um, 1858 01:24:09,850 --> 01:24:12,070 S3: so I think, well, well worth the read. 1859 01:24:12,310 --> 01:24:15,400 S1: We low key. We're giving the best book recommendations on 1860 01:24:15,400 --> 01:24:18,340 S1: this show every week. Thanks to you, Mel. Like booktok. 1861 01:24:18,370 --> 01:24:20,889 S1: Eat your heart out. This podcast should be going ballistic 1862 01:24:20,890 --> 01:24:23,470 S1: amongst book lovers. These these recs are great. Like I'm 1863 01:24:23,470 --> 01:24:24,610 S1: not going to get around to reading it, but it's 1864 01:24:24,610 --> 01:24:25,150 S1: good for people. 1865 01:24:25,450 --> 01:24:25,960 S5: Yeah, yeah, you. 1866 01:24:25,960 --> 01:24:27,519 S3: Might need to sit in your guilt for a bit. 1867 01:24:29,320 --> 01:24:33,010 S1: Um, mine is a mine's a memoir, uh, Mel. Adapted 1868 01:24:33,010 --> 01:24:35,200 S1: into a TV show. So, you know, it's important to clarify. 1869 01:24:35,200 --> 01:24:36,280 S2: Yeah. Best of both worlds. 1870 01:24:37,660 --> 01:24:39,790 S1: Um, so this, uh, show first came out a couple 1871 01:24:39,790 --> 01:24:44,559 S1: of years ago. It's Tokyo Vice, uh, to brilliant, brilliant memoir, uh, 1872 01:24:44,560 --> 01:24:49,330 S1: by a American journalist called Jake Adelstein, uh, who moved 1873 01:24:49,330 --> 01:24:51,880 S1: to Japan when he was quite young and became the 1874 01:24:51,880 --> 01:24:55,389 S1: first Westerner to work at this big Tokyo newspaper and 1875 01:24:55,390 --> 01:24:58,780 S1: was a crime reporter embedded with the cops and investigated 1876 01:24:58,780 --> 01:25:02,620 S1: the Yakuza. Uh, he's played by Ansel Elgort. This show 1877 01:25:02,620 --> 01:25:07,330 S1: also stars Ken Watanabe. He's amazing. Japanese actor. The second season, uh, 1878 01:25:07,330 --> 01:25:11,019 S1: has just been released. I didn't watch the first season 1879 01:25:11,020 --> 01:25:13,030 S1: when it came out, and I'm kind of rewatching it 1880 01:25:13,030 --> 01:25:15,700 S1: to catch up. It's really good. Like Michael Mann was 1881 01:25:15,700 --> 01:25:17,950 S1: originally attached to this. I think he did direct the 1882 01:25:17,950 --> 01:25:21,280 S1: first episode, but then wandered off the project and it 1883 01:25:21,280 --> 01:25:25,479 S1: is shot beautifully. It looks great. Japan is an amazing 1884 01:25:25,479 --> 01:25:30,070 S1: location to to set a sort of gritty police journalist 1885 01:25:30,070 --> 01:25:33,009 S1: noir sort of story. I would strongly recommend this one. 1886 01:25:33,400 --> 01:25:34,900 S3: Yeah, I love that I watched the first season. I 1887 01:25:34,900 --> 01:25:37,420 S3: thought it was fantastic. The book is really good. The book. 1888 01:25:37,420 --> 01:25:40,300 S5: Is. I've read that book and I loved it. 1889 01:25:40,300 --> 01:25:42,490 S3: After you're done in Canberra, straight to the, uh, the 1890 01:25:42,490 --> 01:25:45,550 S3: foreign crime beat, correct? Um, but yes, I'm very much 1891 01:25:45,550 --> 01:25:47,410 S3: looking forward to the second season of that. 1892 01:25:47,770 --> 01:25:51,670 S1: Awesome. Well, we we really covered a lot on this episode. 1893 01:25:51,670 --> 01:25:55,150 S1: And thank you so much for indulging me. My Oscars, uh, 1894 01:25:55,150 --> 01:25:59,410 S1: electoral nerdery hopefully people found it interesting and the pubs 1895 01:25:59,410 --> 01:26:01,180 S1: and the clubs will be a chatter with people saying, 1896 01:26:01,180 --> 01:26:04,060 S1: did you know, did you know how the Oscars. It's 1897 01:26:04,060 --> 01:26:06,130 S1: the same way we vote for the Senate. Isn't that crazy? 1898 01:26:06,160 --> 01:26:09,729 S1: That's my contribution to discourse this this week in Australia. 1899 01:26:09,729 --> 01:26:10,510 S5: I'm just happy to get. 1900 01:26:10,510 --> 01:26:13,719 S2: My mandated one mention per product. 1901 01:26:15,189 --> 01:26:17,860 S1: Thanks, guys. Looking forward to debriefing on Monday night. 1902 01:26:17,979 --> 01:26:18,759 S3: See you Monday. 1903 01:26:20,650 --> 01:26:23,800 S1: This episode of The Drop was produced by Qi Wang. 1904 01:26:23,950 --> 01:26:26,320 S1: If you enjoyed listening to today's episode of The Drop, 1905 01:26:26,320 --> 01:26:29,290 S1: make sure to follow us in your favorite podcast app. 1906 01:26:29,290 --> 01:26:32,230 S1: Leave us a review or better yet, share the episode 1907 01:26:32,229 --> 01:26:35,320 S1: with a friend. I'm Usman Farooqui. See you next week!