WEBVTT - 'A very positive thing if it's being done properly': Shocking new claims that recycling plant is letting batteries burn

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.920
<v S1>Okay. Our next guest lecturer at Deakin University in Hazardous

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.800
<v S1>Materials management, Doctor Trevor Thornton. Good morning.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:07.920
<v S2>Good morning Tom.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.880
<v S1>So the latest uh well maybe it's a boondoggle in

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.920
<v S1>recycling is appears to be batteries. So this company eco

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.520
<v S1>cycle is where the batteries collected at supermarkets go. But

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.960
<v S1>it is alleged not proven alleged that eco cycle is

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.279
<v S1>sending them to landfill and or burning them. Now, obviously,

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.240
<v S1>if that's true, that's not a good way to deal

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.840
<v S1>with used batteries. But does it is it profitable or

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.159
<v S1>can use batteries be economically made into something else?

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.840
<v S2>Yeah, yeah. So batteries, all the components of it. There's

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.640
<v S2>a lot of, you know, valuable metals in them. So

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.240
<v S2>the process is basically to break that down. And then

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.920
<v S2>all those valuable materials are metals rather can be recovered

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.280
<v S2>and used for whatever purposes. So they're suitable for. So

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.120
<v S2>in terms of battery recycling it is a very positive

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.000
<v S2>thing if it's being done properly.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.120
<v S1>But why would Eco Cycle not be doing it properly?

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.670
<v S1>Is it because maybe they can't make money out of it,

0:01:03.670 --> 0:01:05.750
<v S1>or there isn't the demand for the metals? Or is

0:01:05.750 --> 0:01:08.630
<v S1>it like another sort of plastic bag in warehouse scenario?

0:01:09.470 --> 0:01:12.069
<v S2>It's a bit of all of the above. As such,

0:01:12.510 --> 0:01:15.069
<v S2>the bottom line at the end of the day is,

0:01:15.110 --> 0:01:19.350
<v S2>is is it economically viable to recycle or any material,

0:01:19.350 --> 0:01:22.070
<v S2>not just batteries, but anything as such. And part of

0:01:22.069 --> 0:01:25.509
<v S2>the problem was we in Australia and businesses are not

0:01:25.510 --> 0:01:29.350
<v S2>using these recycled materials as their raw materials. So the

0:01:29.350 --> 0:01:33.510
<v S2>cost of, um, of, I guess, processing and making it

0:01:33.510 --> 0:01:36.710
<v S2>into a suitable thing is not being met by people

0:01:36.750 --> 0:01:37.470
<v S2>buying it.

0:01:37.550 --> 0:01:40.190
<v S1>See, see, the problem is I can go and get

0:01:40.230 --> 0:01:42.550
<v S1>one of the cheaper brands of, say, triple A batteries,

0:01:42.590 --> 0:01:44.750
<v S1>you know, $10 will buy you a packet of 20

0:01:44.790 --> 0:01:48.350
<v S1>or something. So let's say they're $0.50 each. Now, something

0:01:48.350 --> 0:01:51.630
<v S1>that you can buy brand new, full of power for $0.50.

0:01:51.990 --> 0:01:56.270
<v S1>I'm struggling to understand can can that thing there be

0:01:56.310 --> 0:02:00.110
<v S1>be be transported from the supermarket to the recycler. The

0:02:00.110 --> 0:02:04.070
<v S1>recycler pulls it apart, you know, assembles the various metals

0:02:04.070 --> 0:02:08.940
<v S1>and things and somehow make close to $0.50 worth of value.

0:02:09.940 --> 0:02:12.540
<v S2>What we've got to look at is what is the alternative?

0:02:12.540 --> 0:02:16.019
<v S2>So if, for example, you don't recycle your batteries, I'll

0:02:16.020 --> 0:02:18.260
<v S2>end up going into, you know, your red bin at

0:02:18.260 --> 0:02:21.540
<v S2>home or wherever. And as we know, there's causing a

0:02:21.540 --> 0:02:25.420
<v S2>lot of fires, a lot of contamination in landfills, etc.

0:02:25.980 --> 0:02:29.220
<v S2>what we've got to accept is if we're using materials,

0:02:29.220 --> 0:02:32.380
<v S2>we've also got to be able to recognise we have

0:02:32.380 --> 0:02:36.140
<v S2>to pay for the recycling, etc. the environmental, I guess,

0:02:36.180 --> 0:02:37.700
<v S2>management of those materials.

0:02:37.740 --> 0:02:40.419
<v S1>Mhm. See, the problem is, without looking at where they're made,

0:02:40.419 --> 0:02:42.060
<v S1>my guess is that a lot of the batteries are

0:02:42.060 --> 0:02:43.860
<v S1>just made in China, and it's very cheap, and they

0:02:43.860 --> 0:02:46.700
<v S1>don't worry too much about that. They export them to Australia.

0:02:46.700 --> 0:02:48.700
<v S1>We buy them, we use them. And then it's like, oh,

0:02:48.740 --> 0:02:49.740
<v S1>what do we do now?

0:02:50.340 --> 0:02:54.540
<v S2>Yeah, exactly. So, you know, we have things like product

0:02:54.540 --> 0:02:59.060
<v S2>stewardship schemes, extended producer responsibility schemes, etc. so it's like

0:02:59.060 --> 0:03:02.820
<v S2>with TVs, you know, the, the industry has to have

0:03:02.820 --> 0:03:05.660
<v S2>a recycling scheme in place, which might put a few

0:03:05.660 --> 0:03:09.250
<v S2>dollars onto the, the cost of purchasing the the TV

0:03:09.250 --> 0:03:13.730
<v S2>or whatever the material is. That way, if you've already

0:03:13.730 --> 0:03:15.610
<v S2>paid for the recycling of it, right.

0:03:15.650 --> 0:03:19.650
<v S1>So what you're saying is somehow with the sale of batteries,

0:03:19.650 --> 0:03:23.090
<v S1>we have to add an amount that would might go

0:03:23.130 --> 0:03:26.370
<v S1>as almost like a subsidy towards this company or other companies,

0:03:26.370 --> 0:03:30.730
<v S1>and that allows them to recycle them in an efficient

0:03:30.730 --> 0:03:32.690
<v S1>and profitable manner.

0:03:33.169 --> 0:03:36.690
<v S2>Yes. And that added cost is already there through, uh,

0:03:37.450 --> 0:03:41.690
<v S2>the extended producer scheme that applies to batteries, etc.. So

0:03:41.850 --> 0:03:44.650
<v S2>what it is, is again, it gets back to, uh,

0:03:44.770 --> 0:03:47.290
<v S2>part of the whole process is, is the fact that

0:03:47.330 --> 0:03:50.130
<v S2>if I'm recycling batteries, I want to sell that material.

0:03:50.330 --> 0:03:52.850
<v S2>AM I going to recover enough to, uh, you know,

0:03:52.890 --> 0:03:55.010
<v S2>cover the cost of processing and a little bit of

0:03:55.010 --> 0:03:55.970
<v S2>profit as well?

0:03:56.050 --> 0:03:57.170
<v S1>Um, and.

0:03:57.210 --> 0:03:58.170
<v S2>That's not happening.

0:03:58.210 --> 0:04:00.530
<v S1>Yeah. Well, that's the. Okay. And just quickly, where are

0:04:00.530 --> 0:04:02.690
<v S1>we at with plastic bags now? Like I remember, you know,

0:04:02.730 --> 0:04:05.210
<v S1>trying to do the right thing, you know, taking my

0:04:05.210 --> 0:04:07.730
<v S1>surplus plastic bags down to the supermarket thinking, oh, this

0:04:07.730 --> 0:04:09.960
<v S1>is good. And then we found that it wasn't good.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.280
<v S1>Has that been fixed up in Australia now? Like, are

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.920
<v S1>we are we able to do something with all these

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:15.840
<v S1>plastic bags?

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.120
<v S2>Yes. Just just recently, uh, you know, that falls in

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.120
<v S2>the category of soft plastics. So just recently has announced that,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.960
<v S2>you know, soft plastics is coming back into, uh, recycling.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.479
<v S2>So hopefully we'll be able to do that. But again,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.480
<v S2>it goes back to we've got to have businesses buying that, uh,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.599
<v S2>processed material. Otherwise we'll end up as we were before,

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.160
<v S2>just getting dumped and stockpiled and causing all those problems.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.320
<v S1>All right. Thank you, Doctor Trevor. Trevor Thornton there, lecturer

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:48.279
<v S1>at Deakin University. So if for recycling to work we

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.200
<v S1>actually have to pay a sort of like a fee

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.400
<v S1>when we buy something new. And I might add, there's

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.960
<v S1>a whole unknown industry that's coming at us all problem

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:01.400
<v S1>solar panels that have run out of their useful lives batteries,

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.600
<v S1>home batteries, car batteries, not just, you know, triple A batteries, uh,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.920
<v S1>scooter batteries, they don't last forever. You know, do we

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.560
<v S1>have the ability to recycle them properly before they burst

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:12.479
<v S1>into flames?