WEBVTT - Words with Kel Richards – 12th June

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Soundly and now on Night's Words with Cal Richards. Yes

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>here he is the great man Kel Richards. Of course,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>lyrics and words is what you're about. And of course

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about this is I think he

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>said it was his favorite song, Yes he did.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>There was an interview clip I saw as part of

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>one of the obituaries, and the interviewer said, what's your

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>favorite beach boy song? And he said, California Girls.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we have a winner yet. Trish, Hello,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Trish Hello, what was it?

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 3>It's the way they.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Kids, It's the way they kiss, they keep their boyfriends

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>warm at night. Trish. You hang on there because you

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have got yourself the fantastic price my friends at Miselle

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent, he owned, often more affordable than foreign substitutes.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Whatever's on the menu at your place. Remember flavor starts

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with Miselle quality. You can taste get the John Stanley

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>mister McGoo mug as well. And I think we might

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>just just a little bit of this though, because it's

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a beautifully cray song.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes please.

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike Love sings the first part and then Brian comes

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>in with the chorus.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Here it is well these girls are here by really

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 4>those Stars be Aware and the Sun Girls with the

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 4>We they knocked me out when I'm where spotters filling

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 4>make you feel off, and the nother Girls.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>With the Way is thinking the same. What a good song,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Just a magnificent song.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>It is a great song. I mean, I speak for

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the baby boomers, but that was when songs were really

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>fabulous in the sixties. We had people like Brian Wilson working,

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and we had Paul Simon, and we had Lennon and McCartney.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:06.639
<v Speaker 2>It was a great era for those songs.

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I think he's up there with mates, so

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to last anyway. That's just my view.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>One three one eight seven three is the number words

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and language Now. Kell's website is oswordsoz words dot com

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>dot au. You can go to that website. It's got

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>fantastic links to Kell's books, all of the wonderful publications

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he often references here. Plus you can subscribe to his

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>daily newsletter as well. And if you've got a question

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for Kell, you can do it on the line one

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>three one eight seven three and talk with him directly,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>or you can get on the text line zero for

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>six zero eight seven three eight seven three so one

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>mystery unregistered entry from the Eastern Suburbs is one one

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar powerball jackpot tonight in the Eastern Suburbs

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of Sydney.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay, So.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Look, you're not you don't buy lottery tickets to you.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I know I can tell no, no, no no. If

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I had, that would have been the one I've made.

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm saying, so if you if you you're

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going to a newsagent whatever, and you can buy a

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>ticket and it's not registered, you put it in your wallet,

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>and if you're not registered as a player or doing

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.399
<v Speaker 1>it online, that ticket is sitting somewhere and it's worth

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollars.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>So you've got to be very very careful of that

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 2>physical thing.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's always intrigued me that if because I used

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy the tickets just like that and put them

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in the wallet and check them later on. And I've

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>always wondered if you had a win like that, you'd

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>probably carefully put it in tissue paper, put it inside

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a book and then carefully go to the car, drive

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it about thirty k's an hour to wherever you've got

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to take.

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>It, wouldn't you, Well, you'd certainly make sure you didn't

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>put it in the jacket going to the dry cleaners.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Well exactly now seven three. I've got any questions for

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>kel at all. But your word of the week, it's

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>often more than one word, and it is this week.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, fifth column. So if you've got a group of people,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe a secret group of people inside an organization, so

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>while you're attacking it from the outside, there white adding

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it away, it's called having a fifth column. It's quite

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>a common expression these days. And I wondered why five

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, why fifth column? I discovered it comes from

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 2>the Spanish Civil War. One of General Franco's generals, General

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Emil Mohler, had Madrid surrounded by four columns of infantry

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen thirty six, and he boasted he had a

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 2>fifth column of citizens inside the city who would rise

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 2>up and support him when he attacks, hence the expression

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>fifth column. So I was puzzled.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Now I found out, you've found out. Now we had

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting one last week, which we put into

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the mixers. Often comes through with potentially one of those

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>made up expressions in a specific family. You've looked into

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this one, have you yes?

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>For crying down the sink. Someone said her mother used

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.679
<v Speaker 2>to say for crying down the sink, and I hadn't

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 2>heard it before, so I've had to do some digging.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 2>It turns out it is yet another of those softened blasphemies.

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 2>You know how often we come across these things. The

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>first half of the twentieth century was very sensitive to

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 2>this sort of thing. This comes from early in the

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century. Now, I'll tell you what the blasphemy is,

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 2>which I think is quite offensive. So I'm saying it

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 2>just to.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Explain to you.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm going to say the words even though they're offensive.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>The words are for Christ's sake, and to soften that,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 2>they made it for crying down the sink. Really, Okay,

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>that's where it came from.

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because a lot of people say for Christ's sake,

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of people do find the defensive. So

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's for crying down the sink is a variation of.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>It's wanting to say that without saying.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>It right, because we can actually go through a few

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of those, and part of it, though, it does mean

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you've then got a reference what they actually are. Yes, yes, right,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So with any of those, you've got to try and

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>work out whether there's some terrible blasphony that matches it,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's the clue. Yep.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 2>And as you and I have discussed quite often on

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>this program, there was a period where people were really

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 2>sensitive to that, and so it happened a lot, quite

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of familiar expressions started that way, and then

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>we forgot that's where they came from. They simply became

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 2>familiar daily idioms.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating, all right, So for crying down the sink, wonderful, right,

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>very good, And I hope our listener who brought that

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>up last week, we did say we'd look into it. Yes,

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that is terrific.

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So if you're listening, we promised. We've kept our promise.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Now in terms of your mouth gob, you're talking about

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>someone sent it here, you know, I yeah, shut your gob.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Your mouth is a gob.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>My memory is this is quite old. This goes back

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 2>a long way. I'm not sure exactly how many years.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it goes back to like thirteen fourteen hundred's

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a long way of fifteen hundred something like that. It

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>originally accord into the Oxford database. It goes back to

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Scottish Gaelic and in Irish. It started off meaning either

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the mouth or the beak of a bird.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And it's simply the Gaelic word for mouth. So it

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>turned up in Irish Gaelic and Scottish Gaelic, and particularly

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>from Scottish Gaelic, it came south of the border and

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>became part of the English language.

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now I'm going to ask you. You said thirteen

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fourteen hundred. Yes, So you go back and

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have a look at the original books where this stuff's written,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>where it originally comes from. You see where it comes from. Yes,

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Now do those books give you an idea of how

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they are pronounced to what the Because this is why

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I've always been curious about about what accents would have

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>been used, what those people would have sounded like when

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they were using the language.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a very good question. Before the days of sound recording,

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 2>so that's before the eighteen nineties, we can't say for

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>certain what people sounded like, but there are a number

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>of clues that just written language will give us. For example,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>if you look at poetry, if one thing rhymes with another,

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 2>then it's clear that that gives you a guide to

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>how the pronunciation was. And people sometimes would write about

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>or report on the way people sounded. When there were

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>some English people who came out to Australia in the

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>first half around the middle of the eighteen hundreds, and

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>they commented on what they heard as the Australian accent.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 2>The interesting thing is what they said was it's the

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 2>purest form of English on earth, and the reason was

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 2>it had no elements of English regional dialect in it.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 2>They had all been flattened out because people had come

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 2>from every part of England, all the dialects had come

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.479
<v Speaker 2>here and to be understood to each other. People consciously

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>very early in the piece started flattening them, and with

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>their children that process went on further, so the dialects

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>got flattened out. And in fact, my own guess is

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 2>probably if you talked to an Australian in the eighteen

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>forties eighteen fifties, they would have sounded very much the

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 2>way you and I sound now.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So I always had this intrigue, and I talk about

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>if we get a Dolori back to the future and

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>go back somewhere, and you could go back and go

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>back to night in eighty until John Lennon to Duck

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and we'd still had him. Stuff like that but I'd

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>love I reckon the joy of going all the way

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>back and listening to what people were talking about in

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>those years. You'll rise at light up. You'd love it.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we've only got these clues, as I say, but

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 2>when you're going back to certain periods, there are a

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of clues. So there's a Welsh born linguist, a

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Manday David Crystal. Professor David Crystal is a very very

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>clever man. And in Shakespeare's day, if you'd listen to

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>them speaking English, it would have sounded a bit german

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 2>So the prop and he actually taught the Shakespearean company

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that plays in the Globe Theater in London how to

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 2>do one of Shakespeare's plays in his pronunciation, and they

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>did a whole play. Now, I am told by the

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 2>reviewers he went to see it. I wasn't there. I

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 2>didn't say it. I have been there to see plays,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>but not that one that when you started hearing it

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>it sounded really odd. But after you've been listening for

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>about ten minutes it started to make sense to you.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>But it did sound more Germanic than modern English does.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Very interesting really.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 2>So they can work out a lot about the sounds

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>from the past.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>People online will get to your calls, texts, emails with

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>kel Richards. It's our word clinic here at twenty three

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>minutes past ten. It has been a busy night and

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we are keeping across all the breaking news happening around

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the world. We have been talking camping and off roading.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Our sponsor ozof Road. One thing that we did learn

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>about then there are one hundred percent Australian built, tested

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and tough and ready to explore Australia. But what we

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>did learn is they make him in Melbourne, which I

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>think in any time anything's being made here, we just

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>need to say that's fantastic and encourage it. They've got

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole range for ultimate off grid touring and comfort.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You can design your own. They've got multiple layout designs

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>and lots of colors as well. And then OZ off

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Road has a four wheel drive fitting center sets your

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>vehicle up for towing with Tabar's electric breaks Anderson plugs,

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>airbags sorted by a team of qualified fitters. So if

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you want the four wheel drive set up for tough

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tracks or touring, they can do that. Bull bar suspension,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>driving lights, winches, recovery year rooftop tens which are great

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>awnings electoral UHF radios as well one stop adventure shop.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's called oz oz oz off Road Caravan's camping Store,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>four wheel drive accessory fitting os off Road Penrith in

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Western Sydney. They are at Port mcquarie on the New

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>South past Mid North Coast and now at Kippering in Queensland.

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So you've got one near you. Most of you call

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>one three hundred and seven six zero one three run

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>all that website oz ozoff road dot com dot au. Look,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the news coming through from this dreadful plane crash in

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>India are Madabad. This is a big city in India

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and this Air India plane it's a seven eight to

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seven Dreamliner, so it's a very it's a big plane.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>It's used right around the world and it was heading

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to Gatwick in the UK. Now they are saying that

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>all the people on board have died. Now, just after

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>this happened, we described what we saw on the people

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have taken images. The plane was up in the air

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for about eight minutes. It took off, didn't get very

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>high and you could see it was struggling to get

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>any height. And as you look at it. You can

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>only imagine the pilots struggling to try and get the

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>nose up. It kept going down and down. They didn't

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>show the No one shown the images of the actual crash,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but you then see this massive plume of smoke, and

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion I think when you pull that together, would

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be it would be very, very difficult for anyone to

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have survived that. They're also talking though, of what they're

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>describing of some sort of either medical hostel or college

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>where there were medical staff, doctors that may have been

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>living there. Whether they were in there, they're trying to

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>work it out. It's a disaster, but they are saying

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at this stage that they haven't found any survivors, whether

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they're got people on the ground they're trying to There

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>are people who are missing from that area where the

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>doctors were as well. It's a dreadful, dreadful tragedy. And

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there are one hundred and sixty nine Indian citizens. Is

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about more than fifty British citizens that was going

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to Gatwick airports and people from Portugal Canada. So we'll

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>let you know what's happening there. But that's the latest.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>They are now saying no survivors.

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty sad, it's pretty awful, and no surprise, I.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Think seven three is our number. Let's just get to

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of callers here. We're talking words and language

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>with Kel Richards. Robin's with us. Hello, Robin, Yes.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I can John and Kel. I don't know if you've

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 3>seen this man on TV. He polls a sign up

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>with Jesus and is the Way the Truth and alife

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 3>and down the opera house and the police come along

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 3>and everything, and they're laying down the law to him

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 3>that he's done allowed to do it. And he said,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 3>now I'm going to stand on my dig.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so he's not going to move. I'm standing here,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to move me. And and the term

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>he years was I'm going to stand on my dig?

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right? And they couldn't understand that they could

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 3>stand on what?

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I mean, I you know what I think. I

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 2>think he was using his own abbreviation of stand on

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>my dignity. That's my guess.

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I understand what that means. If you said that to.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Me, I'm going to stand on my dig In Australia,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 2>dig I don't think it actually applies to a piece

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of land. Maybe you did in the gold Fields during

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the gold Rushes. But my best guess is I think

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>he was actually saying I've seen the clip you're talking about,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I know what you're talking about, and I'm pretty sure

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>he's saying, I'm going to stand on my dignity. That's

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 2>what he means, and that's his own abbreviation of that.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll say that you knew exactly what he

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was saying that. Yeah, thank you, Robin. That's an interesting one.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a good one.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Make a note of that, Kelch You never know, they

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>could be good. Follow up with those ones now, George.

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Hello, George Today, John gaikl tragic news there in India,

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 6>very sad. But he's a topical one, John. I know

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 6>you keep on top of all the international sporting news,

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 6>and you know that Australian manager Ange Costa Coogo has

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 6>been sacked by Tottenham Hotspar in the UK and the

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 6>UK press have so the two years that Andrew's been

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 6>in charge of Tottenham, they've been having a field day

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 6>with the way he expresses himself and Ange uses the

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 6>word mate more than your average Australian does these days,

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 6>and they've been focusing on that endlessly, the fact that

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 6>he uses the word mate mate all the time, and

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 6>I don't know both of you have dealt with this

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 6>over the years. It's a pretty obvious one. But I

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 6>was wondering whether the word mate in the Australian vernacular

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 6>has come from the naval term, you know, the naval

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 6>ranking of first mate, second mate, boss mate. Is that

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 6>where it comes from.

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think. So it goes back to the

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 2>old idea that mate means a friend, a companion, which

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 2>is which is older than the navy that's recorded from

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 2>thirteen eighty, So back in thirteen eight eighty, mate was

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>being used to mean a companion and a friend. So

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>it's that's the oldest version of meaning of the word,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's had that meaning in the English language for

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 2>a long time for a range of historical reasons. That word,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 2>which is definitely English, I mean, it's very old English,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and we didn't invent it, was used here a lot,

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>and certainly by the end of the eighteen hundreds it

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>was being used by Henry Henry Lawson and we've we've

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>appropriated it. And part of the reason for that is

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 2>because this was seen as being a hostile environment. So

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you didn't go anywhere on your own because it was dangerous.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 2>You didn't do a job on your own because it

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 2>was dangerous. You needed a mate, right that. And diggers

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 2>on the goldfields needed a mate. So in the bush

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 2>on the gold fields you needed a mate, You needed

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a friend, a companion. That was the word we adopted,

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's become our word, and we had we we

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 2>we've found lots of ways to use it. For example,

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>John and I keep saying, when you forget someone's name,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 2>it's really easy to say mate, mate, it's so good

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 2>to see you again.

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Georgie, you think we think it's it's We kind

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of think it's an Australian word, don't we.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 6>We do, But but the British actually use it a lot.

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Mate.

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 6>They don't actually emphasize it like we do. We go

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 6>may we stretch it out?

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, there's there was a period probably in the

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties when Labor Party factionalism and the right

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>wing of the Labor Party. Remember there's a book called

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Mates Yes, and that was you'd say may. It was

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like a that was almost like they send themselves up.

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>So there are two things. One is the pronunciation, and yes,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 2>our pronunciation is just The other thing is frequency what

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot. What linguists do when they're doing research, they

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>research the frequency of the word, how often in ten

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 2>thousand words this one turns up and or one hundred

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 2>thousand words or whatever. I would think the frequency in

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Australia would be much higher. So if the frequency in

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Britain would say three hundred per per one hundred thousand

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>words in Australia would be double that, I would think

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>that would be. I haven't seen the frequency studies. It's

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 2>just me guessing based on what I know about the

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 2>way the English speak and the way we speak.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting, all right, thank you, George. Very good. That

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>one kritz is softened blasphemy.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 2>John says it is, and yes, if you'll go back.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>In time, he tell last year Ferdinand not to drive

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to the hospital in Sarajevo in nineteen fourteen. Then Gothic

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>comes from German that.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yes, yeah, yeah. The word Gothic refers originally to

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the Goths, and the Goths were a savage people who

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>raided from the north, so that in fact, the Goths

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 2>were Germanic people, and Gothic has been applied to lots

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 2>of things. Why the word has spread so widely, I'm

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 2>not sure. But you know there's a style of architecture

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>which is Gothic.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now one of our people here and I think

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not being smart. There's a few people try to

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>be smart on the text line not sorry to hear

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about you. Drag us tonight always wanted to wine. Rugby

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and rugby league they call a try a try.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>It started out because by getting the ball over the

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>line that allowed you to kick for goal. It didn't

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 2>actually in the very early days of rugby played at

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 2>the school rugby before it became a big game, the

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 2>rule was you got the ball over the line that

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 2>gave you the right to kick for goal. So what

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 2>you were trying, what you were doing is you were

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>you were going to try to kick for goal. You've

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 2>won a try. You've won the right to kick for goal.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>You've won a try try. That's right.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So you've won a try, which is the right to

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 2>try and kick a goal.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And the irony of all that, if we talk about

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>different codes, is that if a try, you've got to

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>get the ball on the ground, yes, over the line,

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's right. In American football, You've just got to break

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that line above the line. So if you break that line.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So they don't have to touch the ground.

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's called a touchdown.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, it's incredible.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, now let me go here we go? Oh, Cole says,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what's happened to the word? Who? Even supposedly educated people

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>on the media now use that. So I think he's saying,

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of the context here.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 2>If you talk about all the people that were at

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the event as an incorrect and look, you're absolutely right.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 2>That applies to things. Who applies to people? It's a

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 2>very simple rule. But you have to remember that for

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>forty years, our education system failed to teach grammar to stick.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm told they've gone back to teaching, and I certainly

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>hope that's the case, but for forty years they did not.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 2>So there's a whole generation who were failed by the

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 2>education system. Someone deserves to be punished for this. It's

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 2>a really terrible thing they did. So when you're hearing

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>people use that when referring to people rather than things,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 2>what you are hearing is ignorance, sheer ignorance.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, he's busting a puffoo valve here is I Well,

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I love thee. Is that the puff foo valve? Is

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that the old expression.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Puffl valve yes, a pooful valve yes.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Expression that one like that one. Well, let's take a break,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>come back in the moment, because look, you're going to

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>be away for a couple of weeks. Kel you're getting,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you're getting.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy to tell people, Yes, I'm having a total

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 2>knee replacement. So my right knee is not going to

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 2>be a knee anymore. It's going to be a little machine.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 2>And you've prepared, You've been preparing for weeks.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>You've told me. There's getting yourself ready, preparing, getting yourself

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing exercises, getting the muscles around it ready.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Going to physiotherapy and doing a lot of work because

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 2>you've got to and the muscles around where the surgery is.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 2>And they'll take out my decrepit ney that doesn't work

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 2>properly anymore and causes a lot of pain, and they

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>will put in something made of titanium. So when I

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>come back next, I will be titanium.

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Man, titanium man, and I expect.

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>My own Marvel comic.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Before the way. If you, of course, in some cases

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you might be this. You might literally be the six

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>million dollar man depend because these things do cost oh yeah,

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, that's something ahead of us. And that's why

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you won't be here for the next couple of weeks,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>because you'll be recovering from your surgery. Indeed, so if

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got a question for Kel, you've got about twenty

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>two minutes left and you'll or you'll have to wad

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>another three weeks. Yes, seven three is the number now,

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty two minutes to eleven, sixteen to eleven. We're talking

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>words in language here with mister Kel Richards. Don't forget

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>his website oswords dot com dot au. Some of the

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>questions that have come in these are emails. And I

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>remember we used to have Nevill Ran would say, let

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>me just say this Barrier. Farrell would often say, look,

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the reality is so they'd say something yes, yeah, while

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.959
<v Speaker 1>they were getting themselves together in terms of their thoughts.

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is one that never sent in. I would say,

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>while they get what they're going to say, and he says,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Penny Wong.

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Says a lot, and I understand his irritation. It is,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>as you said, a padding phrase, so that they're just

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>throwing out words while their brain works on what's coming next.

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.239
<v Speaker 2>And his real irritation is, why would you say I

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 2>would say, just say it, don't say I would say

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>this is a good idea. Just say this is a

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 2>good idea. That's why it's irritating himself. All the padded

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>padding phrases around. He's right, it is one of the

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 2>most irritating. And if you ever come across a politician

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>who doesn't use padding phrases, I think it makes them

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 2>very effective. Then I was thinking about the speech of

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>just into namper Juper Price. One of the things that

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 2>makes her so effective is what they call a retail

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>politician is she doesn't use a lot of those padding phrases. Interesting,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 2>she just gets into it.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Because I thought about see I think or mister rand

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, he got, well, let me just say this,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And Barry Farrell used to say, look, the

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>reality is at the end of the day, and that

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gives you about three seconds to formulate what you are

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>going to say, because.

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 2>Some politicians will even say things like, look, that's a

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 2>good question, and that is a padding phrase. And Joe

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Bio Competition used to say, don't you worry about that,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 2>don't you worry about that? And it was basically again

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>padding until he got to where he wanted to talk about.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned earlier about Answpasta Cogla getting the sack. I

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think we have done this before, but the termolology of

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>someone getting the.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Sack goes back to the days when workers tradesmen would

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 2>take their tools to work in a bag in a sack,

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and they would leave them there at the factory or

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the job worksite, whatever, And if the tradesman got the sack,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 2>he picked up his sack of tools and took it. Basically,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the boss walked over and said, there you are, there's

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 2>your tools, off you go. He gave him the sack.

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 2>My grandmother used to say with my grandfather Fred, because

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 2>he was a very argumentative man, and he was a tradesman.

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>He cast in cast iron. He used to make the

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>sand moles for cast iron. He was very good at

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>it apparently, but he lost a lot of jobs because

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 2>he was so argumentative and difficulty. She said, I used

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to dread it when your grandfather walked down the street

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 2>with his tools, because I knew he'd got the sack.

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He got the sack very good one of my friends.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>One of my friends exclude, and this person's raising the

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>term disclude as wanting to talk to someone as opposed

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to exclude. What's his The well, I haven't heard it before.

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>It's new on me. I went to the Oxford Dictionary

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 2>database and disclude is there. It's a very old word,

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 2>comes from a Latin source word, and it means basically

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 2>to separate. So if you're discluding this from that, this

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 2>is discluded from our collection. It means to set apart,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 2>to separate.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Exclude my is putting something me.

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 2>It exclude means to remove and it suggests removing completely

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 2>X out of the place. But if you're keeping things

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 2>but separating them, it is disclude. But it is such

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 2>an unfamiliar word. If you use it, no one we'll

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:38.479
<v Speaker 2>understand what you're saying.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Paul asked about time immemorial, time immemorial.

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Time immemorial is actually interesting. The phrase had to be

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 2>coined at some point, and it turns out time immemorial

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 2>refers to a particular time in English history. It refused

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 2>to it refers we know to very distant time, that

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing that no one has any knowledge or

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 2>memory of. But it came into custom in the English

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>language in the Statute of Westminster of twelve seventy five.

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.479
<v Speaker 2>And in that statute it gives a date anything before

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the sixth of June eleven eighty nine, which was the

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 2>accession of Richard the First. There is no legal memory

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of what common law was before that date.

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, look abdall is on the line of

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the question for you on the on the open lane.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 5>Hello, Abdol, Yeah, Hi, I's got a question regarding you

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 5>a dollar sign. So it's like a for example, he's

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 5>saying ten dollars.

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 2>So that dollar sign is like s of the dollar sign?

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 5>Yep, yeah, the dollar side. So why is not the

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 5>key like a two?

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Time?

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Can I tell you that I did actually look this

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 2>up and research it about twenty five years ago, and

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 2>I haven't written about it for twenty five years, and

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember. So when I come back first night,

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 2>back three weeks from tonight, will I will give you

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the history of the dollar sign.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 1>We'll just let's take a break, because with that line

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>through the is was that one stage we did one?

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>In America?

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Did America? America always started off doing two, but quite often,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>particularly in advertising, reduced it to one. So they have

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 2>either one or two.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>They either one or two, but we've always had the two.

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, come back in a moment. Ten minutes to eleven.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>We're talking words in language with Kel Richards. At seven

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>minutes to eleven, just a few minutes left. Reminded to you,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Kel Richards won't be with us for a couple of weeks.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But Kel, what have you got?

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I had a quick look through what I've got in

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>my computer. There are about eight different theories as to

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 2>where the dollar sign came from. The one that is

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>most preferred by most experts. It started out as a

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Spanish peso, so the S was for Spanish and the

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 2>line through it was originally a P for peso. The

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Americans had a thing called the Coinage Act, and the

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>coiny jack said the value of a Spanish milled dollar

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>will be the value of our currency. So it was

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 2>a Spanish peso which the value of the American currency

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>was set on back in the seventeen hundreds.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Now it's most interesting because I do remember one little

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of trivia I remember from the early nineteen sixties

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>was that the then Prime Minister Robert Menzies he wanted

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to call when we went when we went, decimal changed

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>from the pound. He wanted to call the dollar the royal.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I've always remembered that because it was obviously

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't fly, and they went with dollar. But was it

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be what was the symbol for the royal

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be?

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, they never got around to coming up a crown

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>or something or well, who knows, but they never got

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 2>around to that. And once don'tber calling it an ostral

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a U S t ra l. But everyone pointed out

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.239
<v Speaker 2>that when you put the indefinite article in front of it,

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>it becomes a nostril, which I've got a good name

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 2>for a currency, So they dropped that one. At the time,

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>there was a quite famous an answer working at the

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 2>ABC named Martin Royal, and he was he was presenting

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a program and they mentioned the fact that there was

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 2>this push to call the currency a royal, and he said,

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 2>that's very kind of them. Why couldn't they have called

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 2>it a dibble?

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Dibble, that's right, Martin Royal, James Dibble, very very good. Look.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Someone sent me this meg a packet of.

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Poo tickets, pack a packa pow ticket.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Packa poo tickets talking about when everything's gone to custoards.

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 2>An old expression, a pack of Pooh ticket is used

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to describe anything which is really untidy, like scribbled writing.

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I can remember my teacher standing over my desk and saying,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Richard's that book looks like a packa Pooh ticket. And

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the reason is it comes from a Chinese gambling game.

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 2>And in this Chinese gambling game there were slips of

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>paper with Chinese characters on them, and of course Australians

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>couldn't read the Chinese characters. They just looked like scribble.

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 2>So that's what a packapoo tick could look like. And

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 2>if your place was really untidy and messy and scribbly,

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>then there was like a packupoo ticket, all right? Well,

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and can I just say the original Cantonese name for

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 2>a packapoo ticket means something like white dove choice. And

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 2>they had a trained no white pigeon choice. They had

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a trained white pigeon which would pick a number out

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 2>of a bowl to find the winner.

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that good? All right? So look, we learned something

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>here every night tonight. We learned quite a few things. Oswords,

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that's oz words, dot com, dot a USY website. You

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>can keep in touch with the Kel via his website.

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Next week we'll be doing the CEO sleep out from outdoors.

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You won't be here Kell because you're getting your knee done.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You'll be away for a couple of weeks yep.

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>But I'll still have my laptop on my lap when

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm laid up, so you can still get in touch.

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>With me through the website. We'll see you, then thank you,

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>then bye.