WEBVTT - Why do we keep secrets? 

0:00:00.009 --> 0:00:02.990
<v Carly Godden>This podcast was made on the lands of the Wurundjeri people,

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.359
<v Carly Godden>the Woi-Wurrung and the Bunurong. We'd like to pay respects

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.238
<v Carly Godden>to their elders, past and present, and emerging.

0:00:14.550 --> 0:00:17.870
<v Cassie Hayward>From the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences at the University

0:00:17.870 --> 0:00:20.389
<v Cassie Hayward>of Melbourne, this is PsychTalks.

0:00:21.479 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Cassie Hayward>Hi, and welcome to PsychTalks. I'm Associate Professor Cassie Hayward,

0:00:25.389 --> 0:00:27.959
<v Nick Haslam>and I'm Nick Haslam, a professor and social psychologist here

0:00:27.959 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Nick Haslam>at the University of Melbourne's School of Psychological Sciences. Well,

0:00:31.799 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Nick Haslam>today is our very last episode for this series, and

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:35.430
<v Nick Haslam>we really hope you've enjoyed it.

0:00:35.639 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Cassie Hayward>I know I've learned a lot, especially all the takeaways

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:39.869
<v Cassie Hayward>that I can use at home. And if you've felt

0:00:39.869 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Cassie Hayward>the same, feel free to leave us a review and

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Cassie Hayward>spread the word about this series.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.150
<v Nick Haslam>OK, so today we're exploring secrets, why we keep them,

0:00:47.279 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Nick Haslam>and what are some of the personal and social costs

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.490
<v Nick Haslam>of keeping things tucked away. To tell us all about it,

0:00:52.529 --> 0:00:56.169
<v Nick Haslam>we're joined by Associate Professor Katie Greenaway and Valentina Bianchi.

0:01:00.009 --> 0:01:01.799
<v Nick Haslam>Thank you so much for talking to us today, Katie

0:01:01.799 --> 0:01:05.150
<v Nick Haslam>and Valentina. So before we get into the research you've

0:01:05.150 --> 0:01:08.149
<v Nick Haslam>been doing, can you tell us, if it's not a secret, uh,

0:01:08.269 --> 0:01:10.649
<v Nick Haslam>how and why you decided to do research on secrecy?

0:01:11.029 --> 0:01:13.510
<v Katie Greenaway>Well, I think, who doesn't want to know about other

0:01:13.510 --> 0:01:20.649
<v Katie Greenaway>people's secrets? They're scintillating, fascinating, exciting to hear about. Um,

0:01:20.769 --> 0:01:24.129
<v Katie Greenaway>but secrets also tell us something really fundamental about human

0:01:24.129 --> 0:01:27.730
<v Katie Greenaway>nature because we're very communicative as a species. We like

0:01:27.730 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Katie Greenaway>to talk to other people and share things with other people.

0:01:31.019 --> 0:01:34.199
<v Katie Greenaway>So why would we ever want to hold things back

0:01:34.199 --> 0:01:36.610
<v Katie Greenaway>in conversation? So the things that we keep to ourselves

0:01:36.610 --> 0:01:40.169
<v Katie Greenaway>actually tells us really, uh, quite a bit about what

0:01:40.169 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Katie Greenaway>people are like and what they're trying to achieve.

0:01:42.690 --> 0:01:46.089
<v Valentina Bianchi>Well, for me, I got very inspired when Kate and

0:01:46.089 --> 0:01:48.730
<v Valentina Bianchi>I talked about what I could focus my PhD on.

0:01:49.220 --> 0:01:52.730
<v Valentina Bianchi>And I found this topic particularly appealing because, as Katie

0:01:52.730 --> 0:01:55.370
<v Valentina Bianchi>was saying, it's quite relatable and it's also very relatable

0:01:55.370 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Valentina Bianchi>to my work as a clinical psychologist. It helped me

0:01:58.889 --> 0:02:01.730
<v Valentina Bianchi>have a bit more of a, um, maybe scientific look

0:02:01.730 --> 0:02:06.330
<v Valentina Bianchi>at how the choices that people make about keeping secrets

0:02:06.330 --> 0:02:09.329
<v Valentina Bianchi>or sharing secrets have an impact on their well-being as

0:02:09.330 --> 0:02:11.478
<v Valentina Bianchi>well as perhaps even their psychopathology.

0:02:12.130 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Cassie Hayward>It is such a fascinating area, but is it hard?

0:02:15.288 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Cassie Hayward>To research just in terms of people feeling comfortable talking

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.929
<v Cassie Hayward>to you about secrets. Do you think, do you think

0:02:20.929 --> 0:02:24.610
<v Cassie Hayward>you have a good idea of how many people keep secrets,

0:02:24.690 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Cassie Hayward>or do you think some people keep that a secret?

0:02:27.250 --> 0:02:29.929
<v Katie Greenaway>Yeah, it's absolutely. It's a really important question when you're

0:02:29.929 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Katie Greenaway>studying these things. How do you get people to tell

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.130
<v Katie Greenaway>you about their innermost secrets? Fortunately for us, it turns

0:02:36.130 --> 0:02:39.410
<v Katie Greenaway>out that the vast majority of people are keeping a

0:02:39.410 --> 0:02:44.029
<v Katie Greenaway>secret at any given time. In fact, 97% of people That's, uh,

0:02:44.149 --> 0:02:46.669
<v Katie Greenaway>certainly almost all of us in this room, uh, are

0:02:46.669 --> 0:02:50.389
<v Katie Greenaway>keeping a secret right now. And on average people keep

0:02:50.389 --> 0:02:54.228
<v Katie Greenaway>between 10 and 13 secrets at any given time. So

0:02:54.229 --> 0:02:57.149
<v Katie Greenaway>how we ask about this is not by asking people

0:02:57.149 --> 0:03:01.380
<v Katie Greenaway>to divulge the information in their secrets, but we give them, uh,

0:03:01.389 --> 0:03:06.149
<v Katie Greenaway>the common secrets questionnaire, which is a validated, um, scientific

0:03:06.149 --> 0:03:11.570
<v Katie Greenaway>measure of 38 common things that people keep secret. And

0:03:11.580 --> 0:03:14.690
<v Katie Greenaway>we asked them to indicate which of those categories of

0:03:14.690 --> 0:03:19.059
<v Katie Greenaway>information they're currently keeping secret from one person, uh, multiple

0:03:19.059 --> 0:03:22.339
<v Katie Greenaway>people or even everybody in their lives. So if people

0:03:22.339 --> 0:03:25.940
<v Katie Greenaway>listening are interested in finding out how many secrets they're keeping,

0:03:26.020 --> 0:03:30.300
<v Katie Greenaway>they can go to keepingsecrets.org and take the common secrets

0:03:30.300 --> 0:03:31.570
<v Katie Greenaway>questionnaire themselves.

0:03:31.860 --> 0:03:34.660
<v Cassie Hayward>And from that, do you have an idea of what

0:03:34.660 --> 0:03:37.779
<v Cassie Hayward>types of things people are most likely to keep secret?

0:03:38.130 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Katie Greenaway>Yeah, these 38 common categories, I like to group them

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Katie Greenaway>into maybe 3 broad different groups. The first is secrets

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Katie Greenaway>that involve other people or about other people. These could

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:55.490
<v Katie Greenaway>be the classic infidelity or even having extramarital thoughts. Um,

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.789
<v Katie Greenaway>it could be having lied to someone or potentially even

0:03:58.789 --> 0:04:03.330
<v Katie Greenaway>harming someone, having relationship issues with another person. The second

0:04:03.330 --> 0:04:07.889
<v Katie Greenaway>category is pieces of information about ourselves, things like sexual behaviour,

0:04:08.089 --> 0:04:11.570
<v Katie Greenaway>a personal history that we don't want others to know about, um,

0:04:11.729 --> 0:04:14.770
<v Katie Greenaway>feeling discontented at work or in a physical appearance or

0:04:14.770 --> 0:04:19.488
<v Katie Greenaway>in our social relationships, um, mental health or, um, potentially

0:04:19.488 --> 0:04:23.690
<v Katie Greenaway>sexual orientation, even our own beliefs or, um, who we

0:04:23.690 --> 0:04:26.910
<v Katie Greenaway>intend to vote for. And the third category of secrets,

0:04:26.980 --> 0:04:30.059
<v Katie Greenaway>which is a really interesting one, is positive secrets. So

0:04:30.059 --> 0:04:32.099
<v Katie Greenaway>these are things that we actually maybe feel quite good

0:04:32.100 --> 0:04:35.928
<v Katie Greenaway>about but for various reasons are keeping from other people, um,

0:04:35.940 --> 0:04:40.109
<v Katie Greenaway>at this time, they might be, um, an upcoming, uh, uh,

0:04:40.140 --> 0:04:44.928
<v Katie Greenaway>pregnancy announcement, um, an intention to propose marriage to someone,

0:04:45.260 --> 0:04:46.979
<v Katie Greenaway>a surprise or a piece of good news that we

0:04:46.980 --> 0:04:48.820
<v Katie Greenaway>haven't shared with others. So we keep a lot of

0:04:48.820 --> 0:04:50.899
<v Katie Greenaway>different things secret from others.

0:04:51.940 --> 0:04:54.730
<v Nick Haslam>So we've talked in a different episode of PsychTalks about

0:04:54.730 --> 0:04:58.339
<v Nick Haslam>the mental load, and this seems like a different sort of, uh,

0:04:58.369 --> 0:05:00.940
<v Nick Haslam>mental load. Uh, I, I'm sure it's hard for secret

0:05:00.940 --> 0:05:03.420
<v Nick Haslam>keepers to keep secrets, and I, I don't mean just

0:05:03.420 --> 0:05:05.450
<v Nick Haslam>in terms of the desire to blab to someone else,

0:05:05.738 --> 0:05:08.660
<v Nick Haslam>but does it take some sort of toll on people

0:05:08.660 --> 0:05:09.850
<v Nick Haslam>having to keep it a secret?

0:05:09.980 --> 0:05:12.329
<v Katie Greenaway>It absolutely does. And what I think is interesting about

0:05:12.329 --> 0:05:14.809
<v Katie Greenaway>secrecy is it's not actually the times that we have

0:05:14.809 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Katie Greenaway>to hold information back in conversation that's challenging. It's the

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Katie Greenaway>times when we're alone and we're thinking about that secret

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.390
<v Katie Greenaway>and it returns to our mind that's really the thing

0:05:24.390 --> 0:05:27.070
<v Katie Greenaway>that we find the most challenging. And this makes sense

0:05:27.070 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Katie Greenaway>if you think about it, when we conceal information from

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:34.309
<v Katie Greenaway>other people, those tend to be situations that we plan for,

0:05:34.459 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Katie Greenaway>we prepare for, we imagine what we might say, and

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.428
<v Katie Greenaway>we maybe come up with strategies to help us navigate

0:05:40.428 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Katie Greenaway>that particular conversation.

0:05:42.380 --> 0:05:44.988
<v Katie Greenaway>But we have many, many other times when we're not

0:05:44.988 --> 0:05:47.029
<v Katie Greenaway>talking to other people that our minds are free to

0:05:47.029 --> 0:05:50.029
<v Katie Greenaway>think about pretty much anything. And one thing that our

0:05:50.029 --> 0:05:52.420
<v Katie Greenaway>minds really seem to return to over and over again

0:05:52.420 --> 0:05:55.308
<v Katie Greenaway>is information that we're keeping secret from others. Maybe we're

0:05:55.309 --> 0:05:57.549
<v Katie Greenaway>trying to problem solve that, or we're thinking about what

0:05:57.549 --> 0:06:00.909
<v Katie Greenaway>that means for us, and this kind of mental toll

0:06:00.910 --> 0:06:04.070
<v Katie Greenaway>seems to be what is most burdensome about secrecy.

0:06:04.690 --> 0:06:07.299
<v Nick Haslam>So do we know how often people think about those

0:06:07.299 --> 0:06:08.558
<v Nick Haslam>secrets they've stored away?

0:06:08.700 --> 0:06:11.380
<v Katie Greenaway>Yes, much more than they have to conceal those secrets

0:06:11.380 --> 0:06:14.950
<v Katie Greenaway>in conversation. It's usually around about, um, at least 2

0:06:14.950 --> 0:06:18.738
<v Katie Greenaway>to 1 or even, um, sometimes 1 to 3 that

0:06:18.738 --> 0:06:21.609
<v Katie Greenaway>we would be thinking about our secrets more than needing

0:06:21.609 --> 0:06:25.670
<v Katie Greenaway>to conceal those secrets from other people in everyday life.

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.250
<v Nick Haslam>So do we know how many times people think about

0:06:28.250 --> 0:06:28.890
<v Nick Haslam>their secrets?

0:06:29.089 --> 0:06:31.808
<v Valentina Bianchi>We do, actually. So Katie and I, with, uh, a

0:06:31.809 --> 0:06:35.369
<v Valentina Bianchi>couple of colleagues of ours, um, Elise and Michael have

0:06:35.369 --> 0:06:40.558
<v Valentina Bianchi>recently introduced a new way of exploring secrecy in everyday life.

0:06:40.970 --> 0:06:44.089
<v Valentina Bianchi>So we have found a way of asking people multiple

0:06:44.089 --> 0:06:46.850
<v Valentina Bianchi>times a day for many days. So sometimes even a

0:06:46.850 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Valentina Bianchi>week or two weeks, how often they engage in these processes.

0:06:50.850 --> 0:06:54.420
<v Valentina Bianchi>And what we found was perhaps a bit surprising. People

0:06:54.670 --> 0:06:59.070
<v Valentina Bianchi>think about the secrets approximately 30 times per week, and

0:06:59.070 --> 0:07:02.469
<v Valentina Bianchi>only half the times they are required to, uh, conceal

0:07:02.470 --> 0:07:05.469
<v Valentina Bianchi>their secrets. So what I'm trying to say here is

0:07:05.470 --> 0:07:07.529
<v Valentina Bianchi>that secrets are much more on our mind than they

0:07:07.529 --> 0:07:08.700
<v Valentina Bianchi>are on our lips.

0:07:08.910 --> 0:07:11.269
<v Nick Haslam>And it's not just because people can't repress, it's because

0:07:11.269 --> 0:07:13.825
<v Nick Haslam>they're actively thinking about things related to it and maybe

0:07:13.825 --> 0:07:14.545
<v Nick Haslam>solving problems.

0:07:14.665 --> 0:07:19.054
<v Katie Greenaway>Yeah, and that kind of mental, uh, arithmetic can take

0:07:19.054 --> 0:07:22.214
<v Katie Greenaway>a lot of different forms. Sometimes it can be more

0:07:22.225 --> 0:07:25.665
<v Katie Greenaway>productive than others. Maybe we're problem solving, maybe we're thinking

0:07:25.665 --> 0:07:28.984
<v Katie Greenaway>through different ways that we can reinterpret or think about

0:07:28.984 --> 0:07:32.010
<v Katie Greenaway>this information. In fact, what some of our research shows

0:07:32.010 --> 0:07:34.850
<v Katie Greenaway>is that people actually quite like thinking about their secrets,

0:07:34.929 --> 0:07:37.329
<v Katie Greenaway>which might seem a little bit strange, but this is

0:07:37.329 --> 0:07:40.890
<v Katie Greenaway>really important information to us. We tend to engage with

0:07:40.890 --> 0:07:43.170
<v Katie Greenaway>thoughts of those secrets more than we suppress thoughts of

0:07:43.170 --> 0:07:45.850
<v Katie Greenaway>those secrets. But of course, the more you think about

0:07:45.850 --> 0:07:49.140
<v Katie Greenaway>something without coming to a resolution, the more that that

0:07:49.140 --> 0:07:51.619
<v Katie Greenaway>information may come to mind over time. And if we

0:07:51.619 --> 0:07:53.820
<v Katie Greenaway>start to feel negative about that, if we start to

0:07:53.820 --> 0:07:56.619
<v Katie Greenaway>feel like we can't actually see a way through, that

0:07:56.619 --> 0:07:59.850
<v Katie Greenaway>tends to be when thinking about secrets takes a toll.

0:08:00.119 --> 0:08:03.329
<v Cassie Hayward>And just thinking about this kind of rumination on the secrets,

0:08:03.329 --> 0:08:05.630
<v Cassie Hayward>there's a lot of talk these days about people being

0:08:05.630 --> 0:08:10.260
<v Cassie Hayward>their authentic selves. Does keeping secrets mess around with that,

0:08:10.269 --> 0:08:13.709
<v Cassie Hayward>in that we can't really be authentic if we're storing

0:08:13.709 --> 0:08:15.869
<v Cassie Hayward>away all these things that we can't talk about or

0:08:15.869 --> 0:08:17.828
<v Cassie Hayward>thinking about these things that we can't talk about? Does

0:08:17.829 --> 0:08:19.339
<v Cassie Hayward>that have a toll on people?

0:08:19.630 --> 0:08:23.670
<v Valentina Bianchi>Yeah, absolutely. Actually, that's, uh, only one of the many

0:08:23.670 --> 0:08:27.059
<v Valentina Bianchi>ways in which secrets can be, uh, harmful for us

0:08:27.230 --> 0:08:30.149
<v Valentina Bianchi>and taking a toll, both on a personal level and

0:08:30.149 --> 0:08:32.849
<v Valentina Bianchi>on a relational level. If you think about it, it

0:08:32.895 --> 0:08:35.244
<v Valentina Bianchi>kind of makes sense, right? Because if you are holding

0:08:35.244 --> 0:08:38.635
<v Valentina Bianchi>back some information from others, you know that you're concealing

0:08:38.635 --> 0:08:41.034
<v Valentina Bianchi>a part of you from other people. And in that sense,

0:08:41.085 --> 0:08:43.924
<v Valentina Bianchi>you're not being your true authentic self. So you, of course, you,

0:08:44.044 --> 0:08:48.044
<v Valentina Bianchi>you're gonna end up feeling inauthentic. And with that, we'll

0:08:48.044 --> 0:08:51.765
<v Valentina Bianchi>also go a whole range of other feelings, feeling negative

0:08:51.765 --> 0:08:55.645
<v Valentina Bianchi>about yourself, for example, low or maybe anxious. And on

0:08:55.645 --> 0:08:58.284
<v Valentina Bianchi>top of that, as I was mentioning, there are some

0:08:58.284 --> 0:09:02.084
<v Valentina Bianchi>very important relational costs that come with holding information back.

0:09:02.690 --> 0:09:06.130
<v Valentina Bianchi>You don't get to get the support from others, you

0:09:06.130 --> 0:09:10.919
<v Valentina Bianchi>get to end up feeling quite isolated. So yes, authenticity

0:09:10.919 --> 0:09:14.289
<v Valentina Bianchi>is a cost and there are many other costs associated

0:09:14.289 --> 0:09:15.239
<v Valentina Bianchi>with secrecy.

0:09:15.770 --> 0:09:18.609
<v Cassie Hayward>Are there any other harms of keeping secrets?

0:09:19.159 --> 0:09:22.479
<v Katie Greenaway>Yeah, we've sort of alluded to the fact that many

0:09:22.479 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Katie Greenaway>secrets that we keep, um, involve quite negative information and

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.429
<v Katie Greenaway>that goes hand in hand with a variety of, uh,

0:09:28.479 --> 0:09:32.789
<v Katie Greenaway>negative emotions that we might experience. You might think that, um,

0:09:32.799 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Katie Greenaway>people only ever feel guilt or shame about their secrets,

0:09:35.919 --> 0:09:38.549
<v Katie Greenaway>but what our research shows is that people feel a

0:09:38.695 --> 0:09:43.223
<v Katie Greenaway>wide variety of emotions about their secrets. Not always negative,

0:09:43.604 --> 0:09:47.385
<v Katie Greenaway>sometimes positive, sometimes people might feel relief, for example, that

0:09:47.385 --> 0:09:51.694
<v Katie Greenaway>they didn't have to, um, conceal information from others or, uh,

0:09:51.784 --> 0:09:54.145
<v Katie Greenaway>sometimes they can actually feel quite relaxed about their secrets

0:09:54.145 --> 0:09:56.784
<v Katie Greenaway>when not in a context where they need to divulge

0:09:56.784 --> 0:10:00.460
<v Katie Greenaway>that information from others. But of course, the majority of

0:10:00.460 --> 0:10:04.419
<v Katie Greenaway>emotions that we feel about negatively toned secrets are negative

0:10:04.419 --> 0:10:10.659
<v Katie Greenaway>in nature, things like anxiety, sadness, um, also guilt and shame,

0:10:10.700 --> 0:10:15.940
<v Katie Greenaway>but certainly embarrassment, um, and these kinds of negative emotions

0:10:15.940 --> 0:10:18.820
<v Katie Greenaway>tend to be more commonly experienced in relation to secrecy

0:10:18.820 --> 0:10:20.489
<v Katie Greenaway>than to positive emotions.

0:10:21.340 --> 0:10:23.830
<v Nick Haslam>And are there certain types of secrets that are more

0:10:23.830 --> 0:10:26.539
<v Nick Haslam>harmful than others, um, either in terms of the impact

0:10:26.539 --> 0:10:29.909
<v Nick Haslam>on the person keeping the secret, uh, but also the

0:10:29.909 --> 0:10:31.969
<v Nick Haslam>impact if they were to reveal that secret?

0:10:32.150 --> 0:10:34.270
<v Valentina Bianchi>Yeah, that's a very great question that I think has

0:10:34.270 --> 0:10:38.250
<v Valentina Bianchi>been very well addressed by some, uh, research by, uh,

0:10:38.349 --> 0:10:42.789
<v Valentina Bianchi>Michael Slepian and Alex Koch. Uh, they, um, recently, um,

0:10:42.909 --> 0:10:48.429
<v Valentina Bianchi>published a paper where they use the, uh, data-driven approach

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.479
<v Valentina Bianchi>and they examined hundreds of, uh, actually thousands of, uh,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Valentina Bianchi>real life secrets. And they asked hundreds of people to

0:10:57.460 --> 0:11:01.159
<v Valentina Bianchi>read them along 3 different dimensions. So we now know

0:11:01.159 --> 0:11:04.030
<v Valentina Bianchi>that it's a little bit less about the actual, uh,

0:11:04.039 --> 0:11:08.390
<v Valentina Bianchi>idiosyncratic content of secrets. And it's much more about, uh,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:13.239
<v Valentina Bianchi>this dimension that are then linked to secrets caused and, uh, harm.

0:11:13.510 --> 0:11:17.299
<v Valentina Bianchi>And these dimensions are 3. So one is how immoral

0:11:17.299 --> 0:11:20.059
<v Valentina Bianchi>the secret is. So if you think about that, if

0:11:20.059 --> 0:11:22.849
<v Valentina Bianchi>you consider your secret as highly immoral, you are more

0:11:22.849 --> 0:11:26.690
<v Valentina Bianchi>likely to experience shame about it. The second, uh, dimension

0:11:26.690 --> 0:11:30.395
<v Valentina Bianchi>is how relational the secret is. So if a secret

0:11:30.395 --> 0:11:33.114
<v Valentina Bianchi>is helpful in that you are protecting someone else or

0:11:33.114 --> 0:11:36.194
<v Valentina Bianchi>protecting your relationship, that's good for you, right? But if

0:11:36.195 --> 0:11:38.755
<v Valentina Bianchi>on the other hand, you know that this secret is

0:11:38.755 --> 0:11:41.674
<v Valentina Bianchi>drawing a gap between you and other people, it's going

0:11:41.674 --> 0:11:45.145
<v Valentina Bianchi>to lead you to feel quite disconnected and socially isolated.

0:11:45.594 --> 0:11:48.875
<v Valentina Bianchi>And then the third dimension is how much of a

0:11:48.875 --> 0:11:52.224
<v Valentina Bianchi>clear goal you have about holding these secrets. This is,

0:11:52.234 --> 0:11:55.549
<v Valentina Bianchi>for example, the case of professional secrets. So if you

0:11:55.549 --> 0:11:59.190
<v Valentina Bianchi>have a clear goal and objective, then you might feel

0:11:59.190 --> 0:12:02.549
<v Valentina Bianchi>quite certain about what you're doing there, vice versa, if

0:12:02.549 --> 0:12:05.549
<v Valentina Bianchi>you don't have that, you're gonna feel quite uncertain and

0:12:05.549 --> 0:12:07.869
<v Valentina Bianchi>that will lead to psychological harm.

0:12:08.729 --> 0:12:11.599
<v Cassie Hayward>I think those elements of secrets are really helpful for

0:12:11.599 --> 0:12:15.039
<v Cassie Hayward>people to think about the different types of secrets, because

0:12:15.039 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Cassie Hayward>I think when we think secrets, we automatically think of

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.039
<v Cassie Hayward>bad things that have happened that we're keeping secret, and

0:12:22.039 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Cassie Hayward>people wouldn't, you wouldn't want people to know because of

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Cassie Hayward>the shame or the guilt or the morality that you've mentioned. But, um,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.479
<v Cassie Hayward>not all secrets are bad, and just from my perspective,

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Cassie Hayward>so when my husband and I got married, it was

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.700
<v Cassie Hayward>a secret. We didn't tell anyone. And when we had kids,

0:12:35.900 --> 0:12:38.460
<v Cassie Hayward>like many parents, we don't tell anyone that we're pregnant

0:12:38.460 --> 0:12:42.169
<v Cassie Hayward>for a while, so they were all associated with very happy,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.099
<v Cassie Hayward>joyous things that we were just keeping secret for certain reasons.

0:12:46.140 --> 0:12:49.739
<v Cassie Hayward>But is, is there a different experience of the secret

0:12:49.739 --> 0:12:52.900
<v Cassie Hayward>keeper when it's a positive secret, as opposed to a

0:12:52.900 --> 0:12:54.809
<v Cassie Hayward>negative or a moral or shameful?

0:12:55.690 --> 0:12:58.330
<v Katie Greenaway>There absolutely is, and I think that people can think

0:12:58.330 --> 0:13:01.849
<v Katie Greenaway>about this intuitively in their own lives. Certainly positive information

0:13:01.849 --> 0:13:04.229
<v Katie Greenaway>that we keep secret, maybe that we're holding back to

0:13:04.229 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Katie Greenaway>reveal at the right time or in the right way,

0:13:06.890 --> 0:13:09.919
<v Katie Greenaway>we can actually feel quite good about and excited about it,

0:13:09.929 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Katie Greenaway>can heighten the anticipation before revealing that to others. So

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.130
<v Katie Greenaway>that is what we've found, whereas negatively toned secrets tend

0:13:18.130 --> 0:13:20.449
<v Katie Greenaway>to make us feel bad, um, the more that our

0:13:20.450 --> 0:13:23.210
<v Katie Greenaway>minds return to them and that we ruminate about them

0:13:23.210 --> 0:13:27.289
<v Katie Greenaway>over time. Whereas positive secrets are actually ones that we

0:13:27.340 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Katie Greenaway>seem to feel good about, which is kind of ironic

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.460
<v Katie Greenaway>when you think about research that shows that sharing positive

0:13:33.460 --> 0:13:35.299
<v Katie Greenaway>information with other people is one of the best ways

0:13:35.299 --> 0:13:37.849
<v Katie Greenaway>that we can connect with them. In this case, actually

0:13:37.849 --> 0:13:42.169
<v Katie Greenaway>keeping positive information secret is one shortcut way to feeling

0:13:42.169 --> 0:13:47.169
<v Katie Greenaway>very energised and excited because we're thinking about, um, that

0:13:47.169 --> 0:13:50.159
<v Katie Greenaway>information and keeping it to ourselves, maybe feeling a bit

0:13:50.159 --> 0:13:53.289
<v Katie Greenaway>more ownership over it or control, um, over it. So

0:13:53.289 --> 0:13:56.570
<v Katie Greenaway>that's what we found is the reason that positive secrets

0:13:56.570 --> 0:14:00.289
<v Katie Greenaway>seem to be quite energising is because those are secrets

0:14:00.289 --> 0:14:03.010
<v Katie Greenaway>that people tend to choose for their own reasons, as

0:14:03.010 --> 0:14:07.239
<v Katie Greenaway>opposed to feeling as though they're constrained by the situation

0:14:07.239 --> 0:14:09.718
<v Katie Greenaway>or other kinds of reasons that they need to keep

0:14:09.719 --> 0:14:13.609
<v Katie Greenaway>the secret. I think that's a good lesson to take away, actually, um,

0:14:13.729 --> 0:14:16.369
<v Katie Greenaway>more broadly, even about negative secrets. If we can think

0:14:16.369 --> 0:14:19.929
<v Katie Greenaway>about why we're keeping them freely for our own reasons

0:14:19.929 --> 0:14:22.409
<v Katie Greenaway>and for our own benefit, that might be a way

0:14:22.409 --> 0:14:25.090
<v Katie Greenaway>that we can help to help ourselves feel a little

0:14:25.090 --> 0:14:26.010
<v Katie Greenaway>bit better about that.

0:14:27.289 --> 0:14:30.690
<v Nick Haslam>In a similar line of thinking, are there relationship benefits

0:14:30.690 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Nick Haslam>to being the person that other people confide their secrets in?

0:14:34.210 --> 0:14:37.969
<v Katie Greenaway>Yes, there are benefits and costs. So, um, what we

0:14:37.969 --> 0:14:42.250
<v Katie Greenaway>know is, uh, sharing information with others is a way

0:14:42.250 --> 0:14:45.130
<v Katie Greenaway>that we can feel closer to those people. Sharing information

0:14:45.130 --> 0:14:47.890
<v Katie Greenaway>that other people are not allowed to know is an

0:14:47.890 --> 0:14:50.770
<v Katie Greenaway>even better way to feel close to people. We feel

0:14:50.770 --> 0:14:53.010
<v Katie Greenaway>like that's a very intimate relationship, that that's a very

0:14:53.010 --> 0:14:57.020
<v Katie Greenaway>trusting relationship. The cost comes when we need to keep

0:14:57.020 --> 0:14:59.820
<v Katie Greenaway>that secret on behalf of somebody else. So we can

0:14:59.820 --> 0:15:03.380
<v Katie Greenaway>have these pros and cons. When someone divulges a secret

0:15:03.380 --> 0:15:05.419
<v Katie Greenaway>to us that we need to keep secret, it becomes

0:15:05.419 --> 0:15:08.340
<v Katie Greenaway>our secret. So it becomes our mental load and something

0:15:08.340 --> 0:15:13.059
<v Katie Greenaway>that we need to work hard to conceal from other people. So, uh,

0:15:13.099 --> 0:15:15.820
<v Katie Greenaway>we feel closer to the person, we can also feel

0:15:15.820 --> 0:15:18.250
<v Katie Greenaway>a bit more burdened by having that information secret.

0:15:18.539 --> 0:15:23.094
<v Cassie Hayward>Katie, outside of relationship benefits, are there other benefits to

0:15:23.094 --> 0:15:26.335
<v Cassie Hayward>keeping a secret. And so I'm coming from the world

0:15:26.335 --> 0:15:28.974
<v Cassie Hayward>of applied psychology, I think of a story a few

0:15:28.974 --> 0:15:31.775
<v Cassie Hayward>years ago where Chris Hemsworth was in an ad, it

0:15:31.775 --> 0:15:34.335
<v Cassie Hayward>was touted as this, it was gonna be this new movie,

0:15:34.375 --> 0:15:37.085
<v Cassie Hayward>this new Crocodile Dundee movie. Turned out it was gonna

0:15:37.085 --> 0:15:39.255
<v Cassie Hayward>be an ad for Tourism Australia. It was released in

0:15:39.255 --> 0:15:42.494
<v Cassie Hayward>the Super Bowl. But so many people in the industry

0:15:42.494 --> 0:15:45.335
<v Cassie Hayward>had to keep that secret for it to work. And

0:15:45.335 --> 0:15:47.864
<v Cassie Hayward>I think there was this real kind of, that feeling

0:15:47.864 --> 0:15:51.390
<v Cassie Hayward>of being in on something. and if it had leaked,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.190
<v Cassie Hayward>it wouldn't have worked. It would have ruined the surprise.

0:15:53.309 --> 0:15:56.340
<v Cassie Hayward>So are there other benefits like that that can be

0:15:56.630 --> 0:15:58.909
<v Cassie Hayward>a motivator to keep secrets?

0:15:59.109 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Katie Greenaway>Absolutely. And this really gets into the territory of group

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:07.030
<v Katie Greenaway>secrets or potentially even organisational secrets. And it's not just

0:16:07.030 --> 0:16:09.750
<v Katie Greenaway>about having a good relationship with the person that you're

0:16:09.750 --> 0:16:14.705
<v Katie Greenaway>keeping information secret for, it's also having a stronger relationship

0:16:14.705 --> 0:16:16.934
<v Katie Greenaway>with people who are keeping that secret with you. So,

0:16:16.984 --> 0:16:19.705
<v Katie Greenaway>if many people are keeping that secret and keeping that

0:16:19.705 --> 0:16:24.215
<v Katie Greenaway>secret successfully, which is probably an important part to this, then, uh,

0:16:24.265 --> 0:16:26.385
<v Katie Greenaway>what we've found is that that tends to make people

0:16:26.385 --> 0:16:30.065
<v Katie Greenaway>feel more identified with other people in their group or

0:16:30.065 --> 0:16:33.424
<v Katie Greenaway>feel closer to other people who are also successfully enacting

0:16:33.424 --> 0:16:34.784
<v Katie Greenaway>that secrecy intention.

0:16:36.330 --> 0:16:37.929
<v Nick Haslam>Like the secret professor handshake

0:16:38.890 --> 0:16:40.549
<v Katie Greenaway>Yeah, we're not allowed to talk about that.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.130
<v Cassie Hayward>So Katie, are there certain types of people who are

0:16:46.130 --> 0:16:49.369
<v Cassie Hayward>more likely to be selected as the secret keeper? So

0:16:49.369 --> 0:16:52.049
<v Cassie Hayward>do we look for certain personality traits, or is it

0:16:52.049 --> 0:16:55.330
<v Cassie Hayward>more about the relationship elements that we have with those people?

0:16:55.409 --> 0:16:59.239
<v Cassie Hayward>What do we look for when we're selecting our secret keepers?

0:17:00.119 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Katie Greenaway>It can be both, um, so certainly we look for

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.599
<v Katie Greenaway>people who we tend to be closer to. Those are

0:17:04.599 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Katie Greenaway>people that we divulge information to. But there are certain

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.079
<v Katie Greenaway>personality traits that we look for in people that we

0:17:11.079 --> 0:17:13.909
<v Katie Greenaway>want to confide in. The first is that we're looking

0:17:13.910 --> 0:17:18.109
<v Katie Greenaway>for someone empathetic, um, and compassionate, who's going to maybe

0:17:18.109 --> 0:17:20.810
<v Katie Greenaway>validate our feelings or be able to give us emotional support.

0:17:21.428 --> 0:17:23.558
<v Katie Greenaway>The second type of person we look for is someone

0:17:23.558 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Katie Greenaway>who's assertive. So this is someone who's going to maybe

0:17:26.479 --> 0:17:29.598
<v Katie Greenaway>help us think through the secret in a way that

0:17:29.598 --> 0:17:32.588
<v Katie Greenaway>we haven't thought about before or maybe even decide what

0:17:32.588 --> 0:17:34.318
<v Katie Greenaway>to do about that secret and it's really going to

0:17:34.318 --> 0:17:37.239
<v Katie Greenaway>push us to do something about it. The kinds of

0:17:37.239 --> 0:17:41.558
<v Katie Greenaway>people we don't confide in are talkative people, someone who's

0:17:41.558 --> 0:17:44.279
<v Katie Greenaway>maybe in danger of spreading that information far and wide.

0:17:44.540 --> 0:17:47.410
<v Katie Greenaway>And also polite people. So these are people who might

0:17:47.410 --> 0:17:51.229
<v Katie Greenaway>say something nice to your face about, um, the situation

0:17:51.229 --> 0:17:54.718
<v Katie Greenaway>or the secret that you have, but who perhaps underneath

0:17:54.719 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Katie Greenaway>doesn't really, um, uh, empathise with you to the degree

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.319
<v Katie Greenaway>that maybe a compassionate person would.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Nick Haslam>And how about the personality of secrecy researchers? Is there

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Nick Haslam>anything special about the personality of you folk who study

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:06.839
<v Nick Haslam>these things?

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:08.030
<v Katie Greenaway>Sticky beaks, I think.

0:18:08.630 --> 0:18:10.349
<v Valentina Bianchi>Absolutely. Very curious people.

0:18:10.719 --> 0:18:14.349
<v Katie Greenaway>There's that old adage that we study what we Feel right?

0:18:14.469 --> 0:18:16.989
<v Katie Greenaway>that you're studying secrets because you like secrets?

0:18:17.069 --> 0:18:20.630
<v Katie Greenaway>Yeah, research is "me-search." I don't know how many secrets

0:18:20.630 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Katie Greenaway>are you keeping though?

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Valentina Bianchi>Too many.

0:18:23.319 --> 0:18:26.969
<v Nick Haslam>And yet you seem so authentic. So if our listeners

0:18:26.969 --> 0:18:29.849
<v Nick Haslam>are sitting there feeling burdened by a secret they're keeping,

0:18:29.890 --> 0:18:31.530
<v Nick Haslam>what tips do you have for them in terms of

0:18:31.530 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Nick Haslam>how to manage?

0:18:32.650 --> 0:18:36.209
<v Valentina Bianchi>Well, that would depend on what is creating that burden, right?

0:18:36.410 --> 0:18:39.810
<v Valentina Bianchi>So if it's more about, um, that secrets popping into

0:18:39.810 --> 0:18:42.530
<v Valentina Bianchi>their mind time and time and time again. You would

0:18:42.530 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Valentina Bianchi>want to use perhaps more cognitive strategies. So for instance,

0:18:46.410 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Valentina Bianchi>you might want to, uh, think again about those three

0:18:48.959 --> 0:18:52.208
<v Valentina Bianchi>dimensions I was mentioning before, and have a think about

0:18:52.209 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Valentina Bianchi>whether keeping that secret is, um, helpful for a relationship

0:18:57.010 --> 0:19:01.449
<v Valentina Bianchi>or perhaps helpful for a specific goal, or maybe OK

0:19:01.449 --> 0:19:04.089
<v Valentina Bianchi>to be kept secret because it's not really a problem.

0:19:04.130 --> 0:19:07.290
<v Valentina Bianchi>It's not immoral to keep that secret. So I guess

0:19:07.290 --> 0:19:11.319
<v Valentina Bianchi>what I'm suggesting here is to try and, um, reconsider

0:19:11.319 --> 0:19:15.500
<v Valentina Bianchi>or reappraise the reason why or the, um, the goal

0:19:15.500 --> 0:19:18.969
<v Valentina Bianchi>for you to keep that secret. If instead, the problem

0:19:18.969 --> 0:19:22.290
<v Valentina Bianchi>is about concealing the secret and not knowing how to

0:19:22.290 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Valentina Bianchi>do that, then there are a whole range of strategies

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:29.369
<v Valentina Bianchi>to support you with making a decision about how to, um, yeah,

0:19:29.489 --> 0:19:32.699
<v Valentina Bianchi>keep that secret back from others. And of course, then

0:19:32.699 --> 0:19:36.420
<v Valentina Bianchi>there is a last, um, opportunity to consider, which is

0:19:36.420 --> 0:19:38.609
<v Valentina Bianchi>maybe revealing or sharing that secret.

0:19:39.260 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Nick Haslam>That's fascinating because there was some old work by James Pennebaker,

0:19:42.420 --> 0:19:45.140
<v Nick Haslam>I remember who gave the impression that if just you

0:19:45.140 --> 0:19:48.989
<v Nick Haslam>disclosed some secret, there'd be all sorts of well-being benefits,

0:19:49.060 --> 0:19:50.819
<v Nick Haslam>but you're saying it's a bit more complicated than that.

0:19:50.939 --> 0:19:54.819
<v Valentina Bianchi>Yeah, absolutely. Because again, linking to what Katie was mentioning before,

0:19:55.060 --> 0:19:57.930
<v Valentina Bianchi>you want to be very, very cautious of who you're

0:19:57.930 --> 0:20:02.250
<v Valentina Bianchi>sharing that information with, right? So that information is perhaps

0:20:02.250 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Valentina Bianchi>completely OK to keep secret because it has a benefit

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.979
<v Valentina Bianchi>to do that. And vice versa, if you want to

0:20:07.979 --> 0:20:11.140
<v Valentina Bianchi>consider sharing that information, you want to be very careful

0:20:11.140 --> 0:20:15.739
<v Valentina Bianchi>about who you do it with, uh, what your purpose is. And, um,

0:20:15.900 --> 0:20:19.899
<v Valentina Bianchi>one of the interesting aspects that, um, Jess Salerno and

0:20:19.900 --> 0:20:23.419
<v Valentina Bianchi>Michael Slepian found is that if you share that information

0:20:23.420 --> 0:20:25.968
<v Valentina Bianchi>with someone who has a different moral stance from you,

0:20:26.180 --> 0:20:29.229
<v Valentina Bianchi>it might backfire and they might just try to punish

0:20:29.229 --> 0:20:31.849
<v Valentina Bianchi>you by releasing that information on to others.

0:20:32.510 --> 0:20:35.149
<v Cassie Hayward>We've talked about if if someone's burdened by a secret

0:20:35.150 --> 0:20:37.339
<v Cassie Hayward>that they're keeping, and you've sort of touched on this

0:20:37.339 --> 0:20:40.030
<v Cassie Hayward>a little in that answer, but if someone's got some

0:20:40.030 --> 0:20:42.790
<v Cassie Hayward>knowledge or behaviour and is feeling burdened by that and

0:20:42.790 --> 0:20:45.430
<v Cassie Hayward>wants to share it, but obviously, there's a risk in

0:20:45.430 --> 0:20:50.659
<v Cassie Hayward>sharing sensitive information, what's the trade-off in terms of thinking

0:20:50.660 --> 0:20:54.030
<v Cassie Hayward>about the pros and cons of revealing a secret to

0:20:54.030 --> 0:20:56.540
<v Cassie Hayward>someone else from the, from the perspective of the person

0:20:56.540 --> 0:20:59.780
<v Cassie Hayward>with that information? Does it help them or hurt them

0:20:59.780 --> 0:21:01.275
<v Cassie Hayward>to share that Information?

0:21:01.635 --> 0:21:04.675
<v Valentina Bianchi>Yeah, so that really would depend, right? Because again, uh,

0:21:04.795 --> 0:21:09.145
<v Valentina Bianchi>that might have some significant cost for your, uh, psychological well-being,

0:21:09.194 --> 0:21:14.395
<v Valentina Bianchi>but also some, uh, significant advantages. Um, so it's really

0:21:14.395 --> 0:21:17.905
<v Valentina Bianchi>the matter of weighing pros and cons, both for yourself

0:21:17.905 --> 0:21:20.505
<v Valentina Bianchi>and for your relationships, as well as perhaps for your

0:21:20.505 --> 0:21:22.265
<v Valentina Bianchi>ultimate goals, maybe professional.

0:21:23.270 --> 0:21:26.530
<v Nick Haslam>So Valentina, as you said, you're a clinical psychologist, how

0:21:26.530 --> 0:21:30.589
<v Nick Haslam>does secrecy figure in your own work? I mean, I know. Uh,

0:21:30.719 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Nick Haslam>often clients, patients will be keeping secrets from their therapist

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:36.599
<v Nick Haslam>at the start, and there are probably some things you

0:21:36.599 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Nick Haslam>have to keep secret from them as well. How does

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.469
<v Nick Haslam>this all play out in the clinic?

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.109
<v Valentina Bianchi>Yeah, absolutely. So it's a quite fascinating dynamic, I think,

0:21:44.239 --> 0:21:49.030
<v Valentina Bianchi>building a rapport with a client, gaining that trust, and, uh,

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Valentina Bianchi>also showing compassion. I think it's, uh, very crucial to

0:21:52.719 --> 0:21:56.698
<v Valentina Bianchi>make people comfortable enough to open up. Uh, in fact,

0:21:56.780 --> 0:21:59.819
<v Valentina Bianchi>I've incorporated in my clinical practice now, now at the

0:21:59.819 --> 0:22:04.140
<v Valentina Bianchi>beginning of, uh, my initial sessions, uh, a very clear

0:22:04.140 --> 0:22:08.139
<v Valentina Bianchi>overt expectations that people will not maybe feel comfortable opening

0:22:08.140 --> 0:22:11.339
<v Valentina Bianchi>up immediately about maybe the true reasons why they are

0:22:11.339 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Valentina Bianchi>seeking out my support, and that's completely OK. And I

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.020
<v Valentina Bianchi>think that approach is really helpful in letting the anxiety

0:22:18.020 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Valentina Bianchi>go down, letting uh the client um sit with their

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Valentina Bianchi>own information and make a um paced decision about when

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.719
<v Valentina Bianchi>and if they're comfortable enough with opening up with me.

0:22:29.109 --> 0:22:33.079
<v Valentina Bianchi>And then as you touched on, on the other side, unfortunately,

0:22:33.189 --> 0:22:36.410
<v Valentina Bianchi>I do have to keep a lot of personal information secret, uh,

0:22:36.420 --> 0:22:39.709
<v Valentina Bianchi>and confidential, and that can be quite burdening for clinical

0:22:39.709 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Valentina Bianchi>psychologists in general. So we have structures in place, like,

0:22:42.959 --> 0:22:47.625
<v Valentina Bianchi>for example, um, peer supervisions and group supervisions. But that

0:22:47.625 --> 0:22:50.854
<v Valentina Bianchi>can really be, uh, one of the things that takes

0:22:50.854 --> 0:22:56.145
<v Valentina Bianchi>a toll on, um, clinical psychologists and also other professions.

0:22:56.185 --> 0:23:00.425
<v Valentina Bianchi>For example, lawyers, doctors, and so on. So something to

0:23:00.425 --> 0:23:03.614
<v Valentina Bianchi>keep in mind in terms of, um, professional well-being as well.

0:23:04.550 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Nick Haslam>So I mean this is really interesting because there is

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.550
<v Nick Haslam>social pressure to reciprocate disclosure, right? And so if you're

0:23:10.550 --> 0:23:13.949
<v Nick Haslam>in a clinic setting and uh your patient is disclosing

0:23:13.949 --> 0:23:17.310
<v Nick Haslam>all sorts of things to you, it must be hard

0:23:17.310 --> 0:23:19.670
<v Nick Haslam>not to do somewhat similar to them.

0:23:20.300 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Valentina Bianchi>Yeah, absolutely. So, very recently, for instance, I've had situations

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Valentina Bianchi>where people have opened up about, uh, having lost people

0:23:27.479 --> 0:23:30.479
<v Valentina Bianchi>in their life. And, uh, I also have lost someone

0:23:30.479 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Valentina Bianchi>recently in my life. And unfortunately, it's just, perhaps the,

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:39.569
<v Valentina Bianchi>the information cannot be shared. But the compassion and the

0:23:39.569 --> 0:23:44.609
<v Valentina Bianchi>emotional understanding can definitely support people in creating that connection

0:23:44.609 --> 0:23:48.290
<v Valentina Bianchi>with their clients. So perhaps the way I think about

0:23:48.290 --> 0:23:51.369
<v Valentina Bianchi>it and, uh, make peace with it is that I'm

0:23:51.369 --> 0:23:53.849
<v Valentina Bianchi>supporting them, even though I don't share as much of

0:23:53.849 --> 0:23:57.209
<v Valentina Bianchi>my information. I support them through my heart and through

0:23:57.209 --> 0:23:58.290
<v Valentina Bianchi>my compassion.

0:23:59.189 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Nick Haslam>And at a really big abstract level, is mental health

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Nick Haslam>all about having no secrets at all? What's the goal

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Nick Haslam>for treatment?

0:24:07.010 --> 0:24:12.438
<v Valentina Bianchi>Look, I definitely wouldn't say that. And that's because realistically, um,

0:24:12.719 --> 0:24:17.030
<v Valentina Bianchi>sometimes it's the best thing to keep a secret. For instance,

0:24:17.199 --> 0:24:21.149
<v Valentina Bianchi>I'm talking about maybe, uh, personal information or family secrets

0:24:21.479 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Valentina Bianchi>that are best kept because they would have such a

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.719
<v Valentina Bianchi>huge repercussion on people's life, on people's, uh, relationships, on

0:24:27.719 --> 0:24:31.625
<v Valentina Bianchi>people's ability to, for example, to work in certain environments.

0:24:31.785 --> 0:24:34.584
<v Valentina Bianchi>So what I'm saying here is that disclosure is not

0:24:34.584 --> 0:24:35.974
<v Valentina Bianchi>always the best choice.

0:24:36.344 --> 0:24:39.584
<v Katie Greenaway>Yeah, it's not our business as researchers or clinicians to

0:24:39.584 --> 0:24:43.103
<v Katie Greenaway>tell people they should never keep any secrets. We're more

0:24:43.104 --> 0:24:46.063
<v Katie Greenaway>in the business of helping them understand what are the

0:24:46.064 --> 0:24:48.185
<v Katie Greenaway>pros and cons of doing that and how can they

0:24:48.185 --> 0:24:50.385
<v Katie Greenaway>best keep a secret if that's the right thing for them.

0:24:51.619 --> 0:24:54.819
<v Nick Haslam>That's OK. Uh, the thing to look out for is

0:24:54.819 --> 0:24:57.260
<v Nick Haslam>when the secret's weighing on us, uh, more than usual

0:24:57.260 --> 0:24:59.579
<v Nick Haslam>or causing us harm in our daily life, and I

0:24:59.579 --> 0:25:02.140
<v Nick Haslam>think our listeners will be very grateful for all these

0:25:02.140 --> 0:25:04.859
<v Nick Haslam>insights and advice. Thanks for joining us on PsychTalks.

0:25:04.979 --> 0:25:05.380
<v Katie Greenaway>Thank you.

0:25:05.540 --> 0:25:06.140
<v Valentina Bianchi>Thank you.

0:25:07.939 --> 0:25:10.089
<v Cassie Hayward>Nick, can you believe it? That was the last episode

0:25:10.089 --> 0:25:10.930
<v Cassie Hayward>of the series.

0:25:11.459 --> 0:25:13.579
<v Nick Haslam>Hard to believe, Cassie, but it's been a real pleasure.

0:25:13.780 --> 0:25:15.770
<v Cassie Hayward>It really has, and for anyone who wants to listen

0:25:15.770 --> 0:25:17.900
<v Cassie Hayward>to any of our other episodes, you can find them

0:25:17.900 --> 0:25:21.300
<v Cassie Hayward>in the back catalogue of your podcast app. You've been

0:25:21.300 --> 0:25:24.969
<v Cassie Hayward>listening to PsychTalks with me, Cassie Hayward, and Nick Haslam.

0:25:25.099 --> 0:25:28.020
<v Cassie Hayward>We'd like to thank our guests for today, Associate Professor

0:25:28.020 --> 0:25:32.140
<v Cassie Hayward>Katie Greenaway and Valentina Bianchi. This episode was produced by

0:25:32.140 --> 0:25:36.180
<v Cassie Hayward>Carly Godden with production assistance from Mairead Murray and Gemma Papprill.

0:25:36.380 --> 0:25:38.180
<v Cassie Hayward>Our sound engineer was Jack Palmer.