WEBVTT - Teacher’s Pet: the Chris Dawson trial

0:00:02.590 --> 0:00:04.269
<v S1>A listener production.

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.830
<v S2>Hello, Tom Tilley with you for today's briefing. And in

0:00:09.830 --> 0:00:12.049
<v S2>this episode, we get the latest from the trial of

0:00:12.050 --> 0:00:14.720
<v S2>Chris Dawson. Now, this is the case that was at

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:16.669
<v S2>the centre of the Teacher's Pet podcast.

0:00:16.850 --> 0:00:20.180
<v S3>There's evidence that Lynn Dawson made a phone call to

0:00:20.180 --> 0:00:23.090
<v S3>her husband, who was working at the Northbridge Baths as

0:00:23.090 --> 0:00:27.290
<v S3>a lifeguard on that particular Saturday. And she basically said,

0:00:27.290 --> 0:00:30.290
<v S3>according to evidence, Look, you had your time out. I

0:00:30.290 --> 0:00:32.750
<v S3>think I need a little bit of time out for myself.

0:00:33.229 --> 0:00:35.600
<v S3>So that sort of mutually agreed on that. And that

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.960
<v S3>was the last anyone had ever seen Lynn Dawson.

0:00:39.170 --> 0:00:42.080
<v S2>Chris Dawson was a rugby player and a teacher. Lynette

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.320
<v S2>Dawson was a nurse and a devoted mother. He's pleaded

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.920
<v S2>not guilty to her murder. And this story has gripped

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.250
<v S2>the nation and it's now playing out in court. So

0:00:52.250 --> 0:00:55.040
<v S2>midway through the trial, we find out what fresh evidence

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.670
<v S2>has been uncovered in the decades long mystery. First, today's

0:00:58.670 --> 0:01:01.820
<v S2>headlines with Tash Belling. It is Monday, June 20th.

0:01:03.780 --> 0:01:07.080
<v S4>Good morning, Tom. Thank you. A huge decision on transgender

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:11.760
<v S4>athletes in swimming fina world swimming governing body has voted

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.960
<v S4>to restrict transgender athletes in elite women's competitions.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:21.270
<v S5>Male to female transgender athletes whose legal gender or gender

0:01:21.270 --> 0:01:26.160
<v S5>identity is female may only compete in FINA competition in

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:30.240
<v S5>the female category if they can establish that they have

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.620
<v S5>not experienced any part of male puberty fantasy.

0:01:34.770 --> 0:01:38.369
<v S2>Brent Nowicki So the decision was made during Fina's extraordinary

0:01:38.370 --> 0:01:41.220
<v S2>general Congress, which is happening on the sidelines of the

0:01:41.220 --> 0:01:45.840
<v S2>World Championships in Budapest, and around 71% of their members

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.640
<v S2>of the 152 national federations voted for this policy.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.809
<v S4>It means male to female. Transgender competitors have to have

0:01:54.810 --> 0:01:58.620
<v S4>completed their transition by the age of 12in order to

0:01:58.620 --> 0:02:01.830
<v S4>be able to compete in women's competitions.

0:02:01.980 --> 0:02:03.930
<v S2>Yeah, the other important part of this decision is to

0:02:03.930 --> 0:02:07.590
<v S2>create a new category for transgender athletes to compete in.

0:02:07.590 --> 0:02:10.200
<v S2>It will be called an open category. So this is

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.020
<v S2>a big one, Tash. It means that Lia Thomas, that

0:02:13.020 --> 0:02:15.930
<v S2>well-known American transgender swimmer, won't be able to compete at

0:02:15.930 --> 0:02:17.580
<v S2>the Olympics or the world championships.

0:02:17.669 --> 0:02:20.610
<v S4>And Tom, obviously I'm thinking straight away, will this set

0:02:20.610 --> 0:02:25.170
<v S4>a precedent then for other sporting competitions and other athletes?

0:02:25.169 --> 0:02:27.030
<v S2>Yeah, I think it probably will.

0:02:27.270 --> 0:02:29.010
<v S4>And the vote, of course, followed a report from a

0:02:29.010 --> 0:02:34.710
<v S4>transgender taskforce comprising leading medical, legal and sports figures.

0:02:35.550 --> 0:02:39.090
<v S2>And a big payout for hundreds of thousands of Toyota drivers.

0:02:39.210 --> 0:02:42.270
<v S4>In Australia's largest ever class action. The Federal Court ruled

0:02:42.270 --> 0:02:47.550
<v S4>in April that Toyota, Hilux, Prado and Fortuner diesel vehicles

0:02:47.550 --> 0:02:51.220
<v S4>sold from the 1st of October 2015 to the 23rd

0:02:51.220 --> 0:02:53.790
<v S4>of April 2020 had a defect.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.130
<v S2>Yes, the defect caused excessive smell and white smoke and

0:02:58.139 --> 0:03:02.070
<v S2>also increased fuel consumption. And the court found the defects

0:03:02.070 --> 0:03:06.840
<v S2>also led to a 17.5% price drop in the value

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.870
<v S2>of the cars when they were resold, which means the

0:03:09.870 --> 0:03:15.180
<v S2>owners of 260,000 of these defective vehicles will be compensated.

0:03:15.330 --> 0:03:18.390
<v S6>The best guide is around 17.5 per percent of the

0:03:18.389 --> 0:03:20.460
<v S6>average retail price of that vehicle. New.

0:03:20.580 --> 0:03:24.660
<v S4>That's extraordinary. And I can't believe also about the fuel

0:03:24.660 --> 0:03:27.540
<v S4>consumption issues. So does that mean not only the value

0:03:27.540 --> 0:03:29.700
<v S4>of your car has dropped, but also the fact that

0:03:29.700 --> 0:03:32.970
<v S4>you were using a lot more fuel and that was

0:03:32.970 --> 0:03:35.820
<v S4>then costing you a lot more at the petrol pump.

0:03:35.820 --> 0:03:38.730
<v S2>Yeah. Interesting point. That was Matt Mackenzie from Gilbert and

0:03:38.730 --> 0:03:41.850
<v S2>Tobin Lawyers we heard before. But yeah, Toyota's are such

0:03:41.850 --> 0:03:44.580
<v S2>a popular car, so a ruling like this just affects

0:03:44.580 --> 0:03:48.510
<v S2>so many people, a quarter of a million. It's just huge.

0:03:48.510 --> 0:03:51.060
<v S4>And Toyota has appealed that judgment.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.050
<v S2>And the former Coalition government's new job seeker policy will

0:03:55.050 --> 0:03:57.330
<v S2>go ahead in 11 days. It has a points based

0:03:57.330 --> 0:04:00.480
<v S2>system which will require job seekers to earn 100 points

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.380
<v S2>through searching for jobs, studying training and work for the dole.

0:04:04.530 --> 0:04:06.690
<v S7>It's actually too late to not have a point system

0:04:06.690 --> 0:04:09.750
<v S7>at all. It's about getting inside it and making it

0:04:09.750 --> 0:04:13.920
<v S7>logical and making sure that when all these contracts take

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.800
<v S7>effect in a couple of weeks time, we've actually got

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.190
<v S7>a system that helps long term unemployed people.

0:04:20.339 --> 0:04:23.310
<v S4>That's Employment Minister Tony Burke on Sky there. The new

0:04:23.310 --> 0:04:26.640
<v S4>system will replace the job active program that required people

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.090
<v S4>to lodge 20 applications a month. Mr. Burke has said

0:04:30.089 --> 0:04:33.120
<v S4>he supports the flexibility of the new system but is

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.150
<v S4>concerned about parts of it that are meant to be automated,

0:04:36.150 --> 0:04:40.770
<v S4>bringing back memories of course, of the Robodebt disaster.

0:04:41.670 --> 0:04:44.099
<v S2>And pressure is growing on the Australian Government to do

0:04:44.100 --> 0:04:47.940
<v S2>more now that Julian Assange is facing extradition to the US.

0:04:47.940 --> 0:04:51.900
<v S2>On Saturday, the British Home Secretary approved the extradition order

0:04:51.900 --> 0:04:54.240
<v S2>and if carried out, it will mean Assange will face

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:55.290
<v S2>a US court.

0:04:55.500 --> 0:04:58.770
<v S4>He is, of course charged with breaching the US Espionage Act,

0:04:58.770 --> 0:05:03.659
<v S4>facing up to 175 years in jail. If convicted. There's

0:05:03.660 --> 0:05:04.320
<v S4>still a long way to.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.630
<v S8>Go in terms of our appeals here in the United Kingdom,

0:05:06.630 --> 0:05:08.520
<v S8>potentially all the way to the Supreme Court.

0:05:08.670 --> 0:05:12.420
<v S2>So that's Assange's lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, speaking on ten there.

0:05:12.420 --> 0:05:16.410
<v S2>So this case has been going since 2010 when WikiLeaks

0:05:16.410 --> 0:05:20.010
<v S2>first published those documents about the Afghanistan and Iraq wars,

0:05:20.010 --> 0:05:23.460
<v S2>as well as diplomatic cables. And now that he's getting

0:05:23.460 --> 0:05:27.060
<v S2>one step closer to extradition, people are basically calling on

0:05:27.060 --> 0:05:29.850
<v S2>the Labour government to put their money where their mouth is.

0:05:29.970 --> 0:05:33.690
<v S2>They've been seemingly tight, more supportive of Assange plight than

0:05:33.690 --> 0:05:37.140
<v S2>previous governments, saying that this has dragged on long enough.

0:05:37.140 --> 0:05:41.010
<v S2>Anthony Albanese also says that loud hailer diplomacy is not

0:05:41.010 --> 0:05:43.109
<v S2>the way to go here. So you would expect that

0:05:43.110 --> 0:05:46.440
<v S2>behind the scenes they will be talking to Joe Biden and.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.380
<v S4>I saw Jennifer Robinson, who is of course, Assange's lawyer

0:05:49.380 --> 0:05:52.169
<v S4>we heard from earlier there, she said over the weekend,

0:05:52.170 --> 0:05:53.940
<v S4>which I thought was an excellent point. You know, this

0:05:53.940 --> 0:05:58.380
<v S4>is a huge precedent for journalism and journalists in general.

0:05:58.380 --> 0:06:01.740
<v S4>You know, does that mean, therefore, if you publish controversial

0:06:01.740 --> 0:06:06.210
<v S4>documents that may. Expose government mistakes or alleged cover ups.

0:06:06.220 --> 0:06:09.159
<v S4>Does that then mean journalists can go to jail?

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.190
<v S2>Speaking of which, there were a few at the Logies

0:06:12.190 --> 0:06:13.720
<v S2>last night. What journalists.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.070
<v S4>Or criminals?

0:06:16.270 --> 0:06:20.590
<v S2>Good question, Tasha. I'll leave that call to you. The

0:06:20.589 --> 0:06:23.980
<v S2>Logies were back after three years of not happening thanks

0:06:23.980 --> 0:06:27.580
<v S2>to the pandemic. So apart from all the glitz and glamour,

0:06:27.580 --> 0:06:29.890
<v S2>some of the results, Hamish Blake took out the Gold

0:06:29.890 --> 0:06:33.400
<v S2>Logie for most popular personality on Australian TV, as well

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.430
<v S2>as the inaugural Bert Newton Award for most popular presenter.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:37.090
<v S2>We really couldn't.

0:06:37.089 --> 0:06:39.010
<v S9>Do it without the people that are watching at home.

0:06:39.010 --> 0:06:41.970
<v S9>And if you're watching this, you're an insomniac, but if

0:06:41.980 --> 0:06:46.720
<v S9>you're also somebody that supports Australian TV and we would

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.540
<v S9>not be here without you. So thank you.

0:06:49.690 --> 0:06:52.539
<v S4>Hamish Blake there. Good on him for getting gold. Guy

0:06:52.540 --> 0:06:55.930
<v S4>Pearce won most popular actor for Jack Irish and Katie

0:06:55.930 --> 0:06:59.890
<v S4>Flanagan won most popular actress for How Good was Kitty

0:06:59.890 --> 0:07:01.479
<v S4>and Fisk? Did you see it, Tom?

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:03.339
<v S2>No, I didn't. Sorry.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.859
<v S4>It was really, really fantastic. Tony Armstrong won the Graham

0:07:08.860 --> 0:07:12.340
<v S4>Kennedy Award for most popular new talent for ABC News Breakfast.

0:07:12.340 --> 0:07:15.490
<v S4>You might remember him celebrating on air, of course, following

0:07:15.490 --> 0:07:18.070
<v S4>the Socceroos win over Peru. He was a bit excited,

0:07:18.070 --> 0:07:18.670
<v S4>wasn't he?

0:07:19.030 --> 0:07:22.000
<v S2>Yeah, he was. He's had an amazing time on television.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.920
<v S2>I mean, he's sort of really only come to prominence

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.500
<v S2>in the last year, but people love him. He's such

0:07:26.500 --> 0:07:29.140
<v S2>a fun guy. And I guess, you know, in that

0:07:29.140 --> 0:07:32.140
<v S2>ABC News Breakfast format, which is, you know, a pretty

0:07:32.140 --> 0:07:36.370
<v S2>relatively serious kind of show for breakfast TV, he really

0:07:36.370 --> 0:07:39.010
<v S2>likes it up. He's indigenous as well. So he brings

0:07:39.010 --> 0:07:42.100
<v S2>a really interesting background to the show. I've met him.

0:07:42.100 --> 0:07:45.730
<v S2>He's an awesome dude, so good on him. And yeah,

0:07:45.730 --> 0:07:47.680
<v S2>it was good to see everyone frothing up and doing

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.150
<v S2>what they used to do. And of course the Gold

0:07:49.150 --> 0:07:53.140
<v S2>Coast was absolutely the right place for such a wonderfully

0:07:53.140 --> 0:07:54.010
<v S2>trashy event.

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:56.170
<v S4>Do you know what I do think, though, on a

0:07:56.170 --> 0:07:58.390
<v S4>serious note, you know, people think it's all this glitz

0:07:58.390 --> 0:08:00.280
<v S4>and glamour. What I love about it is the fact

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.580
<v S4>that it recognizes all the people behind the scenes that

0:08:03.580 --> 0:08:07.570
<v S4>work incredibly hard to put together. Often these great shows

0:08:07.570 --> 0:08:12.850
<v S4>and also great recognition of some fantastic Australian dramas. The

0:08:12.850 --> 0:08:15.820
<v S4>newsreader was amazing. Did you see that on the ABC? Yeah,

0:08:15.820 --> 0:08:18.610
<v S4>I did, yeah. Yeah. So great recognition for, you know,

0:08:18.610 --> 0:08:21.580
<v S4>an industry that does employ tens of thousands of people.

0:08:21.730 --> 0:08:24.280
<v S2>All right. Thanks so much, Tosh. We're jumping out of here.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.530
<v S2>Anika and Katrina bring you the latest on the Chris

0:08:26.530 --> 0:08:27.490
<v S2>Dawson trial.

0:08:34.750 --> 0:08:39.490
<v S10>Annika. I'm actually not that much of a true crime junkie,

0:08:39.490 --> 0:08:43.240
<v S10>but when the Teacher's Pet podcast came out, it was

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.780
<v S10>honestly one of those ones that got me completely hooked.

0:08:46.870 --> 0:08:48.820
<v S10>I reckon it was one of the first true crime

0:08:48.820 --> 0:08:52.209
<v S10>podcasts that got on my radar. I know I'm not alone.

0:08:52.210 --> 0:08:55.840
<v S10>Millions of people around the world have become obsessed with

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.500
<v S10>this story. It's from the outside looking in a seemingly

0:08:59.500 --> 0:09:04.090
<v S10>perfect marriage. It involves Lynette and Chris Dawson. He was

0:09:04.090 --> 0:09:08.230
<v S10>a star footballer and she was a devoted mum. They

0:09:08.230 --> 0:09:11.230
<v S10>shared a beautiful home in Sydney's northern beaches. But all

0:09:11.230 --> 0:09:15.220
<v S10>of that unravelled when Lynette went missing in January 1982.

0:09:15.370 --> 0:09:18.070
<v S4>Yes, I listened pretty religiously to I can.

0:09:18.070 --> 0:09:22.270
<v S11>Remember getting to work, walking to work, listening and stopping

0:09:22.660 --> 0:09:25.030
<v S11>and not starting work until I could finish an episode.

0:09:25.030 --> 0:09:29.500
<v S11>It was, you know, a really gripping series. And obviously

0:09:30.010 --> 0:09:34.960
<v S11>it created huge interest. And her disappearance has remained a

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.610
<v S11>cold case. It's been 40 years now. Chris Dawson, Lynette's husband,

0:09:39.610 --> 0:09:42.760
<v S11>went on to marry their teenage babysitter and one of

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.780
<v S11>his former students. And for many years, there's been no

0:09:46.780 --> 0:09:50.080
<v S11>movement on this case. And what happened to Lynette? There

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.750
<v S11>were always whispers and speculations about what might have happened.

0:09:53.770 --> 0:09:58.960
<v S11>There were sightings, alleged sightings and questions raised about the

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:03.490
<v S11>relationship between Chris and Lynette, just how happy they were.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.640
<v S11>But nothing was done until a group of journalists dug

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.809
<v S11>into the story, made it a podcast. And now with

0:10:10.809 --> 0:10:14.620
<v S11>fresh evidence, Chris Dawson is on trial for murder.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.740
<v S10>Yeah, So it's been quite a few weeks of this trial,

0:10:17.740 --> 0:10:20.859
<v S10>and we wanted to know what exactly has been brought

0:10:20.860 --> 0:10:24.250
<v S10>to light since this trial has begun and where is

0:10:24.250 --> 0:10:28.480
<v S10>the court case at now? Joining us on today's briefing

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.170
<v S10>is Matthew Condon, who is one of the journalists behind

0:10:32.170 --> 0:10:35.620
<v S10>the teacher's pet podcast. He's been in court every day.

0:10:35.860 --> 0:10:39.309
<v S11>It's been 40 years since Lynette Dawson went missing. And

0:10:39.309 --> 0:10:42.700
<v S11>for those that haven't followed the case or the wildly

0:10:42.700 --> 0:10:47.290
<v S11>popular podcast, can you explain how this latest court case,

0:10:47.290 --> 0:10:50.260
<v S11>so long after she went missing, actually came about.

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.470
<v S3>As you said, 40 years literally this year since Lynn

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:58.900
<v S3>Dawson disappeared? There were sporadic investigations into this. I mean,

0:10:58.900 --> 0:11:01.960
<v S3>for many years she was treated as a missing person.

0:11:02.170 --> 0:11:07.569
<v S3>An investigation heated up again in late 1989, 1990. And then,

0:11:07.570 --> 0:11:12.490
<v S3>of course, along came the incredibly popular podcast The Teacher's Pet,

0:11:12.490 --> 0:11:16.930
<v S3>by Hedley Thomas, the award winning journalist. So that, of course,

0:11:16.929 --> 0:11:20.199
<v S3>revived interest again in the case. I think it had

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.730
<v S3>over 60 million downloads that podcast around the world. Witnesses

0:11:24.730 --> 0:11:29.620
<v S3>came forward certainly to Hedley for his podcast. Again, police

0:11:29.620 --> 0:11:34.750
<v S3>reignited their investigation and subsequently Christopher Dawson, Lynn Dawson's husband,

0:11:35.110 --> 0:11:40.420
<v S3>was finally charged with her murder. So after all these years,

0:11:40.420 --> 0:11:43.689
<v S3>we arrive at Court nine D in the Supreme Court

0:11:43.690 --> 0:11:44.530
<v S3>in Sydney.

0:11:44.710 --> 0:11:46.929
<v S11>And why do you think it's taken so long to

0:11:46.929 --> 0:11:49.690
<v S11>get answers for the family? Was it a case of

0:11:50.020 --> 0:11:53.110
<v S11>police negligence at the time? Was it just a different

0:11:53.110 --> 0:11:57.580
<v S11>time when I guess these cases were treated differently? What

0:11:57.580 --> 0:12:00.520
<v S11>do you put it down to the fact that she

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:01.540
<v S11>wasn't found?

0:12:02.020 --> 0:12:06.040
<v S3>So Lynn disappears in at the end of January 1982,

0:12:06.220 --> 0:12:11.710
<v S3>and then Chris Dawson alleges that his wife contacted him

0:12:12.250 --> 0:12:15.460
<v S3>on a few occasions by telephone after the date of

0:12:15.460 --> 0:12:19.089
<v S3>the end of the first week of January, people came forward,

0:12:19.090 --> 0:12:22.870
<v S3>friends of the Dawsons and indeed a relative. This has

0:12:22.870 --> 0:12:26.920
<v S3>been examined in the case with sightings of Lynn Dawson.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:28.990
<v S3>So there were there were sightings, you know, a few

0:12:28.990 --> 0:12:32.860
<v S3>years after she went missing, working as a nurse, for example,

0:12:32.860 --> 0:12:36.550
<v S3>at a hospital in Cocoa in Sydney, a relative gave

0:12:36.550 --> 0:12:41.650
<v S3>evidence that he indeed sighted Lynn in Gatesville on busy

0:12:41.650 --> 0:12:45.760
<v S3>Victoria Road, believing that she was working as a nurse

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.939
<v S3>at a nearby hospital. So you have all of this

0:12:48.940 --> 0:12:52.450
<v S3>doubt about is she alive? Is she not in the

0:12:52.450 --> 0:12:54.370
<v S3>narrative as it's moved forward?

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.910
<v S10>We've got this court case happening right now. What is

0:12:57.910 --> 0:13:00.700
<v S10>it that the court is being asked to decide and

0:13:00.700 --> 0:13:02.830
<v S10>what could that mean for Chris Dawson?

0:13:03.309 --> 0:13:06.640
<v S3>Well, he's facing the most serious charge of all, and

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.570
<v S3>that is that he murdered his wife, Lynn Dawson. And

0:13:10.570 --> 0:13:13.870
<v S3>that alleged crime occurred around the end of the first

0:13:13.870 --> 0:13:20.080
<v S3>week of January. In 1982. His defense team successfully argued

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:25.750
<v S3>for what's called a judge alone trial. That means no jury.

0:13:25.750 --> 0:13:28.510
<v S3>I mean, the basis was that with the popularity of

0:13:28.510 --> 0:13:31.870
<v S3>the teacher's pet and the Teacher's Pet podcast has come up.

0:13:32.170 --> 0:13:35.980
<v S3>Day in, day out in this trial from the defense,

0:13:35.980 --> 0:13:40.800
<v S3>in terms of the allegation that the podcast had of

0:13:40.809 --> 0:13:46.360
<v S3>serious influence, given its popularity and certain thematics that it took,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.260
<v S3>that it may have indeed influenced witnesses in the trial.

0:13:50.290 --> 0:13:54.309
<v S3>The judge alone decision was because, they argued, Christensen could

0:13:54.309 --> 0:13:58.720
<v S3>not possibly get a fair trial before a jury. Given

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.800
<v S3>the popularity of this story, I mean, the publicity. You know,

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.750
<v S3>fair enough. How could he get a fair trial with

0:14:04.750 --> 0:14:08.140
<v S3>a jury of his peers so its judge alone before

0:14:08.140 --> 0:14:09.520
<v S3>Justice Ian Harrison.

0:14:09.820 --> 0:14:13.420
<v S11>And how much of the evidence being presented is historic

0:14:13.540 --> 0:14:16.690
<v S11>such are those police interviews or intercepts from the time

0:14:16.690 --> 0:14:20.790
<v S11>versus witnesses coming forward in the years since Lynn disappeared?

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.190
<v S11>Is it a 5050 split? Is there a huge amount

0:14:24.190 --> 0:14:27.370
<v S11>of new evidence? What's the court sort of hearing?

0:14:27.580 --> 0:14:31.180
<v S3>The court is hearing piece by piece, brick by brick.

0:14:31.180 --> 0:14:36.580
<v S3>The building of the narrative behind the disappearance of Lynn Dawson.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:41.530
<v S3>Such is the nature of serious trials. For example, though,

0:14:41.590 --> 0:14:46.060
<v S3>since the trial began six weeks ago, people are still

0:14:46.060 --> 0:14:51.460
<v S3>coming forward and contacting Crime Stoppers and are offering new information.

0:14:51.460 --> 0:14:53.350
<v S3>Whether that will be admitted and become part of the

0:14:53.350 --> 0:14:57.160
<v S3>trial is unknown at the moment, but it's been very

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:02.980
<v S3>carefully systematic. So the case began, for example, with evidence

0:15:02.980 --> 0:15:06.610
<v S3>from the neighbors of the Dawsons up at Bayview Heights

0:15:06.610 --> 0:15:11.290
<v S3>on Sydney's northern beaches. It then went to the workmates

0:15:11.290 --> 0:15:14.800
<v S3>of Lynn who worked at the wayward Childcare centre up

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.910
<v S3>there as a nurse. There was evidence, of course, over

0:15:19.210 --> 0:15:24.550
<v S3>several days from JC, who was the young babysitter at

0:15:24.550 --> 0:15:28.660
<v S3>the epicentre of this story and this trial. And then

0:15:28.660 --> 0:15:31.900
<v S3>it moved to, of course, family members were giving evidence.

0:15:31.930 --> 0:15:35.290
<v S3>It was heartbreaking in many instances. And now we've moved

0:15:35.290 --> 0:15:38.770
<v S3>on to the police and their investigation. So it's been

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v S3>very carefully plotted. In any case, a narrative takes time

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.030
<v S3>to sort of come into focus. It is a building

0:15:46.030 --> 0:15:46.780
<v S3>of a picture.

0:15:47.230 --> 0:15:52.270
<v S11>Has the court heard from Chris's second wife? And what

0:15:52.270 --> 0:15:56.050
<v S11>do we know about their relationship, both before Lynne went

0:15:56.050 --> 0:15:57.430
<v S11>missing and of course, after.

0:15:57.910 --> 0:16:01.630
<v S3>Chris's second wife was the babysitter? We can't name her

0:16:01.630 --> 0:16:06.070
<v S3>because she was underage at the time of this situation.

0:16:06.070 --> 0:16:09.550
<v S3>So she's known as Jake to cut a very long

0:16:09.550 --> 0:16:13.300
<v S3>story short. JC was a student at Cromer High where

0:16:13.300 --> 0:16:19.450
<v S3>Chris Dawson was a teacher in late 1981. JC She

0:16:19.450 --> 0:16:23.260
<v S3>briefly moved into the house at two Gill Wingard drive

0:16:23.290 --> 0:16:28.570
<v S3>Bayview into Chris and Lynn's house. The explanation was that

0:16:28.570 --> 0:16:31.180
<v S3>she had a troubled home life. She was trying to

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:37.360
<v S3>complete her HSC, which obviously required stability. And JC, who

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.690
<v S3>had been their babysitter for some time, briefly moved into

0:16:40.690 --> 0:16:46.480
<v S3>the home. Now, if you spool forward to around Christmas 1981,

0:16:46.570 --> 0:16:51.160
<v S3>the evidence in court has been that Chris Dawson and

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.190
<v S3>JC hopped in a car through some clothes in the

0:16:54.190 --> 0:16:57.940
<v S3>car and headed north, ostensibly to Queensland, to start a

0:16:57.940 --> 0:17:03.190
<v S3>new life together as they travelled north. JC felt physically

0:17:03.190 --> 0:17:05.979
<v S3>unwell and was missing her family and said, Can we

0:17:05.980 --> 0:17:10.450
<v S3>turn around essentially and back? They went to Sydney. Christmas

0:17:10.450 --> 0:17:13.359
<v S3>Day has been an epicentre of this case. It's an

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:18.070
<v S3>important day, 1981, in that the Dawsons, a very close family,

0:17:18.070 --> 0:17:20.859
<v S3>have always celebrated Christmas and held it to be very important,

0:17:20.859 --> 0:17:24.820
<v S3>like a lot of families do. But on this Christmas Day,

0:17:24.820 --> 0:17:28.270
<v S3>where there was a gathering at Chris Dawson's parents house

0:17:28.270 --> 0:17:33.280
<v S3>in Sydney, Chris Dawson wasn't present. He was at his

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.609
<v S3>twin brother, Paul's house, which is only a couple of

0:17:36.609 --> 0:17:41.200
<v S3>doors down from his home in Bayview, and Lynn Dawson

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.330
<v S3>went to the function on her own. So there was

0:17:43.330 --> 0:17:49.000
<v S3>evidence about discussions about Chris, and Lynn's understanding was that

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.960
<v S3>he needed some time out to himself at that point.

0:17:53.470 --> 0:17:58.360
<v S3>Go forward now to January and Lynn and Chris Dawson

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.030
<v S3>come back together. They agree to see a marriage counsellor.

0:18:01.030 --> 0:18:04.840
<v S3>Everything looks great. Lynn's happy. Chris Dawson says he was

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.330
<v S3>happy that there was great hopes that they could make

0:18:07.330 --> 0:18:12.369
<v S3>this work. And then come that first weekend in January,

0:18:12.369 --> 0:18:15.970
<v S3>there's evidence that Lynn Dawson made a phone call to

0:18:15.970 --> 0:18:18.880
<v S3>her husband, who was working at the Northbridge Baths as

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:23.080
<v S3>a lifeguard on that particular Saturday. And she basically said,

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.080
<v S3>according to evidence, look, you had your time out. I

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.540
<v S3>think I need a little bit of time out for myself.

0:18:28.990 --> 0:18:31.390
<v S3>So that sort of mutually agreed on that. And that

0:18:31.390 --> 0:18:34.680
<v S3>was the last any. One had ever seen Lin Dawson.

0:18:35.100 --> 0:18:38.609
<v S10>What has it been like covering this case and why

0:18:38.609 --> 0:18:41.879
<v S10>do you think that certain cases like this capture the

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:43.230
<v S10>national attention?

0:18:43.470 --> 0:18:45.630
<v S3>Why they catch the attention. And it occurred to me

0:18:45.630 --> 0:18:48.800
<v S3>sitting in the court, you know, watching witnesses come and go,

0:18:48.810 --> 0:18:51.900
<v S3>listening to arguments from the crown and the defense. It

0:18:51.900 --> 0:18:55.470
<v S3>occurred to me that, in essence, this is a very

0:18:55.470 --> 0:19:00.480
<v S3>simple story. It's about a husband and a wife. It's

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.379
<v S3>about the fraying of a marriage. And it's about that

0:19:04.380 --> 0:19:07.500
<v S3>scenario resulting in where we are today. I think it

0:19:07.500 --> 0:19:10.650
<v S3>touches on a lot of common things that we all

0:19:10.650 --> 0:19:13.650
<v S3>share in terms of a relationship, in terms of having

0:19:13.650 --> 0:19:17.070
<v S3>young children in in terms of trying to make something work.

0:19:17.100 --> 0:19:19.170
<v S3>This is a story from the 70 seconds and the

0:19:19.170 --> 0:19:21.540
<v S3>early 80 seconds, but it's all about raising kids and

0:19:21.540 --> 0:19:23.669
<v S3>how difficult that is and keeping a roof over your

0:19:23.670 --> 0:19:26.159
<v S3>head and being able to afford the mortgage. And it's

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:31.859
<v S3>just that classic suburban drama that touches us all really.

0:19:31.950 --> 0:19:35.040
<v S3>You know, it has its incredibly poignant moments, too, when

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.710
<v S3>you look at the family and they're hearing evidence day in,

0:19:37.710 --> 0:19:40.050
<v S3>day out about their missing sibling.

0:19:40.260 --> 0:19:44.220
<v S11>Now, there's been no evidence that Lin is still around.

0:19:44.220 --> 0:19:47.160
<v S11>There hasn't been a body that's been found. There's been

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.880
<v S11>a few sightings. All of this leaves a really uncertain

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.090
<v S11>situation for the family. So importantly, do you think we're

0:19:54.090 --> 0:19:57.300
<v S11>ever going to get any answers and from this trial

0:19:57.300 --> 0:19:59.280
<v S11>about what happened to Lin?

0:19:59.700 --> 0:20:02.910
<v S3>Well, the assumption of finding a body is the assumption

0:20:02.910 --> 0:20:07.350
<v S3>that she is indeed dead. So the defense contends that

0:20:07.350 --> 0:20:11.190
<v S3>she disappeared and indeed that it was of her own

0:20:11.190 --> 0:20:13.710
<v S3>volition that she made a break from the family at

0:20:13.710 --> 0:20:16.199
<v S3>that point. And the case is been trying to examine

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.320
<v S3>all sides of this story and whether, indeed that's a

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.400
<v S3>valid conclusion to reach and probing Lin's character and her

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.449
<v S3>state of mind leading up to her disappearance, per se. So,

0:20:27.450 --> 0:20:30.899
<v S3>you know, this is a trial. We have to obviously

0:20:30.900 --> 0:20:36.629
<v S3>balance everything, taking every view from the crown, from the defense.

0:20:36.630 --> 0:20:42.420
<v S3>And the ultimate answer to this question rests with his honor,

0:20:42.780 --> 0:20:44.070
<v S3>Justice Ian Harrison.

0:20:44.430 --> 0:20:48.660
<v S10>And that was journalist Matthew Condon, who's been covering this

0:20:48.660 --> 0:20:53.880
<v S10>case every day. Annika, interesting that Chris Dawson, I mean,

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.640
<v S10>so many years have passed. He's he's in his 70

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:01.530
<v S10>seconds now for so many families who their loved ones

0:21:01.530 --> 0:21:05.250
<v S10>have gone missing and they've never been able to get answers.

0:21:05.250 --> 0:21:08.340
<v S10>I guess it's people power that have brought cases like

0:21:08.340 --> 0:21:12.150
<v S10>this particular one and other cases to light and led

0:21:12.150 --> 0:21:16.440
<v S10>to either fresh evidence with people coming forward or inquests

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.020
<v S10>or even court cases, as is the case with this one.

0:21:19.109 --> 0:21:21.030
<v S11>Yeah, it's a bit of a double edged sword, isn't it?

0:21:21.030 --> 0:21:24.930
<v S11>You get the prominence in the media and often, you know,

0:21:24.930 --> 0:21:28.440
<v S11>in this case you actually get a trial, but of

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.270
<v S11>course it can be used against you. You know, Chris

0:21:30.270 --> 0:21:33.210
<v S11>Dawson has tried to use the podcast as a reason

0:21:33.210 --> 0:21:36.270
<v S11>why he says he's not getting a fair trial. So

0:21:36.390 --> 0:21:39.180
<v S11>it's a fine line, but obviously a great way of

0:21:39.180 --> 0:21:48.590
<v S11>trying to deliver outcomes and answers for families. Listener.