Speaker 1: Why from Vall, Heartbland and the Crossroads of America.
Speaker 2: It's Tony Katz today.
Speaker 1: Yes, Jake Tapper, the president's life is going to get
Speaker 1: protected more than your life. Now, you'll note that I
Speaker 1: didn't say that his life means more than yours. Right
Speaker 1: for a life to mean more than another would be
Speaker 1: very very personal as a concept, and I would never
Speaker 1: say that to your family, your life doesn't mean more
Speaker 1: than now of the president of the United States. I
Speaker 1: certainly believe in a night shouldn't say that. I know
Speaker 1: to be fact that my life matters more to my
Speaker 1: wife than the president's life.
Speaker 2: I get that she gets that.
Speaker 1: I'm thrilled by that, actually, But to the Secret Service,
Speaker 1: your life and the media's life, while important, isn't their job.
Speaker 2: Isn't their focus?
Speaker 1: And when there is a threat of assassination against the
Speaker 1: President of the United States, they might make moves that
Speaker 1: they don't tell you about.
Speaker 2: You put in harm's way, but not the president.
Speaker 1: You want to talk about living in the real world, Jake,
Speaker 1: or do you want to pretend that somehow you're special?
Speaker 1: Tony Katz, Tony kats today, great to be with you guys,
Speaker 1: fighting everything I do over at tony kats dot com
Speaker 1: and don't forget live streaming, YouTube and rumble. You should
Speaker 1: check it out for yourself. Just look for Tony Katz
Speaker 1: on the Twitter which is known as x Tony Kats
Speaker 1: and Facebook Tony Kats Radio.
Speaker 2: The story is ugly.
Speaker 1: That that whole conversation that was had when President Trump
Speaker 1: was in anchor in Turkey for the NATO summit, all
Speaker 1: those questions from the New York Times reporters about Air
Speaker 1: Force one, where we asked the question here we watched
Speaker 1: it happen in real time, and I asked what you
Speaker 1: would have been.
Speaker 2: Asking, are you trying to get him killed? Because that's
Speaker 2: how it looked.
Speaker 1: They were absolutely proactively trying to get him killed. Oh,
Speaker 1: there's something wrong with Air Force one. Ooh, there's an
Speaker 1: issue with Air Force one. Hey, enemies of Trump, there's
Speaker 1: a problem with his plane. Go at it. That's what
Speaker 1: it sounded like from two different New York Times reporters.
Speaker 1: And then we learn that you have the Secretary of
Speaker 1: the Air Force who no longer can get access to
Speaker 1: classified information because the former Secretary of the Air Force,
Speaker 1: that's Frank Kendall, may have leaked information to the New
Speaker 1: York times. This is the second chair of Air Force
Speaker 1: under the Biden administration. No more classified info for you,
Speaker 1: no more stuff for you.
Speaker 2: You leaked.
Speaker 1: See, it's not enough. Leakers have to go to jail.
Speaker 1: Leakers have to go to jail immediately. And I don't
Speaker 1: know what the hell we're waiting for. So maybe that's
Speaker 1: how they knew, and that's why they were asking. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the President is in Turkey and there's a threat. According
Speaker 1: to the reporting. This was the Washington Post that had
Speaker 1: the first reporting. President Trump was seen boarding Air Force
Speaker 1: one publicly publicly got on the plane. But what happened
Speaker 1: next was he walked through the plane into a catering truck,
Speaker 1: you know those they brought the food and they kind
Speaker 1: of like they could be elevated up and they are
Speaker 1: usually I like, you enter this door and that it's
Speaker 1: usually on the other side of.
Speaker 2: The are where the galley is for those of us.
Speaker 1: Who fly commercial like morons, He walked right through, got
Speaker 1: on that truck where he was then transported to another
Speaker 1: plane that was to an Air Force C thirty two,
Speaker 1: a military aircraft, and they hid Trump's location for several
Speaker 1: hours because strikes were going on against Iran and there
Speaker 1: was a concern that they may.
Speaker 2: Target Air Force One.
Speaker 1: Now, before we get deeper into the story, let us
Speaker 1: be clear that anybody who thought it was okay for
Speaker 1: him to ride this new Air Force one that was
Speaker 1: donated by the qataris which we never should have accepted.
Speaker 1: His argument is, they want to give me a four
Speaker 1: hundred million dollar plane. I'm taking a four hundred million
Speaker 1: dollar plane. I've seen people give up more for free fries.
Speaker 1: We never, never, ever should have taken that plane. But
Speaker 1: that plane allegedly didn't have all of the safety capabilities
Speaker 1: that a plane like that is supposed to have, countermeasures,
Speaker 1: a whole host of things. It's got to be a
Speaker 1: well armed thing. Why anybody was allowed to fly it
Speaker 1: is beyond me. We will leave that to the side.
Speaker 1: That you and I, regardless of our politics, could agree
Speaker 1: wholeheartedly that a plane that isn't prepared to protect the
Speaker 1: president of the United States cannot be flown, can't be
Speaker 1: We should also be clear that if there's a thread
Speaker 1: against the president of the United States, and I don't
Speaker 1: care who the president of the United States.
Speaker 2: Is, we make moves to protect the president.
Speaker 1: In this case, he was moved off of air Force
Speaker 1: one onto the Air Force C thirty two A, which
Speaker 1: with him on it would be the new Air Force one.
Speaker 2: But that's call signals, and let's just keep it straight
Speaker 2: for now.
Speaker 1: The plane that took off didn't have the President on it,
Speaker 1: even though they thought he was on it had the
Speaker 1: Press Corps on it.
Speaker 2: The Press Corps was on this plane, and.
Speaker 1: That seems to have a whole bunch of people outraged.
Speaker 2: One of those people is Jake Tapper, he writes.
Speaker 1: So the US Secret Service thought the threat against the
Speaker 1: President was strong enough to surreptitiously remove him, surreptitiously remove
Speaker 1: him from Air Force one, and then proceeded to let
Speaker 1: the plane full of White House staffers and reporters take
Speaker 1: off and fly back to the United States. If the
Speaker 1: question is is Jake Tapper stupid?
Speaker 2: The answer is yes.
Speaker 1: We live in the real world in his fantasy world,
Speaker 1: and I'm not about to pretend that Jake Tapper is
Speaker 1: on my level.
Speaker 2: He's not.
Speaker 1: For personal reasons, I have a disdain of Jake Tapper
Speaker 1: helping to build a pylon against me on social media.
Speaker 1: That didn't mean anything, but it showed what cheap of
Speaker 1: a human being he is. How cheap of a human
Speaker 1: being he is what cheap human being he is? Then,
Speaker 1: of course, Jake Tapper showed by his politics that outside
Speaker 1: of being able to note that Lewis Farricott is a
Speaker 1: Jew hating bigot, he has done nothing but celebrate progressivism
Speaker 1: and engage in absolute failures as a journalist, being highlighted
Speaker 1: by writing a book saying, Oh my gosh, can you
Speaker 1: believe Joe Biden didn't have all his mental faculties. He
Speaker 1: wasn't really up to the task. There was a question
Speaker 1: about his mental acuity. I, for one, am shocked he
Speaker 1: profited off a book where he and his at work clearly,
Speaker 1: in my view, lied to the American people repeatedly, if
Speaker 1: not daily, about Joe Biden's condition, and then he profited.
Speaker 2: I think he's a bad person.
Speaker 1: I think he is like all these people become like
Speaker 1: Scott Pelly became over at CBS, so believers in their
Speaker 1: own hype.
Speaker 2: I must be important. I'm on CNN. You're not important.
Speaker 1: Somebody else will be on CNN and they won't be
Speaker 1: important either. What's wrong with you? Never believe your own hype?
Speaker 1: What are you nuts? You know who believed their own hype?
Speaker 2: Shelley Long, who's Shelley Long? Correct? You know who believe
Speaker 2: their own hype?
Speaker 1: David Caruso, Who's David Caruso correct? History has got examples,
Speaker 1: you just don't remember them. Jake Tapper can't believe that
Speaker 1: this plane with staffers and with journalists was allowed to
Speaker 1: fly under threat.
Speaker 2: We live in the real world.
Speaker 1: We don't live as children, even though progressives often live
Speaker 1: that way. Everything is a danger, and the story here
Speaker 1: is that Iran is a danger and Iran should be
Speaker 1: dealt with. Marjorie Taylor Green can't do the job. These
Speaker 1: pseudo intellectuals can't do the job. The leftists can't do
Speaker 1: the job. And I want the president to do the
Speaker 1: job again. Just the threat that's threatening him and threatening
Speaker 1: all of us not to play this game of well,
Speaker 1: we'll wait them out. Oh now, Iran won't do any
Speaker 1: negotiating whatsoever. Okay, Fine, we'll just keep the bombings going,
Speaker 1: small bombings, big bombings. We'll wait three days, we'll do
Speaker 1: another bombing, and of course we'll keep the e gnomic
Speaker 1: sanctions on and of course will continue to make things
Speaker 1: rougher and rougher and rougher.
Speaker 2: The Iranians believe that they can.
Speaker 1: Wait this out to the midterms and get him to
Speaker 1: lose the midterms and go after him and destroy him.
Speaker 1: Why would they want to destroy him, because they want
Speaker 1: to destroy anybody who might destroy them. It's only a
Speaker 1: reason to get rid of the regime and not put
Speaker 1: up with this nonsense. But Jake Tapper seems to miss
Speaker 1: the moment that it is the regime that tried to
Speaker 1: kill our president. Doesn't matter who the president is, because
Speaker 1: if it does, that's the sign of somebody who isn't
Speaker 1: actually a good American. That's the sign of a partisan,
Speaker 1: scumbag Democrat or Republican. You come at our president, we
Speaker 1: come at you, and we come at you at one thousandfold.
Speaker 2: If this is not our philosophy, we really are a
Speaker 2: broken nation.
Speaker 1: The job of the Secret Service is to protect the protectee,
Speaker 1: and that's the President of the United States.
Speaker 2: That's the job.
Speaker 1: And anybody who is flying with, traveling with, or maneuvering
Speaker 1: with the President understands that they are an afterthought.
Speaker 2: Anybody who doesn't understand this needs to understand this.
Speaker 1: If the President were to be killed and you got
Speaker 1: killed in the fifty first paragraph of the story, it
Speaker 1: would read also killed that guy. You understand that, right.
Speaker 1: Every member of the Press Corps doesn't understand this. Every
Speaker 1: member of the White House staff doesn't understand this. I
Speaker 1: didn't say that you should be canon fodder. I didn't
Speaker 1: say violence should come upon you. I am saying that
Speaker 1: the job of the Secret Service is to protect the
Speaker 1: President of the United States.
Speaker 2: So you right.
Speaker 1: So the US Secret Service thought the threat against the
Speaker 1: President was strong enough to serve titiously remove him from
Speaker 1: Air Force one and then proceeded to let the plane
Speaker 1: full of White House staffers and reporters.
Speaker 2: Take off and fly back to the US.
Speaker 1: And the answer, Jake Tapper, you child, is yes, that's
Speaker 1: exactly what happened, because we live in the real world.
Speaker 1: The problem, Jake, you child, is that you think the
Speaker 1: story here is about Trump and the Secret Service, and
Speaker 1: every rational person understands it's about the Islamists and the
Speaker 1: Islamic regime in Iran. Maybe this is where you're having
Speaker 1: the great break because you believe yourself important. Not only yourself,
Speaker 1: you believe that journalists are the most important thing. I
Speaker 1: will tell you that they're not the most important thing,
Speaker 1: mainly because the vast majority of them haven't acted as journalists.
Speaker 2: In decades, I know how that upsets you.
Speaker 1: Obviously, we now have a couple of moments here where
Speaker 1: I've shown where the truth really upsets you. Nobody wants
Speaker 1: these people to be hurt. Nobody wants these people to
Speaker 1: be harmed. I think the way to stop the harm
Speaker 1: where the opportunity for harm is to get rid of
Speaker 1: the Islamist regime and don't allow them in the country.
Speaker 1: And don't allow Islamists who have pledged themselves to undo
Speaker 1: the United States of America, to undo Western civilization. Don't
Speaker 1: allow these people in the country, don't allow them power,
Speaker 1: don't allow them to get office, don't vote for them,
Speaker 1: push them out. You're an obvious answer. And when I
Speaker 1: give that answer, I get told onmin is islamophobe or
Speaker 1: some other line of crap. I understand what's happening around me.
Speaker 1: I am playing in the real politique, not you, Jake.
Speaker 1: The choice was the president or the journalist, and they chose.
Speaker 2: To protect the president. That was the right choice.
Speaker 1: As upsetting as it may be for you, but no
Speaker 1: one should give a damn if.
Speaker 2: You're upset, what were the options?
Speaker 1: Let everybody know that the president wasn't on the plane,
Speaker 1: announced that the president was already back and let the
Speaker 1: press fly back later. Which member of the press would
Speaker 1: have kept it quiet. Hey, there's a real threat against
Speaker 1: the president. We had to put him on another plane.
Speaker 1: You show me every member of the press who would
Speaker 1: have said, hey, we're not going to say a word.
Speaker 1: We got to make sure the president's safe. They would
Speaker 1: have tweeted, they would have posted, they would have got
Speaker 1: on to their substacks, all of it. And you know it, Jake,
Speaker 1: because not a one of them would say, wait a second,
Speaker 1: we got to make sure he's okay and then we
Speaker 1: can report the story. Nope, they would all say, I'm
Speaker 1: reporting the story because I'm a journalist.
Speaker 2: And if I can do some harm. Oh oopsie, you
Speaker 2: think I'm making that up.
Speaker 1: I think I'm doing a pretty damn good rendition and
Speaker 1: impersonation of a lot of the people in your press corps.
Speaker 1: And if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But the Secret Service wasn't.
Speaker 1: The job is to protect the president and we should
Speaker 1: all be focused on the threat, which is the Eranium
Speaker 1: Islamic Islamist regime. That's the threat. That's who we should
Speaker 1: be dealing with. You want to get angry at the
Speaker 1: Secret Service or Trump for protecting him. Jake Tapper, screw you,
Speaker 1: you unbelievable child. I swear to you, I'm challenging my
Speaker 1: inner Philip Seymour Hoffman when I say that from Charlie
Speaker 1: Wilson's War. You child, You're not a man for this world.
Speaker 1: You're not capable of dealing with the threats or even
Speaker 1: understanding the threats. You're so internalizing your emotion and you're
Speaker 1: angst you can't accept that the real world requires real choices.
Speaker 1: There are no solutions, as Thomas Sowell explains, just trade offs.
Speaker 1: And you may not like the trade off as sure
Speaker 1: as I wouldn't like the trade off if it was me.
Speaker 2: But I walked in wide eyed, and I knew that
Speaker 2: was the case.
Speaker 1: Seems that the journalist Jake Tapper forgot what the Secret
Speaker 1: Service does.
Speaker 2: I'm Tony Katz, and this is Tony Katz.
Speaker 3: Today the next president, because remember we have right now
Speaker 3: thousands of factories being built. They're being built and they'll
Speaker 3: be opening over the next year, year and a half,
Speaker 3: and whoever the next president is, they'll be.
Speaker 2: Standing up taking credit for what I accomplished.
Speaker 3: So people like you will remember we have more auto
Speaker 3: plans being built right now than in the heyday of
Speaker 3: the automobile.
Speaker 2: We hadn't had an auto plant built in forty years.
Speaker 3: Forty years, but many, many years.
Speaker 2: We hadn't had one auto plan. Now we haven't built for.
Speaker 3: Numbers during the heyday, they couldn't compete with these numbers.
Speaker 2: Many other plans too.
Speaker 3: They're all coming in and that's because of a few things.
Speaker 3: It's because of the cut in taxes, but it's really
Speaker 3: because of tariffs. If you want to sell automobiles, you
Speaker 3: have to build the automobile in America.
Speaker 1: If you want to build, if you want to sell automobiles,
Speaker 1: you have to build them in America. I don't have
Speaker 1: an issue with building automobiles in America, mister President. I'm
Speaker 1: down with building automobiles in America. I'm downing more people
Speaker 1: building autobiles in America. But don't ask me to love
Speaker 1: on tariffs. Don't ask me to love on tariffs when
Speaker 1: they've also created issues. Tony Katz Tony Kats today an
Speaker 1: absolute pleasure. That was the President on with Wayne Allen Root.
Speaker 1: I've got the story. What's his name, Kevin O'Leary fish tank?
Speaker 1: What's a shark tank?
Speaker 2: And fish tank. I'll be getting emails.
Speaker 1: And he is saying, you know, if it wasn't for AI, economically,
Speaker 1: the country.
Speaker 2: Would be schoo It is the.
Speaker 1: AI investments that are keeping the tariff issues at bay.
Speaker 1: That's why the tariffs haven't been more destructive. I am
Speaker 1: absolutely a believer in this. The President's argument is the
Speaker 1: tariffs forced people to bring things here and look what
Speaker 1: we're building. But my argument has been where are the dollars?
Speaker 2: Where are the dollars that show this? When do we see.
Speaker 1: The building of more plants, of more everything and mass
Speaker 1: and not just in automotive. This is what people want
Speaker 1: to see see the results of the tariff stall.
Speaker 2: I'll be okay, keep it here. I'm Tony Katz.
Speaker 1: Bit of good news in a sea of total insanity.
Speaker 1: Tony Katz, Tony Katz. Today, Robert Gilman, military veteran, has
Speaker 1: been detained or was detained by Russia in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: convicted of beating a police officer after being taken off
Speaker 1: a train for causing a disturbance, and then got convicted
Speaker 1: of attacking a prisoner inspector during a cel check, beating
Speaker 1: an investigator and an assault guard. His sentence was extended
Speaker 1: to last ten years after he was found guilty. He
Speaker 1: has been released and for the last forty seven days
Speaker 1: hasn't been in what is being described reported by Newsmax
Speaker 1: as a disassociative stupor because of the abuse of the
Speaker 1: abuse he suffered in prison.
Speaker 2: He's from Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: I there's a lot here and we're gonna learn more
Speaker 1: about him. The last time we saw somebody in this
Speaker 1: kind of shape was the guy who was released from
Speaker 1: North Korea. North Korea. Auto Wumber never regained consciousness after
Speaker 1: his return to the US, never once.
Speaker 2: It is not U.
Speaker 1: It is not for us to take these things as if, oh, well,
Speaker 1: there's nothing we can do, Tony. Can you turn around
Speaker 1: and can you fight everybody the way they need to
Speaker 1: be fought? Can you really handle all of this? Let
Speaker 1: me let me get to that first. I'm glad this
Speaker 1: guy has been released. I hope he will.
Speaker 2: Be well. I really do.
Speaker 1: But I I I shared as good news because released
Speaker 1: is better. Now let's see what his real condition is
Speaker 1: and we can go from there. Iran believes they can
Speaker 1: wait out the president, wait out America, and they believe
Speaker 1: they control the entire situation. You have a US military
Speaker 1: helicopter that fired at the rudder of a Panama flag
Speaker 1: ship because the crew ignored warnings from personnel enforcing the
Speaker 1: naval blockade. This, according to the Wall Street Journal, Iran
Speaker 1: has said, we're not negotiating with the US anymore. We're done.
Speaker 1: We've done everything we're going to do. You're the ones
Speaker 1: who have the problem. We don't have the problem. We're
Speaker 1: just going to keep the straight closed. We're going to
Speaker 1: make your life very very difficult. Oil prices right now
Speaker 1: at eighty three dollars and five cents a barrel over eighty,
Speaker 1: the president cannot say everything's going well.
Speaker 2: Far from it. And just earlier, just earlier, when I
Speaker 2: say earlier, just.
Speaker 1: Yesterday, the president is out there saying that we are
Speaker 1: full control of the Strait of Hormos. We control it
Speaker 1: one hundred percent. This is the president from the oval.
Speaker 4: The only one that has control of the strait of
Speaker 4: her moves right now is the United States Navy. We
Speaker 4: have a blockade that's been infallible. It's a steel wall,
Speaker 4: and we let people in that we want to let in,
Speaker 4: and those people come in and they've been coming in
Speaker 4: and they're going out. So it's actually open.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 4: We do not let them go into Iran, they not
Speaker 4: admit it into the strait to go to a run,
Speaker 4: but it's open for others. Now a little bit complex
Speaker 4: because they will on occasion drop a mind and we
Speaker 4: find the minds.
Speaker 2: You know, we've mind swept the entire strait, as you.
Speaker 4: Probably maybe heard, maybe you didn't hear, but we control
Speaker 4: the straight one hundred percent. Now, can they make trouble, yeah,
Speaker 4: they can make trouble, but they're broke. They have no money.
Speaker 4: You know, Oran has broke, totally broke, and they're not
Speaker 4: paying their soldiers. They have inflation of three hundred percent
Speaker 4: of last night, I had three hundred, three hundred and
Speaker 4: nine percent.
Speaker 2: So we'll see what happens.
Speaker 4: But they've been bad for it. They say forty seven
Speaker 4: is actually fifty Now forty seven they've been saying it
Speaker 4: for three years. But for fifty years they've been the
Speaker 4: bully of the Middle East.
Speaker 2: What they've done is terrible.
Speaker 4: They've killed hundreds of thousands of people. They've killed people,
Speaker 4: they've wounded and named people with the legs of the arms,
Speaker 4: you know, with the roadside bombers, their momb they're very
Speaker 4: proud of it and now.
Speaker 2: They're paying a price.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much, everybody.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you, mister President. How do we control the Strait?
Speaker 1: How possibly do we control the Strait when oil prices
Speaker 1: are this high. It's a very very hard thing to
Speaker 1: put together. It's a hard thing to try and understand.
Speaker 1: And you don't have the people believing you, sir, that's
Speaker 1: the problem. They do not believe you. The Iranians have decided,
Speaker 1: this regime has decided that they can wait us out.
Speaker 1: They have decided that they can.
Speaker 2: Last and last and last, and that.
Speaker 1: The pressure is too much and too great for the
Speaker 1: United States to bear because we won't handle high oil prices. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm not somebody who buys into that or believes that
Speaker 1: at all. I believe that the story has to be
Speaker 1: told and the story has to be sold, and I
Speaker 1: believe that the President has not done a good job
Speaker 1: of this. I believe that the President has missed, He
Speaker 1: has missed greatly in doing so, and that has been
Speaker 1: a problem for him. But I also allow me to
Speaker 1: say that the idea that we would have Iran thinking
Speaker 1: somehow that they are in charge, that's just nutty. Iran
Speaker 1: wants concessions now, Iran is saying that we're done with
Speaker 1: any negotiation. Iran has said they want reparations, and Trump
Speaker 1: has said, you know what, that's a good idea.
Speaker 2: We want reparations for.
Speaker 1: All the people you've killed and all the people you've
Speaker 1: made that all the attacks you've done, and all the
Speaker 1: damage you've because you pay reparendations. One could argue that
Speaker 1: what we have is a stalemate. Is that the worst
Speaker 1: thing in the world. Well, if we believe Major Mike Lyons,
Speaker 1: military analyst, the siege mentality is going to be successful
Speaker 1: or can be successful.
Speaker 2: They don't have any money.
Speaker 1: You heard President Trump talking about this, and slowly the
Speaker 1: IRGC and others will crack. That's very, very possible. That
Speaker 1: is indeed possible that they will crack. I don't think
Speaker 1: they crack without the IRGC actually having to run for
Speaker 1: their lives. And that involves troops on the ground that
Speaker 1: we've already stated quite clearly as a nation that's not happening.
Speaker 1: I've made the argument doesn't have to be our troops,
Speaker 1: but of course there have to be troops on the ground.
Speaker 1: The minue you started talking about getting the nuclear dust,
Speaker 1: you knew there were going to be.
Speaker 2: Troops on the ground. What's our move here? What's our plan?
Speaker 1: Is our plan to utilize bigger bombs, engage in different
Speaker 1: kinds of bombings, engage more population centers, engage Tehran in toto.
Speaker 1: Maybe is it to send in a force of Saudi
Speaker 1: troops with Pakhrain troops, with Israeli troops and take some
Speaker 1: of the coastal places where they do some shipping and
Speaker 1: some bombing from and wipe it clean. Maybe is it
Speaker 1: to think that you can do this low key? Hey,
Speaker 1: we we have a low key war. Never heard of
Speaker 1: a low key war.
Speaker 2: Even a siege isn't low key.
Speaker 1: We have a low key war. We're just gonna wait
Speaker 1: them mount. We're gonna wait to mount and wait a mount.
Speaker 2: I goa It's no problem, They'll just be there. It's fine.
Speaker 2: Maybe the president has to measure.
Speaker 1: The objective with political realities, political realities that he kind
Speaker 1: of set up for himself. He didn't have to do that.
Speaker 1: He in no way had to put forth that. Well,
Speaker 1: you could argue, I ran not getting a nuclear weapon
Speaker 1: was the key, but he didn't have to argue, you know,
Speaker 1: my gosh, we're gonna keep the oil prices lower than
Speaker 1: you ever seen them before. He could have argued that
Speaker 1: we have to do this in order to protect the
Speaker 1: nation for its future. And oil prices are gonna go
Speaker 1: up a little, they may go up more than a little.
Speaker 1: We're gonna handle it. We're gonna weather it, and in
Speaker 1: the end, the regime will be gone, your kids will
Speaker 1: be safer, and we'll finally have a chance for peace
Speaker 1: in the Middle East and maybe we won't be bothered
Speaker 1: every five minutes by these weirdos. He didn't sell it right,
Speaker 1: So he's in this position. I don't know if I
Speaker 1: believe Eve that this position is the end of the world.
Speaker 2: I just don't think that this.
Speaker 1: Position is great because this position doesn't bring about the
Speaker 1: strength that is needed. And to do this, the President's
Speaker 1: gonna have to say, all right, here's the strength that's needed.
Speaker 1: We are going to starve these people economically. We're gonna
Speaker 1: engage in indiscriminate bombing. They won't even know where it
Speaker 1: came from, why it came, how it came. And we
Speaker 1: are going to engage with the neighbors there to put
Speaker 1: together the force to be able to do damage to
Speaker 1: the IRGC because they have to run. And that either
Speaker 1: includes those troops on the ground, or it involves arming
Speaker 1: the Kurds.
Speaker 2: We'll pick one. Do one.
Speaker 1: Could the President just say, you know what, we're starving
Speaker 1: them out, it's the way it goes. Yes, he can,
Speaker 1: he can absolutely do that. He can absolutely go about
Speaker 1: that philosophy. I just don't think that philosophy so low
Speaker 1: satisfies I don't think it's satisfied. It well, nothing satisfies
Speaker 1: the press. They want to lose. It's very weird. I
Speaker 1: don't think it satisfies the people. I don't think it
Speaker 1: shows a resolve to solving the problem, and that every
Speaker 1: moment you're not forcing them to rearm, they are rearming
Speaker 1: without having to use anything. They're building up. We don't
Speaker 1: know what access to things they still have. They were
Speaker 1: told that they're not allowed in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: They're not allowed to bring missiles to Southern Lebanon. They
Speaker 1: brought one hundred and twenty five thousand missiles to Southern Lebanon.
Speaker 1: It's a lot of missiles. Lord only knows what they
Speaker 1: have in other places that they can wait us out,
Speaker 1: and the President wants to play the game. If we
Speaker 1: can wait them out, financially, we can. You just gotta
Speaker 1: be willing to pay more for oil as you head
Speaker 1: into a midterm where if the Democrats win, they're going
Speaker 1: to impeach you. In the first fifteen minutes of Hakim
Speaker 1: Jeffries being the speaker, what do I think. I think
Speaker 1: that you have to destroy the regime and end this already.
Speaker 1: I think I can't get the president to see that
Speaker 1: point of view. I think he might very well be
Speaker 1: thinking to himself, well, they want to wait us out,
Speaker 1: We'll wait them out. It's not the end of the
Speaker 1: world strategy. It's not, but I don't think it's one
Speaker 1: that gets you what you want. The deal is to
Speaker 1: make with those in the Middle East, and it's time
Speaker 1: to apply the press sure onto them, and the President
Speaker 1: doesn't do that. I just chalk it up to being
Speaker 1: a very large mistake that can have some real consequences.
Speaker 2: Keep it here.
Speaker 1: It's Tony Kats today. Of course, many of you, like
Speaker 1: I took a look at what it is that Senator
Speaker 1: Rob Johnson Ron Johnson sorry from Wisconsin, posted about Anthony Fauci,
Speaker 1: about COVID vaccines and about pregnancy, and if you're not bothered, well,
Speaker 1: we have to talk about what might exactly be wrong
Speaker 1: with those people who are not bothered. The data that
Speaker 1: people are tweeting, posting, screaming about not exactly accurate because
Speaker 1: us the data does not discuss things as they are.
Speaker 1: It's a misread of these high numbers of miscarriages. Tony Katz,
Speaker 1: Tony Kats today, I forget if I said, hello, the
Speaker 1: miscarriage numbers are actually not the story, and I get
Speaker 1: that people want to focus on them.
Speaker 2: The story here is how once again.
Speaker 1: Dr Fauci lied kept things from us and purposefully, willfully
Speaker 1: wantonly kept us from having conversations, and how the press
Speaker 1: acted in concord.
Speaker 2: That's the story. That's what requires our discussion what it.
Speaker 1: Is that we're looking at when we see these text messages.
Speaker 2: I am going to go through those, read.
Speaker 1: To you what's out there, and you should ask yourself
Speaker 1: what is our plan?
Speaker 2: It's likely a rand conversation all over again.
Speaker 1: What's our plan? How can anybody be okay? How could
Speaker 1: anybody be okay with just saying, oh, well that was
Speaker 1: in the past, move on. It's like saying there was
Speaker 1: woke one point zero. We don't we don't talk about woke.
Speaker 1: What are you talking about? Forget about how they burned
Speaker 1: down city blocks. Nah, forget how they lied about COVID
Speaker 1: to force people into things.
Speaker 2: No, won't forget that either. I'm Tony Katz.