WEBVTT - Mac & Bone Show - Sheena Quick Interview 

0:00:00.030 --> 0:00:02.389
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk to one of the absolute fan

0:00:02.450 --> 0:00:06.710
<v Speaker 1>favorites when it comes to media members covering your Carolina Panthers.

0:00:07.350 --> 0:00:11.230
<v Speaker 1>She is at Sheena, two E's, at Sheena underscore Marie

0:00:11.289 --> 0:00:16.779
<v Speaker 1>three on X slash Twitter. She is Sheena Quick, and

0:00:16.820 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>she joins us here to try to figure out what

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>has happened to our Carolina Panthers the last two weeks.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.500
<v Speaker 2>Sheena, how have you been? What's going on?

0:00:24.570 --> 0:00:25.130
<v Speaker 3>I've been good.

0:00:25.150 --> 0:00:27.630
<v Speaker 2>How are you guys? What's happening? We're doing good. We

0:00:27.690 --> 0:00:28.390
<v Speaker 2>are doing good.

0:00:29.290 --> 0:00:31.510
<v Speaker 1>I think we all needed a weekend where the Panthers

0:00:31.530 --> 0:00:34.659
<v Speaker 1>didn't play, where we could watch other teams play, and

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.060
<v Speaker 1>we got help yet again and stayed in first place.

0:00:37.940 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>We were having a discussion earlier, Sheena, about Tampa in

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.930
<v Speaker 1>the last 24 hours or so overtaking Carolina on DraftKings

0:00:48.030 --> 0:00:49.490
<v Speaker 1>as the favorite in the division.

0:00:50.170 --> 0:00:51.309
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like.

0:00:53.229 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We shouldn't be favorites anymore, should we?

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's fair, sadly. What do you think?

0:01:00.340 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately, it is fair, but this is the NFC South.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.500
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anyone should be the favorite right now.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.190
<v Speaker 4>This is just such a wacky, strange division.

0:01:09.510 --> 0:01:12.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you've got a valid point there. Just

0:01:12.630 --> 0:01:15.869
<v Speaker 1>like we thought about the Panthers at 3-2, in this division, Sheena,

0:01:15.910 --> 0:01:19.179
<v Speaker 1>just when you think somebody's on a roll, then they'll

0:01:19.220 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>lay an egg, you know?

0:01:21.590 --> 0:01:24.530
<v Speaker 4>Right, right, exactly. Like, you just never know from week

0:01:24.569 --> 0:01:26.650
<v Speaker 4>to week what these teams are going to look like.

0:01:26.670 --> 0:01:28.650
<v Speaker 4>I mean, did you have it on your bingo card

0:01:28.670 --> 0:01:30.830
<v Speaker 4>that the Bucs will win a game without Baker Mayfield

0:01:30.850 --> 0:01:33.390
<v Speaker 4>completing any passes?

0:01:33.470 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I didn't. I thought we would be the embarrassment.

0:01:36.180 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta said, here, watch this.

0:01:39.940 --> 0:01:41.500
<v Speaker 4>Insane, absolutely insane.

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.780
<v Speaker 3>Sheena, what do you think of the Avero dismissal, and

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.740
<v Speaker 3>how impactful do you think a move like that could

0:01:49.780 --> 0:01:50.970
<v Speaker 3>be within the season?

0:01:53.650 --> 0:01:57.090
<v Speaker 4>I've always felt like this was his prove-it season. I

0:01:57.140 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 4>think that this being his prove-it season was kind of

0:02:00.060 --> 0:02:03.260
<v Speaker 4>overshadowed with people talking about, is this Bryce's prove-it year?

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Is this Xavier Leguette's prove-it year? For me, it's always

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.540
<v Speaker 4>been Everett's prove-it year. I felt like they gave him

0:02:09.580 --> 0:02:12.299
<v Speaker 4>some grace with the injuries he'd had on that side

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>of the ball and all the resources that had been

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.340
<v Speaker 4>spent on the offensive side of the ball. This offseason,

0:02:17.380 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 4>last offseason, they made it a point to focus on

0:02:20.100 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 4>defense heavily. They spent a ton of money on that

0:02:22.980 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 4>side of the ball, and week one was just abysmal

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 4>for that reason. And I know he's had his share

0:02:29.260 --> 0:02:32.140
<v Speaker 4>of injuries, especially with Mike Jack and J.C. Horn, but

0:02:32.900 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 4>everybody other than Nick Skorton was on the field in

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:36.780
<v Speaker 4>week one. I just think that that was just, for me,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.579
<v Speaker 4>it's always been a win more so than an if

0:02:40.860 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 4>after that game.

0:02:42.340 --> 0:02:45.590
<v Speaker 1>What, um, so what do you expect to change? Like,

0:02:45.830 --> 0:02:48.710
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're waiting on Mike Jack and horn and that

0:02:48.730 --> 0:02:51.010
<v Speaker 1>can make a difference. It seems like there's a chance

0:02:51.070 --> 0:02:53.669
<v Speaker 1>Phillips can come back this week, but like, do you

0:02:53.730 --> 0:02:57.429
<v Speaker 1>expect things to look different? I mean, it's, you can't

0:02:57.470 --> 0:03:00.350
<v Speaker 1>really overhaul a scheme completely, but do you, do you

0:03:00.430 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think things will be done a bit differently with Todd

0:03:02.470 --> 0:03:03.340
<v Speaker 1>wash running the show?

0:03:04.780 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 2>I think so.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, other than just the product on the field,

0:03:07.460 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 4>I think the product on the field is a testament

0:03:09.780 --> 0:03:12.750
<v Speaker 4>to maybe a difference in philosophies. I was kind of

0:03:12.790 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 4>hinted at that. He didn't really go into detail about it.

0:03:15.230 --> 0:03:18.830
<v Speaker 4>But I do think that we see some more Latham Ransom.

0:03:18.870 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 4>He's kind of disappeared the last couple of weeks, and

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.220
<v Speaker 4>it gave me shades of Jeremy Chin when Ebro first

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 4>got here. You guys remember that guy?

0:03:25.419 --> 0:03:26.299
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:03:26.930 --> 0:03:29.900
<v Speaker 4>So Latham Ransom being a complete ghost these last couple

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 4>of weeks after being impactful the first part of the

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 4>season was really interesting to me. And I do think

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.910
<v Speaker 4>that I've seen the rumors floating around that they're going

0:03:37.930 --> 0:03:42.790
<v Speaker 4>to a 4-3. It's not completely... out of the question

0:03:42.870 --> 0:03:44.970
<v Speaker 4>for me because they do still have the personnel to

0:03:45.010 --> 0:03:48.130
<v Speaker 4>fill the 4-3 scheme. I don't know if they'll do

0:03:48.170 --> 0:03:50.250
<v Speaker 4>that or if they'll try to slowly introduce it. I'm

0:03:50.270 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 4>not sure. But what I do expect is for the

0:03:52.970 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Panthers to not have the Broncos running down their throat

0:03:56.300 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 4>on Sunday.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.820
<v Speaker 2>That would be nice. I request that. I'm asking for that.

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.220
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of the addition of D'Angelo Hall

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:08.090
<v Speaker 3>to the staff? And the Canales comments about not that

0:04:08.450 --> 0:04:10.350
<v Speaker 3>I'm paraphrasing, but that D.

0:04:10.390 --> 0:04:10.610
<v Speaker 2>Hall.

0:04:10.630 --> 0:04:12.690
<v Speaker 3>Questioned the status quo when he was here. Yeah, he

0:04:12.770 --> 0:04:14.990
<v Speaker 3>questioned the status quo. What do you think of the

0:04:15.770 --> 0:04:18.010
<v Speaker 3>fact that he's back and what Canales said about that?

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.260
<v Speaker 4>I think that goes back to the philosophy. I think

0:04:21.300 --> 0:04:23.970
<v Speaker 4>that Evo, I'm not taking away from his football mind

0:04:23.990 --> 0:04:27.470
<v Speaker 4>and him being absolutely, you know, intelligent and a rock star.

0:04:27.589 --> 0:04:30.349
<v Speaker 4>As JC Horn said, a wizard at breaking down other teams'

0:04:30.430 --> 0:04:32.500
<v Speaker 4>offenses and things like that. I just think he was

0:04:32.540 --> 0:04:36.260
<v Speaker 4>somebody that became a prisoner to his own stubbornness. Sometimes when,

0:04:36.420 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, it seems to me like he's one of

0:04:37.980 --> 0:04:40.020
<v Speaker 4>those guys that would rather be right than successful. And

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.690
<v Speaker 4>that's always, you know, that's always slated for doom.

0:04:43.970 --> 0:04:44.270
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:44.390 --> 0:04:44.589
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:44.630 --> 0:04:46.550
<v Speaker 4>It comes before the fall. And the more that we're

0:04:46.570 --> 0:04:49.370
<v Speaker 4>hearing about that staff and just the timing of D'Angelo

0:04:49.410 --> 0:04:52.490
<v Speaker 4>Hall coming back, anyone that challenges that or challenges the

0:04:52.510 --> 0:04:56.550
<v Speaker 4>status quo and then you're subsequently dismissed. And then as

0:04:56.589 --> 0:04:58.710
<v Speaker 4>soon as, you know, the DC is going, you're back.

0:04:58.810 --> 0:05:01.099
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think that that says a lot.

0:05:01.330 --> 0:05:01.630
<v Speaker 2>It did.

0:05:01.650 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It was almost Dave kind of wanted everybody to hear that.

0:05:04.300 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it was weird. Cause that was a

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>question right at the end of the presser where, you know,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.099
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't a follow-up wasn't asked about the Angela,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:12.060
<v Speaker 1>he might not have said that.

0:05:12.100 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that felt kind of telling.

0:05:14.020 --> 0:05:17.020
<v Speaker 1>It really does. We got to go to the offensive

0:05:17.060 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. Things ain't exactly Rosie over there.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.619
<v Speaker 1>This O line is just making everything so hard to do.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:26.370 --> 0:05:28.610
<v Speaker 1>Is there any, Brady Christensen is a guy, I know

0:05:28.990 --> 0:05:32.109
<v Speaker 1>you were asking about that, I think it was Friday's presser.

0:05:32.770 --> 0:05:35.850
<v Speaker 1>And yesterday he did finally say, hey, he is good

0:05:35.870 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to go. We're putting him on this, you know, open

0:05:38.270 --> 0:05:40.860
<v Speaker 1>up his 21 day window. Like he's a dude, Sheena,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>where like, I feel like he can definitely help. The

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>only question is like, he's so versatile. What position do

0:05:45.740 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>they plug him in at? Because I think he could

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.020
<v Speaker 1>be better than what we got at multiple positions right now.

0:05:51.380 --> 0:05:54.369
<v Speaker 4>Definitely at left tackle and center, for sure.

0:05:54.490 --> 0:05:55.349
<v Speaker 1>Those two, for sure.

0:05:55.570 --> 0:05:58.650
<v Speaker 4>But the question becomes, do you move Monroe Freeling to

0:05:58.670 --> 0:06:00.940
<v Speaker 4>his more natural position at left tackle and plug Brady

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.060
<v Speaker 4>Christensen in there? And maybe give the rookie Sam Heck

0:06:04.100 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 4>a look at center.

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be mad at that at all.

0:06:08.130 --> 0:06:09.780
<v Speaker 4>I made a tweet during the game on Thursday, or

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.380
<v Speaker 4>maybe right afterwards, that that was the same week one

0:06:12.420 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 4>starting line, except for Damian Lewis was out and Corey

0:06:15.100 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Bullock had stepped into his position due to injuries. But

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 4>other than that, you know, and outside of Monroe Freeling,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.060
<v Speaker 4>everybody else is a vet. Everybody else was slated in

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.810
<v Speaker 4>as the week one started. There's no way they should

0:06:26.830 --> 0:06:29.229
<v Speaker 4>have put that performance up on week eight. So in

0:06:29.270 --> 0:06:32.290
<v Speaker 4>addition to Everett's dismissal, I'm pretty sure Dave Canales lost

0:06:32.310 --> 0:06:33.430
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of sleep trying to figure out how

0:06:33.450 --> 0:06:34.830
<v Speaker 4>he's going to fix this offensive line.

0:06:35.029 --> 0:06:39.170
<v Speaker 2>Big time. Big time. Trade deadline is a week from today, right?

0:06:39.290 --> 0:06:42.460
<v Speaker 2>Is that correct, Mac? Yeah, yeah. The 10th. Do you

0:06:42.500 --> 0:06:44.620
<v Speaker 2>expect the Panthers, Sheena, to be active at the deadline?

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>How do you think that's going to play out?

0:06:46.740 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I do expect them to be active at the deadline,

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 4>but I think a lot of that weighs on how

0:06:50.460 --> 0:06:54.250
<v Speaker 4>the game goes on Sunday. If you get back to 500,

0:06:54.250 --> 0:06:55.650
<v Speaker 4>even if you don't get back to 500, it's still

0:06:55.670 --> 0:06:58.089
<v Speaker 4>a salvageable season because you're in the NFC South. So

0:06:58.130 --> 0:06:59.550
<v Speaker 4>I do expect them to at least be in the

0:06:59.589 --> 0:07:03.060
<v Speaker 4>market for some O-line help and maybe some cornerback help, but...

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Depending on how this Sunday goes for a lot of

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 4>different teams, that's going to impact who's going to be available.

0:07:07.860 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Some of these teams are doing fire sales because the

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 4>season is lost. Some teams are waiting to see what

0:07:13.940 --> 0:07:17.150
<v Speaker 4>their status is after Sunday. Does that make them a

0:07:17.170 --> 0:07:19.190
<v Speaker 4>buyer or a seller at the deadline? So I think

0:07:19.250 --> 0:07:21.190
<v Speaker 4>a lot hinges on these week nine games.

0:07:21.850 --> 0:07:22.790
<v Speaker 2>No doubt. No doubt.

0:07:22.810 --> 0:07:26.100
<v Speaker 1>So, Sheena, people are sending in, I know you're shocked

0:07:26.130 --> 0:07:29.580
<v Speaker 1>by this, comments and questions about Bryce. They would like

0:07:29.700 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>us to get your two cents on this. I'm sure

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.380
<v Speaker 1>you've noticed it and had it going on in your mentions.

0:07:35.860 --> 0:07:37.690
<v Speaker 1>We get a lot of this now. The people that

0:07:37.730 --> 0:07:41.030
<v Speaker 1>disappeared while Bryce was balling, right, at a high level,

0:07:41.450 --> 0:07:44.390
<v Speaker 1>have now reappeared on our text line online. And they

0:07:44.450 --> 0:07:48.230
<v Speaker 1>want to give him a lot of blame for what's

0:07:48.270 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>been happening. How much blame do you think Bryce deserves

0:07:53.060 --> 0:07:54.620
<v Speaker 1>for what's happened the last two weeks?

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.540
<v Speaker 2>Or do you put it on the O-line exclusively? How

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>do you feel about that?

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>I think it starts at the O-line, and I don't

0:08:01.350 --> 0:08:05.020
<v Speaker 4>want Bryce to get... feelings of discomfort that he had

0:08:05.140 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 4>in 2023. I mean, you get sacked 60-plus times and hit,

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.900
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't even know how many times that

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.980
<v Speaker 4>starts to mess with your mechanics. And I wouldn't say confidence,

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.420
<v Speaker 4>but just how you go through your reads and things

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 4>like that. So to act as though the offensive line

0:08:19.380 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 4>play hasn't been abysmal and that Bryce is just stinking

0:08:23.020 --> 0:08:26.550
<v Speaker 4>it up, I think is just super disingenuous. Super disingenuous.

0:08:26.650 --> 0:08:28.630
<v Speaker 4>Everybody has seen what he can do. And I will

0:08:28.670 --> 0:08:32.370
<v Speaker 4>say this. We're not sure what's going on with the knee.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:08:34.460 --> 0:08:37.110
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't seem as willing to take off running as

0:08:37.140 --> 0:08:39.390
<v Speaker 4>before because we know Bryce is an athlete. We've seen

0:08:39.429 --> 0:08:41.650
<v Speaker 4>what he can do. And that may have been the

0:08:41.690 --> 0:08:43.810
<v Speaker 4>difference in him making that O-line look better than it

0:08:43.850 --> 0:08:46.170
<v Speaker 4>actually was earlier this season. Because, again, this is kind

0:08:46.230 --> 0:08:48.710
<v Speaker 4>of the same starting offensive line. It's not a makeshift

0:08:48.750 --> 0:08:51.309
<v Speaker 4>patchwork offensive line like, you know, like they were playing

0:08:51.330 --> 0:08:53.550
<v Speaker 4>within the secondary on Thursday because of all the injuries.

0:08:53.950 --> 0:08:55.750
<v Speaker 4>This is who you guys have slated to be the

0:08:55.770 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 4>starters week one, you know, with the exception of Damian Lewis.

0:09:00.100 --> 0:09:02.730
<v Speaker 4>For me, I know that all the stats that Bryce

0:09:02.750 --> 0:09:04.850
<v Speaker 4>was leading the league in, one of the stats that

0:09:04.870 --> 0:09:06.970
<v Speaker 4>he was leading the league in was he was the

0:09:07.010 --> 0:09:10.089
<v Speaker 4>most pressured quarterback. He was performing in spite of that pressure.

0:09:10.110 --> 0:09:12.020
<v Speaker 4>That's not even a category that you want him to

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 4>have to thrive in.

0:09:13.750 --> 0:09:15.090
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to have to.

0:09:14.990 --> 0:09:18.170
<v Speaker 4>Be under pressure all the time. And eventually that weighs down.

0:09:18.350 --> 0:09:20.689
<v Speaker 4>You can't always outperform a bad offensive line.

0:09:20.830 --> 0:09:21.370
<v Speaker 2>No, you're right.

0:09:21.429 --> 0:09:23.690
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing. You said it. We saw him

0:09:23.710 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do it for five weeks, right? And eventually, the dam

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.220
<v Speaker 1>is broken here. And I do think... I was saying, Sheena,

0:09:30.380 --> 0:09:34.780
<v Speaker 1>after the Bucs game, he's not escaping the way he

0:09:34.820 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 1>was previously.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:37.820
<v Speaker 2>And I think the need.

0:09:38.460 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I know Bryce haters or Bryce doubters, I should say,

0:09:40.900 --> 0:09:42.730
<v Speaker 1>are going to say, y'all are making excuses.

0:09:42.780 --> 0:09:46.230
<v Speaker 2>But, like, something was off. The knee thing makes sense,

0:09:46.890 --> 0:09:47.270
<v Speaker 2>you know?

0:09:48.429 --> 0:09:51.410
<v Speaker 4>Can we really say that the people that are overzealous

0:09:51.490 --> 0:09:53.750
<v Speaker 4>Bryce doubters, can we really say that they employ logic

0:09:53.770 --> 0:09:56.449
<v Speaker 4>for real? I think we're giving them a little bit

0:09:56.470 --> 0:10:00.230
<v Speaker 4>more credit than they deserve. Anytime I hear they hit height,

0:10:00.670 --> 0:10:03.770
<v Speaker 4>has anything to do with the last two weeks, I'm like, yeah,

0:10:04.130 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm exiting the conversation. We're giving those guys, we're giving

0:10:07.510 --> 0:10:10.500
<v Speaker 4>that group way too much credit. They don't employ logic anyway.

0:10:10.510 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, they can't even spell logic. And it's funny

0:10:14.100 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 3>that they're going after Bryce's height. I would guess, Sheena,

0:10:16.380 --> 0:10:18.050
<v Speaker 3>that some of those guys are probably like 5'7.

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 4>That's the thing that always gets me. I'm like, let's

0:10:21.980 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 4>see your height. Oh, you're just not tall enough. I mean,

0:10:25.140 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the Chargers are sitting at, what, 0-8 now, or are

0:10:27.540 --> 0:10:28.950
<v Speaker 4>they 0-7?

0:10:28.970 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 3>0-7.

0:10:29.179 --> 0:10:31.730
<v Speaker 4>0-7. And only because they had a bye.

0:10:32.590 --> 0:10:36.130
<v Speaker 1>Big old strapping quarterback. And look how he looks.

0:10:36.390 --> 0:10:37.410
<v Speaker 2>I mean, all right.

0:10:37.650 --> 0:10:42.050
<v Speaker 4>You just cannot outplay– you can't continuously outplay a bad

0:10:42.090 --> 0:10:43.530
<v Speaker 4>offensive line. You just can't do that.

0:10:43.570 --> 0:10:45.790
<v Speaker 2>That's way too much stress. I agree.

0:10:45.860 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Sheena, great stuff as always. I look forward– to reading

0:10:49.580 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>some angry texts from Bryce Dowders right now.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:54.060
<v Speaker 2>You gave him the business.

0:10:54.660 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>If y'all want this great information, if you're not following

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Sheena already, I ask, what are you doing with your life?

0:11:00.260 --> 0:11:05.630
<v Speaker 1>At Sheena underscore Marie3 on Twitter and slash X.

0:11:05.690 --> 0:11:08.030
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Sheena. Enjoyed it. Thanks so much.

0:11:09.010 --> 0:11:09.570
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, guys.