WEBVTT - Episode 4664: Tony Katz Today Hour 1 - 08/12/26

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Live from Ball Heart Blind and the Crossroads of America.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It's Tony Katz Today. I'm taking a look at these primaries.

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking a look.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>At what happened in Wisconsin, and I am saying to myself,

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 2>my gosh, can nobody get any polling right? Now? It

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>wasn't true in all places. They certainly got pulling right

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>in for example, Wisconsin. No, I'm sorry Minnesota, but they

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>absolutely got it wrong, horrifically, horrifically wrong in Wisconsin. So

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>much so that we have to ask ourselves if we're

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna believe anything they have to say. Tony Katz, Tony

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Katz Today and absolute pleasure, guys, glad that you are

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>here live streaming as we do on the YouTube's and

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 2>on Rumble. Just go to Tony Kat's, look for the channel

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Tony Kats Today, and make it happen on the Twitter

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>ex Tony Katz and Facebook, Tony Kats Radio. Now, some

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 2>things weren't a surprise, right, Peggy Flanagan winning the Senate

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>primary for the Democrats in Minnesota or Andree Craig is

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 2>not a surprise. They went with the lieutenant governor. She

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>had name recognition. Of course, this is the one who says,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>protect trans kids. We're wearing a T shirt that has

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a knife on it, right, says protect trans kids, and

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>it's got the knife on it, because she's going to

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>be really tough. If you don't protect those trans kids.

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>My gosh, if you don't let us mutilate children, I'm

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be so angry with you. Meanwhile, in Connecticut,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 2>they just stopped allowing that procedure to take place. They said,

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>no more mutilating children, which is of course the right response.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>And we should go a step further that the doctors

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 2>who engage in child mutilation should be questioned. No, no, no, no,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>no no. This isn't a medical practice we find okay,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>top surgery, bottom surgery, chemical castration, all of it has

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to go. Children are not adults and we don't allow

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 2>them to define themselves in this way or mutilate themselves

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>this way. And anybody who wants to give children agency

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>is out of their heads and is a danger to

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>those children. Show me the person who wants to give

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>a child agency, and I will show you the person

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>who wants to abuse that child. I said it, I

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 2>meant it, you can quote me. I'm cool with it.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Peggy Flanagin wins that. But this is this is Minnesota.

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the land of the DFL. And with the

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>DFL in Minnesota, being radically left is part of their charm.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 2>And when I say charm, I'm not referring to any

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of charm whatsoever whatsoever. DFL, Democratic Farmer Labor, this

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 2>is their party. They've always been more left. That's that's

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>who they are. I mean, this is the place that

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>elects Tim Walls. And if Tim Walls hadn't been basically

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 2>thrown to the side by videos by Nick Shirley and

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>reporting by City Journal and others, well then he'd be running.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>But he knew it was gonna be too much because

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, he knew about the fraud and didn't tell nobody. Wait,

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that's just me, that's my That's what I suspect. Innocent

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>until proven guilty. So she wins, and Amy Klobachar is

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>now the Democrats nominee to be governor. Amy Klobachar, you

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>know who never found a staple or she didn't love.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>She's an odd bird. Something about her. I've always like,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I think I've met her once. I forget where we

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 2>were where I some some Caucus. Maybe we were in Iowa,

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and I thought she was mostly lovely. You know, I

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>met w Washerman Schultz. I thought she was mostly lovely.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Her politics are sinning against nature, but her I thought

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 2>she was lovely. Clobachar I always thought somewhere in her

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>was the capacity to be normal, and she just never

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 2>just never embraced that that idea. That's Minnesota. Then you

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>had South Carolina. South Carolina was interesting. South Carolina was

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>interesting because this was the special right, this was about

0:04:56.040 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 2>replacing the late Senator Lindsey Graham. So you take a

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 2>look at the data, and you take a look at

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the map. The map is interesting. So you had Darlene

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Graham Nardonne, who's the sister. You had Ralph Norman. You

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>have Russell Fry Russell Norman, I'm sorry, Ralph Norman, the congressman.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>We know that Darlene, she was picked to replace Lindsey

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Graham to finish out his term. Right, so she's the Senator,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>But we also know that Lindsay Graham was on the

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 2>ballot for re election. So they're having a special election

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to determine who will be on the ballot for the

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 2>reelection for November. Right, the midterm. In this special election,

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Darlene Graham comes in first, but she only gets thirty

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>two point seven percent of the vote. Ralph Norman comes

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>in second with twenty four point six percent. Russell Fry

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>in third with nineteen point six percent. Top two vote

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>getters Graham and Norman, they move on to a runoff

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 2>on August twenty fifth to determine who will be on

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the ballot November three. That's has not much time to

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 2>run for office. They both at least can say that

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>they have some name.

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 3>I D.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Graham as a congressman, I'm sorry, Norman as a congressman,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Graham as Graham. You take a look at the map

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>and you see green, red, and kind of purple blue.

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>The green was Ralph Norman, the red is Darlene Graham,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and the blue is Russell Frye, and it segments out

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 2>to where they're located. Ralph Norman wins the north, Russell

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Frye wins the east, and Darlene Graham wins the rest.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 2>So Columbia and Charleston go for Graham. Now the question

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>before us is going to be what happens to Russell

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 2>fry Voters sixty five seven and fourteen of them who

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>absolutely could tip the scales in this election. What we

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 2>know about them is that they definitely didn't vote for

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Darlen Graham. So does that mean that they are opposed

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>to Darlene Graham? To see this, Ah, I'm not a

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina expert, and neither of you. This gets really interesting.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 2>A special election in two weeks, This to me is

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.679
<v Speaker 2>absolutely a bourbon and popcorn event. Just don't get yourself

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>too wrapped up in it. Just watch it and see

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>what happens. This is really interesting. I mean, the circumstance

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 2>is odd. A senator dies, a sister is filling the term,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the sisters running to replace him on the ballot, and

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>does not get the overwhelming support, and there is a

0:07:52.960 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 2>spoiler section of the state at play. Honestly, I'm just

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>that's my own kind of curios I'm very interested in

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 2>what happens here. But the story, kids, the story is Wisconsin.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>The Wisconsin primary is the most surreal thing in the world.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about the Democrats here. We already knew that

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Tom Tiffany was going to be the Republican and he

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>will go up against David Crowley, And you're like, excuse me, Tony, Tony, Tony,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>mister Katz, sir you with the hair and the great stuff.

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me. That's supposed to be Francesca Hung, right, the

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 2>crazed socialist, the one who wants to cancel Thanksgiving. She's

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be the winner here. Everybody knows that. The

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>poll said, so, that's right. The poll said, so you

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>bet your sweet but bippi, the poll said so. Check

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>out these numbers. This was the polling. This is from RealClearPolitics,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 2>realclearpolling dot com. These were the numbers. If you take

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a look at the last five polls now where it

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>says current results, that's the win for Crowley. The last

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 2>five has Francesca Hung, this commy weirdo freak show up

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 2>by double digits plus eleven plus thirteen plus twenty plus

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty two plus eighteen.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Plus twenty two. Holy crop. That should be a blowout.

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 4>That should be remarkable. She should have walked away with

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 4>this with everything in her Nope. David Crowley gets three

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifteen two hundred and thirty five votes. Francesca

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Hung gets three hundred and eleven four hundred and seventy

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 4>five votes, thirty nine point eight one percent versus thirty

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 4>nine point thirty three percent.

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>He wins by half a percent. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>going to ask you a very specific question. The question

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>goes as follows, How in the world, How in the

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 2>world am I supposed to in any way trust polling?

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>If they can say someone is leading by twenty two

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>points and then they lose by half a point, how

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>do I do that? Can someone work me through that?

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 2>As I like my cigar here, how do you lead

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 2>by twenty two points and then lose by half a point?

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I put forth to you that that's impossible. That can't happen.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Something has to be wrong. Now you say to me, Tony,

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it's possible for posters to make a mistake. I wholeheartedly agree.

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 2>It is not an exact science, and it is possible

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 2>for posters to make a mistake. One thousand percent true,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand percent true. Can I take a look for

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>a moment at the race between abdul elsa Ed and

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>what's her name? Oh, the one who sounds like Marge Simpson. Oh,

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>you know her, you know her. You know who I'm

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about. Everybody knows who I'm talking about. She's a

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's right. It's her.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 5>A little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 5>and a little bit of sicket to them.

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Haley Stevens, Haley, steph I forgot Stevens, but we're never

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna forget this.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 5>A little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy,

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 5>and a little bit of sicket to them.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Good lord, that's so good. If I take a look

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 2>at the polling from that race, you know what I get.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I get Abdullah al saiaed up by double digits. That's

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>what I get. I get Elsai ed up by double digits.

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>He was up, if my math is correct, thirteen and

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 2>a half points in the overall. He won by a percent.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>He won by one percent. He was up by thirteen

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>point five. Now I have Francesca Hong up twenty two

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 2>points in some polls. If I average it all together,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>could we at least say she's up fifteen double digits,

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 2>clear double digits, fifteen points. Look at the dang numbers.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 2>She loses by half a point. How do you miss

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>that greatly? This is my question, What the hell is

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>going on? I don't believe it is possible to miss

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>this greatly. I've been trying to figure out where the

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 2>issue is. There could be an issue in methodology, for sure,

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>there could be an issue in methodology. But now there's

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>an issue in Michigan, and now there's an issue in Wisconsin.

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Huh okay, all same polling outfits. They could have the

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>same methodology of methodology issue. Absolutely, it could be that

0:13:53.320 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the pollsters. It could be that the pollsters they yeah,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 2>they're asking the wrong questions because they don't quite understand

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>what this new voter is like. They don't understand this party,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>they don't understand how they act and interact. Could be

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that they're asking the wrong people methodology, wrong questions, ask

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>to the wrong people. It's all possible. Or all of

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>these outfits are putting their thumb on the scale to

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 2>try and create a certain advantage. Now that one is

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the most conspiratorial. That's a hard one for me to

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 2>buy into. Although everything is possible, hard one for me

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>to buy into. I'm not saying it couldn't happen. I'm

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>just saying it's a hard one for me to buy into. Seriously,

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 2>that's I'm not I'm not I'm not there for them.

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 2>What I can tell you you guys, is, as we

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>go forward, into the midterms. I will not believe a

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>single pole out of Michigan or Wisconsin, not a one.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Won't believe it for a second, Absolutely not. They could

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 2>talk to me about how well Abdul say Ed is

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 2>doing in Michigan and I will say, I'm sorry. They

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>had him up by thirteen and a half points and

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>he won by a percent. Nope, not buying it. Not

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 2>buying it. And I don't think you should buy it either. Well, Tony,

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't this fit into your theory that you should never

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>believe any pole. My theory for years is never believed

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>just one pole. Never look at one pole and say, well,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>that's fact. It's not fact. It's a snapshot in time

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't tell any story outside of it. It has

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>zero bearing on reality. The fact of politicos and people

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>desperate to fill colum inches will talk about it at

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 2>nauseum on cable news and other places. Well, that's because

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>they have nothing else to say. They have nothing in

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>their minds. They are empty vessels. But that's enough about

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Jim Acosta. Never believe just one poll. What these poles

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>have shown me is that I can't trust anything. Some

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 2>people want to argue that what happened in in Wisconsin

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>was actually a snowjob. What happened there is that they

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>knew that Francesca Hang was going to get ripped apart,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>so the Democratic Party did some finagling and some flubbing

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that she lost. Great conspiracy theory, Democrats

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>going after Democrats to keep Democrats from getting the person

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>they voted for. I mean, that's how we got Kamala

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Harris as a nominee. We've seen this before. The story

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>here isn't even who won, you know, So I'm not

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about David Crowley and Wisconsin at all in that

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>race against Tom Tiffany. I'm talking about what they told us.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 2>None of it makes sense and none of it lines up.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's the whole story, and we got to find

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 2>out why. That's my plan. Keep it here. I'm Tony

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Katz and this is Tony Katz Today. There was a

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 2>question the other day of where the heck has Mark

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Rubio been? And the answer is, Marco Rubio is doing

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>a podcast. No, he's not hosting a podcast. He was

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 2>on Katie Miller's show, Tony Katz, Tony Katz Today, Good

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to be with you. Katie Miller is the lovely person.

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 2>She was doing work in the first Trump administration. I

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 2>got to talk to her then and at an event

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>at the White House. She was beyond lovely. She is

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the wife of Stephen Miller. I think they were just

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 2>dating at the time. Absolutely lovely person. When I learned

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 2>that Katie Miller had dated Eric Swallwell back in the day,

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I don't even know how to process that.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 2>And I learned that the other day, I was like,

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>my gosh, who knew. So he does this this podcast

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and because of connection, she gets access to everybody. And

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the people she gets access to is the

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of State, Marco Rubio and his wife. And this

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 2>is the conversation I did. Hold on a second, let

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 2>me make sure that you get the conversation. Listen.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I did at one time, maybe four or five years ago,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 3>I tried this thing called keto. You've heard of it, yes,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>And you just eat all this protein and so you

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>go through this massive withdrawal from sugar and carbohydrates for

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the first seventy two hours. It was a near psychotic event.

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I did this in this job, I would be the

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 3>mister president. We must bomb you know, you know Paraguay,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and it's like why, I don't know, I'm just really mad.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>At having it. Okay, he's sitting next to his wife

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>having this conversation about Keto. You might look at that

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and say whatever, I don't care. Every time there is

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 2>another photo of Marco Rubio sitting there in the ovo,

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and it gets AI manipulated to put him into some

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of costume or some kind of thing like, Oh,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have to go run this country today. Oh,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have to take on that job today. Everything

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>like this builds him as a presidential candidate you can

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>connect with in ways that jd Vance does not come

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 2>close to. Now. You might disagree on that, you may

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 2>want Jadvance or Marco Rubio we get a degree or

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>disagree about that, but when it comes to the presentation,

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 2>the likability, the connection, he's off the charts. This is

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Tony Katz today. I despise a flock camera as much

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 2>as anybody. The flock cameras are a problem. And even

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 2>if they're not flock and they belong to another company,

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 2>all of this is a problem. Tony Katz. Tony Katz today,

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 2>so good to be with you, guys, Live streaming YouTube Rumble.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Come check it out. Look for Tony Kats Today and

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter x Tony Kats, Facebook, Tonycats Radio. What's happening

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 2>is that cities are saying we need to protect the

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 2>people dun du du, and so they get these cameras

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>from a company called flock Flock. And what these cameras

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>do is you can go to flocksafety dot com and

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 2>learn about them. I own no part of this, and

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I would say right now to my financial people who

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 2>I know are listening, if I am anywhere in a

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 2>fund that is even close to owning anything owned by flock,

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 2>get me out of it right now. I am. I

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 2>don't care, don't care, don't care, don't care. Not supporting

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>this nonsense. The flock cameras connect communities, businesses, and public

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 2>safety so incidents can be understood clearly in decisions can

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 2>be made on acts. Flock cameras surveil your every movement

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 2>in a city so the police can monitor you. Now,

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>police will disagree with my assessment. I can appreciate that

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>they may disagree. It doesn't change the fact that I'm right,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>and I will debate this with any police officer anywhere,

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>any sheriff anywhere, any law enforcement anywhere, any elected official anywhere.

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>This is about surveillance of the people, and government has

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>no right to do that. The argument will come back

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 2>that Tony, you know you are not guaranteed privacy in

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 2>public spaces. I accept this. I absolutely agree with you. You

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>are ten bajillion percent correct. When you are in a

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 2>public space, when you're walking down the street, you don't

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 2>have any expectation of privacy. I agree. I don't have

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>privacy from the public. That is not an invitation for

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the government to track my whereabouts, track my car, track

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 2>where I drive to, track where I walk into, track,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>where I walk out of track, who I talk to.

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 2>You want to track me, you get a warrants kitten.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I am not interested in what you're trying to get done.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested in my ability to move about my city,

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 2>my community, my town, my neighborhood, my state, my country

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>free of government surveillance. So it can be said clearly,

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if your job is made easier by

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the flock camera. Your problem is yours. You chose to

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>be in law enforcement. It's not easy. I respect it.

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't respect it enough to give up my rights

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>for it, though absolutely not. I won't give up a

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>single right to make your job easier. I could right

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>now without any hesitation, ladies and gentlemen, I could end

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 2>all crime in America after six pm Monday through Sunday.

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>I could end it by telling Americans they're not allowed

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 2>to leave their house after six pm Monday through Sunday,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>six pm to six am. That's the curfew. You have

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to be inside your home. You're not even allowed to

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>utilize the land of your home. You just got to

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>be inside. And I can end crime after six pm.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 2>I could end it. Easies can be to an irrational thought.

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Though irrational thought, the idea that you could be ordered

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>inside your home. Police are out of their minds. And

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 2>we have seen some videos like this wasn't it Minnesota

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>where police and they were well armed. We're going down

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the street where they was this about COVID stuff. They're

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>looking for stuff and people are on their porch and

0:23:58.119 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 2>they're screaming get in your house, and people like I

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.959
<v Speaker 2>don't think at my house. They shot bean bags at citizens.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 2>You think Derek Shalvin should be in jail. Throw all

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 2>those guys in jail. Oh, zero respect for any of

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 2>that government has no right to surveil me, none, zero.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>The flock camera is about surveillance, and there's another one

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 2>is alone along a lon I think it is. It's

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 2>all the same stuff. They have no right to surveil

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 2>you whatsoever. And you're hearing more and more about this,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 2>and people are more and more disgusted by it. The

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 2>problem is some of them are taking things into their

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 2>own hands and they're doing things like cutting down the cameras.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>This happened, This has happened a couple places, most recently

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 2>at Ball State University, which is in Munsey, Indiana. You

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>had Ball State University police officers notified that a flock

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 2>camera had been cut down. They found the camera lying

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 2>on the ground, the solar panels shattered, power cables cut,

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 2>and then they found the video of a white Chevy

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.239
<v Speaker 2>pulling up to the flock camera. Two men dressed in

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>black exiting the truck, walked up to the flock cameras

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>with a reciprocating saw and cut down the camera's mounting pole.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 2>You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 2>get me to sit here and say I understand it.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I can't be the guy who says oh, vandalism, that's

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the way. What you're supposed to do is vote everybody out.

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 2>What you're supposed to do is not give them a

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 2>moment's worth of rest. What you're supposed to do is

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>every time they are in the public street, you're supposed

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 2>to videotape them and post it. Make them feel the

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>heat in all the ways that are legal. Rational. Now,

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 2>I must admit I've never been a guy who likes

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the idea of the tracker. Do you know the trackers?

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 2>They follow candidates everywhere, They follow politicos everywhere. This is

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 2>their job. It's disturbing and it's ugly and it's it's gross.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 2>But if the city and the state are saying we

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>have the right to surveilue, well you're the elected official.

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 2>You ever noticed that the elected official things? They can

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 2>do anything. But if you want to discuss things at

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the elected official in the public setting, well you have

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to use a certain set of decorum. You're not allowed

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to raise your voice, You're not allowed to say this,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 2>You're not allowed to do that. They've got rules of plenty.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 2>It's like the TSA. When the TSA you're heading to

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the airport, you're there at the airport, and the TSA

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 2>has signs if you're rude, if you're abusive, if you're this,

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 2>if you're that, well, then you're gonna get arrested. And

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the TSA is screaming at you about whether your laptops

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 2>in and your laptops out, and you app this, you

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>have to do that. No one's ever being polite or respectful,

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>decent or kind, but they're letting you know right off

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>the bat that you are just lucky to be there,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 2>and anytime they feel you're getting just to weep it

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>up and you're going to jail. You're certainly missing your flight,

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and they're gonna wear five blue gloves at once, but

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.479
<v Speaker 2>you are going to get yourself in cavity search and

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>not the fun kind. There are fun kinds. I leave

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 2>that for others. This is a gross way for things

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 2>to act, for people to act with things to be.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>You can't engage in the vandalism. You can't get me

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 2>to condone that stuff. But if these cities don't understand

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>that the flock cameras are wrong, the whole concept is wrong,

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 2>and people will send me an email, they'll sty'll send

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 2>me a message. We were able to find the person

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>who attacked my wife. We're able to find this person.

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>We were able to find these people who are in

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the country illegally, not at my expense, Not at my expense,

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 2>port those who are in the country illegally. Look at

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutors that don't prosecute criminals and allow them on

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 2>the street and vote them out of office or charge them.

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 2>The people have to make aggressive demands, and I think

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>they should make them loudly. I think there should be

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 2>protests in the street. I think they should be protesting

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 2>front of the city hall. I don't think these elected

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 2>officials should get rest from the protests. Take down all

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.959
<v Speaker 2>the flock cameras. The elected officials are wrong, and someone's

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>going to say to me, Tony, if you don't take

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>an action, how will they know that they're wrong, Because

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 2>in that conversation you're four steps away from being Luigi

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>MANGIONI don't ask me to be a part of that.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't ask me to be a part of that. But

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 2>for these elected officials, including my own mayor, who I like,

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>by the way, defending flock cameras, you're out of your head.

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't elect people who defend flock cameras. You're gonna

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 2>have to go. This thing is not okay. I don't

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>care if the police like it. It doesn't matter if

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they like it. It's inconsequential. And oddly enough, this is

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 2>not the most maddening thing I came across yesterday that

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to bring to you today. The most maddening

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 2>thing was this headline. It's an actual headline over at

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Newsmax about the Air Force Secretary of the former Air

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Force secretary who lost their security clearance lost the security

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>clearance because they leaked information about Air Force one, which

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 2>is a whole story that's still going on. The former

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Air Force Secretary of Frank now says he's going to

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>sue the Trump administration after the Pentagon revoked his security clearance,

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 2>saying that he learned about it through a decision on

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>social media. And he's saying, I couldn't think of anything

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd ever said that was classified, and I have tried

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>very hard not to say anything classified and was quite

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>sure I had not allow me. You are not owned

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 2>to security clearance. I don't care how you served, I

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>thank you for the service. You are not owned a

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>security clearance. If the White House decides to pull it.

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 2>If the Pentagon decides to pull it, that's the ballgame.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>That's it. What are you going to sue for? You

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 2>demand access to security clearance when you are not in

0:30:53.440 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the position. When asked about the plans, when asked about

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>whether or not you are a target of criticism, he said,

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna sue them. That's what's next for me. That's

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that's insane right.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know much about Kendall's history. I don't I

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 2>don't recall him during the Biden administration. Nothing comes to

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 2>mind for me. Other people could be like, oh, I

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 2>know his history, and maybe true. But the overarching is,

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 2>who said you're entitled to anything? Why? Why do they

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>act like they're entitled. That's the connective between these two stories.

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I we're entitled to keep an eye on things for safety.

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 2>You're entitled to classified information for your career. No, you're

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 2>not not at all. Joe Biden shouldn't have access to

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 2>classified information either, By the way, Sorry, I know we

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>usually do that for former presidents, and sometimes you need

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 2>them based on conversations they had had and you're still

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 2>engaged in further investigations and negotiations et cetera. But Joe

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Biden can't be trusted. So the answers, no, he's not

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 2>aware of where he is. So the answers no, Like

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>you have a right to the classified info. It's a

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>best of luck in the lawsuit. And any judge who says,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 2>do you have a right to classified information? Well, here

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I go, oh, I definitely deserve classified information. No one

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 2>deserves classified information more than me, because that I mean,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 2>it's basically the same argument that this guy's making that

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the Warmer secretary is making. People are nutty. I'm Tony Katz.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Tony Katz today. So Josh Kushner and Bob

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Iger are going to purchase the Los Angeles Lakers. Tony Katz,

0:32:52.760 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Tony Katz today, My oh my, oh my, twelve billion dollars.

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 5>That is.

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Something else. They had been working on the idea of

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 2>getting a team in Las Vegas because now that gambling

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 2>is so prolific, everyone's like, yeah, you can have a

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 2>team in Vegas. It's fine. And so you've got the

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Raiders in Vegas, got the AS movement in Vegas. Might

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 2>as well have some basketball as well. You've got UFC

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 2>in Vegas. Vegas is going to make its play to

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 2>look at Miami and say, watch how we work. Pretty

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 2>impressive number, by the way, what this is here? And

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>they do a lot of other stuff in other places

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 2>in terms of ownership. But the big sports story right

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 2>now is that there's something called the Patriot Games and

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>it's about youth in sports and it was in Ohio

0:33:55.520 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 2>and Pat McAfee was invited to it and President Trump

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>was there, and so McAfee actually met President Trump on

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the tarmac while it's raining and McAfee is wearing a

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>T shirt and a hat backwards, and there they are

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 2>at the games together. They're sitting next to each other,

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 2>and producer land and is like, you know, people are

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 2>his whole feed is filled with people who are angry

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 2>at Pat McAfee. What's wrong with everybody? Why would you

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>be angry at Pat McAfee. He got invited to be

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 2>the thing. The president got invited to be at the thing.

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>It's about kids in sports, and so they're sitting there.

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 2>What a weird, nutty thing to be upset with. He

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't do anything wrong. There are times you can argue

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 2>that you don't like something he says. There are times

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 2>you can argue that he's gotten out over his skis.

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he would tell you that. I don't know

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the man personally. I've never met him. We're both in India.

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I've never met the guy. It's quite all right, by

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the way, but he's sitting next to the president and

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm supposed to be How dare you these people really

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 2>think that Pat MacFee should have just turned around and

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 2>punched the president in the face. That's their argument. It

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 2>is a weird argument to be that filled with hate.

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 2>If I'm invited to an event for a name that

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 2>for cigars and Barack Obama is there and they seat

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 2>me next to them. Sitting next to Barack Obama, I

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 2>don't think we're gonna talk about anything politics, but we're

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna talk cigars. I would talk cigars with Barack Obama

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 2>right now. I don't think he's much of a cigar guy.

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But be angry at Pat mcabee is just it's just silly.

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And you're right, Chatroom, you are right. The Trumps arrangement

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 2>syndrome is out of control. It has become religion, well cults. Really,

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Tony Katz today,