Speaker 1: Live from Ball Heart Blind and the Crossroads of America.
Speaker 1: It's Tony Katz Today. I'm taking a look at these primaries.
Speaker 1: I'm taking a look.
Speaker 2: At what happened in Wisconsin, and I am saying to myself,
Speaker 2: my gosh, can nobody get any polling right? Now? It
Speaker 2: wasn't true in all places. They certainly got pulling right
Speaker 2: in for example, Wisconsin. No, I'm sorry Minnesota, but they
Speaker 2: absolutely got it wrong, horrifically, horrifically wrong in Wisconsin. So
Speaker 2: much so that we have to ask ourselves if we're
Speaker 2: gonna believe anything they have to say. Tony Katz, Tony
Speaker 2: Katz Today and absolute pleasure, guys, glad that you are
Speaker 2: here live streaming as we do on the YouTube's and
Speaker 2: on Rumble. Just go to Tony Kat's, look for the channel
Speaker 2: Tony Kats Today, and make it happen on the Twitter
Speaker 2: ex Tony Katz and Facebook, Tony Kats Radio. Now, some
Speaker 2: things weren't a surprise, right, Peggy Flanagan winning the Senate
Speaker 2: primary for the Democrats in Minnesota or Andree Craig is
Speaker 2: not a surprise. They went with the lieutenant governor. She
Speaker 2: had name recognition. Of course, this is the one who says,
Speaker 2: protect trans kids. We're wearing a T shirt that has
Speaker 2: a knife on it, right, says protect trans kids, and
Speaker 2: it's got the knife on it, because she's going to
Speaker 2: be really tough. If you don't protect those trans kids.
Speaker 2: My gosh, if you don't let us mutilate children, I'm
Speaker 2: going to be so angry with you. Meanwhile, in Connecticut,
Speaker 2: they just stopped allowing that procedure to take place. They said,
Speaker 2: no more mutilating children, which is of course the right response.
Speaker 2: And we should go a step further that the doctors
Speaker 2: who engage in child mutilation should be questioned. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: no no. This isn't a medical practice we find okay,
Speaker 2: top surgery, bottom surgery, chemical castration, all of it has
Speaker 2: to go. Children are not adults and we don't allow
Speaker 2: them to define themselves in this way or mutilate themselves
Speaker 2: this way. And anybody who wants to give children agency
Speaker 2: is out of their heads and is a danger to
Speaker 2: those children. Show me the person who wants to give
Speaker 2: a child agency, and I will show you the person
Speaker 2: who wants to abuse that child. I said it, I
Speaker 2: meant it, you can quote me. I'm cool with it.
Speaker 2: Peggy Flanagin wins that. But this is this is Minnesota.
Speaker 2: This is the land of the DFL. And with the
Speaker 2: DFL in Minnesota, being radically left is part of their charm.
Speaker 2: And when I say charm, I'm not referring to any
Speaker 2: kind of charm whatsoever whatsoever. DFL, Democratic Farmer Labor, this
Speaker 2: is their party. They've always been more left. That's that's
Speaker 2: who they are. I mean, this is the place that
Speaker 2: elects Tim Walls. And if Tim Walls hadn't been basically
Speaker 2: thrown to the side by videos by Nick Shirley and
Speaker 2: reporting by City Journal and others, well then he'd be running.
Speaker 2: But he knew it was gonna be too much because
Speaker 2: you know, he knew about the fraud and didn't tell nobody. Wait,
Speaker 2: that's just me, that's my That's what I suspect. Innocent
Speaker 2: until proven guilty. So she wins, and Amy Klobachar is
Speaker 2: now the Democrats nominee to be governor. Amy Klobachar, you
Speaker 2: know who never found a staple or she didn't love.
Speaker 2: She's an odd bird. Something about her. I've always like,
Speaker 2: I think I've met her once. I forget where we
Speaker 2: were where I some some Caucus. Maybe we were in Iowa,
Speaker 2: and I thought she was mostly lovely. You know, I
Speaker 2: met w Washerman Schultz. I thought she was mostly lovely.
Speaker 2: Her politics are sinning against nature, but her I thought
Speaker 2: she was lovely. Clobachar I always thought somewhere in her
Speaker 2: was the capacity to be normal, and she just never
Speaker 2: just never embraced that that idea. That's Minnesota. Then you
Speaker 2: had South Carolina. South Carolina was interesting. South Carolina was
Speaker 2: interesting because this was the special right, this was about
Speaker 2: replacing the late Senator Lindsey Graham. So you take a
Speaker 2: look at the data, and you take a look at
Speaker 2: the map. The map is interesting. So you had Darlene
Speaker 2: Graham Nardonne, who's the sister. You had Ralph Norman. You
Speaker 2: have Russell Fry Russell Norman, I'm sorry, Ralph Norman, the congressman.
Speaker 2: We know that Darlene, she was picked to replace Lindsey
Speaker 2: Graham to finish out his term. Right, so she's the Senator,
Speaker 2: But we also know that Lindsay Graham was on the
Speaker 2: ballot for re election. So they're having a special election
Speaker 2: to determine who will be on the ballot for the
Speaker 2: reelection for November. Right, the midterm. In this special election,
Speaker 2: Darlene Graham comes in first, but she only gets thirty
Speaker 2: two point seven percent of the vote. Ralph Norman comes
Speaker 2: in second with twenty four point six percent. Russell Fry
Speaker 2: in third with nineteen point six percent. Top two vote
Speaker 2: getters Graham and Norman, they move on to a runoff
Speaker 2: on August twenty fifth to determine who will be on
Speaker 2: the ballot November three. That's has not much time to
Speaker 2: run for office. They both at least can say that
Speaker 2: they have some name.
Speaker 3: I D.
Speaker 2: Graham as a congressman, I'm sorry, Norman as a congressman,
Speaker 2: Graham as Graham. You take a look at the map
Speaker 2: and you see green, red, and kind of purple blue.
Speaker 2: The green was Ralph Norman, the red is Darlene Graham,
Speaker 2: and the blue is Russell Frye, and it segments out
Speaker 2: to where they're located. Ralph Norman wins the north, Russell
Speaker 2: Frye wins the east, and Darlene Graham wins the rest.
Speaker 2: So Columbia and Charleston go for Graham. Now the question
Speaker 2: before us is going to be what happens to Russell
Speaker 2: fry Voters sixty five seven and fourteen of them who
Speaker 2: absolutely could tip the scales in this election. What we
Speaker 2: know about them is that they definitely didn't vote for
Speaker 2: Darlen Graham. So does that mean that they are opposed
Speaker 2: to Darlene Graham? To see this, Ah, I'm not a
Speaker 2: South Carolina expert, and neither of you. This gets really interesting.
Speaker 2: A special election in two weeks, This to me is
Speaker 2: absolutely a bourbon and popcorn event. Just don't get yourself
Speaker 2: too wrapped up in it. Just watch it and see
Speaker 2: what happens. This is really interesting. I mean, the circumstance
Speaker 2: is odd. A senator dies, a sister is filling the term,
Speaker 2: the sisters running to replace him on the ballot, and
Speaker 2: does not get the overwhelming support, and there is a
Speaker 2: spoiler section of the state at play. Honestly, I'm just
Speaker 2: that's my own kind of curios I'm very interested in
Speaker 2: what happens here. But the story, kids, the story is Wisconsin.
Speaker 2: The Wisconsin primary is the most surreal thing in the world.
Speaker 2: We're talking about the Democrats here. We already knew that
Speaker 2: Tom Tiffany was going to be the Republican and he
Speaker 2: will go up against David Crowley, And you're like, excuse me, Tony, Tony, Tony,
Speaker 2: mister Katz, sir you with the hair and the great stuff.
Speaker 2: Excuse me. That's supposed to be Francesca Hung, right, the
Speaker 2: crazed socialist, the one who wants to cancel Thanksgiving. She's
Speaker 2: supposed to be the winner here. Everybody knows that. The
Speaker 2: poll said, so, that's right. The poll said, so you
Speaker 2: bet your sweet but bippi, the poll said so. Check
Speaker 2: out these numbers. This was the polling. This is from RealClearPolitics,
Speaker 2: realclearpolling dot com. These were the numbers. If you take
Speaker 2: a look at the last five polls now where it
Speaker 2: says current results, that's the win for Crowley. The last
Speaker 2: five has Francesca Hung, this commy weirdo freak show up
Speaker 2: by double digits plus eleven plus thirteen plus twenty plus
Speaker 2: twenty two plus eighteen.
Speaker 4: Plus twenty two. Holy crop. That should be a blowout.
Speaker 4: That should be remarkable. She should have walked away with
Speaker 4: this with everything in her Nope. David Crowley gets three
Speaker 4: hundred and fifteen two hundred and thirty five votes. Francesca
Speaker 4: Hung gets three hundred and eleven four hundred and seventy
Speaker 4: five votes, thirty nine point eight one percent versus thirty
Speaker 4: nine point thirty three percent.
Speaker 2: He wins by half a percent. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm
Speaker 2: going to ask you a very specific question. The question
Speaker 2: goes as follows, How in the world, How in the
Speaker 2: world am I supposed to in any way trust polling?
Speaker 2: If they can say someone is leading by twenty two
Speaker 2: points and then they lose by half a point, how
Speaker 2: do I do that? Can someone work me through that?
Speaker 2: As I like my cigar here, how do you lead
Speaker 2: by twenty two points and then lose by half a point?
Speaker 2: I put forth to you that that's impossible. That can't happen.
Speaker 2: Something has to be wrong. Now you say to me, Tony,
Speaker 2: it's possible for posters to make a mistake. I wholeheartedly agree.
Speaker 2: It is not an exact science, and it is possible
Speaker 2: for posters to make a mistake. One thousand percent true,
Speaker 2: ten thousand percent true. Can I take a look for
Speaker 2: a moment at the race between abdul elsa Ed and
Speaker 2: what's her name? Oh, the one who sounds like Marge Simpson. Oh,
Speaker 2: you know her, you know her. You know who I'm
Speaker 2: talking about. Everybody knows who I'm talking about. She's a
Speaker 2: Oh that's right. It's her.
Speaker 5: A little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy,
Speaker 5: and a little bit of sicket to them.
Speaker 2: Haley Stevens, Haley, steph I forgot Stevens, but we're never
Speaker 2: gonna forget this.
Speaker 5: A little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy,
Speaker 5: and a little bit of sicket to them.
Speaker 2: Good lord, that's so good. If I take a look
Speaker 2: at the polling from that race, you know what I get.
Speaker 2: I get Abdullah al saiaed up by double digits. That's
Speaker 2: what I get. I get Elsai ed up by double digits.
Speaker 2: He was up, if my math is correct, thirteen and
Speaker 2: a half points in the overall. He won by a percent.
Speaker 2: He won by one percent. He was up by thirteen
Speaker 2: point five. Now I have Francesca Hong up twenty two
Speaker 2: points in some polls. If I average it all together,
Speaker 2: could we at least say she's up fifteen double digits,
Speaker 2: clear double digits, fifteen points. Look at the dang numbers.
Speaker 2: She loses by half a point. How do you miss
Speaker 2: that greatly? This is my question, What the hell is
Speaker 2: going on? I don't believe it is possible to miss
Speaker 2: this greatly. I've been trying to figure out where the
Speaker 2: issue is. There could be an issue in methodology, for sure,
Speaker 2: there could be an issue in methodology. But now there's
Speaker 2: an issue in Michigan, and now there's an issue in Wisconsin.
Speaker 2: Huh okay, all same polling outfits. They could have the
Speaker 2: same methodology of methodology issue. Absolutely, it could be that
Speaker 2: the pollsters. It could be that the pollsters they yeah,
Speaker 2: they're asking the wrong questions because they don't quite understand
Speaker 2: what this new voter is like. They don't understand this party,
Speaker 2: they don't understand how they act and interact. Could be
Speaker 2: that they're asking the wrong people methodology, wrong questions, ask
Speaker 2: to the wrong people. It's all possible. Or all of
Speaker 2: these outfits are putting their thumb on the scale to
Speaker 2: try and create a certain advantage. Now that one is
Speaker 2: the most conspiratorial. That's a hard one for me to
Speaker 2: buy into. Although everything is possible, hard one for me
Speaker 2: to buy into. I'm not saying it couldn't happen. I'm
Speaker 2: just saying it's a hard one for me to buy into. Seriously,
Speaker 2: that's I'm not I'm not I'm not there for them.
Speaker 2: What I can tell you you guys, is, as we
Speaker 2: go forward, into the midterms. I will not believe a
Speaker 2: single pole out of Michigan or Wisconsin, not a one.
Speaker 2: Won't believe it for a second, Absolutely not. They could
Speaker 2: talk to me about how well Abdul say Ed is
Speaker 2: doing in Michigan and I will say, I'm sorry. They
Speaker 2: had him up by thirteen and a half points and
Speaker 2: he won by a percent. Nope, not buying it. Not
Speaker 2: buying it. And I don't think you should buy it either. Well, Tony,
Speaker 2: doesn't this fit into your theory that you should never
Speaker 2: believe any pole. My theory for years is never believed
Speaker 2: just one pole. Never look at one pole and say, well,
Speaker 2: that's fact. It's not fact. It's a snapshot in time
Speaker 2: that doesn't tell any story outside of it. It has
Speaker 2: zero bearing on reality. The fact of politicos and people
Speaker 2: desperate to fill colum inches will talk about it at
Speaker 2: nauseum on cable news and other places. Well, that's because
Speaker 2: they have nothing else to say. They have nothing in
Speaker 2: their minds. They are empty vessels. But that's enough about
Speaker 2: Jim Acosta. Never believe just one poll. What these poles
Speaker 2: have shown me is that I can't trust anything. Some
Speaker 2: people want to argue that what happened in in Wisconsin
Speaker 2: was actually a snowjob. What happened there is that they
Speaker 2: knew that Francesca Hang was going to get ripped apart,
Speaker 2: so the Democratic Party did some finagling and some flubbing
Speaker 2: to make sure that she lost. Great conspiracy theory, Democrats
Speaker 2: going after Democrats to keep Democrats from getting the person
Speaker 2: they voted for. I mean, that's how we got Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris as a nominee. We've seen this before. The story
Speaker 2: here isn't even who won, you know, So I'm not
Speaker 2: talking about David Crowley and Wisconsin at all in that
Speaker 2: race against Tom Tiffany. I'm talking about what they told us.
Speaker 2: None of it makes sense and none of it lines up.
Speaker 2: And that's the whole story, and we got to find
Speaker 2: out why. That's my plan. Keep it here. I'm Tony
Speaker 2: Katz and this is Tony Katz Today. There was a
Speaker 2: question the other day of where the heck has Mark
Speaker 2: Rubio been? And the answer is, Marco Rubio is doing
Speaker 2: a podcast. No, he's not hosting a podcast. He was
Speaker 2: on Katie Miller's show, Tony Katz, Tony Katz Today, Good
Speaker 2: to be with you. Katie Miller is the lovely person.
Speaker 2: She was doing work in the first Trump administration. I
Speaker 2: got to talk to her then and at an event
Speaker 2: at the White House. She was beyond lovely. She is
Speaker 2: the wife of Stephen Miller. I think they were just
Speaker 2: dating at the time. Absolutely lovely person. When I learned
Speaker 2: that Katie Miller had dated Eric Swallwell back in the day,
Speaker 2: I was like, I don't even know how to process that.
Speaker 2: And I learned that the other day, I was like,
Speaker 2: my gosh, who knew. So he does this this podcast
Speaker 2: and because of connection, she gets access to everybody. And
Speaker 2: one of the people she gets access to is the
Speaker 2: Secretary of State, Marco Rubio and his wife. And this
Speaker 2: is the conversation I did. Hold on a second, let
Speaker 2: me make sure that you get the conversation. Listen.
Speaker 3: I did at one time, maybe four or five years ago,
Speaker 3: I tried this thing called keto. You've heard of it, yes,
Speaker 3: And you just eat all this protein and so you
Speaker 3: go through this massive withdrawal from sugar and carbohydrates for
Speaker 3: the first seventy two hours. It was a near psychotic event.
Speaker 3: I did this in this job, I would be the
Speaker 3: mister president. We must bomb you know, you know Paraguay,
Speaker 3: and it's like why, I don't know, I'm just really mad.
Speaker 2: At having it. Okay, he's sitting next to his wife
Speaker 2: having this conversation about Keto. You might look at that
Speaker 2: and say whatever, I don't care. Every time there is
Speaker 2: another photo of Marco Rubio sitting there in the ovo,
Speaker 2: and it gets AI manipulated to put him into some
Speaker 2: kind of costume or some kind of thing like, Oh,
Speaker 2: he's gonna have to go run this country today. Oh,
Speaker 2: he's gonna have to take on that job today. Everything
Speaker 2: like this builds him as a presidential candidate you can
Speaker 2: connect with in ways that jd Vance does not come
Speaker 2: close to. Now. You might disagree on that, you may
Speaker 2: want Jadvance or Marco Rubio we get a degree or
Speaker 2: disagree about that, but when it comes to the presentation,
Speaker 2: the likability, the connection, he's off the charts. This is
Speaker 2: Tony Katz today. I despise a flock camera as much
Speaker 2: as anybody. The flock cameras are a problem. And even
Speaker 2: if they're not flock and they belong to another company,
Speaker 2: all of this is a problem. Tony Katz. Tony Katz today,
Speaker 2: so good to be with you, guys, Live streaming YouTube Rumble.
Speaker 2: Come check it out. Look for Tony Kats Today and
Speaker 2: on Twitter x Tony Kats, Facebook, Tonycats Radio. What's happening
Speaker 2: is that cities are saying we need to protect the
Speaker 2: people dun du du, and so they get these cameras
Speaker 2: from a company called flock Flock. And what these cameras
Speaker 2: do is you can go to flocksafety dot com and
Speaker 2: learn about them. I own no part of this, and
Speaker 2: I would say right now to my financial people who
Speaker 2: I know are listening, if I am anywhere in a
Speaker 2: fund that is even close to owning anything owned by flock,
Speaker 2: get me out of it right now. I am. I
Speaker 2: don't care, don't care, don't care, don't care. Not supporting
Speaker 2: this nonsense. The flock cameras connect communities, businesses, and public
Speaker 2: safety so incidents can be understood clearly in decisions can
Speaker 2: be made on acts. Flock cameras surveil your every movement
Speaker 2: in a city so the police can monitor you. Now,
Speaker 2: police will disagree with my assessment. I can appreciate that
Speaker 2: they may disagree. It doesn't change the fact that I'm right,
Speaker 2: and I will debate this with any police officer anywhere,
Speaker 2: any sheriff anywhere, any law enforcement anywhere, any elected official anywhere.
Speaker 2: This is about surveillance of the people, and government has
Speaker 2: no right to do that. The argument will come back
Speaker 2: that Tony, you know you are not guaranteed privacy in
Speaker 2: public spaces. I accept this. I absolutely agree with you. You
Speaker 2: are ten bajillion percent correct. When you are in a
Speaker 2: public space, when you're walking down the street, you don't
Speaker 2: have any expectation of privacy. I agree. I don't have
Speaker 2: privacy from the public. That is not an invitation for
Speaker 2: the government to track my whereabouts, track my car, track
Speaker 2: where I drive to, track where I walk into, track,
Speaker 2: where I walk out of track, who I talk to.
Speaker 2: You want to track me, you get a warrants kitten.
Speaker 2: I am not interested in what you're trying to get done.
Speaker 2: I'm interested in my ability to move about my city,
Speaker 2: my community, my town, my neighborhood, my state, my country
Speaker 2: free of government surveillance. So it can be said clearly,
Speaker 2: I don't care if your job is made easier by
Speaker 2: the flock camera. Your problem is yours. You chose to
Speaker 2: be in law enforcement. It's not easy. I respect it.
Speaker 2: I don't respect it enough to give up my rights
Speaker 2: for it, though absolutely not. I won't give up a
Speaker 2: single right to make your job easier. I could right
Speaker 2: now without any hesitation, ladies and gentlemen, I could end
Speaker 2: all crime in America after six pm Monday through Sunday.
Speaker 2: I could end it by telling Americans they're not allowed
Speaker 2: to leave their house after six pm Monday through Sunday,
Speaker 2: six pm to six am. That's the curfew. You have
Speaker 2: to be inside your home. You're not even allowed to
Speaker 2: utilize the land of your home. You just got to
Speaker 2: be inside. And I can end crime after six pm.
Speaker 2: I could end it. Easies can be to an irrational thought.
Speaker 2: Though irrational thought, the idea that you could be ordered
Speaker 2: inside your home. Police are out of their minds. And
Speaker 2: we have seen some videos like this wasn't it Minnesota
Speaker 2: where police and they were well armed. We're going down
Speaker 2: the street where they was this about COVID stuff. They're
Speaker 2: looking for stuff and people are on their porch and
Speaker 2: they're screaming get in your house, and people like I
Speaker 2: don't think at my house. They shot bean bags at citizens.
Speaker 2: You think Derek Shalvin should be in jail. Throw all
Speaker 2: those guys in jail. Oh, zero respect for any of
Speaker 2: that government has no right to surveil me, none, zero.
Speaker 2: The flock camera is about surveillance, and there's another one
Speaker 2: is alone along a lon I think it is. It's
Speaker 2: all the same stuff. They have no right to surveil
Speaker 2: you whatsoever. And you're hearing more and more about this,
Speaker 2: and people are more and more disgusted by it. The
Speaker 2: problem is some of them are taking things into their
Speaker 2: own hands and they're doing things like cutting down the cameras.
Speaker 2: This happened, This has happened a couple places, most recently
Speaker 2: at Ball State University, which is in Munsey, Indiana. You
Speaker 2: had Ball State University police officers notified that a flock
Speaker 2: camera had been cut down. They found the camera lying
Speaker 2: on the ground, the solar panels shattered, power cables cut,
Speaker 2: and then they found the video of a white Chevy
Speaker 2: pulling up to the flock camera. Two men dressed in
Speaker 2: black exiting the truck, walked up to the flock cameras
Speaker 2: with a reciprocating saw and cut down the camera's mounting pole.
Speaker 2: You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't
Speaker 2: get me to sit here and say I understand it.
Speaker 2: I can't be the guy who says oh, vandalism, that's
Speaker 2: the way. What you're supposed to do is vote everybody out.
Speaker 2: What you're supposed to do is not give them a
Speaker 2: moment's worth of rest. What you're supposed to do is
Speaker 2: every time they are in the public street, you're supposed
Speaker 2: to videotape them and post it. Make them feel the
Speaker 2: heat in all the ways that are legal. Rational. Now,
Speaker 2: I must admit I've never been a guy who likes
Speaker 2: the idea of the tracker. Do you know the trackers?
Speaker 2: They follow candidates everywhere, They follow politicos everywhere. This is
Speaker 2: their job. It's disturbing and it's ugly and it's it's gross.
Speaker 2: But if the city and the state are saying we
Speaker 2: have the right to surveilue, well you're the elected official.
Speaker 2: You ever noticed that the elected official things? They can
Speaker 2: do anything. But if you want to discuss things at
Speaker 2: the elected official in the public setting, well you have
Speaker 2: to use a certain set of decorum. You're not allowed
Speaker 2: to raise your voice, You're not allowed to say this,
Speaker 2: You're not allowed to do that. They've got rules of plenty.
Speaker 2: It's like the TSA. When the TSA you're heading to
Speaker 2: the airport, you're there at the airport, and the TSA
Speaker 2: has signs if you're rude, if you're abusive, if you're this,
Speaker 2: if you're that, well, then you're gonna get arrested. And
Speaker 2: the TSA is screaming at you about whether your laptops
Speaker 2: in and your laptops out, and you app this, you
Speaker 2: have to do that. No one's ever being polite or respectful,
Speaker 2: decent or kind, but they're letting you know right off
Speaker 2: the bat that you are just lucky to be there,
Speaker 2: and anytime they feel you're getting just to weep it
Speaker 2: up and you're going to jail. You're certainly missing your flight,
Speaker 2: and they're gonna wear five blue gloves at once, but
Speaker 2: you are going to get yourself in cavity search and
Speaker 2: not the fun kind. There are fun kinds. I leave
Speaker 2: that for others. This is a gross way for things
Speaker 2: to act, for people to act with things to be.
Speaker 2: You can't engage in the vandalism. You can't get me
Speaker 2: to condone that stuff. But if these cities don't understand
Speaker 2: that the flock cameras are wrong, the whole concept is wrong,
Speaker 2: and people will send me an email, they'll sty'll send
Speaker 2: me a message. We were able to find the person
Speaker 2: who attacked my wife. We're able to find this person.
Speaker 2: We were able to find these people who are in
Speaker 2: the country illegally, not at my expense, Not at my expense,
Speaker 2: port those who are in the country illegally. Look at
Speaker 2: the prosecutors that don't prosecute criminals and allow them on
Speaker 2: the street and vote them out of office or charge them.
Speaker 2: The people have to make aggressive demands, and I think
Speaker 2: they should make them loudly. I think there should be
Speaker 2: protests in the street. I think they should be protesting
Speaker 2: front of the city hall. I don't think these elected
Speaker 2: officials should get rest from the protests. Take down all
Speaker 2: the flock cameras. The elected officials are wrong, and someone's
Speaker 2: going to say to me, Tony, if you don't take
Speaker 2: an action, how will they know that they're wrong, Because
Speaker 2: in that conversation you're four steps away from being Luigi
Speaker 2: MANGIONI don't ask me to be a part of that.
Speaker 2: Don't ask me to be a part of that. But
Speaker 2: for these elected officials, including my own mayor, who I like,
Speaker 2: by the way, defending flock cameras, you're out of your head.
Speaker 2: I don't elect people who defend flock cameras. You're gonna
Speaker 2: have to go. This thing is not okay. I don't
Speaker 2: care if the police like it. It doesn't matter if
Speaker 2: they like it. It's inconsequential. And oddly enough, this is
Speaker 2: not the most maddening thing I came across yesterday that
Speaker 2: I wanted to bring to you today. The most maddening
Speaker 2: thing was this headline. It's an actual headline over at
Speaker 2: Newsmax about the Air Force Secretary of the former Air
Speaker 2: Force secretary who lost their security clearance lost the security
Speaker 2: clearance because they leaked information about Air Force one, which
Speaker 2: is a whole story that's still going on. The former
Speaker 2: Air Force Secretary of Frank now says he's going to
Speaker 2: sue the Trump administration after the Pentagon revoked his security clearance,
Speaker 2: saying that he learned about it through a decision on
Speaker 2: social media. And he's saying, I couldn't think of anything
Speaker 2: I'd ever said that was classified, and I have tried
Speaker 2: very hard not to say anything classified and was quite
Speaker 2: sure I had not allow me. You are not owned
Speaker 2: to security clearance. I don't care how you served, I
Speaker 2: thank you for the service. You are not owned a
Speaker 2: security clearance. If the White House decides to pull it.
Speaker 2: If the Pentagon decides to pull it, that's the ballgame.
Speaker 2: That's it. What are you going to sue for? You
Speaker 2: demand access to security clearance when you are not in
Speaker 2: the position. When asked about the plans, when asked about
Speaker 2: whether or not you are a target of criticism, he said,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna sue them. That's what's next for me. That's
Speaker 2: that's insane right.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: I don't know much about Kendall's history. I don't I
Speaker 2: don't recall him during the Biden administration. Nothing comes to
Speaker 2: mind for me. Other people could be like, oh, I
Speaker 2: know his history, and maybe true. But the overarching is,
Speaker 2: who said you're entitled to anything? Why? Why do they
Speaker 2: act like they're entitled. That's the connective between these two stories.
Speaker 2: I we're entitled to keep an eye on things for safety.
Speaker 2: You're entitled to classified information for your career. No, you're
Speaker 2: not not at all. Joe Biden shouldn't have access to
Speaker 2: classified information either, By the way, Sorry, I know we
Speaker 2: usually do that for former presidents, and sometimes you need
Speaker 2: them based on conversations they had had and you're still
Speaker 2: engaged in further investigations and negotiations et cetera. But Joe
Speaker 2: Biden can't be trusted. So the answers, no, he's not
Speaker 2: aware of where he is. So the answers no, Like
Speaker 2: you have a right to the classified info. It's a
Speaker 2: best of luck in the lawsuit. And any judge who says,
Speaker 2: do you have a right to classified information? Well, here
Speaker 2: I go, oh, I definitely deserve classified information. No one
Speaker 2: deserves classified information more than me, because that I mean,
Speaker 2: it's basically the same argument that this guy's making that
Speaker 2: the Warmer secretary is making. People are nutty. I'm Tony Katz.
Speaker 2: This is Tony Katz today. So Josh Kushner and Bob
Speaker 2: Iger are going to purchase the Los Angeles Lakers. Tony Katz,
Speaker 2: Tony Katz today, My oh my, oh my, twelve billion dollars.
Speaker 5: That is.
Speaker 2: Something else. They had been working on the idea of
Speaker 2: getting a team in Las Vegas because now that gambling
Speaker 2: is so prolific, everyone's like, yeah, you can have a
Speaker 2: team in Vegas. It's fine. And so you've got the
Speaker 2: Raiders in Vegas, got the AS movement in Vegas. Might
Speaker 2: as well have some basketball as well. You've got UFC
Speaker 2: in Vegas. Vegas is going to make its play to
Speaker 2: look at Miami and say, watch how we work. Pretty
Speaker 2: impressive number, by the way, what this is here? And
Speaker 2: they do a lot of other stuff in other places
Speaker 2: in terms of ownership. But the big sports story right
Speaker 2: now is that there's something called the Patriot Games and
Speaker 2: it's about youth in sports and it was in Ohio
Speaker 2: and Pat McAfee was invited to it and President Trump
Speaker 2: was there, and so McAfee actually met President Trump on
Speaker 2: the tarmac while it's raining and McAfee is wearing a
Speaker 2: T shirt and a hat backwards, and there they are
Speaker 2: at the games together. They're sitting next to each other,
Speaker 2: and producer land and is like, you know, people are
Speaker 2: his whole feed is filled with people who are angry
Speaker 2: at Pat McAfee. What's wrong with everybody? Why would you
Speaker 2: be angry at Pat McAfee. He got invited to be
Speaker 2: the thing. The president got invited to be at the thing.
Speaker 2: It's about kids in sports, and so they're sitting there.
Speaker 2: What a weird, nutty thing to be upset with. He
Speaker 2: didn't do anything wrong. There are times you can argue
Speaker 2: that you don't like something he says. There are times
Speaker 2: you can argue that he's gotten out over his skis.
Speaker 2: I think he would tell you that. I don't know
Speaker 2: the man personally. I've never met him. We're both in India.
Speaker 2: I've never met the guy. It's quite all right, by
Speaker 2: the way, but he's sitting next to the president and
Speaker 2: I'm supposed to be How dare you these people really
Speaker 2: think that Pat MacFee should have just turned around and
Speaker 2: punched the president in the face. That's their argument. It
Speaker 2: is a weird argument to be that filled with hate.
Speaker 2: If I'm invited to an event for a name that
Speaker 2: for cigars and Barack Obama is there and they seat
Speaker 2: me next to them. Sitting next to Barack Obama, I
Speaker 2: don't think we're gonna talk about anything politics, but we're
Speaker 2: gonna talk cigars. I would talk cigars with Barack Obama
Speaker 2: right now. I don't think he's much of a cigar guy.
Speaker 2: But be angry at Pat mcabee is just it's just silly.
Speaker 2: And you're right, Chatroom, you are right. The Trumps arrangement
Speaker 2: syndrome is out of control. It has become religion, well cults. Really,
Speaker 2: This is Tony Katz today,