WEBVTT - Mac & Bone Show - Taylor Tannebaum Interview 

0:00:00.070 --> 0:00:02.730
<v Speaker 1>But right now, we're going to talk matchups. We're going

0:00:02.750 --> 0:00:05.670
<v Speaker 1>to talk ACC football. But we're also going to talk

0:00:05.710 --> 0:00:09.619
<v Speaker 1>about those first playoff standings, rankings not being kind to

0:00:09.660 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Wake Forest and.

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:12.860
<v Speaker 2>Therefore the ACC.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Tannenbaum, ACC Network, the hostess with the mostess, is

0:00:17.860 --> 0:00:20.459
<v Speaker 1>with us to talk all things ACC right now.

0:00:20.540 --> 0:00:22.060
<v Speaker 2>Taylor, what's going on? How you doing?

0:00:22.980 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Always great to be with you, friends. I'm good. I'm

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.460
<v Speaker 3>putting my final touches on my packing because we are

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 3>heading to Syracuse, New York. So that's a drive from

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:37.409
<v Speaker 3>my stomping grounds here in Connecticut.

0:00:37.450 --> 0:00:41.629
<v Speaker 1>That's an intriguing game with the way Syracuse has played

0:00:41.650 --> 0:00:45.090
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. Clemson finally got offense going last week.

0:00:45.110 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of interesting, that game. It's not snowing there yet,

0:00:47.900 --> 0:00:48.100
<v Speaker 2>is it?

0:00:49.900 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 3>No, but it's rainy and cold, so you know it

0:00:53.580 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>could potentially happen. It could snow because we're rolling into

0:00:56.060 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>town naturally. It is somewhat intriguing, you guys, because... Clemson,

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.459
<v Speaker 3>for one, is not fully out of the ACC championship

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 3>race by any stretch because of the way things have

0:01:07.580 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>been going in the league, and they looked competent offensively

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 3>last week. I'm not going to say it was their

0:01:12.540 --> 0:01:16.190
<v Speaker 3>greatest performance, but you did have Tate Reynolds looking like

0:01:16.330 --> 0:01:18.970
<v Speaker 3>a more mature quarterback in his sixth start and running

0:01:18.990 --> 0:01:21.830
<v Speaker 3>the offense a little bit better. And then you have

0:01:21.870 --> 0:01:24.309
<v Speaker 3>a Syracuse team that's confident, right? They've won two straight,

0:01:24.370 --> 0:01:27.810
<v Speaker 3>and there's this little bromance between Fran Brown and Davos

0:01:27.830 --> 0:01:30.789
<v Speaker 3>Sweeney over the years from a few years ago and

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Syracuse knocked off Miami in that regular season finale, which

0:01:34.780 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>ultimately sent Clemson to the ACC championship game and then

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.819
<v Speaker 3>the college football playoff. And last year, Syracuse going to

0:01:41.900 --> 0:01:44.580
<v Speaker 3>Death Valley and beating Clemson there. That's when they lost

0:01:44.620 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>their quarterback, Stephen Jelly, to that Achilles injury. And both

0:01:47.700 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>have been very complimentary of each other. So a pivotal point,

0:01:50.900 --> 0:01:53.300
<v Speaker 3>it feels like, for both programs. For Syracuse, it's about

0:01:53.380 --> 0:01:56.980
<v Speaker 3>bowl eligibility at this point. And for Clemson, it's how

0:01:57.030 --> 0:01:59.510
<v Speaker 3>are you going to close out this season that did

0:01:59.750 --> 0:02:01.910
<v Speaker 3>not start or has looked the way that we thought

0:02:01.930 --> 0:02:02.190
<v Speaker 3>it would.

0:02:02.470 --> 0:02:05.260
<v Speaker 4>Syracuse, such a different team, and the numbers bear out too,

0:02:05.300 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Mac and Taylor, with Angele versus without them. So it

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:14.020
<v Speaker 4>makes a much more difficult matchup for Clemson tomorrow. ACC Network,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>check out Taylor and the gang. all their coverage there. Taylor,

0:02:17.900 --> 0:02:21.030
<v Speaker 4>we know here and you know from what you do

0:02:21.060 --> 0:02:24.910
<v Speaker 4>day in, day out, how good Wake Forest is. But

0:02:24.950 --> 0:02:28.850
<v Speaker 4>it's not shocking to us that maybe nationally and committee-wise

0:02:28.889 --> 0:02:31.850
<v Speaker 4>they were disrespected. It doesn't mean it's not annoying, but

0:02:31.889 --> 0:02:34.410
<v Speaker 4>it's not shocking to us. What's your take on Wake

0:02:34.450 --> 0:02:37.380
<v Speaker 4>Forest in the initial playoff rankings based on their level

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 4>of dominance lately that they came in at No.

0:02:39.740 --> 0:02:41.260
<v Speaker 2>16?

0:02:41.260 --> 0:02:45.610
<v Speaker 3>I'm really disappointed. Again, like you just said, I'm not shocked,

0:02:45.730 --> 0:02:48.370
<v Speaker 3>but I'm really disappointed if you've watched football at all.

0:02:49.590 --> 0:02:51.290
<v Speaker 3>And even if you look at their record, their only

0:02:51.310 --> 0:02:53.430
<v Speaker 3>loss is quite literally to the number one team in

0:02:53.450 --> 0:02:57.620
<v Speaker 3>the country. You would recognize that that's a top 10 team.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 3>My biggest thing is, look, I'm not going to blow

0:03:00.220 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>it out of proportion, despite what my mind is telling

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.410
<v Speaker 3>me after release of week one, okay? Because... they do

0:03:07.450 --> 0:03:09.829
<v Speaker 3>still have quote unquote opportunity ahead of them, which is

0:03:09.870 --> 0:03:12.550
<v Speaker 3>simply just winning out and continuing to play the way

0:03:12.570 --> 0:03:15.090
<v Speaker 3>they are at the level they are. But my biggest

0:03:15.169 --> 0:03:18.750
<v Speaker 3>issue is the disparity and the lack of clarity from

0:03:19.370 --> 0:03:23.290
<v Speaker 3>the committee. It's obvious they're valuing wins and ranked wins.

0:03:23.350 --> 0:03:26.590
<v Speaker 3>And that's why the SEC has as many teams in

0:03:26.610 --> 0:03:28.430
<v Speaker 3>there as they do. And as many in the top

0:03:28.430 --> 0:03:30.970
<v Speaker 3>12 as they do, despite several of them having two losses.

0:03:31.850 --> 0:03:35.430
<v Speaker 3>But it's, To me, why is Wake 16 in, like, say,

0:03:35.500 --> 0:03:38.810
<v Speaker 3>Indiana is four, or even a Notre Dame at 11?

0:03:38.810 --> 0:03:41.490
<v Speaker 3>None of those have a ranked win on their schedule.

0:03:42.950 --> 0:03:46.830
<v Speaker 3>The metrics essentially align Indiana and Wake Forest. The eye

0:03:46.850 --> 0:03:49.350
<v Speaker 3>test would tell you Wake Forest is playing, especially in

0:03:49.390 --> 0:03:52.610
<v Speaker 3>the last month, significantly better than Indiana. And credit where

0:03:52.630 --> 0:03:55.530
<v Speaker 3>credit is due, the Hoosiers are the reigning national champions,

0:03:55.550 --> 0:03:59.540
<v Speaker 3>but that was last year. This is this year. So

0:03:59.580 --> 0:04:01.820
<v Speaker 3>to me, it's not necessarily I'm going to complain about

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 3>where Wake is ranked. I don't think they're 16. I

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.860
<v Speaker 3>think they should be a top 10, at least 12 team.

0:04:07.220 --> 0:04:08.780
<v Speaker 3>But to me, it's the disparity and the lack of

0:04:08.820 --> 0:04:12.380
<v Speaker 3>clarity from the committee in why. And to me, when

0:04:12.430 --> 0:04:14.350
<v Speaker 3>you boil it down, the only reason would be is because,

0:04:14.430 --> 0:04:16.529
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote, they play in the ACC, which is a

0:04:16.570 --> 0:04:20.330
<v Speaker 3>perceived lesser conference. When we're also in the same breath,

0:04:20.350 --> 0:04:24.060
<v Speaker 3>having the same conversation. that there's more parody in the

0:04:24.100 --> 0:04:26.580
<v Speaker 3>country than ever before, but this league's not getting that

0:04:26.620 --> 0:04:28.500
<v Speaker 3>benefit of the doubt. Instead, the league is just not

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.810
<v Speaker 3>good when it could just be that everyone is beating

0:04:31.850 --> 0:04:34.390
<v Speaker 3>up on each other, like other leagues. So that's my,

0:04:34.589 --> 0:04:36.729
<v Speaker 3>my short spiel. I have the numbers to back it up,

0:04:36.810 --> 0:04:41.300
<v Speaker 3>but hopefully they can continue to win. We'll see what

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the status is of their quarterback, Gio Lopez, because he

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:49.060
<v Speaker 3>did definitely injure that knee last game. So we'll continue

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:49.740
<v Speaker 3>to monitor that.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.500
<v Speaker 2>Luckily, they have the Mary Mac game.

0:04:51.540 --> 0:04:54.930
<v Speaker 1>No disrespect to Mary Mac, but I'm just being real,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.450
<v Speaker 1>Mary Mac. I'm being real on this one. But luckily,

0:04:57.490 --> 0:05:00.589
<v Speaker 1>they have that game, but they got SMU next week.

0:05:00.750 --> 0:05:03.810
<v Speaker 1>SMU's got Virginia Tech tonight in an important one. I

0:05:03.830 --> 0:05:06.030
<v Speaker 1>want to follow up on what you're saying, Taylor. The

0:05:06.070 --> 0:05:10.300
<v Speaker 1>thing that gets me, and I do acknowledge that the

0:05:10.339 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>way their rankings shape up, they don't have the ranked

0:05:13.220 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>win rate. But the thing that stinks is it seems

0:05:16.740 --> 0:05:20.420
<v Speaker 1>to be apparent that they're going to have to win

0:05:20.460 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the ACC outright to get in, right? Like they don't

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have a chance of playing Miami down to the wire,

0:05:27.050 --> 0:05:29.370
<v Speaker 1>blowing everybody else out and get in.

0:05:29.550 --> 0:05:31.070
<v Speaker 2>And I hate that for Deke fans.

0:05:32.190 --> 0:05:34.790
<v Speaker 3>Me too. And that's sort of what they're signifying. Now,

0:05:34.810 --> 0:05:36.969
<v Speaker 3>I will say there are a ton of teams in

0:05:37.010 --> 0:05:39.070
<v Speaker 3>front of them that will inevitably beat up on each other,

0:05:39.089 --> 0:05:43.220
<v Speaker 3>but because the committee is so evidently valuing you know,

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.260
<v Speaker 3>your strength of schedule and who you beat, those are

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.740
<v Speaker 3>all going to be ranked wins in the SEC because

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>they're putting the SEC in all of these ranked positions

0:05:51.020 --> 0:05:55.130
<v Speaker 3>and not valuing anything this league has done. So yeah,

0:05:55.170 --> 0:05:58.290
<v Speaker 3>that is disappointing. And again, you just kind of have

0:05:58.330 --> 0:06:00.490
<v Speaker 3>to go out there and take care of your business

0:06:00.529 --> 0:06:04.430
<v Speaker 3>and let everything catch fire around you, which is subject

0:06:04.589 --> 0:06:07.010
<v Speaker 3>to happen. And I will say, you know, like, The

0:06:07.029 --> 0:06:09.070
<v Speaker 3>rest of the league in the ACC does have to

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.860
<v Speaker 3>carry its water. Like, you know, that game next week

0:06:11.900 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>against SMU was slated to be a ranked win, and

0:06:15.460 --> 0:06:18.700
<v Speaker 3>then SMU goes and loses to Syracuse. And while Syracuse

0:06:18.900 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 3>is on a hotter streak, when you're at the top

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.969
<v Speaker 3>of the league, you have to carry that water. And unfortunately,

0:06:23.990 --> 0:06:25.950
<v Speaker 3>you saw like a Virginia Tech lose to a Cal

0:06:25.990 --> 0:06:28.770
<v Speaker 3>or else that could have potentially been a ranked game

0:06:28.990 --> 0:06:31.750
<v Speaker 3>on Friday. And you have a Louisville team whose only

0:06:31.770 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 3>three losses– are by three points each. And, oh, by

0:06:34.460 --> 0:06:36.220
<v Speaker 3>the way, one of them is to a top-ten team

0:06:36.260 --> 0:06:38.820
<v Speaker 3>in Ole Miss, but we're not going to acknowledge that, apparently.

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The State loss is the one with Louisville-Taylor where it's like,

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:43.539
<v Speaker 1>come on, you're not helping the Con. As much as

0:06:43.980 --> 0:06:47.099
<v Speaker 1>I personally wanted State to win, it's like, come on.

0:06:47.140 --> 0:06:50.430
<v Speaker 3>You can't lose to NC State because that's a ranked

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 3>win that falls off of Wake's schedule. You know, it's

0:06:54.620 --> 0:06:56.490
<v Speaker 3>all tied together. But go out, take care of your business,

0:06:56.550 --> 0:06:58.690
<v Speaker 3>and hope that the rest of the country cannibalizes itself.

0:06:58.970 --> 0:07:01.070
<v Speaker 4>And, Taylor, the team at the top right now, Miami,

0:07:01.089 --> 0:07:03.090
<v Speaker 4>has been teetering a little bit in some of these games,

0:07:03.150 --> 0:07:05.870
<v Speaker 4>and that was with Malachi, Tony. Now we find out

0:07:05.930 --> 0:07:10.830
<v Speaker 4>he's out for a while here. How worried are you,

0:07:10.870 --> 0:07:12.630
<v Speaker 4>not just about the Notre Dame game? Of course, that's

0:07:12.670 --> 0:07:15.710
<v Speaker 4>tough with or without Tony. But the stretch run, how

0:07:15.750 --> 0:07:20.050
<v Speaker 4>can Miami survive this without Tony here for the next four, five,

0:07:20.070 --> 0:07:20.490
<v Speaker 4>six weeks?

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 3>Run the damn ball. I will say, obviously Malachi Tony

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.110
<v Speaker 3>is the engine that makes this offense go, but don't

0:07:32.170 --> 0:07:35.170
<v Speaker 3>forget they have a Heisman Trophy candidate at quarterback in

0:07:35.190 --> 0:07:37.410
<v Speaker 3>Darian Mensah, and that just didn't pop up overnight because

0:07:37.430 --> 0:07:39.910
<v Speaker 3>he got a good receiver. This has been a strong

0:07:39.930 --> 0:07:42.930
<v Speaker 3>sample size from Tulane to Duke to now at Miami.

0:07:43.630 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 3>And the thing is, Malachi Tony eats up so much

0:07:47.020 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 3>of the catches that other people haven't had to step up.

0:07:50.740 --> 0:07:52.500
<v Speaker 3>This is your chance to go shine. He has his

0:07:53.430 --> 0:07:56.130
<v Speaker 3>Robin to his Batman from Duke and Cooper barking, who

0:07:56.150 --> 0:07:58.890
<v Speaker 3>has really yet to break out. You've seen flashes, but

0:07:58.930 --> 0:08:01.050
<v Speaker 3>they have a rapport that was built two years ago.

0:08:01.490 --> 0:08:03.310
<v Speaker 3>And then you have a young guy in Galen Upshaw.

0:08:03.350 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>You do have an elite tight end and Elijah Lofton.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.540
<v Speaker 3>So it's just incumbent on other people to find, to

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>finally step up and fill that void that Malachi Tony

0:08:13.300 --> 0:08:15.060
<v Speaker 3>is going to leave. And you have a stable of backs.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.780
<v Speaker 3>You have Mark Fletcher. You have JV and Mallory who

0:08:17.820 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 3>has really come into his own as a Shannon Dawson,

0:08:23.660 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the offensive coordinator, is going to call a great game

0:08:25.620 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>like he always does. It's not like they're without weapons.

0:08:27.700 --> 0:08:31.070
<v Speaker 3>I'm more concerned defensively, you guys, honestly. You know, the

0:08:31.130 --> 0:08:32.830
<v Speaker 3>offense is going to do its thing. I do think

0:08:32.870 --> 0:08:35.490
<v Speaker 3>it will score points, even though Notre Dame's defense is

0:08:36.010 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 3>quite literally the best in the country. The defense has to...

0:08:40.390 --> 0:08:42.939
<v Speaker 3>to pull its weight. Like, they can't just be allowing

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 3>30-plus points per game if they are going to survive

0:08:46.100 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>this stretch run without a Malachi Tony.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:48.569
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no doubt.

0:08:48.610 --> 0:08:51.190
<v Speaker 1>That pass defense, you saw it last week. They made

0:08:51.210 --> 0:08:54.510
<v Speaker 1>Billy Edwards look like Drake May last week.

0:08:54.990 --> 0:08:57.170
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah. And the Florida State game, too.

0:08:57.250 --> 0:08:57.390
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:08:57.820 --> 0:09:00.900
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge game. I hate it that Tony's not playing.

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.219
<v Speaker 1>It's such a showcase game. It does suck. I do

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder how the committee, not to go back to the committee, Taylor,

0:09:10.140 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and get on that fun topic again, but I'm wondering

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if they were to lose without Tony, but they then

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:22.140
<v Speaker 1>lost to Wake in the ACC title game, would they

0:09:22.179 --> 0:09:23.940
<v Speaker 1>get a bit of a break and definitely be in

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.500
<v Speaker 1>the field because the loss was to Notre Dame without

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Malachi Tony?

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:30.860
<v Speaker 3>If you're going to tell me that you are going

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 3>to keep out Miami after watching them an entirety of

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.329
<v Speaker 3>the season and full well knowing that he is capable

0:09:38.370 --> 0:09:41.210
<v Speaker 3>of returning for a playoff and leave them out, then

0:09:41.250 --> 0:09:45.350
<v Speaker 3>abolish the committee. Respectfully. But Miami, too, has to win

0:09:45.429 --> 0:09:48.050
<v Speaker 3>the rest of its regular season games if by chance

0:09:48.070 --> 0:09:51.290
<v Speaker 3>something goes wrong at Notre Dame. You have to acknowledge

0:09:51.330 --> 0:09:53.870
<v Speaker 3>that they have other elite players on this team, including

0:09:54.010 --> 0:09:57.150
<v Speaker 3>at quarterback. But it's incumbent on Miami to just not

0:09:57.190 --> 0:09:59.569
<v Speaker 3>even allow the committee to be in this conversation. Yeah.

0:09:59.670 --> 0:10:01.740
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm with you on that. I, and, and, and

0:10:01.770 --> 0:10:04.180
<v Speaker 1>you're running the damn ball comment. Like I do kind

0:10:04.220 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of wonder, not that like Mensa, like to your point

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.420
<v Speaker 1>is really good. But I do wonder, no names run

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>defense is damn good. But do they say, Mark Fletcher,

0:10:12.380 --> 0:10:15.380
<v Speaker 1>this game's on you. We've given you the ball 30 times.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.140
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they try and then ball control it

0:10:18.260 --> 0:10:21.050
<v Speaker 1>and keep Carr off the field and protect your defense.

0:10:21.690 --> 0:10:22.750
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they try that.

0:10:23.090 --> 0:10:25.089
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think it's definitely going to be part

0:10:25.110 --> 0:10:26.709
<v Speaker 3>of the game plan. And I think Mark Fletcher is

0:10:26.730 --> 0:10:29.569
<v Speaker 3>going to say, I want the ball on my shoulders.

0:10:29.610 --> 0:10:31.850
<v Speaker 3>He did it in the playoff last year. He is

0:10:32.130 --> 0:10:34.820
<v Speaker 3>more than capable of carrying a load and then some.

0:10:35.340 --> 0:10:37.860
<v Speaker 3>And I think as a senior leader and Malachi, Tony

0:10:37.900 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 3>is one of his closest, dearest friends. You're going to

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 3>see that this weekend. I think they're going to have

0:10:42.660 --> 0:10:44.820
<v Speaker 3>added motivation, which is not necessarily what you want. Now

0:10:44.900 --> 0:10:47.140
<v Speaker 3>credit to Notre Dame. They are an elite football team.

0:10:47.230 --> 0:10:49.670
<v Speaker 3>They too are dealing with some, some valuable injuries.

0:10:51.429 --> 0:10:54.969
<v Speaker 4>If the committee even thought about leaving Miami out, I

0:10:55.050 --> 0:10:58.490
<v Speaker 4>think that Michael Irvin would go get the RV that

0:10:58.510 --> 0:11:00.830
<v Speaker 4>he gave to Mama Fletcher and drive it into the

0:11:00.890 --> 0:11:03.410
<v Speaker 4>offices of the committee. He'd knock all their hats off

0:11:03.429 --> 0:11:05.460
<v Speaker 4>that rack. I'm terrified how that man would react to this.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.179
<v Speaker 4>All their hats would fall off that rack, Boney.

0:11:08.300 --> 0:11:09.180
<v Speaker 1>He really might.

0:11:09.220 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 3>You're so right about that. But man, if a Miami

0:11:11.860 --> 0:11:15.540
<v Speaker 3>team gets left out of a 12-team playoff by potentially

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.570
<v Speaker 3>losing a close one to Notre Dame and falling short

0:11:17.620 --> 0:11:20.069
<v Speaker 3>in a championship game that a lot of three-loss SEC

0:11:20.090 --> 0:11:22.570
<v Speaker 3>teams aren't even going to be playing in, oh, by

0:11:22.590 --> 0:11:24.570
<v Speaker 3>the way, then you're not putting the 12 best teams

0:11:24.630 --> 0:11:26.370
<v Speaker 3>in the country in the playoff. And you're doing the

0:11:26.410 --> 0:11:27.090
<v Speaker 3>fans a disservice.

0:11:27.190 --> 0:11:29.949
<v Speaker 1>This text is hilarious. 704 number says, Mac, what are

0:11:29.970 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you doing to poor Taylor? You're bringing up hypotheticals that

0:11:32.540 --> 0:11:34.699
<v Speaker 1>are getting her even more angry. Please don't do this.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.059
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I promised myself I.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't get riled up. I promised myself, but I can't

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.099
<v Speaker 3>do it, you guys. I am who I am.

0:11:42.179 --> 0:11:45.260
<v Speaker 1>But that's why we love you is like you are

0:11:45.340 --> 0:11:46.260
<v Speaker 1>just passionate.

0:11:46.340 --> 0:11:47.580
<v Speaker 2>You have opinions. You know what I mean?

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got opinions. You back it up with facts. It's

0:11:49.820 --> 0:11:52.260
<v Speaker 1>not like you're just throwing crazy stuff out like our

0:11:52.290 --> 0:11:52.970
<v Speaker 1>text line does.

0:11:53.870 --> 0:11:55.510
<v Speaker 2>You got facts, baby. I like it.

0:11:55.710 --> 0:11:59.030
<v Speaker 3>Only sometimes, you know. Head over to my Twitter for

0:11:59.070 --> 0:12:01.270
<v Speaker 3>the real facts because I'll drop numbers on there.

0:12:01.770 --> 0:12:02.350
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:12:02.390 --> 0:12:03.750
<v Speaker 1>Before we let you go, we've got to ask you

0:12:03.770 --> 0:12:08.069
<v Speaker 1>about Duke-NC State, a big game here in our neck

0:12:08.090 --> 0:12:11.150
<v Speaker 1>of the woods. Duke has, and Bone has reminded State

0:12:11.170 --> 0:12:12.990
<v Speaker 1>fans of this over the last three years.

0:12:13.150 --> 0:12:13.710
<v Speaker 2>Just numbers.

0:12:13.929 --> 0:12:15.900
<v Speaker 1>I just have the numbers, Taylor. I can't deny it.

0:12:16.330 --> 0:12:19.370
<v Speaker 1>Double-digit wins each of the last three years for Duke

0:12:19.570 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>over State. Do you think that continues? What are your

0:12:23.059 --> 0:12:23.900
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this one?

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:33.330
<v Speaker 3>I remember sidelining that 23 game in Durham. That was

0:12:33.370 --> 0:12:33.750
<v Speaker 3>not good.

0:12:33.870 --> 0:12:35.950
<v Speaker 2>That was a real bad one for State.

0:12:36.350 --> 0:12:40.729
<v Speaker 3>That was not good at all. I think Duke has

0:12:41.309 --> 0:12:44.210
<v Speaker 3>the best running back and one of the best players

0:12:44.230 --> 0:12:47.830
<v Speaker 3>in the country. By the way, they just launched... Nate

0:12:47.870 --> 0:12:50.330
<v Speaker 3>Shepard's Heisman campaign, too, and rightfully so. His numbers are

0:12:50.350 --> 0:12:52.730
<v Speaker 3>off the charts. I don't know that NC State for

0:12:52.750 --> 0:12:54.870
<v Speaker 3>four quarters can sustain trying to figure out how to

0:12:54.910 --> 0:13:00.210
<v Speaker 3>stop Nate Shepard. That's just what this game boils down to,

0:13:00.250 --> 0:13:02.290
<v Speaker 3>I think. It will be great for NC State to

0:13:02.330 --> 0:13:05.689
<v Speaker 3>get Duke Scott back, if they do, because they need

0:13:05.730 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 3>a run game. It's... You know, they want to compete

0:13:09.580 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 3>in this one, I think, to be sustainable and not

0:13:12.179 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>just leave it up to C.J. Bailey and this passing

0:13:15.460 --> 0:13:18.420
<v Speaker 3>game against a really, really, really good Duke defense. So

0:13:18.940 --> 0:13:22.020
<v Speaker 3>those are some things to monitor, but trying to stop

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.310
<v Speaker 3>Nate Shepard is something people haven't been able to do.

0:13:24.370 --> 0:13:25.660
<v Speaker 3>If they can do it on the ground, great, but

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.090
<v Speaker 3>he's going to kill you in the pass game.

0:13:27.630 --> 0:13:27.930
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:13:27.950 --> 0:13:30.429
<v Speaker 3>He's more scrimmage yards than anybody else in the country,

0:13:30.429 --> 0:13:31.010
<v Speaker 3>18 of them.

0:13:31.370 --> 0:13:34.830
<v Speaker 1>He's got 972 rush yards and 14 rush TDs. 31

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.890
<v Speaker 1>catches for 302 receiving yards and four receiving TDs. He

0:13:41.970 --> 0:13:44.630
<v Speaker 1>has to be a Heisman finalist, doesn't he? And I

0:13:44.670 --> 0:13:47.390
<v Speaker 1>don't have confidence that the voters will do that, but

0:13:47.770 --> 0:13:50.030
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he have to be a finalist, y'all, if he

0:13:50.050 --> 0:13:50.620
<v Speaker 1>keeps this up?

0:13:51.090 --> 0:13:51.770
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely does.

0:13:53.110 --> 0:13:56.770
<v Speaker 3>I think numerically, yes, absolutely. The good news is Duke

0:13:56.809 --> 0:14:00.069
<v Speaker 3>does play Miami next week, and Duke does play Wake Forest.

0:14:00.370 --> 0:14:02.610
<v Speaker 3>So he's going to have chances to show not just

0:14:02.630 --> 0:14:05.670
<v Speaker 3>the ACC we're watching, but the country who he really

0:14:05.770 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>is against a legitimate... contender for a college football playoff.

0:14:10.300 --> 0:14:10.660
<v Speaker 2>Good point.

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:12.540
<v Speaker 4>And he has those numbers, and he wasn't healthy for

0:14:12.580 --> 0:14:16.730
<v Speaker 4>about three weeks here. If he was actually healthy... Yeah, no,

0:14:16.750 --> 0:14:18.610
<v Speaker 4>that's a great point, too, man.

0:14:18.790 --> 0:14:19.910
<v Speaker 2>Y'all are all over it, man.

0:14:19.990 --> 0:14:23.670
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're all vibing right now on the

0:14:23.690 --> 0:14:24.230
<v Speaker 1>same page.

0:14:24.510 --> 0:14:25.980
<v Speaker 2>We do need to shout out Taylor.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>She has added, like, a 14th job at ESPN or,

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.940
<v Speaker 1>you know, with ESPN, the ACC Network. You now are

0:14:34.980 --> 0:14:38.500
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing for ESPN... coverage of the women's

0:14:38.570 --> 0:14:39.450
<v Speaker 1>TGL golf.

0:14:39.530 --> 0:14:40.230
<v Speaker 2>Is this true?

0:14:41.250 --> 0:14:44.830
<v Speaker 3>It is true. It starts on Sunday. It's the inaugural

0:14:44.870 --> 0:14:48.610
<v Speaker 3>season of WTGL. They're heading into year three of TGL.

0:14:48.650 --> 0:14:52.590
<v Speaker 3>So they wanted to get the ladies involved in rightfully so. And, uh,

0:14:52.630 --> 0:14:56.710
<v Speaker 3>there are some incredible names, uh, from the LPGA that

0:14:56.730 --> 0:14:59.410
<v Speaker 3>are coming over to play in this, including headline by

0:14:59.430 --> 0:15:03.790
<v Speaker 3>Michelle Lee West. Everybody knows her. Um, and, And I'm

0:15:03.850 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 3>excited to dive into an aspect of sports that I'm

0:15:07.460 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 3>not normally dabbling in, which is golf. But it's so different.

0:15:10.100 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 3>And I hope people will tune in. Our first match

0:15:12.820 --> 0:15:15.610
<v Speaker 3>is Sunday at 3 o'clock on ESPN. And I know

0:15:15.630 --> 0:15:17.590
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people will be watching NFL. But if

0:15:17.610 --> 0:15:19.190
<v Speaker 3>you want a little change of pace and to see

0:15:19.230 --> 0:15:22.570
<v Speaker 3>some of these incredible ladies do their thing. um, lock

0:15:22.670 --> 0:15:24.590
<v Speaker 3>in and then we'll, we'll see what I bring to

0:15:24.610 --> 0:15:28.210
<v Speaker 3>the table because this is a fun, exciting learning experience

0:15:28.230 --> 0:15:29.910
<v Speaker 3>for all of us because it's never been done before.

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 3>So let's get it.

0:15:31.300 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 4>So Sunday's your day off. You said, I'll just throw

0:15:33.220 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 4>another job on the table. Who needs days off?

0:15:35.180 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Who needs a day off? We'll sleep in June.

0:15:39.380 --> 0:15:43.870
<v Speaker 1>All right, Taylor, you rock. Congratulations on that and all

0:15:43.900 --> 0:15:47.330
<v Speaker 1>your success. Um, uh, thanks for coming on. We appreciate it.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.100
<v Speaker 3>You guys are the absolute best anytime, and I hopefully

0:15:51.150 --> 0:15:52.150
<v Speaker 3>will see you soon.