WEBVTT - Mac & Bone Hour 3: Panthering Up???

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.100
<v Speaker 1>Oh, oh, oh, it's Mac and Bo on your radio, baby.

0:00:07.140 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 2>This is my friend Matt. Posh, come on, Posh. This

0:00:10.860 --> 0:00:14.830
<v Speaker 2>is my friend T-Bone. Let's have some fun.

0:00:14.970 --> 0:00:18.310
<v Speaker 3>I can't go to work without listening to Mac and Bone.

0:00:18.329 --> 0:00:18.910
<v Speaker 2>Do it live.

0:00:27.050 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Sports Radio 92.7 WFNZ. We got two more hours to go, baby.

0:00:31.380 --> 0:00:35.770
<v Speaker 4>Eight o'clockers. We getting ready to talk Panthers. Are you

0:00:35.850 --> 0:00:40.180
<v Speaker 4>Panthering up, y'all? Vegas seems to know something, Boning. Panthers

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 4>only two and a half point dogs against the six

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 4>and two Broncos.

0:00:44.100 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>But there is that O-line thing, Bone. There is that

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:47.460
<v Speaker 2>O-line thing.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.540
<v Speaker 4>So we'll talk through it all coming up later this

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.740
<v Speaker 4>hour on the Mac and Bone show. We'll preview the

0:00:52.900 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 4>mammoth college football weekend of seven freaking ranked matchups. You know,

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.050
<v Speaker 4>we got to talk Duke State. You know, we got

0:00:59.060 --> 0:01:02.210
<v Speaker 4>to talk. about all the games for local teams. Gamecocks,

0:01:02.250 --> 0:01:04.650
<v Speaker 4>can they keep going? I've already scheduled my lunch for tomorrow.

0:01:04.790 --> 0:01:08.730
<v Speaker 4>You've already got your lunch delivery for tomorrow's big slate

0:01:08.750 --> 0:01:09.250
<v Speaker 4>of games?

0:01:09.350 --> 0:01:09.649
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:01:09.670 --> 0:01:12.930
<v Speaker 2>Feels like barbecue tomorrow. Okay.

0:01:13.069 --> 0:01:15.929
<v Speaker 4>I can't go wrong there. But right now, we're going

0:01:15.950 --> 0:01:19.370
<v Speaker 4>to talk matchups. We're going to talk ACC football. But

0:01:19.410 --> 0:01:22.030
<v Speaker 4>we're also going to talk about those first playoff standings,

0:01:22.690 --> 0:01:25.220
<v Speaker 4>rankings not being kind to Wake Forest and.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Therefore the ACC.

0:01:27.620 --> 0:01:32.500
<v Speaker 4>Taylor Tannenbaum, ACC Network, the hostess with the mostest, is

0:01:32.540 --> 0:01:35.140
<v Speaker 4>with us to talk all things ACC right now.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Taylor, what's going on? How you doing?

0:01:37.690 --> 0:01:39.050
<v Speaker 1>Always great to be with you, friends.

0:01:39.170 --> 0:01:39.610
<v Speaker 2>I'm good.

0:01:39.630 --> 0:01:43.050
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting my final touches on my packing because we

0:01:43.069 --> 0:01:46.930
<v Speaker 1>are heading to Syracuse, New York. So that's a drive

0:01:47.030 --> 0:01:50.130
<v Speaker 1>from my stomping grounds here in In Connecticut.

0:01:50.510 --> 0:01:52.090
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, okay.

0:01:52.110 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 4>That's an intriguing game with the way Syracuse has played

0:01:56.300 --> 0:01:59.780
<v Speaker 4>the last two weeks. Clemson finally got offense going last week.

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of interesting, that game. It's not snowing there yet,

0:02:02.580 --> 0:02:02.790
<v Speaker 4>is it?

0:02:04.610 --> 0:02:05.430
<v Speaker 2>No, but it's.

0:02:05.550 --> 0:02:09.290
<v Speaker 1>Rainy and cold, so you know it could potentially happen.

0:02:09.350 --> 0:02:13.090
<v Speaker 1>It could snow because we're rolling into town naturally. It

0:02:13.190 --> 0:02:17.870
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat intriguing, you guys, because Well, Clemson, for one,

0:02:18.070 --> 0:02:20.590
<v Speaker 1>is not fully out of the ACC championship race by

0:02:20.630 --> 0:02:22.650
<v Speaker 1>any stretch because of the way things have been going

0:02:22.690 --> 0:02:26.350
<v Speaker 1>in the league. And they looked competent offensively last week.

0:02:26.389 --> 0:02:28.190
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say it was their greatest performance,

0:02:28.970 --> 0:02:31.230
<v Speaker 1>but you did have Tate Reynolds looking like a more

0:02:31.270 --> 0:02:34.070
<v Speaker 1>mature quarterback in his sixth start and running the offense

0:02:34.090 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. And then you have a Syracuse

0:02:37.060 --> 0:02:39.859
<v Speaker 1>team that's confident, right? They've won two straight, and there's

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>this little bromance between Fran Brown and Davos Sweeney over

0:02:43.100 --> 0:02:47.100
<v Speaker 1>the years from a few years ago and Syracuse knocked

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.100
<v Speaker 1>off Miami in that regular season finale, which ultimately sent

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.380
<v Speaker 1>Clemson to the ACC championship game and then the college

0:02:53.430 --> 0:02:57.369
<v Speaker 1>football playoff. And last year, Syracuse going to Death Valley

0:02:57.510 --> 0:02:59.930
<v Speaker 1>and beating Clemson there. That's when they lost their quarterback,

0:02:59.950 --> 0:03:02.630
<v Speaker 1>Steve Angeli, to that Achilles injury. And both have been

0:03:02.669 --> 0:03:05.650
<v Speaker 1>very complimentary of each other. So a pivotal point, it

0:03:05.669 --> 0:03:08.329
<v Speaker 1>feels like, for both programs. For Syracuse, it's about bowl

0:03:08.430 --> 0:03:11.810
<v Speaker 1>eligibility at this point. And for Clemson, it's how are

0:03:11.830 --> 0:03:14.620
<v Speaker 1>you going to close out this season that did not

0:03:14.780 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>start or has looked the way that we thought it would.

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.950
<v Speaker 6>Syracuse, such a different team, and the numbers bear out too,

0:03:19.990 --> 0:03:23.310
<v Speaker 6>Mac and Taylor, with Angele versus without them. So it

0:03:23.370 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 6>makes a much more difficult matchup for Clemson tomorrow. ACC Network,

0:03:28.740 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 6>check out Taylor and the gang. all their coverage there. Taylor,

0:03:32.590 --> 0:03:35.710
<v Speaker 6>we know here and you know from what you do

0:03:35.750 --> 0:03:39.590
<v Speaker 6>day in, day out, how good Wake Forest is. But

0:03:39.650 --> 0:03:43.530
<v Speaker 6>it's not shocking to us that maybe nationally and committee-wise

0:03:43.570 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 6>they were disrespected. It doesn't mean it's not annoying, but

0:03:46.580 --> 0:03:49.100
<v Speaker 6>it's not shocking to us. What's your take on Wake

0:03:49.140 --> 0:03:52.060
<v Speaker 6>Forest in the initial playoff rankings based on their level

0:03:52.100 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 6>of dominance lately that they came in at No.

0:03:54.420 --> 0:03:55.970
<v Speaker 2>16?

0:03:55.970 --> 0:04:00.310
<v Speaker 1>I'm really disappointed. Again, like you just said, I'm not shocked,

0:04:00.410 --> 0:04:03.060
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really disappointed if you've watched football at all.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:05.980
<v Speaker 1>And even if you look at their record, their only

0:04:06.020 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>loss is quite literally to the number one team in

0:04:08.140 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the country. You would recognize that that's a top 10 team.

0:04:12.450 --> 0:04:14.890
<v Speaker 1>My biggest thing is, look, I'm not going to blow

0:04:14.930 --> 0:04:18.130
<v Speaker 1>it out of proportion, despite what my mind is telling

0:04:18.170 --> 0:04:22.100
<v Speaker 1>me after release of week one. Okay. Because they do

0:04:22.130 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>still have quote unquote opportunity ahead of them, which is

0:04:24.580 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>simply just winning out and continuing to play the way

0:04:27.260 --> 0:04:29.779
<v Speaker 1>they are at the level they are. But my biggest

0:04:29.860 --> 0:04:33.500
<v Speaker 1>issue is the disparity and the lack of clarity from

0:04:34.070 --> 0:04:37.989
<v Speaker 1>the committee. It's obvious they're valuing wins and ranked wins.

0:04:38.050 --> 0:04:41.290
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the SEC has as many teams in

0:04:41.310 --> 0:04:43.130
<v Speaker 1>there as they do. And as many in the top

0:04:43.130 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>12 as they do, despite several of them having two losses.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.650
<v Speaker 1>But it's, To me, why is Wake 16 and, like

0:04:49.710 --> 0:04:52.390
<v Speaker 1>I say, Indiana is four, or even a Notre Dame

0:04:52.660 --> 0:04:55.420
<v Speaker 1>at 11? None of those have a ranked win on

0:04:55.460 --> 0:05:01.219
<v Speaker 1>their schedule. The metrics essentially align Indiana and Wake Forest.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.220
<v Speaker 1>The eye test would tell you Wake Forest is playing,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>especially in the last month, significantly better than Indiana. And

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.339
<v Speaker 1>credit where credit is due, the Hoosiers are the reigning

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>national champions, but that was last year. This is this year. Um,

0:05:14.060 --> 0:05:16.289
<v Speaker 1>so to me, it's not necessarily, I'm going to complain

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.310
<v Speaker 1>about where wake is ranked. I don't think they're 16.

0:05:19.290 --> 0:05:20.969
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be a top 10, at least

0:05:20.970 --> 0:05:23.190
<v Speaker 1>12 teams. But to me, it's the disparity and the

0:05:23.230 --> 0:05:26.170
<v Speaker 1>lack of clarity from the committee and in why. And

0:05:26.230 --> 0:05:28.310
<v Speaker 1>to me, when you boil it down, the only reason

0:05:28.330 --> 0:05:30.810
<v Speaker 1>would be is because quote unquote, they play in the ACC,

0:05:30.860 --> 0:05:34.540
<v Speaker 1>which is a perceived lesser conference. When we're also in

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.730
<v Speaker 1>the same breath, having the same conversation, um, that there's

0:05:37.750 --> 0:05:40.430
<v Speaker 1>more parody in the country than ever before, but this

0:05:40.490 --> 0:05:42.490
<v Speaker 1>league's not getting that benefit of the doubt. Instead, the

0:05:42.529 --> 0:05:44.570
<v Speaker 1>league is just not good when it could just be

0:05:44.620 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that everyone is beating up on each other like other leagues.

0:05:48.100 --> 0:05:50.980
<v Speaker 1>So that's my short spiel. I have the numbers to

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>back it up, but hopefully they can continue to win.

0:05:55.630 --> 0:05:57.710
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what the status is of their quarterback, Gio Lopez,

0:05:57.730 --> 0:06:02.810
<v Speaker 1>because he did definitely injure that knee last game. So

0:06:02.970 --> 0:06:04.430
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue to monitor that.

0:06:04.529 --> 0:06:06.190
<v Speaker 2>Luckily, they have the Mary Mac game.

0:06:06.230 --> 0:06:09.630
<v Speaker 4>No disrespect to Mary Mac, but I'm just being real,

0:06:09.650 --> 0:06:10.070
<v Speaker 4>Mary Mac.

0:06:10.110 --> 0:06:11.070
<v Speaker 2>I'm being real on this one.

0:06:11.710 --> 0:06:13.950
<v Speaker 4>But luckily, they have that game, but they got SMU

0:06:14.710 --> 0:06:17.990
<v Speaker 4>next week. SMU's got Virginia Tech tonight in an important one.

0:06:18.450 --> 0:06:20.610
<v Speaker 4>I want to follow up on what you're saying, Taylor.

0:06:20.650 --> 0:06:24.820
<v Speaker 4>The thing that gets me, and I do acknowledge that

0:06:24.900 --> 0:06:27.539
<v Speaker 4>the way their rankings shape up, they don't have the

0:06:27.580 --> 0:06:31.060
<v Speaker 4>ranked win rate. But the thing that stinks is it

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.820
<v Speaker 4>seems to be apparent that they're going to have to

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.900
<v Speaker 4>win the ACC outright to get in, right? Like they

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.300
<v Speaker 4>don't have a chance of playing Miami down to the wire,

0:06:41.740 --> 0:06:44.060
<v Speaker 4>blowing everybody else out and get in.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>And I hate that for Deke fans.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.460
<v Speaker 1>Me too. And that's sort of what they're signifying. Now

0:06:49.490 --> 0:06:51.670
<v Speaker 1>I will say there are a ton of teams in

0:06:51.710 --> 0:06:53.750
<v Speaker 1>front of them that will inevitably beat up on each other,

0:06:53.790 --> 0:06:57.910
<v Speaker 1>but because the committee is so evidently valuing you know,

0:06:57.930 --> 0:06:59.950
<v Speaker 1>your strength of schedule and who you beat, those are

0:06:59.970 --> 0:07:02.430
<v Speaker 1>all going to be ranked wins in the SEC because

0:07:02.450 --> 0:07:05.570
<v Speaker 1>they're putting the SEC in all of these ranked positions

0:07:05.710 --> 0:07:09.710
<v Speaker 1>and not valuing anything this league has done. So, yeah,

0:07:09.750 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that is disappointing. And, again, you just kind of have

0:07:13.020 --> 0:07:15.180
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and take care of your business

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.140
<v Speaker 1>and let everything catch fire around you, which is subject

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.700
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And I will say, you know, like, the

0:07:21.740 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the league in the ACC does have to

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.550
<v Speaker 1>carry its water. Like, you know, that game next week

0:07:26.590 --> 0:07:30.050
<v Speaker 1>against SMU was slated to be a ranked win, and

0:07:30.150 --> 0:07:33.390
<v Speaker 1>then SMU goes and loses to Syracuse. And while Syracuse

0:07:33.590 --> 0:07:36.170
<v Speaker 1>is on a hotter streak, when you're at the top

0:07:36.210 --> 0:07:38.660
<v Speaker 1>of the league, you have to carry that water. And unfortunately,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you saw like a Virginia Tech lose to a Cal

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.460
<v Speaker 1>or else that could have potentially been a ranked game

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. And you have a Louisville team whose only

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.130
<v Speaker 1>three losses– are by three points each. And, oh, by

0:07:49.150 --> 0:07:50.910
<v Speaker 1>the way, one of them is to a top-ten team

0:07:50.950 --> 0:07:53.489
<v Speaker 1>in Ole Miss, but we're not going to acknowledge that, apparently.

0:07:53.690 --> 0:07:56.370
<v Speaker 4>The State loss is the one with Louisville-Taylor where it's like,

0:07:56.410 --> 0:07:58.770
<v Speaker 4>come on, you're not helping the Con. As much as I, like,

0:07:58.850 --> 0:08:01.790
<v Speaker 4>personally wanted State to win, it's like, come on.

0:08:01.830 --> 0:08:05.090
<v Speaker 1>You can't lose to NC State because that's a ranked

0:08:05.130 --> 0:08:09.250
<v Speaker 1>win that falls off of Wake's schedule. You know, it's

0:08:09.310 --> 0:08:11.170
<v Speaker 1>all tied together. But go out, take care of your business,

0:08:11.230 --> 0:08:13.390
<v Speaker 1>and hope that the rest of the country cannibalizes itself.

0:08:13.650 --> 0:08:15.750
<v Speaker 6>And, Taylor, the team at the top right now, Miami,

0:08:15.770 --> 0:08:17.780
<v Speaker 6>has been teetering a little bit in some of these games,

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 6>and that was with Malachi, Tony. Now we find out

0:08:20.620 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 6>he's out for a while here. How worried are you,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 6>not just about the Notre Dame game? Of course, that's

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 6>tough with or without Tony. But the stretch run, how

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.740
<v Speaker 6>can Miami survive this without Tony here for the next four, five,

0:08:34.780 --> 0:08:35.180
<v Speaker 6>six weeks?

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:43.350
<v Speaker 1>Run the damn ball. I will say, obviously Malachi Tony

0:08:43.370 --> 0:08:46.790
<v Speaker 1>is the engine that makes this offense go, but don't

0:08:46.850 --> 0:08:49.850
<v Speaker 1>forget they have a Heisman Trophy candidate at quarterback in

0:08:49.890 --> 0:08:52.100
<v Speaker 1>Darian Mensah, and that just didn't pop up overnight because

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.579
<v Speaker 1>he got a good receiver. This has been a strong

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.620
<v Speaker 1>sample size from Tulane to Duke to now at Miami.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is, Malachi Tony eats up so much

0:09:01.700 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of the catches that other people haven't had to step up.

0:09:05.420 --> 0:09:07.180
<v Speaker 1>This is your chance to go shine. He has his

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.820
<v Speaker 1>Robin to his Batman from Duke and Cooper barking, who

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.580
<v Speaker 1>has really yet to break out. You've seen flashes, but

0:09:13.620 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a rapport that was built two years ago.

0:09:16.179 --> 0:09:18.020
<v Speaker 1>And then you have a young guy in Galen Upshaw.

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>You do have an elite tight end and Elijah Lofton.

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.219
<v Speaker 1>So it's just incumbent on other people to find, to

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.970
<v Speaker 1>finally step up and fill that void that Malachi Tony

0:09:27.990 --> 0:09:29.750
<v Speaker 1>is going to leave. And you have a stable of backs.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.470
<v Speaker 1>You have Mark Fletcher. You have JV and Mallory who

0:09:32.510 --> 0:09:38.350
<v Speaker 1>has really come into his own as a Shannon Dawson,

0:09:38.370 --> 0:09:40.290
<v Speaker 1>the offensive coordinator, is going to call a great game

0:09:40.330 --> 0:09:42.339
<v Speaker 1>like he always does. It's not like they're without weapons.

0:09:42.390 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm more concerned defensively, you guys, honestly. The offense is

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>going to do its thing. I do think it will

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.220
<v Speaker 1>score points, even though Notre Dame's defense is quite literally

0:09:51.260 --> 0:09:54.550
<v Speaker 1>the best in the country. um the defense has to

0:09:55.090 --> 0:09:57.620
<v Speaker 1>to pull its weight like they can't just be allowing

0:09:57.620 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>30 plus points per game if they are going to

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.540
<v Speaker 1>survive this stretch run without a malachi tony.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah no doubt that past defense you saw it last

0:10:05.020 --> 0:10:08.900
<v Speaker 4>week they made billy edwards look like drake may last

0:10:08.940 --> 0:10:12.060
<v Speaker 4>week so yeah and the florida state game too so

0:10:12.500 --> 0:10:15.580
<v Speaker 4>It's a huge game. I hate it that Tony's not playing.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.900
<v Speaker 4>It's such a showcase game. It does suck. I do

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 4>wonder how the committee, not to go back to the committee, Taylor,

0:10:24.830 --> 0:10:28.410
<v Speaker 4>and get on that fun topic again, but I'm wondering

0:10:28.610 --> 0:10:32.450
<v Speaker 4>if they were to lose without Tony, but they then

0:10:32.690 --> 0:10:36.850
<v Speaker 4>lost to Wake in the ACC title game, would they

0:10:36.870 --> 0:10:38.630
<v Speaker 4>get a bit of a break and definitely be in

0:10:38.650 --> 0:10:41.210
<v Speaker 4>the field because the loss was to Notre Dame without

0:10:41.250 --> 0:10:42.050
<v Speaker 4>Malachi Tony?

0:10:43.929 --> 0:10:45.550
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to tell me that you are going

0:10:45.690 --> 0:10:49.410
<v Speaker 1>to keep out Miami after watching them an entirety of

0:10:49.450 --> 0:10:53.010
<v Speaker 1>the season and full well knowing that he is capable

0:10:53.050 --> 0:10:55.900
<v Speaker 1>of returning for a playoff and leave them out, then

0:10:55.940 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>abolish the committee.

0:10:57.540 --> 0:10:58.099
<v Speaker 7>Respectfully.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But Miami, too, has to win the rest of its

0:11:00.740 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>regular season games if by chance something goes wrong at

0:11:03.740 --> 0:11:06.930
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame. You have to acknowledge that they have other

0:11:06.950 --> 0:11:10.350
<v Speaker 1>elite players on this team, including at quarterback. But it's

0:11:10.410 --> 0:11:12.850
<v Speaker 1>incumbent on Miami to just not even allow the committee

0:11:12.890 --> 0:11:13.809
<v Speaker 1>to be in this conversation.

0:11:13.990 --> 0:11:14.250
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:11:14.350 --> 0:11:16.410
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm with you on that. I, and, and, and

0:11:16.450 --> 0:11:18.859
<v Speaker 4>your run the damn ball comment. Like I do kind

0:11:18.900 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 4>of wonder, not that like Mensa, like to your point

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 4>is really good, but I do wonder no names run

0:11:24.140 --> 0:11:27.020
<v Speaker 4>defense is damn good. But do they say Mark Fletcher,

0:11:27.059 --> 0:11:29.860
<v Speaker 4>this game's on you. We given you the ball 30 times.

0:11:29.900 --> 0:11:32.700
<v Speaker 4>Like I wonder if they try and then ball control

0:11:32.780 --> 0:11:35.709
<v Speaker 4>it and keep car off the field and protect your defense.

0:11:36.370 --> 0:11:38.490
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they try that, you know, I think

0:11:38.530 --> 0:11:40.429
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely going to be part of the game plan.

0:11:40.470 --> 0:11:41.630
<v Speaker 7>And I think Mark Fletcher.

0:11:41.350 --> 0:11:44.270
<v Speaker 1>Is going to say, I want the ball on my shoulders.

0:11:44.290 --> 0:11:46.550
<v Speaker 1>He did it in the playoff last year. He is

0:11:46.830 --> 0:11:49.510
<v Speaker 1>more than capable of carrying a load and then some.

0:11:50.030 --> 0:11:52.550
<v Speaker 1>And I think as a senior leader and Malachi, Tony

0:11:52.590 --> 0:11:55.530
<v Speaker 1>is one of his closest, dearest friends. You're going to

0:11:55.570 --> 0:11:57.250
<v Speaker 1>see that this weekend. I think they're going to have

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>added motivation, which is not necessarily what you want. Now

0:11:59.580 --> 0:12:01.820
<v Speaker 1>credit to Notre Dame. They are an elite football team.

0:12:01.900 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>They too are dealing with some, some valuable injuries.

0:12:06.140 --> 0:12:09.660
<v Speaker 6>If the committee even thought about leaving Miami out, I

0:12:09.740 --> 0:12:13.179
<v Speaker 6>think that Michael Irvin would go get the RV that

0:12:13.210 --> 0:12:15.550
<v Speaker 6>he gave to Mama Fletcher and drive it into the

0:12:15.610 --> 0:12:16.790
<v Speaker 6>offices of the committee.

0:12:17.050 --> 0:12:19.070
<v Speaker 2>He'd knock all their hats off that rack. I'm terrified

0:12:19.110 --> 0:12:20.590
<v Speaker 2>how that man would react to this. All their hats

0:12:20.610 --> 0:12:21.870
<v Speaker 2>would fall off that rack, Boney.

0:12:22.990 --> 0:12:25.270
<v Speaker 1>He really might. You're so right about that. But man,

0:12:25.550 --> 0:12:28.050
<v Speaker 1>if a Miami team gets left out of a 12-team

0:12:28.090 --> 0:12:31.540
<v Speaker 1>playoff by potentially losing a close one to Notre Dame

0:12:31.580 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and falling short in a championship game that a lot

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of three-loss SEC teams aren't even going to be playing in, oh,

0:12:37.140 --> 0:12:39.020
<v Speaker 1>by the way, then you're not putting the 12 best

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>teams in the country in the playoff, and you're doing

0:12:40.900 --> 0:12:41.780
<v Speaker 1>the fans a disservice.

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 4>This text is hilarious. 704 number says, Mac, what are

0:12:44.660 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 4>you doing to poor Taylor? You're bringing up hypotheticals that

0:12:47.220 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 4>are getting her even more angry. Please don't do this.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:50.740
<v Speaker 7>Oh, yeah.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I promised myself I wouldn't.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:53.380
<v Speaker 7>Get riled up.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.780
<v Speaker 1>I promised myself, but I can't do it, you guys.

0:12:55.970 --> 0:12:56.780
<v Speaker 1>I am who I am.

0:12:56.870 --> 0:12:59.950
<v Speaker 4>But that's why we love you is like you are

0:13:00.030 --> 0:13:00.950
<v Speaker 4>just passionate.

0:13:01.030 --> 0:13:02.270
<v Speaker 2>You have opinions. You know what I mean?

0:13:02.290 --> 0:13:04.490
<v Speaker 4>You've got opinions. You back it up with facts. It's

0:13:04.510 --> 0:13:06.950
<v Speaker 4>not like you're just throwing crazy stuff out like our

0:13:06.970 --> 0:13:07.650
<v Speaker 4>text line does.

0:13:08.570 --> 0:13:10.290
<v Speaker 2>You got facts, baby. I like it.

0:13:10.429 --> 0:13:13.730
<v Speaker 1>Only sometimes, you know? Hand over to my Twitter for

0:13:13.750 --> 0:13:15.949
<v Speaker 1>the real facts because I'll drop numbers on there.

0:13:16.450 --> 0:13:17.030
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:13:17.070 --> 0:13:18.430
<v Speaker 4>Before we let you go, we've got to ask you

0:13:18.450 --> 0:13:22.750
<v Speaker 4>about Duke-NC State, a big game here in our neck

0:13:22.790 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 4>of the woods. Duke has, and Bone has reminded State

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.700
<v Speaker 4>fans of this over the last three years.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.660
<v Speaker 2>Just numbers. I just have the numbers, Taylor.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 4>I can't deny it. Double-digit wins each of the last

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.310
<v Speaker 4>three years for Duke over State. Do you think that continues?

0:13:37.370 --> 0:13:38.590
<v Speaker 4>What are your thoughts on this one?

0:13:39.730 --> 0:13:48.020
<v Speaker 1>I remember sidelining that 23 game in Durham. That was

0:13:48.059 --> 0:13:48.420
<v Speaker 1>not good.

0:13:48.580 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 2>That was a real bad one for State.

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.429
<v Speaker 1>That was not good at all. I think Duke has

0:13:56.010 --> 0:13:58.890
<v Speaker 1>the best running back and one of the best players

0:13:58.929 --> 0:14:02.530
<v Speaker 1>in the country. By the way, they just launched... Nate

0:14:02.550 --> 0:14:05.020
<v Speaker 1>Shepard's Heisman campaign, too, and rightfully so. His numbers are

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.420
<v Speaker 1>off the charts. I don't know that NC State for

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.540
<v Speaker 1>four quarters can sustain trying to figure out how to

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:14.900
<v Speaker 1>stop Nate Shepard. That's just what this game boils down to,

0:14:14.940 --> 0:14:16.979
<v Speaker 1>I think. It will be great for NC State to

0:14:17.020 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>get Duke Scott back if they do because they need

0:14:20.420 --> 0:14:24.250
<v Speaker 1>a run game. It's... You know, they want to compete

0:14:24.260 --> 0:14:26.850
<v Speaker 1>in this one, I think, to be sustainable and not

0:14:26.870 --> 0:14:30.130
<v Speaker 1>just leave it up to C.J. Bailey and this passing

0:14:30.150 --> 0:14:33.110
<v Speaker 1>game against a really, really, really good Duke defense. So

0:14:33.630 --> 0:14:36.710
<v Speaker 1>those are some things to monitor, but trying to stop

0:14:36.730 --> 0:14:38.990
<v Speaker 1>Nate Shepard is something people haven't been able to do.

0:14:39.050 --> 0:14:40.350
<v Speaker 1>If they can do it on the ground, great, but

0:14:40.370 --> 0:14:41.770
<v Speaker 1>he's going to kill you in the pass game.

0:14:42.310 --> 0:14:42.610
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:14:42.630 --> 0:14:45.110
<v Speaker 1>He's more scrimmage yards than anybody else in the country,

0:14:45.110 --> 0:14:45.690
<v Speaker 1>18 of them.

0:14:46.050 --> 0:14:49.510
<v Speaker 4>He's got 972 rush yards and 14 rush TDs. 31

0:14:51.740 --> 0:14:56.580
<v Speaker 4>catches for 302 receiving yards and four receiving TDs. He

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.330
<v Speaker 4>has to be a Heisman finalist, doesn't he? And I

0:14:59.370 --> 0:15:02.090
<v Speaker 4>don't have confidence that the voters will do that, but

0:15:02.470 --> 0:15:04.740
<v Speaker 4>doesn't he have to be a finalist, y'all, if he

0:15:04.750 --> 0:15:05.340
<v Speaker 4>keeps this up?

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely does.

0:15:07.790 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 7>I think numerically, yes, absolutely.

0:15:09.910 --> 0:15:12.700
<v Speaker 1>The good news is Duke does play Miami next week,

0:15:13.180 --> 0:15:15.660
<v Speaker 1>and Duke does play Wake Forest. So he's going to

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have chances to show not just the ACC we're watching,

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.730
<v Speaker 1>but the country who he really is against a legitimate...

0:15:23.190 --> 0:15:24.850
<v Speaker 1>contender for a college football playoff.

0:15:24.990 --> 0:15:25.410
<v Speaker 2>Good point.

0:15:25.450 --> 0:15:27.230
<v Speaker 6>And he has those numbers and he wasn't healthy for

0:15:27.270 --> 0:15:29.910
<v Speaker 6>about three weeks here. If he was actually healthy.

0:15:30.350 --> 0:15:33.950
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, that's a great point too, man. Y'all are

0:15:33.970 --> 0:15:34.590
<v Speaker 2>all over it, man.

0:15:34.670 --> 0:15:37.580
<v Speaker 4>I feel, I feel, I feel like we're all vibing

0:15:37.620 --> 0:15:39.780
<v Speaker 4>right now on the same page. We do need to

0:15:39.820 --> 0:15:43.260
<v Speaker 4>shout out Taylor. She has added like a 14th job

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:48.479
<v Speaker 4>at ESPN or, you know, with, with ESPN, the ACC network,

0:15:48.860 --> 0:15:51.550
<v Speaker 4>you now are going to be doing for ESPN a,

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.140
<v Speaker 4>coverage of the women's TGL golf.

0:15:54.220 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Is this true?

0:15:54.900 --> 0:15:56.780
<v Speaker 1>It is true.

0:15:57.100 --> 0:15:58.330
<v Speaker 7>It starts on Sunday.

0:15:58.350 --> 0:16:02.150
<v Speaker 1>It's the inaugural season of WTGL. They're heading into year

0:16:02.170 --> 0:16:03.310
<v Speaker 1>three of TGL.

0:16:03.350 --> 0:16:07.290
<v Speaker 7>So they wanted to get the ladies involved in rightfully so. And, uh,

0:16:07.330 --> 0:16:11.410
<v Speaker 7>there are some incredible names, uh, from the LPGA that

0:16:11.430 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 7>are coming over to play in this, including headline by

0:16:14.140 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 7>Michelle Lee West.

0:16:14.940 --> 0:16:19.620
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows her. Um, and, And I'm excited to dive

0:16:19.700 --> 0:16:23.170
<v Speaker 1>into an aspect of sports that I'm not normally dabbling in,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.220
<v Speaker 1>which is golf. But it's so different. And I hope

0:16:25.660 --> 0:16:28.660
<v Speaker 1>people will tune in. Our first match is Sunday at

0:16:28.660 --> 0:16:30.510
<v Speaker 1>3 o'clock on ESPN. And I know a lot of

0:16:30.530 --> 0:16:32.610
<v Speaker 1>people will be watching NFL. But if you want a

0:16:32.610 --> 0:16:34.250
<v Speaker 1>little change of pace and to see some of these

0:16:34.310 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>incredible ladies do their thing. um, lock in and then we'll,

0:16:38.340 --> 0:16:40.500
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what I bring to the table because this

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is a fun, exciting learning experience for all of us

0:16:43.460 --> 0:16:45.830
<v Speaker 1>because it's never been done before. So let's get it.

0:16:45.990 --> 0:16:47.890
<v Speaker 2>So Sunday's your day off. You said, I'll just throw

0:16:47.910 --> 0:16:49.790
<v Speaker 2>another job on the table. Who needs days off?

0:16:49.890 --> 0:16:51.410
<v Speaker 1>Who needs a day off?

0:16:51.430 --> 0:16:54.270
<v Speaker 2>We'll sleep in June.

0:16:54.330 --> 0:16:58.550
<v Speaker 4>All right, Taylor, you rock. Congratulations on that and all

0:16:58.590 --> 0:17:02.010
<v Speaker 4>your success. Um, uh, thanks for coming on. We appreciate it.

0:17:02.750 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You guys are the absolute best anytime, and I hopefully

0:17:05.500 --> 0:17:06.899
<v Speaker 1>will see you soon.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.780
<v Speaker 2>Yes, definitely, definitely. All right, Taylor, be good. Thank you, Taylor.

0:17:09.820 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 2>There you go. That is Taylor Tannenbaum.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 4>I guess she's referencing ACC titles.

0:17:13.619 --> 0:17:16.230
<v Speaker 2>She'll be here, right, in Charlotte? Yes. Does she want

0:17:16.250 --> 0:17:18.949
<v Speaker 2>to do a studio visit? Not many do, Bone. Oh, yeah,

0:17:18.970 --> 0:17:19.369
<v Speaker 2>she'll be here.

0:17:19.410 --> 0:17:22.550
<v Speaker 4>Maybe she does. Oh, by the way, one quick thing

0:17:22.650 --> 0:17:26.030
<v Speaker 4>on golf. How about Liv? Pour one out for Liv.

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 4>It is finally over. That abomination of a horrendous idea

0:17:32.180 --> 0:17:35.460
<v Speaker 4>that all it did, Bone, is cost the Saudis gazillions

0:17:35.500 --> 0:17:39.290
<v Speaker 4>of dollars. All it did is cost many golfers, Bone,

0:17:40.710 --> 0:17:45.390
<v Speaker 4>trust and I don't know, actual likability for the decisions

0:17:45.450 --> 0:17:49.290
<v Speaker 4>they made. What a complete epic failure. Like that is

0:17:49.390 --> 0:17:53.540
<v Speaker 4>like a sports equivalent of Coca-Cola trying new Coke. I mean,

0:17:54.220 --> 0:17:56.660
<v Speaker 4>that's like the glowing puck on Fox. That's how bad

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 4>that damn thing failed.

0:17:57.940 --> 0:17:59.530
<v Speaker 6>You're going to do a list of your top five

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.550
<v Speaker 6>live moments here throughout the show.

0:18:02.010 --> 0:18:02.710
<v Speaker 2>Give us one of them.

0:18:03.369 --> 0:18:06.209
<v Speaker 6>I liked it when they once had 300 viewers for

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 6>one of their golf tournaments.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.580
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that thing, no one was watching. Even with

0:18:11.619 --> 0:18:12.859
<v Speaker 2>the big names, no.

0:18:12.780 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 4>One cared enough to put it on. Anyway, man, good

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.420
<v Speaker 4>riddance to that. Let's get everybody back on the same

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.020
<v Speaker 4>damn tour and rock and roll, man.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:20.620
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sir.

0:18:20.660 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 6>When we come back here on the Mac and Bone Show,

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 6>does Panther Nation have any confidence with Denver coming to town?

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Denver's coming down that mountain, Mac. Are we going to

0:18:29.060 --> 0:18:32.180
<v Speaker 6>Panther up and send them back home with the big

0:18:32.330 --> 0:18:35.330
<v Speaker 6>old L-ski? As Mac says, Sports Radio, 92.7 WFNZ.

0:18:48.470 --> 0:18:50.430
<v Speaker 5>They went nine straight drives without scoring.

0:18:50.490 --> 0:18:53.250
<v Speaker 2>How impressive and how impressed with you were the defense today?

0:18:53.930 --> 0:18:56.850
<v Speaker 8>I was. I wish we would have finished better. I

0:18:56.890 --> 0:19:01.010
<v Speaker 8>said this, it's not a good offense we played. It's

0:19:01.030 --> 0:19:06.610
<v Speaker 8>just the truth. So we expected that and we're going

0:19:06.630 --> 0:19:07.570
<v Speaker 8>to see a lot better teams.

0:19:09.390 --> 0:19:11.250
<v Speaker 4>All right, so you got to go backbone to the

0:19:11.250 --> 0:19:12.750
<v Speaker 4>2024 season.

0:19:12.790 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>That was old Sean O right there. Go scratch yourself.

0:19:15.619 --> 0:19:18.860
<v Speaker 4>That was old punchable face himself, Sean Payton, after they

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.450
<v Speaker 4>beat the Panthers in Bryce Young's return from the benching game.

0:19:22.510 --> 0:19:26.010
<v Speaker 4>Jalen Coker's first touchdown as a NFL player, by the way,

0:19:26.050 --> 0:19:29.850
<v Speaker 4>in that game. and Sean Payton running up the score

0:19:29.890 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 4>late in the game, pissing off JC Horn and having

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.900
<v Speaker 4>words with him after the game. And then he goes

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.340
<v Speaker 4>in the presser and says that, eh, they're not really

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 4>that good of an offense anyway. So that was two

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.550
<v Speaker 4>years ago, Bone. I added that on the list. That

0:19:44.590 --> 0:19:47.930
<v Speaker 4>was like reason 100 not to like Sean Payton. And

0:19:48.050 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 4>fast forward to this week's bone this week, talking about

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.620
<v Speaker 4>the 2026 Panthers offense.

0:19:55.940 --> 0:19:57.020
<v Speaker 2>Listen to what he has to say.

0:19:58.500 --> 0:20:04.010
<v Speaker 8>Listen, he's, he's, you've definitely seen, um, you know, his, uh,

0:20:04.270 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 8>ascension and he's very comfortable with what they're doing. Um,

0:20:09.830 --> 0:20:11.890
<v Speaker 8>It's an explosive team. I think they're seventh or eighth

0:20:11.950 --> 0:20:15.510
<v Speaker 8>in explosives. They do a great job mixing the play action,

0:20:16.210 --> 0:20:21.510
<v Speaker 8>the RPO game. They've drafted well. And so all those

0:20:21.570 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 8>numbers are different today than they were two years ago.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So there you go. Now, you better not say after

0:20:28.980 --> 0:20:30.899
<v Speaker 2>the game, if you beat us, that offense is terrible.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.020
<v Speaker 2>We got you on record, baby.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Explosive.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.020
<v Speaker 6>The moral to the story is always keep your Sean

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.030
<v Speaker 6>Payton receipts. You never know when they could be come

0:20:38.050 --> 0:20:38.370
<v Speaker 6>up again.

0:20:38.890 --> 0:20:42.350
<v Speaker 4>AJ says, I just wish JC horn would have bleep

0:20:42.650 --> 0:20:45.210
<v Speaker 4>beat the bleepity bleep out of Sean Payton that day

0:20:45.609 --> 0:20:47.430
<v Speaker 4>when he was showing him at the end of the game.

0:20:47.770 --> 0:20:48.930
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sir. Please.

0:20:49.330 --> 0:20:51.890
<v Speaker 4>Hey, maybe somebody could get them. Maybe somebody can chin

0:20:51.910 --> 0:20:55.340
<v Speaker 4>them bone this week. God, I would love to beat them.

0:20:55.740 --> 0:20:59.060
<v Speaker 4>I'd love for our defense with the new coordinator, Todd wash,

0:20:59.220 --> 0:21:01.540
<v Speaker 4>who came across as so likable in that presser with

0:21:01.580 --> 0:21:03.860
<v Speaker 4>his intensity and passion and and the way he wants

0:21:03.900 --> 0:21:07.250
<v Speaker 4>players to attack, I would love it if Sean had

0:21:07.350 --> 0:21:11.150
<v Speaker 4>no answers for Todd Walsh and the Panthers' defense, man.

0:21:11.250 --> 0:21:13.510
<v Speaker 2>I would love that. And with the safety.

0:21:13.170 --> 0:21:15.950
<v Speaker 6>Injuries for the Broncos, we know that their corners are good,

0:21:15.990 --> 0:21:20.190
<v Speaker 6>especially the all-world Sertan, but they've got some questions about

0:21:20.250 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 6>injuries in the secondary, and can the Panthers exploit that

0:21:22.700 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 6>in this game?

0:21:23.619 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is true.

0:21:24.180 --> 0:21:25.859
<v Speaker 6>Not a lot of holes in this defense, if you

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 6>look at their roster. They're good at all the levels, but...

0:21:29.020 --> 0:21:30.899
<v Speaker 6>with those safeties being injured right now, that could be

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 6>a big factor here. So I'm curious with Panther fans

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.409
<v Speaker 6>out there, right? Like the fact that spreads two and

0:21:36.430 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 6>a half is interesting. It's very interesting.

0:21:39.700 --> 0:21:41.570
<v Speaker 4>And how many times, Bone, do you see a spread

0:21:41.609 --> 0:21:44.090
<v Speaker 4>where you're like, whoa, that's different than I thought. And

0:21:44.130 --> 0:21:45.970
<v Speaker 4>it ends up like, oh, yeah, they knew.

0:21:46.630 --> 0:21:48.670
<v Speaker 2>They knew. You know, Vegas knew type thing.

0:21:48.690 --> 0:21:50.570
<v Speaker 4>And I wonder if this is going to be a

0:21:50.609 --> 0:21:53.710
<v Speaker 4>spread where a lot of people look at and say, man,

0:21:53.750 --> 0:21:56.290
<v Speaker 4>I watched the Panthers offense. They can't pass protect. They're

0:21:56.330 --> 0:21:58.389
<v Speaker 4>going against the Denver front, which I'm terrified of, by

0:21:58.430 --> 0:22:00.750
<v Speaker 4>the way. How the hell is it only a two

0:22:00.770 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 4>and a half point spread? And then the Panthers find

0:22:03.100 --> 0:22:05.670
<v Speaker 4>a way to win the game. I'm wondering how much

0:22:05.770 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 4>confidence there is out there in the Panthers. What are

0:22:09.180 --> 0:22:13.620
<v Speaker 4>y'all feeling, Panther Nation, my fellow Panthertonians? What are y'all

0:22:13.820 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 4>feeling out there? I don't know if that's going to stick.

0:22:15.660 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so.

0:22:16.220 --> 0:22:18.290
<v Speaker 2>I'm not really sure where that's going. I don't think

0:22:18.310 --> 0:22:20.530
<v Speaker 2>that's it. I hope not. I think Thurs has a

0:22:20.550 --> 0:22:23.930
<v Speaker 2>better chance of sticking than that crap. But like, is.

0:22:23.869 --> 0:22:27.210
<v Speaker 4>This a game where y'all kind of feel like, Hey,

0:22:27.690 --> 0:22:32.820
<v Speaker 4>Denver's offense is certainly nothing dominant. Their running game is

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 4>one that's 29th in the league bone. It is one

0:22:36.340 --> 0:22:39.660
<v Speaker 4>that I think much like the Packers run game, we

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.260
<v Speaker 4>can slow down and then make them put it in

0:22:42.300 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Bo Nix's hands. Like at the very least, I think

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.980
<v Speaker 4>the defense, and I don't know if y'all would shake

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 4>your head at this, I think the defense is going

0:22:50.100 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 4>to play for Todd Walsh. Finney brought this up earlier.

0:22:52.820 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 4>The defense is going to play with a little edge

0:22:54.260 --> 0:22:58.459
<v Speaker 4>after what happened with Avero. I am very confident we're

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be right there in this football game. The

0:23:00.820 --> 0:23:04.220
<v Speaker 4>thing I can't get past is, Bone, the pass protection

0:23:04.270 --> 0:23:07.810
<v Speaker 4>against Nick Benito, Zach Allen, and those guys up front.

0:23:08.590 --> 0:23:11.690
<v Speaker 4>And then I can't get past the way Denver has

0:23:11.750 --> 0:23:12.570
<v Speaker 4>kind of had that.

0:23:12.490 --> 0:23:15.090
<v Speaker 2>Fourth quarter magic. You know what I mean?

0:23:15.450 --> 0:23:18.469
<v Speaker 4>But there's like zero doubt in my mind, which I'm

0:23:18.490 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 4>sure is what you want to hear, y'all, that we're

0:23:20.340 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 4>going to be right there in this game, Bones.

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.100
<v Speaker 6>This is a fourth quarter game. It's close down the stretch.

0:23:26.180 --> 0:23:28.770
<v Speaker 6>If the Panthers defense back, yes, we can look at

0:23:28.810 --> 0:23:32.150
<v Speaker 6>Chicago and Tampa, and rightfully so, how bad it was.

0:23:32.750 --> 0:23:35.250
<v Speaker 6>But you can also look at the job they did

0:23:35.310 --> 0:23:39.070
<v Speaker 6>in containing B. John Robinson, Jameer Gibbs. The Packers didn't

0:23:39.109 --> 0:23:41.420
<v Speaker 6>go off to the level we thought they were. They've

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.980
<v Speaker 6>actually contained some good offenses, especially Detroit and Green Bay,

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 6>down to a level where Detroit, they won, and Green Bay,

0:23:50.220 --> 0:23:52.180
<v Speaker 6>if the offensive line would have held up, they probably

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.420
<v Speaker 6>had a chance to do some weight in the game.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.970
<v Speaker 6>If they can contain those offenses, certainly. A much more

0:23:59.050 --> 0:24:03.050
<v Speaker 6>pedestrian attack that is the Denver Broncos. They can limit

0:24:03.109 --> 0:24:06.470
<v Speaker 6>them and not have them gash them like Chicago and

0:24:06.490 --> 0:24:09.530
<v Speaker 6>Tampa Bay did. This is a four-quarter game. This is

0:24:09.570 --> 0:24:12.369
<v Speaker 6>a close game. We get much more of the Panther

0:24:12.410 --> 0:24:15.570
<v Speaker 6>product we saw to begin the year than we do

0:24:15.590 --> 0:24:17.070
<v Speaker 6>the last couple weeks in this football game.

0:24:17.130 --> 0:24:19.669
<v Speaker 4>What do you think about these numbers? How about these numbers?

0:24:19.790 --> 0:24:22.290
<v Speaker 4>Three of the last four games, the Panthers have given

0:24:22.350 --> 0:24:23.850
<v Speaker 4>up 66 rush yards or less.

0:24:24.970 --> 0:24:26.429
<v Speaker 2>Now, the problem is, the one in the middle, we

0:24:26.450 --> 0:24:27.510
<v Speaker 2>gave up $ 7 gazillion.

0:24:27.710 --> 0:24:29.649
<v Speaker 6>And you mentioned Tampa Bay back in Chicago, lead the

0:24:29.690 --> 0:24:31.389
<v Speaker 6>league in rushing, as someone pointed out. There might be

0:24:31.410 --> 0:24:32.710
<v Speaker 6>a reason for that.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.820
<v Speaker 4>We definitely contributed to that, but they ain't just running

0:24:35.940 --> 0:24:36.260
<v Speaker 4>on us.

0:24:36.580 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>See Tampa last week, Mo. That's true. They ain't just

0:24:39.060 --> 0:24:41.060
<v Speaker 2>running on us. I can assure you of that.

0:24:41.859 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 4>How about this stat? Against bottom 10 run games, which

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Denver definitely is.

0:24:50.210 --> 0:24:52.369
<v Speaker 4>Actually, I had a 29, 26 in the league in

0:24:52.410 --> 0:24:54.850
<v Speaker 4>yards per game and yards per carry Denver. But against

0:24:54.910 --> 0:24:58.250
<v Speaker 4>bottom 10 rush attacks, the Panthers have played three of

0:24:58.290 --> 0:25:01.380
<v Speaker 4>those teams. They have given up 78 yards a game.

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.380
<v Speaker 4>They can play run defense against a team like this.

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 4>And then it becomes Bo Nix. We had a texter

0:25:07.140 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 4>that says, Mac, I agree with you. I think we'll

0:25:10.340 --> 0:25:12.330
<v Speaker 4>hold up against the run. But how the hell are

0:25:12.369 --> 0:25:15.929
<v Speaker 4>those corners stopping Waddle and Sutton? Because Bo Nix is

0:25:15.970 --> 0:25:19.530
<v Speaker 4>throwing the football. I don't think they're going to get

0:25:19.570 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 4>it downfield a ton. That's not the type of season

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:23.540
<v Speaker 4>Bo Nix is having, man.

0:25:23.780 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 6>No, and Waddle's been hit or missing some games. It's

0:25:25.980 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 6>not like he's been a dominant force. So, yeah, no,

0:25:30.170 --> 0:25:34.190
<v Speaker 6>I feel horrible about what the offensive line can do.

0:25:34.270 --> 0:25:36.940
<v Speaker 6>I feel good about the defense in this game. How

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:38.700
<v Speaker 6>do offensive line to me is a much more bigger

0:25:38.740 --> 0:25:39.820
<v Speaker 6>problem than the defense.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:40.020
<v Speaker 3>In this game.

0:25:40.060 --> 0:25:42.859
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. This text is with you. 704 number says, y'all,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.780
<v Speaker 4>I love your optimism. I love the weekly positive vibes

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.350
<v Speaker 4>you try to give us, but how on earth is

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.330
<v Speaker 4>our offense going to do anything against that defense? If

0:25:53.369 --> 0:25:56.010
<v Speaker 4>the offensive line gets it handed to them again. So

0:25:56.070 --> 0:26:00.109
<v Speaker 4>I'll ask you, Bo, what's, how do we overcome that obvious,

0:26:00.250 --> 0:26:02.149
<v Speaker 4>scary mismatch?

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 6>Pray.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Go to church. Give me that rosary. Hug your

0:26:09.180 --> 0:26:09.660
<v Speaker 2>loved ones.

0:26:11.060 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 6>Maybe there's a monsoon and the footing gets bad and

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 6>they can't get they can't just run by Rashid Walker.

0:26:15.740 --> 0:26:16.100
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:26:18.050 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 6>I don't have I don't have I don't necessarily have

0:26:19.980 --> 0:26:20.570
<v Speaker 6>the answer for that.

0:26:20.590 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Can we panther up?

0:26:22.540 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Fitty, I'll ask you, well, I'm asking Fitty if we

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.459
<v Speaker 4>can panther up, panther up under any scenario. It could

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.100
<v Speaker 4>be the football monster's bone against the Panthers and Fitty's

0:26:30.140 --> 0:26:31.630
<v Speaker 4>panthering up.

0:26:31.950 --> 0:26:33.510
<v Speaker 2>Do you, like, how do.

0:26:33.450 --> 0:26:37.470
<v Speaker 4>We panther up, Fitty, when we have to acknowledge that

0:26:37.510 --> 0:26:42.060
<v Speaker 4>if our O-line's not better, Denver's pass rush... which is

0:26:42.220 --> 0:26:46.990
<v Speaker 4>sixth in pressure percentage, they're going to be all over Bryce. Like,

0:26:47.350 --> 0:26:49.619
<v Speaker 4>do you just think the game plan finds a way

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 4>to work around that?

0:26:50.580 --> 0:26:54.270
<v Speaker 2>Or do you just think we run it? I think

0:26:54.310 --> 0:26:55.170
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit of both.

0:26:55.650 --> 0:26:58.629
<v Speaker 9>I do think Carolina will be able to establish the

0:26:58.670 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 9>run game. I think Chuba's going to get 80-plus yards

0:27:03.180 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 9>on the ground. I think they'll get back to some

0:27:05.580 --> 0:27:08.980
<v Speaker 9>of the RPO stuff. I do think, Mac, you had

0:27:08.980 --> 0:27:11.990
<v Speaker 9>10 days from the Green Bay game to this game.

0:27:12.470 --> 0:27:13.850
<v Speaker 3>I think you'll see Bryce on the move.

0:27:13.869 --> 0:27:16.390
<v Speaker 9>I think you'll see a much more mobile pocket where

0:27:16.410 --> 0:27:17.990
<v Speaker 9>he's not just standing back there.

0:27:18.010 --> 0:27:18.270
<v Speaker 2>He better.

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.899
<v Speaker 3>Like a duck waiting to get shot.

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.610
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God. Oh, my God.

0:27:23.970 --> 0:27:26.230
<v Speaker 9>The thing that I come back to is you look

0:27:26.290 --> 0:27:28.390
<v Speaker 9>at Denver, and I don't want to take away from

0:27:28.450 --> 0:27:30.969
<v Speaker 9>what they are and how good a football team they are.

0:27:31.450 --> 0:27:35.060
<v Speaker 9>They play a lot of close games, and they've won

0:27:35.220 --> 0:27:37.780
<v Speaker 9>a crap ton of close games. NFL record of one

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 9>possession game for the last two years. At some point,

0:27:40.660 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 9>that's going to stop. At some point, the luck's going

0:27:43.020 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 9>to run out. Bo Nix is not going to make

0:27:44.580 --> 0:27:47.010
<v Speaker 9>the plays. They're not going to get the stops. At

0:27:47.050 --> 0:27:49.630
<v Speaker 9>some point, that's just a law of averages. And this

0:27:49.670 --> 0:27:53.900
<v Speaker 9>feels like a game where our guy rises to the occasion.

0:27:54.619 --> 0:27:56.260
<v Speaker 9>I don't know if Bryce is going to be great.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.180
<v Speaker 9>It might not be pretty. But I think he's going

0:27:59.220 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 9>to make those throws he has to make in the

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.929
<v Speaker 9>fourth quarter. to elevate this team in what I think

0:28:03.990 --> 0:28:05.810
<v Speaker 9>is going to be an ugly football game from start

0:28:05.830 --> 0:28:06.190
<v Speaker 9>to finish.

0:28:06.230 --> 0:28:08.830
<v Speaker 4>Can it be a clutch Bryce game? Last year, Bryce

0:28:08.930 --> 0:28:11.670
<v Speaker 4>was Mr. Fourth Quarterbone. This year, Bo Nix has been Mr.

0:28:11.930 --> 0:28:15.260
<v Speaker 4>Can we get Bryce as the clutch man? Did you

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 4>make a pick on the game there?

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:17.710
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Panthers won the game 17-13.

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:18.340
<v Speaker 2>Oh, here we go.

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:23.940
<v Speaker 4>I was just going to assume I was just, just

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.580
<v Speaker 4>like bone. We knew Bethany was Panther it up. We

0:28:26.660 --> 0:28:29.590
<v Speaker 4>also are not shocked to see sir. Loin say I'll

0:28:29.619 --> 0:28:32.490
<v Speaker 4>Panther up guys. 35, 17.

0:28:32.490 --> 0:28:33.590
<v Speaker 2>Not shocked to see that.

0:28:34.010 --> 0:28:38.630
<v Speaker 9>We scored 35 points on, on this Denver defense. The

0:28:38.710 --> 0:28:40.590
<v Speaker 9>victory dance is going to get haywire.

0:28:40.610 --> 0:28:43.490
<v Speaker 4>We dance in our underwear, bro. Mark it down. Mark

0:28:43.550 --> 0:28:45.990
<v Speaker 4>it down. We are dancing in our underwear if we

0:28:46.030 --> 0:28:48.370
<v Speaker 4>score 35 on this defense with our O-line.

0:28:48.570 --> 0:28:49.410
<v Speaker 3>Mac, don't give me hope.

0:28:49.670 --> 0:28:50.380
<v Speaker 2>Come on, baby.

0:28:50.490 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 3>I need to shake my ass.

0:28:52.660 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 2>We're wanting views, you know. Oh, you can't act like

0:28:56.140 --> 0:28:59.500
<v Speaker 2>women won't flock. To that damn video, Bone, if Fitty

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>and I are in our undies. Can you act like that?

0:29:02.220 --> 0:29:04.690
<v Speaker 6>I don't need to see Fitty's waxing gibbous.

0:29:05.930 --> 0:29:07.510
<v Speaker 9>Bone, are you saying that she would not dance in

0:29:07.530 --> 0:29:09.270
<v Speaker 9>your underwear with us? It would be Bode or Mack

0:29:09.310 --> 0:29:10.110
<v Speaker 9>and I in the undies?

0:29:10.170 --> 0:29:12.110
<v Speaker 6>Well, I have other stuff I'm working on that could

0:29:12.150 --> 0:29:14.580
<v Speaker 6>be delivered by Monday. So just hold on to your horses.

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.460
<v Speaker 6>Hold on to your horses.

0:29:16.540 --> 0:29:19.500
<v Speaker 2>Bone's going to have a live horse. Bone's borrowing XL's.

0:29:20.180 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Exhales horse dollar bill gonna show up in in the

0:29:24.700 --> 0:29:28.230
<v Speaker 4>building oh god all right so here's the deal bony

0:29:28.350 --> 0:29:31.330
<v Speaker 4>fitting his panther it up we got some textures panthering

0:29:31.390 --> 0:29:33.710
<v Speaker 4>up we do have a fair share of people not

0:29:33.790 --> 0:29:37.050
<v Speaker 4>panthering up which i don't i completely get a hundred

0:29:37.090 --> 0:29:39.990
<v Speaker 4>percent um what's your prediction bony.

0:29:40.330 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna do something that people sometimes get mad at

0:29:43.020 --> 0:29:45.100
<v Speaker 6>i am going to go lock city on this football

0:29:45.140 --> 0:29:51.860
<v Speaker 6>game Denver 24 Panthers 20 the Panthers lose this game

0:29:52.020 --> 0:29:54.500
<v Speaker 6>lock it up i don't think the offensive line gives

0:29:54.540 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 6>this team a chance to win the football game.

0:29:57.380 --> 0:29:59.940
<v Speaker 2>Man, he locks City the opponent. Has that ever been

0:29:59.960 --> 0:30:02.100
<v Speaker 2>done before? You just took the wind out of my sails.

0:30:02.140 --> 0:30:03.140
<v Speaker 2>Holy crap, Moe.

0:30:03.180 --> 0:30:04.530
<v Speaker 3>Give me your tickets. I'll go and sit with you

0:30:04.590 --> 0:30:05.190
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday.

0:30:05.790 --> 0:30:08.170
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Larry and Moe, play the game here, what I'm

0:30:08.210 --> 0:30:12.130
<v Speaker 2>doing here, all right? You trying to fool the sports gods, Moe?

0:30:12.450 --> 0:30:14.910
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to the game. Last year I went to

0:30:14.950 --> 0:30:17.890
<v Speaker 6>New Orleans. That was my three scores galore incident. So

0:30:17.950 --> 0:30:20.730
<v Speaker 6>please allow me here to do what I'm doing here

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:21.950
<v Speaker 6>and just pick the Broncos 24-20.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay. There's a method to your madness.

0:30:24.700 --> 0:30:26.980
<v Speaker 6>Do I have to explain everything around here on the radio?

0:30:27.020 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 6>There's a method to your madness.

0:30:29.700 --> 0:30:33.340
<v Speaker 4>This texter, Dan the Ranger fan, is requesting we dance

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.660
<v Speaker 4>in thongs if the Panthers score 35.

0:30:35.660 --> 0:30:38.020
<v Speaker 2>I've got one. I am ready to go.

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.060
<v Speaker 4>Who wants to know? I'll really say who wants to

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.860
<v Speaker 4>see that. Why do you want that, Dan? Dan, what's

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.850
<v Speaker 4>wrong with you? Are you a blind man, Dan, and

0:30:46.870 --> 0:30:48.690
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to set up all the people with sight

0:30:48.710 --> 0:30:49.830
<v Speaker 4>to see something horrifying?

0:30:50.290 --> 0:30:51.150
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you right now.

0:30:51.170 --> 0:30:54.729
<v Speaker 3>I'll get the bra and the thong. Get my audition

0:30:54.750 --> 0:30:55.850
<v Speaker 3>for tassels ready to go.

0:30:55.970 --> 0:30:57.170
<v Speaker 2>We need cheek coverage, y'all.

0:30:57.370 --> 0:30:58.969
<v Speaker 4>I mean, seriously, that thong would be covering us like

0:30:58.990 --> 0:31:00.900
<v Speaker 4>the Panther secondary, all the injuries right now.

0:31:00.940 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Does your insurance guy AC cover cheeks? Cheek coverage.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to do a thing here. I'm going to

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 4>do a thing. I'm going to pick the damn Panthers.

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm teetering. I think we're going to be right there

0:31:16.220 --> 0:31:18.380
<v Speaker 4>in a low-scoring game, Bone. I think our defense is

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.100
<v Speaker 4>going to play inspired. I think they're going to play well.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think Denver's offense is anything special. I do

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.870
<v Speaker 4>worry a little bit about not having Jalen Phillips and

0:31:27.930 --> 0:31:32.970
<v Speaker 4>possibly Okereke and Willie, obviously. But I just think we're

0:31:33.010 --> 0:31:34.690
<v Speaker 4>due to win a game like this. We did not

0:31:34.730 --> 0:31:36.969
<v Speaker 4>beat Green Bay, and I know the O-line is going

0:31:36.990 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 4>to be probably the same personnel, even though I want

0:31:39.060 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 4>to see Brady see. I think we can win an

0:31:42.230 --> 0:31:44.140
<v Speaker 4>ugly one here, Bone. I think we can lean on

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.060
<v Speaker 4>Chuba and run the ball. I think Idzik had 10

0:31:47.060 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 4>days to figure out how can we scheme around the

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 4>O-line a little bit. I say the Panthers win 17-16.

0:31:53.460 --> 0:31:58.780
<v Speaker 4>17-16 on a Fitzy field goal at the buzzer.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.820
<v Speaker 2>What is going on? Come on, Finney! What is hitting

0:32:01.860 --> 0:32:11.140
<v Speaker 2>him back there? That wasn't very mature, was it? No,

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.620
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. There's like people punching things around here.

0:32:13.700 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 6>I hope you're right. I do think it will be,

0:32:15.540 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 6>like you both said, ugly game.

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 2>This thing.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.290
<v Speaker 6>Low scoring. This thing is not going to be aesthetically pleasing.

0:32:21.510 --> 0:32:23.690
<v Speaker 6>I think so, man. Much like most of my radio career.

0:32:25.810 --> 0:32:28.130
<v Speaker 6>Much like our victory dance on Monday, potentially. Much like

0:32:28.170 --> 0:32:29.490
<v Speaker 6>much of our lives, to be honest.

0:32:29.510 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll see. I'm sorry if I just ruined

0:32:31.940 --> 0:32:33.570
<v Speaker 2>that game, Bo. Also, if.

0:32:34.530 --> 0:32:37.830
<v Speaker 6>If your predictions come true for you two, I do

0:32:37.850 --> 0:32:40.230
<v Speaker 6>need to know if anybody out there has a lead on.

0:32:41.470 --> 0:32:46.190
<v Speaker 2>A horse that could travel on Mondays. Exhale, baby, come on.

0:32:47.130 --> 0:32:48.230
<v Speaker 2>Ride him right into town, baby.

0:32:48.250 --> 0:32:50.030
<v Speaker 6>Do you think, Mac, there would be a meeting called

0:32:50.090 --> 0:32:53.770
<v Speaker 6>by Marsha and Colin and the executives if I just

0:32:53.810 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 6>started riding a horse down the hallway?

0:32:55.100 --> 0:32:56.430
<v Speaker 2>Or would they just be like, that's a victory dance?

0:32:56.450 --> 0:32:57.540
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be fine.

0:32:57.580 --> 0:32:59.500
<v Speaker 4>I think if Philly and I are in our underwear, though,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.540
<v Speaker 4>that could result in corporate-level meetings.

0:33:02.700 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 2>You're not taking this away.

0:33:04.060 --> 0:33:06.860
<v Speaker 3>If we win on Sunday, I'm dancing in my drawers.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to, too, man.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 6>I would rather clean up after my horse than see that.

0:33:13.100 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 6>All right. We're going to figure out what happened here

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.130
<v Speaker 6>when we come back. It's a huge college football weekend.

0:33:20.430 --> 0:33:24.190
<v Speaker 6>The biggest of the year. Seven ranked matchups. What games

0:33:24.250 --> 0:33:28.150
<v Speaker 6>are can't miss? And who is getting the dubs? Sports

0:33:28.190 --> 0:33:29.150
<v Speaker 6>Radio 92.7 WFNZ.

0:33:42.490 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 10>You got that two-headed monster.

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:02.380
<v Speaker 5>Look at that slate, by the way.

0:34:04.020 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 8>Seven top 25 matchups.

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:06.380
<v Speaker 2>I need to say something.

0:34:06.420 --> 0:34:07.180
<v Speaker 8>Most ever.

0:34:08.180 --> 0:34:11.580
<v Speaker 5>And I've never been more serious about something in college football.

0:34:12.540 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 5>If you have a family member or a friend that

0:34:16.300 --> 0:34:22.630
<v Speaker 5>is getting married tomorrow and you go, then you either.

0:34:22.910 --> 0:34:23.670
<v Speaker 9>You mean this weekend?

0:34:24.430 --> 0:34:26.470
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Saturday. Yeah, Saturday.

0:34:26.870 --> 0:34:31.290
<v Speaker 5>If you've got anyone getting married this Saturday, unfamily them

0:34:31.330 --> 0:34:33.009
<v Speaker 5>or unfriend them and don't go.

0:34:35.660 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 4>That is Matt Berry on the broadcast last night for

0:34:39.860 --> 0:34:45.419
<v Speaker 4>UTSA FAU. And that is his message, Bone, about this

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.739
<v Speaker 4>amazing college football weekend with seven.

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Rank versus rank matchups. You heard him.

0:34:51.700 --> 0:34:53.540
<v Speaker 4>If you got a wedding to go to, you know

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 4>what Matt Berry just told you to do. Friendships are over.

0:34:56.020 --> 0:34:57.339
<v Speaker 2>And on family. That's a new term.

0:34:59.180 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Family relationships will be destroyed, according to Matt Berry. Oh, man.

0:35:04.060 --> 0:35:06.110
<v Speaker 6>If you have a new girlfriend and you have a

0:35:06.150 --> 0:35:08.970
<v Speaker 6>babysitting assignment that's taking up 2 p.m. to 11 p.m.,

0:35:09.270 --> 0:35:11.130
<v Speaker 6>you got to put your foot down and say, not

0:35:11.170 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 6>this weekend. This is God's football weekend. Hypothetically speaking, Fitty, right?

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Fitty, you've taken some ribbing on the text line.

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.130
<v Speaker 4>Throughout the week because we've been reiterating that you and

0:35:22.170 --> 0:35:25.469
<v Speaker 4>your lovely girlfriend maddie are going to be babysitting i

0:35:25.510 --> 0:35:29.110
<v Speaker 4>guess is it her three her sister's three kids correct

0:35:29.530 --> 0:35:34.310
<v Speaker 4>um between two and like midnight on saturday during this

0:35:34.390 --> 0:35:37.850
<v Speaker 4>amazing college football weekend you've been called not a football

0:35:37.870 --> 0:35:40.380
<v Speaker 4>guy yep you've been called a dude that just ought

0:35:40.390 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 4>to buy the damn ring now You've been called a

0:35:43.420 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 4>guy that is a total hypocrite for the way he's

0:35:46.820 --> 0:35:50.140
<v Speaker 4>criticized others over the years for not watching sporting events

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:51.620
<v Speaker 4>to be with their ladies.

0:35:52.820 --> 0:35:54.459
<v Speaker 2>What do you have to say for yourself, Vic?

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.350
<v Speaker 3>I am a coward. I own that I am a coward.

0:35:59.190 --> 0:36:02.310
<v Speaker 9>And I deserve every bit of the wrath that I

0:36:02.370 --> 0:36:04.370
<v Speaker 9>am getting for the way that I have said things.

0:36:05.060 --> 0:36:08.250
<v Speaker 9>What I've said previously, most notably at guys like Walker Amell,

0:36:08.290 --> 0:36:09.670
<v Speaker 9>who doesn't miss.

0:36:09.870 --> 0:36:12.129
<v Speaker 4>Is Walker free to head to the zoo on any

0:36:12.190 --> 0:36:13.549
<v Speaker 4>big sports day now?

0:36:13.770 --> 0:36:13.950
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:36:14.730 --> 0:36:15.970
<v Speaker 3>But I have made it known.

0:36:17.110 --> 0:36:19.670
<v Speaker 9>The Heels play tomorrow at noon, so the babysitting starts

0:36:19.710 --> 0:36:22.930
<v Speaker 9>during the Heels game. I'm still going to get my

0:36:22.950 --> 0:36:25.660
<v Speaker 9>football in. She understands what I do for a living.

0:36:26.730 --> 0:36:29.330
<v Speaker 9>The boys have never watched football, so they'll be introduced

0:36:29.350 --> 0:36:30.650
<v Speaker 9>to the great sport tomorrow.

0:36:31.410 --> 0:36:32.610
<v Speaker 3>I will still be locked in.

0:36:32.730 --> 0:36:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're USC fans then. How old are these boys?

0:36:36.940 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 3>One's five or six, and then it was like two.

0:36:39.780 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Finney's going to have a live Oklahoma drill. These boys

0:36:42.739 --> 0:36:45.220
<v Speaker 4>are going to hurt. They're going to break something.

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.919
<v Speaker 6>I told Tara this weekend, this is my weekend. Don't

0:36:49.010 --> 0:36:52.450
<v Speaker 6>bother me. Let me have Saturday night. uh all day

0:36:52.510 --> 0:36:55.130
<v Speaker 6>she's also out of town this weekend so look at

0:36:55.150 --> 0:36:57.350
<v Speaker 6>you tough guy i'm gonna miss her actually and i

0:36:57.390 --> 0:36:59.830
<v Speaker 6>wish she was here on saturday tough guy.

0:36:59.489 --> 0:37:02.850
<v Speaker 4>All right let's talk about the games for those of us.

0:37:02.950 --> 0:37:04.669
<v Speaker 6>That will never say that if she was in town

0:37:04.690 --> 0:37:06.610
<v Speaker 6>by the way because she's listening right now for those of.

0:37:06.670 --> 0:37:08.710
<v Speaker 4>Us that would not be breaking up a fight between

0:37:08.750 --> 0:37:11.870
<v Speaker 4>a two-year-old and a five-year-old uh during a big fourth

0:37:11.910 --> 0:37:15.049
<v Speaker 4>down play in one of these seven rank matchups let's

0:37:15.110 --> 0:37:18.410
<v Speaker 4>talk about it um what game uh I mean, is

0:37:18.430 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 4>the obvious answer. Notre Dame, my Notre Dame Miami is,

0:37:21.020 --> 0:37:24.750
<v Speaker 4>is the obvious answer bone in terms of the biggest

0:37:24.790 --> 0:37:27.130
<v Speaker 4>can't miss game, or is it literally the one at

0:37:27.150 --> 0:37:27.890
<v Speaker 4>the same time.

0:37:28.290 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Ole miss.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 4>Seeing if Georgia can respond to what Trinidad Chambliss did

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.180
<v Speaker 4>to them in the Sugar Bowl is really fascinating to me, man.

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.109
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, if we're removing team stuff out of this, like

0:37:41.130 --> 0:37:42.969
<v Speaker 6>Duke State, South Carolina, obviously.

0:37:42.989 --> 0:37:44.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to get to those games in the

0:37:44.469 --> 0:37:44.770
<v Speaker 2>next segment.

0:37:44.790 --> 0:37:48.390
<v Speaker 6>But if you're just looking for the national can't-miss games, Mac,

0:37:48.450 --> 0:37:49.530
<v Speaker 6>I believe it's that.

0:37:50.300 --> 0:37:51.780
<v Speaker 2>It's that window itself.

0:37:52.380 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 6>Because Notre Dame-Miami to me was the obvious answer, but

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Tony goes out and it takes a little steam out

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 6>of it. But when you have Georgia Ole Miss also

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 6>playing at that time and Kentucky-Tennessee, which I think will

0:38:03.739 --> 0:38:07.050
<v Speaker 6>be a great game as well, although a little bit earlier, 6-15,

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 6>I just think it's that 6-15 window on down there.

0:38:10.890 --> 0:38:14.009
<v Speaker 6>I think those three games, because Ole Miss-Georgia's got potential

0:38:14.330 --> 0:38:17.630
<v Speaker 6>to be a better football game and closer than I

0:38:17.670 --> 0:38:19.690
<v Speaker 6>think Notre Dame-Miami without Tony in there.

0:38:21.150 --> 0:38:25.419
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Ole Miss's defense can have a rough night.

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.500
<v Speaker 6>Georgia can lose to Auburn at home, so who's to

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 6>say they can't lose to Ole Miss?

0:38:29.380 --> 0:38:32.850
<v Speaker 2>That is true, but has Kirby scared them smart? Scared

0:38:32.870 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 2>them smart. Scared them straight since then? Scared smart. I

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 2>wish someone would scare my dumb ass, Mark.

0:38:39.940 --> 0:38:43.730
<v Speaker 6>So I'm excited for that entire window to me is captivating.

0:38:43.850 --> 0:38:47.490
<v Speaker 4>That's multi-view. That's like, hell, just put those two up, man.

0:38:47.850 --> 0:38:51.270
<v Speaker 4>Although you got Tennessee, Kentucky, like you're saying, I think

0:38:51.310 --> 0:38:53.150
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be a good game. I mean, this

0:38:53.270 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 4>is just as, and this is an awesome freaking Saturday.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.980
<v Speaker 4>It's my favorite sport to watch, Bone. um when it's

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.100
<v Speaker 4>not my team right i'll have other you know you

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 4>know my team the panthers are invested in everything going

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.299
<v Speaker 4>on like i care about everything so we have all

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.140
<v Speaker 4>these local games and we'll get into those kind of

0:39:10.180 --> 0:39:13.660
<v Speaker 4>more specifically in college football confidence in the nine o'clock

0:39:13.700 --> 0:39:16.580
<v Speaker 4>segment we'll do more panther talk with zach gelb at

0:39:16.580 --> 0:39:19.900
<v Speaker 4>9 25 um but just to have this day and

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 4>have the playoff format and so much on the line

0:39:22.860 --> 0:39:24.890
<v Speaker 4>what do you think about this notre dame so you

0:39:24.969 --> 0:39:28.209
<v Speaker 4>think You think Notre Dame covers that seven and a half?

0:39:28.330 --> 0:39:29.690
<v Speaker 2>I'm starting to think Miami.

0:39:30.420 --> 0:39:32.980
<v Speaker 4>Is going to keep it close I'm starting to get

0:39:33.020 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 4>a feeling they're going to keep it close without Tony.

0:39:35.340 --> 0:39:37.569
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if they'll cover but I don't know

0:39:37.710 --> 0:39:40.230
<v Speaker 6>what the chances of Miami winning that game are without

0:39:40.270 --> 0:39:42.450
<v Speaker 6>Tony though I don't think there's a lot of mystery

0:39:42.489 --> 0:39:44.450
<v Speaker 6>of who the winner is in that game There was

0:39:44.489 --> 0:39:47.930
<v Speaker 6>with Tony, obviously, although I felt this was a spot

0:39:47.969 --> 0:39:51.780
<v Speaker 6>for Notre Dame anyway because of the pressure on the ranking,

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 6>the must-win nature, the playoff late game it is.

0:39:55.860 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>For the Irish. You take Tony out of their back.

0:39:58.380 --> 0:40:01.299
<v Speaker 6>They haven't used Barca really nearly as much as I

0:40:01.340 --> 0:40:04.549
<v Speaker 6>thought they would. You got Leonard Moore, the best DB

0:40:04.590 --> 0:40:07.969
<v Speaker 6>in America, can now go on Barca. Miami still got

0:40:07.989 --> 0:40:10.250
<v Speaker 6>their run game, but this felt like Notre Dame to

0:40:10.270 --> 0:40:13.330
<v Speaker 6>me anyway. Now it really feels like the Irish. So

0:40:13.850 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 6>can it be right around the spread? Maybe, but I

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 6>don't have any doubt that Notre Dame's winning this football game.

0:40:18.180 --> 0:40:21.140
<v Speaker 4>I'm starting to feel like they ride Fletcher. They just

0:40:21.180 --> 0:40:24.940
<v Speaker 4>tell that freaking machine, that cyborg he's carrying it 28 times.

0:40:25.610 --> 0:40:29.250
<v Speaker 4>Now Notre Dame's run defense is real freaking good. They're

0:40:29.270 --> 0:40:32.649
<v Speaker 4>top 10 in everything, statistically, defensively. Did you know that

0:40:32.750 --> 0:40:34.770
<v Speaker 4>Fletcher's mom ghosts every game on RV?

0:40:34.950 --> 0:40:35.859
<v Speaker 2>I've heard that.

0:40:36.180 --> 0:40:38.180
<v Speaker 4>You do have CJ Carr, who's going to make some

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:42.740
<v Speaker 4>big plays, Bone, against Miami's wounded secondary. Yeah, I wouldn't

0:40:42.780 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 4>pick a game. And Notre Dame's playing for their season,

0:40:44.660 --> 0:40:47.540
<v Speaker 4>whereas Miami is not. I feel like it would be close,

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 4>but I'm with you. It's hard not to pick Notre Dame.

0:40:50.020 --> 0:40:51.620
<v Speaker 4>What do you all think about this one? And I

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:55.029
<v Speaker 4>love the fact that Lane Kiffin is annoyed that the

0:40:55.180 --> 0:40:59.570
<v Speaker 4>hallowed LSU-Bama game... has to be insulted by playing at

0:40:59.570 --> 0:41:00.629
<v Speaker 4>330 and.

0:41:00.570 --> 0:41:03.610
<v Speaker 2>Not playing in the night window. That old rough 330

0:41:03.610 --> 0:41:04.230
<v Speaker 2>window for.

0:41:04.130 --> 0:41:04.509
<v Speaker 8>The SEC game.

0:41:04.610 --> 0:41:07.470
<v Speaker 2>It's horrible. Lane Kiffin was personally offended.

0:41:07.489 --> 0:41:09.969
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't home to the best SEC game, I don't know,

0:41:10.010 --> 0:41:11.190
<v Speaker 6>for the last 25 years.

0:41:12.670 --> 0:41:16.430
<v Speaker 2>Alabama can finish off Lane Kiffin, right, playoff-wise? Yeah.

0:41:16.650 --> 0:41:18.629
<v Speaker 4>If he gives them a third loss where they're ranked

0:41:18.690 --> 0:41:22.100
<v Speaker 4>right now, Fitty, if Alabama gets a third loss, the

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:23.940
<v Speaker 4>committee might drop them from five to six.

0:41:23.980 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, like, what's the ramifications in this game? Like, yeah,

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:28.819
<v Speaker 9>the game means a lot more for LSU for where

0:41:28.860 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 9>they stand. Like, we need to be prepared for Bama.

0:41:32.430 --> 0:41:34.270
<v Speaker 9>If Bama's not going to make the CFP, they've got

0:41:34.290 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 9>to lose at least twice. If there are three losses,

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 9>they're not going from five to 13.

0:41:39.940 --> 0:41:40.980
<v Speaker 3>They're just not going to happen.

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 2>You're right.

0:41:41.460 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 4>The committee just said you can afford one more and

0:41:44.020 --> 0:41:45.379
<v Speaker 4>you're still so comfortable with five.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 9>Which is absurd. Which I have a major issue with.

0:41:48.700 --> 0:41:52.310
<v Speaker 9>It's ridiculous. I'm pulling for LSU to win the game.

0:41:52.469 --> 0:41:55.830
<v Speaker 9>I want Lane Kiffin to have this moment. But I

0:41:55.850 --> 0:41:57.649
<v Speaker 9>thought it maybe would come at the expense of maybe

0:41:57.690 --> 0:42:00.629
<v Speaker 9>putting Bama in a situation where Their playoff lives would

0:42:00.650 --> 0:42:01.069
<v Speaker 9>be over.

0:42:01.110 --> 0:42:02.870
<v Speaker 2>You want Lane Kiffin to have a good moment?

0:42:03.110 --> 0:42:03.370
<v Speaker 8>Yes.

0:42:03.590 --> 0:42:04.670
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God.

0:42:05.130 --> 0:42:05.430
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:42:05.450 --> 0:42:06.430
<v Speaker 2>Are you human?

0:42:06.890 --> 0:42:08.890
<v Speaker 3>I always pull for LSU in this game. I never

0:42:08.930 --> 0:42:09.530
<v Speaker 3>pull for Bama.

0:42:09.750 --> 0:42:11.890
<v Speaker 2>Even with that jerk running the show? Yes.

0:42:12.110 --> 0:42:13.810
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I want that dude out of the damn playoff

0:42:13.850 --> 0:42:17.089
<v Speaker 4>so badly. I could taste it, man. I could just

0:42:17.180 --> 0:42:21.790
<v Speaker 4>taste it. But Alabama's annoying, too. The best text I

0:42:21.810 --> 0:42:23.830
<v Speaker 4>saw the other day when we were all whining, I

0:42:23.870 --> 0:42:27.230
<v Speaker 4>believe deservedly, about Bama being ranked five with the two

0:42:27.270 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 4>losses was a texter that says, is the committee confused?

0:42:32.380 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Do they think they have to overrank Alabama because Nick

0:42:35.420 --> 0:42:39.180
<v Speaker 4>Saban's still coaching them? Or are they still fearful of Saban?

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Don't they know they don't have to do this anymore?

0:42:41.219 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 6>Matt, we have some sad news here about our guy

0:42:44.620 --> 0:42:49.370
<v Speaker 6>Gator Rube here. Big college football fan. Tomorrow's his wedding anniversary.

0:42:50.150 --> 0:42:52.660
<v Speaker 6>So he's trying to work in a brunch. Ooh, that's tough.

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.140
<v Speaker 4>He's trying to work in a brunch. Ruby, that's a

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 4>tough one. How about a Friday night? How about a

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 4>little anniversary Eve?

0:42:58.420 --> 0:43:00.810
<v Speaker 9>Is it like a monumental anniversary? Because it was like

0:43:01.030 --> 0:43:02.169
<v Speaker 9>the 13th anniversary.

0:43:02.190 --> 0:43:03.989
<v Speaker 3>Then he had to do lunch. But it's like 15,

0:43:03.989 --> 0:43:04.530
<v Speaker 3>20 years.

0:43:04.670 --> 0:43:08.190
<v Speaker 6>Is Maddie listening to this? Maddie, take notes on this, girl.

0:43:08.210 --> 0:43:12.260
<v Speaker 6>This is your future. You're celebrating 15 days back there.

0:43:14.020 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 6>By the way, by the way, Rube, Rube, that's a

0:43:16.860 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 6>bad job by you. You didn't see the future on

0:43:18.660 --> 0:43:21.720
<v Speaker 6>this and future Saturdays that could be compromised by your anniversary.

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh, my God. Yeah, you get married in the fall.

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 4>That's one of the reasons why I was like, we

0:43:27.140 --> 0:43:30.250
<v Speaker 4>got to do a summer wedding. Because then you don't

0:43:30.290 --> 0:43:35.150
<v Speaker 4>have anniversaries while football's going on. Husky Pants says, I'm

0:43:35.190 --> 0:43:39.180
<v Speaker 4>glad you already embraced your hypocrisy in this segment. But

0:43:39.260 --> 0:43:42.339
<v Speaker 4>why LSU, Fitty? He's bothered by that. This dude says,

0:43:42.420 --> 0:43:46.980
<v Speaker 4>Fitty has fallen in love faster than a Charlotte sports

0:43:47.020 --> 0:43:49.140
<v Speaker 4>team season can go in the tank.

0:43:51.510 --> 0:43:52.229
<v Speaker 2>That's true, Bone.

0:43:52.450 --> 0:43:54.850
<v Speaker 4>Let's go back a couple of weeks where Finney was

0:43:54.890 --> 0:43:59.859
<v Speaker 4>still lonely. We had Panther optimism and Hornets optimism. Desmond

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 4>from Concord says, Bone doesn't know ball, man. I had

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.620
<v Speaker 4>to say, why doesn't Bone know ball? To say you

0:44:05.660 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 4>have no doubt the number one team doesn't have a chance.

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.350
<v Speaker 4>Notre Dame struggled with Navy last week, although they ended

0:44:11.370 --> 0:44:11.890
<v Speaker 4>up blowing them out.

0:44:12.090 --> 0:44:12.850
<v Speaker 2>Because I know ball.

0:44:13.010 --> 0:44:15.690
<v Speaker 6>They haven't been this dominant team. Hey, Desmond from Concord,

0:44:16.130 --> 0:44:18.469
<v Speaker 6>when you take Tony out of the lineup, would they

0:44:18.489 --> 0:44:20.430
<v Speaker 6>still be number one? Or would they have lost some

0:44:20.469 --> 0:44:23.870
<v Speaker 6>of these games that they got by UNC, Florida State,

0:44:24.310 --> 0:44:26.489
<v Speaker 6>even the Wake Forest game, the beginning of that game?

0:44:27.210 --> 0:44:30.260
<v Speaker 6>You do not know what Miami will be like without Tony.

0:44:30.540 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 6>That's my point.

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, the big plays he creates, not to

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 4>mention the attention he draws to free up others, that's

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:42.850
<v Speaker 4>gone now, too. I have a feeling Miami's going to

0:44:42.870 --> 0:44:45.970
<v Speaker 4>put up a good fight, though. I have a feeling

0:44:46.010 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 4>you were going to see Mark Fletcher's mom happy today.

0:44:48.980 --> 0:44:51.980
<v Speaker 4>during this game a few times. I just think he's

0:44:52.020 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 4>going to literally carry people. You're going to see Michael

0:44:54.140 --> 0:44:56.779
<v Speaker 4>Irvin fighting the leprechaun on the sidelines. All right, we

0:44:56.820 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 4>come back.

0:44:57.340 --> 0:44:58.620
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. What do I know? But, man, I

0:44:58.640 --> 0:44:58.980
<v Speaker 2>can't wait.

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:00.910
<v Speaker 6>We come back on the Mac and Bone Show. College

0:45:00.950 --> 0:45:04.330
<v Speaker 6>football confidence. Who's feeling good about this weekend from the

0:45:04.390 --> 0:45:07.660
<v Speaker 6>local angle? We got Duke State. We got the Gamecocks. And,

0:45:07.670 --> 0:45:10.970
<v Speaker 6>of course, we just talked Notre Dame-Miami. Sports Radio, 92.7 WFNZ.