1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:04,400 Speaker 1: Mark Kelly among several Democratic politicians who is out there 2 00:00:04,440 --> 00:00:07,840 Speaker 1: telling people in the military to disregard the orders of 3 00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:11,880 Speaker 1: the commander in chief. Several different Democrats who did interviews 4 00:00:12,039 --> 00:00:15,200 Speaker 1: after this video went viral, and it didn't go viral 5 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: when it first came out. That's kind of what's crazy 6 00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:19,919 Speaker 1: about it to me. So the video is put out 7 00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:22,079 Speaker 1: by Democrats. If you haven't seen it or heard it, 8 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:24,639 Speaker 1: I could play it. I've played it some other places 9 00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:26,600 Speaker 1: I work, and it annoys me every time I hit 10 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 1: play on it. So I'd rather not even play it 11 00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:32,880 Speaker 1: again for context. But they're telling members of the military 12 00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:35,960 Speaker 1: that you can disregard an illegal order and that you 13 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:37,680 Speaker 1: need to do it. You need to stand up and 14 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:41,320 Speaker 1: fight against President Trump. Now, all of these Democrats and 15 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:45,479 Speaker 1: interviews who've been asked questions actually challenging ones, even remotely challenging, 16 00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:48,440 Speaker 1: have admitted that nothing Trump has said or done has 17 00:00:48,479 --> 00:00:49,440 Speaker 1: actually been illegal. 18 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:51,280 Speaker 2: I'll even go a step further. 19 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:54,280 Speaker 1: You have his White House Press secretary out there on 20 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 1: the front lines telling people how insane this is and 21 00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:02,000 Speaker 1: how it's very you know, simple to see the legalities 22 00:01:02,120 --> 00:01:03,880 Speaker 1: of these kind of things, and the fact that Trump 23 00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:07,800 Speaker 1: has never and will never issue any kind of illegal 24 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:11,120 Speaker 1: order to be members of our military. So I'll let 25 00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,520 Speaker 1: me play that. Let's start with Caroline Levitt, because I 26 00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:15,520 Speaker 1: do think this is pretty good. 27 00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:18,319 Speaker 2: We're hoping to sort of show this distrust go ahead. 28 00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:22,120 Speaker 3: They can't answer the question, Martha, because there is no answer. 29 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:26,000 Speaker 3: They can't identify illegal orders because there are no illegal orders. 30 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,880 Speaker 3: But they were suggesting again to the one point three 31 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:32,479 Speaker 3: million active duty service members in the military today that 32 00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:34,600 Speaker 3: if you think in orders illegal, you don't have to 33 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 3: follow it. Actually, that's against the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 34 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:43,120 Speaker 3: It explicitly states, and I want to read this language precisely. 35 00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:44,760 Speaker 2: By the way, this is what's called bringing the receipts 36 00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:45,120 Speaker 2: go ahead. 37 00:01:45,120 --> 00:01:47,760 Speaker 3: And you say that service members have a legal obligation 38 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:51,320 Speaker 3: under the us UCMJ to obey lawful orders, and that 39 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:54,320 Speaker 3: orders are presumed to be lawful. You can't have a 40 00:01:54,360 --> 00:01:58,800 Speaker 3: soldier out on the battlefield or conducting a classified order 41 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 3: questioning whether that order is lawful or whether they should 42 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:05,640 Speaker 3: follow through. There must be a chain of command in 43 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:09,880 Speaker 3: our military, and Republicans and Democrats for decades since the 44 00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 3: beginning of our country have always respected. 45 00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:14,720 Speaker 2: That until now, Until now, when. 46 00:02:14,639 --> 00:02:19,160 Speaker 3: The Democrat Party has been completely overtaken by Trump's arrangement syndrome. 47 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 2: Now, that is what it sounds like is happening here. 48 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:24,000 Speaker 1: So a couple quick thoughts, and I heard a couple 49 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:27,040 Speaker 1: other national shows talk about this, and I don't believe 50 00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 1: this to be the case as much as maybe some 51 00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:31,200 Speaker 1: of those other talking heads do, but I do think 52 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:33,880 Speaker 1: it's an interesting point to bring up. So, of course, 53 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 1: during COVID, one of the groups of people who were 54 00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:40,120 Speaker 1: either forced to get a vaccine or fired were people 55 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:42,880 Speaker 1: in our military. There were people who were pushed to 56 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:45,120 Speaker 1: do things they might not have wanted to do, and 57 00:02:45,160 --> 00:02:48,000 Speaker 1: people who stood up against those things may have been 58 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:51,680 Speaker 1: out of all kinds of gigs within that structure of 59 00:02:51,720 --> 00:02:55,240 Speaker 1: our government system. And it does seem like you're trying 60 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:57,520 Speaker 1: to push out the people that you assume would not 61 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:00,560 Speaker 1: listen to this, that would then see the Democratic leaders 62 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:03,000 Speaker 1: say I don't follow in order that you don't believe 63 00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 1: is legal. Those individuals who stood up against the vaccine 64 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:08,360 Speaker 1: will probably stand up against this, and they might not 65 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:09,440 Speaker 1: have a gig right now. 66 00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:11,080 Speaker 2: I don't necessarily think that's true. 67 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:13,639 Speaker 1: I wouldn't doubt that men and women who are part 68 00:03:13,639 --> 00:03:17,239 Speaker 1: of our military as much as those national places. I 69 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:19,079 Speaker 1: don't want to name who they are that I heard 70 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:21,720 Speaker 1: talk about that guy Benson, if I'm going to say it, 71 00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:25,480 Speaker 1: Fox guy, but anyway, one of several to throw that 72 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:29,320 Speaker 1: out as an idea to follow. But if you actually 73 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 1: know people who serve in our military in today's world, 74 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 1: you know that, by and large, these individuals, I think 75 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:38,960 Speaker 1: would be upset with Democrats for the message they put 76 00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:40,680 Speaker 1: out and the way they did it because of how 77 00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 1: disconnected it is from the value system of people who 78 00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 1: choose openly and willingly to serve in our military, people 79 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:49,520 Speaker 1: who volunteer for that gig because it's a volunteer role. 80 00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 1: But anyway, as I say that, and as I watch 81 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:55,680 Speaker 1: that video, I can't help but keep thinking about the 82 00:03:55,720 --> 00:03:58,640 Speaker 1: way Democrats are trying to spin it now. And all 83 00:03:58,680 --> 00:04:01,400 Speaker 1: of this is something you weren't talking about, most people 84 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:04,400 Speaker 1: weren't talking about a week ago when the video first 85 00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:07,520 Speaker 1: came out. I actually I feel like I'm patting myself 86 00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:09,360 Speaker 1: on the back way too much filling in on this show. 87 00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:12,160 Speaker 1: But I'm very proud of myself on this one story. 88 00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 1: I dove on this. Immediately I saw the video, I 89 00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:16,719 Speaker 1: thought it was ridiculous. I talked about it some other places. 90 00:04:16,960 --> 00:04:19,440 Speaker 1: I really crapped on it, and I remember like walking 91 00:04:19,480 --> 00:04:21,240 Speaker 1: out of the studio after a show I did, and 92 00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:24,159 Speaker 1: somebody looking at me and saying, like, man, that stuff 93 00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:26,800 Speaker 1: about the military is crazy. I hadn't heard anything about that. 94 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:29,840 Speaker 1: Fast forward a week. Trump says that you should hang 95 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:32,240 Speaker 1: some people, not that he actually wanted to do it, 96 00:04:32,279 --> 00:04:35,919 Speaker 1: but that is the punishment for seditious behavior. But you should, 97 00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:38,679 Speaker 1: you know, know that this is a very big deal 98 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:40,919 Speaker 1: what you're saying to do, and all of a sudden 99 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:43,040 Speaker 1: media is obsessed with it. But anyway, here's a couple 100 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:46,120 Speaker 1: of those Democrats, including Mark Kelly, trying to spin stuff, 101 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 1: trying to tell you that, you know, they just wanted 102 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 1: to make sure that the military knows that these politicians 103 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,359 Speaker 1: support them if they choose to break all of the 104 00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:55,000 Speaker 1: laws and. 105 00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:58,240 Speaker 2: The vows they gave when they joined our military. Rachel, 106 00:04:58,279 --> 00:04:59,839 Speaker 2: we wanted to do something pretty simple. 107 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:03,719 Speaker 4: We wanted to just remind folks that they need to 108 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:08,640 Speaker 4: comply with the law and be reminded, and also explain 109 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:10,960 Speaker 4: to members of the military that we have their backs. 110 00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 1: Jon Trump, By the way, that's something they're absolutely doing. 111 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:16,880 Speaker 1: This is another Democrat now saying that he's threatening members 112 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:20,120 Speaker 1: of the military because of an investigation into marketing a nott. 113 00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:21,960 Speaker 4: A couple of years and if you're part of the 114 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:25,400 Speaker 4: military that's going after sitting senators, sitting members of Congress, 115 00:05:25,680 --> 00:05:29,520 Speaker 4: and part of the weaponization of government, there will be consequences. 116 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 2: So that's weird. 117 00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:32,680 Speaker 1: You got two Democrats in this video, one saying we 118 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 1: have your backs, just do what we want and we'll 119 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 1: support you. And then you have another one saying if 120 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:38,919 Speaker 1: you do what the president wants, who is currently in 121 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:41,719 Speaker 1: charge of said military, then we will tear you apart. 122 00:05:41,839 --> 00:05:43,680 Speaker 1: As soon as we get back into power. I will 123 00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:46,440 Speaker 1: do everything I can to hold you accountable to whatever 124 00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:49,159 Speaker 1: it is we think you did wrong. That is obviously 125 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:52,480 Speaker 1: insane and ridiculous and exactly the kind of reason that 126 00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:56,080 Speaker 1: so much of this is something that's performative politics in 127 00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:59,039 Speaker 1: a dangerous way. But again, it's something that I actually 128 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:01,080 Speaker 1: believe enough in the terry men and women that serve 129 00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:04,200 Speaker 1: our country that they won't actually follow the order, will 130 00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:06,960 Speaker 1: the non order. They won't listen to the Democrats, they 131 00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:09,360 Speaker 1: won't be warped enough to do that. And I think 132 00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:12,640 Speaker 1: the conversations being had between military men and women right 133 00:06:12,640 --> 00:06:16,280 Speaker 1: now would be wildly interesting for you and I to hear, 134 00:06:16,560 --> 00:06:18,880 Speaker 1: because they're probably using language that I can't use on 135 00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:21,440 Speaker 1: the radio and saying how ridiculous it is that they've 136 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:25,360 Speaker 1: overstepped the politicians into this world. At least I hope 137 00:06:25,400 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 1: that's what they're saying. All right, one other piece of 138 00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:28,840 Speaker 1: audio that I want to play, and then we'll take 139 00:06:28,839 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 1: another break. 140 00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 2: This is Jonathan Turley on Fox. 141 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:35,560 Speaker 1: He is talking about Tiss James and James call me 142 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:38,040 Speaker 1: and how happy they seem to be that they might 143 00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:41,080 Speaker 1: not be in trouble even though they seemed like they 144 00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:44,800 Speaker 1: very much could be in trouble because of a legal technicality. 145 00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 1: Jonathan Turley is saying, don't celebrate so fast. Let's pump 146 00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:52,280 Speaker 1: the brakes and assuming that you guys are out of 147 00:06:52,839 --> 00:06:55,359 Speaker 1: any sort of danger zone for the bad things you 148 00:06:55,400 --> 00:06:59,600 Speaker 1: did and the indictments that happened because of this you know, 149 00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:03,120 Speaker 1: legal thing that has nothing to do with whether or 150 00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:05,360 Speaker 1: not you're guilty or innocent of the thing you're being 151 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:08,520 Speaker 1: accused of. It's just something that might have to be 152 00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:11,320 Speaker 1: appealed and then navigated around. 153 00:07:11,320 --> 00:07:13,600 Speaker 2: But potentially these cases. 154 00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:16,040 Speaker 1: Aren't actually going away he's one of the only people 155 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:17,640 Speaker 1: saying that, So I wanted to play. 156 00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:21,360 Speaker 5: This well, First of all, Letitia James might be celebrating. 157 00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 5: It's head too early. The problems here are not with 158 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:28,720 Speaker 5: the charges themselves, but essentially with the cop or in 159 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:32,880 Speaker 5: this case, the prosecutor. So the court is not saying 160 00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:35,360 Speaker 5: that she did that she was innocent of these charges. 161 00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:36,480 Speaker 2: They're not. The court is. 162 00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:39,240 Speaker 5: Simply saying that the person who signed off on the 163 00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:43,200 Speaker 5: charges didn't have authority to do that. So the obvious 164 00:07:43,560 --> 00:07:46,280 Speaker 5: thing here is to get someone who is lawfully in 165 00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:50,480 Speaker 5: a position to perform this role. Usually, after one hundred 166 00:07:50,520 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 5: and twenty days, the district court appoints someone as the replacement. 167 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:59,440 Speaker 5: They're going to have to work this one out, and 168 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:03,560 Speaker 5: it's rather they're uncharted territory here. To make sure that 169 00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 5: the next person who signs is going to be beyond 170 00:08:07,720 --> 00:08:10,840 Speaker 5: these types of questions. They could also appeal, you know, 171 00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 5: they're already past the original date, but the argument is 172 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:15,880 Speaker 5: that they do have a right to go back to 173 00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 5: the grand jury. So they may just appeal and say, look, 174 00:08:18,560 --> 00:08:20,000 Speaker 5: we think we have a good argument here. 175 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 1: I think they have a good argument there that if 176 00:08:22,160 --> 00:08:24,040 Speaker 1: you're saying that the only reason that any of these 177 00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:26,920 Speaker 1: cases are thrown out as the person who actually signed 178 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:31,200 Speaker 1: it was not appointed correctly, not capable of giving that 179 00:08:31,200 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 1: signature and creating this case. Let's get somebody else to 180 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:36,959 Speaker 1: throw the old pen on there. Maybe the auto pen 181 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:40,440 Speaker 1: can do it. Actually, maybe Biden's autopen can be borrowed 182 00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:41,960 Speaker 1: since Trump doesn't need it. 183 00:08:42,160 --> 00:08:44,640 Speaker 2: No, you just sign it as whoever. It doesn't matter. 184 00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:46,600 Speaker 1: But no, I do love that I heard from at 185 00:08:46,679 --> 00:08:49,840 Speaker 1: least one legal expert, well everybody did, I not me 186 00:08:49,960 --> 00:08:52,880 Speaker 1: personally when he was out there to rely saying that 187 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:55,880 Speaker 1: it's a little bit too early to celebrate this because 188 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:58,679 Speaker 1: it seems like more is coming. And I'll say one 189 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:00,840 Speaker 1: other thing and then I'll take a break on just 190 00:09:00,880 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 1: this idea, and actually, you know what, darn it all right, 191 00:09:04,760 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 1: I'm gonna do this a bit differently. There's two things 192 00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:10,280 Speaker 1: out there that are being talked about that I think 193 00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:14,040 Speaker 1: are representative of what people actually wanted when they put 194 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:17,680 Speaker 1: Trump into office. Marjorie Taylor Green of course resigned. I 195 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 1: didn't even talk about it yesterday. I don't really care, 196 00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:23,560 Speaker 1: not because I hated her or liked her. I had, 197 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 1: you know, kind of no feelings about Marjorie Taylor Green, 198 00:09:26,040 --> 00:09:28,720 Speaker 1: which was unique a lot of people had more. And yes, 199 00:09:28,800 --> 00:09:31,320 Speaker 1: she seems to be quitting just in time to get 200 00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 1: some money, some lifelong cash from the American people, from 201 00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:38,480 Speaker 1: the American tax payer. But nonetheless, what I think is 202 00:09:38,480 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: interesting is the idea that maybe more Republicans, more conservatives, 203 00:09:42,240 --> 00:09:45,040 Speaker 1: are upset with the Trump administration and might wind up 204 00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:48,320 Speaker 1: also resigning or not seeking reelection. And I think that's 205 00:09:48,320 --> 00:09:50,400 Speaker 1: called draining the swamp. And I'm not saying that Marjorie 206 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 1: Taylor Green is actually the swamp per se, but I 207 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:56,040 Speaker 1: wonder why she started to pivot against Trump and say 208 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:59,280 Speaker 1: the thing she was saying was someone dangling financial carets 209 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:01,480 Speaker 1: in front of her. And are there certain ways in 210 00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:04,960 Speaker 1: which now you step aside very abruptly, because that could 211 00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:05,840 Speaker 1: have been made public. 212 00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:06,280 Speaker 2: I don't know. 213 00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:09,800 Speaker 1: But whether it's Democrat or Republican, whether it's Epstein files 214 00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:12,440 Speaker 1: or something else, I want the swamp drain. And I 215 00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:14,440 Speaker 1: think this might actually be doing it. If a bunch 216 00:10:14,440 --> 00:10:18,000 Speaker 1: of politicians walk away and we're all scratching our heads saying, why, 217 00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 1: there's a good chance there's something going on behind closed 218 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:23,520 Speaker 1: doors that we don't know anything about, and to me, 219 00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 1: that seems to be again part of what you vote 220 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 1: Trump into office for. And then the other part is 221 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,280 Speaker 1: this crazy stuff with the Democrats and this crazy stuff 222 00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: with how a story could be in nothing. It could 223 00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:37,800 Speaker 1: be a you know, we all call for sedition and 224 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:41,160 Speaker 1: the president ignores us and everything goes away, or it 225 00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:43,600 Speaker 1: could be the way it's happening, which seems like something 226 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:45,680 Speaker 1: that Trump has very much done on purpose, as I 227 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 1: continue to say, and it does seem valuable because now 228 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:51,520 Speaker 1: we are having a much longer discussion in more places 229 00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:54,600 Speaker 1: about it. I don't know, but there's these moments that 230 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:58,160 Speaker 1: you see play out the way from afar you're not 231 00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:01,319 Speaker 1: sure they will that. You then say yourself like, maybe 232 00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:02,960 Speaker 1: what's going on behind and I'm not trying to be 233 00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:06,440 Speaker 1: conspiratorial per se, I'm just being honest. Maybe what's happening 234 00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 1: behind closed doors is exactly the stuff I want how 235 00:11:09,160 --> 00:11:11,120 Speaker 1: to be going on. And as all this is occurring, 236 00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:13,520 Speaker 1: by the way, a lot of mainstream media is doing 237 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:16,679 Speaker 1: some sort of touchdown celebration about how doge no longer 238 00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:17,080 Speaker 1: exists