WEBVTT - Mac & Bone Hour 2: What's Behind Bryce's Improvement? 

0:00:20.579 --> 0:00:23.100
<v Speaker 1>The speed, the twitch, the quickness, right? The stop start,

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:23.900
<v Speaker 1>the herky-jerkiness.

0:00:24.180 --> 0:00:26.540
<v Speaker 2>He can just freeze a defensive end, stop an unblocked

0:00:26.579 --> 0:00:28.300
<v Speaker 2>linebacker while he's on a scramble drill, and it just

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.940
<v Speaker 2>breaks defensive structure, right? He just pulls too many guys

0:00:30.980 --> 0:00:33.229
<v Speaker 2>out of too many places by just flitting in and

0:00:33.270 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 2>out of spots.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.270
<v Speaker 1>And then he can make these throws.

0:00:35.590 --> 0:00:38.510
<v Speaker 2>Disconnected from the ground, hips facing the wrong way, arm

0:00:38.570 --> 0:00:40.470
<v Speaker 2>angles at different spots because he's such a loosey, such

0:00:40.490 --> 0:00:42.850
<v Speaker 2>a lithe body. Now you're seeing that really start to

0:00:42.870 --> 0:00:45.490
<v Speaker 2>impact between the 20s. They're, you know, in the RPO game, right?

0:00:45.530 --> 0:00:47.570
<v Speaker 2>They're running, like, Mike McDaniel RPO stuff with him and

0:00:47.610 --> 0:00:49.770
<v Speaker 2>basically saying, like, we just think that you can get

0:00:49.790 --> 0:00:52.540
<v Speaker 2>the ball Out of the mesh point and into the

0:00:52.620 --> 0:00:55.020
<v Speaker 2>throw so fast that we can take advantage of very

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.090
<v Speaker 2>small windows. And it's working wonderfully for them. What they've

0:00:58.130 --> 0:01:01.310
<v Speaker 2>gotten him to figure out, to learn, to improve upon

0:01:01.370 --> 0:01:04.500
<v Speaker 2>from a Drew Brees, find the windows between the off

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the line perspective. It is one of the bigger turnarounds

0:01:07.220 --> 0:01:09.020
<v Speaker 2>of a quarterbacking talent.

0:01:09.060 --> 0:01:13.850
<v Speaker 1>It's a complete 180. That is Ben Solak, the national

0:01:13.870 --> 0:01:16.510
<v Speaker 1>media bone, like us trying to figure out where our

0:01:16.569 --> 0:01:19.830
<v Speaker 1>remote went. The national media has spent the last few days.

0:01:20.330 --> 0:01:23.070
<v Speaker 1>How has Bryce Young gotten better? What is he doing better?

0:01:23.350 --> 0:01:27.290
<v Speaker 1>And we must have our local version of that conversation

0:01:27.330 --> 0:01:30.230
<v Speaker 1>right now. That's Ben Solak talking about some of the

0:01:30.290 --> 0:01:33.510
<v Speaker 1>things he is noticing from Bryce Young that have made

0:01:33.569 --> 0:01:37.890
<v Speaker 1>him better. We have also had a major development in

0:01:37.970 --> 0:01:41.649
<v Speaker 1>remote gates. the bone man, the light bulb went on

0:01:41.690 --> 0:01:44.949
<v Speaker 1>for somebody, somebody's brain in this studio. And the bone

0:01:44.970 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>man said, how about our guy, Donald, who is in

0:01:47.780 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>charge of all things in the building. And I'll be

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:55.180
<v Speaker 1>damned if Donald just didn't bring in a spare version

0:01:55.620 --> 0:01:59.380
<v Speaker 1>of the exact same remote. The remote is back in

0:01:59.420 --> 0:02:02.260
<v Speaker 1>the studio, baby smoke. You were off the hook. I

0:02:02.300 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>can stop acting like a jackass. I mean, it's beautiful bone.

0:02:05.420 --> 0:02:07.420
<v Speaker 1>And he brought up a point Mac that needs to

0:02:07.460 --> 0:02:10.300
<v Speaker 1>be made. He said, uh, You know, there's a TV

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>station in the building. There's plenty of remote controls. And

0:02:12.820 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know.

0:02:13.820 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 3>What, Donald?

0:02:14.260 --> 0:02:16.150
<v Speaker 1>Great point. Didn't think about that. He found one in

0:02:16.210 --> 0:02:19.070
<v Speaker 1>about 30 seconds. Didn't think about that. That's beautiful. So

0:02:19.090 --> 0:02:21.710
<v Speaker 1>we're back, baby. That whole one hour. Now, you know

0:02:21.730 --> 0:02:22.450
<v Speaker 1>what I mean?

0:02:22.590 --> 0:02:25.610
<v Speaker 3>You declared something during the break that that is now

0:02:25.690 --> 0:02:27.109
<v Speaker 3>your remote that you're going to take home and bring

0:02:27.180 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it back.

0:02:27.630 --> 0:02:29.780
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it, but that would really be selfish.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.740
<v Speaker 1>But that would be funny, wouldn't it? If we literally

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.299
<v Speaker 1>packed it up in one of our backpacks and it

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.989
<v Speaker 1>was only used from 6 to 10. Oh, man.

0:02:36.020 --> 0:02:38.380
<v Speaker 3>They have to choose what channel they want by 10 a.m.,

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:38.980
<v Speaker 3>so I'm back and put.

0:02:38.940 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It on for them. I would just like to urge KB,

0:02:41.810 --> 0:02:44.010
<v Speaker 1>watch Smoke. When Smoke gets to play with the remote,

0:02:44.030 --> 0:02:46.150
<v Speaker 1>it's like one of your kids, KB, when they get

0:02:46.190 --> 0:02:48.350
<v Speaker 1>to play with something, there's some things you've got to

0:02:48.389 --> 0:02:51.190
<v Speaker 1>watch them with. Watch Smoke as he plays with that

0:02:51.230 --> 0:02:53.950
<v Speaker 1>remote control, KB. Okay? And take it away from him

0:02:53.970 --> 0:02:55.530
<v Speaker 1>if it needs to be taken away.

0:02:55.590 --> 0:02:57.990
<v Speaker 3>I'm also suspicious of Fitty also because he was here

0:02:58.030 --> 0:03:01.740
<v Speaker 3>overnight that night, and he's been very quiet on the

0:03:01.780 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>search front and the help front.

0:03:04.180 --> 0:03:07.820
<v Speaker 1>That's true. He knows something. Do you think his sweetie

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.060
<v Speaker 1>at home needed a new remote and Fitty was the

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>knight in shining armor and just stole it from the

0:03:12.419 --> 0:03:16.390
<v Speaker 1>station for her? Yes. All right, back to Bryce anyway.

0:03:16.870 --> 0:03:18.690
<v Speaker 1>People are blaming Tampa Tammy. I mean, it was a

0:03:18.710 --> 0:03:21.590
<v Speaker 1>whole thing going on. Beth Troutman was apparently upset that

0:03:21.650 --> 0:03:23.870
<v Speaker 1>I blamed her. I'm going to have to smooth that over.

0:03:23.889 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a whole thing. But we got a remote back.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.619
<v Speaker 1>And we got Bryce Young playing some amazing freaking football.

0:03:29.900 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get one more clip bone before from the same podcast,

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.140
<v Speaker 1>Amita Kimes podcast. That's where Solak was talking. And this

0:03:36.220 --> 0:03:39.580
<v Speaker 1>is Mina talking about what she really loved watching Bryce

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:40.260
<v Speaker 1>the other night.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.660
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk about Young and what we've seen

0:03:42.690 --> 0:03:45.290
<v Speaker 4>from him this season because you talk about calmness. I

0:03:45.330 --> 0:03:47.730
<v Speaker 4>think that's where I'd want to start. Bryce has been

0:03:47.850 --> 0:03:49.190
<v Speaker 4>under a lot of pressure in the early part of

0:03:49.210 --> 0:03:53.809
<v Speaker 4>the season. But watching him when he's under pressure, there's

0:03:53.830 --> 0:03:57.030
<v Speaker 4>like zero panic. I think that's what strikes me. I

0:03:57.030 --> 0:03:58.190
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of numbers and there's stuff I want

0:03:58.210 --> 0:04:00.130
<v Speaker 4>to talk about, but I think that's what strikes me

0:04:00.180 --> 0:04:04.220
<v Speaker 4>the most, Ben, is the lack of panic under pressure,

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the willingness and ability to execute the offense, which is

0:04:08.500 --> 0:04:10.820
<v Speaker 4>also very good. There's some fun things happening there that

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk about. And then the touch and

0:04:13.460 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 4>the accuracy, particularly over the middle of the field. And

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.770
<v Speaker 4>I looked this up afterwards between the numbers. According to

0:04:20.790 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 4>True Media, Bryce has a 72% precision pass rate, which

0:04:25.020 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 4>is the best in the NFL. And that's what it

0:04:26.500 --> 0:04:29.010
<v Speaker 4>looks like. Like, doesn't it just feel like every ball

0:04:29.070 --> 0:04:32.330
<v Speaker 4>between the numbers is right on the money, just so catchable?

0:04:33.390 --> 0:04:35.349
<v Speaker 1>Was that you or Ben Solak doing that? That was me. Oh,

0:04:35.410 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>I thought Ben Solak has a similar. That was Bone Solak.

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.060
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Bone? She brings up great points.

0:04:41.100 --> 0:04:43.220
<v Speaker 1>The over-the-middle passing that people told us he was too

0:04:43.260 --> 0:04:47.180
<v Speaker 1>small to do. The under-pressure poise that has gone up

0:04:47.660 --> 0:04:50.980
<v Speaker 1>another level. Solak brought up the quick release. It really

0:04:51.020 --> 0:04:53.790
<v Speaker 1>is impressive on those RPOs, Bone. the way he gets

0:04:53.830 --> 0:04:58.670
<v Speaker 1>it out so fast. What are you seeing that you're like,

0:04:58.750 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Bryce is better at that right there?

0:05:00.700 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I have a theory on what's working, and it's a

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>weird theory to have, but hear me out. I think

0:05:05.580 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>because he's under so much pressure, because the offensive line, Mac,

0:05:09.140 --> 0:05:12.580
<v Speaker 3>has had some issues, Bryce has actually benefited from that

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 3>in terms of decision-making and having to get the ball

0:05:15.860 --> 0:05:18.580
<v Speaker 3>out so fast. He doesn't have a lot of time, Mac,

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 3>to overthink stuff at all. He's just reacting. So it's

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.690
<v Speaker 3>a weird thing to say that the pressure is actually

0:05:24.750 --> 0:05:27.950
<v Speaker 3>making Bryce better because he's not really having to go

0:05:28.010 --> 0:05:30.570
<v Speaker 3>through so many progressions. He's just firing that ball out.

0:05:31.150 --> 0:05:34.290
<v Speaker 3>So I think the actual offensive-wide struggles, Bryce has benefited

0:05:34.310 --> 0:05:34.990
<v Speaker 3>from that so far.

0:05:35.110 --> 0:05:36.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:36.050 --> 0:05:38.090
<v Speaker 3>In a weird kind of way. I'm not saying it's ideal,

0:05:38.150 --> 0:05:40.029
<v Speaker 3>but I think that he's just– he has to be

0:05:40.070 --> 0:05:41.630
<v Speaker 3>so fast right now that it's helping him out a

0:05:41.670 --> 0:05:46.110
<v Speaker 3>little bit. When he– you know, Canales has talked about it.

0:05:46.190 --> 0:05:48.410
<v Speaker 3>In chaos, he seems to thrive. We saw it going

0:05:48.430 --> 0:05:51.830
<v Speaker 3>back to Alabama. I did see– and J.T. O'Sullivan talked

0:05:51.850 --> 0:05:55.190
<v Speaker 3>about it this week on the QB School Bryce episode.

0:05:56.310 --> 0:05:58.190
<v Speaker 3>There were times where you saw him go, like, through

0:05:58.230 --> 0:06:01.780
<v Speaker 3>three reads, too. Like– and by the way– like holding

0:06:01.820 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 3>it to the last minute, boom.

0:06:03.940 --> 0:06:06.980
<v Speaker 1>Boom, boom. I'm about to get drilled, but my third

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.820
<v Speaker 1>re like, so he is, he's going through, he's doing

0:06:10.350 --> 0:06:13.210
<v Speaker 1>a bit of everything. I think the one thing I

0:06:13.230 --> 0:06:15.770
<v Speaker 1>want that, that I want to point out statistically bone

0:06:16.370 --> 0:06:18.610
<v Speaker 1>is just how much more he is getting the ball

0:06:18.610 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>10 yards or more downfield. He had been, you know,

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.190
<v Speaker 1>he had, again, thrown it well on deep balls last year,

0:06:25.230 --> 0:06:28.550
<v Speaker 1>but just not that often. His intermediate passing last year

0:06:28.870 --> 0:06:32.289
<v Speaker 1>was maybe his biggest weakness. It was horrible last year, statistically.

0:06:32.910 --> 0:06:35.790
<v Speaker 1>This year, Bone, he has 35 completions of 10 or

0:06:35.810 --> 0:06:38.609
<v Speaker 1>more air yards. That is an average of about nine

0:06:38.630 --> 0:06:41.060
<v Speaker 1>a game. He averaged four a game last year. That's it.

0:06:41.630 --> 0:06:43.860
<v Speaker 1>He has more than doubled it. And then you look

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at his intermediate passing. Intermediate is considered 10 yards to

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>19 yards downfield. 65%, 9.5 yards an attempt, 3 TDs,

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.660
<v Speaker 1>0 interceptions, 122 rating. Last year, Bone, in intermediate passing, 45%,

0:06:52.660 --> 0:06:54.260
<v Speaker 1>7.4 yards an attempt, 6 TDs and 8 interceptions, a

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.349
<v Speaker 1>58 rating. That is crazy. His rating has gone up

0:06:56.350 --> 0:07:16.740
<v Speaker 1>64 points on intermediate passing from last year. That's more

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>than doubled.

0:07:17.500 --> 0:07:18.059
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the.

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.740
<v Speaker 3>Performance against the Lions in that range is out of

0:07:20.780 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>this world. I mean, to be 14 for 15 on

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>intermediate routes in one game, he's up there, Mac. I mean,

0:07:27.420 --> 0:07:30.180
<v Speaker 3>it's no wonder he's getting, you know, at least talked

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.700
<v Speaker 3>about up there with the best in the game because

0:07:32.740 --> 0:07:35.180
<v Speaker 3>his numbers are up there with Josh Allen, Joe Burrow,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.300
<v Speaker 3>Brock Purdy. Like, he has now– he's gone such a

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:42.140
<v Speaker 3>level above where when we think of Bryce where he is–

0:07:42.460 --> 0:07:44.540
<v Speaker 3>in the pecking order of quarterbacks, Matt, we were just

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>hoping that he would be 12 to 15 and hang

0:07:47.660 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>out there and let everything around him develop and win

0:07:50.100 --> 0:07:53.460
<v Speaker 3>some football games. Hell, I said if he becomes Alex Smith,

0:07:53.930 --> 0:07:56.420
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City like Alex Smith, where he just wins a

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.090
<v Speaker 3>lot of games, he's good, but he wins a lot

0:07:58.130 --> 0:07:59.310
<v Speaker 3>of games, I.

0:07:59.290 --> 0:07:59.910
<v Speaker 1>Would take that.

0:07:59.950 --> 0:08:02.090
<v Speaker 3>But his numbers right now and a lot of these metrics,

0:08:02.470 --> 0:08:04.390
<v Speaker 3>they're up there with those guys that are the best

0:08:04.430 --> 0:08:06.690
<v Speaker 3>in the game through a month in the season. But

0:08:06.730 --> 0:08:08.989
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he's even up there at all is

0:08:09.290 --> 0:08:13.870
<v Speaker 3>a great benefit to– perseverance for Bryce as a quarterback.

0:08:14.410 --> 0:08:16.570
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of credit that goes to Bryce individually,

0:08:16.990 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 3>but they did a hell of a job, Mac, to

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 3>rebuild him. mentally since two years ago, whether it's Canales, Inzik,

0:08:24.420 --> 0:08:27.260
<v Speaker 3>Bevel's presence, whatever it may be, they have done a

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.710
<v Speaker 3>tremendous job in restoring his confidence for him to believe

0:08:32.090 --> 0:08:35.069
<v Speaker 3>that he's one of those best in the game right now.

0:08:35.090 --> 0:08:36.990
<v Speaker 3>You can see the confidence wasn't there for a long time.

0:08:37.030 --> 0:08:39.610
<v Speaker 3>He's under control. Like we talked about earlier in the week,

0:08:39.650 --> 0:08:41.730
<v Speaker 3>he's dictating the game now. He's not reacting to the game.

0:08:41.790 --> 0:08:44.449
<v Speaker 3>Even when he's under pressure, he's dictating. Oh, you're over there?

0:08:44.470 --> 0:08:46.090
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make a little move here, a little

0:08:46.130 --> 0:08:47.980
<v Speaker 1>move over there, and boom, I'm going to hit TMAC

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for 14. Like it's just even the most pressured quarterback

0:08:52.260 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and Sumer sports has it at 40, 53%, 53% over

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>half his dropbacks have been pressured and he leads in yards.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:05.220
<v Speaker 1>He is third in touchdowns and he's up here in

0:09:05.340 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>so many categories. What do you guys like? What specifically

0:09:09.220 --> 0:09:12.500
<v Speaker 1>has Bryce gotten better at? Why is Bryce playing at

0:09:12.540 --> 0:09:15.730
<v Speaker 1>this level? What are your theories and thoughts on that

0:09:15.770 --> 0:09:21.770
<v Speaker 1>as we celebrate Bryce Young playing the best of his career? 704-5709-610.

0:09:22.150 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>This texter says, Bryce was always capable of doing this.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about supporting cast and play caller. That

0:09:28.260 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>stuff has improved. Yeah, and I don't want to give

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.620
<v Speaker 1>all the credit to Idzik because I'm sure Canales Bone

0:09:34.980 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was a part of coming up with the general game

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.050
<v Speaker 1>plan for the season for Bryce. Canales made a comment

0:09:41.550 --> 0:09:46.890
<v Speaker 1>in training camp. said, through our time with Bryce, we

0:09:46.929 --> 0:09:49.250
<v Speaker 1>have now been able to craft an offense that is

0:09:49.309 --> 0:09:52.570
<v Speaker 1>Bryce's offense. What does he do well, and how do

0:09:52.590 --> 0:09:54.670
<v Speaker 1>we get the most out of him? So I think

0:09:55.309 --> 0:09:57.550
<v Speaker 1>Bryce is more comfortable in the NFL. The game has

0:09:57.570 --> 0:10:00.260
<v Speaker 1>slowed down, Boney, even when he's under pressure. But I

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.579
<v Speaker 1>also think the staff over there in Idzik has been

0:10:02.660 --> 0:10:06.300
<v Speaker 1>freaking amazing. But I think they now know. how to

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.270
<v Speaker 1>call things, how to run an offense with Bryce. And

0:10:09.309 --> 0:10:12.270
<v Speaker 1>you brought it up yesterday. Guys are making plays for

0:10:12.309 --> 0:10:14.309
<v Speaker 1>him that they were just not making. Like, go back

0:10:14.350 --> 0:10:17.170
<v Speaker 1>to his rookie year. DJ Chark dropping two deep balls

0:10:17.210 --> 0:10:20.860
<v Speaker 1>in Jacksonville. Like, Xavier Lee get two years ago, dropping,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the game-winning touchdown potentially against the Eagles.

0:10:23.820 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Remember, there was one in the end zone that hit

0:10:25.140 --> 0:10:26.100
<v Speaker 3>Ian Thomas in the face.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.699
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, serious. Yeah. Like, and you said it yesterday, and

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you're so right. Like, Mechie just made a play. Tremaine just–

0:10:32.870 --> 0:10:35.870
<v Speaker 1>guys are just– the tight ends are now making– Everybody

0:10:35.910 --> 0:10:39.890
<v Speaker 1>just seems to be making plays for Bryce. But I

0:10:39.929 --> 0:10:41.890
<v Speaker 1>think that happens, Bo, when you believe in your quarter.

0:10:41.910 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Like, I think there's a

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:48.740
<v Speaker 1>symbiotic relationship. Like, oh, I believe in this guy. Oh, look,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.300
<v Speaker 1>he just got that ball. I got to get this.

0:10:50.500 --> 0:10:51.790
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? I think there's an element

0:10:51.809 --> 0:10:54.490
<v Speaker 1>of that, maybe. Also, Dave Canales needs a ton of credit, Matt.

0:10:54.550 --> 0:10:54.950
<v Speaker 1>It's not.

0:10:55.610 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>A coincidence that a quarterback has gotten better under Dave Canales.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.740
<v Speaker 3>Why did he get hired here? The revival of Geno

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Smith in Seattle while Dave Canales was there. Baker Mayfield

0:11:07.710 --> 0:11:10.270
<v Speaker 3>becoming the star he was supposed to be in Tampa

0:11:10.570 --> 0:11:14.069
<v Speaker 3>while Dave Canales was there. Bryce Young emerging into what

0:11:14.130 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 3>he's supposed to be. It's not a coincidence. All these

0:11:16.700 --> 0:11:20.140
<v Speaker 3>things just don't happen in Dave Canales' presence. He's not

0:11:20.660 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Forrest Gump. He just doesn't happen to be on the

0:11:22.980 --> 0:11:26.660
<v Speaker 3>scene and things happen. Dave Canales is doing stuff behind

0:11:26.700 --> 0:11:29.140
<v Speaker 3>the scenes with Bryce. He did it with Geno. He

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.500
<v Speaker 3>did it with Baker. He's got a feel, whether it's

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 3>the mental side, the physical side, whatever it is, Dave

0:11:34.540 --> 0:11:37.469
<v Speaker 3>Canales just connects with quarterbacks, and it's working again here.

0:11:37.670 --> 0:11:39.990
<v Speaker 3>This is why he got hired was for Bryce Young,

0:11:40.350 --> 0:11:40.890
<v Speaker 3>and it's working.

0:11:40.990 --> 0:11:45.060
<v Speaker 1>Dude, the method he used, the benching, I mean, there

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.210
<v Speaker 1>was a method to his madness all along. Sit him down,

0:11:47.230 --> 0:11:49.050
<v Speaker 1>let him take a break, keep coaching him up behind

0:11:49.090 --> 0:11:51.350
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. Don't say a word about the kid in public.

0:11:51.370 --> 0:11:53.450
<v Speaker 1>Remember that whole thing? Remember that whole thing where you

0:11:53.510 --> 0:11:55.550
<v Speaker 1>and I were like, oh, is Canales done with him?

0:11:55.730 --> 0:11:58.380
<v Speaker 1>He won't even talk about Bryce. But he just didn't want,

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he told us, you know, that you're following training camp.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.180
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want any extra pressure. There was already going

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:04.860
<v Speaker 1>to be pressure on when he came back. He said,

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the last thing I want to do is just engage

0:12:06.700 --> 0:12:09.850
<v Speaker 1>in conversation about him. So he basically acted like he didn't.

0:12:09.870 --> 0:12:10.410
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean?

0:12:10.630 --> 0:12:10.809
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:12:10.830 --> 0:12:12.030
<v Speaker 1>It was very weird. Impressors.

0:12:12.070 --> 0:12:15.610
<v Speaker 3>But there was a method to his madness. Panther Cliff

0:12:15.630 --> 0:12:17.730
<v Speaker 3>had a question. He says he hasn't slowed down the

0:12:17.770 --> 0:12:20.949
<v Speaker 3>tape yet. But is Bryce not patting the ball as

0:12:21.010 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 3>much anymore? And that's cutting down some time on the release. Yeah,

0:12:25.140 --> 0:12:25.660
<v Speaker 3>I wonder about that.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:26.260
<v Speaker 1>We'd have to go.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.599
<v Speaker 3>We'd have to ask a guy like Jake DeLome, something

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>of that nature, maybe later on the show.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.020
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we can definitely ask him. But I'm looking forward

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to asking all these questions to Jake. Like, what do

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.820
<v Speaker 1>you notice as a quarterback? And he's on at 925.

0:12:37.809 --> 0:12:42.790
<v Speaker 1>That is different. 704-570-9610. People are bringing up the Daryl

0:12:42.809 --> 0:12:46.370
<v Speaker 1>Bevel effect. That definitely is something that, again, I don't

0:12:46.390 --> 0:12:49.270
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what he's doing. You know what I mean?

0:12:50.100 --> 0:12:52.420
<v Speaker 1>But just bringing in someone who has been there, and

0:12:52.460 --> 0:12:55.610
<v Speaker 1>you bring up the point that he was... If we're

0:12:56.070 --> 0:12:59.110
<v Speaker 1>going to say Canales has worked magic with smaller quarterbacks,

0:12:59.170 --> 0:13:03.829
<v Speaker 1>including Russell Wilson, Darryl Bevel was there with Russ. Four

0:13:03.910 --> 0:13:06.450
<v Speaker 1>people have said the same text here. Now, this could.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 3>This could get you a little fired up here, but

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.420
<v Speaker 3>four people have said it's a contract year. That's why

0:13:12.460 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Bryce is playing better. One guy's worried about it. He

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 3>did say Bryce fan. So y'all think he's working harder?

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:19.940
<v Speaker 3>He did say Bryce fan, but is it because it's

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 3>a contract year? I would say that's not Bryce's. That's

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:23.700
<v Speaker 3>not the way Bryce operates.

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the quarterback position, I'm trying to figure out

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.830
<v Speaker 1>what would he be doing differently in a contract year?

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:33.130
<v Speaker 1>Studying more? Because to your point, you don't think Bryce Young,

0:13:33.170 --> 0:13:35.630
<v Speaker 1>while people were calling him a bust, was just working

0:13:35.650 --> 0:13:39.939
<v Speaker 1>his ass off behind the scenes? A thousand percent. He's

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.350
<v Speaker 1>not a slacker. That kid's not a slacker. You know?

0:13:44.050 --> 0:13:47.410
<v Speaker 1>I also don't think he's... I don't understand what he

0:13:47.429 --> 0:13:49.870
<v Speaker 1>would be doing more of just because it's a contract year.

0:13:49.890 --> 0:13:53.469
<v Speaker 1>I think he's just more comfort, more confidence. I also

0:13:53.490 --> 0:13:54.510
<v Speaker 1>don't see Bryce as a.

0:13:54.510 --> 0:13:57.860
<v Speaker 3>Better situation? I think Bryce is a football success guy.

0:13:57.910 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Not that money doesn't matter to Bryce.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:00.020
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:00.179 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know if he's motivated by that. I

0:14:02.500 --> 0:14:04.460
<v Speaker 3>don't think that's what his motivation would be. I think

0:14:04.500 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 3>he knows, regardless of what happens, I will have money

0:14:06.900 --> 0:14:07.620
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of my life.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.699
<v Speaker 1>Yes. So, yeah, I don't view that either. We have

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:18.490
<v Speaker 1>found bone. We have found our first negative individual bone, man. Bebop! No!

0:14:19.070 --> 0:14:21.010
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if he's texting, and if he is,

0:14:21.070 --> 0:14:24.170
<v Speaker 1>I'm not reading him. We'll save his text until we

0:14:24.190 --> 0:14:26.410
<v Speaker 1>get to the Drake May portion of the show, where

0:14:26.450 --> 0:14:28.690
<v Speaker 1>Drake May is questioning the moon landing. That's where Bebop

0:14:28.730 --> 0:14:29.290
<v Speaker 1>comes in handy.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 5>Correct.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.020
<v Speaker 1>That's a great place for Bob to be today. 10 o'clock, Bobby.

0:14:35.020 --> 0:14:37.970
<v Speaker 1>10 o'clock, yeah, you fire in. Welcome, welcome, Fitty, back

0:14:37.990 --> 0:14:40.130
<v Speaker 1>to the big chair at 10 o'clock, Bob. But here

0:14:40.190 --> 0:14:44.570
<v Speaker 1>is a text from VPISU91. He says, Mac— Sounds like

0:14:44.630 --> 0:14:47.770
<v Speaker 1>a license plate. He says, Mac, I'm not a Bryce eater.

0:14:47.850 --> 0:14:51.790
<v Speaker 1>I think he means hater. He says, I am Team Bryce,

0:14:52.270 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but we're 2-2 because I don't really care what individual

0:14:55.940 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>player is doing right now. We need to get over. 500.

0:15:01.210 --> 0:15:04.450
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that Bryce Young being our franchise quarterback,

0:15:05.470 --> 0:15:08.170
<v Speaker 1>the record is the most important thing. I would argue

0:15:08.210 --> 0:15:11.030
<v Speaker 1>the next most important thing is Bryce Young balling the

0:15:11.070 --> 0:15:11.450
<v Speaker 1>hell out.

0:15:12.590 --> 0:15:12.770
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:15:13.210 --> 0:15:18.310
<v Speaker 1>Because if you don't have a franchise quarterback, you screwed.

0:15:19.060 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So I would argue this is pretty damn– I don't

0:15:21.380 --> 0:15:25.290
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you that, yeah, I would love to get

0:15:25.330 --> 0:15:29.109
<v Speaker 1>healthy and get over 500. But if you want to

0:15:29.290 --> 0:15:31.610
<v Speaker 1>act like this is not worth getting excited about as

0:15:31.650 --> 0:15:35.100
<v Speaker 1>a Panther fan, you're doing it differently to me. And

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.610
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Clearly everybody fans differently. Why would you not–

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. Why would you not be excited for

0:15:43.050 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a team you root for to have a rising star

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback? Yeah, I don't get it either. Well, I couldn't.

0:15:49.420 --> 0:15:51.220
<v Speaker 3>I love the team, but I'm not sure about having

0:15:51.260 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 3>a star quarterback around here.

0:15:52.660 --> 0:15:54.700
<v Speaker 1>I guess he's saying it doesn't mean anything to him

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.660
<v Speaker 1>because we're only 2-2. I got news for you. We

0:15:58.740 --> 0:16:02.500
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be 2-2 if Bryce wasn't playing this way. Yeah. Like,

0:16:02.540 --> 0:16:05.700
<v Speaker 1>let's just call it what it is. We would be 1-3.

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We would not have won on Sunday Night, Bone. If

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Bryce did not play this way, we would have gotten

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.550
<v Speaker 1>blown out. If Bryce just played against Cleveland through all

0:16:17.590 --> 0:16:20.550
<v Speaker 1>that pressure and didn't rise up and give us a

0:16:20.570 --> 0:16:23.330
<v Speaker 1>chance to win the game, we would have got blown

0:16:23.370 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>out by the Browns.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.420
<v Speaker 3>No, I was going to say the same thing. He

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>kept them in that it was his worst game of

0:16:29.460 --> 0:16:32.140
<v Speaker 3>the year, but his worst game is now pretty good.

0:16:32.540 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing about it. Bryce's worst games back before

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>were absolutely horrible. There's no doubt about it, but even

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.700
<v Speaker 3>Bryce's bad game was pretty good. That's a step up.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You're right. It didn't devolve into, you know what I mean?

0:16:45.460 --> 0:16:47.620
<v Speaker 1>One of those really bad Bryce games. He was able

0:16:47.660 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to still hang in there and make plays despite the

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure to bite some of his mistakes that he made,

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.980
<v Speaker 1>despite how the Browns were taking TMAC away as well.

0:16:57.700 --> 0:17:00.750
<v Speaker 1>King McQueen says, you're giving Canales way too much credit.

0:17:01.170 --> 0:17:03.490
<v Speaker 1>Bryce was going to be great here or somewhere else.

0:17:03.910 --> 0:17:06.590
<v Speaker 1>He just needed someone to believe in him and allow

0:17:06.650 --> 0:17:10.390
<v Speaker 1>him to cook. Why do so many in our fan

0:17:10.430 --> 0:17:14.790
<v Speaker 1>base not want to give Canales credit for anything? He's

0:17:14.930 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>almost just hanging out over there and along for the

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.619
<v Speaker 1>ride as the team improves. It's interesting to me.

0:17:21.619 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 3>There are some folks, Mac, that would complain about Dave

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.540
<v Speaker 3>doing the play calling and the game management, and now

0:17:27.580 --> 0:17:31.670
<v Speaker 3>Dave's not doing enough over there. Before, it was too much.

0:17:32.070 --> 0:17:34.310
<v Speaker 3>Now Dave's not doing enough. It's almost like, Mac, some

0:17:34.350 --> 0:17:36.930
<v Speaker 3>people are always mad at the coach. They're always upset

0:17:36.950 --> 0:17:38.930
<v Speaker 3>with the coach, no matter what's going on. Good morning

0:17:38.970 --> 0:17:40.550
<v Speaker 3>to Willie P also out there.

0:17:40.930 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting, like Sean McVay, like, and I know

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he's the play caller and that's probably a bad example.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I just, you understand what I'm saying though, Bone? It's

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>not a coincidence that the culture has completely changed since

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.580
<v Speaker 1>Dave came in here. He's not over there. Like people

0:17:54.619 --> 0:17:56.850
<v Speaker 1>lack bone. Like he's hanging out with the family while

0:17:56.890 --> 0:17:58.949
<v Speaker 1>Brad does all the work. Brad and Daryl Bevel do

0:17:59.010 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>all the work. Angelo Vero does the lake. I just

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>get the feeling bone. He is a culture builder and

0:18:05.940 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a great overseen coach. Play calling probably wasn't his

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>strong point. I didn't even think it was a strong

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>point as an OC, um, with Tampa, but I just

0:18:14.820 --> 0:18:19.219
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the desire to snatch credit away from Dave canals.

0:18:19.540 --> 0:18:21.780
<v Speaker 1>It goes to the, to the text that, that we

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.609
<v Speaker 1>got in KB got this week. Hey man, if it's

0:18:24.630 --> 0:18:26.750
<v Speaker 1>going to get a head coaching job, how about we'd

0:18:26.810 --> 0:18:29.090
<v Speaker 1>keep him, make him head coach and get rid of Canalis.

0:18:29.670 --> 0:18:32.890
<v Speaker 1>Like it just feels like people think Dave is doing.

0:18:32.910 --> 0:18:35.090
<v Speaker 1>It's just, is Dave just, do people just think he's

0:18:35.109 --> 0:18:38.350
<v Speaker 1>the handsome, he's the handsome spokesmodel for the team. Just

0:18:38.390 --> 0:18:39.850
<v Speaker 1>stand by Dave hanging out.

0:18:40.590 --> 0:18:43.130
<v Speaker 3>Someone says people want to get mad at everything, whether

0:18:43.170 --> 0:18:46.250
<v Speaker 3>it's quarterbacks or lost remotes in their place of business.

0:18:46.350 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Did you see what Michael Bell sent in, Bone?

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.620
<v Speaker 1>What's that? Our guy. He sent in the clip from

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Zoolander where the dudes start freaking out because they can't

0:18:56.980 --> 0:19:00.170
<v Speaker 1>get the screen to come on. And he says, this

0:19:00.270 --> 0:19:05.740
<v Speaker 1>is Mac with crying emojis. Yeah, I don't handle... things

0:19:05.780 --> 0:19:07.540
<v Speaker 1>not working for me well. No, you don't. It's a

0:19:07.700 --> 0:19:12.260
<v Speaker 1>serious flaw. And smoke caught the heat because of it.

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.180
<v Speaker 1>You guys haven't seen, Mac can't get his password to work, Mac.

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:15.730
<v Speaker 1>That is one guy.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:22.050
<v Speaker 3>That is one guy. I hate it when you can't

0:19:22.070 --> 0:19:26.290
<v Speaker 3>get into something in the password realm. I've seen it

0:19:26.330 --> 0:19:30.090
<v Speaker 3>for 20 years. And then sometimes they'll go, oh, I

0:19:30.109 --> 0:19:30.630
<v Speaker 3>spelled it wrong.

0:19:30.650 --> 0:19:31.389
<v Speaker 1>They don't get it.

0:19:31.970 --> 0:19:32.030
<v Speaker 6>Oh.

0:19:35.190 --> 0:19:39.810
<v Speaker 1>Oh, God, I'm regressing. I wasn't very good to start with.

0:19:39.850 --> 0:19:41.570
<v Speaker 1>So this is bad news. It really is.

0:19:42.190 --> 0:19:44.770
<v Speaker 3>How long, Mac, until you go full Salania and you

0:19:44.810 --> 0:19:47.090
<v Speaker 3>just give your passwords to other people around you and

0:19:47.350 --> 0:19:48.189
<v Speaker 3>they log in for you?

0:19:48.490 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>That was my job for a decade, by the way. way.

0:19:50.300 --> 0:19:54.180
<v Speaker 1>I was Jim's password man. I got it earlier. Every

0:19:54.220 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>day somebody says Mac is the new Salania, and I'm

0:19:56.460 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just like, I love Jimmy, but I don't know if

0:19:59.280 --> 0:19:59.939
<v Speaker 1>that's good for me.

0:20:00.220 --> 0:20:03.060
<v Speaker 3>Do you know, Mac, Jim has not worked with us,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.649
<v Speaker 3>our former co-host, since 2016. Do you know that he

0:20:06.690 --> 0:20:08.810
<v Speaker 3>called me, and I mean within the last two years?

0:20:09.410 --> 0:20:12.530
<v Speaker 3>and asked me what his Twitter password was, the one

0:20:12.570 --> 0:20:15.730
<v Speaker 3>we set up in 2013, I said, I got.

0:20:15.650 --> 0:20:18.730
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, man. I don't remember 10 years ago

0:20:18.750 --> 0:20:21.340
<v Speaker 1>what your password is. Oh, my God. That's hilarious. I

0:20:21.380 --> 0:20:22.020
<v Speaker 1>didn't do my job.

0:20:22.060 --> 0:20:24.860
<v Speaker 3>I didn't maintain the Selenium passwords for the rest of life.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.180
<v Speaker 3>When we come back in the Mac and Bone show,

0:20:27.540 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 3>who is more likely to pull the upset on Saturday?

0:20:30.300 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 3>UNC at Pitt, State at Wake.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.719
<v Speaker 1>No, Wake. State hosting Wake, right? Yeah.

0:20:35.740 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:20:36.460 --> 0:20:38.980
<v Speaker 1>Stay toasty, Wade. Screwed that up there. It's my back.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to Salania. Sports Radio, 92.7 WFNZ.

0:20:58.850 --> 0:21:01.629
<v Speaker 5>I'm really excited just to see this Wake Forest team.

0:21:01.990 --> 0:21:04.090
<v Speaker 1>And also, can NC State make some noise? Again, that's

0:21:04.410 --> 0:21:05.490
<v Speaker 1>my wolf pack. Love them.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 5>Love them.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.660
<v Speaker 1>Always cheer for them. Always think they got something.

0:21:09.180 --> 0:21:11.420
<v Speaker 5>But I think Wake has an opportunity here to flex

0:21:11.460 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 5>their muscles and show they're one of the best teams

0:21:15.380 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 5>in this league and one of the best teams in

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:18.900
<v Speaker 5>the country. I'm just going to go ahead and give

0:21:18.940 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 5>them that as well. So I think Wake's favored by three.

0:21:22.900 --> 0:21:23.510
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:21:23.530 --> 0:21:26.070
<v Speaker 5>That's just the thing for these first couple of games. Again,

0:21:26.530 --> 0:21:29.290
<v Speaker 5>I don't see it being that close. I think Wake Forest, again,

0:21:29.350 --> 0:21:31.129
<v Speaker 5>wins by double digits.

0:21:32.180 --> 0:21:35.090
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Eric. Matt Klain on the Matt Klain

0:21:35.109 --> 0:21:37.990
<v Speaker 1>and Gramlich podcast. It might be Gramlich and Matt Klain.

0:21:38.010 --> 0:21:40.710
<v Speaker 1>Did I put? Yeah. Kelly Gramlich goes first over EMAC.

0:21:41.510 --> 0:21:45.189
<v Speaker 1>But you heard it there. EMAC admitted. I have to

0:21:45.210 --> 0:21:47.810
<v Speaker 1>say a clean up file too. EMAC admitted. Not having

0:21:47.830 --> 0:21:52.410
<v Speaker 1>your name first on the show. He admitted. McClain needs

0:21:52.450 --> 0:21:54.450
<v Speaker 1>his name first, but Matt Klain apparently doesn't need his

0:21:54.490 --> 0:21:57.580
<v Speaker 1>name first. So EMAC admitted there was a lot going

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on in that clip. He admitted he still thinks NC

0:22:00.780 --> 0:22:04.810
<v Speaker 1>State's a good team. He always buys into NC State,

0:22:05.510 --> 0:22:08.210
<v Speaker 1>but he wrapped it up by saying, this Wake team

0:22:08.350 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is legit, one of the best teams in the country,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he says, and they will win by double digits at

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.290
<v Speaker 1>Raleigh this weekend. That will be a hell of a win.

0:22:17.470 --> 0:22:20.770
<v Speaker 1>of a statement, no pun intended. I know that's NC

0:22:20.790 --> 0:22:24.350
<v Speaker 1>State's thing. But anyway, this is one of two games

0:22:24.410 --> 0:22:26.810
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk about that I find interesting in

0:22:26.850 --> 0:22:29.770
<v Speaker 1>the same way. I feel like each week, Bone, this

0:22:29.830 --> 0:22:33.530
<v Speaker 1>is football in the Carolinas. Each week we're asking, can

0:22:33.570 --> 0:22:35.970
<v Speaker 1>this local team pull an upset? Can that local team

0:22:36.010 --> 0:22:39.810
<v Speaker 1>pull an upset? It's our weekly who can compete. Yes.

0:22:39.930 --> 0:22:42.750
<v Speaker 1>Is someone get a moral victory this week? What are

0:22:42.810 --> 0:22:45.869
<v Speaker 1>our underdogs from the Carolinas going to do? So I

0:22:45.930 --> 0:22:47.609
<v Speaker 1>think the point spreads and you could tell me what

0:22:47.650 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing bone. I think it's like a three and

0:22:51.180 --> 0:22:54.540
<v Speaker 1>a half point spread for wake in Raleigh. And I

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's pit by like four or it might be

0:22:56.660 --> 0:22:58.940
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, four. Okay. So pit by four.

0:22:59.300 --> 0:23:03.810
<v Speaker 3>But the interesting angle to that is 79% of the

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.830
<v Speaker 3>money coming in on the money line on Pittsburgh, but

0:23:07.290 --> 0:23:11.050
<v Speaker 3>even more interesting in the wake state game, 86% of

0:23:11.109 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the money coming in on wake forest. 86 percent like

0:23:15.900 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 3>just money line money line would you say spread was

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 3>i may have been uh checking the text i didn't

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.970
<v Speaker 3>say what that would be the money situation.

0:23:22.750 --> 0:23:25.389
<v Speaker 1>Yeah like in terms of like spread for wake state

0:23:25.430 --> 0:23:27.670
<v Speaker 1>the spread is 54 percent to wait for us okay

0:23:27.690 --> 0:23:30.390
<v Speaker 1>so that's more balanced with the four points or three

0:23:30.410 --> 0:23:31.700
<v Speaker 1>and a half points it's more.

0:23:31.540 --> 0:23:36.700
<v Speaker 3>Balanced spread money for pittsburgh and unc which surprises me

0:23:36.820 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 3>here a little bit is 65 percent coming in on pittsburgh.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>OK, I honestly, Bone, think both these games are going

0:23:43.940 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to be really good. They're both at the same time, too.

0:23:47.340 --> 0:23:49.830
<v Speaker 1>The Wake State one is really juicy because of the

0:23:49.890 --> 0:23:54.430
<v Speaker 1>local aspect. They're both triangle teams. They're both in-state teams.

0:23:54.470 --> 0:23:56.330
<v Speaker 1>We've got fans of both teams out there. Feels like

0:23:56.369 --> 0:23:58.929
<v Speaker 1>a lot of feels like up and down high scoring.

0:23:58.990 --> 0:24:00.150
<v Speaker 1>I think it can be shootout.

0:24:00.330 --> 0:24:02.910
<v Speaker 3>UNC Pittsburgh feels like it's going to be that what

0:24:03.010 --> 0:24:04.310
<v Speaker 3>UNC is.

0:24:04.230 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Going to want there. And Narduzzi might want also. UNC, listen,

0:24:07.820 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>if Mason Heichel was in the game, full disclosure, I'm

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.139
<v Speaker 1>not sure I'd be talking quite the same way. Although,

0:24:14.619 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Pitt's coming off this big emotional win on the road, Bone.

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:23.139
<v Speaker 1>And they've got a first-time starter at quarterback. The Tar Heels,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>I thought, I know Fitty doesn't want any damn moral victory.

0:24:26.070 --> 0:24:29.050
<v Speaker 1>Atta boys for the Notre Dame performance. But I thought

0:24:29.090 --> 0:24:32.070
<v Speaker 1>they did kind of hang in there. You know, they're

0:24:32.150 --> 0:24:36.750
<v Speaker 1>clearly a very improved team from last year. So which game?

0:24:36.810 --> 0:24:38.790
<v Speaker 1>Let's throw it out there to everybody. You include a bone.

0:24:39.310 --> 0:24:41.570
<v Speaker 1>Which team do you think has the best chance of

0:24:41.609 --> 0:24:45.700
<v Speaker 1>an upset this weekend, y'all? Carolina over Pitt or State

0:24:45.740 --> 0:24:46.859
<v Speaker 1>over Wake? What would you say, Bone?

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.220
<v Speaker 3>Well, that spread is telling for Wake and State because

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.500
<v Speaker 3>that's three and a half on the road and you

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 3>get three points at home. So they're saying neutral site there.

0:24:54.700 --> 0:24:57.900
<v Speaker 3>Wake by almost a touchdown over State, right? So that's

0:24:57.960 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 3>pretty telling.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.650
<v Speaker 1>With that... The Pittsburgh.

0:25:01.310 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Quarterback situation is so unknown without their star quarterback, and

0:25:05.300 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 3>he was playing like one of the best quarterbacks in America.

0:25:08.220 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 3>To have that amount of money coming in on Pittsburgh,

0:25:10.940 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that's wrong. I think this is going to

0:25:13.100 --> 0:25:17.460
<v Speaker 3>be a slugfest, a grinded-out game, which Belichick wants. I

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.770
<v Speaker 3>think the Heels get a big road win on Saturday.

0:25:21.790 --> 0:25:23.010
<v Speaker 3>I think the Heels win that game.

0:25:23.780 --> 0:25:24.660
<v Speaker 1>Now, you're right.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 3>If Heinzel was playing, I'm not saying that. But it's

0:25:27.500 --> 0:25:31.150
<v Speaker 3>the first game without him that plays in the UNC's favor.

0:25:31.210 --> 0:25:34.990
<v Speaker 3>I think they pulled off. I think Wake and State's

0:25:35.050 --> 0:25:38.290
<v Speaker 3>very entertaining, but I think Wake ends up winning it.

0:25:39.930 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Both teams may score in the 30s. I know Wake's

0:25:41.580 --> 0:25:43.780
<v Speaker 3>defense is pretty good, but I think both teams can

0:25:43.820 --> 0:25:49.510
<v Speaker 3>get to the 30s. And Wake outlasts them 38-34. You know, 34-31,

0:25:49.550 --> 0:25:52.470
<v Speaker 3>something like that. But you think they're both tight games.

0:25:52.609 --> 0:25:56.350
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Different styles, but tight. We've got multiple people saying

0:25:56.390 --> 0:26:00.050
<v Speaker 1>State has no chance against Wake. That's crazy. The way

0:26:00.090 --> 0:26:04.229
<v Speaker 1>Bailey's been playing lately, you're starting to see Keenan Jackson emerge,

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.340
<v Speaker 1>Preston Douglas emerge. Now, here's the thing I worry about

0:26:06.380 --> 0:26:10.460
<v Speaker 1>with State. Duke Scott healthy? I get the feeling they're

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.790
<v Speaker 1>not going to have Duke Scott. And two offensive linemen, right?

0:26:13.810 --> 0:26:15.930
<v Speaker 1>Two offensive linemen. So how are they going to run

0:26:15.950 --> 0:26:19.820
<v Speaker 1>the football missing two linemen and Duke Scott probably? And

0:26:19.859 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't looked at the availability report. I'll probably have

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to find that because I think it dropped last night

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.820
<v Speaker 1>for the first one. So I'm a little worried about

0:26:28.300 --> 0:26:33.389
<v Speaker 1>Bailey having to carry State against Wake's defense. On the

0:26:33.490 --> 0:26:36.730
<v Speaker 1>flip side, I do worry about State's defense, Bone. They

0:26:36.810 --> 0:26:39.490
<v Speaker 1>still did give up a ton of yards today. Let's

0:26:39.530 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>face it, if Harvey Dyson doesn't make an amazing effort play,

0:26:44.140 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and run down Kiwan Brown and force the fumble,

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>they probably lose that game to Louisville. But I expect

0:26:50.260 --> 0:26:53.170
<v Speaker 1>it to be close. And there are some people now

0:26:53.210 --> 0:26:56.590
<v Speaker 1>saying Carolina gets blown out. This texter says, the fact

0:26:56.630 --> 0:27:00.580
<v Speaker 1>that Pitt is a worthy ranked team. won that game

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in Blacksburg with the crowd going crazy on Friday night,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.060
<v Speaker 1>and you think they lose at home to this lame

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Tar Heel team, that's crazy to me. No, I think

0:27:09.260 --> 0:27:12.070
<v Speaker 1>it was a fair point by Mac. It won't be close.

0:27:13.260 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Getting these teams back up after big wins is a

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.460
<v Speaker 3>challenging thing at times. We see it all the time

0:27:19.500 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 3>in college sports. That's a very fair point by Maggie.

0:27:22.340 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 3>Texter says, who cares what we think? What's Picante's picks? Well,

0:27:26.180 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 3>he's right here in the text box. What's Picante saying

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 3>on these games? We get a little bonus Picante? By

0:27:30.660 --> 0:27:33.700
<v Speaker 3>the way, Picante nailed the over on Jacksonville State, Kennesaw

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:34.300
<v Speaker 3>State last night.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>This guy is an absolute... This dude's on fire. He

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.300
<v Speaker 1>had a winning week for us last week.

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.980
<v Speaker 3>He thinks that Wake for sure wins... But he thinks

0:27:42.020 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh wins big in this game.

0:27:43.540 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Wins big. Okay, so he's saying big, too. Let me

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.230
<v Speaker 1>ask you, Fitty. Oh, I also messed up. I put

0:27:49.290 --> 0:27:52.469
<v Speaker 1>Wake in the triangle, which you would think I've been

0:27:52.570 --> 0:27:54.910
<v Speaker 1>here for 22 years. I wouldn't say. I was kind

0:27:54.930 --> 0:27:57.929
<v Speaker 1>of thinking like Tobacco Road, and I said triangle. So

0:27:57.970 --> 0:28:00.470
<v Speaker 1>that is on me, y'all. Matter of fact, just mop

0:28:00.490 --> 0:28:02.370
<v Speaker 1>me down. You know what I mean? Just mop me.

0:28:02.590 --> 0:28:06.379
<v Speaker 1>Anything not near Mac is just triangle, right? It's all triangle.

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So I messed that up, baby. Triad. My bad. Wake.

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.780
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Deke fans. Y'all deserve better with this squad

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you got. Fitty, do you fear that Pitt's going to

0:28:16.820 --> 0:28:19.290
<v Speaker 1>blow you out with a backup QB? No, I don't

0:28:19.350 --> 0:28:21.209
<v Speaker 1>think Carolina's going to get blown out.

0:28:21.830 --> 0:28:25.290
<v Speaker 6>I think this game will be highly competitive. I don't

0:28:25.390 --> 0:28:28.430
<v Speaker 6>know if I trust Billy Edwards Jr. Mac to go

0:28:28.530 --> 0:28:31.850
<v Speaker 6>on the road and win this football game. Because I

0:28:31.890 --> 0:28:35.620
<v Speaker 6>don't know what to expect from him. Like, you look

0:28:35.660 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 6>at the box score, 17 of 28 against Notre Dame.

0:28:39.170 --> 0:28:42.990
<v Speaker 6>but had a costly pick six. The second interception he

0:28:43.030 --> 0:28:46.510
<v Speaker 6>threw was arguably worse because he had Jordan Shippen just

0:28:46.530 --> 0:28:50.890
<v Speaker 6>threw a bad ball. We haven't ran it well, really,

0:28:50.990 --> 0:28:53.570
<v Speaker 6>since the weather delay against Clemson. We haven't been able

0:28:53.590 --> 0:28:55.390
<v Speaker 6>to run the ball the way that we want to.

0:28:55.490 --> 0:28:58.020
<v Speaker 1>And Pitt's great against the run, though. 55 yards a

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.650
<v Speaker 1>game allowed. And then defensively, like... You know, we had

0:29:01.690 --> 0:29:02.030
<v Speaker 1>a chance.

0:29:02.050 --> 0:29:04.370
<v Speaker 6>We interviewed Jeff Collins last night on the Heel Tough

0:29:04.390 --> 0:29:07.090
<v Speaker 6>Blog podcast. He told us that there was not a

0:29:07.130 --> 0:29:08.150
<v Speaker 6>way for us to stop them.

0:29:08.210 --> 0:29:09.430
<v Speaker 1>It was just a bad matchup.

0:29:09.930 --> 0:29:11.969
<v Speaker 6>But, Matt, what's our defense been since the second half

0:29:11.990 --> 0:29:16.790
<v Speaker 6>against Clemson? 22-3 to a freshman quarterback. And then last week,

0:29:16.830 --> 0:29:19.610
<v Speaker 6>Notre Dame did whatever they wanted to do. Like Belichick,

0:29:19.630 --> 0:29:21.540
<v Speaker 6>you know, after TCU, we thought he was, like, back

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 6>in his bag. Well, he might be back in Jordan

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 6>Hudson's bag because he's getting his ass outcoached.

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.890
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my goodness. I didn't know where that was headed. Yeah,

0:29:28.950 --> 0:29:31.330
<v Speaker 1>I was worried. I was worried. Oh, my heart just beat.

0:29:31.390 --> 0:29:34.970
<v Speaker 1>So what do you guys think? I would probably go UNC,

0:29:35.070 --> 0:29:37.490
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, Bone. I know everybody thinks, well,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt's going to show up. I just think this Wake

0:29:40.340 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>team is really good, and we talked about the state

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>offensive injuries, and I'm still not sold. State's pass rush,

0:29:46.100 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to bother Gio Lopez. Hell, when teams

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>bother Gio Lopez, he just runs around and makes a play.

0:29:51.550 --> 0:29:53.610
<v Speaker 3>And the problem that, you know, even though I think

0:29:53.670 --> 0:29:57.310
<v Speaker 3>State can compete, the issue also would be the consistency

0:29:57.390 --> 0:29:59.650
<v Speaker 3>of State. They're coming off the big home win. We

0:29:59.690 --> 0:30:02.190
<v Speaker 3>know with that program who they are one week.

0:30:02.570 --> 0:30:03.590
<v Speaker 1>They don't. It's a good point.

0:30:03.650 --> 0:30:05.340
<v Speaker 3>It's not always the same the next week. Wake is

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 3>much more consistent with Dicker right now than NC State.

0:30:09.460 --> 0:30:12.020
<v Speaker 3>State doesn't validate. They don't follow up. Right.

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.770
<v Speaker 1>That's a very good point. Whereas I think Carolina is

0:30:15.810 --> 0:30:18.110
<v Speaker 1>just we go back to the timing of these games. Right.

0:30:18.130 --> 0:30:21.150
<v Speaker 1>Like when did Missouri get Florida? When did Florida get Mississippi?

0:30:21.910 --> 0:30:25.060
<v Speaker 1>And I just think Pitt emotional win last week in Blacksburg,

0:30:25.620 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>but they lost their QB. And this kid's starting for

0:30:28.740 --> 0:30:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the first time. Like if they had him in his

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>fourth start bone, he'd probably be a lot more settled in.

0:30:35.290 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But like his first start, How adventurous are they going

0:30:38.540 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to be on offense? Are they going to be kind

0:30:39.900 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of simple on offense? Could he turn the ball over?

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.030
<v Speaker 1>Heinzel wasn't turning it over. Could this kid turn it

0:30:45.130 --> 0:30:48.970
<v Speaker 1>over and help Carolina out? A Virginia Tech fan back

0:30:49.010 --> 0:30:52.570
<v Speaker 1>is looking for you. You keep saying emotional win for Pittsburgh.

0:30:53.130 --> 0:30:55.550
<v Speaker 1>You can say emotional ending. We're still not sure about

0:30:55.590 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that field goal yet. Although we're now getting TikTok angles

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:00.820
<v Speaker 1>from the crowd. Yeah, you were showing me a crowd

0:31:00.860 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>shot that made it look like maybe it missed. Roddy

0:31:03.100 --> 0:31:06.130
<v Speaker 1>Jones said on the ACC podcast, said there is some

0:31:06.170 --> 0:31:11.050
<v Speaker 1>dude out there that did like a, like almost engineering,

0:31:11.670 --> 0:31:16.620
<v Speaker 1>like three different angle views and combined them together. That's

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.140
<v Speaker 1>where Bailey's been. And computed, and computed that it missed.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.170
<v Speaker 1>Give me the meat. By 14 inches wide. Like, this

0:31:23.210 --> 0:31:26.489
<v Speaker 1>guy did all these computations. So, I don't know. Do

0:31:26.550 --> 0:31:28.450
<v Speaker 1>I trust this guy, or are they all full of it?

0:31:28.450 --> 0:31:28.830
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:31:28.850 --> 0:31:31.220
<v Speaker 3>The TikTok video did zoom in as close as they could,

0:31:31.260 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 3>and it did. I thought it was good, but that angle...

0:31:34.990 --> 0:31:35.590
<v Speaker 3>It looked like he missed it.

0:31:35.590 --> 0:31:38.870
<v Speaker 1>Now you're doubting. Yeah. Now you're doubting. But I'm not

0:31:38.910 --> 0:31:42.229
<v Speaker 1>an engineer that's just in. Just in. And you didn't

0:31:42.270 --> 0:31:44.650
<v Speaker 1>even say it at Holiday Inn Express last night. I

0:31:44.730 --> 0:31:46.180
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that makes sense. I don't know if

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that does. No, it really doesn't. You're supposed to be,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.940
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a doctor, and I didn't say it. This texter,

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.860
<v Speaker 1>never trust a guy named Billy Edwards Jr. That's a

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>odd way of putting it.

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:56.620
<v Speaker 3>He does kind of have a NASCAR driver's name.

0:31:57.850 --> 0:32:01.070
<v Speaker 1>Fort Mill Caniac says, you guys are right about getting

0:32:01.150 --> 0:32:04.070
<v Speaker 1>up after big wins. My Charlotte 49ers have had trouble

0:32:04.090 --> 0:32:07.890
<v Speaker 1>getting up after the big win against Monmouth last season. Yeah,

0:32:07.910 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there's been a hangover effect. 15 games worth of hangover,

0:32:12.220 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>something like that.

0:32:12.900 --> 0:32:14.420
<v Speaker 3>We were trying to figure out the other day, they

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 3>were down by like 20 in that game, weren't they?

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 3>If my memory serves, I think something like that in

0:32:20.220 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>that game. So their one win under Albin was a

0:32:23.310 --> 0:32:26.340
<v Speaker 3>big second half rally over Monmouth, if I'm correct on that.

0:32:26.460 --> 0:32:30.060
<v Speaker 1>Over an FCS school where you gave up 35 points. Hey,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's better. One of the MFG called Monmouth. It's better

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.230
<v Speaker 1>than this year's FCS game where they gave up a

0:32:36.230 --> 0:32:38.229
<v Speaker 1>ton of points and a loss to the Citadel. Yeah, Mac,

0:32:38.310 --> 0:32:39.150
<v Speaker 1>it was. God.

0:32:40.260 --> 0:32:43.100
<v Speaker 3>The 49ers in that game scored 35 points in the

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 3>second half, 21 in the third quarter, to rally to

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:47.220
<v Speaker 3>beat Monmouth, 42-35.

0:32:47.660 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I know. And we were like, my God, that's sad.

0:32:49.980 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You got to rally to beat them? Well, this year

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.510
<v Speaker 1>they could beat their FCS opponent. Sorry, Charlotte fans. AC

0:32:55.570 --> 0:32:58.950
<v Speaker 1>wants to know, Bone, if we see Charlotte over North

0:32:58.990 --> 0:33:04.170
<v Speaker 1>Texas as four touchdown underdogs, as a possible local upset team.

0:33:04.490 --> 0:33:04.790
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:33:04.970 --> 0:33:08.020
<v Speaker 1>No. I told AC wrong team favorite. AC, I think

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.910
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be upset, but it's not an upset team.

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 3>AC, worry about your– I got my AC notes here. AC,

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 3>worry about your pack. AC, worry about your Tennessee Vols.

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Guy's got a lot of teams, man. AC, worry about

0:33:19.820 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 3>saving me some money on those rates, baby. I've been

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.380
<v Speaker 3>doing good lately. You know what I mean?

0:33:23.420 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been performing better behind the wheel. Knock on wood,

0:33:25.700 --> 0:33:27.420
<v Speaker 1>I don't want a Matt Gerson. Did I just Matt Gerson?

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>You got a host of all yourself. We got Hurricane Insurance,

0:33:31.620 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>who's a Virginia Tech fan, says he saw enough angles

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.050
<v Speaker 1>of the replay to say that Love missed it wide left.

0:33:38.570 --> 0:33:41.030
<v Speaker 1>So there you go, Hoagie fans. It's all the different

0:33:41.070 --> 0:33:46.270
<v Speaker 1>stages of grief. Love never misses, Mac. Oh! Wow. Man,

0:33:46.350 --> 0:33:48.750
<v Speaker 1>Phitty is just a romantic now. Phitty, people are.

0:33:49.670 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 3>are questioning how mellowed you are today. Everything okay back there?

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:53.380
<v Speaker 3>You're kind of just.

0:33:53.500 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's tired. He had a long one yesterday.

0:33:55.940 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 6>Do you want me to be, like, angry?

0:33:59.700 --> 0:34:02.380
<v Speaker 1>I want you to get after it. Get after Mag.

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.060
<v Speaker 1>Make fun of the Yankees. Be Fitty, man. Make fun

0:34:05.140 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Yankees. Oh, Fitty, walk right through that door, baby.

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Give them a Yankees lose. Oh, Yankees lose. Yankees lose.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:13.810
<v Speaker 4>Fit dog.

0:34:13.820 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Make fun of the Braves. Fit dog. And also, give

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>us a real quick update, too, while you're back there,

0:34:17.460 --> 0:34:20.989
<v Speaker 1>if you don't mind. Oh, okay. I know it's kind

0:34:21.030 --> 0:34:23.750
<v Speaker 1>of sprung on you there. I got to actually stop talking.

0:34:23.950 --> 0:34:26.230
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? I'm waiting for his music.

0:34:26.250 --> 0:34:36.770
<v Speaker 1>There you go, baby. Come on, fit. Bring it on, baby. Fitting.

0:34:38.430 --> 0:34:38.770
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:34:38.830 --> 0:34:44.530
<v Speaker 6>Let's just keep it with the MLB postseason results from yesterday. Obviously,

0:34:44.630 --> 0:34:47.350
<v Speaker 6>the big talking point, the Dodgers eliminate the Braves. They

0:34:47.390 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 6>win 4-1.

0:34:48.820 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The Rays, they.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:53.509
<v Speaker 6>Sweep the Yankees 4-3. Aaron Boone was all smiles in

0:34:53.530 --> 0:34:55.390
<v Speaker 6>the eighth inning while he was making a pitching change.

0:34:55.410 --> 0:34:59.090
<v Speaker 6>About to be eliminated from the postseason. It's because it

0:34:59.150 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 6>was coming to an end for him. The Brewers are

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:05.460
<v Speaker 6>headed back to the NLCS. They eliminated the Padres with

0:35:05.660 --> 0:35:08.900
<v Speaker 6>a 3-1 win. We have a game four in the

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.779
<v Speaker 6>ALDS between the Guardians and the White Sox. Cleveland keeps

0:35:12.820 --> 0:35:16.529
<v Speaker 6>their season alive with a 9-3 win. Guys, if the

0:35:16.570 --> 0:35:20.890
<v Speaker 6>White Sox win today to advance to the ALCS, it'll

0:35:20.910 --> 0:35:25.469
<v Speaker 6>be the second time in 126 years they've clinched a

0:35:25.530 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 6>playoff series at home. This is one of the most

0:35:30.140 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 6>oldest and historic franchises.

0:35:32.700 --> 0:35:33.900
<v Speaker 1>In the American League.

0:35:34.620 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 6>But this would be only their second ever playoff series

0:35:37.260 --> 0:35:39.500
<v Speaker 6>that they've won on their home field.

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:45.110
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder, did... The Guardians, is it now their momentum?

0:35:45.130 --> 0:35:48.510
<v Speaker 3>Their top two pitchers are available the next two games.

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.580
<v Speaker 3>The way that went yesterday, the White Sox are a team,

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:55.060
<v Speaker 3>a franchise, trying to learn how to win and close

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 3>out series. I do wonder if this still might be

0:35:58.620 --> 0:36:00.020
<v Speaker 3>the Guardian series they're fit on.

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 6>Did you see them interview this nine-year-old kid made the news?

0:36:04.380 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 6>This kid was crying because he's like, I saw all

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:10.500
<v Speaker 6>the 100 lost seasons.

0:36:11.739 --> 0:36:13.620
<v Speaker 1>I deserve to see them win a playoff game at home.

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.660
<v Speaker 1>Then they lost 9-3. Imagine crying over your sports team.

0:36:16.700 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Who would do such a thing? That kid needs to

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.130
<v Speaker 1>grow up. Did the kid just have to say goodbye

0:36:21.150 --> 0:36:25.310
<v Speaker 1>to Cormac Ryan? What made him cry? I'm never going

0:36:25.330 --> 0:36:27.090
<v Speaker 1>to let that down. No, you're not.

0:36:27.530 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 3>When we come back, we got a lot of Panther stuff.

0:36:29.820 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles continue to look beatable, the Panthers' next opponent.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.180
<v Speaker 3>Some Panther defensive stats no one is talking about, but

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:41.060
<v Speaker 3>we will. And a Dan Morgan rookie class is doing

0:36:41.100 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 3>it again. All that and more. Sports Radio 92.7 WFNZ.

0:37:23.590 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio 92.7 WFNZ. Yeah, y'all are right. I just

0:37:27.700 --> 0:37:31.420
<v Speaker 1>looked at that availability report. Multiple offensive linemen, including the

0:37:31.460 --> 0:37:34.399
<v Speaker 1>leader of that unit, Soles at center, still out. Left

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:39.089
<v Speaker 1>tackle out for NC State, Bone. Teasdale in the secondary out.

0:37:39.130 --> 0:37:42.779
<v Speaker 1>Duke Scott out. That's not good with this Wake team,

0:37:42.820 --> 0:37:45.580
<v Speaker 1>as good as they are coming in to Raleigh. Let's

0:37:45.620 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Panther it up, though, y'all. Let's Panther it up. We'll

0:37:48.390 --> 0:37:51.029
<v Speaker 1>call this Panther Stuff, Boney. Just a bunch of different

0:37:51.070 --> 0:37:54.150
<v Speaker 1>things to bounce around to with the Panthers, including... I

0:37:54.150 --> 0:37:57.190
<v Speaker 1>like the thought there of a Panther segment called Panther Stuff.

0:37:57.250 --> 0:37:58.469
<v Speaker 1>It took me a lot of time. I spent about

0:37:58.489 --> 0:38:01.390
<v Speaker 1>a half hour last night spitballing, you know, bouncing names

0:38:01.469 --> 0:38:03.589
<v Speaker 1>off the family. You know, what do y'all think? And

0:38:03.610 --> 0:38:06.390
<v Speaker 1>we came up with the amazing name of Panther Stuff.

0:38:06.410 --> 0:38:07.190
<v Speaker 1>Panther Stuff.

0:38:07.810 --> 0:38:07.950
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:38:08.830 --> 0:38:11.630
<v Speaker 1>Dan Morgan, I'm feeling like he did it again with

0:38:11.650 --> 0:38:15.310
<v Speaker 1>this draft class bone. The Panthers are getting production from

0:38:15.350 --> 0:38:19.339
<v Speaker 1>their rookies again. They are fifth in snap percentage played

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.620
<v Speaker 1>by rookies so far this season. And I have to

0:38:22.660 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I think there's guys we hadn't really talked about.

0:38:25.180 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Like a guy like Zaki Wheatley is now playing a

0:38:27.860 --> 0:38:31.339
<v Speaker 1>very big role on this defense, even with Nick Scott back.

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.980
<v Speaker 1>He still played a bunch of snaps. So I think

0:38:35.020 --> 0:38:37.740
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing Lee Hunters playing a bunch of snaps. Has

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.490
<v Speaker 1>flashed at times, maybe not as much as I had hoped, Boney.

0:38:41.890 --> 0:38:47.110
<v Speaker 1>But this rookie class, you can see them making contributions freely.

0:38:47.170 --> 0:38:49.470
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't planned to have him play this many snaps,

0:38:49.530 --> 0:38:52.489
<v Speaker 1>but he is. So they're leaning on young guys. And

0:38:52.530 --> 0:38:55.150
<v Speaker 1>for the second straight year, we're using rookies a lot.

0:38:55.230 --> 0:38:57.890
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like the guys are holding their own

0:38:57.930 --> 0:38:58.660
<v Speaker 1>for the most part.

0:38:58.930 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Wheatley's the highest graded PFF defensive rookie safety this season.

0:39:03.860 --> 0:39:06.460
<v Speaker 3>Definitely needs to be talked about more. Think about the

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:11.350
<v Speaker 3>upside of Caleb Downs. He's 13 points higher right now

0:39:11.890 --> 0:39:15.589
<v Speaker 3>grade-wise than Caleb Downs. He's ahead of Thieneman. You talk

0:39:15.630 --> 0:39:19.020
<v Speaker 3>about being excited about the future of that safety spot

0:39:19.060 --> 0:39:19.620
<v Speaker 3>with him back there.

0:39:19.660 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I said it. in the summer that I'm buying my

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:23.900
<v Speaker 1>weekly stock. Yeah, you liked it. Yeah, you liked it.

0:39:23.940 --> 0:39:26.030
<v Speaker 1>And here I am, the Penn State guy that watched

0:39:26.070 --> 0:39:28.629
<v Speaker 1>him play for my Nittany Lions, and I was kind

0:39:28.650 --> 0:39:31.140
<v Speaker 1>of like, oh, let's see how he goes. over, man.

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>It's been good.

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:36.219
<v Speaker 3>He's a long-range-y safety, Mac, in the mold of... Kind

0:39:36.260 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 3>of what Seattle liked for a long time. So you

0:39:38.340 --> 0:39:40.180
<v Speaker 3>can maybe see what they were looking at there with

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.660
<v Speaker 3>their Seattle connections. They love the DBs. They love the

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:48.740
<v Speaker 3>long DBs. I'm talking about wingspan, y'all. Everybody calm yourself down.

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:53.550
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's move along to defense, the defense. Because

0:39:53.610 --> 0:39:55.710
<v Speaker 3>I just kind of think there's been a feeling, Bone,

0:39:55.770 --> 0:39:58.590
<v Speaker 3>around Panther Nation that the defense hadn't been good.

0:39:58.969 --> 0:40:01.990
<v Speaker 1>The offense has been great. The defense hasn't been good.

0:40:02.469 --> 0:40:07.850
<v Speaker 1>I decided, I have noticed, Bone, a distinct improvement in

0:40:07.870 --> 0:40:11.489
<v Speaker 1>the defense from, you know, from the hideous performance against Chicago.

0:40:12.020 --> 0:40:14.270
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to look it up. How much better

0:40:14.330 --> 0:40:18.010
<v Speaker 1>are they playing? So I went to Sumer Sports last night. Bone,

0:40:18.230 --> 0:40:20.890
<v Speaker 1>since the first game, which, by the way, is one

0:40:20.930 --> 0:40:23.530
<v Speaker 1>of the worst defensive play football games I have seen

0:40:23.870 --> 0:40:26.390
<v Speaker 1>in my entire lengthy life of watching football. I fully

0:40:26.430 --> 0:40:30.180
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that. And you watched this two years ago. Yeah,

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and I made it through 2024. But the last three weeks, Bone,

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.219
<v Speaker 1>their total EPA as a defense is seventh in the

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.819
<v Speaker 1>NFL over that span. EPA per play, seventh in the

0:40:40.980 --> 0:40:42.300
<v Speaker 1>NFL over that span.

0:40:42.380 --> 0:40:42.540
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:40:43.130 --> 0:40:47.580
<v Speaker 1>Don't look now. This defense bone has righted the ship.

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Seventh over a three-week stretch. What did we think they

0:40:50.860 --> 0:40:53.620
<v Speaker 1>were going to be coming into the season? Bottom portion

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of the top 10. So we'll see where they settle.

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.620
<v Speaker 1>I'm not necessarily going to sit here and scream and

0:40:58.660 --> 0:41:00.950
<v Speaker 1>tell you this is definitely a top 10 defense. They

0:41:00.989 --> 0:41:05.049
<v Speaker 1>have to undo bone the statistical. Crap from week one.

0:41:05.650 --> 0:41:08.009
<v Speaker 1>But I do think they've got it headed in the

0:41:08.070 --> 0:41:11.830
<v Speaker 1>right direction and multiple big stops in the fourth quarter

0:41:11.910 --> 0:41:15.790
<v Speaker 1>on Downsbone against a really good freaking offense the other night.

0:41:15.850 --> 0:41:17.310
<v Speaker 3>I don't have a lot to add because you told

0:41:17.330 --> 0:41:18.870
<v Speaker 3>me not to look now. So I just you have

0:41:18.890 --> 0:41:20.150
<v Speaker 3>all the I can't look at the numbers.

0:41:20.190 --> 0:41:21.980
<v Speaker 1>You told me. Oh, I didn't mean to tell you.

0:41:21.989 --> 0:41:24.190
<v Speaker 1>Don't look now. So I'm like, oh, that was just

0:41:24.230 --> 0:41:29.340
<v Speaker 1>an expression. Look away, baby. Look away. Sumer Sports it up, man.

0:41:30.090 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Sumer Sports is ridiculous. It's a great site. I started

0:41:32.739 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to pair that up now and not just go just PFF,

0:41:35.500 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of use them both. And they both do their

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>own things. They both do different things. And you'll see

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.069
<v Speaker 1>some kind of cool trends on there. Like we went

0:41:44.130 --> 0:41:47.549
<v Speaker 1>backbone to the to 89 percent man this week or

0:41:47.630 --> 0:41:49.990
<v Speaker 1>zone this week. Like I kind of thought we would

0:41:50.390 --> 0:41:52.529
<v Speaker 1>with the corners out. I would think we'd go back

0:41:52.570 --> 0:41:54.820
<v Speaker 1>to being zone heavy. But before that, we really, in

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the first three games, we really mixed in more man

0:41:57.180 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>than we have. We blitzed way more. We're the seventh

0:42:00.110 --> 0:42:03.050
<v Speaker 1>highest blitz percentage team in the NFL with the Vero.

0:42:03.090 --> 0:42:06.690
<v Speaker 1>Brian wants you to explain the EPA stat. It's like

0:42:06.710 --> 0:42:10.060
<v Speaker 1>an efficiency number. So like per play, you get an

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>efficiency number per play, essentially, Bone, by the statistical formula.

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So the EPA per play one is just like each

0:42:17.980 --> 0:42:22.009
<v Speaker 1>play is separate. The total EPA number just adds up

0:42:22.050 --> 0:42:25.489
<v Speaker 1>your efficiency on every play for like a total number. Yeah.

0:42:25.630 --> 0:42:27.610
<v Speaker 1>So that's what it is. It's just one of these,

0:42:28.090 --> 0:42:31.609
<v Speaker 1>you know, metrics that is done to judge efficiency. What

0:42:31.710 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>does it stand for? Estimated pass arrival? Estimated... I don't

0:42:35.700 --> 0:42:37.350
<v Speaker 1>know what it is. That's a good point. Is that

0:42:37.390 --> 0:42:39.049
<v Speaker 1>a stat passer? I just made that whole thing up.

0:42:39.050 --> 0:42:42.140
<v Speaker 1>Passer rival. it's uh it's when the pass is gonna

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.540
<v Speaker 1>arrive at the destination what does epa stand for why

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.340
<v Speaker 1>y'all gotta ask me the hard questions um on offense

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.500
<v Speaker 1>we're eighth in in uh total epa and epa per

0:42:50.540 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>play for the season um now i gotta figure out

0:42:53.780 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>what the hell that stands for let's go to uh

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the eagles expected uh expected points added there you go

0:42:59.580 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>per play expected not not expected pass arrival expected pass

0:43:04.620 --> 0:43:07.270
<v Speaker 1>please the pass will arrive here in probably about 2.1

0:43:07.270 --> 0:43:12.910
<v Speaker 1>seconds Unless you're playing for Tampa Bay and that pass

0:43:12.930 --> 0:43:15.790
<v Speaker 1>will never arrive. Let's talk about the Eagles bone. If

0:43:16.090 --> 0:43:18.029
<v Speaker 1>I talk like a pilot, I'll show. Go ahead, baby.

0:43:18.070 --> 0:43:18.310
<v Speaker 6>Go ahead.

0:43:18.370 --> 0:43:21.270
<v Speaker 1>That could be your new thing. How about the Eagles?

0:43:21.690 --> 0:43:23.530
<v Speaker 1>And I am not, I don't want to Matt curse this.

0:43:23.590 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing a guarantee. But it is ridiculous the

0:43:27.260 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>way they're dropping like flies off that offensive line. Lane Johnson,

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:36.259
<v Speaker 1>of course, retired. Um, uh, you know, for mental health reasons, bone. Um,

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but then you had, uh, you already have Landon Dickinson out, um,

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:44.940
<v Speaker 1>on their offensive line on IR. And now yesterday they

0:43:45.020 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 1>trade cam Juergens. Who's a former pro bowl center who

0:43:47.890 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>has had to play guard with Dickinson out. It has

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:52.950
<v Speaker 1>not been as good at guard as he is at center.

0:43:53.350 --> 0:43:55.469
<v Speaker 1>So that's the, uh, I think they said for the

0:43:55.510 --> 0:43:58.820
<v Speaker 1>depth chart this week, bone, only one starter remains, uh,

0:43:59.310 --> 0:44:03.210
<v Speaker 1>from their preferred starting five in training camp. That offensive

0:44:03.250 --> 0:44:06.529
<v Speaker 1>line's a shell of itself. Devontae Smith is apparently going

0:44:06.570 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to miss time with a hamstring injury. Goddard's been out?

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:14.739
<v Speaker 3>Goddard's been out. It's crazy, dude. What is happening there?

0:44:14.780 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Maybe an Eagles fan can weigh in, because obviously Lane

0:44:17.020 --> 0:44:20.750
<v Speaker 3>Johnson retiring is... his decision, but to trade a former

0:44:20.810 --> 0:44:23.690
<v Speaker 3>Pro Bowl center, after you traded A.J. Brown, I know

0:44:23.710 --> 0:44:26.149
<v Speaker 3>things were a mess there, but for a team that's

0:44:26.210 --> 0:44:30.580
<v Speaker 3>trying to find their offensive identity, they're not exactly... Things

0:44:30.620 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 3>aren't exactly trending in the right direction right now for

0:44:32.580 --> 0:44:36.130
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles. Like, you traded a star... Like, are they tanking?

0:44:36.310 --> 0:44:36.989
<v Speaker 3>That's what I wondered.

0:44:37.010 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Are they doing some... little weird reset here yeah i

0:44:40.700 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know it's very odd to do that and your

0:44:43.140 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>your offensive line team that desperately needs to win now

0:44:46.780 --> 0:44:49.299
<v Speaker 1>and you desperately need your offensive lineman you trade one

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of your best one after one of your other best

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:53.470
<v Speaker 1>ones retires and then your third best one is out

0:44:53.590 --> 0:44:56.370
<v Speaker 1>it's just it is really weird but i'm not i'm

0:44:56.410 --> 0:44:58.870
<v Speaker 1>not gonna complain about it man i asked zoki today

0:44:58.910 --> 0:45:00.950
<v Speaker 1>what was going on he said they like their interior

0:45:00.969 --> 0:45:03.069
<v Speaker 1>guys but i would think that they work on that

0:45:03.090 --> 0:45:05.170
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason then like you got a pro bowler

0:45:05.190 --> 0:45:07.129
<v Speaker 1>there I thought Cam Juergens was one of their best

0:45:07.170 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>interior guys. So is the other dude that's out, Dickinson.

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I do need to mention a couple things. The arrival

0:45:12.660 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the tight ends this season, Bone. I love the

0:45:14.420 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>way this group's contributing. Darren Waller, first in average separation

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:22.410
<v Speaker 1>per route among tight ends in the entire NFL. And

0:45:22.810 --> 0:45:26.900
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Tremblebone is third. in separation per route.

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Waller also leads the league in waffle house appearances in

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 3>post games.

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You gotta love a guy that goes to the damn

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.350
<v Speaker 1>waffle house after the game get some smothered covered and

0:45:36.410 --> 0:45:38.130
<v Speaker 1>chunked if he if he puts.

0:45:37.969 --> 0:45:40.310
<v Speaker 3>Money from atlanta right that's part of the connection oh

0:45:40.330 --> 0:45:41.750
<v Speaker 3>yeah he loves the place.

0:45:41.570 --> 0:45:43.670
<v Speaker 1>If he puts money in that jukebox too man that's

0:45:43.710 --> 0:45:46.529
<v Speaker 1>a waffle house all-star bro Seriously.

0:45:46.770 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 3>When we come back, Taylor Tannenbaum, ACC Network back. She's

0:45:49.980 --> 0:45:53.380
<v Speaker 3>actually in town, or was in town, doing basketball coverage.

0:45:53.739 --> 0:45:55.219
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk football with her as well.

0:45:55.260 --> 0:45:56.940
<v Speaker 1>Taylor's next. Sports Radio, 92.7 WFNZ.