WEBVTT - Episode 4657: Tony Katz Today Hour 3 - 08/07/26

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Why from Baal Heartland and the crossroads of America.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>It's Tony Katz today. So the economy shed twenty three

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>thousand jobs in July. It missed the expectations, and the

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 2>market said that's cool, and you said something, it's cool

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>by us. We're fine with it. We're good with it,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>no problem. As a matter of fact, we'll go up

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, Good to be with you.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>There are reasons, though, there are reasons, including, of course,

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 2>inflation and rate hikes. Doctor Mattwell joined as economist at

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the University of Indianapolis. I started to understand this one early,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>but I want to understand what's in the jobs report. First,

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>you took a look at it. We've got jobs report,

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>We've got unemployment numbers. Walk me through what the report says,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the Job's report, and what it says to you.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, I'm going to start off by telling you

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that the headline is bad. And just like the other

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>day we talked about this. You know, headlines are bad,

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>but when you look under the hood, it's actually good

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for the economy, believe it or not. So let's start

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with the headline minus twenty three thousand jobs, which is

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because the expectation is plus eight eighty thousand,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>so this was one hundred thousand job myths. That's a

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>big deal. But let's now start looking underneath the hood.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Unemployment rate dropped from four point two to four point

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>one percent. That's good, okay, Now for the bad. The

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>only reason to drop is because the participation rate declined.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Fewer people are looking for jobs. Fewer people are in

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. Now more bad news for you. Tony, May

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and June were revised down by one hundred and three

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand jobs, so people didn't get employed this quarter. Argue

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this month, two big revisions. I mean, there's a lot

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>going on there that's not good. But there is a

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>good part to this. The private industry gained thirty thousand jobs,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>so there was a growth in private and the government

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>lost fifty three thousand. This was all government job loss,

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so as far as the market's concerned, good Again, back

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to the same scene we've been talking about. Government is contracting,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>private industry is growing, and if you look across the board,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some pretty good information in this. I mean, construction

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two thousand jobs up, durable goods manufacturing eighteen thousand

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>jobs up, Transportation warehousing ten thousand jobs up. I mean,

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>there is good news in this report for the private economy,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and wages didn't grow that much. I know, again that

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds bad, but there's a story behind this and why

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this job's report is loved by the market.

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>So I've with you on the government stuff, and I

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>have discussed this now in a couple of places. Your

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>point that GDP gross domestic product one point five percent

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>bad headline. But if government spending juices GDP, we had

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>less government spend, which is good for us the taxpayer.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>It just makes the GDP number look worse. But when

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you look as you describe it, under the hood, things

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 2>on some fundamentals, specifically manufacturing, very very solid. But when

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I took a look at market response and I watched

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the futures go up one hundred points in a blink

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of an eye after this report came out, it became

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty clear to me. And I feel like all this

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>talking together has finally gotten me some level of degree,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe only in associates, but still them on my way

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>that what they saw is the job market might be weaker.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 2>So those in the federal Reserve who are thinking about

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>rate hikes to tamp down and tamper down inflation. Might

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>think twice and no rate hikes is where the market

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>wants to be true or false.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh close, tony close, I'm giving you a B, not

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>an A.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, teacher, ever.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Well, every time someone gets the bad grade,

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what they tell me. You're very close. The reason

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was the unemployment rate drop. So it's not that the

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>job market is bad, it's that the wage growth is

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>not exorbitant. Wage growth would indicate inflation. So the bad

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>part where you're correct is in quotes, wage inflation is

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>not there. And the unemployment rate stayed at four point one,

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean four to two to four to one, so

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have hot unemployment. If we had significantly increasing unemployment,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there would be pressure on the SAD to cut rates.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>There's inflation, which seems to be in this case moderate

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>not outrageous. Moderate, which is less pressure to increase rates.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So the said, here's what happened this morning. In the markets,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there is a fifty seven percent chance that said was

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>going to do a rate hike in September. There's stuff

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street and the options market in futures, the

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>market that predicts this that went down as soon as

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>this came out. As soon as it came out the

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>news on the unemployment, that probability dropped from fifty seven

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>percent to forty seven percent. So the headline is this

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation argues for a hike, employment argues against it, and

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning the employment won.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Talking to doctor Matt will the economist from the University

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of Indianapolis, So when you talk about winning this back

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and forth, this seems to be a non scientific struggle.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 2>This only seems to be a reaction struggle. Am I

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 2>right about that?

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Absolutely, that's exactly what's happening.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 2>So the reaction from Wall Street was that the lack

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>of of labor participation, which would show us that we

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 2>don't have wage inflation, means that everything is getting better.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But your phrase reaction is why you might get

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>an aus on this now, because what happened is it's

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the reaction to the latest piece of news. You and

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I the other day talked about the PCE very high, CPI,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>eh okay, PPI terrible. That was Then today's news is, look,

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 1>unemployment is pretty flat. That's good. Wage increase not going

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>through the roof. So what happened here is today's most

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>immediate current news reaction is okay, inflation under control, no

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>rate change. So that's what the market saw. The latest reaction.

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Now you know, something could happen tomorrow and completely changed

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the game again. But this is what the market's doing

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>with the news that got today. Okay, unemployment's fine, wage inflacement,

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation is reasonable, no reason to overreact here. So the

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Fed again only a forty four percent chance they're going

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to do a rate increase. Now the market likes that.

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>The market liked it so much that as soon as

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they got that information, the futures jump. Nasdaq futures immediately

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>went up one point one percent. S and T future

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is one up half a percent instantly, instantly on the

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>news coming out. And the tenure treasury, which you talked about,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the tenure treasury sell eight BIPs, eight bases points down

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the four point one six or the two year treasury

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and the ten year also went down to

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>four point six to one immediately reaction lower treasury rates.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Market bumped both Nasdaq and S and P across the board.

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>The market loves this.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Can discuss something else that I'm surprised I haven't heard

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>from bet since the Treasury Secretary or President Trump that

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the US trade deficit contracted. It went to seventy three

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>point three billion in June from seventy seven point six

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>billion in May. That story just came out earlier this week.

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Everything about tariffs is about trade deficits, that somehow trade

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>deficits are the end of civilization. I don't believe that

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>they are. I believe it's a bad reason to implement

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>tariffs as a concept. Does this trade deficit going down not?

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Does that have an effect on people, on how people

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 2>see the market, manufacturing, futures, etc. No.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>When you say people, if you're talking about Wall Street

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and financial experts, No, because actually what you saw was

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a blip. The trade deficit has been growing since tariff

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>institution has been stabilized, and this is exactly what I

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>consider a good thing. Again, I'm a fan of trade deficits.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not against them because to cause foreign direct investment,

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we buy lots of cheap crap from overseas, and those

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars that we spend flow back into the United States

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in the form of investing in our country, which is

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>how you grow your economy. So I've got lots of

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>research on this. I'm a fan of these trade deficits,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think he made a comment about it

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because it was just a blip. And if he here's

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the big deal if he were to bring up the topic, Tony,

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the secret between you and me. If he were to

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>bring that topic up, then everyone would start talking about Wait,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the trade deficits have been growing significantly since you put

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the terrorists in place, So I think he wants to

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>avoid that topic altogether.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Talking to doctor Matt Will, economists at the University of Indianapolis,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 2>let's continue the conversation if we would, if we can,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>because I have mentioned that there have been a couple

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 2>of FED governors before this report came out today and

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>the market is making their bet. A couple of FED

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 2>governors have said it's time for a rate increase. The

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>inflation is not down, we need a rate hike. Are

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>are they correct? Does this report change them at all?

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It changes them? They're correct that inflation isn't gone, but

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>their solution is wrong, and this report gives wash some

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>time to adjust. And this is where it gets that

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>complex assets thing again. They had a legitimate point, do

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to camp down inflation? And one of the

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>tools you do it is to increase rates. Well, when

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you increase rates, that's going to decrease investment because money

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>costs more. So that's a you know, one of the

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>things Trump always argues against me. But there's another way

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to control inflation, and that's what Warsh is trying to do.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He's slowly moving the ship. He Slowly's got this commission going.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It's going to look at selling assets off the balance sheet.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Good for him. So he's working on that, and this

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>report gives him cover. It gives him more time to

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>let his political technique, his little commission do its job,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's going to be able to say to these

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>three governors, Okay, hold on, can't you see look unemployment flat,

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>no reason to increase rates. Everything's wonderful right now, people

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>go back into your corner. So I think this buys

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>him time to not worry about the whole rape situation

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>while he gets his ducks in line to do a

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>huge asset sale. And I think he's going to pull

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>it off. I'm confident, I'm patient, and I think he's

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>going to succeed.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to see it happen, like I want to

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 2>see how that plays out. But there were some other

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 2>things that happen I want people to be aware of

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 2>in the market, and you've been making mention of this.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>We've talked often about layoffs, right, a lot of layoffs

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>in Tech Wall Sheet Journal, discussing the fact that the

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 2>new data shows that job cuts are down forty one

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 2>percent so far this year, which would make one believe that, Okay,

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 2>we've done enough cutting. Let's actually see if our AI

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>investments increased productivity. Maybe we just really need these people.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>There's only so much you can cut. We saw have

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a business to run, products to sell, et cetera. But

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>within this is the recognition that software is getting the living,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>not kicked out of it. That when we talk all

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 2>about the technology and AI transforming the economy and all

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that jazz software, I don't know if they mean software

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>as a service or software in general is getting slapped around.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>What is happening in that in that sector?

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I like what you said. You said productivity, and

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in fact, today's report had a two percent

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>increase in productivity. So that is a side benefit at

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a consequence the main benefit of AI. So what's happening

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, it's SaaS as a service, software as

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a service, I should say. And what's happening is companies

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like work Day and Salesforce and Adobe, and we talked

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>about the other day, IBM while sixty nine billion dollars

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in value in one single day because there's software got killed.

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So what's happening is AI is replacing software. I'll give

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you my own personal example. I've got to put together

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this schedule of classes for students. It takes forever to

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>go through all the gyrations and the formulas, and I

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>now have an AI that can do it in minutes

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>compared todays. There's software on the market that does that. Well,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the people that sell that software, they're not selling the software.

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I can just turn on my AI, tell it what

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I want, and it gives me the same output. That

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is what's happening to companies like Workday and Salesforce and

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Adobe and IBM. They're getting beaten down because people can

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>go on their computer on their phone and get the

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>same output quality that they were getting from a piece

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of software that costs them a fortune just two years ago.

0:13:54.240 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 2>How does this play into overall tech sector? Are there

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>companies that care about their software products or are they

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>willing to sacrifice at all to the h on the

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>altar of AI because it's the only thing that matters.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I don't like this phrase, but I

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have to use it. It's a massive paradigm shift that phrase.

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 2>You're right about that.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>You know again, I don't like using that phrase, but

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what's happening. It's what companies are doing. Is it's

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>literally Shoepayer's creative destruction that you and I have talked

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>about before. This whole software industry is being upended. It's

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to disappear, it's going to reformulate. So people

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that are willing to say, okay, we're going to

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>look at this differently. So instead of hiring IBM to

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>write some software, I'm going to hire a bunch of

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>AI experts and they're going to develop prompts and custom

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>gems and custom GPPs, and they're going to create these

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>AI environment so that any one of my lower level

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>employees can do the same thing that that software was

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>doing before at a cheaper price. So they're really transforming

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>their businesses away from reliance on software which is static.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got to buy updates. You know, it has bugs. Yeah,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>AI is not perfect, but it can do the job

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>much easier, quicker, and with less overhead. So companies are

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just transform they still have to do the same thing, Tony.

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You still got to edit your audio and your videos,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to get them published on your various platforms. Well,

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>now the AI is going to alleviate your need to

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>buy a bunch of software to do that.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Matt Well, economists at the University of Indianapolis. I

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you taking the time to be with us more

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to get to this is Tony Katz. Today is the

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 2>ongoing war in Iran having an impact and negative impact

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 2>upon the US economy.

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Oil energy prices are a little bit inflated, but we

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>could say that way less that people expected. But we're

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>mindful of the fact that gasoline prices are high, and

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 3>we're making many steps to help reduce the stress of

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that for people.

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Can we come over here? The answer is yes. I

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 2>mean I like Kevin Hassett a lot. National Economic Council Director,

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I like them a lot. But that's were saying a

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit, a bit of a thing. With the energy prices,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 2>we still have barrel price up today, Tony Katz. Tony

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Katz today. God's always great to be with you, Thanks

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>for having me here. The number is not going anywhere

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>because there's no deal with Iran. There's no deal with Iran.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Iran wanted to have a deal where no US or

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Israeli tankers could go through the strait. Okay, okay, sure,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>sure that's that's that's fantastic. Then there's the story that

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a deal with a Ran over her moves may require

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 2>a compromise from Trump. This is Newsmax with the article

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>he divides the world into winners and losers, and this

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 2>would make him a loser according to one expert, and

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that is that image would be intolerable for him. So

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>this is about levels of control and whether or not

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the Iranian regime can still have any control the way

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the Iranians want to see it. They control one route,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 2>oman controls another route, and so therefore there's still the

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 2>people who make the decisions on who goes through. The Iranians,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 2>in their entire methodology of negotiation is never ever, ever,

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>ever relent. Never keep up the heartache, up, keep up

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the hassle. The other side relents because they just grow

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>tired of it, and you win. That's their methodology. Which

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 2>is why I have stated from the beginning the only

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.120
<v Speaker 2>answer is the end of the regime, because it's the

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 2>only way anything can be done. And all I'm doing,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I knew this before Trump put anything out

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>on social media years ago. He put out on social media.

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Iran never won a war, never lost a negotiation. That's

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 2>exactly what's happening here. And so if we want to

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 2>talk about how President Trump looks like he lost every day,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>it's like, oh, we got We're gonna get to a

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 2>deal soon soon. I think we could see something soon.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>And he was in the Oval yesterday talking about how

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 2>we saw oil prices down to numbers no one thought

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 2>they could be this loan and we'll get there again soon.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>You're telling me about what happened yesterday. I want to

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>know what's gonna happen today and what's gonna happen tomorrow.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Those oil prices are what I'm talking about. You can't

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 2>sell well three months ago it was only a dollar

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 2>eighty five a gallon, or two months ago it is

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 2>only a dollar eighty five a gallon in Iowa. That

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 2>doesn't move anybody. And every time you say well soon,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>well soon, as I have argued, I think he looks

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 2>weak and who is advising him on this because he

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 2>doesn't want to look that way. Ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>If you want to argue, mister President, that you can

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 2>string this out for forever, you plenty of patients. Great,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 2>that's a position of strength. But don't tell us a

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>deal'll be soon. You know, when the Iranians come to

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>us and they beg forgiveness and they surrender, we'll have

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a deal. Than just go wait for them to learn

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 2>their lesson. We've got all the time in the world.

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 2>It's all on them. That would be a position of strength.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 2>This is Tony Katz today. So the way this was

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 2>described was unhinged, which is a term you see often.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 2>It was OutKick putting out a post, and then Fox

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 2>News with Jones OutKick putting out the article Meghan Rapino

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 2>goes on an unhinged rant. Unhinged usually means screaming and

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 2>yelling and out of someone's mind. Well, I don't think

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Megan Rapino is screaming or yelling here. She's just out

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>of her mind. Tony Katz. Tony Katz today is so

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 2>good to be with you, guys. Find everything I do

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 2>at Tony kats dot com. Don't forget to grab the

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 2>videos on YouTube and rumble a Tony Katz go and

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>subscribe right now. Meghan Rapino, the soccer player who is

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 2>beyond a leftist? Who is I would argue in this

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 2>bit of audio I'm going to share with you, is

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 2>going to prove it hateful. We're talking about a hateful

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 2>person here. I would also argue, dishonest person. She's the

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 2>one who took the knee in solidarity with Colin Kaepernick

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 2>for the national anthem. Colin Kaepernick didn't even do it

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 2>in solidarity with Colin Kaepernick. He wanted attention. He got attention.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Didn't get a job in the NFL, but he got attention.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>When Dave should said of Colin Kaepernick, he didn't need

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to do that. His belly was full, but he did

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that for us, No, he did not. Dave has it

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 2>completely wrong. Don't tell me. I can't tell Dave Schappell

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 2>he's got it wrong. When he's wrong, he's wrong when

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 2>he's right. I've agreed many times when he has said

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 2>something I haven't thought of, I said, doubt say, that's amazing.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 2>But he's wrong on this. He doesn't have it anywhere

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 2>close and he can engage with me in all the

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>race this and you don't understand that he wants. In

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the end, I do understand, He's just wrong. Colin Kaepernick

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>did nothing for anyone else, and no one is stronger

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>for it. He did not even take a stand by

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 2>taking a knee. Not a conversation for another day. Meghan

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Rapino believes, in all of her radical leftism that men

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 2>can be women and trans women which are men, can

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>be in women's sports. And this is her argument against

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Sophie Cunningham of the Indiana Fever and Riley Gaines, the

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 2>swimmer who took on the madness of was it Mia

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Thomas or whatever his name was, and the swimmers and

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 2>really has made this a front and center issue as

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>it should be. Again, I will state we're talking about

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>a culture war here that has to be won. It

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>is a culture war. I accept the terms. We win,

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 2>they lose. That's that because it's far more than just

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not a man is in women's sports.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 2>It is about a society written large, of course it is.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 2>It's about the idea of normalcy. And can I tell

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you I have put out videos about this where I've

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>discussed Sophie Cunningham being normal and the amount of people

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 2>who come at me, Why in the world would you

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 2>call it normal? What other people are not normal? Who

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 2>are you to decide what normal is? Sophie Cunningham said,

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 2>girls sports are for girls and if we can't call

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that normal, we can't call anything normal. And I think

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you understand that that's the objective. The objective is to

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>end the concept of normalcy. Everything is up to debate,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 2>everything can be questioned, everything can be seen as okay

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>or acceptable. That is a total lack of standards. And

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 2>the answer is no, not going to have that society.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 2>And I get that it puts people like us on

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the ounce with these other people and they want to

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 2>be very violent about it, and they control a lot

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 2>of the institutions. And my answer is game on, let's

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 2>go do this thing. It's a culture war. We win,

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 2>they lose. That's that men are not women and men

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>are not welcome in women's sports. Don't care if you

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 2>like it, don't care if you're happy about it, don't

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 2>care if you cry, and don't scream to me that

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 2>it's going to lead to you committing suicide. Because with

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>all due respect. A guy who has spent some time

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>being suicidal myself doesn't make me an expert, not an

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>expert in what makes someone suicidal. I can only tell

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>you where I was in my twenties. Also at nine

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 2>eight eight. That is the suicide prevention hotline. I never called.

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 2>I never did that, but if you need to, you should.

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 2>It gets better, it can, It takes work. I'm right here. Oh.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 2>My twenties were a miserable experience, and the depression took

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 2>me while into my thirties until I started to figure

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 2>out that first of all, I wasn't crazy. I was

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 2>just doing things that could in no way provide me happiness.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Why wasn't I changing the things that I was doing?

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Which is the whole point that I only speak from

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 2>a personal experience here, I'll let an expert discuss from

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>an expert's position. Happiness does not come from without, It

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>only comes from within. So if somebody is miserable with

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 2>who they are, me, lying to them is not going

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 2>to help them. Lying will make me miserable. What I

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 2>learned about myself is that I was lying all the time.

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 2>They weren't big lives, they weren't at landishlies. I wasn't

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 2>lying about a job, or I wasn't lying to my wife.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I was lying about being unhappy. I was lying about

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>everything being fine. There were these small little things and

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 2>when I stopped, when I stopped lying, and there's a

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 2>multiplicity of things. I won't get into everything. I swear

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 2>to you, in an instant, it got better. It required

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 2>more honesty. Honesty is certainly tough. What I found is

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a tough that I like. It's a tough that's

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 2>good because it's clarifying. When you lie, you can't fix

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the thing. When you're honest, you can fix the thing,

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 2>or at least come to accept the thing, whatever that

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>thing in your head is or the thing I'm in

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 2>front of you, et cetera. That's better. I've always said,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, in my contract negotiations, for example, I don't understand.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 2>And this has happened in multiple companies. It's happened for years.

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>You've dealt with this kind of stuff. These people who

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>want to they're having a negotiation, they're still kind of

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>playing a game, and well, where do you see yourself?

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And what do you want?

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Dude? You know what I provide? How much? Here's what

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 2>I want boom. Or here's your offer, boom, here's my

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 2>counter boom. Can we be done. We can finish this

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 2>in ten minutes and then go have lunch. Don't you

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 2>want to have lunch. I hear they have truffle fries.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's go get some truffle fries. Who doesn't love some

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 2>truffle fries. I love them, by the way. I'll take

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 2>regular fries, sure, but if they're truffle fries, I'll be like,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll give those a go, and if I don't like them,

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 2>I'll get the regular fries. That's right, I'll order both

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 2>and then see which one I want. That's the kind

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of man I am. Ten minutes, that's all I need.

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't need the game. Well, Tony, we really value you,

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>but you have to understand the situation that we're in.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 2>How much I don't know about you. I don't need

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 2>any of the rest. I don't need any of that

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of that kind of stuff. And I swear to you

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 2>that the changing of this mindset has has further solidified this.

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I accept the fact that for some people

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>it's jarring and off putting. I accept, but I also

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 2>accept that that's part of the deal. But since in

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the overall it works for me so well, it's part

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 2>of the deal. I accept this. It doesn't mean that

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 2>there aren't moments where I'm unhappy, and I can talk

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>to you about a million things where I have real

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 2>issues with satisfaction right, But I don't think I'm so

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 2>different in that regard from other people. But one of

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the things that I do know, going back to Megan Rapino,

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 2>is that if I have to be told, or if

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be told that I have to lie

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 2>and call a man a woman, I'm going to go

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 2>back to lying. And I can't do that because being

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a liar and lying to myself and lying to others

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>made me miserable, made me depressed, and made me think

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 2>about ending my own life. I'm not doing that for

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Megan Rapino. Screw you, honey, I don't. I refuse to

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>care about your feelings more than I care about my feelings.

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 2>You don't care about my feelings at all. I think

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>my feelings matter. I don't think I should be rude

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to you, or rude to somebody else who's going through

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>gendernysphor you and having this mental issue. I don't think

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I should be mean I think we should be considerate

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and kind and decent and loving. Of course I do,

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>but don't ask me to lie to satisfy somebody else's lie.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doing that. I won't be a part of that.

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 2>And thus, from a personal perspective, I believe in this

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>culture war. But if you were to take my perspective

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 2>out of it, I believe in the culture war because

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>there are young girls being told they have to take

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>a backseat to boys, and the answer is no, never

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 2>mind that the boy thinks they're a girl, and society

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>wants us to buy in to this madness. I'm not

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 2>buying into mental illness. I'm not buying into wholesale lying

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>where everybody buys into the lie. Absolutely not a culture

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>war worth fighting, and we have to win. Meghan Rappino

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 2>is angry with Sophie Cunningham for saying the most normal

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>thing in the world girl sports are for girls, Angry

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 2>with Riley Gaines for being supportive of girls in girl

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 2>sports and girls alone and fighting for it. And so

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 2>she goes on this ranch. She's looking right into the

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 2>camera doing a little podcast thing. They called it unhinged,

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'm like, no, just wrong. Maybe unhinged.

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Listen, I want to address the controversy that is happening

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 4>right now around on trans women in sports. As you know,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 4>I've talked about this a lot and will continue to

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 4>keep talking about this.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know Sophie.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 4>So I can only project what I see about her

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 4>beliefs based on her actions and seeing a picture of

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 4>her with Riley Gaines after the game told me everything

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 4>I need to know about what's happening. Riley Gaines has

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 4>made it her life's mission to exclude trans people from

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 4>public life. She's directly tied to the Heritage Foundation, the

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 4>authors of Project twenty twenty five and now twenty twenty six.

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 2>We can stop there. That is nonsense, Project twenty twenty five,

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty Sex All this stuff was always ridiculous stuff.

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 2>The Heritage Foundation has plenty of problems. Megan Rapino, that

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>ain't it, but the exclusion of trans people. She's been

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 2>clear and focused about keeping women only in women's sports.

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>This is this is a lie, and it gets bigger.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Who have now published a report that suggests that they

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 4>want to repeal Title nine, the very piece of legislation

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 4>that allowed athletes like Sophie and myself to compete in sports.

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Sophie has claimed both to love trans people and support

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Title nine, and this is where I think the accountability

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 4>with having a major platform is extremely important. You can

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 4>hear it even in the language being used, that the

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 4>root of trans exclusion is to protect young girls from men.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 4>To be clear, I would love to have that conversation

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 4>and it's much needed in this country. But it frames

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 4>the conversation as if we're protecting young girls from men

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 4>being in WNBA locker rooms not happening. It villainizes trans

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 4>girls as if they're somehow magically older than their peers

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 4>or are men, when in reality they are also young girls.

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 2>No, they're not. That's a lie. She's just lying. She's

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 2>flat out lying, as clear as can be. Also, if

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 2>men can be in women's sports, here's a Megan Rappino,

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 2>formerly of the US women's soccer team, talking about the

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>importance of Title nine, which is about funding women's sports.

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 2>If men can be in women's sports, there's no need

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>for Title nine. Don't get angry with me at Riley Gaines.

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 2>She's the one who's actually engaged in a protection of

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Title nine. You're the one who wants to destroy it.

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 2>If Title nine is about women's sports and making sure

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that there's a proper funding and you want men to

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>be in women's sports, there's no need for Title nine

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>because there is no women's sports the end. But if

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 2>you believe that men who say they're women are women,

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 2>well then you're just a liar. You're just wrong. And

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that's where the culture war is kid and that's what

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 2>we're fighting. That's it right there. So is she unhinged? No,

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>she's just a liar.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 4>These laws are excluding kids, kids from playing youth sports.

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 4>If we want to have a conversation around elite sports,

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 4>there are effective policies that have been in place for

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 4>many years that no one noticed because they worked. So

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 4>if anybody is taking these talking points as legit or

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 4>believing they're protecting young girls in sports, I just have

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 4>to ask are you serious?

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we're all serious. The question is, Megan Rapino, why

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 2>do you hate girls? We're talking about kids in sports.

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 2>So you are in favor of children being mutilated in

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 2>terms of these top surgeries and bottom surgeries. You're in

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 2>favor of confusing children. You're in favor of lying to children.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 2>You're in favor of chemical castration of children. Where does

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 2>it end for you? Are you serious? Can you imagine

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>that that's how she actually thinks? It's an intellectual conversation?

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 2>Are you serious? For real? Seriously? I don't know. You

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 2>could add your own in there as well. That's not unhinged.

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Well maybe it's a little unhinged. But she is a liar,

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>She is lying, and what she favors is downright dangerous.

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:42.280
<v Speaker 2>We have to win, they have to lose. Girls. Sports

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 2>are for girls. This is Tony Katz today. Is Putin

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>looking to test NATO? US intel reports say maybe Wall

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal with this report Tony Katz, Tony Katz today,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Why would anybody put anything past Vladimir Putin? US intel

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 2>fines putin contest nadoes resolved with limited incursion. I think

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Russia has bigger issues. They would do this to try

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 2>and get the US to waste time, money, resources doing

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 2>this on the behest of whom one would assume, China,

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 2>and no one should ever leave that out of their thinking.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 2>But right now there's a story that Ukraine doesn't have

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 2>any missiles left to fire at Russia. I don't know

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 2>if that's one hundred percent sure. Not Again, all these

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 2>stories you never know. But with the Ukraine working so

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 2>well on the drone tech and the US working with

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>them now on the drone tech, this has been bad

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 2>stuff for Russia. Russia within a few years could engage

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 2>some of these scenarios. Does Vladimir Putin have a few

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 2>more years?

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>There's all.

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those reports where you go, huh,

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I have questions. Find everything at Tony Kats dot com.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll catch you Monday. Everyone, take care,