Speaker 1: Line from vall Hartblind and The Crossroads of America.
Speaker 2: It's Tony Katz today.
Speaker 1: So a thirty eight year old is outside of the
Speaker 1: Trump National Golf Club in ranch Apalos, just hanging out,
Speaker 1: just walking down the street.
Speaker 2: No no, no, no, no.
Speaker 1: No no no no no no no no no no, no
Speaker 1: no no. He's scouting, he's looking, he's keeping an eye
Speaker 1: on things. Deputy is assigned to the Lomita Sheriffs Station,
Speaker 1: responded to the golf course after planes closed. Federal agents
Speaker 1: reported a suspicious individual on the property.
Speaker 2: The guy was walking onto.
Speaker 1: The golf course taking pictures and quote a peer 'ring
Speaker 1: to monitor security planning activities because the president was coming
Speaker 1: to town.
Speaker 2: Okay, so this.
Speaker 1: Is just another guy in a long list of people
Speaker 1: who are trying to kill the President of the United
Speaker 1: States because he, like everybody in America, has been told, well,
Speaker 1: you know, the president's the threats to democracy or some
Speaker 1: other nonsense horsecrap like that. We've been saying this from
Speaker 1: the beginning for over a decade. The people of MSNBC, NOW,
Speaker 1: ms NOW and lots of left leaning outlets have been
Speaker 1: calling for a lone wolf, have been calling for damage
Speaker 1: to be done for the to the president. They have
Speaker 1: wanted this and they did not get what they wanted
Speaker 1: in Butler, Pennsylvania, and nothing has changed. Tony Katz, Tony
Speaker 1: Katz Today, that is me, that is the show. It's
Speaker 1: a pleasure to be with. You find everything I do
Speaker 1: at Tony katz dot com. Live streaming on YouTube, just
Speaker 1: go to Tony Kat's Rumble, Tony Kat's great platform, Love
Speaker 1: the Rumble, and then of course on Twitter which is
Speaker 1: known as x Tony Katas and Facebook Tony kats Radio.
Speaker 1: That's all the places you can find us. Go be
Speaker 1: a part of the show, getting the chatroom hit like subscribe,
Speaker 1: do all the things if you would.
Speaker 2: So we have this arrest.
Speaker 1: We know that this man has been detained, a thirty
Speaker 1: eight year old of Downey, California. He was carrying a
Speaker 1: sixteen round magazine loaded with hollow points in his pants pocket.
Speaker 2: Now he just had the magazine.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's allowed to have a magazine unless, of course,
Speaker 1: there's a reason why he's not. Because the local reporting
Speaker 1: from KTLA says that he has a handgun and the ammunition.
Speaker 1: He wasn't just carrying a magazine just by itself loose
Speaker 1: at his home. They found an I legally modified AR
Speaker 1: Star style rifle. Learn how to talk, Tony. Just so
Speaker 1: we remember AR does not stand for assault rifle. Just
Speaker 1: want you just need the lefties to know these things.
Speaker 1: A nineteen eleven forty five caliber pistol, an AR platform,
Speaker 1: upper receiver, body armor, high capacity magazines, a large quantity
Speaker 1: of pistol and rifle ammunition.
Speaker 2: I don't know what large quantity is.
Speaker 1: Notebooks containing what investigators describe as concerning statements, and two
Speaker 1: radio signal devices.
Speaker 2: Well, that's the part that you should be paying attention to.
Speaker 1: That's the part that you should be paying attention to.
Speaker 1: Why would you need well, why would you need radios?
Speaker 1: Who's on the other end of the radio. The investigation,
Speaker 1: according to the Sheriff's Department, is being conducted in close
Speaker 1: coordination with the FBI Joined Terrorism Task Force and the
Speaker 1: US Secret Service. I'll say it again for the people
Speaker 1: in the cheaps seats. The objective of all of these
Speaker 1: talking heads is the harm to the President of the
Speaker 1: United States. The objective was to bring harm and to
Speaker 1: intimidate Supreme Court justices under Joe Biden when no protection
Speaker 1: was given to Justice Kavanaugh, and we now are forced
Speaker 1: to ask the question about whether or not that has
Speaker 1: changed justice Amy Cony Barrett. Some people have called on
Speaker 1: her to walk away. You're not built for this. They're
Speaker 1: going to try and scare you and threaten your children
Speaker 1: every day to get the results they want on the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. That's what they want to do. I can
Speaker 1: understand the concern. I can also understand that you can't
Speaker 1: bow down to this. I understand why you went to
Speaker 1: Congress said we need more for security. What do you
Speaker 1: think is happening here? This is a danger. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: put the Supreme Court justices in danger. Wanted to him
Speaker 1: and the cabal that was running the country. Never think
Speaker 1: a good thought of Joe Biden. Wish the man well
Speaker 1: and leave it be. His legacy is one of unbelievable, unmitigated,
Speaker 1: undoubted failure, of lies, of fraud, of deceit, of hating
Speaker 1: the American people. That's who Joe Biden is. The history
Speaker 1: books should write it.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 1: It could be that this guy is just mentally disturbed.
Speaker 1: It could be that this guy is just just a
Speaker 1: little bit nutty.
Speaker 2: It could be nothing. I mean.
Speaker 1: When we say body armor. I just want to make
Speaker 1: sure we understand are we talking about a bulletproof vest.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's a weird thing for someone to
Speaker 1: have an AR platform upper receiver. Well, if they build
Speaker 1: their own firearms, I don't think that that is something
Speaker 1: odd to have a nineteen eleven can I share? I've
Speaker 1: never been a gun guy, and I'm gonna get yelled at.
Speaker 2: Gonna. I am about to get yelled at. In ways.
Speaker 1: I am a Second Amendment guy. I would never call
Speaker 1: myself a gun guy. And the reason that I'm not
Speaker 1: is that it takes a lot of study. That's not
Speaker 1: where I ever found my interest. I'm also one of
Speaker 1: the few people I know I can't stand shooting.
Speaker 2: You know, if people go to the range and they
Speaker 2: love going to the range, I can't stand it. I
Speaker 2: have never ever ever liked it.
Speaker 1: I have always found it to be a tedious exercise.
Speaker 1: It's like listening to Rosi o' donald tell me about
Speaker 1: her healthy habits. It's just exhausting, and as opposed to
Speaker 1: Rosi o' donald, it goes on for forever. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get yelled at. I always have been about this. I
Speaker 1: am absolutely a guy. I am vehement in my defense.
Speaker 1: It's just not where I find my relaxation in everything
Speaker 1: else when it comes to firearms, which bring me to
Speaker 1: the comments where Brian says every gun person has at
Speaker 1: least one nineteen eleven.
Speaker 2: It's not comfortable. And this is where I'm gonna get
Speaker 2: yelled at. I know I'm gonna get yelled at. I
Speaker 2: know it's coming. Just do it, get it over with.
Speaker 2: It's fine. I hear you.
Speaker 1: I just and you have to get you the crux
Speaker 1: of your hands in there. And I just don't.
Speaker 2: Don't. I know.
Speaker 1: Maybe I just haven't done it right. Maybe I haven't
Speaker 1: engaged in enough. It could totally be me. I would
Speaker 1: never tell somebody not to have a nineteen eleven. I
Speaker 1: am saying I have tried it, and I have said no, thanks.
Speaker 2: Oh you want to talk about unpopular onions? There it is.
Speaker 2: Do I think owning a nineteen eleven is weird? No.
Speaker 1: So there's a whole series of things on this list
Speaker 1: that are meant to sound scary. I don't know what
Speaker 1: any of it is yet, Like the actual weaponry doesn't
Speaker 1: sound scary to me at all, doesn't sound scary in
Speaker 1: the slightest. I'm curious what the notebooks contain. I'm curious
Speaker 1: about concerned about the two radio signal devices. What in
Speaker 1: the world does that mean? But more than anything, we
Speaker 1: need to understand that there is still an objective, that
Speaker 1: there has been nothing that has been toned down, tamped
Speaker 1: down by the left. It is still at a fevered pitch.
Speaker 1: Should it stop, of course it should stop. Will it stop?
Speaker 1: Absolutely not, absolutely not. The objective is to do harm,
Speaker 1: and they have come to not only want this, but
Speaker 1: to accept this, to value.
Speaker 2: This, to well rationalize it. I should say, wait, we
Speaker 2: have to do this. Trump's just a threat.
Speaker 1: Once we get rid of Trump, then everything can be fine,
Speaker 1: everything can go back to normal. It was like when
Speaker 1: The New York Times was in Trump's first term. They
Speaker 1: were talking about the fact that they had to go
Speaker 1: against their principles and go against journalistsic integrity because Trump
Speaker 1: was such a threat. But now that Trump lost to
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, feel the air quotes, I do that something
Speaker 1: just to drive people crazy. Now now we can get
Speaker 1: back to real journalism. They said that, like anybody would
Speaker 1: ever trust the New York Times Again, I put forth
Speaker 1: to you that this is everything they have wanted, everything
Speaker 1: they have put together, everything they have tried to achieve.
Speaker 1: I am not surprised that there is somebody out there who,
Speaker 1: in my view take on this situation, this is somebody
Speaker 1: who was looking to do harm. Now innocent until proven guilty.
Speaker 1: I can wait for more information, but I think the
Speaker 1: story is well known. I don't think there's anything.
Speaker 2: Left amongst the left to say that it wasn't what
Speaker 2: it was.
Speaker 1: It was a guy looking for an opportunity to see
Speaker 1: where his opportunity would be. That's my take, and I
Speaker 1: say it very clearly. I don't like jumping ahead. I
Speaker 1: don't like rushing ahead. I want to get all the
Speaker 1: data I have. This This says to me that this
Speaker 1: is somebody looking to do harm. I'll let the investigation
Speaker 1: go forward. But do I believe that the left is
Speaker 1: still looking for someone to do harm? Sadly yes, And
Speaker 1: they have done nothing to temper my thought on this,
Speaker 1: nothing at all, speaking of doing harm? Can we discuss
Speaker 1: the unwillingness to discuss an actual harm? Plus Rand Paul's
Speaker 1: resolution on the condemnation and the contempt of Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 1: That's all coming up. Keep it here. This is Tony
Speaker 1: Kats today, Senator rand Paul bringing forth the contempt resolution
Speaker 1: against Anthony Fauci Tony Katz. Tony Katz today, I'm happy
Speaker 1: to see it. There should be no moments where Anthony
Speaker 1: Fauci is allowed to think that he is a good,
Speaker 1: decent man or a worthy public servant.
Speaker 2: He's a terrible person who.
Speaker 1: Lied to America, I argue as engaged in crimes, and
Speaker 1: he should have to stand trial for those crimes, regardless
Speaker 1: of the preemptive pardon given by Joe Biden. And I
Speaker 1: still am one of the people who absolutely believes that
Speaker 1: this was not signed by Joe Biden. There's no way
Speaker 1: Joe Biden had any mind of what was The autopen
Speaker 1: is a thing, and there is no way that this
Speaker 1: can absolve him. The pardons should be ripped to shreds,
Speaker 1: and we should be proactive in the legal actions against
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci for lying, for committing this fraud. If I
Speaker 1: am unable to move through the legal system, then we
Speaker 1: have to do a part two, which is ensure that
Speaker 1: when it comes to legacy, it is forever.
Speaker 2: In the names of those who are.
Speaker 1: Well the most horrifying members of the American experiment, starting
Speaker 1: with and including Benedict Arnold. Senator Paul putting out on
Speaker 1: X authorizing the President of the Senate to certify the
Speaker 1: report of the Committee of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Speaker 1: of the Senate regarding the refusal of doctor Anthony Fauci
Speaker 1: to answer questions pertinent to the subject under inquiry before
Speaker 1: the Committee as required by Committee subpoena. Privately, he would
Speaker 1: acknowledge natural immunity in public.
Speaker 2: He was saying, Oh, we just don't know.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot of public and private disparity, and
Speaker 1: I think that's really what's caught him up.
Speaker 2: And I think people don't like that hypocrisy.
Speaker 3: Well, you.
Speaker 2: Are getting it right there, the Senator of Paul.
Speaker 1: Whereas the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of
Speaker 1: the Senate is conducting an investigation into, among other matters,
Speaker 1: risky life sciences research and the origins of the COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen virus. You know that Senator Paul is really focused
Speaker 1: on this gain of function research issue.
Speaker 2: That's what really moves him.
Speaker 1: We were funding a lab in China to figure out
Speaker 1: how to manipulate viruses to do us harm.
Speaker 2: It's insane.
Speaker 1: So it continues that July nine, twenty twenty six, doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci appeared before the Committee and delivered prepared testimony discussing
Speaker 1: his tenure as federal government employee prior testimony to Congress
Speaker 1: and records released by the Committee as part of its investigation.
Speaker 1: He concluded his testimony by saying his intent to refuse
Speaker 1: and answer refuse to answer questions sorry posed by the Committee,
Speaker 1: citing the right against self incrimination under the Fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: to the Constitution of the United States. It then mentions
Speaker 1: the fact that he got the pardon. When he was
Speaker 1: asked questions pertinent under the inquiry, he refused to answer,
Speaker 1: citing the Fifth Amendment. Chairman Paul says the privilege of
Speaker 1: the Fifth Amendment is unsupported is applied to questions pertaining
Speaker 1: to the period of pardon and directed doctor Fauci to answer.
Speaker 1: And it's Chairman Paul who further found that doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: waived his right to claim the privilege as a result
Speaker 1: of his opening testimony on subject matter pertinent to the
Speaker 1: questions under inquiry. We hinted at this, I should have
Speaker 1: hit it harder. Fauci said that he would not answer
Speaker 1: a question right. He said, I'm not going to answer
Speaker 1: any questions based on the advice of counsel.
Speaker 2: But that isn't how he started.
Speaker 1: He started by going directly at Senator Ran Paul. He
Speaker 1: started by saying that the Senator was obsessed with him.
Speaker 2: Let's go back.
Speaker 3: Answering questions about the very issues that are now the
Speaker 3: subject of this hearing. However, given Senator Paul's obvious obsession
Speaker 3: with calling for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me,
Speaker 3: and recently his publicly releasing my unredacted personal diary aimed
Speaker 3: at embarrassing and intimidating me, the only conclusion I can
Speaker 3: reach is that the sole reason he is calling me
Speaker 3: before this committee is to get me to say something,
Speaker 3: anything that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I
Speaker 3: end up in his words, quote behind bars unquote any
Speaker 3: reasonable person who has followed.
Speaker 1: His But you're talking about the situation, and what Senator
Speaker 1: Paul is saying is that you have indeed opened yourself up.
Speaker 1: You can't claim the fifth if you've already gone down
Speaker 1: this road. I agree with this, by the way. So
Speaker 1: now we've got the contempt, we'll see where it goes.
Speaker 1: And we also discovered that Anthony Fauci had asked Deborah
Speaker 1: burgh Works, you know, the doctor with the scarves. Hey,
Speaker 1: I'm going to be out for a day, but would
Speaker 1: you do me favorite when you push back hard on
Speaker 1: the Great Barrington Declaration Great Barrington. This was doctors and
Speaker 1: health professionals who in October of twenty twenty signed a
Speaker 1: letter that said, sorry, government's doing this all wrong. These lockdowns,
Speaker 1: this fear, this is all dangerous stuff. That we're doing
Speaker 1: this wrong. This is not what the science says. The
Speaker 1: Great Barrington Declaration is extremely important, extremely important, and I
Speaker 1: have it in full over there at Tony Katz dot com.
Speaker 2: You can check it out for yourself.
Speaker 1: It was a statement to say that, in fact, these
Speaker 1: experts around the globe are being silenced.
Speaker 2: Here's what we have to say.
Speaker 1: We're putting it out there for the world to see
Speaker 1: that what you're hearing isn't accurate. These people were pushed
Speaker 1: to the side, brushed aside, and still buy our media,
Speaker 1: mocked and shunned. And it was Fauci's trying to direct
Speaker 1: other people. Make sure you attack this, make sure you
Speaker 1: go after that. Not let's debate the science. But he
Speaker 1: still believes he was the science, and now he believes
Speaker 1: he is.
Speaker 2: The law contempt. There we go, Let's see what happens next.
Speaker 2: Keep it here.
Speaker 1: This is Tony Kats today. Three more things, Tony Kats,
Speaker 1: Tony Katz today.
Speaker 2: What are three more things? I will tell you three
Speaker 2: more things.
Speaker 1: These are stories that should be front page news, but
Speaker 1: because everything on the front page, they don't make the
Speaker 1: front page.
Speaker 2: So I bring them to you.
Speaker 1: Of course, we've got some supposed deal with Iran, which
Speaker 1: is not a deal. Then you have ad I'll say it,
Speaker 1: winning the primary in Michigan. You had a couple of
Speaker 1: DSA communists winning their primaries house races. This was the
Speaker 1: center race against Haley Stevens. Hally Stevens has already come
Speaker 1: out to say I'm gonna support El Sad and help
Speaker 1: him win.
Speaker 2: Well, what else was she going to say? I guess.
Speaker 1: Bad, bad, bad news for Democrats. It is the hardest
Speaker 1: thing for them because the party was split.
Speaker 2: In the vote. They were split, and that split.
Speaker 1: Creates for them an absolutely incredibly difficult issue. How do
Speaker 1: they get people into one headspace? How do they get
Speaker 1: them to buy in to this guy who is gonna
Speaker 1: have a real problem with with independent voters, with Jewish voters.
Speaker 1: I mean he called today, he called Israel blood thirsty dude, listen.
Speaker 2: We know you want to replace Hassan Piker.
Speaker 1: At the top of the list of bigoted Kamis who
Speaker 1: have an audience at the University of Michigan by the
Speaker 1: University of Michigan. We're all in favor of Dulasi ed.
Speaker 1: You don't send your kids to the University of Michigan.
Speaker 1: Stop telling me about go blue. It's not go blue,
Speaker 1: it's go blow just right out. And by the way,
Speaker 1: you know I'm on in Detroit, right. I know when
Speaker 1: I say that, I'm going to get yelled at, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna get hit so hard, and I feel bad about it.
Speaker 2: Right, But it's it is true.
Speaker 1: It is true that school more and more and more
Speaker 1: and more vehemently to the left. Oh and also, and
Speaker 1: by the way, Grace, I'm totally with you. Black voters
Speaker 1: don't want this stuff. Black voters, well, certainly they don't
Speaker 1: think like in a monolithic block. Black voters realize that
Speaker 1: their interests are being pushed aside for communists and Islamists.
Speaker 1: Nobody cares about them still being taken for granted by
Speaker 1: the political left. Black voters should be Republicans. You can
Speaker 1: actually get something done. People will listen to you. The left,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter, doesn't care about.
Speaker 2: You at all. Right that those are just the facts.
Speaker 1: But we talked about the level of issue this is
Speaker 1: for the Democrats. They've got all these disparate groups who're like,
Speaker 1: we don't want any part of them.
Speaker 2: Do I'll say it.
Speaker 1: This was Fox News Harris Faulkner talking to the former
Speaker 1: congressman from Utah, Jason Jaffits.
Speaker 4: I think this is the worst case scenario for the Democrats.
Speaker 4: I mean, even Chuck Schumer couldn't get his arms around
Speaker 4: whether or not he would endorse him if he actually
Speaker 4: got the nomination. So it's a party divided in its
Speaker 4: best case scenario.
Speaker 2: But they haven't figured out who they are, what they
Speaker 2: believe in. They don't have a leader.
Speaker 4: Then nationally, the fundraising has been an emic, down to
Speaker 4: almost zero nationally, and you have people like James Carvill
Speaker 4: and others that are saying, hey, I can't support.
Speaker 2: And get behind this. And that did to have it be.
Speaker 4: So close, it wasn't dominated one direction or another. That
Speaker 4: is the worst case scenario for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: Correct, absolutely correct, It splits them in two. There's no
Speaker 1: oh saying, well, seventy eight percent of Democrats went for
Speaker 1: this guy, So we go for this guy.
Speaker 2: It makes sense. No half the people thinks he sucks.
Speaker 1: Bad bad result for the Democrat. Can he still win?
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, yes he could still win. Can Republicans still
Speaker 1: screw this up? They're Republicans, they were born to screw
Speaker 1: these things up. But also a solid point there from
Speaker 1: the former congressman about the fundraising. You understand that Democrats
Speaker 1: have no money mortgaging their own headquarters, They have no money.
Speaker 1: Where is it coming from. Where is the support coming from?
Speaker 1: The financial support? And how much are we gonna throw
Speaker 1: at this to ensure that else I d never sees
Speaker 1: the Senate. That's the question. But I said I had
Speaker 1: three more things, and I do because I do not
Speaker 1: lie about these things. The first is Susan Collins. Susan
Speaker 1: Collins has decided that she is going to be a
Speaker 1: no vote on Todd Blanche. Todd Blanche, of course the
Speaker 1: attorney general, the acting attorney general. Trump wants him to
Speaker 1: be the attorney general. He got through committee, and now
Speaker 1: Susan Collins is saying, no, I'm not going to support him.
Speaker 1: This was Todd Blanche speaking about that.
Speaker 5: Turned about anything new with my responsibility to you know
Speaker 5: if I'm confirmed in the next couple of days compared
Speaker 5: to what my responsibilities have been really since March of
Speaker 5: last year, but obviously.
Speaker 1: Since April this year as well. So all right, thanks
Speaker 1: a lock, I said, I'm not concerned about that. My
Speaker 1: responsibilities are still my responsibilities. I think a lot of
Speaker 1: people are going to look at Susan Collins and say,
Speaker 1: all this conversation about Maine, all this noticing what kind
Speaker 1: of lowlife, garbage, nazi and alleged sexual abuser Graham Platner is,
Speaker 1: and you're gonna vote no. You, Susan Collins voted to
Speaker 1: confirm Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland, You're not gonna vote to
Speaker 1: confirm Todd Blanche because now, all of a sudden he's
Speaker 1: a problem because the Justice Department has become too politicized.
Speaker 1: That's what she said. While I believe mister Blanche is
Speaker 1: a capable lawyer, the Department of Justice has become increasingly political.
Speaker 1: Mister Blanche has taken several actions that have further eroted
Speaker 1: the Department's independence, and that is the basis for my
Speaker 1: vote to oppose his confirmation. That is a wholy unserious statement,
Speaker 1: unsirious and I said, my god, why in the world
Speaker 1: did anybody support her during.
Speaker 2: This process? Why in the world will we do this?
Speaker 1: And then I said, wait a second, Maybe that's the
Speaker 1: answer I put forth to you.
Speaker 2: What if?
Speaker 1: What if now this is some five D chess kind
Speaker 1: of deep in the weeds.
Speaker 2: Kind of a thing.
Speaker 1: What if she needed to come out against him so
Speaker 1: she could appease some independence in Maine, to show to
Speaker 1: show everybody that she isn't some kind of Trump puppet,
Speaker 1: she's her own woman, and that this was okayed by
Speaker 1: Senate leadership. What that's not possible? Of course that's possible.
Speaker 1: The question is is it probable? And right now I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you I'm a little fifty to fifty on it.
Speaker 1: There is not a rational reason for her not to
Speaker 1: be okay with Blanche as the ag.
Speaker 2: None.
Speaker 1: You can't say Merrick Garland was fine and Todd Blanche
Speaker 1: is an issue.
Speaker 2: It's just it's an impossibility. So the only thing I
Speaker 2: can come to is.
Speaker 1: She needed a way to show the people of Maine
Speaker 1: that she's her own woman. Take the wind out of
Speaker 1: Troy Jackson sale. Troy Jackson is the guy who they
Speaker 1: picked to replace the Nazi and alleged sexual abuser, Graham Platiner. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the guy who is having sex with his cousin. Right, No, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to tell a joke. He has two
Speaker 1: children with a second cousin.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, no.
Speaker 1: From what I'm told, the family reunions are great. They're
Speaker 1: happening daily. You're not supposed to tell jokes about this, Okay, okay,
Speaker 1: our hunter Biden cocaine jokes still allowed. No, those are
Speaker 1: also not allowed. Any what left? What else are we
Speaker 1: allowed to joke about? Anything else?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: Rans Paul getting his ribs broken by his neighbor. That's allowed.
Speaker 1: Everything else not allowed? Got it, got it understood. Thanks,
Speaker 1: I appreciate the update. Whew, that's Susan Collins. Then there
Speaker 1: is Senator Fune talking about the Save Acts. That this
Speaker 1: thing is not passed is an absolute sin on every
Speaker 1: single level.
Speaker 2: It is a sin. It is wrong, it is.
Speaker 1: Insane, and Fune does not look pleased that he hass
Speaker 1: to answer the questions the Senate Majority leader, why in
Speaker 1: the world can we not pass the Save Act?
Speaker 2: What's going on on here? Well?
Speaker 6: Listen by the President when he says he wants you
Speaker 6: to stay in session.
Speaker 4: Wants you to pass the Save America Act.
Speaker 2: Well, I think the President.
Speaker 6: I've heard from a couple of times this morning on
Speaker 6: issues that he cares about. I wouldn't say I'm isolated, No.
Speaker 6: I mean, I've been very clear about the prospects for
Speaker 6: the Save America Act. And the only thing I've said
Speaker 6: all along is there are one We have voted on
Speaker 6: the Save America Act five times.
Speaker 2: It was the pending.
Speaker 6: Business on the floor of the Senate for over two weeks,
Speaker 6: and I am willing to in any way possible get
Speaker 6: that across the finish line if there is a path
Speaker 6: to do it. But there are two realities and two
Speaker 6: facts you have to deal with. And the first is
Speaker 6: there are no Democrats we're going to vote for this.
Speaker 6: All forty seven voted against the Save Act five times.
Speaker 6: So let's make this an issue in the campaign. How
Speaker 6: about we go out and turn our fire on Democrats
Speaker 6: and make it about them opposing the Save Act. So
Speaker 6: we're not that's the point. So we're not getting any Democrats.
Speaker 6: The second thing is we are not getting rid of
Speaker 6: the legulated philibuster. The volts aren't there to do that.
Speaker 6: I've made it abundantly clear many many times, and it
Speaker 6: seems to me some days that I'm the only one
Speaker 6: here can count to fifty in this town. But we
Speaker 6: don't have the votes to get rid of the filibuster.
Speaker 1: Let's now stop for a moment and address these two things.
Speaker 1: He is saying on the filibuster that they can't get
Speaker 1: to the fifty. He is not making the argument that
Speaker 1: we shouldn't get rid of the filibuster. He is making
Speaker 1: the argument that we don't have fifty votes to get
Speaker 1: rid of the filibuster. Oh oh, so who do we
Speaker 1: have to apply pressure to? Who needs a phone call?
Speaker 1: Who needs to be told to get this done? That's
Speaker 1: number one center of them. But let's continue this by
Speaker 1: taking a look at how we turn it. You want
Speaker 1: to use it as a campaign piece, you can go
Speaker 1: right ahead and use it as a campaign piece.
Speaker 2: But we need a past.
Speaker 1: So what maneuvers can you utilize to get this voter
Speaker 1: ID done?
Speaker 2: I think that the Center is looking at this in
Speaker 2: the wrong way.
Speaker 1: You need to be looking at your data in the
Speaker 1: right way, which is privately.
Speaker 2: Your name is out there, your.
Speaker 1: Email address, medical conditions, your kids' names, it's in a file,
Speaker 1: and that file is being sold everywhere. It's your information
Speaker 1: and that information should be kept private, but anyone with
Speaker 1: a credit card can buy it. It's this multi billion
Speaker 1: dollar industry of data brokers, and your file gets collected, packaged, sold,
Speaker 1: and they have these phishing texts. They know way too
Speaker 1: much about you. That's all because they have your information.
Speaker 1: They did not get lucky. The scammers got prepared, and
Speaker 1: it's costing Americans twenty billion dollars plus each and every year.
Speaker 2: Change the game.
Speaker 1: Get prepared using cogni I n cog n i in
Speaker 1: cognity dot com, going broker by broker, forcing each one
Speaker 1: of them to delete your files. And when your data
Speaker 1: tries to creep back on boom, Incognity makes it disappear.
Speaker 1: Utilize my last name cats and get sixty percent off
Speaker 1: right now to protect you and your family. Go to
Speaker 1: incogny incognity dot com slash cats right now for sixty
Speaker 1: percent off. That's in cogni dot com slash cats. Katz.
Speaker 1: Take your private life off the market, keep it here.
Speaker 1: It's Tony Kats today. Not to make it more crazy
Speaker 1: for anybody out there, but Chipotle stock is falling because
Speaker 1: there's a possible link to salmonella in Minnesota. That's I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. It's not my fault.
Speaker 1: And get the steak Tony Katz, Tony Katz today an
Speaker 1: absolute pleasure to be with you. Chipotle has also removed salmon,
Speaker 1: removedanos that are linked to the salmonella outbreak from its restaurants.
Speaker 1: They think that that could be the source. So we've
Speaker 1: got the cyclospariasis, which is the explosive diarrhea, which two
Speaker 1: people lost their lives in Michigan because of the cyclosporiasis.
Speaker 1: This is no longer funny. And now you've got Chipotle
Speaker 1: having salmonilla. They think it's the alpinos. They think it's
Speaker 1: just Minnesota. So, you know, let's not completely lose our
Speaker 1: heads here. I'm gonna say it again for the people
Speaker 1: in the cheap seats.
Speaker 2: Is it me or man?
Speaker 1: Are there a lot of recalls lately, Like over the
Speaker 1: past five years, this has become out of control. Are
Speaker 1: we better at noticing things or have we gotten worse
Speaker 1: at being able to stop them before they come a problem?
Speaker 2: Which? What is it? There's a recall every dang day.
Speaker 2: It's it's it is an issue.
Speaker 1: It is a thing, and I'm I'm curious where this
Speaker 1: should we take a look at Chipotle's stock.
Speaker 2: Stock price. Hell on, where is Chipotle right now? Now?
Speaker 1: Chimotle's is fine right now. I mean it might have
Speaker 1: taken a little tip. Oh no, I took other dig
Speaker 1: more than.
Speaker 2: A little dip.
Speaker 1: So on the third of August it was a thirty seven,
Speaker 1: and on the fourth of August it ended at thirty three.
Speaker 2: That's not.
Speaker 1: That's not a massive tip. They'll be back from this,
Speaker 1: and also extra guacamoli place. This is Tony Kat today.