WEBVTT - Mac & Bone Show - Sam Farber Interview 

0:00:00.110 --> 0:00:02.790
<v Speaker 1>Sam Barber, voice of the Hornets on the radio side,

0:00:02.850 --> 0:00:05.170
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the Mac and Bone Show.

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.420
<v Speaker 2>Sam, how's Phoenix treating you, man? What's going on?

0:00:08.539 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Phoenix is beautiful, but I got so many questions. Did

0:00:10.780 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 3>I miss an engagement? Did something happen here?

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 4>No, Phinney's just been dating a girl for a month.

0:00:18.220 --> 0:00:21.860
<v Speaker 2>I might have gotten a little overzealous, Sammy.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.770
<v Speaker 4>We're really wanting another WFNZ wedding to happen. We might

0:00:25.810 --> 0:00:29.090
<v Speaker 4>be trying to force it here one day.

0:00:29.130 --> 0:00:32.950
<v Speaker 3>Trying to speak it into existence. I thought maybe I

0:00:32.970 --> 0:00:35.570
<v Speaker 3>miss a bit, but I do that. But no, I

0:00:35.610 --> 0:00:38.450
<v Speaker 3>didn't do that this time, so there you go. Nothing

0:00:38.470 --> 0:00:39.350
<v Speaker 3>for the Urkel reference?

0:00:39.530 --> 0:00:39.850
<v Speaker 4>Nothing?

0:00:40.070 --> 0:00:40.950
<v Speaker 3>No? Not good enough?

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.409
<v Speaker 2>I missed you. One flew over my head there.

0:00:45.470 --> 0:00:47.769
<v Speaker 4>No, you got me on that one there. You're on

0:00:48.130 --> 0:00:50.409
<v Speaker 4>your West Coast tie, but you still got your game

0:00:50.450 --> 0:00:51.610
<v Speaker 4>going on there, Sammy.

0:00:51.970 --> 0:00:52.990
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying.

0:00:53.050 --> 0:00:53.570
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying.

0:00:53.650 --> 0:00:56.470
<v Speaker 1>Sam, what did you think of the Hornets the other night?

0:00:56.850 --> 0:01:00.390
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine that you, in your seat, calling the game,

0:01:00.910 --> 0:01:04.810
<v Speaker 1>you had to have the same exhilaration watching the shots

0:01:04.850 --> 0:01:06.750
<v Speaker 1>go in that Hornet fans did.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.380
<v Speaker 3>I mean, specifically being here in Arizona, it felt like,

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, water for someone thirsty in the desert. The

0:01:16.700 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 3>team not only had been at the bottom in so

0:01:19.380 --> 0:01:22.710
<v Speaker 3>many offenses, statistical categories, but it was odd because we

0:01:22.750 --> 0:01:24.770
<v Speaker 3>were 10 games in and there hadn't even been an

0:01:24.930 --> 0:01:27.890
<v Speaker 3>outlier yet where, you know, usually a team that's, you know,

0:01:28.750 --> 0:01:30.750
<v Speaker 3>an outright bad team. And I don't think the Hornets are,

0:01:30.830 --> 0:01:32.790
<v Speaker 3>for the record. They are not a bad team shooting

0:01:32.810 --> 0:01:34.450
<v Speaker 3>the ball. But even a team that would be a

0:01:34.490 --> 0:01:37.569
<v Speaker 3>bad team shooting would have a off night in the

0:01:37.630 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 3>opposite direction and shoot 40% from three and just run

0:01:41.140 --> 0:01:43.620
<v Speaker 3>into a decent shooting day. That hadn't happened at all

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.540
<v Speaker 3>for Charlotte. So it felt very much overdue for the team.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.940
<v Speaker 3>Not to say that shooting 50% from three should be

0:01:51.060 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 3>expected as the norm because there's not a team in

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>NBA history that's really demonstrated that. But it did feel

0:01:57.260 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>closer to what I think we can expect on a

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.250
<v Speaker 3>routine basis because there's a track record for these guys.

0:02:02.330 --> 0:02:06.010
<v Speaker 3>They are accustomed to knocking down shots throughout their career.

0:02:06.050 --> 0:02:10.270
<v Speaker 3>So it was well overdue in general. It was badly

0:02:10.330 --> 0:02:13.070
<v Speaker 3>needed to snap that six game slide. And hopefully it's

0:02:13.090 --> 0:02:15.669
<v Speaker 3>something that can continue here because the beginning of this

0:02:15.730 --> 0:02:19.070
<v Speaker 3>road trip does offer some opportunities to put some more

0:02:19.650 --> 0:02:20.290
<v Speaker 3>W's in the column.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Sam, how close do you think Kobe White is to

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 4>becoming the full Kobe after the time off and the injury?

0:02:28.020 --> 0:02:32.970
<v Speaker 3>He does, from a physical, his movement standpoint, look closer

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.290
<v Speaker 3>and closer with every game. And having that trust in

0:02:37.310 --> 0:02:40.390
<v Speaker 3>that calf to have the kind of explosiveness that we

0:02:40.430 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 3>grew accustomed to late in the last season, You know,

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 3>that that's something that's badly needed for this team. At

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the same time, you obviously you can't afford a relapse here. So,

0:02:50.220 --> 0:02:53.530
<v Speaker 3>you know, taking Kobe at whatever percentage you would say

0:02:53.590 --> 0:02:56.830
<v Speaker 3>he is right now is better than not having him

0:02:56.889 --> 0:02:59.450
<v Speaker 3>at all on the floor, particularly with Dennis Schroeder being

0:02:59.530 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 3>out for a couple of weeks. So it's really hard

0:03:02.690 --> 0:03:04.820
<v Speaker 3>to say he's the one who knows his body the best.

0:03:05.550 --> 0:03:08.010
<v Speaker 3>But I do think he has been making great strides,

0:03:08.070 --> 0:03:10.630
<v Speaker 3>not just getting on the court, period, end of sentence,

0:03:10.690 --> 0:03:13.419
<v Speaker 3>but actually looking more and more like himself out there.

0:03:13.460 --> 0:03:15.740
<v Speaker 3>And last game, even though the shots haven't been falling,

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.389
<v Speaker 3>he had, I think, a nine-assist contest. So that's exactly

0:03:19.430 --> 0:03:20.609
<v Speaker 3>what the Hornets need right now.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.290
<v Speaker 1>We're talking with Sam Farber, voice of your Charlotte Hornets.

0:03:24.750 --> 0:03:28.290
<v Speaker 1>Hornets start the road trip out west tonight, Phoenix, 9

0:03:28.290 --> 0:03:31.780
<v Speaker 1>o'clock game. So 8 o'clock for Bone and KB on

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.020
<v Speaker 1>the pregame. Next game will be in L.A.

0:03:35.540 --> 0:03:36.370
<v Speaker 2>On Sunday.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.850
<v Speaker 1>A Sunday afternoon tilt, which will be 4.30 our time

0:03:40.890 --> 0:03:45.910
<v Speaker 1>for the game, 3.30 pregame. Sam, I apologize in advance

0:03:46.070 --> 0:03:49.630
<v Speaker 1>if you get a distracted T-bone during the pregame show

0:03:49.850 --> 0:03:52.850
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. The Panthers will be probably in the middle

0:03:52.890 --> 0:03:55.770
<v Speaker 1>of a stressful ending while you guys are talking on

0:03:55.790 --> 0:03:56.790
<v Speaker 1>the pregame show.

0:03:57.110 --> 0:03:58.410
<v Speaker 2>Oh, no.

0:03:58.710 --> 0:04:02.420
<v Speaker 3>Usually the NBA does a really good job of avoiding

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>the heart of these– These football windows, basically. And this one,

0:04:09.100 --> 0:04:11.060
<v Speaker 3>they just put it right smack dab in the middle.

0:04:11.140 --> 0:04:13.260
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where the Clippers have to get to

0:04:13.580 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>that they need to fly out earlier, but it's a

0:04:17.540 --> 0:04:19.380
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a surprise that they couldn't put that

0:04:19.490 --> 0:04:21.789
<v Speaker 3>one later. But I guess for T-bone sleep patterns, it

0:04:21.810 --> 0:04:22.469
<v Speaker 3>might be for the best.

0:04:23.070 --> 0:04:24.830
<v Speaker 2>Usually, we've had a lot of.

0:04:26.050 --> 0:04:29.010
<v Speaker 4>pregame shows that come on right at the very end

0:04:29.050 --> 0:04:30.150
<v Speaker 4>of a Panthers game.

0:04:30.230 --> 0:04:32.150
<v Speaker 2>But we don't normally have a.

0:04:32.529 --> 0:04:37.770
<v Speaker 4>Fourth quarter 331. But don't worry about my focus, Sam.

0:04:37.810 --> 0:04:39.580
<v Speaker 4>I've got my little gummies I can chew to keep

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 4>my focus.

0:04:40.620 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, no. I don't know that that's what they're talking about,

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:48.220
<v Speaker 3>what those gummies are for. I do think as a

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.060
<v Speaker 3>sports fan, this is perfection here. You can watch the

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.290
<v Speaker 3>Panthers on the TV and you can tune in on

0:04:55.290 --> 0:04:59.150
<v Speaker 3>92.7 Sports Radio WFNZ to the Hornets. You get both

0:04:59.290 --> 0:05:00.070
<v Speaker 3>at the same time.

0:05:00.150 --> 0:05:00.770
<v Speaker 2>There you go, Benny.

0:05:00.790 --> 0:05:01.150
<v Speaker 3>Wonderful.

0:05:01.170 --> 0:05:01.729
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:05:01.790 --> 0:05:05.750
<v Speaker 1>Sam, what do you think? The Lakers, that one feels like...

0:05:06.190 --> 0:05:08.110
<v Speaker 1>That feels like a hell of a challenge with the

0:05:08.150 --> 0:05:11.060
<v Speaker 1>way they're playing. That will be the Tuesday night game.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.100
<v Speaker 1>But these next two, at the risk of going so

0:05:14.180 --> 0:05:17.020
<v Speaker 1>far that I curse it, Sam, I will just tee

0:05:17.060 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you up for this. Talk to us about, obviously, we

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.580
<v Speaker 1>know Miles Bridges is now at Phoenix, so it'll be

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a reunion of sorts tonight. But it feels like games

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.580
<v Speaker 1>tonight against Phoenix and against the Clippers, it feels like

0:05:29.620 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>those games are winnable.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:31.790
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:05:32.850 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Most definitely they are. And I think any time you

0:05:35.950 --> 0:05:39.660
<v Speaker 3>go on the road, particularly to the West Coast, anything

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.500
<v Speaker 3>in the vicinity of 500 on the trip is a positive.

0:05:42.820 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 3>So for this one in particular, you know, to split

0:05:44.779 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 3>it and go two and two, that would be a

0:05:46.460 --> 0:05:50.789
<v Speaker 3>great success, particularly with it. the tonnage of injuries that

0:05:50.830 --> 0:05:52.810
<v Speaker 3>the Charlotte Hornets are facing right now. You go two

0:05:52.860 --> 0:05:55.299
<v Speaker 3>and two there, I think you're feeling really, really good

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.180
<v Speaker 3>about this trip. And that puts some added importance on

0:05:58.220 --> 0:06:01.300
<v Speaker 3>these games. It's not going to be easy. Phoenix is

0:06:01.339 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 3>coming off a victory. But if you look at the numbers,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.570
<v Speaker 3>the Hornets are the best rebounding team in the NBA,

0:06:07.589 --> 0:06:10.110
<v Speaker 3>depending on which category you look at, either one or

0:06:10.150 --> 0:06:12.289
<v Speaker 3>at least top five. and depending on which category you

0:06:12.310 --> 0:06:15.089
<v Speaker 3>look at, Phoenix is either the worst or bottom five.

0:06:15.370 --> 0:06:17.370
<v Speaker 3>So I think rebounding is going to be a really

0:06:17.430 --> 0:06:20.350
<v Speaker 3>big key. The Suns are facing some injury issues this season,

0:06:20.650 --> 0:06:23.380
<v Speaker 3>in particular their center, a guy we're familiar with, Mark Williams.

0:06:23.650 --> 0:06:25.190
<v Speaker 3>He has been out and will be out for an

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.340
<v Speaker 3>extended period of time. They've got other talent at that position,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.180
<v Speaker 3>but they're younger players, and they don't have the rebounding

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 3>pedigree of a Ryan Kalkbrenner or a Moussa Diabate who's

0:06:34.860 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 3>supposed to return tonight, or a Grant Williams who is probable.

0:06:37.900 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 3>to return tonight so I think there is a real

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>opportunity for Charlotte even if they relapse and don't have

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.700
<v Speaker 3>a great shooting effort if you can dominate the boards

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.350
<v Speaker 3>against a team that really struggles in that category you

0:06:48.370 --> 0:06:52.250
<v Speaker 3>might be able to attempt 15-20 extra shots and use

0:06:52.290 --> 0:06:54.029
<v Speaker 3>that as your advantage to get the win.

0:06:54.529 --> 0:06:56.690
<v Speaker 4>Sam we've talked a lot about the absence of Khan

0:06:56.750 --> 0:06:59.750
<v Speaker 4>and when Kobe was out maybe not so much about

0:06:59.830 --> 0:07:04.030
<v Speaker 4>Grant Williams what what does his return add and what

0:07:04.070 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 4>did they miss while he's been out I think.

0:07:06.810 --> 0:07:09.630
<v Speaker 3>There's just a level of consistency that you get with

0:07:09.690 --> 0:07:12.690
<v Speaker 3>Grant as a veteran of the position. It's not to

0:07:12.750 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 3>say that the production on a one- or two-night basis

0:07:16.380 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been there. I think we've seen really good play.

0:07:18.540 --> 0:07:21.620
<v Speaker 3>Tijon's second quarter the other day was magnificent. I don't

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.369
<v Speaker 3>know what more you would want from someone playing roughly.

0:07:24.750 --> 0:07:27.630
<v Speaker 3>the same position. And, you know, I think defensively, this

0:07:27.650 --> 0:07:30.170
<v Speaker 3>team has been really, really good over the course of

0:07:30.210 --> 0:07:33.370
<v Speaker 3>the season, despite not having Grant Williams out there. So

0:07:33.420 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 3>that's a credit to the coaching staff and to the

0:07:35.860 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 3>players filling in. But if we're being honest with ourselves,

0:07:38.500 --> 0:07:40.620
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's a reason why Grant Williams has been

0:07:40.660 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 3>in the league as long as he has with his,

0:07:43.260 --> 0:07:46.380
<v Speaker 3>you know, overall shooting ability for sure. But defensively and

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.930
<v Speaker 3>his toughness, Those are things that he's brought to several

0:07:48.990 --> 0:07:52.250
<v Speaker 3>organizations now, and we've missed that. So I think having

0:07:52.270 --> 0:07:55.740
<v Speaker 3>someone who has the level of consistency in those positions,

0:07:56.060 --> 0:07:58.540
<v Speaker 3>still leaving room for guys like Tijon and Liam McNeely

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.790
<v Speaker 3>to get in there and take those minutes as well.

0:08:01.310 --> 0:08:02.930
<v Speaker 3>But I think that will be an added boost to

0:08:02.970 --> 0:08:04.250
<v Speaker 3>shot the arm there for Charlotte.

0:08:04.910 --> 0:08:07.070
<v Speaker 2>Sam, I'm going to ask you about something.

0:08:07.090 --> 0:08:10.330
<v Speaker 1>We played a clip from the Bill Simmons podcast earlier

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.620
<v Speaker 1>where Rob Mahoney and Bill Simmons were talking about Brandon Miller,

0:08:15.060 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of thought what we've seen in this

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:23.140
<v Speaker 1>short sample without LaMelo, like... he is not a number

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>one guy on like a championship contender. Would you, I

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.550
<v Speaker 1>love Brandon, but I might say, eh, they're probably right.

0:08:30.730 --> 0:08:33.350
<v Speaker 1>Although he didn't have con with him. He didn't have

0:08:33.390 --> 0:08:35.329
<v Speaker 1>Kobe healthy. You know what I mean? He was, he

0:08:35.370 --> 0:08:37.730
<v Speaker 1>was kind of on his own there early in the season.

0:08:38.010 --> 0:08:40.809
<v Speaker 1>Would you push back on that? What do you think

0:08:40.870 --> 0:08:41.309
<v Speaker 1>about that?

0:08:42.150 --> 0:08:44.780
<v Speaker 3>I think what you said there, you know, nails it

0:08:44.860 --> 0:08:48.020
<v Speaker 3>is that it's at best and incomplete. I have the

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.089
<v Speaker 3>utmost respect. belief in Brandon and his game. And, you know,

0:08:52.179 --> 0:08:55.090
<v Speaker 3>we saw in those three straight 30-point performances, you know,

0:08:55.150 --> 0:08:57.110
<v Speaker 3>just how good of a score he can be. And that,

0:08:57.150 --> 0:08:59.910
<v Speaker 3>by the way, was with all the other injuries that

0:09:00.090 --> 0:09:03.070
<v Speaker 3>prevented him from having running mates and people to take

0:09:03.090 --> 0:09:06.059
<v Speaker 3>some of the pressure off of him from the opposition's defense.

0:09:06.740 --> 0:09:08.740
<v Speaker 3>But it's really hard to say, you know, I mean, like,

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.660
<v Speaker 3>look at Phoenix right now. Everyone loves Devin Booker out

0:09:11.700 --> 0:09:13.939
<v Speaker 3>here and sees him. You know, he's been a perennial all-star.

0:09:13.980 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 3>He's been an extremely high-level scorer, kind of like what

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.110
<v Speaker 3>we saw in that two-week span there. from Brandon Miller

0:09:19.170 --> 0:09:21.309
<v Speaker 3>before he got hurt. But he hasn't been able to

0:09:21.350 --> 0:09:23.770
<v Speaker 3>lead a team because he has not consistently had running

0:09:23.820 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 3>mates who were able to assist him to getting over

0:09:27.620 --> 0:09:29.620
<v Speaker 3>the hump. At least that's the theory of the case

0:09:29.700 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 3>here in Phoenix. So I would say it's early to

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:34.660
<v Speaker 3>make a call like that. I would love to see

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.510
<v Speaker 3>what this team looked like with Conniffle, with Kobe White,

0:09:39.010 --> 0:09:42.410
<v Speaker 3>with all these injured players back around Brandon Miller and

0:09:42.590 --> 0:09:45.090
<v Speaker 3>see what he does as a leader. Because I think

0:09:45.130 --> 0:09:47.700
<v Speaker 3>he has all the qualities and capabilities to do it.

0:09:48.050 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's a little unfair through, you know,

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.980
<v Speaker 3>10 games where he's kind of the only guy out

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.020
<v Speaker 3>there to say we have definitive proof that he is

0:09:56.110 --> 0:09:56.949
<v Speaker 3>or isn't anything.

0:09:57.410 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sam, uh we you are the man we

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:03.660
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you um you head back to us to uh

0:10:03.980 --> 0:10:06.500
<v Speaker 1>to cali um i know you're going to enjoy that

0:10:07.020 --> 0:10:09.750
<v Speaker 1>um after phoenix so have fun out there back out

0:10:09.780 --> 0:10:11.670
<v Speaker 1>on the west coast we'll talk to you next week.

0:10:11.530 --> 0:10:14.870
<v Speaker 3>Man Appreciate you guys. Let me know when my wedding

0:10:14.910 --> 0:10:17.130
<v Speaker 3>invite is coming, and I will try and do better

0:10:17.950 --> 0:10:20.470
<v Speaker 3>on my 80s and 90s references. I'll make them clearer

0:10:20.490 --> 0:10:21.170
<v Speaker 3>next time.

0:10:21.190 --> 0:10:21.849
<v Speaker 2>No, you were good.

0:10:21.890 --> 0:10:23.989
<v Speaker 1>The texters got it. Bone and I were asleep at

0:10:24.010 --> 0:10:26.930
<v Speaker 1>the wheel, man. Sam, I'm on, like, a TBS, like,

0:10:27.010 --> 0:10:28.770
<v Speaker 1>five-minute delay today, so don't worry about me.

0:10:28.790 --> 0:10:30.300
<v Speaker 2>That is true. I'm the one that messed up.

0:10:30.300 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 3>TBS is the perfect place to watch an 80s or

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 3>90s podcast.

0:10:35.260 --> 0:10:36.900
<v Speaker 2>Sam, it's too short for me today. I'm going to

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:37.430
<v Speaker 2>be honest with you.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:38.179
<v Speaker 3>Seriously.

0:10:38.220 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Bone's still in a haze from yesterday.

0:10:39.780 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, Sam.

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:42.020
<v Speaker 2>Have a good call tonight, brother.

0:10:42.950 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, guys. Talk to everybody soon.