1 00:00:01,320 --> 00:00:05,200 Speaker 1: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of 2 00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:08,280 Speaker 1: a free state, the right of the people to keep 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:12,240 Speaker 1: in their arms shall not be infringed. This is the 4 00:00:12,280 --> 00:00:15,320 Speaker 1: Second Amendment, and this is the Gun Guy. 5 00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:22,760 Speaker 2: Boom boom boom boom bang bang bang bang boom boom 6 00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:25,439 Speaker 2: boom boom bang. 7 00:00:25,239 --> 00:00:28,920 Speaker 1: Bang boo, Guy Ralford on ninety three WYBC. 8 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:32,199 Speaker 3: Welcome afternoon, and welcome to the Gun Guy Show here 9 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:35,879 Speaker 3: on ninety three WIBC. We're throwing here with us, and 10 00:00:36,880 --> 00:00:39,000 Speaker 3: I got a lot to get into, as I always 11 00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:41,879 Speaker 3: do you know this first topic I'm going to discuss. 12 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 3: I really I'm usually pretty decisive on what I want 13 00:00:47,400 --> 00:00:50,400 Speaker 3: to talk about on the show and what I don't 14 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:53,199 Speaker 3: what I want to write about, whether it's out on 15 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:56,560 Speaker 3: the internet or otherwise. I've usually got a pretty clear idea. 16 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:59,360 Speaker 3: And I really went back and forth on this, but 17 00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:02,480 Speaker 3: really decide I did I think for the right reasons 18 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:08,160 Speaker 3: that I do want to address some real I think 19 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:12,600 Speaker 3: scam artists and grifters that are out there claiming to 20 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 3: be Second Amendment advocates, and I just think at every opportunity, 21 00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:18,960 Speaker 3: those of us who have been involved in the fight 22 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,800 Speaker 3: for a long time, and those of us who actually, 23 00:01:23,160 --> 00:01:26,720 Speaker 3: oh say, show up at the state House, who actually 24 00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:29,479 Speaker 3: take part in drafting legislation and then fighting to get 25 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:34,160 Speaker 3: it passed. Those of us who fight to stave off 26 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 3: the attacks on our Second Amendment rights with a lot 27 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:39,200 Speaker 3: of success here in Indiana. You know, when we see 28 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:43,840 Speaker 3: somebody really I think, just trying to profiteer off others' efforts. 29 00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:48,200 Speaker 3: And there are a lot of people fighting every day 30 00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:50,360 Speaker 3: for Second Amendment rights, and a lot of people have 31 00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 3: done some amazing things right here in the state but 32 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:57,520 Speaker 3: to protect our Second Amendment rights. And occasionally, though, we 33 00:01:57,560 --> 00:02:00,280 Speaker 3: see a scam artist come along, really just trying under 34 00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:03,600 Speaker 3: line their own pockets. And that's exactly what we have 35 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:08,000 Speaker 3: in a gun group that I'm starting to get solicitations 36 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:09,840 Speaker 3: from on email. I don't know how I ended up 37 00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:12,280 Speaker 3: on their email list, because I certainly have not sent 38 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:15,200 Speaker 3: any money to this organization and I haven't signed up 39 00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 3: in any way to receive their stuff. But apparently I'm 40 00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 3: on some list because I get solicitations for money all 41 00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:26,440 Speaker 3: the time from them, and it's always in relation to 42 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:30,480 Speaker 3: you know, oh no, there's this horrible bill that's been filed. 43 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:32,480 Speaker 3: I've got a couple here lately and I'm talking about 44 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:36,640 Speaker 3: the Indiana Firearms Coalition. There's the group I'm talking about, 45 00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:41,400 Speaker 3: and this is this is the Door Brothers d r R. 46 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:45,079 Speaker 3: And listen, if you're you know, not in your car, 47 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,320 Speaker 3: you know a place where you can you can safely 48 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,720 Speaker 3: do so at your computer on your phone. Just google 49 00:02:52,280 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 3: Door Brothers, Scam Artists or Aaron Door, Chris Door, and 50 00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 3: the third one I think is Alan I'm not entirely sure, 51 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:07,920 Speaker 3: but Chris Door and Alan Door are the two I 52 00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:11,520 Speaker 3: think faces the organization. And they have these so called 53 00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:14,320 Speaker 3: gun rights groups that have popped up in several different states, 54 00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:18,320 Speaker 3: and apparently, according to a video they just released, they 55 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:24,880 Speaker 3: formed Indiana Firearms Coalition in twenty twenty one. And the 56 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 3: video that kind of set me off and the reason 57 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 3: I decided to talk about them here on the show 58 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 3: tonight is video they put out here just recently that 59 00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:38,120 Speaker 3: they called, you know, the origins of IFC or Indiana 60 00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:42,880 Speaker 3: Firearms Coalition, and they talked about, well, why did we 61 00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 3: form Indiana Firearms Coalition? And you know, what are the 62 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 3: wonderful things we've accomplished and what are we trying to 63 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:50,000 Speaker 3: fix in terms of the problem with all these other 64 00:03:50,120 --> 00:03:53,880 Speaker 3: people that are failing so miserably to protect Second Amendment 65 00:03:53,960 --> 00:03:58,000 Speaker 3: rights in Indiana. And that was the tenor of the video. 66 00:03:58,080 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 3: And I don't so much want to direct people to 67 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,800 Speaker 3: the video because they start off bragging about the number 68 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 3: of views they get on their YouTube videos, and hey, 69 00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:09,160 Speaker 3: I'm guilty. I went and watched the thing, and by 70 00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 3: the time it was over, I was so angry. I 71 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 3: was angry generally. I was angry on a personal level 72 00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:17,480 Speaker 3: because they really tried to claim credit for a lot 73 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 3: of things that I directly contributed to. If not, we're 74 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 3: responsible for. And I tried to be an adult on 75 00:04:26,720 --> 00:04:30,240 Speaker 3: those things. But it's something that can certainly set you 76 00:04:30,279 --> 00:04:32,159 Speaker 3: off a bit, as it did me. But the Indian 77 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:36,400 Speaker 3: A Firearms Coalition, and listen, I think they intentionally created 78 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:40,960 Speaker 3: a name very close to the Firearms Policy Coalition. Now 79 00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:44,360 Speaker 3: that's a national group. And let's just talk about gun 80 00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:46,520 Speaker 3: rights groups for a minute before I get back to 81 00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:50,560 Speaker 3: the door Brothers being the grifters and the scam artists 82 00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:53,320 Speaker 3: that they are. There are a lot of national organizations 83 00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:58,440 Speaker 3: out there, and listen, for decades, for generations, we had 84 00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:01,960 Speaker 3: really since the not long after I believe it was 85 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:07,479 Speaker 3: a civil war the NRA was for him and and 86 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:10,240 Speaker 3: and NRA has been the big kid on the block 87 00:05:10,279 --> 00:05:12,799 Speaker 3: with gun rights groups and and have done an awful 88 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:14,599 Speaker 3: lot of good for an awful lot of years. A 89 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:17,960 Speaker 3: lot of us have become very concerned about the direction 90 00:05:18,040 --> 00:05:21,000 Speaker 3: of NRA, especially under Wayne law Pierre there I think 91 00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:23,040 Speaker 3: he was executive vice president, but he was the guy 92 00:05:23,120 --> 00:05:27,400 Speaker 3: running the organization. And there were whole kinds of litigation 93 00:05:27,640 --> 00:05:32,320 Speaker 3: involving mismanagement of funds, and and and the direction of NRA, 94 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:36,280 Speaker 3: you know, drifted to a large degree, and so many 95 00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:40,520 Speaker 3: so much of its resources and the money people contributed 96 00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:45,279 Speaker 3: started going to defending the lawsuits against NRA as opposed 97 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:47,160 Speaker 3: to going out there and doing the things that we 98 00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:49,359 Speaker 3: really needed to get done. Now, make no mistake, I 99 00:05:49,400 --> 00:05:54,000 Speaker 3: am a benefactor level life member of NRA, and I 100 00:05:54,040 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 3: truly believe we need a strong, fully resourced, powerful influential 101 00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:03,960 Speaker 3: NRA in this country. Gun rights are better off when 102 00:06:03,960 --> 00:06:07,400 Speaker 3: the n RA A is fully functional, fully fully funded, 103 00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 3: and doing the job that they they were chartered to do. 104 00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:14,840 Speaker 3: When when the group was created again, it started off 105 00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 3: as really a marksmanship focused group, and it's quickly focused 106 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:23,359 Speaker 3: to being policy and legislative and lobbying to a large 107 00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 3: degree after so many of the attacks started being launched 108 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:29,239 Speaker 3: on our Second Amendment rights. But n RA in recent 109 00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:30,760 Speaker 3: years is one of the reasons I formed a two 110 00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:34,800 Speaker 3: A project. I was worried about a gap between n 111 00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:39,840 Speaker 3: ra's influence and ability to help us fight off attacks 112 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:42,800 Speaker 3: on our two AA rights, help us get uh pro 113 00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:45,280 Speaker 3: two AA legislation passed. I said, you know what, I 114 00:06:45,320 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 3: don't wanna. I don't I don't want to. I don't 115 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:48,600 Speaker 3: want to. I'm wanna. I don't want to miss any 116 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:51,760 Speaker 3: opportunities here. I don't want to need gaps. And and 117 00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:54,160 Speaker 3: this says nothing against NRA. I'm still a proud member. 118 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:57,440 Speaker 3: I go to their national meetings, but a lot of 119 00:06:57,480 --> 00:07:03,680 Speaker 3: us lost a lot of confidence, especially over the last five, six, 120 00:07:03,680 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 3: seven years in NRA. But again I'm a defender and 121 00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:13,320 Speaker 3: supporter and member and will remain so of NRA. And 122 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:16,720 Speaker 3: I'm very glad we now have three board members at 123 00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:20,160 Speaker 3: NRA from Indiana. We have Craig Haggard, state representative now 124 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:24,239 Speaker 3: running for Congress. We have Charlie Hilton and who's president 125 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:28,120 Speaker 3: of the Indiana State Rifle and Pistol Association, a good 126 00:07:28,120 --> 00:07:31,480 Speaker 3: friend of mine, and just a great guy, as is 127 00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:35,640 Speaker 3: Craig Haggard. And then you have Jim Jim Toms, state 128 00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 3: Senator from Indiana, who drafted our preemption law here in 129 00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:41,840 Speaker 3: Indiana went into effect back in twenty eleven, which is 130 00:07:41,880 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 3: still one of the most important pro gun bills we've 131 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 3: ever gotten passed in this state, which prevents local governments 132 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:51,640 Speaker 3: from regulating firearms, which is huge. If you allowed Bloomington 133 00:07:51,680 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 3: and Fort Wayne, in East Chicago, Hammond, all these different 134 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 3: communities to regulate guns the way they would independently as 135 00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:05,080 Speaker 3: a local government, we'd have a whole different situation here 136 00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:08,600 Speaker 3: in Indiana. So Jim Toms did that. Tom's tomes you 137 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:12,120 Speaker 3: hear different pronunciations. I just call him Jim when I 138 00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 3: see him. But he and I've worked together a lot too. 139 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:17,160 Speaker 3: So with those three guys on the board of NRA, 140 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:20,280 Speaker 3: I'm hopeful they can really help steer NRA in the 141 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:23,200 Speaker 3: right direction because we need NRA. But in addition to NRA, 142 00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:26,560 Speaker 3: there are some other really great groups that have had 143 00:08:26,560 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 3: a lot of success here recently, especially in the courtroom, 144 00:08:31,080 --> 00:08:33,719 Speaker 3: and there I'm talking about Gun Owners of America. I'm 145 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:37,040 Speaker 3: also a proud member of Gun Owners of America GOA. 146 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 3: They've done some great things. They've won some great victories 147 00:08:39,880 --> 00:08:44,760 Speaker 3: for US in court. Firearms Policy Coalition, and that's the 148 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 3: group I mentioned because I'm concerned that Indiana Firearms Coalition, 149 00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:54,720 Speaker 3: I'm sorry. Firearms Policy Coalition is the national group that 150 00:08:54,760 --> 00:08:56,800 Speaker 3: I'm fully behind. They do great work, They've won some 151 00:08:56,880 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 3: great victories in court in a firearms coalition. Is are 152 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 3: the Door Brothers. That's a Door Brothers organization. They've set 153 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:11,600 Speaker 3: up similar lobbying quote unquote groups or so called gun 154 00:09:11,679 --> 00:09:14,840 Speaker 3: rights groups across multiple states. These guys are from Iowa apparently, 155 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:18,599 Speaker 3: but they've set up these kind of sister organizations in 156 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:22,400 Speaker 3: different states. But there are some great national groups out 157 00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:24,360 Speaker 3: there doing great things right here in the state. You've 158 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:27,440 Speaker 3: got the two A Project, that's the organization I've founded. 159 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:30,400 Speaker 3: You got Indiana State Rifle and Pistol Association. And I 160 00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:33,040 Speaker 3: worked very closely with those guys. We're on each other's 161 00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:36,040 Speaker 3: email distribution list. We share strategy, we get together before 162 00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:39,240 Speaker 3: every legislative session, we sit together at the committee. Here 163 00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 3: again I mentioned Charlie hilltonan long term great friend of mine. 164 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:49,080 Speaker 3: Kelly and Avon Kelly Myers here calling to the show 165 00:09:49,120 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 3: often also a member of the two A Project, but 166 00:09:51,440 --> 00:09:55,000 Speaker 3: co director of legislative Affairs along with Jerry Torr, recently 167 00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:59,959 Speaker 3: retired state representative, also co director of Legislative Affairs for ISRPA. 168 00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:03,360 Speaker 3: The eight people, good people whose hearts are in the 169 00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:07,080 Speaker 3: right place, who are doing great work, and who show up. 170 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:10,199 Speaker 3: They're there. I know because I'm there, and I've been 171 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:12,440 Speaker 3: going there and being there and fighting in the State 172 00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:17,760 Speaker 3: House for a damn long time. And so when you 173 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:21,040 Speaker 3: see the folks that have fought hard and assisted in 174 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:24,360 Speaker 3: drafting legislation, that's one thing I do of anybody I 175 00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:26,560 Speaker 3: just named, And I'm not trying to pat myself on 176 00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:28,719 Speaker 3: the back. It's just something that I've done and I'm 177 00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:32,640 Speaker 3: comfortable doing. I've drafted the most legislat I've drafted our 178 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:35,600 Speaker 3: self defense immunity law that passed in twenty nineteen. I've 179 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:40,920 Speaker 3: passed or excuse me, I drafted the expungement law relative 180 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:44,959 Speaker 3: to our red flag cases that now allows people found 181 00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:49,360 Speaker 3: not dangerous to wipe that off their record. I've drafted 182 00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:52,480 Speaker 3: improvements to the guns on School Property bill. I've drafted 183 00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:57,839 Speaker 3: improvements other improvements that greatly whittled down the dramatic over 184 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:01,920 Speaker 3: breadth that allows for dramatic misuse and abuse of the 185 00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:05,680 Speaker 3: red Flag Statute. I've drafted multiple bills that have assisted 186 00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:08,960 Speaker 3: in pairing that down to the way it ought to be. 187 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:13,200 Speaker 3: I actould say multiple provisions of a bill to greatly 188 00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:17,559 Speaker 3: improve that law, which we've done. But there are people 189 00:11:17,559 --> 00:11:20,920 Speaker 3: here doing good work, and I'm a small part of 190 00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:25,120 Speaker 3: that team. But now what we have. We have the 191 00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:28,360 Speaker 3: Indiana Firearms Coalition. And if you get emails from these people, 192 00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:33,200 Speaker 3: they always start off with some crisis. And you know what, 193 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 3: NRA was doing a little bit too much of this too. 194 00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:38,679 Speaker 3: I would get email. I actually unsubscribed from a lot 195 00:11:38,720 --> 00:11:42,240 Speaker 3: of NRA's emails because I was getting emails. I say, 196 00:11:42,480 --> 00:11:46,599 Speaker 3: oh my god, there's this huge crisis. Send us money. 197 00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:51,000 Speaker 3: And with the door brothers, they're Indiana Firearms Coalition. Invariably, 198 00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:56,000 Speaker 3: the crises that they identify in these email are complete 199 00:11:56,040 --> 00:12:01,520 Speaker 3: false flags. They are complete red herrings. I mean I've 200 00:12:01,520 --> 00:12:05,200 Speaker 3: seen them here lately help us defeat Senate bill whatever 201 00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,200 Speaker 3: which would ban semi automatic weapons, or which would do 202 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:11,319 Speaker 3: this or do that. And invariably you look at these 203 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:13,679 Speaker 3: I'll say, hold on, what are they raising money on? 204 00:12:13,800 --> 00:12:18,280 Speaker 3: That basis for to fight that bill, because that bill's dead. 205 00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:21,280 Speaker 3: That bill died in committee. By the way, we're not 206 00:12:21,320 --> 00:12:23,439 Speaker 3: even in the legislative session right now. So if they 207 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:26,880 Speaker 3: sent you some email that says, look, there's this horrible bill. 208 00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:30,079 Speaker 3: It was a bill that was filed last year and 209 00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:33,000 Speaker 3: last session, or could be this year in a session 210 00:12:33,040 --> 00:12:38,320 Speaker 3: that now that ended this spring, and it's not on 211 00:12:38,360 --> 00:12:41,920 Speaker 3: the table now. It may make it refiled next year, 212 00:12:41,960 --> 00:12:44,959 Speaker 3: and if it does, then we'll put the call out 213 00:12:45,559 --> 00:12:49,000 Speaker 3: to go kick its ass. But these false flag emergencies 214 00:12:49,040 --> 00:12:52,719 Speaker 3: and always end with and help us save your Second Amendment, right, 215 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:56,320 Speaker 3: send us money, Send us money, Send us money, and listen. 216 00:12:56,440 --> 00:13:01,480 Speaker 3: I don't mind solicitations for money. I've engaged in that 217 00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:03,120 Speaker 3: too on behalf of the two A project. You don't 218 00:13:03,160 --> 00:13:04,920 Speaker 3: hear me talk a lot about that here, because I 219 00:13:04,960 --> 00:13:07,080 Speaker 3: don't know that people listen to the gun Guy Show 220 00:13:07,440 --> 00:13:11,640 Speaker 3: because they want to get solicited for money, other than 221 00:13:11,679 --> 00:13:14,960 Speaker 3: perhaps signed up for my classes, which I pitch on 222 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:19,559 Speaker 3: the regular. But I don't mind so much the solicitation 223 00:13:19,679 --> 00:13:21,840 Speaker 3: of money, But it's what are you getting in return 224 00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:24,520 Speaker 3: for that in terms of what's being delivered to you, 225 00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:27,719 Speaker 3: in terms of the efforts on your behalf and are 226 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:32,240 Speaker 3: they being stray with you on the reasons they're asking 227 00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:36,880 Speaker 3: for money. And that's where the Door Brothers Indiana Firearms 228 00:13:36,880 --> 00:13:41,600 Speaker 3: Coalition clearly, unquestionably are simply grifters. And listen, if I 229 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:43,960 Speaker 3: mentioned before, if you're near a phone, you're near your computer, 230 00:13:44,120 --> 00:13:48,880 Speaker 3: you're not driving. Just google these guys, do your own search. 231 00:13:49,400 --> 00:13:53,760 Speaker 3: Read the articles. It's article after article after article about 232 00:13:53,880 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 3: what do these guys do. They do nothing in the 233 00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:59,760 Speaker 3: state houses where they have organizations, including here in Indiana. 234 00:14:00,160 --> 00:14:02,559 Speaker 3: Seeing these guys once ever in the state House, not 235 00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:05,320 Speaker 3: ever once, And I'm always there there's gun related bill, 236 00:14:05,360 --> 00:14:11,480 Speaker 3: I'm there. A lot of people will tell you that. 237 00:14:11,520 --> 00:14:13,520 Speaker 3: You know, they'll say, well, we send a lot of emails, 238 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:18,520 Speaker 3: they post YouTube videos. They'll certainly attack people that they 239 00:14:18,559 --> 00:14:22,400 Speaker 3: say are selling out gun rights quote unquote. But it's 240 00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:26,520 Speaker 3: a way of causing division and the process put money 241 00:14:26,520 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 3: in their own pocket by getting people to donate to 242 00:14:29,800 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 3: the organization. Not believing that the other organizations or even 243 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:35,680 Speaker 3: some of our best pro to A legislators are really 244 00:14:35,680 --> 00:14:40,120 Speaker 3: fighting for their rights. I say, well, gosh, maybe I'm 245 00:14:40,120 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 3: being sold out by these other people, by these other 246 00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:46,200 Speaker 3: organizations included maybe I ought to just send money to 247 00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 3: these guys because they're the as they say, no compromise group, 248 00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:51,160 Speaker 3: and they'll stand. 249 00:14:50,920 --> 00:14:51,320 Speaker 4: Up for me. 250 00:14:53,520 --> 00:14:55,160 Speaker 3: Except PROBAB. They do is take your money and do 251 00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:59,200 Speaker 3: absolutely nothing. Then they wait to see what actually happens, 252 00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:01,520 Speaker 3: and then they swoop then take credit for it. We're 253 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:02,920 Speaker 3: going to take a break. I'm a little past the 254 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:06,960 Speaker 3: quarter hour. I'm gonna give you some specific examples based 255 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:10,320 Speaker 3: on this most recent video that they posted where they're 256 00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 3: taking specific credit for accomplishes. Accomplishments we've had it right 257 00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 3: here in Indiana that they had absolutely nothing to do with. 258 00:15:22,000 --> 00:15:24,480 Speaker 3: And listen, I don't take pleasure in any of this 259 00:15:25,520 --> 00:15:30,680 Speaker 3: because pro two A groups, conservatives in general, we all 260 00:15:30,680 --> 00:15:34,040 Speaker 3: ought to be shoulder to shoulder, all ought to be 261 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:39,280 Speaker 3: marching in lockstep. And I hated even gun owners. 262 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:39,440 Speaker 4: Man. 263 00:15:39,440 --> 00:15:41,600 Speaker 3: I'll go out there on the gun related pages that's 264 00:15:41,640 --> 00:15:44,720 Speaker 3: on social media or otherwise, and gun owners always want 265 00:15:44,720 --> 00:15:47,400 Speaker 3: to attack each other. You know, somebody will post a 266 00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:49,440 Speaker 3: picture of their rifle and other people will be making 267 00:15:49,440 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 3: fun of their dime store optics or there, this, that 268 00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:54,560 Speaker 3: or the other thing. It's like, come on, man, we're 269 00:15:54,600 --> 00:16:00,920 Speaker 3: sharing interest here. We're on the same team. And lately, 270 00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:03,640 Speaker 3: you know with this overused term of rhino, well that 271 00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:06,440 Speaker 3: people over there are rhinos. Listen, I'm not immune. I've 272 00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:12,880 Speaker 3: used that term. I've used it recently, but anymore that 273 00:16:12,920 --> 00:16:19,240 Speaker 3: gets used to create infighting, not because the target of 274 00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:25,440 Speaker 3: those attacks has legitimately sold us out, but because people 275 00:16:25,520 --> 00:16:29,200 Speaker 3: see that a way as a way to fundraise, and 276 00:16:29,240 --> 00:16:33,280 Speaker 3: that's the distinction without ever delivering any work product or 277 00:16:33,480 --> 00:16:37,120 Speaker 3: even any effort in the process. So it pains me 278 00:16:38,360 --> 00:16:41,080 Speaker 3: to go after a group that's ostensibly fighting for your 279 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:43,920 Speaker 3: two AA rights. But I'll tell you what, I don't 280 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:46,720 Speaker 3: want these people in Indiana. I don't want them getting 281 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:50,560 Speaker 3: your money and having them not deliver on what it 282 00:16:50,640 --> 00:16:53,520 Speaker 3: is they promise, because I'll guarantee you they don't. They 283 00:16:53,520 --> 00:16:56,200 Speaker 3: collect your money and laugh on the way to the bank. 284 00:16:56,360 --> 00:16:59,280 Speaker 3: And that's that. And just google it, do your own research. 285 00:16:59,280 --> 00:17:02,520 Speaker 3: You'll see how many times across the country, legislators other 286 00:17:02,600 --> 00:17:06,959 Speaker 3: pro two A groups. Respected groups like NSSF National Shooting 287 00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:10,840 Speaker 3: Sports Foundation, which represents the firearms industry, including retailers and 288 00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:14,840 Speaker 3: manufacturers and gun shops and gun ranges and instructors. The 289 00:17:14,880 --> 00:17:18,960 Speaker 3: reason I'm a member but we're taking a break. We'll 290 00:17:18,960 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 3: come back. I'll get it more into this discussion and 291 00:17:21,080 --> 00:17:23,359 Speaker 3: go through some of the specifics of this most recent 292 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:28,919 Speaker 3: Door Brothers video and how completely outlandish it is in 293 00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:32,919 Speaker 3: terms of the attacks they make on Indiana legislators, the 294 00:17:32,960 --> 00:17:36,479 Speaker 3: attacks they make another pro two AA gun groups, and 295 00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:39,719 Speaker 3: the credit they try to claim themselves for things they 296 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:43,720 Speaker 3: had absolutely nothing to do with. It angers me and 297 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:45,840 Speaker 3: it's time to call them out. This is Guy Ralford 298 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:48,680 Speaker 3: on The Gun Guy Show on ninety three WIBC. 299 00:17:56,760 --> 00:17:59,439 Speaker 1: Second to nine on this second amendment of This is 300 00:17:59,480 --> 00:18:04,200 Speaker 1: the Gun with Guy Ralford on WYBC. 301 00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 3: And welcome back. I'm Guy Ralford on the Gun Guy 302 00:18:06,520 --> 00:18:12,159 Speaker 3: Show on ninety three WIBC. So we're talking about this organization, 303 00:18:12,280 --> 00:18:16,359 Speaker 3: Indiana Firearms Coalition really set up by set of brothers. 304 00:18:16,400 --> 00:18:19,360 Speaker 3: There's actually four brothers, but the two that are most 305 00:18:19,400 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 3: vocal you see out there on YouTube and whatnot are 306 00:18:21,600 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 3: the oldest Aaron doordr R and his brother Chris, and 307 00:18:27,920 --> 00:18:29,680 Speaker 3: they do the same thing state to state to state. 308 00:18:29,720 --> 00:18:31,920 Speaker 3: And by the way, gun rights are not their only deal. 309 00:18:32,119 --> 00:18:35,639 Speaker 3: They really got going I think during COVID because they 310 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:40,720 Speaker 3: started launching these fundraising efforts around fighting COVID restrictions, and 311 00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:43,400 Speaker 3: then they decided that conservatives were pretty good about opening 312 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:46,040 Speaker 3: up their checkbook or getting their credit card out, and 313 00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:49,680 Speaker 3: they decided to set up the pro life anti abortion 314 00:18:50,560 --> 00:18:53,600 Speaker 3: websites and organizations and they were fundraising on that basis, 315 00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 3: and then decided to add the Second Amendment to the mix. 316 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:02,080 Speaker 3: And okay, you know, anybody can advocate for whatever causes 317 00:19:02,080 --> 00:19:06,239 Speaker 3: they believe in, and those are all causes that I 318 00:19:06,359 --> 00:19:11,159 Speaker 3: personally believe in. The problem is, what are they returning 319 00:19:11,640 --> 00:19:15,200 Speaker 3: as far as return on investment based on the donations 320 00:19:15,200 --> 00:19:17,520 Speaker 3: that they receive. And there are reports out there these 321 00:19:17,560 --> 00:19:23,520 Speaker 3: people nationally received millions of dollars, which is like a 322 00:19:23,560 --> 00:19:27,159 Speaker 3: punch in the gut to think that they're really just 323 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:29,200 Speaker 3: putting that money in their own pocket and getting rich 324 00:19:29,280 --> 00:19:34,480 Speaker 3: off other people's desires to really fight to preserve liberties 325 00:19:34,480 --> 00:19:38,159 Speaker 3: in this country. But in the video that kind of 326 00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:40,680 Speaker 3: set me off. The reason I'm talking about it here 327 00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:44,520 Speaker 3: on the show is they talk about why they formed 328 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:48,320 Speaker 3: Indiana Firearms Coalition and it was formed in twenty twenty one, 329 00:19:48,440 --> 00:19:52,080 Speaker 3: and they talk about Indiana's red Flag law. And listen, 330 00:19:52,440 --> 00:19:54,200 Speaker 3: anytime we're going to talk about the red Flag law. 331 00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:57,399 Speaker 3: When I explain to people how the law works, and 332 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:00,879 Speaker 3: I explained to them what is and isn't wrong with 333 00:20:00,920 --> 00:20:03,960 Speaker 3: the law, a lot of times people will misperceive that 334 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:09,399 Speaker 3: and then mischaracterize that into believing that somehow or portraying 335 00:20:09,480 --> 00:20:12,440 Speaker 3: my discussion is that I'm somehow defending in the Indiana's 336 00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:15,679 Speaker 3: red flag law. There's no one that's been more vocal 337 00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:20,439 Speaker 3: than me in talking about the flaws and the abuse 338 00:20:23,119 --> 00:20:26,640 Speaker 3: associated with Indiana's red flag law. I litigate those cases. 339 00:20:27,800 --> 00:20:33,960 Speaker 3: I'm in court fighting for clients under this statute. And 340 00:20:34,080 --> 00:20:37,879 Speaker 3: I'm the only lawyer in this state who took the 341 00:20:37,960 --> 00:20:42,119 Speaker 3: statute up to the Indiana Court of Appeals arguing as 342 00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:46,879 Speaker 3: strongly and with as much powers of advocacy as I 343 00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:51,679 Speaker 3: could summon that it's unconstitutional. And in a two to 344 00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:55,320 Speaker 3: one decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals disagreed with me, 345 00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:58,119 Speaker 3: and the Supreme Court didn't choose to take the case. 346 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:01,719 Speaker 3: But I argue the whole DM statute was unconstitutional law 347 00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:06,879 Speaker 3: to be set aside. So I'm not the guy who's 348 00:21:06,920 --> 00:21:11,960 Speaker 3: going to come into any discussion defending our red flag law. 349 00:21:13,560 --> 00:21:17,159 Speaker 3: At the same time, when people take issue with it 350 00:21:17,320 --> 00:21:19,240 Speaker 3: or talk about why it ought to be repealed. I 351 00:21:19,240 --> 00:21:22,240 Speaker 3: want to make sure if we're going to be effective 352 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:24,800 Speaker 3: advocates for the Second Amendment, we need to do so 353 00:21:24,960 --> 00:21:29,760 Speaker 3: from a position not only of strength, but of accuracy 354 00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:35,240 Speaker 3: and of intellectual integracy, integrity. And by that I mean, 355 00:21:35,320 --> 00:21:39,840 Speaker 3: let's be right and let me tell you, as set 356 00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:42,359 Speaker 3: out in this video from the Door Brothers, they got 357 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:45,359 Speaker 3: about every damn thing wrong. They clearly haven't taken the 358 00:21:45,400 --> 00:21:49,639 Speaker 3: time to even understand Indiana law and recent Indiana changes 359 00:21:50,200 --> 00:21:54,760 Speaker 3: or changes in Indiana law, or they're just not particularly bright, 360 00:21:54,920 --> 00:21:58,960 Speaker 3: or some combination of the of all the above. Let's 361 00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:01,320 Speaker 3: talk about the red flag law. It was passed in 362 00:22:01,359 --> 00:22:03,480 Speaker 3: two thousand and five. Indiana was the second state in 363 00:22:03,520 --> 00:22:06,960 Speaker 3: the country to pass a red flag law, after Connecticut, 364 00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:10,840 Speaker 3: and the momentum behind getting it passed two thousand and 365 00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:15,840 Speaker 3: five was the murder, totally senseless murder of a very 366 00:22:15,920 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 3: beloved Indianapolis Police Department patrolman named Timothy nicknamed Jake Laird 367 00:22:24,040 --> 00:22:27,720 Speaker 3: and everybody knew him by Jake, thirty one years old 368 00:22:27,760 --> 00:22:30,080 Speaker 3: at the time, has happened on August eighteenth, two thousand 369 00:22:30,119 --> 00:22:35,040 Speaker 3: and four, and the person who murdered Jake Laird. Officer 370 00:22:35,160 --> 00:22:39,080 Speaker 3: Laird was a thirty three year old guy who lived 371 00:22:39,119 --> 00:22:43,480 Speaker 3: on Deet Street down on the Near south Side named 372 00:22:43,560 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 3: Kenneth Charles Anderson. And Kenneth Anderson was a guy who'd 373 00:22:47,800 --> 00:22:50,520 Speaker 3: had a history of mental health problems. He was a paranoid, 374 00:22:50,520 --> 00:22:55,320 Speaker 3: skidst a fronter, and he also had a bunch of guns. 375 00:22:56,160 --> 00:23:00,920 Speaker 3: He'd never been involuntarily committed to a mentalist, which would 376 00:23:00,960 --> 00:23:04,119 Speaker 3: have made him ineligible to possess guns or buy guns. 377 00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:06,919 Speaker 3: And he'd never been convicted of a serious crime like 378 00:23:06,960 --> 00:23:12,280 Speaker 3: a felony that would have also prohibited him from possessing firearms. 379 00:23:14,560 --> 00:23:17,360 Speaker 3: And multiple times when he would stop taking his medication, 380 00:23:17,640 --> 00:23:20,880 Speaker 3: he would start getting threatening. He would threaten violence, he'd 381 00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:23,920 Speaker 3: be loud, police would be called. He had had guns, 382 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:28,720 Speaker 3: his guns taken from him. But he would then he 383 00:23:28,800 --> 00:23:31,280 Speaker 3: start taking his medication again, he'd calm down. He'd go 384 00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:32,520 Speaker 3: down to the police station and say I want my 385 00:23:32,560 --> 00:23:35,720 Speaker 3: guns back. And at the time, there was no legal mechanism, 386 00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:37,720 Speaker 3: there was no legal way for police to say no, 387 00:23:37,800 --> 00:23:40,520 Speaker 3: you can't have your guns back. He wasn't a prohibited possessor, 388 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:46,639 Speaker 3: and so they had to give him his guns back. 389 00:23:46,640 --> 00:23:50,480 Speaker 3: There his property well, on August eighteen, two thousand and four, 390 00:23:50,560 --> 00:23:54,920 Speaker 3: again he's not taking his medication. He's having a schizophrenic episode. 391 00:23:54,920 --> 00:23:56,760 Speaker 3: He ends up murdering his wife and he goes out 392 00:23:56,800 --> 00:24:00,320 Speaker 3: into the street with a se automatic SKS seven to 393 00:24:00,359 --> 00:24:07,000 Speaker 3: sixty two rifle. It's firing shots, screaming and yelling. Police 394 00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:10,760 Speaker 3: are called. Multiple police respond, there's a shootout, a couple 395 00:24:10,800 --> 00:24:14,480 Speaker 3: of different officers were wounded, and Patrolman Jake Lair is killed. 396 00:24:15,520 --> 00:24:17,640 Speaker 3: And the legislature in the very next session looked at 397 00:24:17,640 --> 00:24:20,920 Speaker 3: this and a lot of people and when, for all 398 00:24:20,920 --> 00:24:23,639 Speaker 3: the flaws of our red flag law, I understand this, 399 00:24:25,240 --> 00:24:27,399 Speaker 3: A lot of legislators said, hold on, we knew this 400 00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:30,640 Speaker 3: guy had serious mental illness, we knew he didn't reliably 401 00:24:30,680 --> 00:24:32,600 Speaker 3: take his medication, we knew he was dangerous when he 402 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:36,200 Speaker 3: didn't take his medication. Why couldn't his guns be taken 403 00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:39,080 Speaker 3: from him? Was the thought prize. And I'm not defending 404 00:24:39,080 --> 00:24:41,600 Speaker 3: any of this. And if somebody wants to sit down 405 00:24:41,600 --> 00:24:43,600 Speaker 3: a debate with me whether you should have your gun 406 00:24:43,680 --> 00:24:47,159 Speaker 3: sees from you when you haven't been institutionalized and you 407 00:24:47,200 --> 00:24:50,720 Speaker 3: haven't been convicted of any crime, I know which side 408 00:24:50,720 --> 00:24:53,840 Speaker 3: of that argument I'm going to take based on purely 409 00:24:53,880 --> 00:24:57,240 Speaker 3: constitutional grounds. I'm trying to explain to you the rationale 410 00:24:57,240 --> 00:25:00,359 Speaker 3: of the legislature, and the legislature said to be a 411 00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:04,440 Speaker 3: mechanism if someone's truly dangerous. So the way the statute 412 00:25:04,480 --> 00:25:09,479 Speaker 3: has worked and worked since the beginning is police can 413 00:25:09,560 --> 00:25:11,840 Speaker 3: either go to and this can be based on a 414 00:25:11,840 --> 00:25:15,920 Speaker 3: report from anybody. There's another where the door brothers are confused. 415 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:20,119 Speaker 3: Since it's been passed in two thousand and five, the 416 00:25:20,119 --> 00:25:23,240 Speaker 3: Indiana Red Flag Statute allows your neighbor could call police 417 00:25:23,400 --> 00:25:25,080 Speaker 3: this guy's crazy, he's point of gun at me. I've 418 00:25:25,119 --> 00:25:27,640 Speaker 3: had this case, this guy's random and raven and point 419 00:25:27,680 --> 00:25:30,720 Speaker 3: of gun to me. That a family member can call police. 420 00:25:31,400 --> 00:25:34,919 Speaker 3: Police can just observe you directly as you're out in public, 421 00:25:35,040 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 3: or police get called to your house for whatever reason 422 00:25:37,280 --> 00:25:39,640 Speaker 3: and you're behaving in a way that make police think 423 00:25:39,640 --> 00:25:42,399 Speaker 3: you're both dangerous and possession of a firearm. Police can 424 00:25:42,440 --> 00:25:45,040 Speaker 3: either go to a court and ask for a judge 425 00:25:45,040 --> 00:25:48,479 Speaker 3: to determine whether there's probable cause based on information supplied 426 00:25:48,520 --> 00:25:51,719 Speaker 3: by the police officer that you're dangerous, and if so, 427 00:25:51,800 --> 00:25:54,119 Speaker 3: the judge sign's a warrant that says yes, go seize 428 00:25:54,160 --> 00:25:58,080 Speaker 3: this person's firearm. Are in more of an emergency situation 429 00:25:58,160 --> 00:26:01,919 Speaker 3: when it's just the police who encounter person who may 430 00:26:01,960 --> 00:26:07,520 Speaker 3: be dangerous. Police can seize the firearms. Then within within 431 00:26:07,760 --> 00:26:10,000 Speaker 3: forty eight hours, they have to submit. Now it's called 432 00:26:10,040 --> 00:26:12,480 Speaker 3: an aff David. That's changed a little bit. They used 433 00:26:12,480 --> 00:26:14,040 Speaker 3: to be able to report still some kind of a 434 00:26:14,080 --> 00:26:16,359 Speaker 3: report to the judge saying here's why I see this 435 00:26:16,400 --> 00:26:20,879 Speaker 3: guy's guns. And a judge then reviews that for probable cause. 436 00:26:21,160 --> 00:26:23,240 Speaker 3: And if a judge says no, there's no probable cause, 437 00:26:23,520 --> 00:26:26,080 Speaker 3: they say give him his guns back. If they say yes, 438 00:26:26,119 --> 00:26:28,560 Speaker 3: there's probable cause, okay, keep the guns, and then they 439 00:26:28,560 --> 00:26:30,760 Speaker 3: set up for a hearing, which is supposed to happen 440 00:26:30,800 --> 00:26:34,720 Speaker 3: in fourteen days. And that's where the person has full 441 00:26:34,760 --> 00:26:37,439 Speaker 3: blown due process. Now, when people say guns can be 442 00:26:37,480 --> 00:26:40,320 Speaker 3: seized on the front end with no due process, is 443 00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:42,399 Speaker 3: that true or is that not true? That is, a 444 00:26:42,400 --> 00:26:48,359 Speaker 3: police officer can take the guns and there's no court hearing, 445 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:51,639 Speaker 3: there's no opportunity to argue your case, no opportunity to 446 00:26:51,680 --> 00:26:54,399 Speaker 3: have a lawyer. That doesn't sound like due process, does it. 447 00:26:55,160 --> 00:26:56,520 Speaker 3: We'll tell you what. We're a little past bomb in 448 00:26:56,520 --> 00:26:58,160 Speaker 3: the ar I'm going to break there. We'll come back 449 00:26:58,480 --> 00:27:01,320 Speaker 3: and it is their due or is there a sufficient 450 00:27:01,440 --> 00:27:04,080 Speaker 3: new process, which is a whole separate question in the 451 00:27:04,119 --> 00:27:07,119 Speaker 3: Red Flag Law. I'll come back then and talk about 452 00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:11,040 Speaker 3: the attacks on Indiana, attacks on Indiana legislators by these idiots, 453 00:27:11,080 --> 00:27:14,960 Speaker 3: the Door Brothers, and how it's really completely not only unfounded, 454 00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:19,600 Speaker 3: I think it's intentionally disingenuous, purely as a grift, purely 455 00:27:19,640 --> 00:27:22,760 Speaker 3: as a scam to raise money to line their own pockets. 456 00:27:22,920 --> 00:27:24,520 Speaker 3: That's what we'll get into when we come back, says 457 00:27:24,520 --> 00:27:27,240 Speaker 3: Guy Ralford on The Gun Guy Show on ninety three WYBC. 458 00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:37,959 Speaker 1: This show about gun rights, gun safety, and responsible gun ownership. 459 00:27:38,160 --> 00:27:41,320 Speaker 1: This is the Gun Guy with Guy Ralford on ninety 460 00:27:41,359 --> 00:27:42,640 Speaker 1: three WYPC. 461 00:27:43,600 --> 00:27:45,600 Speaker 3: And welcome back on Guy Ralford on The Gun Guy 462 00:27:45,680 --> 00:27:48,520 Speaker 3: Show on ninety three WIBC. So, again, if anybody's just 463 00:27:48,600 --> 00:27:50,919 Speaker 3: joining us, I'm explaining how our Red Flag law, that 464 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:54,639 Speaker 3: is a gun seizure law that allows guns to be 465 00:27:54,680 --> 00:27:57,560 Speaker 3: sees from people that are quote unquote dangerous, how it works. 466 00:27:57,640 --> 00:28:01,159 Speaker 3: And please do not take my expl for how the 467 00:28:01,200 --> 00:28:05,160 Speaker 3: statute works to be an argument by me that I'm 468 00:28:05,160 --> 00:28:07,359 Speaker 3: in favor of the law. That's not my point. I'm 469 00:28:07,400 --> 00:28:10,760 Speaker 3: simply explaining the way the law functions and explaining what 470 00:28:10,960 --> 00:28:14,280 Speaker 3: attacks on the law are legitimate and which ones don't 471 00:28:14,280 --> 00:28:17,040 Speaker 3: have any real legal support. And that's an important point. 472 00:28:17,080 --> 00:28:19,240 Speaker 3: If we're going to be intellectually honest about the discussion 473 00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:22,480 Speaker 3: and how we can we can either improve it or 474 00:28:22,520 --> 00:28:24,520 Speaker 3: get rid of it altogether. Let's do so on the 475 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:29,480 Speaker 3: basis of facts and correct legal interpretation of how the 476 00:28:29,480 --> 00:28:35,639 Speaker 3: statute actually functions. So a policeman encounters someone who's acting 477 00:28:35,680 --> 00:28:39,560 Speaker 3: strangely threatening people waving a gun around. They take that 478 00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:44,120 Speaker 3: gun away from them, and in that moment that that 479 00:28:44,200 --> 00:28:48,720 Speaker 3: person has their gun, sees has there been any due process? No, 480 00:28:48,720 --> 00:28:53,840 Speaker 3: none whatsoever. Okay, But the police officer has to submit 481 00:28:54,000 --> 00:28:57,640 Speaker 3: now an affidavit to a judge who reviews that affidavit 482 00:28:57,720 --> 00:29:01,960 Speaker 3: to determine whether it establishes probable call us that the 483 00:29:01,960 --> 00:29:05,560 Speaker 3: person's dangerous, so that the officer was correct in seizing 484 00:29:05,600 --> 00:29:08,400 Speaker 3: the gun, because that's the standard for the police officer 485 00:29:08,400 --> 00:29:11,560 Speaker 3: to seize the gun to begin with probable cause to 486 00:29:11,600 --> 00:29:17,640 Speaker 3: believe dangerousness. When the judge reviews the affidavit for probable cause, 487 00:29:18,800 --> 00:29:21,560 Speaker 3: that's the first step in due process, not complete due process. 488 00:29:22,400 --> 00:29:25,479 Speaker 3: But consider this people, let say there's no due process. 489 00:29:25,520 --> 00:29:28,520 Speaker 3: And again I'm not defending the statute. I'm explaining how 490 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:34,480 Speaker 3: it works. When a police officer sees you, let's say, 491 00:29:34,720 --> 00:29:41,080 Speaker 3: sees you commit an arm robbery on the sidewalking downtown Indianapolis. 492 00:29:42,640 --> 00:29:46,760 Speaker 3: Police officer sees you, pulls up, pulls their gun, disarms you, 493 00:29:47,040 --> 00:29:48,720 Speaker 3: puts you in the back, puts you in the back 494 00:29:48,720 --> 00:29:51,720 Speaker 3: of the police cruiser, and takes you to jail. Now, 495 00:29:51,720 --> 00:29:55,160 Speaker 3: there's a dramatic difference in that situation, because you've just 496 00:29:55,200 --> 00:29:58,760 Speaker 3: committed a serious felony and you deserve to get arrested 497 00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:02,760 Speaker 3: based on that officer observing you. However, the only point 498 00:30:02,800 --> 00:30:05,400 Speaker 3: I'm making is in the moment the police officer puts 499 00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:07,160 Speaker 3: you in the back of the car, in handcuffs and 500 00:30:07,160 --> 00:30:11,120 Speaker 3: takes you to jail, you've had no due process whatsoever. 501 00:30:11,200 --> 00:30:15,480 Speaker 3: So how is that constitutional if you can't be deprived 502 00:30:15,520 --> 00:30:17,960 Speaker 3: of life liberty. Well, if you're in handcuffs in the 503 00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 3: back of a police car on the way to jail, 504 00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:22,840 Speaker 3: you've been deprived of your liberty without due process. How 505 00:30:22,840 --> 00:30:26,680 Speaker 3: can that possibly be Well, because we can't convene a 506 00:30:26,720 --> 00:30:30,400 Speaker 3: court session there on the sidewalk to determine whether it's 507 00:30:30,440 --> 00:30:34,840 Speaker 3: probable cause for your arrest. So the system and what's 508 00:30:34,840 --> 00:30:37,800 Speaker 3: been determined to be constitutional in the context of due 509 00:30:37,800 --> 00:30:40,920 Speaker 3: process is, yes, you go to jail, but then you 510 00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:45,400 Speaker 3: promptly have a hearing before a judge for the judge 511 00:30:45,400 --> 00:30:47,880 Speaker 3: to determine whether there's probable cost for you to be held, 512 00:30:48,960 --> 00:30:51,240 Speaker 3: and only if, and then this can be done in writing, 513 00:30:51,280 --> 00:30:54,920 Speaker 3: it could be done on the submission of Affidavit's very 514 00:30:55,040 --> 00:30:57,200 Speaker 3: very similar, not identical to what we're talking about with 515 00:30:57,280 --> 00:31:01,120 Speaker 3: red flagwaws. A judge then determines probably cause, aha, no 516 00:31:01,200 --> 00:31:05,800 Speaker 3: probable cause. You get set free due process. But then 517 00:31:05,840 --> 00:31:08,280 Speaker 3: the real point is, do you, in an a timely 518 00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:11,280 Speaker 3: basis get to have full due process, have a lawyer 519 00:31:12,440 --> 00:31:15,120 Speaker 3: to compel witnesses to testify on your behalf, confront the 520 00:31:15,120 --> 00:31:20,720 Speaker 3: witnesses against you, all the elements of due process. None 521 00:31:20,760 --> 00:31:26,160 Speaker 3: of that's immediate. It all happens eventually, and therefore that 522 00:31:26,240 --> 00:31:33,080 Speaker 3: process is constitutional in the due process area. The red 523 00:31:33,080 --> 00:31:37,640 Speaker 3: flag law was designed around that. No, you don't get 524 00:31:37,720 --> 00:31:39,880 Speaker 3: due process when your guns are seized by a police officer, 525 00:31:39,880 --> 00:31:42,320 Speaker 3: but a judge reviews the seizure for probable cause, just 526 00:31:42,400 --> 00:31:46,760 Speaker 3: like an arrest. No, you don't get full due process 527 00:31:46,840 --> 00:31:50,960 Speaker 3: at the time the judge is reviewing that affidavit. That's 528 00:31:51,040 --> 00:31:54,920 Speaker 3: just one side only. And yes, eventually it's supposed to 529 00:31:54,920 --> 00:31:57,440 Speaker 3: be happening in fourteen days unless you ask for more time. 530 00:31:57,560 --> 00:32:00,800 Speaker 3: As the person's who person whose gun was seized, you 531 00:32:00,800 --> 00:32:02,760 Speaker 3: get a hearing where you have full due process. So 532 00:32:02,960 --> 00:32:04,640 Speaker 3: for people to come out and say there's no due process, 533 00:32:04,680 --> 00:32:08,680 Speaker 3: well it's not perfect due process. But let's attack the 534 00:32:08,720 --> 00:32:14,000 Speaker 3: statute on legitimate basis and let's reform it and let's 535 00:32:14,040 --> 00:32:16,160 Speaker 3: cure the abuses. That's why I've been working on for 536 00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:18,440 Speaker 3: a damn long time and with a lot of success. 537 00:32:18,800 --> 00:32:22,920 Speaker 3: I wanted to lay that out and give you that 538 00:32:22,960 --> 00:32:26,120 Speaker 3: context before we get into the specifics of the Door 539 00:32:26,160 --> 00:32:29,520 Speaker 3: Brothers attack on Indiana, on Indiana legislators, on other pro 540 00:32:29,600 --> 00:32:33,000 Speaker 3: gun groups based on what's happened with our red flag 541 00:32:33,080 --> 00:32:35,520 Speaker 3: law in recent years. We'll get back into that discussion 542 00:32:35,920 --> 00:32:37,400 Speaker 3: here in just a moment. By the way, we have 543 00:32:37,440 --> 00:32:40,600 Speaker 3: a very short short segment. We come back. Our phone 544 00:32:40,640 --> 00:32:43,520 Speaker 3: lines are apparently down. I got producer Jack working on that. 545 00:32:43,720 --> 00:32:46,120 Speaker 3: Hopefully we can get that fixed in the next hour. 546 00:32:46,160 --> 00:32:48,520 Speaker 3: And ten minutes. But right now apparently the phone lines 547 00:32:48,560 --> 00:32:51,560 Speaker 3: are down, which happens here somewhat on the regular at WIBC. 548 00:32:51,800 --> 00:32:53,880 Speaker 3: Hopefully we can get that cured, and if so, I 549 00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:55,760 Speaker 3: will let you know. Right now we're taking a break. 550 00:32:55,840 --> 00:32:57,400 Speaker 3: Is this Guy Ralford on the Gun Guy Show on 551 00:32:57,480 --> 00:33:05,680 Speaker 3: ninety three WIBC. 552 00:33:03,520 --> 00:33:07,920 Speaker 1: Is your rights, it is your responsibilities, your guns. This 553 00:33:08,000 --> 00:33:12,240 Speaker 1: is the Gun Guy with Guy Ralford on ninety three WYVC. 554 00:33:13,720 --> 00:33:15,600 Speaker 3: So in explaining a little bit how the red flag 555 00:33:15,680 --> 00:33:19,320 Speaker 3: law works, again, I can't emphasize this enough. Do not 556 00:33:19,400 --> 00:33:21,480 Speaker 3: take that as me defending the red flag law. I 557 00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:24,840 Speaker 3: was explaining it and explaining why there's some attacks make 558 00:33:24,920 --> 00:33:27,960 Speaker 3: more sense than others, an attack that I've been making 559 00:33:28,000 --> 00:33:33,040 Speaker 3: since day one and really points to how this was 560 00:33:33,120 --> 00:33:35,440 Speaker 3: rushed through the General Assembly in two thousand and five. 561 00:33:36,640 --> 00:33:38,280 Speaker 2: Is the horrible, horrible. 562 00:33:37,880 --> 00:33:42,480 Speaker 3: Definition of dangerous that was in the statute. These door 563 00:33:42,520 --> 00:33:46,120 Speaker 3: Brother idiots start off their video early on saying, oh, yeah, 564 00:33:46,120 --> 00:33:48,160 Speaker 3: I was passed and there was no definition of dangerous. 565 00:33:48,160 --> 00:33:50,479 Speaker 3: It's whatever a police officer thinks it is. No, there 566 00:33:50,520 --> 00:33:53,440 Speaker 3: was a definition. It's in section one of the statute. 567 00:33:53,480 --> 00:33:55,280 Speaker 3: I'm not really sure how you missed it. There, guys, 568 00:33:56,560 --> 00:34:01,160 Speaker 3: But there was a definition, but it was just horribly overbroad. 569 00:34:01,720 --> 00:34:05,320 Speaker 3: The definition started off, if a person's an imminent risk 570 00:34:05,360 --> 00:34:08,759 Speaker 3: of personal injury to themselves or others. Okay, well, that 571 00:34:08,760 --> 00:34:10,920 Speaker 3: part makes a little bit of sense. Imminent risk of 572 00:34:10,920 --> 00:34:12,600 Speaker 3: personal injury to yourself for others. But then it went 573 00:34:12,640 --> 00:34:15,359 Speaker 3: on to say, or the person may be a risk 574 00:34:15,440 --> 00:34:17,640 Speaker 3: of personal injury to themselves or others in the future, 575 00:34:17,920 --> 00:34:22,560 Speaker 3: may maybe in the future. How incredibly overbroad is that? 576 00:34:22,640 --> 00:34:25,759 Speaker 3: And one of two things. Either they have a mental 577 00:34:25,760 --> 00:34:28,279 Speaker 3: illness is controlled by medication, but they don't reliably take 578 00:34:28,280 --> 00:34:32,560 Speaker 3: their medication, or there's documented evidence which will give rise 579 00:34:32,600 --> 00:34:35,160 Speaker 3: to reasonable belief that they have a propensity for either 580 00:34:35,320 --> 00:34:39,360 Speaker 3: violent or emotionally unstable conduct. And I asked you, I 581 00:34:39,480 --> 00:34:41,840 Speaker 3: we know what violent conduct is, You're trying to hurt somebody. 582 00:34:41,880 --> 00:34:45,440 Speaker 3: What's emotionally unstable mean? What does that mean? What is 583 00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:47,480 Speaker 3: emotionally unstable me? It means whatever a judge wants it 584 00:34:47,520 --> 00:34:50,440 Speaker 3: to meet. That was the original definition. That was a problem, 585 00:34:50,640 --> 00:34:52,839 Speaker 3: and that's what we needed to fix and we did. 586 00:34:53,080 --> 00:34:54,759 Speaker 3: Right now, we're taking a break. Top of the hour. 587 00:34:54,880 --> 00:34:56,640 Speaker 3: Is is Guy Ralford on The Gun Guy Show on 588 00:34:56,800 --> 00:34:58,000 Speaker 3: ninety three WYBC. 589 00:35:01,320 --> 00:35:05,200 Speaker 1: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of 590 00:35:05,239 --> 00:35:08,279 Speaker 1: a free state, the right of the people to keep 591 00:35:08,320 --> 00:35:12,239 Speaker 1: in their arms shall not be infringed. This it's the 592 00:35:12,280 --> 00:35:17,279 Speaker 1: Second Amendment. And this is the gun Guy a boom. 593 00:35:17,000 --> 00:35:23,160 Speaker 2: Boom boom boom bang bang bang bang boom boom boom, 594 00:35:23,200 --> 00:35:26,279 Speaker 2: boom bang bang bom. 595 00:35:25,960 --> 00:35:32,440 Speaker 1: Guy Ralford on ninety three WYBC, And. 596 00:35:32,160 --> 00:35:34,040 Speaker 3: Welcome back for our number two the gun Guy Show 597 00:35:34,080 --> 00:35:38,359 Speaker 3: here on ninety three WIBC. So, I'm talking about some 598 00:35:38,440 --> 00:35:44,600 Speaker 3: scam artists, some absolute unquestionable grifters in form of the 599 00:35:44,680 --> 00:35:49,120 Speaker 3: Door Brothers who have this organization now one of several 600 00:35:49,239 --> 00:35:53,920 Speaker 3: state organizations that are popped up across the country founded 601 00:35:53,920 --> 00:35:56,719 Speaker 3: by these guys called Indiana Firearms Coalition, and it's a 602 00:35:56,719 --> 00:36:00,400 Speaker 3: scam group. They don't actually do anything. They send some 603 00:36:00,440 --> 00:36:04,560 Speaker 3: emails looking for money and then they post YouTube videos 604 00:36:04,560 --> 00:36:08,720 Speaker 3: claiming about their victories, but they don't actually have any victories. 605 00:36:08,719 --> 00:36:12,000 Speaker 3: What they're doing is claiming credit for what others have accomplished, 606 00:36:12,239 --> 00:36:16,160 Speaker 3: and in the process they'll criticize anybody actually involved in 607 00:36:16,200 --> 00:36:19,280 Speaker 3: the fight for two A rights in the various states 608 00:36:19,320 --> 00:36:22,759 Speaker 3: where they have a presence, as slimy A presence as 609 00:36:22,760 --> 00:36:27,080 Speaker 3: it may be. And we're talking about this video that 610 00:36:27,120 --> 00:36:30,560 Speaker 3: they posted here just recently, and my friends at Indiana 611 00:36:30,560 --> 00:36:33,640 Speaker 3: State Rifle and Pistol Association sent it to me and 612 00:36:33,680 --> 00:36:35,439 Speaker 3: they knew it would set me off, and of course 613 00:36:35,440 --> 00:36:38,239 Speaker 3: it did. So they're talking about why they formed the 614 00:36:38,280 --> 00:36:42,640 Speaker 3: Indiana Firearms or excuse me, the Indiana Firearms Coalition, and 615 00:36:42,680 --> 00:36:45,680 Speaker 3: they said, well, we did it in two thousand and 616 00:36:46,400 --> 00:36:54,560 Speaker 3: twenty one, really in reaction to the horrible Rhinos expanding 617 00:36:54,680 --> 00:36:57,319 Speaker 3: the red flag lawn in twenty nineteen and making it 618 00:36:57,440 --> 00:37:01,880 Speaker 3: much worse, and so we just felt we had to 619 00:37:01,920 --> 00:37:05,560 Speaker 3: do something for Indiana gun owners. Well, what actually happened 620 00:37:05,600 --> 00:37:08,319 Speaker 3: in twenty nineteen. I was explaining before the break the 621 00:37:08,360 --> 00:37:11,480 Speaker 3: top of the hour that one of the main problems 622 00:37:11,520 --> 00:37:13,880 Speaker 3: with the Red Flag Law and something and I actually 623 00:37:14,680 --> 00:37:16,520 Speaker 3: this was part of my argument for why the two 624 00:37:16,600 --> 00:37:21,919 Speaker 3: A or why the red Flag Law is unconstitutional as 625 00:37:21,920 --> 00:37:28,000 Speaker 3: it previously existed anyway, is the incredibly vague and overly 626 00:37:28,040 --> 00:37:31,000 Speaker 3: broad definition of dangerous because it not only, as I 627 00:37:31,000 --> 00:37:33,160 Speaker 3: said before the break, not only did it include someone 628 00:37:33,200 --> 00:37:35,799 Speaker 3: who's an imminent danger an imminent risk of personal injury 629 00:37:35,840 --> 00:37:39,640 Speaker 3: to themselves or others, but it included if they may 630 00:37:39,719 --> 00:37:41,839 Speaker 3: be a risk of personal injury to themselves or others 631 00:37:41,840 --> 00:37:46,040 Speaker 3: in the future. Maybe. And I actually had an mdphd 632 00:37:46,080 --> 00:37:49,719 Speaker 3: psychiatrist on the stand in one Red Flag hearing and 633 00:37:49,760 --> 00:37:53,000 Speaker 3: he was asked by a prosecutor, well, is the respondent 634 00:37:53,000 --> 00:37:55,520 Speaker 3: and that's the person whose guns were sived? Is mister 635 00:37:55,560 --> 00:37:59,920 Speaker 3: so and so a potential future risk? When the psychiatrist said, well, 636 00:38:00,040 --> 00:38:03,240 Speaker 3: everybody's a potential future risk, Boom, You've just checked that box. 637 00:38:04,880 --> 00:38:06,640 Speaker 3: But then the second box it has to be checked 638 00:38:06,719 --> 00:38:10,840 Speaker 3: under this alternative definition of dangerous is either the person 639 00:38:10,880 --> 00:38:13,560 Speaker 3: has a mental illness controlled by medication, but they don't 640 00:38:13,600 --> 00:38:18,520 Speaker 3: reliably take their medication, or there's documented evidence which will 641 00:38:18,520 --> 00:38:20,440 Speaker 3: give rise to a reasonable belief that they have a 642 00:38:20,480 --> 00:38:26,040 Speaker 3: propensity for a violent or emotionally unstable conduct. Now, why 643 00:38:26,080 --> 00:38:29,480 Speaker 3: did the legislature go beyond someone who's an imminent danger 644 00:38:29,520 --> 00:38:31,680 Speaker 3: and talk about someone who just may be a danger 645 00:38:31,680 --> 00:38:34,960 Speaker 3: in the future. Because that's as I argue to the 646 00:38:34,960 --> 00:38:37,440 Speaker 3: Court of Appeals, and I still think this was absolutely correct. 647 00:38:38,040 --> 00:38:42,680 Speaker 3: Why that's unconstitutionally vague is because it's put in judges 648 00:38:43,000 --> 00:38:46,520 Speaker 3: and at least on the street. Initially, police officers in 649 00:38:46,560 --> 00:38:49,160 Speaker 3: the position of trying to read minds. And in fact, 650 00:38:49,200 --> 00:38:51,759 Speaker 3: I made the analogy to the movie Minority Report with 651 00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:55,680 Speaker 3: Tom Cruise, where it was this futuristic police department and 652 00:38:55,719 --> 00:38:59,799 Speaker 3: they formed a department of pre crime and they had 653 00:38:59,800 --> 00:39:05,000 Speaker 3: these three psychics called Precogs. And the Precogs I recall, 654 00:39:05,040 --> 00:39:08,960 Speaker 3: they kind of drifted around in this sensory deprivation kind 655 00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:11,919 Speaker 3: of an environment and they and they did psychic things 656 00:39:11,920 --> 00:39:13,600 Speaker 3: and they predicted the future and they would come back 657 00:39:13,640 --> 00:39:16,000 Speaker 3: and they say, well, guy Rufford's going to commit a 658 00:39:16,040 --> 00:39:18,640 Speaker 3: crime three weeks from Monday and he's going to commit 659 00:39:18,719 --> 00:39:23,759 Speaker 3: this horrible murder or whatever it might be. And they'd 660 00:39:23,760 --> 00:39:27,440 Speaker 3: go arrest you before you committed the crime. And this 661 00:39:27,480 --> 00:39:31,319 Speaker 3: is all great because now it's crime prevention, right, And 662 00:39:31,400 --> 00:39:33,640 Speaker 3: of course that all breaks down and innocent people start 663 00:39:33,640 --> 00:39:35,560 Speaker 3: getting carted off to jail, and that's the point of 664 00:39:35,600 --> 00:39:40,160 Speaker 3: the movie. And I said, you're asking judges at a hearing. 665 00:39:40,480 --> 00:39:42,840 Speaker 3: If you say somebody may be a dangerous in the future, 666 00:39:42,920 --> 00:39:45,920 Speaker 3: may be dangerous in the future, you're asking judges to 667 00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:50,120 Speaker 3: be the Precox from the Minority Report, something they're ill 668 00:39:50,160 --> 00:39:54,640 Speaker 3: equipped to do. I don't know that a psychiatrist is 669 00:39:54,960 --> 00:39:57,920 Speaker 3: equipped fully to predict someone's behavior in the future. I 670 00:39:58,000 --> 00:40:01,600 Speaker 3: know for a fact they're not much less a judge. 671 00:40:01,719 --> 00:40:04,600 Speaker 3: It's not what they're trained to do. And I still 672 00:40:04,600 --> 00:40:07,239 Speaker 3: think I'm right on that argument, and respectfully disagree with 673 00:40:07,280 --> 00:40:10,160 Speaker 3: the Court of Appeals didn't throw that provision of the 674 00:40:10,520 --> 00:40:14,080 Speaker 3: statute out. But it was a huge problem, especially and 675 00:40:14,239 --> 00:40:20,080 Speaker 3: maybe a danger in the future combined with this danger 676 00:40:20,160 --> 00:40:24,560 Speaker 3: or excuse me, violent or emotionally unstable conduct. What's emotionally 677 00:40:24,719 --> 00:40:27,400 Speaker 3: unstable me? I made this argument many many times before 678 00:40:27,400 --> 00:40:31,440 Speaker 3: we finally got the statute improved. I started to say fixed, 679 00:40:31,480 --> 00:40:34,760 Speaker 3: and I wouldn't go that far improved in twenty nineteen. 680 00:40:36,680 --> 00:40:39,520 Speaker 3: And what's emotionally unstable? And if I'm watching a Colts 681 00:40:39,560 --> 00:40:42,760 Speaker 3: game and the quarterback throws an interception and I cuss 682 00:40:42,760 --> 00:40:44,560 Speaker 3: a lot and throw my pillow at the TV, my 683 00:40:44,600 --> 00:40:47,799 Speaker 3: wife would say, that's emotionally unstable. Do I have a 684 00:40:47,840 --> 00:40:51,880 Speaker 3: propensity for emotionally unstable conduct? And if so, since I 685 00:40:52,000 --> 00:40:54,040 Speaker 3: may be a risk of personal injury in the future, 686 00:40:54,120 --> 00:40:59,840 Speaker 3: since everyone's a potential risk, then boom, I can have 687 00:40:59,880 --> 00:41:04,360 Speaker 3: my guns taken away from me. That's not okay, especially 688 00:41:04,400 --> 00:41:06,640 Speaker 3: going back to the baseline position, if should anyone ever 689 00:41:06,680 --> 00:41:08,560 Speaker 3: have their guns taken from them and they've not committed 690 00:41:08,600 --> 00:41:14,240 Speaker 3: any crime, which is the fundamental attack on red flag laws. 691 00:41:15,960 --> 00:41:18,480 Speaker 3: And so in twenty nineteen, a couple of things were 692 00:41:18,520 --> 00:41:22,440 Speaker 3: happening together. And by the way, you need to know 693 00:41:22,480 --> 00:41:26,840 Speaker 3: these facts to fully understand how completely off base and 694 00:41:26,960 --> 00:41:30,040 Speaker 3: dishonest the Door Brothers are in their attack on legislators 695 00:41:30,040 --> 00:41:32,680 Speaker 3: who were involved in this process or gun rights groups 696 00:41:32,719 --> 00:41:38,520 Speaker 3: that were were not involved in this process. Approaching twenty nineteen, 697 00:41:38,520 --> 00:41:42,279 Speaker 3: a number of things were going on. I was going 698 00:41:42,320 --> 00:41:47,320 Speaker 3: to legislators saying, we got to fix this vague statute 699 00:41:47,320 --> 00:41:51,920 Speaker 3: of dangers. You're having people lose red flagcses and have 700 00:41:52,000 --> 00:41:57,040 Speaker 3: their constitutional rights destroyed in the context of the Second Amendment. Anyway, 701 00:41:57,560 --> 00:42:00,200 Speaker 3: who are truly not dangerous. It's because judges were rely 702 00:42:00,280 --> 00:42:05,239 Speaker 3: on this emotionally unstable business. When emotionally unstable doesn't mean 703 00:42:05,280 --> 00:42:08,839 Speaker 3: they're going to hurt anybody, and it certainly doesn't mean 704 00:42:08,960 --> 00:42:11,040 Speaker 3: they're going to use a gun to hurt anybody. Why 705 00:42:11,040 --> 00:42:13,840 Speaker 3: are we taking constitutional rights away from people on that basis? 706 00:42:13,880 --> 00:42:19,200 Speaker 3: Makes no sense. At the same time, on the other 707 00:42:19,280 --> 00:42:22,120 Speaker 3: side of the equation, a lot of Republican lawmakers were 708 00:42:22,120 --> 00:42:27,080 Speaker 3: getting approached by law enforcement, and they also got approached 709 00:42:27,719 --> 00:42:31,319 Speaker 3: by people I deeply, deeply respect. That's the parents of 710 00:42:31,440 --> 00:42:36,920 Speaker 3: j Claired and and and I met Michael Laird on 711 00:42:37,000 --> 00:42:40,400 Speaker 3: multiple occasions, and his wife he always calls missus l 712 00:42:40,520 --> 00:42:42,440 Speaker 3: so I can never remember her first name, and I 713 00:42:42,440 --> 00:42:45,960 Speaker 3: apologize for that if they listen to this or get 714 00:42:45,960 --> 00:42:49,719 Speaker 3: wind of it. But Michael Laired a true gentleman. And 715 00:42:50,800 --> 00:42:56,040 Speaker 3: he's obviously very very very pro cop, being the father 716 00:42:56,239 --> 00:43:00,640 Speaker 3: of a murdered police officer, but he's he's also pro 717 00:43:00,680 --> 00:43:05,160 Speaker 3: two W A A. He's not an anti gunzela or 718 00:43:05,200 --> 00:43:07,680 Speaker 3: a gun grabber or any other of the names you 719 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:09,759 Speaker 3: want to want to put on people who are trying 720 00:43:09,760 --> 00:43:11,839 Speaker 3: to deprive people of their constitutional rights. That's not who 721 00:43:11,840 --> 00:43:19,880 Speaker 3: he is. But police officers, including the Lairds, realized that 722 00:43:19,920 --> 00:43:22,759 Speaker 3: there was, from their perspective anyway, a hole in the 723 00:43:22,760 --> 00:43:26,720 Speaker 3: red Flag statue, which is that, yes, if you're found 724 00:43:26,719 --> 00:43:29,680 Speaker 3: to be dangerous, you get your full due process and 725 00:43:29,880 --> 00:43:32,520 Speaker 3: you bring your own lawyer in, you present your own arguments, 726 00:43:32,800 --> 00:43:35,360 Speaker 3: present your own evidence, but the judge rules against you 727 00:43:35,400 --> 00:43:38,040 Speaker 3: and finds you to be dangerous under the law as 728 00:43:38,040 --> 00:43:41,319 Speaker 3: it existed before twenty nineteen. You could say okay, which 729 00:43:41,360 --> 00:43:44,360 Speaker 3: meant that the police would keep the guns they seized 730 00:43:44,360 --> 00:43:47,080 Speaker 3: from you. But you could walk right out of the courthouse, 731 00:43:47,120 --> 00:43:48,960 Speaker 3: walk across the street to a gun store and buy 732 00:43:48,960 --> 00:43:51,719 Speaker 3: another gun, and it was nothing that prohibited you from 733 00:43:51,760 --> 00:43:54,480 Speaker 3: doing that because you weren't a quote unquote prohibitive possessor 734 00:43:54,480 --> 00:43:57,640 Speaker 3: by being found to be dangerous under state or federal law. 735 00:43:59,120 --> 00:44:03,120 Speaker 3: And listen, have I ever seen cases where people were 736 00:44:03,239 --> 00:44:07,480 Speaker 3: legitimately dangerous? Yes, I have seen that case. Doesn't mean 737 00:44:07,480 --> 00:44:09,480 Speaker 3: I'm supporting the red flag law. I'm just telling you 738 00:44:09,800 --> 00:44:15,640 Speaker 3: there are people out there who are truly dangerous. And 739 00:44:15,719 --> 00:44:18,040 Speaker 3: so a lot of momentums started building up in the 740 00:44:18,040 --> 00:44:23,040 Speaker 3: General Assembly to put in a penalty for buying a gun, 741 00:44:23,120 --> 00:44:25,600 Speaker 3: or acquiring a gun, or even possessing a gun after 742 00:44:25,640 --> 00:44:29,240 Speaker 3: you've been found to be dangerous. And I got consulted 743 00:44:29,320 --> 00:44:33,000 Speaker 3: on this by several different lawmakers, including Donna Shibiley, who 744 00:44:33,040 --> 00:44:38,000 Speaker 3: was really in the forefront and working with the lairds 745 00:44:38,640 --> 00:44:41,040 Speaker 3: on this issue of this whole of where yeah, you 746 00:44:41,080 --> 00:44:42,520 Speaker 3: can be found to be dangerous, but you can just 747 00:44:42,520 --> 00:44:46,520 Speaker 3: go out and buy another gun. And I said, well, listen, 748 00:44:47,239 --> 00:44:49,520 Speaker 3: I'll get involved in this I'm not going to advocate 749 00:44:49,560 --> 00:44:51,840 Speaker 3: for the change you want to make because that's expanding 750 00:44:51,880 --> 00:44:53,440 Speaker 3: the red flag law and that's not something I'm going 751 00:44:53,520 --> 00:44:56,680 Speaker 3: to support. But if you think there's overwhelming support for that, 752 00:44:58,160 --> 00:44:59,799 Speaker 3: I said, I'll tell you right now. There are many 753 00:44:59,840 --> 00:45:02,920 Speaker 3: other things in this statute that are horribly flawed and 754 00:45:02,920 --> 00:45:05,480 Speaker 3: we need to fix. And the number one thing is 755 00:45:05,480 --> 00:45:10,240 Speaker 3: this ridiculously overly broad definition of dangerous, including this emotionally 756 00:45:10,320 --> 00:45:16,480 Speaker 3: unstable bs. And I was talking to Representative Shibly, who 757 00:45:16,640 --> 00:45:19,000 Speaker 3: by the way, was my representative at the time because 758 00:45:19,040 --> 00:45:22,160 Speaker 3: her district covered Scienceville, where I live no longer does 759 00:45:22,239 --> 00:45:26,160 Speaker 3: and she didn't run for reelection. But and she goes, well, guy, 760 00:45:26,239 --> 00:45:28,719 Speaker 3: emotionally unstable. Where you know, I think the rest legilature 761 00:45:28,840 --> 00:45:32,200 Speaker 3: was trying to reach people that are suicidal because we 762 00:45:32,239 --> 00:45:35,319 Speaker 3: want to be able to to keep people safe who 763 00:45:35,320 --> 00:45:38,400 Speaker 3: are suicidal by by separating them from their guns. And 764 00:45:38,440 --> 00:45:42,960 Speaker 3: I said, well, then say suicidal. That's easy because I 765 00:45:42,960 --> 00:45:46,440 Speaker 3: can in court, I can prove or present evidence on 766 00:45:46,480 --> 00:45:48,920 Speaker 3: whether somebody is suicidal or not. Have they tried to 767 00:45:48,960 --> 00:45:52,320 Speaker 3: kill themselves no, and they talked about killing themselves. 768 00:45:52,320 --> 00:45:52,400 Speaker 2: No. 769 00:45:52,719 --> 00:45:54,600 Speaker 3: Have they locked themselves in the bathroom with a gun 770 00:45:54,640 --> 00:45:57,480 Speaker 3: to their head. No, they're not suicidal. I win give 771 00:45:57,520 --> 00:46:04,200 Speaker 3: them his guns back. Violent. Yes, he tried to hurt somebody. No, 772 00:46:05,120 --> 00:46:10,760 Speaker 3: he's not violent. So violent or suicidal conduct makes some sense. 773 00:46:10,840 --> 00:46:12,600 Speaker 3: And by the way, on this may be a danger 774 00:46:12,640 --> 00:46:14,520 Speaker 3: in the future, that's not based on any evidence. That's 775 00:46:14,560 --> 00:46:17,640 Speaker 3: just speculation. So we changed that to according to the 776 00:46:17,680 --> 00:46:20,920 Speaker 3: bill that I helped or at least I contributed to 777 00:46:20,960 --> 00:46:24,399 Speaker 3: in twenty nineteen, make it at least probable they will 778 00:46:24,440 --> 00:46:26,720 Speaker 3: be a danger. And why was that maybe a danger 779 00:46:26,719 --> 00:46:31,279 Speaker 3: in the future in there at all? Kenneth Anderson the 780 00:46:31,320 --> 00:46:34,760 Speaker 3: crazy guy who murdered Ja Laird. He was a paranoid 781 00:46:34,760 --> 00:46:37,640 Speaker 3: schizophrenic who didn't take his medication, so they but he 782 00:46:37,680 --> 00:46:40,080 Speaker 3: had documented evidence that he'd been dangerous in the past 783 00:46:40,120 --> 00:46:42,680 Speaker 3: and threatening hadn't committed a crime or at least been 784 00:46:43,040 --> 00:46:46,200 Speaker 3: convicted of a crime. So they wrote this may be 785 00:46:46,280 --> 00:46:49,280 Speaker 3: a danger in the future thing specifically around the facts 786 00:46:49,320 --> 00:46:54,320 Speaker 3: of the Laired case and Kenneth Anderson's owned conduct prior 787 00:46:54,320 --> 00:46:57,560 Speaker 3: to the murder of Officer Laird. And I get that, 788 00:46:57,600 --> 00:47:00,680 Speaker 3: I understand their motivation, but they wrote a ridiculous, overly 789 00:47:00,719 --> 00:47:04,279 Speaker 3: brought in my view, as I argued unconstitutional statute in 790 00:47:04,320 --> 00:47:07,560 Speaker 3: the process, so we changed that to say it's probable 791 00:47:07,600 --> 00:47:09,040 Speaker 3: they will be a danger in the future. 792 00:47:09,080 --> 00:47:09,319 Speaker 4: Ah. 793 00:47:09,480 --> 00:47:13,319 Speaker 3: Now that takes some evidence based on what and it 794 00:47:13,400 --> 00:47:17,280 Speaker 3: has to be clear and convincing evidence. By the way, 795 00:47:17,960 --> 00:47:20,879 Speaker 3: now we've firmed up this definition, I'll tell you right now, 796 00:47:20,920 --> 00:47:23,640 Speaker 3: I have won a good at least a dozen Red 797 00:47:23,640 --> 00:47:27,320 Speaker 3: Flag cases because we firmed up that definition of dangerous. 798 00:47:27,600 --> 00:47:30,240 Speaker 3: That was a huge, huge, huge improvement to that bill, 799 00:47:30,680 --> 00:47:34,600 Speaker 3: and we built in several other improvements. Now instead of 800 00:47:34,719 --> 00:47:38,279 Speaker 3: police necessarily holding onto your gun while you're fighting over 801 00:47:38,320 --> 00:47:40,080 Speaker 3: whether your gun should have been seized under the Red 802 00:47:40,120 --> 00:47:42,640 Speaker 3: Flag law, now you can have them be held by 803 00:47:42,640 --> 00:47:46,280 Speaker 3: a quote unquote responsible person, your buddy with the gun safe, 804 00:47:46,320 --> 00:47:48,279 Speaker 3: a gun store. You know somebody owns a gun store. 805 00:47:48,280 --> 00:47:49,960 Speaker 3: Hey man, can you hold my guns while I'm going 806 00:47:49,960 --> 00:47:53,360 Speaker 3: through this red flag thing. Sure, they signed affidavit that says, 807 00:47:53,560 --> 00:47:55,080 Speaker 3: I guy a secure place to store them, and I 808 00:47:55,120 --> 00:47:57,520 Speaker 3: won't give them back until the person's found it not 809 00:47:57,560 --> 00:48:02,400 Speaker 3: be dangerous. Now you can have your guns not stored 810 00:48:02,440 --> 00:48:04,719 Speaker 3: in a barrel in the damp basement of the city 811 00:48:04,760 --> 00:48:09,719 Speaker 3: County building in the impd property room, but held in 812 00:48:09,760 --> 00:48:12,839 Speaker 3: a way, they won't be damaged. We build in if 813 00:48:12,840 --> 00:48:16,280 Speaker 3: they are damaged because they're not stored responsibly by the police, 814 00:48:16,280 --> 00:48:19,960 Speaker 3: are handled responsibly. The police departments is now liable for that. 815 00:48:20,400 --> 00:48:22,040 Speaker 3: They have to write you a check and compensate you 816 00:48:22,080 --> 00:48:25,080 Speaker 3: for that. That's an improvement we made. In twenty nineteen, 817 00:48:25,239 --> 00:48:27,759 Speaker 3: there were some departments across the country that were engraving 818 00:48:27,840 --> 00:48:30,120 Speaker 3: either the receiver or the barrel of a gun, engraving 819 00:48:30,200 --> 00:48:33,799 Speaker 3: it with the cause number of the red flagcase to 820 00:48:33,880 --> 00:48:36,960 Speaker 3: identify that gun for the red flatcase. I'll tell you 821 00:48:37,040 --> 00:48:40,239 Speaker 3: what I've got some I don't have any real, real 822 00:48:40,360 --> 00:48:43,000 Speaker 3: expensive guns, but I've got some nice guns. You engrave 823 00:48:44,360 --> 00:48:46,600 Speaker 3: the barrel of my gun with a hand engraver like 824 00:48:46,600 --> 00:48:48,640 Speaker 3: some of these departments were doing. Hell no, we said 825 00:48:48,640 --> 00:48:56,000 Speaker 3: it's illegal to do that, and several other significant improvements. 826 00:48:57,719 --> 00:48:59,920 Speaker 3: And what we were bargaining with, especially to get this 827 00:49:00,040 --> 00:49:06,640 Speaker 3: ridiculous definition of dangerous improved, was the momentum that was 828 00:49:06,680 --> 00:49:10,800 Speaker 3: already behind the amendment of the statute to include making 829 00:49:10,840 --> 00:49:14,040 Speaker 3: someone who's been found to be dangerous a prohibited possessor. 830 00:49:14,160 --> 00:49:16,160 Speaker 3: And listen, that train was going to leave the station. 831 00:49:17,360 --> 00:49:19,680 Speaker 3: I talked to a lot of different legislators and said, yeah, man, 832 00:49:19,680 --> 00:49:21,719 Speaker 3: I've heard from a lot of cops on this, if 833 00:49:22,000 --> 00:49:23,800 Speaker 3: you know a lot of other people in the community, 834 00:49:24,040 --> 00:49:25,840 Speaker 3: this is something we got to fix in this statute. 835 00:49:25,840 --> 00:49:27,680 Speaker 3: And I said, well, hold on, before you do that, 836 00:49:27,800 --> 00:49:29,840 Speaker 3: let's fix some things on the other side of the 837 00:49:29,920 --> 00:49:32,560 Speaker 3: ledger that are really wrong with the statute from a 838 00:49:32,600 --> 00:49:36,720 Speaker 3: gun owner's perspective. And we ended up getting a ton done, 839 00:49:38,520 --> 00:49:43,560 Speaker 3: including the dramatic improvement of the definition of dangerous. So 840 00:49:43,600 --> 00:49:45,720 Speaker 3: that's what's happened in two thousand, that's what actually happened 841 00:49:45,719 --> 00:49:48,640 Speaker 3: in twenty nineteen. What did the Door Brothers say about 842 00:49:48,640 --> 00:49:52,280 Speaker 3: all that? Why did they say they founded Indiana Firearms 843 00:49:52,360 --> 00:49:54,839 Speaker 3: Coalition because gun owners were getting sold down the river 844 00:49:55,320 --> 00:49:59,440 Speaker 3: by existing organizations based on the amendment of the Red 845 00:49:59,480 --> 00:50:02,120 Speaker 3: Flags tab shoot in twenty nineteen. The amendments I just 846 00:50:02,120 --> 00:50:04,960 Speaker 3: described to you is the context. That's what we'll get 847 00:50:04,960 --> 00:50:06,680 Speaker 3: into when we come back. Right now, we're taking a break. 848 00:50:06,680 --> 00:50:08,279 Speaker 3: This is Guy Ralford on The Gun Guy Show on 849 00:50:08,400 --> 00:50:09,560 Speaker 3: ninety three WIBC. 850 00:50:16,840 --> 00:50:21,120 Speaker 1: Now you got a gun guy, Guy Ralford on ninety 851 00:50:21,160 --> 00:50:22,360 Speaker 1: three WYPC. 852 00:50:23,360 --> 00:50:25,319 Speaker 3: Welcome back. I'm Guy Ralford on The Gun Guy Show 853 00:50:25,320 --> 00:50:30,239 Speaker 3: on ninety three WIBC training out the Indiana Firearm Coalition, 854 00:50:30,719 --> 00:50:33,520 Speaker 3: and again, I hate it when gun rights groups turn 855 00:50:33,600 --> 00:50:36,160 Speaker 3: on each other, but these guys are just griffers and frauds, 856 00:50:36,960 --> 00:50:38,839 Speaker 3: and I really want to expose them for what they are. 857 00:50:38,880 --> 00:50:41,120 Speaker 3: A lot of other people have seriously just google it 858 00:50:41,239 --> 00:50:45,759 Speaker 3: Door Brothers two A whatever you want to call it, 859 00:50:46,239 --> 00:50:49,000 Speaker 3: dal r R and it did a lot of different articles. 860 00:50:49,000 --> 00:50:50,960 Speaker 3: By the way, my friend Chris Lee at the National 861 00:50:50,960 --> 00:50:55,400 Speaker 3: Shooting Sports Foundation wrote a great article in Shooting Sports 862 00:50:56,520 --> 00:50:59,000 Speaker 3: that talks about these guys and really exposes them. So 863 00:50:59,120 --> 00:51:01,000 Speaker 3: in the same video talking about of course, they went 864 00:51:01,040 --> 00:51:05,480 Speaker 3: after Chris personally posted a picture of him with hunting 865 00:51:05,480 --> 00:51:08,759 Speaker 3: gear on holding a beautiful pheasant up, and they ridiculed 866 00:51:08,800 --> 00:51:13,080 Speaker 3: him for, you know, being a false firearm enthusiast because 867 00:51:13,080 --> 00:51:16,279 Speaker 3: he had you know, quote unquote new hunting equipment on 868 00:51:16,800 --> 00:51:19,040 Speaker 3: and all that was just bus I know Chris, I've 869 00:51:19,080 --> 00:51:21,239 Speaker 3: known him for years. He's been a long time hunter 870 00:51:21,320 --> 00:51:24,760 Speaker 3: his whole life and a true advocate for Second Amendment rights. 871 00:51:25,080 --> 00:51:28,120 Speaker 3: And it just shows you how idiotic the attacks these 872 00:51:28,160 --> 00:51:30,160 Speaker 3: people make on people really can be. By the way 873 00:51:30,200 --> 00:51:32,840 Speaker 3: they went after Chris, by the way, I'm fully expecting 874 00:51:32,880 --> 00:51:35,680 Speaker 3: something along the lines coming after me. Hey, take your 875 00:51:35,719 --> 00:51:39,359 Speaker 3: best shot. But their position in this video is they 876 00:51:39,400 --> 00:51:43,520 Speaker 3: formed the Indiana Firearms Coalition because of the horrible rhinos 877 00:51:43,560 --> 00:51:50,000 Speaker 3: and backstabbers that not only stood by while the red 878 00:51:50,000 --> 00:51:52,440 Speaker 3: Flag statue was passed in two thousand and five, but 879 00:51:52,480 --> 00:51:55,400 Speaker 3: then stepped up and actually made it much much worse 880 00:51:56,040 --> 00:51:58,279 Speaker 3: in twenty nineteen. And then they said, boy, we just 881 00:51:58,280 --> 00:52:00,000 Speaker 3: can't let this spread. And this is going to enfluce 882 00:52:00,080 --> 00:52:03,359 Speaker 3: in so other states, and it allows lawmakers in other 883 00:52:03,360 --> 00:52:05,719 Speaker 3: states to say, wow, if red state like Indiana can 884 00:52:05,760 --> 00:52:07,520 Speaker 3: pass this horrible red flag law, that we should be 885 00:52:07,560 --> 00:52:09,640 Speaker 3: able to do it here. So they need to step 886 00:52:09,719 --> 00:52:11,920 Speaker 3: up and save us from what's going on in the 887 00:52:11,960 --> 00:52:17,000 Speaker 3: Indiana General Assembly. And so they formed the Indiana Firearms 888 00:52:17,040 --> 00:52:21,719 Speaker 3: Coalition in twenty nineteen or twenty twenty one. Rather and listen, 889 00:52:21,760 --> 00:52:24,279 Speaker 3: they're just wrong about the statute. In twenty nineteen, we 890 00:52:24,360 --> 00:52:27,160 Speaker 3: dramatically improved the statute. I was right in the middle 891 00:52:27,160 --> 00:52:29,960 Speaker 3: of the process. I was the one fighting to fix 892 00:52:30,000 --> 00:52:34,560 Speaker 3: the definition of dangerous and we got that done. And again, 893 00:52:34,719 --> 00:52:36,440 Speaker 3: there are people right now that still have their gun 894 00:52:36,560 --> 00:52:40,640 Speaker 3: rights because we took out this ridiculous emotionally unstable and 895 00:52:40,760 --> 00:52:42,799 Speaker 3: maybe a danger in the future, but now there has 896 00:52:42,840 --> 00:52:47,160 Speaker 3: to be real evidence of dangerousness or including being suicidal, 897 00:52:47,239 --> 00:52:51,040 Speaker 3: and people will win cases for generations based on those improvements. 898 00:52:51,360 --> 00:52:54,280 Speaker 3: That wasn't selling anybody down the river. That wasn't turning 899 00:52:54,320 --> 00:52:57,120 Speaker 3: our backs on gun owners. That was fighting the fight, 900 00:52:57,200 --> 00:53:00,120 Speaker 3: as participating in the process, being at the table. I 901 00:53:00,160 --> 00:53:02,160 Speaker 3: know a lot of this was around my table in 902 00:53:02,280 --> 00:53:05,200 Speaker 3: my office in Carnibal Well, meeting legislators, going here's how 903 00:53:05,239 --> 00:53:07,120 Speaker 3: we can improve this thing that needs to be improved. 904 00:53:08,320 --> 00:53:12,200 Speaker 3: And yes, they added criminal penalties to say, if you 905 00:53:12,360 --> 00:53:14,480 Speaker 3: buy a gun or possessed gun after you're found to 906 00:53:14,520 --> 00:53:17,920 Speaker 3: be dangerous, then now that's a mist By the way, 907 00:53:17,920 --> 00:53:20,040 Speaker 3: they wanted to make it a felony, and I participated 908 00:53:20,040 --> 00:53:22,799 Speaker 3: in discussions where we talked him into reducing it only 909 00:53:22,800 --> 00:53:25,680 Speaker 3: to a misdemeanor. It's a felony. If you provide a 910 00:53:25,719 --> 00:53:28,280 Speaker 3: gun to someone knowing they've been determined to be dangerous, 911 00:53:28,640 --> 00:53:32,600 Speaker 3: you yourself only a misdemeanor. So we held that down. 912 00:53:32,680 --> 00:53:35,040 Speaker 3: But yes, you could say that was an expansion of 913 00:53:35,080 --> 00:53:38,759 Speaker 3: the red flag statute. That's fair, but it was more 914 00:53:38,800 --> 00:53:41,960 Speaker 3: than counterbalanced by the dramatic improvements we made in it, 915 00:53:42,320 --> 00:53:44,399 Speaker 3: and that's helping a lot of people. I know because 916 00:53:44,400 --> 00:53:47,920 Speaker 3: I handle the cases on the ground in the courtroom. 917 00:53:48,400 --> 00:53:50,239 Speaker 3: And with that, I'll tell you what. Let's go to 918 00:53:50,280 --> 00:53:54,520 Speaker 3: the phone lines because Anthony has called in to I 919 00:53:54,560 --> 00:53:57,000 Speaker 3: believe talking about the Door Brothers as well. Anthony, Welcome 920 00:53:57,000 --> 00:53:57,719 Speaker 3: to the Gun Guy Show. 921 00:53:58,440 --> 00:54:02,520 Speaker 4: Yeah, good evening. I'm glad you stepped up to talk 922 00:54:02,560 --> 00:54:06,880 Speaker 4: about these grifters. Uh. I want something that you haven't 923 00:54:06,920 --> 00:54:07,560 Speaker 4: mentioned yet. 924 00:54:07,960 --> 00:54:08,360 Speaker 3: Uh. 925 00:54:08,480 --> 00:54:10,440 Speaker 4: And they do this with every single one of their 926 00:54:10,440 --> 00:54:13,000 Speaker 4: headquarters though, what seventeen different headquarters bet. 927 00:54:13,120 --> 00:54:17,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, they're they're ups box stores, Yeah, the. 928 00:54:17,560 --> 00:54:22,920 Speaker 4: UPS Mail and Parcel drop box. Yeah, Washington Street in Indianapolis, Yeah, 929 00:54:22,960 --> 00:54:26,520 Speaker 4: I know, and every single one. The other thing is 930 00:54:26,520 --> 00:54:30,759 Speaker 4: is that you know these guys are going after kind 931 00:54:30,760 --> 00:54:33,160 Speaker 4: of you tangently. But some of the guys in the 932 00:54:33,160 --> 00:54:36,840 Speaker 4: Indiana General Assembly who get no credit from them for 933 00:54:37,120 --> 00:54:38,800 Speaker 4: doing stuff like Ben Smaaltz. 934 00:54:40,640 --> 00:54:44,040 Speaker 3: There, they went after Ben in this same video. They said, Oh, well, 935 00:54:44,280 --> 00:54:46,520 Speaker 3: we're gonna primary Ben Smalltz and that's going to put 936 00:54:46,520 --> 00:54:48,760 Speaker 3: the fear of God in him because we're gonna, we're gonna, 937 00:54:48,840 --> 00:54:52,839 Speaker 3: we're gonna fund his opponent Ben Smallts isn't losing any 938 00:54:52,880 --> 00:54:56,640 Speaker 3: primary anytime soon, certainly not because of the Door Brothers. 939 00:54:57,239 --> 00:55:00,719 Speaker 4: Yeah, you and Jim Lucas did the Kisney's law. Yeah 940 00:55:00,480 --> 00:55:03,880 Speaker 4: you know, where were these guys, you know, cricketing? 941 00:55:04,280 --> 00:55:07,040 Speaker 3: Well, exactly, and listen, Anthey, thanks so much for your call. 942 00:55:07,560 --> 00:55:09,759 Speaker 3: I've never seen these guys in the state House. And listen. 943 00:55:09,800 --> 00:55:12,520 Speaker 3: Aaron dor in particular, he's kind of he's the older one, 944 00:55:12,640 --> 00:55:14,920 Speaker 3: he's the most vocal. I think he says he brags 945 00:55:14,920 --> 00:55:17,520 Speaker 3: about being so involved in the legislative process. He's a 946 00:55:17,560 --> 00:55:21,919 Speaker 3: noticeable guy. He's a great, big, heavy guy, balding. Hey, 947 00:55:22,080 --> 00:55:24,360 Speaker 3: don't put that. I don't hold that against him. But 948 00:55:24,440 --> 00:55:26,640 Speaker 3: he's got these big dark circles under his eyes. He 949 00:55:26,719 --> 00:55:28,960 Speaker 3: just looks as shady as he really is. He's not 950 00:55:29,000 --> 00:55:32,000 Speaker 3: a guy you're gonna miss walking around the hallways of 951 00:55:32,040 --> 00:55:34,960 Speaker 3: the state House, much less showing up in a a 952 00:55:35,120 --> 00:55:38,799 Speaker 3: in a committee hearing somewhere. He's never ever shown up 953 00:55:39,360 --> 00:55:41,600 Speaker 3: in support of a bill. I've seen a couple of pictures. 954 00:55:41,640 --> 00:55:44,960 Speaker 3: In fact, I've seen articles from other states where he 955 00:55:45,160 --> 00:55:48,680 Speaker 3: was made fun of and ridiculed because he showed up 956 00:55:49,080 --> 00:55:51,200 Speaker 3: with a tripod to take a picture of himself in 957 00:55:51,239 --> 00:55:54,800 Speaker 3: the state House pose for the picture, took the tripod 958 00:55:54,840 --> 00:55:56,200 Speaker 3: down and the left, and they were in the middle 959 00:55:56,200 --> 00:55:58,520 Speaker 3: of the legislative session. His only involvement was just to 960 00:55:58,600 --> 00:56:01,520 Speaker 3: catch a picture of himself in the state House before 961 00:56:01,520 --> 00:56:03,480 Speaker 3: we ran out the door. Let's go back to the 962 00:56:03,520 --> 00:56:06,719 Speaker 3: phone lines and Kelly and Avon, my buddy has called. 963 00:56:06,480 --> 00:56:09,120 Speaker 5: Hey, Kelly, Hey guy, how are you doing. 964 00:56:09,320 --> 00:56:11,520 Speaker 3: I'm all right, get myself a little riled up here. 965 00:56:12,560 --> 00:56:12,960 Speaker 6: Me too. 966 00:56:13,120 --> 00:56:16,600 Speaker 5: I also wasted thirty eight minutes and fourteen seconds of 967 00:56:16,640 --> 00:56:21,560 Speaker 5: my life yesterday watching watching that video. I'll tell you what, though, 968 00:56:21,920 --> 00:56:26,640 Speaker 5: Indiana gun Owners caught some actual hate from the oldest 969 00:56:26,680 --> 00:56:29,040 Speaker 5: door brother there. I kind of view that as street 970 00:56:29,080 --> 00:56:31,680 Speaker 5: cred for Indiana gun Owners. 971 00:56:31,320 --> 00:56:35,600 Speaker 3: Which, yeah, you know, and if you don't know about that, yeah, 972 00:56:35,680 --> 00:56:38,320 Speaker 3: people don't know about that. It's Indiana Gun Owners dot Com, 973 00:56:38,400 --> 00:56:41,640 Speaker 3: affectionately known as NGO, and I'm a member. I just 974 00:56:41,640 --> 00:56:43,200 Speaker 3: posted a little bit on there. I don't post here 975 00:56:43,239 --> 00:56:45,640 Speaker 3: as much as they used to, but in goes a 976 00:56:45,680 --> 00:56:49,720 Speaker 3: great resource. There's a ton of different forums and topics 977 00:56:49,760 --> 00:56:53,640 Speaker 3: you can select from, including the legislative legislating the Second Amendment, 978 00:56:54,000 --> 00:56:57,280 Speaker 3: which is one that I look at often and contribute 979 00:56:57,280 --> 00:57:00,520 Speaker 3: to on occasion, and as does Kelly. But but now 980 00:57:00,800 --> 00:57:02,880 Speaker 3: for him to come around and go after Ingo, I 981 00:57:02,920 --> 00:57:06,600 Speaker 3: mean the largest forum online for gun owners in Indiana 982 00:57:06,640 --> 00:57:09,520 Speaker 3: after he's formed Indiana Firearms Coalition. That doesn't seem to 983 00:57:09,560 --> 00:57:12,080 Speaker 3: be Does it seem to be a very productive enterprise 984 00:57:12,120 --> 00:57:12,839 Speaker 3: for him in my mind? 985 00:57:12,920 --> 00:57:16,280 Speaker 6: Kelly, Well, you know we were out in front in 986 00:57:16,360 --> 00:57:20,360 Speaker 6: twenty nineteen identifying them as grifters and scam artists, so 987 00:57:20,400 --> 00:57:23,400 Speaker 6: that might be why he said we attacked them. But 988 00:57:23,520 --> 00:57:25,520 Speaker 6: if he would have hung around a little more, he 989 00:57:25,520 --> 00:57:29,200 Speaker 6: would see that sub forum you mentioned the legislation of 990 00:57:29,280 --> 00:57:33,080 Speaker 6: the Second Amendment, where I mean members here are very 991 00:57:33,120 --> 00:57:36,960 Speaker 6: active in this, not only legislation here in Indiana but 992 00:57:37,080 --> 00:57:40,640 Speaker 6: around the country well and ego members of the people 993 00:57:40,680 --> 00:57:44,440 Speaker 6: stepping up when there needs to be phone calls and 994 00:57:44,480 --> 00:57:48,080 Speaker 6: emails and even even old fashioned snail mail to our 995 00:57:48,120 --> 00:57:49,640 Speaker 6: representatives to let them know. 996 00:57:49,560 --> 00:57:50,200 Speaker 4: Where out here. 997 00:57:50,440 --> 00:57:52,560 Speaker 3: You bet, you bet well. Ingo does a great service. 998 00:57:52,600 --> 00:57:55,920 Speaker 3: I'm a fan of the forum. It's like any online forum. 999 00:57:55,960 --> 00:57:58,120 Speaker 3: You can run into a knucklehead here or there, but 1000 00:57:58,480 --> 00:58:01,000 Speaker 3: for the most part it's really I think well done, 1001 00:58:01,080 --> 00:58:04,680 Speaker 3: well moderated, and very very useful for the Indiana Gun 1002 00:58:04,680 --> 00:58:07,120 Speaker 3: Owner tell you what, let's call it there, let's take 1003 00:58:07,160 --> 00:58:09,400 Speaker 3: a break, we come back. I'm gonna go more through 1004 00:58:09,840 --> 00:58:14,040 Speaker 3: some of the horrible attacks again on other organizations, on Ingo, 1005 00:58:14,240 --> 00:58:19,760 Speaker 3: the Indiana Gun Owners Forum, on other gun rights organizations. 1006 00:58:20,200 --> 00:58:22,480 Speaker 3: But and then, and what really kind of set me 1007 00:58:22,520 --> 00:58:25,040 Speaker 3: off and the reason I decided to talk about these 1008 00:58:25,080 --> 00:58:27,920 Speaker 3: grifters on the show tonight is they started taking credit 1009 00:58:27,960 --> 00:58:31,240 Speaker 3: for things that they had absolutely nothing to do with 1010 00:58:31,800 --> 00:58:34,320 Speaker 3: and a lot of which I was directly involved in. 1011 00:58:34,680 --> 00:58:36,680 Speaker 3: That sets me off. You set me off like that, 1012 00:58:36,840 --> 00:58:38,760 Speaker 3: I'm gonna call it, especially right here on the Gun 1013 00:58:38,760 --> 00:58:41,000 Speaker 3: Guy Show. And with that, let's take a break. This 1014 00:58:41,120 --> 00:58:42,840 Speaker 3: is Guy Ralford on The Gun Guy Show on ninety 1015 00:58:42,840 --> 00:58:43,720 Speaker 3: three WIBC. 1016 00:58:51,200 --> 00:58:56,160 Speaker 1: He's a Second Amendment attorney, he's an NRA certified firearms instructor. 1017 00:58:56,640 --> 00:59:03,880 Speaker 1: He's the Gun Guy, Guy RALFORDYPC. 1018 00:59:02,560 --> 00:59:04,680 Speaker 3: And welcome back. I'm Guy Ralford on The Gun Guy 1019 00:59:04,720 --> 00:59:10,040 Speaker 3: Show in ninety three wibc's talking about the Indiana Firearms Coalition. Unfortunately, 1020 00:59:10,520 --> 00:59:15,800 Speaker 3: some grifters, scam artists among us, trying to get your 1021 00:59:15,840 --> 00:59:20,480 Speaker 3: contributions and in the process virtually nothing for gun owners. 1022 00:59:21,440 --> 00:59:24,000 Speaker 3: In Indiana and then try to take credit for the 1023 00:59:24,040 --> 00:59:27,120 Speaker 3: hard work and success of others, which is setting a 1024 00:59:27,160 --> 00:59:29,240 Speaker 3: lot of us off who are actually involved in the fight. 1025 00:59:30,000 --> 00:59:32,280 Speaker 3: And so it's time to call them out. And again 1026 00:59:32,320 --> 00:59:35,520 Speaker 3: there's a great thread on ingo Indiana gun Owners. It's 1027 00:59:35,560 --> 00:59:40,200 Speaker 3: Indiana gun Owners dot Com under legislating the Second Amendment, 1028 00:59:41,160 --> 00:59:46,320 Speaker 3: and it just lays it out. Even Kelly Navon, who 1029 00:59:46,400 --> 00:59:50,800 Speaker 3: just called even has timestamps on one post here that 1030 00:59:50,840 --> 00:59:53,240 Speaker 3: talks about the different topics these guys get into and 1031 00:59:53,640 --> 00:59:57,439 Speaker 3: how completely off base they are. But with that something 1032 00:59:57,480 --> 00:59:59,800 Speaker 3: that got me, so they said, okay, Well, in response 1033 00:59:59,840 --> 01:00:04,640 Speaker 3: to all the rhinos and the backstabbers, you know, expanding 1034 01:00:04,760 --> 01:00:08,240 Speaker 3: the red Flag law in twenty nineteen. Now, we dramatically 1035 01:00:08,320 --> 01:00:12,439 Speaker 3: improved the red Flag Law in twenty nineteen in ways 1036 01:00:12,480 --> 01:00:16,920 Speaker 3: I went through. That's when we formed the Indiana Firearms Coalition. 1037 01:00:16,960 --> 01:00:19,800 Speaker 3: And boy, it's a good thing we did that. We 1038 01:00:19,840 --> 01:00:21,840 Speaker 3: formed it in twenty twenty one in reaction to what 1039 01:00:21,880 --> 01:00:26,520 Speaker 3: happened in twenty nineteen. And by the way, if you 1040 01:00:26,640 --> 01:00:31,760 Speaker 3: formed Indiana Firearms Coalition in twenty twenty one, that means 1041 01:00:32,640 --> 01:00:38,520 Speaker 3: you were formed during the fight for constitutional care. Probably 1042 01:00:38,880 --> 01:00:41,240 Speaker 3: the biggest and again, there are others out there. The 1043 01:00:41,280 --> 01:00:50,240 Speaker 3: rest of the preemption bill is you know, prevents local 1044 01:00:50,240 --> 01:00:53,760 Speaker 3: governments from regulating firearms, is huge, huge, huge huge. The 1045 01:00:53,800 --> 01:00:56,600 Speaker 3: self defense Immunity bill that I wrote and we passed 1046 01:00:56,600 --> 01:00:59,480 Speaker 3: twenty nineteen is also big. But I don't have any 1047 01:00:59,560 --> 01:01:02,480 Speaker 3: problems saying constitutional carries the biggest pro two way achievement 1048 01:01:02,520 --> 01:01:04,680 Speaker 3: we've achieved here in Indiana, and it was a ten 1049 01:01:04,760 --> 01:01:07,120 Speaker 3: year fight to get it done, and I was involved 1050 01:01:07,120 --> 01:01:11,080 Speaker 3: all ten years. Well, if Indian a Firearms Coalition was 1051 01:01:11,080 --> 01:01:14,360 Speaker 3: formed at twenty twenty one, that means they were they 1052 01:01:14,360 --> 01:01:19,040 Speaker 3: were formed, They were supposedly fighting for two A rights 1053 01:01:19,080 --> 01:01:21,280 Speaker 3: in Indiana in twenty twenty one. Where were they in 1054 01:01:21,320 --> 01:01:25,320 Speaker 3: twenty twenty two when we finally got it passed. For 1055 01:01:25,400 --> 01:01:29,720 Speaker 3: all the hearings, all the conversations in the hallway, all 1056 01:01:29,720 --> 01:01:34,560 Speaker 3: the strategy sessions, all the meetings with legislators, Where was 1057 01:01:35,320 --> 01:01:37,240 Speaker 3: Where was Aaron Dor? Where was Chris Dorr? Where were 1058 01:01:37,240 --> 01:01:39,720 Speaker 3: the other two door brothers? They weren't in the State House, 1059 01:01:39,760 --> 01:01:43,400 Speaker 3: I know because I was there. Never testified in the 1060 01:01:43,400 --> 01:01:45,880 Speaker 3: committee hearing ever. Once at one point they show a 1061 01:01:45,920 --> 01:01:48,800 Speaker 3: picture of somebody testifying in one of the committee rooms 1062 01:01:48,840 --> 01:01:51,840 Speaker 3: in Indiana, and Aaron Dorr goes, yeah, you know, some 1063 01:01:51,920 --> 01:01:55,400 Speaker 3: of these Midwest courthouses or state houses are not great. 1064 01:01:55,600 --> 01:01:57,280 Speaker 3: You know, look at this conference room. Yeah, it's in 1065 01:01:57,320 --> 01:02:02,280 Speaker 3: the basement. I've testified in that particular room dozens of times. 1066 01:02:03,760 --> 01:02:06,160 Speaker 3: And I'm going I've never seen you there. You're making 1067 01:02:06,160 --> 01:02:07,320 Speaker 3: it sound like you've been there. 1068 01:02:07,360 --> 01:02:07,720 Speaker 4: I don't know. 1069 01:02:07,840 --> 01:02:09,760 Speaker 3: You may have stopped buying, taken a picture. You've never 1070 01:02:09,800 --> 01:02:11,960 Speaker 3: shown up for any significant event. Hey, you sure's hell 1071 01:02:12,000 --> 01:02:14,480 Speaker 3: weren't involved in the fight for constitutional carry when we 1072 01:02:14,520 --> 01:02:17,560 Speaker 3: finally got it passed in twenty twenty two. I'm sure 1073 01:02:17,560 --> 01:02:20,120 Speaker 3: you want to take credit for it. But then in 1074 01:02:20,120 --> 01:02:21,840 Speaker 3: the video they go on to say, boy, sure is 1075 01:02:21,920 --> 01:02:24,080 Speaker 3: a good thing that we're around here in Indiana, because 1076 01:02:24,080 --> 01:02:27,160 Speaker 3: in twenty twenty three, they attempted to expand the red 1077 01:02:27,160 --> 01:02:31,960 Speaker 3: flag law again, and we snuffed it out. We stepped 1078 01:02:32,040 --> 01:02:35,520 Speaker 3: up and headed it off, and we got our email 1079 01:02:35,560 --> 01:02:41,240 Speaker 3: campaign out, and we sent text messages to legislators and 1080 01:02:41,280 --> 01:02:44,000 Speaker 3: we got involved, and we snuffed out another attempt to 1081 01:02:44,040 --> 01:02:46,160 Speaker 3: expand the red flag law on twenty twenty three. Well 1082 01:02:46,160 --> 01:02:48,520 Speaker 3: what are we talking about. Yeah, there was a horrible 1083 01:02:48,560 --> 01:02:51,439 Speaker 3: attempt to expand the red Flag Law on twenty twenty three, 1084 01:02:51,440 --> 01:02:53,760 Speaker 3: and what it was, it was a bill. The worst 1085 01:02:53,760 --> 01:02:55,720 Speaker 3: thing were several bad things about it, but the worst 1086 01:02:55,720 --> 01:02:58,000 Speaker 3: thing about it it would have made you a prohibited 1087 01:02:58,040 --> 01:03:04,080 Speaker 3: possessor immediately upon a judge finding probable cause to believe 1088 01:03:04,120 --> 01:03:08,200 Speaker 3: that you're dangerous, or a judge issuing a warrant based 1089 01:03:08,240 --> 01:03:11,240 Speaker 3: on probable cause to seize fire arms from you based 1090 01:03:11,280 --> 01:03:14,880 Speaker 3: on probable cause that you're dangerous. Now, at this point, 1091 01:03:17,400 --> 01:03:21,680 Speaker 3: you've had no due process other than the judge reviewing 1092 01:03:23,040 --> 01:03:27,040 Speaker 3: and essentially an application. It's an affid David about establishing 1093 01:03:27,040 --> 01:03:30,200 Speaker 3: probable costs, but you haven't had your own day in 1094 01:03:30,280 --> 01:03:35,120 Speaker 3: court yet. And in that sense, to make you a 1095 01:03:35,160 --> 01:03:38,120 Speaker 3: prohibited possessor, you've lost your Second Amendment rights. You cannot 1096 01:03:38,160 --> 01:03:39,600 Speaker 3: go into a gun store and buy a gun. You're 1097 01:03:39,600 --> 01:03:42,400 Speaker 3: a prohibitive possessor, just like a felon when you haven't 1098 01:03:42,400 --> 01:03:45,680 Speaker 3: had a court hearing yet. And we said, oh, hell no. 1099 01:03:46,880 --> 01:03:50,600 Speaker 3: But the prosecutor's office and several police departments around the 1100 01:03:50,640 --> 01:03:53,680 Speaker 3: country we're saying, oh, we need this because you know, 1101 01:03:53,760 --> 01:03:55,840 Speaker 3: these people still have access to guns before they have 1102 01:03:55,960 --> 01:03:58,200 Speaker 3: their hearing, and these things can stretch out for a 1103 01:03:58,200 --> 01:04:00,240 Speaker 3: while if they ask for more time before they're hearing, 1104 01:04:00,640 --> 01:04:02,680 Speaker 3: and we're worried, you know, they're going to go out 1105 01:04:02,720 --> 01:04:06,640 Speaker 3: and commit crimes or hurt people in the process in 1106 01:04:06,680 --> 01:04:10,880 Speaker 3: the interim, So we need him declared prohibited possessors and 1107 01:04:10,920 --> 01:04:13,000 Speaker 3: make it illegal for them to have a gun before 1108 01:04:13,040 --> 01:04:15,080 Speaker 3: their day in court where they get to come in 1109 01:04:15,080 --> 01:04:17,520 Speaker 3: and present their own evidence and have a lawyer represent 1110 01:04:17,560 --> 01:04:19,640 Speaker 3: them and have all the other elements to do process. 1111 01:04:21,400 --> 01:04:24,520 Speaker 3: And that was a bill filed in the Senate and 1112 01:04:24,560 --> 01:04:27,440 Speaker 3: it was assigned to Aaron Freeman's committee. Senator Aaron Freeman, 1113 01:04:27,560 --> 01:04:30,520 Speaker 3: chairman of the Courts and Criminal Code Committee in the Senate. 1114 01:04:33,080 --> 01:04:36,360 Speaker 3: And Aaron listen, Aaron, I always give him credit. In 1115 01:04:36,400 --> 01:04:38,880 Speaker 3: twenty twenty two during constitutional carry, I think he saved 1116 01:04:38,960 --> 01:04:43,480 Speaker 3: us on constitutional carry in the Senate and he was 1117 01:04:43,520 --> 01:04:45,480 Speaker 3: just a rock stars and I always get will and 1118 01:04:45,480 --> 01:04:47,360 Speaker 3: give him credit for that. And he's been very solid 1119 01:04:47,440 --> 01:04:51,240 Speaker 3: on two A issues in the past. But Aaron was 1120 01:04:51,800 --> 01:04:54,880 Speaker 3: and Aaron you know, has a lot of former connections 1121 01:04:55,120 --> 01:04:58,280 Speaker 3: to law enforcement himself, and it's always considered very pro 1122 01:04:58,680 --> 01:05:02,120 Speaker 3: law enforcement in addition to being pro two way, and yes, 1123 01:05:02,200 --> 01:05:05,240 Speaker 3: you can be both. I put myself in the same category, 1124 01:05:05,680 --> 01:05:09,000 Speaker 3: but he's getting pressure from the Prosecutors Association and police 1125 01:05:09,040 --> 01:05:11,560 Speaker 3: departments to say, yeah, we ought to make people prohibited 1126 01:05:11,600 --> 01:05:15,040 Speaker 3: possessors before the hearing, but oh, by the way, when 1127 01:05:15,080 --> 01:05:17,480 Speaker 3: they get their hearing, and if they're not shown to 1128 01:05:17,480 --> 01:05:20,480 Speaker 3: be dangerous at that point, then okay, then that prohibition 1129 01:05:20,520 --> 01:05:24,040 Speaker 3: gets lifted. And we actually had a meeting and it 1130 01:05:24,160 --> 01:05:29,160 Speaker 3: was Senator Chairman Aaron Freeman and me and three members 1131 01:05:29,160 --> 01:05:31,880 Speaker 3: of the Indiana Prosecutors Association who were pushing for the bill, 1132 01:05:33,840 --> 01:05:35,640 Speaker 3: and I was there on the pro two A side, 1133 01:05:35,640 --> 01:05:38,040 Speaker 3: and the prosecutors were pushing the bill, and we had 1134 01:05:38,040 --> 01:05:40,000 Speaker 3: a discussion and I talked about how I would never, 1135 01:05:40,240 --> 01:05:42,560 Speaker 3: could never support a bill that would make people a 1136 01:05:42,560 --> 01:05:47,280 Speaker 3: prohibited possessor before they ever had their day in court 1137 01:05:47,320 --> 01:05:50,000 Speaker 3: to present their own evidence. And I talked about all 1138 01:05:50,000 --> 01:05:51,520 Speaker 3: the cases I've won. They said, well, you got to 1139 01:05:51,600 --> 01:05:53,480 Speaker 3: understand these people are going to lose eventually. I mean, 1140 01:05:53,520 --> 01:05:56,120 Speaker 3: there's a reason the judge found probable cause. And I'd 1141 01:05:56,120 --> 01:06:01,920 Speaker 3: say I'm batting about eight eighty on winning these things 1142 01:06:02,960 --> 01:06:04,920 Speaker 3: in terms of I win most of them. And that's 1143 01:06:04,920 --> 01:06:06,440 Speaker 3: not because I'm a great lawyer. It's because I take 1144 01:06:06,480 --> 01:06:10,560 Speaker 3: cases I believe we should win and a person's not dangerous, 1145 01:06:12,680 --> 01:06:14,360 Speaker 3: and I said, we're gonna make those people prohibit a 1146 01:06:14,360 --> 01:06:18,640 Speaker 3: possessor before their day in court. Hell no, that's and 1147 01:06:18,680 --> 01:06:20,960 Speaker 3: to me, I will litigate that. I will take that 1148 01:06:21,240 --> 01:06:23,200 Speaker 3: up and I will I will win that on due 1149 01:06:23,240 --> 01:06:25,400 Speaker 3: process crowns in the Court of Appeals of the Indiana 1150 01:06:25,400 --> 01:06:27,600 Speaker 3: Supreme Court or the US Supreme Court. I will litigate 1151 01:06:27,600 --> 01:06:31,120 Speaker 3: this issue, and I believe I will win it. And 1152 01:06:31,160 --> 01:06:33,480 Speaker 3: I wasn't disrespectful to anybody, and the prosecutors were all 1153 01:06:33,600 --> 01:06:36,920 Speaker 3: very respectful as well, and we had a nice professional conversation. 1154 01:06:37,680 --> 01:06:40,920 Speaker 3: But the end of the day, Senator Freeman said, I 1155 01:06:41,000 --> 01:06:42,919 Speaker 3: don't believe this bill should move forward in its current 1156 01:06:43,040 --> 01:06:46,280 Speaker 3: form for the reasons that we've discussed here, meaning the 1157 01:06:46,320 --> 01:06:49,600 Speaker 3: reasons I discussed there. And so that bill died in committee, 1158 01:06:49,640 --> 01:06:53,080 Speaker 3: didn't get a hearing. And in this video the door 1159 01:06:53,240 --> 01:06:58,000 Speaker 3: brothers after knowing that history myself, I mean, having known 1160 01:06:58,360 --> 01:07:01,240 Speaker 3: about that meeting and and and how Senator Aaron Freeman 1161 01:07:01,320 --> 01:07:05,240 Speaker 3: killed it because of the right reasons, because he's a 1162 01:07:05,240 --> 01:07:10,200 Speaker 3: solid senator and I think a great representative of Indiana 1163 01:07:10,480 --> 01:07:13,120 Speaker 3: citizens in the Indiana and General Assembly. He made the 1164 01:07:13,240 --> 01:07:16,160 Speaker 3: right decision. And yes, I had a lot of input 1165 01:07:16,200 --> 01:07:18,280 Speaker 3: on that point, and I think I was persuasive in 1166 01:07:18,320 --> 01:07:21,960 Speaker 3: the process. But the Door Brothers said, yeah, we launched 1167 01:07:21,960 --> 01:07:24,800 Speaker 3: our campaign because we had stepped in and gotten involved 1168 01:07:24,840 --> 01:07:26,960 Speaker 3: in Indiana. And boy, it's a good thing we did, 1169 01:07:27,000 --> 01:07:29,959 Speaker 3: because we snuffed out this bill in twenty twenty three, 1170 01:07:30,840 --> 01:07:32,680 Speaker 3: and they took all the credit. I never heard from 1171 01:07:32,720 --> 01:07:35,360 Speaker 3: these people, I never saw them. I never talked to 1172 01:07:35,400 --> 01:07:38,120 Speaker 3: any legislators that had ever heard from them. They did 1173 01:07:38,240 --> 01:07:41,680 Speaker 3: nothing to achieve that result in twenty twenty three, and 1174 01:07:41,720 --> 01:07:45,640 Speaker 3: that they took all the credit. Not okay with that, 1175 01:07:45,720 --> 01:07:47,919 Speaker 3: but get this and we'll wrap up when we come 1176 01:07:47,960 --> 01:07:52,400 Speaker 3: back on this point again. A short segment the bill 1177 01:07:52,440 --> 01:07:55,520 Speaker 3: I wrote last year to where if people are found 1178 01:07:55,560 --> 01:07:58,600 Speaker 3: to not be dangerous or no longer be dangerous, and 1179 01:07:58,640 --> 01:08:01,440 Speaker 3: they can now spunge that off their public record so 1180 01:08:01,480 --> 01:08:05,000 Speaker 3: they don't lose jobs lose relationships. I wrote that I 1181 01:08:05,120 --> 01:08:07,840 Speaker 3: fought for it in the General Assembly. Ben Smaaltz introduced it. 1182 01:08:08,240 --> 01:08:11,560 Speaker 3: Guess who to credit for that bill as well? Yeah, 1183 01:08:11,800 --> 01:08:16,040 Speaker 3: you guessed it. The slime balls at Indiana Firearms Coalition. 1184 01:08:16,160 --> 01:08:17,759 Speaker 3: Right now, we're taking a break. This is guy Ralford 1185 01:08:17,760 --> 01:08:26,720 Speaker 3: on The Gun Guy Show on ninety three WYBC, Second. 1186 01:08:26,439 --> 01:08:29,240 Speaker 1: To none on this second amendment. This is the Gun 1187 01:08:29,280 --> 01:08:32,640 Speaker 1: Guy with Guy Ralford on ninety three WYBC. 1188 01:08:34,640 --> 01:08:41,800 Speaker 3: So this legislative session, I realized and there's something I'd 1189 01:08:41,840 --> 01:08:44,280 Speaker 3: been talking to legislators about before. In fact, I had 1190 01:08:44,280 --> 01:08:46,360 Speaker 3: a bill I wanted to get introduced last year in 1191 01:08:46,360 --> 01:08:49,080 Speaker 3: twenty twenty four. Didn't get that done until this year. 1192 01:08:49,120 --> 01:08:52,120 Speaker 3: But it was a bill that addressed another huge problem 1193 01:08:52,160 --> 01:08:56,280 Speaker 3: with red flag, which is that if someone accuses you 1194 01:08:56,280 --> 01:09:00,720 Speaker 3: of being dangerous and authorities begin a person against you, 1195 01:09:00,800 --> 01:09:05,360 Speaker 3: even if you win, that stays on your criminal history. 1196 01:09:05,520 --> 01:09:08,200 Speaker 3: It's not even a criminal proceeding. It's a civil proceeding. 1197 01:09:10,120 --> 01:09:12,439 Speaker 3: But just like traffic tickets and whatnot, you go to 1198 01:09:12,479 --> 01:09:14,920 Speaker 3: my case, for instance, I use a separate system called 1199 01:09:15,000 --> 01:09:18,640 Speaker 3: dockspop that a lot of lawyers use, but I use 1200 01:09:19,720 --> 01:09:21,680 Speaker 3: the lawyer's version of my case as well, and you 1201 01:09:21,720 --> 01:09:26,880 Speaker 3: can you can sign on there, just the publicly accessible 1202 01:09:27,240 --> 01:09:31,080 Speaker 3: version of the site and put in somebody's name and 1203 01:09:31,360 --> 01:09:33,759 Speaker 3: come up with their whole background. You can see civil 1204 01:09:33,800 --> 01:09:36,920 Speaker 3: cases filed against them, you can see criminal cases, but 1205 01:09:36,960 --> 01:09:40,800 Speaker 3: you'd also see red flat cases and in a criminal case. 1206 01:09:40,840 --> 01:09:44,800 Speaker 3: If you're found not guilty or a case is dismissed, 1207 01:09:45,920 --> 01:09:52,000 Speaker 3: that is immediately expunged. Even if you're found guilty, you 1208 01:09:52,040 --> 01:09:53,880 Speaker 3: can go back for a lot of crimes, not all. 1209 01:09:54,040 --> 01:09:57,080 Speaker 3: This is what I talk about when I'm plugging expungements. 1210 01:09:57,880 --> 01:10:00,680 Speaker 3: You can go back and expunge criminal conviction for a 1211 01:10:00,720 --> 01:10:03,600 Speaker 3: lot of convictions. But because a red flag proceeding was 1212 01:10:03,600 --> 01:10:05,479 Speaker 3: civil and not criminal, there was no way to expunge 1213 01:10:05,479 --> 01:10:07,400 Speaker 3: that off your record. So people were being found to 1214 01:10:07,400 --> 01:10:10,360 Speaker 3: be not dangerous, but then going and applying for a 1215 01:10:10,439 --> 01:10:12,040 Speaker 3: job and they run it and they go, well, wow, 1216 01:10:12,040 --> 01:10:14,400 Speaker 3: what's this red flagcase where you had gun sees from you? 1217 01:10:14,880 --> 01:10:17,360 Speaker 3: We don't think we want you working for this company. 1218 01:10:18,840 --> 01:10:23,479 Speaker 3: And it was costing people relationships and volunteer opportunities. Had 1219 01:10:23,560 --> 01:10:26,640 Speaker 3: lady who wasn't allowed to teach her to coach her 1220 01:10:26,720 --> 01:10:29,559 Speaker 3: daughter's softball team, said well, you know, we see you 1221 01:10:29,640 --> 01:10:32,559 Speaker 3: had this red flat case. Yeah, but I won. Well, 1222 01:10:32,680 --> 01:10:35,680 Speaker 3: we're not comfortable with that. And so last year I 1223 01:10:35,720 --> 01:10:37,760 Speaker 3: wrote a bill because I saw the need in my 1224 01:10:37,920 --> 01:10:41,639 Speaker 3: cases with my clients, so we ought to be able 1225 01:10:41,680 --> 01:10:44,439 Speaker 3: to clean this off people's records that shouldn't influence them 1226 01:10:44,479 --> 01:10:49,880 Speaker 3: after they win. So I wrote that bill and Ben 1227 01:10:49,920 --> 01:10:53,000 Speaker 3: s Maltz was the author in the House, sailed through 1228 01:10:53,040 --> 01:10:56,960 Speaker 3: committee unanimously. Get this. It passed unanimously on the floor 1229 01:10:57,000 --> 01:11:00,519 Speaker 3: of the House, went over to the Senate, passed unanimously committee. 1230 01:11:00,560 --> 01:11:03,759 Speaker 3: Out of that, I testified both places and then passed 1231 01:11:03,800 --> 01:11:07,680 Speaker 3: unanimously on the floor of the Senate. There you go, 1232 01:11:07,800 --> 01:11:11,080 Speaker 3: we win. It passes now the law Guess who took 1233 01:11:11,080 --> 01:11:13,760 Speaker 3: credit for that in their video the Door Brothers. They said, 1234 01:11:13,800 --> 01:11:20,599 Speaker 3: because the legislators were so afraid of them, they felt 1235 01:11:20,600 --> 01:11:22,680 Speaker 3: the need to do something on red Flag, had to 1236 01:11:22,760 --> 01:11:26,880 Speaker 3: appease them and passed my expungement statue. That's the scumbag 1237 01:11:26,960 --> 01:11:29,680 Speaker 3: these people are. That's this week's show. Hope you enjoyed it. 1238 01:11:29,680 --> 01:11:32,200 Speaker 3: Come back next week, and I always remember, be safe 1239 01:11:32,320 --> 01:11:33,640 Speaker 3: and shoot straight.