1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,840 Speaker 1: Okay, So there is this survey and it was from 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:06,440 Speaker 1: the argument of vera site. 3 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:09,760 Speaker 2: Oh that sounds like a very reputable polling system I've 4 00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:10,879 Speaker 2: never heard of before. 5 00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:15,960 Speaker 1: And they asked a hypothetical question, and the question was, 6 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:21,439 Speaker 1: if there was an election today and your choices were 7 00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:23,599 Speaker 1: AOC or. 8 00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:27,560 Speaker 3: Jd Vance, who would you pick? 9 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:33,479 Speaker 1: And surprisingly, it was a lot closer than you'd think. Actually, 10 00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:38,520 Speaker 1: AOC won this poll fifty one to forty nine percent. 11 00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:43,879 Speaker 3: Now there is a two percent margin of error, right. 12 00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:45,800 Speaker 2: So the reality could swing either way. 13 00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:48,159 Speaker 3: Right. I was surprised by that. 14 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:53,600 Speaker 1: Well, this hypothetical matchup, they've got AOC beating jd Vance. 15 00:00:53,840 --> 00:00:59,080 Speaker 2: Look, look, number one, can't believe we're doing presidential polls 16 00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 2: for twenty twenty eight when we're still a year away 17 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 2: from the twenty twenty six mid terms. That's number one. 18 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:08,559 Speaker 2: For fun, that's number one. Number two. Keep in mind, yeah, 19 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:11,800 Speaker 2: I got breaking news for you here. The twenty twenty 20 00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:15,959 Speaker 2: eight presidential election is gonna be real, real close, no 21 00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 2: matter who the Democrats put up there. I mean, it 22 00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:22,520 Speaker 2: could be AOC, could be Gavin Newsom, could be Governor 23 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:27,679 Speaker 2: Bashar in Kentucky. It could be Shapiro from Pennsylvania. It 24 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:30,360 Speaker 2: could be mayor Peak, it could be Gretchen Whitmer, who knows, 25 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 2: But it doesn't matter who the Democrats run. Let's keep 26 00:01:33,200 --> 00:01:36,720 Speaker 2: this in mind. They ran Kamala Harris last time. She 27 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:40,280 Speaker 2: was a disaster, dumpster fire of a candidate, maybe the 28 00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:44,320 Speaker 2: least qualified candidate we've seen run on either major party 29 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 2: in modern times. And Donald Trump won the presidency. Now 30 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:49,720 Speaker 2: you want the popular vote, but it was by a 31 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:54,279 Speaker 2: tiny margin, less than one percent. And that's for a terrible, 32 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:57,840 Speaker 2: awful candidate like Kamala Harris. So whatever whoever the Democrats 33 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 2: put up and whoever the Republicans put up, come twenty twenty, 34 00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:00,760 Speaker 2: it is going. 35 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 3: To be a real, real close election. 36 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 1: Again, before we dig into the survey a little bit 37 00:02:04,720 --> 00:02:06,640 Speaker 1: more and give you some stats on it, I wanted 38 00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 1: to mention that Kamala Harris was on with Jimmy Kimmel 39 00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:13,560 Speaker 1: and he was asking her all sorts of different things. 40 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:16,440 Speaker 1: Of course she was answering with all sorts of word salad. 41 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 1: But one of the things that he asked her was 42 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:24,400 Speaker 1: what she did after the election after her huge loss 43 00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 1: to Donald Trump. 44 00:02:25,919 --> 00:02:29,200 Speaker 2: It's a different world after the election. Did you and 45 00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 2: Doug just start drinking. We did we. 46 00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:40,240 Speaker 3: Yes, let me translate that for you. 47 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:44,799 Speaker 2: Yes, before, during, and after the election. They were throwing 48 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:45,640 Speaker 2: them back. I'm sure. 49 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:49,520 Speaker 3: Okay. So this what was it called the Argument. 50 00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:55,119 Speaker 1: Company we're referencing here from is published in Newsweek. 51 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:58,040 Speaker 3: By the way, they say the AOC. 52 00:02:58,120 --> 00:03:01,320 Speaker 1: Still trails bigger names like Kamala Harris and Pete Buddha 53 00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:08,200 Speaker 1: Judge in a hypothetical Democrat primary poll. But Quinnipiac just 54 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:11,840 Speaker 1: came out and this is just wow, it's very telling. 55 00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:18,200 Speaker 1: Quinnipiac says only fifteen percent of American men approve of Democrats, 56 00:03:18,639 --> 00:03:21,320 Speaker 1: seventy seven percent disapproving. 57 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:23,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, that was really kind of one of the big 58 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:26,359 Speaker 2: stories that came out of the last last election is 59 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:30,639 Speaker 2: the male gender gap that the Democrats have. If you're 60 00:03:30,680 --> 00:03:33,560 Speaker 2: a dude, not many of you out there voting Democrat 61 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 2: right now. 62 00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:37,920 Speaker 1: So the gender split on this Newsweek poll, fifty four 63 00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 1: percent of men chose jd vance, fifty six percent of 64 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: women were for AOC. 65 00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 2: Okay, okay, So we just talked about the Quinnipiac poll 66 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 2: and how you know seventy some percent of men disapprove. 67 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:52,720 Speaker 3: Seventy seven percent disapprove of. 68 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:55,720 Speaker 2: Jade Vance in a two person race of Jadvance got 69 00:03:55,760 --> 00:03:58,080 Speaker 2: fifty six percent. That means Kamala Harris must have gotten 70 00:03:58,080 --> 00:03:59,840 Speaker 2: forty six percent of men in that poll. 71 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:03,080 Speaker 1: Here's a different poll, and this is just between the 72 00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:06,520 Speaker 1: two of us, which is your favorite JD Vance? 73 00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:10,400 Speaker 3: Is it fat jd or is it just normal JD Oh. 74 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:14,120 Speaker 2: Internet meme JD Vance fat with the curly hair longer like, oh, 75 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:15,280 Speaker 2: that's easily my favorite. 76 00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:15,800 Speaker 1: JD Van. 77 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 2: I think it's JD Vance's favorite JD Vance because he 78 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:20,479 Speaker 2: keeps retweeting those memes all the time. 79 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:25,200 Speaker 1: And then you had Marco Rubio who made that Vanity 80 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:28,760 Speaker 1: Fair picture his profile pick. Now apparently that was a 81 00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:32,280 Speaker 1: bet between him and JD Vance, Like they must have 82 00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:35,560 Speaker 1: joked about it offline that wow, that's a really bad picture. 83 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,920 Speaker 3: And JD was like, hey, Marco, make it your profile pick, 84 00:04:38,960 --> 00:04:39,480 Speaker 3: and he did. 85 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:43,320 Speaker 1: I think his JD Vance commented on and I guess 86 00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:47,520 Speaker 1: I owe you one thousand dollars. That Vanity Fair photographer 87 00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 1: was really trying to paint a portrait with all of 88 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:54,960 Speaker 1: those pictures of the Trump administration. 89 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:57,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, those are some of the least flattering photos you've 90 00:04:57,720 --> 00:04:59,880 Speaker 2: seen from all of those people that were released in 91 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:03,560 Speaker 2: Vanity Fair article. Compare that to the spread they did 92 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,600 Speaker 2: on Biden's press secretary of Karine Jean Pierre. Photos were 93 00:05:06,600 --> 00:05:10,159 Speaker 2: her were beautiful, she was glamorous, looking fabulous. Photos in 94 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:12,800 Speaker 2: front of the White House. She looked fantastic. Hard to 95 00:05:12,800 --> 00:05:15,000 Speaker 2: believe that Vanity Fair might be a little biased in 96 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:17,680 Speaker 2: putting out some pictures that are less flattering of the 97 00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 2: Republicans that they interviewed, such. 98 00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:23,440 Speaker 1: An extreme close up of jd Vance and also Susie 99 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:27,680 Speaker 1: Wiles and Caroline Lovett, and then you had the one 100 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 1: of Marco Rubio where he's he's kind of tilting, he's 101 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:33,520 Speaker 1: looking at a lamp. 102 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:35,239 Speaker 3: I love lamp. 103 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:37,680 Speaker 2: They were just all very unflattering photos. But back to 104 00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:41,159 Speaker 2: your initial point, Yes, fat internet named jd Vance is 105 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:43,599 Speaker 2: my favorite. Jd Vance. I feel like I got a 106 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:47,400 Speaker 2: channel Ricky Bobby from the Talladega Nights. You can, you know, 107 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:50,960 Speaker 2: pray to baby jd Vance teenage gd Vance, bearded jd 108 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:52,640 Speaker 2: Vans or any jd Vance. You won't