WEBVTT - Mac & Bone - Dari Nowkhah Interview

0:00:00.030 --> 0:00:03.220
<v Speaker 1>Dari Noka joining us, the SEC Network to talk college

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>football and alcoholic beverages. Dari, do you go daiquiri or

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:09.750
<v Speaker 1>pina colada ever?

0:00:11.030 --> 0:00:14.350
<v Speaker 2>Pina colada all day over a daiquiri. All day over

0:00:14.370 --> 0:00:18.169
<v Speaker 2>a daiquiri. There you go. On a vacation, somewhere around

0:00:18.210 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a pool or an ocean, you know, but yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:21.900
<v Speaker 2>No Phoenix a.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.060
<v Speaker 1>Lot all day, man.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to jump in on one other thing. Whatever's

0:00:26.700 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>going on in the studio, you're not talking about like

0:00:28.380 --> 0:00:31.140
<v Speaker 2>somebody making a mess, right? You're talking about the conversation

0:00:31.180 --> 0:00:33.330
<v Speaker 2>in the studio. Is that what you're getting at? Cause

0:00:33.370 --> 0:00:34.270
<v Speaker 2>I got my own story.

0:00:35.190 --> 0:00:36.550
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you got it.

0:00:36.630 --> 0:00:38.370
<v Speaker 1>I need to hear your, I need to hear your story.

0:00:38.570 --> 0:00:41.310
<v Speaker 2>So, So now I thought you, when you said what

0:00:41.340 --> 0:00:43.580
<v Speaker 2>happened to our studio, I thought somebody had made a

0:00:43.659 --> 0:00:44.460
<v Speaker 2>mess in the studio.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>No, it actually stays messy, actually.

0:00:47.659 --> 0:00:50.660
<v Speaker 2>Okay. A little known fact here. And if he's listening,

0:00:50.700 --> 0:00:52.500
<v Speaker 2>he probably won't, he'll probably laugh if I say this.

0:00:52.940 --> 0:00:56.270
<v Speaker 2>Peter Burns, messiest guy I've ever known. I will walk

0:00:56.330 --> 0:00:59.150
<v Speaker 2>into our studio after he leaves the studio at the

0:00:59.230 --> 0:01:02.890
<v Speaker 2>FCC Network. There will be cups that are partially full

0:01:02.910 --> 0:01:06.229
<v Speaker 2>of water. There will be used, you know, those little

0:01:06.310 --> 0:01:09.890
<v Speaker 2>toothbrushy things or little dental floss things. There'll be sitting

0:01:09.950 --> 0:01:12.380
<v Speaker 2>on a little table there next to us. Man, we

0:01:13.030 --> 0:01:14.830
<v Speaker 2>joke about how we got to clean up after our guy,

0:01:14.900 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Peter Burns. But knowing that you all live with a

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 2>messy studio, then everybody's to blame. So, you know, I

0:01:20.340 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 2>just threw him under the bus.

0:01:21.140 --> 0:01:23.140
<v Speaker 1>You've got one specific violator.

0:01:23.260 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I think I've seen your guy, Doreen, complaining about Burns

0:01:25.620 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>being messy on Twitter before.

0:01:27.980 --> 0:01:31.610
<v Speaker 2>Probably have. He's messy as hell, there's no doubt.

0:01:31.690 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Dude, he's an LSU fan. You're lucky he doesn't leave

0:01:34.330 --> 0:01:37.410
<v Speaker 1>corndog sticks all over the studio. You know what I'm saying?

0:01:37.430 --> 0:01:39.830
<v Speaker 2>If we had corndogs in the studio, he would.

0:01:39.930 --> 0:01:44.309
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk some college football here. We talk drinks,

0:01:44.370 --> 0:01:48.850
<v Speaker 1>we talk messy co-workers. Let's talk college football. I was

0:01:48.890 --> 0:01:51.850
<v Speaker 1>mentioning this earlier, Dari, ESPN, I think it's Heather Dinnich

0:01:51.870 --> 0:01:55.130
<v Speaker 1>that does it like each week now. the college playoff

0:01:55.190 --> 0:01:57.690
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, you know, you know, projection type thing.

0:01:57.750 --> 0:01:57.990
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:01:58.030 --> 0:01:59.550
<v Speaker 1>And I get into the, I know it's way early.

0:01:59.590 --> 0:02:01.570
<v Speaker 1>I get into this stuff. I can't help myself. And

0:02:01.610 --> 0:02:05.820
<v Speaker 1>it's got six SEC teams on there. How do you

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>feel when it's all said and done? If what would

0:02:08.139 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>be your guess? Five was kind of my stab at it. Well,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.540
<v Speaker 1>what would be your guess for SEC playoff teams when

0:02:13.580 --> 0:02:14.780
<v Speaker 1>it's all said and done?

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I think four or five, 16 is really aggressive. I mean,

0:02:18.780 --> 0:02:20.350
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to end up in a, in

0:02:20.430 --> 0:02:24.410
<v Speaker 2>a league where we might have, one team with one

0:02:24.490 --> 0:02:27.900
<v Speaker 2>loss overall. I think, you know, you two or three

0:02:27.940 --> 0:02:31.140
<v Speaker 2>that have two losses, I think if we get six,

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:36.650
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get multiple three-loss teams, which seems... unlikely,

0:02:36.830 --> 0:02:39.950
<v Speaker 2>given that we haven't had a three-loss game yet, get

0:02:39.990 --> 0:02:42.109
<v Speaker 2>into the college football playoff. At least I don't think

0:02:42.169 --> 0:02:45.810
<v Speaker 2>we did last year. So I know Texas was close

0:02:45.850 --> 0:02:48.170
<v Speaker 2>with three losses. I know South Carolina a couple years

0:02:48.210 --> 0:02:50.060
<v Speaker 2>back was close, and Ole Miss was close. I don't

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 2>think anybody's gotten in. Heck, Vanderbilt didn't get in last

0:02:52.940 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>year at 10-2. But I think we've got a league,

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and we've already seen it. At the end of this weekend,

0:03:00.220 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>we're already going to have, at most, two teams left

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.530
<v Speaker 2>without a conference loss. And it will be October 10th. So,

0:03:08.070 --> 0:03:10.110
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're seeing a world where teams are beating

0:03:10.150 --> 0:03:14.169
<v Speaker 2>everybody up, leading to probably more three-loss teams than we

0:03:14.210 --> 0:03:16.419
<v Speaker 2>would be comfortable with if we're thinking we're going to

0:03:16.460 --> 0:03:18.780
<v Speaker 2>get a half-dozen teams in the playoffs. So I'd say

0:03:18.820 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 2>four or five, Matt, probably.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Darian, a national question before some more SEC talk here,

0:03:23.780 --> 0:03:26.260
<v Speaker 3>because we're talking all about the SEC playoff teams and

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the Big Ten. Well, we've also got Miami in the ACC,

0:03:29.810 --> 0:03:33.049
<v Speaker 3>Notre Dame independent. Who have you been most impressed with

0:03:33.130 --> 0:03:35.810
<v Speaker 3>so far of those two teams right there at the

0:03:35.830 --> 0:03:36.270
<v Speaker 3>start of the year?

0:03:37.530 --> 0:03:40.330
<v Speaker 2>Neither has really played much of anybody. So it's hard

0:03:40.370 --> 0:03:43.070
<v Speaker 2>to make too much of a judgment. But I think

0:03:43.090 --> 0:03:46.770
<v Speaker 2>Darian Minson, Malachi, Tony, just you look at those two alone.

0:03:47.730 --> 0:03:50.870
<v Speaker 2>and then obviously what they can do on defense. I mean,

0:03:50.890 --> 0:03:53.250
<v Speaker 2>only one team played them even remotely close, and that

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:54.940
<v Speaker 2>was Wake Forest, who I think is a pretty good

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.300
<v Speaker 2>football team. Notre Dame also has been completely untested. I'm

0:03:59.340 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of trying to hold out too much judgment on

0:04:02.420 --> 0:04:05.700
<v Speaker 2>either of those two until they play one another. I

0:04:05.740 --> 0:04:07.839
<v Speaker 2>think they're really good. I mean, obviously they'll play each

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:09.710
<v Speaker 2>other later in the year. Notre Dame has to go

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.850
<v Speaker 2>to BYU, which I think will be an interesting test,

0:04:11.870 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>but So far, neither has been tested, but that's kind

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>of been what should have been the case given the

0:04:16.260 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 2>schedule they played.

0:04:17.339 --> 0:04:23.490
<v Speaker 1>We're talking football with Dari Noka, ESPN, SEC Network. Dari, Georgia, Alabama.

0:04:23.970 --> 0:04:29.210
<v Speaker 1>This is freaking going to be amazing on Saturday night. Obviously,

0:04:29.270 --> 0:04:31.890
<v Speaker 1>Bama's had their success, but last time out in the

0:04:31.910 --> 0:04:34.580
<v Speaker 1>SEC title game, Georgia got them. What's your feeling on

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this game?

0:04:36.740 --> 0:04:38.659
<v Speaker 2>My feeling is a hell of a game, Mac. My

0:04:38.700 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>feeling is, you know, and I think it depends. One, Georgia,

0:04:44.700 --> 0:04:48.460
<v Speaker 2>how well do you defend the big play? Because Keelan

0:04:48.500 --> 0:04:52.180
<v Speaker 2>Russell and his group of receivers, Lazier Brooks and Ryan

0:04:52.220 --> 0:04:55.229
<v Speaker 2>Coleman Williams, and you go down the list, that's a

0:04:55.260 --> 0:04:57.850
<v Speaker 2>big play waiting to happen. Keelan Russell's a star. I mean,

0:04:57.870 --> 0:04:59.990
<v Speaker 2>he's a star. I think most people thought he would

0:05:00.010 --> 0:05:02.030
<v Speaker 2>and were surprised that that competition wouldn't as late as

0:05:02.089 --> 0:05:04.450
<v Speaker 2>it did into the fall before he was named the

0:05:04.470 --> 0:05:08.030
<v Speaker 2>starter over Austin Mack. Not knocking Austin Mack. Keelan's just different.

0:05:08.740 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 2>And they have really, really made A in the big play.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.339
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I– if Georgia can slow that down,

0:05:16.380 --> 0:05:18.300
<v Speaker 2>make Alabama have to beat them on the ground. And

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Bama's a good run team, too. They're way impressed. Much

0:05:20.980 --> 0:05:23.290
<v Speaker 2>better this year than they were a year ago. But

0:05:23.310 --> 0:05:27.790
<v Speaker 2>that's Georgia's chance. For Georgia, I don't– I think they're

0:05:27.810 --> 0:05:29.530
<v Speaker 2>going to want to and have to really kind of

0:05:29.570 --> 0:05:32.250
<v Speaker 2>control things on the ground to some degree and hit

0:05:32.290 --> 0:05:35.550
<v Speaker 2>the occasional play through the air. But what they can do.

0:05:36.420 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I think if this is a lower-scoring game, I would

0:05:38.620 --> 0:05:41.260
<v Speaker 2>give Georgia the advantage. If the winner gets into the

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.370
<v Speaker 2>high 20s or 30s, I think Alabama wins it. I'm

0:05:44.430 --> 0:05:48.589
<v Speaker 2>leaning Alabama right now because I do think they'll be

0:05:48.650 --> 0:05:50.539
<v Speaker 2>able to hit one or two of those plays over

0:05:50.580 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the top that kind of is the backbreaker for Georgia.

0:05:54.260 --> 0:05:57.779
<v Speaker 3>Daria, I don't think anyone takes any joy or pride

0:05:57.820 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 3>or anything in having to talk about Shane Beamer because

0:06:01.779 --> 0:06:04.739
<v Speaker 3>of the person that he is and how he represents

0:06:04.779 --> 0:06:08.380
<v Speaker 3>himself and all around him. But why do you think,

0:06:08.460 --> 0:06:10.170
<v Speaker 3>not just, we know he's on the hot seat, but

0:06:10.690 --> 0:06:12.670
<v Speaker 3>why do you think it's been such a struggle for

0:06:12.730 --> 0:06:16.190
<v Speaker 3>him to find consistency? There's been some great moments. There's

0:06:16.230 --> 0:06:18.830
<v Speaker 3>been some woe woes. Why is it so hard for

0:06:18.850 --> 0:06:21.130
<v Speaker 3>them to sort of find a middle ground at consistency?

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:27.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he's going to be judged ultimately by

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>the lack of development of Lenore Sellers and the lack

0:06:31.460 --> 0:06:35.690
<v Speaker 2>of development in that offense. And the Mike Shula hire

0:06:35.730 --> 0:06:39.110
<v Speaker 2>set him back a ways. It was a bad hire.

0:06:39.190 --> 0:06:40.650
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people at the time thought

0:06:40.690 --> 0:06:42.990
<v Speaker 2>it was going to be a bad hire, and it

0:06:43.010 --> 0:06:46.050
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be the case. You know, I do

0:06:46.150 --> 0:06:49.469
<v Speaker 2>think Kendall Bryles is a good hire, but we haven't

0:06:49.510 --> 0:06:52.610
<v Speaker 2>seen the development of Lenore Sellers. And in the end,

0:06:52.750 --> 0:06:55.430
<v Speaker 2>to some degree, I think Shane's going to be tied

0:06:55.470 --> 0:06:59.550
<v Speaker 2>to Sellers because I think you could make the case that, like,

0:06:59.589 --> 0:07:03.550
<v Speaker 2>Lenore Sellers should have been the best quarterback that has

0:07:03.650 --> 0:07:06.289
<v Speaker 2>ever worn that uniform, that has ever stepped through that,

0:07:06.710 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the gates of Williams-Rush wearing a Gamecock uniform.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And it just has not materialized. And I don't know

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.110
<v Speaker 2>what he'll end up doing in the NFL or if

0:07:16.140 --> 0:07:18.490
<v Speaker 2>he'll end up, you know, doing anything in that league,

0:07:18.510 --> 0:07:21.770
<v Speaker 2>but his lack of development, I think ultimately is what

0:07:21.810 --> 0:07:25.370
<v Speaker 2>has really hurt Shane Beamer. And I hate to see

0:07:25.410 --> 0:07:28.590
<v Speaker 2>that because he'll get fired and he'll land somewhere on

0:07:28.630 --> 0:07:31.590
<v Speaker 2>his feet. Maybe not as a head coach, but even

0:07:31.630 --> 0:07:35.140
<v Speaker 2>if it's a special teams coordinator and offensive assistant or somewhere,

0:07:35.300 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>so he'll end up on a, on a big time

0:07:37.140 --> 0:07:40.620
<v Speaker 2>staff somewhere and he'll get a chance somewhere else to coach. But, um,

0:07:41.530 --> 0:07:43.770
<v Speaker 2>I think ultimately you look at that, just they could

0:07:43.830 --> 0:07:48.970
<v Speaker 2>never really get that offense going. And honestly, Bone, as

0:07:49.070 --> 0:07:52.330
<v Speaker 2>great as that six-game run was a few years ago

0:07:52.350 --> 0:07:54.650
<v Speaker 2>where they blew the doors off Tennessee and they blew

0:07:54.670 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the doors off Clemson, I guess it was, what, two

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:02.220
<v Speaker 2>years ago, that set a really, really high bar that

0:08:02.260 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Shane's never been able to get back to, and it

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>might have been kind of leading to his own demise.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I know this, Bone. When you watch Settle In at

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>1245 SEC Network, there's a plug for you, Dari. On Saturday,

0:08:14.300 --> 0:08:17.340
<v Speaker 1>to watch South Carolina-Florida, you need to have a daiquiri

0:08:17.380 --> 0:08:19.260
<v Speaker 1>in hand. And you might need a few, Bone. I

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:19.780
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling.

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be thinking about Peter Burns messing up

0:08:22.220 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the studio now when I watch him on there.

0:08:23.660 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, make sure you clean up after yourself. Don't go

0:08:25.660 --> 0:08:29.980
<v Speaker 1>full Burns on the house. Dari, I wanted to ask

0:08:30.020 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you about Florida. They are the next opponent for the Gamecocks.

0:08:34.380 --> 0:08:37.619
<v Speaker 1>in the swamp. And it just feels like John Summerall

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.660
<v Speaker 1>is going to be chewing those dudes a new one

0:08:39.730 --> 0:08:42.590
<v Speaker 1>all week and have them ready to take the frustration

0:08:42.630 --> 0:08:45.130
<v Speaker 1>out on someone else after the loss to Missouri. How

0:08:45.150 --> 0:08:48.089
<v Speaker 1>do you view Florida? Cause we were kind of guilty

0:08:48.190 --> 0:08:52.370
<v Speaker 1>of crowning them last week. And, uh, we were very

0:08:52.410 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>guilty as Willie P the Missouri alum at the station, uh,

0:08:55.530 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>bashing Missouri and joining in with everybody that was saying,

0:08:58.700 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>why are they ranked all the time? Why are they

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.980
<v Speaker 1>clinging in the top 25? And we were shocked by

0:09:04.020 --> 0:09:07.420
<v Speaker 1>last week. When you look at Florida now, do you

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>still view them as, hey, they're a playoff caliber team?

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Or are you now wondering, is it going to be

0:09:13.850 --> 0:09:17.089
<v Speaker 1>a good first year for Summerall, but maybe not playoff caliber?

0:09:17.110 --> 0:09:17.570
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:09:18.500 --> 0:09:20.980
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think more of that. I think it's going

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.660
<v Speaker 2>to be a good first year, but not playoff caliber. Preseason,

0:09:24.700 --> 0:09:26.819
<v Speaker 2>I had him fifth in the SEC, which was really

0:09:26.860 --> 0:09:29.589
<v Speaker 2>high compared to where most people had him. I just

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.089
<v Speaker 2>like him, and I like the guys that stayed there

0:09:32.290 --> 0:09:37.210
<v Speaker 2>to play for him. But I think South Carolina is

0:09:37.270 --> 0:09:40.650
<v Speaker 2>running into something nasty Saturday, to be honest with you.

0:09:41.100 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, when Missouri hammered Florida, Doring and I were

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 2>both texted back and forth with Drake, who's just a

0:09:47.620 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 2>friend of ours. And whether he's a pina colada or

0:09:50.100 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a daiquiri, I don't know.

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:52.090
<v Speaker 3>Let us know.

0:09:52.300 --> 0:09:52.750
<v Speaker 2>Ask him.

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.610
<v Speaker 3>Let us know.

0:09:55.710 --> 0:09:57.869
<v Speaker 2>He was talking about how it's easy to coach a

0:09:57.890 --> 0:10:00.260
<v Speaker 2>team that's pissed off all week because they were pissed

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.179
<v Speaker 2>off all week after what happened in mississippi state i

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>think john sumrall's had a team this week that's pissed

0:10:05.660 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 2>off all week and i would expect a similar type

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.420
<v Speaker 2>of outing that they had put up against them last

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.230
<v Speaker 2>week this week when they face South Carolina. I think

0:10:16.309 --> 0:10:19.870
<v Speaker 2>it spells trouble for Carolina. I hate that going into

0:10:19.910 --> 0:10:24.850
<v Speaker 2>a bye week for Carolina. Understanding what that could possibly

0:10:24.890 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 2>mean for Shane Beamer when that game is over at Florida.

0:10:28.790 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I think Florida's really good. I think it's an eight

0:10:30.980 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>or nine win team that's really good. But I wouldn't

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.860
<v Speaker 2>go playoff yet. But I think they're going to put

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 2>up a show Saturday afternoon.

0:10:38.570 --> 0:10:41.010
<v Speaker 3>John Summerall can't be a strawberry dad guy. I'm going

0:10:41.030 --> 0:10:43.900
<v Speaker 3>to say that right now. I'm not going to ask

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>him either. That's what I'm staying away from.

0:10:45.420 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think Peter Kalanis is type of thing either. Dari,

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.420
<v Speaker 1>I got no time. I want you to know here.

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.260
<v Speaker 1>I have no time for the dude on the text

0:10:53.300 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>line at a 980 number that is trolling your Sooners

0:10:56.740 --> 0:10:59.860
<v Speaker 1>and wants to know how many daiquiris Mateer has before

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.350
<v Speaker 1>he goes and throws those interceptions. I got no time

0:11:02.380 --> 0:11:03.610
<v Speaker 1>for that guy, Dari. All right?

0:11:06.070 --> 0:11:09.170
<v Speaker 2>I like the interception better than the backward toss there

0:11:09.210 --> 0:11:12.250
<v Speaker 2>to nobody. I would rather the ball move in a

0:11:12.370 --> 0:11:13.150
<v Speaker 2>forward direction.

0:11:13.220 --> 0:11:15.620
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair. I think that's a fair request.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I was all in on Mateer, too, man. I can't

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>say anything.

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.219
<v Speaker 3>Hey, that game against Texas was always wild. You never

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.490
<v Speaker 3>know what may happen this weekend. It wouldn't shock me.

0:11:23.530 --> 0:11:23.770
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:23.970 --> 0:11:24.270
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:24.809 --> 0:11:27.710
<v Speaker 2>Wait, is that 9-8-0? Who's your Oklahoma State listener, by

0:11:27.730 --> 0:11:29.830
<v Speaker 2>the way? Gotta give him some credit, man. Hit some props.

0:11:29.870 --> 0:11:31.949
<v Speaker 2>That team's good now. I'll admit that. That team's a

0:11:31.990 --> 0:11:32.490
<v Speaker 2>good football team.

0:11:32.510 --> 0:11:34.510
<v Speaker 1>That's a good shout from you. That's that dude likes

0:11:34.570 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the paycheck. And yeah, they are. We can point out

0:11:38.270 --> 0:11:40.300
<v Speaker 1>the one fan of that team. I think there's two,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but likes the paycheck is a name I remember. Even

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Dari's aware of your work. out there likes the paycheck.

0:11:45.540 --> 0:11:48.339
<v Speaker 1>That team's fun to watch, man. No doubt about it.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, brother.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Why couldn't, by the way, when my Nittany Lions went

0:11:52.620 --> 0:11:54.180
<v Speaker 1>out and got a coach, I know you don't give

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.180
<v Speaker 1>a damn about my Nittany Lions, Dory. I understand it,

0:11:56.220 --> 0:11:59.460
<v Speaker 1>nor should you. But when my Nittany Lions go out, fellas,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and get a coach and bring half their team with us,

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.459
<v Speaker 1>why couldn't we get the same results that they did

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.500
<v Speaker 1>at Oklahoma State when they went and got North Texas'

0:12:07.570 --> 0:12:11.010
<v Speaker 1>coach and half the team? We got to Cyclones East

0:12:11.070 --> 0:12:12.370
<v Speaker 1>and we're getting our rear ends kicked.

0:12:13.309 --> 0:12:16.110
<v Speaker 2>Well, but one of the things was that OSU had

0:12:16.370 --> 0:12:18.530
<v Speaker 2>a coaching staff in place on signing day. You guys

0:12:18.550 --> 0:12:20.309
<v Speaker 2>didn't even have a staff in place. Like, there was

0:12:20.350 --> 0:12:20.910
<v Speaker 2>no roster.

0:12:21.190 --> 0:12:24.810
<v Speaker 1>I know, but that's because they whiffed on about 14 dudes, man.

0:12:24.870 --> 0:12:26.650
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they even tried to go out to BYU

0:12:26.730 --> 0:12:30.390
<v Speaker 1>and drag Satake. Anyway, this is not— no one cares. Other

0:12:30.410 --> 0:12:32.530
<v Speaker 1>than to laugh at me, no one cares about my

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.100
<v Speaker 1>plight as a Penn State fan.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Hey, tell Burns to tighten up there, all right, Dory?

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Likes the paycheck.

0:12:37.580 --> 0:12:38.990
<v Speaker 2>Won't do any good, brother. Won't do any good.

0:12:39.110 --> 0:12:41.610
<v Speaker 1>Likes the paycheck has heard you, Dari. He's very flattered.

0:12:41.650 --> 0:12:46.430
<v Speaker 1>Very flattered by the attention. All right, brother. Thanks as always, man.

0:12:46.450 --> 0:12:47.170
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you.

0:12:48.050 --> 0:12:48.980
<v Speaker 2>You got it, guys. Take care.