1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,640 Speaker 1: So this redistricting bank continues to rage on here in Indiana. 2 00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:09,680 Speaker 1: And now Mitch Daniels, former governor, has weighed in with 3 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:11,080 Speaker 1: an op ed in the Washington Post. 4 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:15,760 Speaker 2: Yeah. He he said that Indiana lawmaker's duty is to 5 00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:20,920 Speaker 2: their constituents, not to the White House or national political organizations. 6 00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:25,680 Speaker 1: Well, and you know, the redistricting debate is fascting because 7 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:27,880 Speaker 1: I think it's much bigger than just redistricting. It's like 8 00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:31,880 Speaker 1: an eye, it's like an opening into the mind of 9 00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 1: the populace as a collective. Because he used to be 10 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:36,280 Speaker 1: able to and I think this is where Mitch Daniels 11 00:00:36,280 --> 00:00:38,319 Speaker 1: is coming from. Used to be able to sit down 12 00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 1: with people kind of with facts and go Okay, here's 13 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:43,840 Speaker 1: what's actually going on, and the people go, oh, yeah, 14 00:00:43,880 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: you're kind of right now. The people acknowledge what the 15 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:49,440 Speaker 1: facts are and they're just straight up don't care. We 16 00:00:49,479 --> 00:00:52,000 Speaker 1: don't care. Yeah, And so I've thought about this quite 17 00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 1: a bit over the last week, and several people have 18 00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:58,120 Speaker 1: sent me messages, including one pretty high profile person here 19 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 1: in Indiana politics, and said, I just love how you 20 00:01:01,240 --> 00:01:03,640 Speaker 1: continue to swat down all the people that come at 21 00:01:03,720 --> 00:01:06,680 Speaker 1: you on redistricting. And I said, well, what do I care? 22 00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 1: Like to me, it's the Republicans have done nothing for 23 00:01:10,319 --> 00:01:13,720 Speaker 1: my family or me. They lie to me all the time, 24 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:17,000 Speaker 1: they never follow through, they never do what they promise. 25 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:20,319 Speaker 1: So why would I be or why would anyone be 26 00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:26,160 Speaker 1: invested in more Republicans in the Congress, Because they're never 27 00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:28,760 Speaker 1: going to govern effectively if you don't make them earn 28 00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 1: the election and then the people come out and go, well, yeah, California, Okay, 29 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,920 Speaker 1: First of all, California's California, and California did this in 30 00:01:36,959 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 1: response to Texas to Texas. And if we look at 31 00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:43,240 Speaker 1: the maps right now, in the way they're drawn, apparently 32 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 1: they're so unrigged that the Republicans have been able to 33 00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:50,360 Speaker 1: secure majorities for multiple elections now since they've been redrawn 34 00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:55,680 Speaker 1: in the House of Representatives. And I just don't see 35 00:01:56,160 --> 00:02:01,080 Speaker 1: how adding two more Jefferson Shreeves or Aaron ha Outions 36 00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 1: or Messmer or whoever pick your favorite underachieving Republican of 37 00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:11,520 Speaker 1: the seven or make a composite of them, giving them 38 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,239 Speaker 1: two more seats is going to make the government any better. 39 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:19,519 Speaker 1: And the Republicans currently have the House of Representatives. The 40 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:22,400 Speaker 1: jerrymandering takes place in all of these states, and then 41 00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:25,400 Speaker 1: the argument gets even more ridiculous, like that we've said, 42 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:28,919 Speaker 1: well Massachusetts, okay, I have challenged for days now somebody 43 00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:30,480 Speaker 1: to draw me a map. There's all these websites, we 44 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:32,880 Speaker 1: can go, draw your own map, draw me a fair 45 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:36,720 Speaker 1: map of Massachusetts where Republicans get seats, and nobody'll do 46 00:02:36,760 --> 00:02:39,400 Speaker 1: it because you can't, because they can. And then the 47 00:02:39,400 --> 00:02:42,840 Speaker 1: people are like, well, Vermont, Vermont is one representative, are 48 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:44,960 Speaker 1: you saying it should be a Republican based on the 49 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:50,680 Speaker 1: fact that Vermont is heavily Democrat? Or New Hampshire, which 50 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,919 Speaker 1: goes to I think they've got two. Well, New Hampshire's 51 00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:59,640 Speaker 1: gone Democrat in almost all the recent memory presidential elections. 52 00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 1: Are saying we should just give one of those seats 53 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:04,680 Speaker 1: to the Republican. Maine is split in half. One's Republican, 54 00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:07,080 Speaker 1: one's Democrat. Like they keep using the East Coast, and 55 00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:10,480 Speaker 1: it's like, but most of these states have like one 56 00:03:10,639 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 1: or two reps and the states are democrat, so it 57 00:03:14,240 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 1: makes sense that the reps would be like, it's just 58 00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 1: this bizarro totally total ignoring of the facts or totally 59 00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:25,400 Speaker 1: hiding of the facts. And I'm at a point now 60 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:27,160 Speaker 1: where it's like you can't even have an honest debate 61 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:30,160 Speaker 1: with people because they don't care what the facts are, 62 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:33,720 Speaker 1: and what are the Republicans giving you anyway? What are 63 00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:34,160 Speaker 1: you getting? 64 00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:37,680 Speaker 2: So Mitch Daniels said that he acknowledged the pressure that 65 00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:39,480 Speaker 2: they were getting from the White House, but he said 66 00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:42,440 Speaker 2: that they should quietly and respectfully pass on the idea. 67 00:03:42,880 --> 00:03:46,400 Speaker 2: He called it almost without precedent and said that the 68 00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:51,280 Speaker 2: current maps were drawn by Republicans and are visually reasonable 69 00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:55,560 Speaker 2: and compact. He said he does support the outcome, but 70 00:03:55,680 --> 00:04:00,640 Speaker 2: the tactic being employed to get there is not well. 71 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:03,840 Speaker 1: And my favorite thing of all of this is these 72 00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 1: phony outrage from Republicans about Andre Carson. Oh, we got 73 00:04:08,600 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 1: to get rid of Carson. You guys had a chance 74 00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 1: to get rid of Carson four years ago when you 75 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 1: drew these maps the last time, and you deliberately the 76 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 1: same people crying foul in many cases are the same 77 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:27,200 Speaker 1: people who deliberately made Carson stronger. Because Victoria Sparts is 78 00:04:27,240 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: such a lit aloof goof that they were like, we 79 00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:32,159 Speaker 1: got to figure out a way to save her, and 80 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:34,839 Speaker 1: so they made her district more red, and they made 81 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:38,400 Speaker 1: Carson's district more blue and they just did this. And 82 00:04:38,400 --> 00:04:41,440 Speaker 1: it's the hypocrisy of these people where they scream and 83 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 1: cry about Andre Carson when they just made him stronger. 84 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:46,680 Speaker 2: So there's lots of pulling out there. And it says 85 00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:51,880 Speaker 2: that Hoosiers mostly opposed the mid decade redistricting, and Daniel 86 00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:55,920 Speaker 2: said that Charlie Kirk's death became a flashpoint for this, 87 00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,520 Speaker 2: but that doesn't justify it. Two wrongs don't make a right. 88 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:03,080 Speaker 2: I'm curious, do you think Mitch Daniels still has the 89 00:05:03,120 --> 00:05:06,400 Speaker 2: poll in Indiana that he used to Are people listening 90 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 2: to what he has to say? 91 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:12,159 Speaker 1: Look, I think we've long moved past the idea of 92 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:14,960 Speaker 1: this statesman being able to come in and go, hey, everybody, 93 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:18,200 Speaker 1: let's just calm down. I think they were so partisan now, 94 00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:21,000 Speaker 1: And that's what I'm saying. Like, his article was very 95 00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:24,279 Speaker 1: well written, but so many people acknowledge that this is 96 00:05:24,279 --> 00:05:26,720 Speaker 1: completely political. It's not like they're lying about it. It's 97 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:28,479 Speaker 1: not like you have to show the people. We have 98 00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:31,880 Speaker 1: people like the governor, like Andrew Ireland, State Rep. Like 99 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:34,280 Speaker 1: many other reps and senators who are for this, who 100 00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 1: are just openly admitting, yeah, it's for political reason, but 101 00:05:37,440 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 1: we got to do it. So, how do you have 102 00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:42,839 Speaker 1: a how do you have an honest, you know, fruitful 103 00:05:42,920 --> 00:05:45,440 Speaker 1: conversation with that You don't. You don't