Speaker 1: Live, Rumball, Heartbyer and the Crossroads of America. It's Tony
Speaker 1: Kats today.
Speaker 2: So we have a deal with the RAN and now
Speaker 2: there's peace in our time. Hold on, hold on, I've
Speaker 2: heard that before. I have a hard time trust in
Speaker 2: guys named Neville. It's an occupational hazard. I guess. Tony Kats,
Speaker 2: Tony Kats today, guys, good to be with You Find
Speaker 2: everything I do over at Tony Katz dot com, live streaming,
Speaker 2: YouTube and Rumble, Tony Katz Facebook, Tony Cats Radio on
Speaker 2: Twitter also known as x. You find it at Tony Kats.
Speaker 2: It's not a deal. It's not a deal. I don't
Speaker 2: know what we're what we're thinking, what we what we
Speaker 2: actually believe here? But what if I'm wrong? And I
Speaker 2: had to ask myself that question earlier. You take a
Speaker 2: look at what has just happened with We're gonna open
Speaker 2: up this trait of our moves and I Ran agrees
Speaker 2: to this, and a Rando agrees to that, And you
Speaker 2: say to yourself, Iran doesn't agree to any How can
Speaker 2: I Ran possibly agree to anything? Iran can't agree because
Speaker 2: Iran doesn't have control. The IRGC has control any amount
Speaker 2: of leadership. You want to talk about you can talk
Speaker 2: about it from now and to the end of time.
Speaker 2: They don't have control. The FIGM minister doesn't have control,
Speaker 2: The president doesn't have control, The Iatola doesn't have control.
Speaker 2: Because the Iatola clearly has no control. I don't believe
Speaker 2: the Iatola is alive. By the way, the old Iatola
Speaker 2: is dead. The new Iatola I don't think is alive either.
Speaker 2: Any conversation they have is these are frauds for people,
Speaker 2: So why would I trust them? No. I would put
Speaker 2: forth to you that there is no top leadership, and
Speaker 2: the top leadership that may exist has no control of
Speaker 2: the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. And I put forth to
Speaker 2: you that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has no connection
Speaker 2: to each other, none whatsoever, zero connection to each other.
Speaker 2: They are acting independently. They are acting in their own
Speaker 2: self interest, and they are acting well as radical ideologues
Speaker 2: would act. They want destruction. We understand the rational mind
Speaker 2: that they want no deal whatsoever. Anybody who thinks that
Speaker 2: Iran wants a deal is out of their head. Iran
Speaker 2: wants destruction of Western civilization period. End of discussion. We
Speaker 2: can move on from that. But I have to ask
Speaker 2: myself a question, what is it that I'm looking at?
Speaker 2: What is it that we are all seeing? What is
Speaker 2: it that we are all dealing with here? What started this? Well,
Speaker 2: what started this was a NonStop bombardment campaign that then
Speaker 2: led to, Hey, they asked us not to and they're
Speaker 2: gonna make a deal and we get a memorandum of understanding.
Speaker 2: The memorandum of understanding is we said was nonsense. We
Speaker 2: said it from the beginning. There was nothing there that
Speaker 2: was legitimate, nothing there that was real, nothing there that
Speaker 2: we should hang our hat on, move on, move on. Now.
Speaker 2: Some people said, well, the memorandum of understanding allows them
Speaker 2: to get a lot of money, so it's not nothing
Speaker 2: that's legitimate. I thought that was a legitimate argument that
Speaker 2: what happens in this memorandum of understanding is that they're
Speaker 2: able to get access to cash because we're going to
Speaker 2: take off the economic blockade allowing them to sell oil
Speaker 2: billions of dollars. We shouldn't allow them a single dime,
Speaker 2: let them starve economically, and then what do they do.
Speaker 2: They screw it all up. They screw it all up,
Speaker 2: because how could they not screw it all up? This
Speaker 2: is who they are. This is what they do. They
Speaker 2: can't make a deal. Deals mean they can't do what
Speaker 2: they want, which is destroy Western civilization and bring about
Speaker 2: Islam across the globe. This is the desire, you say
Speaker 2: to me, Tony, there are other Islamic nations that they're attacking.
Speaker 2: Don't we understand that that part is inconsequential. Of course,
Speaker 2: they'll attack others, a lot of nations. They'll decide that
Speaker 2: that one isn't doing it right, and that one isn't
Speaker 2: doing it right. No one ever discusses the Sunni Shia fights,
Speaker 2: et cetera. I shouldn't say no one, not enough people.
Speaker 2: So the MoU gets blown up, and so what do
Speaker 2: we start doing. We put back the economic blockade and
Speaker 2: then bam, powl ping. It's like Batman meets Joe Peshi.
Speaker 2: We're knocking the snot out of people. Things are blown up,
Speaker 2: getting destroyed. And then you hear that President Trump is
Speaker 2: willing to go all the way. He is willing to
Speaker 2: knock out the desalinization plants, He's willing to knock out
Speaker 2: the power plants. He's willing to knock out the bridges,
Speaker 2: He's willing to knock out infrastructure. He's willing to cripple
Speaker 2: the region. I'm willing to make a deal, and then
Speaker 2: you don't make a deal. I'm not putting up with that.
Speaker 2: And that led to this talk before the weekend. He
Speaker 2: was getting him harder than ever before. But what happened, well, magically,
Speaker 2: I say magically because we have all seen this story
Speaker 2: numerous times. Magically, what happens is that all the neighboring
Speaker 2: countries they came to the President and they said, let's
Speaker 2: not let's not have you do this and take out this,
Speaker 2: and take out that, and take out the other, and
Speaker 2: we'll get Iran to the table. And Iran will come
Speaker 2: to the table, and the Strait of our Moves will
Speaker 2: be open for sixty days and you'll see oil prices
Speaker 2: go down, and this will be great. And Iran says,
Speaker 2: we'll make the deal. Needs really seem fine with the deal,
Speaker 2: the President writing that the country of Israel joins me
Speaker 2: in this commitment of the immediate, complete and total opening
Speaker 2: of the Straight of our Moves and an end to
Speaker 2: Iran's nuclear threat. Based on this request, I've agreed, writes
Speaker 2: the President, for the future benefit of the world, and likewise,
Speaker 2: the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran to cancel
Speaker 2: the attack, and the decision is contingent on the parties
Speaker 2: being able to quote rapidly make a deal. To that moment,
Speaker 2: I first tweeted out if you followed me on X,
Speaker 2: I said, deja vu all over again. We've been down
Speaker 2: this road. Something different. What in the world is different.
Speaker 2: It's like Malcolm Gladwell's blink, like I know it's different,
Speaker 2: but I don't know what it is. And maybe it's
Speaker 2: not different. Maybe I'm different. Something is different in this
Speaker 2: And I stopped myself and I said, what is it
Speaker 2: that I'm looking at here? This makes no sense. This
Speaker 2: is the same old stuff, the same old song and dance.
Speaker 2: Why would you believe it? And I read and I'm
Speaker 2: looking and I'm paying attention to this one that on
Speaker 2: the other one, And I said to myself, perhaps what
Speaker 2: is different here? And I ask you only not necessarily
Speaker 2: for agreement, but at least the acceptance of what is possible.
Speaker 2: I say to myself, what if I'm looking at this
Speaker 2: all wrong? And what if I'm looking at the deal
Speaker 2: all wrong? What if no one is trying to make
Speaker 2: a deal with the Iranian regime? I am accurate in
Speaker 2: my assessment. I would take this on with anybody anywhere,
Speaker 2: at any time. The Iranian so called leadership doesn't exist.
Speaker 2: It has no control over the IRGC, none whatsoever. The
Speaker 2: IRGC is acting as independent factions, not one group of
Speaker 2: the IERGC or faction of the IRGC having any level
Speaker 2: of control or even connection with another. Everyone acting in
Speaker 2: their own self interest for their own ideological goals, whether
Speaker 2: that is dollars or whether that is a caliphate. Right,
Speaker 2: so everybody is acting the way they want to act.
Speaker 2: You can't make a deal with the IERGC at all.
Speaker 2: The leadership has no control of the IERGC, so a
Speaker 2: deal with them is meaningless. What if that's not where
Speaker 2: the deal is? Follow me here. I don't say I've
Speaker 2: got it perfect. I am asking a question of whether
Speaker 2: or not I'm onto something. And I know you're used
Speaker 2: to a lot of guys on radio always saying that
Speaker 2: they've got this and they know that and they're the experts.
Speaker 2: Oh they're sure. It's like the influencer class expre on
Speaker 2: this thing until social media is talking about something else
Speaker 2: twodays from now, and then they're an expert on that thing.
Speaker 2: Boring as hell? What if the deal that is being
Speaker 2: made has nothing to do with Iran, and it has
Speaker 2: to do with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Vagrain, Jordan, etc.
Speaker 2: What if that's the deal I discuss ending the regime.
Speaker 2: I'm a believer in regime change. I get that some
Speaker 2: people disagree with me. I believe that's the only way
Speaker 2: this group can be handled. We have discussed that when
Speaker 2: the US hits Iran, Iran doesn't hit Israel. No, what
Speaker 2: Iran does is Iran hits everybody else around them. They
Speaker 2: hit their so called allies, friends, like minded brethren, at
Speaker 2: least if you want to talk about being Muslim or Islamists,
Speaker 2: not in every case, in some cases is Lomist. And
Speaker 2: you say, why would they hit those people, Well, the
Speaker 2: answer is you hit these people so they will put
Speaker 2: pressure on the United States to stop bombing them. Hey,
Speaker 2: you're hitting Iran, Iran is hitting us. Would you please
Speaker 2: stop hitting them so they would stop hitting us. They
Speaker 2: are trying to engage their own level of protection and
Speaker 2: Iran being more and more backed into a corner. What
Speaker 2: will an animal do backed into a corner? Will lash out?
Speaker 2: You knew this without me telling you, So what other
Speaker 2: lashouts are going to happen. You think it's just going
Speaker 2: to be hitting US Bass and Jordan. No, no, no,
Speaker 2: it's going to be going after their critical infrastructure. Iran
Speaker 2: can still do this. It's a great example, by the way,
Speaker 2: a messaging of if you think that Iran is bad,
Speaker 2: now is a problem. Now, can still engage in threats now,
Speaker 2: can still try and decide the landscape. Now, imagine what
Speaker 2: happens if they had a nuclear weapon. You have to
Speaker 2: be out of your mind to think that letting Iran
Speaker 2: get close to a nuclear weapon or thinking about a
Speaker 2: nuclear weapon is okay. You have to be certifiably insane.
Speaker 2: Oh hi, Marjorie Taylergreen, how you doing? No, I wasn't
Speaker 2: really talking about you. I was just talking about people
Speaker 2: who are criminally insane. I see where you can be confused.
Speaker 2: You cannot let them get close, you can't. Now. I
Speaker 2: do agree that Iran has been at war with US
Speaker 2: for forty seven years. We don't have to be at
Speaker 2: war with Iran. Iran is at war with us. So
Speaker 2: what idea could we possibly have of saying they're not
Speaker 2: a threat to us, They're not a problem to us. Oh,
Speaker 2: it's no big deal. It's some of the most embarrassing
Speaker 2: childlike silly talk I have ever witnessed. Oh hey, Tucker, no,
Speaker 2: I was talking about child like silly talk. But I
Speaker 2: see where you could have thought I was talking about you.
Speaker 2: Miss You don't know what happens. I hope you figure
Speaker 2: it out. So what if the deal goes like y?
Speaker 2: These other nations don't want to get hit, They don't
Speaker 2: want to have any threat to their critical infrastructure. They
Speaker 2: need another way. We start with Major Mike Lyons, retired
Speaker 2: in United States Army military analysts. You hear on the
Speaker 2: show very often talking about the idea of siege. He said,
Speaker 2: we need a siege, the economic blockade, keeping them locked in,
Speaker 2: letting them fall apart, feeling the economic crunch, and you
Speaker 2: should continue the bombing. That's what he said. But what
Speaker 2: if you have this, You keep up the economic blockades,
Speaker 2: you don't allow them to sell any oil, you don't
Speaker 2: allow any money to get to the terrorist groups, you
Speaker 2: don't allow them to function. They slowly start to crack
Speaker 2: under that pressure. You stop the bombing. So Iran will
Speaker 2: stop the bombing. But you say, to Saudi Arabia, the Bachraine,
Speaker 2: to the UAE, to Jordan, what's in it for us,
Speaker 2: what do we get? What if that's the way the
Speaker 2: deal goes, Now we can have a real deep conversation
Speaker 2: about what do we get. I can give a couple suggestions.
Speaker 2: I don't have the answer. I can give a couple
Speaker 2: of ideas. Number one, the commitment of troops to go
Speaker 2: into Iran to end the IRGC. Saudi troops, UAE troops,
Speaker 2: Pokeran troops, Jordanian troops. They go in. Maybe they work
Speaker 2: with the Kurds. Maybe it's about them putting up the
Speaker 2: money to give the get the guns to the Curds
Speaker 2: so the Kurds can take out the IRGC and the
Speaker 2: people can rise up. Maybe it's oil. We already see
Speaker 2: cracks and divisions amongst opek. We already see these changes
Speaker 2: happening from nations that want to make their money now
Speaker 2: and they don't want to have to wait it out
Speaker 2: twenty or thirty years, and they don't want other people
Speaker 2: out there deciding what the cost of oil should be.
Speaker 2: So it could be oil, it could be troops, and
Speaker 2: it could be that I'm wrong about both, because less
Speaker 2: than an hour from when I started talking, President Trump
Speaker 2: put out on true Social oh crap, Iranian leadership is
Speaker 2: unbelievably duplicitous. They ask for a meeting, some would say
Speaker 2: beg talks begin with more schedule than the immediate future,
Speaker 2: and they say openly and proudly that they're not having
Speaker 2: any discussions, that nothing is being talked about, and they're
Speaker 2: only dealing with Oman. Then they go on to give
Speaker 2: their usual blatherer in saying the straight up, ourmuds will
Speaker 2: be operated powerfully by them when it is already completely
Speaker 2: controlled by the United States Navy in our blockade, or
Speaker 2: as some say, the United States Wall of Steel. I
Speaker 2: have not heard anybody say the United States Wall of steel.
Speaker 2: That's awesome. Quote. Nothing gets through to Iran unless we
Speaker 2: want it to, and nothing will get through unless a
Speaker 2: deal or total surrender is accomplished. Now he hasn't said
Speaker 2: the words I want to make sure I'm clear on this.
Speaker 2: Someone double check me, Beth in the chat, get on it.
Speaker 2: He hasn't said the words total surrender in a while.
Speaker 2: That was talk in the beginning. He hasn't said that
Speaker 2: in a while. Nothing will get through, writes President Trump
Speaker 2: unless a deal or total surrender is accomplished. Quote, whether
Speaker 2: Iran wants to admit it or not. We are in
Speaker 2: fact talking of a solution to a problem that they
Speaker 2: have caused for decades. It is very simple. Iran will
Speaker 2: never have a nuclear weapon. Thank you for your attention
Speaker 2: to this matter, President Donald J. Trump. Maybe that just
Speaker 2: takes my entire conversation, throws it away. Maybe maybe it
Speaker 2: proves the conversation true. We are in fact talking of
Speaker 2: a solution to a problem that they have caused for decades.
Speaker 2: He can be talking about it with the Iranians or
Speaker 2: whoever in the Iranian government. He could be talking about
Speaker 2: it with others. He could be talking to two different
Speaker 2: groups of people at the same time. I don't know if
Speaker 2: I'm right, but I don't think I'm wrong. Who said
Speaker 2: the deal had to be with Iran? Maybe that is
Speaker 2: where the real deal making is. I'm Tony Katz in.
Speaker 2: This is Tony Katz today. So what happened with Morocco
Speaker 2: in this Spanish city state, if you will, which I
Speaker 2: have still not ever heard pronounced, I've only read it.
Speaker 2: I took off a couple of days, Tony Kats. Tony
Speaker 2: Kats today, good to be with you. Went up Chicago,
Speaker 2: caught a White Sox game. I almost cut off my
Speaker 2: finger that's a true story. That's a true story. I
Speaker 2: got my finger caught in a car door I when
Speaker 2: I was a teenager. I think it was maybe I
Speaker 2: was twenty. I got my whole hand caught in a
Speaker 2: card door literally closed. I was just sitting there and
Speaker 2: someone closed the door and boom, and it hurt. But
Speaker 2: nothing got broken, nothing got cut. This I was talking
Speaker 2: to my oldest and we were going to the game,
Speaker 2: and I was doing this. I was throwing something, I'm
Speaker 2: moving things around weight, I'm gonna need that in boom
Speaker 2: caught the finger and I caught the finger, and my
Speaker 2: oldest you are right, I'm like, I need one minute,
Speaker 2: leave me alone, because I just needed to be like
Speaker 2: I can't believe I did that. How embarrassing that I didn't.
Speaker 2: We're in this parking lot of this like hot dog
Speaker 2: stand where we parked near right field, which used to
Speaker 2: be Kamisky, and no one calls things what they are anymore.
Speaker 2: It's pathetic. And so I'm like, I look at the
Speaker 2: top of the finger, and the top of the fingers cut.
Speaker 2: It started to bleed. I'm like, son of them, keep
Speaker 2: your calm, Tony, You've got band aids in the car
Speaker 2: you know you do get it done. So I go
Speaker 2: into the car. I toss my sunglasses onto the roof
Speaker 2: the hood of the car. I open up the door,
Speaker 2: and I put my hand down to look for the
Speaker 2: bandage to put the left hand down where I've cut myself,
Speaker 2: right left pointer finger, and I go to reach and
Speaker 2: I've slipped, and I realized I didn't just cut myself
Speaker 2: from the top, cut myself underneath. It's a real cut,
Speaker 2: ladies and gentlemen. It was not great. I slid. I'm like,
Speaker 2: oh damn, well, I gotta go see a game. So
Speaker 2: we find the band aids. I have three band aids
Speaker 2: on there. We walk to a great field, which is
Speaker 2: just a couple of blocks from where we're parking, and
Speaker 2: my kid is like, are you gonna be all right?
Speaker 2: I'm like, dude, I don't feel any pain, which could
Speaker 2: be a sign of you've got a serious problem. You're
Speaker 2: just in shock. No, No, I didn't. I didn't sever
Speaker 2: her anything or anything like that. I think a little
Speaker 2: harder of a door slam, and I could have never
Speaker 2: lost any color in the in the finger. So just
Speaker 2: a public service announcement, don't go see the Chicago White
Speaker 2: Sox you'll die. Way is I don't have the message?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, don't be a schmuck and get your finger
Speaker 2: caught in a car door. Just ridiculous. I'll get into
Speaker 2: the story about Morocco coming up. Just Tony Cats today.
Speaker 2: So President Trump was on a plane. It's like we're
Speaker 2: on a bridge, Charlie, but different Tony Kats, Tony Cats today.
Speaker 2: Good to be with you. And if you got that,
Speaker 2: you're you're my friend. We're on a bridge, Charlie. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: President Trump is flying an air Force one and he
Speaker 2: has thoughts, as you you know, the man often has
Speaker 2: a lot of thought. I like BBC better than ABUNE
Speaker 2: if they don't approve. But we have a man named
Speaker 2: Doug Ledge. He's outstanding in every way. Most of you
Speaker 2: know he is. You're not going to find a better
Speaker 2: plus and everybody. And it's because I fact that war
Speaker 2: is a vote that has a voted one in the
Speaker 2: last ride. This that's the only reason, agres say. But
Speaker 2: I will say there are a lot of people that
Speaker 2: like people were hurting so badly twenty two suicides. They
Speaker 2: would destroy, their families, would destroy. Now the president is
Speaker 2: talking about the weaponization funds and we are going to
Speaker 2: dig into this because the weaponization fund is now dead,
Speaker 2: and it's the weaponization fund that was keeping Todd Blanche
Speaker 2: from being confirmed. That seems to be over Tony Katz.
Speaker 2: Tony Cat said, I forgot if I said hello. Sometimes
Speaker 2: I forget. But I'm going to dig into this about
Speaker 2: what it is that has happened here and the deal
Speaker 2: making that has taken place. He also spoke about the
Speaker 2: possibility of a deal with the Ran this is before
Speaker 2: in today's announcement, and why he isn't going forward with
Speaker 2: his planned attack for many many years to ever build
Speaker 2: it back. I don't think it would be even building
Speaker 2: bull up.
Speaker 1: So we had a we had an attack that would be.
Speaker 2: The biggest attack since World War Two, and it would
Speaker 2: have been disastrous with them, and they didn't want us
Speaker 2: to do it. At frankly, I sure he Arabi didn't
Speaker 2: want it either. They thought that the dealer is eminently,
Speaker 2: the dealer is eminent having to do with the are
Speaker 2: most straight and also the ultimately that you go to
Speaker 2: the realization of the deal, the deal, the deal. It's
Speaker 2: gonna be lots and lots and lots of deals. And
Speaker 2: this is why I started listening to this as well,
Speaker 2: and I'm like, there's something I think that the deal
Speaker 2: might not be with a RAN, it might be with these,
Speaker 2: with these other nations. We will have more on that
Speaker 2: as well. We are keeping our eyes on the Michigan
Speaker 2: primary which is tomorrow and how the DSA, the Democratic
Speaker 2: Socialists are rallying around this. Abdul I say it going
Speaker 2: against Haley Stevens. Not that I'm a big Hailey Stevens fan,
Speaker 2: but she's at least not an Islamist and not a communist.
Speaker 2: She's more left than I would like. And I can
Speaker 2: show you polling that doesn't work out well for either
Speaker 2: one of them. Against the Republican Rogers for this Senate seat.
Speaker 2: In today's poll, the Epic poll Rogers forty six, LSAA
Speaker 2: forty three. I can show you one poll where Stevens
Speaker 2: is edging Rogers by two points within the margin of error.
Speaker 2: I can show you one POE where Rogers is edging
Speaker 2: Stephens by three points. Therefore, the race is a toss up.
Speaker 2: But it seems that said gives Republicans a better chance
Speaker 2: for victory. And this is the thing that should be
Speaker 2: concerning Democrats in primaries all across the country. Should be
Speaker 2: but dozens. Why because when you are ideological first, and
Speaker 2: when you are afraid of Hassan Piker, you'll do anything
Speaker 2: and you'll say anything. But we now come to some
Speaker 2: newer parts about the DSA, the Democratic Socialists of America,
Speaker 2: who are communists. There is no such thing as a
Speaker 2: democratic socialist. It's a lie. I don't care what they say.
Speaker 2: I don't care that there's some website where somebody wrote
Speaker 2: a definition. They are what they are. They believe in
Speaker 2: dismantling the constitution. They believe in getting rid of private
Speaker 2: property rights. They believe that you should not be allowed
Speaker 2: to do anything. They don't say you can do. They
Speaker 2: are what they are. They are communists. End of list.
Speaker 2: They now have taken to a support of China. Friends
Speaker 2: of Socialist China have nine hundred and fifty two signatories.
Speaker 2: This is a London based group to support the People's
Speaker 2: Republic of China and to promote understanding of Chinese socialism.
Speaker 2: May we stop? This is an actual story from the
Speaker 2: New York Post. Can we stop for just a moment?
Speaker 2: There is no such thing as Chinese socialism. They are communists.
Speaker 2: And if somebody's going to say, well, no, they're she's socialists.
Speaker 2: You don't understand at that moment, we're going to have
Speaker 2: to start institutionalizing people. Oh wait, they're allowed to actually
Speaker 2: walk free and vote like I do. They want to
Speaker 2: tell me that China's not a communist nation and they
Speaker 2: get a vote. What kind of crazy for Cocta country
Speaker 2: is this? But they do, They do get the vote,
Speaker 2: and no, they don't get institutionalized, although I'm still going
Speaker 2: to advocate for it. Eleven self described VSA members are
Speaker 2: among those who sign the pledge and resolve to support
Speaker 2: defend the build understanding of Chinese socialism. If you really
Speaker 2: need anything else, I can't help you. And if you
Speaker 2: are engaged with people who won't accept the fact that
Speaker 2: they're communists, who will try to defend this, you can't
Speaker 2: help them. The only people you can help yourselves, your family.
Speaker 2: It's the best you can do. And I have long
Speaker 2: understood that when it's a family composition, right, and everyone's
Speaker 2: still trying to you know, connect and get along. Okay,
Speaker 2: we disagree politically, but you know we can agree on
Speaker 2: we all love, you know, pick the team. Whatever. I
Speaker 2: used to say, I understand that, And then in the
Speaker 2: same breath I would say things like, you know, when
Speaker 2: you're having your Thanksgiving dinner, you do not have to
Speaker 2: invite that uncle who likes to scream and everybody, or
Speaker 2: that aunt who likes to get political, and she's allowed
Speaker 2: to say whatever terrible, awful thing she wants, and then
Speaker 2: everyone tells you don't say anything. Let's just get through this. No,
Speaker 2: don't invite the aunt. Why in the world would you
Speaker 2: put yourself through that? Why would we ever tell anybody
Speaker 2: to put themselves through that? Screw through that. Tell Aunt
Speaker 2: Matilda to eat alone with their five cats. You're not
Speaker 2: welcome in my house, Aunt Matilda. You're nasty or despicable.
Speaker 2: I don't want those politics anywhere near me. If you
Speaker 2: just not talk politics, we can at least sit and
Speaker 2: enjoy a meal. But you think you can say anything
Speaker 2: and I have to be quiet. Screw everybody. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: I'll start new traditions. I'll start new traditions with new people.
Speaker 2: And people said to you, oh, it's not very you
Speaker 2: know pro family. I push forth to you that family
Speaker 2: is not necessarily blood. Some people believe this from personal experience.
Speaker 2: Some people believe this because they just understand it to
Speaker 2: be true. I do not believe, and I've been saying
Speaker 2: this for years, that you have to put yourself through it.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, I favor not putting yourself
Speaker 2: through it. You deserve better. You don't have to put
Speaker 2: yourself through through the madness. I have come to believe
Speaker 2: this now about your children on a whole myriad of subjects.
Speaker 2: I have college age kids, and I'll tell you as
Speaker 2: clear as day that my relationship with them seems to
Speaker 2: be somewhat fantastic. I'm a fortunate, fortunate man. They're decent people,
Speaker 2: and they have unique interests and unique personalities as your kids.
Speaker 2: If you have kids that you know, regardless of the age,
Speaker 2: do as well, and you deal with them differently. Not
Speaker 2: everything is equal, which is I think the weirdest thing
Speaker 2: in the world. No, not everybody gets things that are equal.
Speaker 2: Each Each relationship has its own ebb and flow. I
Speaker 2: am fortunate to have a good relationship, to have a
Speaker 2: rational relationship, to be able to engage, to agree and disagree.
Speaker 2: Do my kids have my politics is a question that
Speaker 2: I get a lot, and the answer is someone They've
Speaker 2: got to figure out their path and their way. They
Speaker 2: have got to figure out as they engage with other people.
Speaker 2: Well that I engage with this group and that group
Speaker 2: at school, in this group and that group from my school,
Speaker 2: and they're all fine. Well, when you're talking about your friends,
Speaker 2: are we talking about those groups at large? Do you
Speaker 2: have enough life experience yet to know? So it's not
Speaker 2: about being judgmental. It is about being clear. But things
Speaker 2: have to be experienced, some things don't. You can know
Speaker 2: somebody who is a boy who claims to be a girl,
Speaker 2: a man who claims to be a woman. You can
Speaker 2: know them, but you never forget that they're mentally ill.
Speaker 2: Doesn't matter what they say, it doesn't matter anything. You
Speaker 2: have to know that. You don't have to be mean,
Speaker 2: you don't have to be rude, you don't have to
Speaker 2: stop talking to them. You have to understand what it
Speaker 2: is that you're dealing with. If you know somebody who
Speaker 2: says they're a Communist, you have to know that they're
Speaker 2: a bad person who believes in murder. This is what
Speaker 2: communists do. This is their entire history. Now, the communists
Speaker 2: will tell you that communists never murdered one hundred million people. Well,
Speaker 2: of course the communists will tell you this. All communists
Speaker 2: are liars at all times, at every time they're a liar,
Speaker 2: they don't stop lying. They are such liars that they
Speaker 2: will tell you that China just socialists, you know, just
Speaker 2: some big social programs like Norway. Well then they call
Speaker 2: Norway a socialist country, which it isn't. But neither here
Speaker 2: nor there. China is a communist nation to which if
Speaker 2: you step out of line, you will be just appeared,
Speaker 2: where every action is recorded on camera. This is why
Speaker 2: I oppose flocks cameras and the other ones, the along
Speaker 2: cameras I believe they're called. All of that is government surveillance.
Speaker 2: I don't care if a CoP's job is made harder
Speaker 2: because the cameras are gone. The cameras have to be gone.
Speaker 2: But you don't think China's communism, you are a communist nation,
Speaker 2: you want to openly support them. The only thing that
Speaker 2: communists ever got right was the phrase useful idiots. And
Speaker 2: that's the DSA, all of their membership, all of their supporters,
Speaker 2: including Alexandria A Cosu Cortez and Ayana Presley and Mashida's
Speaker 2: leib and ilhan Omar and Bernie Sanders, all of them
Speaker 2: useful idiots. And thus I bring it back to your kids.
Speaker 2: Because when your kids start saying they're a communist, you're
Speaker 2: supposed to tell them now, and you're supposed to say,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, I'm not paying for that college anymore. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: you don't come upon this on your own. Those people
Speaker 2: are putting crap into your head and you're acting the
Speaker 2: dam I won't pay for that. The answer is no.
Speaker 2: I have come around to the idea. I mean, certainly,
Speaker 2: I've always believed that you have to love your children
Speaker 2: enough to say no, and you have to recognize that
Speaker 2: you're the parent and not a friend. But I have
Speaker 2: really come around to voicing the concepts of you have
Speaker 2: to be proactive in the movements. I don't pay for
Speaker 2: that school. I don't pay for that car. I don't
Speaker 2: pay for you to be a part of that. I
Speaker 2: won't do it, and I won't sit there and listen
Speaker 2: to it in my home. And if you want to
Speaker 2: talk to me, you have to accept the fact that
Speaker 2: we will never ever have a place where I have
Speaker 2: to couch out to you. You're wrong. You have to
Speaker 2: love your kids enough to say so, because the DSA
Speaker 2: are communists and they are flat out dangerous. I'm Tony Katz.
Speaker 2: This is Tony Kats today. One more peace to add
Speaker 2: to the communists or the dssay also, don't forget that
Speaker 2: they're bigots in general. And this is Dana Nessel. I
Speaker 2: am no fan of Dana Nessels. Who in the world
Speaker 2: is Dana Nessel. Dana Nessel is the Attorney General of Michigan. Me.
Speaker 2: I'm Tony Katz. The show is Tony Kats today. You
Speaker 2: are fantastic and you look great in those genes. Dana
Speaker 2: Nessel will not be attending the Michigan Democratic Convention. Dana
Speaker 2: Nessel has said I can't go because well, I'm Jewish
Speaker 2: and that group is a serious issue and they are
Speaker 2: safety concerns. I feel like my president isn't going to
Speaker 2: be welcome. Let me say that again. I feel like
Speaker 2: my presence isn't going to be welcome. I don't want
Speaker 2: to get chased around. I don't want to get harassed,
Speaker 2: I don't want to get yelled and screamed that. I
Speaker 2: don't want to get booed off the stage, irrespective of
Speaker 2: what I'm saying. And I believe that if I go,
Speaker 2: that is what will happen, because it's happening to me.
Speaker 2: Democrats are yelling screaming, booing, and waiting their moment to
Speaker 2: attack the Attorney General of Michigan because she's Jewish. Hey, Tony,
Speaker 2: why are you armed? This is the reality of the situation.
Speaker 2: We all understand that this is the reality of the situation.
Speaker 2: What I've been trying to impress upon all of you
Speaker 2: for quite a few years now is that this is
Speaker 2: not about Jews. This is about Christians. You're the target.
Speaker 2: We are the easing stepping stone. Why because specifically liberal
Speaker 2: Jews or schmucks, and they're more than happy to be
Speaker 2: utilized in their own destruction. I say this clearly. Maybe
Speaker 2: this is why I'm not asked to speak in so
Speaker 2: many synagogues. Well, Christians, this is about you. Jews are
Speaker 2: not the target. Jews are just first. It's about you,
Speaker 2: and man, I could really use your help, we all
Speaker 2: could in ending these threats. Keep it here, Sony Kats Today,