Speaker 1: Live from vall Hartbeiner and the Crossroads of America.
Speaker 2: It's Tony Katz Today. So what we have.
Speaker 1: Our primary is Galore Minnesota, Wisconsin. Now South Carolina has
Speaker 1: the special primary going on today. This one is because
Speaker 1: of the death of Lindsay Graham. Tony Katz, Tony Katz Today,
Speaker 1: that's me. That's the name of the show. Find everything
Speaker 1: at Tony kats dot com, Live shreaming on YouTube, live
Speaker 1: shreaming on Rumble Tony Katz. And then you've got Twitter
Speaker 1: known as ex Tony Katz and Facebook, Tony Kats Radio.
Speaker 2: So you have Lindsay Graham dying. He was running for reelection.
Speaker 1: So first someone has to be there for the rest
Speaker 1: of the term. Term ends in January. That is the
Speaker 1: sister Darling. She is the one who is put in
Speaker 1: for the rest of the term. She is also running
Speaker 1: to be on the ballot to replace her brother as
Speaker 1: the candidate. That polling where you've got Darlene Graham, Nordone,
Speaker 1: you have Ralph Norman. You have a couple of others
Speaker 1: who are in there. Mark Sanford is in there. Nordone
Speaker 1: is leading in the polls, but not by much. Ralph
Speaker 1: Norman not Ralph Norman. Sorry, yes, Ralph Norman, I got
Speaker 1: that right. He is coming on strong. He has had
Speaker 1: a solid uptick as of late. This is to be
Speaker 1: the nominee. The winner here now has to run in
Speaker 1: the general election, which takes twice in November. So you
Speaker 1: have the replacement of Lindsey Graham to finish the term.
Speaker 1: You have the special election decide which Republican is going
Speaker 1: to be on the ballot against the Democrat. Then you've
Speaker 1: got election date of every third. A lot going on.
Speaker 1: That's South Carolina. In Minnesota, you have the Senate primary
Speaker 1: with Craig and Flanagan. Flannagan is the one who wears
Speaker 1: the T shirts.
Speaker 2: Wears she discusses the fact.
Speaker 1: That trans lives matter, and the T shirt has a
Speaker 1: knife on it because she's willing to get violent to
Speaker 1: protect translves And she's the one who wears the burka,
Speaker 1: as you know, she's submitting to the Islamists of her state.
Speaker 1: She is the more progressive of the two. Angie Craig
Speaker 1: still plenty much on the left. No matter which way
Speaker 1: you turn, you're gonna have a left it. It's just
Speaker 1: a question whether or not do you have somebody who's
Speaker 1: told things themselves as a Democrat or someone who believes
Speaker 1: that they are democrats socialist and a democratic socialist is
Speaker 1: a communist. That's Minnesota, in Wisconsin. You have got this woman,
Speaker 1: Francesca Hung. She is what is the word I'm looking for?
Speaker 1: She's goofy. She comes across terribly. She is proof that
Speaker 1: the Democratic Socialists they don't care if you have a mind,
Speaker 1: and oh these people don't have minds. There are no
Speaker 1: minds to these people. Violent, dangerous and incredibly stupid. Right,
Speaker 1: It's like it's you know.
Speaker 2: Factor on Constupid is no way to go through life. Son,
Speaker 2: This is them.
Speaker 1: This is one of their leadership doing an interview explaining
Speaker 1: where they are with jails.
Speaker 2: Oh, my daughter is assaulted and raped.
Speaker 3: Is there any agency that would seek to find her
Speaker 3: assailant and bring him to justice?
Speaker 2: Of course, yeah, of course be if not police? And
Speaker 2: where would he be if not a jail?
Speaker 3: So I guess I really, I really want to avoid
Speaker 3: getting kind of caught into these hypotheticals and talk more
Speaker 3: about the reality that we're actually facing right now, which
Speaker 3: is that we're spending absolutely outrageous amounts of money on
Speaker 3: police and policing and we're not spending money on things
Speaker 3: that actually make people safe.
Speaker 2: You don't know that it doesn't make people safe.
Speaker 1: And also the real world is there are people out
Speaker 1: there who do bad things.
Speaker 2: What do we do about the people doing the bad things?
Speaker 2: Right now? What do you do with this person?
Speaker 1: If the police aren't going to the person who will,
Speaker 1: and if there's no jail to put them in, where
Speaker 1: do you put them?
Speaker 2: You want to.
Speaker 1: Disassociate yourself from the question and from all reality to
Speaker 1: say that's not what matters. These people are violent, dangerous,
Speaker 1: and stupid. Now that can be seen as a very
Speaker 1: low rent thing to say, but I played for you
Speaker 1: where they're at.
Speaker 2: These are people who support hamas.
Speaker 1: These are people who believe that private property should.
Speaker 2: Be against the law.
Speaker 1: These are the people who believe in rent control as
Speaker 1: a way of stealing your property.
Speaker 2: These are people who believe.
Speaker 1: In, well, we'll just solve things by taxing the ultra rich.
Speaker 1: And you say to me, Tony, they all say that,
Speaker 1: but they today really think that that is a winning
Speaker 1: strategy and a winning proposition. And the answer is they
Speaker 1: do all say that. They do you all believe that
Speaker 1: it hasn't done them an ounce of good. The people
Speaker 1: leave the places where they get over tax like they're
Speaker 1: leaving New York and yet Francesca Hong, the communists there
Speaker 1: in Wisconsin.
Speaker 4: Learn then you have some hot takes, sometimes bad takes
Speaker 4: on Twitter. And I let my feelings out into the world,
Speaker 4: and right now, as governor, what I'm most serious about
Speaker 4: are the issues that voters are telling me they want
Speaker 4: solutions for. For permanent affordability, to tax the ultra rich,
Speaker 4: to make sure we're getting corruption like he is out
Speaker 4: of politics, to make sure that we're fully funding public schools,
Speaker 4: and that we're fighting for universal childcare, and never.
Speaker 1: Mind the universal child's care, and we can get into
Speaker 1: that all day. Permanent what what was the term she used?
Speaker 4: And I let my feelings out into the world, and
Speaker 4: right now, as governor, what I'm most serious about are
Speaker 4: the issues that voters are telling me they want solutions for.
Speaker 4: For permanent affordability, to tax the ultra rich.
Speaker 2: What does permanent afford Hold on? We can do this together,
Speaker 2: I know we can. We're smart.
Speaker 1: Permanent of I don't think I've ever heard the terminology
Speaker 1: permanent affordability before.
Speaker 2: What in the world is permanent affordability? Hold on?
Speaker 1: Let's let's turn to producer Landin gen Zer. Producer Landing,
Speaker 1: turn on that microphone. How are you Dode?
Speaker 2: Good sir? How are you?
Speaker 1: I'm glorious. Thank you so much doing a little radio show.
Speaker 1: It's kind of cool.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's pretty cool.
Speaker 1: If I said to you, permanent affordability, Producer Landing, all.
Speaker 2: Of what twenty four?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's correct, twenty four years of age, Producer Landing.
Speaker 1: When you hear permanent affordability, what does that mean to you?
Speaker 1: That I will be able to afford anything and everything
Speaker 1: permanently for the rest of my life.
Speaker 2: Okay, now take it a step further.
Speaker 1: You'll be able to afford anything and everything permanently for
Speaker 1: the rest of your life. What's another way of being
Speaker 1: able to have anything you want, any time you want
Speaker 1: without question?
Speaker 2: Having a good stable job.
Speaker 1: You say, having a good stable job. I think that's lovely.
Speaker 1: Your problem is you're somebody who is responsible and you
Speaker 1: want to be able to earn your way. Permanent affordability,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen, means free. That's permanent affordability. Your problem,
Speaker 1: Producer Landon, is that you're still a capitalist.
Speaker 2: You just haven't learned. Don't worry.
Speaker 1: A couple of weeks, months, years in the re education camp,
Speaker 1: and you'll be just fine.
Speaker 2: You'll be right as rain. Let's go.
Speaker 1: Permanent affordability is free. But as we know, as we know,
Speaker 1: what you have is what Margaret Thatcher described. Eventually, socialism
Speaker 1: is great until you run out of other people's money.
Speaker 2: It can't be free. This is just what they present.
Speaker 1: And people can answer it other ways, right Robert there
Speaker 1: in the chat room. Per and affordability is locked prices,
Speaker 1: which can only happen with communism. What happens when you
Speaker 1: have price freezes like they want to have rent control?
Speaker 1: Rent control is about stealing property. Rent control, the landlord
Speaker 1: can't increase the rent, but the costs still go up,
Speaker 1: so they can't keep up with the upkeep of the apartment.
Speaker 1: So eventually they have to do away with it. They
Speaker 1: have to walk away from it. They can't afford this anymore,
Speaker 1: and the state takes over. It's about going after a
Speaker 1: private property rights, which they don't believe in, of course
Speaker 1: at all. Permanent affordability is the word play to steal
Speaker 1: of land and stealing of ownership and eliminating ownership except
Speaker 1: of course from the state, which is their goal and
Speaker 1: their desire and that's what she's putting forth. That's what
Speaker 1: the woman who will most probably win the primary for
Speaker 1: the Democrats today, that's her message.
Speaker 2: That is her message.
Speaker 1: This brings us to a commentary by Stephen Cotkin, who's
Speaker 1: appearing on a podcast now. Copkin is an academic born
Speaker 1: in Jersey, taught at Princeton. He has written about Stalin
Speaker 1: and in a bunch of different ways, and this is
Speaker 1: a breakdown that he is giving of how.
Speaker 2: This still works.
Speaker 1: How is it possible that we have heard these lies,
Speaker 1: We've seen these lives, We've seen the devastation these lives
Speaker 1: have brought. Never mind on economics, but on lives, and
Speaker 1: one hundred million people murdered by communism period, unquestionable, no doubt.
Speaker 1: Of course they will lie about this. Number two, How
Speaker 1: does one deal with this confront to this? This was
Speaker 1: a conversation that existed. I saw it online. I'm like,
Speaker 1: I think it's clean, prettycer Land and just finger on
Speaker 1: the dumb button just in case. I don't think anybody
Speaker 1: says anything odd. I just want to share part of
Speaker 1: this with you.
Speaker 5: Why is Marxism, Marxism Leninism especially so attractive to young
Speaker 5: people and to intellectuals. Why we have this history, which
Speaker 5: is a bloody mess. Millions of people die, and they
Speaker 5: die because of the enactment of this ideology. How could
Speaker 5: people continue to adhere to an ideology like that during
Speaker 5: the murderous time period and even more after the murderous
Speaker 5: time period, when we can look at it dispassionately. Here's
Speaker 5: part of the answer again. Young people are attracted to impatient, quick,
Speaker 5: total transformation of the world, eradication of war, eradication of
Speaker 5: social injustice. And there's a simplicity to the ideal. It's
Speaker 5: kind of a total package. It gets rid of everything
Speaker 5: bad just if you do if you follow the precepts,
Speaker 5: and so sure things happen that shouldn't have happened. There
Speaker 5: are some surprises, there are some downsides. But are you
Speaker 5: pro capitalism? Are you pro imperialist war? Are you pro
Speaker 5: landowners having all the land and the have nots having nothing?
Speaker 5: So there's this constant threat where if you contravene the ideology,
Speaker 5: you're in bed with the very evils that the ideology
Speaker 5: is trying to overcome. So you become an accomplice in
Speaker 5: the persistence of the things that you're dedicated to.
Speaker 2: Overthrowing. So it's not just that you're loyal to the party.
Speaker 5: You're loyal to the outcome that the party is dedicated
Speaker 5: to achieving.
Speaker 2: And you know that they're going.
Speaker 5: To be mistakes and costs and bad things happen along
Speaker 5: the way. But hey, is imperialist war better than that? No,
Speaker 5: the answer is imperialist war has got to be worse,
Speaker 5: and so I got to But the other reason, which
Speaker 5: is even deeper than that, is because Marxism Leninism empowers
Speaker 5: the intellectual class and the lump and intellectual class. You see,
Speaker 5: in a market system, you get to do what you want.
Speaker 5: You want to open up a family business, you want
Speaker 5: to take a loan and give it a try.
Speaker 2: You can do that.
Speaker 5: Nobody can see.
Speaker 2: Now. It might be that it's hard.
Speaker 5: To get the loan in some neighborhoods. It might be
Speaker 5: that the loan interest rates, you've got to work much
Speaker 5: harder than you thought, et cetera. But you get to
Speaker 5: make the decisions. You get to decide what to do,
Speaker 5: when to do. You can work for somebody else, you
Speaker 5: can put out your own shingle. In these kind of systems,
Speaker 5: it's the intellectuals and the lump and intellectuals who make
Speaker 5: those decisions. They use the state as an instrument to
Speaker 5: overcome the injustices of the existing society. Again, the injustices
Speaker 5: are real, but that empowers them to be in charge.
Speaker 5: So the beauty of Marxism, Leninism, and why what we
Speaker 5: used to call the third world loves this is because
Speaker 5: they get to be in power. It empowers them across
Speaker 5: the board. They get to make the decisions on the economy,
Speaker 5: and they don't have to submit to elections, they don't
Speaker 5: have to have a mandate, they don't have to legitimate
Speaker 5: their rule beyond the ideological building of a new world
Speaker 5: of overcoming injustice. So what we see again and again
Speaker 5: is young people being impatient for evil to end, but
Speaker 5: also empowering themselves to be in charge.
Speaker 2: They love the state.
Speaker 5: They love the state as an instrument for social justice,
Speaker 5: social engineering. They love to empower themselves as the decision
Speaker 5: makers because after all, they're the intellectuals.
Speaker 1: Now that's a really good breakdown. I'm going to give
Speaker 1: you the three components here worth remembering. Number one, this
Speaker 1: impatience idea. This impatience idea is also something that has
Speaker 1: drilled into them through an academia, which we gave up
Speaker 1: to the progressive, and that says your parents learned wrong,
Speaker 1: only you know what's right. It's about cleaving the child
Speaker 1: from the parent, cleaving the child from the family unit,
Speaker 1: breaking up of the nuclear family so that the child
Speaker 1: can have independent thought, allegedly with no consequence to a
Speaker 1: family tie or paying attention to a family unit. And
Speaker 1: says you want things quick, and we can do things quick.
Speaker 1: For example, no more forever wars, even though that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean anything.
Speaker 2: If you should break.
Speaker 1: And say, well I agree with this, and I agree
Speaker 1: with that, but I don't agree with that, well then
Speaker 1: you are on the side of the oppressor. That's number two.
Speaker 1: Any break or from the loyalty, from the fealty from
Speaker 1: this chain, and you are on the side of the oppressor.
Speaker 2: What you want forever wars.
Speaker 1: It's an irrational statement that creates an irrational response that
Speaker 1: one has a hard time coming back to you because
Speaker 1: the other person is now screaming that you're in favor
Speaker 1: of killing babies or some nonsense. It relies on irrationality
Speaker 1: to play on your rationality, and then it allows the
Speaker 1: intellectual who has never created anything and never produced anything.
Speaker 1: It does not have to show any result, does not
Speaker 1: have to show their work. All they have to do
Speaker 1: is say the right thing, and look at my degrees
Speaker 1: and look where I teach. Utilizing the trappings of institutions
Speaker 1: we used to rely on against our own children, against us,
Speaker 1: against Western civilization as proof that they are right. That's
Speaker 1: some insidious stuff and it's working. And I think it's
Speaker 1: going to work in Wisconsin, shamefully, at least in a primary.
Speaker 2: Keep it here. This is Tony Kats Today.
Speaker 1: President Trump put on an executive order yesterday, and the
Speaker 1: executive order was about changing the vaccine schedule.
Speaker 2: Tony Katz Tony kats Today.
Speaker 1: Specifically, what I had read was that it reduces the
Speaker 1: number of vaccines from seventeen to eleven. Not that you
Speaker 1: can't get other vaccines. This is the number of recommended vaccines.
Speaker 1: And then there was the breaking up of MMR, mumps, measles, rubella.
Speaker 1: First things first, I'm not a doctor. I just play
Speaker 1: one in the bedroom. Secondly, I didn't need an executive
Speaker 1: order to do any of this for my children. My
Speaker 1: wife and I years ago looked at the vaccine schedule
Speaker 1: and said, you know what the problem here is, there's
Speaker 1: too much happening at one time.
Speaker 2: This is too much.
Speaker 1: This is overloading of a system. This is a bad idea.
Speaker 1: We don't have a problem of vaccines, but there's an
Speaker 1: overload here. There's an aggression here. This isn't necessary. And
Speaker 1: we went to our doctor and we said, no, no,
Speaker 1: no, no no, we want to break them all up. We'll
Speaker 1: come back time and again, but we want to do
Speaker 1: these one at a time, please, And that's exactly how
Speaker 1: we did it. I didn't need an executive order to
Speaker 1: break things up. I'm the parent, I'm in charge. I
Speaker 1: said there's a better way, you know what my doctor
Speaker 1: said to her credit, Yeah, we.
Speaker 2: Can do that. It's not a problem.
Speaker 1: Like we weren't the first people to do this, the
Speaker 1: idea of seventeen recommended to eleven recommended. Can't we agree
Speaker 1: that maybe science evolves and we learn more and maybe
Speaker 1: some things are more important than others, and some things
Speaker 1: were actually never necessary and they were bad ideas.
Speaker 2: Are you telling me it always has to be seventeen No, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: this is fine. Consult with your doctor, do what's best
Speaker 2: for your kid. I'm Tony Katts.
Speaker 1: Three more things Tony Katz, Tony Kats today.
Speaker 2: Always great to be with you. What are three more things? Here?
Speaker 1: Is what three more things is? There are stories that
Speaker 1: should be front page news, but because of everything on
Speaker 1: the front pages, they don't make the front pages. And
Speaker 1: that's why I bring them to you. Three more things.
Speaker 1: I guess I should start with Fauci. Fauci should be
Speaker 1: in prison. That's my look, that's my take. Innocental, proven guilty.
Speaker 1: I didn't say you couldn't have a trial. I'm just
Speaker 1: saying Fauci is guilty. I am not a lawyer, that
Speaker 1: I am not a judge. We have not heard a defense.
Speaker 1: All I'm saying is Anthony Fauci should spend the rest
Speaker 1: of his days in prison. And I would argue that
Speaker 1: you have to take away his passport right now because
Speaker 1: that dude is a flight risk? Did I Did I
Speaker 1: say it well enough? Did I explain myself well enough?
Speaker 1: This comes from the announcements yesterday, text messages.
Speaker 2: That were put out by.
Speaker 1: Senator Ron Johnson, text messages released by Johnson, released by
Speaker 1: Senator Ran Paul. We already know that there's going to
Speaker 1: be an investigation to Fauci, who was the guy who
Speaker 1: was going to save us from COVID, you know, like
Speaker 1: Governor Andrew Cuomo did until he killed everybody's grandparents in
Speaker 1: a nursing home.
Speaker 2: And here is the.
Speaker 1: Message that sent everybody into an apoplectic fit. Quote from
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci. This is January twenty fifth, twenty twenty one.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: I asked around a bit more and another issue came up.
Speaker 2: That you need to be aware of. Be aware of.
Speaker 1: Since many people have significant cytokine storms and fever after
Speaker 1: the second dose. This theoretically could be associated with miscarriage
Speaker 1: in the first trimester. Now, first things first, I still
Speaker 1: haven't figured out whether I'm pronouncing it correctly when I
Speaker 1: say cytokines are cytokines cyto ki n e s. These
Speaker 1: are signaling proteins that control inflammation in the body, allowing
Speaker 1: you to mount to defense. So he's saying that after
Speaker 1: the second dose, meaning a booster, a COVID booster, there
Speaker 1: is significant cytokine storm and fever. Well, I don't question this.
Speaker 1: As a non medical professional, I don't know if this
Speaker 1: is true or this is not. It is the next
Speaker 1: statement that got everybody into an insanity. This theoretically could
Speaker 1: be associated with miscarriage in the first trimester.
Speaker 2: Oh oh my, is that right?
Speaker 1: You had concerns, doctor Fauci, of pregnant women having miscarriages,
Speaker 1: and then you decided to spend the next year saying
Speaker 1: nothing about it. This was a message that you wrote
Speaker 1: on January twenty fifth, twenty twenty one, and then on
Speaker 1: February third, twenty twenty one, you stated, FDA and this
Speaker 1: is the quote have found thus far and we have
Speaker 1: to be careful, but thus far, no red flags about
Speaker 1: that about pregnant women.
Speaker 2: This was a rebuttal.
Speaker 1: That you made to a doctor James Thorpe, published to
Speaker 1: a paper that was published in the New England Journal
Speaker 1: of Medicine. You stated that there was absolutely no connection. Nope,
Speaker 1: I didn't say I shouldn't say that. You didn't say
Speaker 1: that absolutely. You said, as of right now, no red
Speaker 1: flags about pregnant women. And a week earlier you were saying,
Speaker 1: you know, this could theoretically lead to that. I didn't
Speaker 1: say that it did. I said theoretically that it could.
Speaker 1: And you're seeing a lot of discussion about this right now.
Speaker 1: But a couple other things got said. August thirtieth, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one, quote from Anthony Fauci, Well, are the vaccines safe.
Speaker 1: Tens and tens and tens of thousands of women who
Speaker 1: have been followed by the CDC who have been vaccinated
Speaker 1: when they were pregnant, there's no indication whatsoever that there's
Speaker 1: any increase of any adverse issues in a pregnant woman
Speaker 1: who was vaccinated compared to a pregnant woman who wasn't vaccinated.
Speaker 1: It's pretty clear that pregnant women should get vaccinated. Rashaul Wlenski,
Speaker 1: who led the CDC quote. CDC strongly recommends COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: vaccination either before or during pregnancy, because the benefits of
Speaker 1: vaccination outweigh known or potential risks. Did you share what
Speaker 1: those potential risks are? Like miscarriage, theoretical risk is potential risk.
Speaker 1: Did you mention what those risks are? This, to me
Speaker 1: is the story. Now there are people who are going
Speaker 1: to argue all day, all night, weekends as well, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden they're experts. Of course, social media is
Speaker 1: all about the people who want to put out how
Speaker 1: smart they are, even if they have no expertise on
Speaker 1: the subject. This takes us to Brad Palumbo. Brad Palumbo
Speaker 1: is a nice guy. Brad Palumbo is part of the
Speaker 1: Steamboat Institute. You've seen Brad Palumbo maybe on TV. Brad
Speaker 1: Palumbo again, nice guy, but he often thinks that he
Speaker 1: knows it all. And his point is is that everybody
Speaker 1: is sharing an out of context piece of data because
Speaker 1: if you take a look at the data, it could
Speaker 1: read that eighty two percent of pregnant women who received
Speaker 1: the COVID vaccine had a miscarriage.
Speaker 2: That isn't the number.
Speaker 1: And Alex Berenson and some others have been pointing out, guys,
Speaker 1: this eighty two percent number isn't really the number. That's
Speaker 1: not the miscarriage number, and you gotta you gotta stop it. Actually,
Speaker 1: when you actually engage these these numbers, it's twelve percent,
Speaker 1: which works out roughly the same as the typical first
Speaker 1: trimester miscarriage. So that's his argument. This then leads to
Speaker 1: other arguments, which.
Speaker 2: Is, no, that's not it.
Speaker 1: And you've got people who are mds or at least
Speaker 1: make the claim of being mds online saying that you're
Speaker 1: relying on certain studies that have zero value, especially when
Speaker 1: you're talking about vaccination that occurred on women in the
Speaker 1: third trimester, which is way different than the first trimester.
Speaker 1: At this moment, what the rational person should do is
Speaker 1: concede the following point. There could be many different ways
Speaker 1: to interpret the data, and none of us are medical
Speaker 1: professional enough to properly interpret the data, So we need
Speaker 1: to talk to people who know all the ways that
Speaker 1: can be interpreted. Once we understand all the ways it
Speaker 1: can be interpreted, we as human beings and rational people
Speaker 1: could say, well.
Speaker 2: That doesn't make any sense. That does make sense.
Speaker 1: I could see how somebody could do this, I see
Speaker 1: how this could be manipulated. There that much we can
Speaker 1: do to make the claim that we have an expertise
Speaker 1: and how to interpret the data. No, I think that's foolhardy.
Speaker 1: But that's not the story, is it. Just like we
Speaker 1: discussed Jake Tapper. Jake Tapper all upset because there was
Speaker 1: a threat on the life of President Donald Trump. So
Speaker 1: they took Donald Trump secretly off of Air Force One
Speaker 1: when he was leaving Turkey, put him on a different
Speaker 1: plane and flew him home. And the press corps and
Speaker 1: White House staffers were on Air Force One thinking they
Speaker 1: were on board with the President when they weren't.
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, well look what they did.
Speaker 1: How dare they The Secret Service has a job to
Speaker 1: do to protect the President of the United States, And
Speaker 1: your argument is what about me?
Speaker 2: What about you? Jake Tapper?
Speaker 1: I live in the real world, and the real world
Speaker 1: required that the President the United States be safe. But
Speaker 1: you and I both know, or at least I know,
Speaker 1: and you're acting the fool that that's not the story.
Speaker 1: The story is the Iranian regime trying to kill the
Speaker 1: President of the United States.
Speaker 2: That's the story.
Speaker 1: The story here with Fauci is not actually the data
Speaker 1: because we don't have enough information yet, just from less
Speaker 1: than twenty four hours of the story being out to
Speaker 1: be able to understand what actually has taken place, understand
Speaker 1: where all where the data is, and how it can
Speaker 1: be interpreted, all the ways can be interpreted, and then
Speaker 1: asking ourselves what do those interpretations mean. The story here
Speaker 1: is that Anthony Fauci didn't give us the actual story
Speaker 1: in every instance that we have seen over the last week,
Speaker 1: when his emails.
Speaker 2: Are out, the diaries are out.
Speaker 1: He's claiming a couple of weeks, I should say, when
Speaker 1: his information is out. The information is out, diaries are out,
Speaker 1: emails are out, the text messages are out. When he's
Speaker 1: pleading the fifth one hundred and eleven times. Everything shows
Speaker 1: that Anthony Fauci purposefully, willfully, and wantonly hid information from
Speaker 1: the American people. I would argue from President Trump, and
Speaker 1: I would argue from those people in charge at the
Speaker 1: time to make well founded decisions, conclusions, or to give
Speaker 1: proper advice. That proper advice was the thing he was
Speaker 1: avoiding giving. Rather, it was about control, and the media
Speaker 1: Apparachic worked in concert with him to control that message
Speaker 1: and silence other people from delivering their messages. Social media
Speaker 1: moved to ban those messages from being delivered and to
Speaker 1: keep people delivering those messages off of social media. That's
Speaker 1: the story. It's not that we couldn't have made decisions
Speaker 1: for ourselves. It's that we weren't allowed to make decisions
Speaker 1: for ourselves. It's not that we couldn't take a look
Speaker 1: at all the extrapolated data and ask ourselves, here's how
Speaker 1: it applies to me. It's that nobody was willing to say, hey,
Speaker 1: there's more than one way to look at this. Why
Speaker 1: don't we trust the institutions?
Speaker 2: This is why.
Speaker 1: Because Anthony Fauci didn't want trust in the institution. He
Speaker 1: wanted to be the infallible institution. And for that, I
Speaker 1: want him in jail, innocent until proven guilty.
Speaker 2: Sure for a court of law.
Speaker 1: You bet. What do I say? I say what you say,
Speaker 1: He's going to look great in Orange. I also say
Speaker 1: that you need to protect your data because it's out
Speaker 1: there for any criminal to grab a hold of. Lots
Speaker 1: of criminals out there, not just.
Speaker 2: In my view.
Speaker 1: And they want your data and all your information, including
Speaker 1: your email addressing, your cell phone number, including your kids names,
Speaker 1: including your address, and your medical conditions, including your voting record,
Speaker 1: and they're going to use it against you.
Speaker 2: They're going to take that file.
Speaker 1: They're going to sell that file to all these people
Speaker 1: are going to try and scam you. And they are
Speaker 1: really really sophisticated, like when you get those text messages,
Speaker 1: and those text messages are all about like personal information.
Speaker 2: How they know this? All this must be real?
Speaker 1: No, the scammers got prepared, The scammers got really in
Speaker 1: tune with how to abuse you. Now, you need to
Speaker 1: protect yourself. You do that within cogni I ncog ni,
Speaker 1: in Cogniti, dot com, slash cats, they go data broker
Speaker 1: by data broker. These data brokers, of course scamming Americans
Speaker 1: out of twenty billion dollars a year plus each and
Speaker 1: every year in Cogni are the people going to them
Speaker 1: and getting your information legally removed from their files.
Speaker 2: And if that information.
Speaker 1: Starts to creep back in Cogny does it again? You
Speaker 1: want to talk to Incogniti. Check it out for yourself.
Speaker 1: Go to Incogniti dot com slash cats. Katz in Cogniti
Speaker 1: dot com slash cats and get sixty percent off. Right now,
Speaker 1: that's promo code cats. My last name Katz. Go to
Speaker 1: Incogniti dot com slash cats. Get sixty percent off. Take
Speaker 1: your private life off of the market. I got a
Speaker 1: lot to get to keep it here Tony Katz today.
Speaker 1: So you might see some movements in the market as
Speaker 1: one of the executives of open ai has decided to
Speaker 1: leave the company to start something new.
Speaker 2: Okay, well, a.
Speaker 1: Lot of investment going in to see the executive team
Speaker 1: start falling apart. He was nothing more than the chief
Speaker 1: operating officer, okay, Tony Katz. Tony Katz today. And if
Speaker 1: that's not enough to bother you, flesh eating bacteria. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is a not just a Florida story. Liver disease,
Speaker 1: comprised immune systems dealing with this more than others. It's
Speaker 1: a flesh eating bacteria spreading up the Eastern seaboard, and
Speaker 1: so the bacteria is known as Vibrio vilnificous, which you
Speaker 1: would think is something that was a spell with Harry Potter.
Speaker 1: It can infect through skin wounds and by eating raw oysters,
Speaker 1: enters the body through any break in the skin. Even
Speaker 1: a small cut or scrape ones inside can burrow beneath
Speaker 1: the surface and destroy muscle tissue. In severe cases, spreads
Speaker 1: into the bloodstream and causes sepsis.
Speaker 2: That's just honest.
Speaker 1: If you look at enough stuff, as I just doubt
Speaker 1: myself in antibacterial, you wouldn't leave the house. And the
Speaker 1: thing you're looking for is swollen, red or tendered. Pain
Speaker 1: that seems more severe than the wound would suggest a.
Speaker 2: Slight cut, but you're in great pain.
Speaker 1: Could be a sign of things going on here, really
Speaker 1: frightening stuff. Do I think you should stop going outside?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 2: Is there a concern? Yes?
Speaker 1: Do we have more of these things than ever? In
Speaker 1: some ways I think we do. Could just be things
Speaker 1: come and go, could be something else. This is Tony
Speaker 1: Katt today.