1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,120 Speaker 1: But what if I'm reading the whole situation about Disney wrong. 2 00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:05,840 Speaker 1: What if that when I take a look at the 3 00:00:05,840 --> 00:00:08,559 Speaker 1: CNBC reporting another reporting, they're telling me the more people 4 00:00:08,560 --> 00:00:11,560 Speaker 1: are going to theme parks, but theme parks are actually flat. 5 00:00:11,960 --> 00:00:15,000 Speaker 1: And what if I'm seeing that there's an increase in subscribers. 6 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 1: But maybe that's not telling the whole story. Because when 7 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:19,680 Speaker 1: I saw this story about Disney, and I said, how 8 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:21,599 Speaker 1: is it possible if the economy is having problems and 9 00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:24,800 Speaker 1: more people are going to Disney? And then how does 10 00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:28,080 Speaker 1: any of this relate to Trump's economic policies? Is there 11 00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:31,240 Speaker 1: actually some progress happening that we don't note? And then 12 00:00:31,280 --> 00:00:33,639 Speaker 1: you take a look that he's already made his nomination 13 00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:39,519 Speaker 1: to replace Jerome Powell with Kevin Walsh Warsh, which is 14 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:44,040 Speaker 1: a plan that our own doctor Matt Will, has wanted 15 00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:46,640 Speaker 1: to happen for a long time. Now, Tony Katz, Tony 16 00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:49,200 Speaker 1: Katz today, good to be here, Good to be with you. 17 00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:52,239 Speaker 1: Doctor Matt Will joins me right now, economist at the 18 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:57,120 Speaker 1: University of Indianapolis. We have talked often about Kevin Walsh 19 00:00:57,440 --> 00:01:00,680 Speaker 1: as being a possible selection as the next Shair and 20 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:03,360 Speaker 1: what you have liked about him and discussed, is this 21 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:07,399 Speaker 1: idea of removing things from the balance sheet? Talk to 22 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:11,080 Speaker 1: me about the nomination and if he gets his way, 23 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:15,399 Speaker 1: what will be the immediate difference between a Jerome Powell 24 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 1: led FED and a Kevin Walsh lead FED. 25 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 2: Well, first of all, the markets like this selection. Because 26 00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:29,319 Speaker 2: the markets reacted positively. The commodity prices plummeted gold, silver, 27 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 2: because the market believes we will now have control over inflation. 28 00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:35,959 Speaker 2: And this is how he's going to control inflation. I 29 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 2: love his formula. He's going to do two things. One, 30 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:42,040 Speaker 2: he's going to cut interest rates. Now that's going to 31 00:01:42,080 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 2: cause inflation. People get nervous about that. But he will 32 00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:49,200 Speaker 2: combine it with selling the assets owned on the FED 33 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 2: balance sheet. He's going to sell treasury bonds, He's going 34 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 2: to sell mortgages, and when he does that, that will 35 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:58,920 Speaker 2: pull cash out of the economy. That dual approach is 36 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 2: the ideal approach. That's the opposite of what Jerome Palell 37 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:04,640 Speaker 2: was doing. Jerome pal said, no, no, we're going to 38 00:02:04,680 --> 00:02:06,560 Speaker 2: hold all these mortgages. We're going to hold all these 39 00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 2: treasure We're going to keep all this cash floating in 40 00:02:08,919 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 2: the economy. And Kevin Warsh has said he's going to 41 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:16,160 Speaker 2: do the opposite. So the market understands this. I realize 42 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:19,400 Speaker 2: that's a complicated topic, but people need to understand. The 43 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:23,760 Speaker 2: market's happy because he is going to control inflation. That 44 00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:27,799 Speaker 2: is the best news. It's going to be independent. There's 45 00:02:27,840 --> 00:02:29,520 Speaker 2: a lot of people in the Senate who are nervous 46 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 2: about this. They think he's not going to be independent 47 00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:33,919 Speaker 2: because he said, yes, he wants to cut rates like Trump. 48 00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:37,480 Speaker 2: But the people saying that are not knowledgeable. They don't understand. 49 00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:40,280 Speaker 2: He's got a too pronged approach, and the too pronged 50 00:02:40,280 --> 00:02:43,760 Speaker 2: approach is going to be successful as controlling inflation. The 51 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:46,120 Speaker 2: market believes us. Why do we know the market believes 52 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:49,440 Speaker 2: it because silver drop and gold drop. The market believes 53 00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:50,480 Speaker 2: he will cut inflation. 54 00:02:51,639 --> 00:02:56,359 Speaker 1: Talking to doctor Matt Will, economist at the University of Indianapolis. 55 00:02:56,400 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 1: So when we see that massive silver and gold drop down, 56 00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:04,519 Speaker 1: it's that the wah pick brings down inflation, which tells 57 00:03:04,639 --> 00:03:08,160 Speaker 1: us that inflation has indeed still been there. Isn't that 58 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:12,040 Speaker 1: kind of a proof of concept is the wrong word, 59 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:14,440 Speaker 1: but a proof of our arguments. So where people have 60 00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:17,079 Speaker 1: been yelling at me for months, the inflation's down. Why 61 00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:21,519 Speaker 1: won't you admit it down where it was with Biden? Yes, gone, no. 62 00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:24,760 Speaker 1: So there's already the market saying that if you have 63 00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:27,080 Speaker 1: this new guy, everything. 64 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:28,919 Speaker 3: On the inflation side will get better. 65 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:31,320 Speaker 1: But don't those plans have to be implemented and don't 66 00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:32,359 Speaker 1: those plans take time? 67 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:35,560 Speaker 2: Yes, they do take time, and it's going to take 68 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:39,000 Speaker 2: some while to implement. But the market reacts to news instantly, 69 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:42,320 Speaker 2: So as soon as something is known, a fact occurs, 70 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,440 Speaker 2: a piece of information comes out, the market reacts. So 71 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 2: the fact that he is going to be the FED chair, 72 00:03:48,320 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 2: the market has reacted positively. So the market reacts to news. 73 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:54,960 Speaker 2: So he doesn't have to do it yet, but we 74 00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:56,480 Speaker 2: know that he's going to do it because he has 75 00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 2: indicated that he will, and he's been very emphatic about it, 76 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:01,920 Speaker 2: which is why I support even though I got to 77 00:04:01,920 --> 00:04:04,280 Speaker 2: tell you, Tony, I wasn't a fan of his in 78 00:04:04,320 --> 00:04:07,040 Speaker 2: the past, because this is the guy who invented too 79 00:04:07,080 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 2: Big to Sail and yes, he's had a mea kolpa 80 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 2: on that, but he was the guy that did something 81 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:14,040 Speaker 2: that you and I have said we don't like. 82 00:04:16,080 --> 00:04:18,279 Speaker 1: Let's move it off of Kevin Washing and get into 83 00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:24,200 Speaker 1: this conversation specifically about Disney. It was an interesting piece 84 00:04:24,200 --> 00:04:27,159 Speaker 1: over there at CNBC that the Disney stock was up 85 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:31,240 Speaker 1: and it's being led by streaming and theme parks. And 86 00:04:31,279 --> 00:04:34,080 Speaker 1: I said, now, wait a second, how in the world 87 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:37,760 Speaker 1: is anybody affording to take their family to Disney. 88 00:04:38,360 --> 00:04:40,640 Speaker 3: It's an outrageously expensive thing to do. 89 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:43,080 Speaker 1: Never mind the fact that I was told that there 90 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 1: were people boycotting Disney and they're streaming for things that 91 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,480 Speaker 1: they were putting on there, and how they ruined certain things, 92 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:49,800 Speaker 1: and I guess that didn't hold. 93 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:51,880 Speaker 3: Is often these things don't hold. 94 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:57,520 Speaker 1: Ej Antni economist things that the issue regarding Disney has 95 00:04:57,560 --> 00:05:01,440 Speaker 1: to do with income disparity, that there are people who 96 00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:03,280 Speaker 1: have been making more money, the idea of the rich 97 00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:05,800 Speaker 1: are getting richer, and they're now spending their money. And 98 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 1: so it's not at any level of traditional blue collar worker. 99 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:12,080 Speaker 1: It's mom and dad each making more than one hundred 100 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:14,479 Speaker 1: thousand a year who could afford to take their family 101 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:18,280 Speaker 1: to Disney. First things First, you think the CNBC reporting 102 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:23,120 Speaker 1: is right or wrong regarding Disney in the stock price, Okay, 103 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:23,960 Speaker 1: I first. 104 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:26,799 Speaker 2: Have to just fully disclose Tony that my student fund 105 00:05:26,960 --> 00:05:30,400 Speaker 2: that my students and I manage. We own Disney, and 106 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:32,359 Speaker 2: we have voted to get rid of Disney, so we 107 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:34,360 Speaker 2: haven't sold it yet, but we have voted to get 108 00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:36,920 Speaker 2: rid of it, and all this information is part of 109 00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:40,440 Speaker 2: the reason we made that decision. I think the CNBC 110 00:05:40,640 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 2: reporting initially is just reproducing the public relations release from Disney. 111 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:49,560 Speaker 2: It doesn't have a deep dive. How do I know that? 112 00:05:49,839 --> 00:05:53,600 Speaker 2: Because the market's down five points on Disney. The stock 113 00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 2: price has plummeted. That's a five percent drop at the 114 00:05:57,360 --> 00:06:00,240 Speaker 2: current price by one oh seven, So the market's says 115 00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:02,559 Speaker 2: this is not good news. And let me go into 116 00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:07,200 Speaker 2: a deep dive on the streaming Hulu. They've acquired Hulu, 117 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 2: and in their press release they said, oh, Hulu and 118 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:12,760 Speaker 2: Disney Plus is up. Well, yeah, because Hulu is up, 119 00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:16,920 Speaker 2: they bought subscribers. You don't grow by buying subscribers when 120 00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:20,440 Speaker 2: you acquire a company like Hulu. So the fact is 121 00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 2: Disney Plus was at one hundred and sixty one thousand 122 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:28,200 Speaker 2: subscribers two years ago. The forecast that they will be 123 00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:30,440 Speaker 2: this year at one hundred and twenty seven thousand. One 124 00:06:30,480 --> 00:06:32,800 Speaker 2: hundred and twenty seven thousand is lower than one hundred 125 00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:36,960 Speaker 2: and sixty one thousand, and ESPN Plus will be down 126 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:40,719 Speaker 2: I mean million, I'm at million subscribers. I apologize. YESPN 127 00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:44,360 Speaker 2: Plus will be down from twenty six million to twenty 128 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:47,960 Speaker 2: three million. So there, they cannot get people to buy 129 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:51,600 Speaker 2: ESPN Plus. They can't get people to buy Disney Plus. 130 00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:54,480 Speaker 2: Hulu is the only thing they have that is of 131 00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 2: any worth in their streaming service, but they lump it 132 00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,440 Speaker 2: all together to make you think their streaming is great 133 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:03,640 Speaker 2: when they're streaming stinks. So I don't think their streaming 134 00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:06,159 Speaker 2: numbers are legitimate, and I think the market agrees with me. 135 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:11,840 Speaker 1: So how does how in today's world could you possibly 136 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:15,400 Speaker 1: have And that's one heck of an allegation that that's 137 00:07:15,520 --> 00:07:18,360 Speaker 1: that's being made there. And I hear you that you're 138 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:21,560 Speaker 1: not making an allegation. This is your personal opinion. This 139 00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 1: personal opinion and view has formed you and for your 140 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 1: students there at the University of Indianapolis, some ideas on 141 00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:32,880 Speaker 1: where to invest and not invest. How does one come 142 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:35,720 Speaker 1: to the place where you don't trust a number because 143 00:07:35,760 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 1: you're not the only person who's ever invested and said, yeah, 144 00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:39,920 Speaker 1: I don't think that's actually what's happening and I have 145 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:43,160 Speaker 1: reasons for it. Is it the idea of where they've 146 00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:45,880 Speaker 1: been in the past, Is it the idea of other 147 00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:48,320 Speaker 1: examples of over inflation by Disney? 148 00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 3: Can you get a little more specific, Well. 149 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:53,280 Speaker 2: Let me say that it's not my opinion. I mean, 150 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:56,400 Speaker 2: I just gave you actual numbers as to what their 151 00:07:56,440 --> 00:08:00,560 Speaker 2: subscribers are and what they were. That's a fact. That's 152 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:03,280 Speaker 2: nothing disputable about that. It's not an opinion. And if 153 00:08:03,280 --> 00:08:05,040 Speaker 2: I were to look at like their affiliate fees, so 154 00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:09,720 Speaker 2: the fees they get from affiliates for their networks, that's 155 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,960 Speaker 2: down from it was about eleven point seven billion in 156 00:08:12,960 --> 00:08:15,480 Speaker 2: twenty twenty three. At the end of this year, it's 157 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:18,400 Speaker 2: going to be eight point five billion. I don't care 158 00:08:18,440 --> 00:08:20,560 Speaker 2: how you slice it. Eight point five is less than 159 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:24,320 Speaker 2: eleven point seven billion. That's just a fact. So the 160 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:27,240 Speaker 2: only thing they're doing well on their on their entertainment 161 00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:29,880 Speaker 2: side is direct to consumer. They are making money direct 162 00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:33,120 Speaker 2: to consumer. Why because they're selling all that Disney archive. 163 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:37,360 Speaker 2: People are buying tons of Disney products. But it's true 164 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:40,439 Speaker 2: their theme parks are up for the moment, that is true, 165 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:43,400 Speaker 2: and maybe their theme parks will continue to grow. But 166 00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:47,320 Speaker 2: Tony that's you know, their theme parks, park experiences, you know, 167 00:08:47,679 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 2: ten and a half billion dollars of revenue. That's they 168 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,439 Speaker 2: make more money on licensing their content. They make thirty 169 00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 2: eight billion dollars a year licensing Disney. So yeah, okay, 170 00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 2: they're up ten point five billion in theme parks. Correct, 171 00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:05,080 Speaker 2: good job. Okay, they had a billion dollar increase. That's 172 00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:10,320 Speaker 2: nothing compare to their overall revenue scheme. They're heavily into content, 173 00:09:10,679 --> 00:09:15,480 Speaker 2: they're heavily into streaming services, and those two areas they 174 00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 2: need some improvement. 175 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:21,240 Speaker 1: Talking to doctor Matt Will, economists at the University of 176 00:09:21,360 --> 00:09:27,040 Speaker 1: Indianapolis before I let you go, my take on this 177 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:32,280 Speaker 1: economy has been that these first six months of twenty 178 00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:33,439 Speaker 1: twenty six looked. 179 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:37,040 Speaker 3: Very, very rough. They look like. 180 00:09:38,520 --> 00:09:42,120 Speaker 1: A kind of resetting of all, right, here's what Trump's doing. 181 00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 1: You never know when a tariff is going to get 182 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:45,800 Speaker 1: implement You never never know when a tariff is going 183 00:09:45,800 --> 00:09:48,359 Speaker 1: to get removed. That leads to a level of uncertainty. 184 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:52,560 Speaker 1: And after this this spending season, this holiday spending season 185 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:54,839 Speaker 1: where more was spent on luxury goods but less was 186 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:59,319 Speaker 1: spent overall. As at least I've looked at the numbers. 187 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:02,560 Speaker 1: I certainly could be wrong there, but more was spent 188 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 1: on luxury goods than everyday goods. It is continuing this 189 00:10:06,360 --> 00:10:09,560 Speaker 1: idea of not wage gap but income gap, this idea 190 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 1: of the K curve instead of you know, where the 191 00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:17,720 Speaker 1: rich are getting rich or the poor are getting poorer 192 00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:22,400 Speaker 1: and the middle class is shrinking. Although one could argue 193 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,319 Speaker 1: that all wages are going up overall, just some of 194 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:29,440 Speaker 1: faster than others. I have looked at these next six 195 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:31,240 Speaker 1: months saying this is going to be rough, and it's 196 00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:33,800 Speaker 1: going into a midterm, and Trump needs a couple of 197 00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:36,080 Speaker 1: things to turn around to be able to show some 198 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:39,160 Speaker 1: success on the economy, to get back some voters who 199 00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:41,920 Speaker 1: may have left and not be with him for the 200 00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:42,360 Speaker 1: mid term. 201 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:47,040 Speaker 3: Is the pick of wash or is there are there. 202 00:10:46,920 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 1: Any moves that you see in the in the offing, 203 00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:52,880 Speaker 1: things that have already happened, that are going to show 204 00:10:52,920 --> 00:10:56,760 Speaker 1: a result that you think either work for the Republicans 205 00:10:57,240 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 1: or are going to continue to trend for the Democrats. 206 00:11:00,960 --> 00:11:04,000 Speaker 2: Oh man, that was a backhanded way of making me 207 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:07,199 Speaker 2: predict the future. But I will do it, will I 208 00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,200 Speaker 2: will do it, and I will say this. I believe 209 00:11:10,280 --> 00:11:12,960 Speaker 2: in the analogy that I've used all along. It's a 210 00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:16,560 Speaker 2: boxing match where Trump is against Trump, and he makes 211 00:11:16,559 --> 00:11:18,760 Speaker 2: some good moves and he makes some bad moves. And 212 00:11:18,800 --> 00:11:22,320 Speaker 2: I think the worst decision is a great move, and 213 00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:25,560 Speaker 2: I believe it's going to lower prices going into the midterms. 214 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:28,400 Speaker 2: So he's going to get lucky on that. If he 215 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:32,200 Speaker 2: falls back to tariffs are beautiful, I think that's going 216 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,079 Speaker 2: to hurt him because tariffs are not beautiful and they 217 00:11:35,120 --> 00:11:38,120 Speaker 2: harm the economy. As far as the luxury goods, I 218 00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:40,520 Speaker 2: got to tell you you've seen a little bit of 219 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:42,600 Speaker 2: a blip. That is true. There's been a little bit 220 00:11:42,600 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 2: of a blip. But the leading indicator for this is 221 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:49,760 Speaker 2: LVMH moet Hennessy. It's they own the brand names across 222 00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:53,080 Speaker 2: the board in luxury goods, and their revenue has declined 223 00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 2: from eighty six billion to eighty four to eighty They 224 00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:58,240 Speaker 2: had a blip this year of up to eighty two, 225 00:11:59,120 --> 00:12:02,480 Speaker 2: but that's a blip. They are still on the downward trajectory, 226 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:06,080 Speaker 2: so the luxury good market is still being hurt. I 227 00:12:06,120 --> 00:12:08,080 Speaker 2: don't know who's going to win the battle in Trump 228 00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:11,200 Speaker 2: versus Trump. I'm hoping that good Trump wins if he 229 00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:14,960 Speaker 2: cannot believe the terrors are beautiful and the sights to 230 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:18,160 Speaker 2: stop using them as a weapon. I think this could 231 00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:21,600 Speaker 2: be a really good year, but I cannot predict what 232 00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:23,920 Speaker 2: he's going to do. If you can let me know. 233 00:12:24,679 --> 00:12:28,720 Speaker 1: Well, I only went with where where I hear things 234 00:12:28,760 --> 00:12:32,320 Speaker 1: anecdotally and what the numbers seem to be showing me. 235 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:35,839 Speaker 1: So they don't show me that things are great. The 236 00:12:36,679 --> 00:12:39,240 Speaker 1: anecdotally in the discussion with business owners don't show me 237 00:12:39,280 --> 00:12:42,600 Speaker 1: that things are great. We talking about manufacturing numbers. They 238 00:12:42,640 --> 00:12:45,080 Speaker 1: don't show me this level of growth that I think 239 00:12:45,160 --> 00:12:47,360 Speaker 1: is necessary in the place is to be able to 240 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 1: have a strong economy, and it does. I don't think 241 00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 1: it's going to take much, Sir, for things to turn 242 00:12:52,120 --> 00:12:54,880 Speaker 1: around or for people to feel good. I have said, 243 00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:56,959 Speaker 1: gas prices have to keep coming down. You have to 244 00:12:56,960 --> 00:12:59,600 Speaker 1: be able to afford a stake to grill in your backyard, 245 00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:01,040 Speaker 1: and you have to be able to afford to take 246 00:13:01,040 --> 00:13:03,439 Speaker 1: your family out to dinner. You do those three things 247 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 1: and people start feeling good, and I think it'll show 248 00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:09,560 Speaker 1: in an election. That was That was my three. Do 249 00:13:09,640 --> 00:13:11,600 Speaker 1: you have your three or do you have an opinion 250 00:13:11,640 --> 00:13:12,400 Speaker 1: on what I just said? 251 00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:16,120 Speaker 2: Yes, I think you know. I gave you the positive 252 00:13:16,200 --> 00:13:19,760 Speaker 2: upside potential for Trump, but let me explain the absolute 253 00:13:19,880 --> 00:13:23,199 Speaker 2: downside horrendous, and that is the manufacturing. You hit the 254 00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:27,280 Speaker 2: nail on the head. Manufacturing has been shrinking. The report 255 00:13:27,280 --> 00:13:30,120 Speaker 2: In fact, you know, the report just came out today 256 00:13:31,559 --> 00:13:35,559 Speaker 2: and okay, ready for this. It reversed a ten month decline. 257 00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:38,400 Speaker 2: We now had a growth in manufacturing last month for 258 00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:42,199 Speaker 2: the first time in ten months. That's a good thing. 259 00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:46,240 Speaker 2: That's positive. At the same time, the prices were going 260 00:13:46,280 --> 00:13:49,160 Speaker 2: through the roof. They went I mean, the PMI report 261 00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:51,240 Speaker 2: came out and we had growth in manufacturing, we had 262 00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:54,319 Speaker 2: growth in new wars. It was a great report. So 263 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 2: I see some good news. But that's not a trend yet. 264 00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 2: It's not a trend. We had ten months of shrinking 265 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:05,160 Speaker 2: manufacturing because of tariffs. Have we turned the corner yet? 266 00:14:05,400 --> 00:14:07,840 Speaker 2: I hope we have, but I don't know for sure. 267 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:10,960 Speaker 2: I know I didn't give you. I didn't give you 268 00:14:11,559 --> 00:14:14,520 Speaker 2: maybe a concrete reply to your question. 269 00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 3: Tony, I assume you did. 270 00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:18,559 Speaker 1: You did it like some kind of politician. I see, 271 00:14:18,960 --> 00:14:22,840 Speaker 1: I see, you see where this friendship has gone. Doctor Mattwell, Economist, 272 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:24,720 Speaker 1: University of Indianapolis. 273 00:14:24,720 --> 00:14:27,120 Speaker 3: I appreciate you taking the time. Moore's coming up on 274 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:29,000 Speaker 3: Tony Katz. This is Tony Katz today