Speaker 1: Why from the heartland and the crossroads of America. It's
Speaker 1: Tony Katz today. So it's l SA ed winning the
Speaker 1: Michigan primary. The news just coming across and good on
Speaker 1: the Michigan Democrats.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 3: Why make it.
Speaker 4: Easier for yourself when you can make it more difficult
Speaker 4: for yourself? Why make it easy on yourself when you
Speaker 4: can expose that half the Democratic Party isn't interested in
Speaker 4: this communist Islamist nonsense. But hey, too late now, fourteen
Speaker 4: eighty eight votes.
Speaker 3: That's what he won by. It's a percentage point. That
Speaker 3: was the margin difference in that rate.
Speaker 4: Kats Tony Katz today. Good to be here, Good to
Speaker 4: be with you. The numbers, man, it tells a story.
Speaker 4: All the numbers have changed, Nahn either. I think I've
Speaker 4: got it right. He's got forty eight point four eight
Speaker 4: percent of the vote. Does the Islamist versus Stevens forty
Speaker 4: seven point five? Now, I admit to you, I think
Speaker 4: it was gonna be kind of hard for Stevens to
Speaker 4: win when this is her.
Speaker 5: A little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy,
Speaker 5: and a little bit of sicket to.
Speaker 3: Them, right right, I think it's gonna be so good.
Speaker 3: I think it's gonna be a little bit rough, and
Speaker 3: maybe I'm being rough and calling uh I do. I'll
Speaker 3: say it, uh An is lomist.
Speaker 4: I will say this when you say to me, hey,
Speaker 4: let's not bring up the death of the Iyatola because
Speaker 4: some of my voters will be sad. You have different
Speaker 4: priorities than I do. Also, don't tell me that you're
Speaker 4: a capitalist who opposes monopolies like Adam Smith, the Scottish economist,
Speaker 4: when you believe in Medicare for all, which is government
Speaker 4: monopoly of your health, which is of course about control
Speaker 4: and turning doctors and nurses and health officials into slaves.
Speaker 3: But let's put all that aside. You cannot unring the bell.
Speaker 3: A lot happened in.
Speaker 4: The primaries yesterday. Fascinating stuff from the primaries yesterday, Things
Speaker 4: that nobody is talking about. How about the fact that
Speaker 4: Corey Bush got schalacked, Corey Bush got wrecked. Connor McGregor's
Speaker 4: knee looks better than Corey Bush.
Speaker 3: That's not a bad it's not a bad reference. By
Speaker 3: the way. I'll take that.
Speaker 4: Corey Bush is the former congresswoman of Missouri first District,
Speaker 4: and she, of course is one of.
Speaker 3: The more original kind of weirdos.
Speaker 4: I remember she made her career by doing hands up,
Speaker 4: don't shoot after the shooting death of Michael Brown Ferguson.
Speaker 4: That's how she made her bones. Lied about the whole thing.
Speaker 4: She lied about the entire thing is what she did,
Speaker 4: because there was no hands up, don't shoot. Michael Brown
Speaker 4: attacked a cop, broke his orbital socket, walked away, and
Speaker 4: then ran back after the cop, and that's when he
Speaker 4: got shot.
Speaker 3: According to the Arik.
Speaker 4: Holder Justice Department, she's a fraud and everything about her
Speaker 4: was awoke.
Speaker 3: This and a critical race.
Speaker 4: Theory that and an intersectionality that and of course moving
Speaker 4: into the communism was super easy for her because she
Speaker 4: thought it would have meant victory.
Speaker 3: She got the crap kicked.
Speaker 4: Out of her by someone named by the name of
Speaker 4: Wesley Bell. Wesley Bell got fifty nine point two percent
Speaker 4: of the vote. She got thirty six point nine percent
Speaker 4: of the vote, twenty three points. Bravo, bravo. Now put
Speaker 4: your hands up, say I give and go. Sit down.
Speaker 4: Nobody wants to see you anymore. Great to see. Then
Speaker 4: there's some of the more crazy stuff to see. If
Speaker 4: you take a look by the way, all my results
Speaker 4: are from the New York Times.
Speaker 3: You're like Tony, you're using the New York Times.
Speaker 4: When it comes to their election coverage, like how they
Speaker 4: do the data, they're outstandingly good. The data part is spectacular,
Speaker 4: really and truly.
Speaker 3: Kansas put an amendment out. They had a couple of
Speaker 3: things put out. One of those things put out was
Speaker 3: whether or not they should require elections for Supreme State
Speaker 3: Supreme Court justices Kansas Supreme Court. Should they require elections
Speaker 3: to do it? And what did they determine? Nope, No,
Speaker 3: thanks don't need it. We don't need these elections. Sixty
Speaker 3: one said, nah, that's that's amazing.
Speaker 4: Why wouldn't you vote for Supreme Court justices? And you'll
Speaker 4: note where the vote totals come in is to peak
Speaker 4: in Wichita. So the more left cleaning areas believe that
Speaker 4: they're the population centers and they could just keep hand
Speaker 4: selecting their Supreme Court justices and therefore or never have
Speaker 4: any question regarding what the rest of the state may
Speaker 4: actually be interested in. They wanted by one hundred and
Speaker 4: fifty thousand votes. But this is the one that's the knockout.
Speaker 4: This is Missouri, and Missouri asked the question, do you
Speaker 4: want to eliminate the income tax? So individual income tax
Speaker 4: makes up more than sixty percent of the state's general revenue.
Speaker 4: The question is do you want to change that around
Speaker 4: and eliminate the income tax?
Speaker 3: And they voted no.
Speaker 4: Eighty three point three percent. You look at the whole map.
Speaker 3: If you take a look at it, the whole map Missouri,
Speaker 3: the no votes were in.
Speaker 4: An orange and the yes votes were in this like
Speaker 4: teal green. The whole thing is orange.
Speaker 3: It's unbelievable, it's incredible. You look at it, you like,
Speaker 3: that's crazy town.
Speaker 4: Every single county was a Only one county was ah no,
Speaker 4: but close, Nope, all of them, all the rest solid,
Speaker 4: solid nose. I'm blown away by that one. So there
Speaker 4: was a lot that happened, and we should be clear
Speaker 4: that the socialists didn't win everywhere. They lost, as I said,
Speaker 4: in the Missouri first, they lost in the Virginia second.
Speaker 4: Now remember they lost to Democrats. We're still talking about
Speaker 4: people who you may not agree with politically, but they're
Speaker 4: not communists. And so one could argue that this is
Speaker 4: a pushback against what the DSSAY is doing. The problem
Speaker 4: with that argument is that one thinks that pushback means
Speaker 4: that the other side feels it or changes DSA isn't
Speaker 4: going to change anything. They're not going to change a thing.
Speaker 4: Even if they had lost to Haley Stevens in Michigan,
Speaker 4: they would not have changed the thing.
Speaker 3: But they didn't. They got their prize, and their prize
Speaker 3: was Abdullah El Sayed into this race.
Speaker 6: It is time for the group chat, and there is
Speaker 6: so much to talk about today. It seems we do
Speaker 6: have a winner in the Democratic Party's biggest and most
Speaker 6: expensive primary of this summer. We can now officially report
Speaker 6: that Abdul al Sayed has won the Democratic primary for
Speaker 6: the US Senate in Michigan. We just heard from El
Speaker 6: Sayed's campaign that Stevens called him to officially concede.
Speaker 4: Now she was down by a percent. She could have,
Speaker 4: I guess challenged it, but Selavi. Nothing changes. Where these
Speaker 4: communists are. Nothing's going to change their presentation, absolutely nothing.
Speaker 4: They believe that this is their moment and they are
Speaker 4: not going to not take their moment.
Speaker 3: If they should lose, they keep going. If they win,
Speaker 3: they keep going. And where do they keep going, Well,
Speaker 3: they keep moving further and further and further. Left to
Speaker 3: they get their goals.
Speaker 4: And when they get their goals, just like Alynsky taught, right,
Speaker 4: once you have a tactic that works and you get
Speaker 4: the thing you want, you actually have to go do
Speaker 4: the thing.
Speaker 3: Well, then they'll move further and further to the left.
Speaker 3: And since these.
Speaker 4: Are people who believe in the permanent revolution, there will
Speaker 4: be another group that says you're not left enough. That's
Speaker 4: how this goes. That's how this works. That's where they
Speaker 4: are at. So win or lose.
Speaker 3: They were not about to change a thing. They weren't
Speaker 3: going to change anything. They are not interested what happens
Speaker 3: in the election in Michigan. Worthy question. Let's start with
Speaker 3: the basics. What we know to be true. We know
Speaker 3: that the party is split. We know that when we take.
Speaker 4: A look at the Michigan results, we see forty eight
Speaker 4: point four to eight percent for Elsa ed and forty
Speaker 4: seven point five to one percent for Stevens, a difference,
Speaker 4: as I said of oh, actually, actually I think it's
Speaker 4: thirteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty eight votes, not fourteen thousand.
Speaker 3: Let's called fourteen thousand votes. That means that the.
Speaker 4: Democrat Party, the likely voter, is split. One could argue
Speaker 4: that that is not the totality of voters in a
Speaker 4: general election. General election will bring out more people. One
Speaker 4: could argue such a thing. But amongst the Democrats who
Speaker 4: are voting right now, they are split. Ask yourself about
Speaker 4: the Stephens voter for what reason did they vote for Stevens.
Speaker 4: Some of them voted for Haley Stevens because Haley Stephens
Speaker 4: is a woman. Of course, I don't think anybody questions this,
Speaker 4: would you what a foolhardy thing to question? Of course
Speaker 4: people vote that way. They voted for her because she's
Speaker 4: a woman.
Speaker 3: There are people who voted for her.
Speaker 4: Because they didn't like abdua Alsad's policies. Some of those
Speaker 4: people would be Jewish voters who didn't want a guy
Speaker 4: who was screaming and yelling about APAC Like somehow it
Speaker 4: makes sense. The anti APAX stuff is amongst the stupidest
Speaker 4: stuff out there. It's just ridiculous. It is regurgitated Pavlovian nonsense.
Speaker 4: So everybody knows that they're all in the same group.
Speaker 4: Nobody wants to be seen not saying something bad about APAK.
Speaker 4: There are people who are like, no, this is just dumb,
Speaker 4: and for religious reasons, and other reasons. I'm not voting
Speaker 4: for Abdulsi ed right and not doing that. Some people
Speaker 4: didn't want to vote for a guy who's clearly UH
Speaker 4: and Islamist. They didn't want to be around that. By
Speaker 4: the way, quick thing back to APAK. I guess if
Speaker 4: lsied wins. APAC doesn't determine elections, right, They don't determine
Speaker 4: the outcome of elections. They already lost and Representative Ocossia
Speaker 4: Cortes Caimana convection, bitch all she wants.
Speaker 3: They lost.
Speaker 4: They put the money into Haley Stevens and they lost.
Speaker 4: They don't control elections. You have improven or wrong? Please
Speaker 4: sit down, would you?
Speaker 3: Hey? At least that argument, sit down? Could you do that?
Speaker 3: So there could be a serious number of reasons or
Speaker 3: multiplicity of reasons the people don't vote for el say it,
Speaker 3: that's in a primary. What happens in a general when
Speaker 3: you're going up against the Republican rogers? What happens in
Speaker 3: this moment? I don't know.
Speaker 4: Do those people hold their nose and say, yeah, sure
Speaker 4: he's a communist, and yeah sure he has a thing
Speaker 4: for the Islamists, and yeah sure he's supported by the DSA,
Speaker 4: but Trump bad, so I have to vote for him.
Speaker 4: Do they say, I'm not gonna tell a soul what
Speaker 4: I'm doing. I'm gonna walk into the voting booth and
Speaker 4: I'm voting for that Republican and then I'm gonna.
Speaker 3: Take a shower with Brillow. But that's the way it
Speaker 3: happen to be because that guy can't be in office.
Speaker 3: Or do they say, you know what Election Day, No,
Speaker 3: I'm not gonna have any part of this.
Speaker 4: I'm just gonna Netflix and Show. Now, I know what
Speaker 4: Netflix and Chill means, and maybe they'll do that, or
Speaker 4: maybe they're just gonna sit on the couch and watch Netflix.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 4: You understand, Producer Landing, and Netflix and Show means more
Speaker 4: than Netflix and Show.
Speaker 3: Yes, correct, you understand that, right, Producer Landing? Yes, correct, Yeah, Okay,
Speaker 3: that's correct. That's accurate. When the kids say they're going
Speaker 3: to Netflix and Shell, they're not alone. I'm just you
Speaker 3: gotta know.
Speaker 4: They're just gonna sit there and they're gonna binge watch
Speaker 4: the Bear for the seventh time and forget that election
Speaker 4: day ever happens. They're gonna hold their nose. They're gonna
Speaker 4: secretly vote for the Republican or they're going to do nothing.
Speaker 4: Two out of the three of those responses are re
Speaker 4: bad for Abdul Sayet and the Democrats, really bad because
Speaker 4: there are also other elections going on in Michigan. You've
Speaker 4: got congressional stuff, You've got a governor's or, you have
Speaker 4: a governor's race going on.
Speaker 3: You've got other things.
Speaker 4: And now you've got a guy on the ticket that
Speaker 4: can depress Democrat turnout.
Speaker 3: Okay, now we got ourselves a story. Now we've got
Speaker 3: something to watch. I don't know about you. I got
Speaker 3: a lot of bourbon. I got I there's you want
Speaker 3: to go, I'll grab any bottle.
Speaker 4: We are gonna election day, We're gonna pour ourselves a drink,
Speaker 4: and we're gonna watch this. I could be wrong, absolutely,
Speaker 4: but if I'm looking at the data right now, which
Speaker 4: I am, two of the three possibilities are not only
Speaker 4: very bad for Abduel's very bad for Democrats in Michigan.
Speaker 4: And trust me when I say Republicans have all the
Speaker 4: power to screw this up in ways you cannot possibly comprehend.
Speaker 4: I'm Tony Katz, and this is Tony Katz.
Speaker 3: Today we've got an I ran update coming up. It's well,
Speaker 3: whatever it is you want it to be, I guess.
Speaker 4: But I have spoken a lot about USAID and I
Speaker 4: want to say it again. I'm glad the organization is gone.
Speaker 4: I want to continue with the DOGE cuts. I want
Speaker 4: to continue seeking out the fraudsters. I want these people
Speaker 4: to go to jail. I want them to suffer. Tony Katz,
Speaker 4: Tony Katz today, a pleasure to be with you guys.
Speaker 4: And yes, I will discuss the assassination attempt.
Speaker 3: Against President Trump and that whole story. There. There was
Speaker 3: a story in the Washington Times about.
Speaker 4: USAID cuts, Ebola crisis in Africa, open door to Beijing's
Speaker 4: bid for influence in the Congo. Now never forget that
Speaker 4: foreign aid is also about soft power.
Speaker 3: And the idea that hey, we'll give you these.
Speaker 4: Dollars, you don't connect with them, and everything's cool. I
Speaker 4: don't know if the Tucker set agrees with this philosophy
Speaker 4: or not.
Speaker 3: It seems to me that they don't, and it seems
Speaker 3: to me.
Speaker 4: That that is a serious, serious issue. I do not
Speaker 4: believe that it is our job to give money everywhere,
Speaker 4: and I don't mind if people say let's end far
Speaker 4: An aid.
Speaker 3: Okay, end it, end toto, end it. We'll see what happens.
Speaker 4: I just want them to realize that others will try
Speaker 4: and fill the void. But when we got rid of USAID,
Speaker 4: people are like, we're gonna We're gonna get people killed,
Speaker 4: going to die because we're not giving them the money.
Speaker 3: Here's a great example.
Speaker 4: Here is the Democratic Republic of Congo dealing with an
Speaker 4: ebola outbreak, more than thirty four hundred cases over sixteen
Speaker 4: hundred deaths reported since May fifteenth. Should we or should
Speaker 4: we not be in the business of supporting them through this?
Speaker 4: I would argue that it's not a bad idea when
Speaker 4: dealing with certain issues to be helpful, because you don't
Speaker 4: want that thing finding its way through through person and
Speaker 4: the weirdest game of telephone ever and ending up in
Speaker 4: your city, in your state, and your country.
Speaker 3: You don't want that disease around.
Speaker 4: Would we need to in this situation talking about this
Speaker 4: situation with Congo specifically.
Speaker 3: Do you think it's necessary for us.
Speaker 4: To give that money to be able to be helpful
Speaker 4: through USAID or is it possible we could do this
Speaker 4: through some other organization. And this is the point. We
Speaker 4: can always be helpful when it is needed or when
Speaker 4: we think there is a needed alignment. They could be
Speaker 4: two different things. They could be the same thing. You
Speaker 4: don't need this USAID organization to do it, you just
Speaker 4: go about doing it. USAID was never necessary and not
Speaker 4: a life was lost because that organization got defunded because
Speaker 4: we could, like we did with AMPHAR, still be helpful
Speaker 4: in all sorts of ways. It was a slush fund
Speaker 4: to help like minded ideologues be able to get paid
Speaker 4: to move money, like minded ideologues to do us harm.
Speaker 3: It's better that it's gone. I'm Tony Kats.
Speaker 7: We are here to kick off what has at this
Speaker 7: point been an informal effort, which is working with Congress
Speaker 7: to help us combat frauds. So, as you know, when
Speaker 7: the President the United States.
Speaker 3: Started the Fraud Task Force.
Speaker 7: And really set the federal government to taking a whole
Speaker 7: of government approach to the anti f fraud issue, that
Speaker 7: was mainly an administrative thing. That was something we were
Speaker 7: working with our colleagues at h ANDHS, at DOJ, at
Speaker 7: all of the various agencies in the federal government and
Speaker 7: trying to root out fraud. And i'd remind all of
Speaker 7: you and remind the American people, and remind what these
Speaker 7: Congressmen and senators don't need reminding, which is that fraud
Speaker 7: is really a dual victim crime. The most obvious victim,
Speaker 7: of course, is the American taxpayer, who has their hard
Speaker 7: earned tax dollars stolen from them to enrich people who
Speaker 7: are violating our laws and take advantage of our country.
Speaker 7: But I think, more profoundly and more sadly, the second
Speaker 7: victim of fraud are the people who benefit from programs
Speaker 7: that the American people have set up in their generosity
Speaker 7: and in their kindness of spirit, and those programs don't
Speaker 7: function as well or don't even have their resources necessary
Speaker 7: to work because they've been stolen from by fraudsters.
Speaker 4: He is not wrong, is the Vice President Tony Katz.
Speaker 4: Tony Katz today an absolute pleasure to be with you
Speaker 4: live streaming on YouTube and rumble. Just look for Tony
Speaker 4: Katz on the Twitter, which is also known as ex
Speaker 4: Tony Katz, Facebook, Tony Kats or radio. It's the Vice
Speaker 4: President is there and Steven Miller is right next to him.
Speaker 4: And somewhere during that little opening, someone told Steven Miller
Speaker 4: to smile, and he did. Every time we're talking about
Speaker 4: the fraud. Every time we're talking about finding the fraud,
Speaker 4: rooting out the fraud. Good, good guys. I was just
Speaker 4: talking about Doge earlier. These are the good things. These
Speaker 4: are the rights and smart things. We need to be
Speaker 4: staying on this.
Speaker 3: And never stop and never quit ever. This is the
Speaker 3: thing that we want. And yes, this is what I
Speaker 3: voted for. I'm always voting for this. Find the fraudsters
Speaker 3: and put them in jail. But if I don't get jail,
Speaker 3: if I don't see these people behind bars, then I'm
Speaker 3: gonna think, mister Vice President, that.
Speaker 4: You're full of crap, and you, Steven Miller and everybody
Speaker 4: else else.
Speaker 3: People have to go to jail. That's what has to happen.
Speaker 3: And if people don't go to jail. And I'm not
Speaker 3: just talking.
Speaker 4: About the Somali national in Minneapolis, or the American in
Speaker 4: Los Angeles with the hospice fraud, or in this state,
Speaker 4: or and that my beloved state of Indiana, all fifty
Speaker 4: states have this fraud. I'm talking about the elected officials.
Speaker 4: I'm talking about the unelected bureaucrats who all look the
Speaker 4: other way and allowed this to happen, never question, never
Speaker 4: did their job well never actually said, hey, wait a second,
Speaker 4: we have to be a safeguard of the people's dollars
Speaker 4: here these receipts.
Speaker 3: Doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 4: If some of them, I mean, I want all, but
Speaker 4: I know I'm not gonna get all.
Speaker 3: If some of them aren't going to.
Speaker 4: Jail, then I don't know what we're doing that simply
Speaker 4: will not do.
Speaker 3: If they're not going to go to jail, well, then
Speaker 3: there's no reason to vote for you, whatsoever is there,
Speaker 3: mister Vice President.
Speaker 4: I'm just telling you how this has to work. Now,
Speaker 4: this brings us to what's going on in Iran. From
Speaker 4: what I'm told, we are just moments away from.
Speaker 3: A deal that's going to make oil free for everybody.
Speaker 3: You get a barrel of oil, and you get a
Speaker 3: barrel of oil. Look under your seat. Everybody gets a
Speaker 3: barrel of oil and a lavender candle. I think I
Speaker 3: stole that line from Tina Fay, not the barrel of
Speaker 3: oil line. That was all me.
Speaker 4: US and regional partners see progress toward reopening the horror
Speaker 4: moves choke points.
Speaker 3: Interesting. Interesting, and literally the same day that headline came out,
Speaker 3: came out Emerging horror Moves Accord could give a ran
Speaker 3: greater sway over Key Waterway. Huh okay, well this is
Speaker 3: going great.
Speaker 4: So what actually is happening? What is going on? What
Speaker 4: will we see out of Iran? Well, maybe the answer
Speaker 4: is in oil prices. Seventy five dollars and seventy one
Speaker 4: cents a barrel hasn't really moved since yesterday.
Speaker 3: It's lower than being in the nineties. That's a plus.
Speaker 4: Brent crude, which is coming out of the oceans the
Speaker 4: West Texas comes out of the ground. Brent crude had
Speaker 4: seventy nine dollars and eighty four cents a barrel, still
Speaker 4: both under eighty bucks a barrel. Gotta be making people happy.
Speaker 4: How possibly could there be any situation in which Iran
Speaker 4: has a sway? Well, this is reported by the New
Speaker 4: York Times, So you'll forgive me if I won't just say,
Speaker 4: let's wait and find out. It's the New York Times
Speaker 4: world class maps showing where the votes are coming from
Speaker 4: in any given state or any different congressional district in
Speaker 4: primary general elections. Incredible technology. Reporting will pass, I will pass.
Speaker 4: They're saying the New York Times that Iranian US officials
Speaker 4: said Iran and Oman are moving toward an agreement that
Speaker 4: would allow commercial shipping to resume through the Strait, and
Speaker 4: Iranian officials said inbound vessels would use a shipping lane
Speaker 4: along Iran's coastline, while outbound traffic would move through a
Speaker 4: channel closer to Aman. It would not include formal tolls,
Speaker 4: but would impose a service fee. Feel the the air
Speaker 4: quotes a service fee to cover security, environmental protection, and staffing,
Speaker 4: with the revenues divided equally between Iran and Oman. Service fee.
Speaker 4: You guys may not know this about me, but in
Speaker 4: addition to the two radio shows, of course, I've got
Speaker 4: the third radio show or I've got the morning show
Speaker 4: in Indianapolis, I've got the syndicated show, I've got Eat, Drink,
Speaker 4: Smoke of the naturally syndicated it Scaren Bourbon Show. When
Speaker 4: my father passed away, I took over his merchant services company.
Speaker 3: Small company. You never made it a big thing.
Speaker 4: It took a long time to get everything streamlined into
Speaker 4: a way that works and now works. He had done
Speaker 4: this for years providing credit card processing services, and I
Speaker 4: do that still.
Speaker 3: To this day.
Speaker 4: I talk to people, I answer questions, I solve problems.
Speaker 4: I do the whole thing. Service fees. Service fee is
Speaker 4: one heck of a turn. And you've seen more and
Speaker 4: more credit card receipts where you're paying the fee for
Speaker 4: using the credit card.
Speaker 3: And that comes from the fact that people may not
Speaker 3: know this.
Speaker 4: You know all those credit cards that say, well, we'll
Speaker 4: give you points for this, and we'll give you points
Speaker 4: for that, and points are all so many points are
Speaker 4: well more points that.
Speaker 3: You know what to do with. You know that the
Speaker 3: credit card companies don't pay for any of that.
Speaker 4: It's not how it works. No, no, no, the merchant
Speaker 4: pays for all of that in the world of higher fees.
Speaker 4: So what has happened is that you have seen a
Speaker 4: world of service fees, surcharging, convenience fees, et cetera. Because
Speaker 4: why is the merchant now being so screwed over with
Speaker 4: everybody getting points to do all sorts of things and
Speaker 4: it's all coming out of their pocket they're paying the
Speaker 4: extra charges for this type of card.
Speaker 3: Nope, we push the charges back and it has.
Speaker 4: Become rather ubiquitous now and we do a fair amount
Speaker 4: of that of that work.
Speaker 3: It's there are some.
Speaker 4: Businesses like, Nope, we really don't want to do that
Speaker 4: to our customer for our purposes right certain types of
Speaker 4: luxury lines, et cetera. The vast majority of people are
Speaker 4: like yes, because it is the difference between growing and
Speaker 4: not growing, hiring the next person, marketing budgets all sorts.
Speaker 3: Of things three dollars, and so we do this.
Speaker 4: But we also know that service fee can be utilized
Speaker 4: as a cover for whatever we want. When we hear
Speaker 4: service fee, how many raise your hands? Everybody in their
Speaker 4: car be looking. How many people when they heard service
Speaker 4: fee raise your hand? Immediately thought ticketmaster? There it is,
Speaker 4: there it is. When you hear service fee, you're like,
Speaker 4: I'm about to get you know what with my pants on?
Speaker 3: You know it? Service fee?
Speaker 4: What service was provided by Iran and Oman for the
Speaker 4: navigable waterway? Well, the service of not having put any
Speaker 4: minds into the strait of Hormuz. Let me let me
Speaker 4: give you another way to look at service fee. Ticket
Speaker 4: Master was one. Here, here's another way to look at
Speaker 4: service fee. That's a nice boat you got there. It'd
Speaker 4: be a shame if something happened to it. We all
Speaker 4: get it now, we all understand. Now, we got to
Speaker 4: figure it out. Now we understand what we mean by
Speaker 4: service fee.
Speaker 3: I mean I don't have to.
Speaker 4: I don't have to do it anymore, you know, like
Speaker 4: clearer than that, do I.
Speaker 3: Now we're good. We got it all understood. Now what
Speaker 3: we mean by service fee? Okay?
Speaker 4: Just making sure, just making sure we had it all Sometimes,
Speaker 4: Producer Landing, I feel like I'm being a bit obtuse,
Speaker 4: and I just want to hit it right there, you know,
Speaker 4: right there, get it clear.
Speaker 3: I don't want to make a mess right there. Just
Speaker 3: bring a point service fee.
Speaker 4: Anybody Iran or Aman thinks a charging a service fee,
Speaker 4: I think we should hit them with the biggest bombs
Speaker 4: we have, and then we should charge them for it,
Speaker 4: you know, explosion fees, dust fees. It's it is remarkable
Speaker 4: to think that this is the deal.
Speaker 3: Now. The flip side of this is that there is
Speaker 3: no deal. No one knows what they're talking about.
Speaker 4: No one knows what I understand what the president's saying.
Speaker 4: He's saying there's gonna be a deal any moment. Now,
Speaker 4: I don't know what that possibly could be or how
Speaker 4: anybody could possibly believe it.
Speaker 3: What do I want? I want success for the president
Speaker 3: because it means success for me. Give me oil. Back
Speaker 3: in the sixties, fantastic, and while we're at it, get
Speaker 3: rid of some terrafs. That would be great. But could
Speaker 3: we could we stop thinking that there's a deal to
Speaker 3: be made. There's no deal to be made, there's no
Speaker 3: one to make it with. And if there was a deal,
Speaker 3: what are we giving it? We're giving it, We're giving
Speaker 3: it two weeks?
Speaker 4: How long did the so called MoU last? What's the
Speaker 4: over under? Can producial land and go to polymarket or
Speaker 4: call she? What is the over under?
Speaker 2: On?
Speaker 4: How many weeks a new deal with Iran will last?
Speaker 4: And see it if it doesn't exist? I want to
Speaker 4: figure out how we can place the line right? How
Speaker 4: do we place that bet? I'm giving it two weeks?
Speaker 4: Iran was begging us to make a deal. We said, okay,
Speaker 4: we won't bomb you, will make a deal, and that
Speaker 4: night they attacked US bases in Kuwait.
Speaker 3: But we're going to make a deal.
Speaker 4: I'm just sharing with you what everybody's saying. I want
Speaker 4: you to know. I don't want you to think that
Speaker 4: I'm avoiding the subject. I'm just avoiding looking at some
Speaker 4: of the people in the Trump administration in the eye
Speaker 4: because i know I'm gonna laugh with their face and
Speaker 4: that's really rude. There's only one way this ends.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 4: That brings us back to the reporting from Reuters that
Speaker 4: we are dangerously low in our tomahawks.
Speaker 3: I don't buy it. I don't believe it, not for
Speaker 3: a second. I'm reminded of Sun Sou. When you are strong,
Speaker 3: make your enemy think you're weak. When you're weak, make
Speaker 3: your enemy think you're strong. So as I see it,
Speaker 3: not going to buy into that. If by some chance,
Speaker 3: we are really low on tomahawks. I've said this numerous times.
Speaker 3: I want generals over the past twenty years who are
Speaker 3: collecting retirement to stop. No more pensions for you, and
Speaker 3: I believe we should just bust you down to corporal. Sorry,
Speaker 3: gotta go. We don't have enough weapons, you know.
Speaker 4: I feel this way about everybody who's spent who put
Speaker 4: us for twenty years in Afghanistan and then created a
Speaker 4: military that fell to Al Kaeda in eleven days.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry. Do I say eleven days, I meant eleven minutes.
Speaker 4: You built an army that was dependent on air support
Speaker 4: and then you shut down the damn airport. No pensions
Speaker 4: for the Ladia, for the Ladia, No, I don't believe
Speaker 4: there's a deal with Iran, but they keep saying it,
Speaker 4: so I'll hope for the best. This is Tony Katz today.
Speaker 4: I thought this was just a spelling mistake. Oxford comma.
Speaker 4: Have you heard about this? Tony Katz? Tony Katz today
Speaker 4: live streaming on YouTube and rumble. Look for Tony Katz
Speaker 4: and subscribe. The White House released classified memos and what
Speaker 4: it shows is that in twenty seventeen there was a
Speaker 4: counter intelligence investigations. Who we're talking about, James Comy Here
Speaker 4: a counter and Elgent's investigation into whether or not President
Speaker 4: Trump's firing of Comy was connected to Russia?
Speaker 3: Is that right? And it spelled ox fer d Oxford
Speaker 3: comma as opposed to the you know, the the what
Speaker 3: I call it, the literary, the vocabulary, the grammar concept
Speaker 3: of the Oxford comma oxfo r d. It was launched
Speaker 3: due to the national security concerns about whether Trump himself
Speaker 3: was a Russian asset. M my god.
Speaker 4: They wanted to determine whether Trump was quote directed by,
Speaker 4: controlled by, and or coordinated activities with the Russian Federation
Speaker 4: in a manner constituting a threat to the national security
Speaker 4: of the United States and or a violation federal criminal statutes.
Speaker 3: Could we please do this with all.
Speaker 4: Candidates who view themselves as communists or connects it to
Speaker 4: communists or is lomists.
Speaker 3: That would be much much much better, much better. They
Speaker 3: really did go after him in all the ways, in
Speaker 3: all of the ways, and now feeling they can't get
Speaker 3: them legally, they're still trying to shoot at the man.
Speaker 4: What happened in California? Was it an assassination attempt? You
Speaker 4: know the answers, yes, right, Rand Paul lowering the boom
Speaker 4: on Anthony Fauci. I've got that as well, plus three
Speaker 4: more things is coming up. Keep it here.
Speaker 3: That's He's Tony Kats today.
Speaker 1: Line from dall Hartbeiner and the Crossroads of America. It's
Speaker 1: Tony Katz today.
Speaker 4: So a thirty eight year old is outside of the
Speaker 4: Trump National Golf Club in ranch Apalos, just hanging out,
Speaker 4: just walking down the street.
Speaker 3: No no, no, no, no no no no no no no
Speaker 3: no no no no no no.
Speaker 4: He's scouting, he's looking, he's keeping an eye on things.
Speaker 4: Deputy is assigned to the Lomita Sheriff Station, responded to
Speaker 4: the golf course after planes closed. Federal agents reported a
Speaker 4: suspicious individual on the property. The guy was walking onto
Speaker 4: the golf course taking pictures end quote, appearing to monitor
Speaker 4: security planning activities because the president was coming to town. Okay,
Speaker 4: so this is just another guy in a long list
Speaker 4: of people who are trying to kill the President of
Speaker 4: the United States because he, like everybody in America, has
Speaker 4: been told well, you know, the president's threats of democracy
Speaker 4: or some other nonsense horsecrap like that.
Speaker 3: We've been saying this from the beginning for over a decade.
Speaker 4: The people of MSNBC NOW, ms NOW and lots of
Speaker 4: left leaning outlets have been calling for a lone wolf,
Speaker 4: have been calling for damage to be done for the
Speaker 4: to the president. They have wanted this and they did
Speaker 4: not get what they wanted in Butler, Pennsylvania, and nothing
Speaker 4: has changed. Tony Katz, Tony Katz Today, that is me,
Speaker 4: that is the show. It's a pleasure to be with You.
Speaker 4: Find everything I do at Tony katz dot com. Live
Speaker 4: streaming on YouTube just go to Tony Kat's Rumble, Tony
Speaker 4: Kat's Great platform, Love the Rumble, and then of course
Speaker 4: on Twitter which is known as x Tony Katz and Facebook,
Speaker 4: Tony Kats Radio that's all places you can find us.
Speaker 4: Go be a part of the show, getting the chat
Speaker 4: room hit like, subscribe to all the things if you would.
Speaker 4: So we have this arrest. We know that this man
Speaker 4: has been detained, a thirty eight year old of Downey, California.
Speaker 4: He was carrying a sixteen round magazine loaded with hollow
Speaker 4: points in his pants pocket.
Speaker 3: Now he just had the magazine.
Speaker 4: I mean, he's allowed to have a magazine unless, of
Speaker 4: course there's a reason why he's not. Because the local
Speaker 4: reporting from KTLA says that he has a handgun and
Speaker 4: the ammunition. He wasn't just carrying a magazine just by
Speaker 4: itself loose.
Speaker 3: At his home, they found an illegally modified AR Star
Speaker 3: style rifle.
Speaker 4: Learn how to talk, Tony. Just so we remember AR
Speaker 4: does not stand for assault rifle. Just what you just
Speaker 4: need the lefties to know these things. A nineteen eleven
Speaker 4: forty five caliber pistol, an AR platform, upper receiver, body armor,
Speaker 4: high capacity magazines, a large quantity of pistol and rifle ammunition.
Speaker 3: I don't know what large quantity is.
Speaker 4: Notebooks containing what investigators describe as concerning statements, and two
Speaker 4: radio signal devices. Well that's the part that you should
Speaker 4: be paying attention to. That's the part that you should
Speaker 4: be paying attention to. Why would you need well, why
Speaker 4: would you need radios? Who's on the other end of
Speaker 4: the radio.
Speaker 3: The investigation, according to the Sheriff's Department, is being conducted
Speaker 3: in close coordination with the FBI Joined Terrorism Task Force
Speaker 3: and the US Secret Service.
Speaker 4: I'll say it again for the people in the cheap seats.
Speaker 4: The objective of all of these talking heads is the
Speaker 4: harm to the President of the United States. The objective
Speaker 4: was to bring harm and to intimidate Supreme Court justices
Speaker 4: under Joe Biden when no protection was given to Justice Kavanaugh,
Speaker 4: and we now are forced to ask the question about
Speaker 4: whether or not that has changed Justice Amy Cony Barrett.
Speaker 3: Some people have called on her to walk away. You're
Speaker 3: not built for this.
Speaker 4: They're going to try and scare you and threaten your
Speaker 4: children every day to get the results they want on
Speaker 4: the Supreme Court. That's what they want to do. I
Speaker 4: can understand the concern. I can also understand that you
Speaker 4: can't bow down to this. I understand why you went
Speaker 4: to Congress and said we need more for security. What
Speaker 4: do you think is happening here? This is a danger.
Speaker 4: Joe Biden put the Supreme Court justices in danger. He
Speaker 4: wanted to him and the cabal that was running the
Speaker 4: country never think a good thought of Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: Wish the man well and leave it be.
Speaker 4: His legacy is one of unbelievable, unmitigated, undoubted failure, of lies,
Speaker 4: of fraud, of deceit, of hating the American people. That's
Speaker 4: who Joe Biden is. The history books should write it.
Speaker 8: So.
Speaker 4: It could be that this guy is just mentally disturbed.
Speaker 4: It could be that this guy is just just a.
Speaker 3: Little bit nutty. It could be nothing. I mean.
Speaker 4: When we say body armor, I just want to make
Speaker 4: sure we understand. Are we talking about a bulletproof vest.
Speaker 4: I don't think it's a weird thing for someone to
Speaker 4: have an AR platform upper receiver. Well, if they build
Speaker 4: their own firearms, I don't think that that is something
Speaker 4: odd to have a nineteen eleven can I share. I've
Speaker 4: never been a gun guy, and I'm gonna get yelled at.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna I am about to get yelled at. In
Speaker 4: ways I am a Second Amendment guy. I would never
Speaker 4: call myself a gun guy. And the reason that I'm
Speaker 4: not is that uh, it takes a lot of study.
Speaker 4: That's not where I ever found my interest. I'm also
Speaker 4: one of the few people I know I can't stand shooting.
Speaker 3: You know, if people go to the range and they
Speaker 3: love going to the range, I can't stand it. I
Speaker 3: have never, ever ever liked it.
Speaker 4: I have always found it to be a tedious exercise.
Speaker 4: It's like listening to Rosi o'donald tell me about her
Speaker 4: healthy habits. It's just exhausting, and as opposed to Rosie o'donald,
Speaker 4: it goes on for forever. I'm gonna get yelled at.
Speaker 4: I always have been about this. I am absolutely a
Speaker 4: two A guy.
Speaker 3: I am. I am vehemence in my defense. It's just
Speaker 3: not where I.
Speaker 4: Find my relaxation in everything else when it comes to firearms,
Speaker 4: which bring me to the comments where Brian says every
Speaker 4: gun person has at least one nineteen eleven.
Speaker 3: It's not comfortable. And this is where I'm gonna get
Speaker 3: yelled at. I know I'm gonna get yelled at. I
Speaker 3: know it's coming. Just do it, get it over with.
Speaker 3: It's fine, I hear you. I just and you have
Speaker 3: to get you the crux of your hands in there.
Speaker 3: And I just don't. I know. Maybe I just haven't
Speaker 3: done it right. Maybe I haven't engaged in enough. It
Speaker 3: could totally be me. I would never tell somebody not
Speaker 3: to have a nineteen eleven. I am saying I have
Speaker 3: tried it, and I have said.
Speaker 5: No.
Speaker 3: Thanks. Oh, you want to talk about unpopular opinions. There
Speaker 3: it is. I think owning a nineteen eleven is weird.
Speaker 5: No.
Speaker 3: So there's a whole series of things on this list
Speaker 3: that are meant to sound scary. I don't know what
Speaker 3: any of it is yet, Like the actual weaponry doesn't
Speaker 3: sound scary to me.
Speaker 4: At all, doesn't sound scary in the slightest. I'm curious
Speaker 4: what the notebooks contain. I'm curious concerned about the two
Speaker 4: radio signal devices.
Speaker 3: What in the.
Speaker 4: World does that mean? But more than anything, we need
Speaker 4: to understand that there is still an objective. That there
Speaker 4: has been nothing that has been toned down, tamped down
Speaker 4: by the Left. It is still at a fevered pitch.
Speaker 4: Should it stop, of course, it should stop.
Speaker 3: Will it stop? Absolutely not, absolutely not.
Speaker 4: The objective is to do harm, and they have come
Speaker 4: to not only want this, but to accept this, to
Speaker 4: value this, to well rationalize it. I should say, wait,
Speaker 4: we have to do this. Trump's just a threat. Once
Speaker 4: we get rid of Trump, then everything, everything can be fine,
Speaker 4: everything can go back to normal.
Speaker 3: It was like when The New York Times was in.
Speaker 4: Trump's first term. They were talking about the fact that
Speaker 4: they had to go against their their principles and go
Speaker 4: against journalistsic integrity because Trump was such a threat. But
Speaker 4: now that Trump lost to Joe Biden, feel.
Speaker 3: The air quotes, I do that something just to drive
Speaker 3: people crazy.
Speaker 4: Now now we can get back to real journalism. They
Speaker 4: said that, like anybody would ever trust the New York
Speaker 4: Times again, I put forth to you that this is
Speaker 4: everything they have wanted, everything they have put together, everything
Speaker 4: they have tried to achieve. I am not surprised that
Speaker 4: there is somebody out there who, in my view, take
Speaker 4: on this situation, this is somebody who was looking to
Speaker 4: do harm. Now innocent until proven guilty. I can wait
Speaker 4: for more information, but I think the story is well known.
Speaker 4: I don't think there's anything left amongst the left to say.
Speaker 3: That it wasn't what it was. It was a guy
Speaker 3: looking for an opportunity, to see where his opportunity would be.
Speaker 4: That's my take, and I say it very clearly, I
Speaker 4: don't like jumping ahead. I don't like rushing ahead. I
Speaker 4: want to get all the data I have.
Speaker 3: This this says to me that this is somebody looking
Speaker 3: to do harm.
Speaker 4: I'll let the investigation go forward. But do I believe
Speaker 4: that the left is still looking for someone to do harm?
Speaker 4: Sadly yes, And they have done nothing to temper my
Speaker 4: thought on this, nothing.
Speaker 3: At all, speaking of doing harm?
Speaker 4: Can we discuss the unwillingness to discuss an actual harm?
Speaker 4: Plus Rand Paul's resolution on the condemnation and the contempt
Speaker 4: of Anthony Fauci, that's all coming up.
Speaker 3: Keep it here. This is Tony kats today, Senator rand Paul.
Speaker 4: Bringing forth the contempt resolution against Anthony Fauci. Tony Katz,
Speaker 4: Tony Katz today, I'm happy to see it. There should
Speaker 4: be no moments where Anthony Fauci is allowed to think
Speaker 4: that he is a good, decent man or a worthy
Speaker 4: public servant. He's a terrible person who lied to America.
Speaker 4: I argue as engaged in crimes, and he should have
Speaker 4: to stand trial for those crimes, regardless of the preemptive pardon.
Speaker 3: Given by Joe Biden. And I still am one of.
Speaker 4: The people who absolutely believes that this was not signed
Speaker 4: by Joe Biden. There's no way Joe Biden had any
Speaker 4: mind of what was the autopen is a thing, and
Speaker 4: there is no way that this can absolve him. The
Speaker 4: pardons should be ripped to shreds, and we should be
Speaker 4: proactive in the legal actions against doctor Fauci for lying,
Speaker 4: for committing this fraud. If I am unable to move
Speaker 4: through the legal system, then we have to do a
Speaker 4: part two, which is ensure that when it comes to legacy,
Speaker 4: it is.
Speaker 3: Forever in the names of those who are.
Speaker 4: Well the most horrifying members of the American experiment, starting
Speaker 4: with and including Benedict Arnold.
Speaker 3: Senator Paul putting out.
Speaker 4: On x authorizing the President of the Senate to certify
Speaker 4: the report of the Committee of Homeland Security and Governmental
Speaker 4: Affairs of the Senate regarding the refusal of doctor Anthony
Speaker 4: Fauci to answer questions pertinent to the subject under inquiry
Speaker 4: before the Committee as.
Speaker 3: Required by Committee subpoena. Privately, he would acknowledge natural immunity
Speaker 3: in public. He was saying, Oh, we just don't know.
Speaker 4: So there's a lot of public and private disparity, and
Speaker 4: I think that's really what's caught him up.
Speaker 3: And I think people don't like that hypocrisy. Well you
Speaker 3: are getting it right there, the Senator of.
Speaker 4: Whereas the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of
Speaker 4: the Senate is conducting an investigation into, among other matters,
Speaker 4: risky life sciences research and the origins of the COVID
Speaker 4: nineteen virus. You know that Senator Paul is really focused
Speaker 4: on this gain of function research issue.
Speaker 3: That's what really moves him. We were funding a lab
Speaker 3: in China to figure out how to manipulate viruses to
Speaker 3: do us harm. It's insane.
Speaker 4: So it continues that July nine, twenty twenty six, doctor
Speaker 4: Fauci appeared before the committee and delivered prepared testimony discussing
Speaker 4: his tenure as federal government employee prior testimony to Congress
Speaker 4: and records released by the committee as part of its investigation.
Speaker 4: He concluded his testimony by saying his intent to refuse
Speaker 4: answer to refuse to answer questions all right posed by
Speaker 4: the committee, citing the right against self incrimination under the
Speaker 4: Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Speaker 3: It then mentions the.
Speaker 4: Fact that he got the pardon when he was asked
Speaker 4: questions pertinent under the inquiry. He refused to answer, citing
Speaker 4: the Fifth Amendment. Chairman Paul says the privilege of the
Speaker 4: Fifth Amendment is unsupported is applied to questions pertaining to
Speaker 4: the period of pardon and directed doctor Fauci to answer.
Speaker 4: And it's Chairman Paul who further found that doctor Fauci
Speaker 4: waived his right to claim the privilege as a result
Speaker 4: of his opening testimony on subject matter pertinent to the
Speaker 4: questions under inquiry. We hinted at this, I should have
Speaker 4: hit it harder. Fauci said that he would not answer
Speaker 4: a question right. He said, I'm not going to answer
Speaker 4: any questions based on the advice of counsel. But that
Speaker 4: isn't how he started. He started by going directly at
Speaker 4: Senator Ran Paul. He started by saying that the Senator
Speaker 4: was obsessed with him.
Speaker 3: Let's go back.
Speaker 9: Answering questions about the very issues that are now the
Speaker 9: subject of this hearing. However, given Senator Paul's obvious obsession
Speaker 9: with calling for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me,
Speaker 9: and recently his publicly releasing my unredacted personal diary aimed
Speaker 9: at embarrassing and intimidating me.
Speaker 3: The only conclusion I can reach is that.
Speaker 9: The sole reason he is calling me before this committee
Speaker 9: is to get me to say something, anything that could
Speaker 9: vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up in
Speaker 9: his words quote behind bars unquote any reasonable.
Speaker 3: Person who has followed.
Speaker 4: His But you're talking about the situation, and what Senator
Speaker 4: Paul is saying is that you have indeed opened yourself up.
Speaker 4: You can't claim the fifth if you've already gone down
Speaker 4: this road. I agree with this, by the way. So
Speaker 4: now we've got the contempt, we'll see where it goes.
Speaker 4: And we also discovered that Anthony Fauci had asked Deborah Burks,
Speaker 4: you know the doctor with the scarves, Hey, I'm going
Speaker 4: to be out for a day, but would you do
Speaker 4: me favorite when you push back hard on the Great
Speaker 4: Barrington Declaration Great Barrington, this was doctors and health professionals
Speaker 4: who in October of twenty twenty signed a letter that said, sorry,
Speaker 4: government's doing this all wrong, these lockdowns, this fear, this
Speaker 4: is all dangerous stuff. That we're doing this wrong. This
Speaker 4: is not what the science says. The Great Barrington Declaration
Speaker 4: is extremely important, extremely important, and I have it in
Speaker 4: full over there at Tony Katz dot com. You can
Speaker 4: check it out for yourself. It was a statement to
Speaker 4: say that, in fact, these experts around the globe are
Speaker 4: being silenced.
Speaker 3: Here's what we have to say.
Speaker 4: We're putting it out there for the world to see
Speaker 4: that what you're hearing isn't accurate. These people were pushed
Speaker 4: to the side, brushed aside, and still buy our media,
Speaker 4: mocked and shunned. And it was Fauci's trying to direct
Speaker 4: other people. Make sure you attack this, make sure you
Speaker 4: go after that, not let's debate the science.
Speaker 3: But he still believes he was the science, and now
Speaker 3: he believes he is the law contempt. There we go,
Speaker 3: Let's see what happens next.
Speaker 4: Keep it here. This is Tony Kats today. Three more things,
Speaker 4: Tony Kats, Tony Katz today.
Speaker 3: What are three more things? I will tell you three
Speaker 3: more things.
Speaker 4: These are stories that should be front page news, but
Speaker 4: because everything on the front page, they don't make the
Speaker 4: front page. So I bring them to you. Of course,
Speaker 4: we've got some supposed deal with Iran.
Speaker 3: Which is not a deal.
Speaker 4: H Then you have Abdul said winning the primary in Michigan.
Speaker 4: You had a couple of DSA communists winning their primaries
Speaker 4: house races. This was the center race against Haley Stevens.
Speaker 4: Hally Stevens has already come out to say I'm gonna support.
Speaker 3: I'll say d and and help him win. Well, what
Speaker 3: else was she going to say? I guess bad, bad,
Speaker 3: bad news for Democrats. It is the hardest thing for
Speaker 3: them because the party was split in the vote. They
Speaker 3: were split, and that split.
Speaker 4: Creates for them an absolutely incredibly difficult issue. How do
Speaker 4: they get people into one headspace? How do they get
Speaker 4: them to buy in to.
Speaker 3: This guy who is going to have a real problem
Speaker 3: with independent voters, with Jewish voters. I mean he called today,
Speaker 3: he called Israel blood thirsty. Dude.
Speaker 4: Listen, we know you want to replace Hassan Piker at
Speaker 4: the top of the list of bigoted commis who have
Speaker 4: an audience at the University of Michigan. By the University
Speaker 4: of Michigan. We're all in favor of Dulsi ed. You
Speaker 4: don't send your kids to the University of Michigan. Stop
Speaker 4: telling me about go blue. It's not go blue, it's
Speaker 4: go blow just right out. And by the way, you
Speaker 4: know I'm on in Detroit, right, I know when I
Speaker 4: say that, I'm going to get yelled at, I'm gonna
Speaker 4: get hit so hard, and I feel bad about it. Right,
Speaker 4: but it's it is true. It is true that school
Speaker 4: more and more and more and more vehemently to the left.
Speaker 4: Oh and also, and by the way, Grace, I'm totally
Speaker 4: with you.
Speaker 3: Black voters don't want this stuff. Black voters, well, certainly
Speaker 3: they don't think like in a monolithic block. Black voters
Speaker 3: realize that their interests are being pushed aside for communists
Speaker 3: and Islamists. Nobody cares about them, still being taken for
Speaker 3: granted by the political left.
Speaker 4: Black voters should be Republicans. You can actually get something done.
Speaker 4: People will listen to you. The left doesn't matter, but
Speaker 4: doesn't care about you at all.
Speaker 3: Right that those are just the facts.
Speaker 4: But we talked about the level of issue this is
Speaker 4: for the Democrats. They've got all these disparate groups where like,
Speaker 4: we don't want any part of them.
Speaker 3: Do I'll say it. This was Fox News.
Speaker 4: Harris Faulkner talking to the former congressman from Utah, Jason Jeffits.
Speaker 10: I think this is the worst case scenario for the Democrats.
Speaker 10: I mean, even Chuck Schumer couldn't get his arms around
Speaker 10: whether or not he would endorse him if he actually
Speaker 10: got the nomination. So it's a party divided in its
Speaker 10: best case scenario. But they haven't figured out who they are,
Speaker 10: what they believe in. They don't have a leader. Then nationally,
Speaker 10: the fundraising has been an emic, down to almost zero nationally,
Speaker 10: and you have people like James Carville and.
Speaker 3: Others that are saying, hey, I can't support and.
Speaker 10: Get behind this. And that did to have it be
Speaker 10: so close, it wasn't dominated in one direction or another.
Speaker 10: That is the worst case scenario for the Democrats.
Speaker 3: Correct, absolutely correct, It splits them in two. There's no saying, well,
Speaker 3: seventy eight percent of democrat 's went for this guy,
Speaker 3: so we go for this guy. It makes sense. No
Speaker 3: half the people thinks he sucks. Bad, bad result for
Speaker 3: the Democrat. Can he still win? Oh gosh, yes, he
Speaker 3: could still win. Can Republicans still screw this up? They're Republicans.
Speaker 3: They were born to screw these things up.
Speaker 4: But also a solid point there from the former congressman.
Speaker 3: About the fundraising.
Speaker 4: You understand that Democrats have no money mortgaging their own headquarters,
Speaker 4: they have no money.
Speaker 3: Where is it coming from. Where is the support coming from,
Speaker 3: the financial support, and how much are we gonna throw
Speaker 3: at this to ensure that else I had never sees
Speaker 3: the Senate, that's the question. But I said I had
Speaker 3: three more things, and I do because I do not
Speaker 3: lie about these things. The first is Susan Collins. Susan
Speaker 3: Collins has decided that she is going to be a
Speaker 3: no vote on Todd Blanche.
Speaker 4: Todd Blanche, of course the attorney general, the acting attorney general.
Speaker 3: Trump wants him to be the attorney general. He got
Speaker 3: through committee, and now Susan Collins is saying no, I'm
Speaker 3: not going to support him. This was Todd Blanche speaking
Speaker 3: about that.
Speaker 11: Turned about anything new with my responsibility to you know,
Speaker 11: if I'm confirmed in the next couple of days, compared
Speaker 11: to what my responsibilities have been really since March of
Speaker 11: last year, but obviously since April of.
Speaker 3: This year as well. So all right, thanks a lock, I.
Speaker 4: Said, I'm not concerned about that. My responsibilities are still
Speaker 4: my responsibilities. I think a lot of people are going
Speaker 4: to look at Susan Collins and say, all this conversation
Speaker 4: about Maine, all this noticing what kind of lowlife garbage
Speaker 4: Nazi and alleged sexual abuser Graham Plattner is and you're
Speaker 4: gonna vote no.
Speaker 3: You. Susan Collins voted to confirm Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland,
Speaker 3: You're not going to vote to confirm Todd Blanche because now,
Speaker 3: all of a sudden, he's a problem because the Justice
Speaker 3: Department has become too politicized.
Speaker 4: That's what she said. While I believe mister Blanche is
Speaker 4: a capable lawyer, the Department of Justice has become increasingly political.
Speaker 4: Mister Blanche has taken several actions that have further voted
Speaker 4: the department's independence, and that is the basis for my
Speaker 4: vote to oppose his confirmation. That is a wholly unserious statement, unserrious.
Speaker 4: And I said, my god, why in the world did
Speaker 4: anybody support herring.
Speaker 3: This process? Why in the world will we do this?
Speaker 3: And then I.
Speaker 4: Said, wait a second, Maybe that's the answer I put
Speaker 4: forth to you. What if what if now this is
Speaker 4: some five D chess kind of deep in the weeds
Speaker 4: kind of a thing.
Speaker 3: What if she needed to come out against him so
Speaker 3: she could appease some independence in Maine to show, to
Speaker 3: show everybody that she isn't some kind of Trump puppet
Speaker 3: she's her own woman, and that this was okayed by
Speaker 3: Senate leadership. What that's not possible. Of course that's possible.
Speaker 3: The question is is it probable? And right now, I
Speaker 3: gotta tell you I'm a little fifty to fifty on it.
Speaker 4: There is not a rational reason for her not to
Speaker 4: be okay with Blanche's dag.
Speaker 3: None.
Speaker 4: You can't say Merrick Garland was fine and Todd Blanche
Speaker 4: is an issue. It's just it's an impossibility. So the
Speaker 4: only thing I could.
Speaker 3: Come to is she needed a way to show.
Speaker 4: The people of Maine that she's her own woman. Take
Speaker 4: the wind out of Troy Jackson sale. Troy Jackson is
Speaker 4: the guy who they picked to replace the Nazi and
Speaker 4: alleged sexual abuser Graham Platner.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the guy who is having sex with his cousin. Right.
Speaker 4: No, no, no, I'm not trying to tell a joke. He
Speaker 4: has two children with a second cousin.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, no.
Speaker 4: From what I'm told, the family reunions are great. They're
Speaker 4: happening daily. You're not supposed to tell jokes about this, okay, Okay,
Speaker 4: Our Hunter Biden cocaine.
Speaker 3: Jokes still allowed. No, those are also not allowed any
Speaker 3: what left?
Speaker 4: What else are we allowed to joke about anything else?
Speaker 4: Oh RAN's Paul getting his ribs broken by his neighbor.
Speaker 4: That's allowed. Everything else not allowed? Got it, got it understood. Thanks,
Speaker 4: I appreciate the update. Whew, that's Susan Collins. Then there
Speaker 4: is Senator Thune talking about the Save Acts. That this
Speaker 4: thing is not passed is an absolute sin on every
Speaker 4: single level.
Speaker 3: It is a sin. It is wrong, it is insane.
Speaker 3: And Fune does not look pleased that he has to
Speaker 3: answer the questions the Senate majority leader, why in the
Speaker 3: world can we not pass the Save Act? What's going
Speaker 3: on here? Well? Listen when he says he wants you
Speaker 3: to stay in session, wants you to pass the Save
Speaker 3: America Act.
Speaker 12: Well, I think the President I've heard from a couple
Speaker 12: of times this morning on issues that he cares about.
Speaker 12: I wouldn't say I'm isolated, No, I mean I've been
Speaker 12: very clear about the prospects for the Save America Act.
Speaker 3: And the only thing I've.
Speaker 12: Said all along is there are one We have voted
Speaker 12: on the Save America Act five times. It was the
Speaker 12: pending business on the floor of the Senate for over
Speaker 12: two weeks, and I am willing to in any way
Speaker 12: possible get that across the finish line if.
Speaker 3: There is a path to do it.
Speaker 12: But there are two realities and two facts you have
Speaker 12: to deal with. And the first is there are no
Speaker 12: Democrats we're going to vote for this. All forty seven
Speaker 12: voted against the Save Act five times. So let's make
Speaker 12: this an issue in the campaign. How about we go
Speaker 12: out and turn our fire on Democrats and make it
Speaker 12: about them opposing the Save Acts. So we're not that's
Speaker 12: the point. So we're not getting any Democrats. The second
Speaker 12: thing is we are not getting rid of the legislator philibuster.
Speaker 12: The votes aren't there to do that. I've made it
Speaker 12: clear many many times, and it seems to me some
Speaker 12: days that I'm the only one here can count to
Speaker 12: fifty in this town. But we don't have the votes
Speaker 12: to get rid of the filibuster.
Speaker 4: Let's now stop for a moment and address these two things.
Speaker 4: He is saying on the filibuster that they can't get
Speaker 4: to the fifty. He is not making the argument that
Speaker 4: we shouldn't get rid of the filibuster. He is making
Speaker 4: the argument that we don't have fifty votes to get
Speaker 4: rid of the filibuster.
Speaker 3: Oh oh, so who do we have to apply pressure to?
Speaker 3: Who needs a phone call? Who needs to be told
Speaker 3: to get this done? That's number one center of them.
Speaker 3: But let's continue this by taking a look at how
Speaker 3: we turn it.
Speaker 4: You want to use it as a campaign piece, you
Speaker 4: can go right ahead and use it as a campaign piece.
Speaker 4: But we need a past. So what maneuvers can you
Speaker 4: utilize to get this.
Speaker 3: Voter ID done? I think that the center is looking
Speaker 3: at this in the wrong way. You need to be
Speaker 3: looking at your data in the right way, which is privately.
Speaker 3: Your name is out there, your.
Speaker 4: Email address, medical conditions, your kids' names, it's in a file,
Speaker 4: and that file is being sold everywhere. It's your information
Speaker 4: and that information should be kept private. But anyone with
Speaker 4: a credit card can buy it. It's this multi billion
Speaker 4: dollar industry of data brokers. And your file gets collected,
Speaker 4: package sold, and they have these phishing texts. They know
Speaker 4: way too much about you. That's all because they have
Speaker 4: your information. They did not get lucky.
Speaker 3: The scammers got prepared, and it's costing Americans twenty billion
Speaker 3: dollars plus each and every year. Change the game. Get
Speaker 3: prepared using cogni I ncog Ni Cogniti dot com going
Speaker 3: broker by broker, forcing each one of them to delete
Speaker 3: your files.
Speaker 4: And when your data tries to creep back on Boom,
Speaker 4: Incognity makes it disappear. Utilize my last name Cats and
Speaker 4: get sixty percent off right now to protect you and
Speaker 4: your family. Go to incognit in cognity dot com slash
Speaker 4: cats right now for sixty percent off. That's in Cogni
Speaker 4: dot com, slash cats. Katz, take your private life off
Speaker 4: the market.
Speaker 3: Keep it here. It's Tony Kats today. Not to make it.
Speaker 4: More crazy for anybody out there, but Chapotle stock is
Speaker 4: falling because there's a possible link to salmonella in Minnesota.
Speaker 3: That's I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. It's
Speaker 3: not my fault. And get the steak Tony Katz, Tony
Speaker 3: Katz today an absolute pleasure to be with you. Chipotle
Speaker 3: has also removed salmon, removed hallapanos that are linked to
Speaker 3: the salmon outbreak from its restaurants. They think that that
Speaker 3: could be the source.
Speaker 4: So we've got the cyclostpariasis, which is the explosive diarrhea
Speaker 4: which two people lost their lives in Michigan. Because of
Speaker 4: the cyclosporiasis. This is no longer funny. And now you've
Speaker 4: got Chipotle having salmonilla. They think it's the opinions. They
Speaker 4: think it's just Minnesota. So you know, let's not completely
Speaker 4: lose our heads here. I'm gonna say it again for
Speaker 4: the people in the cheap seats.
Speaker 3: Is it me or man? Are there a lot of
Speaker 3: recalls lately, like over the past five years, this has
Speaker 3: become out of control. Are we better at noticing things
Speaker 3: or have we gotten worse at being able to stop
Speaker 3: them before they come a problem? Which? What is it?
Speaker 3: There's a week call every dang day. It's it's it
Speaker 3: is an issue. It is a thing, And I'm I'm
Speaker 3: curious where this should we take a look at Chipotle's
Speaker 3: stock stock price? Hell on, where is Chipotle right now?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 4: Chimotle is fine right now. I mean it might have
Speaker 4: taken a little tip. Oh no, I took other dig more.
Speaker 3: Than a little tip.
Speaker 4: So on the third of August it was at thirty seven,
Speaker 4: and on the fourth of August it ended at thirty three.
Speaker 3: That's not.
Speaker 4: That's not a massive tip. They'll be back from this.
Speaker 4: And also extra guacamole place. This is Tony kay today.
Speaker 1: Why from vall Hartbiner and the Crossroads of America. It's
Speaker 1: Tony Katz today.
Speaker 4: So what is the obligation of the athlete to say,
Speaker 4: well anything when it comes to men and women's sports,
Speaker 4: or what's going on around the world, or what's happening domestically.
Speaker 4: Is there some type of obligation. I don't believe that
Speaker 4: there is. What I believe is that if they are
Speaker 4: going to say something, they have to be able to
Speaker 4: back it up. But when something is said so normal,
Speaker 4: like Sophie Cunningham of the Indiana Fever saying girls sports
Speaker 4: are for girls, how could that begin to be political?
Speaker 4: And to make a political is part of this idea
Speaker 4: of culture war? And if indeed this is a culture war,
Speaker 4: not having men and women's sports, not having boys and
Speaker 4: girls sports, well I'm fine with that, and it's a war.
Speaker 3: We have to win.
Speaker 4: Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, Good to be with you.
Speaker 4: Jennifer Say joins us right now. She is the CEO
Speaker 4: in coppo di tutti coppo. Over at xxxy Athletics xx
Speaker 4: dash xy Athletics dot com you.
Speaker 3: Can buy all your gear.
Speaker 4: There a long history in sports as a national champion
Speaker 4: gymnast and you're traveling around. You have become your own
Speaker 4: level of star in this space. Along with selling a
Speaker 4: quality product. You've taken on this culture war head on.
Speaker 4: But I need to take a step back to make
Speaker 4: sure people understand where you come from, which is this
Speaker 4: world of gymnastics. You are part of the nineteen eighty
Speaker 4: six national team or a part of that group that
Speaker 4: won in my beloved Indianapolis, Indiana, and you were one
Speaker 4: of the people who worked with the Indianapolis Star talking
Speaker 4: about the horror show that was the physician Larry Nasser
Speaker 4: who is now in jail for his sexual abuse. Is
Speaker 4: this what brings you to xxxy or is this what
Speaker 4: brings you to the idea of if we're not front
Speaker 4: and center on these issues, now we're going to deal
Speaker 4: with massive, dangerous ramification.
Speaker 5: That is a great question. Yeah, you're right.
Speaker 8: I was a national.
Speaker 5: Team member gymnasts throughout the eighties, eight time national team member,
Speaker 5: a six national champion in Indianapolis. I was also the
Speaker 5: first whistleblower about abuse and sport and gymnastics in particular.
Speaker 5: That was two thousand and eight when I wrote my
Speaker 5: first book called Chalk Up That was ten years before
Speaker 5: Naser went to prison for life. As you might imagine,
Speaker 5: the US Olympic Committee and the US Olympic Movement and gymnasts, etc.
Speaker 5: They were not ready for that message. I spoke about
Speaker 5: the national team coach who I traveled around the world
Speaker 5: with in that book being a known pedophile. That did
Speaker 5: not go particularly well for me. I was pretty much
Speaker 5: ousted from that community, but I knew I needed to
Speaker 5: say it because I didn't want another little girl to
Speaker 5: go through what I had. And I did work with
Speaker 5: the Indie Star. They did such amazing work reporting.
Speaker 8: On the Naser case.
Speaker 5: And I think what's important to remember about that case
Speaker 5: is now is not one bad apple. That sport is
Speaker 5: rotten to the core. He was able to abuse for
Speaker 5: thirty years because the governing body knew and look the
Speaker 5: other way and actually destroyed evidence.
Speaker 8: So you know, I've been working a heart.
Speaker 5: A long time to try to clean that sport up.
Speaker 5: I believe young athletes deserve to train with dignity and
Speaker 5: safety in striving to achieve their dreams. So you know,
Speaker 5: I've been at this for a while in terms of
Speaker 5: trying to protect female athletes. So yes, they're absolutely related.
Speaker 5: These two issues, and it's why I care so much
Speaker 5: about protecting women's sports. That said, I also have a
Speaker 5: kind of separate, long term corporate career as a brand builder.
Speaker 5: I worked at Levi's for twenty three years. I was
Speaker 5: a chief marketing officer for eight and the brand president
Speaker 5: for two, and so I know how brands can influence
Speaker 5: the culture. And we lost the culture on this one,
Speaker 5: you know, slowly but surely, there was a long march
Speaker 5: to steal our language and you know, co op the
Speaker 5: culture with these terrible ideas that men can be women
Speaker 5: if they just say that they are.
Speaker 8: Want to fight this battle.
Speaker 5: On cultural grounds, not legal, not political. It's the culture
Speaker 5: we need to win back, and I believe a brand
Speaker 5: can really help do that with our content, with our product.
Speaker 5: You know, I want to make it cool to say
Speaker 5: women men can't become women.
Speaker 8: I want to make it cool to say these totally.
Speaker 5: Normal things like women deserve their own sports and spaces.
Speaker 5: So you know, that's why we're in this game. But
Speaker 5: we do make as you mentioned, you know, hot world
Speaker 5: class premium athletic gear. You don't need to buy some
Speaker 5: brands that throw women under the bus, like Nike. You
Speaker 5: can buy from us, and we're just so thrilled to
Speaker 5: be part of this. And you know Sophie has Sophie
Speaker 5: Cunningham has thrown this issue into the center of culture.
Speaker 3: I want to go in a way. I do, but
Speaker 3: I want to bring it back a little bit. Talking
Speaker 3: to Jennifer Say.
Speaker 4: The CEO, a founder of xx dash x Y Athletics
Speaker 4: x x dash x y athletics dot com, you said
Speaker 4: a lot there, including utilized the term long march, which
Speaker 4: I think was very, very purposeful in this way the
Speaker 4: abuse of these young girls in regarding gymnastics and the
Speaker 4: Larry Nasser story. If you haven't read it, it's horrifying stuff.
Speaker 4: You are still making these allegations about US gymnastics today.
Speaker 4: Your book Chalks Up, which you can find at Amazon
Speaker 4: dot com. You can go get that and read your accounts,
Speaker 4: just so we're clear, just so we can put the
Speaker 4: pin on that and then move on. In your view,
Speaker 4: that level of abuse, Larry Nasser level of abuse still
Speaker 4: going on.
Speaker 8: Okay me.
Speaker 5: First of all, if you want to know about the
Speaker 5: whole Larry Nauncer story, you can watch athlete A. It's
Speaker 5: a movie on Netflix that I produced as a documentary
Speaker 5: won an Emmy back in twenty twenty. It tells you
Speaker 5: the whole story, and it connects his crimes to the
Speaker 5: broader culture of abuse. Do I want to tell you
Speaker 5: that that level of abuse is happening throughout the sport.
Speaker 5: I mean that would be extreme. He abused over five
Speaker 5: hundred athletes over the course of thirty years under the
Speaker 5: guise of medical treatment, but abusive coaches, and I want
Speaker 5: to just say it's physical, emotional and sexual abuse is
Speaker 5: rampant in the sport of gymnastics. These are very young
Speaker 5: girls and they are very vulnerable. And because it's an
Speaker 5: individual sport, that one on one coaching dynamic is more intense,
Speaker 5: I think than in a team sport, and it.
Speaker 3: Just invites.
Speaker 8: Bad actors.
Speaker 5: I will say that it invites bad actors. Do I
Speaker 5: think it's as bad as it was in the eighties
Speaker 5: when I trained. I hope it's better. I don't know.
Speaker 5: I'm not inside the sport. People are aware, parents are aware,
Speaker 5: safe sport exists, there is a mechanism to report abuse.
Speaker 5: But I will tell you this safe sport is backed
Speaker 5: up for four years with reports of abuse. They don't
Speaker 5: even take reports of emotional and physical abuse because they're
Speaker 5: so backed up on sexual abuse claims. So we need
Speaker 5: to change the culture in that sport.
Speaker 8: And in the movement overall.
Speaker 5: And I think we're on the way, but I don't
Speaker 5: think it is fixed enough.
Speaker 4: Talking to Jennifer Say, the founder of xxxy Athletics xx
Speaker 4: dash xyathletics dot com, this brings us now into the
Speaker 4: conversation about Sophie Cunningham, who said something, as I've said
Speaker 4: on this show numerous times, very normal girls. Sports are
Speaker 4: for girls. It was so normal. I found it to
Speaker 4: be unremarkable. And I stated at the time and I
Speaker 4: have since then, why anybody would make this political, Whether
Speaker 4: you want to load and glorify her as some kind
Speaker 4: of right wing icon, or whether you want to go
Speaker 4: at her an attacker because you're on the political.
Speaker 3: Left, No part of this makes sense. The rational response.
Speaker 4: Is that girls are not boys, Boys are not girls,
Speaker 4: and girls sports belong to girls. This has of course
Speaker 4: been seen as somehow we for making that rational points
Speaker 4: are the biggots. You've got the owner of the Seattle
Speaker 4: Storm yelling at two girls in the crowd. You've got
Speaker 4: the coach of the Minnesota Link wearing a shirt that
Speaker 4: says protect trans kids. You have the coach of the
Speaker 4: Golden State Valkyries who wants to go out there and
Speaker 4: say sports are about belonging as opposed to the highest
Speaker 4: level of competition. Why is it that women seem to
Speaker 4: be very focused on not thinking that women deserve to
Speaker 4: be known as women.
Speaker 5: Okay, there's a lot in there. I want to back
Speaker 5: up for one store and be clear. Sophie was asked
Speaker 5: a question in an interview that happened back in February.
Speaker 5: That ESPN interview happened months ago. She was directly asked
Speaker 5: a question. She didn't go in there, you know, ready
Speaker 5: to blow the doors off this thing and put herself
Speaker 5: at the center of this controversy. So everybody calling her
Speaker 5: Maga Barbie and all this crazy stuff. It's ridiculous. She
Speaker 5: answered a question in a very simple and pointed way,
Speaker 5: and she was very clear to your point in your
Speaker 5: opener about what she believes, and she said girls. She
Speaker 5: cares about protecting girls sports and spaces. That was it.
Speaker 5: She put the attention back on the girls when the
Speaker 5: cultural attention has been on the boys.
Speaker 8: Who think they are girls.
Speaker 5: Thank you for that, Sophie. I would say I.
Speaker 8: Agree with you that was not remarkable.
Speaker 5: What was remarkable was just last week when she was
Speaker 5: reasked the question after that ESPN interview was published, and
Speaker 5: she said, I said what I said. She did not
Speaker 5: back it up. She did not bend any That was
Speaker 5: the remarkable part. That was the line in the sand,
Speaker 5: because a year ago, I'm not sure she would have
Speaker 5: stood her around. I don't want to speak for Sophie,
Speaker 5: but I'll just tell you every we see it all
Speaker 5: the time, right, somebody says something and then they back
Speaker 5: it up. When challenged, they ben deny. She didn't do it.
Speaker 5: She stood strong, her spine is straight. Bless her. She
Speaker 5: is blowing the doors up this thing. So that's the
Speaker 5: first thing. And I agree with you. This whole like
Speaker 5: mumbo jumbo from all these coaches about inclusivity and sports.
Speaker 5: It's such a hogwash. I was a competitive that sports
Speaker 5: are about striving and competition and striving for excellence and
Speaker 5: yes winning. In professional women's basketball, less than one percent
Speaker 5: of college basketball players make the WNBA.
Speaker 3: That's exclusive.
Speaker 5: Sports are about exclusivity. If you want inclusivity, go play
Speaker 5: pickleball at the rec center. That's inclusive, not women's professional basketball.
Speaker 8: It's so dumb.
Speaker 5: Sports have all kinds of categories. They have age categories,
Speaker 5: weight classes.
Speaker 8: In boxing.
Speaker 5: No one's saying that heavyweights should be able to box
Speaker 5: against the welterweight. It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
Speaker 8: But clearly they're.
Speaker 5: Talking points went out and that's what they're going with.
Speaker 5: It's just ridiculous. As far as why are women are
Speaker 5: our own worst enemy here, I don't know. They are
Speaker 5: the ones the left has made this political. We are
Speaker 5: speaking common sense. Men cannot become women, and women deserve
Speaker 5: their own sports and spaces.
Speaker 8: It's so simple. I will say it all.
Speaker 5: Day long, over and over again. Their position makes zero sense.
Speaker 5: But they are so loyal and committed to the Democrat
Speaker 5: Party talking points that they will pronounce themselves more on
Speaker 5: every day in saying I'm.
Speaker 8: Not educated enough.
Speaker 5: One of the coaches said that to talk on this issue,
Speaker 5: they will beclown themselves every day to stay loyal to
Speaker 5: the Democratic Party talking points on this, and it's embarrassing,
Speaker 5: and every passing day more people abandoned that position. Fewer
Speaker 5: and fewer people are afraid to stand up and say, yeah,
Speaker 5: this is ridiculous, not my daughter's sports.
Speaker 3: Let's say that that's true. I certainly hope you're right
Speaker 3: about that, Jennifer.
Speaker 4: But in the case of the WNBA, which has become
Speaker 4: the hot button point, I mean, this is happening in tennis,
Speaker 4: but tennis has said we don't let men in the sport,
Speaker 4: and there are women in tennis saying I agree. It's
Speaker 4: certainly Martina ne Rachelova has been very outspoken on this subject,
Speaker 4: and I think, for the most part, very very well.
Speaker 3: But the WNBA has.
Speaker 4: A commissioner, Kathy Ngbrick, who has said nothing, has a
Speaker 4: coach in the Minnesota Lynx who wears that shirt protect
Speaker 4: trans kids, who has a coach in the Golden State
Speaker 4: Valkyries who says it's about a belonging and look at
Speaker 4: what they said about me because of my race, and
Speaker 4: she brought.
Speaker 3: Race into the subject. You have the coach of the
Speaker 3: Indiana Fever, Stephanie White, who wants to not just heiman
Speaker 3: hall about it, act like she doesn't know enough about it,
Speaker 3: engage the idea of I need to get more educated.
Speaker 3: So as a league, the WNBA has created this problem
Speaker 3: seemingly for themselves, where they have forgotten that the w
Speaker 3: stands for women. What is your messaging.
Speaker 8: Both said to.
Speaker 5: Them, well, I would just tell you the culture is moving.
Speaker 5: We have long heard that eighty percent of Americans agree
Speaker 5: on this common sense issue that women's sports are for women,
Speaker 5: but the vast majority have been silent. I know this
Speaker 5: very well. I hear from them all the time. They're
Speaker 5: afraid to speak out. They're afraid to lose their job,
Speaker 5: they're afraid to be called names. They're afraid their kids
Speaker 5: won't have friends at school. But that's changing. That culture
Speaker 5: shift is happening in real time. What I will tell
Speaker 5: you is the institutions they're far behind. The mainstream media
Speaker 5: is far behind. Their headlines don't match where the culture
Speaker 5: is and where the people are. Versities the institutions, the teams,
Speaker 5: the leagues like the WNBA, but they are so out
Speaker 5: of touch with real people that they are just making
Speaker 5: a mockery in themselves every day. But this is why
Speaker 5: it's going to take a while. It took ten or
Speaker 5: fifteen years for us to get to this ridiculous place.
Speaker 5: We're not going to unwind it with one WNBA season.
Speaker 5: But the more people stand up, I'll tell you, I
Speaker 5: was in Minneapolis at the last game and against against
Speaker 5: the Links, the fever against the Links.
Speaker 6: We had a rally to.
Speaker 5: Celebrate Sophie outside the stadium and we outnumbered the clowns
Speaker 5: on the other side by at least ten to one.
Speaker 5: That wouldn't have happened a year ago. And in the stadium,
Speaker 5: you're right about the broadcast. The coach for the Links
Speaker 5: wore the T shirt about trans kids belonging, and there
Speaker 5: were lots of people in the stadium that had similar
Speaker 5: teas on What was happening in the stadium was not
Speaker 5: reflective of the broadcast ESPN Lockdown, and they decided to
Speaker 5: make this a pro trans game. The only people they
Speaker 5: showed in the audience had those T shirts on. I
Speaker 5: was sitting on the second row on the court with
Speaker 5: Riley Gaines. We had xxxy T shirts on. The cameras
Speaker 5: kept finding us and they would not show us in
Speaker 5: the broadcaster on the jumbo tron. We met people on
Speaker 5: in the stadium, stopped us as for hugs and photos
Speaker 5: and autographs. They bought us drinks, they bought us.
Speaker 8: Food, they thanked us.
Speaker 5: So the story that ESPN wants to tell is not
Speaker 5: the story of what was happening on the ground. So
Speaker 5: this is the last gasp of a dying movement and
Speaker 5: the institutions that are so out of touch with people.
Speaker 8: But they're going to lose.
Speaker 5: They're going to lose this battle because we're right and
Speaker 5: we're speaking the truth, and we're standing up for girls.
Speaker 4: And you're you're I mean, I'm gonna call it a tour,
Speaker 4: but you're hitting more of these WNB games. You're coming
Speaker 4: to my beloved Indianapolis to see the fever. I'm only
Speaker 4: hoping we were able to grab a cigar when you're here.
Speaker 4: But is this about putting more pressure on them? Is
Speaker 4: this about bringing more light? Is this just marketing for
Speaker 4: xxtash xy athletics dot com.
Speaker 5: This is about celebrating Sophie and celebrating Honly Wilson, the
Speaker 5: young girl who is at the Seattle game, who got
Speaker 5: spit on and screened at by the co owner of
Speaker 5: the Seattle Storm.
Speaker 8: This is about letting them know that they have support
Speaker 8: for those.
Speaker 5: Of us that have been apt as a while it has.
Speaker 8: Felt very lonely.
Speaker 5: You would not believe, you probably would believe the harassment
Speaker 5: and threats that we receive every single day. And I
Speaker 5: want Sophy's obviously getting no support from the league, from
Speaker 5: her teammates.
Speaker 8: I want her to know that she's supported.
Speaker 5: We go in peace and.
Speaker 3: We go in love.
Speaker 8: We bring balloons, we give.
Speaker 5: Out T shirts, we have fun, We get shouted down
Speaker 5: by insane lunatics who call us terrible, terrible names, which
Speaker 5: I won't mention because you can't.
Speaker 8: Say them on the radio. We just want her to
Speaker 8: know she's supported.
Speaker 3: That's really, that's.
Speaker 5: It, and we want people to know it's normal to
Speaker 5: support her and to say women's sports are for women.
Speaker 3: I'm not one hundred percent sure where all her teammates are.
Speaker 3: I don't necessarily need them to make a statement every
Speaker 3: which way but loose, but your support is something that
Speaker 3: is seen very very clearly. Jennifer say s e y
Speaker 3: is how you spell that? Xx dash x y Athletics
Speaker 3: dot com. I look forward to seeing you when you
Speaker 3: are in Indianapolis. I appreciate you taking the time to
Speaker 3: be with the show more to get to keeping here.
Speaker 3: I'm Tony Katz and this is Tony Katz today. I
Speaker 3: want you to remind him that if we come through this,
Speaker 3: when we come through this in shah Now, we'll have
Speaker 3: to take a seventy million dollars on the chain and
Speaker 3: kept fighting that it. Well, it's good to know that
Speaker 3: the winner of the Democrat primary for Senate is very
Speaker 3: very comfortable with the kind of expressions that lead you
Speaker 3: to believe, yeah, is lomist Tony Kats, Tony Katz today,
Speaker 3: Good to be here, Good to be with you.
Speaker 4: That was Abdua. I'll say it. Who won the primary.
Speaker 4: Very very very tight primary, by the way, much tighter
Speaker 4: than the polls showed, shows a very divided Democrat party
Speaker 4: in Michigan. And I love how I think it was,
Speaker 4: NBC News, a big win for the left. What are
Speaker 4: you talking about? You mean it's a big win for
Speaker 4: the communists. A Democrat was going to win the seat.
Speaker 4: They just didn't give it to Hanley Stevens. They gave
Speaker 4: it to the guy who wants to connect himselves to
Speaker 4: being an Islamist. Claims to be a capitalist but wants
Speaker 4: universal health care, claims to be anti monopoly, but only
Speaker 4: wants government to be able to provide healthcare. Good Lord,
Speaker 4: never mind all the people connected to UH. I'll say
Speaker 4: it like Hassan Piker. So when I say islamis when
Speaker 4: I will say people who want to do away with
Speaker 4: their civilization.
Speaker 3: I have got the backup to it. This is not
Speaker 3: where the left wants to be. The Democrats, to the
Speaker 3: extent that there are so Democrats and they're not communists,
Speaker 3: know that this is bad for them.
Speaker 4: You have a split, a really split Democrat party. Now
Speaker 4: when you take a look at Michigan, when you take
Speaker 4: a look at the results, the answer is now what
Speaker 4: Alsayed wins with a forty eight point five percent of
Speaker 4: the vote. Stevens got forty seven point five percent of
Speaker 4: the vote.
Speaker 3: The difference is fifteen thousand votes.
Speaker 4: Actually just under fourteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty eight votes.
Speaker 4: That's the difference fourteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty eight.
Speaker 4: That's bad news for the Democrats because you need those
Speaker 4: Democrats to go out there and beat Mike Rogers. The Republican. Now,
Speaker 4: all those people who voted for Stevens, they're just going
Speaker 4: to hold their nose and vote for al Sai Ed.
Speaker 4: Some yes, because Trump's so bad. You have to meet
Speaker 4: the Republicans. Oh my gosh, it doesn't matter for some.
Speaker 4: They can't stomach it. They're not gonna stomach this America hater.
Speaker 4: They're not gonna stomach this anti semi They're not gonna stomach.
Speaker 3: It at all. They're gonna listen to all that APAC
Speaker 3: talk and say this is all stupid talk, because it is.
Speaker 3: All the anti APAC talk is ridiculous talk.
Speaker 4: But be clear, this is a result that creates huge
Speaker 4: issues for the left in Michigan in the Senate race
Speaker 4: for the general election.
Speaker 3: Keep it here. It's Tony Katz today. There were a
Speaker 3: couple of stories I didn't get a chance to get
Speaker 3: to this week already. I mean, it's been a massive,
Speaker 3: massive news week, and one of them was about James
Speaker 3: tall Rico, James Talafrico as they call him, which I
Speaker 3: thought that was just somebody.
Speaker 4: Saying something once on social media. It turns out it's
Speaker 4: a regular thing. He's an odd guy. Tony Katz, Tony
Speaker 4: kats today, good to be with you. This is the
Speaker 4: Democrat running for Senate in Texas. He's basically better a' rourke,
Speaker 4: but without all the testosterone. He is the guy who
Speaker 4: talks about vegan this and vegan that, and then when
Speaker 4: he wins the nomination, it's pictures of him eating ribs
Speaker 4: and you're like, this is we see you? You know,
Speaker 4: we've been through all this political nonsense before. We know
Speaker 4: when someone's full of crap. If you don't eat me,
Speaker 4: you don't eat mean. If you don't like brisket, don't
Speaker 4: eat brisket. Don't lie about who you are. It's the
Speaker 4: last thing in the world.
Speaker 3: You should do. But his it's his conversations on Christianity
Speaker 3: that are so peculiar, that are so I don't know,
Speaker 3: I don't not peculiar, not offensive, questionable? Can I say questionable?
Speaker 3: Because he promotes himself as a guy who is Christian
Speaker 3: and I think there's there's a term for the kind
Speaker 3: of things that he has done from the pulpit. I
Speaker 3: would call it a pulpit.
Speaker 4: It's very, very, very odd stuff, and I don't know
Speaker 4: how it's taken. So tell Rico has been a guest
Speaker 4: preacher at places and Auburn referred to as a seminarian,
Speaker 4: Presbyterian minister and seminarian.
Speaker 3: That's who he is.
Speaker 4: So in his conversations, in conversations about what I'm gonna
Speaker 4: call Christianity, I don't think I'm supposed to call it
Speaker 4: anything else.
Speaker 3: Am I supposed to just call it religion? No? I
Speaker 3: don't think so. Because one of the things that he
Speaker 3: has gotten the most pushedback on is that he has
Speaker 3: described himself as.
Speaker 4: A Christian who hates Christianity. Was made during a podcast interview.
Speaker 4: This goes back to twenty twenty one. It's a very
Speaker 4: very weird thing to say, a Christian who hates Christianity. Well,
Speaker 4: I don't know what to say about this. He was
Speaker 4: on this podcast and that was the quote. I always
Speaker 4: think of myself as a Christian who hates Christianity, right
Speaker 4: question Mark. Now this could be put into context, I guess,
Speaker 4: but it's not.
Speaker 3: For me to do that.
Speaker 4: Although I would like to understand it, I can't explain
Speaker 4: for him what it is he was trying to say.
Speaker 4: And he states that the reason I think Christianity can
Speaker 4: be powerful in our context in this country is because
Speaker 4: so many of our political opponents share that kind of tradition.
Speaker 3: Well, if you're talking about the idea that.
Speaker 4: There are Christians who run for office, sure, but I
Speaker 4: don't think they hate Christianity.
Speaker 3: I don't think that that's it.
Speaker 4: But that's just one of the many odd things that
Speaker 4: he has discussed. He has discussed the fact that God
Speaker 4: is non binary, that there are six genders, and you're like, okay,
Speaker 4: we're done here.
Speaker 3: We're just if you aren't done on the first. And
Speaker 3: I must admit I don't mean to speak with trepidation.
Speaker 3: It's just I.
Speaker 4: Wonder if I sometimes look at my religion. I'm Jewish,
Speaker 4: and I say, what the hell is wrong with us?
Speaker 4: How is it possible that I've got these Jews that
Speaker 4: so hate themselves? How is it possible that I'm not
Speaker 4: one hundred years past the Holocaust and this is all
Speaker 4: happening in America.
Speaker 3: You don't think I've ever asked like, hey, God, what
Speaker 3: are you doing? What in the world is this nonsense?
Speaker 3: But that's questioning. It's different than saying I'm a Christian
Speaker 3: who hates Christianity. Right, so I walk in with a
Speaker 3: bit of trepidation.
Speaker 4: But now as I kind of discuss it out, I
Speaker 4: think that difference is rather obvious. I don't know how
Speaker 4: Christians might view that, may have something some connectivity to it,
Speaker 4: or some scripture that they can pull from something else
Speaker 4: that's say, actually, what he's referring to.
Speaker 3: Is this, So I leave that possibility open. Maybe I'm
Speaker 3: giving more grace than I should, but better do that
Speaker 3: with you than to not do that with you. But
Speaker 3: when you tell me that there are six genders. I'm out.
Speaker 3: I know I'm out at that moment. Thank you, Cleveland,
Speaker 3: good night. But maybe the stuff that's most maddening.
Speaker 4: Is the equating of Islam and Christianity's equal pathways to truth.
Speaker 3: This is the quote. This is.
Speaker 4: The quote regarding tall Rico in a discussion of this.
Speaker 4: This was that came out at the end of July.
Speaker 3: Listen, I know personally.
Speaker 2: That I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition,
Speaker 2: from the Islami mystics, from poets like Rumy, as much
Speaker 2: as I have from Christian authors.
Speaker 3: I must ask, now, what does the Christian say to
Speaker 3: that you've learned as much about Christianity from Islamic teachings. Listen,
Speaker 3: I'm pretty clear on these subjects. If somebody wants.
Speaker 4: To live their life as a Muslim, it's not for
Speaker 4: me to say otherwise. But we're not talking about a religion.
Speaker 4: We're talking about a political system. And I will say
Speaker 4: that to any Muslim anywhere. I'm not angry about it.
Speaker 4: It is a political system. My argument is is that
Speaker 4: I refuse to allow that political system to take hold
Speaker 4: in my nation because that political system, as applied as
Speaker 4: we have seen it in nation after nation after nation
Speaker 4: throughout history. Is a violent political system that ends up
Speaker 4: with me being dead and my wife being raped, to
Speaker 4: my kids being killed. That's what happens now. That does
Speaker 4: not mean that's somebody who is Muslim is about that
Speaker 4: whole life or doing any of those things. That would
Speaker 4: be an insane thought. But you can't deny history, and
Speaker 4: you cannot deny reality. Looking you in the face, I
Speaker 4: don't have to deny what Hamas those Islamists.
Speaker 3: Have done in Gaza.
Speaker 4: I don't have to deny what those Islamis have done
Speaker 4: to the people of Iran.
Speaker 3: I can see it with my own eyes.
Speaker 4: And then people will say how dare you and Islamophobia?
Speaker 4: Oh kiss off? While Hassan Piker that islamis Kami loser.
Speaker 4: He's looking at the results of the election. Where else
Speaker 4: else Iaid wins I was always pronouncing el said it
Speaker 4: is elsaaid else I had wins the Democratic primary in Michigan.
Speaker 4: He's going to be the candidate for the Democrats, going
Speaker 4: up against Rogers the Republican in November. But the race
Speaker 4: is so close nobody gets over fifty percent. He won
Speaker 4: the race by less than fifteen thousand votes and Hassan
Speaker 4: Piker is screaming islamophobia.
Speaker 3: Kiss off, you, loser.
Speaker 4: Islamophobia isn't a thing, although I will tell you that
Speaker 4: Islamists are a thing.
Speaker 3: Their desire for a.
Speaker 4: Worldwide caliphate is a thing, and their killing is a
Speaker 4: real thing. Their destructive behavior is a real thing. They're
Speaker 4: wanting you to submit or die is a real thing.
Speaker 4: A real thing can't be denied. Who cares what assign
Speaker 4: Piker says, him and his whole twitch audience can switch off,
Speaker 4: doesn't matter. The facts are there. If they want to
Speaker 4: try and deny them, that's fine.
Speaker 3: But my job is to say, you can't deny what's
Speaker 3: right in front of your face.
Speaker 4: How does the Christian engage again, this conversation. I've learned
Speaker 4: as much from about Christianity from Islam as I have
Speaker 4: from Christianity.
Speaker 3: That's as a.
Speaker 4: Matter of just rational talk. You and me have an
Speaker 4: a bourbon on a barstool. That's not how this works.
Speaker 4: That can't be how it works. That's a peculiar, peculiar
Speaker 4: thought that you've learned more about Christianity.
Speaker 3: From Islam.
Speaker 4: It seems to me that's the kind of talk you
Speaker 4: engage when you're trying to placate when you're trying to
Speaker 4: endear yourself. That's what that sounds like. That's what it shows.
Speaker 4: And we see this a.
Speaker 3: Time and again and again where you see the political
Speaker 3: left working aggressively.
Speaker 4: To connect themselves to Muslims. My problem is to the
Speaker 4: Islamist Let me give you another example.
Speaker 3: Today there is going to be a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
Speaker 4: On the Muslim Brotherhood that was scheduled for today. It's
Speaker 4: still going to go on a hearing on the Muslim Brotherhood. Now,
Speaker 4: do we actually have to question whether or not the
Speaker 4: Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist group or should we say
Speaker 4: terrorists adjacent to make sure the lawyers are all okay,
Speaker 4: terrorist align terrorist supporting. Are we really questioning whether or
Speaker 4: not the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization because it's
Speaker 4: designated one by Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates,
Speaker 4: Bakaray and Russia, Argentina, Kenya, in Germany, amongst others, it
Speaker 4: is a terrorist organization. Republicans are having this hearing on
Speaker 4: Muslim Brotherhood activities in the United States. Democrats have decided
Speaker 4: not to appear at the hearings. Democrats on the Senate
Speaker 4: Judiciary Committee are not coming. Quote, Democrats have no intention
Speaker 4: of indulging this political creep show. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of
Speaker 4: Rhode Island, the guy who joins the only the all
Speaker 4: white country clubs. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat Connecticut who
Speaker 4: lied about his Vietnam service. Mazie Horono, the senator from Hawaii.
Speaker 4: Never let your boys grow up to date or marry
Speaker 4: women like Mazie Herono. Senator Alex Padilla, who charges then
Speaker 4: Secretary of Homeland Security Christy Noman, is amazed to get stopped.
Speaker 3: If they refuse to show up. You can't say out
Speaker 3: loud that this is an issue.
Speaker 4: It's an issue. How can you not? How can you
Speaker 4: stop yourself? How could you keep yourself from saying it's
Speaker 4: an issue? Of course it is. It's a real issue.
Speaker 4: The Islamist is an issue the world over.
Speaker 3: I am able to.
Speaker 4: Say, without any level of equivocation, that I don't understand.
Speaker 3: Those who are part of a group called the Hareddi.
Speaker 4: So we're talking about extremely observant Jews, And there's a
Speaker 4: whole philosophy that you could be so observant that you
Speaker 4: do not have to serve in the military.
Speaker 3: Now we're talking about what Israel does here. I would
Speaker 3: argue that if you live in Israel and their rule
Speaker 3: is you have to join the military, which is, by
Speaker 3: the way, not the sign of a healthy society. We
Speaker 3: all understand that, right.
Speaker 4: I like a volunteer military, thank you very much. A
Speaker 4: military where you're forced into it, that's the sign of
Speaker 4: serious issues.
Speaker 3: But the idea that.
Speaker 4: No, no, no, no no, we just study the religion
Speaker 4: and that's what we do and we don't have to serve.
Speaker 4: I think that's wrong. I think that is wholly wrong,
Speaker 4: surreal wrong. These are also a group that in many
Speaker 4: cases despise Israel in and of itself. They don't think
Speaker 4: Israel should exist. It's really fascinating, but they live there,
Speaker 4: they take the protections, they don't serve.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, that's wrong, that's nuts.
Speaker 4: The Islamist is a violent person engaged in violent activities
Speaker 4: to bring about an end of Western civilization and any
Speaker 4: other culture.
Speaker 3: We shouldn't say that that's wrong. Democrats can't bring themselves
Speaker 3: to say that it's wrong. They cannot bring themselves to
Speaker 3: say this is a problem, because they're so afraid of
Speaker 3: losing that voter. They're afraid of being called an islamophobe.
Speaker 3: They don't know how to tell Hassan Piker to suck it.
Speaker 3: Who cares what he says? The facts are facts. I
Speaker 3: didn't insult anybody. I notice what's happening around me, and what.
Speaker 4: Democrats are saying is we're not even willing to notice.
Speaker 4: They really are a scared little child bunch. And when
Speaker 4: I listen to tell Rico, I don't know if I'm
Speaker 4: supposed to believe anything he's saying. Seems to me like
Speaker 4: all he's trying to do is endear himself to this
Speaker 4: group or that group, do whatever he needs to do
Speaker 4: politically to get a win. He'll say anything. Maybe that's
Speaker 4: why I haven't run for office. I'm not willing to
Speaker 4: say anything. I'm willing to watch the movie. I'm just
Speaker 4: not willing to say anything. You have to know what
Speaker 4: you believe, you have to say it, and if you're wrong,
Speaker 4: you gotta be able to say that too. Anyway, just
Speaker 4: a thought. This is Tony Katz today. Find everything at
Speaker 4: Tony kats dot com. So we're told the deal is
Speaker 4: coming to reopen the Straight of hor Moves.
Speaker 3: Isn't that amazing? I've heard this before. I hope it works.
Speaker 3: I don't think it will. I don't think it can.
Speaker 3: I don't think it can be long term. I think
Speaker 3: we're all.
Speaker 4: Kidding ourselves and all the rest. But hey, hope strings eternal.
Speaker 4: Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, an absolute pleasure to be
Speaker 4: with you, everybody. According to President Trump, the deal could
Speaker 4: come as early as Wednesday, or maybe not. It could
Speaker 4: happen tomorrow the next day. He spoke about this yesterday evening.
Speaker 4: Oil prices certainly seem to be happy about it, at
Speaker 4: least they were earlier in the day, down to seventy
Speaker 4: five dollars forty nine cents a barrel. That's on the
Speaker 4: West Texas crude, great, terrific. Have faith in it.
Speaker 3: Oh gosh, no, But.
Speaker 4: This is the way the President's going with it, and
Speaker 4: I can't change his mind.
Speaker 3: This doesn't end until the regime has gone.
Speaker 4: Just a reminder, but lower oil prices, lower gas prices,
Speaker 4: I'll take that for as long as I can get it.
Speaker 3: Find everything at Tony kats dot com. I will catch
Speaker 3: you all tomorrow. Everyone, Take care.
Speaker 2: He