WEBVTT - Tony Katz & Dr. Matt Will on Latest Inflation Numbers

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So the numbers come in on the consumer price index,

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>an inflation conversation, and they're up point one point one.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Huh, that ain't that ain't bad at all.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>The annual rates three point four, well, that's not great,

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's not going up.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 2>If inflation is not going up.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna tell the Federal Reserve don't do any rate

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hikes because they want to because inflation is still too high.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But the measure doesn't make any sense when you get

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>rid of food and energy, volatile energy and it goes

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>up to point two. I don't understand what's happening here,

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, good to be with you.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Doctor batt Will, economist at the University of Indianapolis, is

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>here to make it all make sense. This is peculiar, right,

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of conversation about that. The Fed

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to raise rates in September. You have two

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve governors who want to do that because the

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation is still too high. Tariffs are caused. Towers did

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not create an explosion of inflation. It's just keeping it

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>higher than we want it to be. But you also

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have this madness of oil prices because of what's going

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>on in Iran that's having an effect. Yet somehow if

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I take energy out, the measure of inflation goes up,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't make any sense at all. So let's

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>start where we start, doctor Matt, Well, what does this

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>report say to you?

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, you got to remember that this

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 3>is not the report that the FED is going to

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 3>use to make decisions. But it does give Kevin Walsh cover,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>and we spoke of that just about that just a

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>few days ago. Kevin now has more time. This is

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a good enough report that it's going to give him

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 3>some breathing room again to not have to make a

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 3>decision to increase rates to control inflation, because this isn't

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the measure that they use to make their decisions. But

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 3>here's the good news. So the report point one for

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the months, it's now a trend. Last month it was

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>down point four down. So we now have a two

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>month decent trend in the CPI, which is what you

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>and ipay when we go to the grocery store. Core.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned at point two point two, that's two point

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 3>four annualized. That's still too high, but the rest of

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the report gives him cover. In fact, When you dig

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>down into the details, almost every category is in good shape.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>The only two that are not are airline tickets, which

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 3>are two point two percent for the month, and healthcare,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>which is point six. The healthcare is persistent. We continue

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 3>to see an increase in health care inflation. That is

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 3>the big red flag in this report. If there is one,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the airlines, I'm not worried about. That's a blip because

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 3>they have contracted inventory during the whole situation with Iran.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 3>They're going to expand their inventory once things stabilize. It's

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 3>a good report. It's not a decision report. But the

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 3>bottom line for me is it gives Kevin Walsh more

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>time to make the right decisions. So he should be happy,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>and quite honestly, we should be happy because he'll probably

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 3>end up doing the right thing on inflation.

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, but me, you said trend. Now, let me go

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>through a couple numbers with you. If I take a

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>look at all items from May, June and July, all

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>items was point five negative point four and last month

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>point one that we're discussing. If I take out food

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and energy, it goes point two zero point zero and

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>then point two.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>What we just saw in the month of July. What

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 2>the hell kind of trend is that?

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, it's not a uniform trend, but they're all low.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 3>When you take with you, when you look at the core,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.119
<v Speaker 3>which you did, and those numbers you just listed, those

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 3>are consistently low. Now, I know I'm saying low. You

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>and I don't agree. Two point four percent inflation is

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 3>not low, but it's lower than it was, and it's

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 3>low enough that it's going to allow him to not

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>have to take inflation reactions quickly. And again, I've told

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 3>you before and I'll say it again. I don't think

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the way you fight inflation right now is by increasing

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 3>the said funds rate. I think the red funds rate

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>is stable. It should stay stable. I like where it's at,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the way that he wants to fight it, and the

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 3>way I also want to fight it is to begin

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 3>to sell assets off the balance sheet.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Talking to doctor Matt Will, economist at the University of Indianapolis,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll save that conversation for another day. Annual inflation rate

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>at three point four percent. We look at this, the

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>market looks at this and says we don't care.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, again, market's looking at it like I do.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 3>That three point four percent is a government number that's

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>twelve months old. They're not looking twelve months old. The

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>market is looking at this month and last month, and

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>both of these months. If you look at the headline

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>number negative point four and point one. The market likes it.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 3>So immediately when this support was released, four things happened.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>We saw that the Nasdaq went up, We saw that

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the Dow went up. We saw that interest rates went

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 3>down in both the ten year and the two year,

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 3>so we saw a decrease in rates. We saw an

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 3>increase in the stock market. The market likes this report

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 3>because they see the same thing I see. Kevin Walsh

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>gets breathing room, and that's what they want him to have.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>All Right, you're gonna drag me into this conversation because

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>your argument, sir, is that the removing of things from

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet is the golden goose. Once that starts happening,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody does better. The tariffs won't matter, oil prices won't matter.

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Your pain in the ass, brother in law won't matter.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Nothing matters if we take things off the balance sheet.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 2>First, describe what it means to take things off the

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>balance sheet.

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>What it is, Kevin wash the new chair of the

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve believes in and then is it indeed the

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>panacea we've all been hoping for.

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm gonna answer your first your second question. First,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 3>it's not the panacea, but it's one of the pieces.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Tariffs are the other piece, and that is a big,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 3>big problem. And I will refer people to an article

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 3>that you send me about you know, mister wonderful Kevin N.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Leary talking about how bad the tariffs are and how

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 3>the AI is covering up the damage done by those.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 3>So no, it's not the panacea. But the way it

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 3>works is very simple. The FED and anybody should look

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 3>this up. Just go to Google and look up FED

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet and look at the image. Look up images.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 3>You'll see this massive balance sheet that they have. They

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>own all these assets, mortgages, treasury bills. They need to

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 3>sell those. They've been buying them to juice the economy

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 3>that was wrong. They need to sell them because here's

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>what happens. They sell a bond because the government owns it.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>They sell a mortgage because the government owns it. As

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 3>soon as they sell those, they receive cash, and that

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>cash is removed from the economy. That is the key.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 3>When they remove the cash from the economy, inflation goes down.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>They need to sell these assets. They need to take

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 3>cash out of the economy. Kevin Walsh knows that's the

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 3>way to do it, not by increasing interest rates. That

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 3>is not the right solution. Interest rates are now in

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a very good equilibrium location. Now they need to sell

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>assets and pull that cash out of the economy. But

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>there are other parts, like we mentioned, like tariffs, like

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>federal government deficits.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Talking to doctor Matt Wyll, economists at the University of Indianapolis,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>let me throw a curve your way. I wanted to

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about the report, but in the world

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of ai as, what I had sent you regarding Kevin

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>O'Leary is that Kevin O'Leary's point is that we're spending

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so much money investing in AI it is booing the economy.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And if it wasn't for that, the tariffs would knock

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this not out of this economy and break it into

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And I sent that to you, and your response to

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>me was where I was at. He clearly listens to

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>our conversations. He's listening to the show every single day.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>We've been having this conversation for over a year now

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in different ways. But on the AI tip, Brad Lightcamp,

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>who was the chief operating officer for open Ai, has

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>left the company. He's going to start something new. The

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>question before us is is this a sign of something

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>bad that at one of the bigger AI groups that

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to say it's not just him.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 2>You're seeing people head for the exits.

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Wait, wait, are they heading for the exits or are

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>they heading for new opportunities? I mean, think about it.

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>If you were a big shot in one of these companies,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>You've got your stock options, you've got your pay that

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 3>you've made over the years. You cashed in. But wait,

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 3>we're at the beginning of this boom, and I believe

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 3>we're at the beginning of this boom. Wouldn't you go

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>off and be, you know, the next Steve Jobs, the

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 3>next Bill Gates? Wouldn't you want to start your own

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I really believe that these people know there's a golden

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 3>goose out there and they're going to go get their own.

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>When you say get their own, that is to believe

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 2>that is to believe that there's more investment to come.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>We're already into the we're over a trillion dollars in

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the investments, and you're.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Telling me that there's more to come. Now.

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a believer that the pie is finite, right,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a player in that, but even I have

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to ask the question, exactly how much more investment can

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>there possibly be?

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I don't have the number in front of me

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>at my fingertips, but just go look at what Meta

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 3>did last two weeks. They announced massive bond issues for

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the purposes of getting so much cash that could dump

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>into data centers and AI development. Apple, which is way

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 3>behind the curve on this. They aren't even in the

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>game yet. Wait till they get into the AI game.

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Apple has a history. I'm I'm not a fan of

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Apple's r indeed since Steve Jobs passed, but I got

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>to tell you they's nothing to be sneezed at. This

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>company knows what they're doing. This people are going to

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 3>look back and think, oh, you're kidding me. I should

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 3>have gotten into the E the AI early. Yeah. Yeah,

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 3>it's not too late to get in on AI. This

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 3>thing is just beginning to take off. I mean, I

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 3>could give you this week of people entrepreneurs I've had

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 3>conversations with who are saying it's revolutionize their business across the.

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>World's great, it's revolutionizing their business across the world. And

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be plenty of places that there's

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pushback on, like you know what, we tried to say,

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I crap and it doesn't work.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 2>We tried to say I stuff.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You know what, we actually need people again these things

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>EBB and flow.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>My question was to.

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>The idea of is there a moment where markets say

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that's too much investment, that you guys are spending in

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the wrong places. We need to self correct on all

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of this because you're all being ridiculous.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what. The answer is, yes, but this is

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 3>not that situation. This is not a bubble like two

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 3>thousand and one, because these companies have earnings. These companies

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 3>have profits. Another reason that we see CPI being moderated

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 3>and not let's go back to the original topic and

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 3>not the producer prices those things are still inflated, is

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 3>because the profits are so huge. These profits are justified.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 3>These prices are justified. When you see the price of

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 3>a stock going up. This is not you know, a

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 3>one hundred times earnings with no earnings. Sometimes these are earnings,

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 3>These are profits and the prices are reasonable given the

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 3>growth in these companies. There is no bubble here. There

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 3>is well, the market go down at some point, of course,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 3>but there is no bubble that we're looking at in

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>the near future.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Matt Well, economist at the University of Indianapolis. I

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time to be with us. Keep

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it right here. This is Tony Katz today.