Speaker 1: Why from the heart blind and the Crossroads of America.
Speaker 1: It's Tony Katz today. So it's l SA ed winning
Speaker 1: the Michigan primary. The news just coming across, and good
Speaker 1: on the Michigan Democrats.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 3: Why make it easier for yourself when you can make
Speaker 3: it more difficult for yourself? Why make it easy on
Speaker 3: yourself when you can expose that half the Democratic Party
Speaker 3: isn't interested in this communist Islamist nonsense. But hey, too
Speaker 3: late now, fourteen eighty eight votes, that's what he won by.
Speaker 3: It's a percentage point. That was the margin difference.
Speaker 2: In that race.
Speaker 3: Katz, Tony Katz today. Good to be here, Good to
Speaker 3: be with you. The numbers, man, it tells a story.
Speaker 3: All the numbers have changed, Nahn either. I think I've
Speaker 3: got it right. He's got forty eight point four eight
Speaker 3: percent of the vote. Does the Islamist versus Stevens forty
Speaker 3: seven point five? Now, I admit to you, I think
Speaker 3: it was gonna be kind of hard for Stevens to
Speaker 3: win when this is her.
Speaker 4: A little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy,
Speaker 4: and a little bit of sicket to them, right.
Speaker 2: Right, I think it's gonna be so good.
Speaker 3: I think it's gonna be a little bit rough, and
Speaker 3: maybe I'm being rough and calling.
Speaker 2: Uh I do. I'll say it, uh An is lomist.
Speaker 3: I will say this when you say to me, hey,
Speaker 3: let's not bring up the death of the Iyatola because
Speaker 3: some of my voters will be sad. You have different
Speaker 3: priorities than I do. Also, don't tell me that you're
Speaker 3: a capitalist who opposes monopolies like Adam Smith, the Scottish economist,
Speaker 3: when you believe in Medicare for all, which is government
Speaker 3: monopoly of your health, which is of course about control
Speaker 3: and turning doctors and nurses and health officials into slaves.
Speaker 3: But let's put all that aside. You cannot unring the bell.
Speaker 3: A lot happened in.
Speaker 2: The primaries yesterday.
Speaker 3: Fascinating stuff from the primaries yesterday, Things that nobody is
Speaker 3: talking about. How about the fact that Corey Bush got schalacked,
Speaker 3: Corey Bush got wrecked. Connor McGregor's knee looks better than
Speaker 3: Corey Bush.
Speaker 2: That's not a bad it's not a bad reference. By
Speaker 2: the way. I'll take that.
Speaker 3: Corey Bush is the former congresswoman of Missouri first District,
Speaker 3: and she, of course is one of the more original.
Speaker 2: Kind of weirdos.
Speaker 3: I remember she made her career by doing hands up,
Speaker 3: don't shoot after the shooting death of Michael Brown Ferguson.
Speaker 3: That's how she made her bones. Lied about the whole thing.
Speaker 3: She lied about the entire thing is what she did,
Speaker 3: because there was no hands up, don't shoot. Michael Brown
Speaker 3: attacked a cop, broke his orbital socket, walked away, and
Speaker 3: then ran back after the cop, and that's when he
Speaker 3: got shot. According to the Arik Holder Justice Department, she's
Speaker 3: a fraud and everything about her was awoke. This and
Speaker 3: a critical race theory that and an intersectionality that and
Speaker 3: of course moving into the communism was super easy for
Speaker 3: her because she thought it would have meant victory. She
Speaker 3: got the crap kicked out of her by someone named
Speaker 3: by the name of Wesley Bell. Wesley Bell got fifty
Speaker 3: nine point two percent of the vote. She got thirty
Speaker 3: six point nine percent of the vote, twenty three points. Bravo, bravo.
Speaker 3: Now put your hands up, say I give and go.
Speaker 3: Sit down. Nobody wants to see you anymore. Great to see.
Speaker 3: Then there's some of the more crazy stuff to see.
Speaker 3: If you take a look by the way, all my
Speaker 3: results are from the New York Times.
Speaker 2: You're like Tony, you're using the New York Times.
Speaker 3: When it comes to their election coverage, like how they
Speaker 3: do the data, they're outstandingly good. The data part is spectacular,
Speaker 3: really and truly. Kansas put an amendment out. They had
Speaker 3: a couple of things put out. One of those things
Speaker 3: put out was whether or not they should require elections
Speaker 3: for Supreme State Supreme Court justices Kansas Supreme Court. Should
Speaker 3: they require elections to do it? And what did they determine? Nope, No,
Speaker 3: thanks don't need it. We don't need these elections. Sixty
Speaker 3: one point said, Nah, that's that's amazing. Why wouldn't you
Speaker 3: vote for Supreme Court justices? And you'll note where the
Speaker 3: vote totals come in is to peak in Wichita. So
Speaker 3: the more left cleaning areas believe that they're the population
Speaker 3: centers and they could just keep hand selecting their Supreme
Speaker 3: Court justices and therefore or never have any question regarding
Speaker 3: what the rest of the state may actually be interested in.
Speaker 3: They wanted by one hundred and fifty thousand votes. But
Speaker 3: this is the one that's the knockout. This is Missouri,
Speaker 3: and Missouri asked the question, do you want to eliminate
Speaker 3: the income tax? So individual income tax makes up more
Speaker 3: than sixty percent of the state's general revenue. The question
Speaker 3: is do you want to change that around and eliminate
Speaker 3: the income tax?
Speaker 2: And they voted no eighty three point three percent. You
Speaker 2: look at the whole map.
Speaker 3: If you take a look at it, the whole map Missouri,
Speaker 3: the no votes were.
Speaker 2: In an orange and the yes votes were in this
Speaker 2: like teal green. The whole thing is orange.
Speaker 3: It's unbelievable, it's incredible.
Speaker 2: You look at it, you like, that's crazy town.
Speaker 3: Every single county was a Only one county was ah no,
Speaker 3: but close, Nope, all of them, all the rest solid,
Speaker 3: solid nose. I'm blown away by that one. So there
Speaker 3: was a lot that happened, and we should be clear
Speaker 3: that the socialists didn't win everywhere. They lost, as I said,
Speaker 3: in the Missouri first, they lost in the Virginia second.
Speaker 2: Now remember they lost to Democrats.
Speaker 3: We're still talking about people who you may not agree
Speaker 3: with politically, but they're not communists. And so one could
Speaker 3: argue that this is a pushback against what the DSSAY
Speaker 3: is doing. The problem with that argument is that one
Speaker 3: thinks that pushback means that the other side feels it
Speaker 3: or changes DSA isn't going to change anything.
Speaker 2: They're not going to change a thing.
Speaker 3: Even if they had lost to Haley Stevens in Michigan,
Speaker 3: they would not have changed the thing.
Speaker 2: But they didn't.
Speaker 3: They got their prize, and their prize was Abdullah El Sayed.
Speaker 2: Into this race.
Speaker 4: It is time for the group chat, and there is
Speaker 4: so much to talk about today. It seems we do
Speaker 4: have a winner in the Democratic Party's biggest and most
Speaker 4: expensive primary of this summer. We can now officially report
Speaker 4: that Abdul al Sayed has won the Democratic primary for
Speaker 4: the US Senate in Michigan. We just heard from El
Speaker 4: Sayed's campaign that Stevens called him to officially concede.
Speaker 3: Now she was down by a percent. She could have,
Speaker 3: I guess challenged it, but Selavi. Nothing changes. Where these
Speaker 3: communists are. Nothing's going to change their presentation, absolutely nothing.
Speaker 3: They believe that this is their moment and they are
Speaker 3: not going to not take their moment. If they should lose,
Speaker 3: they keep going. If they win, they keep going. And
Speaker 3: where do they keep going, Well, they keep moving further
Speaker 3: and further and further. Left to they get their goals.
Speaker 3: And when they get their goals, just like Alynsky taught, right,
Speaker 3: once you have a tactic that works and you get
Speaker 3: the thing you want, you actually have to go do
Speaker 3: the thing. Well, then they'll move further and further to
Speaker 3: the left. And since these are people who believe in
Speaker 3: the permanent revolution, there will be another group that says
Speaker 3: you're not left enough. That's how this goes. That's how
Speaker 3: this works. That's where they are at. So win or lose.
Speaker 3: They were not about to change a thing. They weren't
Speaker 3: going to change anything. They are not interested what happens
Speaker 3: in the election in Michigan. Worthy question. Let's start with
Speaker 3: the basics. What we know to be true.
Speaker 2: We know that the party is split.
Speaker 3: We know that when we take a look at the
Speaker 3: Michigan results, we see forty eight point four to eight
Speaker 3: percent for Elsa ed and forty seven point five to
Speaker 3: one percent for Stevens, a difference, as I said of oh, actually,
Speaker 3: actually I think it's thirteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty
Speaker 3: eight votes, not fourteen thousand.
Speaker 2: Let's called fourteen thousand votes.
Speaker 3: That means that the Democrat Party, the likely voter, is split.
Speaker 3: One could argue that that is not the totality of
Speaker 3: voters in a general election. General election will bring out
Speaker 3: more people. One could argue such a thing. But amongst
Speaker 3: the Democrats who are voting right now, they are split.
Speaker 3: Ask yourself about the Stephens voter for what reason did
Speaker 3: they vote for Stevens. Some of them voted for Haley
Speaker 3: Stevens because Haley Stephens is a woman. Of course, I
Speaker 3: don't think anybody questions this, would you what a foolhardy
Speaker 3: thing to question? Of course people vote that way. They
Speaker 3: voted for her.
Speaker 2: Because she's a woman.
Speaker 3: There are people who voted for her because they didn't
Speaker 3: like abdua Al say It's policies. Some of those people
Speaker 3: would be Jewish voters who didn't want a guy who
Speaker 3: was screaming and yelling about APAC like somehow it makes sense.
Speaker 3: The anti APAX stuff is amongst the stupidest stuff out there.
Speaker 3: It's just ridiculous. It is regurgitated Pavlovian nonsense. So everybody
Speaker 3: knows that they're all in the same group. Nobody wants
Speaker 3: to be seen not saying something bad about APAK. There
Speaker 3: are people who are like, no, this is just dumb
Speaker 3: and for religious reasons and other reasons. I'm not voting
Speaker 3: for Abdulsi ed right, not doing that. Some people didn't
Speaker 3: want to vote for a guy who's clearly uh An Islamist.
Speaker 3: They didn't want to be around that. By the way,
Speaker 3: quick thing back to APAK. I guess if lsied wins.
Speaker 3: APAC doesn't determine elections, right, They don't determine the outcome
Speaker 3: of elections. They already lost and Representative Ocossia Cortes caimana convection,
Speaker 3: bitch all she wants.
Speaker 2: They lost.
Speaker 3: They put the money into Haley Stevens and they lost.
Speaker 3: They don't control elections. You have improven or wrong? Please
Speaker 3: sit down, would you?
Speaker 2: Hey? At least that argument sit down? Could you do that?
Speaker 2: So there could be a serious number of reasons or
Speaker 2: multiplicity of reasons the people don't vote for el say it,
Speaker 2: that's in a primary.
Speaker 3: What happens in a general when you're going up against
Speaker 3: the Republican rogers?
Speaker 2: What happens in this moment? I don't know.
Speaker 3: Do those people hold their nose and say, yeah, sure
Speaker 3: he's a communist, and yeah sure he has a thing
Speaker 3: for the Islamists, and yeah sure he's supported by the DSA,
Speaker 3: but Trump bad, so I have to vote for him.
Speaker 2: Do they say, I'm not gonna tell a soul what
Speaker 2: I'm doing. I'm gonna walk into the voting booth and
Speaker 2: I'm voting for that Republican and then I'm gonna take
Speaker 2: a shower with Brillow.
Speaker 3: But that's the way it happen to be because that
Speaker 3: guy can't be in office.
Speaker 2: Or do they say, you know what.
Speaker 3: Election Day, No, I'm not gonna have any part of this.
Speaker 3: I'm just gonna Netflix and Show. Now, I know what
Speaker 3: Netflix and Chill means, and maybe they'll do that, or
Speaker 3: maybe they're just gonna sit on the couch and watch Netflix.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: You understand, Producer Landing, and Netflix and Show means more
Speaker 3: than Netflix and Show.
Speaker 2: Yes, correct, you understand that, right, Producer Landing? Yes, correct, Yeah, Okay,
Speaker 2: that's correct. That's accurate.
Speaker 3: When the kids say they're going to Netflix and Shill,
Speaker 3: they're not alone.
Speaker 2: I'm just you gotta know.
Speaker 3: They're just gonna sit there and they're gonna binge, watch
Speaker 3: the Bear for the seventh time, and forget that election
Speaker 3: day ever happens.
Speaker 2: They're gonna hold their nose.
Speaker 3: They're gonna secretly vote for the Republican or they're going
Speaker 3: to do nothing. Two out of the three of those
Speaker 3: responses are re bad for Abdul Sayet and the Democrats,
Speaker 3: really bad because there are also other elections going on
Speaker 3: in Michigan.
Speaker 2: You've got congressional stuff, You've got a governor's or, you
Speaker 2: have a governor's race going on. You've got other things.
Speaker 3: And now you've got a guy on the ticket that
Speaker 3: can depress Democrat turnout. Okay, now we got ourselves a story.
Speaker 3: Now we've got something to watch. I don't know about you.
Speaker 3: I got a lot of bourbon, I got I there's
Speaker 3: you want to go, I'll grab any bottle. We are
Speaker 3: gonna election day, We're gonna pour ourselves a drink, and
Speaker 3: we're gonna watch this. I could be wrong, absolutely, but
Speaker 3: if I'm looking at the data right now, which I am,
Speaker 3: two of the three possibilities are not only very bad
Speaker 3: for Abduel's very bad for Democrats in Michigan. And trust
Speaker 3: me when I say Republicans have all the power to
Speaker 3: screw this up in ways you cannot possibly comprehend. I'm
Speaker 3: Tony Katz, and this is Tony Katz.
Speaker 2: Today we've got an I ran update coming up. It's well,
Speaker 2: whatever it is you want it to be, I guess.
Speaker 3: But I have spoken a lot about USAID and I
Speaker 3: want to say it again. I'm glad the organization is gone.
Speaker 3: I want to continue with the DOGE cuts. I want
Speaker 3: to continue seeking out the fraudsters. I want these people
Speaker 3: to go to jail. I want them to suffer. Tony Katz,
Speaker 3: Tony Katz today, a pleasure to be with you guys.
Speaker 3: And yes, I will discuss the assassination attempt.
Speaker 2: Against President Trump and that whole story. There.
Speaker 3: There was a story in the Washington Times about USAID cuts,
Speaker 3: Ebola crisis in Africa, open door to Beijing's bid for
Speaker 3: influence in the Congo. Now never forget that foreign aid
Speaker 3: is also about soft power.
Speaker 2: And the idea that hey, we'll give you these.
Speaker 3: Dollars, you don't connect with them, and everything's cool. I
Speaker 3: don't know if the Tucker set agrees with this philosophy
Speaker 3: or not.
Speaker 2: It seems to me that they don't, and it seems
Speaker 2: to me.
Speaker 3: That that is a serious, serious issue. I do not
Speaker 3: believe that it is our job to give money everywhere,
Speaker 3: and I don't mind if people say let's end far
Speaker 3: an aid.
Speaker 2: Okay, end it, end toto, end it. We'll see what happens.
Speaker 3: I just want them to realize that others will try
Speaker 3: and fill the void. But when we got rid of USAID,
Speaker 3: people are like, we're gonna We're gonna get people killed.
Speaker 2: Keep our going to die because we're not giving them
Speaker 2: the money. Here's a great example.
Speaker 3: Here is the Democratic Republic of Congo dealing with an
Speaker 3: ebola outbreak, more than thirty four hundred cases over sixteen
Speaker 3: hundred deaths reported since May fifteenth. Should we or should
Speaker 3: we not be in the business of supporting them through this?
Speaker 3: I would argue that it's not a bad idea when
Speaker 3: dealing with certain issues, to be helpful, because you don't
Speaker 3: want that thing finding its way through through person and
Speaker 3: the weirdest game of telephone ever and ending up in
Speaker 3: your city, in your state, and your country.
Speaker 2: You don't want that disease around.
Speaker 3: Would we need to in this situation talking about this
Speaker 3: situation with Congo specifically, do you think it's necessary for
Speaker 3: us to give that money to be able to be
Speaker 3: helpful through USAID or is it possible we could do
Speaker 3: this through some other organization. And this is the point
Speaker 3: we can always be helpful when it is needed or when.
Speaker 2: We think there is a needed alignment. They could be
Speaker 2: two different things. They could be the same thing.
Speaker 3: You don't need this USAID organization to do it, you
Speaker 3: just go about doing it. Usaid was never necessary and
Speaker 3: not a life was lost because that organization got defunded,
Speaker 3: because we could, like.
Speaker 2: We did with AMPHAR, still be helpful in all sorts
Speaker 2: of ways.
Speaker 3: It was a slush fund to help like minded ideologues
Speaker 3: be able to get paid to move money, like minded
Speaker 3: ideologues to do us harm.
Speaker 2: It's better that it's gone. I'm Tony Kats.
Speaker 5: We're here to kick off what has at this point
Speaker 5: been an informal effort, which is working with Congress to
Speaker 5: help us combat frauds. So, as you know, when the
Speaker 5: President the United States started the Fraud Task Force and
Speaker 5: really set the federal government to taking a whole of
Speaker 5: government approach to the anti f fraud issue, that was
Speaker 5: mainly an administrative thing. That was something we were working
Speaker 5: with our colleagues at h ANDHS, at DOJ, at all
Speaker 5: of the various agencies in the federal government and trying
Speaker 5: to root out fraud. And I'd remind all of you
Speaker 5: and remind the American people and remind what these Congressmen
Speaker 5: and senators don't need reminding, which is that fraud is
Speaker 5: really a dual victim crime. The most obvious victim, of course,
Speaker 5: is the American taxpayer, who has their hard earned tax
Speaker 5: dollars stolen from them to enrich people who are violating
Speaker 5: our laws and take advantage of our country. But I think,
Speaker 5: more profoundly and more sadly, the second victim of fraud
Speaker 5: are the people who benefit from programs that the American
Speaker 5: people have set up in their generosity and in their
Speaker 5: kindness of spirit, and those programs don't function as well
Speaker 5: or don't even have their resources necessary to work because
Speaker 5: they've been stolen from by fraudsters.
Speaker 3: He is not wrong, is the Vice President Tony Katz.
Speaker 3: Tony Katz today an absolute pleasure to be with you
Speaker 3: live streaming on YouTube and rumble. Just look for Tony
Speaker 3: Katz on the Twitter, which is also known as ex
Speaker 3: Tony Katz, Facebook, Tony Kats or radio. It's the Vice
Speaker 3: President is there and Steven Miller is right next to him.
Speaker 3: And somewhere during that little opening, someone told Steven Miller
Speaker 3: to smile, and he did every time we're talking about
Speaker 3: the fraud, every time we're talking about finding the fraud,
Speaker 3: rooting out the fraud. Good, good, guys. I was just
Speaker 3: talking about Doge earlier. These are the good things. These
Speaker 3: are the right and smart things. We need to be
Speaker 3: staying on this and never stop and never quit.
Speaker 2: Ever.
Speaker 3: This is the thing that we want. And yes, this
Speaker 3: is what I voted for. I'm always voting for this.
Speaker 3: Find the fraudsters and put them in jail. But if
Speaker 3: I don't get jail, if I don't see these people
Speaker 3: behind bars, then.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna think, mister Feisce President.
Speaker 3: That you're full of crap, and you, Steven Miller and
Speaker 3: everybody else else. People have to go to jail. That's
Speaker 3: what has to happen. And if people don't go to jail.
Speaker 3: And I'm not just talking about the Somali national in Minneapolis,
Speaker 3: or the American in Los Angeles with the hospice fraud,
Speaker 3: or in this state or and that my beloved state
Speaker 3: of Indiana, all fifty states have this fraud. I'm talking
Speaker 3: about the elected officials. I'm talking about the unelected bureaucrats
Speaker 3: who all look the other way and allowed this to happen.
Speaker 3: Never question, never did their job well, never actually said, hey,
Speaker 3: wait a second, we have to be a safeguard of
Speaker 3: the people's dollars here these receipts. Doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 3: If some of them, I mean, I want all, but
Speaker 3: I know I'm not gonna get all.
Speaker 2: If some of them aren't going to.
Speaker 3: Jail, then I don't know what we're doing that simply
Speaker 3: will not do. If they're not going to go to jail, well,
Speaker 3: then there's no reason to vote for you, whatsoever is there,
Speaker 3: mister Vice President. I'm just telling you how this has
Speaker 3: to work. Now, this brings us to what's going on
Speaker 3: in Iran. From what I'm told, we are just moments
Speaker 3: away from.
Speaker 2: A deal that's going to make oil.
Speaker 3: Free for everybody. You get a barrel of oil, and
Speaker 3: you get a barrel of oil. Look under your seat.
Speaker 3: Everybody gets a barrel of oil and a lavender candle.
Speaker 3: I think I stole that line from Tina Fay, not
Speaker 3: the barrel of oil line.
Speaker 2: That was all me.
Speaker 3: US and regional partners see progress toward reopening the horror
Speaker 3: moves choke points interesting.
Speaker 2: Interesting, and literally the same day that headline.
Speaker 3: Came out, came out emerging horror moves accord could give
Speaker 3: a ran greater sway over Key Waterway. Huh okay, well
Speaker 3: this is going great. So what actually is happening? What
Speaker 3: is going on? What will we see out of Iran? Well,
Speaker 3: maybe the answer is in oil prices. Seventy five dollars
Speaker 3: and seventy one cents a barrel hasn't really moved since yesterday.
Speaker 2: It's lower than being in the nineties. That's a plus.
Speaker 3: Brent crude, which is coming out of the oceans the
Speaker 3: West Texas comes out of the ground. Brent crude had
Speaker 3: seventy nine dollars and eighty four cents a barrel, still
Speaker 3: both under eighty bucks a barrel. Gotta be making people happy.
Speaker 3: How possibly could there be any situation in which Iran
Speaker 3: has a sway? Well, this is reported by the New
Speaker 3: York Times, So you'll forgive me if I won't, just say,
Speaker 3: let's wait and find out. It's the New York Times
Speaker 3: world class maps showing where the votes are coming from
Speaker 3: in any given state or any different congressional district in
Speaker 3: primary or general elections. Incredible technology reporting will pass, I
Speaker 3: will pass. They're saying, the New York Times that Iranian
Speaker 3: US officials said Iran and Oman are moving toward an
Speaker 3: agreement that would allow commercial shipping to resume through the Strait,
Speaker 3: and Iranian officials said inbound vessels would use a shipping
Speaker 3: lane along Iran's coastline, while outbound traffic would move through
Speaker 3: a channel closer to Aman. It would not include formal tolls,
Speaker 3: but would impose a service fee.
Speaker 2: Feel the the air.
Speaker 3: Quotes a service fee to cover security, environmental protection, and staffing,
Speaker 3: with the revenues divided equally between Iran and Oman. Service fee.
Speaker 3: You guys may not know this about me, but in
Speaker 3: addition to the two radio shows, of course, I've got
Speaker 3: the third radio show or I've got the morning show
Speaker 3: in Indianapolis, I've got the syndicated show, I've got Eat,
Speaker 3: Drink Smoke of the nationally syndicated it s Garen Bourbon Show.
Speaker 3: When my father passed away, I took over his merchant
Speaker 3: services company. Small company. You never made it a big thing.
Speaker 3: It took a long time to get everything streamlined into
Speaker 3: a way.
Speaker 2: That works and now works. He had done this for
Speaker 2: years providing credit card processing services, and I do that
Speaker 2: still to this day.
Speaker 3: I talk to people, I answer questions, I solve problems.
Speaker 3: I do the whole thing. Service fees. Service fee is
Speaker 3: one heck of a turn. And you've seen more and
Speaker 3: more credit card receipts where you're paying the fee for
Speaker 3: using the credit card.
Speaker 2: And that comes from the fact that people may not
Speaker 2: know this.
Speaker 3: You know all those credit cards that say, well, we'll
Speaker 3: give you points for this, and we'll give you points
Speaker 3: for that, and points are all so many points are
Speaker 3: more points that you know what to do with.
Speaker 2: You know that the credit card companies don't pay for
Speaker 2: any of that.
Speaker 3: It's not how it works. No, no, no, the merchant
Speaker 3: pays for all of that in the world of higher fees.
Speaker 3: So what has happened is that you have seen a
Speaker 3: world of service fees, surcharging, convenience fees, et cetera. Because
Speaker 3: why is the merchant now being so screwed over with
Speaker 3: everybody getting points to do all sorts of things and
Speaker 3: it's all coming out of their pocket. They're paying the
Speaker 3: extra charges for this type of card. Nope, we push
Speaker 3: the charges back and it has become rather ubiquitous now
Speaker 3: and we do a fair amount of that of that work.
Speaker 2: It's there are some.
Speaker 3: Businesses like Nope, we really don't want to do that
Speaker 3: to our customer for our purposes right certain types of
Speaker 3: luxury lines, et cetera. The vast majority of people are
Speaker 3: like yes, because it is the difference between growing and
Speaker 3: not growing, hiring the next person, marketing budgets all sorts.
Speaker 2: Of things three dollars, and so we do this.
Speaker 3: But we also know that service fee can be utilized
Speaker 3: as a cover for whatever we want. When we hear
Speaker 3: service fee, how many raise your hands? Everybody in their
Speaker 3: car be looking. How many people when they heard service
Speaker 3: fee raise your hand immediately thought ticketmaster?
Speaker 2: There it is. There it is.
Speaker 3: When you hear service fee, you're like, I'm about to
Speaker 3: get you know what with my pants on?
Speaker 2: You know it? Service fee?
Speaker 3: What service was provided by Iran and Oman for the
Speaker 3: navigable waterway? Well, the service of not having put any
Speaker 3: minds into the strait of hormones. Let me let me
Speaker 3: give you another way to look at service fee. Ticket
Speaker 3: Master was one. Here, here's another way to look at
Speaker 3: service fee. That's a nice boat you got there. It'd
Speaker 3: be a shame if something happened to it. We all
Speaker 3: get it now, we all understand. Now, we got to
Speaker 3: figure it out. Now we understand what we mean by
Speaker 3: service fee.
Speaker 2: I mean I don't have to.
Speaker 3: I don't have to do it anymore, you know, like
Speaker 3: clearer than that, do I?
Speaker 2: Now we're good, We got it all understood. Now what
Speaker 2: we mean by service fee? Okay?
Speaker 3: Just making sure, just making sure we had it all. Sometimes,
Speaker 3: Producer Landing, I feel like I'm being a bit obtuse,
Speaker 3: and I just want to hit.
Speaker 2: It right there, you know, right there, get it clear.
Speaker 2: I don't want to make a mess right there. Just
Speaker 2: bring a point service fee.
Speaker 3: Anybody Iran or Aman thinks a charging a service fee,
Speaker 3: I think we should hit them with the biggest bombs
Speaker 3: we have, and then we should charge them for it,
Speaker 3: you know, explosion fees, dust fees. It's it is remarkable
Speaker 3: to think that this is the deal. Now, the flip
Speaker 3: side of this is that there is no deal. No
Speaker 3: one knows what they're talking about.
Speaker 2: No one knows what. I understand what the president's saying.
Speaker 2: He's saying there's gonna be a deal any moment.
Speaker 3: Now, I don't know what that possibly could be or
Speaker 3: how anybody could possibly believe it. What do I want?
Speaker 3: I want success for the president because it means success
Speaker 3: for me. Give me oil back in the sixties. Fantastic
Speaker 3: and while we're at it, get rid of some terrafts.
Speaker 3: That would be great.
Speaker 2: But could we could we stop thinking that there's a
Speaker 2: deal to be made. There's no deal to be made,
Speaker 2: there's no one to make it with. And if there
Speaker 2: was a deal, what are we giving it?
Speaker 3: We're giving it. We're giving it two weeks? How long
Speaker 3: did the so called MoU last? What's the over under?
Speaker 3: Can producer land and go to polymarket or call she?
Speaker 3: What is the over under?
Speaker 4: On?
Speaker 3: How many weeks a new deal with Iran will last?
Speaker 3: And see it if it doesn't exist? I want to
Speaker 3: figure out how we can place the line right? How
Speaker 3: do we place that bet? I'm giving it two weeks?
Speaker 3: Iran was begging us to make a deal. We said, okay,
Speaker 3: we won't bomb you, will make a deal, and that
Speaker 3: night they attacked US bases in Kuwait.
Speaker 2: But we're going to make a deal.
Speaker 3: I'm just sharing with you what everybody's saying. I want
Speaker 3: you to know. I don't want you to think that
Speaker 3: I'm avoiding the subject. I'm just avoiding looking at some
Speaker 3: of the people in the Trump administration in the eye
Speaker 3: because I know I'm gonna laugh with their face, and
Speaker 3: that's really rude. There's only one way this ends.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: That brings us back to the reporting from Reuters that
Speaker 3: we are dangerously low in our tomahawks. I don't buy it.
Speaker 3: I don't believe it, not for a second. I'm reminded
Speaker 3: of Sun Sou. When you are strong, make your enemy
Speaker 3: think you're weak. When you're weak, make your enemy think
Speaker 3: you're strong. So as I see it, not going to
Speaker 3: buy into that if by some chance, we are really
Speaker 3: low on tomahawks. I've said this numerous times. I want
Speaker 3: generals over the past twenty years who are collecting retirement
Speaker 3: to stop. No more pensions for you, and I believe
Speaker 3: we should just bust you down to corporal. Sorry, gotta go.
Speaker 3: We don't have enough weapons, you know. I feel this
Speaker 3: way about everybody who's spent who put us for twenty
Speaker 3: years in Afghanistan and then created a military that fell
Speaker 3: to Al Kaeda in eleven days.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry. Do I say eleven days, I meant eleven minutes.
Speaker 3: You built an army that was dependent on air support,
Speaker 3: and then you shut down the damn airport. No pensions
Speaker 3: for the Ladia, for the Ladia, no I don't believe
Speaker 3: there's a deal with Iran, but they keep saying it,
Speaker 3: so I'll hope for the best. This is Tony Katz today.
Speaker 3: I thought this was just a spelling mistake. Oxford Comma.
Speaker 3: Have you heard about this? Tony Katz? Tony Katz today
Speaker 3: live streaming on YouTube and rumble. Look for Tony Katz
Speaker 3: and subscribe. The White House released classified memos and what
Speaker 3: it shows is that in twenty seventeen there was a
Speaker 3: counter intelligence investigations who were talking about James Komy. Here
Speaker 3: a counter and eligent's investigation into whether or not President
Speaker 3: Trump's firing of Comy was connected to Russia.
Speaker 2: Is that right?
Speaker 3: And it spelled ox fer d Oxford comma.
Speaker 2: As opposed to the.
Speaker 3: You know, the the what I call it the literary,
Speaker 3: the vocabulary, the grammar concept of the Oxford comma oxfo
Speaker 3: r d. It was launched due to the national security
Speaker 3: concerns about whether Trump himself was a Russian asset.
Speaker 2: M my god.
Speaker 3: They wanted to determine whether Trump was quote directed by,
Speaker 3: controlled by, and or coordinated activities with the Russian Federation
Speaker 3: in a manner constituting a threat to the national security
Speaker 3: of the United States and or a violation federal criminal statutes.
Speaker 3: Could we please do this with all candidates who view
Speaker 3: themselves as communists or connect it to communists or is lomists.
Speaker 3: That would be much much much better, much better.
Speaker 6: They really did go after him in all the ways,
Speaker 6: in all of the ways, and now, feeling they can't
Speaker 6: get them legally, they're still trying to shoot at the man.
Speaker 2: What happened in California? Was it an assassination attempt? You
Speaker 2: know the answers?
Speaker 3: Yes, right, Rand Paul lowering the boom on Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 2: I've got that as well, plus three more things just
Speaker 2: coming up. Keep it here. This is Tony Kats today.