WEBVTT - Episode 4645: Tony Katz Today Hour 3 - 08/03/26

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Why from Dall Hartliner and the Crossroads of America.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>It's Tony Katz today. What in the world is going

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>on with the end? What is going on with the

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Japanese economy? I mean, I thought they were out of

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the stagflation. Why are we propping it up. I'm not

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>saying I'm opposed. I just want to understand. Why is

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>this Argentina all over again where we're buying pesos. I mean,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 2>we got the money back, so I guess all was good.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 2>But is this what we do now? Or is this

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>about something having to do with China? Is this about

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the politics more than it is about the money? But

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>it is costing us money? Or is it not? You see,

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>that's just it. Everybody wants to say something, but no

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>one actually digs into what is actually going on. Tony Katz.

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Tony Katz today, good to be with you. Just call

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>me the digger because that's what I'm doing. Doctor Mattwill

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>joins me right now, economist at the University of Indianapolis.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get to Japan. We're going to talk

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>about what's going on with the yen here. But I

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>want to start where I start, which is our economy

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and on Friday. I was out on Friday, but happy

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 2>to be back today. And we take a look at

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 2>GDP's second quarter GDP and it grew at a rate

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of one point five percent, not two point one percent

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that was the first quarter one point five percent. In

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 2>all of these cases, a number means nothing unless we

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>can analyze why the number is what it is. So

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>you take a look at one point five percent. Economist

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 2>to Matt Will, what's the story. It's false. I will

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 2>tell you that the number is much higher than one

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 2>point five percent. And this goes back to the Keynesian

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>flaw and how they calculate GDP. So yeah, let's look

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>at the headline one point five. By the way, the

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>market wasn't phase because the market knows what I know.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>First of all. One of the reasons it was only

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one point five is because the government portion of the

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>GDP was reduced.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a good thing.

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You and I everyone listening to the show knows that

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the smaller government is better. So that pulled down GDP. Also,

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>imports pulled it down one and a half percent. Again,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge flaw with the GDP formula is that it

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>punishes the country for imports, but it ignores foreign direct investment,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>because those dollars that we spend to buy stuff from

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>overseas flows back into the United States. Exports boosted it

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>by half.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 2>That's good.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Consumption up half two points two percent. Investments were up,

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>in fact, fixed investments, you know, equipment and buildings and

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>stuff up one and a half percent. I'm telling you

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>this is this is good underneath the hood. Accept the eyeword.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Inflation is still over five percent in the sport. Let's

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>hold off a little bit and let's get back to this.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>The argument is that the GDP number of one point

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>five percent is false because we're to schedule a discussion

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 2>of government is about government spend or government lack of spend.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Government growth. The growth of government reduces GDP, I mean

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>increases GDP. So when the government is constrained, that causes

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a GDP to go down. And that's what this report shows.

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It shows less. You know, we call real versus you know,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>nominal dollars. So inflation adjusted government spend and the economy

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it decreased yer point one four percent.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 2>So when the government is spending, when government is spending.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Talking to doctor Mattwill, economist at the University of Indianapolis.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>When the government is spending, we consider that growth. In

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the United States, when we talk about GDP gross domestic product,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>government spending is seen as as growths. So when the

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>government is going on wild spending spreeze, those people who

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>engage the spending can look at the GDP it say see,

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>look how much we're growing.

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what happened under Biden. That was his primary source.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>When we looked at the microscopic parts of GDP under

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>by and we saw that almost all the growth in

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy was coming from government growth. Under Trump, it's

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a completely different picture. Almost all of the growth is

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>coming from private industry. In fact, GDP is subtracting, I

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>mean government is subtracting from GDP. So the formula which

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>John Maynard Kaines wrote back in the forties, and by

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, at the end of his life he actually said,

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it's really flawed, but it's the best

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got. And I would agree with him. It's very flawed,

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's the only thing we have at the moment.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It ignores a lot of things like import exports, foreign

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>direct investment, So you have to look under the hood,

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>not all one point five percents are created equal.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.119
<v Speaker 2>Now let's get to the next which you talked about

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>investments up point five three percent, about half a percent

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 2>investments into you're talking about long lasting goods, manufacturing goods,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 2>is investments into my four oh one k.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>What are these investments made up of. Yeah, that's an

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>important point that you're making. This is company investment, private

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>corporate investments in production, manufacturing, including services, so anything that

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a company is investing to expand their business. So that's

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking you and I saving for retirement. This

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is actual investments made by companies to grow their businesses.

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And underneath that this half a percent growth, one and

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a half percent of the GDP was due to fixed investments.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>That's putting up a facility to build some product that

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is a long term benefit. That is huge. And we

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't see that under Biden. We've seen that under Trump

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's instituted policies and deregulation that has encouraged this.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we talk about are those other countries

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>around the world investing that's not even in this number.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That's foreign direct investment which should be included, which isn't

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in the GDP calculation.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Talking to doctor Matt Well, economists at the University of Indianapolis.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's keep breaking this down understanding our numbers, and one

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>of these is manufacturing. When it comes to the ISM report,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 2>which is something you look to keep in high regard,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 2>this tells us something. This matters. ISM was fifty three

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 2>point three. That's up about six percent, which is the

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 2>six straight increase that we have had. That signals what. Wow.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>It signals wow because that's the private economy. So go

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>back to the GDP that was plus one and a

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>half percent on fixed investments by companies. We have proof

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a bogus estimate by the government ISM

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Private Industry Report. Actual companies calling in saying, hey, this

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is what we're doing. So this is the six month

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Inventories are up, production is up. There's

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>these are sub parts of the ISM report. New orders

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>are up. This is fantastic. It's what Trump wanted to

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>do with the terroriffs, but the tariffs actually delayed it.

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe these things would have been up inventories, production,

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>new orders without the tariffs sooner. But the tariffs have

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>been in place for a long time. Now they're they're

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they're baked into the economy, not in a good way

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in some places, like inflation. The only thing in the

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>ISM report that was concerning is employment is flat. But actually,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if you consider all the disruption with AI, flat employment

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's good because it should be dropping with

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>all the disruption, So the growth is overcompensating for the

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>AI disruption. There's a lot of good things that's report,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>except double digit inflation for manufacturers. That's right, double digit

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices, aluminum, copper, It's not good.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>This now leads into what you said where the problem is,

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Where the issue is with inflation. We have seen Kevin

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Walsh now Chairman of the Federal Reserve twice say we're

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>not changing interest rates. They are not going down. This

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>can't please President Trump at all, but we have been

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I have been very very consistent. I think you have

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>been with me on this. I would never say otherwise.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>The inflation is here. You've argued that it's baked into

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>everything Wall Street is doing. What somehow is still unfathomable

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to people is that we accept that this is the

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 2>way it is. We aren't. There is no aggressive push

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 2>to bring it down because we discuss policy. So where

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 2>is inflation right now, and what are the competing forces.

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, I don't agree that we've accepted it.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't do not accept inflation. And if Wall Street

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is accepting it, shame on them.

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 2>But they are. I mean, I'm arguing that they are right.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the point. I didn't say you and I sitting

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>on a barstool are happy with this. This whole thing sucks.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 2>To quote Rodney Dangerfield from Caddy Shack, But I do

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>say that Wall Street has absolutely accepted this. They've baked

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>it into the cake. We've discussed this many times. It

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>is not where Midwest Main Street is, but it's absolutely

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>in my view outsider looking in where Wall Street is.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me tell you, I'm gonna pivot a little

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>bit and say, Kevin Walsh is he is doing the

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>right thing. He's announced he's not going to change rates.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that. I think the Fed funds rate

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is where it should be. I think this is a

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>stable rate. And notice Trump didn't scream at him about

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this because Wall Street's pushing him to increase. He even

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>had some of his governors. Three of his fellow governors

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>voted to increase rates last week, but he refused. He's

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>playing the long game. What he's doing, and people pay

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>attention to this. He is reducing the amount of information

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>flow out of the FED. He set up a special

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>commission to look at the selling of assets off the

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>FED balance sheet. I am convinced that he's going to slowly,

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, move this giant ship, and he's going

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to convince his fellow governors once this special Commission does

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>their work, to start shedding assets from the balance sheet,

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sell those assets, pull the cash out of the economy

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>without increasing inflation. He knows how to cut inflation, and

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do it the right way. I'm confident

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>based on what he's doing right now his strategy that

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he's going to pull it off patience, and I think

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>even Trump has patience with.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Him on this. But let's continue on this conversation of

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 2>inflation in general. Never mind where we are about the

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>market accepting this. The inflation is here. What are the

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>competing forces that are causing it to remain.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's still the tariffs, It's still growth of government deficits. Now,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about government spending earlier, but the deficits also

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>contribute to this whole phenomenon because the FED is forced

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>to monetize the deficits, so we have to cut the deficits.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the FED is between a rock and

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>a hard place, because they don't control the fiscal policy.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>They only control the monetary policy, so they can control

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the cash in the economy, but so can the federal

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>government by deficit spending. And that deficit spending is really

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>massive at the moment, and that's a huge issue. That's

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>causing the sustained inflation despite the growth in the economy

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the private sector.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's the economy, that's the GDP. But we have

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 2>to get into the conversation about Japan and the end

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>because this has got some people and I don't even

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 2>know if it's confused. It's got them bothered like somehow

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>we're doing something very very wrong. But I think most

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 2>people don't understand what we're doing. We will break that

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 2>down with doctor Matt Will, economist at the University of Indianapolis.

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Keep it right here, guys, I'm Tony Katz, and this

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is Tony Katz. Today.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 3>The Democratic National Committee, it's been well publicized, has been

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 3>struggling with debt. Republicans are sitting on at least one

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty million dollar war chess. What does the

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 3>success of LSIED tell you about what the definition of

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>power is right now, because in our universe we often

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 3>think power is money. That's the opposite of what he's

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>running on.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, what I have read is that some of the

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 4>big donors are holding back because they're not quite sure

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 4>what they're funding right now. And I think that we're

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 4>in the middle of an interesting debate right now about

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, where is the center of the Democratic Party,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 4>And this election will help it, but it doesn't have

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 4>a center the way the Republican Party has a center,

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 4>which is Donald Trump. And so what's happened is it's

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 4>allowed I think the media, among other things and I

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 4>mean Fox US, but I also mean MS now to

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 4>focus on the extremes right without. I don't think there's

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 4>that many DSA candidates out there, but you look at

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 4>the media and that's all there are is DSA candidates

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 4>out there. And the result of that is you put

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 4>forward a Democratic Party that looks like it's extreme, which

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 4>it has its extremes, but no focus at all, by

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the way, on the Republican extremes.

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Because the Republicans aren't engaged in these extremes. I mean,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 2>one could argue that the point being made there in

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 2>MS now is a legitimate point. Maybe there aren't as

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>many communist candidates, Democratic socialists or communists end of discussion.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 2>As you know, we talk about them, but there's only, like,

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, five or six as opposed to five hundred.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>But you're talking about people who could be the next

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>senator from Michigan. You had a guy who had a

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Nazi tattoo and multiple allegations which are deemed credible by

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the vast majority. It hasn't been in front of a

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 2>court of law yet, so I can't say that of

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>sexual impropriety. And you replace him with a guy who

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>married I'm sorry, didn't marry, but had kids with his

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 2>second cousin. That's Troy Jackson. You have got a lot

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>of radicalness out there. You've got a mayor in New York,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 2>a mayor in Seattle. These are not small cities engaging

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 2>these full on communist agendas. Of course, you have a

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>reason to be concerned. Tony Katz, Tony Kats today, good

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to be with you. So the counter to that argument

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>is we're obsessing about these things. But I only named

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a handful. Those handful affect a lot of lives. Those

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>handful tell a story about growth, and those handful is

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the recognition that the political left is broken and has

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>been commondeared by these communists. This is who they are.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 2>They are communists, and they are Islamist adjacent. They're certainly

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Islamis supportive because they say nothing. They say nothing of

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>what we see all around the country of this growing threat.

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>They look at the communism and say, this is what

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the young people want. They don't one hundred million people

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>dead at the hands of communis. Well, that's not really

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the case. That's not true. That's not what happens. They

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 2>will lie about anything and everything, everywhere and all the time.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>But we know that we're aware of that because we

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 2>discuss these things. But the real story here is if

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>you allow this to metastasize, if you allow this radicalness

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>of an ideology to grow and to fester, you will

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 2>have an unrecognizable country, and then you will have no

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 2>country whatsoever. So, while he is correct, it may only

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>be my word handful of these communists running for office,

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>it is that they feel emboldened to run. They feel

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 2>that this is their time. I have no idea if

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Hassan Piker is a legit guy or doing this for

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the clicks, I have no clue. All I know is

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>his ideology has to lose and screw him and Iona

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Pressley and Rashida Talib and Elanomar and then the Kazu Cortes.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 2>They don't care that these people are communists. They say welcome,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>because in the end the goal is the same, the

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>dismantling of Western civilization and the ending of the United States,

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the ripping asunder of the Constitution. When it's just one person,

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you notice, and that's where this falls apart. If Steve

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Lisman over there, he's a CNBC guy, but he was

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 2>doing an interview on MS now saying there's no focus

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>at all in the Republican extremes because everyone is obsessed

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>with the DSA. I put forth to you that Republicans extremes,

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to the extent that there are extremes, they get rooted

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>out by Republicans. Democrats welcome it, embrace it, laud it,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>glorify it, and then say, how dare you ask questions

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>about it? We have to beat those Republicans. Graham Platter

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 2>is a Nazi credibly accused in my view, of multiple

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 2>accounts of sexual and propose innocent until proven guilty in

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>a court of law. Fetishizes about pleasuring himself in a

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 2>porta potty and laughs when American soldiers are killed and

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Democrats said, hey, we have to win the Senate. There's

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the difference. Republicans would have felt the pressure immediately and

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>he begne. He'd begne. We got rid of the senator

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>from Idaho for having a wide stance. Do you remember

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 2>this guy? He's he's in the bathrooms. Larry Craig is

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 2>his name. Arrested for lude conduct in a men's bathroom

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>at the Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport. He entered a

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 2>guilty plea for disorderly conduct a wide stance because he

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>put it where the foot was underneath the stall door.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 2>He was tapping his foot. It was a signal that

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>somebody wanted to engage and lude conduct. I don't know,

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and these are not This is not my world, thank

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 2>you very much. Gone. The Left is openly endorsing communists,

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>and we got rid of Larry Craig because he liked

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>to tap dance while he was going number two I'm

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>sorry they don't like us. These things are not comparable.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why the hell were pretending that they

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 2>are just madness, So you can argue that it's an obsession.

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Rational people would argue that they're communists. Know, by the way,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>ripping the Democrat Party apart. Now, when I say ripping

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 2>it apart, they are ripping apart those people who won't

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 2>accept the communists. Communists are gonna win this thing. The

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Communists are gonna win this thing. I don't think the

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 2>Democrats have what it takes to keep him ount. I

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>don't think they want to keep him out. Power is power.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Power is power, and they don't care how they get it.

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 2>They will morph, they will maneuver, they will be these people.

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Wait till Representative Acosti Cortes learns she's not enough to

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the left, because that crop is coming up soon. If

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>you want the revolution to remain, there always has to

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>be somebody who's more revolution minded than you. And for

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 2>all these squad members, that is coming really really quick

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 2>and coming directly at them. Find everything I do at

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Tony kats dot com. I've got more with doctor Matt

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Will coming up. Keep it here. I'm Tony Katz, And

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>this is Tony Katz today. So this whole yen thing

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 2>with President Trump has got a bunch of people in

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 2>an uproar, except I don't know if there's anything to

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>uproar here. When you hear about this deal, We're we're

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 2>propping up the end or are we buying the yen?

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Is this like that Argentine the deal where we bought

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>pesos and they got dollars and then they they did

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 2>pay us back. So what is the story here? I mean,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 2>what maybe we should be asking what's up with the

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Japanese economy? Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, Great to be

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 2>with you talking to doctor Matt Will, economist at the

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 2>University of Indianapolis. The story out of Japan, which the

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>market doesn't seem to care too much about. Again, the

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>market fascinating. It was just so happy that there's an

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>alleged deal with Iran and the opening of the Straight

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 2>of Horn moves boom, like the Dow opened and it

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 2>went over seven hundred in the first hour. I don't

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 2>know where it's gonna close, No one does, but everyone

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 2>was very, very excited. But this yen story and what's

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>going on with the Japanese economy. Now, this is the

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff that always puts me a bit on edge.

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>At first, I thought this was a story much like

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Argentina and US buying pesos. And then I said, well,

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 2>this is Japan. This is a country that's coming out

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 2>of thirty plus years of stagflation. I thought they had

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 2>already come out of it. This does not signal that.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the question whether or not this is

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>an economic move or a political move. Talk to me

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>about what's happening in the Japanese economy. What did they

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>signal to the world, and why did the US come

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 2>to the rescue.

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Okay, there's a lot to unpack here, and I'm

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna put on my professor cap and try to explain

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it clearly. But you added one thing that I had

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not thought about, because I'm an economics nerd, the political angle.

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You are one hundred percent correct. I had not thought

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 1>about why the US is doing this. It's political. So

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here? The US bought yen a significant amount.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>This takes them out of circulation. So go back to

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the same discussion we have about inflation and taking dollars

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>out of the economy. The United States government bought yen

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and took them out of circulation in Japan. So that

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>makes the yen stronger, that reduces their inflation, and that's

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for them, but it also makes the

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>yen stronger against the buller, which we our currency, which

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is which is a side issue. But it's interesting why

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we are accepting that. And I got a theory as

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to why we're accepting that. But it's a little different

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>than Argentina. And let me tell it's similar, but not exactly.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Argentina needed US dollars, they needed US dollars to buy

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>other things, so we gave them US dollars by buying pasos.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Japan doesn't need dollars. They just need fewer yen. They've

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>got plenty of US dollars. They needed fewer yen in

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>their economy, and they wanted us to take them out.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And I got to give, you know, Scott Bessant and

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department genius for how they did it. They

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>did it in a way that we've never seen before.

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And Wall Street got very upset at this. They didn't

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>buy yen with dollars, they bought yen with euros. They

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>took the euros that we hold, and we do hold

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of international currencies, and they bought the yen

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>with that. That totally messed up Wall Street's arbitrage and

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the speculators and the traders because they didn't want to

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>spend dollars. My theory is that they believe the dollar

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is a good investment right now because Trump's all about investing.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>He's all about I'm going to make money here and

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>make money there. And Scott Bessen did a very good

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pivot and disrupted the markets, and I think it's going

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to help Japan. But Japan has to get their own

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>house in order.

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Also, Okay, everything you just said makes people want to

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>have a drink. No part of that for the normal

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>person makes any sense. So let's start going back. Why

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 2>did Japan need us to buy yen and pull yen

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 2>out of their economy.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Japan is causing their own inflation and they're asking us

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for help to bail them out because they're not doing

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>enough domestically. Their own prime minister, she's doing a great

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>job in trying to be responsible. She's a good free

0:23:55.400 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>market capitalist type person. Yes, what, it's a culture. They

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have tremendous they have price caps, they have price caps,

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they have government subsidies across the board for their citizens,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and therefore she's having a tough time domestically controlling this monster,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the Japanese government and what they give to

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>their citizens. I know, this sounds weird. They also have

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>another problem, this is going to sound very weird. Their

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>people save too much and don't borrow enough. They have

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the highest savings rates in the world and

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they have one of the lowest borrowing rates in the world. Well,

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't encourage people to grow their businesses. And because

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of the price controls, I'm hoping I'm not losing people here.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Their CPI is low, but their PPI is seven point

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Their producers are experienced inflation as bad as ours,

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and they can't pass it along because of government controls.

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So she's trying to rein in this government monster. This

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this okay, ready Godzilla in Japan see to do that.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 2>But that's not my role, okay.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But she needed the US government help, and they reached

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>out and asked us for help. It was a coordinated effort.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty impressed with how it's going in our cooperation

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on this.

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 2>So they needed Yen out of the economy to thwart

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the inflation issue, which is because of their own government policies.

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>But they're not about changing the government policies, not changing

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 2>them fast enough.

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>She is trying to change them. She's having great difficulty,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can imagine Trump wants to keep her politically strong.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So you added that genius touch there. I didn't think about.

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>There is politics here, and he wants to prop her up.

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want her to suffer. And by the way,

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>she will be punished if she tries to take away

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>some of those goodies.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And understand that the politics here, you can argue, are

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>within Japan and of itself, but these are politics that

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>are about China and thwarting China and making a strong

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Pacific rim. And this is about shipping lanes and the

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan Straight and the Yellow Sea in the South China Sea.

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 2>This is about navigable seas. This is about hegemonic power.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot here. And Sonai Takaichi, the Prime minister

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 2>that we're talking about, has been very very westward looking

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and forward looking with President Trump wanting that alliance because

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 2>she knows if Taiwan goes, everything is up for grabs.

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 2>She's nobody's fool talking to doctor Matt Will, economist at

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the University of Indianapolis. So let's now go back to

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 2>what happened here. We end up buying yen to pull

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 2>yen out of the system, and we pay them in

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 2>euros that we're holding. What the hell do they do

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 2>with the euro? What gets weird is I don't care

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 2>if you give me a pound of gold, or you

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 2>give me the equivalent in dollars, or you give me

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent in platinum. The money is still there, so

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not necessarily pulled out. All you did is go

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 2>from a liquid to a solid to a gas man.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 2>You changed its form, but you didn't change the thing.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Ah, but Japanese citizens don't pay for stuff in euros.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>They pay for stuff in yen. So, to quote one

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of our favorite politicians, you put it in the lock

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>box in the corner of Tokyo and nobody touches it.

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So the euros are in the lock box and no

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>one's touching them, so it's not causing the inflation. I

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>got to go back and.

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Just say, told don did you just quote al Gore

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>on this show? You got the reference? Yes, my gosh, guys,

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to apologize to everybody. I try to vet

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the people on this show to the best of my ability,

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Wils quoting Al Gore, My goodness, gracious sir, but

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 2>continue please, Well.

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But your analysis I was doing the I can explain

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what I understand what occurred, the mechanics. I can even

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>go into what we call a cash and carry trade

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in an arbitrage yen dollar rates. But you said the political.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I understand why the why was missing. You know,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>all the financial press this morning are going over the

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 1>top looking at this, crunching the numbers, saying this is

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>But that's the why.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>The why is the politics because he needs Trump needs

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>her in that place for the whole China's situation, and

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>because it actually makes a dollar stronger or weaker. I mean,

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this is he's going against his own thing. By the way,

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know how he could solve the problem with China

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>much or with Japan much easier. Eliminate the tariffs. Eliminate

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs. It's causing their exports to cost more. If

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>he would just eliminate the tariffs, that would have a

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>huge benefit for Japan. So why don't we just eliminate

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 2>He's not going to do this on any level. So

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 2>here we are. We just bought this currency. So this

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 2>is different. Talking to doctor Matt Will, economist at the

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 2>University of Indianapolis. And by the way, I'm with you,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting rid of all all the tariffs and as

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm not a tariff guy. We buy this currency.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 2>It does didn't hurt us. I mean it does if

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you want to argue, we can the dollar, which would

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>be Trump going against his own desires. But he sees

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a bigger long term value. And now we hold on

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to this yend like we held on to the euro.

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't change anything. Is that how it's different than

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the Argentina deal.

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the Argentina deal was a swap. We knew that

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we were buying pesos and we knew that we were

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>going to sell them back. That was a you know,

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a swap is literally that Japan had access to what's

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>called a repo. A repo is like a swap. It's

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an overnight where you sell your currency and buy it back.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want that. They want it taken off the market,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>not forever, but for the foreseeable future. And so Yeah,

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we own the Euros. They're sitting you know, in electronic

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>form and banking, you know, New York or d C.

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And they'll just sit there until we decide we want

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of them.

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 2>So now we get into the next steps here, what

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>happens in the Japanese economy or what should we be

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 2>looking for? What are the markers in the Japanese economy

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 2>to see whether or not this has provided them value?

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 2>And is there something we need to be looking at

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to see whether or not it has done us harm?

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I could not have answered that until you mentioned

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the political angle. Now I get it. So this is

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>what I think is going to happen. I think it

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>gives the Prime Minister cover. I think it allows her

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to her you know whatever they call their

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know congress in Japan. I'm not familiar with that,

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and say, look, I've got Trump on my side. They're

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>supporting us. Look what they did with buying yen. They've

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>been very beneficial. Now, you guys, if you want me

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep getting my friend Trump to help us, you

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have to start helping me change some things in our economy.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think she's going to be able to use it

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>as leverage to improve the elimination of the subsidies. I mean,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I won't bore you with the details, but things like rice,

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing how much subsidy goes into the right place

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>farms in Japan, so much so that there are blocks

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in Tokyo of rice farms. The most densely populated city

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and they have rice farms because of

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the subsidies make it so financially advantageous. I think she's

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to slowly change the policies, get

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>people in the country on board, and I think she's

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>using Trump's aid as a tool to make that happen.

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So kudos for her. I think she's doing a pretty

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>good job in trying to use this for domestic gain.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>By the way, in Japan they have a bicameral system

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 2>that comes based modeled after our system after the Emperor.

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Just as I only know little things here and there,

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 2>doctor Well, it's one of the weird things that I know,

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>doctor Matt Will, economist at the University of Indianapolis. I

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you taking the time to be with us. There's

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>much more show to get to keep it here. I'm

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Tony Katz. This is Tony Katz today.

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 5>I know you don't have the fever again in the

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 5>regular season, but coming out of the break, one of

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 5>the big news stories has been Sophie Cunningham and the

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 5>protest for her and protests against her. And you know,

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 5>they had a national televised game today and Cheryl, you know,

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 5>wor A's shirt and it's just a conversation. I'm wondering,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 5>just what do you think about it? Do you do

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 5>you think that's good for the league? Does it detract

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 5>from the basketball? Is it just noise? I'm just wondering

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 5>what your opinion is.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's the question asked the head coach of the

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Golden State Valkyries. Her name is Natalie Nikassi.

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 6>Me.

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tony Katz. This is Tony Kats today. I'm glad

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you guys are here. Of course, the WNBA has screwed

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 2>it all up. They've screwed it all up, every last

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of it. There is so much hatred in the WNBA.

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 2>It is racial, it is sexual orientation based. They really

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 2>don't want the popularity if it means that two white

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 2>women might be popular. They it is clear it's what

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 2>they've said, and all of this so called anger towards

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Sophie Cunningham for saying girls should be a girl, sports

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 2>should be for girls. She didn't say anything political. It's

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 2>totally normal. Now she is taking pictures with Riley Gaines,

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 2>and Riley Gaines is definitely political. So you could argue

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 2>she's playing in the space, or she's at least embracing it,

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>or maybe she likes Riley Gaines. How would I know?

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Somebody at The Guardian wrote that she's anti trans and

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 2>anti black. What in the world. But it goes to

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>prove that the WNBA wants to be a league for

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 2>black women. That more than anything, that's what they want,

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 2>at least that's what the reporter class wants. This is

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 2>where black women play, this is where black women are stars.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 2>But Kate and Clark has electrified the whole league, in

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the whole country, and Sophie Cunningham's popular. That's all. You

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 2>can't control these things. You could utilize it to your

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>advantage if you wanted to. But how does the coach

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Golden State Valkyries answer the question about what

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 2>she thinks of what's going on?

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 6>I think, thank you for that question.

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I think just in terms of.

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 6>How I'm seeing it is if I could answer with like,

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 6>for me, sports is about belonging.

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 2>It's about inclusivity.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 6>It's about allowing everyone to be their authentic self.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 2>You know I'm big on that.

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 6>Just because I have been criticized for my height, for

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 6>my ethnicity. I've been in those you shouldn't belong here

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 6>many times.

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Sports is about belonging. Okay. I thought sports was about winning.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was about fair play. I thought it

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>was about excellence. It's about belonging. What possibly possibly are

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 2>you talking about? What nonsense is this? What does your

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>ethnicity coach have to do with any of it? Should

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>boys play in girls' sports? The answer is no, and

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 2>every other answer is wrong. And the WNBA, the w

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 2>stands for women WNBA. It's the Women's National Basketball Association.

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 2>And I know I'm telling you something you already know,

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and this has been your argument. How is it possible

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 2>that they're doing this to themselves? Well, the answer has

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to be equally as obvious. They do not want popularity,

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 2>they do not want growth, they do not want to

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 2>get better. They want to be a welfare league. They

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:43.479
<v Speaker 2>want to have grievance, and they want only to cater

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to black women and gay women and no one else.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Everyone else is a token who has to adhere to

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 2>their powerful and yet wholly ugly politics or be excommunicated.

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 2>It's not me saying it, they're saying it. Don't get

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 2>angry with us for noticing just how bigoted they are.

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 2>They really will let men play in the WNBA. It's

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 2>coming any day. Find everything at Tonycotts dot com tomorrow. Everyone,

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>take care,