1 00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:10,160 Speaker 1: Live from ball Heart Blind and the Crossroads of America. 2 00:00:10,600 --> 00:00:25,079 Speaker 1: It's Tony Katz. Today. 3 00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:30,360 Speaker 2: I did myself and just coming from the firing room 4 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:32,680 Speaker 2: just a little bit ago. On my way over here, 5 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:35,040 Speaker 2: talked to a bunch of members of the team and 6 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 2: I'll say, normally when we're in the firing room working 7 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:41,120 Speaker 2: over there, folks got their heads down and they're working 8 00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:43,159 Speaker 2: and they do doing all the business that we do 9 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:44,640 Speaker 2: of the space business. But I'll say there was a 10 00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:47,559 Speaker 2: lot of smiles today, so it felt really good about that. 11 00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:50,800 Speaker 2: As the team is preparing, I think everybody's pretty excited 12 00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 2: and understands the significance of this launch. We did talk 13 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:57,279 Speaker 2: to the flight quil last night late a briefing with them. 14 00:00:57,280 --> 00:00:59,240 Speaker 2: We had another one just a little bit before I 15 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:01,280 Speaker 2: went down to the firing We had another briefing with 16 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:03,440 Speaker 2: them last night, was just to kind of go over 17 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:05,959 Speaker 2: the day launch routine with them and kind of a 18 00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,840 Speaker 2: refresher for ourselves and for them, and that went really well. 19 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 2: They were in great spirits. And then we had another 20 00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:13,640 Speaker 2: briefing today just to talk about how the launch countdown 21 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:16,320 Speaker 2: was going. And as we'll talk here a little bit, 22 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:17,399 Speaker 2: it has been going really well. 23 00:01:17,959 --> 00:01:18,600 Speaker 3: Artemis too. 24 00:01:19,880 --> 00:01:23,920 Speaker 4: We're talking about the flyby of the Moon that is 25 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 4: scheduled for well, April first, which is a terrible day 26 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,880 Speaker 4: to do. Who does a flight on April Fool's Day? 27 00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:35,200 Speaker 4: That is just that is not the timing I would 28 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:37,440 Speaker 4: have gone for, But then again, I'm not in charge 29 00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:41,120 Speaker 4: of timing for NASA. Tony Kats, Tony Kats today, an 30 00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:42,280 Speaker 4: absolute pleasure. 31 00:01:41,959 --> 00:01:44,760 Speaker 3: Guys, good to be with you. 32 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:50,720 Speaker 4: It's a ten day mission and Artemis is about getting 33 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 4: back to the Moon. This is the first time since 34 00:01:54,960 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 4: the Apollo program. What is the point here, Well, the 35 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 4: point is something that just a good amount of thinking 36 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 4: has brought us to, and that is, if the plan 37 00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:15,520 Speaker 4: is Mars. 38 00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:18,399 Speaker 3: Right, if the plan. 39 00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:25,959 Speaker 4: Is to get to Mars an exploration of Mars, how 40 00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:32,000 Speaker 4: does that happen? And what has been clearly understood is 41 00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:34,320 Speaker 4: that it would be easier if you were launching from 42 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:38,120 Speaker 4: the Moon first, you have a little bit of distance, 43 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 4: but really what you get is the benefit of a 44 00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:44,800 Speaker 4: lack of atmosphere and a lack of gravity. 45 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:47,800 Speaker 3: Not a total lack of gravity, but a great lack 46 00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:49,160 Speaker 3: of gravity. 47 00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:52,399 Speaker 4: If you're talking about launching, I don't claim an expertise. 48 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:55,440 Speaker 4: I do claim an understanding that I get the mouth. 49 00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 4: If you are talking about launching from Earth, you have 50 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:04,240 Speaker 4: to overcome this gravity with a trendous metaforce and fuel. 51 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:06,919 Speaker 3: And now you got to take a flight to Mars, 52 00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:08,520 Speaker 3: which is not an easy thing to do. 53 00:03:08,639 --> 00:03:12,720 Speaker 4: By the way, I still argue large levels of impossible. 54 00:03:14,240 --> 00:03:18,360 Speaker 3: If you're doing it from the Moon, you have some 55 00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:19,639 Speaker 3: distance you don't have to cover. 56 00:03:20,400 --> 00:03:23,600 Speaker 4: Right, You're not halfway there by any stretch, but you 57 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:26,919 Speaker 4: got some distance you don't have to cover. And man, 58 00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:30,960 Speaker 4: is it a lot easier to punch through whatever atmosphere 59 00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:38,680 Speaker 4: may minutely exist, allowing you more opportunity, more fuel, et 60 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:42,160 Speaker 4: cetera to get to where you're going. That is as 61 00:03:42,360 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 4: Laman as I can get, really as layman as I 62 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:47,720 Speaker 4: can understand. 63 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:52,600 Speaker 3: It what you have. 64 00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:55,360 Speaker 4: So the question is is the Moon a hub for Mars? 65 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 4: The Moon is a hub for a lot of things. 66 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:04,880 Speaker 4: But yes, that is a strong possibility, And that's where 67 00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:08,600 Speaker 4: a lot of these conversations are now. I think it's fascinating, 68 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 4: and I will tell you that the Moon or NASA 69 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:19,480 Speaker 4: is one of the It might be the only thing 70 00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:22,719 Speaker 4: left where I say, I know government shouldn't be in 71 00:04:22,720 --> 00:04:26,400 Speaker 4: this business, per se. I know that government should spend 72 00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 4: its money like this. I don't care do it. I 73 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:34,600 Speaker 4: think it's awesome. I the level of hypocrite you can 74 00:04:34,640 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 4: call me on this subject goes from now until the 75 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:38,159 Speaker 4: end of time. 76 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 3: I accept, I accept. 77 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:43,119 Speaker 4: I get what I'm doing, I get what I'm saying. 78 00:04:43,160 --> 00:04:49,480 Speaker 3: I understand completely and totally. It's true. It's true. Yet 79 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:51,600 Speaker 3: it's awesome. 80 00:04:53,760 --> 00:04:55,600 Speaker 4: I think there is something to it. I think there's 81 00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:59,120 Speaker 4: something you can call it romantic. 82 00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:05,920 Speaker 3: I just think of look at what our fellow human 83 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 3: beings thought of as possible and then did. 84 00:05:09,560 --> 00:05:12,920 Speaker 4: It's why SpaceX is so unbelievable. These people who hate 85 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:20,719 Speaker 4: Elon Musk and call him dumbscrew them, moron, morons, embarrassing, pathetic. 86 00:05:20,279 --> 00:05:22,680 Speaker 3: Low people. It's amazing. 87 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:31,600 Speaker 4: It is all spectacular, spectacular and terrific. 88 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,080 Speaker 3: I just want to see more of it. I just 89 00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:40,520 Speaker 3: want to see more of it. That's all. Love it. 90 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:44,960 Speaker 4: What I'd like to see less of is this absolute 91 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:49,760 Speaker 4: nonsense garbage that the Daily Mail just put out about 92 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 4: Charlie Kirk. This is truly truly disgusting. What they post 93 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 4: did over there. 94 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 3: The Daily Mail. 95 00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:09,159 Speaker 4: Read's bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match 96 00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:16,360 Speaker 4: rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson. New court filing claims, well, 97 00:06:18,520 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 4: that's something. 98 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 3: That's not what actually happened. It is an. 99 00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:39,960 Speaker 4: Incendiary, disgusting, horrifying headline. So it was a conspiracy. So 100 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:43,599 Speaker 4: Candice Owens was right. Hey, let me click on this 101 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:54,840 Speaker 4: story to get more. It is beyond a misleading headline. 102 00:06:55,080 --> 00:07:02,520 Speaker 4: It's a lie because when we take a look at 103 00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:07,279 Speaker 4: what it is they found during autopsy, they state that 104 00:07:07,320 --> 00:07:17,360 Speaker 4: the result of the comparison was inconclusive. Somehow the defense, 105 00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:22,360 Speaker 4: trying to mount a defense, wants to make a claim 106 00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:27,160 Speaker 4: that this proves that it wasn't Tyler Robinson. 107 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:28,840 Speaker 3: No, it doesn't. 108 00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:34,440 Speaker 4: Atf ran as is been reported, an analysis on the 109 00:07:34,440 --> 00:07:40,440 Speaker 4: bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie's autopsy, the result was inconclusive, 110 00:07:40,760 --> 00:07:44,720 Speaker 4: not no match. Those are two different things. Now, people 111 00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:46,840 Speaker 4: who play in that world might be able to give 112 00:07:46,880 --> 00:07:49,600 Speaker 4: me a little more data and a little more explanation. 113 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:54,960 Speaker 4: The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially 114 00:07:54,960 --> 00:08:02,920 Speaker 4: explains the lack of an exit wound. Inconclusive means insufficient 115 00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:05,880 Speaker 4: evidence to draw any conclusion. It does not mean that 116 00:08:05,920 --> 00:08:09,520 Speaker 4: the bullet did not match the rifle, as the headline stated, 117 00:08:09,800 --> 00:08:19,400 Speaker 4: the false inflammatory let me get some clicks headline. 118 00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 3: So now, what the defense is saying. 119 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:34,400 Speaker 4: Is that they want this to be exculpatory, right, exculpatory 120 00:08:34,480 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 4: to clear someone of guilt. But that's not what this 121 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:44,679 Speaker 4: data does. That's not what this data can do, not 122 00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:51,360 Speaker 4: by any stretch. There are other testings that could take place, 123 00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:54,439 Speaker 4: and the defense doesn't. 124 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:57,080 Speaker 3: Want those tests because they. 125 00:08:56,960 --> 00:09:00,480 Speaker 4: Want to be able to rest on something inconclusive about 126 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 4: what it is and help their clients who seems to 127 00:09:04,880 --> 00:09:19,120 Speaker 4: have murdered Charlie Kirk. It is beyond beyond ugly what 128 00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:27,440 Speaker 4: it is that the Daily Mail has done here. The 129 00:09:27,520 --> 00:09:33,559 Speaker 4: defense is questioning how the bullet gets matched. They're trying 130 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:41,680 Speaker 4: to defend their clients. And what you want is to say, hey, 131 00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:49,720 Speaker 4: click here, I mean, I I understand that that clicks 132 00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:54,400 Speaker 4: are are you know, how. 133 00:09:54,280 --> 00:09:59,800 Speaker 3: Do I clean this up? Clicks our prostitutes game. Honestly, 134 00:09:59,800 --> 00:10:01,240 Speaker 3: that's the best I could do to clean it off. 135 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:01,800 Speaker 1: I swear to you. 136 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:10,560 Speaker 4: But this is dirty. This is dirty and obscene, and 137 00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:13,240 Speaker 4: that's what that seems to be where we're at right now. 138 00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:23,200 Speaker 4: We're in the dirty uh kind of play and people 139 00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:28,559 Speaker 4: fine with it, solid with it. They think that it's 140 00:10:28,600 --> 00:10:32,640 Speaker 4: somehow acceptable. What part of this would be acceptable? And 141 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:36,920 Speaker 4: no one's gonna stop reading the Daily Mail tomorrow. What's 142 00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 4: going to happen is it's gonna get quoted, it's gonna 143 00:10:40,840 --> 00:10:45,679 Speaker 4: get used, It's gonna get utilized. Bloody heck, even I 144 00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 4: will sometimes still use a CNN story as a source. 145 00:10:49,400 --> 00:10:56,480 Speaker 4: I know that CNN is full of garbage. I'm fully 146 00:10:56,520 --> 00:10:59,520 Speaker 4: aware that these people can't be trusted, but but they 147 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:02,240 Speaker 4: do have one or two people left who can go 148 00:11:02,360 --> 00:11:08,040 Speaker 4: about doing some reporting. My god, there's still some reporters 149 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:09,840 Speaker 4: of the New York Times. You know, it's just that 150 00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:17,880 Speaker 4: the New York Times can't be trusted. It's it is 151 00:11:18,400 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 4: just flat out horrifying that this would happen, But I 152 00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:31,760 Speaker 4: guess not surprising. So with that, when you read that headline, 153 00:11:32,720 --> 00:11:36,200 Speaker 4: know how nonsense it is, know how shameful it is, 154 00:11:38,640 --> 00:11:41,480 Speaker 4: and know that no, it's not what it claims to be. 155 00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:45,719 Speaker 3: Right now, Tyler Robinson is the main suspect. He has 156 00:11:45,760 --> 00:11:46,679 Speaker 3: the right to a defense. 157 00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:52,240 Speaker 4: Bring him on the trial. I'm Tony Katz, and this 158 00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:53,400 Speaker 4: is Tony Katz today,