1
00:00:05,920 --> 00:00:10,600
Speaker 1: No, it's not a joke. There's an article that is

2
00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:16,439
Speaker 1: seriously saying Hillary Clinton as a potential candidate in twenty

3
00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:22,400
Speaker 1: twenty eight, completely outlandish. Another Clinton run at the age

4
00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:25,600
Speaker 1: of eighty one. Now this may make sense to some

5
00:00:25,720 --> 00:00:30,680
Speaker 1: diehard Democrats, but Republicans would have a field day painting

6
00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:34,920
Speaker 1: the race as a rerun of old politics. I can't

7
00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:38,720
Speaker 1: even imagine. But one thing this does show you is

8
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:45,199
Speaker 1: how slim the Democrat bench is if we're actually hearing

9
00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:48,040
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton in twenty twenty eight.

10
00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:49,960
Speaker 2: Well, this goes back to the problem. We've had this

11
00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:52,080
Speaker 2: question a lot the last year, and really since the

12
00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:54,360
Speaker 2: Trump election in twenty twenty four. You get a lot

13
00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:57,280
Speaker 2: of political pundits that are asking the question who is

14
00:00:57,320 --> 00:01:00,279
Speaker 2: the leader of the Democrat Party. A couple weeks ago,

15
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:04,479
Speaker 2: we had that audio Someman. Yeah, somebody was interviewing John

16
00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:06,120
Speaker 2: Fetterman and they asked him who the leader of the

17
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:08,680
Speaker 2: Democrat Party is, and he said, we don't have one.

18
00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:12,080
Speaker 2: Our leader is Trump derangement system syndrome. Because that's the

19
00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:14,400
Speaker 2: only thing that the Democrat Party wants to talk about.

20
00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:16,840
Speaker 2: So this is not something new. This has been going

21
00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:18,720
Speaker 2: on for a year and a half. Now since the

22
00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:22,520
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four election, and you're exactly right. With no

23
00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:26,280
Speaker 2: clear leader, people just start throwing names up against the

24
00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:29,800
Speaker 2: wall and see if anything will stick. And eventually you're

25
00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:32,320
Speaker 2: gonna get down to Hillary Clinton's name and we'll see

26
00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:33,040
Speaker 2: if it sticks.

27
00:01:33,400 --> 00:01:36,240
Speaker 1: The reason this has started is because she's set to

28
00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:39,480
Speaker 1: give a keynote speech in New Hampshire, and that's a

29
00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:44,280
Speaker 1: state with early nominating influence, which fuels speculation about her

30
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:47,920
Speaker 1: political ambitions. Now, there were some other names that were

31
00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:53,040
Speaker 1: being thrown around, some contenders like Kamala Harris nah also

32
00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:58,760
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsome and Pete Buddha Judge, but there's no one

33
00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:03,880
Speaker 1: that is clearly domining that lane just yet, especially when

34
00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:07,320
Speaker 1: you're hearing the name Hillary Clinton being thrown around.

35
00:02:07,680 --> 00:02:12,400
Speaker 2: Here's the state of the way the Democrats currently nominate

36
00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:16,519
Speaker 2: their people to be run for president of the United States.

37
00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:18,360
Speaker 2: Have talked about this a lot lately. We know what

38
00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:22,799
Speaker 2: happened in twenty sixteen. Bernie Sanders was out there crushing

39
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:25,680
Speaker 2: it in the primaries. The Democrat Party at the national

40
00:02:25,760 --> 00:02:28,680
Speaker 2: level and the establishment made sure to sideline him so

41
00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,120
Speaker 2: Hillary Clinton could get put in there. Same thing happened

42
00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:34,440
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty Bernie was winning it. They grabbed Joe Biden,

43
00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:36,000
Speaker 2: they put him up there. We know what happened in

44
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:39,840
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four. Biden's out, Kamala's in. Hillary Clinton is

45
00:02:39,919 --> 00:02:44,800
Speaker 2: so intertwined to the national Democrat Party and their donors

46
00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:47,400
Speaker 2: and the structure and the support system, and we know

47
00:02:47,440 --> 00:02:50,160
Speaker 2: the Democrat Party will fudge the results and kind of

48
00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:52,600
Speaker 2: put their thumb on the scale to put whoever they want.

49
00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:55,440
Speaker 2: If Hillary Clinton really wants to be the nominee in

50
00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:58,360
Speaker 2: twenty twenty eight, my guess is she has enough power

51
00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:02,880
Speaker 2: and influence within that Democrat operative structure to where she

52
00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:04,360
Speaker 2: could probably get it if she wanted it.

53
00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:06,760
Speaker 1: Well, I think it. Also, it just shows you that

54
00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:09,799
Speaker 1: the bench is so weak that Hillary twenty twenty eight

55
00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:16,720
Speaker 1: is being written about seriously by political journalists, and that

56
00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:20,040
Speaker 1: just shows you that they have to circle back to

57
00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:23,280
Speaker 1: the woman who lost to Trump in twenty sixteen. And

58
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:26,880
Speaker 1: you can't make that up. No, but there are some

59
00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:30,160
Speaker 1: journalists who are this isn't a joke, this article. They're

60
00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:31,680
Speaker 1: being serious about that.

61
00:03:31,880 --> 00:03:34,640
Speaker 2: Can you imagine? So let's just let's daydream for a

62
00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:37,160
Speaker 2: minute here, casey. Let's say it's twenty twenty eight. Uh huh,

63
00:03:37,160 --> 00:03:40,560
Speaker 2: and Hillary Clinton is the Democrat nominee for president. Now again,

64
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,160
Speaker 2: let's go back in history. She ran in two thousand

65
00:03:43,200 --> 00:03:45,720
Speaker 2: and eight and got whooped by Barack Obama, so she

66
00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:48,120
Speaker 2: lost there. And then she runs in twenty sixteen and

67
00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:51,200
Speaker 2: gets beat by Donald Trump. Can you imagine her making

68
00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:54,920
Speaker 2: another full throated push for president in twenty twenty eight

69
00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:57,200
Speaker 2: and losing again.

70
00:03:58,080 --> 00:03:59,600
Speaker 1: I don't know why she would want to do that

71
00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:00,440
Speaker 1: to her self