WEBVTT - Tony Katz & Dr. Matt Will on Unemployment Rates & Rate Hikes

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Live from the Heart Blind and the Crossroads of America.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 2>It's Tony Katz today.

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So the economy shed twenty three thousand jobs in July.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It missed the expectations, and the market.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Said that's cool, and you said something.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's cool by us. We're fine with it. We're good

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>with it, no problem. As a matter of fact, we'll

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>go up, Tony Katz. Tony Katz today, Good to be

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with you. There are reasons, though, there are reasons, including,

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, inflation and rate hikes. Doctor Mattwell joined as

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>economist at the University of Indianapolis. I started to understand

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this one early, but I want to understand what's in

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the jobs report. First, you took a look at it.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got jobs report, We've got unemployment numbers. Walk me

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>through what the report says, the Job's report, and what

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it says to you.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, I'm going to start off by telling you

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>that the headline is bad. And just like the other

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 3>day we talked about this. You know, headlines are bad,

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>but when you look under the hood, it's actually good

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>for the economy, believe it or not. So let's start

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 3>with the headline minus twenty three thousand jobs, which is

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 3>really interesting because the expectation is plus eight eighty thousand,

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 3>so this was one hundred thousand job myths. That's a

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>big deal. But let's now start looking underneath the hood.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Unemployment rate dropped from four point two to four point

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 3>one percent. That's good, okay, Now for the bad. The

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>only reason to drop is because the participation rate declined.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Fewer people are looking for jobs. Fewer people are in

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the workforce. Now more bad news for you. Tony, May

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and June were revised down by one hundred and three

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>thousand jobs, so people didn't get employed this quarter. Argue

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>this month, two big revisions. I mean, there's a lot

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>going on there that's not good. But there is a

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 3>good part to this. The private industry gained thirty thousand jobs,

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 3>so there was a growth in private and the government

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>lost fifty three thousand. This was all government job loss,

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 3>so as far as the market's concerned, good Again, back

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>to the same scene we've been talking about. Government is contracting,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 3>private industry is growing, and if you look across the board,

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>there's some pretty good information in this. I mean, construction

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty two thousand jobs up, durable goods manufacturing eighteen thousand

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 3>jobs up, Transportation warehousing ten thousand jobs up. I mean,

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 3>there is good news in this report for the private economy,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and wages didn't grow that much. I know, again that

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 3>sounds bad, but there's a story behind this and why

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 3>this job's report is loved by the market.

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So I've with you on the government stuff, and I

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have discussed this now in a couple of places. Your

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>point that GDP gross domestic product one point five percent

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>bad headline. But if government spending juices GDP, we had

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>less government spend, which is good for us the taxpayer.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>It just makes the GDP number look worse. But yet,

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>when you look as you describe it, under the hood,

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>things on some fundamentals, specifically manufacturing, very very solid. When

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I took a look at market response and I watched

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the futures go up one hundred points in a blink

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of an eye after this report came out, it became

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear to me. And I feel like all this

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>talking together has finally gotten me some level of degree,

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe only in associates, but still am on my way

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that what they saw is the job market might be weaker.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So those in the federal Reserve who are thinking about

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes to tamp down and tamper down inflation, might

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think twice and no rate hikes is where the market

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to be true or false.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Uh close, tony close, I'm giving you a B, not

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>an A.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, teacher, ever.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry. Well, every time someone gets a bad grade,

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 3>that's what they tell me. You're very close. The reason

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>was the unemployment rate drop. So it's not that the

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 3>job market is bad, it's that the wage growth is

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>not exorbitant. Wage growth would indicate inflation. So the bad

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>part where you're correct is in quotes, wage inflation is

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 3>not there. And the unemployment rate stayed at four point one,

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean four two to four to one, so we

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>didn't have hot unemployment. If we had significantly increasing unemployment,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>there would be pressure on the Fed to cut rates.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 3>There's inflation, which seems to be in this case moderate

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>not outrageous. Moderate, which is less pressure to increase rates.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>So the said, here's what happened this morning. In the markets,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>there is a fifty seven percent chance that said was

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>going to do a rate hike in September. There's stuff

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street and in the options market, in futures

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 3>market that predicts this that went down as soon as

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 3>this came out. As soon as it came out the

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 3>news on the unemployment, that probability dropped from fifty seven

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 3>percent to forty seven percent. So the headline is this

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 3>inflation argues for a hike, employment argues against it. And

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 3>this morning the employment one.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Talking to doctor Matt will the economist from the University

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of Indianapolis. So when you talk about winning this back

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and forth, this seems to be a non scientific struggle.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>This only seems to be a reaction struggle. Am I

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>right about that?

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Absolutely, that's exactly what's happening.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So the reaction from Wall Street was that the.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 3>Lack of.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Labor participation, which would show us that we don't have

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>wage inflation, means that everything is getting better.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, But your phrase reaction is why you might get

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 3>an as on this now, because what happened is it's

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the reaction to the latest piece of news. You and

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>I the other day talked about the PCE very high, CPI,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>eh okay, PPI terrible. That was Then today's news is, look,

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 3>unemployment is pretty flat. That's good, wage increase not going

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>through the roof. So what happened here is today's most

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 3>immediate current news reaction is okay, inflation under control, no

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>rate change. So that's what the market saw. The latest reaction.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Now you know, something could happen tomorrow and completely changed

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 3>the game again. But this is what the market's doing

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>with the news that got today. Okay, unemployment's fine, wage inflacement,

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 3>inflation is reasonable, no reason to overreact here. So the

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Fed again only a forty four percent chance they're going

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 3>to do a rate increase. Now the market likes that.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 3>The market liked it so much that as soon as

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>they got that information, the futures jump. NASDAK futures immediately

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 3>went up one point one percent, S and T futures

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>went up half a percent instantly instantly on the news

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 3>coming out. And the tenure treasury, which you talked about,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the tenure treasury sell eight BIPs eight basis points down

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to four point one six or the two year treasury

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and the ten year also went down to

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.119
<v Speaker 3>four point six to one immediately reaction lower treasury rates.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Market bumped both Nasdaq and SMP across the board. The

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 3>market loves this.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Can't discuss something else that I'm surprised I haven't heard

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>from Beat since the Treasure Secretary or President Trump that

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the US trade deficit contracted. It went to seventy three

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.559
<v Speaker 1>point three billion in June from seventy seven point six

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>billion in May. That story just came out earlier this week.

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Everything about tariffs is about trade deficits, that somehow trade

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>deficits are the end of civilization.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe that they are.

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's a bad reason to implement tariffs as

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a concept.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Does this trade deficit going down not?

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Does that have an effect on people, on how people

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>see the market, manufacturing, futures, et cetera.

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 3>No, when you say people, if you're talking about Wall

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Street and financial experts, no, because actually what you saw

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 3>was a blip. The trade deficits has been growing since

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 3>tariff institution has been stabilized, and this is exactly what

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I consider a good thing. Again, I'm a fan of

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 3>trade deficits. I'm not against them because to cause foreign

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 3>direct investment, we buy lots of cheap crap from overseas,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 3>and those dollars that we spend flow back into the

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 3>United States in the form of investing in our country,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 3>which is how you grow your economy. So I've got

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 3>lots of research on this. I'm a fan of these

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 3>trade deficits, so I don't think he made a comment

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 3>about it because it was just a blip. And if

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 3>he here's the big deal if he were to bring

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 3>up the topic, Tony, the secret between you and me.

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 3>If he were to bring that topic up, then everyone

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 3>would start talking about Wait, the trade deficits have been

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 3>growing significantly since you put the terrorists in place, So

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 3>I think he wants to avoid that topic altogether.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Talking to doctor Matt Will, economists at the University of Indianapolis,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue the conversation if we would, if we can,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>because I have mentioned that there have been a couple

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of FED governors before this report came out today and

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the market is making their bet. A couple of FED

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>governors have said it's time for a rate increase. The

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation is not down, we need a rate hike. Are

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are they correct? Does this report change them at all?

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 3>It changes them? They're correct that inflation isn't gone, but

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>their solution is wrong, and this report gives wash some

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 3>time to adjust. And this is where it gets that

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 3>complex assets thing again. They had a legitimate point, do

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>you want to camp down inflation and one of the

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>tools you do it is to increase rates. Well, when

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 3>you increase rates, that's going to decrease investment because money

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>costs more. So that's a you know, one of the

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 3>things Trump always argues against. But there's another way to

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 3>control inflation, and that's what Warsh is trying to do.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 3>He's slowly moving the ship. He Slowly's got this commission going.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 3>It's going to look at selling assets off the balance sheet.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 3>Good for him. So he's working on that, and this

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 3>report gives him cover. It gives him more time to

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>let his political technique, his little commission do its job,

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>because he's going to be able to say to these

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 3>three governors, Okay, hold on, can't you see look, unemployment flat,

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 3>no reason to increase rates. Everything's wonderful right now, people

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>go back into your corner. So I think this buys

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>him time to not worry about the whole rate situation

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 3>while he gets his ducks in line to do a

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 3>huge asset sale. And I think he's going to pull

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>it off. I'm confident, I'm patient, and I think he's

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 3>going to succeed.

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to see it happen, like I want to

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>see how that plays out. But there were some other

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>things that happen I want people to be aware of

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the market, and you've been making mention of this.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We've talked often about layoffs, right, a lot of layoffs

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in tech Wallstreet Journal, discussing the fact that the new

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>data shows the job cuts are down forty one percent

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so far this year, which would make one believe that, Okay,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we've done enough cutting. Let's actually see if our AI

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>investments increased productivity. Maybe we just really need these people.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>There's only so much you can cut. We saw a

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>business to run products to sell, et cetera. But within

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the recognition that software is getting.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 2>The living, not kicked out of it.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>That when we talk all about the technology and AI

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>transforming the economy and all that jazz software, I don't

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>know if they mean software as a service or software

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in general is getting slapped around.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 2>What is happening in that in that sector?

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I like what you said. You said productivity, and

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 3>we've seen, in fact, today's report had a two percent

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>increase in productivity. So that is a side benefit at

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 3>a consequence the main benefit of AI. So what's happening

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And you're right, it's SaaS as a service, software as

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 3>a service, I should say. And what's happening is companies

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 3>like work Day and Salesforce and Adobe, and we talked

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 3>about the other day, IBM while sixty nine billion dollars

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 3>in value in one single day because there's software got killed.

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So what's happening is AI is replacing software. I'll give

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 3>you my own personal example. I've got to put together

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 3>this schedule of classes for students. It takes forever to

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 3>go through all the gyrations and the formulas, and I

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 3>now have an AI that can do it in minutes

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 3>compared todays. There's software on the market that does that. Well,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 3>the people that sell that software, they're not selling the software.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>I can just turn on my AI, tell it what

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I want, and it gives me the same output. That

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>is what's happening to companies like Workday and Salesforce and

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Adobe and IBM. They're getting beaten down because people can

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>go on their computer on their phone and get the

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 3>same output quality that they were getting from a piece

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>of software that costs them a fortune just two years ago.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>How does this play into overall tech sector? Are there

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>companies that care about their software products or are they

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to sacrifice at all to the U on the

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>altar of AI, because that's the only thing that matters.

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I don't like this phrase, but I

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 3>have to use it. It's a massive paradigm shift.

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>What phrase. You're right about that?

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>You know again, I don't like using that phrase, but

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>that's what's happening. It's what companies are doing. Is it's

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>literally shoepayers creative destruction that you and I have talked

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>about before. This whole software industry is being upended. It's

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 3>not going to disappear, it's going to reformulate. So people

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 3>companies that are willing to say, Okay, we're going to

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>look at this differently. So instead of hiring IBM to

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>write some software, I'm going to hire a bunch of

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 3>AI experts and they're going to develop prompts and custom

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 3>gems and custom GPPs, and they're going to create these

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 3>AI environment so that any one of my lower level

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 3>employees can do the same thing that that software was

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>doing before at a cheaper price. So they're really transforming

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>their businesses away from reliance on software which is static.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 3>You've got to buy updates. You know, it has bugs. Yeah,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 3>AI is not perfect, but it can do the job

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 3>much easier, quicker, and with less overhead. So companies are

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>just transforming, they still have to do the same thing, Tony.

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 3>You still got to edit your audio and your videos,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 3>and you've got to get them published on your various platforms. Well,

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 3>now the AI is going to alleviate your need to

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 3>buy a bunch of software to do.

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>That, Doctor Matt Will, economists at the University of Indianapolis.

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you taking the time to be with us

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>more to get to this is Tony Katz today.