Speaker 1: Line from ball hertbind and the.
Speaker 2: Crossroads of America. It's Tony Katz today.
Speaker 3: Yes, So today the President signed these two executive orders
Speaker 3: here relating to birthright citizenship and birth tourism. As the
Speaker 3: President mentioned, the Fourteenth Amendment was passed exclusively in the aftermath.
Speaker 1: Of the Civil War, so to ensure that the children
Speaker 1: of slaves of these citizens.
Speaker 3: It had no other meaning and purpose out side of it.
Speaker 3: And that's been clear obviously since the day that it
Speaker 3: was passed. You can go back and you can read
Speaker 3: the congressional debate. This is not something that's even seriously
Speaker 3: contested by anybody.
Speaker 1: The President is.
Speaker 3: Using his authority as commander in chief, designed first and
Speaker 3: executive order using the new ruling the Supreme Court issued
Speaker 3: to expand the definitions of people who are ineligible for
Speaker 3: birthright citizenship. That includes, for example, alien enemies of the
Speaker 3: United States, members of foreign parist organizations, and large categories
Speaker 3: of people who lobby and act of behalf.
Speaker 4: Of foreign governments.
Speaker 3: And so with taking this action, it ensures that large
Speaker 3: numbers of people who wrongly would be getting birthright citizenship
Speaker 3: will no longer be eligible for those benefits.
Speaker 5: Anybody upset with this doesn't understand what the Supreme Court said,
Speaker 5: certainly doesn't understand what Kavanaugh said in part of his descent.
Speaker 5: If you're upset with the President moving forward on executive orders,
Speaker 5: if you're upset with Senator Jim Banks moving forward with legislation,
Speaker 5: you don't understand what was said. What you believe is
Speaker 5: that we should accept any abuse of the nation that comes,
Speaker 5: and that the.
Speaker 1: Constitution is a suicide pact. It is not, and we
Speaker 1: should act accordingly.
Speaker 5: Tony Katz Tony Katz today, guys, so good to be
Speaker 5: with you.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being here.
Speaker 5: Find everything at Tony Katz dot com, livestream on YouTube
Speaker 5: and rumble. Look for Tony Katz on Twitter, which is
Speaker 5: also known as x Tony Katz Facebook, Tony Katz Radio.
Speaker 5: Two different conversations here on birthright citizenship from the President
Speaker 5: to different executive orders. And we can agree that someone
Speaker 5: this is you me sitting on a bar stool. People
Speaker 5: plan having their baby in the United States when they live.
Speaker 1: In another country.
Speaker 5: And I've always lived in another country, so they could
Speaker 5: take advantage of American citizenship. That's messed up. That's not
Speaker 5: its purpose, and we should do something about that. What
Speaker 5: the Supreme Court said in their decision on birthright citizenship
Speaker 5: is that, yeah, you should do something about that, which
Speaker 5: is really what the Brett Kavanaugh descent was all about.
Speaker 6: But the.
Speaker 5: Argument was that the Constitution says born in the United
Speaker 5: States and subjects to the jurisdiction. And what the Court
Speaker 5: said is born in the United States, is born in
Speaker 5: the United States and subjects to the jurisdiction thereof, they
Speaker 5: didn't really touch.
Speaker 1: I found that to be a questionable stance. But what they.
Speaker 5: Opened the door for is the thing that we should
Speaker 5: at least approve of.
Speaker 1: And this is the hallmark of the John Roberts Court.
Speaker 5: I didn't say it isn't frustrating, and I'm also not
Speaker 5: saying that it's totally proper. When it came to Obamacare
Speaker 5: and allowing Obamacare to exist, what they said was it
Speaker 5: could exist as attacks. Now that was not for the
Speaker 5: role of the Court to decide. If these wanted to
Speaker 5: be a tax, they could go about passing attacks. They
Speaker 5: could do such a thing. But what they did was
Speaker 5: say specifically, this is not a tax. And when the
Speaker 5: Court said it could exist as a tax, they said, okay.
Speaker 1: It's a tax. The Court found a way for it
Speaker 1: to exist. And that is where a lot of us,
Speaker 1: going back a great.
Speaker 5: Number of years, have a tremendous amount of disagreement with
Speaker 5: the Supreme Court on Obamacare.
Speaker 1: I have a disagreement with this constantly.
Speaker 5: For example, the Obergafel decision, which is about same sex marriage. Oh,
Speaker 5: this one gets me in trouble all the time because
Speaker 5: some people don't want to listen if we want to
Speaker 5: pass laws that allow for same sex marriage, pass laws
Speaker 5: same sex marriage. If you remember going back to when
Speaker 5: this was happening, was already winning in the States, it
Speaker 5: was sweeping.
Speaker 1: There was no real issue about it none.
Speaker 5: But what the Obergafel decision said is that the right
Speaker 5: to same sex marriage exists, which it does not. They
Speaker 5: created it out of hole clock. This is my argument
Speaker 5: against the decision. It's that it's unfounded in the Constitution,
Speaker 5: and you could have just passed laws about it and
Speaker 5: we would not have this issue today. My argument is
Speaker 5: totally one based on system. Why did I oppose Roe v.
Speaker 5: Wade Because what happened to states' rights? What happened to
Speaker 5: the very idea that states can make this decision? Different
Speaker 5: states could do different things. They were the DA Dobbs decision,
Speaker 5: which then led to the overturning of Roe v.
Speaker 1: Wade, didn't end.
Speaker 5: At all, did not end in any way abortion in
Speaker 5: the United States.
Speaker 1: There's still plenty of states that allow it. But it
Speaker 1: was the overreach by the.
Speaker 5: Supreme Court back in seventy two, seventy three, seventy two,
Speaker 5: seventy three. It was their overreach. And you know who
Speaker 5: agreed with me, the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg. I believe
Speaker 5: there are moments where the court is overreached. Has she said,
Speaker 5: definitely went overreaching, that decision went too far, went to extreme.
Speaker 1: But in these other cases you're talking about inventing something.
Speaker 5: In the case of birthright citizenship, they certainly did not
Speaker 5: decide to take a deep, detailed look into and subject
Speaker 5: to the jurisdiction thereof when we talked about the fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 5: But what they left was the door open to this
Speaker 5: concept of if you Congress, this is your job. After all,
Speaker 5: you know, it's Donald Sutherland an animal house.
Speaker 1: I'm serious, this is my job. People, if you want
Speaker 1: to go about creating laws, you can.
Speaker 5: This brings us to Senator Jim Banks, who did exactly this,
Speaker 5: introducing the Citizenship Act. Of twenty twenty six to end
Speaker 5: birthright citizenship for children of undocked immigrants and birth tourists.
Speaker 1: Now, they all want to talk.
Speaker 5: About what's the difference between a tourist and a birth tourist,
Speaker 5: and we'll get to that in a moment. But what
Speaker 5: we're saying here is is that citizenship is not for everybody,
Speaker 5: and we must pare it down, and we can do
Speaker 5: this via the legislative process. The Court challenged Congress to
Speaker 5: do this, and Senator Jim Banks took up that.
Speaker 1: Fight.
Speaker 5: This is Stephen Miller and standing next to President Trump
Speaker 5: in the Oval, explaining these two executive orders on birthright
Speaker 5: citizenship that he assigned.
Speaker 3: The second action that he's taking, which is especially historic,
Speaker 3: is for the first time ever in American history, to
Speaker 3: ban birth tourism. So I want you to really let
Speaker 3: that sink in. This has been some of the people
Speaker 3: have talked about, not only for years, but for decades,
Speaker 3: the idea that people come here pretend to be a tourist,
Speaker 3: pretend to be a visitor, saying they want to go
Speaker 3: to Disneyland, they want to go visit a monument or
Speaker 3: go to a national park. But the real reason they're
Speaker 3: here is to have a child, to make that child
Speaker 3: with an automatic citizen leave our country.
Speaker 4: And then have a US citizen child.
Speaker 1: It gives them.
Speaker 3: Access out of this broken system to welfare benefits, ultimately.
Speaker 4: To the voting booth, and all the other.
Speaker 1: Rights and privileges that belong solely to Americans.
Speaker 3: So that practice of birth tourism is as of the
Speaker 3: signing of this order hereby band.
Speaker 1: And what that means is.
Speaker 4: That no one in the world is any.
Speaker 3: More allowed to obtain a visa for this fraudulent purpose.
Speaker 3: It is probably and President Trump has done many historic
Speaker 3: things on immigration, too many to listen now. Seal the
Speaker 3: southern border, shut record deportations, record integrity, stopping foreign terrorist entry,
Speaker 3: record reduction in drug seizures, dismantling the criminal cartels, dismantling
Speaker 3: the gangs. For everything he's done that has been so unprecedented,
Speaker 3: I would put this in the top three in terms
Speaker 3: of importance because it ends what has been one of
Speaker 3: the gravest and most egregious abuse that of the American system,
Speaker 3: and it keeps the American citizenship sacred.
Speaker 5: Now, I happen to agree with Steven Miller on that point,
Speaker 5: but I want to address the people who are offended.
Speaker 1: And appalled by what it is that they're seeing.
Speaker 5: First, as I made clear, the Supreme Court said, intimated,
Speaker 5: if you want to go about changing the law, go
Speaker 5: right ahead.
Speaker 1: That's up to you. Go do it. You have that power.
Speaker 1: This was the.
Speaker 5: Argument on the Obamacare case. If you want to get
Speaker 5: rid of this tax, go change the law. It doesn't
Speaker 5: matter what we said. You're allowed to change the law.
Speaker 5: Your Congress, go to it. You gave us a piece
Speaker 5: of legislation to look at. And so what is the
Speaker 5: constitutionality here? We said, as a tax, it's constitutional?
Speaker 1: When there it is. The argument against.
Speaker 5: The argument to say it's wrong to end birth tourism
Speaker 5: is to say it is all right to manipulate the
Speaker 5: American system, to manipulate the US constitution, and to have
Speaker 5: children who will never live in the United States, never
Speaker 5: be United States citizens, and will never have a loyalty
Speaker 5: to the United States. It is okay to have them
Speaker 5: growing up and name the country and then have them
Speaker 5: go through that laundry list that Stephen Miller just listed out, voting.
Speaker 1: Being a key amongst them.
Speaker 5: If you are in favor or you are accepting of
Speaker 5: the idea of children being born here, living in another
Speaker 5: country for eighteen years, and then voting in our elections.
Speaker 5: I would say, you're somebody who wants to do away
Speaker 5: with Western civilization and wants to end America. And the
Speaker 5: answer is no. Now I see someone on the chat
Speaker 5: room saying there's no birth tourism. Listen, we can't lie.
Speaker 5: If you don't think that there is any birth tourism
Speaker 5: that takes place in the United States from China, you
Speaker 5: are flat out lying to everyone, including yourself. I want
Speaker 5: to be clear. It is a lie told by liars.
Speaker 5: Of course it happens. This has been a story in
Speaker 5: California whole, all neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: Where they have this happen. This is the.
Speaker 5: Associated Press going back to twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: You know how hard this was to find. This wasn't
Speaker 1: very hard to find.
Speaker 5: California pay convicted in Chinese birth tourism scheme. To say
Speaker 5: it isn't happening is a lie told by liars, and
Speaker 5: you have to call them liars, liars, frauds, bs artists.
Speaker 5: I don't care. And you have to do it. If
Speaker 5: they're family and you have to do it with their friends.
Speaker 5: You have to do it on social media, or honestly,
Speaker 5: you could just delete them because they're tools, and you
Speaker 5: have to do it. If you're somebody who's fortunate enough
Speaker 5: like me to be on air and fortunate enough to
Speaker 5: be able to show up in some of these cable
Speaker 5: news outlets and engage in pushing back against these fraudsters,
Speaker 5: that's the story, and you must.
Speaker 1: Push back on these things.
Speaker 5: It is clear and it is obvious that allowing for
Speaker 5: this creates the problem, the opportunity for the problem. How
Speaker 5: many times do we talk about voter fraud. You'd rarely
Speaker 5: see somebody showing up to the voting booth claiming to
Speaker 5: be somebody else, But you see ballad stuffing. This is
Speaker 5: what the problems with with mail in ballots. You see
Speaker 5: ballot harvesting, you see lots of issues. You see people
Speaker 5: go to jail for this thing. And what the does
Speaker 5: the left do? The left says, this doesn't happen, and
Speaker 5: we don't need voter ID and we don't they want
Speaker 5: to create.
Speaker 1: The opportunity for fraud.
Speaker 5: By allowing these things to occur, you are allowing for
Speaker 5: the opportunity for fraud. Why would anybody allow for the
Speaker 5: opportunity for fraud? Why in the world would you do it?
Speaker 5: The last questions as silly, is well, how many times
Speaker 5: has it happened? Once is enough?
Speaker 1: You wouldn't allow this to happen in any other part
Speaker 1: of your life, not once.
Speaker 5: Not Ever, you wouldn't allow the opportunity for something like
Speaker 5: this in any part of your life at all. Yet somehow,
Speaker 5: when it comes to voting, yes it's fun. When it
Speaker 5: comes to the safety and security of the nation, yes
Speaker 5: it's fine. I did not know that something this basic
Speaker 5: would be part of the culture war. But okay, it's
Speaker 5: a culture war.
Speaker 1: I'm in. I'm in. We win, you lose. That's the story.
Speaker 1: That's the way it has to be. This is the
Speaker 1: right to move and the right maneuver.
Speaker 5: And anybody who actually cared about the country or favored
Speaker 5: the country.
Speaker 1: Would be completely in agreement.
Speaker 5: Anybody who favors the destruction of the country, who favors
Speaker 5: the manipulation of elections, who doesn't care how many false
Speaker 5: or fraudulent votes come through, They'll be fine with whatever happens,
Speaker 5: because destruction of the nation is the name of the game.
Speaker 5: These are bad people. These aren't even American people. As
Speaker 5: far as I'm concerned. I didn't say you had to
Speaker 5: like a political party, you had to think a certain way.
Speaker 5: We're having a very baseline conversation here. What do you
Speaker 5: do to protect the vote? And what do you do
Speaker 5: to say a citizen as a citizen someone born in
Speaker 5: the US who lives their life in another country under
Speaker 5: that's country's practices, and then as the ability to vote
Speaker 5: in our elections, that's not a citizen. The court said
Speaker 5: they can be considered a citizen. I say we can
Speaker 5: change this. Senator Jim Banks says we can change this.
Speaker 5: And I argue that the people who don't want to
Speaker 5: change this are the people who want to do harm
Speaker 5: to the United States or open up the opportunity and
Speaker 5: the capacity for harm to be done to the United States.
Speaker 5: I think we should stop them. I think we should
Speaker 5: cut them off at the pass. So let's let's get
Speaker 5: this legislation through. I don't know these executive orders will hold,
Speaker 5: by the way, I don't know if some signing by
Speaker 5: the President makes this happen. But this is the direction
Speaker 5: to go into. This is the direction. I'm Tony Katz.
Speaker 5: This is Tony kats today. So here's the update regarding
Speaker 5: around Nothing's new. There's absolutely nothing new Iran thinks they're
Speaker 5: in charge. We think there are a.
Speaker 1: Bunch of low lifes.
Speaker 5: And that's that's it. That is it. That's the Iran update.
Speaker 5: Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, what's going on?
Speaker 1: Everybody? Good to be with you.
Speaker 5: Oh and breaking in the last hour or so, Senator
Speaker 5: Bill Cassidy, who has no love for President Trump, is
Speaker 5: going to back Todd Blanche as Attorney General.
Speaker 1: And vote in his favor. This is going to happen.
Speaker 1: This is going to happen. I don't know.
Speaker 5: Where else we are so so far, you have Collins
Speaker 5: opposing Blanche and now Lisa Murkowski. I was going to
Speaker 5: say something very rude, and I decided, because I'm a professional,
Speaker 5: I won't do that. But if you see me walking
Speaker 5: down the street, ask me and I'll tell you. So
Speaker 5: Murkowski opposes Cassidy is in favor. The question becomes about
Speaker 5: Mitch McConnell. Allegedly Mitch McConnell's now home and recovering, and people.
Speaker 1: Said, oh, I talked to Mitch McConnell.
Speaker 5: He's doing great. This whole thing is so weird. The
Speaker 5: Mitch McConnell thing is weird. The Max Miller thing is
Speaker 5: weird because Max Miller is the guy accused of putting
Speaker 5: a gun at his ex wife's head and his ex
Speaker 5: father in law is the senator from Ohio, Bernie Moreno,
Speaker 5: it's a really, really weird story.
Speaker 1: But he did not drop.
Speaker 5: Out of this race in a time where Republicans could
Speaker 5: easily replace him.
Speaker 1: So now there's a whole thing they are going on
Speaker 1: with the House.
Speaker 5: He is not going quietly into that good night, and
Speaker 5: he's not presenting himself well either. But with McConnell, is
Speaker 5: McConnell going to vote on Todd Blanche? Is he someone
Speaker 5: considered because if you lost two in a fifty three
Speaker 5: forty seven Senate, now you're fifty to fifty, well you're
Speaker 5: fifty forty seven, but you get my point, while you're
Speaker 5: fifty forty nine in this case, No wait, no, I
Speaker 5: take that back. You'd be three down because McConnell, you're
Speaker 5: fifty to fifty. I did the math right, and now
Speaker 5: you need the tie break. You can't afford to lose
Speaker 5: anybody else. There's really no reason, none, for anybody to
Speaker 5: be opposed to Blanche. You cannot you cannot state that
Speaker 5: Merrick Garland was okay, But Todd Blanches. You can't do it.
Speaker 1: By the way, Jeffrey in the chat room, you're right,
Speaker 1: it would be.
Speaker 5: Fifty forty nine because if if McConnell's not there, he's
Speaker 5: a no vote, but he's not. He's a non vote,
Speaker 5: but he's not a no vote. There we go, it
Speaker 5: would be fifty forty nine. He still can't afford to
Speaker 5: lose anybody else. That was my point.
Speaker 1: Man. That took a lot. I need a drink. I
Speaker 1: do maybe two.
Speaker 5: This is Tony Katz today. I don't enjoy talking about
Speaker 5: Zoron Mumdani. The communist Islamists, I say Islamists. Some people
Speaker 5: are now into islamo Marxist. It's just too many, too
Speaker 5: many things. One thing, picket is Lamists are communists. They're
Speaker 5: working together.
Speaker 1: This Red Green alliance is very very real, and when.
Speaker 5: They destroy Western civilization, they will fight each other and
Speaker 5: the Commedis are gonna lose.
Speaker 1: We all understand this, right. The communists are gonna get
Speaker 1: their asses kicked. They're gonna lose so bad.
Speaker 5: They are gonna lose like Purdue against Indiana in an
Speaker 5: oaken bucket game.
Speaker 1: Now, for those of.
Speaker 5: You who are not from here, let me say, for
Speaker 5: the record, this is a dig on the new athletic
Speaker 5: director Tommy McClelland, who made one of the great blunders
Speaker 5: I've ever heard, and I have argued publicly that firing
Speaker 5: him is on the table. Tony Katz, Tony Kats today.
Speaker 5: Good to be with you. I will get to that.
Speaker 5: Ed Morrissey joins me right now from hot air dot com.
Speaker 5: He appreciated my big ten humor. I bring up Mom Donnie,
Speaker 5: and I don't you like to talk about New York
Speaker 5: because it gets too much play. But what's important here
Speaker 5: is that how this is trying to spread across the
Speaker 5: country an election after election.
Speaker 1: But it was a really interesting story in Staten Island.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 5: Stotton Island is one of the boroughs of New York
Speaker 5: where Mom Donnie is mayor, and it is has always
Speaker 5: been a conservative, if not Republican stronghold. These are very
Speaker 5: pro America people and they don't see themselves as the
Speaker 5: rest of New York and if they could break away,
Speaker 5: they would. They had an event for a local police department.
Speaker 5: It was a turnout with the neighbors kind of event,
Speaker 5: and Mamdani showed up and after sixty seconds of speaking
Speaker 5: gets booed off the stage, gets booed off the stage. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and it's embarrassing, it's humiliating for him. And then comes
Speaker 5: the story that Mam Donnie, it turns out, has a very.
Speaker 1: Very very thin bit of skin.
Speaker 5: And this was the story front page of the New
Speaker 5: York Post. Mam Donnie is thin skinned and hyper sensitive
Speaker 5: in private, in private, despite unflappable social media image.
Speaker 1: And my argument, ed, is that's where all these communists.
Speaker 5: Are, That's just all these Islamis are, because none of
Speaker 5: them can actually handle an actual discussion of what it
Speaker 5: is they believe.
Speaker 1: Is there a tide.
Speaker 5: Turning based on what you can see regarding Mom Donnie
Speaker 5: in New York and.
Speaker 1: Is that now flowing through to the rest of the nation.
Speaker 4: I'm not sure about New York City.
Speaker 7: I'm honestly not sure about whether there's a tide turning
Speaker 7: in New York City or not.
Speaker 4: Think it's too early to tell.
Speaker 7: But I mean, we haven't had side elections or by
Speaker 7: elections or anything else like that. And frankly, New York
Speaker 7: has been turning kind of a radical for a while now.
Speaker 7: They just nominated you know, Daria Lisis Chevalier and a
Speaker 7: couple other DSA people, you know, outright DSA people for
Speaker 7: the US House, and they're going to win those districts,
Speaker 7: so they'll be sitting in Congress next January unless there's
Speaker 7: something really remarkable that goes on in those heavily Democratic districts.
Speaker 4: That's baked into the cake. So I'm not necessarily sure
Speaker 4: about in New York City.
Speaker 7: I do think though, that we might have seen peak
Speaker 7: DSA around the country. I would point to what's happening
Speaker 7: in Michigan, what happened in Michigan this week, which was
Speaker 7: that abdulah Sayed was supposedly had all this momentum behind him.
Speaker 7: You had five different polsters that had him up by
Speaker 7: double digits in a Democrat primary within two and three
Speaker 7: weeks of the actual primary vote, and he barely won
Speaker 7: the nomination, didn't get to fifty percent, barely won against
Speaker 7: Tiley Stephens.
Speaker 4: Haley Stevens ends up winning Wayne County, which.
Speaker 7: Is Detroit, which is remarkable that she won that county
Speaker 7: and still didn't win the nomination. And that just goes
Speaker 7: to show you that this is really a phenomenon that's
Speaker 7: really around college towns.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 7: And I've been arguing this all along, which is that
Speaker 7: this is only going to work in really concentrate blue bubbles.
Speaker 7: Right when you get statewide in a state like Michigan,
Speaker 7: or if you want to go over to nearby Wisconsin
Speaker 7: where Francesca hang is running for the Democrat nomination for governor,
Speaker 7: that's next week.
Speaker 4: Once you go, once you go statewide, that dissipates.
Speaker 7: And I think that because all of this stuff is
Speaker 7: getting exposed about the DSA's actual agenda, I mean, they're
Speaker 7: explicit agenda. You can look at their explicit agenda and
Speaker 7: see that what they're talking about is eliminating the Senate,
Speaker 7: eliminating the presidency as we know it now, basically throwing
Speaker 7: out the Constitution, going to a House of Representatives that
Speaker 7: acts more like a ball up bureau, and imposing a
Speaker 7: no private property type of system on America, probably by force,
Speaker 7: because that's the way it it would have to proceed.
Speaker 7: I think people understand now that these people are actual nuts,
Speaker 7: they're radicals.
Speaker 1: And right now you're.
Speaker 7: Seeing the media talk about this as a you know,
Speaker 7: Republicans are doing a red scare. This isn't a red scare.
Speaker 7: This is code red, by the way, and this is real.
Speaker 5: Let a quick thing to go over here, because this
Speaker 5: just popped up on my feed as a graphic.
Speaker 1: It looks a little pornographic.
Speaker 5: It's not meant to and I'm not trying to be
Speaker 5: pornographic with this graphic. There is a red line at
Speaker 5: the top and a blue line at the bottom, and
Speaker 5: the red line is.
Speaker 1: L Sayed and the blue line is Haley Stevens.
Speaker 5: This was the polling in Michigan, and then it got closed,
Speaker 5: and then it spread a little bit more, and then
Speaker 5: on election day it's el Sayed the Islamist or the
Speaker 5: Islamist adjacent by one percent.
Speaker 1: So to your point, this.
Speaker 5: Did not work out the way any of the pollsters
Speaker 5: said it would, and that we should really discuss what
Speaker 5: it is that we're getting in terms of the polling.
Speaker 5: And we have discussed here what a huge problem this
Speaker 5: creates for else. I had for the Democrats to win
Speaker 5: against Mike Rogers, because Democrats the forty seven percent plus
Speaker 5: who voted for Haley Stevens, who is no peach by
Speaker 5: the way, the.
Speaker 1: Representative.
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't know how you vote for somebody
Speaker 5: who gives you such incredible gems like this one.
Speaker 3: A little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy
Speaker 3: and a little bit of sicket to them.
Speaker 1: I don't I don't know. I don't know how you
Speaker 1: do that.
Speaker 5: I also don't know how you vote for a guy
Speaker 5: supported by Hassan Piker. I edited this pretty well. Their
Speaker 5: producer Landa but finger on the dumb button. The RNC
Speaker 5: put this out about him talking about black voters.
Speaker 1: Would black people care about?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 1: Black people care about this? Is black people care about that?
Speaker 6: Like?
Speaker 1: Shut the fuck up. That's not how politics works.
Speaker 8: Oh well, Hassan, how dare you like it or not
Speaker 8: black people care about this issue?
Speaker 1: It's like it's such a stupid stance.
Speaker 8: Any other black folk want to engage in radical activist
Speaker 8: language in.
Speaker 1: This freaking chat suck? Yes, dude, it's because I'm racist.
Speaker 1: That's why. It's because I'm racist.
Speaker 5: Dude.
Speaker 8: Go back to a better time when lynchings were happening.
Speaker 8: This is what I like as a black man. Are
Speaker 8: you always doing too much with black people? Leave them alone.
Speaker 8: I want to go back to lynching, like, I get it.
Speaker 8: Will relax, man, Shut the f up.
Speaker 1: Okay, damn, you got me. Okay, you got me. Because
Speaker 1: I'm a racist person, now.
Speaker 4: You know, why he lost Detroit.
Speaker 1: There is a real story here.
Speaker 5: Talking to edmarscyat hotair dot com, as we talk about
Speaker 5: whether or not this works in certain blue bubbles, we
Speaker 5: already have LSI ed having a problem with the Stephens voters,
Speaker 5: because the Stephens voter can either hold their nose and
Speaker 5: vote for him, hold their nose and vote for Mike Rogers,
Speaker 5: or hold their nose at home and not go out
Speaker 5: and vote.
Speaker 1: But when you.
Speaker 5: Talk about people outside of these blue bubbles, you're talking
Speaker 5: about black voters, and black voters, I agree, are not
Speaker 5: a monolithic block, but they absolutely understand that their wants, desires, thoughts,
Speaker 5: their importance has been pushed aside because the Democratic Party
Speaker 5: now the Socialist Party has said communists and Muslims are
Speaker 5: the only things that matter in the voting base. We're
Speaker 5: going to even hide things on our campaign websites so
Speaker 5: it doesn't upset them like our thoughts on LGBTQ, et cetera.
Speaker 5: There is a large scale problem, and I'm asking you
Speaker 5: to kind of break it down a little bit more
Speaker 5: about how this problem is going to affect coming into November.
Speaker 4: So let me explain this to you in a structural way.
Speaker 7: The Democrat Party has long butught into the idea of
Speaker 7: intersectionality as a way of redistributing the political goods between
Speaker 7: the different grievance groups, if you will, in a woke structure, right,
Speaker 7: because Democrats are all about identity, right, So there's the
Speaker 7: black identity, there's female identity, there's you know, Jewish identity,
Speaker 7: there's you know, et cetera. And there's an intersectionality structure
Speaker 7: that goes with this. And this is important in Texas.
Speaker 7: Can I interrupt you really quick?
Speaker 5: Yeah, the Democrats have given up on the idea of
Speaker 5: Jewish identity. They want no Jewish identity whatsoever.
Speaker 7: Well, no, I mean, but what I was going to
Speaker 7: say is they've ranked Jewish identity at the very bottom
Speaker 7: of this intersectionality structure, right, and for a very long time,
Speaker 7: being black was at the top of this intersectionality structure.
Speaker 4: The whole thing was called was based on critical.
Speaker 7: Race theory, which was, you know that America is very racist,
Speaker 7: and so therefore you you know, and your ethnicity is
Speaker 7: completely determinist in terms of what your outcomes aren't access
Speaker 7: to social goods, and so therefore it must be redistributed
Speaker 7: based on where you rank each group, So you had
Speaker 7: blacks above Hispanics, for instance, which is one of the
Speaker 7: reasons why Hispanics started to leave the Democrat Party. Now
Speaker 7: you've got Democrats saying no, Socialists and Muslims are now
Speaker 7: at the top of this intersectionality structure and Blacks getting
Speaker 7: pushed down the structure. And in Texas, that's part of
Speaker 7: what happened. What's happening because Jasmine Crockett was both black
Speaker 7: and female, which in intersectionality terms should have made her
Speaker 7: top ranked in that primary, and James Tallerico, as a
Speaker 7: white male, shouldn't have even run against her. And this
Speaker 7: is the reason why Jane the Jasmine Crockett has been
Speaker 7: saying ever since that the Democrats primary was racist because
Speaker 7: it violated this intersectionality structure that black voters thought was
Speaker 7: in place to advance their interests. And what you're saying
Speaker 7: is part of this, which is that the intersectionality structure
Speaker 7: has been completely rewritten now by the DSA and people
Speaker 7: like Hassan Piker and Islamists to say no, right now,
Speaker 7: Palestine and communism and socialism are now the top part
Speaker 7: of the highest priority in this intersectionality structure, and blacks
Speaker 7: just need to shut up and get in line, and
Speaker 7: that is not That didn't go over will in the
Speaker 7: Michigan primary.
Speaker 4: It's not going to go over well in Texas either.
Speaker 5: Talking to Edmarssey of hotair dot com, listen, I don't
Speaker 5: know your schedule.
Speaker 1: Can you hang out for a few more minutes.
Speaker 5: Let me take a break because we should come back
Speaker 5: to where this actually goes to, which is how do
Speaker 5: Republicans take advantage of this?
Speaker 1: Not how do they take advantage of black voters.
Speaker 5: I think a tremendous number of black voters should be Republicans.
Speaker 5: Anyway they can make great changes in great strides. Republicans
Speaker 5: aren't bright, and they don't know how to act and interact.
Speaker 1: They don't know how to speak, and.
Speaker 5: You can't think of a group as a monolithic block,
Speaker 5: but you can recognize what you're discussing. How do they
Speaker 5: go about getting these voters in this mid term? Stay
Speaker 5: right there, Ed Morrissey, hotair dot Com, Stay right here, guys.
Speaker 1: This is Tony Katz today.
Speaker 5: Continue the conversation with Ed Morrissey regarding how Republicans can
Speaker 5: actually get black vote because part of the problem with
Speaker 5: Republicans is that they are not bright and they are
Speaker 5: afraid and they don't know how to talk, and those
Speaker 5: are some of their finest qualities. Tony Katz, Tony Kats today,
Speaker 5: good to be with you atmarcihotair dot com, joins me.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you sticking around for another few minutes.
Speaker 5: If we are to agree, as I've discussed it and
Speaker 5: now you're discussing it, that the left has abandoned the
Speaker 5: black voter as a necessary talking point, that what matters
Speaker 5: is hatred of Israel, pretending Palestine's a real place. These
Speaker 5: kinds of attacks the communist desire because capitalism is evil.
Speaker 5: Black voters clearly said in the Michigan election for the
Speaker 5: Democratic primary, No, So what is the advice to Republicans?
Speaker 5: Starting with Mike Rogers in Michigan, Republicans written large, how
Speaker 5: do they go about talking to voters Democrat voters who
Speaker 5: are black and saying, Hey, I may not be perfect,
Speaker 5: but my god, I think that you matter as an American.
Speaker 7: Well, the first thing would be to actually talk to them.
Speaker 7: I wrote about this ten years ago in my book
Speaker 7: Going Round. They don't show up, read they don't show up.
Speaker 7: They don't go to the neighborhoods. You know, I talked
Speaker 7: about this in the book extensively. I sat down with
Speaker 7: black conservatives in these different swing counties talking about what
Speaker 7: their experience was dealing with Republicans, and they said the
Speaker 7: same thing over and over again. Republicans will open up
Speaker 7: an office six weeks before an election and pack it
Speaker 7: up about four weeks afterwards. They don't stay in the communities.
Speaker 7: They don't keep going back and talking to people. They
Speaker 7: don't ask them what their issues are. They'd given the
Speaker 7: thirty thousand foot talking points. And the people that I
Speaker 7: talked to who were successful in making inroads in these
Speaker 7: communities were the people who actually sat down and listen
Speaker 7: first about what the actual issues were, what their concerns were,
Speaker 7: and trying to address them while not leaving their own
Speaker 7: values behind.
Speaker 4: And you have to start with respect. It starts with respect.
Speaker 7: So all you're doing is running advertising and not sitting
Speaker 7: down with people. You're not showing them enough respect for
Speaker 7: them to listen to you. And so your question is
Speaker 7: a great question. I've been talking about this for ten years,
Speaker 7: and Republicans have made some changes to try to do that.
Speaker 7: There's been some better GOTV efforts, for instance, and they
Speaker 7: have people who actually stick around in the communities a
Speaker 7: little longer, but for the most part, they still haven't
Speaker 7: learned to go and talk to these voters and show
Speaker 7: them respect. If they just showed up, you might be
Speaker 7: able to peel another five percent six percent just from
Speaker 7: the fact that you showed up and talked to them
Speaker 7: and made them feel like they mattered.
Speaker 5: And I will say this, I've discussed this on my
Speaker 5: morning show for years.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I've brought it here. Uh.
Speaker 5: If somebody invites me to speak at a black church,
Speaker 5: I'm going. I am there. You want me and Ed
Speaker 5: to come, I will pay for Ed's ticket. We will
Speaker 5: come and talk about these things and where we think
Speaker 5: conservatism is and why we think it matters, and and
Speaker 5: and and try and win hearts and minds to conversation.
Speaker 1: Invite I can't just show up, that's weird. Invite.
Speaker 5: I will bring Ed and I will wear a better
Speaker 5: shirt than he's wearing right now.
Speaker 1: And and you across.
Speaker 5: So all I A I p oh, yes, yes, yes,
Speaker 5: my shirt's fine. But this is it sounds so it
Speaker 5: sounds so basic. You got to actually talk to people.
Speaker 5: That is a huge part of it. Ed Morrissey, stay
Speaker 5: right there, hot air.
Speaker 1: Dot com and the book going Read.
Speaker 5: You can find that at Amazon dot com wherever fine
Speaker 5: books are sold, and appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Stay right there. More is coming up.
Speaker 5: This is Tony Katz today.
Speaker 2: Lie from Vall Heartbyer and the Crossroads of America. It's
Speaker 2: Tony Katz today.
Speaker 5: There's something about the political right in Mexican food that
Speaker 5: really my people, my people conservatives, well maybe it's republican
Speaker 5: Zamba conservative.
Speaker 1: They are not a function.
Speaker 5: Because it was about Trump and well this was the
Speaker 5: left naming it taco. Trump always chickens out, which is
Speaker 5: not true at all or in any way. So there
Speaker 5: was the taco thing, and now it's about the burrito.
Speaker 5: And I cannot describe to you how wrong everyone is.
Speaker 5: I should say many people are on the political right
Speaker 5: about this story.
Speaker 1: You're missing the point.
Speaker 5: You sound ridiculous, out of touch, lost, disconnected.
Speaker 1: If you want to lose elections.
Speaker 5: You keep talking the way you talk, or you can
Speaker 5: listen to me Tony Katz. Tony Katz Today, an absolute
Speaker 5: pleasure to be with you live streaming on YouTube and rumble.
Speaker 5: Just look for Tony Katz on Twitter also known as
Speaker 5: ex Tony Katz and Facebook Tony Katz Radio. It starts
Speaker 5: with a post from Matt Wallsh who I've disagreed with
Speaker 5: on things over there at Daily Wire, and he wrote
Speaker 5: that grocery prices are insane.
Speaker 1: They're still rising.
Speaker 5: Addressing this problem should be the number one priority of
Speaker 5: every elected leader, and the stupid foreign wars and focus
Speaker 5: on this issue. It's one of the main reasons socialists
Speaker 5: are gaining power. Well, he's wrong.
Speaker 1: One of the main.
Speaker 5: Reasons socialists are gaining power is because we gave up
Speaker 5: control and observation of education for forty years.
Speaker 1: Fifty years. I mean, let's speak clear about it.
Speaker 5: It's origins, Matt foreign wars and saying and stupid foreign
Speaker 5: wars is a talking point. Stopping the Iranian regime is smart,
Speaker 5: is conservative, is strong, is pro America, and is America first.
Speaker 1: No one who.
Speaker 5: Would allow RAND to remain as they were before was
Speaker 5: actually in any way ever America first. That includes Tucker
Speaker 5: Tucker Carlson, that includes Marjorie Taylor Green, that includes Thomas Massey.
Speaker 5: There is nothing that is America first about leaving a
Speaker 5: terrorist regime to do harm to the United States and
Speaker 5: United States interest just not real, but absolutely grocery prices
Speaker 5: are too high. Yes, egg prices are down and other
Speaker 5: things have come down. Beef prices are down, but they're
Speaker 5: still too high. And what we're really talking about when
Speaker 5: people utilize the term affordability is the idea that the
Speaker 5: basic has become costly.
Speaker 1: We should note these things. We've discussed it here.
Speaker 5: In the terms of going out to eat, there was
Speaker 5: a moment that that fast food quick serve and the
Speaker 5: prices have gotten so high that people had moved to
Speaker 5: places like Texas Roadhouse. If I'm going to go to
Speaker 5: a Chipotle, never mind the salmonila from the Halopanos, which
Speaker 5: they pulled the Holopanos, and I hope they come out
Speaker 5: of this, you know, I don't want them to get
Speaker 5: destroyed by this issue. But if I get the family
Speaker 5: of four, everyone gets a burrito, speaking of burritos, and
Speaker 5: they get a drink, and we get some extra trips.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, oh yeah, the little one wants to guacamole.
Speaker 5: That bill could be sixty dollars, right, well, one, I'm
Speaker 5: at sixty dollars. Can I be at seventy three dollars
Speaker 5: and get my an eight ounce steak, sit in a booth,
Speaker 5: get my refills where someone brings them to me.
Speaker 1: Oh, I get the rolls, and I.
Speaker 5: Get to feel like a person. When a family cannot
Speaker 5: go out to eat to the most basic of places,
Speaker 5: the Texas Roadhouse, the Applebee's, I'm not mocking these places.
Speaker 5: I'm discussing them as they are. People start asking themselves
Speaker 5: what are we working so hard for? The going out
Speaker 5: to eat, The going to one of these places and
Speaker 5: being served is the way to feel normal. It's the
Speaker 5: way to feel like my work is worth it. I
Speaker 5: can afford to provide for my family this little luxury.
Speaker 1: In this way, the missus didn't have to cook.
Speaker 5: Being stereotypical, everybody's out, it's a little relive.
Speaker 1: Will actually look.
Speaker 5: At each other? No, no, no, everybody off the phones. We're
Speaker 5: hanging out. Come on, you're in a restaurant. Don't be
Speaker 5: on your phone. Don't be see those people ridiculous. Don't
Speaker 5: do that. And it connects. That is good, and that
Speaker 5: is where a sense of normalcy comes from. When people
Speaker 5: can't afford to do that, or feel that they can't
Speaker 5: afford to do that, they ask themselves.
Speaker 1: What am I working this hard for?
Speaker 6: Is?
Speaker 1: What is this?
Speaker 5: You cannot cannot deny that you should not deny that,
Speaker 5: do not deny where people are, where they exist, and
Speaker 5: what it is that moves them. I would argue that
Speaker 5: there is a great amount of America that isn't looking
Speaker 5: for millions and billions. They're looking for happy, They're looking
Speaker 5: for you know what.
Speaker 1: This is good and I have zero issue with that.
Speaker 1: To respond to.
Speaker 5: Matt Walsh, comes Andrew Covid. Andrew was, of course the
Speaker 5: producer and the right hand of the late Charlie Kirk,
Speaker 5: and I believe he still.
Speaker 1: Runs that show.
Speaker 5: He's still doing that show. It's on the same time.
Speaker 5: I am so I never listened. I've never met Andrew.
Speaker 5: And Andrew posted. And what Andrew posted was this right here.
Speaker 5: He posted that one of our TPUSA college students, meaning
Speaker 5: Turning Point USA, gave me his.
Speaker 1: Take on affordability.
Speaker 5: Quote a burrito shouldn't cost twenty dollars, he continues, Yeah,
Speaker 5: a lot of this is a hangover from COVID and
Speaker 5: Biden error inflation, but the lived experience is the same.
Speaker 1: It just feels like basic things cost too much. That is.
Speaker 9: A very normal thing to say. That's very very true.
Speaker 5: The idea that a burrito may not cost twenty dollars
Speaker 5: is not the story. It's that the experience, the basics
Speaker 5: are just too high.
Speaker 1: It is it's the rent is too m high.
Speaker 5: It's that feeling. The responses to this have been ridiculous.
Speaker 5: One of those ridiculous responses was from Mark Theiesson, who
Speaker 5: does a lot of writing Fox Washington Post.
Speaker 1: I follow some of his work.
Speaker 5: I like the guy, but he made a mistake and
Speaker 5: he wrote crimea River. The burritos in the college cafeteria
Speaker 5: are included in your meal plan. Oh, we really don't
Speaker 5: want to win elections doing The political right has no
Speaker 5: interest reading winning elections. They don't everything that said. Oh
Speaker 5: you're just complaining. Oh you're just ridiculous as opposed to
Speaker 5: listening to what's being said. Not only is this said
Speaker 5: by Mark Theison, but Ben Shapiro jumps in and says
Speaker 5: that if young people were paying twenty dollars for a burrito,
Speaker 5: they are quote doing life wrong. I said earlier this
Speaker 5: week that when it came to Sophie Cunningham, Matt Walsh
Speaker 5: had a swing and a miss. This is a swing
Speaker 5: and a miss from Ben Shapiro. Jide, Now, all I
Speaker 5: have is that quote producer Land and if you want
Speaker 5: to go find the post from Ben you can.
Speaker 1: That is a mistake.
Speaker 5: The argument he is not that a turning point USA
Speaker 5: member should be should not be buying twenty dollars burritos.
Speaker 5: The argument here is the idea of cost, the idea
Speaker 5: that the basics are high, and that is not solely
Speaker 5: represented by the college student. It's represented by anybody who
Speaker 5: buys groceries. It's represented by anybody who pays car insurance
Speaker 5: or any other shirts, homeowners inshurts. Can we discuss the
Speaker 5: rising costs here buying an airline ticket and you get
Speaker 5: less service, less care, and what do you do?
Speaker 1: You pay more and more and more. I was discussing yesterday.
Speaker 5: That there is this budget airline out of Australia that
Speaker 5: now wants to charge you if you put your carry
Speaker 5: on in the overhead bin.
Speaker 1: If that holds, what happens.
Speaker 5: When they bring that to United and Delta and Jet Blue, etc.
Speaker 5: Now some people responded to these things with just ridiculousness.
Speaker 5: One of those people was the vice president. The vice
Speaker 5: president stated, I'm surprised talking about Mark Theesen, I'm surprised
Speaker 5: to hear Mark say this. If you've ever met him
Speaker 5: in person, it's quite obvious. The man who has never
Speaker 5: missed a burrito, that's just dumb.
Speaker 1: What are you doing?
Speaker 5: Congratulations, you got in the dig terrific. You're now an
Speaker 5: influencer on social media. You might as well just be
Speaker 5: a podcaster, not the vice president of the United States, unless,
Speaker 5: of course, this is all part of your economic nationalism.
Speaker 1: That you're just thrilled by.
Speaker 5: Can we discuss winning elections for half a second? Could
Speaker 5: you listen to what is being said. There is a
Speaker 5: cost issue, and it's real, and it has a great
Speaker 5: number of places that we can look to. And yes, absolutely,
Speaker 5: Biden level inflation is a part of it.
Speaker 1: Inflation is not down to where we need it to be.
Speaker 1: It isn't.
Speaker 5: We had a whole conversation about two Fed governors talking
Speaker 5: about the need for rate hikes, increased interest rates to
Speaker 5: keep dollars from getting into the system. Inflation is too
Speaker 5: much cash, not enough stuff, and therefore you increase the
Speaker 5: interest rates. Let's cash into the system and inflation comes down.
Speaker 5: I saw somebody in the chat talk about deflation. Deflation
Speaker 5: can be a problem if it comes too quickly. Stagflation
Speaker 5: is super ugly Japan over the last thirty plus years,
Speaker 5: and ask China, as they are now slowly realizing they
Speaker 5: are in the grips of it. It is obvious to
Speaker 5: all of us that the daily costs have gotten into
Speaker 5: an obscenity. It simply is a problem. Why not address
Speaker 5: that problem from all of the angles of which it
Speaker 5: is a problem. Inflation is a part of the problem.
Speaker 5: If President Trump would remove a bunch of tariffs, you
Speaker 5: would see things get easier. My take if we took
Speaker 5: a look at the regulatory environment and talked about how
Speaker 5: less government is a clear place that we can engage
Speaker 5: to reduce cash in the system, to where President Trump
Speaker 5: is having great effect and result. We take a look
Speaker 5: at the jobs numbers that just came out, and I'll
Speaker 5: talk to doctor Matta Will economists at the University of
Speaker 5: Indianapolis coming up in a little bit.
Speaker 1: The jobs numbers. My gosh, you lost twenty three thousand jobs.
Speaker 1: This is terrible.
Speaker 5: But we actually had sectors that we gained private jobs.
Speaker 5: The private sector gained thirty thousand jobs in the month
Speaker 5: of July. Government lost fifty three thousand jobs. Losing government
Speaker 5: jobs is good. We don't need this big bloated government.
Speaker 5: But you lost more government than you picked up private sector,
Speaker 5: Thus the negative number. So the negative number top line
Speaker 5: tells a story of things still having an issue, but
Speaker 5: there are things within it that explain why it's happening.
Speaker 5: Lowering government smart, getting what Kevin Walsh, the FED chair,
Speaker 5: is trying to do, getting things off the balance sheet, smart,
Speaker 5: changing the regulatory environments.
Speaker 1: When it comes to the very idea of.
Speaker 5: Costs smart, how about we discussed the idea of a
Speaker 5: twenty dollars burrito and those states that want to push
Speaker 5: twenty dollars an hour minimum wages, of course the cost
Speaker 5: of a burrito or anything else is going to go up.
Speaker 1: Do we not understand how this works?
Speaker 5: We have a thousand ways to address what's happening, and
Speaker 5: go and speak to gen Z and speak to all
Speaker 5: of America and say there is a path out of this,
Speaker 5: and it involves fiscal policy. We're the ones with the
Speaker 5: fiscal policy. Vote for us. Instead, I've got Marked Feesson
Speaker 5: and Ben Shapiro dismissing it with non even with non
Speaker 5: intellectual commentary. This is baseline garbage that they just put out,
Speaker 5: and I've got the Vice president making fact jokes. This
Speaker 5: is why people drink bourbon, and this is why people
Speaker 5: hate politics and Republicans.
Speaker 1: This is why people hate you. What are you doing?
Speaker 5: You have an opportunity here, why not take the damn opportunity.
Speaker 5: You can argue, well, you see, this is just a
Speaker 5: populist message and what the populast would do. America has
Speaker 5: to protect itself more and they have to implement this,
Speaker 5: and you can't be allowed.
Speaker 1: To charge that. No, that stuff is wrong.
Speaker 5: And Trump has some of those inclinations because he's not
Speaker 5: a conservative.
Speaker 1: I understand this, and that's not correct.
Speaker 5: It has to be a policy prescription that takes government
Speaker 5: out of these things, that puts an end to this
Speaker 5: maddening idea that it is on the back of the
Speaker 5: employer to pay what somebody who has never employed anybody
Speaker 5: is to de cited as a living wage. We have
Speaker 5: to address these things honestly and clearly and show gen
Speaker 5: Z that they could be active participants in making things better.
Speaker 5: All they have to do is act, and instead listening
Speaker 5: to a real concern from Andrew Covid, it gets dismissed.
Speaker 5: It is the dumbest thing I have seen the political
Speaker 5: right do in a good long time, and that includes
Speaker 5: nominating Carrie Lake in Arizona. When you knew she was
Speaker 5: gonna lose tired, like you, exhausted of people just not
Speaker 5: being normal when that's all it takes. I'm Tony Katz.
Speaker 5: This is Tony Katz today.
Speaker 1: So Presier Landon, as we were talking about the cost
Speaker 1: of burritos, than this story about someone saying that.
Speaker 5: If they can't afford the basic things, It was Andrew
Speaker 5: Covitt saying that people at Turning Point USA are like,
Speaker 5: you know, a burrito shouldn't cost twenty dollars. The point
Speaker 5: being that the costs of the everyday things are too high.
Speaker 5: And I'm not suggesting buying twenty dollars burritos Tony Katz,
Speaker 5: Tony kats today, but to mock these people are supposed
Speaker 5: to recognize that there are increased costs and there are
Speaker 5: things we can do about this, and these are policy prescriptions,
Speaker 5: and why not go sell those and show people how
Speaker 5: they can be active participants in making things better in
Speaker 5: their own life. Instead they're getting mocked. And Ben Shapiro
Speaker 5: didn't he was wrong, Mark Theson did it.
Speaker 1: He's wrong. They're just wrong.
Speaker 5: And producer Landen said, does this apply to door dash?
Speaker 1: Allow me, No, it does not.
Speaker 5: Door dash is about you being outrageously lazy about the
Speaker 5: cost of the item. You are now paying for an
Speaker 5: added luxury. And there are people who DoorDash four times.
Speaker 1: A week producer land and true or false, that's true.
Speaker 1: Those people are insane.
Speaker 5: Those people need to have Dave Ramsey come hit them
Speaker 5: about the head with a stick. You you can't afford
Speaker 5: door dash?
Speaker 1: What are you out of your mind?
Speaker 5: That is about being foolhardy with your economics. That's a
Speaker 5: different conversation than the cost of simple basic things.
Speaker 1: That's the difference.
Speaker 5: If you are somebody just starting out in life, or
Speaker 5: you're a college student and you're door dashing four days
Speaker 5: a week, you are indeed doing it wrong.
Speaker 1: If you're talking about wanting to go.
Speaker 5: Out and a burrito is really expensive Chipotle, what have you?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that is an.
Speaker 5: Issue, and that issue comes from a lot of other places.
Speaker 5: You decide you need the luxury of someone driving it
Speaker 5: to you because you just won't get your ass off
Speaker 5: a couch. I don't feel anything for you. Now in
Speaker 5: all of this, we should be clear. If you're just
Speaker 5: starting out, pack your lunch at home. It's better economics.
Speaker 5: If you have a kitchen you need to cook, you
Speaker 5: need to handle your economic realities. Well, it doesn't change
Speaker 5: the point that's being made about.
Speaker 1: Our economics as a nation. This is Tony Kats Today.
Speaker 1: Three more things, Tony Kats, Tony Katz today. Guys, glad
Speaker 1: that you are here live streaming on YouTube and Rumble.
Speaker 5: Just look for Tony Katz. Come join the fun. Three
Speaker 5: more things. These are stories that should be front page news,
Speaker 5: but because.
Speaker 1: Of all the news on the front pages, and they
Speaker 1: get moved off the front pages.
Speaker 5: So I bring them to you, as we said, live
Speaker 5: streaming smoking a Crux marble head as we do the show.
Speaker 5: It's turned out to be a lovely cigar and can
Speaker 5: work as a daily smoke, A nice piece Crux Crux.
Speaker 5: They have a whole line of cigars. This is the
Speaker 5: marble head right here. Did I pay this ten eleven
Speaker 5: dollars a stick? Something like that?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 1: I get it, Tony.
Speaker 5: How can you talk about affordability when you're talking about
Speaker 5: spending eleven dollars on a cigar? Well, I can afford
Speaker 5: the eleven dollars cigar. I can afford the eleven dollars cigar,
Speaker 5: and I've set up my life to be able to
Speaker 5: do this every day.
Speaker 1: If you can't, and when I couldn't, I didn't.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 5: This whole conversation about economics a never ever excludes the
Speaker 5: idea of being somebody who is aware of your economic
Speaker 5: situation and being focused on it. I was being asked
Speaker 5: in the chat room about a car issue I have,
Speaker 5: and it's a real differential went never I've never never
Speaker 5: had a rear differential go And so I was like, well,
Speaker 5: do you fix it? Does that mean you should sell
Speaker 5: the car?
Speaker 1: What do you do?
Speaker 5: And in speaking to some people who know better than I,
Speaker 5: the answer was, oh, gosh, no, no, no, no, everything else
Speaker 5: about the car works.
Speaker 1: You're not going to sell anything. Used cars are unbelievably high.
Speaker 1: Why are used cars high?
Speaker 5: Because new car prices are criminally insane, criminally insane. The
Speaker 5: average car payment in America is seven hundred and seventy
Speaker 5: five dollars for a new car, and there are definitely
Speaker 5: people who are well over one thousand dollars in new
Speaker 5: car payments.
Speaker 1: That's crazed. Now.
Speaker 5: My issue there is certainly, if you can afford it,
Speaker 5: you do what you will. If you're like, oh, I
Speaker 5: gotta have a new car, no, you don't have to
Speaker 5: have a new car, grow up and handle yourself. There's
Speaker 5: a difference between being smart about your economics and the
Speaker 5: economics of things.
Speaker 1: We have.
Speaker 5: When it comes to new cars, a problem by which
Speaker 5: we loaded up with crap. Oh this safety feature, that feature,
Speaker 5: the other feature. Nobody wants the features, nobody cares about
Speaker 5: the features, and they all increase the cost of the vehicle.
Speaker 5: We're forced into these things. Somebody in the chat room wrote,
Speaker 5: that's the capitalism you guys wanted, damn Strade, it's the
Speaker 5: capitalism I want. You think I want what the communists
Speaker 5: have to offer. No choices and breadlines, pooky. Nobody wants that.
Speaker 5: No one who's normal wants that. But the government interference
Speaker 5: that causes the price increases have to go.
Speaker 1: Watch the prices come down.
Speaker 5: You can actually draw a direct line, in my view,
Speaker 5: between this and things like rent control.
Speaker 1: Of course you have rent control.
Speaker 5: All we're going for rents too high, and we have
Speaker 5: to stop these high prices of rent. If you have
Speaker 5: rent control, you're stopping the landlord from being able to
Speaker 5: charge a market rate. But the landlord still has to
Speaker 5: deal with the market rate for all the repairs. Then
Speaker 5: the landlord can't afford to make the repairs, and so
Speaker 5: what does the state come and do they take the property?
Speaker 5: Because somebody has to manage this and you are being
Speaker 5: a slum lord. Rent control is the maneuver to the
Speaker 5: expropriation of property. Argentina had rent control for years. Javier
Speaker 5: Malay gets elected, the rent controls end prices dropped immediately,
Speaker 5: and then apartments became available because landlords started renting again.
Speaker 1: But what do the communists want? They want to do
Speaker 1: away with rent.
Speaker 5: They hold symposiums, they write books about abolishing rent. How
Speaker 5: does that work? Well, it works when you don't believe
Speaker 5: in private property. So yeah, capitalism good. Communism sucks. But
Speaker 5: when we talk about cars, we're talking about all the
Speaker 5: things that are forced into it.
Speaker 1: By a government.
Speaker 5: I didn't realize we would get on a whole thing
Speaker 5: here about the dollars. But I'm happy to do it
Speaker 5: this way, get rid of the things that are you know,
Speaker 5: I don't want. I don't want my car, Ford, GM Stilantis, whomever.
Speaker 5: Stop sending me a notification that I should look in
Speaker 5: the back seat to see if my kid is there first.
Speaker 5: What about the people who can't have kids? Thanks for
Speaker 5: reminding them every day that they're unable to have children.
Speaker 5: I think that's rude and disgusting. Secondly, I do not
Speaker 5: want to spend extra for the reminder. I can put
Speaker 5: a post it note right there on the dash, or
Speaker 5: I can remember that I have my kid in the car.
Speaker 5: Don't take away personal responsibility. Stop it with that stupid
Speaker 5: ding that happens when I don't put on my seat belt.
Speaker 5: I wear my seat belts. I think wearing a seat
Speaker 5: belt makes sense. But if someone doesn't want to wear
Speaker 5: seat belts, I don't want a law that says they
Speaker 5: have to wear a seat belt if they fly through
Speaker 5: the window in a car accident. They fly through the window,
Speaker 5: it's no skin off my nose. I mean it'll be
Speaker 5: skinned off their nose because they just flew through the window.
Speaker 1: But don't bother me about it, and I don't have
Speaker 1: to pay for it.
Speaker 5: So the new car prices are so dang high because
Speaker 5: of a lot of this nonsense.
Speaker 1: It's regulatory insanity.
Speaker 5: Therefore, the used car prices go up and there would
Speaker 5: be no real replacing of this car. So get it fixed.
Speaker 5: It's just a reird differential. I didn't know.
Speaker 1: I now know. It is a crappy thing to have
Speaker 1: to replace.
Speaker 5: It is a crappy thing to have to replace if
Speaker 5: it can't be fixed. And yes, the auto shut off
Speaker 5: is nonsense. But the EPA under lee'sz Elton has moved
Speaker 5: to remove the auto shut off and to that excellent work,
Speaker 5: absolutely terrific. I could not be more happy. But let
Speaker 5: me get to the three more things, and I will
Speaker 5: get to one more financial thing. This was Duke University,
Speaker 5: where the Justice Department says that Duke University's law school
Speaker 5: discriminates against white and Asian students. You can apply that anywhere,
Speaker 5: of course it does. I would say this about Duke,
Speaker 5: I would say this about universities, not even just law schools,
Speaker 5: medical schools, everything.
Speaker 1: Of course they do.
Speaker 5: The Department, meaning the Justice Department, says that they're utilizing
Speaker 5: racial references and admissions, violating civil rights laws.
Speaker 1: So that's number one. They give a preferential treatment.
Speaker 5: To a black and Hispanic applicants, right because they want
Speaker 5: to say, look how many of this group, but look
Speaker 5: how many of that group.
Speaker 1: This is what happened with Harvard.
Speaker 5: They absolutely were discriminating against Asian students.
Speaker 1: Why we've got enough of those? You've got enough of those?
Speaker 5: I mean, that's the that is an absolutely horrifying thing
Speaker 5: to be said. That is pure, raw, unadulterated bigotry, complete bigotry.
Speaker 1: So they said that the black.
Speaker 5: Livespanic students get a leg up in white and Asian applicants,
Speaker 5: and the media LSAT scores for white and Asian applicants
Speaker 5: who were rejected were higher than those of black students
Speaker 5: who were admitted. And this after the Supreme Court three
Speaker 5: years ago explicit said explicit racial preferences are.
Speaker 1: Illegal in college admissions. We've already seen that.
Speaker 5: So many of these universities have done workarounds to try
Speaker 5: and continue this road because they all believe in the bigotry.
Speaker 5: They are are well wrapped into the idea that no,
Speaker 5: this one deserves it and this one doesn't. They don't
Speaker 5: believe in the very concept of merit. Oh, if you
Speaker 5: don't think, I'm not worried about my medical future and
Speaker 5: doctors and nurses and whether or not we brought in
Speaker 5: the best of the brightest. Tony, you're saying a black
Speaker 5: Rispanic nurse can't be the best of the brightest.
Speaker 1: Of course not.
Speaker 5: But everything has to be on merit and not based
Speaker 5: on this group and that group and a great number
Speaker 5: here and a good number here, and does it balance out?
Speaker 5: And how does it all look? And the pie charts
Speaker 5: totally equal. That's not the way it works. That can't
Speaker 5: be the way it works. I don't want my doctor
Speaker 5: or my nurse getting into being a doctor or nurse
Speaker 5: because well, but we had to do that.
Speaker 1: I want the best of the best of the best
Speaker 1: of the best. That's what I want.
Speaker 5: And I can't imagine that there's somebody out there who
Speaker 5: wants anything else. Then there is President Trump denying a
Speaker 5: rift with Pete Hegseth regarding munitions. Right, this reporting that
Speaker 5: somehow we're low on weaponry, which is indeed a firing offense.
Speaker 5: I would take every general who was responsible over the
Speaker 5: last years and I would bust them down.
Speaker 1: I had said I would bust them down to corporal.
Speaker 5: And someone reminded me, you can only bust them down
Speaker 5: to second lieutenant.
Speaker 1: Don't tell me how to live. But I get your point.
Speaker 1: Get rid of.
Speaker 5: Pensions, you get nothing. Low on munitions. It's an insane idea.
Speaker 5: Now President Trump says we're not and I didn't believe
Speaker 5: the reporting.
Speaker 1: And look that you can argue in a.
Speaker 5: Whole series of ways that this was a story that
Speaker 5: got leaked and you know it's Sun sou and when
Speaker 5: you're strong, make your enemy think you're weak.
Speaker 1: On all these kinds of things, you can.
Speaker 5: Argue it was done to make the administration look bad
Speaker 5: and put pressure on them to stop being engaged with Iran.
Speaker 5: It also could be true again the firings. But Trump's
Speaker 5: point is no, no, no, no, there's no issue at all
Speaker 5: with Hegseth. There are a lot of people on the
Speaker 5: left who want to say all the nasty things in
Speaker 5: the world about Pete hag Seth.
Speaker 1: They're more than welcome to I think Pete hag Seth
Speaker 1: has done an incredibly good job. The recruitment rates are up.
Speaker 5: The focus of the military is clear that we are
Speaker 5: indeed about lethality in the military, and we are not
Speaker 5: going to stop that. We are going to push that.
Speaker 5: We want a fighting force that can fight. I love
Speaker 5: every bit of it. This is absolutely what I want,
Speaker 5: and I think Hegseth has been very good at It
Speaker 5: has been a breadth of fresh air on the subject.
Speaker 5: And I think the recruitment goals tell the story, and
Speaker 5: if we are paying attention, the recruitment goals are being
Speaker 5: achieved and they're being exceeded. But yet we are saying
Speaker 5: that the military is becoming a more strict place and
Speaker 5: a more disciplined place, more focused on the physical fitness harder.
Speaker 5: How do those two things jive. It is because what
Speaker 5: people want.
Speaker 1: Is a standard, and when you beat the standard out
Speaker 1: of them.
Speaker 5: Through outrageous policy, through welfare, through telling people that the
Speaker 5: system is terrible and rigged and can't help them, but
Speaker 5: here will provide for you. Because you can't do for yourself,
Speaker 5: you create a despondent society. You create a society that
Speaker 5: doesn't believe they can and that society becomes weak. And
Speaker 5: what people crave is structure and order and the recognition
Speaker 5: that they are strong and they can be strong and
Speaker 5: they can do this for themselves. I think it's been terrific.
Speaker 5: The one thing you have to do for yourself is
Speaker 5: protect your data online. You have to do it because
Speaker 5: these data brokers they've got these files on you, and
Speaker 5: they've got your home.
Speaker 1: Address, they've got your email address, they have your medical records.
Speaker 5: You know, they have the name of your kids, they
Speaker 5: have the names of your kids, and that file gets
Speaker 5: sold to scammers.
Speaker 1: People are losing is it.
Speaker 5: Americans losing twenty billion dollars plus each and every year
Speaker 5: to these fraudsters and the scammers. They're not getting lucky,
Speaker 5: they're getting prepared. Because your file is collected and packaged
Speaker 5: and sold, and it's done legally. You have to fight back.
Speaker 5: Use incognitive do something about your file. I ncog n
Speaker 5: I in Cogni dot com, going broker by broker, forcing
Speaker 5: each one to delete your file. And in Cogni they're
Speaker 5: keeping an eye on things, so if everything starts coming
Speaker 5: back boom, they knock it right out again. They do
Speaker 5: this all legally. In cogny wipes it out. Go to
Speaker 5: incogni dot com slash cats. That's the website in Cogni
Speaker 5: dot com slash cats and get sixty percent off.
Speaker 1: That's my last name, Katz.
Speaker 5: To get your sixty percent off in Cogniti dot com
Speaker 5: slash cats. Take your private life off of the market
Speaker 5: in cognit dot com slash cats.
Speaker 1: More to get to this is Tony Kats. Today, I
Speaker 1: promised I would share.
Speaker 5: The new athletic director at Purdue University, Tommy McClelland, who's
Speaker 5: taking it on the chin, and he's handling it pretty well.
Speaker 5: He's been doing some interviews about a really really really
Speaker 5: big foot in the mouth moments as he was making
Speaker 5: his announcement, right, Hey, it's a pleasure to be here.
Speaker 1: I can't wait to get started for Purdue University.
Speaker 5: Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, big ten And of course
Speaker 5: you're talking about the rivalry with Indiana University, which just
Speaker 5: won the national championship. Coach Kurt Signetti going undefeated, Vananda Mendoza,
Speaker 5: the whole story. Everybody knows that, it's an amazing story.
Speaker 1: This is what he said.
Speaker 5: As he was being welcomed, as as he was introducing
Speaker 5: himself to the university into America.
Speaker 10: Every recruit and every current student athlete will hear this
Speaker 10: message repeatedly. We are here to win championships. If you
Speaker 10: don't want to win championships, go to Indiana.
Speaker 5: They are coming off the biggest national championship victory ever.
Speaker 5: Why would you tell them to go to Indiana? Also,
Speaker 5: they have many more championships than Purdue.
Speaker 1: Not good. Now he has been.
Speaker 5: On the circuit today, a local stuff, national stuff. I'm
Speaker 5: with Pat mcavie as well, and in my neck of
Speaker 5: the woods in Indianapolis, he was on with a great
Speaker 5: sports host by name of Jay Querry, and he's like,
Speaker 5: he's like.
Speaker 1: Look, yeah, I stuck my foot.
Speaker 5: And I believe one of the lines he used is
Speaker 5: I play a lot of golf, and I hit that
Speaker 5: one directly in the water.
Speaker 1: There's still a lot of holes left to play.
Speaker 5: I'm telling you, there had to have been a conversation
Speaker 5: somewhere about whether or not you fire him. That's how
Speaker 5: insane that statement is insane.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's gonna happen, but it had to
Speaker 1: have been discussed. Just wow, I was a mess. This
Speaker 1: is Tony Katz today.
Speaker 2: Why from dall Hartbiner and the Crossroads of America.
Speaker 1: It's Tony Katz today.
Speaker 5: So the economy shed twenty three thousand jobs in July.
Speaker 5: It missed the expectations, and the market said that's cool.
Speaker 5: Technical and you said something, it's cool by us. We're
Speaker 5: fine with it. We're good with it, no problem. As
Speaker 5: a matter of fact, we'll go up, Tony Katz. Tony
Speaker 5: Katz today, Good to be with you.
Speaker 1: There are reasons, though.
Speaker 5: There are reasons, including, of course, inflation and rate hikes.
Speaker 5: Doctor Mattwill joined as economist at the University of Indianapolis.
Speaker 5: I started to understand this one early. But I want
Speaker 5: to understand what's in the jobs report. First, you took
Speaker 5: a look at it. We've got jobs report, We've got
Speaker 5: unemployment numbers. Walk me through what the report says, the
Speaker 5: jobs report and what it says to you.
Speaker 6: Okay, Well, I'm going to start off by telling you
Speaker 6: that the headline is bad. And just like the other
Speaker 6: day we talked about this. You know, headlines are bad,
Speaker 6: but when you look under the hood, it's actually good
Speaker 6: for the economy, believe it or not. So let's start
Speaker 6: with the headline minus twenty three thousand jobs, which is
Speaker 6: really interesting because the expectation is plus eight eighty thousand,
Speaker 6: so this was one hundred thousand job myths. That's a
Speaker 6: big deal. But let's now start looking underneath the hood.
Speaker 6: Unemployment rate dropped from four point two to four point
Speaker 6: one percent. That's good, Okay. Now for the bad. The
Speaker 6: only reason to drop is because the participation rate declined.
Speaker 6: Fewer people are looking for jobs, fewer people are in
Speaker 6: the workforce. Now more bad news for you. Tony, May
Speaker 6: and June were revised down by one hundred and three
Speaker 6: thousand jobs, so people didn't get employed this quarter. Argue
Speaker 6: this month, two big revisions. I mean, there's a lot
Speaker 6: going on there that's not good, but there is a
Speaker 6: good part to this. The private industry gained thirty thousand jobs,
Speaker 6: so there was a growth in private and the government
Speaker 6: lost fifty three thousand. This was all government job loss,
Speaker 6: So as far as the market's concerned, good Again, back
Speaker 6: to the same scene we've been talking about. Government is contracting,
Speaker 6: private industry is growing, and if you look across the board,
Speaker 6: there's some pretty good information in this I mean, construction
Speaker 6: twenty two thousand jobs up, durable goods, manufacturing eighteen thousand
Speaker 6: jobs up, transportation warehousing ten thousand jobs up. I mean,
Speaker 6: there is good news in this report for the private economy,
Speaker 6: and wages didn't grow that much. I know, again that
Speaker 6: sounds bad, but there's a story behind this and why
Speaker 6: this job's report is loved by the market.
Speaker 5: So I've went you on the government stuff, and I
Speaker 5: have discussed this now in a couple places. Your point
Speaker 5: that GDP grossmuster product one point five percent bad headline,
Speaker 5: But if government spending juices GDP, we had less government spend,
Speaker 5: which is good for us the taxpayer.
Speaker 1: It just makes the GDP number look worse.
Speaker 5: But yet when you look as you describe it, under
Speaker 5: the hood, things on some fundamentals, specifically manufacturing, very very solid.
Speaker 5: But when I took a look at market response and
Speaker 5: I watched the futures go up one hundred points in
Speaker 5: a blink of an eye after this report came out,
Speaker 5: it became pretty clear to me. And I feel like
Speaker 5: all this talking together has finally gotten me some level
Speaker 5: of degree, maybe only in associates, but still them on
Speaker 5: my way that what they saw is the job market
Speaker 5: might be weaker. So those in the Federal Reserve who
Speaker 5: are thinking about rate hikes to tamp down and tamper
Speaker 5: down inflation might think twice and no rate hikes is
Speaker 5: where the market wants to be.
Speaker 1: True or false?
Speaker 6: Close, Tony Close, I'm giving you a B, not an A.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the worse teacher ever.
Speaker 6: I'm sorry. Well, every time someone gets a bad grade,
Speaker 6: that's what they tell me. You're very close. The reason
Speaker 6: was the unemployment rate drop. So it's not that the
Speaker 6: job market is bad, it's that the wage growth is
Speaker 6: not exorbitant. Wage growth would indicate inflation. So the bad
Speaker 6: part where you're correct is in quotes, wage inflation is
Speaker 6: not there. And the unemployment rate stayed at four point one,
Speaker 6: I mean four two to four to one, so we
Speaker 6: didn't have hot unemployment. If we had significantly increasing unemployment,
Speaker 6: there would be pressure on the Fed to cut rates.
Speaker 6: There's inflation, which seems to be in this case moderate
Speaker 6: not outrageous, moderate, which is less pressure to increase rates.
Speaker 6: So the said, here's what happened this morning in the markets,
Speaker 6: there is a fifty seven percent chance that said was
Speaker 6: going to do a rate hike in September. That's there's
Speaker 6: stuff on Wall Street and the options market, in futures
Speaker 6: market that predicts that went down as soon as this
Speaker 6: came out. As soon as it came out the news
Speaker 6: on the unemployment, that probability dropped from fifty seven percent
Speaker 6: to forty seven percent. So the headline is this, inflation
Speaker 6: argues for a hike, employment argues against it, and this
Speaker 6: morning the employment one.
Speaker 5: Talking to doctor Matt will the economist from the University
Speaker 5: of Indianapolis. So when you talk about winning this back
Speaker 5: and forth, this seems to be a non scientific struggle.
Speaker 5: This only seems to be a reaction struggle. Am I
Speaker 5: right about that?
Speaker 6: Oh? Absolutely, that's exactly what's happening.
Speaker 1: So the reaction from Wall Street was that the lack of.
Speaker 5: Labor participation, which would show us we don't have wage inflation,
Speaker 5: means that everything is getting better.
Speaker 6: Yes, but your phrase reaction is why you might get
Speaker 6: an AUS on this now, because what happened is it's
Speaker 6: the reaction to the latest piece of news. You and
Speaker 6: I the other day talked about the PCE very high,
Speaker 6: CPI eh, okay, PPI terrible. That was Then today's news is, look,
Speaker 6: unemployment is pretty flat. That's good, wage increase not going
Speaker 6: through the roof. So what happened here is today's most
Speaker 6: immediate current news reaction is okay, inflation under control, no
Speaker 6: rate change. So that's what the market saw the latest reaction. Now,
Speaker 6: you know, something could happen tomorrow and completely change the
Speaker 6: game again. But this is what the market's doing with
Speaker 6: the news that got today. Hey, unemployment's fine, wage inflacement,
Speaker 6: inflation is reasonable, no reason to overreact here. So the
Speaker 6: Fed again, only a forty four percent chance they're going
Speaker 6: to do a rate increase. Now the market likes that.
Speaker 6: The market liked it so much that as soon as
Speaker 6: they got that information, the futures jump. Nasdaq futures immediately
Speaker 6: went up one point one percent. SMT futures went up
Speaker 6: half a percent instantly, instantly on the news coming out.
Speaker 6: And the tenure Treasury, which you talked about, the tenure
Speaker 6: treasury sell eight BIPs eight basis points down to four
Speaker 6: point one six or the two year treasury, I mean,
Speaker 6: and the ten yuere also went down to four point
Speaker 6: six to one immediately reaction lower treasury rates. Market bumped
Speaker 6: both Nasdaq and S and P across the board. The
Speaker 6: market loves this.
Speaker 5: I can't discuss something else that I'm surprised. I haven't
Speaker 5: heard from Best in the Treasure Secretary or President Trump
Speaker 5: that the US trade deficit contracted. It went to seventy
Speaker 5: three point three billion in June from seventy seven point
Speaker 5: six billion in May.
Speaker 1: That story just came out earlier this week.
Speaker 5: Everything about tariffs is about trade deficits, that somehow trade
Speaker 5: deficits are the end of civilization.
Speaker 1: I don't believe that they are. I believe it's a.
Speaker 5: Bad reason to implement tariffs as a concept. Does this
Speaker 5: trade deficit going down not? Does that have an effect
Speaker 5: on people on how people see the market.
Speaker 1: Manufacturing futures et cetera.
Speaker 6: No, when you say people, if you're talking about Wall
Speaker 6: Street and financial experts, no, because actually what you saw
Speaker 6: was a blip. The trade deficits has been growing since
Speaker 6: tariff institution has been stabilized, and this is exactly what
Speaker 6: I consider a good thing. Again, I'm a fan of
Speaker 6: trade deficits. I'm not against them because they cause foreign
Speaker 6: direct investment. We buy lots of cheap crap from overseas,
Speaker 6: and those dollars that we spend flow back into the
Speaker 6: United States in the form of investing in our country,
Speaker 6: which is how you grow your economy. So I am
Speaker 6: I've got lots of research on this. I'm a fan
Speaker 6: of these trade deficits. So I don't think he made
Speaker 6: a comment about it because it was just a blip.
Speaker 6: And if he here's the big deal. If he were
Speaker 6: to bring up the topic, Tony, the secret between you
Speaker 6: and me. If he were to bring that topic up,
Speaker 6: then everyone would start talking about Wait, the trade deficits
Speaker 6: have been growing significantly since you put the terroriffs in place,
Speaker 6: So I think he wants to avoid that topic altogether.
Speaker 5: Talking to doctor Matt Will economists at the University of Indianapolis,
Speaker 5: let's continue the conversation, if we would, if we can,
Speaker 5: because I have mentioned that there have been a couple
Speaker 5: of FED governors before this report came out today and
Speaker 5: the market is making their bet. A couple of FED
Speaker 5: governors have said it's time for a rate increase. The
Speaker 5: inflation is not down, we need a rate hike. Are
Speaker 5: they correct? Does this report change them at all?
Speaker 6: It changes them. They're correct that inflation isn't gone, but
Speaker 6: their solution is wrong. And this report gives wash some
Speaker 6: time to adjust. And this is where it gets that
Speaker 6: complex assets thing again. They had a legitimate point. Do
Speaker 6: you want to camp down inflation and one of the
Speaker 6: tools you do it is to increase rates. Well, when
Speaker 6: you increase rates, that's going to decrease investment because money
Speaker 6: costs more. So that's a you know, one of the
Speaker 6: things Trump always argues against me. But there's another way
Speaker 6: to control inflation. And that's what Warsh is trying to do.
Speaker 6: He's slowly moving the ship. He Slowly's got this commission going.
Speaker 6: It's going to look at selling assets off the balance sheet.
Speaker 6: Good for him. So he's working on that and this
Speaker 6: report gives him cover. It gives him more time to
Speaker 6: let his political technique, his little commission do its job,
Speaker 6: because he's going to be able to to these three governors. Okay,
Speaker 6: hold on, can't you see Look, unemployment flats, no reason
Speaker 6: to increase rates. Everything's wonderful right now, people go back
Speaker 6: into your corner. So I think this buys him time
Speaker 6: to not worry about the whole rape situation while he
Speaker 6: gets his ducks in line to do a huge asset sale.
Speaker 6: And I think he's going to pull it off. I'm confident,
Speaker 6: I'm patient, and I think he's going to succeed.
Speaker 5: I want to I want to see it happen, like
Speaker 5: I want to see how that plays out. But there
Speaker 5: were some other things that happen I want people to
Speaker 5: be aware of in the market, And you've been making
Speaker 5: mention of this. We've talked often about layoffs right, a
Speaker 5: lot of layoffs in Tech Wall Sheet Journal, discussing the
Speaker 5: fact that the new data shows the job cuts are
Speaker 5: down forty one percent so far this year, which would
Speaker 5: make one believe that, Okay, we've done enough cutting. Let's
Speaker 5: actually see if our AI investments increased productivity. Maybe we
Speaker 5: just really need these people. There's only so much you
Speaker 5: can cut. We still have a business to run products
Speaker 5: to sell, et cetera. But within this is the recognition
Speaker 5: that software is getting.
Speaker 1: The living, not kicked out of it.
Speaker 5: That when we talk all about the technology and AI
Speaker 5: transforming the economy and all that jazz software, I don't
Speaker 5: know if they mean software as a service or software
Speaker 5: in general is getting slapped around.
Speaker 1: What is happening in that in that sector?
Speaker 6: Well, I like what you said. You said productivity, and
Speaker 6: we've seen in fact today's report had a two percent
Speaker 6: increase in productivity, So that is a side benefit at
Speaker 6: O a consequence the main benefit of AI. So what's happening?
Speaker 6: And you're right, it's SaaS as a service software as
Speaker 6: a service, I should say. And what's happening is companies
Speaker 6: like Workday and Salesforce and Adobe, and we talked about
Speaker 6: the other day, IBM while sixty nine billion dollars in
Speaker 6: value in one single day because their software got killed.
Speaker 6: So what's happening is AI is replacing software. I'll give
Speaker 6: you my own personal example. I've got to put together
Speaker 6: this schedule of classes for students. It takes forever to
Speaker 6: go through all the gyrations and the formulas, and I
Speaker 6: now have an AHI that can do it. In minutes
Speaker 6: compared today's there's software on the market that does that. Well,
Speaker 6: the people that sell that software, they're not selling software.
Speaker 6: I can just turn on my AI, tell it what
Speaker 6: I want, and it gives me the same output. That
Speaker 6: is what's happening to companies like Workday and Salesforce and
Speaker 6: Adobe and IBM. They're getting beaten down because people can
Speaker 6: go on their computer on their phone and get the
Speaker 6: same output quality that they were getting from a piece
Speaker 6: of software that costs them a fortune just two years ago.
Speaker 5: How does this play into overall tech sector? Are there
Speaker 5: companies that care about their software products or are they
Speaker 5: willing to sacrifice at all to the on the altar
Speaker 5: of AI because that's the only thing that matters.
Speaker 6: You know what, I don't like this phrase, but I
Speaker 6: have to use it. It's a massive paradigm shift.
Speaker 1: That's the phrase. You're right about that.
Speaker 6: You know again, I don't like using that phrase, but
Speaker 6: that's what's happening. It's what companies are doing. Is it's
Speaker 6: literally shoepayers creative destruction that you and I have talked
Speaker 6: about before. This whole software industry is being upended. It's
Speaker 6: not going to disappear it's going to reformulate so people
Speaker 6: companies that are willing to say, Okay, we're going to
Speaker 6: look at this differently. So instead of hiring IBM to
Speaker 6: write some software, I'm going to hire a bunch of
Speaker 6: AI experts and they're going to develop prompts and custom
Speaker 6: gems and custom GPPs, and they're going to create these
Speaker 6: AI environment so that any one of my lower level
Speaker 6: employees can do the same thing that that software was
Speaker 6: doing before at a cheaper price. So they're really transforming
Speaker 6: their businesses away from reliance on software which is static,
Speaker 6: you've got to buy updates. You know, it has bugs. Yeah,
Speaker 6: AI is not perfect, but it can do the job
Speaker 6: much easier, quicker, and with less overhead. So companies are
Speaker 6: just transform They still have to do the same thing
Speaker 6: to You still got to edit your audio and your
Speaker 6: videos and you've got to get them published on your
Speaker 6: various platforms. Well, now the AI is going to alleviate
Speaker 6: your need to buy a bunch of software to do that.
Speaker 5: Doctor Matt Will, economists at the University of Indianapolis. I
Speaker 5: appreciate you taking the time to be with us more
Speaker 5: to get to this is Tony Katz today, it's the.
Speaker 3: Ongoing war in Iran having an impact and negative impact
Speaker 3: up on the US economy. Oil energy prices are a
Speaker 3: little bit inflated, but we.
Speaker 1: Could say that way less that people expected. But we're
Speaker 1: mindel of the fact the gasoline prices.
Speaker 3: Are high, and we're making many.
Speaker 1: Steps to help reduce the stress of that for people.
Speaker 1: Can you come over here? The answer is yes. I
Speaker 1: mean I like Kevin Hassett a lot.
Speaker 5: National Economic Council Director, I like them a lot.
Speaker 1: But that's we say it a little bit of a
Speaker 1: bit of a thing.
Speaker 5: With the energy prices, we still have barrel price up today.
Speaker 5: Tony Katz, Tony Katz today. God's always great to be
Speaker 5: with you. Thanks for having me here. The number is
Speaker 5: not going anywhere because there's no deal with Iran. There's
Speaker 5: no deal with Iran. Iran wanted to have a deal
Speaker 5: where no US or Israeli tankers could go through the Strait. Okay, okay, sure, sure,
Speaker 5: that's that's fantastic. Then there's the story that a deal
Speaker 5: with I ran over her moves may require.
Speaker 1: A compromise from Trump. This is Newsmax.
Speaker 5: With the article he divides the world into winners and losers,
Speaker 5: and this would make him a loser, according to one expert.
Speaker 1: And that is that image would be intolerable for him.
Speaker 5: So this is about levels of control and whether or
Speaker 5: not the Iranian regime can still have any control.
Speaker 1: The way the Iranians want to see it.
Speaker 5: They control one route, oman controls another route, and so
Speaker 5: therefore there's still the people who make the decisions.
Speaker 1: On who goes through. The Iranians, in.
Speaker 5: Their entire methodology of negotiation is never ever, ever, ever relent.
Speaker 5: Never keep up the heartache, keep up the hassle. The
Speaker 5: other side relents because they just grow tired of it,
Speaker 5: and you win. That's their methodology, which is why I
Speaker 5: have stated from the beginning the only answer is the
Speaker 5: end of the regime, because it's the.
Speaker 1: Only way anything can be done.
Speaker 5: And all I'm doing, I mean, I knew this before
Speaker 5: Trump put anything out on social media years ago.
Speaker 1: He put out on social.
Speaker 5: Media, Iran never won a war, never lost a negotiation.
Speaker 5: That's exactly what's happening here. And so if we want
Speaker 5: to talk about how President Trump looks like he lost
Speaker 5: every day, it's like, oh, we got We're going to
Speaker 5: get to a deal soon soon. I think we could
Speaker 5: see something soon. And he was in the Oval yesterday
Speaker 5: talking about how we saw oil prices down to numbers,
Speaker 5: knowing thought they could be this loan. We'll get there
Speaker 5: again soon. You're telling me about what happened yesterday. I
Speaker 5: want to know what's gonna happen today and what's gonna
Speaker 5: happen tomorrow. Those oil prices are what I'm talking about.
Speaker 5: You can't sell well. Three months ago it was only
Speaker 5: a dollar eighty five a gallon. Two months ago is
Speaker 5: only a dollar eighty five a gallon in Iowa. That
Speaker 5: doesn't move anybody. And every time you say well soon,
Speaker 5: well soon, as I have argued, I think he looks
Speaker 5: weak and who is advising him on this because he
Speaker 5: doesn't want.
Speaker 1: To look that way. Ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever.
Speaker 5: If you want to argue, mister President, that you can
Speaker 5: string this out for forever, you have plenty of patients. Great,
Speaker 5: that's a position of strength. But don't tell us a
Speaker 5: deal be soon. You know, when the Iranians come to
Speaker 5: us and they beg forgiveness and they surrender, we'll have
Speaker 5: a deal.
Speaker 1: Thanks. Go wait for them to learn their lesson. We've
Speaker 1: got all the time.
Speaker 6: In the world.
Speaker 5: It's all on them that would be a position of strength.
Speaker 1: This is Tony Katz today.
Speaker 5: So the way this was described was unhinged, which is
Speaker 5: a term you see often. It was OutKick putting out
Speaker 5: a post, and then Fox News with Jones OutKick putting
Speaker 5: out the article Meghan Rapino goes on an unhinged rant.
Speaker 5: Unhinged usually means screaming and yelling and out of someone's mind. Well,
Speaker 5: I don't think Megan Rapino is screaming or yelling here.
Speaker 5: She's just out of her mind. Tony Katz, Tony Katz today.
Speaker 1: Is so good to be with you, guys.
Speaker 5: Find everything I do at Tony kats dot com. Don't
Speaker 5: forget to grab the videos on YouTube and rumble Tony Katz,
Speaker 5: go and subscribe right now. Megan Rapino, the soccer player
Speaker 5: who is beyond a leftist? Who is I would argue
Speaker 5: in this bit of audio I'm going to share with you,
Speaker 5: is going to prove it hateful. We're talking about a
Speaker 5: hateful person here, I would also argue, dishonest person. She's
Speaker 5: the one who took the knee in solidarity with Colin
Speaker 5: Kaepernick for the national anthem. Colin Kaepernick didn't even do
Speaker 5: it in solidarity with Colin Kaepernick. He wanted attention, He
Speaker 5: got attention. Didn't get a job in the NFL, but
Speaker 5: he got attention. When Dave Chappelle said of Colin Kaepernick,
Speaker 5: he didn't need to do that. His belly was fullby
Speaker 5: that for us. No, he did not. Dave has it
Speaker 5: completely wrong. Don't tell me. I can't tell Dave Chapelle
Speaker 5: he's got it wrong. When he's wrong, he's wrong when
Speaker 5: he's right.
Speaker 1: I've agreed many times when he has said something I
Speaker 1: haven't thought of, I said, doubt, say that's amazing. But
Speaker 1: he's wrong on this. He doesn't have it anywhere close.
Speaker 5: And he can engage with me in all the race
Speaker 5: this and you don't understand that he wants In the end,
Speaker 5: I do understand, he's just wrong. Colin Kaepernick did nothing
Speaker 5: for anyone else, and no one is stronger for it.
Speaker 1: He did not even take a stand by taking a knee.
Speaker 1: Not a conversation for another day.
Speaker 5: Meghan Rapino believes, in all of her radical leftism that
Speaker 5: men can be women and trans women which are men,
Speaker 5: can be in women's sports. And this is her argument
Speaker 5: against Sophie Cunningham of the Indiana Fever and Riley Gaines,
Speaker 5: the swimmer who took on the madness of was it
Speaker 5: Mia Thomas or whatever his name was, and the swimmers
Speaker 5: and really has made this a front and center issue
Speaker 5: as it should be. Again, I will state we're talking
Speaker 5: about a culture war here. That has to be one.
Speaker 5: It is a culture war. I accept the terms. We win,
Speaker 5: they lose. That's that because it's far more than just
Speaker 5: about whether or not a man is in women's sports.
Speaker 5: It is about a society written large, of course it is.
Speaker 5: It's about the idea of normalcy. And can I tell
Speaker 5: you I have put out videos about this where I've
Speaker 5: discussed Sophie Cunningham being normal and the amount of people
Speaker 5: who come at me.
Speaker 1: Why in the world would you call it normal? What
Speaker 1: other people are not normal? Who are you to decide
Speaker 1: what normal is?
Speaker 5: Sophie Cunningham said girls sports are for girls and if
Speaker 5: we can't call that normal, we can't call anything normal.
Speaker 5: And I think you understand that that's the the objective.
Speaker 5: The objective is to end the concept of normalcy. Everything
Speaker 5: is up to debate, Everything can be questioned, everything can
Speaker 5: be seen as okay or acceptable. That is a total
Speaker 5: lack of standards and The answer is no, not going
Speaker 5: to have that society.
Speaker 1: And I get that it puts people like us on
Speaker 1: the ounce.
Speaker 5: With these other people, and they want to be very
Speaker 5: violent about it, and they control a lot of the institutions.
Speaker 5: And my answer is game on, let's go do this thing.
Speaker 5: It's a culture war. We win, they lose.
Speaker 1: That's that men are not women and men are not
Speaker 1: welcome in women's sports.
Speaker 5: Don't care if you like it, don't care if you're
Speaker 5: happy about it, don't care if you cry, and.
Speaker 1: Don't scream to me that it's going to lead to you.
Speaker 5: Committing suicide, because, with all due respect, a guy who
Speaker 5: has spent some time being suicidal myself doesn't make me
Speaker 5: an expert. Not an expert. And what makes someone suicidal?
Speaker 5: I can only tell you where I was in my twenties.
Speaker 5: Also on nine eight eight. That is the suicide prevention hotline.
Speaker 5: I never called. I never did that, but if you
Speaker 5: need to, you should. It gets better, it can, It
Speaker 5: takes work.
Speaker 1: I'm right here. Oh.
Speaker 5: My twenties were a miserable experience, and the depression took
Speaker 5: me while into my thirties until I started to figure
Speaker 5: out that. First of all, I wasn't crazy. I was
Speaker 5: just doing things that could in no way provide me happiness.
Speaker 5: Why wasn't I changing the things that I was doing?
Speaker 5: Which is the whole point that I only speak from
Speaker 5: a personal experience. Here, I'll let an expert discuss from
Speaker 5: an expert's position, happiness does not come from without, It
Speaker 5: only comes from within.
Speaker 1: So if somebody is miserable.
Speaker 5: With who they are, me, lying to them is not
Speaker 5: going to help them, But lying will make me miserable.
Speaker 5: What I learned about myself is that I was lying
Speaker 5: all the time. They weren't big lives. They weren't at
Speaker 5: landish lies. I wasn't lying about a job or I
Speaker 5: wasn't lying to my wife. I was lying about being unhappy.
Speaker 5: I was lying about everything being fine. They were these
Speaker 5: small little things. And when I stopped. When I stopped lying,
Speaker 5: and there's a multiplicity of things. I won't get into everything.
Speaker 5: I swear to you, in an instant, it got better.
Speaker 5: It required more honesty. Honesty is certainly tough. What I
Speaker 5: found is it's a tough that I like. It's a
Speaker 5: tough that's good because it's clarifying. When you lie, you
Speaker 5: can't fix the thing.
Speaker 1: When you're honest. You can fix the thing, or at
Speaker 1: least come to accept the thing, whatever that thing in
Speaker 1: your head is or the thing.
Speaker 5: The problem in front of you, et cetera. That's better.
Speaker 5: I've always said, you know, in my contract negotiations, for example,
Speaker 5: I don't understand. And this has happened in multiple companies.
Speaker 5: It's happened for years. You've dealt with this kind of stuff.
Speaker 5: These people who want to they're having the negotiation. They're
Speaker 5: still kind of playing a game, and well, where do
Speaker 5: you see yourself?
Speaker 1: And what do you want? Dude? You know what I provide?
Speaker 1: How much? Here's what I want? Boom? Or here's your
Speaker 1: offer boom, here's my counter boom. Can we be done?
Speaker 5: We can finish this in ten minutes and then go
Speaker 5: have lunch. Don't you want to have lunch? I hear
Speaker 5: they have truffle fries. Let's go get some truffle fries.
Speaker 5: Who doesn't love some truffle fries? I love them, by
Speaker 5: the way. I'll take regular fries, sure, but if they're
Speaker 5: truffle fries, I'll be like, I'll give those a go,
Speaker 5: and if I don't like them, I'll get the regular fries.
Speaker 5: That's right, I'll order both and then see which one
Speaker 5: I want. That's the kind of man I am. Ten minutes,
Speaker 5: that's all I need. I don't need the game. Well, Tony,
Speaker 5: we really value you, but you have to understand the
Speaker 5: situation that we're.
Speaker 1: In, how much I don't know about you.
Speaker 5: I don't need any of the rest. I don't need
Speaker 5: any of that of that kind of stuff. And I
Speaker 5: swear to you that the changing of this mindset has
Speaker 5: further solidified this. I mean, I accept the fact that
Speaker 5: for some people it's jarring and off putting. I accept,
Speaker 5: but I also accept that that's part of the deal.
Speaker 1: But since in the overall it works for me so well,
Speaker 1: it's part of the deal. I accept this.
Speaker 5: It doesn't mean that there aren't moments where I'm unhappy,
Speaker 5: and I can talk to you about a million things
Speaker 5: where I have real issues with satisfaction, right, But I
Speaker 5: don't think I'm so different in that regard from other people.
Speaker 5: But one of the things that I do know, going
Speaker 5: back to Megan Rapino, is that if I have to
Speaker 5: be told, or if I'm going to be told that
Speaker 5: I have to lie and call a man a woman,
Speaker 5: I'm going to go back to lying and I can't
Speaker 5: do that because being a liar and lying to myself
Speaker 5: and lying to others made me miserable, made me depressed,
Speaker 5: and made me think about ending my own life. I'm
Speaker 5: not doing that for Meghan Rapino. Screw you, honey, I don't.
Speaker 5: I refuse to care about your feelings more than I
Speaker 5: care about my feelings. You don't care about my feelings
Speaker 5: at all. I think my feelings matter. I don't think
Speaker 5: I should be rude to you or rude to somebody
Speaker 5: else who's going through gender dysphoria and having this mental issue.
Speaker 5: I don't think I should be mean. I think we
Speaker 5: should be considerate and kind and decent, loving.
Speaker 1: Of course I.
Speaker 5: Do, but don't ask me to lie to satisfy somebody
Speaker 5: else's lie.
Speaker 1: I'm not doing that. I won't be a part of that.
Speaker 5: And thus, from a personal perspective, I believe in this
Speaker 5: culture war. But if you were to take my perspective
Speaker 5: out of it, I believe in the culture.
Speaker 1: War because there are young girls being.
Speaker 5: Told they have to take a backseat to boys, and
Speaker 5: the answer is no, never mind that the boy thinks
Speaker 5: they're a girl, and society wants us to buy in
Speaker 5: to this madness.
Speaker 1: I'm not buying into mental illness.
Speaker 5: I'm not buying in to wholesale line where everybody buys
Speaker 5: into the lie. Absolutely not a culture war worth fighting,
Speaker 5: and we have to win. Megan Rappino is angry with
Speaker 5: Sophie Cunningham for saying the most normal thing in the world,
Speaker 5: girl sports are for girls, Angry with Riley Gaines for
Speaker 5: being supportive of girls in girl sports and girls alone
Speaker 5: and fighting for it. And so she goes on this ranch.
Speaker 5: She's looking right into the camera doing a little podcast thing.
Speaker 5: They called it unhinged, and I'm like, no, just wrong,
Speaker 5: maybe unhinged.
Speaker 1: Listen.
Speaker 11: I want to address the controversy that is happening right
Speaker 11: now around trans women in sports. As you know, I've
Speaker 11: talked about this a lot and will continue to keep
Speaker 11: talking about this. I don't know Sophie, so I can
Speaker 11: only project what I see about her beliefs based on
Speaker 11: her actions, and seeing a picture of her with Riley
Speaker 11: Gaines after the game told me everything I need to
Speaker 11: know about what's happening. Riley Gaines has made it her
Speaker 11: life's mission to exclude trans people from public life. She's
Speaker 11: directly tied to the Heritage Foundation, the authors of Project
Speaker 11: twenty twenty five and now twenty twenty six.
Speaker 5: We can stop there. That is nonsense. Project twenty twenty five,
Speaker 5: twenty twenty sex all this stuff was always ridiculous stuff.
Speaker 5: The Heritage Foundation has plenty of problems. Megan Rapino, that
Speaker 5: ain't it, but the exclusion of trans people. She's been
Speaker 5: clear and focused about keeping women only in women's sports.
Speaker 5: This is this is a lie and it gets bigger.
Speaker 11: Who have now published a report that suggests that they
Speaker 11: want to repeat fel Title nine, the very piece of
Speaker 11: legislation that allowed athletes like Sophie and myself to compete
Speaker 11: in sports. Sophie has claimed both to love trans people
Speaker 11: and support Title nine. And this is where I think
Speaker 11: the accountability with having a major platform is extremely important.
Speaker 11: You can hear it even in the language being used,
Speaker 11: that the root of trans exclusion is to protect young
Speaker 11: girls from men.
Speaker 1: To be clear, I would.
Speaker 11: Love to have that conversation and it's much needed in
Speaker 11: this country. But it frames the conversation as if we're
Speaker 11: protecting young girls from men being in WNBA locker rooms
Speaker 11: not happening. It villainizes trans girls as if they're somehow
Speaker 11: magically older than their peers, or are men when in
Speaker 11: reality they are also young girls.
Speaker 1: No, they're not. That's a lie. She's just lying.
Speaker 5: She's lad out lying as clear as can be. Also,
Speaker 5: if men can be in women's sports, here's a Megan Rappino,
Speaker 5: formerly of the US women's soccer team, talking about the
Speaker 5: importance of Title nine, which is about funding women's sports.
Speaker 5: If men can be in women's sports, there's no need
Speaker 5: for Title nine. Don't get angry with me at Riley Gaines.
Speaker 5: She's the one who's actually engaged in a protection of
Speaker 5: Title nine. You're the one who wants to destroy it.
Speaker 5: If Title nine is about women's sports and making sure
Speaker 5: that there's a proper funding, and you want men to
Speaker 5: be in women's sports, there's no need for Title nine
Speaker 5: because there is no women's sports the end. But if
Speaker 5: you believe that men who say they're women are women,
Speaker 5: well then you're just a liar.
Speaker 1: You're just wrong.
Speaker 5: And that's where the culture war is kids, and that's
Speaker 5: what we're fighting. That's it right there is she unhinged? No,
Speaker 5: she's just a liar.
Speaker 11: These laws are excluding kids, kids from playing youth sports.
Speaker 11: If we want to have a conversation around elite sports.
Speaker 11: There are effective policies that have been in place for
Speaker 11: many years that no one noticed because they worked. So
Speaker 11: if anybody is taking these talking points as legit or
Speaker 11: believing they're protecting young girls in sports, I just have
Speaker 11: to ask are you serious?
Speaker 5: Yes, We're all serious. The question is, Megan Rapino, why
Speaker 5: do you hate girls? We're talking about kids in sports?
Speaker 5: So you are in favor of children being mutilated in
Speaker 5: terms of these top surgeries and bottom surgeries. You're in
Speaker 5: favor of confusing children. You're in favor of lying to children.
Speaker 5: You're in favor of chemical castration of children.
Speaker 1: Where does it end for you?
Speaker 5: Are you serious? Can you imagine that that's how she
Speaker 5: actually thinks? It's an intellectual conversation? Are you serious?
Speaker 1: For real? Seriously? I don't know.
Speaker 5: You could add your own in there as well. That's
Speaker 5: not unhinged. Well maybe it's a little unhinged. But she
Speaker 5: is a liar, She is lying, and what she favors
Speaker 5: is downright dangerous. We have to win, they have to
Speaker 5: lose girls. Sports are for girls. This is Tony Katz
Speaker 5: today is putin looking to test NATO US intel reports.
Speaker 5: Say maybe Wall Street Journal with this report Tony Katz.
Speaker 5: Tony Katz today, why would anybody put anything past Vladimir Putin?
Speaker 5: US Intel findes Putin cound test, NATO's resolved with limited incursion.
Speaker 1: I think Russia has bigger issues. They would do this
Speaker 1: to try and.
Speaker 5: Get the US to waste time, money, resources doing this
Speaker 5: on the behest of whom one would assume, China, and
Speaker 5: no one should ever leave that out of their thinking.
Speaker 5: But right now there's a story that Ukraine doesn't have
Speaker 5: any missiles left to fire at Russia. I don't know
Speaker 5: if that's one hundred percent sure. Not again, all these
Speaker 5: stories you never know.
Speaker 1: But with the.
Speaker 5: Ukraine working so well on the drone tech and the
Speaker 5: US working with them now on the drone tech, this
Speaker 5: has been bad stuff for Russia. Russia within a few
Speaker 5: years could engage some of these scenarios. Does Letterer Putin
Speaker 5: have a few more years? There's all This is one
Speaker 5: of those reports where you go, huh, I have questions.
Speaker 5: Find everything at Tony kats dot com.
Speaker 1: I'll catch you Monday. Everyone, take care
Speaker 6: In a n