1 00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:10,760 Speaker 1: Line from Vaal Hartbeiner and the Crossroads of America. It's 2 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: Tony Katz today, fifteen days to flatten the curve. 3 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:19,440 Speaker 2: I remember that as you do. We were told. 4 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:22,800 Speaker 1: Fifteen days, everyone just stays home. You won't have this 5 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:25,520 Speaker 1: massive amount of COVID cases and hospitals. We'll be able 6 00:00:25,560 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: to manage everything. And well that didn't work out so well, 7 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 1: and I did it, Tony Katz, Tony kats today, Good 8 00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:34,280 Speaker 1: to be here, Good to be with you. Now it's 9 00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 1: President Trump telling Iran fifteen days to come to a deal. 10 00:00:37,960 --> 00:00:40,880 Speaker 2: Or you're going to regret it. Now. 11 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 1: I'm not in favor of what it is that we're 12 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:47,760 Speaker 1: seeing regarding the Iranian regime. 13 00:00:47,800 --> 00:00:49,600 Speaker 2: I'm not in favor of keeping the eye of toolin 14 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:51,360 Speaker 2: in power. 15 00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:53,599 Speaker 1: If you ask me if I favor regime change, if 16 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:54,400 Speaker 1: we're gonna call it. 17 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:57,680 Speaker 2: That, the answer is yeah, I really and truly do. 18 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:01,120 Speaker 1: But when we talk about while the President is going 19 00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 1: to engage in attack on the regime, what does it 20 00:01:04,920 --> 00:01:07,560 Speaker 1: mean we're gonna hit military targets, what do I do 21 00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 1: with that information? Because that doesn't help the people. I'm 22 00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:16,039 Speaker 1: focused on the people, not dealmaking. And regarding nuclear capabilities 23 00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: that I thought we destroyed, and certainly we did a 24 00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:22,080 Speaker 1: lot of damage to Noah Roffman joins me right now 25 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 1: from National Review. His third book, Blood in Progress, A 26 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:29,319 Speaker 1: Century of Left Wing Violence, will be out in May 27 00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:32,839 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty six. Be looking for pre orders at. 28 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:34,880 Speaker 2: Amazon dot com. 29 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:40,080 Speaker 1: His piece over at National Review, The clock ticks in Iran. 30 00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:44,040 Speaker 2: Is it your take that the clockticks. 31 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:47,680 Speaker 1: Because the iatola knows that his days are numbered? Or 32 00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:51,200 Speaker 1: is just the clock ticking because at any moment, Iran 33 00:01:51,240 --> 00:01:54,480 Speaker 1: can be involved in some type of military action with 34 00:01:55,040 --> 00:01:58,640 Speaker 1: Israel or the United States. 35 00:01:57,440 --> 00:02:01,760 Speaker 3: Or both, and it's increasingly looking like both. Yeah, I'm 36 00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:07,040 Speaker 3: leaning much towards the latter of your year description there. 37 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:11,680 Speaker 3: Nobody knows precisely what the president is thinking, and I 38 00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:13,960 Speaker 3: think there's an element of ambiguity there that he himself 39 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:17,280 Speaker 3: is cultivating. He's beginning to talk about the Wall Street 40 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 3: Journal reported, and he said as much to reporters yesterday 41 00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:23,919 Speaker 3: and today that maybe we do we love it it strike, 42 00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:27,960 Speaker 3: maybe we only get a couple of things, some military targets, 43 00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:30,600 Speaker 3: and then you guys come back to the negotiating table 44 00:02:30,600 --> 00:02:32,880 Speaker 3: and you strike a deal with us, or there's going 45 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:35,200 Speaker 3: to be another round of strikes that's going to be bigger, 46 00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:38,120 Speaker 3: and it will grow successfully until you guys come to 47 00:02:38,160 --> 00:02:42,520 Speaker 3: the table. I don't believe that for a second. This 48 00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:45,000 Speaker 3: is a use it or lose its scenario for the 49 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:48,280 Speaker 3: Iranian regime, and they understand as much. And indeed, the 50 00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:50,919 Speaker 3: United States has enough firepower in this region that it 51 00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:53,600 Speaker 3: would make very little sense for it to tailor it's 52 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:57,160 Speaker 3: targeting to such an extent that it leads itself vulnerable 53 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 3: to retaliatory responses the IRGC, the Iranian regime, its army, 54 00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:06,040 Speaker 3: or the dozens of proxy groups that are still active 55 00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:08,560 Speaker 3: in the region. And we'll engage with the US in 56 00:03:08,639 --> 00:03:12,760 Speaker 3: Israel on RAN's behalf once hostilities start. I don't anticipate 57 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:14,720 Speaker 3: that's what we're going to see, but I think we're 58 00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:16,520 Speaker 3: going to see, and what we're beginning to get some 59 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,080 Speaker 3: glimpses of in the Israeli press in particular, but some 60 00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:21,679 Speaker 3: of the in the American press and the Wall Street 61 00:03:21,720 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 3: Journal in particular, is some biblical stuff we executed. We 62 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:32,519 Speaker 3: have a few weeks ago an attack on Venezuela that 63 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:39,400 Speaker 3: was phenomenal in its technical tactical capacity. It was an interoperable, 64 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:46,160 Speaker 3: integrated combined arms operation using every element of American firepower 65 00:03:46,280 --> 00:03:48,480 Speaker 3: as well as special forces on the ground, in which 66 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:51,840 Speaker 3: we used experimental weapons that apparently turned the Cuban security 67 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:55,360 Speaker 3: forces around Nicholas Mudurero into jelly. They came home in 68 00:03:55,400 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 3: shoe boxes. We haven't seen anything like what we're about 69 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 3: to see in Iran. The scope, the scale, the speed, 70 00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 3: and the aggression with which the US can apply power 71 00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 3: to First, Iranian military targets. It's missile launchers, it's whatever 72 00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:15,400 Speaker 3: remains of its layered air defense system from the Twelve 73 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:18,279 Speaker 3: Day War, as well as any other ability for its 74 00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 3: proxies read in the region and around Iran and inside 75 00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:24,960 Speaker 3: Iran to project power. That's first, and that's going away 76 00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:27,839 Speaker 3: in hours. And in the subsequent hours there will be 77 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 3: attacks on ier GC targets and regime targets designed to 78 00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:34,320 Speaker 3: minimize the casualties that the experienced by the Iranian people, 79 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:37,599 Speaker 3: the civilian population. The whole point of this exercise is 80 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:41,719 Speaker 3: to re energize the protest movement and filment something that 81 00:04:41,720 --> 00:04:44,159 Speaker 3: looks like a ground force, because you can't dissolve a 82 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 3: regime from the air without a ground force. 83 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,159 Speaker 2: And that's why the protesters join. 84 00:04:48,080 --> 00:04:49,840 Speaker 3: US but that is the goal. I think the goal 85 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:50,960 Speaker 3: is to collapse the regime. 86 00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:55,080 Speaker 2: So that's where it gets for me rather confusing. 87 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 1: That is what I want, and I'm going to be 88 00:04:56,880 --> 00:04:59,680 Speaker 1: called a warmonger for it, and I honestly don't care 89 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:01,800 Speaker 1: about that. One of the things I think interesting about 90 00:05:01,839 --> 00:05:04,560 Speaker 1: Trump foreign policy is that while he would never call 91 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 1: himself a Neocon, I think he's given himself a little 92 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:10,240 Speaker 1: bit of an eye to the idea that maybe dealing 93 00:05:10,279 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 1: with these things before they become bigger things is the 94 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:15,160 Speaker 1: right way to go about things. I don't know if 95 00:05:15,160 --> 00:05:17,480 Speaker 1: we would call that a neocon policy or any other 96 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:21,120 Speaker 1: kind of policy, but I have been questioning, how in 97 00:05:21,160 --> 00:05:23,680 Speaker 1: the world, if I bomb this site, if I bomb 98 00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 1: that site, how does that help the people? 99 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:28,600 Speaker 2: He said help is on its way. You can't say 100 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 2: help is on its way and then not provide help. 101 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:33,440 Speaker 1: You have to break the IRGC and the only way 102 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 1: I think to do that is to end the money 103 00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:39,440 Speaker 1: supply and the power supply that goes to these people. 104 00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 1: So what you're arguing is is that what we saw 105 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:45,480 Speaker 1: in Venezuela is only a taste of the kind of 106 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:49,359 Speaker 1: activity you could see in Iran, and that means that 107 00:05:49,400 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 1: you're going to see US troops actually making maneuvers. 108 00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:58,039 Speaker 3: We don't have a force posture in the region that's 109 00:05:58,080 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 3: conducive to a ground element. They're not there. Well, we 110 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:04,640 Speaker 3: do have are probably special Forces operations that it would 111 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:07,560 Speaker 3: not be surprised if they'd taken a role on the 112 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:10,040 Speaker 3: ground in some very limited capacity, and much the same 113 00:06:10,040 --> 00:06:11,800 Speaker 3: way that we saw in Venezuela. There was a ground 114 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:14,560 Speaker 3: component to that as well. I wouldn't rule that out. 115 00:06:14,839 --> 00:06:16,719 Speaker 3: But what you have to do, and when you're engaged 116 00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:19,400 Speaker 3: in a campaign like this, is start with the military targets, 117 00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:21,960 Speaker 3: because you're trying to protect your forces. We want to 118 00:06:21,960 --> 00:06:24,200 Speaker 3: make sure that as much as Iran is capable of 119 00:06:24,200 --> 00:06:28,560 Speaker 3: retaliating against US and Israeli and allied forces in the 120 00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:32,960 Speaker 3: region at US basis, Israeli basis, our joint partnership bases, 121 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:35,360 Speaker 3: as well as our naval assets. You want to neutralize 122 00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:38,200 Speaker 3: all that stuff right away. That's the first that's job 123 00:06:38,279 --> 00:06:43,240 Speaker 3: number one. Then you start peeling away the regime targets, 124 00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:47,800 Speaker 3: the IRGC command structure, as well as its capacity to 125 00:06:47,839 --> 00:06:50,599 Speaker 3: communicate with its troops on the ground, and then after 126 00:06:50,640 --> 00:06:55,080 Speaker 3: that you start attacking symbolic targets, symbols of political authority, 127 00:06:55,520 --> 00:06:59,719 Speaker 3: the region's political authority, and inside Iran. And you know, 128 00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:02,560 Speaker 3: we've talking who knows how long this campaign lasts. What 129 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:04,400 Speaker 3: it looks like, we've been talking about weeks and weeks 130 00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:07,240 Speaker 3: and weeks. But if you start looking at reading some 131 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 3: of the informed speculation from people who know exactly what 132 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:14,560 Speaker 3: they're talking about, like those who are talking who are 133 00:07:14,600 --> 00:07:17,640 Speaker 3: not inside the loop here, but are nevertheless informed on it, 134 00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 3: like for example, Vice Admiral Bob Howard, the former Deputy 135 00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 3: commander of the US Central Command SYENTCOM in the Middle East, 136 00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 3: speaking of the Jerusalem Post, it speculates that a lot 137 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 3: of the really heavy kinetic operations will take place within hours, 138 00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 3: not days, not weeks, hours that we have the capacity 139 00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:40,760 Speaker 3: and we have the firepower in this region to execute 140 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 3: something that the world has never seen before. And make 141 00:07:44,960 --> 00:07:48,840 Speaker 3: no mistake, the world is watching. The audience for this 142 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 3: is not justin Tehran, it is in Beijing, it is 143 00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:55,200 Speaker 3: in Moscow. And what the performance that is about to 144 00:07:55,240 --> 00:07:57,520 Speaker 3: be put on is for their benefit, and it is 145 00:07:57,520 --> 00:08:00,600 Speaker 3: designed to deter as much as anything else, a much 146 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:03,520 Speaker 3: broader conflict in West in the Western Pacific, or in Europe, 147 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 3: and I think we're going to see something that's going 148 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:09,160 Speaker 3: to be pretty impressive. You know, you had regime Chinese 149 00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 3: regime officials speaking to their house organs, the propagandist outlets 150 00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 3: that they populate the West with, and even they could 151 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:21,360 Speaker 3: not like really hide how impressed they were with that. 152 00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:24,760 Speaker 3: You know, it was a violation of international law, it 153 00:08:24,800 --> 00:08:27,840 Speaker 3: was reckless and imperialist. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But at the 154 00:08:27,880 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 3: same time, you had Beijing, Beijing Link officials and military 155 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:37,280 Speaker 3: strategists speaking with for example, the Daily, the Chinese People's Daily, 156 00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:39,360 Speaker 3: saying like, well, you got to hand it to them. 157 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:41,680 Speaker 3: I mean, it was really actually pretty impressive as a 158 00:08:41,720 --> 00:08:46,640 Speaker 3: matter of tactical and strategic military prowess. And I think 159 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:50,520 Speaker 3: that really did it really did hit home in Beijing 160 00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:53,000 Speaker 3: what they saw in Caracas, and I think what they're 161 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 3: about to see in Iran is going to is going 162 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:58,319 Speaker 3: to be just as impressive and leave just as lasting 163 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:02,920 Speaker 3: an impression of what US capabilities are for sustained power projection, 164 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:06,000 Speaker 3: for the speed at which we can amass resources halfway 165 00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:08,840 Speaker 3: across the planet Earth, for the integrity of our alliances 166 00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:11,720 Speaker 3: while we're doing this sort of thing. It's designed to 167 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:13,480 Speaker 3: be a deterrent and I think it'll be effective. 168 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:16,760 Speaker 1: Now, just really quickly, before we move on we talk 169 00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 1: about not having certain forced postures in the region. You 170 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 1: can argue that the Israelis are in the region, and 171 00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:26,360 Speaker 1: the Israelis are absolutely capable of doing a whole bunch 172 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:30,720 Speaker 1: of things. Is this a coordinated effort with the Israelis 173 00:09:31,040 --> 00:09:35,240 Speaker 1: or is it better for a on a pr level, 174 00:09:35,280 --> 00:09:38,760 Speaker 1: I'll call it to tell the Israelis or to say, hey, 175 00:09:38,800 --> 00:09:41,520 Speaker 1: we're not going to involve the Israelis in this until 176 00:09:41,559 --> 00:09:44,280 Speaker 1: they start getting hit with drones and missiles and whatever 177 00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:47,120 Speaker 1: it is Iran does in a flurry of fury. 178 00:09:48,280 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 2: Yeah. 179 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:52,439 Speaker 3: So we have to stress at this point in time 180 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:55,280 Speaker 3: that the information environment is saturated with a lot of 181 00:09:55,320 --> 00:10:00,239 Speaker 3: stuff that may not be real. There's efforts to misterrecd 182 00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:04,040 Speaker 3: redirect to get the Iranians to think something is coming 183 00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:06,400 Speaker 3: that is not coming, to get the Iranians to think 184 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:09,560 Speaker 3: that something is coming that may not be coming. So 185 00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:12,240 Speaker 3: we have to be cautious about being caught in the 186 00:10:12,280 --> 00:10:15,280 Speaker 3: misinformation loop that is being actively cultivated right now as 187 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:19,520 Speaker 3: part of any competent strategic operation. But there are indications 188 00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:22,760 Speaker 3: in Western media outlets that Israel will take an active 189 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 3: role jointly along with the United States in this operation, 190 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:28,439 Speaker 3: which would be kind of unprecedented. There really was, There 191 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:32,080 Speaker 3: was coordination during the Twelve Day War, and we took 192 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:35,319 Speaker 3: over in the middle of that operation to execute the 193 00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:40,720 Speaker 3: Operation Midnight Hammer, but it wasn't a joint allied operation 194 00:10:41,080 --> 00:10:43,880 Speaker 3: like what we're seeing in news reports. I can't necessarily 195 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:46,440 Speaker 3: say that that's definitely going to happen. I would be 196 00:10:46,559 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 3: kind of surprised if it did, but not completely surprised 197 00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:53,000 Speaker 3: because this is a joint project. For one very important reason, 198 00:10:53,400 --> 00:10:56,320 Speaker 3: Iran does not distinguish between the United States and Israel. 199 00:10:56,720 --> 00:10:59,800 Speaker 3: It doesn't distinguish it strategically, it doesn't distinguish it tactically. 200 00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 3: When there are when when things this will start popping 201 00:11:02,960 --> 00:11:06,520 Speaker 3: off on either side of this equation, we get involved 202 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:10,160 Speaker 3: very quickly. Iranians target us, we target them. Their proxies 203 00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:13,720 Speaker 3: target us, we target them. There is no distinction on 204 00:11:13,760 --> 00:11:16,440 Speaker 3: the ground when it comes to when the when the 205 00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:20,200 Speaker 3: shootings begins, So it's sort of a distinction without a 206 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:22,320 Speaker 3: difference for me. It's the sort of thing that really 207 00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:27,160 Speaker 3: dominates the thinking in Western European capitals. And then you 208 00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:30,719 Speaker 3: know uh, social media venues, but it really is. As 209 00:11:30,720 --> 00:11:34,520 Speaker 3: far as tactical strategic considerations go, it's just not really 210 00:11:34,559 --> 00:11:35,080 Speaker 3: up there for me. 211 00:11:35,920 --> 00:11:39,959 Speaker 1: Talking to Noah Roffman of National Review his new book 212 00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:43,080 Speaker 1: Blood and Progress, A Century of Left Wing Violence. 213 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:45,400 Speaker 2: You'll be able to get that in May of this 214 00:11:45,679 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 2: very year. 215 00:11:46,280 --> 00:11:49,240 Speaker 1: Look for pre sales at Amazon dot Com or wherever 216 00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:51,400 Speaker 1: it is you like to get your books. 217 00:11:52,040 --> 00:11:54,360 Speaker 2: Let me move it over to Representative Acasio Cortes. 218 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:57,400 Speaker 1: This performance at the Munich Security Conference, which I would 219 00:11:58,200 --> 00:12:01,360 Speaker 1: say before anything else that Marco rub speech was an 220 00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 1: absolute joy to listen to, and not only just I 221 00:12:06,160 --> 00:12:10,439 Speaker 1: think a full throated defense of the value of Western civilization. 222 00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:14,240 Speaker 1: But I took this speech not as I think some 223 00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:17,320 Speaker 1: Europeans wanted to take it, that we are not abandoning you, 224 00:12:17,720 --> 00:12:21,680 Speaker 1: but rather if you don't want to survive, well that's 225 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:22,120 Speaker 1: on you. 226 00:12:22,480 --> 00:12:24,600 Speaker 2: We simply won't be a part of it. The best 227 00:12:24,640 --> 00:12:25,240 Speaker 2: of luck to you. 228 00:12:25,320 --> 00:12:28,160 Speaker 1: The United States is moving in this direction, but with 229 00:12:28,280 --> 00:12:32,000 Speaker 1: Representative of Cassio Cortes. Most people are pointing to her 230 00:12:32,040 --> 00:12:34,680 Speaker 1: answer regarding what if China made a move on Taiwan 231 00:12:35,120 --> 00:12:37,440 Speaker 1: and her hemming and hang and her inability to even 232 00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:40,559 Speaker 1: understand the question, never mind formulate an answer which was 233 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:43,280 Speaker 1: rather sophomoric as saying, we need to do what we 234 00:12:43,320 --> 00:12:45,959 Speaker 1: can to make sure that moment never comes. As opposed 235 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:48,320 Speaker 1: to answering the question. I would argue that there were 236 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:50,839 Speaker 1: a great number of things that she discussed at the 237 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:54,040 Speaker 1: Munich Security Conference that showed that even with all her 238 00:12:54,160 --> 00:12:58,160 Speaker 1: prep work, it was a very sophomoric attempt at trying 239 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:02,720 Speaker 1: to be seen as somebody sirious about foreign policy. Your 240 00:13:02,760 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 1: piece AOC's breakout performance, which you can find at National 241 00:13:07,280 --> 00:13:11,000 Speaker 1: Review dot com, do you see it as a sophomore 242 00:13:11,320 --> 00:13:13,840 Speaker 1: performance or do you see it as something else? 243 00:13:14,840 --> 00:13:17,280 Speaker 3: No, I absolutely agree with your assessment. And yeah, that 244 00:13:17,280 --> 00:13:20,520 Speaker 3: piece was written sort of a tongue in cheek praising 245 00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 3: her for her what her staff build as really like 246 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:28,280 Speaker 3: her debutant's ball here. She was going to come out 247 00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:30,800 Speaker 3: and demonstrate her foreign policy chops. They had prepped the 248 00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:35,280 Speaker 3: beaches for weeks in advance of her trip to Munich 249 00:13:35,280 --> 00:13:38,240 Speaker 3: and Berlin, you know, indicating to the press, hey, keep 250 00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:40,280 Speaker 3: your eye on AOC. She's going to make some news. 251 00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 3: And she sure did, but it wasn't the news that 252 00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:45,520 Speaker 3: she wanted to make. I watched as much as I 253 00:13:45,559 --> 00:13:49,079 Speaker 3: possibly could the hour and forty five minutes she spent 254 00:13:49,520 --> 00:13:53,560 Speaker 3: at a Berlin university speaking, you know, extemporaneously on foreign 255 00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:58,320 Speaker 3: policy issues. And it was excruciating because this lady just 256 00:13:58,360 --> 00:14:02,040 Speaker 3: doesn't know how to speak about foreign policy. She understands 257 00:14:02,080 --> 00:14:04,800 Speaker 3: how to appeal to an audience of far left progressives 258 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:07,240 Speaker 3: in the United States on domestic issues. That is her 259 00:14:07,280 --> 00:14:10,800 Speaker 3: box of rhetorical tricks, and she pulled every single one 260 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:14,280 Speaker 3: out over the course of this that engagement and in 261 00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:16,840 Speaker 3: subsequent engagements over in Germany over the course of that week, 262 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 3: and they were so wholly unimpressive. They were really reflective 263 00:14:21,040 --> 00:14:23,520 Speaker 3: of the milieu in which she is steeped, in which 264 00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:26,160 Speaker 3: the United States is the bad guy. Western Europe is 265 00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 3: the bad guy. We were imperialist, where aggressive, we're preternaturally racist, 266 00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:35,400 Speaker 3: institutionally and structurally racist, and all of that informs her worldview. 267 00:14:35,800 --> 00:14:39,080 Speaker 3: So when she goes out and she just doesn't know what, 268 00:14:39,160 --> 00:14:41,400 Speaker 3: she doesn't know. So a lot of the stuff that 269 00:14:41,440 --> 00:14:44,920 Speaker 3: made news was her hemming and haweing and not saying 270 00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:47,880 Speaker 3: anything of substance at all, but using a lot of 271 00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:51,880 Speaker 3: polysyllabic jargon that is familiar to the Academy and sounds 272 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:54,600 Speaker 3: superficially authoritative, But then when you actually type it out 273 00:14:54,640 --> 00:14:57,040 Speaker 3: and read the transcript, you realize nothing was said at all. 274 00:14:57,160 --> 00:14:59,120 Speaker 3: No point was ever made over the course of the 275 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:01,920 Speaker 3: entire paragraph in which she spoke. But there were other 276 00:15:01,960 --> 00:15:04,880 Speaker 3: moments where she said Marco Rubios, for example, appeal to 277 00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:08,840 Speaker 3: Western culture was essentially chauvinist, that he didn't really understand 278 00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:13,280 Speaker 3: that cowboys are really I guess the tantamount of slave 279 00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:16,840 Speaker 3: patrols is sort of the implications she made that Mexicans 280 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 3: and descendants of African enslaved people are. 281 00:15:20,200 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 2: Word for it. 282 00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:22,840 Speaker 1: Because I listened to her and I still don't know 283 00:15:22,880 --> 00:15:23,840 Speaker 1: what she was talking about. 284 00:15:24,640 --> 00:15:27,400 Speaker 3: No, it's because she wasn't saying anything. She was saying 285 00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:29,720 Speaker 3: a lot of words that don't amount to a complete 286 00:15:29,760 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 3: and coherent thought. It's like she starts talking and then 287 00:15:33,440 --> 00:15:35,880 Speaker 3: hopes her brain will catch up to her with a 288 00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 3: point that's comprehensive and incogent. But most of the time 289 00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:42,400 Speaker 3: she just keeps talking and doesn't actually get to anything 290 00:15:42,440 --> 00:15:47,320 Speaker 3: resembling a point. But you can assess if you dissect 291 00:15:47,640 --> 00:15:50,720 Speaker 3: and interrogate, to use her word and her highly academic language, 292 00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:53,560 Speaker 3: the points that she's attempting to make, and you get 293 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:56,560 Speaker 3: at the nut of it, which is that the United 294 00:15:56,560 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 3: States is fundamentally imperialist, even when it engages with anti 295 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:03,440 Speaker 3: democratic actors, as they did with Nicholas Maduro, a very 296 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:07,000 Speaker 3: generous concession on her part, it is nevertheless imperialist, and 297 00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:10,120 Speaker 3: it is informed entirely by the degree to which we're 298 00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:12,960 Speaker 3: executing hostile operations against people with dark skin. 299 00:16:13,680 --> 00:16:14,680 Speaker 2: That's her worldview. 300 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 3: It is very naive, it is very childish, but she's 301 00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:20,760 Speaker 3: been taught her whole life that this is the height 302 00:16:20,760 --> 00:16:26,280 Speaker 3: of sophistication. That you can't understand the events without layering 303 00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:30,920 Speaker 3: onto them this elaborate academic framework that reduces everything to 304 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,400 Speaker 3: the influence of capital and the influence of race. That's 305 00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 3: just her worldview, and it is impossible to navigate foreign 306 00:16:37,640 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 3: policy with that worldview. I should know. I went through 307 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:43,560 Speaker 3: a foreign when I was in graduate school for doing 308 00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:46,160 Speaker 3: an IR degree. There were schools of thought that I 309 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:50,440 Speaker 3: had to understand, like the Feminist school of international relations, 310 00:16:50,640 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 3: which isn't a thing which does not help you understand 311 00:16:53,640 --> 00:16:57,720 Speaker 3: the geopolitical landscape and navigate it. The Marxist school of 312 00:16:57,760 --> 00:17:00,720 Speaker 3: international relations, which again is sort of a theory that 313 00:17:00,760 --> 00:17:04,480 Speaker 3: reduces everything to the pernicious influence of capital, and it's obstructive, 314 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:08,000 Speaker 3: It obscures, it doesn't it doesn't enlighten you about how 315 00:17:08,040 --> 00:17:10,399 Speaker 3: the world works. It makes it very confusing how the 316 00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:13,399 Speaker 3: world works, because nothing is behaving as your doctrine tells 317 00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:15,679 Speaker 3: you it should. This is the kind of world that 318 00:17:15,720 --> 00:17:19,840 Speaker 3: she comes from, and it was very interesting to see 319 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:22,800 Speaker 3: the extent to which the entire planet seemed to agree 320 00:17:23,240 --> 00:17:26,160 Speaker 3: that what they were hearing was not sophisticated. They didn't 321 00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:29,480 Speaker 3: have to pretend as though this was some really nuanced 322 00:17:29,520 --> 00:17:32,320 Speaker 3: and authoritative outlook on foreign policy just to prop this 323 00:17:32,359 --> 00:17:35,120 Speaker 3: person up, even though she's a great white hope. They 324 00:17:35,200 --> 00:17:37,720 Speaker 3: let her flat, they let her flail, they let her fail, 325 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:41,240 Speaker 3: and it was really refreshing to see that. I don't 326 00:17:41,240 --> 00:17:43,399 Speaker 3: know if it's going to be indicative of the future 327 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:45,879 Speaker 3: trajectory of her political career. She's going to be around 328 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:48,080 Speaker 3: for a very very long time, but it was refreshing. 329 00:17:48,160 --> 00:17:48,920 Speaker 2: She's going to be around. 330 00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:51,360 Speaker 1: She's going to be formidable because she talks in sloganeering 331 00:17:51,359 --> 00:17:54,879 Speaker 1: and emojis, and the American press is already trying to 332 00:17:55,000 --> 00:17:57,200 Speaker 1: rally around her. I think in great ways. But that's 333 00:17:57,200 --> 00:18:01,080 Speaker 1: another conversation for another day. Noah rothen National Review. I 334 00:18:01,160 --> 00:18:03,640 Speaker 1: appreciate you taking the time. Moore's coming up on Tony 335 00:18:03,680 --> 00:18:04,000 Speaker 1: Katz