Speaker 1: Live from Vall Heartbyer and the Crossroads of America. It's
Speaker 1: Tony Katz today. The deal is so close you can
Speaker 1: almost taste it. A deal with Iran and Omon and the.
Speaker 2: Strait of Hormuz and blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: I hate the fact that I have to start this way,
Speaker 2: but I got to assume more. The lack thereof is
Speaker 2: the top story. I don't know. Maybe it is Abdullah
Speaker 2: al said, being the tough guy. It's so adorable. He
Speaker 2: is precious, he really is. He's like having your very
Speaker 2: own Tamagachi. Don't forget to feed him. Or there's Tucker
Speaker 2: Carlson with his ten point declaration of what a political
Speaker 2: party in America should be, which sounds like a lot
Speaker 2: of things we would say, except of course, without the insanity.
Speaker 2: And Marjorie Taylor Green Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, an
Speaker 2: absolute pleasure to be with you.
Speaker 3: I'm going to get into what he said, because.
Speaker 2: It's the funny thing is that I think Tucker doesn't
Speaker 2: understand how he's coming across. And I am more and
Speaker 2: more convinced that the marketplace for his madness is slight,
Speaker 2: very very slight and certainly who he has picked to
Speaker 2: align himself with it puts in the same position. Certainly
Speaker 2: when it comes to the idea of war, certainly.
Speaker 3: Comes to what's going on with Iran.
Speaker 2: There are people who want to scream America first, with
Speaker 2: all due respect, If taking out a terrorist which that's
Speaker 2: trying to kill you isn't America first, I'm not exactly sure.
Speaker 3: What is Marjorie Taylor Green.
Speaker 2: Again, I repeat myself, no serious political anything is done
Speaker 2: with Marjorie Taylor Green, none.
Speaker 3: Zero.
Speaker 2: Tucker has still has the opportunity to be taken seriously,
Speaker 2: far more seriously than her.
Speaker 3: But you're gonna align with her.
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, Sure, we're gonna spend even less time
Speaker 2: thinking about you. I'm gonna get into that. I will
Speaker 2: get into the tough guy commentary of Abdullah al Sayid,
Speaker 2: because if he thinks that the issue is nobody can
Speaker 2: pronounce abdu ra Chlan, well that's not the issue. The
Speaker 2: issue is whether or not you're an Islamo Marxist, whether
Speaker 2: or not you.
Speaker 3: Have connections to care.
Speaker 2: The Council of American Islamic Relations, which is a front
Speaker 2: group for the Muslim Brotherhood, as said by the UAE,
Speaker 2: designated a terrorist group by Florida and Texas, and oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, not a very good group of people
Speaker 2: as Islamist apologists.
Speaker 3: My take on that one.
Speaker 2: They may disagree, but you're gonna complain about APAC, Oh honey,
Speaker 2: kit and boo boo, and then you're gonna get tough
Speaker 2: with Mike Rogers, the Republican running.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we'll get into that too.
Speaker 2: But can I start not even with what's going on
Speaker 2: with the RAN because there's nothing really to report. It's
Speaker 2: the same as it ever was, and the oil prices
Speaker 2: are showing this.
Speaker 3: We're actually up this morning.
Speaker 2: Like when I was doing my morning show, we were
Speaker 2: at seventy five dollars a barrel. Now we're at seventy
Speaker 2: seven dollars a barrel midday.
Speaker 3: The brend crude was.
Speaker 2: Just at about eighty now is at eighty two thirty eight.
Speaker 2: The Brench crew is what comes out of the ocean,
Speaker 2: so we're seeing a tickup.
Speaker 3: But put that to the side as well.
Speaker 2: Can we agree The one thing in American society can
Speaker 2: we agree on, please, is f the flock cameras can
Speaker 2: say that, right, Parducier landing, Can I get a ruling.
Speaker 3: Yes, as long as the last three letters do not
Speaker 3: get spelled.
Speaker 2: Okay, as long as the last three letters do not
Speaker 2: get spelled.
Speaker 3: Of the flock camera? Oh that one? Yes? Oh that
Speaker 3: I can say. Okay, so I did it right?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Yeh that Maybe I got it confused. That could have
Speaker 3: just been terrible.
Speaker 2: There is a story out of NewsNation newsnationnow dot com.
Speaker 3: All eight flock.
Speaker 2: Cameras, according to the Wenona Police Department, Wynona, Minnesota, all
Speaker 2: eight of them.
Speaker 3: Which are next to the Wisconsin border.
Speaker 2: We're missing. Somebody stole all eight flock cameras. Now, I
Speaker 2: do not condone the theft, and that is wrong. But
Speaker 2: let us discuss the American discussed of the flock camera.
Speaker 3: So what is a flock camera? Great?
Speaker 2: Great, great, great question. This is the idea of surveillance.
Speaker 2: So flock safety is the website flocksafety dot com Clear evidence, safer, communities,
Speaker 2: privacy first, and it reads their website right there on
Speaker 2: their page. Flock connects communities, businesses and public safety, so
Speaker 2: incidents may be understood clearly and decisions can be made
Speaker 2: on facts. Okay, I should be clear that what I'm
Speaker 2: about to discuss has nothing to do specifically with the
Speaker 2: company Flock. I don't know much about the actual company.
Speaker 2: I don't mind a company being in business. These are
Speaker 2: not the things that I concern myself with, and they
Speaker 2: are not the only company that is in this business.
Speaker 2: There is also a company called is it a lawn
Speaker 2: aln that does this picture the scenario. You want to
Speaker 2: keep your community safe, you want to keep an eye
Speaker 2: on things. You work with a group like Flock, and
Speaker 2: they install cameras all around your city and that allows
Speaker 2: the local police department to keep the better eye on things.
Speaker 2: And so if there's a criminal on the loose, or
Speaker 2: if someone's doing this, that or the other, the police
Speaker 2: can handle it and we can stop the crimes. When
Speaker 2: a private business does this, I have zero issue with
Speaker 2: it whatsoever. So I work with a group, right, I
Speaker 2: work with a group called Who's Your Security? I do
Speaker 2: work with them. I'm very clear about this. They have
Speaker 2: a website Catchthebadguys dot com, which their entire world is
Speaker 2: how to utilize.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, Armando, give me a call.
Speaker 2: How do you utilize your camera like your existing security
Speaker 2: camera with their AI tech? And the philosophy is, why
Speaker 2: can't we stop the crime while it's happening, really before
Speaker 2: it gets going, so we can actually arrest somebody instead
Speaker 2: of having a camera saying, oh, look there's the guy
Speaker 2: who robbed me stole all my stuff. You could actually
Speaker 2: do something about it. I have zero issue with that whatsoever.
Speaker 2: On the private level, none, absolutely none. And they've got
Speaker 2: like tools that you can get for this kind of thing,
Speaker 2: and trailers you can rent, like if you have like
Speaker 2: like car lots or construction sites and things like that,
Speaker 2: totally fine, absolutely fine. The prime if you have home
Speaker 2: security and you have cameras, that's fine. I have cameras,
Speaker 2: of course I do. I don't like the idea that
Speaker 2: government comes and knock and saying, hey, can we get
Speaker 2: access to your footage. That's where it starts to get weird.
Speaker 2: I am discussing the idea of government surveilling the citizenry,
Speaker 2: no matter how it is described. In the end, what
Speaker 2: is happening is that local governments are utilizing these cameras
Speaker 2: and putting these cameras up, and oh, the police departments
Speaker 2: love them. They're surveiling the citizen ran where I happen
Speaker 2: to live. The mayor, she's lovely, by the way, I
Speaker 2: like her. On a great number of subjects. She's wrong
Speaker 2: on this. The police department is thrilled with these cameras.
Speaker 2: They were able to catch three people who were wanted
Speaker 2: from a county just below us.
Speaker 3: The only way to know that.
Speaker 2: Is if you are surveiling all the people who are
Speaker 2: walking down Main Street and where I live quite literally
Speaker 2: Main Street, right, That's the only way it can happen.
Speaker 2: The government has absolutely no right to surveil the citizen,
Speaker 2: and no citizen should think a rational society has surveillance.
Speaker 2: China has surveillance, NonStop cameras in all plays, at all times.
Speaker 2: They have what are referred to as social credit scores.
Speaker 2: Do you smile enough? Did you pick up that piece
Speaker 2: of garbage? Well, if your social credit score isn't high enough,
Speaker 2: no travel for you.
Speaker 3: No opportunities for you.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, you get less your rights
Speaker 2: to the extent that you can have a right in
Speaker 2: a communist nation, whether that be in all of China
Speaker 2: or in Manhattan under Bondani, they get taken from you
Speaker 2: because you are not acting appropriately and the camera is watching.
Speaker 3: That is some Philip K. Dick kind of low class.
Speaker 2: Stuff that is gross ugly beyond the pale obscenity. This
Speaker 2: is the last thing a society should want. If you
Speaker 2: want to know the real last thing a society should want.
Speaker 2: What that happens when a society tries to equalize out
Speaker 2: in certain ways. You should read Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut.
Speaker 2: You can actually see the movie with Julie Haggerty. I
Speaker 2: think it's George c.
Speaker 3: Scott.
Speaker 2: It's a short film. It'll turn you, it'll turn your stomach.
Speaker 2: But neither here nor there on this subject. We do
Speaker 2: not want a society where we are surveiled.
Speaker 3: And I will have.
Speaker 2: This conversation with anybody in law enforcement anywhere, at any time,
Speaker 2: whether you're a police officer, whether you're a police chief,
Speaker 2: whether you're a sheriff, whether you're FBI retired. I start
Speaker 2: with a baseline. It is not the job of the
Speaker 2: citizen to make easier the job of law enforcement. When
Speaker 2: I say easier, I am saying that my rights do
Speaker 2: not get abused, misused, or taken, so it is easier
Speaker 2: for law enforce. Horseman, not now, not Ever. The answer
Speaker 2: is no, I understand the role of police. I'm not
Speaker 2: a defund the police guy. Was it Bernie Sanders who
Speaker 2: just said that, no serious democrat is talking about defunding
Speaker 2: the police. Oh, I know, I've got this to Oh,
Speaker 2: it's gonna kill me.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna find it.
Speaker 2: I think Bertie just said that no serious democrat is
Speaker 2: talking about defunding the police. Adorable. Of course they are,
Speaker 2: and of course they want to.
Speaker 3: I am not.
Speaker 2: But I'm also not going to have a conversation about
Speaker 2: putting my rights up for grabs.
Speaker 3: Or up for debate.
Speaker 2: Do you have a right to privacy in the public square.
Speaker 2: We've answered that question really in America by saying no.
Speaker 2: If my eyes can see you, you're not private, and
Speaker 2: a recording device can be seen as nothing more than
Speaker 2: your eyes. Now I'm paraphrasing this, but I I have
Speaker 2: the general concept right that is of the private citizen.
Speaker 2: If I am going to name the restaurant and someone
Speaker 2: has decided that they're going to take my picture and
Speaker 2: post it, oh look, Tony Katz went here.
Speaker 3: First of all, that's weird. But secondly, they can do that.
Speaker 3: They can do that.
Speaker 2: That's different than whether your government should be able to
Speaker 2: do that. Your government being restricted is what is so great.
Speaker 2: That is what matters most. When President Obama complained about
Speaker 2: the Constitution. He complained that it was a charter of
Speaker 2: negative rights. It was a negative charter, which is to
Speaker 2: say that the Constitution, if you were to give it
Speaker 2: a read, he talks about what government cannot do to you.
Speaker 2: It does not discuss what government must do for you.
Speaker 2: I always thought that was a very frightening and ugly
Speaker 2: thing for him to say. It is really a great
Speaker 2: example of how diametrically opposed I am to that philosophy.
Speaker 2: I do not want my government to do for me
Speaker 2: outside of Article one, Section eight, provide for the common defense,
Speaker 2: promote the general welfare, right solid.
Speaker 3: Do I want them to have a military? Absolutely?
Speaker 2: Do I want a government as small and as lean
Speaker 2: as possible doing the basics, Yes, I do. Everything else
Speaker 2: should be up to me. What with the tenth Amendment
Speaker 2: ensuring that the rest of the rights are mine that
Speaker 2: are not actually laid out there within the Bill of
Speaker 2: Rights or within the Constitution itself, it belongs to us.
Speaker 2: Restraining the government was the whole point, and Barack Obama,
Speaker 2: the wait for it, constitutional scholar, seems to have missed.
Speaker 3: He missed the points of the thing.
Speaker 2: That's like reading the New Testament, being like so so.
Speaker 3: Like, who is this Jesus guy? Again? You have missed
Speaker 3: the point.
Speaker 2: If you're not, if you can read that not under
Speaker 2: the Constitution is about constraining government. It is about amplifying
Speaker 2: the concepts of liberty now in and of itself. If
Speaker 2: we have a constitution that we are saying that freedom,
Speaker 2: absolute freedom, pure freedom is not the thing we were
Speaker 2: going for. We are going for a rule of law.
Speaker 2: We're looking for the maximum amounts of liberty, which means,
Speaker 2: by definition, a level of guardrails. And we keep those guardrails,
Speaker 2: and we keep them as wide away from each other
Speaker 2: as possible. That's a liberty society. That's the society I favor.
Speaker 2: Governments can't track you. If they could track you on
Speaker 2: the street just because they put up the cameras well,
Speaker 2: then what happened to the idea of search, Whatever happened
Speaker 2: to the idea of the Fourth Amendment, whatever happened to
Speaker 2: the idea of a warrant. They're already keeping tabs on you,
Speaker 2: keeping tabs in your location. And we have seen the
Speaker 2: videos out there, a police officer saying we know when
Speaker 2: you left town, we know when you came back, we
Speaker 2: know what you did.
Speaker 3: Is that right?
Speaker 2: And the worst is the officer acts like a total
Speaker 2: scumbag in the videos, which must be something they train,
Speaker 2: because no real person should ever act like that. So
Speaker 2: there in Wynoda, Minnesota, they tore down the flock cameras
Speaker 2: to stop this surveillance. You can't condone the law breaking
Speaker 2: of the vandalism there.
Speaker 3: But should you.
Speaker 2: Vote out people who want the flock cameras and should
Speaker 2: you vote to remove them?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 2: And should you vote for any any politico who wants
Speaker 2: to install them? No? No, you should not keep it here.
Speaker 2: This is Tony Katz today. Twelve states now having cyber
Speaker 2: attacks on the water supply. Tony Kats Tony Katz today,
Speaker 2: a pleasure to be with you everybody at Michigan and Minnesota.
Speaker 2: We already in Minnesota, Georgia, New Jersey, and South Dakota
Speaker 2: to the list. What's happening is that they are losing
Speaker 2: critical remote control capabilities, forcing operators to switch to manual modes.
Speaker 2: Hackers are getting access to pumps, valves, and water pressure.
Speaker 3: The water itself.
Speaker 2: Has remained safe, but you've got the fbiv EPA and
Speaker 2: the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency also known as SISSA
Speaker 2: CISA warning that cyber threat actors had remotely accessed online
Speaker 2: infrastructure for water and waste water systems in at least
Speaker 2: seven states. Now, this is a good time to remind
Speaker 2: people that you don't have to be a prepper. You
Speaker 2: just have to be able to have some water in
Speaker 2: the house to deal with a couple of days of
Speaker 2: things all going apot. You are responsible for you, and
Speaker 2: not everything is going to work all the time. There
Speaker 2: are not only people trying.
Speaker 3: To do us wrong. Sometimes things break.
Speaker 2: If you're not prepared to have a few days of
Speaker 2: water in the house, what are you doing?
Speaker 3: What are you doing? You're just going to depend on
Speaker 3: government to bring you water. You're not going to work
Speaker 3: on it yourself. You should work on it yourself.
Speaker 2: I don't know if you've got to be like a
Speaker 2: underground bunker prepper meals for three years, Mrs kind of guy.
Speaker 2: I do think that you have to have some level
Speaker 2: of preparedness. But this was the part.
Speaker 3: That made me lose my mind.
Speaker 2: The water agencies were advised to disconnect their operating programs
Speaker 2: from the Internet and strengthen their password protections and firewalls.
Speaker 2: And I said protections and firewalls passed passwords.
Speaker 3: Oh, yes, the tactics.
Speaker 2: While people think this is Iranian backed hackers and not
Speaker 2: one hundred percent sure that's what they think. It resembles
Speaker 2: a twenty twenty three campaign by a group that was
Speaker 2: linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, which tapped into water
Speaker 2: system controllers using default passwords. I'm telling you right now,
Speaker 2: if some water system somewhere has a password of password,
Speaker 2: I want everybody fired today, no pension, nothing, We physically
Speaker 2: throw you out, and if you're on the second floor,
Speaker 2: it's gonna hurt because we're still gonna throw.
Speaker 3: Default passwords. What the heck is going on?
Speaker 2: You're telling me that's somewhere the water system of name
Speaker 2: that city has the password of one two three four
Speaker 2: or because it was extra secure.
Speaker 3: One two three four five.
Speaker 5: Default password. I jumped out of my chair when I
Speaker 5: first read that. That's Do you ever wonder whether or
Speaker 5: not everybody's just gotten stupid?
Speaker 3: Well there could be an answer, at least some.
Speaker 2: I'm Tony Katz, so I found the clip the audacity
Speaker 2: of these people. Bernie Sanders being asked a question from
Speaker 2: the people over there pod Save America.
Speaker 3: I think this is.
Speaker 2: Clean producer car producer Land and the finger on the
Speaker 2: dumb button just in case me. I'm Tony Katz the show.
Speaker 2: Oh is Tony Katz today? And this was Bernie Sanders
Speaker 2: being asked about.
Speaker 3: Funding and defunding the police.
Speaker 6: As a politics has always been focused on the material
Speaker 6: needs of working class people, and I would say that
Speaker 6: to the extent that you've broken from Democratic Party policy,
Speaker 6: it's usually around economic issues, healthcare, et cetera. There are
Speaker 6: some DSA candidates today, you know, including some who've won
Speaker 6: their primaries the cycle, who've also talked about abolishing prisons,
Speaker 6: defunding or even abolishing the police, abolishing borders. You've never
Speaker 6: been for any of that. Are you worried that taking
Speaker 6: those positions, which are unpopular with most voters and even
Speaker 6: most Democrats, sort of hurt the movement that you've worked
Speaker 6: really hard to build?
Speaker 3: Well, you know, look, people.
Speaker 4: Have different views and what you know as well as
Speaker 4: I do that the right wing that's their job, right
Speaker 4: they will take what one person said and put eighty
Speaker 4: billion dollars of TV ads on it and make it
Speaker 4: claim every Democrats supports that. I'm no serious person. Then
Speaker 4: I know who is running for office believes in quote
Speaker 4: unquote defunding the police.
Speaker 2: Stop, just stop. Of course they do. Of course the
Speaker 2: DSA does. Of course these communists do. It isn't some
Speaker 2: Republican boogeyman. Eighty billion dollars worth of ads. It's embarrassing
Speaker 2: from Bernie Sanders. Also in this interview, he looks so
Speaker 2: much like the guys, the judges from the Muppet Show.
Speaker 2: He looks he is a if he had a mustache.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's Stadler or Waldorf. I don't
Speaker 2: know which one it is. But he's really showing his age, truly,
Speaker 2: that a twenty three year old is listening to this
Speaker 2: old man. Here he is lying to you. You have
Speaker 2: candidate after candidate discussing defund the They've been doing so
Speaker 2: for years.
Speaker 3: This isn't some boogeyman.
Speaker 2: And you know it, and he's twenty three year olds
Speaker 2: know it, and these college students know it. And here
Speaker 2: he is lying to you. Why would you buy into
Speaker 2: that wall? If Trump lies to you, you say Trump's
Speaker 2: lying to me, Bernie's lying to you. Just say it, man,
Speaker 2: just say it. He's lying to you, plain and simple.
Speaker 2: They really do want to defund the police. That's who
Speaker 2: they are. So that was that was Bernie. Then there
Speaker 2: is Abdul al Sayid el Sayed. I think it's really
Speaker 2: pronounced el Sayed. I do want to say it properly.
Speaker 2: So what he has done is he has won the
Speaker 2: Democratic primary and he has now decided he's going to
Speaker 2: be the toughest guy out there. Oh is he going
Speaker 2: to be so tough, so strong, so vigorous. He's going
Speaker 2: to keep telling everybody that he's not a not a socialist.
Speaker 3: And he goes on a tear.
Speaker 2: He is just playing all sorts of tough guy. And
Speaker 2: after he gets the nomination he takes it to the
Speaker 2: microphone and well, I'm gonna share it with you. I
Speaker 2: think again it's clean. They're pretty sure landing, but just
Speaker 2: in case you're ready. Good stuff who will do anything
Speaker 2: Blue Cross, Blue Shield wants him to do, including raise
Speaker 2: your rates.
Speaker 3: Mike Rogers is a guy who introduced legislation to increase
Speaker 3: the flow of opioids. He did that while I was
Speaker 3: in high school.
Speaker 5: Mike Rogers is a guy who's politics and vision and
Speaker 5: perspective are old.
Speaker 3: Mike Rogers is a guy who has never shot away
Speaker 3: from a corporation.
Speaker 1: He could do a favor for.
Speaker 3: Mike Rogers is a guy who believe it or not,
Speaker 3: what back the floor so he.
Speaker 2: Can lick every single boot Donald Trump owns to pay
Speaker 2: for his endorsement.
Speaker 3: I'm soos are.
Speaker 5: If you want a senator's gonna lick some boots, fine,
Speaker 5: go vote for Mike Rodgers.
Speaker 2: But if you want a senator who's gonna stand up
Speaker 2: to Donald Trump, then you've.
Speaker 3: Got your option right here.
Speaker 2: He'll stand with care, he'll stand with communists, and everybody
Speaker 2: he disagrees with is a boot licker.
Speaker 3: So tough and so bold. He also said of Mike
Speaker 3: Rogers that if you want to.
Speaker 2: Get tough, it's gonna work out very bad for you.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's an obvious, obvious threat that he is
Speaker 2: putting out here when he says, you're not going to
Speaker 2: have safe quarter from people holding you accountable.
Speaker 3: He said those words about Mike Rogers.
Speaker 2: The Republican You are not going to have safe quarterer
Speaker 2: from people holding you accountable. So we understand that that's
Speaker 2: a threat, right, We understand that it's a threat. It's
Speaker 2: clearly a threat. But it's part of what is obviously
Speaker 2: calculated as the need to be a tough guy for
Speaker 2: the people in Michigan. Because not only is he gonna
Speaker 2: get tough with Mike Rogers. He said of Mike Rogers
Speaker 2: that if you want to come and have a conversation,
Speaker 2: well you won't be able to handle the questioning, and
Speaker 2: you're going to wither under the questioning because of the
Speaker 2: crimes you have committed.
Speaker 3: What crimes did Mike Rogers commit? What crimes did he commit?
Speaker 2: He served in the US Army from eighty five to
Speaker 2: eighty nine. What crimes did he commit? He was a
Speaker 2: special agent with the FBI from eighty nine to ninety four.
Speaker 2: He was interviewed to be the director of the FBI
Speaker 2: after Comy was dismissed. What crimes serving our country twice?
Speaker 2: But Abdul I'll say it also wants to be a
Speaker 2: tough guy on his name, and he decides to pull
Speaker 2: this Sonny hosting card and say, if you can't pronounce
Speaker 2: my name, don't talk about me.
Speaker 3: You know they think that you want to use my
Speaker 3: whole name against me.
Speaker 2: Mike, listen, man, if you can't say the name is
Speaker 2: keep the name out your damn mouth. If you haven't
Speaker 2: give me lessons, you'll give me lessons in what keeping
Speaker 2: your name.
Speaker 3: Out of my mouth?
Speaker 2: Your website reads Abdul for Senate dot Com.
Speaker 3: Look at it, it's right there. It's right there.
Speaker 2: If you're part of the live stream on YouTube and rumble,
Speaker 2: it's right there, it says Abdul for Senate dot Com.
Speaker 2: You call yourself Abdul because you didn't think the voters
Speaker 2: were capable of pronouncing adul Rahman. Oh, I can say it,
Speaker 2: I guess I can say things about you now, tough guy. Look,
Speaker 2: I'm not the strongest, I'm not the biggest, not the fastest.
Speaker 3: I accept this about me.
Speaker 2: I'll say anything I want about you anytime I want
Speaker 2: to say it about you. And there is no fear
Speaker 2: that I have that you're going to get angry with me.
Speaker 2: Get angry. Can't help that. I don't think you should
Speaker 2: people say things about me all the time.
Speaker 3: Move on with your day.
Speaker 2: I know what it's like to get angry, and I
Speaker 2: know what it's like to act inappropriately.
Speaker 3: And I didn't mine on CA.
Speaker 2: It wasn't even cable news, it was public access nonsense.
Speaker 2: Learned a lot from those days. I would not have
Speaker 2: been a good candidate in those days, nor would I
Speaker 2: have been a good radio host in those days. You learn,
Speaker 2: you grow, you get smarter, you stop being dumb. But
Speaker 2: you don't play the tough guy. There's one thing that
Speaker 2: I have learned is that you don't play the tough guy.
Speaker 2: The tough thing it's never tough. It's never, ever ever
Speaker 2: tough comes across as weird and it's performative. Honestly, you
Speaker 2: could might not just be a finance bro and put
Speaker 2: on a vest. What are you doing. I know what
Speaker 2: it is like to do the wrong thing. You shouldn't
Speaker 2: do the wrong thing. But if you think we can't
Speaker 2: talk about you and your nonsense policies, and you're lying,
Speaker 2: as I see it, to the people all around you.
Speaker 2: If you can't say my name, keep it out of
Speaker 2: your mouth.
Speaker 3: Stop. We're gonna discuss you and your policies.
Speaker 2: And oh the one hundred and fifteen thousand dollars you
Speaker 2: took from CARE, the counsel from American Islamic Relations, a
Speaker 2: front group as described for the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist
Speaker 2: organization deemed the terrorist organization is CARE by the UAE.
Speaker 2: Buy Florida, buy Texas, and let's start there, a do Rahan.
Speaker 2: Taking money from CARE is worse than taking money from APAK.
Speaker 2: What I just needed that to soak right, just needed
Speaker 2: that to hang out there in the ether for a
Speaker 2: little bit.
Speaker 3: Let me say it again, for the people in the
Speaker 3: cheap seats.
Speaker 2: If you take money from Care, that is far more
Speaker 2: problematic than if you take money from APAK. People who
Speaker 2: take Care money can't be elected to office. People who
Speaker 2: take Care money are connected to some of the worst
Speaker 2: bigotries and atrocities. Ever, how about just the subjugation of
Speaker 2: women within their own culture. Because I'm watching right now.
Speaker 3: There is Abdu Rachmann. He has guy, he's.
Speaker 2: Got his collar open, he's got a button unbuttoned, and
Speaker 2: it's wide open, and there's his face for everybody to see.
Speaker 3: And then to the left is.
Speaker 2: A Muslim woman who has to wear a full head
Speaker 2: covering and long sleeves and everything else.
Speaker 3: He he's find and open. She's not.
Speaker 2: Oh, Tony, you can't talk about culture, you bet?
Speaker 3: I can. You know why I can pronounce his name?
Speaker 2: If we want to do this, We're gonna do all
Speaker 2: of this, guys, and I think we should.
Speaker 3: So I start where I start. Taking money from Care.
Speaker 2: A front group, as described as reported, taking money from
Speaker 2: Care is far more disqualifying. Nope, say it differently, Tony
Speaker 2: taking money from care is disqualifying. Taking money from APAC
Speaker 2: you cannot like, but it's certainly not disqualifying. Care is worse.
Speaker 2: If a pack is bad, care is worse. This is
Speaker 2: my take. A pack is Americans care. I'm not so
Speaker 2: sure neither are you, not that you cared at all?
Speaker 2: And Care is going to front a group, a terrorist
Speaker 2: group as described that thinks that that woman should live undercover,
Speaker 2: quite literally.
Speaker 3: But this will get us.
Speaker 2: Into the common of Islam as a political system, not
Speaker 2: a religion, and that's going to be a whole nother subject.
Speaker 2: Although it is a political system and not a religion.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to apologize for saying. So see what
Speaker 2: happens when you do the tough guy thing. See now,
Speaker 2: you're not talking about policy, We're talking about the kind
Speaker 2: of person you are. And the kind of person you
Speaker 2: are is not the kind of person who has the
Speaker 2: temperament who can be an elected office.
Speaker 3: Just not.
Speaker 2: This is the start of a very long conversation that
Speaker 2: we're going to be having through November.
Speaker 3: Keep it here. This is Tony Katz. Today.
Speaker 2: I was looking at the markets which are down right now,
Speaker 2: and then I read that Ford has Ford not learned
Speaker 2: a lesson or does for see an opportunity. I'm talking
Speaker 2: about Ford Motor Company, Tony Katz, Tony Katz today guys.
Speaker 2: Great to be with you, live streaming on YouTube and
Speaker 2: rumble Tony Katz, go to a Twitter or are also
Speaker 2: known as ex Tony Katz, Facebook, Tony Katz Radio. Ford
Speaker 2: did the F one fifty Lightning. Now, I have driven
Speaker 2: the lightning many times over. I used to work with
Speaker 2: a local car dealership and they would provide a vehicle
Speaker 2: and it was the Lightning, which is the electric F
Speaker 2: one fifty.
Speaker 3: And I'm telling you it's outstanding.
Speaker 2: The speed is nuts, the comfort is great, It's outstanding.
Speaker 2: I loved it, loved it. Tried to buy one. Yes,
Speaker 2: I tried to buy an electric because I work from
Speaker 2: home and stuff and so you know, I have studio
Speaker 2: things and everything else. So it seemed to work. The
Speaker 2: price they wanted was insane. No one's buying them. The
Speaker 2: price they wanted was surreal. Then you read that Ford
Speaker 2: is taking a look at another EV platform, which they
Speaker 2: call you EV Universal Electric Vehicle. It's a new platform
Speaker 2: and they are coming out with the Ford Fathom and
Speaker 2: the Ford Fathom is going to have a starting price
Speaker 2: of twenty nine nine and forty five dollars. It's going
Speaker 2: to be a pickup thirty thousand dollars electric pickups. They're
Speaker 2: a market for this.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Pre Orders for a five passenger truck will begin in
Speaker 2: early twenty twenty seven. It'll deliver summer or fall in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty seven, and there's no images of what the
Speaker 2: truck looks like yet. They're doubling down on EVS. I
Speaker 2: have questions. This is Tony Katta today