WEBVTT - Mac & Bone Hour 2: Defensive Expectations Post Bye Week 

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, so let's start with this. The Eagles have really,

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>really struggled to run the football. So if you're the Panthers,

0:00:34.350 --> 0:00:37.750
<v Speaker 1>especially with your corners out, I think you need to

0:00:37.790 --> 0:00:40.690
<v Speaker 1>make them prove they can run it. I mean, I

0:00:40.729 --> 0:00:43.610
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Saquon will play, but there's a pretty

0:00:43.650 --> 0:00:45.940
<v Speaker 1>good chance that they'll be down to their fourth and

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>fifth string, both of whom were on practice squad last week.

0:00:50.220 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and Damian Pierce and Carson Steele. Make them prove that

0:00:54.420 --> 0:00:56.860
<v Speaker 1>they can actually run the ball against you, even if

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.740
<v Speaker 1>you have a light box. That's certainly what I would do.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:01:01.740 --> 0:01:06.100
<v Speaker 3>That is Ross Tucker, who will be calling Eagles Panthers

0:01:06.819 --> 0:01:11.060
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday on CBS. His partner in crime on that

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.539
<v Speaker 3>broadcast will be Ian Eagle. We will talk to Ian

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Eagle later today at 925. Always fun to talk to him, Bone,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.890
<v Speaker 3>and I want to see what he thinks. about the

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.810
<v Speaker 3>Eagles and Panthers headed into this game. But that's Ross

0:01:24.830 --> 0:01:29.310
<v Speaker 3>Tucker talking about the Panthers' defense this week. And we

0:01:29.330 --> 0:01:32.089
<v Speaker 3>will get into more of those conversations about what to do,

0:01:32.590 --> 0:01:37.779
<v Speaker 3>what we need to do to win this game. The much-respected, much-anticipated,

0:01:38.370 --> 0:01:40.810
<v Speaker 3>Victory Formula bonus coming up at 8 o'clock on this

0:01:40.870 --> 0:01:42.250
<v Speaker 3>radio show.

0:01:42.470 --> 0:01:44.930
<v Speaker 4>People's entire weeks depend on how to beat the Eagles.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.740
<v Speaker 4>And we have the answers. They come to us for

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 4>the answers, right? This is certainly where they come, I'm sure.

0:01:50.740 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 4>We've been in the lab for days with these answers.

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Big time, big time. If Saquon Barkley plays, slow him down.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:58.340
<v Speaker 4>It's on my list.

0:01:58.420 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it bad if part of my victory formula is

0:02:00.380 --> 0:02:01.530
<v Speaker 3>Saquon Barkley sits out?

0:02:01.580 --> 0:02:03.130
<v Speaker 2>That was actually near the top of my list. We

0:02:03.150 --> 0:02:04.170
<v Speaker 2>don't want to give it all away yet.

0:02:04.290 --> 0:02:07.870
<v Speaker 3>Splinter's... Splitters and Saquon's booty is right up there on

0:02:07.890 --> 0:02:11.370
<v Speaker 3>my victory formula. Because if it's not him, it's probably

0:02:11.410 --> 0:02:13.030
<v Speaker 3>a fourth string bag. It's probably Pierce.

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:02:14.740 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the Panthers' defense more big picture right now.

0:02:18.580 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Like yesterday, we did the whole offensive conversation, and I

0:02:21.370 --> 0:02:25.230
<v Speaker 3>really love the fact, Bone, that on a skeptical place,

0:02:25.610 --> 0:02:28.690
<v Speaker 3>the WFNZ text line, it was an overwhelming amount of

0:02:28.830 --> 0:02:31.530
<v Speaker 3>optimism about this offense. I mean, people believe in Idzik.

0:02:31.810 --> 0:02:35.050
<v Speaker 3>The majority believe in Bryce. The majority believe the point

0:02:35.090 --> 0:02:37.390
<v Speaker 3>that you were the first to make during the segment yesterday,

0:02:37.450 --> 0:02:42.190
<v Speaker 3>which is there's room to grow. Moten's coming back. You know,

0:02:42.510 --> 0:02:45.260
<v Speaker 3>Coker looking like he's going to go like there's room

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.020
<v Speaker 3>to grow on this team offensively.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Don't send in your Bryce jokes about what Matt just.

0:02:52.620 --> 0:02:55.430
<v Speaker 2>Said. I can't use the word grow with Bryce. I

0:02:55.470 --> 0:02:56.270
<v Speaker 2>forgot all about that.

0:02:56.710 --> 0:02:59.530
<v Speaker 3>But I want to talk about the defense, and I

0:02:59.590 --> 0:03:02.650
<v Speaker 3>don't think the expectations are going to be near as high.

0:03:02.669 --> 0:03:05.290
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the optimism is going to be near

0:03:05.350 --> 0:03:08.290
<v Speaker 3>as high. But I'm kind of wondering with y'all, I mean,

0:03:08.510 --> 0:03:12.419
<v Speaker 3>I think there's two phases of the season for this defense,

0:03:12.540 --> 0:03:15.220
<v Speaker 3>at least the way it looks right now. The first

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.340
<v Speaker 3>phase is this period bone until they get Mike Jack

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 3>and Horn back.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:21.020
<v Speaker 2>And it's probably in the.

0:03:20.980 --> 0:03:25.549
<v Speaker 3>Neighborhood of like five to six, five to seven weeks.

0:03:25.790 --> 0:03:30.010
<v Speaker 3>Mike Jack probably back quicker than Horn. So it's this

0:03:30.050 --> 0:03:32.770
<v Speaker 3>next five or six games or so where they have

0:03:32.810 --> 0:03:38.020
<v Speaker 3>to find ways to to maintain, to be solid. Maybe

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.420
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to be spectacular most weeks. Like for example,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.980
<v Speaker 3>the Detroit game, you get a bunch of red zone stops.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.860
<v Speaker 3>You make them kick field goals instead of touchdowns. You

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.100
<v Speaker 3>get a couple of stops on fourth down and lo

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:50.660
<v Speaker 3>and behold, at the end of the night, you were

0:03:50.700 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the first team in the NFL and still are the first,

0:03:53.500 --> 0:03:55.870
<v Speaker 3>the only team in the NFL this season to hold

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.190
<v Speaker 3>the lions under 30 points.

0:03:57.430 --> 0:03:57.610
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:57.670 --> 0:03:59.650
<v Speaker 3>I feel like bone, like, and then I feel like

0:03:59.670 --> 0:04:03.130
<v Speaker 3>when you get your corners back, Hopefully you haven't had

0:04:03.170 --> 0:04:05.590
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of other injuries on defense, knock on wood,

0:04:06.150 --> 0:04:08.770
<v Speaker 3>and then you're a full unit at that point in time.

0:04:09.530 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that a good way of putting it?

0:04:10.780 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>What do we expect from this defense without the corners,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:14.900
<v Speaker 3>but then what do we expect them to be when

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:15.700
<v Speaker 3>they get them back?

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 4>First of all, they're going to give up points. They're

0:04:17.540 --> 0:04:19.500
<v Speaker 4>going to give up yards in the pass game just

0:04:19.540 --> 0:04:23.130
<v Speaker 4>because those guys are out. Can they hold serve enough

0:04:23.210 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>to give the team a chance? Can they... Can they bend?

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.619
<v Speaker 4>And they will bend at times, but just not break

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 4>and give this team a chance, whether it be a

0:04:31.050 --> 0:04:34.010
<v Speaker 4>close game or whatever, give this team a chance for

0:04:34.050 --> 0:04:36.790
<v Speaker 4>the offense to go win the football game. I equate

0:04:36.850 --> 0:04:40.990
<v Speaker 4>it back to a pitching staff is missing two main

0:04:41.070 --> 0:04:45.210
<v Speaker 4>rotation pieces right now. Can you just get enough out

0:04:45.230 --> 0:04:48.450
<v Speaker 4>of the guys in there to give your team a chance?

0:04:48.750 --> 0:04:51.150
<v Speaker 4>You may not get the pitcher that's going to go

0:04:51.230 --> 0:04:53.850
<v Speaker 4>seven innings, strike out 10, and be dominant. But can

0:04:53.870 --> 0:04:56.540
<v Speaker 4>you get guys that give you enough length in the

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.900
<v Speaker 4>game to give your team a chance? We're just looking

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 4>for guys that can hold serve, keep the defense average,

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.900
<v Speaker 4>and let this emerging offense take over a football game.

0:05:06.020 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:06.430 --> 0:05:09.030
<v Speaker 4>I'm not expecting some dominant defensive performances here.

0:05:09.170 --> 0:05:09.350
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:05:09.390 --> 0:05:11.650
<v Speaker 2>I just want to see them not get gutted. You

0:05:11.670 --> 0:05:12.030
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean?

0:05:12.089 --> 0:05:14.770
<v Speaker 3>But I think it does need to be mentioned, Bone,

0:05:15.230 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 3>that Detroit is averaging, I don't know, like 36 points

0:05:19.620 --> 0:05:21.740
<v Speaker 3>a game against their other four opponents and scored 26

0:05:21.740 --> 0:05:26.110
<v Speaker 3>against us. So, yes, is it ideal to see Jared

0:05:26.150 --> 0:05:28.150
<v Speaker 3>Goff throw for 400 plus yards against us?

0:05:28.230 --> 0:05:28.830
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not.

0:05:29.300 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 3>I also think you've got to figure out something with

0:05:31.339 --> 0:05:34.420
<v Speaker 3>the Caleb Evans situation as well.

0:05:34.980 --> 0:05:36.219
<v Speaker 2>I think you've got to.

0:05:38.250 --> 0:05:41.270
<v Speaker 3>Does Corey Thornton get a chance? Do you play Shaw

0:05:41.310 --> 0:05:44.190
<v Speaker 3>Smith Wade out there some? Robert Rochelle got signed to

0:05:44.210 --> 0:05:46.370
<v Speaker 3>the practice squad, but I know Joe Person was saying

0:05:46.410 --> 0:05:49.450
<v Speaker 3>last night on Panthers Collective, he thinks the move was

0:05:49.710 --> 0:05:52.890
<v Speaker 3>Rochelle to practice squad and Thornton will be elevated. Thornton

0:05:52.930 --> 0:05:55.940
<v Speaker 3>had such a disappointing preseason bone coming off his injury

0:05:55.950 --> 0:05:56.460
<v Speaker 3>from last year.

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.339
<v Speaker 2>What happened to this guy? You tapped him all summer.

0:05:58.380 --> 0:05:59.540
<v Speaker 2>But maybe that's what happened.

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm Matt cursed him, but like, remember his performances

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 3>bone in training camp last year. And remember the fact

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 3>that he stole that job last season from Shaw Smith, Wade.

0:06:09.820 --> 0:06:12.140
<v Speaker 3>So I wonder if Corey Thornton can be the guy,

0:06:12.500 --> 0:06:14.620
<v Speaker 3>but that's what they've got to figure out. Do you

0:06:14.660 --> 0:06:17.380
<v Speaker 3>give a Caleb Evans another shot? But I said it yesterday,

0:06:17.580 --> 0:06:19.750
<v Speaker 3>you gotta be quick. You can't be, you can't give

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.110
<v Speaker 3>him a long leash anymore, man.

0:06:21.450 --> 0:06:22.810
<v Speaker 2>No, no, you can't.

0:06:23.850 --> 0:06:26.890
<v Speaker 4>I think Sunday is going to be a, uh, low

0:06:26.950 --> 0:06:30.549
<v Speaker 4>scoring tough game but i don't think that the panthers

0:06:30.589 --> 0:06:33.450
<v Speaker 4>are going to want to get in too many or

0:06:33.510 --> 0:06:35.950
<v Speaker 4>we'll end up in too many defensive struggles along the

0:06:35.970 --> 0:06:38.130
<v Speaker 4>way it's it's a little bit different than we thought

0:06:38.150 --> 0:06:40.450
<v Speaker 4>i think they're going to want to get in more

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 4>offensive games because i think that's going to be how

0:06:42.620 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 4>they're going to win football games i think that won't

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 4>always work out that way but it's the way it's

0:06:46.300 --> 0:06:48.460
<v Speaker 4>going to be we've got a texter that says i

0:06:48.500 --> 0:06:50.300
<v Speaker 4>don't mean that in long term when mike jack and

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 4>horn get back it's a different mentality but right now

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.260
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be they're going to score some points

0:06:54.300 --> 0:06:58.130
<v Speaker 4>in these games 704 number says, what you're hearing is

0:06:58.270 --> 0:07:03.370
<v Speaker 4>Mac changing the expectations from his hype in the preseason

0:07:03.410 --> 0:07:05.150
<v Speaker 4>about this defense. Well, I don't know how you can't

0:07:05.190 --> 0:07:07.970
<v Speaker 4>when you're missing two corners that good. You know, and

0:07:07.990 --> 0:07:10.410
<v Speaker 4>when a Caleb Evans was forced to start last game

0:07:10.690 --> 0:07:13.010
<v Speaker 4>and almost gave up 200 yards on 11 completions.

0:07:13.410 --> 0:07:14.690
<v Speaker 2>Like, I'm just trying to be honest.

0:07:14.740 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, what Bone said there at the end, I do think,

0:07:17.860 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, guys will get experience, Bone, and will be

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>better for it when they get back. If you can

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 3>still be healthy in the front seven and you get

0:07:25.940 --> 0:07:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Horn and Jack back, I think you have a chance

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to have a, you know, defense that is top half

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.500
<v Speaker 3>in the league and an offense that's top 10.

0:07:33.500 --> 0:07:35.230
<v Speaker 2>And if you can get into the playoffs with that

0:07:35.290 --> 0:07:35.890
<v Speaker 2>kind of balance.

0:07:36.670 --> 0:07:38.950
<v Speaker 3>By the end of the season, you could be damn dangerous.

0:07:39.010 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>But like this dude says, sounds like Mac is on

0:07:43.300 --> 0:07:45.010
<v Speaker 3>here making excuses for Avero.

0:07:46.070 --> 0:07:48.510
<v Speaker 2>Aren't we just being honest, though? I don't think it's

0:07:48.630 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>an excuse. Isn't this fair? The two best corners are out.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 4>One guy is a top five corner in the league

0:07:53.740 --> 0:07:56.660
<v Speaker 4>per ESPN.com's rankings this past summer.

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.420
<v Speaker 2>Like, is that what's going to happen here?

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Is, like, people are going to use what happened to

0:08:00.820 --> 0:08:04.750
<v Speaker 3>the defense without, like, here's the thing, too. If we

0:08:04.770 --> 0:08:07.530
<v Speaker 3>win games and give up 26 points, are y'all going

0:08:07.550 --> 0:08:09.830
<v Speaker 3>to be on this text line whining and nagging and

0:08:09.910 --> 0:08:15.140
<v Speaker 3>harassing Averro? Without his top two corners? Absolutely. The object

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:16.140
<v Speaker 3>of the game is to win.

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:17.770
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

0:08:17.870 --> 0:08:21.530
<v Speaker 3>And we're fortunate enough now to, we think... we have

0:08:21.570 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>an offense bone that's really freaking good. Like, I was

0:08:25.300 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 3>checking all the– The.

0:08:26.100 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Green Bay game's an example of where the offense has

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:29.940
<v Speaker 4>got to show up in that game. And they had

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 4>to against Detroit, too. I don't think they're going to

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.500
<v Speaker 4>hold Green Bay to very few points, the way they operate.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 4>And they had to against Detroit. But, again, like, that

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Green Bay offensive line's pretty.

0:08:39.020 --> 0:08:39.380
<v Speaker 5>Bad, too.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean? Can we hurt them? Can

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.420
<v Speaker 3>we make them pay up front a little bit? So, again,

0:08:43.540 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>the object's to win the game. So I hope we're

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.100
<v Speaker 3>not sitting here, if we find ways to keep winning

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>games like we did against Detroit– and the defense is

0:08:49.970 --> 0:08:52.729
<v Speaker 3>bend but not break and stuff like that, I hope

0:08:52.770 --> 0:08:55.250
<v Speaker 3>people aren't complaining about the defense. We're lucky to have

0:08:55.309 --> 0:08:56.370
<v Speaker 3>this offense like this.

0:08:56.410 --> 0:08:56.810
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

0:08:57.070 --> 0:08:59.590
<v Speaker 3>If we had last year's offense and we're missing Mike

0:08:59.610 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Jack and J.C. Horn, I believe that would be serious

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:03.620
<v Speaker 3>cause for concern.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:05.780
<v Speaker 4>Good news is we don't have a lot of people

0:09:05.820 --> 0:09:07.620
<v Speaker 4>that complain a whole lot, so we don't really run

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 4>into that problem too much. We've got a bunch of

0:09:09.500 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Danny Hurleys on the text line. I was just going

0:09:10.860 --> 0:09:12.179
<v Speaker 4>to say we've got a bunch of Danny Hurleys on

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.050
<v Speaker 4>the text line. You and I, two guys, one brain.

0:09:15.570 --> 0:09:16.890
<v Speaker 4>Let's see what else we have here.

0:09:17.470 --> 0:09:17.910
<v Speaker 3>Literally.

0:09:18.550 --> 0:09:20.910
<v Speaker 2>We each have. 5 of a brain. It adds up

0:09:20.950 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to one. Smitty from the City Panthers.

0:09:23.100 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>D without their corners is like the Mac and Bone

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 3>Show without Mac.

0:09:28.670 --> 0:09:28.950
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:09:29.050 --> 0:09:31.130
<v Speaker 3>Is that like, does that, I mean, what about without Bone?

0:09:31.770 --> 0:09:33.070
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we need both of us here. What about

0:09:33.090 --> 0:09:34.410
<v Speaker 3>without Finney? We ain't the same without Finney.

0:09:34.429 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I'm offended or not. I know.

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, hey, you miss one of us, man.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:40.780
<v Speaker 2>We ain't the same show. All right.

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.570
<v Speaker 4>We're like Coach Kaysen. You put your fist together, we're one.

0:09:44.830 --> 0:09:45.630
<v Speaker 2>We're one with a fist.

0:09:45.830 --> 0:09:48.570
<v Speaker 3>Travis, thank you, Kay. Travis from Statesville. I don't think

0:09:48.610 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>it's changing expectations. I think it's just acknowledging that the

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 3>ceiling of the defense is lower right now. I think

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.420
<v Speaker 3>that's a good way of putting it. John says mac

0:09:56.500 --> 0:09:59.420
<v Speaker 3>acts like a varro's bend but not break um or

0:09:59.540 --> 0:10:01.860
<v Speaker 3>is it bend but not break when he has his

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 3>corners yeah i mean there's a mindset right of keeping

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.770
<v Speaker 3>everything in front of you and umbrella coverage and stuff

0:10:06.790 --> 0:10:09.130
<v Speaker 3>like that i will say this and i want to

0:10:09.170 --> 0:10:11.410
<v Speaker 3>say right now the coverage they played bone on that

0:10:11.470 --> 0:10:12.929
<v Speaker 3>long pass played by detroit at the end of the

0:10:12.970 --> 0:10:17.270
<v Speaker 3>first half was an abomination An absolute abomination. I just

0:10:17.309 --> 0:10:20.130
<v Speaker 3>don't understand how you have a five-man umbrella and two

0:10:20.150 --> 0:10:22.530
<v Speaker 3>of them stay underneath in that situation. So I will

0:10:22.550 --> 0:10:25.340
<v Speaker 3>never defend that crap. And I'm not saying Avero's perfect.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>I will point out, Bone, that we're sixth in blitz percentage.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 3>We blitz 45% of the time against Jerry Goff. Agero

0:10:33.340 --> 0:10:35.540
<v Speaker 3>Avero listened to Fitty's advice.

0:10:36.350 --> 0:10:38.810
<v Speaker 2>Last game. Phinney said blitz Jared Goff.

0:10:39.290 --> 0:10:41.450
<v Speaker 3>Brenton Buckner and a bunch of people texted in and said,

0:10:41.470 --> 0:10:43.849
<v Speaker 3>do y'all realize how good Goff is against the blitz?

0:10:44.350 --> 0:10:48.390
<v Speaker 3>We went out there, Bone, and got pressures over 60%

0:10:48.390 --> 0:10:51.630
<v Speaker 3>of the time on our blitzes. And Goff ended up

0:10:51.650 --> 0:10:54.630
<v Speaker 3>with like a 72 rating against the blitz. So they

0:10:54.650 --> 0:10:56.770
<v Speaker 3>did a hell of a job. And Goff's a hard

0:10:56.830 --> 0:11:00.700
<v Speaker 3>quarterback to blitz. So I do think they got to

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.220
<v Speaker 3>pick their spots with the blitzes. But I don't think

0:11:03.260 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be all conservative blitzes. You know, umbrella stuff.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>We also have to mention how much of a difference

0:11:11.940 --> 0:11:14.740
<v Speaker 4>Devin Lloyd is for this team and how he alters

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 4>the ceiling of the defense with or without those corners.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.239
<v Speaker 4>Devin Lloyd's play does put the defense on it. They're

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 4>not going to be Mac, a defense that was the

0:11:25.140 --> 0:11:28.020
<v Speaker 4>worst ever two years ago. when Devin Lloyd is out there.

0:11:28.059 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 4>He will not let that happen. He's an absolute difference

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 4>maker for this team. We've seen it already in the

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 4>first quarter of the season. Well, that's another thing, too. Like, OK,

0:11:35.780 --> 0:11:38.100
<v Speaker 4>we're missing our two corners, and they are freaking good.

0:11:38.260 --> 0:11:40.260
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Mike Jack is one of the most underrated

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.330
<v Speaker 4>corners in football. There's no way around it.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:43.450
<v Speaker 2>And J.C.

0:11:43.470 --> 0:11:45.750
<v Speaker 3>Horn, the last two years, has started to get his recognition.

0:11:46.290 --> 0:11:48.530
<v Speaker 3>You lose those two guys, but we do have to

0:11:48.570 --> 0:11:51.609
<v Speaker 3>talk about what we have, Bone. We have Devin Lloyd, who,

0:11:51.890 --> 0:11:53.530
<v Speaker 3>to your point, is a game changer, the leader of

0:11:53.550 --> 0:11:56.130
<v Speaker 3>this defense. And he helps you in every aspect of defense.

0:11:56.210 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 3>Run defense, coverage, pass rush as a blitzer. And then

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:05.119
<v Speaker 3>you throw in Okereke next to him. Hell, if you

0:12:05.140 --> 0:12:07.660
<v Speaker 3>want to throw in Dodson. Our linebacker situation is so

0:12:07.700 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 3>much better than last year. The pass rush, Bone, I

0:12:10.580 --> 0:12:13.070
<v Speaker 3>know it doesn't seem like much. We're up to 17th

0:12:13.110 --> 0:12:17.110
<v Speaker 3>in pressure percentage overall. It is still 25th in sack percentage,

0:12:17.150 --> 0:12:20.210
<v Speaker 3>which isn't great. But I do think Bone Prinsley is

0:12:20.270 --> 0:12:22.010
<v Speaker 3>right up there in the top three in pass rush

0:12:22.050 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 3>win rate. I think Jalen Phillips is 11th in pressures

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 3>among edges. There is more pass rush this year. And

0:12:31.940 --> 0:12:33.740
<v Speaker 3>we get Wharton back. I think that could be a

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.270
<v Speaker 3>big pass rush boon as well, giving us some interior rush.

0:12:37.350 --> 0:12:40.990
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned a comment that I liked earlier about the

0:12:41.030 --> 0:12:43.950
<v Speaker 4>guys that are getting to play now. Does that benefit

0:12:43.990 --> 0:12:47.330
<v Speaker 4>them long term for the negative of having to play now?

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Does that benefit them long term? That's a theme I

0:12:50.380 --> 0:12:53.260
<v Speaker 4>think on this roster. Freeling got in there quicker than

0:12:53.300 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 4>we thought. Does he benefit from that long term? Of course,

0:12:55.980 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 4>I think he will. Um, Prince Lee is playing a

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.359
<v Speaker 4>lot more than we thought because Gordon is out. There's

0:13:01.380 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of guys on this roster who are getting

0:13:03.500 --> 0:13:07.979
<v Speaker 4>opportunities and that depth is being built here for it hurting.

0:13:08.059 --> 0:13:09.980
<v Speaker 2>Now going forward.

0:13:09.660 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 4>In the next couple of years, these guys playing now

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:13.969
<v Speaker 4>does benefit the overall depth of this football.

0:13:14.070 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It does.

0:13:14.610 --> 0:13:16.670
<v Speaker 3>It does. And even later this year, you know, when,

0:13:16.710 --> 0:13:19.430
<v Speaker 3>when we get Hornet and Mike Jack back, Patrick is

0:13:19.610 --> 0:13:22.850
<v Speaker 3>already taking us bone to the eight o'clock segment and

0:13:22.910 --> 0:13:24.890
<v Speaker 3>to the victory formula against the Eagles.

0:13:25.309 --> 0:13:27.590
<v Speaker 2>He says he's worried in a different time zone. He's worried.

0:13:27.650 --> 0:13:30.710
<v Speaker 2>Princely still doesn't. Where's he at here? He's worried.

0:13:30.770 --> 0:13:34.110
<v Speaker 3>Princely still doesn't understand what a pocket is and hurts.

0:13:34.130 --> 0:13:37.070
<v Speaker 3>We'll get out and burn us on some scrambles. That

0:13:37.230 --> 0:13:40.570
<v Speaker 3>is going to be boned very high on my list

0:13:41.190 --> 0:13:46.580
<v Speaker 3>of victory formula items. Now, the good news is he

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.700
<v Speaker 3>does sound like he's got a bit of a calf injury.

0:13:49.020 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 3>He has not run enough for Philly fans liking. But

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>that would be some Panther stuff, Bone, where the quarterback's

0:13:54.059 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 3>not running a ton and all of a sudden runs

0:13:56.140 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>it 10 times for 56 yards against the Panthers. But

0:13:59.220 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that is absolutely something that I hope we learn from.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:08.130
<v Speaker 3>the William's experience and the Watson experience because this is

0:14:08.190 --> 0:14:11.250
<v Speaker 3>back to a controlled rush game against Jalen Hurts.

0:14:11.270 --> 0:14:13.570
<v Speaker 4>All right, we're going to let Mac answer his text messages.

0:14:13.650 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 3>Important text coming. Oh, Coach Canale said, what time is

0:14:16.980 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>that victory formula on? We're going to stop what we're doing.

0:14:19.780 --> 0:14:20.140
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:21.540
<v Speaker 2>We come back.

0:14:21.620 --> 0:14:25.900
<v Speaker 4>Reports indicate we are getting closer to a 2014 playoff

0:14:25.950 --> 0:14:30.190
<v Speaker 4>at college football, and a listener brought up an interesting question.

0:14:30.630 --> 0:14:34.450
<v Speaker 4>Shouldn't the increased playoff access make local fans want to

0:14:34.510 --> 0:14:36.330
<v Speaker 4>double the playoff field?

0:14:36.870 --> 0:14:38.690
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that on the Mac and Bone Show,

0:14:38.710 --> 0:14:39.410
<v Speaker 2>Sports Radio.

0:14:39.410 --> 0:14:40.010
<v Speaker 5>92.7 WFNZ.

0:15:02.730 --> 0:15:04.790
<v Speaker 6>I think if you're a middle of the road team,

0:15:05.310 --> 0:15:09.150
<v Speaker 6>Bill Belichick has certainly ample opportunity to beat you. And

0:15:09.170 --> 0:15:11.250
<v Speaker 6>that's just us maybe being a little biased towards that

0:15:11.270 --> 0:15:13.270
<v Speaker 6>because he's the greatest NFL coach of all time. So

0:15:13.310 --> 0:15:15.150
<v Speaker 6>we assume he's going to be a good college football coach.

0:15:15.620 --> 0:15:17.290
<v Speaker 6>It didn't look like that last year. They didn't even

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:18.780
<v Speaker 6>have a recruiting class last year. I think if you

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 6>listen to them talk about it all while under fire

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.100
<v Speaker 6>a lot, they're under siege a lot with a lot

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 6>of distractions. And then did you see after the game?

0:15:26.370 --> 0:15:27.790
<v Speaker 6>players said, hey, you take a lot of s * * *

0:15:27.820 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 6>for us. We appreciate you. First ranked win, they gave

0:15:30.020 --> 0:15:31.660
<v Speaker 6>him a ball, and then they celebrated with him, and

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 6>Bill was smiling. It felt like he actually has a

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 6>little bit of a culture set in there somehow. I

0:15:36.100 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 6>don't know how he's been able to do it, but

0:15:37.540 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 6>I think North Carolina would be a problem for teams.

0:15:40.380 --> 0:15:43.060
<v Speaker 3>There's a little bit of a culture set there somehow.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:43.890
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how he's done it.

0:15:44.300 --> 0:15:47.630
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's Pat McAfee talking about UNC, and they got

0:15:47.670 --> 0:15:50.170
<v Speaker 3>Duke this weekend, and that is a juicy one.

0:15:50.330 --> 0:15:52.790
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll be a hell of a game. And

0:15:52.830 --> 0:15:54.090
<v Speaker 2>I do want to say this, Bone.

0:15:54.510 --> 0:15:57.150
<v Speaker 3>I do think, like, when I saw that it was

0:15:57.190 --> 0:15:59.100
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Shipp giving them the game ball and how happy

0:15:59.140 --> 0:16:01.820
<v Speaker 3>the guys were for Bill, and he did say that, like,

0:16:01.860 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>you take all this crap for us, man, and we

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:09.180
<v Speaker 3>love you for it. Like, they're starting to establish something.

0:16:09.780 --> 0:16:14.570
<v Speaker 3>I honestly think the vibes at the program probably improved

0:16:15.050 --> 0:16:16.230
<v Speaker 3>when Michael Lombardi was.

0:16:16.210 --> 0:16:16.550
<v Speaker 5>Out of there.

0:16:17.290 --> 0:16:20.140
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know. And he took his typewriter with him.

0:16:20.190 --> 0:16:22.380
<v Speaker 3>And took that typewriter out, just had it on out. Like,

0:16:22.550 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, and maybe that's more with like. The

0:16:25.740 --> 0:16:28.900
<v Speaker 3>people in the administration and the staff, like the people

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.460
<v Speaker 3>that had to deal with him more, maybe it's not

0:16:30.500 --> 0:16:33.740
<v Speaker 3>the players, but I just think that dude was bad

0:16:33.780 --> 0:16:36.590
<v Speaker 3>at his job and a complete pain in the rear

0:16:36.710 --> 0:16:38.470
<v Speaker 3>to deal with the way it seems. So I almost

0:16:38.490 --> 0:16:40.450
<v Speaker 3>feel like they lifted a black cloud when they got

0:16:40.510 --> 0:16:43.070
<v Speaker 3>rid of him. And I don't know if Steve, I

0:16:43.090 --> 0:16:44.770
<v Speaker 3>don't want to talk too much about the Steve Belichick thing.

0:16:44.790 --> 0:16:47.150
<v Speaker 3>We don't know all the details, but that one too

0:16:47.230 --> 0:16:49.550
<v Speaker 3>might have met, that one might've made, you.

0:16:49.370 --> 0:16:50.890
<v Speaker 2>Know, lifted a black cloud as well.

0:16:51.050 --> 0:16:53.980
<v Speaker 4>And, Jordan's been quieter this year than last year, and

0:16:54.020 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 4>it's not all about her and the drama. So it

0:16:56.860 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 4>feels like this year has been much more about football

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.860
<v Speaker 4>than everything else. I know that stuff happened with Belichick

0:17:03.900 --> 0:17:06.780
<v Speaker 4>and Lombardi, but I feel like they resemble more of

0:17:06.859 --> 0:17:11.540
<v Speaker 4>a football program than some television program we're watching develop

0:17:11.580 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 4>before our eyes.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>100%.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.010
<v Speaker 3>So I give Bill a little credit here. Obviously, we've

0:17:15.030 --> 0:17:17.489
<v Speaker 3>been critical. The whole free world's been critical. Although she

0:17:17.530 --> 0:17:21.190
<v Speaker 3>could have Belichick in a Halloween costume pretty soon. Jordan

0:17:21.210 --> 0:17:23.750
<v Speaker 3>Hudson is a black cloud in a cheerleading outfit, by

0:17:23.790 --> 0:17:25.689
<v Speaker 3>the way, speaking of removing black clouds.

0:17:25.910 --> 0:17:26.490
<v Speaker 2>But you're right.

0:17:26.510 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 3>Somebody texted about the other day, said, I don't know

0:17:28.940 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 3>if it's coincidence, but Jordan hasn't really seemed to be

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 3>around and things have been going better. She's there at

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.910
<v Speaker 3>every game, though, supporting her boo. Supporting Billy the Boo.

0:17:37.930 --> 0:17:41.750
<v Speaker 3>Billy the Boo. That probably isn't the coolest thing I've

0:17:41.790 --> 0:17:42.290
<v Speaker 3>ever said.

0:17:42.310 --> 0:17:45.020
<v Speaker 4>You just called yourself on the break Captain Corny about

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:45.590
<v Speaker 4>a minute ago.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.940
<v Speaker 2>I know, and I proved it. Captain Corny!

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.780
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's talk about something a texter sent in.

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.629
<v Speaker 3>And this could be addressed by all local college football fans.

0:17:55.770 --> 0:17:59.830
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's an interesting point. So, we got

0:17:59.850 --> 0:18:02.990
<v Speaker 3>a text, I think it was yesterday, Bone, where he texted,

0:18:03.650 --> 0:18:06.630
<v Speaker 3>maybe it was two days ago, but we were saying

0:18:06.710 --> 0:18:09.810
<v Speaker 3>something about not liking the 2014 playoff idea.

0:18:10.369 --> 0:18:12.270
<v Speaker 2>Which, by the way, if you read.

0:18:12.350 --> 0:18:15.330
<v Speaker 3>The latest stuff, it does seem like, there was a

0:18:15.350 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>report yesterday, Bone, that it just feels like it is...

0:18:19.260 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 3>It's getting really close to that being done. The deadline

0:18:21.780 --> 0:18:24.340
<v Speaker 3>is December 1st, and it just feels like this is

0:18:24.780 --> 0:18:28.270
<v Speaker 3>probably the last season of the 12-team playoff. And the

0:18:28.310 --> 0:18:30.949
<v Speaker 3>texter said something, I'll just paraphrase it.

0:18:31.190 --> 0:18:33.450
<v Speaker 4>Can't believe it's already ending. It seems like it just began.

0:18:33.510 --> 0:18:36.230
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable. And they wanted to do it after one year.

0:18:36.950 --> 0:18:39.740
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, the texter said something to the effect of,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.139
<v Speaker 3>I keep hearing you guys and your listeners say, Bad

0:18:43.220 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 3>mouth the 2014 playoff. He said, when you root for

0:18:46.540 --> 0:18:49.970
<v Speaker 3>all these teams in the Carolinas that don't have a

0:18:50.030 --> 0:18:54.190
<v Speaker 3>chance in a 12-team playoff, why would the local fans

0:18:54.790 --> 0:18:57.100
<v Speaker 3>not embrace doubling the playoff field?

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:57.980
<v Speaker 4>Huh?

0:18:58.100 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 3>And I think this is like, and you look at

0:18:59.540 --> 0:19:02.340
<v Speaker 3>wake forest right now, like, yeah, they've got a chance

0:19:02.540 --> 0:19:05.410
<v Speaker 3>at a 12 team playoff, but 2014 playoff. If you're

0:19:05.430 --> 0:19:07.950
<v Speaker 3>a Deke fan, how good would you feel about your

0:19:07.990 --> 0:19:10.850
<v Speaker 3>chances then? What do you think about that bone? Like

0:19:10.890 --> 0:19:13.390
<v Speaker 3>you were for Duke in South Carolina. I think you're, you're,

0:19:13.510 --> 0:19:15.580
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's two of the fans like last year,

0:19:15.619 --> 0:19:18.790
<v Speaker 3>Duke would have been in, in a 2014 field. health

0:19:18.950 --> 0:19:21.530
<v Speaker 3>of the sport and the meaning of the regular season

0:19:21.570 --> 0:19:24.780
<v Speaker 3>being diminished. I just, that's why I don't like it.

0:19:24.790 --> 0:19:26.929
<v Speaker 3>It also feels like it's too much too fast. We

0:19:26.950 --> 0:19:29.770
<v Speaker 3>were at four teams like three years ago, you know,

0:19:30.130 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 3>but there isn't art. Like I wouldn't blame fans of

0:19:33.500 --> 0:19:37.260
<v Speaker 3>the local team saying, Hey, what, you know what? Now

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>you put it that way, I think I want 24 teams.

0:19:39.060 --> 0:19:41.900
<v Speaker 4>It's moving faster than Finney's relationship, to be quite honest

0:19:41.940 --> 0:19:45.310
<v Speaker 4>about it. Oh, and that's fast. That's the speed of light.

0:19:45.510 --> 0:19:47.970
<v Speaker 4>Gator Rube has a point here, and I disagree with it.

0:19:47.970 --> 0:19:50.859
<v Speaker 4>He says Wake versus Georgia in the first round, what's

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.540
<v Speaker 4>the spread? Because when it comes to stuff like that,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 4>obviously a lot of the teams here, Mac, wouldn't go

0:19:56.900 --> 0:19:59.340
<v Speaker 4>very far. But I still think if you're one of

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:04.460
<v Speaker 4>the 24 and you're in those stand-alone windows, those playoff games...

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.310
<v Speaker 4>That's big for programs like Wake, for recruiting, for the

0:20:08.390 --> 0:20:11.750
<v Speaker 4>money that they need. Yeah, the results may not go

0:20:11.790 --> 0:20:14.690
<v Speaker 4>their way, especially in a game like Wake and Georgia,

0:20:14.710 --> 0:20:18.550
<v Speaker 4>for example. But just being in those matchups, getting the attention,

0:20:18.950 --> 0:20:22.490
<v Speaker 4>being in standalone windows for your program would be huge

0:20:22.570 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 4>for Wake. for Duke, for State, for Carolina, for the game,

0:20:25.980 --> 0:20:28.220
<v Speaker 4>for all those schools. That would be massive for them

0:20:28.260 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 4>to be in those spots.

0:20:29.180 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 2>It would be. No, that's true.

0:20:30.500 --> 0:20:33.310
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know, like, I think with the, is

0:20:33.350 --> 0:20:35.190
<v Speaker 3>the way they would do it the most talked about

0:20:35.250 --> 0:20:37.449
<v Speaker 3>way that the first eight teams would get buys?

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 2>And then the bottom 16 would play in round one.

0:20:40.859 --> 0:20:42.500
<v Speaker 2>All right. So the SEC gets buys. And then the

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>eight winners.

0:20:43.060 --> 0:20:45.220
<v Speaker 3>Would play the eight by. I think that's the way they're.

0:20:45.340 --> 0:20:48.060
<v Speaker 3>So I don't think you would get that extreme in

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.140
<v Speaker 3>the first round. But I get like I'm with you

0:20:51.220 --> 0:20:52.980
<v Speaker 3>on that one, though, Rube, just the general sense of

0:20:53.010 --> 0:20:55.570
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying. This is another reason I don't want

0:20:55.609 --> 0:20:58.530
<v Speaker 3>it for the sake of college football. Like watching if

0:20:58.590 --> 0:21:03.909
<v Speaker 3>it's 24 against nine. You know what I mean? I

0:21:04.109 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 3>just don't think that's good for the sport, watching 10

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.939
<v Speaker 3>against 23. Now, you will get more on campus games,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.140
<v Speaker 3>which I do like that idea of, but I've always

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>liked the exclusivity of the college football playoff.

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 2>They just went to 12. We barely....

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.340
<v Speaker 4>I just feel like they should have let 12 breathe

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 4>longer than they did. I have a question about it, though.

0:21:26.260 --> 0:21:28.420
<v Speaker 4>I've mainly been on your side, but if I'm looking

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 4>the other way, I do have a question about what

0:21:31.020 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 4>you're saying about those matchups. And I know it's different

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.270
<v Speaker 4>in that sport, but we do love March Madness and

0:21:37.310 --> 0:21:39.669
<v Speaker 4>we do love talking about lopsided matchups and who can

0:21:39.690 --> 0:21:42.570
<v Speaker 4>pull off upsets. We do talk about March Madness in

0:21:42.609 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 4>that way. We look at 16-versus-1s and 15-versus-2s and try

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.700
<v Speaker 4>to figure out who could pull off an upset.

0:21:48.740 --> 0:21:52.010
<v Speaker 2>We do have the most parity in the sport we've seen, man.

0:21:52.150 --> 0:21:56.410
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes in college basketball, obviously, it goes major blowout city,

0:21:56.450 --> 0:21:58.189
<v Speaker 4>but there are times where the games are closer than

0:21:58.230 --> 0:21:59.170
<v Speaker 4>we think, so who knows?

0:21:59.369 --> 0:22:01.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, and we are in— That's why we

0:22:01.060 --> 0:22:05.420
<v Speaker 3>love March, right? Football has never really been the same bone.

0:22:06.130 --> 0:22:09.350
<v Speaker 3>You know, but we're in an NIL era where we've

0:22:09.470 --> 0:22:10.970
<v Speaker 3>we have not really seen this much parody.

0:22:11.010 --> 0:22:13.370
<v Speaker 2>So 10 versus 23. I don't know. Is that.

0:22:13.770 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 3>But even if it is, my whole argument is you're

0:22:15.540 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 3>putting in 12 teams that are worse than the 12.

0:22:18.619 --> 0:22:21.939
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean? Like you're watering down the field.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's see what fans are saying.

0:22:23.980 --> 0:22:24.620
<v Speaker 2>704-570-9610.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.370
<v Speaker 3>Got a text from Mikey Swags here.

0:22:28.530 --> 0:22:31.169
<v Speaker 2>What's Mikey saying? I don't know. I just like the

0:22:31.210 --> 0:22:31.550
<v Speaker 2>name Mikey.

0:22:31.570 --> 0:22:35.010
<v Speaker 4>Mikey Swags, baby. Forget about it. There are still blowouts

0:22:35.070 --> 0:22:36.670
<v Speaker 4>in the 12-team playoff as well.

0:22:36.670 --> 0:22:36.950
<v Speaker 5>100%.

0:22:36.950 --> 0:22:39.430
<v Speaker 2>Hell, the 14-playoff. Mikey Swags.

0:22:39.450 --> 0:22:42.250
<v Speaker 3>We were getting blowouts in the semis. uh let's see

0:22:42.350 --> 0:22:45.410
<v Speaker 3>here uh matt says wake from miami was a great

0:22:45.470 --> 0:22:48.810
<v Speaker 3>game yeah that's i mean maybe great's a little strong

0:22:48.830 --> 0:22:50.470
<v Speaker 3>but they were driving in the fourth quarter with a

0:22:50.470 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 3>chance to cut it to one score they were in

0:22:52.380 --> 0:22:54.260
<v Speaker 3>the red zone with a chance cut so lost by

0:22:54.260 --> 0:22:57.700
<v Speaker 3>13 so they acquitted themselves pretty well actually to his

0:22:57.780 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 3>point there it's a good point i know.

0:22:58.980 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 4>That he got off to a great start but mac

0:23:00.780 --> 0:23:03.460
<v Speaker 4>i think the most uncomfortable that mensa's looked all year

0:23:03.940 --> 0:23:06.620
<v Speaker 4>was in the second half against wake They actually pressured

0:23:06.660 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Mensah to where he didn't look that great in that half. Now,

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:14.060
<v Speaker 4>Tony was out, but that was where Mensah actually looked

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:14.820
<v Speaker 4>human in that half.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Not the first half, second half.

0:23:16.340 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 4>They did.

0:23:16.700 --> 0:23:18.850
<v Speaker 3>That defensive front will get after you at Wake, man.

0:23:18.890 --> 0:23:23.530
<v Speaker 3>No doubt about it. This texter says, is it wrong

0:23:23.550 --> 0:23:27.530
<v Speaker 3>that as a UNC fan, I don't want to make

0:23:27.670 --> 0:23:31.690
<v Speaker 3>a cheap 2014 playoff? It feels like you really haven't

0:23:31.830 --> 0:23:38.580
<v Speaker 3>earned anything special. Why are you laughing? Finney, you're a

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.460
<v Speaker 3>UNC fan. What do you think of this guy's opinion?

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.899
<v Speaker 3>Can a UNC football fan act like that? Like, I

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 3>don't want to be in it unless it's 12 team.

0:23:47.100 --> 0:23:49.220
<v Speaker 3>If you put it to 20, like what's next bone,

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.580
<v Speaker 3>a UNC fan texts in and says they want them

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:52.540
<v Speaker 3>to turn the bit down.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 2>If they, in the future, make the 2014 field, do

0:23:55.820 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 2>you fit?

0:23:56.780 --> 0:23:59.860
<v Speaker 3>Do you like the 2014 playoff idea because it would

0:23:59.900 --> 0:24:02.180
<v Speaker 3>give your heels a better chance in the future?

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:03.830
<v Speaker 2>Or, or does that not play into it?

0:24:04.020 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 7>If I look at it with my fandom and play

0:24:07.060 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 7>massive in favor of a 2014 playoff, because I don't

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.369
<v Speaker 7>know how realistically, how often Carolina could compete in a

0:24:15.350 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 7>12 team I think you open it up to 24 teams.

0:24:20.020 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 7>They would have made it under Sam. They would have

0:24:21.700 --> 0:24:25.139
<v Speaker 7>made it with Drake May. I think maybe at some point, hopefully,

0:24:25.180 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 7>you could say you made it under Bill Belichick.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 8>I look at it from your point of view, Mac. Like,

0:24:31.820 --> 0:24:35.090
<v Speaker 8>I was listening to Josh Payton talk about this on

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:35.660
<v Speaker 8>his podcast.

0:24:35.700 --> 0:24:36.910
<v Speaker 2>He was all over it this week.

0:24:36.930 --> 0:24:42.629
<v Speaker 7>Georgia-Bama was great. And there was a great atmosphere in T-Town.

0:24:43.190 --> 0:24:45.950
<v Speaker 7>And there was a sense of urgency in that game.

0:24:46.820 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 7>But imagine if that game takes place in a 24 team.

0:24:50.900 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 7>There's no repercussion for teams that lose that game.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Not at all.

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.010
<v Speaker 7>Because those teams are still going to, A, make the playoff, B,

0:24:58.070 --> 0:25:01.410
<v Speaker 7>still very well be alive to get buys in the playoffs.

0:25:01.869 --> 0:25:06.290
<v Speaker 7>What makes college football different is that every weekend matters.

0:25:06.990 --> 0:25:09.949
<v Speaker 7>And that got lessened when we went from 4 to 12.

0:25:09.950 --> 0:25:12.570
<v Speaker 7>If you go from 12 to 24, how many of

0:25:12.609 --> 0:25:14.850
<v Speaker 7>these great weekends, like look at this upcoming weekend of

0:25:14.869 --> 0:25:15.330
<v Speaker 7>college football.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 8>It is tremendous.

0:25:18.020 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't matter.

0:25:20.340 --> 0:25:22.780
<v Speaker 8>There's no repercussions for the teams that lose.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.929
<v Speaker 2>The games that would matter, Fitty, would involve worse teams.

0:25:27.030 --> 0:25:27.210
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:25:27.230 --> 0:25:27.810
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

0:25:28.090 --> 0:25:30.950
<v Speaker 8>Teams that aren't championship caliber.

0:25:31.350 --> 0:25:34.969
<v Speaker 2>Our team's here. And that goes back to the point.

0:25:35.390 --> 0:25:36.110
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Bone.

0:25:36.130 --> 0:25:40.940
<v Speaker 3>It's like, are we missing a better, I guess, I

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know what it is. I just love college football

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 3>so much. Like that I can't, I don't know. I

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.690
<v Speaker 3>don't look at this selfishly. And I feel like I

0:25:49.790 --> 0:25:52.409
<v Speaker 3>usually look at sports selfishly. But for some reason, I

0:25:52.450 --> 0:25:55.450
<v Speaker 3>just want to protect the great game of college football.

0:25:55.950 --> 0:25:57.570
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing, too, is Josh Pate made a

0:25:57.609 --> 0:26:00.230
<v Speaker 3>great point this week. Let's all be honest about the

0:26:00.290 --> 0:26:05.050
<v Speaker 3>reason why, Bone, the powers that be want the 2014.

0:26:05.050 --> 0:26:07.909
<v Speaker 3>It's a bailout, in the words of Josh Pate. It's, oh,

0:26:07.930 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 3>my God, we've got ourselves into this situation where we

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.500
<v Speaker 3>need money for so many different things. Oh, my God,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 3>we actually got to pay the players now. It has

0:26:16.900 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot to do with the need for money. As

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 3>much as anything.

0:26:20.420 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 2>The biggest reason.

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 7>Why I'm open to a 2014 playoff more than anything, Mac,

0:26:25.060 --> 0:26:27.570
<v Speaker 7>is that it would bring a different TV network to

0:26:27.590 --> 0:26:27.990
<v Speaker 7>the table.

0:26:28.570 --> 0:26:31.250
<v Speaker 2>But it doesn't sound like it would. I saw something yesterday.

0:26:31.390 --> 0:26:33.950
<v Speaker 7>Oh, so now it can expand to 24 and ESPN

0:26:33.970 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 7>still gets to drive the narrative?

0:26:35.060 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like it. Oh, then to hell with this.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Because you know ESPN's been negotiating. They have that window

0:26:40.820 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 3>to negotiate that's just ending. There was a report saying, Bone,

0:26:44.020 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 3>it looks like it could very well still be all ESPN.

0:26:46.460 --> 0:26:49.420
<v Speaker 7>Then why would CBS and NBC pay for college football games?

0:26:50.020 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 7>If you can't have your feet at the table to

0:26:51.660 --> 0:26:54.780
<v Speaker 7>have playoff games and be able to drive your own

0:26:54.820 --> 0:26:57.139
<v Speaker 7>narrative for the Big Ten, what's the point of them

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 7>even televising the damn conferences?

0:26:58.540 --> 0:27:01.929
<v Speaker 4>Same reason ESPN broadcasts college basketball. They don't have March Madness.

0:27:03.710 --> 0:27:05.910
<v Speaker 4>College football games do much bigger ratings than college basketball.

0:27:06.109 --> 0:27:09.609
<v Speaker 4>Here's the thing, though, Fitty, to your point, it doesn't

0:27:09.690 --> 0:27:14.930
<v Speaker 4>help the regular season games. ESPN gets the postseason games,

0:27:15.250 --> 0:27:17.130
<v Speaker 4>but now a lot of the big games, to your point,

0:27:17.170 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 4>are diminished on the networks. but yet Fox and CBS

0:27:21.100 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 4>and NBC don't get a part of the book. So

0:27:23.060 --> 0:27:26.909
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure it's not ideal for them. Um, I don't know, man,

0:27:27.070 --> 0:27:30.189
<v Speaker 4>this dude says I'm a Clemson fan. I'm embarrassed that

0:27:30.230 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 4>we made a 12 team playoff, 14 playoff.

0:27:33.380 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>We're embarrassed for you. I'm, That's another thing, too.

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.830
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to be rude-boned to our local fan

0:27:39.869 --> 0:27:41.650
<v Speaker 3>bases that butter our bread.

0:27:42.090 --> 0:27:44.710
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean? Butter them biscuits.

0:27:44.770 --> 0:27:47.340
<v Speaker 3>Where are these attitudes getting from that our teams in

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.380
<v Speaker 3>the Carolinas are too good for expanded playoffs?

0:27:49.420 --> 0:27:49.900
<v Speaker 2>I don't get that.

0:27:50.100 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 4>This Ask the Audience has been courtesy of QC Mechanical,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 4>your local... HVAC experts. Mac, I wanted to read a

0:27:56.220 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 4>text before we go to break here. I'm going to

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.980
<v Speaker 4>try not to laugh when I read it. A texter says,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:05.530
<v Speaker 4>let's go back to the era of the BCS. Simply

0:28:05.700 --> 0:28:08.650
<v Speaker 4>one verse two, a time when men were men. Oh yeah,

0:28:08.670 --> 0:28:12.790
<v Speaker 4>that was perfect. That worked out beautifully. No controversies. The

0:28:12.869 --> 0:28:15.610
<v Speaker 4>early 2000s, the time when men were men. That's exactly right.

0:28:15.950 --> 0:28:19.350
<v Speaker 4>When we come back, it's a random crap segment. Is

0:28:19.410 --> 0:28:24.090
<v Speaker 4>the college football video game going away again already? We

0:28:24.109 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 4>have a sports broadcasting duo at odds. Is that us,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.550
<v Speaker 4>by the way? And two new sports TV streaming shows

0:28:31.050 --> 0:28:32.850
<v Speaker 4>are on the way. We talk about all that on

0:28:32.869 --> 0:28:34.070
<v Speaker 4>Sports Radio 92.7 WFNZ.

0:28:38.610 --> 0:28:42.530
<v Speaker 5>Random crap, random crap, Mac and Bone talk, random crap,

0:28:42.990 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 5>random crap, random crap, Mac and Bone talk, random crap, random,

0:28:48.500 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 5>random crap, random crap, random crap.

0:28:55.180 --> 0:28:56.540
<v Speaker 2>What the deuce?

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:57.060
<v Speaker 7>Oh crap.

0:28:57.220 --> 0:28:57.820
<v Speaker 4>Oh crap.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>We stink.

0:28:59.020 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Like a baby's blowout-infested diaper.

0:29:01.940 --> 0:29:03.930
<v Speaker 1>They talk about crap that is random.

0:29:04.230 --> 0:29:06.250
<v Speaker 4>It's the Queen City's favorite born in tandem.

0:29:06.790 --> 0:29:08.890
<v Speaker 2>Mack and Bone. Random crap.

0:29:09.370 --> 0:29:10.070
<v Speaker 1>Mack and Bone.

0:29:13.380 --> 0:29:14.100
<v Speaker 2>All right, y'all.

0:29:14.140 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 3>It is Random Crap Time here on the Mac and

0:29:17.540 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Bone Show. We got some fun stories to hit you with.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.620
<v Speaker 3>At the top of the hour, victory formula time, baby.

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 3>To beat the Eagles. To win a game that it

0:29:27.220 --> 0:29:30.470
<v Speaker 3>feels like we should win, but it feels like we're

0:29:30.510 --> 0:29:32.810
<v Speaker 3>all worried about whether or not we actually will. So

0:29:32.830 --> 0:29:35.670
<v Speaker 3>that's coming up at 8 o'clock. Let's start here with

0:29:35.750 --> 0:29:39.190
<v Speaker 3>Random Crap, Boney. I want to shout out our former co-worker,

0:29:39.210 --> 0:29:42.050
<v Speaker 3>Brian Tilley. who has texted in, Bone, and he has

0:29:42.110 --> 0:29:42.850
<v Speaker 3>shared a link.

0:29:42.870 --> 0:29:43.469
<v Speaker 4>Who?

0:29:43.950 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Brian Tilley. You don't remember Tilley?

0:29:45.540 --> 0:29:45.820
<v Speaker 5>Oh, yeah.

0:29:45.860 --> 0:29:47.970
<v Speaker 2>Tilley, yeah. I forgot his name was Brian for a second.

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.780
<v Speaker 3>He has sent in a link from Barstool where their

0:29:51.860 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 3>ask is, this could be another ask the audience question

0:29:54.100 --> 0:29:56.700
<v Speaker 3>here on the show, where they are asking all their

0:29:56.740 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 3>employees what the easiest position is to play in sports. Now,

0:30:01.100 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 3>someone on there says quarterback, and I find that to

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 3>be laughable. Third string quarterback is my dream.

0:30:06.780 --> 0:30:08.580
<v Speaker 2>What position is the easiest one in sport?

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.620
<v Speaker 3>I'm going punter. I'm going punter. Like kicker, I would

0:30:11.660 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 3>never say. I would never say long snapper. You have

0:30:14.100 --> 0:30:18.590
<v Speaker 3>games on the line at kicker. Punter, though, you practice

0:30:18.790 --> 0:30:22.020
<v Speaker 3>punting a football. I mean, they don't even let them

0:30:22.060 --> 0:30:25.810
<v Speaker 3>hit you. You barely need to make a tackle. Like,

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:27.970
<v Speaker 3>punter is the first thing that popped into my head.

0:30:29.130 --> 0:30:32.930
<v Speaker 4>Not an enormous amount of pressure, I'd say, compared to

0:30:32.950 --> 0:30:33.390
<v Speaker 4>the kicker.

0:30:33.690 --> 0:30:37.540
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's got to be punter, right? I would think so.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Turd Ferguson, long snapper. How dare you, sir?

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:40.580
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 2>JJ could be listening, sir. No, it's not. We are

0:30:44.620 --> 0:30:47.380
<v Speaker 2>not doing that in this house. Like, what other positions

0:30:47.420 --> 0:30:49.180
<v Speaker 2>would you even think of in sports?

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.070
<v Speaker 4>Because it's not basketball. It wouldn't be any other football. Like,

0:30:52.090 --> 0:30:53.620
<v Speaker 4>it can't be, like, relief pitcher.

0:30:54.050 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:30:54.390 --> 0:30:55.810
<v Speaker 3>Because you get in there, all the pressure in the

0:30:55.830 --> 0:30:58.050
<v Speaker 3>world could be on you. Low leverage relief pitcher?

0:30:58.070 --> 0:30:59.890
<v Speaker 2>You also have to. Like, the guy that goes in

0:30:59.910 --> 0:31:00.729
<v Speaker 2>when you're getting blown out?

0:31:00.750 --> 0:31:02.850
<v Speaker 4>You also have to throw, like, 98 now, which is

0:31:02.890 --> 0:31:06.330
<v Speaker 4>not easy to do. So, I don't know. Patton Mount Pleasant, golfer.

0:31:07.330 --> 0:31:09.550
<v Speaker 3>As mentally tough as that game is yeah let me

0:31:09.570 --> 0:31:11.610
<v Speaker 3>tell you you're out there yourself you have no teammates

0:31:11.670 --> 0:31:13.570
<v Speaker 3>to help you golfers not easy.

0:31:13.530 --> 0:31:16.100
<v Speaker 4>Now we're talking about like position and like the main

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.660
<v Speaker 4>we're not talking about like dart throwers it's we're talking

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 4>about like of the main sports easiest position to play.

0:31:21.700 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Right dirt i would assume ders in huntersville says placeholder

0:31:25.060 --> 0:31:28.460
<v Speaker 3>for the kicker but they're usually have another job but

0:31:28.500 --> 0:31:32.350
<v Speaker 3>would you have a third string quarterback slash holder That seems.

0:31:32.190 --> 0:31:32.930
<v Speaker 2>Like a good gig.

0:31:33.010 --> 0:31:38.330
<v Speaker 3>I call that my dream. Baron says male cheerleaders.

0:31:39.730 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Caddy. Matt.

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'd like to be a caddy. But you got

0:31:44.540 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 3>to actually know stuff, though, to be a caddy. That

0:31:47.420 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 3>would disqualify me.

0:31:48.620 --> 0:31:51.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I don't know, man.

0:31:51.900 --> 0:31:54.620
<v Speaker 4>I think it's if we're talking about the main sport,

0:31:54.660 --> 0:31:55.890
<v Speaker 4>I would think it has to be punter.

0:31:56.470 --> 0:31:58.729
<v Speaker 2>Welcome down, says long snapper. You can do it in

0:31:58.770 --> 0:31:59.910
<v Speaker 2>your 70s, apparently.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't like this passive-aggressive stuff towards JJ going on. Anyway,

0:32:05.220 --> 0:32:10.170
<v Speaker 3>keep those texts coming. Bullpen catcher. Backup catcher. Backup catcher

0:32:10.190 --> 0:32:11.070
<v Speaker 3>that handles the bullpen.

0:32:11.110 --> 0:32:13.209
<v Speaker 4>My best friend in high school was a bullpen catcher,

0:32:13.230 --> 0:32:15.030
<v Speaker 4>and he used to get harassed by the opposing fans

0:32:15.070 --> 0:32:16.990
<v Speaker 4>down the line. So you're saying that's not fun. No,

0:32:16.990 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 4>they would call him Fatty, Fatty McGee. Like, oh, yeah,

0:32:19.300 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 4>it was ugly.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Someone says first baseman. I don't know.

0:32:22.660 --> 0:32:24.340
<v Speaker 3>You've got to clean up those. You've got to stretch

0:32:24.380 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 3>and clean up those little hoppers. Those throws that come

0:32:27.180 --> 0:32:29.610
<v Speaker 3>to you in the dirt. There's no way that's easy. Yeah,

0:32:29.650 --> 0:32:31.230
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't think so. Plus, you still have to hit

0:32:31.270 --> 0:32:32.270
<v Speaker 3>or you ain't going to have your job. What are

0:32:32.290 --> 0:32:33.090
<v Speaker 3>you talking about here?

0:32:33.210 --> 0:32:33.990
<v Speaker 2>All right, DH.

0:32:34.010 --> 0:32:34.450
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:32:34.510 --> 0:32:36.910
<v Speaker 2>Someone that says DH. No, you have to still hit

0:32:36.950 --> 0:32:41.750
<v Speaker 2>the baseball. Kevin says LeBron James' son. Winner. Winner, winner.

0:32:41.850 --> 0:32:44.690
<v Speaker 2>Kevin wins, baby. Kevin wins the text line.

0:32:44.790 --> 0:32:44.950
<v Speaker 1>Winner.

0:32:44.990 --> 0:32:45.450
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:32:45.770 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to some more stories. Shout out Brian Tilly

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.020
<v Speaker 3>and Barstool. That was a good question.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:50.300
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:56.500
<v Speaker 3>So, Bone, there is apparently some tension between Joe Buck

0:32:56.540 --> 0:32:59.210
<v Speaker 3>and Troy Aikman, according to a front office sports report.

0:32:59.630 --> 0:33:02.590
<v Speaker 3>They both have been going through contract situations. Joe Buck

0:33:02.630 --> 0:33:05.910
<v Speaker 3>got his contract. Aikman is not. And apparently they got

0:33:05.950 --> 0:33:07.790
<v Speaker 3>into an argument about it, Bone.

0:33:07.810 --> 0:33:07.890
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:33:08.270 --> 0:33:10.380
<v Speaker 3>And there is tension there. How do you feel about

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.380
<v Speaker 3>the Buck Aikman tension? Some people are thinking this could

0:33:13.420 --> 0:33:16.380
<v Speaker 3>lead to Aikman walking from ESPN.

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.380
<v Speaker 4>What do you think of all this? There's been something

0:33:18.430 --> 0:33:21.250
<v Speaker 4>going on here. I don't know if Buck, you know,

0:33:21.290 --> 0:33:24.990
<v Speaker 4>they signed together with ESPN. They've been together, by the way, for...

0:33:25.820 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Since 2005, they are like best friends. Imagine that, be

0:33:29.620 --> 0:33:32.340
<v Speaker 4>with a broadcasting partner since 2005. That's insane to be

0:33:32.380 --> 0:33:37.290
<v Speaker 4>together for that long. Good morning, Mac. I've wondered, this

0:33:37.850 --> 0:33:43.570
<v Speaker 4>is just my speculation, does ESPN want to put McAfee

0:33:43.610 --> 0:33:46.780
<v Speaker 4>in the booth with them or in some role? Joe

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.740
<v Speaker 4>Buck doesn't mind it, signed right away, and Aikman, the

0:33:49.780 --> 0:33:52.930
<v Speaker 4>football guy, is like, I'm not doing this. I wonder

0:33:52.950 --> 0:33:56.219
<v Speaker 4>if they're just my guess. Because money-wise, you would think

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.060
<v Speaker 4>it'd be pretty equal. Aikman's already filthy rich. It may

0:33:59.100 --> 0:34:01.700
<v Speaker 4>not be money, but what would hold back Aikman from

0:34:01.780 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 4>signing when Buck did it right away? And a couple

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago, Mac, Joe Buck on the broadcast, they showed

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.930
<v Speaker 4>McAfee on the sidelines. He said, hey, there's our friend

0:34:11.969 --> 0:34:15.779
<v Speaker 4>Pat McAfee. And McAfee like waved during the game. Troy

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 4>Aikman said nothing back at all to that at all.

0:34:18.340 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 4>Troy Aikman says, is that the guy you're trying to

0:34:19.739 --> 0:34:21.370
<v Speaker 4>place for your job? I wonder if Buck's been like, yeah,

0:34:21.390 --> 0:34:23.450
<v Speaker 4>let's throw him in here. And then Aikman's kind of like,

0:34:23.570 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 4>you're not taking him.

0:34:24.170 --> 0:34:24.569
<v Speaker 2>I will say this.

0:34:24.630 --> 0:34:26.569
<v Speaker 3>McAfee came out the other day and said all this

0:34:26.610 --> 0:34:28.370
<v Speaker 3>stuff about me being in the booth is BS.

0:34:28.570 --> 0:34:31.299
<v Speaker 2>All that stuff. But what's he going to say? Right

0:34:31.340 --> 0:34:33.700
<v Speaker 2>now he's doing Disney voiceovers. That's true. And he's got.

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:38.180
<v Speaker 3>Another job now. His 1700th job, voicing a character for Hext.

0:34:39.260 --> 0:34:44.630
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of entertainment vehicles. How about the two new sports

0:34:44.690 --> 0:34:47.649
<v Speaker 3>streaming shows that are in the works? One of them

0:34:47.989 --> 0:34:51.060
<v Speaker 3>is going to be out soon. This one is called

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 3>The Land. Have you read about this one, Bone? I

0:34:55.500 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 3>don't think so. Fictitious story. It's on Hulu coming up.

0:34:58.040 --> 0:34:58.259
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Fictitious story that follows the inner workings of a struggling

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.580
<v Speaker 3>NFL franchise named the Cleveland Browns.

0:35:06.660 --> 0:35:10.140
<v Speaker 2>What a fictitious tale. Where'd they get the idea for

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:10.569
<v Speaker 2>this one?

0:35:11.530 --> 0:35:15.410
<v Speaker 4>Episode one, they sign a quarterback that is under fire

0:35:15.469 --> 0:35:17.130
<v Speaker 4>for his massage therapy pass.

0:35:17.750 --> 0:35:20.450
<v Speaker 2>To a massive contract. Obviously, it's a very fake show.

0:35:21.450 --> 0:35:21.790
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:35:21.870 --> 0:35:25.330
<v Speaker 3>It sounds kind of cheesy to me. It's like meddlesome owner.

0:35:25.489 --> 0:35:25.910
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:35:25.989 --> 0:35:29.069
<v Speaker 3>It has all the stereotypical things that you would see

0:35:29.110 --> 0:35:31.549
<v Speaker 3>in this like fake conflict stuff.

0:35:31.570 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 4>They should do a movie on a struggling baseball team

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.860
<v Speaker 4>in Cleveland. A comedic look at baseball in Cleveland.

0:35:38.730 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if this is comedic or not, but yes,

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:44.530
<v Speaker 3>they hit with that one.

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Who wants to see? I'm not feeling this. We don't

0:35:46.540 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>want to see the real Browns. They're quite a fictitious

0:35:48.739 --> 0:35:51.870
<v Speaker 2>Browns team. I'm not feeling this. Change the city up. Now,

0:35:51.989 --> 0:35:53.509
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you this next one I am all

0:35:53.590 --> 0:35:54.230
<v Speaker 2>in on. She got it.

0:35:54.510 --> 0:35:58.530
<v Speaker 3>Netflix is doing a documentary on DeJuan Love.

0:35:58.590 --> 0:36:01.140
<v Speaker 2>Is that his name? The dude that pretended.

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.940
<v Speaker 3>To be a 49ers wide receiver and, like, frauded all

0:36:04.980 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 3>these women out of money.

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:06.219
<v Speaker 2>Oh, hell yeah.

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.140
<v Speaker 3>Netflix is doing a doc on that. Wide Deceiver is

0:36:10.180 --> 0:36:12.580
<v Speaker 3>what the name of it's going to be, which is tremendous.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.180
<v Speaker 2>I am all in.

0:36:14.460 --> 0:36:18.049
<v Speaker 3>You know what that is? That's like Tinder Swindler with football.

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:19.890
<v Speaker 2>That's a great one. That's what that is. And I

0:36:19.950 --> 0:36:22.529
<v Speaker 2>love that movie. I love that doc. Have you been

0:36:22.570 --> 0:36:25.670
<v Speaker 2>into the Saban documentary at all yet? I have not.

0:36:25.690 --> 0:36:27.670
<v Speaker 2>I've seen a lot of clips of it. A few

0:36:27.710 --> 0:36:31.049
<v Speaker 2>minutes last week's first episode. I don't know.

0:36:31.110 --> 0:36:34.700
<v Speaker 3>I kind of get Saban'd out. You know, he's on

0:36:34.739 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 3>commercials every other break trying to decide. He's trying to

0:36:38.140 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 3>decide if he's on Aflac. He's trying to decide if

0:36:40.380 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 3>he's going to eat a sandwich or do his drilling.

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.570
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean? And he's also on Game Day.

0:36:48.110 --> 0:36:50.710
<v Speaker 2>But it looks like it might be good content.

0:36:50.950 --> 0:36:53.270
<v Speaker 4>We also have the new that came out last week,

0:36:53.290 --> 0:36:55.750
<v Speaker 4>the new Mike Tyson documentary on Netflix.

0:36:55.770 --> 0:36:56.930
<v Speaker 2>I have not seen that one yet either.

0:36:57.190 --> 0:36:57.370
<v Speaker 1>What?

0:36:58.190 --> 0:36:59.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I saw that one pop up when I was

0:36:59.969 --> 0:37:02.259
<v Speaker 3>looking last night. Did you see what the name of

0:37:02.300 --> 0:37:03.740
<v Speaker 3>that one is? I'm Spartacus.

0:37:03.780 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm Copernicus. I'm Gideon's children. That's the name of it?

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:06.700
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm in.

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I would have liked that.

0:37:08.900 --> 0:37:10.259
<v Speaker 4>That would be a silly name for a documentary. I

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.540
<v Speaker 4>would have liked that name.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 3>So what do you think, Bone, about the speculation that's

0:37:16.380 --> 0:37:19.290
<v Speaker 3>out there in the media that because of the NIL

0:37:19.330 --> 0:37:22.149
<v Speaker 3>money going up and up, that it'll cost too much

0:37:22.230 --> 0:37:25.570
<v Speaker 3>money now to get the players... to pay all the

0:37:25.610 --> 0:37:28.470
<v Speaker 3>players for rights to use them in the EA Sports

0:37:28.510 --> 0:37:31.989
<v Speaker 3>college football video game. And there's a real fear from

0:37:32.050 --> 0:37:35.489
<v Speaker 3>many that the college football video game bone could be

0:37:35.530 --> 0:37:37.950
<v Speaker 3>going away just a few years after it coming back.

0:37:38.130 --> 0:37:42.779
<v Speaker 4>Also, we're supposed to get the college basketball video game

0:37:42.860 --> 0:37:45.700
<v Speaker 4>next year also. So is that going to make a

0:37:45.820 --> 0:37:48.860
<v Speaker 4>one-year return and just be gone for another 20 years?

0:37:49.380 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't like where this is headed.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Are you guys still enjoying the college football video game? Like,

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 3>is this still, has the luster worn off? Because I

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 3>haven't played it since the first year back.

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.219
<v Speaker 4>I play it when it first comes out for the year,

0:38:01.260 --> 0:38:03.940
<v Speaker 4>but then once the actual, like it gets my football

0:38:03.980 --> 0:38:06.020
<v Speaker 4>fix in for a few weeks, and then we get

0:38:06.060 --> 0:38:08.140
<v Speaker 4>so busy with actual football, I kind of lose it

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 4>a little bit during the season.

0:38:09.260 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, I'm playing it, but I'm not playing

0:38:11.140 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>it as often as.

0:38:11.660 --> 0:38:11.860
<v Speaker 1>I used to.

0:38:11.860 --> 0:38:15.390
<v Speaker 3>Are you still taking the Tar Heels to great footballing heights, Fetty,

0:38:15.430 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 3>or no?

0:38:15.890 --> 0:38:18.310
<v Speaker 7>No, I probably pick back up in the offseason.

0:38:18.450 --> 0:38:20.190
<v Speaker 2>There's just too much. Too much going on. I don't

0:38:20.210 --> 0:38:21.330
<v Speaker 2>have time to do stuff right now.

0:38:21.510 --> 0:38:25.190
<v Speaker 3>That's understandable, though. It still would be a bummer, man.

0:38:25.210 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 3>That's a beloved game. It still would. But I understand

0:38:28.260 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 3>they also have to pay all the conferences for rights, Bone.

0:38:31.260 --> 0:38:34.339
<v Speaker 3>There's so many rights, like coaches. There's just so many

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.609
<v Speaker 3>different rights fees involved. that they have to pay. All right.

0:38:37.750 --> 0:38:39.989
<v Speaker 3>I will wrap this up bone on this note. Did

0:38:40.010 --> 0:38:43.990
<v Speaker 3>you have any idea? Usually I'm on top of celebrity couples, right? Boney.

0:38:44.530 --> 0:38:48.310
<v Speaker 3>Usually I know who's dating who, and then some texter

0:38:48.350 --> 0:38:50.330
<v Speaker 3>texts in and says, that's why I have low T

0:38:50.370 --> 0:38:52.169
<v Speaker 3>because I follow this stuff too much.

0:38:52.650 --> 0:38:54.630
<v Speaker 2>Um, that literally happened earlier, but anyway.

0:38:54.730 --> 0:38:57.150
<v Speaker 4>That couple was Kelly Clarkson and a toy bird.

0:38:57.469 --> 0:39:00.490
<v Speaker 3>Did you know that Elizabeth Hurley and Billy Ray Silas

0:39:00.510 --> 0:39:01.790
<v Speaker 3>had been a couple for over a year?

0:39:02.710 --> 0:39:03.630
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea.

0:39:03.650 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I He's got an achy, breaky heart no longer.

0:39:06.340 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 2>You talking about the guy from the T-Mobile ads?

0:39:09.380 --> 0:39:09.660
<v Speaker 5>Mr.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Achy, breaky heart.

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:10.950
<v Speaker 5>Oh, Billy Ray.

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:12.410
<v Speaker 4>I thought you said Billy Bob. I thought you meant

0:39:12.430 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Billy Bob Thornton. You said Billy Ray Cyrus.

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.029
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, no. Did you know that?

0:39:17.010 --> 0:39:19.549
<v Speaker 4>I thought maybe somewhere along the way, because I saw

0:39:20.070 --> 0:39:23.850
<v Speaker 4>a tweet about Miley and her. But maybe I don't

0:39:23.890 --> 0:39:25.569
<v Speaker 4>remember it, though. Hell, I just thought you were talking

0:39:25.590 --> 0:39:27.630
<v Speaker 4>about Billy Bob Thornton. Doesn't that seem like an odd couple?

0:39:28.610 --> 0:39:29.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a little bit.

0:39:29.310 --> 0:39:29.469
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:39:30.290 --> 0:39:30.850
<v Speaker 2>A little bit.

0:39:31.070 --> 0:39:35.170
<v Speaker 3>British and Southern country. But who knows, man? A lot

0:39:35.190 --> 0:39:37.670
<v Speaker 3>of people say Mrs. Mac and Mac are an odd couple.

0:39:38.110 --> 0:39:41.430
<v Speaker 3>I'm not worthy of her, and they'd probably be right.

0:39:41.469 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 4>Some people say some things about that.

0:39:43.340 --> 0:39:43.860
<v Speaker 2>Definitely.

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:48.879
<v Speaker 4>When we come back, victory formula time, Eagles edition. How

0:39:48.900 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 4>do the Panthers get a W on Sunday? Sports Radio,

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 4>92.7 WFNZ.