WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #283 - May 7th 2025 - Nick Cater

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news Talks it be

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:16.133
<v Speaker 1>follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.693 --> 0:00:19.733
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.773 --> 0:00:24.293
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of the sis, Now the

0:00:24.453 --> 0:00:27.733
<v Speaker 1>Layton Smith Podcast powered by news Talks.

0:00:27.453 --> 0:00:31.053
<v Speaker 2>It be Welcome to podcasts two eighty three, May seven,

0:00:31.093 --> 0:00:34.853
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. Whichever way you look at it, Australia

0:00:34.893 --> 0:00:38.813
<v Speaker 2>is in political turmoil after the election last Saturday May third.

0:00:39.693 --> 0:00:41.973
<v Speaker 2>There are numerous and plenty of theories as to why.

0:00:42.493 --> 0:00:45.653
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty of propaganda lots of it. One thing is

0:00:45.733 --> 0:00:49.453
<v Speaker 2>certain and lies. One thing is certain, it's a man

0:00:49.453 --> 0:00:53.293
<v Speaker 2>made problem. Question is where does it lead. Nick Cator

0:00:53.333 --> 0:00:55.973
<v Speaker 2>returns in two eighty three to help analyze how a

0:00:56.093 --> 0:00:58.853
<v Speaker 2>government with such a poor record in the first term

0:00:59.093 --> 0:01:02.573
<v Speaker 2>could nuke its opposition so decisively and what it means

0:01:02.613 --> 0:01:08.733
<v Speaker 2>to important issues, starting with free speech, taxation, defense, climate issues,

0:01:09.093 --> 0:01:13.093
<v Speaker 2>energy supply, and of course the cost of living. And

0:01:13.213 --> 0:01:15.253
<v Speaker 2>let's use a little common sense. The cost of living

0:01:15.333 --> 0:01:19.173
<v Speaker 2>is attached to directly to much of the aforementioned, such

0:01:19.213 --> 0:01:22.213
<v Speaker 2>as energy supply, and there is plenty to be said

0:01:22.253 --> 0:01:25.413
<v Speaker 2>about that, but just as a teaser. Here is a

0:01:25.493 --> 0:01:29.693
<v Speaker 2>letter that I received yesterday from Brian Leyland, who is

0:01:30.253 --> 0:01:34.693
<v Speaker 2>a man of vast experience in power supply. He said,

0:01:35.093 --> 0:01:37.693
<v Speaker 2>I've sent this letter to the editor of a newspaper.

0:01:38.133 --> 0:01:40.533
<v Speaker 2>I will be very surprised if it gets published, and

0:01:40.573 --> 0:01:43.013
<v Speaker 2>so far there is no sign of it. New Zealand

0:01:43.013 --> 0:01:46.293
<v Speaker 2>could save billions of dollars simply by following the example

0:01:46.293 --> 0:01:50.013
<v Speaker 2>of many other countries and quietly backpedal on the rash

0:01:50.053 --> 0:01:52.493
<v Speaker 2>promises that we made when we signed the Paris Agreement.

0:01:53.133 --> 0:01:56.053
<v Speaker 2>This will have no effect on the climate because anything

0:01:56.093 --> 0:01:59.533
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand does to reduce emissions will be swamped by

0:01:59.533 --> 0:02:02.853
<v Speaker 2>the emissions from China, India and the United States. The

0:02:02.893 --> 0:02:06.933
<v Speaker 2>carbon market costs about five hundred million dollars a year,

0:02:07.653 --> 0:02:11.893
<v Speaker 2>and axes increase the cost of transport by billions. That's

0:02:11.933 --> 0:02:15.573
<v Speaker 2>with a b of dollars. The previous government's ban on

0:02:15.853 --> 0:02:19.173
<v Speaker 2>gas exploration has left us short of gas and forced

0:02:19.213 --> 0:02:22.613
<v Speaker 2>us to import even more coal. This has cost electricity

0:02:22.613 --> 0:02:27.933
<v Speaker 2>consumers billions of dollars. Likewise electric vehicles and their charging points.

0:02:28.653 --> 0:02:32.093
<v Speaker 2>Then there is the multi billion dollar capital costs of

0:02:32.293 --> 0:02:38.053
<v Speaker 2>unreliable wind and solar farms. Fundamentally uneconomic industries that only

0:02:38.173 --> 0:02:41.733
<v Speaker 2>exist thanks to subsidies and mandates in many other countries.

0:02:42.533 --> 0:02:46.533
<v Speaker 2>The rational alternative is to use our substantial resources of

0:02:46.573 --> 0:02:50.853
<v Speaker 2>gas and coal in existing stations, build more hydro and geothermal,

0:02:51.173 --> 0:02:55.853
<v Speaker 2>and then transition to safe and reliable nuclear power. This

0:02:55.973 --> 0:03:00.813
<v Speaker 2>would provide a reliable and economic supply for the foreseeable future.

0:03:01.133 --> 0:03:05.893
<v Speaker 2>And with his experience and having read lots of background

0:03:06.013 --> 0:03:10.133
<v Speaker 2>on such matters, I endorse exactly what he said. We

0:03:10.253 --> 0:03:13.293
<v Speaker 2>have politicians in power at the moment who are not

0:03:13.373 --> 0:03:16.413
<v Speaker 2>delivering a staying close to home. There is another matter

0:03:16.453 --> 0:03:19.613
<v Speaker 2>that I want to make mention of. This comes from

0:03:19.613 --> 0:03:22.733
<v Speaker 2>a column by Graham Adams. Graham Adams is a freelancer

0:03:23.333 --> 0:03:29.773
<v Speaker 2>who published this through ENZCPR dot com Murial Newman's website.

0:03:30.413 --> 0:03:33.013
<v Speaker 2>So it's worthy of finding and reading in its entirety,

0:03:33.053 --> 0:03:35.933
<v Speaker 2>because I'm not going to read it all. Auckland University

0:03:35.973 --> 0:03:39.933
<v Speaker 2>students react to Treaty indoctrination. This year the University of

0:03:39.973 --> 0:03:42.813
<v Speaker 2>Auckland launched this is something we knew, but this is

0:03:42.853 --> 0:03:46.053
<v Speaker 2>a follow up that is a good one. This year,

0:03:46.093 --> 0:03:49.333
<v Speaker 2>the University of Auckland launched a mandatory courses focused on

0:03:49.453 --> 0:03:54.053
<v Speaker 2>a particular view of New Zealand History, a tyrrity and

0:03:54.333 --> 0:04:00.173
<v Speaker 2>indigenous quote knowledge systems unquote, which is to say matteunger Mary.

0:04:00.573 --> 0:04:04.013
<v Speaker 2>For all first year students, it doesn't matter whether you're

0:04:04.013 --> 0:04:08.893
<v Speaker 2>studying engineering, accounting, science or arts. You'll have to enroll

0:04:09.053 --> 0:04:13.693
<v Speaker 2>in one of the WTR papers, even if you can

0:04:13.773 --> 0:04:17.093
<v Speaker 2>see no value in the topic and object to having

0:04:17.133 --> 0:04:20.093
<v Speaker 2>to pay for it. Domestic students are obliged to pay

0:04:20.133 --> 0:04:24.213
<v Speaker 2>fees of more than one thousand, three hundred for the

0:04:24.253 --> 0:04:28.933
<v Speaker 2>single paper, but international students are ones being really screwed

0:04:29.293 --> 0:04:32.053
<v Speaker 2>with five thousand, seven hundred and thirty dollars well up

0:04:32.093 --> 0:04:35.493
<v Speaker 2>to Apparently it should come as no surprise, he writes

0:04:36.053 --> 0:04:40.453
<v Speaker 2>to the university's Vice Chancellor, Dawn Freshwater and her management

0:04:40.493 --> 0:04:44.773
<v Speaker 2>team that the courses are not universally popular. A petition

0:04:45.133 --> 0:04:50.653
<v Speaker 2>titled stop the WTR one hundred series Courses ASAP has

0:04:50.693 --> 0:04:55.013
<v Speaker 2>gained one four hundred and sixty seven signatures across multiple

0:04:55.013 --> 0:04:59.333
<v Speaker 2>faculties since it was launched in early April. The organizers

0:04:59.333 --> 0:05:01.413
<v Speaker 2>of the petition were very careful to make it clear

0:05:01.493 --> 0:05:04.293
<v Speaker 2>that their objection isn't to students being taught about the

0:05:04.293 --> 0:05:08.573
<v Speaker 2>treaty and the true significance of Marie history in modern

0:05:09.253 --> 0:05:13.933
<v Speaker 2>at Rower per se, but rather the execution of the

0:05:13.933 --> 0:05:19.413
<v Speaker 2>course material. Their rejection centered on student's assessments that the

0:05:19.853 --> 0:05:24.733
<v Speaker 2>content is vague, poorly structured, and disconnected to the degrees

0:05:24.773 --> 0:05:29.053
<v Speaker 2>from which they are enrolled in. It is oversimplified, politically

0:05:29.093 --> 0:05:35.053
<v Speaker 2>one sided, and lacking academic depths. In other words, it's nonsense. However,

0:05:35.173 --> 0:05:38.053
<v Speaker 2>students who gave their reasons for signing the petition were

0:05:38.173 --> 0:05:41.013
<v Speaker 2>more forthright. One said, the course and here have to

0:05:41.053 --> 0:05:43.493
<v Speaker 2>be a little careful. One said, the course has a

0:05:43.613 --> 0:05:47.573
<v Speaker 2>very small amount of valuable content compared to the amount

0:05:47.653 --> 0:05:52.413
<v Speaker 2>of BS content presented. I haven't learned, and then you

0:05:52.453 --> 0:05:55.693
<v Speaker 2>get the second half of the BS. I haven't learned

0:05:56.253 --> 0:05:59.493
<v Speaker 2>so far, and we've done almost six weeks of it.

0:05:59.853 --> 0:06:02.653
<v Speaker 2>Waste of time, waste of money, waste of resources. Never

0:06:02.653 --> 0:06:05.493
<v Speaker 2>should have been created in the first place. Others described

0:06:05.493 --> 0:06:09.093
<v Speaker 2>it as racist, brainwashing, propaganda and the growing of our

0:06:09.213 --> 0:06:15.733
<v Speaker 2>use and woke nonsense, with the content controlled by apartheid enthusiasts.

0:06:16.093 --> 0:06:21.693
<v Speaker 2>One female student wrote, it's just pure, unnecessarily forced indoctrination

0:06:21.973 --> 0:06:26.533
<v Speaker 2>of Marie mythicism and totally inaccurate New Zealand history, as

0:06:26.573 --> 0:06:31.053
<v Speaker 2>well as the extortion of money. Ninety nine percent of

0:06:31.053 --> 0:06:34.173
<v Speaker 2>students would elect to spend their course fees on a

0:06:34.213 --> 0:06:39.133
<v Speaker 2>subject they're passionate about, rather than these Marxist courses designed

0:06:39.133 --> 0:06:41.853
<v Speaker 2>to turn them into angry radicals. It is not yet

0:06:41.893 --> 0:06:44.453
<v Speaker 2>clear how many of the signatories are first year students

0:06:44.493 --> 0:06:48.533
<v Speaker 2>currently enrolled in the courses, which are tailored for different faculties,

0:06:48.933 --> 0:06:52.413
<v Speaker 2>but the university estimates around seven thousand students in total

0:06:52.693 --> 0:06:55.933
<v Speaker 2>will complete them this year. Descent is not limited to

0:06:55.973 --> 0:07:00.133
<v Speaker 2>the petition. Criticism is common on social media. Our one

0:07:00.173 --> 0:07:03.053
<v Speaker 2>Facebook friend contacted me to say, I wonder how long

0:07:03.053 --> 0:07:06.173
<v Speaker 2>the WT papers will continue. My son is at Auckland

0:07:06.253 --> 0:07:09.253
<v Speaker 2>Journey and he said the students are pushing back in class.

0:07:09.333 --> 0:07:14.173
<v Speaker 2>The lecturers are very defensive. I don't know how the

0:07:14.253 --> 0:07:18.653
<v Speaker 2>lecturers feel about it. Probably, knowing universities these days, the

0:07:18.653 --> 0:07:21.013
<v Speaker 2>majority of them would be very much in favor of it.

0:07:21.573 --> 0:07:24.653
<v Speaker 2>But I'll cut to the last paragraph. How long taxpayers

0:07:24.653 --> 0:07:29.613
<v Speaker 2>will agree to support universities which dedicate themselves to decolonization

0:07:30.173 --> 0:07:34.333
<v Speaker 2>and the overthrow of Western knowledge and boast about it

0:07:34.413 --> 0:07:39.253
<v Speaker 2>as Auckland University's newsletter has done is open to question.

0:07:39.693 --> 0:07:42.253
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's going to survive. They might try

0:07:42.253 --> 0:07:44.413
<v Speaker 2>and make it so, but I don't think it will.

0:07:44.573 --> 0:07:50.493
<v Speaker 2>It isn't warranted, it's outrageously stupidly expensive, and the whole

0:07:50.533 --> 0:07:54.733
<v Speaker 2>thing is purely propaganda. Now just a reminder there is

0:07:54.733 --> 0:07:58.933
<v Speaker 2>some good commentary at the end of the podcast, after

0:07:59.253 --> 0:08:02.293
<v Speaker 2>the mail room, but in a moment after a short

0:08:02.333 --> 0:08:13.813
<v Speaker 2>break nick Cator. Buccolan is a natural oral vaccine in

0:08:13.853 --> 0:08:17.693
<v Speaker 2>a tablet form called bacterial licate. It'll boost your natural

0:08:17.733 --> 0:08:21.253
<v Speaker 2>protection against bacterial infections in your chest and throat. A

0:08:21.293 --> 0:08:24.133
<v Speaker 2>three day course of seven Bucklan tablets will help your

0:08:24.133 --> 0:08:27.613
<v Speaker 2>body build up to three months of immunity against bugs

0:08:27.733 --> 0:08:31.933
<v Speaker 2>which cause bacterial cold symptoms. So who can take buccolan well,

0:08:32.053 --> 0:08:34.893
<v Speaker 2>the whole family From two years of age and upwards.

0:08:35.053 --> 0:08:38.093
<v Speaker 2>A course of Buckelan tablets offers cost effective and safe

0:08:38.133 --> 0:08:42.333
<v Speaker 2>protection from colds and chills. Protection becomes effective a few

0:08:42.413 --> 0:08:45.253
<v Speaker 2>days after you take buccolan and lasts for up to

0:08:45.293 --> 0:08:48.333
<v Speaker 2>three months following the three day course. Buccolan can be

0:08:48.373 --> 0:08:51.813
<v Speaker 2>taken throughout the cold season, over winter, or all year round.

0:08:52.053 --> 0:08:54.973
<v Speaker 2>And remember, Buckolan is not intended as an alternative to

0:08:55.013 --> 0:08:58.453
<v Speaker 2>influenza vaccination, but may be used along with the flu

0:08:58.533 --> 0:09:02.653
<v Speaker 2>vaccination for added protection. And keep in mind that millions

0:09:02.653 --> 0:09:05.933
<v Speaker 2>of doses have been taken by Kiwis for over fifty years.

0:09:06.293 --> 0:09:09.333
<v Speaker 2>Only available from your pharmacist all ways, read the label

0:09:09.613 --> 0:09:12.853
<v Speaker 2>and users directed, and see your doctor if systems persist.

0:09:13.013 --> 0:09:26.773
<v Speaker 2>Farmer Broker Auckland Leighton Smith. So, at the point of

0:09:26.813 --> 0:09:31.013
<v Speaker 2>recording this conversation, the ALP in Australia has won eighty

0:09:31.053 --> 0:09:34.013
<v Speaker 2>seven seats in the Liberal National Party coalition has one

0:09:34.133 --> 0:09:38.453
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine. Damning as hell, you might say, and it is,

0:09:38.493 --> 0:09:41.333
<v Speaker 2>but things are changing a little bit, a little bit.

0:09:41.373 --> 0:09:44.933
<v Speaker 2>They're lifting Couyong is a very interesting seat. But the

0:09:44.973 --> 0:09:49.613
<v Speaker 2>real question for Nick Cata is what went wrong?

0:09:51.413 --> 0:09:54.133
<v Speaker 3>You want to want a quick two sentence answer to that, Yeah,

0:09:55.013 --> 0:09:57.453
<v Speaker 3>and then we shall explain that. Well, I'll try and

0:09:57.453 --> 0:10:01.373
<v Speaker 3>give you one. Then what went wrong was that the

0:10:01.413 --> 0:10:07.773
<v Speaker 3>Liberals forgot how to do politics and that Labor didn't

0:10:07.813 --> 0:10:11.333
<v Speaker 3>know how to do politics. I think that's a simple thing.

0:10:11.453 --> 0:10:14.373
<v Speaker 3>This was not about an honest debate about policy or

0:10:14.373 --> 0:10:18.413
<v Speaker 3>anything like that. This was the most political election I've

0:10:18.413 --> 0:10:22.173
<v Speaker 3>ever seen. It was just played ruthlessly by Labor and

0:10:22.853 --> 0:10:25.093
<v Speaker 3>the Liberals just couldn't match it well.

0:10:25.133 --> 0:10:28.493
<v Speaker 2>Watching Sky News last night, and it wasn't the only time,

0:10:28.693 --> 0:10:32.933
<v Speaker 2>but the sound waves were filled with lies, lies, lies

0:10:33.333 --> 0:10:37.173
<v Speaker 2>that were told by Labor. By ALBERANIZI, you agree with

0:10:37.213 --> 0:10:39.413
<v Speaker 2>that very definitely.

0:10:39.453 --> 0:10:42.613
<v Speaker 3>But that I think Labor and its friends would say

0:10:42.613 --> 0:10:47.853
<v Speaker 3>it's just politics. I'd say it's a distinct erosion about

0:10:48.773 --> 0:10:52.213
<v Speaker 3>civic debate and everything we hold dear. I mean, you've

0:10:52.213 --> 0:10:54.693
<v Speaker 3>got to be able to think that when a prime

0:10:54.693 --> 0:10:57.973
<v Speaker 3>minister opens his mouth, that he's actually speaking the truth

0:10:58.213 --> 0:11:01.253
<v Speaker 3>as he knows it, or some approximation of that. You know,

0:11:01.293 --> 0:11:03.773
<v Speaker 3>we know that they're going to cherry pick the figures

0:11:03.813 --> 0:11:06.653
<v Speaker 3>that work for them, or they might just exaggerate just

0:11:06.693 --> 0:11:10.333
<v Speaker 3>a touch in their rhetoric, well more than a touch.

0:11:10.373 --> 0:11:13.653
<v Speaker 3>But when the prime minister actually says figures, puts a

0:11:13.693 --> 0:11:18.653
<v Speaker 3>figure forward like the opposition's nuclear policy is going to

0:11:18.653 --> 0:11:21.973
<v Speaker 3>cost six hundred billion dollars, and says it not just

0:11:22.053 --> 0:11:26.733
<v Speaker 3>once but repeatedly, and has picked up many times being

0:11:26.733 --> 0:11:29.333
<v Speaker 3>told well, that's not actual the figure, that's not even

0:11:29.333 --> 0:11:32.653
<v Speaker 3>the figure that your own csiro are telling you. He

0:11:32.693 --> 0:11:36.093
<v Speaker 3>doesn't relent, He just does not back away from that figure.

0:11:36.733 --> 0:11:40.093
<v Speaker 3>So I'm troubled by it. Maybe I'm just being old fashioned.

0:11:40.133 --> 0:11:43.773
<v Speaker 3>And I think that we should expect politics or politicians,

0:11:43.853 --> 0:11:47.693
<v Speaker 3>but certainly the leader of the government to speak the

0:11:47.733 --> 0:11:50.573
<v Speaker 3>truth and if he makes a mistake or he misssteps

0:11:50.573 --> 0:11:51.893
<v Speaker 3>and he should correct himself.

0:11:52.613 --> 0:11:55.853
<v Speaker 2>That hasn't happened. That hasn't happened. Now. He still didn't

0:11:55.893 --> 0:11:56.893
<v Speaker 2>fall off the stage.

0:11:57.653 --> 0:12:01.613
<v Speaker 3>No, well he did once. Some of your listeners may

0:12:01.613 --> 0:12:03.973
<v Speaker 3>have seen that memorable shop where he tripped off the

0:12:03.973 --> 0:12:06.973
<v Speaker 3>back of the stage and then afterwards said no, no,

0:12:07.053 --> 0:12:09.613
<v Speaker 3>I didn't fall. I was fine, I didn't fall, And

0:12:09.813 --> 0:12:12.093
<v Speaker 3>we have the video showing he fell, but he never

0:12:12.133 --> 0:12:14.253
<v Speaker 3>admitted he even fell off the stage. But because the

0:12:14.293 --> 0:12:18.973
<v Speaker 3>irony was on election night, the entire Liberal party fell

0:12:18.973 --> 0:12:20.773
<v Speaker 3>off the stage and it's going to take them a

0:12:20.813 --> 0:12:22.213
<v Speaker 3>long time to get back up again.

0:12:23.133 --> 0:12:27.253
<v Speaker 2>Well, I agree with the commentary that says they won't

0:12:27.253 --> 0:12:30.133
<v Speaker 2>be ready for retaking the reins of government by the

0:12:30.213 --> 0:12:33.133
<v Speaker 2>next election. It'll be at the earliest opportunity the one

0:12:33.173 --> 0:12:36.613
<v Speaker 2>after that. But then again, before you comment on that,

0:12:37.013 --> 0:12:40.573
<v Speaker 2>then again, you never know what's going to happen on

0:12:40.613 --> 0:12:43.373
<v Speaker 2>the planet at the moment that could change things. Is

0:12:43.373 --> 0:12:46.173
<v Speaker 2>that a fair comment? Yeah, you just answered your own

0:12:46.253 --> 0:12:49.773
<v Speaker 2>point for me. I mean it's just all we know

0:12:49.933 --> 0:12:52.373
<v Speaker 2>now is that, well, the only thing we can predict

0:12:52.613 --> 0:12:55.173
<v Speaker 2>with some certainty is that the next three years are

0:12:55.213 --> 0:12:58.213
<v Speaker 2>going to be less predictable than we could even imagine.

0:12:58.293 --> 0:13:00.493
<v Speaker 2>So that's just the way it goes, both in world

0:13:00.533 --> 0:13:04.853
<v Speaker 2>affairs and in politics. I mean, all the old rules.

0:13:04.933 --> 0:13:09.733
<v Speaker 3>People used to say, well, it's a second term government,

0:13:09.813 --> 0:13:13.133
<v Speaker 3>so a government that's seeking a second term always suffers

0:13:13.133 --> 0:13:15.573
<v Speaker 3>a swing against it. And that's true going back to

0:13:15.613 --> 0:13:19.653
<v Speaker 3>World War Two, certainly probably before, but it wasn't true

0:13:19.653 --> 0:13:23.413
<v Speaker 3>this time. So there's one rule that's broken. And there

0:13:23.453 --> 0:13:25.253
<v Speaker 3>was always said, look, if you didn't get at least

0:13:25.773 --> 0:13:27.813
<v Speaker 3>forty percent of the primary vote, you didn't have a

0:13:27.893 --> 0:13:29.813
<v Speaker 3>hope of coming anywhere near to government.

0:13:30.173 --> 0:13:31.613
<v Speaker 2>But that's out of the window now.

0:13:31.733 --> 0:13:34.613
<v Speaker 3>So and it was said in going back a little

0:13:34.653 --> 0:13:39.013
<v Speaker 3>bit further, when John Howard lost the election in two

0:13:39.093 --> 0:13:43.173
<v Speaker 3>thousand and seven, lost his seat Landslide to Kevin Rudd. Oh,

0:13:43.213 --> 0:13:45.413
<v Speaker 3>the Liberals won't get him back in power for at

0:13:45.533 --> 0:13:49.893
<v Speaker 3>least two elections, nearly three, probably three or four. They

0:13:50.053 --> 0:13:52.733
<v Speaker 3>almost got back the next election. They were very close

0:13:53.053 --> 0:13:56.093
<v Speaker 3>that label was in a minority government, and then they

0:13:56.133 --> 0:13:58.813
<v Speaker 3>came back the one after that, so the comeback last

0:13:58.853 --> 0:14:02.813
<v Speaker 3>time was much quicker than people were predicting on election night.

0:14:02.853 --> 0:14:04.133
<v Speaker 3>I mean a lot of people have been saying I

0:14:04.133 --> 0:14:07.133
<v Speaker 3>think I heard Peter Credin say this last night. Politics

0:14:07.693 --> 0:14:10.573
<v Speaker 3>is never as bad as you think, and it's never

0:14:10.613 --> 0:14:13.653
<v Speaker 3>as good as you think. So any given moment in time,

0:14:14.413 --> 0:14:18.653
<v Speaker 3>you know, things are always better than what you're imagining

0:14:18.813 --> 0:14:23.093
<v Speaker 3>and not as good as you imagine in the good times.

0:14:24.053 --> 0:14:28.773
<v Speaker 2>Was she do you think genuine with that comment or

0:14:28.813 --> 0:14:33.293
<v Speaker 2>was she just trying to paste over it? Yes?

0:14:33.333 --> 0:14:37.253
<v Speaker 3>I think she was genuine because she's lived through enough campaigns,

0:14:37.693 --> 0:14:39.973
<v Speaker 3>many of them on the inside. Working as you know,

0:14:41.173 --> 0:14:46.293
<v Speaker 3>was a very close advice to Tony Abbott and lived

0:14:46.293 --> 0:14:49.773
<v Speaker 3>all through that campaign, both campaigns twenty ten, twenty thirteen.

0:14:49.773 --> 0:14:53.933
<v Speaker 3>Her husband is a campaign director. First election was two

0:14:53.973 --> 0:14:57.333
<v Speaker 3>thousand and four with John how You know, when you've

0:14:57.373 --> 0:15:00.173
<v Speaker 3>been around in this game for a while, you know,

0:15:00.213 --> 0:15:03.253
<v Speaker 3>you learn not to write anybody off or to think

0:15:03.293 --> 0:15:07.733
<v Speaker 3>anything's a dead certainty. And that's that's probably the story

0:15:07.733 --> 0:15:08.333
<v Speaker 3>of this campaign.

0:15:09.613 --> 0:15:12.533
<v Speaker 2>I have to throw in, seeing you just mentioned John Howard.

0:15:13.013 --> 0:15:15.973
<v Speaker 2>I was literally shocked this morning at a picture I

0:15:16.053 --> 0:15:21.573
<v Speaker 2>saw in The Australian of John Howard. He's looking very old.

0:15:23.333 --> 0:15:27.093
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah he is. He is old. Are you going

0:15:27.133 --> 0:15:30.133
<v Speaker 3>to ask me his age? I never like to even

0:15:30.173 --> 0:15:30.653
<v Speaker 3>think about it.

0:15:30.773 --> 0:15:31.173
<v Speaker 2>Ask him.

0:15:31.373 --> 0:15:35.893
<v Speaker 3>He's one of those people you would dearly love to

0:15:35.933 --> 0:15:39.493
<v Speaker 3>be around forever because he's just got such experienced, such wisdom.

0:15:39.813 --> 0:15:43.373
<v Speaker 3>He's very well loved in the country. But he's you know,

0:15:43.413 --> 0:15:46.813
<v Speaker 3>he's like all of us. He's getting older, but his

0:15:46.853 --> 0:15:48.653
<v Speaker 3>mind is still as sharp as anything. I mean, he

0:15:48.733 --> 0:15:53.933
<v Speaker 3>still speaks brilliantly and perceptively. And you know, I had

0:15:53.933 --> 0:15:56.813
<v Speaker 3>a text exchange with him yesterday about an issue. He's

0:15:57.053 --> 0:15:59.693
<v Speaker 3>very much engaged and has an office here in the

0:15:59.773 --> 0:16:03.573
<v Speaker 3>center of the city center of Sydney and welcomes good

0:16:03.573 --> 0:16:05.573
<v Speaker 3>people to go around and sit in the armchair and

0:16:05.653 --> 0:16:07.533
<v Speaker 3>chat with him about this and that. He always wants

0:16:07.573 --> 0:16:11.573
<v Speaker 3>the latest political gossip. Who doesn't. So he's so much involved.

0:16:11.573 --> 0:16:14.093
<v Speaker 3>But so then the question is, well, who's the next

0:16:14.333 --> 0:16:17.573
<v Speaker 3>person to step up as the next a kind of

0:16:17.693 --> 0:16:20.253
<v Speaker 3>eminence careeze, you know that the sort of great wise

0:16:20.373 --> 0:16:25.013
<v Speaker 3>head behind the scenes. Probably that's Tony Abbott. He's adapting

0:16:25.053 --> 0:16:28.853
<v Speaker 3>to that role of elder statesman very well, although he's

0:16:28.933 --> 0:16:30.973
<v Speaker 3>kind of kicking against it. I think he wants to

0:16:30.973 --> 0:16:33.093
<v Speaker 3>be back in the thick of it.

0:16:33.133 --> 0:16:35.133
<v Speaker 2>Is there any reason why he shouldn't be back in

0:16:35.133 --> 0:16:35.573
<v Speaker 2>the thick of it?

0:16:37.013 --> 0:16:42.253
<v Speaker 3>None at all, None at all, and particularly now. I

0:16:42.293 --> 0:16:44.933
<v Speaker 3>mean the only reason is that it's the logistics of it.

0:16:45.133 --> 0:16:46.973
<v Speaker 3>He'd have to find a seat that he could win.

0:16:47.053 --> 0:16:49.413
<v Speaker 3>But I think, you know, we've a lot of He've

0:16:49.453 --> 0:16:53.453
<v Speaker 3>been talking for some time, sometimes jokingly, sometimes half serious

0:16:53.493 --> 0:16:55.853
<v Speaker 3>that if he found the right seat in Western Sydney,

0:16:55.893 --> 0:16:58.133
<v Speaker 3>where you know, the area where he's very popular, he

0:16:58.853 --> 0:17:01.493
<v Speaker 3>could win it. It wouldn't be a certainty, of course,

0:17:01.533 --> 0:17:04.973
<v Speaker 3>but he could be back in the Parliament. And right now,

0:17:05.013 --> 0:17:07.013
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's anybody who would stand in his

0:17:07.053 --> 0:17:10.613
<v Speaker 3>way of becoming leader again. And be a very unusual thing,

0:17:11.293 --> 0:17:14.493
<v Speaker 3>certainly post war. But before that it wasn't you know,

0:17:14.693 --> 0:17:17.613
<v Speaker 3>people came and got we came and went from politics,

0:17:17.653 --> 0:17:20.853
<v Speaker 3>didn't they, including you know, people like Winston Churchill for instance.

0:17:20.893 --> 0:17:25.613
<v Speaker 3>So it's not an impossible thing to imagine. He's certainly

0:17:25.613 --> 0:17:28.373
<v Speaker 3>full of vigor and energy and very very sharp.

0:17:29.333 --> 0:17:32.493
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to set this next question up because

0:17:32.533 --> 0:17:35.173
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to leave it, because I'm keen to

0:17:35.213 --> 0:17:38.613
<v Speaker 2>hear what you have to say, I'm talking about Couyong.

0:17:39.773 --> 0:17:42.773
<v Speaker 2>You drew our attention to Cou Young yourself a couple

0:17:42.813 --> 0:17:47.773
<v Speaker 2>of weeks back. But Monique Ryan, who is a doctor

0:17:47.853 --> 0:17:51.853
<v Speaker 2>of something to do with brains or things, what is it?

0:17:52.533 --> 0:17:54.573
<v Speaker 3>I don't really know. I just know that her staff

0:17:56.053 --> 0:17:59.173
<v Speaker 3>tell all the volunteers you must refer to as Dr Ryan.

0:17:59.373 --> 0:18:02.493
<v Speaker 2>It's quite pompous. You know, that's her very much so.

0:18:03.093 --> 0:18:07.853
<v Speaker 2>Having seen her behaving in an unsatisfactory way, I put

0:18:07.893 --> 0:18:12.333
<v Speaker 2>it on someone's interviewing it. On Saturday night, she assumed

0:18:12.333 --> 0:18:16.053
<v Speaker 2>that she'd won the seat again and partied. Now she's

0:18:16.093 --> 0:18:19.413
<v Speaker 2>had to back off that and admit that it's too

0:18:19.413 --> 0:18:22.613
<v Speaker 2>close to coll Well, we should we should locate this

0:18:22.973 --> 0:18:26.533
<v Speaker 2>in time. So we're recording this on Tuesday, I think,

0:18:26.653 --> 0:18:31.693
<v Speaker 2>and three three days after the election. Now, the processing

0:18:31.733 --> 0:18:34.733
<v Speaker 2>of postal votes is the main thing that's going on now,

0:18:35.453 --> 0:18:40.093
<v Speaker 2>and postal votes are moving very heavily in favor of

0:18:40.613 --> 0:18:44.773
<v Speaker 2>the liberal candidate there, Amelia Hamer, by more than two

0:18:44.773 --> 0:18:46.733
<v Speaker 2>to one. I've just looked at them just before we

0:18:47.413 --> 0:18:52.493
<v Speaker 2>cooked up, so on that trajectory, Amelia Hamer is now

0:18:52.533 --> 0:18:54.613
<v Speaker 2>in the in the front seat. Even though there's I

0:18:54.613 --> 0:18:57.533
<v Speaker 2>think about nine hundred votes separating them. She can she

0:18:57.613 --> 0:18:59.573
<v Speaker 2>can clear that up on postals, so it could be

0:18:59.973 --> 0:19:03.653
<v Speaker 2>a narrow Liberal victory, which would be a big thing,

0:19:03.773 --> 0:19:05.973
<v Speaker 2>you know, because you've got these independence came in a

0:19:06.213 --> 0:19:09.933
<v Speaker 2>one term ago so called community independence. But we know

0:19:09.973 --> 0:19:13.333
<v Speaker 2>that they're heavily backed by the renewable energy industry and

0:19:13.853 --> 0:19:19.853
<v Speaker 2>quite sophisticated, well organized American style operation behind them. So

0:19:20.293 --> 0:19:23.733
<v Speaker 2>but people have clonly seen through that in that seat,

0:19:24.453 --> 0:19:26.373
<v Speaker 2>they may even have seen through in the Seed of

0:19:26.413 --> 0:19:29.893
<v Speaker 2>gold Steam, which is another Melbourne seat where the former

0:19:29.933 --> 0:19:34.253
<v Speaker 2>member Liberal member Tim Wilson is is only ninety one

0:19:34.293 --> 0:19:38.453
<v Speaker 2>seats behind, now ninety one boats behind and postals, I

0:19:38.493 --> 0:19:41.213
<v Speaker 2>think about a lot of them to count. Yet he

0:19:41.253 --> 0:19:43.533
<v Speaker 2>would win if those postals continue to go his way.

0:19:43.613 --> 0:19:46.493
<v Speaker 2>So that's two Teals they've knocked off. On the other

0:19:46.573 --> 0:19:49.933
<v Speaker 2>side of it, well, there is another Teal candidate as

0:19:49.973 --> 0:19:51.933
<v Speaker 2>we call them, looks like they're going to win the

0:19:51.933 --> 0:19:54.933
<v Speaker 2>Seed of Bradfield and the north Shore of Sydney, and

0:19:55.133 --> 0:19:59.893
<v Speaker 2>one teal Ish sort of e candiac. You know, they

0:19:59.893 --> 0:20:03.373
<v Speaker 2>all have loose relationship with one another, but they're certainly

0:20:03.813 --> 0:20:07.093
<v Speaker 2>organized and funded by the same sources. There's one in

0:20:07.573 --> 0:20:11.013
<v Speaker 2>camera will fall to a Teal independent or a till

0:20:11.093 --> 0:20:14.413
<v Speaker 2>style independent, and the seed of fremantle in Western Australia

0:20:14.453 --> 0:20:16.493
<v Speaker 2>looks like it might go from Labor to Teal. So

0:20:17.093 --> 0:20:19.933
<v Speaker 2>they may increase their numbers in the chamber up to seven.

0:20:20.013 --> 0:20:23.853
<v Speaker 2>But the way that Parliament is with a thumping Labor majority,

0:20:23.933 --> 0:20:26.013
<v Speaker 2>they'll just be irrelevant, you know, they'll just be sort

0:20:26.013 --> 0:20:30.333
<v Speaker 2>of sitting there, biding their time and looking all perse

0:20:30.413 --> 0:20:34.933
<v Speaker 2>lipped and angry and behaving the way they do. What

0:20:35.173 --> 0:20:39.133
<v Speaker 2>is it about those tials that makes me think of

0:20:39.173 --> 0:20:42.213
<v Speaker 2>them in very negative terms?

0:20:44.213 --> 0:20:49.973
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's more about you, your good judgment there. Look,

0:20:50.293 --> 0:20:54.093
<v Speaker 3>there's the best way I can describe it is it's

0:20:54.133 --> 0:20:59.613
<v Speaker 3>like a cult like phenomena, and they actually operate with

0:20:59.813 --> 0:21:03.933
<v Speaker 3>sort of cult like principles. So they'll get a band

0:21:03.933 --> 0:21:06.373
<v Speaker 3>of supporters together. They'll often start by saying, you know,

0:21:07.053 --> 0:21:10.573
<v Speaker 3>you would you like to seependent representing your community, then

0:21:10.613 --> 0:21:12.533
<v Speaker 3>come to this meeting, and then they'll build that up

0:21:12.573 --> 0:21:14.813
<v Speaker 3>and they'll say bring more followers, and they've got sort

0:21:14.853 --> 0:21:17.413
<v Speaker 3>of like ritual chants where they have to say all

0:21:17.453 --> 0:21:19.933
<v Speaker 3>these things and everybody gets worked up and excited. It's

0:21:20.053 --> 0:21:23.213
<v Speaker 3>very much like you know, a cult of some sort

0:21:23.213 --> 0:21:27.333
<v Speaker 3>of weird I don't know, Pentecostal style cult. And I

0:21:27.373 --> 0:21:30.493
<v Speaker 3>think that that analogy holds true because you can see

0:21:30.493 --> 0:21:35.813
<v Speaker 3>how people remain wedded to these candidates even when their

0:21:35.853 --> 0:21:38.453
<v Speaker 3>flaws are exposed, even if they've done a turning government

0:21:38.493 --> 0:21:42.013
<v Speaker 3>and it's quite apparent that they haven't done anything helpful,

0:21:42.053 --> 0:21:44.613
<v Speaker 3>and they voted seventy percent or more of the time

0:21:45.053 --> 0:21:47.733
<v Speaker 3>on the same side as the Greens. You sort to

0:21:47.733 --> 0:21:50.053
<v Speaker 3>go where they claim to be just a nicer shade

0:21:50.093 --> 0:21:52.933
<v Speaker 3>of liberal kind of falls away very quickly, but they're there.

0:21:53.893 --> 0:21:55.653
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing I think I'd say about them

0:21:55.733 --> 0:21:59.573
<v Speaker 3>is that it's a little bit of a misjudgment to

0:21:59.613 --> 0:22:02.653
<v Speaker 3>say that they are liberal voters on strike, as some

0:22:02.773 --> 0:22:04.693
<v Speaker 3>try and say, I mean, some try and compare them

0:22:04.693 --> 0:22:07.853
<v Speaker 3>with the DLP, which, you know, the breakaway movement from

0:22:07.893 --> 0:22:12.133
<v Speaker 3>the Labor Party in the fifties, which damage but most

0:22:12.173 --> 0:22:15.373
<v Speaker 3>of the DLP members were former Labor members in this case,

0:22:15.413 --> 0:22:17.933
<v Speaker 3>probably about twenty twenty five percent of them, the former

0:22:18.013 --> 0:22:21.773
<v Speaker 3>liberal members. The rest are labor people voting tactically and

0:22:22.213 --> 0:22:26.133
<v Speaker 3>Green's voters who are voting tactically, so they are to

0:22:26.133 --> 0:22:28.613
<v Speaker 3>all intents and purposes are just another shade of green.

0:22:29.333 --> 0:22:33.093
<v Speaker 2>So moniy Ryan, would she be a standout for what

0:22:33.133 --> 0:22:37.373
<v Speaker 2>you've just described, Yeah, she's They're all that way.

0:22:37.453 --> 0:22:42.333
<v Speaker 3>Really, they're you know, for so called independence, representing separate communities.

0:22:42.413 --> 0:22:45.573
<v Speaker 3>They are remarkably similar in their voting pattern and views

0:22:45.653 --> 0:22:49.333
<v Speaker 3>on things like say, nuclear power, to which they're staunchly opposed.

0:22:49.893 --> 0:22:53.293
<v Speaker 3>They all want more action on climate change. Well, they're

0:22:53.293 --> 0:22:56.093
<v Speaker 3>in the lucky position of never having to say what

0:22:56.133 --> 0:22:59.813
<v Speaker 3>that more is because you know, as we're seeing in

0:22:59.853 --> 0:23:02.533
<v Speaker 3>places like Splain in Portugal, you know, you get to

0:23:02.573 --> 0:23:04.933
<v Speaker 3>a point where you go more, we can't do more.

0:23:05.173 --> 0:23:07.613
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's no more we can do when it

0:23:07.613 --> 0:23:11.093
<v Speaker 3>comes to the energy system. So yeah, they're in that

0:23:11.133 --> 0:23:13.813
<v Speaker 3>privileged position. I think we might have said this last

0:23:13.813 --> 0:23:16.693
<v Speaker 3>time about them, but they sort of conformed to that

0:23:17.573 --> 0:23:20.653
<v Speaker 3>theory of luxury beliefs. You know, the more the more

0:23:20.693 --> 0:23:24.653
<v Speaker 3>wealthy you've got, then the more you've got time to

0:23:24.733 --> 0:23:28.733
<v Speaker 3>worry about things that don't worry most people, like climate

0:23:28.813 --> 0:23:32.213
<v Speaker 3>change being the big one, or transgender rights. And I

0:23:32.213 --> 0:23:34.853
<v Speaker 3>actually saw some polling in the Seed of Wentworth, which

0:23:34.893 --> 0:23:39.133
<v Speaker 3>is held held by a TiAl candidate, that showed that

0:23:39.293 --> 0:23:45.213
<v Speaker 3>if on the top three issues. Cost of living was

0:23:45.293 --> 0:23:49.293
<v Speaker 3>number three. Now, anywhere else in the country apart from

0:23:49.413 --> 0:23:53.053
<v Speaker 3>those wealthiest inner city seats, I guarantee you it would

0:23:53.053 --> 0:23:55.533
<v Speaker 3>be number one, two, three, four, five. You know, it

0:23:55.573 --> 0:23:58.613
<v Speaker 3>goes on and on. They weren't concerned about energy prices,

0:23:58.693 --> 0:24:01.053
<v Speaker 3>petrol prices, anything like that, you know, the sort of

0:24:01.093 --> 0:24:05.293
<v Speaker 3>things that affect people on lower incomes in other parts

0:24:05.333 --> 0:24:05.893
<v Speaker 3>of the country.

0:24:06.493 --> 0:24:09.453
<v Speaker 2>Well, for those who don't know, went Eth in Sydney

0:24:10.453 --> 0:24:15.093
<v Speaker 2>it's along the along the harves side, specifically, it is

0:24:15.493 --> 0:24:21.933
<v Speaker 2>it would equate to Remuera in Auckland without the well

0:24:22.933 --> 0:24:28.613
<v Speaker 2>Remure has a southern side to it, down along the motorway.

0:24:28.693 --> 0:24:32.973
<v Speaker 2>But take that away and you've got You've got Wentworth

0:24:33.093 --> 0:24:36.693
<v Speaker 2>and Remuera being pretty much the same, the same level

0:24:37.693 --> 0:24:43.853
<v Speaker 2>of wealth and housing. So that that that sort of

0:24:43.933 --> 0:24:49.173
<v Speaker 2>frames frames the picture. Now, somebody said to me yesterday

0:24:49.613 --> 0:24:52.493
<v Speaker 2>when I was having a discussion in the street, now

0:24:52.573 --> 0:24:54.853
<v Speaker 2>you've got it wrong. You've got it wrong. This this

0:24:54.973 --> 0:24:59.813
<v Speaker 2>result is really good. Can you guess why? It's sort

0:24:59.813 --> 0:25:02.893
<v Speaker 2>of fairly obvious in the end, But look, I know

0:25:02.933 --> 0:25:03.613
<v Speaker 2>it's really good.

0:25:04.293 --> 0:25:06.813
<v Speaker 3>If you want to look at why it's it's not

0:25:06.933 --> 0:25:09.933
<v Speaker 3>the worst that could have happened. You say, well, at

0:25:10.013 --> 0:25:13.293
<v Speaker 3>least Labor was in the majority, so that means they

0:25:13.333 --> 0:25:16.493
<v Speaker 3>won't have to form a coalition with the Greens.

0:25:16.733 --> 0:25:18.693
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly That was exactly the point.

0:25:18.893 --> 0:25:23.053
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wouldn't say it's really good. Quite far from that.

0:25:23.773 --> 0:25:26.213
<v Speaker 3>They didn't get a little carried away with it, no doubt.

0:25:26.213 --> 0:25:28.133
<v Speaker 3>Meant you know, some of your listeners are welcome to

0:25:28.133 --> 0:25:31.573
<v Speaker 3>disagrutin me, but I don't think it's really good, and

0:25:31.613 --> 0:25:33.453
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's as good of results as Labor

0:25:33.613 --> 0:25:37.773
<v Speaker 3>seems to be making out because of that primary vote.

0:25:37.813 --> 0:25:42.573
<v Speaker 3>You know that they hold twice as many seats as

0:25:43.733 --> 0:25:45.973
<v Speaker 3>or they will hold at least twice as many seats

0:25:45.973 --> 0:25:51.253
<v Speaker 3>as the Liberal and National Coalition, so they look like

0:25:51.293 --> 0:25:53.053
<v Speaker 3>they're in a commanding position. But wait for it. I mean,

0:25:53.053 --> 0:25:58.973
<v Speaker 3>they only got what three hundred thousand more votes out

0:25:59.013 --> 0:26:02.533
<v Speaker 3>of you know, the probably eight million votes shared between them,

0:26:02.573 --> 0:26:06.533
<v Speaker 3>So the difference in the popular vote is not matched

0:26:06.573 --> 0:26:10.653
<v Speaker 3>by the difference in the parliament I mean, never is completely.

0:26:10.693 --> 0:26:14.413
<v Speaker 3>But it used to be much closer than that, when

0:26:14.413 --> 0:26:16.893
<v Speaker 3>their primary vote used to match the number receipts in

0:26:16.933 --> 0:26:19.373
<v Speaker 3>Parliament's come more closely and of course, exactly the same

0:26:19.493 --> 0:26:23.453
<v Speaker 3>is happening in the UK. Maybe we should all adopt

0:26:23.453 --> 0:26:28.493
<v Speaker 3>the hair Clark system. Probably not. You know, that's the

0:26:28.533 --> 0:26:31.733
<v Speaker 3>problem I think for Labor because they think they've got

0:26:31.733 --> 0:26:35.453
<v Speaker 3>a commanding majority in the Parliament. But when only thirty

0:26:35.773 --> 0:26:39.093
<v Speaker 3>four percent of people vote for you, you've got to

0:26:39.133 --> 0:26:43.373
<v Speaker 3>be really appealing to people who didn't vote for you

0:26:43.573 --> 0:26:45.813
<v Speaker 3>if you want to keep in power, because they can

0:26:45.853 --> 0:26:49.093
<v Speaker 3>easily flip their votes next time. It wouldn't take much

0:26:49.093 --> 0:26:51.293
<v Speaker 3>for people to flip their votes and for that huge

0:26:51.293 --> 0:26:54.533
<v Speaker 3>majority to disappear. But you know the dangers You get

0:26:54.533 --> 0:27:00.653
<v Speaker 3>a bit hubristic and go too far, and that's what

0:27:01.133 --> 0:27:04.493
<v Speaker 3>Labor I think they're in danger of doing, particularly if

0:27:04.493 --> 0:27:06.853
<v Speaker 3>they get hold of the Senate, which is still a possibility.

0:27:06.893 --> 0:27:08.333
<v Speaker 3>We won't know that for a while, but they may

0:27:08.453 --> 0:27:09.733
<v Speaker 3>have control of both houses.

0:27:10.413 --> 0:27:15.293
<v Speaker 2>Just explain for us the importance of the Senate or otherwise.

0:27:16.853 --> 0:27:21.693
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I'm more and more kind of like Paul

0:27:22.013 --> 0:27:27.693
<v Speaker 3>Keating's definite explanation of it unrepresentative swill, but there's probably

0:27:27.693 --> 0:27:29.533
<v Speaker 3>a little unkind. I mean, the idea of the Senate

0:27:29.613 --> 0:27:31.573
<v Speaker 3>was like the House of Lords. It was a house

0:27:31.613 --> 0:27:35.333
<v Speaker 3>of review, it was supposed to check over, you know,

0:27:35.413 --> 0:27:38.413
<v Speaker 3>everything that came to the Lower House and just point

0:27:38.453 --> 0:27:40.773
<v Speaker 3>out any flaws and throw it back to them. But

0:27:40.893 --> 0:27:43.533
<v Speaker 3>eventually it would you know, the idea was it would

0:27:43.533 --> 0:27:45.773
<v Speaker 3>act like the House of Lords and would just give

0:27:45.853 --> 0:27:47.253
<v Speaker 3>way to the House of Commons.

0:27:47.533 --> 0:27:48.613
<v Speaker 2>But would be very useful.

0:27:48.653 --> 0:27:50.453
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it is a useful process to

0:27:50.493 --> 0:27:54.453
<v Speaker 3>have that legislation checked and maybe amended a bit by

0:27:54.773 --> 0:27:57.093
<v Speaker 3>the more eyes that get across it, the better. And

0:27:57.133 --> 0:27:59.853
<v Speaker 3>it was also state based, right, so every state has

0:28:00.333 --> 0:28:05.173
<v Speaker 3>has the same number of representatives, and so even Tasmania,

0:28:05.213 --> 0:28:07.453
<v Speaker 3>which has got five hundred thousand odd people, has got

0:28:07.493 --> 0:28:10.573
<v Speaker 3>as many as New South Wales we've got six or

0:28:10.613 --> 0:28:14.293
<v Speaker 3>seven million. So you know, it's not a one vote,

0:28:14.333 --> 0:28:17.053
<v Speaker 3>one value place in that respect. But that's because it's

0:28:17.053 --> 0:28:20.213
<v Speaker 3>supposed to respect states, but because become something else. It's

0:28:20.253 --> 0:28:24.413
<v Speaker 3>become an alternative center of power in the minds of

0:28:24.453 --> 0:28:29.333
<v Speaker 3>people there. So the acts completely without reference to the

0:28:29.413 --> 0:28:32.533
<v Speaker 3>majority in the lower House, and well, you know, it

0:28:32.533 --> 0:28:34.373
<v Speaker 3>doesn't sort of respect the fact that because you've got

0:28:34.373 --> 0:28:36.253
<v Speaker 3>a majority in the lower House, you know, we should

0:28:36.253 --> 0:28:38.773
<v Speaker 3>look at your legislation kindly and even though we don't

0:28:38.773 --> 0:28:41.893
<v Speaker 3>completely like it, we recognize that you have a mandate

0:28:41.973 --> 0:28:44.973
<v Speaker 3>for it. They don't do that. And now it's it's

0:28:45.293 --> 0:28:48.093
<v Speaker 3>a long time really since, I think since two thousand

0:28:48.133 --> 0:28:51.253
<v Speaker 3>and four was the last time one party had the

0:28:51.253 --> 0:28:54.493
<v Speaker 3>majority in both houses. So it's full of a bunch

0:28:54.573 --> 0:28:59.693
<v Speaker 3>of rap bags, independence and small parties, particularly the Greens,

0:29:00.373 --> 0:29:04.173
<v Speaker 3>who just act negatively. I mean, if you're if you're

0:29:04.213 --> 0:29:07.333
<v Speaker 3>say the Jackie Lambee party, she's from Tasmania and I

0:29:07.373 --> 0:29:10.173
<v Speaker 3>think she had two Upper House members at one stage.

0:29:10.653 --> 0:29:13.253
<v Speaker 3>She won't do now, but she got with Jackie Lambee.

0:29:14.013 --> 0:29:16.653
<v Speaker 3>You know, how are you going to make attention? How

0:29:16.653 --> 0:29:18.773
<v Speaker 3>are you going to how are you going to people

0:29:18.853 --> 0:29:20.453
<v Speaker 3>voted for you because they didn't want to vote for

0:29:20.493 --> 0:29:25.013
<v Speaker 3>the two major parties. You your motivation is to keep

0:29:25.133 --> 0:29:28.293
<v Speaker 3>needling the major parties. You don't want to say yes

0:29:28.333 --> 0:29:31.293
<v Speaker 3>to anything from either of them. And that's basically what

0:29:31.333 --> 0:29:35.733
<v Speaker 3>they do. They are basically the grumps and the grumblers

0:29:35.773 --> 0:29:40.653
<v Speaker 3>who who you know, pops on both your houses and

0:29:41.453 --> 0:29:43.373
<v Speaker 3>because that's what their voters put them in there for,

0:29:43.573 --> 0:29:48.293
<v Speaker 3>they haven't got any incentive whatsoever to be cooperative and

0:29:48.373 --> 0:29:51.133
<v Speaker 3>so they're not. And that's that's the problem. We've got

0:29:51.133 --> 0:29:56.093
<v Speaker 3>an Upper House, which is which thwarts the democratic mandate

0:29:56.213 --> 0:30:00.853
<v Speaker 3>of the Lower House constantly and waters down good legislation

0:30:01.733 --> 0:30:06.133
<v Speaker 3>just for silly ends. And you get people like former

0:30:06.173 --> 0:30:08.973
<v Speaker 3>rugby league players in there who have I end up

0:30:08.973 --> 0:30:12.853
<v Speaker 3>having the casting vote on say, university funding, and you

0:30:12.933 --> 0:30:15.893
<v Speaker 3>sort of think, well, you were damn good at rugby league,

0:30:15.893 --> 0:30:17.653
<v Speaker 3>but I'm not sure that that's what we want to

0:30:17.653 --> 0:30:20.573
<v Speaker 3>take your You're going to be the deciding voice on

0:30:20.653 --> 0:30:21.973
<v Speaker 3>that in the whole country.

0:30:21.973 --> 0:30:27.053
<v Speaker 2>It seems a bit nuts. You know, Well, there are

0:30:27.053 --> 0:30:30.733
<v Speaker 2>two states that I have worked in. I've worked in more.

0:30:30.813 --> 0:30:34.813
<v Speaker 2>I've worked in four states on radio I'm talking. But

0:30:34.933 --> 0:30:39.973
<v Speaker 2>Tasmania was the first and South Australia was the second

0:30:40.173 --> 0:30:43.373
<v Speaker 2>that I want to refer to. I lasted six months

0:30:43.413 --> 0:30:48.573
<v Speaker 2>in both states before I got out. Are you thrown

0:30:48.613 --> 0:30:49.013
<v Speaker 2>out late?

0:30:49.133 --> 0:30:49.173
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:30:50.533 --> 0:30:54.133
<v Speaker 2>No, I certainly wasn't thrown out. I was. In fact,

0:30:54.133 --> 0:31:00.013
<v Speaker 2>they went overboard in Adelaide to keep me. That's another story,

0:31:00.413 --> 0:31:05.573
<v Speaker 2>but the point being that it doesn't surprise me about

0:31:05.573 --> 0:31:12.173
<v Speaker 2>Tasmania being tode Lee labor after this election. Uh. And

0:31:12.213 --> 0:31:14.973
<v Speaker 2>they're very big on green stuff down there too, uh.

0:31:15.053 --> 0:31:20.413
<v Speaker 2>And and South Australia isn't isn't maybe that far behind

0:31:21.693 --> 0:31:22.173
<v Speaker 2>m you.

0:31:22.173 --> 0:31:27.093
<v Speaker 3>Say, the entire Yeah, well, the entire metropolitan region of

0:31:28.573 --> 0:31:30.893
<v Speaker 3>South Australia is now read.

0:31:31.213 --> 0:31:32.213
<v Speaker 2>You know, we lost.

0:31:32.533 --> 0:31:34.693
<v Speaker 3>There was some hope we win the seed of Boothby

0:31:34.773 --> 0:31:41.093
<v Speaker 3>in the in the Eastern suburbs or southeastern suburbs, and

0:31:41.093 --> 0:31:44.773
<v Speaker 3>and but we we didn't. We didn't win that having

0:31:44.773 --> 0:31:47.813
<v Speaker 3>a very good candidate and lost the seed to Sturt.

0:31:47.973 --> 0:31:50.173
<v Speaker 3>It used to be Christopher Pine's old seat if you remember,

0:31:50.613 --> 0:31:53.333
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's the last seat that they hold in

0:31:53.333 --> 0:31:58.253
<v Speaker 3>in in metropolitan Adelaide Mayo up in the Hills borders

0:31:58.293 --> 0:32:00.893
<v Speaker 3>with the Edge of Edgepolitan Adelaide and Adelaide Hills. That

0:32:00.893 --> 0:32:05.533
<v Speaker 3>that went to a independent some time back. So yeah,

0:32:05.693 --> 0:32:09.773
<v Speaker 3>that's the brutal truth that there are two coalition MPs

0:32:10.293 --> 0:32:14.333
<v Speaker 3>in South Australia, but they're basically the country MPs. They're

0:32:14.373 --> 0:32:19.413
<v Speaker 3>basically two country MPs in the South and North, the

0:32:19.453 --> 0:32:22.533
<v Speaker 3>states divided pretty neatly so that they're out of the

0:32:22.573 --> 0:32:27.093
<v Speaker 3>city and will struggle to get a toe hold back.

0:32:27.133 --> 0:32:28.893
<v Speaker 3>I suspect, but I don't know.

0:32:28.933 --> 0:32:29.173
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:32:29.613 --> 0:32:31.813
<v Speaker 3>And of course they've got a labor state government and

0:32:31.853 --> 0:32:36.413
<v Speaker 3>they have had pretty much for twenty years that they

0:32:36.453 --> 0:32:40.613
<v Speaker 3>had one term of liberal government. Wasn't very successful in between,

0:32:40.693 --> 0:32:43.973
<v Speaker 3>but they've been in power and quite a good premier

0:32:44.173 --> 0:32:49.133
<v Speaker 3>incidentally down there at Peter melanowskis So it's a labor

0:32:49.173 --> 0:32:52.493
<v Speaker 3>state top to bottom. One thing you could say about Adelaide.

0:32:52.493 --> 0:32:56.133
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the economy, it's very low on

0:32:56.213 --> 0:33:00.213
<v Speaker 3>private enterprise. It struggles, so you know, it's almost a

0:33:00.253 --> 0:33:05.773
<v Speaker 3>civil service town in many respects. You know, everybody, large

0:33:05.773 --> 0:33:08.613
<v Speaker 3>percentage of people either work for the government or they

0:33:08.693 --> 0:33:11.293
<v Speaker 3>get their paycheck thanks to the government if they work

0:33:11.333 --> 0:33:15.773
<v Speaker 3>in a hospital or doctor or something. So it's and

0:33:15.813 --> 0:33:18.013
<v Speaker 3>if you're in that position, or if you're on the

0:33:18.053 --> 0:33:20.253
<v Speaker 3>other end of the extreme, you're you know, sort of

0:33:20.293 --> 0:33:25.053
<v Speaker 3>welfare dependent person, you've no motivation to vote for the

0:33:26.133 --> 0:33:29.453
<v Speaker 3>Liberals because you know, you want the party that is

0:33:29.493 --> 0:33:32.373
<v Speaker 3>a big government party and they're the ones that keep

0:33:32.413 --> 0:33:35.773
<v Speaker 3>paying a paycheck. So you get to that threshold which

0:33:35.853 --> 0:33:38.493
<v Speaker 3>I think South Australia passed some time back, where it's

0:33:38.573 --> 0:33:43.133
<v Speaker 3>very hard for an enterprise orientated, free market party to

0:33:43.173 --> 0:33:43.733
<v Speaker 3>break through.

0:33:44.453 --> 0:33:51.253
<v Speaker 2>Just Center Price was on television last night and Carolyn said, well,

0:33:51.293 --> 0:33:55.653
<v Speaker 2>she commented how impressive she was and wouldn't she make

0:33:55.693 --> 0:34:00.973
<v Speaker 2>a good leader of the Liberals? And I wanted to

0:34:01.053 --> 0:34:06.413
<v Speaker 2>agree with it, but I couldn't quite what's your thought, Well,

0:34:06.773 --> 0:34:10.893
<v Speaker 2>it's a nice thought. For a lot of number of reasons,

0:34:10.253 --> 0:34:17.533
<v Speaker 2>it might not happen. But she's she's just tough, street

0:34:17.613 --> 0:34:23.293
<v Speaker 2>smart and common sense and well spoken. And if you

0:34:23.733 --> 0:34:27.293
<v Speaker 2>read an autobiography which came out I think just for Christmas,

0:34:28.253 --> 0:34:31.493
<v Speaker 2>she tells the story of her own life being brought

0:34:31.573 --> 0:34:35.053
<v Speaker 2>up in a a in a in an Aboriginal town

0:34:35.533 --> 0:34:39.573
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the Tamini Desert, and she, you know,

0:34:39.613 --> 0:34:43.413
<v Speaker 2>a brutal place to grow up in and she suffered violence,

0:34:43.533 --> 0:34:47.773
<v Speaker 2>family violence, a lot, you know, but she remarkably managed

0:34:47.813 --> 0:34:49.453
<v Speaker 2>to pull herself out of it, thanks I think largely

0:34:49.533 --> 0:34:52.933
<v Speaker 2>to her mother, who was a terrific woman. So she's

0:34:52.933 --> 0:34:56.013
<v Speaker 2>lived a tough life, right, So she's the sort of

0:34:56.053 --> 0:34:58.773
<v Speaker 2>stuff they throw at you in politics. She just you know,

0:34:58.853 --> 0:35:02.093
<v Speaker 2>it's nothing for her, you know, because she's so That's

0:35:02.133 --> 0:35:05.013
<v Speaker 2>where she's really strong. Plus she's very well liked across

0:35:05.053 --> 0:35:11.493
<v Speaker 2>the country. And she was the leading voice that encouraged

0:35:11.493 --> 0:35:14.013
<v Speaker 2>Australians to reject the Voice to Parliament. She was dead

0:35:14.013 --> 0:35:16.853
<v Speaker 2>against it. So she's a terrific woman and.

0:35:18.533 --> 0:35:20.933
<v Speaker 3>She's you've been interested, you should mention her because I

0:35:20.933 --> 0:35:23.533
<v Speaker 3>think one for me, one of the the turning points

0:35:23.533 --> 0:35:26.693
<v Speaker 3>of the campaign when I sort of said oh, was

0:35:26.773 --> 0:35:29.773
<v Speaker 3>when she stood up. She was there with Peter Dutton

0:35:29.773 --> 0:35:31.973
<v Speaker 3>and she said we want to make Australia great again.

0:35:32.693 --> 0:35:35.093
<v Speaker 3>And then of course all the all the all the

0:35:35.133 --> 0:35:37.773
<v Speaker 3>Trump haters and Dunton haters got in and said, oh,

0:35:37.853 --> 0:35:42.253
<v Speaker 3>you sound like Donald Trump. You're mimicking Donald Trump, and Dute,

0:35:42.293 --> 0:35:46.333
<v Speaker 3>who was so worried about being compared to Donald Trump's

0:35:46.333 --> 0:35:49.933
<v Speaker 3>at that point, of course, he'd become quite unpopular for

0:35:50.013 --> 0:35:53.853
<v Speaker 3>his trade measures and his and his foreign affairs. You know,

0:35:53.853 --> 0:35:58.373
<v Speaker 3>he's treated Laodamiller's Zelenski. So he backed away and everybody

0:35:58.493 --> 0:36:01.373
<v Speaker 3>backed away, and I think just Enterprise was forced to

0:36:01.373 --> 0:36:03.653
<v Speaker 3>make some sort of apology and say, well, of course

0:36:03.653 --> 0:36:06.053
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want to reflect Donald Trump. And I thought,

0:36:06.053 --> 0:36:09.413
<v Speaker 3>we've lost your nerve now, because if you took that

0:36:09.493 --> 0:36:11.653
<v Speaker 3>to a referendum, you know, do you want to make

0:36:11.693 --> 0:36:14.413
<v Speaker 3>Australia create again? If you could theoretically take that to

0:36:14.453 --> 0:36:17.973
<v Speaker 3>a referendum, is there any chance that would be lost?

0:36:18.653 --> 0:36:22.853
<v Speaker 3>It would be a thumping majority, so they didn't play

0:36:22.893 --> 0:36:26.533
<v Speaker 3>into that, backed away from that, would not play into

0:36:26.533 --> 0:36:29.133
<v Speaker 3>that nationalist rhetoric for fear of sand like Donald Trump,

0:36:29.253 --> 0:36:31.813
<v Speaker 3>that's just what we actually need right now when you've

0:36:31.853 --> 0:36:36.373
<v Speaker 3>got the Chinese gumboats off our shores and Russia threatening

0:36:36.373 --> 0:36:39.613
<v Speaker 3>to put long range aircraft in Indonesia, and you know,

0:36:39.653 --> 0:36:42.293
<v Speaker 3>we're feeling a bit exposed because we're not sure how

0:36:42.293 --> 0:36:46.013
<v Speaker 3>committed the Americans are. We'd love people to say, come on,

0:36:46.053 --> 0:36:48.133
<v Speaker 3>we're going to make Australia great. We're going to all

0:36:48.253 --> 0:36:51.773
<v Speaker 3>rally round, and which is the kind of rhetoric that

0:36:52.773 --> 0:36:59.213
<v Speaker 3>both candidates used in Canada. Both Polyev and Karne both

0:36:59.413 --> 0:37:02.973
<v Speaker 3>used that rhetoric and the result both of them got

0:37:03.093 --> 0:37:05.213
<v Speaker 3>a massive increase in their primary vote.

0:37:05.373 --> 0:37:07.893
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at a number of headlines from this morning.

0:37:08.813 --> 0:37:12.573
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party donors threatened to pull donations after coalition loss.

0:37:13.093 --> 0:37:16.333
<v Speaker 2>Is that any surprise, No.

0:37:18.333 --> 0:37:20.373
<v Speaker 3>I think that we'll see what the how they feel

0:37:20.373 --> 0:37:24.693
<v Speaker 3>in two years time. Certainly there was a I think

0:37:24.733 --> 0:37:29.213
<v Speaker 3>there is there is will be a lot of anger

0:37:29.253 --> 0:37:32.533
<v Speaker 3>from donors because there was a few big donors who

0:37:32.573 --> 0:37:37.013
<v Speaker 3>were giving large amounts of money because they just could

0:37:37.133 --> 0:37:41.173
<v Speaker 3>see the danger that the labor government played was what

0:37:41.453 --> 0:37:44.973
<v Speaker 3>was to the business community and the prosperity of the

0:37:44.973 --> 0:37:48.813
<v Speaker 3>country more generally. And so they did get behind the

0:37:48.853 --> 0:37:51.373
<v Speaker 3>Libs and they'll fill they didn't get value for money,

0:37:51.453 --> 0:37:54.213
<v Speaker 3>no doubt about that. Whether they pull their funding on

0:37:54.293 --> 0:37:56.013
<v Speaker 3>what sure, But it's threatening.

0:37:56.653 --> 0:38:01.853
<v Speaker 2>Look, we haven't actually discussed Peter Dunton and I know

0:38:01.893 --> 0:38:04.573
<v Speaker 2>that he's being discussed all over and there are people

0:38:04.573 --> 0:38:08.213
<v Speaker 2>who are very disgusted with him. But does he does

0:38:11.373 --> 0:38:12.133
<v Speaker 2>does he deserve it?

0:38:12.893 --> 0:38:18.173
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, there are Peter Dutton and nobody's ever pretended otherwise.

0:38:18.173 --> 0:38:22.533
<v Speaker 3>Peter Dutton has had a few difficulties to contend with

0:38:22.613 --> 0:38:26.413
<v Speaker 3>from the beginning. He didn't look great. I mean he

0:38:26.973 --> 0:38:30.533
<v Speaker 3>suffers from a certain condition which means had not only

0:38:30.573 --> 0:38:34.453
<v Speaker 3>to lose his hair, he lost his eyebrows. So he

0:38:34.493 --> 0:38:37.413
<v Speaker 3>looks very similar to Christopher Luxon in many ways actually so,

0:38:38.093 --> 0:38:43.133
<v Speaker 3>but you know, he's not an attractive figure he visually,

0:38:44.253 --> 0:38:47.493
<v Speaker 3>and so that is unfortunately something you have to wrestle

0:38:47.533 --> 0:38:52.133
<v Speaker 3>with in politics. And also he doesn't easily show his

0:38:52.613 --> 0:38:56.013
<v Speaker 3>true emotions, so he's not he's not. He doesn't easily

0:38:56.093 --> 0:39:00.133
<v Speaker 3>sort of come switch from to the emotional rhetoric very well.

0:39:00.613 --> 0:39:03.253
<v Speaker 3>So when you're when you've got that doesn't mean to

0:39:03.293 --> 0:39:05.933
<v Speaker 3>say you're unelectable, which I just think you've got to work.

0:39:06.173 --> 0:39:06.853
<v Speaker 2>You've got to do.

0:39:06.973 --> 0:39:09.853
<v Speaker 3>Much much better than a nominal fifty to fifty or

0:39:09.893 --> 0:39:12.053
<v Speaker 3>fifty one forty nine to get elected.

0:39:12.093 --> 0:39:14.333
<v Speaker 2>You just have to have that extra buffer.

0:39:14.693 --> 0:39:19.533
<v Speaker 3>So in that sense, that's that's he doesn't deserve criticism

0:39:19.573 --> 0:39:20.773
<v Speaker 3>for how he looks, but.

0:39:22.493 --> 0:39:24.533
<v Speaker 2>It is all that it is. But it is unfortunate.

0:39:25.173 --> 0:39:29.173
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And nor does he deserve criticism. For most of

0:39:29.213 --> 0:39:31.773
<v Speaker 3>the three years as opposition leader, which was remarkable, he

0:39:31.893 --> 0:39:34.613
<v Speaker 3>united the party room, he got and geared up. He

0:39:34.693 --> 0:39:38.333
<v Speaker 3>got them in a position to win, and they looked

0:39:38.533 --> 0:39:40.573
<v Speaker 3>ahead of the Poles. They were ahead of the Poles

0:39:41.373 --> 0:39:44.173
<v Speaker 3>at the start of the year. So he did that.

0:39:44.733 --> 0:39:47.493
<v Speaker 3>But then the question is, of course, well how much

0:39:47.573 --> 0:39:51.453
<v Speaker 3>was he responsible for the rapid decline in the party's

0:39:51.653 --> 0:39:54.053
<v Speaker 3>vote from about early March onwards?

0:39:54.493 --> 0:39:55.933
<v Speaker 2>And well, entirely.

0:39:56.173 --> 0:40:01.173
<v Speaker 3>And I think what what happened is that he became nervous.

0:40:01.973 --> 0:40:04.213
<v Speaker 3>We hadn't seen the whites of his eyes up to

0:40:04.253 --> 0:40:06.773
<v Speaker 3>that point, but once he was in the lead, he thought, well,

0:40:06.773 --> 0:40:09.573
<v Speaker 3>I've got to hold onto this, and then became extraordinarily

0:40:09.613 --> 0:40:14.773
<v Speaker 3>cautious with policy and.

0:40:13.373 --> 0:40:14.573
<v Speaker 2>And not not.

0:40:16.093 --> 0:40:19.573
<v Speaker 3>Going on the attack, not not running the same negative

0:40:19.613 --> 0:40:22.933
<v Speaker 3>campaign that Labor and so that caution in the end

0:40:23.053 --> 0:40:26.893
<v Speaker 3>cost him, uh the chance to be Prime minister in

0:40:26.893 --> 0:40:30.093
<v Speaker 3>my view, because you in opposition you can't be cautious.

0:40:30.133 --> 0:40:32.973
<v Speaker 3>You just have to go out there like a whirling

0:40:33.013 --> 0:40:35.733
<v Speaker 3>dervish and just just go it, go for it, you know,

0:40:35.933 --> 0:40:39.053
<v Speaker 3>and which is what Tony Abbott was famously very good at.

0:40:40.773 --> 0:40:43.973
<v Speaker 2>In the States. They're talking about somebody had forgotten who

0:40:43.973 --> 0:40:47.853
<v Speaker 2>it was? Now was it was it musk anyway? Big balls?

0:40:48.813 --> 0:40:51.213
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmmm, you're familiar with what I'm saying.

0:40:51.733 --> 0:40:55.413
<v Speaker 3>Big balls? They think I've read that reference? They do

0:40:55.573 --> 0:40:56.813
<v Speaker 3>you care to explain it to me?

0:40:57.333 --> 0:41:00.613
<v Speaker 2>Well, just just just not frightened of anything, just I

0:41:00.853 --> 0:41:03.813
<v Speaker 2>got the got the guts if you like. But but

0:41:03.893 --> 0:41:06.093
<v Speaker 2>that that term has been adopted now and it's being

0:41:06.253 --> 0:41:10.333
<v Speaker 2>used in you know, all sorts of newspapers and what

0:41:10.373 --> 0:41:14.493
<v Speaker 2>have you. Right, I just think that that dutn't lacked

0:41:14.693 --> 0:41:18.933
<v Speaker 2>precisely that m Yeah, we often call it mongrel. I

0:41:18.973 --> 0:41:19.773
<v Speaker 2>think you do too.

0:41:21.333 --> 0:41:23.893
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Look, I think so, I think I think yeah,

0:41:23.893 --> 0:41:27.293
<v Speaker 3>I mean, clearly that's right. I mean I think he

0:41:27.453 --> 0:41:31.333
<v Speaker 3>just lost his nerve towards the end and was so

0:41:31.493 --> 0:41:36.213
<v Speaker 3>worried of things being used against him, either by labor

0:41:36.133 --> 0:41:38.653
<v Speaker 3>or the or the press, that he just went into

0:41:38.853 --> 0:41:42.693
<v Speaker 3>complete defensive mode and and didn't present policies which he

0:41:42.733 --> 0:41:45.293
<v Speaker 3>should have done. For instance, I mean, there was a

0:41:45.413 --> 0:41:49.773
<v Speaker 3>very strong tax reform policy sitting in his draw that

0:41:50.533 --> 0:41:53.933
<v Speaker 3>the Treasurer of Opposition, Treasurer Angus Taylor had drawn up,

0:41:54.573 --> 0:42:02.293
<v Speaker 3>and it included scrapping, well no introducing. It included indexing

0:42:02.333 --> 0:42:04.373
<v Speaker 3>of tax brackets, which is a big issue here. I

0:42:04.413 --> 0:42:06.253
<v Speaker 3>don't know whether it's the same in New Zealand.

0:42:05.973 --> 0:42:11.293
<v Speaker 2>But look what is now you finished, because I'll explode.

0:42:12.053 --> 0:42:14.893
<v Speaker 3>So indexing of tax trackets obviously when you know whatever

0:42:14.933 --> 0:42:18.893
<v Speaker 3>the threshold is, say thirty five thousand to go under

0:42:18.933 --> 0:42:22.253
<v Speaker 3>the second high the second rate of tax, that never moves.

0:42:22.333 --> 0:42:24.573
<v Speaker 3>So as people earn more, you know, more and more

0:42:24.613 --> 0:42:28.413
<v Speaker 3>people are caught in high and tax rates. The government

0:42:28.453 --> 0:42:31.533
<v Speaker 3>makes a lot of money that way by not moving

0:42:31.573 --> 0:42:34.573
<v Speaker 3>the rates. But of course it's desperately unfair and people

0:42:34.613 --> 0:42:36.973
<v Speaker 3>know it's unfair, so they had a plan to get

0:42:37.053 --> 0:42:39.173
<v Speaker 3>rid of that. It's going to be It's not cheap,

0:42:39.373 --> 0:42:41.093
<v Speaker 3>I mean, because the government's got to take a haircut

0:42:41.093 --> 0:42:42.693
<v Speaker 3>with revenue. But they had a plan to do that

0:42:42.773 --> 0:42:44.693
<v Speaker 3>and how they do it and where they make savings.

0:42:45.373 --> 0:42:46.093
<v Speaker 2>But that was.

0:42:47.693 --> 0:42:49.893
<v Speaker 3>Dutton said, Look, I didn't want that, So as I

0:42:49.973 --> 0:42:53.933
<v Speaker 3>understand it, that was Dunton's call. And so Angus Taylor

0:42:54.013 --> 0:42:58.133
<v Speaker 3>just had to buy his time and and and not

0:42:58.253 --> 0:43:00.253
<v Speaker 3>put forward this what I think would have been a

0:43:00.293 --> 0:43:03.453
<v Speaker 3>very popular measure. So that's that, I think is a

0:43:03.493 --> 0:43:06.333
<v Speaker 3>sign of a leader who's lost his courage.

0:43:08.133 --> 0:43:13.333
<v Speaker 2>That that brings me to Michael de Percy and a

0:43:13.413 --> 0:43:18.613
<v Speaker 2>column from The Spectator yesterday. Angus and Dan can save

0:43:18.693 --> 0:43:21.253
<v Speaker 2>the Liberals and the mainstream media keep banging on about

0:43:21.253 --> 0:43:25.493
<v Speaker 2>how the coalition lost because they aren't left enough. That

0:43:25.613 --> 0:43:29.813
<v Speaker 2>is absolute nonsense. The Liberals facilitated the fracturing of the

0:43:29.853 --> 0:43:34.813
<v Speaker 2>conservative votes by being labor liked. Every conservative knows this

0:43:34.893 --> 0:43:37.733
<v Speaker 2>is true. Conservatives don't want the Liberal Party to go left.

0:43:37.973 --> 0:43:40.853
<v Speaker 2>They want the Liberal Party to be conservative. Well, all

0:43:40.853 --> 0:43:44.533
<v Speaker 2>of that's pretty obvious, I think. But bottom line is

0:43:44.533 --> 0:43:47.973
<v Speaker 2>is Angus Taylor a prospect?

0:43:48.933 --> 0:43:54.093
<v Speaker 3>In my view, he's the best prospect. He is the

0:43:54.213 --> 0:43:58.733
<v Speaker 3>smartest man in any room I've been in. He's rapier

0:43:58.773 --> 0:44:02.093
<v Speaker 3>sharp when it comes to economic policy and policy more generally.

0:44:02.653 --> 0:44:06.573
<v Speaker 3>He's a deep thinker. He's an Oxford man. He worked

0:44:06.613 --> 0:44:09.013
<v Speaker 3>for he doesn't have to be in policy, which I

0:44:09.013 --> 0:44:11.013
<v Speaker 3>guess is weighing on his mind at the moment because

0:44:11.013 --> 0:44:13.573
<v Speaker 3>he you know, he had a very very well paid

0:44:13.613 --> 0:44:16.213
<v Speaker 3>job in the private sector as a senior advisor at

0:44:16.253 --> 0:44:20.293
<v Speaker 3>the companies around the world. I mean, he could go

0:44:20.373 --> 0:44:22.253
<v Speaker 3>back to that job and be making ten times as

0:44:22.293 --> 0:44:23.693
<v Speaker 3>much money as he can make at the moment. So

0:44:24.053 --> 0:44:25.693
<v Speaker 3>one of the things I reckon would be on his

0:44:25.773 --> 0:44:28.333
<v Speaker 3>mind right now would be do I really want the

0:44:28.373 --> 0:44:31.293
<v Speaker 3>pain and that it's going to come with picking up

0:44:31.573 --> 0:44:35.693
<v Speaker 3>this party in opposition. But it is precisely because he's

0:44:36.453 --> 0:44:39.773
<v Speaker 3>he's a solid conservative, is from the country. You know,

0:44:39.813 --> 0:44:45.653
<v Speaker 3>he's a farming family. He's got very solid values, in

0:44:45.773 --> 0:44:52.973
<v Speaker 3>my view, about about conservative values and commitment to smaller government,

0:44:53.133 --> 0:44:56.133
<v Speaker 3>or at least if more efficient government, and governments that

0:44:56.173 --> 0:45:00.573
<v Speaker 3>spend within their means, you know, the sort of Thatcher

0:45:00.613 --> 0:45:04.013
<v Speaker 3>and Reagan policy. He's committed to that, and that's his

0:45:04.093 --> 0:45:06.893
<v Speaker 3>frustration is he can't you know, that's so hard in

0:45:07.013 --> 0:45:10.133
<v Speaker 3>this in this era. So but what's happened is, of

0:45:10.173 --> 0:45:15.693
<v Speaker 3>course he does have some enemies in the party who

0:45:15.733 --> 0:45:19.733
<v Speaker 3>are just leaking mercilessly on him now, completely unfairly and

0:45:19.973 --> 0:45:23.573
<v Speaker 3>just complete nonsense. And they're doing that because it's a

0:45:23.613 --> 0:45:28.133
<v Speaker 3>deeply factionalized party, particularly in New South Wales, a very

0:45:28.173 --> 0:45:33.173
<v Speaker 3>strong so called moderate faction which would like to do

0:45:33.253 --> 0:45:37.213
<v Speaker 3>away with a lot of policies, probably the nuclear policy

0:45:37.253 --> 0:45:40.373
<v Speaker 3>as well. So there's a lot at stake here and

0:45:40.413 --> 0:45:45.213
<v Speaker 3>they will fight and quite dirtily to try and smear

0:45:45.293 --> 0:45:48.853
<v Speaker 3>him with, you know, the blame for the campaign, which

0:45:48.893 --> 0:45:54.653
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely unwarranted in my view, and they'll downplay his

0:45:54.733 --> 0:45:56.653
<v Speaker 3>credentials and everything.

0:45:57.493 --> 0:45:58.813
<v Speaker 2>But I think he's he's.

0:45:58.653 --> 0:46:00.413
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's a sort of you know, he reminds

0:46:00.413 --> 0:46:02.933
<v Speaker 3>me of It reminds me of a Bill English. He's

0:46:02.933 --> 0:46:07.653
<v Speaker 3>that kind of guy. But he just solid very similar

0:46:07.973 --> 0:46:10.053
<v Speaker 3>law and feel to Angus's Bill English.

0:46:10.093 --> 0:46:13.133
<v Speaker 2>That's where I put him. Bill. Bill is a good guy.

0:46:14.133 --> 0:46:17.733
<v Speaker 2>He didn't have the persona to take people with him

0:46:17.773 --> 0:46:22.093
<v Speaker 2>on many occasions. I feel as as the as the

0:46:22.133 --> 0:46:26.453
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister, would you say that Angus Taylor was in

0:46:26.493 --> 0:46:27.133
<v Speaker 2>that category.

0:46:28.053 --> 0:46:30.133
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, probably in the same way. He'd probably got to

0:46:30.453 --> 0:46:34.573
<v Speaker 3>gotta work on that side too, just as Bill English did.

0:46:34.853 --> 0:46:37.733
<v Speaker 3>It's consequence I think of being, you know, a certain

0:46:37.773 --> 0:46:40.213
<v Speaker 3>type of person where you think quite deeply about things

0:46:40.253 --> 0:46:42.253
<v Speaker 3>and you come to a recent answer, and you you

0:46:42.893 --> 0:46:45.773
<v Speaker 3>expect everybody else to come to that conclusion too, because

0:46:46.253 --> 0:46:48.533
<v Speaker 3>other people are like five steps behind you, and you

0:46:48.653 --> 0:46:51.533
<v Speaker 3>need to sort of bring them on with with more

0:46:52.853 --> 0:46:56.533
<v Speaker 3>more retail language. If you like, yeah, so I've got

0:46:56.533 --> 0:46:58.813
<v Speaker 3>like I mean, he'd be my pick. I think Dan

0:46:59.053 --> 0:47:03.933
<v Speaker 3>dan Tian is. The other possibility is again you know,

0:47:04.013 --> 0:47:08.373
<v Speaker 3>he's a country MP, he's from Victoria from one and

0:47:08.373 --> 0:47:16.933
<v Speaker 3>and he's a very solid guy, quite a sharp intellect. Again, look,

0:47:16.973 --> 0:47:19.573
<v Speaker 3>I think they both make good candidates, but I would

0:47:19.573 --> 0:47:22.053
<v Speaker 3>have thought that Angus would be the one they turned

0:47:22.133 --> 0:47:24.893
<v Speaker 3>to if they're simply going on the basis of talent

0:47:25.213 --> 0:47:25.893
<v Speaker 3>and ability.

0:47:27.333 --> 0:47:31.413
<v Speaker 2>So another headline from this morning that got my attention

0:47:31.533 --> 0:47:35.653
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanese leads a more left dominated Labor party that

0:47:35.733 --> 0:47:40.693
<v Speaker 2>will stall economic reform and the opening couple of lines,

0:47:41.213 --> 0:47:44.133
<v Speaker 2>the fundamental question must be asked, in light of Labour's

0:47:44.293 --> 0:47:47.573
<v Speaker 2>thumping victory, whether as a nation we have lost the

0:47:47.613 --> 0:47:51.413
<v Speaker 2>war on economic dependency. It would appear to be over

0:47:51.453 --> 0:47:53.813
<v Speaker 2>for the moment. The problem will be that once dependency

0:47:53.853 --> 0:47:57.653
<v Speaker 2>is entrenched into the political culture, the economy will eventually

0:47:57.733 --> 0:48:00.253
<v Speaker 2>bite back. The only question is when.

0:48:00.573 --> 0:48:04.133
<v Speaker 3>Any thoughts Yeah, I think I don't know whether the

0:48:04.173 --> 0:48:06.933
<v Speaker 3>country's move that way, but certainly the Labor Party has

0:48:07.893 --> 0:48:11.773
<v Speaker 3>a so I think they've elected. I mean, I don't

0:48:11.813 --> 0:48:14.693
<v Speaker 3>know the new members that are going to make a

0:48:14.733 --> 0:48:16.893
<v Speaker 3>difference in the party room, except to have seen them

0:48:16.933 --> 0:48:20.133
<v Speaker 3>on the television. General observation that they're all quite young

0:48:20.173 --> 0:48:24.133
<v Speaker 3>and predominantly female. And what we know is that young

0:48:24.173 --> 0:48:27.693
<v Speaker 3>female voters are probably more likely to vote Green than

0:48:27.773 --> 0:48:33.173
<v Speaker 3>Labor actually because that's their politics, and say it will

0:48:33.173 --> 0:48:35.053
<v Speaker 3>be there. We saw it in the last parliament. We

0:48:35.133 --> 0:48:37.813
<v Speaker 3>saw it. It came to the four not so much

0:48:37.853 --> 0:48:41.453
<v Speaker 3>of economic questions as Palestine. You know, there are a

0:48:41.533 --> 0:48:45.813
<v Speaker 3>lot of people even though you know, the Labor Party

0:48:45.853 --> 0:48:49.293
<v Speaker 3>basically walked away from supporting Israel, there are a lot

0:48:49.333 --> 0:48:51.093
<v Speaker 3>of people that felt they hadn't done a laugh, you know,

0:48:51.133 --> 0:48:54.493
<v Speaker 3>and it should be sort of calling for international courts

0:48:54.493 --> 0:48:56.733
<v Speaker 3>to judge Israel and for genocide and all this quite

0:48:56.773 --> 0:49:00.733
<v Speaker 3>extreme view. So yeah, they're going to face that. He

0:49:00.773 --> 0:49:03.933
<v Speaker 3>will have he's on the left of the party himself,

0:49:03.933 --> 0:49:06.733
<v Speaker 3>of course, but he's going to have to put a

0:49:06.733 --> 0:49:11.253
<v Speaker 3>lot of effort into calming the people on the left

0:49:11.253 --> 0:49:12.853
<v Speaker 3>that want him to go even further left.

0:49:14.653 --> 0:49:18.093
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think it's young women who I have

0:49:18.133 --> 0:49:20.053
<v Speaker 2>a theory, but why do you think it's young women

0:49:20.133 --> 0:49:26.453
<v Speaker 2>who fall into this trap with regard to matters green

0:49:27.613 --> 0:49:33.173
<v Speaker 2>and other matters like well, the Middle East. I don't know.

0:49:33.253 --> 0:49:38.493
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm hesitant on this one because I will be

0:49:38.533 --> 0:49:40.613
<v Speaker 3>called out if I make a judgment on what young

0:49:40.653 --> 0:49:43.573
<v Speaker 3>women think, and because not a woman young women think

0:49:43.613 --> 0:49:48.613
<v Speaker 3>the same. But it's marked. I can't give you an explanation,

0:49:48.693 --> 0:49:52.293
<v Speaker 3>but it is marked. In Australian politics now the difference

0:49:52.333 --> 0:49:57.573
<v Speaker 3>between men are eighteen to twenty five and twenty six

0:49:57.653 --> 0:50:00.333
<v Speaker 3>to thirty four voters and women in the same categories,

0:50:00.453 --> 0:50:05.693
<v Speaker 3>just like whide divide, and the women are predominantly Green.

0:50:05.693 --> 0:50:08.333
<v Speaker 3>I mean I was out on a few polling boot

0:50:10.693 --> 0:50:13.253
<v Speaker 3>before the election and you'd sort of see a young

0:50:13.293 --> 0:50:15.613
<v Speaker 3>woman of a certain age and a certain look coming

0:50:16.333 --> 0:50:19.413
<v Speaker 3>and you just put your packet a Liberal party how

0:50:19.413 --> 0:50:21.573
<v Speaker 3>to vote cards away because just you knew she was

0:50:21.613 --> 0:50:25.173
<v Speaker 3>going to go to the Green candidate or Labor possibly

0:50:25.253 --> 0:50:26.533
<v Speaker 3>but almost certainly Green.

0:50:26.813 --> 0:50:27.373
<v Speaker 2>It's just.

0:50:30.213 --> 0:50:32.893
<v Speaker 3>So wed hazard a guess. I mean that they've been

0:50:33.453 --> 0:50:36.693
<v Speaker 3>been to university and they've been indoctrinated since since they

0:50:36.693 --> 0:50:40.013
<v Speaker 3>first went to school about some of this climate change

0:50:40.013 --> 0:50:44.093
<v Speaker 3>stuff and you know, anti colonialism and we're all living

0:50:44.133 --> 0:50:46.973
<v Speaker 3>on stolen land, all that sort of stuff that's deep

0:50:47.013 --> 0:50:50.053
<v Speaker 3>in their heads. But that doesn't account for why the men,

0:50:51.373 --> 0:50:55.973
<v Speaker 3>the young men voters vote differently, so that I think,

0:50:56.573 --> 0:50:58.333
<v Speaker 3>you know less inclined to vote that way.

0:50:58.413 --> 0:51:02.373
<v Speaker 2>So it's I don't know what it is. Well, well

0:51:02.453 --> 0:51:06.373
<v Speaker 2>you you touched on them quite rightly. The education system

0:51:06.373 --> 0:51:08.453
<v Speaker 2>has a great deal to do, and they lay the groundwork,

0:51:09.253 --> 0:51:16.853
<v Speaker 2>even even into kindergarten. Uh and even even matters sexual

0:51:16.973 --> 0:51:22.253
<v Speaker 2>in kindergarten. The media is I think responsible for the

0:51:22.373 --> 0:51:24.893
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of it. I mean, they get taught

0:51:24.933 --> 0:51:29.133
<v Speaker 2>this stuff or presented with with what what you just

0:51:29.213 --> 0:51:33.893
<v Speaker 2>discussed in the education system, and then it gets verified

0:51:34.053 --> 0:51:37.893
<v Speaker 2>as far as they're concerned by the media. Yeah yeah,

0:51:38.053 --> 0:51:41.253
<v Speaker 2>that would be right. Yeah, yeah, that's they live.

0:51:41.093 --> 0:51:43.813
<v Speaker 3>In in that that world, that paradigm.

0:51:43.933 --> 0:51:47.213
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it may be it may be that the

0:51:47.253 --> 0:51:51.253
<v Speaker 2>young guys are more interested in other things than looking

0:51:51.253 --> 0:51:52.253
<v Speaker 2>for the meaning of life.

0:51:54.333 --> 0:51:58.893
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, well that's right, isn't it with fast cars,

0:51:58.893 --> 0:52:01.573
<v Speaker 3>football all the rest. Yeah, okay, I get I get that.

0:52:01.693 --> 0:52:05.253
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is Rob McCulloch who has a blog site.

0:52:05.453 --> 0:52:09.613
<v Speaker 2>He is a professor at Auckland University. The worst finance

0:52:09.653 --> 0:52:14.693
<v Speaker 2>minister ever Labour's grunt Robertson and now the new one

0:52:14.733 --> 0:52:18.973
<v Speaker 2>who is competing for that title, Nikola Willis, have jointly

0:52:19.013 --> 0:52:22.333
<v Speaker 2>created a fiscal crisis in New Zealand. We currently have

0:52:22.573 --> 0:52:25.413
<v Speaker 2>one of the most one of the worst primary fiscal

0:52:25.453 --> 0:52:29.413
<v Speaker 2>deficits in the developed world in brackets, which is government

0:52:29.493 --> 0:52:34.573
<v Speaker 2>spending minus tax revenues excluding interest costs close bracket. In

0:52:34.613 --> 0:52:37.373
<v Speaker 2>the face of an aging population, New Zealand's public debt

0:52:37.413 --> 0:52:42.373
<v Speaker 2>will start rapidly increasing above its high host pandemic levels

0:52:42.413 --> 0:52:47.093
<v Speaker 2>starting in twenty thirty, as confirmed by the IMF. He

0:52:47.253 --> 0:52:50.813
<v Speaker 2>then goes on the quote a fellow blog of Michael Riddell,

0:52:52.573 --> 0:52:56.213
<v Speaker 2>our current finance minister has only one plan, which isn't

0:52:56.213 --> 0:52:59.613
<v Speaker 2>a plan, cross the fingers and pray for economic growth

0:52:59.653 --> 0:53:02.973
<v Speaker 2>to pick up. We've we've got major issues.

0:53:03.013 --> 0:53:08.053
<v Speaker 3>Also, yeah, we've got those same issues. I haven't done

0:53:08.053 --> 0:53:11.853
<v Speaker 3>a cross comparison, but but yeah, I mean, this is

0:53:11.893 --> 0:53:14.053
<v Speaker 3>this is the problem. We've had a government elected with

0:53:14.893 --> 0:53:19.413
<v Speaker 3>a mandate to spend wealth without any mandate or even

0:53:19.453 --> 0:53:23.053
<v Speaker 3>discussion about how we earn the wealth. And that's that's

0:53:23.133 --> 0:53:27.653
<v Speaker 3>the problem for the two countries. They labor call it

0:53:27.693 --> 0:53:31.453
<v Speaker 3>a structural deficit. You know that exactly. What's what you've

0:53:31.493 --> 0:53:34.013
<v Speaker 3>just outlined in that piece, That we're spending more than

0:53:34.013 --> 0:53:37.293
<v Speaker 3>we get in revenue, spending more than we can raise

0:53:37.333 --> 0:53:40.013
<v Speaker 3>in taxes. It's not a structural deficit. It's a government

0:53:40.013 --> 0:53:44.653
<v Speaker 3>that can't live within its means. The massive increases in

0:53:44.653 --> 0:53:51.373
<v Speaker 3>in welfare spending, health spending, education spending, we haven't done

0:53:51.453 --> 0:53:54.733
<v Speaker 3>that just willian nilly, without any any back up with

0:53:55.093 --> 0:53:55.653
<v Speaker 3>how we're going.

0:53:55.573 --> 0:53:56.333
<v Speaker 2>To pay for them.

0:53:56.453 --> 0:53:58.293
<v Speaker 3>And as a result, the one we really should be

0:53:58.333 --> 0:54:01.333
<v Speaker 3>putting more money into now defense. You know, there's limited

0:54:01.333 --> 0:54:05.293
<v Speaker 3>funds available and limited enthusiasm to spend them. So we

0:54:05.333 --> 0:54:09.053
<v Speaker 3>are in a we are in a bind fiscally, and

0:54:09.773 --> 0:54:16.093
<v Speaker 3>that's was hardly debated in the election. That's that's the trouble.

0:54:16.093 --> 0:54:18.933
<v Speaker 3>We've were talking about everything except the important things at

0:54:18.933 --> 0:54:21.093
<v Speaker 3>this stage, and of the two critical issues, which is

0:54:21.933 --> 0:54:24.773
<v Speaker 3>national security and the economy.

0:54:24.773 --> 0:54:27.733
<v Speaker 2>Just in conclusion, unless you want to add anything more,

0:54:28.013 --> 0:54:31.573
<v Speaker 2>the one thing we haven't mentioned is the influence supposed

0:54:31.653 --> 0:54:38.253
<v Speaker 2>influence of Donald Trump. And they're pointing to where there's

0:54:38.293 --> 0:54:42.213
<v Speaker 2>been a reaction Canada being one, Australia being another, and

0:54:42.293 --> 0:54:46.813
<v Speaker 2>saying that Trump's ruining the ruining the world, when in

0:54:46.853 --> 0:54:49.853
<v Speaker 2>fact that's far from the truth. Even this morning, there

0:54:49.933 --> 0:54:53.013
<v Speaker 2>is the story on the Romanian prime minister to resign

0:54:53.053 --> 0:54:59.613
<v Speaker 2>after conservative candidate crushes coalition in do over election. It

0:54:59.613 --> 0:55:01.973
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter that we don't know exactly what the detail is,

0:55:02.013 --> 0:55:07.973
<v Speaker 2>but the point is that the prime minister resigning has

0:55:08.093 --> 0:55:10.533
<v Speaker 2>every thing to do with the fact that there's a

0:55:10.533 --> 0:55:15.133
<v Speaker 2>conservative running who is a follower of Trump. That was one,

0:55:15.253 --> 0:55:17.893
<v Speaker 2>and there's another one that I can't think of hand

0:55:18.333 --> 0:55:19.733
<v Speaker 2>oh farage of course.

0:55:21.013 --> 0:55:27.933
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, Well when you talk about, you know, doesn't

0:55:28.253 --> 0:55:32.973
<v Speaker 3>lacking the mongrel then then yeah, I mean, particularly around

0:55:33.053 --> 0:55:35.453
<v Speaker 3>January time of the inauguration, there were a lot of

0:55:35.493 --> 0:55:37.373
<v Speaker 3>people on the conservative side, So you've got to be

0:55:37.413 --> 0:55:39.213
<v Speaker 3>more like Trump, You've got to be more like Trump.

0:55:40.093 --> 0:55:45.373
<v Speaker 3>They stopped saying that once Trump's problematic side started to

0:55:45.413 --> 0:55:49.853
<v Speaker 3>emerge in terms of tariffs and so forth. But I

0:55:49.893 --> 0:55:53.213
<v Speaker 3>never thought that was right. I mean, Trump is fantastic

0:55:54.013 --> 0:55:58.533
<v Speaker 3>for the American context perfect for their current political malaise

0:55:58.613 --> 0:56:01.693
<v Speaker 3>and managed to break through the system as they have

0:56:01.773 --> 0:56:03.813
<v Speaker 3>it there. But because our system is not like that,

0:56:03.893 --> 0:56:06.373
<v Speaker 3>neither is yours. You know, Prime Minister can't just come

0:56:06.413 --> 0:56:09.373
<v Speaker 3>in and do things by decree. You know, he actually

0:56:09.373 --> 0:56:12.013
<v Speaker 3>has to negotiate with Parliament and negotiate with his own

0:56:12.053 --> 0:56:14.453
<v Speaker 3>party first and then Parliament. That's our system, and I

0:56:14.453 --> 0:56:16.573
<v Speaker 3>think I happened to think it's a better system, so

0:56:16.613 --> 0:56:20.533
<v Speaker 3>we didn't need that. But yeah, I mean, because Trump

0:56:20.573 --> 0:56:24.733
<v Speaker 3>is so demonized on the left and by the left

0:56:24.933 --> 0:56:28.493
<v Speaker 3>of course that includes most of the media that you know,

0:56:28.653 --> 0:56:31.293
<v Speaker 3>you Dunne was just away from the start that he

0:56:31.373 --> 0:56:34.013
<v Speaker 3>had to be distance himself from this idea or you're

0:56:34.013 --> 0:56:37.613
<v Speaker 3>going to be the next Donald Trump and America and

0:56:38.293 --> 0:56:42.333
<v Speaker 3>you're going to Americanize Australia, You're going to americanize our

0:56:42.373 --> 0:56:44.213
<v Speaker 3>health service, You're going to know, et.

0:56:44.213 --> 0:56:44.893
<v Speaker 2>Cetera, et cetera.

0:56:45.133 --> 0:56:48.493
<v Speaker 3>That's what the Labor was saying overtly time and time again.

0:56:48.533 --> 0:56:50.933
<v Speaker 3>It was a big part of the negative campaign. So yes,

0:56:51.333 --> 0:56:54.373
<v Speaker 3>it gave labor the ammunition I think is what happened,

0:56:54.453 --> 0:56:56.373
<v Speaker 3>and that's not Trump's full I don't think you can

0:56:56.413 --> 0:56:59.933
<v Speaker 3>blame Trump for it. I mean, presumably he's acting in

0:57:00.133 --> 0:57:02.893
<v Speaker 3>America's best interest. We can argue about, you know, whether

0:57:02.893 --> 0:57:06.173
<v Speaker 3>his trade policy is in America's best interest, but that's

0:57:06.253 --> 0:57:08.253
<v Speaker 3>what he's doing and he's got a mandate to do it.

0:57:08.453 --> 0:57:11.053
<v Speaker 3>He's not here to represent New Zealand's best interests or

0:57:11.093 --> 0:57:13.653
<v Speaker 3>Australia's best interests. So there's just a thing.

0:57:14.173 --> 0:57:18.293
<v Speaker 2>All right. And finally, finally, and you've given me the

0:57:18.373 --> 0:57:23.013
<v Speaker 2>lead for this. Living standards down something like eight percent

0:57:23.933 --> 0:57:27.373
<v Speaker 2>over the first term of the Albanesi government. You mentioned

0:57:27.493 --> 0:57:34.973
<v Speaker 2>the defense spending. They got humiliated with the voice. Would

0:57:34.973 --> 0:57:39.773
<v Speaker 2>you agree that they're eddie free speech labor.

0:57:40.813 --> 0:57:43.573
<v Speaker 3>Well, they've shown those tendencies. So they try to pass

0:57:43.613 --> 0:57:46.493
<v Speaker 3>this misinformation bill, which is where you'd have basically a

0:57:46.493 --> 0:57:52.693
<v Speaker 3>government official would decide if you had misinformation on your

0:57:53.093 --> 0:57:56.853
<v Speaker 3>media website or on your podcast or whatever, and could

0:57:56.893 --> 0:57:57.773
<v Speaker 3>sanction you for that.

0:57:57.933 --> 0:57:59.733
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's very dangerous.

0:57:59.933 --> 0:58:03.373
<v Speaker 3>I think we'd all agree, because it's who decides what's

0:58:03.413 --> 0:58:07.173
<v Speaker 3>misinformation what's not, you know, so we can't That was

0:58:07.573 --> 0:58:10.213
<v Speaker 3>just genuine movie down the road to censorship. I think

0:58:10.253 --> 0:58:12.613
<v Speaker 3>like all on the left, you know they are, they

0:58:12.693 --> 0:58:16.093
<v Speaker 3>would do whatever they could to shut up their critics,

0:58:17.213 --> 0:58:21.333
<v Speaker 3>to silence them, and will do it. So I expect

0:58:21.373 --> 0:58:24.853
<v Speaker 3>them to move on free speech. Yeah, the restricts free speech,

0:58:24.973 --> 0:58:28.733
<v Speaker 3>just definitely, they will and go the voice again. Well,

0:58:28.973 --> 0:58:31.653
<v Speaker 3>because they can do elements of the voice without taking

0:58:31.653 --> 0:58:34.133
<v Speaker 3>it to a referendum. There will be a lot of

0:58:34.173 --> 0:58:36.813
<v Speaker 3>pressure on them to do that from inside the party,

0:58:36.813 --> 0:58:39.053
<v Speaker 3>from the left of the party, and I think they

0:58:39.133 --> 0:58:42.893
<v Speaker 3>will do something of that nature. They will, they'll legislate

0:58:43.013 --> 0:58:48.413
<v Speaker 3>something which will be, you know, in total contempt of

0:58:48.453 --> 0:58:51.573
<v Speaker 3>the sixty to forty vote that we had in twenty

0:58:51.693 --> 0:58:55.333
<v Speaker 3>twenty three. So yeah, of course they're going to come out.

0:58:55.493 --> 0:58:58.573
<v Speaker 3>But I do sense actually that albanezis learned its less

0:58:58.573 --> 0:59:01.733
<v Speaker 3>to some extent and realizes that he's got to avoid

0:59:02.533 --> 0:59:06.773
<v Speaker 3>doing that Woki stuff if he wants to hold the

0:59:06.773 --> 0:59:08.933
<v Speaker 3>middle ground, which he has to do, and he knows

0:59:08.933 --> 0:59:09.453
<v Speaker 3>he's got to.

0:59:09.413 --> 0:59:13.133
<v Speaker 2>Do that, right. Yeah, So I said, finally, finally, But

0:59:13.573 --> 0:59:16.293
<v Speaker 2>I'd forgotten something that I think is very important. You

0:59:16.373 --> 0:59:19.093
<v Speaker 2>are a student, have been a student of Robert Menzies.

0:59:19.933 --> 0:59:23.253
<v Speaker 2>You know him better than I do, even and I

0:59:23.333 --> 0:59:27.093
<v Speaker 2>adored him as a teenager. Robert Menzies was the founder

0:59:27.133 --> 0:59:30.093
<v Speaker 2>of the Liberal Party. Suggestions are now being made that

0:59:30.133 --> 0:59:35.053
<v Speaker 2>it's time to abandon the Liberal Party and start something new.

0:59:35.453 --> 0:59:38.613
<v Speaker 2>Another suggestion was, and I can't think who it was,

0:59:38.613 --> 0:59:43.053
<v Speaker 2>was that what the Liberals and especially whoever the leaders are,

0:59:43.613 --> 0:59:46.613
<v Speaker 2>need to get in and read his speeches. All of

0:59:46.653 --> 0:59:51.213
<v Speaker 2>which is good advice, of course. But if Robert Menzies

0:59:51.453 --> 0:59:56.493
<v Speaker 2>was here today and he was involved in this, how

0:59:56.493 --> 0:59:57.293
<v Speaker 2>would he handle it?

0:59:57.533 --> 1:00:02.733
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's instinct. What Rob Menzies did famously in nineteen

1:00:02.773 --> 1:00:06.853
<v Speaker 3>forties and nineteen forty four was to recognize that the

1:00:06.973 --> 1:00:10.493
<v Speaker 3>sender right was just into them, you know, twenty six

1:00:10.573 --> 1:00:13.613
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven different parties, and was not going to succeed

1:00:13.733 --> 1:00:17.373
<v Speaker 3>unless it came together as one organized force. That's what

1:00:17.453 --> 1:00:19.213
<v Speaker 3>the Liberal Party was put on earth to do, and

1:00:19.253 --> 1:00:24.973
<v Speaker 3>it's been remarkably successful up to now. But so I

1:00:25.013 --> 1:00:28.333
<v Speaker 3>think his instinct would be, Look, I'm worried that we're

1:00:28.373 --> 1:00:30.573
<v Speaker 3>going that way again. You know, we've got the same

1:00:30.773 --> 1:00:34.253
<v Speaker 3>sort of fracturing of the Liberal Party or the center

1:00:34.333 --> 1:00:37.093
<v Speaker 3>right vote happening, and he'd want to bring them together,

1:00:37.733 --> 1:00:39.173
<v Speaker 3>but he'd also he wouldn't want to do that at

1:00:39.173 --> 1:00:41.613
<v Speaker 3>any cost. You know, it would have to be sure

1:00:41.653 --> 1:00:45.853
<v Speaker 3>that whoever was that they shared common values, so it

1:00:45.893 --> 1:00:47.653
<v Speaker 3>would be to define I think what he'd be looking

1:00:47.653 --> 1:00:50.493
<v Speaker 3>to do is to define those common values. And it's simple

1:00:50.573 --> 1:00:55.413
<v Speaker 3>things like we want individuals who generally we much prefer

1:00:55.493 --> 1:00:58.613
<v Speaker 3>individuals to make decisions about their own lives, and the

1:00:58.653 --> 1:01:01.733
<v Speaker 3>government we much prefer to give responsibility to individuals, and

1:01:01.773 --> 1:01:04.653
<v Speaker 3>the government to give people opportunity, to make sure every

1:01:04.733 --> 1:01:07.813
<v Speaker 3>he's got equal opportunity. I think one of the things

1:01:07.853 --> 1:01:10.053
<v Speaker 3>he'd be concerned about his housing, you want, because he

1:01:10.133 --> 1:01:13.413
<v Speaker 3>thought that central the Royal Mensis philsophy as everyody should

1:01:14.093 --> 1:01:16.853
<v Speaker 3>be able to buy their own home. So that's obviously

1:01:16.853 --> 1:01:19.853
<v Speaker 3>a problem now, so he yeah, I think he would

1:01:19.893 --> 1:01:22.773
<v Speaker 3>those central principles and they're not hard you know, it's

1:01:22.813 --> 1:01:26.133
<v Speaker 3>not it's not sort of hardline conservative, I think. But

1:01:26.173 --> 1:01:27.973
<v Speaker 3>if he looked at the modern Liberal party, I think

1:01:28.013 --> 1:01:31.813
<v Speaker 3>he would be he would be disappointed that it's lost

1:01:32.333 --> 1:01:36.293
<v Speaker 3>half of its mission. So it's like center right parties

1:01:36.293 --> 1:01:39.013
<v Speaker 3>around the world have become since that and Reagan, they've

1:01:39.053 --> 1:01:41.613
<v Speaker 3>come to think they're only there to keep the economy

1:01:42.213 --> 1:01:46.213
<v Speaker 3>in decent shape and and you know, clear up Labour's mess.

1:01:46.733 --> 1:01:49.533
<v Speaker 3>But but because that's only there's only a means to

1:01:49.573 --> 1:01:51.613
<v Speaker 3>an end, and the end is a better life for people.

1:01:51.693 --> 1:01:54.013
<v Speaker 3>It's a richer life, it's a more fulfilling life, and

1:01:54.053 --> 1:01:56.493
<v Speaker 3>it's having that sort of more rounded vision of how

1:01:56.533 --> 1:02:00.133
<v Speaker 3>we improve the lives of people that the party struggles

1:02:00.173 --> 1:02:02.133
<v Speaker 3>with that and I think that's where it has to

1:02:02.733 --> 1:02:05.693
<v Speaker 3>look to give that vision because that counters, you know,

1:02:05.733 --> 1:02:09.053
<v Speaker 3>all labour stuff that we're going to bring equality in fairness,

1:02:09.133 --> 1:02:10.333
<v Speaker 3>because it never does.

1:02:11.413 --> 1:02:16.013
<v Speaker 2>I had I bought a copy of his autobiography Afternoon Late,

1:02:16.253 --> 1:02:20.013
<v Speaker 2>I might have said this to you on release and

1:02:20.093 --> 1:02:21.853
<v Speaker 2>I just wish I had a copy of it today.

1:02:22.653 --> 1:02:27.173
<v Speaker 2>Now this is this, This really is the end, so

1:02:27.333 --> 1:02:31.733
<v Speaker 2>as an exit Reality bites by Nick Kava Substack.

1:02:31.973 --> 1:02:36.173
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, this is a substack. I'm sure lots of

1:02:36.173 --> 1:02:38.853
<v Speaker 3>people are familiar with that. It's a very good platform

1:02:39.013 --> 1:02:43.813
<v Speaker 3>for independent writers like me to to have this say

1:02:43.893 --> 1:02:49.213
<v Speaker 3>and it's it's it's desperately democratic in that in that

1:02:49.253 --> 1:02:51.853
<v Speaker 3>anybody can go on there. You know, anybody can start

1:02:51.893 --> 1:02:55.933
<v Speaker 3>writing on there, but people will go to people. You know,

1:02:56.173 --> 1:02:58.933
<v Speaker 3>you can only build an audience of people actually like

1:02:59.013 --> 1:03:02.293
<v Speaker 3>what you're right, and you can actually also you can

1:03:02.333 --> 1:03:05.613
<v Speaker 3>ask people to subscribe, so people can be a financial

1:03:05.653 --> 1:03:07.933
<v Speaker 3>subscriber as well, you know, which is always helpful.

1:03:08.373 --> 1:03:09.733
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's.

1:03:09.613 --> 1:03:12.813
<v Speaker 3>Very you know, it's a very good, sobering judgment for

1:03:13.253 --> 1:03:15.413
<v Speaker 3>ride like me on how good my stuff really is.

1:03:15.653 --> 1:03:18.053
<v Speaker 3>You know, the people really prepare to read it?

1:03:18.173 --> 1:03:18.613
<v Speaker 2>Number one?

1:03:18.653 --> 1:03:20.973
<v Speaker 3>And are they actually prepared to put the hands in

1:03:21.013 --> 1:03:23.133
<v Speaker 3>the pocket and put in a bit of support for

1:03:23.253 --> 1:03:27.693
<v Speaker 3>my work as an independent journalist. And surprisingly some people

1:03:27.733 --> 1:03:29.933
<v Speaker 3>are and I'm very grateful to that. But it's where

1:03:29.973 --> 1:03:32.173
<v Speaker 3>I can pull together all my work. But you had

1:03:32.173 --> 1:03:34.173
<v Speaker 3>to come up with a title, and I thought reality

1:03:34.213 --> 1:03:36.413
<v Speaker 3>Bites is it, you know, and that's it. I want

1:03:36.453 --> 1:03:41.013
<v Speaker 3>to write about the point a bit where reality and.

1:03:40.813 --> 1:03:43.893
<v Speaker 2>The dreams and utopian dreams.

1:03:44.053 --> 1:03:47.093
<v Speaker 3>Come and come collide and when you have to face

1:03:47.173 --> 1:03:50.733
<v Speaker 3>up to real world facts because that that, I think

1:03:50.773 --> 1:03:52.933
<v Speaker 3>is where we're at on the debate on the economy

1:03:52.973 --> 1:03:57.133
<v Speaker 3>and well so many of the issues we've discussed today.

1:03:57.373 --> 1:04:00.333
<v Speaker 2>You indicated to me privately that you wanted to spend

1:04:00.333 --> 1:04:01.453
<v Speaker 2>a bit more time in your zealment.

1:04:03.013 --> 1:04:05.853
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well it's I'd love the country. I love the

1:04:05.933 --> 1:04:09.493
<v Speaker 3>people and the scenery and and get to know the

1:04:09.533 --> 1:04:12.973
<v Speaker 3>politics or to know where you're up to. Really, I

1:04:13.013 --> 1:04:15.853
<v Speaker 3>was there or I don't know, just over a year ago.

1:04:16.653 --> 1:04:18.493
<v Speaker 3>But the christ the government was new then and there

1:04:18.533 --> 1:04:20.413
<v Speaker 3>was lots of hope for it, and I gather things

1:04:20.413 --> 1:04:26.133
<v Speaker 3>aren't going quite so well. So yeah, yeah, it's the differences.

1:04:26.173 --> 1:04:26.333
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:04:26.373 --> 1:04:30.453
<v Speaker 3>It's very similar course to Australia in some broad senses,

1:04:30.573 --> 1:04:34.333
<v Speaker 3>but quite different in many others. And I love just

1:04:34.333 --> 1:04:37.333
<v Speaker 3>finding locating those differences and asking.

1:04:37.133 --> 1:04:39.693
<v Speaker 2>Why it's only three hours away.

1:04:40.773 --> 1:04:45.133
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, indeed, I don't know. This sort of stage

1:04:45.133 --> 1:04:48.093
<v Speaker 3>in the year, as we go from autumn to winter

1:04:48.293 --> 1:04:50.573
<v Speaker 3>is really my favorite time. I'm not a skier, but

1:04:51.653 --> 1:04:53.013
<v Speaker 3>maybe when the weather picks up.

1:04:53.973 --> 1:04:58.253
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, all right, again, you've been You've been very generous.

1:04:58.373 --> 1:05:02.493
<v Speaker 2>Thank you appreciate it. Reality bites by in the CATA.

1:05:03.373 --> 1:05:06.053
<v Speaker 2>It's very easy to find, and I suggest to you, well,

1:05:06.053 --> 1:05:09.653
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I'm telling you it's worth reading. How many

1:05:09.653 --> 1:05:12.493
<v Speaker 2>are you putting out? A couple of week A couple

1:05:12.533 --> 1:05:13.453
<v Speaker 2>of weeks, that's what I try and do.

1:05:13.493 --> 1:05:15.973
<v Speaker 3>It's not altogether, some of them that can't be quite

1:05:16.013 --> 1:05:17.293
<v Speaker 3>as regular as I'd like to be, but a couple

1:05:17.333 --> 1:05:19.373
<v Speaker 3>of week at least is generally what I put out.

1:05:19.493 --> 1:05:22.773
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, please go on, you can subscribe for free,

1:05:23.093 --> 1:05:26.853
<v Speaker 3>or you can you can subscribe as a special page

1:05:26.853 --> 1:05:28.333
<v Speaker 3>subscriber and get extra content.

1:05:28.733 --> 1:05:33.493
<v Speaker 2>Beautiful Nick, thank you once again, Thank you always good

1:05:33.493 --> 1:05:53.373
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you lately. This is a producer podcast

1:05:53.493 --> 1:05:55.373
<v Speaker 2>number two hundred and eighty three. And here we are

1:05:55.413 --> 1:05:58.933
<v Speaker 2>in the mail room, and I'm going to invite you

1:05:59.013 --> 1:06:00.933
<v Speaker 2>to go first, and then I've got an announcement tomorrow.

1:06:01.013 --> 1:06:04.373
<v Speaker 4>All right, late, And this is from Howard not once

1:06:04.533 --> 1:06:07.853
<v Speaker 4>but twice in podcast to eight too, you quoted a

1:06:07.893 --> 1:06:10.733
<v Speaker 4>chorus and who proclaimed that Winston Peters had been the

1:06:10.773 --> 1:06:14.173
<v Speaker 4>man for common sense for all his political life. I

1:06:14.293 --> 1:06:17.813
<v Speaker 4>do not understand why mister Peters is constantly given a

1:06:17.853 --> 1:06:21.373
<v Speaker 4>free pass for the complete and utter lack of common

1:06:21.413 --> 1:06:26.173
<v Speaker 4>sense he displayed in twenty seventeen when he appointed jasindera

1:06:26.293 --> 1:06:29.573
<v Speaker 4>durn Prime Minister and in doing so led this great

1:06:29.653 --> 1:06:33.133
<v Speaker 4>country down the gurglar. His action was, in my opinion,

1:06:33.213 --> 1:06:36.613
<v Speaker 4>completely selfish behavior, with only one thing in mind, the

1:06:36.693 --> 1:06:40.013
<v Speaker 4>rise of his own star to the detriment of New Zealand.

1:06:40.773 --> 1:06:43.533
<v Speaker 4>Conservative and right wing commentators at the time were highly

1:06:43.573 --> 1:06:46.813
<v Speaker 4>critical of Peter's but now salute him and laud his

1:06:46.933 --> 1:06:50.853
<v Speaker 4>conservative principles and common sense I may be accused of

1:06:50.853 --> 1:06:53.093
<v Speaker 4>bearing a grudge and I have been told to let

1:06:53.173 --> 1:06:53.453
<v Speaker 4>it go.

1:06:53.813 --> 1:06:59.013
<v Speaker 2>That will never happen. I do understand that sentiment, and listen,

1:06:59.093 --> 1:07:01.533
<v Speaker 2>I understand it also, and I felt that way for

1:07:01.973 --> 1:07:07.413
<v Speaker 2>quite a long time. But things change, time passes, and

1:07:07.493 --> 1:07:11.733
<v Speaker 2>some people wrecked fire their pasts. You can say he

1:07:11.773 --> 1:07:15.613
<v Speaker 2>hasn't that he could never do it. I say, live

1:07:15.653 --> 1:07:18.493
<v Speaker 2>for the present. In the future, you have to hope

1:07:18.773 --> 1:07:23.733
<v Speaker 2>you do now from Paul, And this is very coincidental,

1:07:24.533 --> 1:07:27.773
<v Speaker 2>is as Layton just now listening to your conversation with

1:07:27.893 --> 1:07:31.653
<v Speaker 2>Nick Cata. In describing the teal elites that live on

1:07:31.733 --> 1:07:35.933
<v Speaker 2>the shores of Sydney Harbor, one can make a comparison

1:07:35.973 --> 1:07:38.493
<v Speaker 2>to the governing elites on the shores of Auckland Harbor,

1:07:38.573 --> 1:07:43.413
<v Speaker 2>Simon Wat's being a classic example. Most of them are idiots. Well,

1:07:43.493 --> 1:07:46.453
<v Speaker 2>I don't entirely disagree with what you say, especially the

1:07:46.453 --> 1:07:50.733
<v Speaker 2>most bit. But how did he hear that? And I'm

1:07:50.773 --> 1:07:56.053
<v Speaker 2>now reading his email because this has only just been recorded.

1:07:56.853 --> 1:08:00.173
<v Speaker 2>The answer is, of course that this was done after

1:08:00.253 --> 1:08:05.293
<v Speaker 2>the previous discussion I had with Nick Cata on April sixteenth,

1:08:05.333 --> 1:08:07.093
<v Speaker 2>and I hadn't picked it up, and here it is

1:08:07.133 --> 1:08:11.053
<v Speaker 2>today now. My phone went buzz just a few moments ago,

1:08:11.333 --> 1:08:13.693
<v Speaker 2>just before we started the bailroom, and I mean literally

1:08:14.133 --> 1:08:17.933
<v Speaker 2>seconds before we started the mailroom, and the headline was

1:08:18.013 --> 1:08:23.653
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Wilson reclaims Goldstein. Tim Wilson is set to reclaim

1:08:23.653 --> 1:08:28.613
<v Speaker 2>Goldstein from Teal incumbent Zoe Daniel. This was from the

1:08:28.613 --> 1:08:32.613
<v Speaker 2>Australians rolling coverage of news from Canberra and around the country.

1:08:34.293 --> 1:08:36.693
<v Speaker 4>Leyden Steve says it was humbling to hear read out

1:08:36.693 --> 1:08:39.453
<v Speaker 4>so much of my RC twelve submission at the end

1:08:39.453 --> 1:08:42.293
<v Speaker 4>of two eighty two. I'm very grateful and I can

1:08:42.373 --> 1:08:45.053
<v Speaker 4>but hope that it may help open some eyes that

1:08:45.173 --> 1:08:49.213
<v Speaker 4>hitherto have been forced shut by the all pervading official narrative.

1:08:49.933 --> 1:08:53.413
<v Speaker 4>As you suggested at the end, in an ideal world,

1:08:53.533 --> 1:08:56.493
<v Speaker 4>all young people should have access to such a font

1:08:56.533 --> 1:09:00.293
<v Speaker 4>of wisdom as Ramesh. I hope the Australians appreciate how

1:09:00.333 --> 1:09:03.533
<v Speaker 4>fortunate they are to have him. He mentioned how the

1:09:03.653 --> 1:09:07.413
<v Speaker 4>establishment left is now in serious defense mode and its

1:09:07.413 --> 1:09:10.773
<v Speaker 4>efforts to counter the populist right surge across most of

1:09:10.813 --> 1:09:13.253
<v Speaker 4>the West. That's no surprise when I think of the

1:09:13.293 --> 1:09:16.093
<v Speaker 4>words of Melanie Phillips some ten to fifteen years ago,

1:09:16.213 --> 1:09:19.453
<v Speaker 4>when she explained that the Left had an unshakable faith

1:09:20.013 --> 1:09:25.293
<v Speaker 4>in its intellectual, moral, and ethical superiority. The left regards

1:09:25.333 --> 1:09:29.453
<v Speaker 4>it as an absolute responsibility to defeat any opposing views

1:09:29.533 --> 1:09:32.173
<v Speaker 4>on the basis that those views are not just wrong,

1:09:32.213 --> 1:09:36.333
<v Speaker 4>that evil. And Steve says, of course, it's the perfect

1:09:36.413 --> 1:09:40.253
<v Speaker 4>diversionary tactic. Of course, accuse your opposition of doing what

1:09:40.293 --> 1:09:42.533
<v Speaker 4>you're actually doing and late.

1:09:42.653 --> 1:09:46.453
<v Speaker 2>It's from Steve. Steve, appreciate it. Thank you. This is

1:09:46.493 --> 1:09:48.853
<v Speaker 2>from Alan ellen Trotter, who was one of the three

1:09:48.933 --> 1:09:54.373
<v Speaker 2>authors of the two books that were published that we

1:09:54.453 --> 1:09:57.973
<v Speaker 2>did a couple of interviews on and I mentioned them

1:09:57.973 --> 1:10:04.853
<v Speaker 2>on numerous occasions on climate change. Climate Actually, Eddie writes,

1:10:05.373 --> 1:10:07.933
<v Speaker 2>and this comes to you from Johannesburg, where we currently

1:10:07.973 --> 1:10:12.173
<v Speaker 2>recover from concluding a road trip with Australian friends for

1:10:12.213 --> 1:10:16.493
<v Speaker 2>the past five weeks, including a week in Kruger National

1:10:16.533 --> 1:10:20.493
<v Speaker 2>Park and citing the Big Five of game animals almost daily,

1:10:20.533 --> 1:10:25.413
<v Speaker 2>following a seventeen night cruise on Cund's Queen Anne from

1:10:25.453 --> 1:10:28.773
<v Speaker 2>Singapore to Cape Town. I like knowing what people doing.

1:10:28.733 --> 1:10:31.773
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a fantastic trip, doesn't that During that

1:10:31.853 --> 1:10:34.013
<v Speaker 2>time we have listened to a couple of times to

1:10:34.173 --> 1:10:37.693
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio to keep abreast of New Zealand news and happenings.

1:10:38.253 --> 1:10:41.613
<v Speaker 2>It seems that the Paris Accord is destined for the

1:10:41.613 --> 1:10:45.733
<v Speaker 2>scrap heap, thank the Lord in the foreseeable future, especially

1:10:45.773 --> 1:10:50.773
<v Speaker 2>with China in the Russia and the USA approximately sixty

1:10:50.773 --> 1:10:54.373
<v Speaker 2>percent of global emissions being responsible for that not being

1:10:54.933 --> 1:10:59.013
<v Speaker 2>party there too. New Zealand could well be brave enough

1:10:59.293 --> 1:11:03.413
<v Speaker 2>to act sensibly and join that scrap heap of forlorn

1:11:03.533 --> 1:11:09.093
<v Speaker 2>commitment and terminate its ridiculous commitment to that nonsense. Let's

1:11:09.133 --> 1:11:13.493
<v Speaker 2>hope so as that alone would provide much of the capital.

1:11:13.493 --> 1:11:15.893
<v Speaker 2>This is the important part. Much of the capital required

1:11:15.933 --> 1:11:20.373
<v Speaker 2>for infrastructure expenditure needed to be applied to so urgently

1:11:20.733 --> 1:11:24.453
<v Speaker 2>and thereby reduce substantially the borrowings that need to be

1:11:24.533 --> 1:11:28.453
<v Speaker 2>made because of gross errors made by labor during the

1:11:28.533 --> 1:11:33.013
<v Speaker 2>COVID period. Paris exit right now, What a great start

1:11:33.053 --> 1:11:38.613
<v Speaker 2>for our capital shortfall, that is, by exiting the Paris

1:11:38.653 --> 1:11:42.013
<v Speaker 2>Accord quick smart anyway, ell, I'm glad you're having a

1:11:42.013 --> 1:11:43.133
<v Speaker 2>great holiday, and I take.

1:11:43.013 --> 1:11:48.733
<v Speaker 4>Your point, Leighton Lorna says. She says her subject is

1:11:49.213 --> 1:11:54.253
<v Speaker 4>net zero is actually and her start of her email says,

1:11:55.173 --> 1:11:59.653
<v Speaker 4>it's actually not zero. Why why doesn't our useless government

1:11:59.693 --> 1:12:01.013
<v Speaker 4>pull out of the Paris Agreement?

1:12:01.573 --> 1:12:01.853
<v Speaker 2>Why?

1:12:01.933 --> 1:12:05.333
<v Speaker 4>She says, no one has any guts or brain anymore.

1:12:05.653 --> 1:12:08.253
<v Speaker 2>And that's pretty much. That's pretty much the way that

1:12:08.493 --> 1:12:14.333
<v Speaker 2>it is. From Vincent, Hey, Australia, what have you done?

1:12:14.813 --> 1:12:19.493
<v Speaker 2>I'm plumoxed. Don't need to say much more than that now.

1:12:20.093 --> 1:12:24.653
<v Speaker 2>From jin A Ramesh, the Kur is a genius. He

1:12:24.693 --> 1:12:27.733
<v Speaker 2>gave a perfect summary regarding the state of some Western

1:12:27.733 --> 1:12:31.813
<v Speaker 2>countries today, saying you've got the soft states in the

1:12:31.813 --> 1:12:35.293
<v Speaker 2>West which are engaged in an orgy of national self

1:12:35.333 --> 1:12:37.973
<v Speaker 2>abasement at all the evils of the world that are

1:12:38.053 --> 1:12:42.013
<v Speaker 2>laid at our own doors at Australia's Labor Party proved

1:12:42.053 --> 1:12:45.493
<v Speaker 2>his point by pushing the Voice and Welcome to Country

1:12:45.533 --> 1:12:50.573
<v Speaker 2>campaigns of national victimhooden penance. Yet they voted Elbow and

1:12:50.693 --> 1:12:54.733
<v Speaker 2>his lot back into power. Sky News Australia reports that

1:12:54.773 --> 1:12:57.613
<v Speaker 2>the Labor Green's control of the Senate sets up the

1:12:57.653 --> 1:13:01.973
<v Speaker 2>most progressive parliament ever. I don't get why Australians refused

1:13:01.973 --> 1:13:04.413
<v Speaker 2>to learn from us Kiwi's We had six years of

1:13:04.493 --> 1:13:08.613
<v Speaker 2>Labour Green's government from Hell under Jacinda Adern, I've got

1:13:08.613 --> 1:13:11.773
<v Speaker 2>a hand it to the progressives. They always clearly stood

1:13:11.813 --> 1:13:16.093
<v Speaker 2>for communist ideology, even the Pope. As I reflected what

1:13:16.173 --> 1:13:19.453
<v Speaker 2>Pope Francis stood for after his death, all I could

1:13:19.493 --> 1:13:23.733
<v Speaker 2>think of was his anti Trump, anti capitalism, pro LGBT,

1:13:23.853 --> 1:13:28.213
<v Speaker 2>and pro climate change stances. For all intents and purposes,

1:13:28.253 --> 1:13:31.533
<v Speaker 2>Pope Francis lived more like a modern day politician than

1:13:31.573 --> 1:13:34.413
<v Speaker 2>the head of the Roman Catholic Church. He was more

1:13:34.413 --> 1:13:38.133
<v Speaker 2>comfortable being in Davos than being in God's House. In fact,

1:13:38.173 --> 1:13:43.773
<v Speaker 2>Heather Duplicy Allen remarked that he was obviously the Pope. Thankfully,

1:13:44.133 --> 1:13:47.893
<v Speaker 2>Ramesh the Khur reminds us that there are others in

1:13:47.933 --> 1:13:51.373
<v Speaker 2>the West who still want to preserve their national identity,

1:13:51.493 --> 1:13:54.453
<v Speaker 2>take pride in their history and their contributions to human

1:13:54.533 --> 1:13:59.173
<v Speaker 2>welfare and progress, through their enlightenment, through their industrial revolution

1:13:59.773 --> 1:14:03.133
<v Speaker 2>led by fossil fuels, which have raised living standards around

1:14:03.173 --> 1:14:06.333
<v Speaker 2>the world, which have made education and better health possible,

1:14:06.573 --> 1:14:09.693
<v Speaker 2>which have made life better for all of us. The

1:14:09.733 --> 1:14:13.213
<v Speaker 2>conservative West needs to unashamedly and clearly stand for the

1:14:13.253 --> 1:14:18.093
<v Speaker 2>preservation of faith, family, community, and country, without which we

1:14:18.133 --> 1:14:20.853
<v Speaker 2>would not have the first world countries we live in today.

1:14:20.853 --> 1:14:25.493
<v Speaker 2>It's very very well stated. Jin Thank you, missus, producer,

1:14:25.613 --> 1:14:28.173
<v Speaker 2>thank you, Thank you later and see you next week

1:14:28.213 --> 1:14:29.973
<v Speaker 2>now if you'd like to write to us, of course,

1:14:30.093 --> 1:14:33.013
<v Speaker 2>latent at Newstalks AB dot co dot nz or Carolyn

1:14:33.133 --> 1:14:36.173
<v Speaker 2>Caroline with the Wide News Talks AB dot co dot nz.

1:14:36.493 --> 1:14:37.933
<v Speaker 2>Do we love getting their male.

1:14:38.213 --> 1:14:40.733
<v Speaker 4>We love getting your mail guys exactly.

1:14:52.253 --> 1:14:54.373
<v Speaker 2>Now, let me go back to the comment I made

1:14:54.413 --> 1:14:58.093
<v Speaker 2>to Nick when we were talking about how girls and

1:14:58.413 --> 1:15:02.653
<v Speaker 2>blokes are different. If you like an attitude to what's important,

1:15:03.333 --> 1:15:07.693
<v Speaker 2>especially when you're younger, and I may mention of education

1:15:08.973 --> 1:15:12.453
<v Speaker 2>and media, and I have a very good example of it.

1:15:12.653 --> 1:15:16.293
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have it until after the interview was done,

1:15:16.373 --> 1:15:18.733
<v Speaker 2>when I just came across it. But I'm saving it

1:15:18.773 --> 1:15:21.573
<v Speaker 2>because it's it's worthy of more attention that I have

1:15:21.653 --> 1:15:24.413
<v Speaker 2>time to give it now. But there is there is

1:15:24.453 --> 1:15:27.413
<v Speaker 2>a little trial I want to follow. Bear with me.

1:15:27.933 --> 1:15:30.413
<v Speaker 2>Why did we need a This is where I want

1:15:30.453 --> 1:15:32.493
<v Speaker 2>to start. Why did we need a court of Lord

1:15:32.493 --> 1:15:35.013
<v Speaker 2>to tell us what a woman is? It's written by

1:15:35.013 --> 1:15:39.853
<v Speaker 2>Brendan O'Neil from the UK and it was published in

1:15:39.933 --> 1:15:43.293
<v Speaker 2>an Australian news in the Australian newspaper. Actually, why did

1:15:43.333 --> 1:15:45.373
<v Speaker 2>we need a court of lord to tell us what

1:15:45.413 --> 1:15:47.853
<v Speaker 2>a woman is? There was a time when every babbling

1:15:47.893 --> 1:15:50.813
<v Speaker 2>toddler knew there were men and women and that they

1:15:50.853 --> 1:15:55.653
<v Speaker 2>were different. Even our Neanderthal forebears understood sex difference. They

1:15:55.653 --> 1:15:57.773
<v Speaker 2>didn't know much, but they knew half the tribe was

1:15:57.773 --> 1:16:01.093
<v Speaker 2>made up of grunting blokes who were good with spears,

1:16:01.293 --> 1:16:04.173
<v Speaker 2>and the other half of females who might get pregnant.

1:16:04.613 --> 1:16:07.453
<v Speaker 2>It skewed by putting it, and yet in twenty twenty

1:16:07.493 --> 1:16:11.653
<v Speaker 2>five were apparently need five judges to explain what a

1:16:11.693 --> 1:16:15.973
<v Speaker 2>woman is. Ours is an age of dazzling tech that

1:16:16.053 --> 1:16:18.413
<v Speaker 2>you can ask an app on your phone to explain

1:16:18.493 --> 1:16:21.453
<v Speaker 2>the War of the Roses and traverse entire continents in

1:16:21.533 --> 1:16:24.533
<v Speaker 2>mere ours. And yet when it comes to that simplest

1:16:24.533 --> 1:16:27.773
<v Speaker 2>of queries, what is a woman? People erm and r

1:16:28.053 --> 1:16:31.613
<v Speaker 2>and say I don't know. Shall we defer to the courts?

1:16:32.933 --> 1:16:36.133
<v Speaker 2>That's been my overriding emotion following the UK Supreme Court

1:16:36.293 --> 1:16:40.253
<v Speaker 2>ruling this week that essentially it was on mid April

1:16:40.293 --> 1:16:46.013
<v Speaker 2>actually essentially says trans women are not women. I'm glad

1:16:46.093 --> 1:16:49.173
<v Speaker 2>that ruling has been made, but I'm be amused and

1:16:49.293 --> 1:16:52.693
<v Speaker 2>kind of scared that we needed it and that's all

1:16:52.733 --> 1:16:55.333
<v Speaker 2>we need from it, because it's my lead into some

1:16:55.533 --> 1:16:59.573
<v Speaker 2>other things. It's the same sort of thinking, if not

1:16:59.653 --> 1:17:03.413
<v Speaker 2>the same sort of a group of people who will

1:17:03.493 --> 1:17:06.093
<v Speaker 2>argue with you that women can be men and men

1:17:06.133 --> 1:17:10.653
<v Speaker 2>can be women and get pregnant, etc. And who, on

1:17:10.693 --> 1:17:14.613
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, will push the climate change bs and

1:17:14.693 --> 1:17:17.853
<v Speaker 2>try and enforce it on all of us. So with

1:17:17.893 --> 1:17:21.333
<v Speaker 2>that in mind, the Spanish power outage provides a very

1:17:21.333 --> 1:17:25.893
<v Speaker 2>good example. Daniel Le carl who is who is an

1:17:25.893 --> 1:17:31.653
<v Speaker 2>economist I think from memory, and who writes extremely well.

1:17:31.733 --> 1:17:35.493
<v Speaker 2>It is. On April twenty third, I participated in a

1:17:35.533 --> 1:17:39.253
<v Speaker 2>conference at the European Parliament on the future of nuclear

1:17:39.413 --> 1:17:43.373
<v Speaker 2>energy with experts from all over Europe, where I warned

1:17:43.493 --> 1:17:48.533
<v Speaker 2>that with the current energy policies, blackouts will be the norm,

1:17:48.733 --> 1:17:52.773
<v Speaker 2>not a coincidence. The shortsighted and sectarian policy of the

1:17:52.773 --> 1:17:56.053
<v Speaker 2>activists who populate the government has led us to the

1:17:56.053 --> 1:17:59.533
<v Speaker 2>worst blackout in history of Spain. We have been without

1:17:59.573 --> 1:18:04.533
<v Speaker 2>communication or electricity for nearly eleven hours. This blackout, with

1:18:04.653 --> 1:18:08.613
<v Speaker 2>the immediate collapse of fifteen gigawatts of power in the system,

1:18:09.133 --> 1:18:12.373
<v Speaker 2>is the consequence of a policy that penalizes base energy,

1:18:12.653 --> 1:18:16.493
<v Speaker 2>key to providing key to providing stability to the system,

1:18:16.693 --> 1:18:20.573
<v Speaker 2>and plunders the energy sector. Governments have been dedicated to

1:18:20.613 --> 1:18:25.333
<v Speaker 2>closing nuclear power plants, making them unviable with the abusive

1:18:25.373 --> 1:18:31.853
<v Speaker 2>and confiscatory taxation, penalizing investment in distribution with absurd regulations,

1:18:32.333 --> 1:18:37.453
<v Speaker 2>imposing a volatile and intermittent energy mix, and burning energy

1:18:37.573 --> 1:18:42.733
<v Speaker 2>with elevated taxes and administrative delays. Of what could go wrong?

1:18:43.053 --> 1:18:49.213
<v Speaker 2>He asks everything, and it happened. Renewable energies, while essential

1:18:49.293 --> 1:18:54.093
<v Speaker 2>in a balanced energy mix, cannot provide cannot provide safety

1:18:54.093 --> 1:18:58.933
<v Speaker 2>and stability due to their volatility and intermittent nature. That's

1:18:58.973 --> 1:19:01.693
<v Speaker 2>why it is essential to have a balance system with

1:19:01.853 --> 1:19:05.773
<v Speaker 2>baseload energy that operates all the time, such as hydropower,

1:19:05.853 --> 1:19:11.493
<v Speaker 2>nuclear and natural gas back up. Destroying access to nuclear

1:19:11.653 --> 1:19:17.653
<v Speaker 2>energy with unnecessary closures and confiscatory taxation has been part

1:19:17.693 --> 1:19:22.413
<v Speaker 2>of the fundamental causes of the disaster and the blackout.

1:19:23.413 --> 1:19:30.133
<v Speaker 2>Then to the mesas wire Juaqim book The Spanish Blackout

1:19:30.133 --> 1:19:34.093
<v Speaker 2>shows why the green dream is unsustainable. There are a

1:19:34.173 --> 1:19:37.373
<v Speaker 2>lot of articles like this, I've just chosen the best

1:19:37.373 --> 1:19:42.893
<v Speaker 2>couple I've come across. When the Spanish electricity grid collapsed

1:19:43.133 --> 1:19:47.013
<v Speaker 2>one ordinary Monday in late April, the dreams of renewable

1:19:47.133 --> 1:19:52.533
<v Speaker 2>energy and the green transition team died with it. On

1:19:52.613 --> 1:19:55.373
<v Speaker 2>these pages, Ryan McCann was quick to point out that

1:19:55.853 --> 1:20:01.333
<v Speaker 2>under European Green Deal type political convictions, affordability and reliability

1:20:01.693 --> 1:20:08.693
<v Speaker 2>are wait. Affordability and reliability are not important virtue of

1:20:08.733 --> 1:20:15.653
<v Speaker 2>the European electricity grid. Shoving too much odious excrement onto

1:20:15.693 --> 1:20:20.613
<v Speaker 2>a single electricity grid is bound to break. While the

1:20:20.653 --> 1:20:23.373
<v Speaker 2>story is still unfolding, and the Spanish officials have denied

1:20:23.413 --> 1:20:26.293
<v Speaker 2>that renewables were the cause of the loss in frequency

1:20:26.373 --> 1:20:29.973
<v Speaker 2>that shut down all our electricity for some sixty million

1:20:29.973 --> 1:20:33.973
<v Speaker 2>people in Spain and Portugal, several commentators and the experts

1:20:34.613 --> 1:20:39.253
<v Speaker 2>have now publicly come out and confess that the overwhelming

1:20:39.293 --> 1:20:42.653
<v Speaker 2>reliance on SOLA at the time of the blackout was

1:20:43.093 --> 1:20:48.453
<v Speaker 2>to blame. The literal gas lighting by the increasingly irrelevant

1:20:48.493 --> 1:20:54.733
<v Speaker 2>mainstream corporate media was mostly sad. Amusingly, the author of

1:20:54.773 --> 1:20:59.013
<v Speaker 2>the propaganda piece in Reuters tried to diffuse blame away

1:20:59.053 --> 1:21:02.693
<v Speaker 2>from the green deities by saying that it wasn't the

1:21:02.733 --> 1:21:07.253
<v Speaker 2>renewable energy's fault, but the renewables in the modern grid.

1:21:07.773 --> 1:21:11.853
<v Speaker 2>Then he writes, spelling it the way it sounds. Okay,

1:21:12.853 --> 1:21:16.773
<v Speaker 2>let's back up. Have you heard anything about ESG, environmental,

1:21:16.813 --> 1:21:20.693
<v Speaker 2>social and governance recently? Me neither. There was a remarkable

1:21:20.733 --> 1:21:23.693
<v Speaker 2>turnaround in the corporate use of ESG in just a

1:21:23.733 --> 1:21:28.253
<v Speaker 2>few short years, from being all encompassing, uttered by every

1:21:28.613 --> 1:21:32.733
<v Speaker 2>CEO and shoved down the throats of every employee by

1:21:32.813 --> 1:21:36.573
<v Speaker 2>every HR department, the curse of the Earth at every

1:21:36.613 --> 1:21:43.413
<v Speaker 2>sufficiently large enough company, it's all just vanished almost overnight.

1:21:44.333 --> 1:21:49.093
<v Speaker 2>Nobody cared anymore. One recent survey suggested that only seven

1:21:49.133 --> 1:21:51.373
<v Speaker 2>percent of those who were hired a couple of years

1:21:51.373 --> 1:21:54.853
<v Speaker 2>ago to work on corporate ESG are still employed to

1:21:54.893 --> 1:21:59.493
<v Speaker 2>do that today. At it all happened quietly. Matt Levine

1:22:00.013 --> 1:22:05.013
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Money Stuff Fame has repeatedly hypothesized that ESG,

1:22:05.333 --> 1:22:09.253
<v Speaker 2>like so much else, was a low interest straight phenomenon.

1:22:09.653 --> 1:22:12.933
<v Speaker 2>Once rates and inflation started biting, people were quick to

1:22:12.973 --> 1:22:18.173
<v Speaker 2>abandon virtue signaling environments, social justice efforts. Here's a prediction,

1:22:19.013 --> 1:22:22.773
<v Speaker 2>in light of the Spanish disaster, the green wave or

1:22:22.813 --> 1:22:27.293
<v Speaker 2>the ominous energy transition that shoves solar panels on every

1:22:27.373 --> 1:22:31.693
<v Speaker 2>roof and blankets. The landscape with wind turbines will suffer

1:22:32.213 --> 1:22:35.693
<v Speaker 2>a similar fate. Now that's only a little way into it.

1:22:35.853 --> 1:22:40.653
<v Speaker 2>Mesis Institute is where you'll find it. But that now

1:22:40.773 --> 1:22:47.133
<v Speaker 2>leads to the ultimate. This is a trail we're following it.

1:22:48.653 --> 1:22:53.293
<v Speaker 2>After referring to the Beatles song he Comes the Sun,

1:22:53.653 --> 1:22:57.933
<v Speaker 2>Thaddeus Marcatta writes, standing with both hands extended for a

1:22:58.173 --> 1:23:02.853
<v Speaker 2>fifty million pounds squeeze of the public teat United Kingdom.

1:23:02.933 --> 1:23:07.813
<v Speaker 2>Scientists claim the sun you celebrate in song contributes to

1:23:07.893 --> 1:23:11.533
<v Speaker 2>runaway climate change, and these white robed high priests of

1:23:11.693 --> 1:23:16.893
<v Speaker 2>Perfidious Albion's climate cult have a novel idea to control

1:23:16.893 --> 1:23:22.893
<v Speaker 2>the weather and forestall the impending apocalypse dimming the sun. Apparently,

1:23:22.893 --> 1:23:26.413
<v Speaker 2>for these climate cult dimwits, sunshine on their shoulders makes

1:23:26.453 --> 1:23:31.973
<v Speaker 2>them anything but happy. Per Simon Kent's article in Writbart News,

1:23:32.453 --> 1:23:35.853
<v Speaker 2>this is not the only hair brain scheme. These liberal

1:23:35.853 --> 1:23:41.373
<v Speaker 2>dimwits at ARIA promise for someone else's money. ARIA the

1:23:41.453 --> 1:23:46.053
<v Speaker 2>Advanced Research and Invention Agency. According to the Daily Telegraph,

1:23:46.133 --> 1:23:48.773
<v Speaker 2>a host of possible options for climate control are being

1:23:48.813 --> 1:23:53.853
<v Speaker 2>considered by scientists with government approval. Alongside fifty million pounds

1:23:53.933 --> 1:23:58.653
<v Speaker 2>in taxpayer funds. Scientists are considering outdoor field trials, which

1:23:58.733 --> 1:24:03.493
<v Speaker 2>could include injecting aerosols into the atmosphere or brightening clouds

1:24:03.533 --> 1:24:08.173
<v Speaker 2>to reflect sunshine as a way to prevent runaway climate change.

1:24:08.453 --> 1:24:13.253
<v Speaker 2>Clearly the old school itinerant cloud seeders preying upon the

1:24:13.293 --> 1:24:17.293
<v Speaker 2>angst of drought riddled farmers and their small towns have

1:24:17.453 --> 1:24:21.773
<v Speaker 2>nothing on Aria at its siren song of salvation, for

1:24:21.893 --> 1:24:25.373
<v Speaker 2>they have the entire UK government on board to foot

1:24:25.413 --> 1:24:28.453
<v Speaker 2>the bill for what should be should have been named

1:24:29.133 --> 1:24:34.853
<v Speaker 2>Operation Data Less. I'm not sure I pronounced that correctly,

1:24:34.893 --> 1:24:38.093
<v Speaker 2>but I know who he is, father at Icarus, and

1:24:38.173 --> 1:24:42.653
<v Speaker 2>that is basically where I'm going to. If you're interested,

1:24:42.693 --> 1:24:47.013
<v Speaker 2>you will go to Am Greatness and find it under

1:24:47.053 --> 1:24:50.093
<v Speaker 2>the name of Stadius Marcotta, and at that point we'll

1:24:50.093 --> 1:24:53.653
<v Speaker 2>say that throws us out of the studio. For podcasts

1:24:53.653 --> 1:24:57.253
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and eighty three, it's been very enjoyable. And

1:24:57.333 --> 1:25:00.013
<v Speaker 2>if you do go and look up some of those articles,

1:25:00.093 --> 1:25:02.893
<v Speaker 2>let me know your thoughts. I think it's fairly obvious

1:25:02.933 --> 1:25:07.413
<v Speaker 2>what they will be. Why is it? Do you think?

1:25:07.573 --> 1:25:10.173
<v Speaker 2>This is a question I leave you with, Why is it?

1:25:10.213 --> 1:25:13.893
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that people like mister Watts, people like

1:25:13.933 --> 1:25:17.253
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister, stick their fingers in their ears and

1:25:17.333 --> 1:25:20.453
<v Speaker 2>will not listen to a bar of any alternative. But

1:25:20.573 --> 1:25:26.693
<v Speaker 2>they're corrupted pathway, so latent at Newstalks ATB dot co

1:25:26.813 --> 1:25:30.173
<v Speaker 2>dot Nz, Caroline at Newstalks ATB dot co dot Nz.

1:25:31.053 --> 1:25:34.373
<v Speaker 2>We shall be backwards two eighty four very shortly, So

1:25:34.453 --> 1:25:36.973
<v Speaker 2>thank you for listening and we'll talk soon.

1:25:44.773 --> 1:25:48.413
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from News Talks at B Listen

1:25:48.493 --> 1:25:51.453
<v Speaker 1>live on air or online, and keep our shows with

1:25:51.573 --> 1:25:54.693
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio