WEBVTT - How new zoning plans could change Auckland forever

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Cure. I'm Richard Martin in for Chelsea Daniels and this

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is the Front Page Daily Podcast presented by The New

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Zealand Herald. Auckland is under pressure to make space for

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>two million homes and counselors have little choice in the matter.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>On September twenty fourth, the city's Policy and Planning Committee

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>will decide whether to press ahead with the existing Plan

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Change seventy eight, which allows three story housing across most

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the city, or back a new plan that concentrates

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>apartment blocks up to fifteen stories around key transport hubs.

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Both options have sparked heated debate, from fears of flooding

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and towers overshadowing suburban homes to arguments that the city

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>desperately needs more density to tackle the housing crisis. Minister

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for Arima Reform, Chris Bishop, has made it clear that

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Auckland must provide for growth while promising locals a stronger

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>voice in how it plays out. So what's really at

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>stake for Auckland is and how much power does the

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>council actually have Today? On the front page, New Zealand

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Herald's senior reporter Simon Wilson joins us to break down

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the battle over Auckland's housing future. All right, So first off,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>simon what exactly are these designing changes that have been proposed.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>At the moment. Auckland Council has a plan in place

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 2>that says that it will create the capacity for two

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>million homes in the city over the coming decades. This

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 2>is a requirement of the previous government and has been

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 2>in place with the existing government until now. The existing government, however,

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>told Auckland Council that it could get out of that

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>option if it produced a new plan that's still allowed

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>for two million homes but didn't have the instruction that

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>was there in the labor plan. That or pretty much

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>all property could be subdivided and pretty much all property,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 2>even subdivided could go up to three stories. So the

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Auckland Council has produced a new draft plan change that

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 2>proposes there will be the capacity for those for all

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 2>those homes. It doesn't mean that it'll be built, but

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a capacity. But it focuses the development around train stations,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 2>along arterial roads and in town centers, places where there

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 2>is already the infrastructure for denser development, and at the

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>same time has recognized because the government has instructed it

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 2>to keep the two minion capacity. It's recognized that it

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>has to also allow more density in various other parts

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of the city. So some of the suburbs and some

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>parts of some of the suburbs will have a denser

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>capacity than is currently the case.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And so you mentioned the Labor government putting thing a place.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>That's the Plan Changed seventy eight. It's cored this controversial

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of directive. Parts of that have been progressed, but

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>why is the government looking to replace that?

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 2>So Plan Change seventy eight is based on something called

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the MDRS, the medium Density Residential standards. These were originally

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 2>introduced by Labor and National under the Labor government. It

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 2>was a coalition deal that they would both support them,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and the idea there was that it took the very

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>contentious housing issue away from partisan politics because both sides

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>agreed and recognized that long term development of the city

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>was required and we weren't going to get it if

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>it became too much a question of party squabbling. So

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>that was the plan, but National reneeded on that deal

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>before the last election. So the MDRS was what said

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that basically everything can go up to three stories anywhere

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of opposition to that. The new

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>plan change proposal comes in and under the government saying okay,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>you can, you can be more flexible about it. You

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>can do more density where it's a good idea to

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.839
<v Speaker 2>do it, and not have as much density where it's

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>more problematic.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because this talk of like obviously the Hawkland floods

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>might be a contributing fact. There's been sort of discussion

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>that it's addressing zoning issues and those high risk areas.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>How much of that actually is that.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Is an important part of it. Under the MDRS and

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Plan Chained seventy eight, the rules were that you couldn't

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>downsize the capacity of sections. So where after the Anniversary

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>weekend floods and cyclone Gabriel at the beginning of twenty

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, Auckland Council recognized really clearly that it had

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 2>a whole range of area parts of the city where

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 2>they were at risk of flooding or coastal erosion and

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>it was not a good idea to allow more housing

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 2>in those places. In fact, the reverse that to it. Okay,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 2>regulations prevented the dune zoning of those areas. So the

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 2>new plan allows for that so they have established a

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>whole range of areas, but eighty percent of them are

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 2>on the coast. Auckland has an enormous coastline because it's

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>two coastlines, and the rest are flood areas that are

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>liable to flood. In the Wairau Valley, some parts of

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Henderson and West Auckland margery places that were it is

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 2>simply not appropriate to build.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Aside from just abstaining from the vote, there are two

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>options at place well.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>The proposal in front of council that they will vote

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 2>on next week is to adopt the new plan change.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>The legal language is that they will notify it. It

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean that it becomes the law. It means that

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 2>it then becomes open to public consultation and there is

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 2>a lengthy process for that. If they don't notify the

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>new plan change, then Plan Change seventy eight, the existing one,

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>which creates the three x three housing density situation, that

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>will remain in place. So it's a yes no on

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 2>the new one. But the choice they have counselors are

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>facing between those two options, both of which allow the

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>capacity of two million homes.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought, like Chris Bishop said that you know, promising

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to allow Aucklanders to have their saying that what is

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that process?

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Bishop has announced just this week what the

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>consultation process will be. It was always assumed there would

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 2>be one, but it was unclear exactly what it would be.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>And so what Bishop has made clear now is that

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 2>from early November until just before Christmas there will be

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 2>an open public consultation process. Now early November is significant

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 2>because that is the time when the new council, because

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 2>we've got council elections underway and that's the time when

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the new council will take office. They will be in

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>charge of that consultation. It won't be something happening in

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the election campaign and that's a good

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>thing for everybody. And then that something like six seven

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 2>week period of public consultation will be followed next year

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 2>by an independent hearings panel being established. These are experts

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>in the field and they will hear submissions from They

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 2>will hear the submissions and consider the submissions of everybody

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>who wants to front before them who's submitted in that

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>public consultation process. At the end of this year, and

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 2>that whole process, the Minister says, will probably taken around

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>eighteen months, so there is a very there's a good

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>period of time for the public to have their say

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>formally as part of the process, and then there is

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>a lengthy period of the panel considering that and hearing

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>from that and deciding what to recommend. It is a

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 2>standard process, but it is the Minister's now made it

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>very clear that they're not going to convent that in

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>any way. It will be done properly.

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>As someone who's never engaged in a public forum like that, like,

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>how do those exactly work, that feedback process and how

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>likely is it to actually change it?

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>So there will be a whole range of public submissions

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 2>and it will be as simple as you will, I imagine,

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>going on previous experience, you'll be able to go onto

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 2>the council website and fill in a form or send

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>them a one sentence note saying I object to this

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>or I love this.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Through too.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 2>There will be groups that get lawyers involved and do

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 2>very considered submissions. There will be groups who get planners

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and other experts involved and make their submissions on the

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 2>basis of that, they spend some money, and then the

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Independent Hearings Panel their job is to filter all that

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and assess it and the fact that you, as a

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>member of the public, have done your It costs me nothing,

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>but I have a heartfelt opinion and I want them

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 2>to know about it. Now. They'll recognize that for what

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 2>it is and they'll consider that properly.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Or they're supposed to.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>But they will also, of course have a whole lot

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of that expert submitted material as well to consider, and

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 2>they'll do a balance and the council will report on

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 2>it too. They'll say, we've had this many submissions from

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the public, We've had this many submissions from lobby groups,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 2>We've had this many submissions from the expert areas. These

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>are the opinions that we've had from other parts of

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the democratic process, like the local boards and so on.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 2>They'll report on all that, so we'll be able to

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>see all that, and they'll probably quantify it, so we'll

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 2>know roughly the public opinion was sixty forty this way

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>or that way or whatever it is. They will tell.

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Us do we have any indication sort of which way

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>counsel or general public are leaning between the options?

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's no single view. If you go to a

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 2>public meeting in mud Eden or remu Era parnell as

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 2>I've been doing. You'll hear some very angry locals. If

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>you go out to Mangaee, which I did last weekend,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>you won't find them talking about it at all. They

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Marngoy is a fascinating suburb because it was built after

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 2>the war to house the floods of people migrating to Auckland,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 2>particularly Maori from the north. It was built without with

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>hardly any proper sewage and water services. It was very

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 2>very basic that all came to a head and was

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>very problematic. Margarray in the last ten to fifteen years

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>has been very substantially rebuilt. There are a lot of

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 2>apartments and denser housing. They've got good services. They put

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>it in underground. It cost money to do it because

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 2>they have to do it underground, and it's quite a

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>transformed suburb now down there. In this election, they're not

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about oh my god, we don't want density. They've

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>got it. They like it because it's given them warm, dry,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 2>safe houses to live in and created communities. They're talking

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 2>about other issues, you know, like employment. Those sorts of

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.599
<v Speaker 2>things very different depending on where you go. If you

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>got to fung A Perrara, was there last weekend. Again

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about the inability of infrastructure to help with

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 2>development up there. And it's different again from what's happening

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in the central city.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>When you go to those suburbs where they are getting

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>really fired up about this. What are the concerns that

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>they're raising.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's two main areas of concern. One of

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 2>them is the minister has said that around the railway

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 2>stations that are close to the central city, which he's

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>calling the CRL stations, like what used to be Munden

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>and now to be known as Mongopho in Kingsland and Morningside,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 2>those stations will have the capacity to take buildings at

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>are fifteen stories tall, and so people are worried about that.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>The second concern is not the fifteen stories, but people

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 2>living in leafy suburbs, in nice villas with their neighbors

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and villas are worried that a three or a six

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 2>story apartment block might appear on their street or might

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>appear right next to them. And so that's it, and

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 2>that's actually fundamentally a separate concern. There are two concerns there.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Most quite possibly many people would say, if we're going

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to have growth in the city, people have to live

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>somewhere and putting dents living around railway stations, particularly because

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.239
<v Speaker 2>the CURL will transform the railway network and double its capacity,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a good place to put them. And that's a

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 2>different issue from saying, do we how many apartments do

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>we want in those leafy suburbs, those villa suburbs.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 1>If you like, yeah, it's because you know, we're talking

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>about quite affluent suburbs, and especially you know people outside

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of Auckland as well might be looking at these Champagne problems.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Are these legitimate concerns or are these just like sort

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of not in my backyard.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>It depends whether you're in one of the streets concerned.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Shane Henderson, who is a counselor out at Tiatatu in

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the Henderson in the Waitaker re Ward there, he argues

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>very strongly that Tata two is being completely built out

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>with apartments because those suburbs closer to town, which have

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 2>better services, much better services, particularly transport and water, are

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 2>refusing to allow development there. So you could say that's nimbiaism.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 2>It's easy to say the word nimbiaism. Personally, I think

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that's a good example of it. Not in my backyard.

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>It's quite literal. But of course people who don't want

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the character of where they live changed to say, it's

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 2>not nimbiaism. It's preserving character and heritage, and there are

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 2>values that we need to look after, so you know

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that's where they come from. One of the ironies on

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it is that there was a report that I wrote

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 2>up over the weekend about where the demand in Auckland

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>is for apartment living. The two suburbs or the biggest

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>demand are Anywhere and Mount Eden, and that is largely

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>people who live there now but whose kids have left

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>home or they've retired. They want to downsize. They want

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to stay living in their suburb, but they don't want

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to stay living in the big family home anymore. They

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>want somewhere smaller that is still good, so they want apartments.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>So while family X living in a really nice house

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 2>and Remuera might not want apartment blocks near them, they're

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 2>neighbors who are retiring do want the apartment block because

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>they want to live in it. So that's a inside

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the suburb engine.

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Like we've picked the first five CRL stations, they are

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 3>the most important stations. We just really want to get

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>it into law. That these stations like Kingsland Morning Side

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 3>for example, you know, we really should be having dense

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 3>apartments around there. They're not going to happen straight away.

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not like you're gonna wake up tomorrow and find

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 3>a fifteen story building next to Kingsland train station. But

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 3>over the next few years you will see more buildings

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>like that in these key stations. We've come over the

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 3>top with CRL and actually the men supports that. There

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 3>people sort of saying, well, I'm sort of forcing them

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 3>to do it, and in some senses I am in

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the sense that we're legislating for it. But the Mayor

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>and I've had a lot of discussions around it, and

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 3>he's actually on the press release we issued yesterday around it.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of support from Mayor Brown and

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>many councilors and awkward for it.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the ones around the Transport hubse we

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about the fifteen story potentially apartment blocks. Chris Bishop

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that, you know, the head calls them the CRL

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of things. You know, that's potentially opening soon hopefully,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but is that infrastructure, the transport infrastructure going to be

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>able to support that many more people living around those hubs.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it is one of the things that people say

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 2>in those suburbs where they don't want the density to happen,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>is that infrastructure should happen first. If they don't want

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the density to happen, they probably don't want it at all,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>so they probably don't want the infrastructure either. But actually

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't work like that. Under the old Auckland Unitary

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Plan passed in twenty sixteen, they said in thirty fifty

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 2>years time, we're going to have the capacity to do

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 2>this much housing. They didn't have all the infrastructure in place,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 2>they just knew that over those decades it would be developed.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And that is what's happened, certainly with the CRL and

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>with wastewater also in central Auckland. So the CRL is

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the two really big projects that they've been building,

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.479
<v Speaker 2>and the other one is something called the Central Interceptor,

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>which is a big wastewater pipe that runs right through

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the Isthmus and takes the waste out to Mungery where

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the big plants are. And that will revolutionize the capacity

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of Isthmus Auckland to manage wastewater, particularly when they're a store.

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>It should mean that there is no fecal contamination on

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 2>the beaches any longer. That's a major change. Maline is

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the suburbs that will directly benefit from that.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>So that infrastructure is there, but in places where it

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 2>more is needed. Partell is a good example. Parnell pipes

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 2>have burst recently, quite famously. There is a plan. Water

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Care has a major plan for the whole city in

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>fact of when it's going to build the new infrastructure,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's all staged according to what they understand the

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 2>demand to be. So that's underway. It's not like the

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 2>council's doing nothing.

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>It's funny, like we're talking about all these different suburbs

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and like it seems that you look at the maps

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>of the proposed changes and it's like they've just circled

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>an entire suburb. Gone, Yeah, the apartments can go here,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the three stories can go here, how much like Nuance

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is normally Yeah, something like that.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 2>So you are right. The government put the council on

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a very strict timetable to get those new maps done.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>And some of them are AI generated and there are

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 2>mistakes of them. There are places in those plans where

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 2>you go that's clearly the map makers or AI whoever

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>it was or whatever it was, assumed that was a

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>bigger wider road than it is. You're just not going

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to be able to carry sustain that many people living

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>on it. So those things will change the consultation that

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 2>we will see next week when the Council comes back

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to decide on the new plan change, there will be

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>revisions to those maps, but there'll be more. The notification

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 2>period is one of the reasons for it is it

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 2>allows everybody to say you've got it wrong here, and

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>for the Council to have a really good, careful look

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>at that and to modify the plans accordingly. So there

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>will be changes that Meghan Tyler, who's the Council's Chief

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Planning officer, she says, you know, that's just the normal process.

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we'll do it because that's what we always

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>do when we have plan changes. So we can expect

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that happening as well.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So with these maps, though I've read about there are

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>overlays which then override what's been that's right.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 2>One of the examples of an overlay is flood risk,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 2>which you might say this suburb is going to be

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>zoned for, or this part of the suburb is going

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 2>to be zoned for six story apartments because it's got

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>an arteria road running through it. But actually in that

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 2>part of it it's prone to flooding there, so there'll

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>be an overlay that protects that from development, and that

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>is what's called a special character overlay. Another kind of

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>special character overlay, which is much more valued by many people,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>is where the housing is judged to have a particular

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 2>historic value. I suppose it might not be a historic

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>it be it might be a subdivision of extremely exciting

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 2>architecturally designed new places that want that are going to

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>be preserved, But actually that's not how it works in reality. Villas,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>bungalows and other historic places where there's a concentration of

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 2>historic housing that gets an overlay on it. And the

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 2>best example in Auckland is Devenport. Devenport, apart from navy buildings,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 2>has no buildings of any height at all. There's an

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 2>overlay over there. No one's been allowed to build anything,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 2>so it's just the old houses.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And how do these overlays come into it?

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 2>So what that means is if you think it a

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>think of a place like the Mungofold station or the

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 2>Kingston Railway station, there are places near those stations that

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>are within the walkable areas which have a concentration of

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>historic housing, and so there's a ring on the map

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 2>if you like that says okay, in those areas, you're

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>not going to have the density requirements that places outside

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>that ring will be subjected to. There are fewer special

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Character areas is preserving historic housing in the new plan

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 2>change than there were in Plan Change seventy eight. I

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 2>think it's something like fifteen hundred fewer homes. Therefore, there

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 2>is concern that the city could lose a number of

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>those historic homes. When I say historic, I live in

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>one of them. Now. I live in a special Character

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>area where actually in our street almost all the houses

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>are workers cottages. They were built in the nineteenth century.

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 2>They're very simple, but over the years people have put

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 2>false or new verandas on them in the colonial style.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>My house had the previous owners to us did that.

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>It looks very pretty, but it's fake, as the verandas

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>on most of my neighbours' houses. They are fake too.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>But the council went down that street and went this

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 2>is lovely and called it a special character So that

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 2>limits the development on our street, which is I think

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of weird. Which is not to say that genuine

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 2>villa streets, as there are many in Mount Eden and

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Pontsybu Graylin, Devenport, et cetera, not to say that they

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 2>they are the same, they villa streets of villa streets.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, in Mount Eden, you drive around Mount Eden,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you will see a lot of apartment blocks already, which

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 2>happened in the seventies, and a lot of what's called

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 2>sausage flats, where because the height limit was in place,

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>developers built just to one or two stories, and there's

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of apartments in a row back from

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the street, and they're called sausage flats in the sense

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that they look like a six pack of sausages there

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 2>sitting next to each other, and you won't have any

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>green space, a very small exactly, whereas if if that

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>had been built as a sex story apartment block, you

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 2>could have had a park around it, you know, for

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the for the residents. So that's one of the reasons

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 2>why people are saying, actually, sausage flats is not a

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 2>good way to develop us up. The other factor that

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 2>is significant in this is what's called walkable catchments. So

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 2>around the city center Auckland City Center there is a

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 2>twelve hundred meter walkable catchment. Effectively, they've said if you

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 2>can walk, if it's fifteen minute walk from downtown, then

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 2>you can build densely in that area. And for the

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 2>railway stations it's an eight hundred meta radius for a

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>ten minute walk. It's not an absolute radius, it's not

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 2>just a circle. They looked at the geography, they looked

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 2>at the things like where the railway lines are. You

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>can't just walk across a railway line, of course, and

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 2>a good example of that is Kingston Railway station, where

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 2>if it was just a circle, the walkable catchment would

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 2>include Great North Road on the other side of the motorway.

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 2>On the west side of the motorway, it doesn't because

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a big dip and it's a longer walk. So

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the walkable catchmentsps on the railway station side of the motorway.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>So they did take account of all that. But in

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 2>those walkable catchments it will be possible to build more

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 2>densely because those are the places where they want people

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 2>to live close to the train station. Unless there's a

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 2>special character over it's complicated.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Finally, I just want to circle back to something at

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the start. Might be sound quite surprising to hear this

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>number of two million homes, but that's not actually like

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a promise of we're going to build two million homes.

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 2>That's correct, and it's not too many more either, as

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 2>many people have been saying. I find one of the

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 2>ways that's quite useful to look at it is to think,

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>if the council knows that we're going to build, let's

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 2>say we're going to build twenty thousand new homes a year.

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>In fact, they've never got to that. They've got to eighteen,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 2>and the peak year, which is twenty twenty three, slipped

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>back a bit now. I think it's fourteen at the moment.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 2>But let's say twenty. Let's say the economy picks up,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>growth occurs, and they're doing twenty. That will mean over

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty years there's something like six hundred thousand new homes,

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>not the two million. But if they only zoned for

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 2>six hundred thousand new homes over the next thirty years,

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 2>that would mean that every homeowner, every property owner, whether

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>you're a developer or just living in your own home,

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>would be required to build to the maximum the zoning

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 2>allows on that section. We would tell you own your section,

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's zoned for three stories, so you've got to

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 2>build three stories. You know. We would tell a developer, sorry,

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 2>you can't put three story townhouses there. We want you

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 2>to build a six story apartment block there. And the

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 2>developer would say, it's my land. I can do this

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the way I want to because it's my land. And

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>they might have a very good reason for not putting

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 2>six stories in because that's more expensive. You've got to

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 2>build a stronger building, you've got to put in lifts,

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 2>you've got to put in fire sprinklers and other things.

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 2>It's a more expensive proposition. Some developers don't have the

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 2>cash flow or don't want to take the risk to

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>do that. We don't live in a country where people

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>can be told what to do with their property in

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 2>that way. So that's why there's a much bigger capacity

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>than we're going to need, so that choices exist for

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 2>property owners. And it also indicates that over time, although

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>there will be more density, it absolutely does not mean

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>there will be density everywhere.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you so much for joining. I shan't keep

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you any longer. Yeah, I know, You're going to have

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a very busy week next week dealing.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 2>With this great questions.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for joining us. That's it for

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this episode of the Front Page. You can read more

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>about today's stories and extensive news coverage at inzidherld dot

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>co dot z. The Front Page is produced by Jane Ye.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Richard Martin. Subscribe to The Front Page on iHeartRadio

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for another look behind the headlines.