1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,080 Speaker 1: Cam Satter say what you like about him. He can 2 00:00:02,120 --> 00:00:04,280 Speaker 1: certainly write. His head is ups and downs. He's paid 3 00:00:04,280 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: for some bad behavior, but he has good flow in 4 00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:08,880 Speaker 1: his writing. He always had a good contact book. But 5 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:11,400 Speaker 1: whether those contacts still talk to him as anybody's guess. 6 00:00:11,440 --> 00:00:15,200 Speaker 1: But anyway, he's now renamed Whale Oil to a website 7 00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:18,280 Speaker 1: called good Oil, and yesterday he wrote a think piece 8 00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:23,040 Speaker 1: called the coming National Coup. He reckons Christopher Luckson's continued 9 00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:26,480 Speaker 1: bad numbers means the National Party is now seriously talking 10 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 1: about replacing him as leader. Even cams and on game 11 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:33,360 Speaker 1: these days, he claims sources inside caucus say that Luxon 12 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: has three months to turn around his numbers. He claims 13 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 1: that women don't like Luxon, people who believe in anything 14 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:43,760 Speaker 1: don't like Christopher because nobody knows what he believes. Kam 15 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,519 Speaker 1: Satter says his coalition partners know what they believe, and 16 00:00:46,560 --> 00:00:48,680 Speaker 1: he says the free marketeers can go with Act, the 17 00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:50,879 Speaker 1: Nationalists can go with New Zealand first, so who's going 18 00:00:50,920 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: to go with Christopher? He says the opposition can smell blood, 19 00:00:54,240 --> 00:00:56,560 Speaker 1: and then he lumps the media into the opposition camp, 20 00:00:56,720 --> 00:00:58,639 Speaker 1: even though of course he is acting like an opposition 21 00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:02,240 Speaker 1: right now with this opinion, but slowly Christopher Luxon seems 22 00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:04,400 Speaker 1: to be losing the support of the center right according 23 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:06,320 Speaker 1: to cam Slater, not that he had much in the 24 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:08,560 Speaker 1: first place. To be fair, he was never given a 25 00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:11,960 Speaker 1: honeymoon period. I think the electric could see that he 26 00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:16,199 Speaker 1: had a very performative nature in his politics. But these 27 00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 1: are easy editorials to write, and everyone can point out 28 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:24,000 Speaker 1: the flaws and the problems with anything. Only the truly 29 00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 1: talented can provide a solution. So if the problem as 30 00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 1: Christopher Luxen, what is the answer? Is it Willis? Is 31 00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:36,479 Speaker 1: it Bishop? Is it Stamford or is it Simeon? There 32 00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:38,959 Speaker 1: the next four on the list. You want to go deeper? 33 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 1: Would Mitchell, Goldsmith or Collins be any better than Christopher Luxon? 34 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:48,440 Speaker 1: Fkam is correct and a coup is coming inside the 35 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:52,120 Speaker 1: next three months? Could that be National shooting itself in 36 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:55,640 Speaker 1: the foot? Well, of course it is. Did they learn 37 00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 1: nothing from all the long years in opposition where they 38 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 1: chopped and changed their leader without going forward in any way, 39 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 1: shape or form. For more from early edition with Ryan Bridge, 40 00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 1: listen live to news talks it be from five am weekdays, 41 00:02:09,240 --> 00:02:11,320 Speaker 1: or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio,