WEBVTT - Will sharing data really improve banking? Yes

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Open banking is here, or at least the first real

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>version of it, with New Zealand's four biggest banks and

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>zed ASB B and Z and Westpac now required to

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>share the customer's data with trusted third parties with the

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>customer's authorization.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it promises to open up innovation in everything

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 2>from faster, more convenient retail and e commerce payments to

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 2>new budgeting and investment apps.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It could take a lot of hassle out of the

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>process of applying for a loan or mortgage, but.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Will open banking really unlock the competition our highly concentrated

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and vastly profitable banking sector needs.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>This week on the Business of Tech powered by two

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Degrees Business, we took to two entrepreneurs on the frontlines

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of open banking, hoping to take advantage of regulatory changes

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to increase choice and competition in financial services.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 3>And the UK, it took a while for uptake off

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>the open banking regime and certainly the same in Australia.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I think New Zealand's going to be much faster. The

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>customer product data built was really well designed and an

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 3>our view as a stands today is going to be great.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Eventually woman that was comin foundation later that everyone can

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 4>build upon and you can start thinking about, well, what

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 4>of the care you make the lines that could really

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 4>generate value, Like we're actually solving a problem that's value where.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 5>People are willing to pay for more on open banking.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Coming up with our featured guests Blink Pays, Adrian Smith

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and AKA Who's Josh Daniel shortly, but.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>First we look at some of the big tech stories

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>making headlines this week, and we start with Harold Tech

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>editor Chris Keel's Tech Insider piece very interesting about Soul

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Machines are really promising, New Zealand's startup founded by Greg

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Cross and Mark Sagar. And just as a bit of background,

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Soul Machines came up with what they call it a

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>digital brain. This was Mark Saga who came out of

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where a digital So the idea was to take this

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>incredible intelligence they created and use it to feed digital

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>avatars that could have really sensible conversations in a customer

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>service context. So we saw a lot of pilot projects

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>pop up with the likes of A and Z and

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes bend And in New Zealand, and it appears as

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>though both those founders, Greg cross Mark Sager are actually

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gone from Soul Machines.

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Bin Yeah, operationally and the directorship. They've both stepped back.

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 2>They're on an advisory role now, whatever you want to

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 2>make of that. If you are adjacent to the industry

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>as we are, you're kind of would have been hearing

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 2>these rumblings around Soul Machines for some time now that

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>it seems to have been struggling to find its feet

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in the new world of AI. And that's kind of

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>what Chris Keel's story goes into the details of what

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 2>actually seems to have happened there. The question is that

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>people are asking is whether they were kind of disrupted

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>by generative AI, or whether they the tech was actually

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 2>more flash than bang, whether it actually seemed like it

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 2>was going to be really valuable to a lot of

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>consumers but ultimately just wasn't really what people were looking

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 2>for or weren't ready for.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps, and I was sort of expecting by now we

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>would be interacting with these digital avatars which you can

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>actually see rather than just talk to, like Siri or Alexa.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought they'd be everywhere now, but they're not. And

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in the intervening few years since Solar Machines really got

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>going on these digital avatars. We've seen the rise of

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>generative AI, which Solar Machines has embraced. So they are

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>using chat GPT to power some of their sort of

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>off the shelf bots that you can buy relatively cheaply

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to run your customer service. The big question mark is

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>over the digital brain technology. Is it too expensive, is

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it too cumbersome to use? Is it actually still valuable?

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And it may well be, but so Machines appear to

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be running out of money. You wrote a story this

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>week looking at the financial statements. They've got cash and

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>TERMB deposits of twelve point three million dollars with net

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>cash outflows of thirty eight point one million for the

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>year ending March thirty one.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was last year, twenty twenty three, So that

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>was what they had then and it's been twelve months

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>since then. That that's probably why they've reduced their head

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>count from two hundred and fifty three to seventy in

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>that time.

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And we haven't heard anything about a significant new injection

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of funding, have we?

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 2>No, And again in that in Chris Kill's article he

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>talks about them potentially it looks like they've tried to

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>whether that was not as successful as they hoped, or

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>whether they couldn't quite get that off the ground, it's

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 2>not really obvious to us what actually happened. So yeah,

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>keeping an eye on things, and hopefully we'll hear something

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a little more detailed from either the company's new CEO

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 2>or somebody soon, because they're keeping their cards very close

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to their chest at the moment.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see this company really succeed in its

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>original mission, which sounded fantastic and drew on some great technology,

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and they've put a lot of work into this all

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the way since twenty sixteen, I think when they set

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>out on this venture. But is this unfortunately going to

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be a victim of this disruptive generative AI revolution where

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>things that were very expensive and complex to create with

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>suddenly with natural language processing and large language models and

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>training those models, you can arrive at something as good

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for a fraction of the price. That's the concern.

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>You also have to look at just the cost to

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 2>open AI of training those models. It's billions of dollars,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and did zull Machine ever have those kinds of Microsoft

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>level pockets to be able to do something that would

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>ever challenge that level. They didn't really, but yeah, it

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>is difficult to know how big the general audience is

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 2>for face to face chatbots. Like I struggle to see

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>the value. And I was speaking to a former podcast guest,

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Tim Warren the other day about this, and one of

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the things he said to me, it's difficult when you're

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>facing a generation that doesn't even want to pick up

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the phone and have a call to try and convince

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 2>them to have conversations with digital people.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And we were at an event with the Amazon

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Australia New Zealand people last week and I was asking

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one of them when to Genai sort of coming to

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Alexa, and they said, it is coming, you know,

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>watch out, it's not far away. So that will be

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the big test. I think at the moment they're not

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>very useful those voice assistants really for anything other than

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>asking what the weather is or what's in my calendar.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But if they can use those large language models to

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>deliver much more lifelike and an intuitive answers to less

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>structured questions, that will be a game changer. But do

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I need a digital representation of a person on a

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>screen fronting that for me personally. No, maybe millennials and

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>gen z don't give us stuff about that. They just

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>want to get a really good answer to their question,

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and if it's speaking into their phone, they're happy to

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing I guess is that you know,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of hype for the metaverse that

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 2>some machines tried to ride there for a while, but

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately that was a hype train without rails and didn't

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>gat very far.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Looking a bit more broadly at AI, interesting report

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>from Judith Collin's office as the Minister of Science, Technology

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and Innovation starting to give us a little bit of

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>an idea as to where she is directing the government

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to take artificial intelligence, both from a regulation point of view,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but also trying to promote update offen.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they proactively released a cabinet paper that Judith Collins

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 2>submitted basically talking about how she wants to try and

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 2>get New Zealand using AI. A big part of it

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 2>for the private industry is that she they basically want

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>to say, don't be stressed about future regulations.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 5>You can go and start playing now.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take a light touch regulation and if

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>anything crops up outside of the current legal frameworks.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 5>Then we'll address that when it happens.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>So maybe that will have the intended effect and get

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 2>people a little bit more excited to dive in and

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 2>use it. I don't know if anybody was sitting there

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>with their finger hovering over a button just waiting for

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the regulatory nod from government or not, but maybe they were.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So this really carries on to theme I think from

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the National Party and then with Judith Collins as sort

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of Technology Minister and really passionate about AI light touch,

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>risk based approach to AIG, which is what the EU

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>has done, but what will happen here nowhere near is prescriptive?

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense to me, but there's just a lot

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of gray areas in our privacy law and our copyright law,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and what she's basically saying is where existing legislation can

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with this, we will build on that if things

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>need to be tweaked, but we're not really looking at

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole new regime which some countries and the European

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Union have actually gone and introduced. So she's signaling very

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>much we're not going to be as heavy handed on that.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess the other thing the paper flags is a

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>role for GCD government chief Digital Officer who we had

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.719
<v Speaker 1>on the show back last year. Paul James is in

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that role at the moment. She's basically signaling to that office,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we need to get the ball rolling here. You're going

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to coordinate things across government when it comes to the

0:09:58.440 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>uptake of AI.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 2>She refers to strong leadership as needed, and I guess

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>she is putting her faith in Paul James to be

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>that strong leader and to maybe establish a strong leadership

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>team as well hopefully that can get together and do this.

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 2>She wants to get all the different portfolios to basically

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>come back and offer some ideas about how they could

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 2>potentially use artificial intelligence to improve the public services that

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>they offer, and then put those together and create a

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 2>cross portfolio working group headed by the Chief Digital Officer

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 2>to start getting that together basically to start thinking about

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>how they could possibly integrate some AI to improve public services.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So it's a start, you know, it is a start,

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and hopefully it doesn't end up in bureaucratic quagmire.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, relatively little in there about how to really jump

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>start use of AI across the economy in a private sector.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they just haven't really got to grips with

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>how sort of mb AS, the agency responsible for that

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff, would go about it. Other countries have

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>set up, for instance, the National Center for AI and

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Australia to really push that along. The UK is going

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>big on that, as is the us SO question Mike

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>over that, particularly when we don't really have a strong

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>digital strategy at the moment. There is other stuff that

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is happening that is useful. The AI Forum put out

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>their Blueprint for AI in r Tauro last week, so

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's good and they suggested a handful of

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>industries we should really focus on for AI. So and

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the more appropriate place for that to come from,

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>which is them to tell government, if you really want

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 1>to help us, this is the areas you should focus on.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Another interesting report out last week from the Institute of

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Directors really useful guide for governing AI boards and business

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>leaders actually incorporating it into their existing frameworks for governance

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>rather than trying to create a whole new one. So

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there's pragmatic stuff. There's a lot of good stuff actually

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>happening in New Zealand. It's probably not happening quickly enough.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>To enable what we need to make the most of

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this technology. But in some ways it's good that we're

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>just not under public pressure or some need to do

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>something jumping straight to regulation that may not be fit

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for purpose down to track.

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah it's a slow start, but it's a start.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Now. Open banking quietly arrived officially on May thirty, with

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>our four big banks now required to run secure channels

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to third parties such as FinTechs and online retailers, allowing

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>customer account and transaction data to be shared.

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a real milestone for the fintech sector, which is

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 2>looking at the huge profitability of our big banks and

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 2>seeing ample scope. It takes some market share, if not

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 2>in the core business of taking deposits and issuing loans,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 2>at least in the financial services that wrap around the banks,

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 2>such as online payments.

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We've been slow to join the open banking party. Other

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>countries are frankly way ahead, but finally been we seem

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to have progress on open banking APIs or application programming interfaces,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Big four playing ball and Kiwi Bank also

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>set to join the open banking regime from twenty twenty six.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's coming.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It's finally kind of here in a way, it's really

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 2>relying on the Consumer Product Bill which was recently read

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 2>before it actually gets into force legislatively. But Payments in

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand and its API center have actually been doing

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 2>quite a good job at pushing ahead with the kind

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 2>of with the legislation there in the in the background,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 2>saying it's coming, so let's get working on it now.

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 2>And they're the ones that have set these timeframes just

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 2>for the big four banks moment, but they do have

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>about a ninety five percent share of the market in

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand, so it's pretty pretty dominant anyway.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So take us through this ben there are a whole

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of startups out there that are just chomping at

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the bit to get hold of customer data from banks

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in an accessible format that allows them to do what exactly.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>What are some of these companies and what are the

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sorts of services they're looking to jump on the open

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>banking bandwagon to deliver to kiwis.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>You've got the likes of blink pay, who we're going

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>to speak to Adrian Smith shortly from blink pay quick Pay.

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>They similar to blink pay, where they are a payments provider,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>so they can allow merchants to quickly and easily take

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>payments directly from people's bank accounts using an API. You've

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 2>got the likes of Akoho, So they're open banking, but

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 2>they are actually not actually using APIs at the moment.

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>You'll hear a bit about that from Josh Daniel in

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the conversation. They use an older form of open banking

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>called screen scraping, which is a little bit controversial. And

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>then you've got the likes of Pocketsmith. They help with budgeting.

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 2>They provide you with insight into your bank accounts so

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>you can see you where your money's being spent, and

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>you can set budgets for things and do all kinds

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>of clever stuff. So while it sounds kind of boring

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>and dull and kind of like what's the point of

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it all, the reality is is that the banks have

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a huge amount of your data. This is data that

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 2>is about you, about the stuff that you have been

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>spending money on.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>We've sort of got Stockholm syndrome. I think in New Zealand.

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>We've been told that, you know, you need to have

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a stable banking system, so they cane us on fees,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but at least it's a stable system and your bank

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to collapse and take all your money. But

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the consequence of that is we just haven't seen the

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>innovation in new services. It's not until you go to

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Singapore or China or even a UK and you go,

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>my god, look at the diversity of players. They are

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger markets, but just the sorts of services that they're

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>offering a lot of them at based, very accessible convenience

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>services that we just don't really have here. And I

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's when people realize, wow, we're so far behind

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in New Zealand. We were ahead with f poss and

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the eighties, but we have slipped behind. So

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what we definitely need to address. That's what the

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>legislation is aimed at. So here's Ben's interview with a

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>car who's Josh Daniel and Blink Pays Adrian Smith. Who

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>are really going to articulate for us exactly what the

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>promises of open banking.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Kyodo, Hello, welcome to the Business of Tech Josh and Adrian.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 5>How's it going well, Kyoder?

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Very good, good, Thank you so much for joining us.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>So you guys are both on the third party provider side,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of this open banking progression that we've been slowly pushing

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 2>towards over the last several years. So do you want

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>to just very quickly give us a quick bit of

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 2>information about what your companies do, Adrian, Oh.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, So blink pay we position ourselves as a

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 4>paytech because that was the first thing that has been

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 4>building open banking standards in the payment initiation APIs. But

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 4>now the account information APIs are coming along, we're going

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.959
<v Speaker 4>to be repositioning ourselves as an integration player. And last

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 4>so not too the similar to the work that are

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 4>coding with Josh and Josh ok.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So Kahu is an open finance intermediary. We focus

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 3>our work on the New Zealand market only, so we

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 3>provide data integrations with New Zealand banks and other financial

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 3>service providers. So what we do is enable people building

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 3>consumer products to use a single API for access to

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 3>those data integrations. And then there are other parts of

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 3>our service that do things like transaction and Richmond other

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>things like that that we think that at the Ushalaya.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Cool, thanks so much. So API actually is what we're

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be starting a conversation with. So the technically

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>it stands for Application Programming Interface, I believe. But what

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 2>that basically means is it's a piece of software that

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>allows two different pieces of software to.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Share data kind of freely.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 2>That's an oversimplification obviously, but that's kind of been the

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 2>main focus, I guess in recent times for open banking.

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 2>On May thirty we saw one standard come in for APIs.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>We've got another one coming in November. So the May

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>thirty one was about payments. So what has that offered

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 2>in terms of capability for people who can plug into

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>those APIs.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes. So one of the really cool things about the

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 4>Open Banking Paymentiation APIs is if you're connected to a

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 4>third party, like a payment gateway, you can enable your

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 4>customers to pay directly buy from their own bank accounts

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 4>and you know, as an alternative means to using cards

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 4>to make those payments in the e commerce space. And

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 4>as a consequence, because we're going outside of the card

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 4>scheme rails, the cost profile is materially lower than if

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 4>you're going by the card schemes. And I'm sure we

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 4>all recently saw that paper from ComCom that highlighted that

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Bees and MasterCard charge about ninety five billion annually in

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 4>card payments and for the tune of about a billion

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.959
<v Speaker 4>dollars in fees. So the open banking standard and the

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 4>fee structures with the banks are materially lower than that,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 4>and so we have the opportunity and ability to offer

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the everyday kiwis in New Zealanders a lower price point

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 4>in order to process payments and not go into debt

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 4>for that.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 5>Got cha, Josh, anything to add to that.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I guess just to set the scene a little more,

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 3>a car who operates with unregulated forms of open banking

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 3>for the last three and a half years. We launched

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 3>because we felt that the regulation was coming soon and

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 3>it's taken longer than we expected. But the idea was,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 3>let's get things moving and evolve into the purpose built

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>regulation which looks like is coming in New Zealand. So

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 3>what we do is provide data and payment connectivity. And

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 3>we have over fifty customers that made from governments, corporates

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to FinTechs, and that's a range of enduring data consents,

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>one off data consents, and enduring payment consents. The only

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 3>thing we don't do is a one off payment consent.

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 3>So this first release on the thirtieth of May from

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 3>the Big four Banks is a one off payment consent API,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 3>which is the only functionality that we don't provide, So

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 3>this first release wasn't relevant to us that looking a

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 3>head to the next release on thirtieth November, which was

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 3>a one off and enduring data consent API, that is

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 3>where for the Big four banks, their first release will

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 3>enable functionality for we think at least six of our

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.239
<v Speaker 3>customers depending on what gets delivered in that release, out

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 3>of the optional functionality.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mean the data that it's going

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 2>to be accessible? What is this transaction data that's supposedly

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>so useful?

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the canonical example in New Zealand

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 3>is zero, where if you use zero, you want your

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>transaction data to be hooked up into the accounting software

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and you don't want to manually import it each time

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 3>you want to do bank reconciliation and zero. So there's

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 3>a whole lot of dasy use cases like that where

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 3>you as a consumer might want to grant access to

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 3>some third party service. So some of the common ones

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>are budgeting tools. So if you allow your data to

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 3>automatically flow in, a historical budget can be automatically generated

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and then you can extrapolate that forward to make budgeting

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 3>more accessible and easier to tract to. You could do

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 3>nit worth tracking, which basically aggregates the balances of your

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>financial accounts and allows you to see that high level

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 3>view of how you're tracking over time accounting and text

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 3>as a really common one. One that's been in the

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 3>news recently is Prosaic, which has a tool for business

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>owners to find tax deductible expenses and then make it

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 3>easier to similar to claim to IID. So all of

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 3>these use cases require financial data. That's the customer's data,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 3>and what open banking does is make it autable or

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 3>easily portable. And that could be a one off access

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>to a third party, or it could be an ongoing

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 3>access which people are familiar with from accounting software or

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 3>personal finance software.

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of where we're at. But I think

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>it's also worth mentioning that this is only for the

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 2>big four.

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 5>Banks at the moment.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 2>There are many banks across New Zealand, although I think

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 2>it's what is it, ninety five percent of the population

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 2>are covered by those big four, so it's a big swath.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But then we're also seeing some laggards and I guess. Also,

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the question is with these API timeframes that we've got

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 2>May and then November and then maybe another six months

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 2>or the next one, is that getting us where we

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 2>need to be quick enough is leaving provision for other

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>banks to kind of slowly catch up. Does that make

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 2>sense as well?

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 4>So the big four banks, depending on your definition, they

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 4>have anywhere from eighty five to ninety percent of the

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 4>bank to New Zealand populace. And from our perspective, for

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 4>any network to work and feed on through the platform revolution,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 4>it's all our network effects. And in our case in

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand, ninety nine percent of New Zealand is a bank.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 4>And so for a network to really take off, obviously

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 4>having the full major banks is a really good starting point.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 4>But actually we want everyone to be included and involved,

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 4>right because the value of a network comes from its participants.

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 4>So I remember when I was at university, I was

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 4>one of the first mugs to get a mobile phone

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 4>and have I guess how many people like a call?

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 4>No one, I was the only one, so that netwok

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 4>wasn't worth crack then, But then fast forwards, today everyone's

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 4>in a smartphone, right, so the more people on the network,

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the more valuable it becomes. And so for us, that's

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 4>a pretty interesting point. And I think the other really

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 4>interesting point around major banks and sort of the other

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 4>banks and laggards is one of the really interesting things

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 4>that we've observed in the Zealand context is all it

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 4>takes for one major provider API provider to not want

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 4>to participate and it can nobble the whole thing because

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 4>when you go out and you speak to in our

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 4>case we're B to B two C, so we're other businesses.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 4>We talk to them, we saill say, hey, this new thing,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 4>it's magic du du da and they say, oh, well

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 4>call us from the Big four on and you're like, ah, okay,

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 4>well we're trying. And so that's part of the challenge

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 4>is that's the first objection always raised ball us in

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 4>the Big four on right, because as a business you

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 4>can understand the perspective. I don't want to have to

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 4>only get a partial solution if I'm going to commit

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 4>time of resources to a thing.

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I think we need to acknowledge that in the current environment,

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 3>there is nothing compelling the banks to offer API services

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 3>to third parties. It is voluntary, and there is regulation

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 3>coming that will compel data holders to provide these services,

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 3>but at the moment there is nothing. So if we

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 3>waited for the slowest bank to be part of this,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>it just wouldn't happen until there is regulation. So if

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>you think about this from a consumer's perspective, the upgrade

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>that is coming from these purpose built APIs. The main

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 3>upgrade is that you can authenticate directly with your bank

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 3>and grant the consent there rather than doing that authentication

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 3>via a third party. And so we don't actually need

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>all the banks to have these services available to start

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 3>getting the benefits. Even if one bank is ready and

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 3>you can switch that customer across to the purpose built API,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>those customers of that bank will have a better experience.

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 3>So we can do this on a bank by bank basis,

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 3>and for each bank integration you just upgrade to the

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 3>best API that is available, so it makes it okay

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 3>to do this in an editative way. I think the

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 3>thing we need to be in mind, though, is that

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the functionality that these APIs do can only deliver to

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>so many use cases, and so we shouldn't expect this

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 3>thirty May release in the standing November release to change

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the world because the functionality that's available is not at

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 3>parasy with what's a market already. So there are some

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 3>use cases that will not be able to migrate, yet

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 3>they will come at a later stage when iterations on

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 3>those APIs have been delivered. So we always try to

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>just be sober about expectations because we can't expect a

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 3>whole lot to take off if the APIs themselves can't

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 3>deliver everything that's in market already.

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So if I could just respond to that and

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 4>challenge that the statement of the wouldn't happen, which is

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 4>a bit of an absolute statement, because I'm happy to

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 4>report that as of this afternoon we signed the last

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 4>of the big four major banks.

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations on the commercial agreement.

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So there's a scuttle but that it requires regulation

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 4>to get this done, and that's how it worked in

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 4>the other jurisdictions I know where I did this. In

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 4>the UK, the regulator says, you nine go together, play nice.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 4>If you don't, we'll beach out. Okay, fine, And so

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 4>it's been different not having that regulatory stick to move

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 4>every and along. So, as Josh alluded to, right, there's

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 4>going to be folks in the caravan to move slower

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 4>than others, and if you're trying to do it together,

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty hard to do it if they are slower members.

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 4>But what I would say at all that, though, is

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 4>we got there without the regulatory stick. It may not

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 4>as been as quicker or as easy it would have liked,

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 4>but we've got them there.

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean, yes, you did in a way.

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 2>But I would say that the banks have known that

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>there was the regulatory stick hovering just out of frame

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 2>for some time. So while that the stick wasn't necessarily

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 2>descending fast, it definitely may have been in their peripheral.

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh absolutely, And I'm pretty certain that's what's managed because

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 4>like the thirty may date, setting that to the side,

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 4>like as a thing, what it did was it meant

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 4>the four major banks all arrived at that date pretty

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 4>much at the same time. So one of the reasons

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 4>why we've been pretty quiet the last six seven weeks

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 4>is because we've been doing four integrations and four commercial negotiations.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 4>It's been quite the to do. But having that line

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 4>in the sand caused a reaction and a response which

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 4>has actually been I think going to be net beneficial

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 4>once everyone starts to join in and get involved.

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Now so does that make you then does that make

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Blink Pay the first third party outside of Worldline, which

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>has had them for some time to have API agreements

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 2>with all four of the big banks.

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's correct. Although what I would say though, is

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 4>in this scenario, Worldline are the to AKNA and the

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 4>to a kind of ten relation, we are the juniors,

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 4>like Full Credit. They spent seven or eight years getting

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 4>the four major banks right, and I can understand the

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 4>concern of hey, this is this is ever going to happen,

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 4>and so we've got them there in three and so

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 4>we feel very fortunate to have done so, and we

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 4>think because of industry efforts as well as regularly oversight,

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 4>even though there hasn't been a really hard push, that's

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 4>allowed us to get there at less than half the

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 4>time that wild One got there.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Great, let's talk a little bit now about I guess

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>what you referred to before, Josh as a unregulated open banking,

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think the common parlance for it is screen scraping, right,

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 2>which is where you have a tool that can access

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>a bank account on behalf of a customer, and it

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 2>can read the information on that online banking and then

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>make changes et cetera, et cetera. The benefits that are

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 2>from that, and it's something that was talked a little

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 2>bit about in the Australian Open Banking Palava, which will

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>cover shortly, but it is that it's it's free, There

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>are no transaction fees, no any other kind of fees

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>that go.

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 5>With it, and it seems to work.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 2>And there is a conversation maybe about how secure it

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>actually is, but there have been people have pointed out

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>there have been no major breaches due to screen scraping,

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 2>So why then do we need APIs if we have

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a functional, serviceable approach.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, yeah, it's a good question, and I guess to

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 3>give context to the uptake.

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, in New.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Zealand there are more than a million kiwis that would

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 3>use in a form of unregulated open banking or screen

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 3>scraping process in a product every year, and it's similar

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 3>in other countries where there are products that use those processes.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 3>The major drawbacks of the current methods is that, first

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 3>of all, to create the connection between bank account and

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the third party service, you have to share your log

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 3>in credentials with a third party and that is clearly suboptimal.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>You shouldn't have to do that in order to create

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 3>the connection, so that is the major upgrade. The second

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 3>important point is that with purpose built APIs you can

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 3>clearly define the scope of access that you want to

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 3>share with a third party. So those are two upgrades

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 3>we're going to get from purpose built APIs through the

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 3>regulatory regime or voluntary APIs that become available. But I

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>do think it is an autumn like this whole open

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 3>banking regulation movement has come about because of all of

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the other forms of open banking that have had products

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>built on them for the last twenty years. So without

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Mint dot Com in the US, without Zero and New Zealand,

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 3>without a clear show of consumer demand, we wouldn't have

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>had this move towards open banking regulation. And the way

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I see it, like obviously all this current activity should

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 3>have migrate into the regulated system when it can, but

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 3>we do need to make the most of what has

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 3>been done to date to see what functionality there is

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 3>demand for and it use as a benchmark for whether

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the regulated system is at parracy or doing the job

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 3>it needs to. In Australia, there's been a whole lot

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 3>of recent debate brought on by an Australian Banking Association

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 3>study about what has happened in Australian's version of regulated

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 3>open banking and the uptake over there, and the uptake

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 3>there hasn't been great. There hasn't been a lot of

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>migration from the unregulated forms into the regulated system, and

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 3>we want to avoid that in New Zealand. We want

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that our regulated system is designed so

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 3>that it is compelling to use that system instead, so

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 3>that those consumer benefits are it.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 2>So how do we do that, agrim maybe you went

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 2>away in here. How do we make it so that

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a system that is essentially more expensive becomes more attractive?

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 4>We'll see the level of expense isn't actually been determined

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 4>because the access to the data action function. None of

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 4>the major banks have actually set the stall out around pricing,

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 4>and so as a precedent when the UK did open banking,

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 4>the bank's aid all the costs. Because let's think about

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 4>this logically, underneath the customer product Data bill and the

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 4>consumer data right whereby this is my data? Like, are

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 4>you going to charge me to access my data?

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Huh?

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 4>That doesn't seem to stack up logically, and so I'd

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 4>be curious to see which way Minister Bailey and NBG

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 4>with all of this in terms of any cost profile,

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 4>because suddenly you've got your cost to get your data

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 4>from banking and then electricity and then telco and the

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 4>insurance and everyone who gets designated, and you then run

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 4>into the issues of the quality right and ten tility

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Like if there'll be some socioeconomic groups I'm Maldy, so

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna be quite sympathetic who may not be able

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 4>to access their own data because they can't afford it.

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 4>So there's some social economic issues that play there and

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 4>titility issues. But coming back to the question around kind

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 4>of how do we get this to work? I think

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 4>one of the challenges we have we've seen the screen scraping,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and this is part of my previous experience in another

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 4>world in the UK is I would be at a

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 4>big major bank and i would see a screen scraper

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 4>come in and then I'd see all of the audit

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 4>logs just delete it and I'd have no idea what

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 4>they did. Clueless, I was like, what the hell has

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 4>happened here? And I would then look at it and like, well,

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what the permitted purpose was, but the

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 4>amount of data that's been sort of deleted from our

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 4>logs suggested they've gone way beyond what was the original

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 4>permissions and authorizations for that. And so that kind of

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 4>stuff really gave me a difficult sense of can I

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 4>can I get comfortable with this? And so I spoke to

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 4>some of these young bankcine this happened in Britain. Do

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 4>you guys have that have it today? I? Oh, why

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 4>don't we talk about that? And there's various reasons and

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 4>logical other banks don't talk about that. So there are

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 4>aspects of that. And so for me, it's analogous to like, Okay,

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:12.919
<v Speaker 4>I've just met you, here's the key to my house.

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 4>You're going to do that one thing and then lock up.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 4>But then I don't know if they're rummaging through my

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 4>drawls and such. So I just can't get comfortable that

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 4>kind of as as an approach. And so and then

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 4>there's the other issue right where okay, then the regulated

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 4>version of things, the bank has to keep the consent

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 4>and you need to be no, no, what is the

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 4>concent this transparency of what it's for for how long?

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 4>What purpose? And you can go edit or a ment

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 4>or delete the consent at the bank or at the

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 4>third party within the screen scraping process, it'll be down

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 4>to the third party alone for that consent. And then

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how many people actually know what they've

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 4>signed up to where they can go to don any

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 4>of the things that the CPD bill is going to

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 4>bring in.

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 2>So should there be an attempt to regulate out screen

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 2>scraping once we do get the regulation come in around

0:34:58.560 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 2>data sharing?

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.240
<v Speaker 4>View? Right, I keep on talking about an orderly exodus

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 4>screen scrapping. To Josh's point, right, there are certain capabilities

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.720
<v Speaker 4>in market today that is superior to what the standards

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 4>bringing in initially. And as the saying goes right, necissity

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 4>is the mother of invention, and the fact that a

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 4>million keys have engaged with these services suggests that there's

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 4>demand for it. There's linked to demand. Well, there's actual

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 4>demand for that. And so to Josh's point, which I

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 4>agree with, it's like, well, we can't just cut them off,

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 4>but we need to find some way to say, Look,

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 4>as we've got secure and stable and supporting methods that

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 4>allow people to access these data services in order to

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 4>do really cool things to help them be better off,

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 4>we then need to unwind the other things that aretas

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 4>stable and un and secure. So I guess that's my

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 4>view on that is, if we could have an exit

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.959
<v Speaker 4>from the unsupported sort of means to do the supported means,

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 4>they'd be really good because I think I don't know

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 4>if you unsaw the first three of the CPD bill

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 4>where Minister Bailey spoke around banks have to get better

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 4>at making sure there's no impersonated access people coming in

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 4>and doing stuff like that seemed like a pretty strong

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 4>signal that he's putting up he's sending out a caller

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 4>cutting off to the screen scrapers that he's going to

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 4>do something about or he's going to get someone else

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 4>do something about that soon.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and how does that sit with you, Josh, being

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, as you have relied on these Owen regulated

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:14.399
<v Speaker 2>methods for some time.

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Look, we'd love to use purpose built APIs instead, and

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the sooner that can happen, the better. So we support

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 3>the Customer Product Data Bill that Adri mentioned before, which

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 3>is the Consumer Data Right regime that New Zealand is developing.

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 3>We offered to banks to build APIs for them so

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 3>that they could do authentication in their own environment. We

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 3>do everything we can to bring about this world faster.

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 3>So yes, we definitely support that, but in my view,

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 3>we need to keep the market pressure to show demand

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and it's incumbent on the data holders to come up

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to speed with where the market's at rather than lose

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the innovation and competition that has been driven by the

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 3>market over the last twenty years. So yep, I'm up

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 3>for an orderly transition at the right time and light

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 3>with the iterative approach to rolling out purpose built APIs.

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 3>It should walk hand in hand with that because more

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.439
<v Speaker 3>and more use cases should be able to transition as

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 3>new iterations of the APIs are rolled out. You know,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 3>in the UK it took a while for uptake of

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the open banking regime and certainly the same in Australia.

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 3>I think New Zealand's going to be much faster for

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 3>a couple of reasons. One is that we've got both

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 3>read and write access probably in scope from day one,

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 3>which is for example, not the case in Australia where

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 3>it's just read access. And the second major one is

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 3>that the Customer Product Data bill is really well designed.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 3>We truly have taken the lessons from the UK and

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Australia and other developing regimes around the world, and an

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 3>argue that consumer Data Right regime in New Zealand as

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 3>a stands today, it's going to be great. We're excited

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 3>to use it and we think we'll bet be able

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 3>to migrate a lot of our traffic early on, which

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 3>will show success in the early years, which is what

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 3>we really want. We need to make the cost benefit

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 3>of this regulation worth it, and we think there is

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 3>a good chance of that at the New Zealand region.

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 2>One kind of trump card that some people like to

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 2>pull out quite often is like mortgages. You know, the

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 2>open banking comes up and they go but mortgages, and

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 2>expect people to go, yeah, you're right, let's forget open banking.

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe I'm exaggerating, but the argument is that you know,

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 2>people have mortgages with their banks, that this makes them

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 2>really sticky, so open banking isn't going to increase competition anyway,

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and that mortgages are actually the key fundamental profit center

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 2>for financial services. So financial service like you guys, you

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 2>know you're not actually going to be able to make

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 2>any money from what you're doing. I compete with the

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 2>banks in the future do you want to kind of

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 2>talk to a little bit about the influence of mortgages

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 2>of this, the power they have over consumers, and the

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 2>whether that is a fair statement.

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so yeah. I think there are a few things

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 3>in there, and one that I'd like to seize out

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 3>is this idea around bank switching, and I think a

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 3>lot of people conflate bank switching with open banking. I

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of people get ideas around bank switching

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 3>from the talco industry, where the idea is you really

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 3>only want one number. Banking is different. It's okay to

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 3>have ten accounts, and if you move to a new

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 3>financial product at a different provider, it's okay to leave

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 3>your transactional banking with the provider you're already with. When

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 3>it comes to mortgages, one of the things that's been

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 3>happening over the last decade in New Zealand is an

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 3>increase in proportion of mortgages that are originated via brokers,

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and as that has increased to now more than sixty percent,

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 3>there's an increased likelihood that the customer will switch the

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 3>provider of that home line because they're less weirdded to

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 3>just signing up with whatever is offered by the bank

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 3>that they mostly interact with. So if we just really

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 3>quickly go through how homeland process looks for an applicant

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 3>right now, most people on average are going to a

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 3>broken so they'll have a discussion. They'll be sent a

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 3>link to use screen scraping to simplify the application process

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 3>and fetch or clase all the financial data for the application.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 3>The broker will then assess it, provide some advice if

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the applicant wants to. That broker will then send out

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 3>that financial data, usually over email, to a bunch of lenders.

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 3>People on the other end will get that data. They'll

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 3>spend hours going through it, come up with a view

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 3>on yes no. Here are the terms of yes, back

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 3>through the broker and back to the applicant. So with

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 3>open banking, it definitely improves that it should be more

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 3>secure and easier for the applicant to do the application form,

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 3>it should be easier for the broker to digitally interact

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 3>with the lenders, and the lenders should be getting machine

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 3>readable data that they can then process automatically or at

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 3>least more automatically than they currently do. Along that whole chain,

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 3>there are improvements that open banking should bring to make

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 3>the whole process of refinancing you're playing for a loan

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 3>easier for an applicant, which should and decrease the inertia

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:35.240
<v Speaker 3>of movement.

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just then it's a little bit more

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 2>complicated than saying, well, people have their mortgages with X bank.

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, your point is that under open banking that

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 2>actually becomes a lot more fluid that yes, they might

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 2>have a mortgage with the bank, but by being able

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 2>to kind of have a service that will say, hey,

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:54.359
<v Speaker 2>you've got your mortgage with this bank, do you want

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 2>us to check around and see what else there is,

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that could start to actually increase competition and put pressure

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 2>on the market.

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right. And so if you're able to port

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 3>your data to another provider and say what can you

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 3>do for me, and that's a simple process, then you

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 3>should be able to switch products easily. Does it mean

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.399
<v Speaker 3>you need to switch banks or wherever you have your

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 3>payment set up or wherever you receive your income. It's

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the other products that may be more important, and it

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 3>should be easy to compare and switch those.

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>And what about the idea of profitability that you know,

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>mortgages are the only way really that banks make most

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 2>of their money, and that offering financial services that don't

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 2>include hefty amounts of interest on loans isn't going to

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 2>be a profitable future for a company agent.

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 4>The way banking works apologies that I'm teaching you on

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 4>a stuck eggsit right is banks are really preoccupied with

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 4>net interest marginal nimbs and so you know, quick explainer,

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.399
<v Speaker 4>deposit in, give you tiny bit of interest, lend it out,

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 4>charge a lot of interest, and neet the difference net

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 4>interest margins. That's what they do and that's been the

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 4>banking model for hundreds of years. And when you look

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 4>at the New Zealand banks, you see that typically the

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 4>retail banks have a n them of about two point one percent.

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Some of the clever ones have taken very particular views

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 4>on markets, like for instance, Heartland's net interests manage about

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 4>eight percent. But that's what they're doing. That's what they

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 4>used to. They used to making money off of interest,

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 4>and then they used to they also make money for

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 4>things like a fees and charges. And when I was

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 4>at Barkleys, we used to refer to that as like

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 4>bad income. We didn't want to make money from overdraft

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 4>charges and unplaned overdrafts and interest on all of that

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of stuff. And so whilst banks still make moneys

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 4>in those ways and that's still the most profitable path

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 4>to banking, there's still opportunity though, because as we are

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 4>all aware right, last year the New Zealand banks that

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 4>are owned by Australia there was about seven point two

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 4>billion New Zealand dollars in profits, So there's, you know,

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 4>there's a pretty sizable pie out there. There's things that

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 4>can be done over and above just interest generated from

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 4>mortgage accounts. And as we're all aware right, if you're

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 4>getting in deposits into your bank accounts that you're giving

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 4>tiny interest on, those are the most cheapest forms of

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 4>capital and the world, which is why banks are very

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 4>keen for you to put money and deposit your salary

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.280
<v Speaker 4>into their bank. So you have these tier one banks

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:10.240
<v Speaker 4>who have a slightly insolent advantage of this size and scale,

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 4>which is hard to replicate if you don't have the

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 4>size and scale. But having settled that, there are other

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 4>ways to generate income if you can create value added

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 4>services that you can charge for. So one of the

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 4>things we're really excited about within the open banking regime

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 4>and APIs is the stuff we do at the moment

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 4>is foundational stuff. But eventually, when we've got this common

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 4>foundational layer that everyone can build upon, then you can

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 4>start to think about, well, what are the premium APIs

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 4>the kind of proprietary, bespoke things that Josh is talking

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 4>about that could then really generate value, like we're actually

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 4>solving a problem that's valuable that people are willing to

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 4>pay for. And so one of the things around the

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 4>mortgage example is and this is something that Minister Bailey

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 4>called out earlier on this week, is in Australia you

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 4>can get a mortgage and they basically as part of

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 4>that process they then access with your consent or your ID,

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 4>they then access your primary account. They then run a

0:44:57.520 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 4>full bity assessments on everything in there, they get all

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 4>transactional industry they need in order to then arrive at

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 4>a lending decision in minutes. And so that's the kind

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 4>of premium API you know from banking will eventually unlock

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 4>file toy and all. And I'm here for that. Let's go.

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think as well, it's worth noting that

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 2>a UK fintech Revolute. They just got approved as a

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 2>bank in the UK, I think it was as of

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.320
<v Speaker 2>today or yesterday, and they were hundreds of millions of

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 2>dollars a year in profit and they haven't got mortgages yet,

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 2>so you know, I think there is a piece of

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 2>evidence there that we can point to.

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 5>That's our time.

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, I could talk about open banking for hours, but

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 2>we do have to wrap up. So thank you so

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 2>much to Josh and Adrian for joining us and giving

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.760
<v Speaker 2>us a bit of insight into what's going on leisure.

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks foraming us.

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, I reckon we could have gone on for

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 4>another couple of hours because I don't know if you've urdosed,

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 4>but Josh and I have some fairly pointed views, not

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:56.439
<v Speaker 4>always aligned, but at least we're in the tent trying

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:58.439
<v Speaker 4>to do something, unlike others who are outside the tent

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 4>lobbing stones and name names. But part of the reason

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 4>why the CPD bill is so important is the recent

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 4>data breach by Squirrell says, Hey, this is why this

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 4>stuff's important, guys, Let's get some regulation in it.

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So Ben, A big takeaway for me from that discussion

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is the existing banking system when it comes to mortgages,

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:22.919
<v Speaker 1>which you asked about. You know, I sort of thought,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you get a mortgage that sort of

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 1>locks you into a bank, and then you do your

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>savings and maybe your shared trading, and that's through your

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>bank because it's the most efficient way to do it.

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is is that mortgage brokers account for

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>something like sixty percent of what new mortgages signed. So

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>there's this whole layer of third parties that are interacting

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with the banks and the ability for them to gain

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:56.799
<v Speaker 1>access to your transaction history, your account information massively going

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to speed up that process. And then if you can

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>put that information into hand of financial advisors as well,

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the rise of robo advice, which is feared

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>by artificial intelligence, suddenly you've got a lot of kiwis

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>who may see a lot of benefit and dealing with

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>third parties and allowing the financial data to be existed.

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, we are talking about a country in

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 2>which there was a whole generation or two who when

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 2>they turned to certain age asb rolled up to their

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 2>school and said that no, give us five bucks and

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll start you a bank account, and they never bothered

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 2>to change like that. I mean that was a massively

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 2>successful campaign for them. I was one of those kids,

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and it was only by dint of my restlessness that

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that I ended up leaving ASB.

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 5>I went to National Bank.

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.439
<v Speaker 2>National Bank got eaten up by A and Z and

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to not be with an Australian bank basically,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 2>so I left again. Like you say, this lock in

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 2>that we have, this inertia that we have to moving

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:02.440
<v Speaker 2>about is real. But with a tool like this, and

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 2>with an increasingly digitally savvy population, we can start to

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 2>see things become easy. I always talk about the benefit

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of user interface and user experience. If you can make

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 2>something easy for people, that is when you start to

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 2>see drastic change. That's what the iPhone was all about.

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 2>That's what Zero is all about. It's what all of

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.800
<v Speaker 2>these amazing companies have been all about. And I truly

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 2>think that with the advent of these APIs, with these

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 2>really forward thinking FinTechs who are on the cutting edge

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 2>of technology and really agile and able to make things

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 2>work for their audiences, I truly think that as long

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 2>as things are accessible and affordable, it will start to

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 2>see some drastic change that will create a more equal

0:48:47.520 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 2>playing field of people, will give people better budgeting tools,

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 2>will give people better access to lending that is less

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 2>predatory because they may not just google personal loan and

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 2>go with the first person and that pops up. That's

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 2>my hope, Like, that's what I would like to think anyway,

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:06.439
<v Speaker 2>and I.

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Think that you know that.

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully Adrian and Josh would agree with me, but there

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 2>are probably a.

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 5>Lot of people who would disagree with me.

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean? They talked about read access as

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:20.399
<v Speaker 1>well as right access, and this includes right access which

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>apparently the Australian regime doesn't. So presumably read ACXISS means

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you can look at account information and transaction history and

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. Does writing it mean that you

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 1>can do something in say a dash app or something

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, and then that's reflected back in someone's bank

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 1>account with one of the Big four.

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they can kind of, I guess, make transactions on

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 2>your behalf using your bank account, which could be good

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 2>for your budgeting apps, right, because if you want to

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 2>pocketsmith or something that is able to read all of

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 2>your transaction data and say, don't let me spend more

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 2>than fifteen bucks a week on coffee or at cafes

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 2>and then you your pocket Smith card. But that's you

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.879
<v Speaker 2>don't have to worry about topping up a wallet into

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Pocketsmith to actually enact that. It can all be kind

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of done more simply.

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>That's great, and I could see it eventually super wraps

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 1>emerging for financial services where they become the interface for

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:23.839
<v Speaker 1>my chers e's, my bank account, my hatch, whatever else

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm using, and I do it all through one interface

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>rather than going to separate apps, and maybe it gives

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 1>me some intelligence around what is my overall financial health

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>or investment health looking at, rather than having to go

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>from chers E's to ASB to what's my key we

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>savior doing. Having all of that in one place that

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 1>would be really powerful.

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Basically anything you do with a spreadsheet like is

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 2>what you can hopefully get automated with open banking.

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:54.359
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of how I like to think of it.

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and these two guys seem really upbeat about this.

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:00.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not like what happened in Australia.

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.800
<v Speaker 1>They say that we've learned from that. We've got quite

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>an effective regime that's been outlined here. So they seem

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.880
<v Speaker 1>quite upbeat on what the prospects are over the coming

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:14.800
<v Speaker 1>years for open banking in New Zealand.

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think everybody is pretty upbeat about it. Like

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:21.239
<v Speaker 2>if you go to the Customer and Product Data Bill

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 2>first reading the transcript and so you look at the

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Bellies comment and he says, the question is who

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:32.880
<v Speaker 2>supports the bill? Well, honestly basically everyone, which I think.

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 5>Is really true.

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 2>You scroll down and you've got Labor, Greens, Acts to

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Party Maori that're all supportive of this bill. And although

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you know it's a different extent and with different perspectives

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 2>around competition and about data sovereignty and all these kinds

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 2>of things, they all recognize that enabling consumers to have

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 2>access and control of their own data is going to

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 2>be a net good at the end of the day.

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Great bring it on and good luck to blink, pay

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a carhoo dash all of them. Because we do know

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>already that the fintech sector is a big revenue spinner

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and most of that is probably zero is counted and that,

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but this is a big sector, you know, best part

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of a billion dollars already. And as those two guests

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, banking is seriously profitable in New Zealand, so

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there is market share to be claimed there, there are

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fees to be taken out of the system and lowered,

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's not as though they're cannibalizing and in dussery

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that's doing it tough. You know, there's a lot of

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>fat there to be eaten away, so credit to them.

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:42.359
<v Speaker 1>That's where innovation and disruption will really come into its own.

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:43.319
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep. Well that's it for the Business of Tech this week.

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to Adrian Smith from blink pay and Josh

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Daniel from Alcohou for filling us in on the practicalities

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and potential of open banking.

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 5>We'll keep a close eye on that sector as the

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 5>regime develops.

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The Business of Tech is on all may do podcast

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>platforms as well as iHeartRadio, where you can stream every episode.

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Show notes are in the Tech section on the Business

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Desk website. Leave us a review and share it with

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:11.840
<v Speaker 1>your friends and colleagues.

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Get in touch with feedback, ideas, topics and guest suggestions.

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 2>You can email me Ben at business apps dot co

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 2>dot NZAD. We'll find both of us on LinkedIn and x.

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll find the next episode of the Business of Tech

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>in your podcast app. Bright and early next Thursday, we'll

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>catch you there.